340
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[19 May 2015
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)
(G.O. Ms. No. 28, dated 30th April 2015)
NOTIFICATION
In continuation to the G.O. Ms. No. 27, dated 30-4-2015,
the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry is pleased to order
with immediate effect that Shri V. Candavelou, I.A.S.,
Chief Electoral Officer/Secretary (Elections), Puducherry
shall hold additional charge of the Subjects/Departments
“Revenue, Relief-cum-Rehabilitation, Health, Excise,
Housing, Transport, Town and Country Planning, Rural
Development, Information and Publicity, Science,
Technology and Environment and Project Director, PIA”.
2. This issues with the approval of the Election
Commission of India vide Letter No. 154/PUDU/2015-EPS,
dated 20-4-2015 of the Secretary, Election Commission
of India, New Delhi.
(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)
CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 37/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 5th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Hidustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division),
Puducherry and its workman Thiru K. Hariharan, over
non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in
the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV
of 1947),
it is hereby directed by Secretary to
Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The
Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award within
3 months from the date of issue of reference as
stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with
rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.
The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim
complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and
witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days
of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward
a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite
parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru K. Hariharan
against the management of M/s. Hidustan Unilever
Limited (Detergents
Factory), Vadamangalam,
Puducherry, over his non-employment is justified?
If justified, what relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
A. RAJARATHINAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 38/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 5th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Hidustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division),
Puducherry and its workman Thiru P. Iyyanar, S/o. Perumal
over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned
in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV
of 1947),
it is hereby directed by Secretary to
Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The
Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award within
3 months from the date of issue of reference as
stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the
341
19 May 2015]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with
rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central)
Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a
statement of claim complete with relevant documents, list
of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court,
Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of
reference and also forward a copy of such statement to
each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru P. Iyyanar,
S/o. Perumal against the management of M/s. Hidustan
Unilever Limited (Detergents Factory), Vadamangalam,
Puducherry, over his non-employment is justified?
If justified, what relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
A. RAJARATHINAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 39/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 5th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Hidustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division),
Puducherry and its workman Thiru C. Ezhil, over
non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in
the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV
of 1947),
it is hereby directed by Secretary to
Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The
Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award within
3 months from the date of issue of reference as
stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with
rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central)
Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file
a statement of claim complete with relevant documents,
list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court,
Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order of
reference and also forward a copy of such statement to
each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru C. Ezhil
against the management of M/s. Hidustan Unilever
Limited (Detergents Factory), Vadamangalam,
Puducherry, over his non-employment is justified?
If justified, what relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
A. RAJARATHINAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 40/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 5th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division),
Puducherry and its workman Thiru R. Vengatakrishnan,
son of Ramamoorthy over non-employment in respect
of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this
order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of
1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government
(Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the
Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour
Court, Puducherry shall pass the award within 3 months
from the date of issue of reference as stipulated under
sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B
342
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[19 May 2015
of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The
party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim
complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and
witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days
of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward
a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite
parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether
t h e
d i s p u t e
r a i s e d
b y
Thiru R. Vengatakrishnan, son of Ramamoorthy
against the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever
Limited (Detergents Factory),
Vadamangalam,
Puducherry, over his non-employment is justified?
If justified, what relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
A. RAJARATHINAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 41/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 5th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division),
Puducherry a n d its workman Thiru K. Dhandapani, over
non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in
the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947),
it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour)
that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court,
Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court,
Puducherry shall pass the award within 3 months from
the date of issue of reference as stipulated under
sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B
of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The
party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim
complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and
witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days
of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward
a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite
parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether
t h e
d i s p u t e
r a i s e d
b y
Thiru K. Dhandapani, son of Kuppan against the
management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited
(Detergents Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry,
over his non-employment is justified? If justified,
what relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
A. RAJARATHINAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 42/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 5th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that
an industrial dispute has arisen between the managemant
of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division),
Puducherry and Thiru N. Sampath, son of Nagarajan,
over non- employment in respect of the matter
mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of
1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government
(Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour
Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court,
Puducherry shall pass the award within 3 months from
the date of issue of reference as stipulated under
sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B
of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The
party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim
complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and
343
19 May 2015]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days
of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward
a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite
parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether
t h e
d i s p u t e
r a i s e d
b y
Thiru N. Sampath, son of Nagarajan, against the
management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited
(Detergents Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry,
over his non-employment is justified? If justified,
what relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
A. RAJARATHINAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 43/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 5th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division)
Puducherry a n d its workman Thiru B. Parthiban, son of
Balul, over non-employment in respect of the matter
mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of
1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government
(Labour) that the said dispute be referred to the Labour
Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court,
Puducherry shall pass the award within 3 months from
the date of issue of reference as stipulated under
sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B
of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The
party raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim
complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and
witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days
of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward
a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite
parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether
t h e
d i s p u t e
r a i s e d
b y
Thiru B. Parthiban, son of Balul, against the
management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited
(Detergents Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry,
over his non-employment is justified? If justified,
what relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms
of money, if it can be so computed?
(By order)
A. RAJARATHINAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
CHIEF SECRETARIAT (AGRICULTURE AND FORESTS)
(G. O. Ms. No. 1/Ag., dated 7th May 2015)
ORDER
The tentative inter-se seniority list of Deputy Director (Agricultural Engineering) and Hydrogeologist was
circulated to all concerned vide this Department’s Memorandum No. 32202/CS (Agri.)/2015/A1, dated 30-3-2015, calling
for objections, if any and informing that if no objections were received, their seniority would be fixed as indicated
in the Annexure therein.
2. As no objections are received, the final inter-se seniority list of Deputy Director (Agricultural Engineering)
and Hydrogeologist is fixed as indicated in the Annexure to this Order.
344
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[19 May 2015
ANNEXURE
FINAL INTER-SE SENIORITY LIST OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR (AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING)
AND HYDROGEOLOGIST
Sl. Seniority
Name and
Office in which
Post in
Date of regular
No.
No.
designation
working
which regularised
appointment
in the
post of
DD(AE)/Hg.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Thiruvalargal:
1
1.
L. Susairaj,
Retired
Deputy Director (AE)
3-2-1978
Assistant Director (AE).
2
2.
I. Vasanthakumar Reddy,
Retired
Hydrogeologist
10-5-1978
Director of Agriculture.
(earlier the post was
Assistant Geologist).
3
3.
T.C. Kaliamurthy,
Expired
Deputy Director (AE)
2-11-1978
Deputy Director (AE).
4
4.
R. Venkatachalam,
Retired
Deputy Director (AE)
8-11-1980
Deputy Director (AE).
5
5.
R. Joe John Bosco,
Retired
Deputy Director (AE)
26-1-1988
Deputy Director (AE).
6
6.
A. Subramanian,
Retired
Hydrogeologist
4-11-1988
Joint Director (AE).
7
7.
S. Sekar,
Retired
Hydrogeologist
20-10-1993
Joint Director (AE).
8
8.
S. Nagarajan,
Retired
Deputy Director (AE)
25-11-1997
Deputy Director (AE).
9
9.
S. Regupathy,
Retired
Deputy Director (AE)
1-10-2000
Deputy Director (AE).
10
10.
D. Somalingam (SC),
Office of the
Deputy Director (AE)
23-2-2001
Deputy Director (AE).
Deputy Director (AE)
GAEW.
11
11.
P. John Paul,
Retired
Deputy Director (AE)
12-3-2002
Deputy Director (AE).
12
12.
V. RadhaKrishnan,
Office of the
Hydrogeologist
8-10-2003
Hydrogeologist.
HG-II, SGWU and SC.
13
13.
A. Kaliamurthy
Retired
Deputy Director (AE)
23-1-2004
Deputy Director (AE).
14
14.
M. Sekar,
Office of the OCM
Deputy Director (AE)
1-6-2006
Deputy Director (AE).
15
15.
C. Mady @ Ramamurthy,
Puducherry Ground
Deputy Director (AE)
1-9-2006
Deputy Director (AE).
Water Authority.
16
16.
D. Parameswaran,
Retired
Deputy Director (AE)
13-2-2008
Deputy Director (AE).
17
17.
C. Venkataraman,
Office of the HG-II,
Deputy Director (AE)
18-2-2008
Deputy Director (AE).
SGWU.
(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)
S. SREENIVASAN,
Deputy Secretary to Government
(Agriculture and Forests).
345
19 May 2015]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)
(G.O. Ms. No. 30, dated 8th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
On at taining th e age o f sup erannua tio n,
Thiru M. Murugesan, Pondicherry Civil Service (Entry
Grade) Officer, worked as Deputy Director (MA), Local
Administration Department, Puducherry is retired from
service with effect from the afternoon of 30-4-2015.
(By order)
M. KANNAN,
Under Secretary to Government.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
HEALTH SECRETARIAT
(G.O. Ms. No. 37, dated 8th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,
Dr. M. Ramalingam, Chief Medical Officer (Senior
Administrative Grade), Indira Gandhi Government
General Hospital and Postgraduate Institute, Puducherry
is admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon
of 28-2-2015.
(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)
V. JEEVA,
Under Secretary to Government (Health).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)
(G.O. Ms. No. 49, dated 8th May 2015)
NOTIFICATION
Consequent on attaining the age of superannuation,
Thiru S. Sampathkumar, Assistant Engineer, Special
Buildings Division-I, Public Works Department, Puducherry
is admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon
of 31-5-2015.
(By order)
V. THENRALI,
Deputy Secretary to Government (Works).
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
HEALTH SECRETARIAT
No. A. 12012/H1/Health/2010-12/PF,
Puducherry, the 8th May 2015.
Notice of termination of service issued under
rule 5(1) of the Central Civil Services
(Temporary Service) Rules, 1965.
In pursuance of sub-rule (1) of rule 5 of the Central
Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, notice
is hereby given to Dr. Rajendra Karnati, General Duty
Medical Officer, Government General Hospital, Yanam,
Department of Health and Family Welfare Services,
Puducherry, that his services shall stand terminated
with effect from the date of expiry of a period of one
month from the date on which this notice is served on,
or, as the case may be, tendered to him.
(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)
V. JEEVA,
Under Secretary to Government (Health).
`
`
`
“
”