IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE AT KARAIKAL

M.C. No. 256/2019, I.R. No. 54/2019 of the

T.R. Pattinam Police Station, dated 08-04-2019.

Endt: 3363/DCK/A3/2019 of the

Collector-cum-District Magistrate, dated 22-04-2019

Station House Officer,

. .

Petitioner

T.R.Pattinam Police Station.

Vive @ Vickraman,

. .

Counter Petitioner

S/o. Jaganathan @ Dhanabal,

No. 254, 5th Cross,

No. 132, Mariamman Koil Street,

Nethaji Nagar,

Polagam, T.R.Pattinam.

Karaikal.

Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 (i), (ii) and (iii) of Cr.PC.

Whereas, one F.I.R was filed by the Station House Officer, T.R.Pattinam

Police Station vide I.R. No. 54/2019 under section144 (i), (ii) and (iii) Cr.PC. in the

Court of District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Karaikal and hence, forwarded to this

Court vide Endorsement No. 3363/DCK/A3/2019, special report filed by the Station

House Officer to describe the information laid under section 144 of Cr.PC. goes on

[1951]

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410



La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

PART - I



EXTRAORDINAIRE

EXTRAORDINARY



Publiée par

Published by



Autorité

Authority

` 4-00

Prix : ` 4-00

Price : ` 4-00

Registered No. PY/44/2018-20

WPP No. TN/PMG(CCR)/WPP-88/2018-20

Dated : 19-8-2019

Price : ` 4-00







2019 }

|

19 {

No.

136

Poudouchéry

Lundi

19

Août

2019 (28 Sravana 1941)

No.

Puducherry

Monday

19th

August

2019

1952

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[ PART-I

1952

to narrate the criminal activities of the accused namely, Vive @ Vickraman, who has

been reportedly indulging in serious offences like organized murders, extortion, hurt,

criminal intimidation and thereby became a perennial source of threat to the

community and disturbance to the public tranquility.

2. Whereas, the information laid by the Station House Officer, T.R.Pattinam

Police Station, Karaikal, under section 144 of Cr.PC. has listed out the record of

previous cases registered against the accused as detailed below:-

(i) Cr.No. 322/15 under sections 147, 148, 341, 342 and 294(b), 506(II), 302

r/w 3(1) of PPDT Act of Sirkali Police Station, dated 26-04-2015.

The counter petitioner along with Ezhilarasi had hired the hooligans

for committing the murder as revenge for the murder of her husband that

the counter petitioner along with Ezhilarasi’s brother Murugavel, her

brother’s son Raj @ Rajagopal, Sethappa and others (hooligans of

Chennai) had committed murder of one Vinotha, w/o. Ramu @

Radhakrishnan. During the course of investigation, the counter petitioner

and others were arrested. This case was charge sheeted on 15-07-2015.

This case is pending trial.

(ii) Cr.No. 01/2017 under sections 147, 148, 332, 395, 307, 448, 302, 120(b),

427 IPC r/w 149 IPC and 3 and 4 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 of Neravy Police

Station, Karaikal.

The counter petitioner has played vital role to hire the hooligans from

Trichy for committing the murder as revenge for the murder of Ezhilarasi’s

husband Ramu @ Radhakrishnan that some unknown culprits about 7

members had joined together formed themselves into an unlawful

assembly, armed with deadly weapons and country made bombs in

prosecution of common object hurled the country made bomb at front

mirror of the car bearing Registration No. PY-02-P-6789 extorted the

carbine gun from the complainant who is the gunman of the deceased

and criminally trespassed into the construction site and assaulted the

deceased Ex-MLA Thiru VMC Sivakumar by using lethal weapons by

causing cut injuries on his body and head, and thereby committed

murder of him due to previous enmity. During the course of investigation,

the counter petitioner and others were arrested. The case was charge

sheeted on 02-05-2018 vide charge sheet No. 28/2018, PRC No. 22/2018

and pending trial before the Hon’ble District Session’s Court, Karaikal.

(iii) Cr.No. 266/11 under sections 147, 148, 307, 324, 323, 354 and 506(II) r/w

149 IPC, dated 07-08-2011 of Town Police Station, Karaikal.

The counter petitioner along with Ezhilarasi and her husband Ramu @

Radhakrishnan, Suresh, Babu, Kandipan and Tahmizh had in prosecution

of their common object formed themselves into an unlawful assembly

assaulted the complainant Vinotha w/o. Ramu @ Radhakrishnan

following which, on 07-08-2011 at 23.456 hrs, a complaint was registered.

During the course of investigation, the counter petitioner and other

accused concerned in this case were arrested. This case was charge

sheeted on 31-12-2012 vide charge sheet No. 216/2011 vide SC No. 03/

2016 and the case was ended in Acquittal under section 235 (1) Cr.PC.,

dated 02-08-2018 by the Hon’ble District Session’s Court, Karaikal.

PART-I ]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

1953

(iv) Cr.No. 02/2017 under sections 336, 427 r/w 34 IPC and 3 and 4 of

Explosive Substances Act, 1908, dated 03-01-2017 of T.R.Pattinam, Karaikal.

Two unknown male persons have in furtherance of their common

intention so as to endanger the life and personal safety of the people had

hurled country made bombs at the gate of the Ganesh Bar at Polagam,

T.R.Pattinam and thereby caused damages to the bar. During the course

of investigation, the counter petitioner was arrested as he had

associated along with the other accused involved in this case to hurled

country made bomb after the completion of murder of VMC Sivakumar on

03-01-2017 at 13.15 hours. The accused Ezhilarasi and her associates were

arrested and they were released on bail by the Hon’ble Court. The case

was charge sheeted on 18-10-2017 vide charge sheet No. 18/2017, PRC

No. 6/2017 and pending trail before the Hon’ble Court, Karaikal.

(v) Cr.No. 104/2011, under sections 147, 448, 323 and 506 IPC r/w 149

IPC, dated 07-07-2011 of T.R.Pattinam Police Station, Karaikal.

The counter petitioner along with other accused persons namely,

Suresh, Kandipan, Babu have in prosecution of their common object

formed themselves into an unlawful assembly criminally trespassed into

the house of the complainant Vinotha, w/o. Ramu @ Radhakrishnan of

T.R. Pattinam, Karaikal, assaulted her by their hands and also threatened

her on 07-07-2011 at 15.45 hours. During the course of investigation, the

counter petitioner was arrested in this case. Later, this case was charged

on 19-07-2011 vide CC. No. 921/2011 and is pending trial before the

Hon’ble JM-II Court, Karaikal.

(vi) On 30-06-2017 a case under section 3 (2) of the Puducherry

Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 2008 was registered against the counter

petitioner and his gang leader Ezhilarasi @ Meera and hence, the District Magistrate,

Karaikal, had issued a detention order vide No. 6051/DM/RO/D2/PPASAA/2017,

dated 06-07-2017 under the provisions of Puducherry Prevention of Anti-Social

Activities Act, 2008 (Act No. 10 of 2010), following which the counter petitioner was

detained under the provisions of the said Act, as there was serious apprehension

of danger to the life and property of the citizens and disturbance to the public peace

and order. The counter petitioner had hired three different hooligan groups from

Tamil Nadu for committing the above three murders. He had also planned to commit

murder of the other accused persons who are involved in the commission of

Ezhilarasi's second husband namely, Ramu @ Radhakrishnan’s murder.

Other Cases of Criminal Conspiracy, Hurt and Criminal Tresspass

(vii) Cr.No. 21/2018 under section 120(B) r/w 34. IPC and 27(1) of Arms

Act, 1959 @ 1230(B) 150, 212 @ 212, 115150, 120(B), 148, r/w. l49(342) IPC-2 counts

and 27(l) of Arms Act. 1959 of D.Nagar Police Station, Puducherry.

(viii) Cr.No. 73/2009 under sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, r/w 149 IPC,

dated 15-05-2009 of the T.R.Pattinam Police Station, Karaikal – a hurt case filed

based on complaint filed by one N S K Kabilan of T.R.Pattinam, Karaikal – charge

sheeted and case acquitted.

1954

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[ PART-I

1954

(ix) Cr.No. 172/2012 under sections 448, 294, 506(ii) IPC of the

T.R.Pattinam Police Station – a Tresspassing case threat on dire consequences of

life, abuse with filthy language – case filed based on complaint filed by one Vinodha,

w/o. Ramu @ Radha Krishnan – charge sheeted and case under trail in the Hon’ble

Court of JM-II, Karaikal.

3. The petitioner being the Station House Officer of T.R.Pattinam Police

Station, Karaikal, has submitted that the counter petitioner has formed a gang of

rowdies and is bent upon indulging in criminal activities such as murders, extortion,

hurt, criminal intimidation, Arms Act violation and disturbance to the public

tranquility and order which have created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and

the business community living under the jurisdiction of the T.R Pattinam Police

Station limit. He is associated with the criminal activities of one Ezhilarasi who in

turn is operating in T.R.Pattinam and Neravy adjoining areas and has become a

source of terror among the public. The general public of the above localities are

afraid of them and they do not come forward to lodge complaint against the counter

petitioner due to fear of retaliation and revenge. The prosecution witnesses are

having fear to depose evidence against him and hence, they do not volunteer.

4. The petitioner further submitted that the counter petitioner had

invariably used deadly weapons in commission of the above crimes, thereby, the

general public were affected at large and spent sleepless nights in panic and fear

of death, extortion and hurt. The petitioner further submits that the counter

petitioner is a close associate of the gang leader Ezhilarasi and leads a team by

hiring criminals from the neighboring State i.e., Tamil Nadu to commit grave

offences. In general, the public fear of their life posed by this anti-social element

along with his associates. Taking advantage of fears of public, the counter

petitioner is going ahead in his unlawful acts which are detrimental to the public

peace and tranquility which are likely to create panic and sense of insecurity in the

society.

5. The petitioner further submitted that the Police Intelligence reveals that

counter petitioner has planned to extort money from merchants, selected targets of

people to have accumulated money through illegal means with the aid of her active

associates which needs to be clinched out at the very beginning itself.

6. Whereas, the counter petitioner has been reported as a notorious

criminal who does not bother on discipline and morale of society, ignorant of the

Police warnings and he is reportedly heading a gang of hooligans to move around

in the view of public to inflict fear in minds of general public, merchants and people

of business class and others. He moves around with his henchmen as a gang leader.

It has been reported by the Station House Officer, T.R Pattinam Police Station,

Karaikal, that the counter petitioner has planned to eliminate the alleged

conspirators involved in the commission of murder of Ezhilarasi’s husband and also

who have been listed to have assisted the assailants namely, Govindaraj and

Maheshwaran of Karaikal to escape after the murder of Ezhilarasi’s husband namely,

Ramu @ Radhakrishnan. In conclusion, the Station House Officer, T.R Pattinam

Police Station, Karaikal, being the petitioner has submitted that the counter

petitioner is a hard core criminal and detrimental to the peace and tranquility of

public life and the security of the public is at stake due to his notorious criminal

activities. He along with his active associates are waiting to extort money from

people of rich wealth and business community by inflicting fear of threat to their

life so as to accumulate amazing wealth to fund his heinous act.

PART-I ]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

1955

7. Whereas, the counter petitioner was summoned to appear in this Court

on 20-05-2019 at 3.30 p.m. to answer to the charges under sections 144 (i) and (ii)

Cr.PC vide summons served under M.C. No. 256/2019, dated 14-05-2019. While the

counter petitioner was called absent and the petitioner appeared to state that

summons could not be served to the counter petitioner at the residential address

as specified in I.R. No. 54/2019 and he was not found in such an address. The

petitioner however, continued to depose before this Court on the contents of

information laid under section 144 (i) and (ii) of Cr.PC. on 07-06-2019 stated as to

have served summons of this Court in M.C.No. 256/2019, dated 14-05-2019 to one

G. Selladurai, s/o. Govindhasamy, who works as private Security Guard at the

reportedly transit residential house of the counter petitioner known as No. 254,

5th Cross, Nethaji Nagar, Karaikal under the Neravy Police Station limits at the

residential house of the counter petitioner on 27-06-2019 and obtained the

acknowledgments. While the Counter Petitioner was called absent on the day of

enquiry by this Court on 07-06-2019 also.

8. Whereas, in my opinion, it has been made to appear to this Court that

there were sufficient grounds for proceeding against the counter petitioner under

section 144 (i) (ii) and (iii) of Cr.PC. Hence, the counter petitioner Vive @

Vickraman, s/o. Jaganathan @ Dhanabal was directed to appear in person before this

Court on 19-07-2019 at 3.30 p.m. to show cause as to why he should not be ordered

not to enter the entire region of Karaikal District with immediate effect which is

under the jurisdiction of this Court for a period of 2 (two) months except on the days

he is summoned by any other Hon’ble Court of Law at Karaikal.

9. Whereas, the counter petitioner appeared in this Court along with his

Counsel on 19-07-2019, while the learned Counsel appearing for the counter

petitioner argued on this point that the counter petitioner could not be prohibited

from entering Karaikal District as himself usually resides in a place of residence

within the Karaikal District and also prayed for time while filing the counter affidavit

on 24-07-2019.The Station House Officer in turn refuted the version of argument that

the counter petitioner himself is facing life threat since, he has involved himself in

murder cases as one among the accused within the jurisdiction of Karaikal District

on the other hand the counter petitioner also has been identified as a potential life

threat to those members of rival gangs victimised by his dreaded criminal activities.

Hence, it appears to this Court that there is an intense gang rivalry which could lead

to cognizable offences that would certainly thwart maintenance of law and order,

public peace and tranquility in the Karaikal District, since, the counter petitioner is

reportedly operative along with his supporters in and around the area covered within

the jurisdiction of this Court.

10. Whereas, counter affidavit and objections respectively, filed by the

Counsel for the counter petitioner and also by the Station House Officer,

T.R.Pattinam Police Station, Karaikal were received by this Court on 29-07-2019 and

02-08-2019 and were examined in detail. Contention assorted by the counter

petitioner to question the provisions revoked by this Court under sections 144 (i),

(ii) and (iii) of Cr.PC. which are reportedly contrary to the fundamental rights granted

by the Article 14 of the constitution of India were not acceptable to this Court,

while the objections filed by the Station House Officer, T.R.Pattinam Police Station,

Karaikal, stands to refute all the averments of the counter petitioner that he has no

valid legal immunity to defend the invoking the provisions of 144 (i), (ii) and (iii) of

1956

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[ PART-I

1956

Cr.PC against him. This Court adopts such a view as clearly established by the

Section 144 (i) of the Cr.PC. that a Magistrate can act in derogation of private civil

right when such rights conflict with other rights of the public or tend to endanger

the public peace and tranquility. The very purpose of Section 144 Cr.PC. is to give

such direction that may be necessary to uphold public order and tranquility. Hence,

the argument of the learned Counsel for the counter petitioner that the counter

petitioner’s civil right is violated cannot be the grounds for non-application of

section 144 of Cr.PC. Even fundamental rights are subject to reasonable restrictions

such as on the basis of the interests of the general public. In this case, the rights

of the general public to public order and safety take precedence over a private civil

right.

11. Therefore, this Court reviewed the prayer by the petitioner, who has

submitted to this Court that the counter petitioner may be ordered not to enter into

Karaikal District for a period of 2 (two) months in order to prevent the danger to the

human life and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order in

jurisdiction of the Hon’ble District Magistrate, Karaikal by invoking the provisions

under sections 144 (i), (ii) and (iii) of Cr.PC. except on the days he is summoned by

any other Hon’ble Court of Law at Karaikal.

12. Whereas, I am satisfied that based on the information placed before me

and other facts which are brought out through enquiry report placed by the Station

House Officer, T.R.Pattinam Police Station, Karaikal that if, the counter petitioner is

allowed to move free handedly within the jurisdiction of Karaikal District, then his

free movement would cause fear and apprehension in the minds of general public

which would also severely affect the public tranquility, good order, common peace

in the area of living with in the jurisdiction of T.R.Pattinam Police Station and also

with in the entire jurisdiction of this Court in Karaikal District.

13. Hence, I, M. Adharsh, Subdivisional Magistrate, Karaikal, after going

through the information laid before me and also after satisfying myself of the need

for prohibition of certain activities of the counter petitioner, doth hereby pass

Prohibitory Orders to the Counter Petitioner, Vive @Vickraman, s/o. Jaganathan @

Dhanabal under section 144 (i), (ii) and (iii) of Cr.PC. to restrain him not to enter into

the entire region of Karaikal District which is under the jurisdiction of this Court,

for a period of 2 (two) months (or) 60 (sixty) days with effect from the date of issue

this order (or) till any further order passed by the competent authority revoking this

prohibitory order as per law whichever is earlier, except for the days he is summoned

by any other Hon’ble Courts of Law at Karaikal District.

Dated, this 14th day of August 2019.

M. ADHARSH,

Subdivisional Magistrate, Karaikal.

————

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by The Director, Government Press

Printed at: Government Central Press, Puducherry.

Posted at: Puducherry HPO on every Tuesday