

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry



Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

` 18-00

Prix : ` 18-00

Price : ` 18-00



SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS



Page

Page



..

62

Notifications du Gouvernement

..

62

Government Notifications ..

62



..

71

Avis de saisis-arrét

..

71

Notice of attachments

..

71



..

81

Annonces

..

81

Announcements

..

81

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India under

No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2018-20

WPP No. TN/PMG(CCR)/WPP-88/2018-20

Dated : 22-1-2019

Price : ` 18-00

[ 61 ]







2019 }

|

22 {

No.

4

Poudouchéry

Mardi

22

Janvier

2019 (2 Magha 1940)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

22nd

January

2019

62

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[22 January 2019

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 160/AIL/Lab./T/2018,

Puducherry, dated 28th December 2018)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Puducherry Agro Products Food and Civil

Supplies Corporation Limited, (PAPSCO), Puducherry

and the union workmen represented by PAPSCO

Thozhilalar Nala Sangam, affiliated to Puducherry State

Government Employees Federation, Mullai Nagar,

Puducherry, over payment of bonus @ ` 5,000 to the

daily rated employees as per Payment of Bonus Act,

1965 for the year 2016-17 and the demand of the union

for payment of productivity linked bonus @ 38% to the

daily rated employees subject to a ceiling of

` 11,000 on par with regular employees for the year

2016-17, in respect of the matter mentioned in the

Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for

adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of

issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section

(2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising

the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete

with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days

of the receipt of the order of reference and also forward

a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite

parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen represented by PAPSCO Thozhilalar Nala

Sangam, affiliated to Puducherry State Government

Employees Federation, Mullai Nagar, Puducherry

against the management of M/s. Puducherry Agro

Products Food and Civil Supplies Corporation

Limited (PAPSCO), Puducherry, over payment of

bonus @ ` 5,000 to the daily rated employees as per

Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 for the year 2016-17 is

justified or not?

(b) If not justified, whether the demand of the

union for payment of productivity linked bonus

@ 38% to the daily rated employees subject to a

ceiling of ` 11,000 on par with regular employees

for the year 2016-17 is justified?

(c) If justified, what relief the union workmen are

entitled to?

(d) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 02/AIL/Lab./T/2019,

Puducherry, dated 4th January 2019)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited,

Sedarapet, Puducherry

and

the union workmen

represented by Chemcrown Exports Suolificio Linea

Italia Thozhilalargal Sangam, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry

over extension of the benefits of 12 (3) settlement,

dated 17-04-2019 to 12 employees listed in Annexure-I

in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/90/Lab./1, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for

63

22 January 2019]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall

pass the Award within 3 months from the date of issue

of reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising

the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete

with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days

of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen represented by Chemcrown Exports

Suolificio Linea Italia Thozhilalargal Sangam,

Mudaliarpet, Puducherry, against the management of

M/s. Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited,

Sedarapet, Puducherry, over extension of the benefits

of 12 (3) settlements, dated 17-04-2019 to

12 employees listed in Annexure—I is justified or

not? If justified, what relief the union workmen are

entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

ANNEXURE—I

1. A. Subramanian

2. S. Ramesh

3. K. Elumalai

4. K. Latchumanan

5. P. Sekar

6. A Arumaiselvam

7. E. Selvam

8. R. Murugan

9. K. Kaliamurthy

10. S. Magesh

11. T. Seenuvasan

12. A. Ravichandran

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 03/AIL/Lab./T/2019,

Puducherry, dated 4th January 2019)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited, Detergent Factory,

Vadamangalam, Puducherry and the union workmen

represented by Hindustan Unilever Pattali Thozhirsangam,

Villianur, Puducherry, over various demands in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 21/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for

adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of

issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section

(2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising

the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete

with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days

of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen represented by Hindustan Unilever Pattali

Thozhirsangam, Villianur, Puducherry, against the

management of M/s. Hindustan Unilever Limited,

Detergent Factory, Vadamangalam, Puducherry, over

various demands are justifiable or not? If justified,

what relief the union workmen are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

64

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[22 January 2019

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 04/AIL/Lab./T/2019,

Puducherry, dated 4th January 2019)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited,

Sedarapet, Puducherry

and

the union workmen

represented by Chemcrown Exports Suolificio Linea

Italia Thozhilalargal Sangam, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry,

over non-payment of 20% bonus and ex gratia for an

amount of ` 10,000 for the year-2016-2017, in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry for

adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of

issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section

(2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising

the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete

with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days

of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen represented by Chemcrown Exports

Suolificio Linea Italia Thozhilalargal Sangam,

Mudaliarpet, Puducherry, against the management of

M/s. Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited,

Sedarapet, Puducherry, over non-payment of 20%

bonus and ex gratia for an amount ` 10,000 for the

year-2016-2017 is justified or not? If justified, what

relief the union workmen are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 814/JD-IEC/2019.

Puducherry, the 4th January 2019.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the following candidate has lost his original S.S.L.C. Mark Certificate beyond

the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificate. If, any one finds

the original Mark Certificate, it may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec.),

College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

Sl.

Name of the

Register No.,

Sl. No. of

School in which

No.

applicant

session and

the mark

studied last

year

certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

1

Thiru M Deepak

5631962, March 2018

—

Fathima Boys’ Higher Secondary

School, Karuvadikuppam, Puducherry.

M. KUPPUSAMY,

Joint Director of School Education.

65

22 January 2019]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 05/AIL/Lab./T/2019,

Puducherry, dated 7th January 2019)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Dexin Medi Solutions Private Limited,

Madagadipet (Post), Puducherry and the union workmen

represented by Dexin Medi Solutions Thozhilalar Nala

Sangam, affiliated with CITU, Puducherry, over

non-employment of 17 employees listed in Annexure—I,

in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for

adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of

issue of reference as stipulated under sub-section

(2-A) of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

and in accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising

the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete

with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, within 15 days of

the receipt of the order of reference and also forward

a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite

parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the union

workmen represented by Dexin Medi Solutions

Thozhilalar Nala Sangam, Puducherry, affiliated with

CITU against the management of M/s. Dexin Medi

Solutions Private Limited, Kalitheerthalkuppam,

Puducherry, over non-employment of 17 employees

as listed in Annexure—I is justified or not? If

justified, what relief the union workmen are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

ANNEXURE—I

1. Ragunath, K.

2. Sathyanandhan, N.

3. Ramani, J.

4. Thirumanagai, M.

5. Mohan, G.K.

6. Gangadurai, P.

7. Bakkiyam, M.

8. Ilango, K.

9. Vignesh, K.

10. Balamurugan, B.

11. Murugan, R.

12. Vijayabaskar, B.

13. Hariharan, K.

14. Tamilarasi, M.

15. Purushothaman, M.

16. Murugan, T.

17. Suresh, A.

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 06/AIL/Lab./T/2019,

Puducherry, dated 7th January 2019)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Dexin Medi Solutions Private Limited,

Madagadipet (Post), Puducherry and Tmt. S. Sumathy,

Kalitheerthalkuppam, Puducherry, over non-employment

in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure

to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

66

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[22 January 2019

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Labour Court, Puducherry for

adjudication. The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall pass

the Award within 3 months from the date of issue of

reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial

Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising

the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete

with relevant documents, list of reliance and witnesses

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days

of the receipt of the order of reference and also

forward a copy of such statement to each one of the

opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the the

petitioner Tmt. S. Sumathy, Kalitheerthalkuppam,

Puducherry against the management of M/s. Dexin

Medi Solutions Private Limited, Madagadipet (Post),

Puducherry is justified or not? If justified, what relief

the union workmen are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

(By order)

S. MOUTTOULINGAM,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No.1, Puducherry, dated 7th January 2019)

NOTIFICATION

Shri Shashvat Saurabh, I.A.S., (AGMU:2016) on

having reported for duty in this Administration on the

forenoon of 11-10-2018, in pursuance of the Order No.

14020/02/2018-UTS-I,

dated

25-9-2018 of the

Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, is posted as

Sub-Collector (Revenue) (South), Villianur, Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant- Governor)

ASHWANI KUMAR,

Chief Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 2, Puducherry, dated 9th January 2019)

NOTIFICATION

In pursuance of the Letter No. 14020/02/2018-UTS, 1,

dated 09-01-2019 of the Ministry of Home Affairs, New

Delhi, Shri R. Kesavan, I.A.S. (AGMU:2013), District

Collector, Karaikal, is relieved from this Administration

with immediate effect to take up his new assignment

in the Government of Mizoram.

2. Shri A. Vikranth Raja,

I.A.S. (AGMU:2015),

Sub-Collector, (Revenue) Karaikal, shall hold charge

of the post of District Collector, Karaikal, until further

orders.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

ASHWANI KUMAR,

Chief Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 694-695/DSE/HSW/EC/C/2019.

Puducherry, the 10th January 2019.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original Higher Secondary

Examination Mark Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue

duplicate certificates. If, any one finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary,

State Board of Secondary Examination, College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is/they are

no longer valid.

67

22 January 2019]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Sl.

Name and address of the

Register No.,

Sl. No. of

School in which

No.

applicant

session and

the Mark

studied last

year

Certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Thiru/Tmt./Selvi :

1

Anand, M.

908121, March 2014

—

Private Study

2

Sumitha, D.

609106, March 2012

7069751

Kasthuribai Gandhi Government

Girls’ Higher Secondary School,

Bahour, Puducherry.

M. KUPPUSAMY,

Joint Director.

————























































































































































AA









68

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[22 January 2019





































































































































































































A







































































AA







69

22 January 2019]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT









































































































































Dr. 



AE



















G





















K. 

P. 







-do-

-do-

-do-

































A











70

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[22 January 2019







AA













A





SMS





















F





























-do-

-do-

-do-













































-do-

-do-

-do-























A



F















P. 









K. 











B















C





















D



















































71

22 January 2019]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT



E

























F



A

















G



A





















A























A























A



AE































}|{,

















M/s. 











































