461

30 June 2015]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER

MANAGEMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 15, dated 15th June 2015)

ORDER

The G.O. Ms. No. 152, dated 24-11-2005 of the

Department of Revenue and Disaster Management,

Puducherry empowers the District Magistrate to cancel

the Caste/Community Certificates (SC, OBC and MBC)

in consultation with the members of the District Committee.

2. The residents of the Union territory of Puducherry

who have migrated from other States/Union Territories

and settled down in this Union Territory are issued

Caste Certificates by the Revenue authorities based on

the previous certificates issued by the authorities of the

States/Union Territories from which they have migrated.

Any certificate issued based on false representation or

any certificate issued by oversight needs to be

cancelled when it is learnt that the certificate has been

erroneously issued.

3. But, the words “(SC, OBC and MBC)” in para 10 of

the said Government Order restrains the District Magistrate

from cancelling a Scheduled Tribe Certificate which has

been issued based on a certificate obtained fraudulently.

The Hon’ble High Court while allowing the Order, dated

19-1-2015 in W.P. No. 30955/2014 of the Hon’ble High

Court of Judicature at Madras had observed that ‘the

respondents are at liberty to deal with the subject of

cancellation of Scheduled Tribe Certificates if any such

power is conferred on the competent authority to act,

in accordance with law’.

4. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in its order,

dated 9-8-1996 in the case of Indian Bank Vs. Satyam

Fibres India Private Limited held that, the administrative

authorities have inherent powers to recall or revoke

their own orders if such order was obtained by playing

fraud on such public authority. As a necessary corollary

if something is done by public authority at the

behest of a person who played fraud, the same public

authority can nullify that was done as vitiated by fraud.

Under section 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897 (Central

Act No. X of 1897), an authority who has power to

issue, inter alia, orders has also power to rescind such

order.

5. Therefore, para 10 of G.O. Ms. No. 152, dated

24-11-2005 cited above is amended as hereunder:

“10. Regarding the cancellation of Scheduled

Caste/Scheduled Tribe and all other

Caste/

Community Certificates, the District Magistrate shall

cancel the Caste/Community Certificate in consultation

with the Members of District Committee and also by

giving reasonable opportunity to the affected

applicant/parent/guardian. Any authority lower than

the rank of District Magistrate is not competent to

cancel the certificate. For the purpose of cancellation

of the certificate, the District Committee is constituted

with the following composition:-

1. District Magistrate, Puducherry/ . . Chairman

Karaikal.

2. Director, Adi-Dravidar Welfare . . Member

Department, Puducherry.

(in respect of SC/ST Certificates).

Director, Social Welfare Department,

Puducherry.

(in respect of all other Caste/

Community Certificates other than

SC/ST Certificate.)

3. Superintendent of Police (Vigilance) . . Member

4. Head of Department or any . . Member

P ro fesso r o f Anthro po lo gy

Department, Pondicherry University,

Puducherry.

5. Any two non-official members . . Member

selected by the existing members.

6. Special Officer, Office of the Special/ . . Member-

Additional Secretary (Revenue),

Secretary.

Puducherry in respect of Puducherry

District comprising of Puducherry,

Mahe and Yanam regions/Deputy

Collector (Revenue), Karaikal in

respect of Karaikal District.

6. All other procedures/instructions contained in the

G.O. Ms. No. 152, dated 24-11-2005 of the Department

of Revenue and Disaster Management, Puducherry

remain the same.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

Dr. V. CANDAVELOU, I.A.S.,

Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Revenue).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER

No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2014-15.

Puducherry, the 15th June 2015.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark

Certificate, under Register Number 328763 of March 1996,

in respect of A. Anandakumar an ex-pupil of Thamizh

Thendral Thiru Vika Government High School, Puducherry

462

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[30 June 2015

is reported to have been lost and beyond the scope of

recovery, it is proposed to issue a duplicate certificate.

If the original certificate is to be found by anybody,

it

should be sent

to

the Director of Government

Examinations, Chennai-6 for cancellation, as it is no

longer valid.

N. RAMALINGAM,

Chief Educational Officer.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER

No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2014-15.

Puducherry, the 15th June 2015.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark

Certificate, under Register Number 369310 of March 1999,

in respect of B. Vanaja, an ex-pupil of Government Girls’

Higher Secondary School, Kadirkamam is reported to

have been lost and beyond the scope of recovery, it is

proposed to issue

a

duplicate certificate.

If the

original certificate is to be found by anybody, it

should be sent to the Director of Government

Examinations, Chennai-6 for cancellation, as it is no

longer valid.

N. RAMALINGAM,

Chief Educational Officer.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER

No. 650/CEO/Exam.Cell/2014-15.

Puducherry, the 15th June 2015.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark

Certificate, under Register Number 488481of March 2005,

in respect of N. Manivannan, an ex-pupil of Bharathi

Government Higher Secondary School, Bahour is

reported to have been lost and beyond the scope of recovery,

it is proposed to issue a duplicate certificate. If the

original certificate is to be found by anybody, it

should be sent to the Director of Government Examinations,

Chennai-6 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

N. RAMALINGAM,

Chief Educational Officer.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 47/AIL/Lab./J/2014, dated 16th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Novateur Electrical and Digital Systems Private

Limited, Puducherry over transfer of employee

M/s. P.S. Mary in respect of the matter mentioned in

the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

against the management of M/s. Novateur Electrical

and Digital Systems Private Limited, Puducherry

over transfer of employee M/s. P.S. Mary from

Puducherry to Coporate Office Chennai by an act of

motivation and victimisation is justified or not?

If justified what relief she is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

463

30 June 2015]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 48/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 16th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division),

Puducherry and its workman Thiru R. Muthumanickam

over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned

in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of

claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance

and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within

15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether

t h e

d i s p u t e

r a i s e d

b y

Thiru R. Muthumanickam against the management of

M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergents Factory),

Vadamangalam, Puducherry over his non-employment

is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 49/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 16th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Division),

Puducherry and its workman Thiru S. Prabakaran,

over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned

in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru S. Prabakaran,

against the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever

Limited (Detergents Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry

over his non-employment is justified? If justified,

what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

464

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[30 June 2015

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 50/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 17th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent

Division), Puducherry and its workman Thiru K. Iyyanar,

S/o. Krishnamoorthy over non-employment in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab/1., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall pass the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru K. Iyyanar,

S/o. Krishnamoorthy against the management of

M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergents Factory),

Vadamangalam, Puducherry over his non-employment

is justified? If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 11/F2/A2/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Thiru D. Satchinathan, Senior Accounts Officer, Office

of the Council of Ministers, Puducherry is admitted into

retirement on the afternoon of 30-6-2015.

(By order)

P. AUGUSTIN LUCIEN DIAGOU,

Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 12/F2/A2/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Thiru S. Srinivasaraghavan, Junior Accounts Officer,

Department of Art and Culture, Puducherry is admitted

into retirement on the afternoon of 30-6-2015.

(By order)

P. AUGUSTIN LUCIEN DIAGOU,

Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 13/F2/A2/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Tmt. M. Sudharma, Junior Accounts Officer, Division-I

Electricity Department, Puducherry is admitted into

retirement on the afternoon of 30-6-2015.

(By order)

P. AUGUSTIN LUCIEN DIAGOU,

Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

465

30 June 2015]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 14/F2/A2/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Thiru A. Sounthirarajan, Junior Accounts Officer,

Directorate of Accounts and Treasuries, Branch Office,

Karaikal is admitted into retirement on the afternoon of

30-6-2015.

(By order)

P. AUGUSTIN LUCIEN DIAGOU,

Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 52/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the managemant

of M/s. Poorvika Mobile World, Puducherry and its

workman Thiru N. Narayanasamy, over non-employment

and disablement compensation in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947),

it is hereby directed by Secretary to Government (Labour)

that the said dispute be referred to the Labour Court,

Puducherry for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry

shall submit the award within 3 months from the date

of issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A)

of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and

in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the

dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with

relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the

Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt

of the order of reference and also forward a copy of

such statement to each one of the opposite parties

involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether

t h e

d i s p u t e

r a i s e d

b y

Thiru N. Narayanasamy, against the management of

M/s. Poorvika Mobile World, Puducherry, over his

non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief

he is entitled to?

(b) Whether the claim of the petitioner for the

reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by him

for his treatment at PIMS, since he met with an

accident during the course of employment and his

claim of disablement compensation as per Act is

justified? If justified,what relief he is entitled to?

(c) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 53/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the S&S Power

Switchgear Limited Employees Union against the

management of M/s. Sri Ram Charitable Trust,

Puducherry and its workman Thiru D. Vadivelu, over

non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in

the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of

claim complete with relevant documents, list of

466

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[30 June 2015

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru D. Vadivelu,

against the management of M/s. Sri Ram Charitable

Trust, Puducherry over his non-employment is justified?

If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 54/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited (Detergent Factory),

Puducherry and its workman Thiru P. Jothilingam over

non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned in

the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of

claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance

and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within

15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru P. Jothilingam

against the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever

Limited, (Detergent Factory), Vadamangalam,

Puducherry over his non-employment is justified?

If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 55/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited, Puducherry and its

workman Thiru P. Atchudan over non-employment in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central)

Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall file

a statement of claim complete with relevant documents,

list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court,

Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the order

of reference and also forward a copy of such statement

to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru P. Atchudan

against the management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever

Limited (Detergent Factory), Vadamangalam, Puducherry

over his non-employment is justified? If justified,

what relief he is entitled to?

467

30 June 2015]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 56/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management of

M/s. Shri Raamsuratkumar Enterprise, Puducherry and

workers’ representative Tmt. K. Kasiammal and 11 others

over charter of demands and refusal of employment to

12 employees in respect of the matter mentioned in the

Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the workers’

representatives namely Thiruvalargal (1) K. Kasiammal,

(2) M. Saroja, (3) V. Thamizselvi, (4) M. Rani,

(5) R. Sumathi, (6) S. Vijaya Lakshmi, (7) P. Lakshmi

(8) D. Suganthi, (9) E. Valli, (10) I. Savitha,

(11) K. Porkalai and (12) K. Chamundeswari against

the management of M/s. Shri Raamsuratkumar

Enterprise situated at No. 72, Pettaiyan Chatram,

Puducherry over charter of demands and refusal of

employment to 12 employees while pending of the

conciliation proceedings is justified ? If justified,

what relief they are entitled ?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 57/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Dinamalar Newspaper, Puducherry and its

workman Thiru V.S. Murugan over non-employment in

respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru V.S. Murugan

against the management of M/s. Dinamalar Newspaper,

Puducherry over his non-employment is justified?

If justified, what relief he is entitled to?

468

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[30 June 2015

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 58/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18th June 2015)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. UCAL Fuel Systems Limited, Puducherry over

non-employment of Thiru N. Govindarajulu in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the award within

3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

The party raising the dispute shall file a statement of

claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance

and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within

15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether

t h e

d i s p u t e

r a i s e d

b y

Thiru N. Govindarajulu against the management of

M/s. UCAL Fuel Systems Limited, No. A-98,

Mettupalayam Estate, Puducherry over his non-

employment is justified? If justified, what relief he is

entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

(By order)

A. RAJARATHINAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

BUILDINGS AND ROADS DIVISION

Karaikal, the 15th June 2015.

e-TENDER NOTICE

On behalf of the President of India, e-tenders are invited from the eligible contractors of Public

Works Department Puducherry by the Executive Engineer, Buildings and Roads Division, Public Works Department,

Karaikal for the following works.

Sl. Tender

Name of work

Approximate

Earnest

Eligibility

Time

Cost of

No.

No.

estimated cost

money

of

allowed

tender

deposit

contractors

schedule

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

`

`

`

1

08-1/

Construction of reading hall over

15,89,737

31,795

Class IV

3 (Three)

500 +

BRK/

the existing ground floor including

and

months

VAT @

2015-16

staircase to the Branch Library at

above.

5%.

Kottucherry in Karaikal.