

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry



Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

` 27-00

Prix : ` 27-00

Price : ` 27-00



SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS



Page

Page

.. 1298

Sentence arbitral du Travail .. 1298

Award of the Labour Court .. 1298

de Tribunal.



.. 1307

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 1307

Government Notifications

.. 1307



.. 1316

Avis d’Adjudications

.. 1316

Tender Notices

.. 1316



.. 1322

Etablissements Dangereux

.. 1322

Dangerous Establishments

.. 1322



.. 1326

Annonces

.. 1326

Announcements

.. 1326



.. 1334

Corrigendum

.. 1334

Corrigendum

.. 1334

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India under

No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2018-20

WPP No. TN/PMG(CCR)/WPP-88/2018-20

Dated : 9-10-2018

Price : ` 27-00

[ 1297 ]







2018 } | 9 {

No.

41

Poudouchéry

Mardi

9

Octobre

2018 (17 Asvina 1940)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

9th

October

2018

1307

9 October 2018]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Ex.R6 —

Copy of Acknowledgment

Card for service of charge

memo, dated 27-02-2013 to

the petitioner.

Ex.R7 — 27-02-2013 Copy of the charge memo

issued by the respondent to

the petitioner.

Ex.R8 — 30-03-2013 Copy of the warning memo

given by the respondent to

the petitioner.

Ex.R9 — 13-03-2013 Copy

of

the

discharge

summary

given

by

the

respondent Hospital to the

petitioner.

Ex.R10—27-04-2013 Copy of the charge memo

issued by the respondent to

the petitioner.

Ex.R11—29-04-2013 Copy of the explanation

letter given by the petitioner

to the respondent for the

charge memo, dated 27-04-2013.

Ex.R12—15-05-2013 Copy of the order passed by

the respondent for the charge

memo, dated 27-04-2013.

Ex.R13—21-09-2013 Copy of the charge memo

issued by the respondent to

the petitioner.

Ex.R14—23-09-2013 Copy of the explanation

letter given by the petitioner

to the respondent to the

charge memo, dated 21-09-2013.

Ex.R15—01-10-2013 Copy of the order passed by

the respondent for the charge

memo, dated 21-09-2013.

Ex.R16—17-12-2013 Copy of the charge memo

issued by the respondent to

the petitioner.

Ex.R17—23-12-2013 Copy of the explanation

letter given by the petitioner

to the respondent.

Ex.R18—27-12-2013 Copy of the enquiry notice

sent by the respondent to

the petitioner.

Ex.R19 —

Copy of Acknowledgment

Card for service of charge

memo, dated 27-12-2013 to

the petitioner.

Ex.R20—02-01-2014 Copy

of

the

enquiry

proceedings given by the

Enquiry Officer.

Ex.R21—03-01-2014 Copy of the second show

cause notice given by the

respondent to the petitioner.

Ex.R22

03-01-2014 Copy of the findings of the

enquiry report submitted by

the Enquiry Officer.

Ex.R23

03-01-2014 Copy of the explanation

letter given by the petitioner

to the respondent.

Ex.R24

04-06-2014 Copy of the explanation

letter given by the petitioner

to the respondent.

Ex.R25 —

Copy of the service rules of

the respondent’s institution.

Ex.R26

28-01-2014 Copy of the dismissal order

passed by respondent to the

petitioner with RPAD slip

and Acknowledgement Card.

G. THANENDRAN,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 124/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 23rd August 2018)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour,

Puducherry and the union workmen represented by

United Labour Federation, Thambu Chetty Street,

Chennai, over providing safety in supply of food to the

workers in the working place/canteen in respect of the

matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,

it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of

1308

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[9 October 2018

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central

Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary

to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be

referred

to

the

Labour Court,

Puducherry for

adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue

of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute

shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant

documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Labour

Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the receipt of the

order of reference and also forward a copy of such

statement to each one of the opposite parties involved

in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen represented by United Labour Fedaration,

Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai against the

management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited,

Bahour, Puducherry, over providing safety in supply

of food to the workers in the working place/canteen

are justified or not? If justified, what relief the union

workmen are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed ?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 125/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 23rd August 2018)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. ICICI Bank Limited, Needarajayapar Street,

Puducherry and M/s. IRIS Facility Management Global

Services LLP, Hyderabad, Telangana and Tmt. S. Hema,

Veerampattinam, Puducherry, over non-employment in

respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,

it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central

Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary

to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be

referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether there exists any employer-employee

relationship between the management of M/s. ICICI

Bank Limited, Needarajayapar Street,

Puducherry

and M/s. IRIS Facility Management Global Services

LLP, Hyderabad, Telangana and Tmt. S. Hema,

Veerampattinam, Puducherry? If so, to give appropriate

directions?

(b) Whether the dispute raised by Tmt., S. Hema,

Veerampattinam, Puducherry against the management

of M/s. ICICI Bank Limited, Needarajapar Street,

Puducherry and M/s. IRIS facility Management

Global Services LLP, Hyderabad, Telangana,

over non-employment is justified or not? If justified,

what relief she is entitled to?

(c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed ?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 126/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 23rd August 2018)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour,

Puducherry and the union workmen represented by

1309

9 October 2018]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

United Labour Federation, Thambu Chetty Street,

Chennai, over confirmation of the employees listed in

Annexure-I and to fix the working hours in respect of

the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central

Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary

to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be

referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section 2-A of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen, represented by United Labour Fedaration,

Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai against the

management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited,

Bahour,

Puducherry, over confirmation of the

employees listed in Annexture-I and to fix the

working hours are justified or not? If justified, what

relief they are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed ?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

ANNEXURE-I

1.

P. Vinoth Kumar

2.

V. Arun Rozariyo Amiral

3.

M. Sathish Kumar

4.

I. Vimalraj

5.

S. Rajavarma

6.

M. Suresh Kumar

7.

S. Sanjeevi

8.

N. Siddharthan

9.

M. Prathaap

10.

R. Pratheep Raj

11

P. Rajagopal

12.

R. Rajesh

13.

P. Harikrishnan

14.

J. Jayaseelan

15.

A. Manikandan

16.

K. Aravindh

17.

V. Senthil Kumar

18.

S. Michael Raj

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 127/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 23rd August 2018)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited and

Shasun

Chemical

Staff

Union,

Ariyankuppam,

Puducherry, over grant of financial reward of ` 1,00,000

each to the retired employees as listed in Annexure-I

on account of transfer of undertaking of the

management of M/s. Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited to

M/s. Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited, in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,

it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central

Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary

to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be

referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for

adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue

of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute

shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant

documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the

Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry within 15 days of the

receipt of the order of reference and also forward a

copy of such statement to each one of the opposite

parties involved in the dispute.

1310

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[9 October 2018

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Shasun

Chemical Staff Union, Ariyankuppam, Puducherry

against the management of M/s. Strides Shasun

Pharmaceuticals Limited, Puducherry, over grant of

financial reward of `1,00,000 each to the retired

employees as listed in Annexure-I on account of

transfer of undertaking of the management of

M/s. Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited to M/s. Strides

Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited is justified or not?

If justified, what relief they are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed ?

ANNEXURE-I

1.

R. Krishnamoorthy

2.

V. Achuthan

3.

M. Mohan

4.

P. Veeraraghavan

5.

G. Veerapathiran

6.

D. Devadoss

7.

A. Muthusamy

8.

P. Ramachandiran

9.

A. Mohammed Symella

10.

N. Poomalai

11.

A. Udhuman Ali

12.

V. Pandian

13.

Y. Johns Arthur

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 129/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 30th August 2018)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between Puducherry

Distilleries

Limited,

Puducherry

and

Indiya

Thozhirsanga Maiyam (CITU), Mudaliarpet, Puducherry,

over promotion of Thiru P. Chandramohan as Junior

Operator with effect from 23-11-2009 and to grant him

subsequent promotion to the post of Senior Operator

with all monetary and service benefits in respect of the

matter mentioned in the annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Indiya Thozhirsanga

Maiyam (CITU), Mudaliarpet, Puducherry, against

the management of M/s. Puducherry Distilleries

Limited, Puducherry, over promotion of Thiru

P. Chandramohan as Junior Operator with effect from

23-11-2009 and to grant him subsequent promotion

to the post of Senior Operator with all monetary and

service benefits is justified or not?

(b) If justified, what relief Thiru P. Chandramohan

is entitled to?

(c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

1311

9 October 2018]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 130/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 5th September 2018)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial

dispute

has

arisen

between Puducherry

Distilleries Limited, Puducherry and Puducherry

Distilleries Limited Workers Union, over grant of

promotion to

Thiru

V. Kannan for the post of

Electrician Grade-III, with retrospective effect with all

monetary and service benefits, in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for

adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of

issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section

(2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising

the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete

with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses

to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the

receipt of the order of reference and also forward a

copy of such statement to each one of the opposite

parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Puducherry

Distilleries Limited Workers Union, Ariyapalayam,

Villianur, Puducherry, against the management of

M/s. Puducherry Distilleries Limited, Villianur, Puducherry,

over grant of promotion to Thiru V. Kannan for the

post of Electrician Grade-III with retrospective effect

with all monetary and service benefits is justified or

not? If justified, what relief Thiru V. Kannan is

entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 131/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 5th September 2018)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management of

M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited, Bahour,

Puducherry and the union workmen represented by the

United Labour Federation, Thambu Chetty Street,

Chennai, over (i) impugned transfer of 5 employees as

listed in Annexure-I; (ii) impugned suspension of

Thiru P. Kalaiselvan; (iii) non-employment of 17 employees

as listed in Annexure-II; (iv) to grant Grade and fix the

wages based on seniority to the union workmen as listed

in Annexure-III and (v) impugned labour practice in

respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,

it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for

adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of

issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section

(2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising

the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete

with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses

to the Labour Court, Puducherry within 15 days of the

receipt of the order of reference and also forward a

copy of such statement to each one of the opposite

parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen represented by United Labour Federation,

Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai, against the

management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited,

Bahour, Puducherry, over (i) impugned transfer of

5 employees as listed in Annexure-I; (ii) impugned

suspension of Thiru P. Kalaiselvan; (iii) non-employment

1312

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[9 October 2018

of 17 employees as listed in Annexure-II and (iv) to grant

Grade and fix the wages based on seniority to the

union workmen as listed in Annexure-III all justified

or not? If justified, what relief the said workmen are

entitled to?

(b) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen represented by United Labour Federation,

Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai, against the

management of M/s. Lanson Motors Private Limited,

Bahour, Puducherry, over impugned labour practice

is justified or not? If justified, what relief the union

workmen are entitled to?

(c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

ANNEXURE-I

Sl.

Name of the

Date of

Place of

No.

employee and

transfer

transfer

place of work

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

1

R. Malayan

28-01-2017

Pallikaranai

(LM 1051),

Branch.

Puducherry.

2

J. Amaresan

28-01-2017

Koyembedu

(LM 1250),

Branch.

Puducherry.

3

V. Vijay

14-02-2017

Thiruvannamalai

(LM 2588),

Branch.

Puducherry.

4

P. Kunnan

14-02-2017

Neelankarai

(LM 1177),

Branch.

Puducherry.

5

A. Baskaran

14-02-2017

Chettipedu

(LM 2396),

Branch.

Puducherry.

ANNEXURE-II

1.

P. Rajagopal

2.

M. Sathish Kumar

3.

M. Pradeep

4.

S. Michael Raj

5.

N. Siddharthan

6.

R. Rajesh

7.

R. Pradeep Raj

8.

S. Rajvarma

9.

V. Senthil Kumar

10.

J. Jayaseelan

11.

P. Harikrishnan

12.

S. Sanjeevi

13.

A. Manikandan

14.

I. Vimalraj

15.

M. Suresh Kumar

16.

K. Aravind

17.

M. Arun Rozariyo Amiral

ANNEXURE-III

1.

R. Malayan

2.

P. Kalaiselvan

3.

K. Sakthivel

4.

M. Anandha Kumar

5.

S. Veerachandran

6.

A. Baskaran

7.

S. Dharmaraj

8.

P. Murali

9.

V. Vijay

10.

S. Murugan

11.

M. Prakash

12.

T. Sisubalan

13.

A. Sathish Kumar

14.

J. Amareson

15.

P. Kunnan

16.

S. Sakthivel

17.

A. Tamilvanan

18.

S. Tamilselvan

19.

M. Silambarasan

20.

P. Vinoth Kumar

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 132/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 5th September 2018)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Ajantha Cycle Parts Industry, Industrial Estate,

Thattanchavady, Puducherry and the union workmen

1313

9 October 2018]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

represented by Cycle Parts Jananayaga Thozhilalar

Sangam, Bharathi Street, Puducherry, over granting

annnual increment to Thiru K. Sekar from the year 2006

onwards, in respect of the matter mentioned in the

Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,

it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the

powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for

adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue

of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute

shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant

documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the

Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the

receipt of the order of reference and also forward a

copy of such statement to each one of the opposite

parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen represented by Cycle Parts Jananayaga

Thozhilalar Sangam, Bharathi street, Puducherry

against the management of M/s. Ajantha Cycle

Parts Industry, Industrial Estate, Thattanchavady,

Puducherry, over granting annual increment to

Thiru K. Sekar from the year 2006 onwards is

justified or not?

(b) If justified, what relief Thiru K. Sekar is

entitled to?

(c) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed ?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 680-683/DSE/HSW/EC/C/2018.

Puducherry, dated the 25th August 2018.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original Higher Secondary

Examination Mark Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue

duplicate certificates. If, any one finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary,

State Board of School Examinations (Sec), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

Sl.

Name and address of the

Register No.,

Sl. No. of the

School in which

No.

applicant

session and

mark

studied last

year

certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Thiru/Tmt./Selvi:

1

Rajesh S

572712, March 2015

—

Anbalaya Higher Secondary School,

Shanthi Nagar, Puducherry.

2

Saijanani R

544106, March 2013

7979393

Vivekananda Higher Secondary School,

Sellaperumalpet, Puducherry.

3

Diderot Emil D

559734, March 2014

9106409

Anbalaya Higher Secondary School,

Shanthi Nagar, Puducherry.

4

Jayasri G

559889, March 2014

9093175

Sri N.K.C. Government (Girls) Higher

Secondary School, Kurusukuppam,

Puducherry.

M. KUPPUSAMY,

Joint Director.

1314

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[9 October 2018

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)

(G. O. Ms. No. 31, Puducherry, dated 6th September 2018)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Thiru M. Vaitianadin, Executive Engineer, Public Works

Department, Puducherry [on deputation to Project

Implementation Agency (PIA), Puducherry], is admitted

into retirement on the afternoon of 30-9-2018.

(By order)

CHAURE RATNAGHOSH KISHOR,

Under Secretary to Government (Works).

————







}|{











[



]















































(i) 









(ii) 





(iii) 





(iv) 







(v) 























————







}|{









S.K. 







A-22012/1/2012/DPAR/SSI(2)







1315

9 October 2018]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT





































@









S.K. 























A. 







A. 







































————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 801/JD-IEC/2018.

Puducherry, the 20th September 2018.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the following candidates have lost their original S.S.L.C. Mark Certificates and

beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificates. If, any one

finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations

(Sec.), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is/they are no longer valid.

Sl.

Name of the

Register No.,

Sl. No. of

School in which

No.

applicant

session and

the mark

studied last

year

certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Thiruvalargal:

1

D. Ganesan

508524,

March 2007

—

Government Higher Secondary School,

551092,

July

2007

Sedarapet and Private study.

2

S. Sarath Kumar

2163959, April

2012

—

Private study.

M. KUPPUSAMY,

Joint Director of School Education.

1316

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[9 October 2018

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF

SCHOOL EDUCATION

No. 802/JD-IEC/2018,

Puducherry, the 25th September 2018.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the original S.S.L.C. Mark Sheet

bearing Register Number 1749634, of April 2012

in respect of Jayasri G, an ex-pupil of Sacret Heart of

Jesus High School, Puducherry, is reported to have

been lost beyond the scope of recovery and is proposed

to issue a duplicate certificate. If, the original

certificate is to be found by anybody, it should be

sent to the Director of Government Examinations,

Chennai-600 006 for cancellation, as it is no longer

valid.

M. KUPPUSAMY,

Joint Director of School Education.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 137/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 28th September 2018)

NOTIFICATION

On the recommendations of the High Court of

Judicature at Madras and in exercise of the powers

conferred by section 8 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act 14 of 1947), the Lieutenant-Governor,

Puducherry, is pleased to appoint Thiru C. Kumarsaravanan,

District Judge, functioning as Judge, Family Court,

Puducherry, as the Presiding Officer, Industrial

Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Puducherry for the whole

of the Union territory of Puducherry for the purposes

of the said Act.

2. The notification shall be deemed to have come

into force with effect from 28th day of June, 2018

forenoon.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

Puducherry, the 18th September 2018.

TENDER-CUM-AUCTION NOTICE

Public are hereby informed that the unserviceable

articles of this office as listed in the Annexure will be

disposed off in as-is-where-is condition by tender-cum-

auction sale on 25-10-2018 at 11.30 a.m.

Terms and Conditions

1. The sealed tenders should be addressed to the

“Senior Accounts Officer, Office of the Council of

Ministers, Puducherry” duly superscribing on the

envelope as “Tender for purchase of unserviceable/

unserviceable Electronic items” and should reach this

office on or before 25-10-2018 at 10.30 a.m. The

tenders will be opened at 11.00 a.m. on the same day

in the presence of the tenderers present if any, in the

chamber of the undersigned at Office of the Council of

Ministers, Puducherry.

2. The tender will be awarded to the highest tenderer

on the spot.

3. If, the highest tender amount offered by the

tenderer is found to be not acceptable by the

undersigned, then the public auction will be conducted

on the spot keeping the highest tender amount as the

minimum upset price for bid of auction.

4. The intending tenderers should deposit an earnest

money of

` 1,000 (Rupees one thousand only) along

with sealed tenders. The earnest money deposit of the

unsuccessful tenderers will be refunded on the same day

soon after completion of the tender/auction sale.

5. The successful tenderer/bidder should pay the

entire amount soon after the completion of the tender/

auction sale and should clear the sold materials at his

own arrangements/cost before 5.00 p.m. on the same

day, failing which the office will not be held

responsible either for the safe custody or for loss or

damage of articles once the tender/auction sale is over.

6. GST will be charged extra as per the sale

applicable at the time of tender/auction sale.

7. No claim on the quantity or quality of the articles

will be admitted once the tender/auction sale is over.