La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry
The Gazette of Puducherry
Publiée par Autorité
Published by Authority
` 15-00
Prix : ` 15-00
Price :
` 15-00
2017 }
|
18 {
No.
16
Poudouchéry
Mardi
18
Avril
2017 (28 Chaitra 1939)
No.
Puducherry
Tuesday
18th
April
2017
SOMMAIRES
CONTENTS
Page
Page
.. 312
Sentence arbitral du travail
.. 312
Award of the Labour Court .. 312
de tribunal.
.. 314
Notifications du Gouvernement
.. 314
Government Notifications .. 314
.. 327
Etablissements dangereux
.. 327
Dangerous Establishments
.. 327
.. 328
Annonces
.. 328
Announcements
.. 328
[ 311 ]
Registered with the Registrar
of Newspapers for India under
No. 10410
Registered No. SSP/PY/44/2015-17
WPP No. TN/PMG(CCR)/WPP-88/2015-17
Dated : 18-4-2017
Price : ` 15-00
314
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[18 April 2017
against 2nd respondent and that the petitioner is
willfully and wantonly stated that respondents
appointed him the 2nd respondent Marg Karaikal
Port on 1-2-2010 as a workman on a monthly salary
of ` 5,982 and that he was regularized on permanent
basis in the year 2010, so as to harvest illegal gain
from 2nd respondent and that the petitioner is
illegally and unauthorizedly running a shop at the
Port land outside the Port entrance gate without any
legal sanction from any of the Government authority
and that necessary steps are being taken by 2nd
respondent and that the petitioner is gainfully
employed by running a shop at the port land till date
and that the petitioner in his claim statement with
illegal and hidden motive has mentioned at all
places as “respondents” by not specifying the name
of the respondent with whom he avers and alleges
and that the petitioner concealed all the material and
relevant facts and made false and vexatious
allegations against the 2nd respondent and that the
2nd respondent had not been involved in any sort of
unfair labour practice at any point of time.
5. In the course of enquiry, no oral or documentary
evidence has been let in by either sides. Both sides
arguments heard.
6. Records perused. This reference has been made
by the Government to decide the dispute raised by the
petitioner over reinstatement with backwages against
the management of the respondents private limited
company is justified or not and for other reliefs.
However, today the memo has been filed by the
petitioner stating that there was a settlement reached
between the petitioner and the respondents under
section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
on 6-2-2017 and the copy of the settlement arrived
between the parties is also enclosed with the memo.
and that therefore, the petitioner has also stated in the
memo that he is not pressing the claim. In view of the
memo filed by the petitioner stating that the matter
was settled between the parties herein out of Court and
that not pressing the claim, the Tribunal is of the
considered view that the reference is to be closed and
accordingly the same is closed.
7. In the result, the reference is closed in view of
the memo filed by the petitioner stating that the matter
is settled out of Court and not pressing the case.
Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her,
corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court on
this the 24th day of February, 2017.
G. THANENDRAN,
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Puducherry.
}| {
315
18 April 2017]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
NO. 111/DSE/JBB/2017.
Puducherry, the 31st March 2017.
MEMORANDUM
Thiru M. Venkataramanan, Bal Bhavan Instructor in
Creative Art, Jawahar Bal Bhavan, Puducherry is
absconding from duty unauthorizedly since 13-3-2012.
He has not responded to the communication sent to
him by the Department on 28-3-2012, 25-6-2012,
8-8-2012, 29-8-2016 and 9-9-2016 nor has he
reported for duty till date.
2. As per rule 12(2) of the CCS (Leave) Rules,
1972, a Government servant who remains absent from
duty for a continuous period exceeding five years other
than on foreign service, with or without leave, shall be
deemed to have resigned from the Government service
provided that a reasonable opportunity to explain the
reasons for such absence shall be given to that
Government servant before provisions of sub-rule (2)
are invoked.
3. Accord ingly, Thiru M. Venkataramanan,
Bal Bhavan Instructor in Creative Art, Jawahar Bal
Bhavan, Puducherry is hereby given an opportunity to
explain as to why the abovesaid rule 12 (2) of the CCS
(Leave) Rules, 1972 shall not be invoked against him
as he remains absent from duty for a continuous period
exceeding five years without any communication from
him.
4. The required explanation shall reach the
undersigned with in 10 days from the date of
publication/issue of this Memorandum failing which he
shall be deemed to have resigned from the Government
service with immediate effect, without any further
notice.
L. KUMAR,
Director of School Education.
To,
Thiru M. Venkataramanan,
Bal Bhavan Instructor,
No. 19, II Cross,
Tagore Nagar, Lawspet,
Puducherry-605 008.
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE (SECRETARIAT WING)
(G. O. Ms. No. 13/Ind.&Com./A6/2017,
Puducherry, dated 3rd April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Constitution of the “High Level Committee” to
decide upon the special incentives/concessions to be
extended to the industrial projects in the Union territory
of Puducherry has been approved as hereunder.
1. Hon’ble Chief Minister
. . Chairman
2. Hon’ble Minister for Industries
. . Member
3. Chief Secretary to Government
. . Member
4. Development Commissioner/
. . Member
Secretary (Finance)
5. Secretary to Government (Industries . . Member
and Commerce)
6. Director of Industries and Commerce. . Member-
Secretary.
The above Committee shall decide the quantum of
special incentives/concessions to the industrial projects
over and above the concessions/incentives as provided
in the New Industrial Policy 2016 so as to attract new
investments and to retain the existing industrial
establishments as well as to encourage them to enhance
their production capacity and turnover mainly taking
into account the investment to be made by them and
employment to be provided in this Union territory of
Puducherry.
The Committee will meet as and when the necessity
arises.
(By order)
G. MALAR KANNAN,
Additional Secretary to Government
(Industries and Commerce).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)
(G.O. Ms. No. 17, Puducherry, dated 4th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
On attaining the age of superannuation,
Thiru P. Arunagiri, Assistant Engineer, B & R Circle-I,
Public Works Department, Puducherry is admitted into
retirement with effect from the afternoon of 30-4-2017.
(By order)
V. THENRALI,
Deputy Secretary to Government (Works).
316
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[18 April 2017
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Ms. No. 05/AIL/Lab./G/2017,
Puducherry, dated 4th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the proposal for fixation of minimum
rates of wages payable to the employees employed in
Leather Goods Manufactory in the Union territory of
Puducherry was published as required under
clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 5 of the
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Central Act 11 of 1948)
in the Labour Department's notification issued
vide G.O. Ms. No. 3/AIL/Lab./G/2016, dated 5th
July, 2016 published in the Official Gazette No. 29,
dated 19th July, 2016, inviting objections and
suggestions from all persons likely to be affected
thereb y, within sixty d ays fro m the
date of
publication of the said notification in the Official
Gazette of Puducherry;
2. And whereas, the said Gazette notification was
notified for information of the general public on 19th
July, 2016;
3. And whereas, pursuant to the said notification no
objections or suggestions have been received within
the abovesaid stipulated time limit;
4. And whereas, a meeting was convened on
29-9-2016 with the employers and employees
representatives under the Chairmanship of Secretary to
Government (Labour), Puducherry for the purpose of
examining the minimum rates of wages to the
employees employed in Leather Goods Manufactory
in the Union territory of Puducherry;
5. And whereas, the management of M/s. Hidesign
India Private Limited, Puducherry has submitted their
objection
vide letter, dated 7-10-2016, on the
following grounds:
(i) Government of Puducherry has not opted to
fix Minimum Rates of Wages in the scheduled
employment of Leather Goods Manufactory through
Committee method under section 5 (a) of the
Minimum Wages Act, 1948.
(ii) The Minimum Rates of Wages proposed by
the Government of Puducherry is higher than rates
fixed by the Government of Tamil Nadu.
6. And whereas, the objection received from the
management of M/s.Hidesign India Private Limited,
Puducherry was considered and found that the
Government of Puducherry adopted the second method
by notification in the Official Gazette, publish its
proposals for the information of persons likely to be
affected thereby and specify a date, not less than two
months from the date of the notification, on which the
proposals will be taken into consideration;
7. And whereas, objection raised under para 5 (ii)
is not tenable in as much as the minimum rates of
wages in this proposal is fixed taking into
consideration of the Consumer Price Index Numbers
(General) for Industrial workers of Puducherry as
notified by the Labour Bureau, Ministry of Labour and
Employment, Government of India.
8. And whereas, since, the Government followed
the procedure as enshrined under section 5 of the Act
and other relevant provisions of the Minimum Wages
Act, 1948, it was decided to fix the minimum rates of
wages to the employees employed in Leather Goods
Manufactory in the Union territory of Puducherry;
9. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers
conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3
read with sub-section (2) of section 5 and sub-section (1)
of section 13 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948
(Central Act 11 of 1948), the Lieutenant-Governor,
Puducherry, is hereby pleased to fix the minimum rates
of wages payable to each category of employees
employed in Leather Goods Manufactory in the Union
territory of Puducherry, as specified in the Schedule:-
SCHEDULE
Employment in leather goods manufactory
Sl.
Classes of employees
Minimum
No.
rates of
wages per
month
(8 hours
work
per day)
(1)
(2)
(3)
`
I. Administrative Staff
1
Manager
7,923.00
2
Accountant
7,496.00
317
18 April 2017]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
(1)
(2)
(3)
`
3
Superintendent/Storekeeper
7,210.00
4
Typist/Timekeeper/Computer
6,925.00
Operator/Cashier.
5
Driver/Mechanic/Electrician
6,925.00
6
Cleaner/Attender/Gardener
6,355.00
II. Technical Staff
1
Unskilled
6,355.00
2
Semi-skilled
6,640.00
3
Skilled
6,925.00
Explanations
(1) Dearness allowance:— In addition to the
minimum rates of basic wages fixed above, the
employees shall be paid dearness allowance as
indicated below:-
(i) The dearness allowance is linked to the
Puducherry City Consumer Price Index for the
month of December, 2014 i.e., 262 points (with base
year 2001=100) and for every raise of one point
over and above 262 points an increase of ` 24.25
(Rupees twenty-four and paise twenty-five only) per
point per month shall be paid as dearness allowance.
(ii) The dearness allowance shall be calculated
every month, based on the availability of latest
Consumer Price Index Points.
(2) Where the nature of work is the same, no
discrimination in the payment of wages shall be made
between men and women employees.
(3) To arrive at the daily wages, the monthly wages
shall be divided by 26.
(4) Wherever the existing wages are higher than
the minimum wages fixed herein, the same higher
wages shall be continued to be paid.
(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)
E. VALLAVAN,
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 31/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 4th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Sri Bharathi Motor Service, Sholinghur,
Vellore District having its branch office at Muthialpet,
Puducherry and its workman Thiru V. Vivekananthan
over
non-employment in respect of the matter
mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour
Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the
order of reference and also forward a copy of such
statement to each one of the opposite parties involved
in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner
Thiru V. Vivekananthan, Nettapakkam, Puducherry
against the management of M/s. Sri Bharathi Motor
Service, Sholinghur, Vellore District having its
branch office at Muthialpet, Puducherry over his
non-employment is justified or not? If justified,
what relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
318
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[18 April 2017
[(iii)-]
H.
A.
Ca.
–
D
D
A
–
F
F
–
G
}|{,
319
18 April 2017]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
}| {
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
(SECRETARIAT WING)
(G. O. Ms. No. 02, Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,
Thiru R. Mahalingam, Vice-Principal, Bharathi
Government Higher Secondary School, Bahour,
Puducherry is admitted into retirement with effect
from the afternoon of 30-4-2017.
(By order)
V. JAISANKAR,
Under Secretary to Government
(School Education).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 32/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. SABMiller India Limited, Unit: Sica Breweries,
Puducherry and Thiruvalargal M. Kanniyappan,
A. Munisamy and R. Periyasamy, Puducherry over
reinstatement with backwages and other statutory
benefits in respect of the matter mentioned in the
Annexure to this order;
320
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[18 April 2017
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it
is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue
of reference as stipulated under sub-
section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the
Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party
raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim
complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and
witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15
days of the receipt of the order of reference and also
forward a copy of such statement to each one of the
opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioners
Thiruvalargal (i) M. Kanniyappan, (ii) A. Munisamy
and (iii) R. Periyasamy against the management of
M/s. SABMiller India Limited, Unit: Sica Breweries,
Puducherry over reinstatement with backwages and
other statutory benefits is justified? If justified,
what relief they are entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 33/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. The Karaikal Women Co-operative Printing
Society Limited, Karaikal and Selvi M. Kalaivani,
Karaikal over refusal of employment in respect of the
matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour
Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the
order of reference and also forward a copy of such
statement to each one of the opposite parties involved
in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitiner
Selvi M. Kalaivani, Karaikal against the management
of M/s. The Karaikal Women Co-operative Printing
Society
Limited,
Karaikal
over
refusal
of
employment is justified or not? If justified, what
relief she is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 34/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. R.K. Guest House, Sellur, Karaikal and Thiru
G. Ravi, Karaikal over non-employment in respect of
the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
321
18 April 2017]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour
Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the
order of reference and also forward a copy of such
statement to each one of the opposite parties involved
in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner
Thiru G. Ravi, Karaikal against the management of
M/s. R.K. Guest House, Sellur, Thirunallar, Karaikal
over non-employment is justified or not? If
justified, what relief the petitioner is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 35/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Hotel De L’ Orient, Puducherry and the union
workmen
represented
by
Hotel
De
L’
Orient
Oozhiyargal Sangam, Puducherry over non-payment of
20% bonus and ` 5,000 as ex gratia for the year 2014-2015
in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to
this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the
Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry within 15 days of the
receipt of the order of reference and also forward a
copy of such statement to each one of the opposite
parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Hotel De L’ Orient
Oozhiyargal Sangam, Puducherry against the management
of M/s. Hotel De L’ Orient, Puducherry over non-payment
of 20% bonus and ` 5,000 as ex gratia for the
year 2014-2015 is justified or not? If justified, what
relief the union workmen are entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 36/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning
Mills Limited, Karaikal and Thiru G. Anandaraman and
12 others listed in the Annexure-I, over non-employment
in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to
this
order;
322
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[18 April 2017
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by
the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said
dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry
for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section
(2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial
Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising
the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete
with relevant documents, list
of reliance and
witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15
days of the receipt of the order of reference and also
forward a copy of such statement to each one of the
opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the
petitioner Thiru G. Anandaraman and 12 others
listed in the Annexure-I, against the management
of
M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative
Spinning Mills Limited, Karaikal over non-
employment is justified or not? If justified, what
relief the petitioners are entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
ANNEXURE-I
Sl.
Name
No.
(1)
(2)
1. G. Anandaraman,
2. S. Vasudevan,
3. R. Sakthivel,
4. V.R. Ganesan,
5. P. Darmadoure,
6. S. Saminathan,
(1)
(2)
7. S. Suresh,
8. J. Beemarao,
9. S. Murugavel,
10. S. Yudhi Francis,
11. P. Aravamutham,
12. P. Selvamani,
13. K. Thennarasu.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 37/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. SABMiller India Limited, Unit: Sica Breweries,
Puducherry and Thiruvalargal K. Raji and V. Krishnamoorthy,
Puducherry over reinstatement with backwages and
other statutory benefits in respect of the matter
mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it
is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab., dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by
the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said
dispute be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry
for adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue
of reference as stipulated under sub-
section (2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 and in accordance with rule 10-B of the
Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party
raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim
complete with relevant documents, list of reliance and
witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry within
15 days of the receipt of the order of reference and
also forward a copy of such statement to each one of
the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioners
Thiruvalargal K. Raji and V. Krishnamoorthy,
Puducherry against the management of M/s.SABMiller
India Limited, Unit: Sica Breweries, Puducherry
323
18 April 2017]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
over
reinstatement with backwages and other
statutory benefits is justified? If justified, what
relief they are entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G. O. Rt. No. 38/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 5th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Dr. Miltons Laboratories Private Limited,
Puducherry and the union workmen represented by
Indiya Thozhirsanga Maiyam (CITU), Puducherry over
illegal closure and non-employment of S. Arulvizhi and
26 others as listed in the Annexure-I in respect of the
matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it
is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A)
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the
Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry within 15 days of the
receipt of the order of reference and also forward a
copy of such statement to each one of the opposite
parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union
workmen represented by Indiya Thozhirsanga Maiyam
(CITU), Puducherry against the management of
M/s. Dr. Miltons Laboratories Private Limited,
Puducherry over illegal closure and non-employment
of S. Arulvizhi and 26 others as listed in Annexure-I
are justified or not? If justified, what relief the
employees listed in Annexure-I are entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Commissioner of Labour-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
ANNEXURE-I
Sl.
Name
No.
(1)
(2)
1
S. Arulvizhi
2
S. Boomadevi
3
J. Revathi
4
G. Nalini
5
H. Shanmugapriya
6
M. Katheravi
7
L. Banumathi
8
M. Rajeswari
9
A. Thamizharasi
10
I. Deivakanni
11
E. Shanthi
12
S. Lakshmi
13
R. Kavitha
14
S. Meenabai
15
A. Vimala
16
D. Valli
17
G. Mahalakshmi
18
P. Suseela @ Usha
19
V. Veerammal @ Pushpa
20
S. Muniammal @ Jamuna
21
I. Saraswathy
22
M. Kannagi
23
S. Lakshmi
24
S. Amsaveni @ Guna
25
M. Maidhili
26
P. Deivanai
27
K. Valli
324
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[18 April 2017
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
NO. 3818/CEO/KKL/E3(Exam)/2017/646.
Karaikal, the 5th April 2017.
NOTIFICATION
It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original Higher Secondary Course
Examination Mark Certificate/S.S.L.C. Mark Certificates and beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps
have been taken to issue duplicate certificates. If, any one finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be
sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for
cancellation, as it is/they are no longer valid.
Sl.
Name of the
Examination
Register No.
Serial No.
School in which
No.
applicant
session and
of the mark
studied last
year
certificate
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Thiru/Tmt./Selvi :
1
Aravindkumar, R.
HSC
540014,
5125741
Thanthai Periyar Government
March 2010
Higher Secondary School,
Kovilpathu, Karaikal.
2
Sarojadevi, M.
SSLC
3980240,
A302388
Murugathalachi Government
March 1996
Girls’ High School, Karaikal.
3
Priya @ Karupayee, N.
SSLC
477118,
578857
Annai Theresa Government Girls’
March 2003
Higher Secondary School,
Karaikal.
S. ILANGOVANE,
Chief Educational Officer.
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 42/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning
Mill, Karaikal and its workman Thiru L. Stalin, over
reinstatement and subsistence allowance in respect of
the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour
Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the
order of reference and also forward a copy of such
statement to each one of the opposite parties involved
in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru L. Stalin,
against the management of
M/s.
Jayaprakash
Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal
325
18 April 2017]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
over his reinstatement and subsistence allowance is
justified or not? If justified, what relief he is
entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 43/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management of
M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill,
Karaikal and its workman Thiru M. Dhanasegaran, over
reinstatement and backwages in respect of the matter
mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour
Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the
order of reference and also forward a copy of such
statement to each one of the opposite parties involved
in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether
the dispute
raised by Thiru
M. Dhanasegaran, against the management of
M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning
Mill, Karaikal over reinstatement and backwages is
justified or not? If justified, what relief he is
entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 44/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning
Mill, Karaikal and its workman Thiru T. Suresh, over
reinstatement in respect of the matter mentioned in the
Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour
Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the
order of reference and also forward a copy of such
statement to each one of the opposite parties involved
in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru T. Suresh,
against the management of
M/s.
Jayaprakash
Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal
over reinstatement is justified or not? If justified,
what relief he is entitled to?
326
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[18 April 2017
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 45/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill,
Karaikal and its workman Thiru U. Shanmuganathan,
over reinstatement in respect of the matter mentioned
in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour
Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the
order of reference and also forward a copy of such
statement to each one of the opposite parties involved
in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru
U.Shanmuganathan, against the management of
M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning
Mill, Karaikal over reinstatement is justified or not?
If justified, what relief he is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 46/AIL/Lab./T/2017,
Puducherry, dated 6th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Jayaprakash Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill,
Karaikal and its workman Thiru G. Subash, over
reinstatement, subsistence allowance and backwages in
respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to
this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,
it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the
Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute
be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for
adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry shall
submit the Award within 3 months from the date of
issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A
of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and
in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute
shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour
Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the
order of reference and also forward a copy of such
statement to each one of the opposite parties involved
in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru G. Subash,
against the management of
M/s. Jayaprakash
Narayanan Co-operative Spinning Mill, Karaikal
over his reinstatement, subsistence allowance and
backwages is justified? If justified, what relief he
is entitled to?
327
18 April 2017]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in
terms of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
E. VALLAVAN,
Labour Commissioner-cum-
Additional Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
HOME DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Ms. No. 16, Puducherry, dated 7th April 2017)
ORDER
Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for
redesignation of the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector
of Police/Stenographer (Male) as Head Constable/
Stenographer (Male) in India Reserve Battalion,
Puducherry, with immediate effect, as detailed below:
Sl.
Old
Redesignated
Pay
No.
Designation
as
Matrix
(Level)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1. Assistant Sub-Inspector
Head Constable/ Level-4
of Police/Stenographer
Stenographer
(Male).
(Male).
(By order)
B. PRABAGARAN,
Deputy Secretary to Government.
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNELWING)
(G. O. Ms. No. 17, Puducherry, dated 10th April 2017)
NOTIFICATION
On attaining the age of superannuation, the
following Pondicherry Civil Service (Selection Grade)
Officers shall retire from service on the afternoon of
30-4-2017.
Sl.
Name and Designation
No.
(1)
(2)
1
Thiru S. Abel Rozario,
Deputy Collector (Excise),
Puducherry.
2
Thiru S. Kanakaraj,
Private Secretary to Public Works Minister,
Puducherry.
(By order)
M. KANNAN,
Under Secretary to Government.
B.
M/s.
G
,