La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry
The Gazette of Puducherry
Publiée par Autorité
Published by Authority
` 20-00
Prix : ` 20-00
Price :
` 20-00
SOMMAIRES
CONTENTS
Page
Page
..
104
Sentence arbitral du travail
.. 104
Award of the Labour Court
.. 104
de tribunal.
..
123
Notifications du Gouvernement
.. 123
Government Notifications
.. 123
..
126
Etablissements dangereux
.. 126
Dangerous Establishments
..
126
..
127
Annonces
.. 127
Announcements
..
127
Registered with the Registrar
of Newspapers for India
under No. 10410
Registered No. PY/44/2018-20
WPP No. TN/PMG(CCR)/WPP-88/2018-20
Dated : 11-2-2020
Price : ` 20-00
[ 103 ]
2020 }
|
11 {
No.
6
Poudouchéry
Mardi
11
Février
2020 (22 Magha 1941)
No.
Puducherry
Tuesday
11th
February
2020
104
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 12/AIL/Lab./T/2019,
Puducherry, dated 13th January 2020)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, an Award in I.D. (T) No. 2/2016, dated
16-10-2019 of the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry in
respect of the industrial dispute between the
management of M/s. Swadeshi-Bharathi Textile Mills
Limited, Puducherry and National Textile Corporation
Limited (A Government of India Undertaking), Coimbatore
and the union workmen represented by Swadeshi-
Bharathi Mills Thozhilalar Urimai Padukappu Sangam-
over deductions of bonus advances from the terminal
benefits of employees (Annexure-I) has been received;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with
the Notification issued in Labour Department’s
G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L., dated 23-5-1991, it is hereby
directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that
the said Award shall be published in the Official
Gazette, Puducherry.
(By order)
S. MOUTTOULINGAM,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AT
PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru V. PANDIARAJ, B.SC., L.L.M.,
Presiding Officer
Wednesday, the 16th day of October 2019.
I.D. (T) No. 2/2016
The President,
Swadeshi-Bharathi Mills Thozhilalar
Urimai Padukappu Sangam,
Puducherry.
. . Petitioner
Versus
1. The Managing Director,
M/s. Swadeshi - Bharathi Textile
Mills Limited, Puducherry.
2. The Managing Director,
National Textile Corporation Limited,
Coimbatore.
. . Respondents
This industrial dispute coming on 27-08-2019
before me for final hearing in the presence of
Thiruvalargal K. Velmurugan and P. Preethi, Counsel for
the petitioner and Thiru. K. Ravikumar, Counsel for the
1st respondent, Thiru. K. Babu, Counsel for the 2nd
respondent, upon hearing, upon perusing the case
records, after having stood over for consideration till
this day, this Court passed the following:
AWARD
1. This Industrial Dispute has been referred by the
Government of Puducherry as per the G.O. Rt. No. 46/
AIL/Lab./T/2016, dated 30-05-2016 for adjudicating the
following:-
(a) Whether the dispute raised by Union workmen
Swadeshi-Bharathi
Mills
Thozhilalar
Urimai
Padukappu Sangam, against the management of
M/s. Swadeshi-Bharathi Textiles Mills Limited,
Puducherry and National Textile Corporation
(A Government of India Undertaking), Coimbatore,
over the illegal deductions made in the terminal
benefits of 285 employees listed in Annexure-I,
against the bonus advance amount paid from the year
1996-1997 to 2003-2004 is justified or not? If justified,
what relief they are entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms
of money if, it can be so computed?
2. The brief averment of the petition filed by the
petitioner:
(i) The petitioner Trade Union was a registered
Trade Union, established for the welfare of the
employees worked in the Swadeshi and Bharathi
Mills under the name and style of Swadeshi-Bharathi
Mills Thozhilalar Urimai Pathugappu Sangam,
Puducherry. This industrial dispute has been filed
to recover the bonus advances that was deducted
from the Terminal benefits of the workmen. Even
though this industrial dispute has been raised by
285 workmen, at present 211 workmen alone confined
with this industrial dispute as per the Annexure-I.
Originally Swadeshi and Bharathi Mills were under
the control of the National Textile Corporation
Limited, Coimbatore. Thereafter, it was taken over by
the Government of Puducherry Union Territory, now,
it is the under the control of Puducherry Textile
Corporation from 01-04-2005 onwards. The 2011
workmen involved in this industrial dispute are the
workers of the first respondent mill and they have
rendered continuous and unblemished service to the
first respondent mill and they have completed their
service during the years varying from 1996 to 2004.
The petitioners in the abovesaid Union agitated
against, the respondents for their demand of bonus
105
11 February 2020]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
from the year 1996 onwards. Further, it has issued
several strike notices to the first respondent mills
against the illegal deduction of bonus advances from
the terminal benefit of the workers. Further, it has
given strike notices to the Conciliation Officer during
the year 2001 to 2003 and therefore, a meeting was
convened by the Conciliation Officer, and at that
time, the first respondent mill requested this
petitioner union, not to resort to strike, as it may
cause heavy loss to the mills. The first respondent
has assured that whatever the agreement, that would
be reached between the 2nd respondent with its mills,
will be adopted by the First respondent mill and the
said benefit will be extended to the all workman
employed in the first respondent mill by ipso fact.
Again during the year 2005 all the workers in the
mills functioning under the NTC resorted to strike
condemning the action of deduction of bonus
advances by the NTC from the terminal benefits of
the workers. At that time also, the Managing Director
of the first respondent mill requested this petitioner
Union not to resort to strike as it may cause
irreparable loss and hardships to the mill. Furthermore,
it also assured that the settlement reached between
the NTC (R2) and the other mills in Tamil Nadu
functioning under it will be accepted by it and it will
be apply, the same to all its employees, and in
furtherance of that it has extended the terms of
settlement arrived under section 12 (3) and 18 (1) to
all its employees, that was reached by the NTC with
the mills functioning under it and therefore, the strike
was also called off by this petitioner union. As per
the agreed advice, dated 20-04-2005 both the parties
in the agreement, mutually agreed that, bonus
advances paid for the years 1996 to 2004 will not be
deducted anymore and the amount already deducted
will be refunded to the respective workmen. As per
which, the first respondent mill had write off the
bonus advances already paid to its workers from the
year 1996 to 2004 and the said amount was not to be
deducted from the terminal benefits of the workers
who retired after the year 2005. Similarly, the 1st
respondent mill has refunded the deducted bonus
advances to nearly 400 workers, who retired during
the period 1996 to 2004. The petitioners/workmen in
this trade union, have left their services, during 1996
to 2004, and therefore, they are entitled for the
benefit of the agreement, dated 20-04-2005. However,
the 2nd respondent mill have not refunded the
deducted bonus advance amount to the 211 workmen
involved in this industrial dispute for the best
reasons known to them. This petitioner union has
made several representations to both respondents,
even then it ends in vein. Hence, the petitioner union
made representations, dated 11-11-2013 and 09-06-2016
before the Conciliation Officer at Puducherry, against
the respondents regarding the illegal deductions
made from the terminal benefits of these petitioners.
However, the conciliation proceedings also came to
an end with failure report and therefore, this reference
has been made to this Tribunal for adjudication. The
petitioners are entitle for refund of the deductions
made from the terminal benefits and therefore, this
petition has to be allowed.
3. The brief averment of the counter filed by the 1st
respondent:
(i) This petition is not maintainable either in law
or on facts as it is devoid of merits. The 1st
respondent mill was not under the control of 2nd
respondent as alleged in this petition, and it need
not implement the schemes and the settlement of the
2nd respondent, as it is not applicable to this 1st
respondent mill. Originally, the 1st respondent mill
was comprised of two mills in the name of Swadeshi
Cotton Mill and Bharathi Mill and they were under
the 2nd respondent management. The 2nd respondent
has decided to close the abovesaid mills as it was
unable to run the Mills, as it was unviable as per the
revival-cum-rehabilitation Scheme. At that time, the
Government of Puducherry has stepped down and
taken over the mills directly under the control of
Pondicherry Textile Corporation vide notification,
dated 19-04-2005 and as per Gazette Notification in
G.O. Ms. No. 11/05-Ind-B, dated 04-07-2005 and
thereafter, the abovesaid two mills were amalgamated
as Swadeshi-Barathi Textile Mill Limited, Puducherry.
It was done as a welfare measure and not for profits
and thus, the 1st respondent mill came into existence.
The 211 workmen involved in this industrial dispute
pertains to the period when they were employed
either in Sri Bharathi Mills or in Swadeshi Cotton
Mills, but, they were never employed in the 1st
respondent mill. Since, they were in employment,
while the mills were the control of the 2nd
respondent, this respondent is not a necessary party
to this proceedings and hence, this petition has to
be dismissed for mis joinder of parties. Further, this
claim is barred by Law of limitation as it is claimed
belatedly. The settlement/agreement arrived between
the 2nd respondent and its units mills was not
having binding force on the 1st respondent mill and
hence, it is not applicable to this 1st respondent.
Further, the 1st respondent has never ever given any
assurance to this petitioner’s Union that it will grant
the benefits of the settlement arrived by the 2nd
respondent, as it was not applicable to this 1st
106
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
respondent. It has not automatically extended the
benefit of the settlement reached by the 2nd
respondent with other mills under its control. This
1st respondent never assured to refund the
deductions made in the bonus advances from the
terminal benefit of the workers who retired between
1996 to 2004. The 2nd respondent alone has to refund
the deductions made by it during the year 1996 to
2004. This 1st respondent denies the legal heirship
of the deceased workers as they were not the true
legal heirs to them respectively. The claim made
against this respondent is devoid of merits and lack
of bona fide and hence, prayed for dismissal of this
application.
4. The brief averment of the counter filed by the 2nd
respondent:
The claim and the allegations made against the
2nd respondent was denied as lack of bona fideness.
The 2nd respondent is a public sector undertaking,
coming under the Ministry of Textiles, Government
of India. The Central Government is a necessary
party for adjudicating this dispute and hence, this
Tribunal is not having jurisdiction to entertain this
application. This industrial dispute is raised with
inordinate delay and hence, it is barred by limitation
also. During the year 1995-2004, this 2nd respondent
corporation had 13 mills in Tamil Nadu and two mills
in Puducherry and they were coming under the
coverage of bonus Act. It is the usual practice, that
whatever bonus and ex gratia, decided on Industry
wise basis, was used to be paid to the employees
who were covered under the Payment of Bonus Act
irrespective of the facts whether they fall under the
category of workmen, staff or Officers. In the case
of, the employees who were not covered under the
Payment of Bonus Act, it is the usual practice to pay
an advance amount which is recoverable in easy
monthly installments. During the year 1995-1996 the
bonus was paid at the rate of 8.33 % on their wages,
and the ex gratia was paid at the rate of 8.17%.
In respect of the 1st respondent mill the ex gratia
amount was fixed as 8.17 %. Further, for those
workmen who were not covered under the Payment
of Bonus Act, it was agreed that the amount
equivalent to that of bonus and ex gratia, was
decided to be given and the same would be recovered
in six equal monthly installments commencing from
March 1997. This petitioner union and some other
union made a representation that, there was a move
to the Government to amend the Payment of Bonus
Act regarding the ceiling limit, and the applicability
of the same to those who earned more than ` 3,500
per month, and in view of that request the recovery
was deferred and the commencement of recovery
was postponed to April 1997. This settlement is,
on the issue of recovery of bonus advance made with
regard to employees, who were not covered under
the Payment of Bonus Act only. The petitioner in this
industrial dispute, has received the advances, were
under obligation to refund the same on installment
basis commencing from April 1997. There was no
amendment took place in the Payment of Bonus Act
till 2005 and therefore, the abovesaid advances
amount given to them were to be recovered without
fail. The legal heirs of the deceased workmen are not
entitled make any claim as the legal heirship itself is
denied as false by this respondent. The payment of
advances to the staff, workmen were made in terms
of settlement that was arrived on 07-11-1996 and
08-11-1996, and hence, recoveries also to be made
on the basis of the abovesaid settlement. There is
no employer and employee relationship between the
2nd respondent and the petitioner union on and from
01-04-2005. Since, the petitioners received the
advance, they have to refund the same by way of
installments. If, the mill was not permitted to recover
the same it will create financial crunch to the
respondent and no such advance can be granted in
future also. It is true that the Joint Commissioner of
Labour has given agreed advice
vide,
dated
20-04-2005 duly signed by the NTC management with
Trade Unions functioning in the units in Tamil Nadu,
for not deducting the bonus advances paid to the
workers in the unit mills in Tamil Nadu for the period
from 1996-2004 till the final decision of the Central
Government. The said terms of agreed advice was
applicable to the mill employees as on 20-04-2005, in
Tamil Nadu State only. The relationship between this
2nd respondent and the petitioners came to an end
during 1996 to 2004 itself. Therefore, the assurance
of the 1st respondent to the petitioner union that,
the agreement reached by this 2nd respondent with
its units mills functioning under it, will be applicable
to the 1st respondent and it will extend the same to
the petitioners union by ipso fact, will not bind this
respondent. Further, it is unknown to this 2nd
respondent regarding the assurance given by the 1st
respondent to this petitioner’s union regarding the
applicability of the settlement arrived by this 2nd
respondent and hence, this petition has to be
dismissed.
5. On the side of the petitioner only one witness was
examined and Ex.P1 to Ex.P 244 were marked. On the side
of the respondent RW.1 was examined and Ex.R1 to R54
were marked.
107
11 February 2020]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
6. The petitioner side Counsel argued that these
petitioners are the Ex-workmen in Swadeshi-Bharathi
Cotton Mills and they got retired from their service
during the year 1996 to 2004 and they were given bonus
advances in lieu of bonus and ex gratia during their
service period, as they were not coming under the
coverage of Payment of Bonus Act. As per the agreed
advice, dated 20-04-2005 the bonus advances cannot be
deducted from their terminal benefits. But, it was
deducted illegally and therefore, this industrial dispute
has been raised against 1st and 2nd respondent with a
prayer to refund the abovesaid amount and the 1st and
2nd respondents are jointly and severally liable to
refund the same with 18% of interest and hence, he
prayed to allow this industrial dispute.
7. The 1st respondent side Counsel argued that this
industrial dispute is not maintainable as there is no
employer and employees relationship exists at the time
of filing the industrial dispute. It is further, argued that
this Tribunal is not empowered to adjudicate this
industrial dispute on the ground of time-limit and on
the ground of lack of jurisdiction. It is further, argued
that even if, the petitioners are entitle for any relief, that
has to be paid by the 2nd respondent alone and
therefore, it has to be dismissed for mis-joinder of this
mill as 1st respondent. It is further, argued that the
petitioner union is not having any locus standi to file
this industrial dispute and hence, he prayed for
dismissal of this industrial dispute.
8. The Counsel for the 2nd respondent argued that
this petitioner union is not having any locus standi to
raise this industrial dispute and this Tribunal is not
empowered to adjudicate this industrial dispute as it
is not having jurisdiction over the dispute. It is further,
argued that this Industrial Dispute is for dismissal for
non-joinder of necessary parties as the petitioner has
failed to implead the Central Government in this case.
Further, it is argued that, as 1st respondent is not under
the control of NTC on and from 20-04-2005 and
therefore, it cannot get the benefit of the terms of
agreed advice, dated 20-04-2005. It is further, argued
that this 2nd respondent is not having any liability to
refund the bonus advances to this petitioner union as
it is not a claim legally sustainable against this
respondent and hence, he prayed for dismissal of this
application.
9. Points for consideration:
Whether the dispute raised by this petitioner
union against the respondent/management, over the
illegal deductions made in the terminal benefits of
285 employees against the bonus advance amount
paid from the year 1996-1997 to 2003-2004 is justified
or not? and if justified, what is the relief that they
are entitled for?
10. On the point:
The respondent side Counsel argued that this
Tribunal is not empowered to entertain this
industrial dispute as it is not having jurisdiction.
To this aspect the respondent side Counsel argued
that the Central Government is the necessary party
to this dispute and therefore, this Tribunal lacks
jurisdiction. On perusal records it is found that this
industrial dispute is raised by this petitioner union
for its members/employees for refund of the bonus
advance that was deducted from the terminal benefits
of the workman. This Tribunal gets it power under
the industrial dispute Laws, to adjudicate this
dispute as the claim is related to bonus advances
in lieu of bonus. Furthermore, the petitioner has made
their claims against the 1st and 2nd respondent alone
and it has not made any claim against the Central
Government and therefore, the argument of lack of
jurisdiction was not accepted by this Tribunal.
11. The respondent side Counsel further, argued that
the petitioner union is not having any locus standi to
raise this industrial dispute. In this regard, the
petitioner side Counsel filed the citation reported in
2010 LLR 403
in
Duncans Industries Limited, Kanpur
Vs.
Presiding Officer and another
Wherein, the 2nd para runs as follows:
An industrial dispute was raised by respondent
No. 2 on behalf of the workers. It was referred to
Industrial Tribunal and registered as Adjudication
Case No. 232 of 1982, In the said Adjudication Case,
petitioner raised a preliminary objection that
respondent No. 2 is not competent to raise the
aforesaid dispute on behalf of the workmen as they
are not members of the said Union and substantial
number of workmen of the company, not being
members of the said Union, are not interested in
raising the dispute through the aforesaid Union. An
application 22-D was also moved by the petitioner
for summoning certain documents from respondent
No. 2. On said application on 07-12-1983 an order
was passed directing respondent No. 2 to produce
three documents, namely, (1) Constitution of the
Union; (2) Membership register of the Union for the
year 1982; and (3) The resolution, if any, of the Union
for raising the dispute. Despite sufficient time being
granted, non of the above documents were produced
by the respondent No. 2 for about ten years,
whereupon impugned order, dated 31-10-1994 was
108
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
passed by the Tribunal permitting respondent No. 2
to continue representing the case of the workers, and
absolving it from the liability to produce the
aforesaid documents, as the documents summoned
were not available.
12. As per the abovesaid Judgment the Trade Union
has to given its Registration Certificate, membership
register and the resolution if any, to prove it locus
standi. Here, in this case, the PW.1 has deposed that
he is the president of Trade Union and he is one of the
Ex-workman employed in the abovesaid mill and it has
its own Registration Number and the resolution was
also passed in the meeting to conduct/raise this
industrial dispute by the Trade Union. He has further,
deposed that he has raised the industrial dispute for
the welfare of 211 workmen. Therefore, from the
evidence of PW.1 it is found that the petitioner Trade
Union having locus standi to raise this industrial
dispute. Further, in the citation reported in
AIR 1966(53) SC 182
In
Workmen of M/s. Dharam Paul Prem Chandra
Vs.
M/s. Dharam Paul Prem Chandra
it was held that an individual dispute become industrial
dispute only if, it is sponsored by the union of workmen
and such union fairly claims to be working in
representative capacity on behalf of such workers. Here,
in this case also, this industrial dispute was raised for
the welfare of 211 Ex-workmen of Swadeshi-Bharathi
Cotton Mills. It reveals that the petitioner union has
locus standi to raise the dispute. Further more, this
petitioner union has already filed writ petition in WP
49773/2006 before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature
at Madras against the 1st and 2nd respondents for
some other claims related to gratuity, and the said writ
petition was ordered in favour of this petitioner union
namely, Swadeshi-Bharathi Panchalai Thozhilalar Urimai
Padukappu Sangam. It also, reveals that this Trade
Union is having locus standi to raise this industrial
dispute. At this stage, this Tribunal inclined to discuss
whether the citation filed by this respondent are
applicable to this case, and whether they can get any
benefit under the citations. The first citation filed by
the respondent mill is the Judgment rendered by the
Hon’ble Delhi High Court in
Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd.
Vs.
The Appellate Authority
reported in 2002 (92) FLR 676 wherein, the petitioner has
claimed gratuity under section 4 of the Payment of
Gratuity Act 1972, wherein, the respondent management
has branches in more than one State and on that basis,
the Hon’ble High Court has held that the appropriate
Government is the Central Government. It is established
that the authority appointed by the State Government
has no jurisdiction to entertain and decide the matter.
But, here in the present case, this petitioner has not
claimed gratuity under section 4 of Payment of Gratuity
Act 1972. Further, both the respondent is not having
branches in more than one State. Therefore, the
argument putforth by the respondent Counsel is found
to be not applicable to this case. The respondent side
Counsel filed another Judgment of the Hon’ble
High Court of the Madras in W.A.P. No. 178 to 180/2012,
dated 04-08-2016, wherein, the order of the Controlling
Authority for Mahe under the Payment of Gratuity Act,
1972 and Labour Officer, Karaikal was challenged before
the Hon’ble High Court at Madras. In the abovesaid
citation, the appellant was the Cannanore Spinning and
Weaving Mills (A Unit of NTC (APKK & M) Ltd.,
Palloor, Mahe, wherein, the Hon'ble High Court has dealt
with the question whether the abovesaid Mill was
under the Central Government or Puducherry Union
Territory Control? The abovesaid mill have been shown
as a sick unit and it was taken over by the Central
Government and therefore, the Hon’ble High Court has
held that Central Government is the Appropriate
Authority for the abovesaid mill. But, here in this case,
the both the mills are not under the Central Government
control. Further, they were not coming under the
category of sick units and it was not taken over by the
Central Government. Therefore, the abovesaid citation
was not applicable to the scenario of the present case.
Hence, considering the abovesaid citations reported on
both sides and on perusal of the Writ Petition order
produced by this petitioner Trade Union, this Court
come to the conclusion that the petitioner Trade Union
is having locus standi to raise this industrial dispute.
13. The next point argued by the respondent
Counsel is that the claim is barred by limitation. No
fruitful documents and evidences were produced by the
respondent mill in this aspect. Further, the respondent
has failed to prove how it has prejudice the
respondents. Further more, Law of limitation is not
applicable to industrial dispute cases. Further more, on
perusal of records Ex.P212 to Ex.P244 this Court found
that this petitioner Trade Union has made several
representations before the respondent and the
Conciliation Officer regarding its claim of bonus and
refund of deductions made from their terminal benefits
from the year 2001 itself. All these documents would
goes to shows that this petitioner trade union is making
their claim within the time-limit and not in a belated
manner. Hence, considering all these aspects, this Court
come to the conclusion that the claim is not barred under
law of limitation.
109
11 February 2020]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
14. The next point for consideration is whether, the
petitioner Trade Union is making a lawful claim against
the 1st and 2nd respondents? and whether, it is
sustainable? if so, who is liable to refund the deductions
of bonus advances made from the terminal benefits of
the workmen?
15. The petitioners are the Ex-workmen of the
Swadeshi-Bharathi Cotton Mills at Puducherry. The 1st
and 2nd respondents have made deductions towards
bonus advances from the terminal benefits of the
workmen. The Swadeshi Cotton Mill and Bharathi Mill
are to different entity and they were under the control
of the 2nd respondent NTC till 31-03-2005 and it was
taken over by the Puducherry Government on and from
01-04-2005. All the abovesaid facts are admitted by both
the parties.
16. Indisputably the petitioners are trying to enforce
the terms of agreed advice, dated 20-04-2005 under the
Industrial Disputes Act in their favour. It is the plea
raised by the petitioner union, that it was entitled for
the benefit of the above agreed advice, dated
20-04-2005. Per contra, it is denied by the respondents,
that these petitioners are not entitled for the same and
hence, the claim is to be dismissed in limine.
17. PW.1 in this case deposed that an agreed advice
was arrived on 20-04-2005 between the NTC(R2) and the
mills functioning under it and thereby both parties have
mutually agreed that the bonus advances paid to the
employees during the year 1996 to 2004 will not be
deducted any more. In support of this evidence, he has
marked Ex.P225 and the very same document was marked
as Ex.R3 on the side of the respondents. In Ex.R3/
Ex.P225 the clause No. 1 runs as follows:
“
”
So, it is clear that deductions cannot be made from
the terminal benefit of the workmen until the final
decision is received from the Central Government
with respect to the deductions of bonus advances.
Further, in view of the stay order of the Hon’ble High
Court, Madras, the deductions cannot he made from
the terminal benefits. PW.1 has further deposed that
the 1st respondent mill has implemented the same
and it has write-off the bonus advances already paid
and the said amount was not deducted from the
terminal benefits of the workers who retired after 2005.
He further, deposed that the 1st respondent mill have
refunded the deductions nearly 400 workers who
retired during the period 1996 to 2004 and the same
benefit was not extended to the 211 workmen in the
present industrial dispute. To prove this aspect the
petitioner has filed the documents such as Ex.P227
to Ex.P232. The abovesaid documents would goes to
shows that there was no deductions for the
employees who left the mill during 2007 to 2013. In
this regard, the 1st respondent mill has sent the
letters such as Ex.P227 to Ex.P232 to the NTC on
various dates during 2007 to 2013. Further, it would
goes to shows that the terms and conditions of the
agreed advice, dated 20-04-2005 was adopted and
applied by the 1st respondent mill to part of its
workers who left the mill from 2007 to 2013. But, at
the same time, it has not rendered the same benefit
to the workers who get retirement during 1996 to
2004. It shows, the disparity action of the 1st
respondent management. Even though, it has been
stated in Ex.P225, that deduction should not be made
towards the bonus advances for the employees who
got retirement during 1996-1997 to 2003-2004, the 1st
respondent has deducted the same in an illegal
manner without offering any explanation for its
action of deduction. At this juncture, the respondent
side counsel argued that the Agreed advice, dated
20-04-2005 was applicable for the mills in Tamil Nadu
only and it was not applicable for the mills at
Pondicherry. Per contra, the petitioner side Counsel
argued that whatever the decision taken by the NTC
during its settlement it has been promptly adopted
and applied by the mills at Pondicherry also. In this
regard, this Tribunal inclined to peruse the document
Ex.P216. On perusal of Ex.P216, it is found that the
Swadeshi Cotton Mill has given a letter to the Trade
Union, stating that the settlement arrived by the NTC
was adopted by it for its employees also. Further, as
per the Ex.P227 to Ex.P232 the respondent mill has
adopted the settlement arrived by NTC and in result
of which it has not deducted the bonus advances
from the employees who left the mill from 2007 to
2013. Hence, Ex.P216 and P227 to P232 would goes
to shows that 1st respondent has adopted the
decision/settlement arrived by the NTC in letter and
sprit. Therefore, refusing the benefit of the same, to
this petitioner union is nothing but, a disparity
shown by the 1st respondent. Further more, RW.1
has not denied the same in his cross-examination.
Hence, considering the clause No. 1 in agreed
advice, dated 20-04-2005 and the documents such as
Ex.P216, P227 to P231 and P232, this Court come to
110
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
the conclusion that the claim made by this petitioner
union is legally sustainable one and the petitioners
are also entitle for the benefit of the agreed advice,
dated 20-04-2005.
18. The next point for consideration is who is liable
to refund the bonus advances that were recovered from
the petitioners. In this aspect, this Court inclined to go
through the evidence of RW.1. During the cross-
examination, RW.1 has deposed that the first respondent
mill has deducted the bonus advances from 2011
workmen and the said sum deducted was in the hands
of the 1st respondent mill. It was not denied by the 1st
respondent mill by showing contra any evidences.
Further more, as per clause 3 and 6 of the memorandum
of understanding (Ex.P224) between R1 and R2, the lst
respondent is liable to refund the same, Hence,
considering the evidence of RW.1 and memorandum of
understanding (Ex.P224), this Tribunal come to the
conclusion that the 1st respondent management is liable
to refund the deductions.
20. In the result, this claim petition is allowed and
the industrial dispute raised by this petitioner Union
against the 1st respondent/management, over the issue
of deductions of bonus advances from the terminal
benefits of the employees (Annexure-I) is decided as
justified, and an award is passed directing the 1st
respondent/management to refund the deductions
towards the bonus advances from the employee’s
terminal benefits who left from the service during
1996-2004 with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per
annum from the date of its deductions, within a period
of one month and the industrial dispute raised against
the 2nd respondent stands dismissed. No cost.
Dictated to Stenographer, transcribed by him,
corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court on
this the 16th day of October, 2019.
V. PANDIARAJ,
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Puducherry.
List of petitioner’s witness:
PW.1 — 13-07-2017
K. Mohandoss
List of petitioner’s exhibits:
Ex.P1
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Patchaipillai.
Ex.P2
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Babu Azamadulla.
Ex.P3
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Selvaraj.
Ex.P4
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Susaimarianathan
@ Joseph.
Ex.P5
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Balan @
Arikrishnan.
Ex.P6
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman B. Muthuarasan.
Ex.P7
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Sandanakrishnan.
Ex.P8
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Perumal.
Ex.P9
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Chandran.
Ex.P10
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman H. Nethra Lal
Sharma.
Ex.P11
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Kaliyaperumal.
Ex.P12
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman E. Muniyan.
Ex.P13
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Mohamed
Hannifa.
Ex.P14—
Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Patchaiyappan.
Ex.P15
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Pandarinathan.
Ex.P16
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman B. Raymont.
Ex.P17
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Iroudayanathan.
111
11 February 2020]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
Ex.P18
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Subramanian.
Ex.P19
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman I. Pathiyanathan.
Ex.P20—
Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Nagamuthu.
Ex.P21
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Thangaraj.
Ex.P22
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Kannappan.
Ex.P23
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Ramalingam.
Ex.P24
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Radhakrishnan.
Ex.P25
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Subramanian.
Ex.P26—
Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Gopalsamy.
Ex.P27
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Masilamani.
Ex.P28—
Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Tamilselvam.
Ex.P29
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Ranganathan.
Ex.P30
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman T. Dhandapani.
Ex.P31
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Velu.
Ex.P32
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Ezhumalai.
Ex.P33
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Arokiasamy.
Ex.P34
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Devaraj.
Ex.P35
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Datchinamoorthy.
Ex.P36
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Padmanaban.
Ex.P37
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M.Velu.
Ex.P38
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Lourdusamy
Tirinty.
Ex.P39
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Andre Norbert
Leon.
Ex.P40
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Devanathan.
Ex.P41
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Anandarayer.
Ex.P42
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Subramanian
Rajendiran.
Ex.P43
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Subramanian.
Ex.P44
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Govindan @
Thulasingam.
Ex.P45
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Sivadasan.
Ex.P46
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Datchinamoorthy.
Ex.P47
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Mohandoss.
Ex.P48
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Veeramany.
112
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
Ex.P49
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Rajendiran.
Ex.P50
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Savoul
Perlistere.
Ex.P51
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Ramadoss.
Ex.P52
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Arumugam.
Ex.P53
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Mani.
Ex.P54
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Arumugam.
Ex.P55
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Lourdunathan.
Ex.P56
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Abdul Azis.
Ex.P57
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Kannan.
Ex.P58
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Tamijepalane
Pedro.
Ex.P59
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Mani.
Ex.P60
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Purushottaman.
Ex.P61
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Pattabiraman.
Ex.P62
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Faranswa.
Ex.P63
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Nithiyanandam.
Ex.P64
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Padmanaban.
Ex.P65
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Balu Naidu.
Ex.P66
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Boopalan.
Ex.P67
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman B. Gunasekaran.
Ex.P68
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment driven by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Jothikumar.
Ex.P69
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman L. Kaliappan.
Ex.P70
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S Kengamuthu.
Ex.P71
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Marie Juliane
Ambrose.
Ex.P72
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Kalivardhan.
Ex.P73
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Anandakumar.
Ex.P74
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Kanagaraj.
Ex.P75
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Sambandam.
Ex.P76
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Jeeva.
Ex.P77
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Balasubramanian.
Ex.P78
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Valvilori.
Ex.P79
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Narasimmamurthy.
113
11 February 2020]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
Ex.P80
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Villalan.
Ex.P81
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Rayappan.
Ex.P82
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the Ist respondent
mills to the workman K. Mugundan.
Ex.P83
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Israyal.
Ex.P84
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Rabiel.
Ex.P85
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman L. Palanivel @
Dhandapani.
Ex.P86
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Sugumaran.
Ex.P87
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman T. Paneerselvam.
Ex.P88
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Visvanathan.
Ex.P89
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman E. Uthiravelu.
Ex.P90
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman L. Ragothaman.
Ex.P91
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Balasubramanian.
Ex.P92
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Sekaran.
Ex.P93
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Mohanan.
Ex.P94
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman I. Soosai.
Ex.P95
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Angappan.
Ex.P96
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N, Kuppan.
Ex.P97
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman T. Loganathan.
Ex.P98
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Kasinathan.
Ex.P99
— Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman C. Rajendiran.
Ex.P100 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Paneerselvam.
Ex.P101 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Parasuraman @
Paramasivam.
Ex.P102 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman E. Rathinam.
Ex.P103 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Seenivasan.
Ex.P104 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Louis.
Ex.P105 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Sabidadevi.
Ex.P106 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Ravindran.
Ex.P107 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Sadhanantham.
Ex.P108 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Adinarayanan.
Ex.P109 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Sivagnanam.
Ex.P110 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Ambujam.
Ex.P111 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Arunachalam.
114
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
Ex.P112 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Zeeva Artiste.
Ex.P113 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Susaimarinathan.
Ex.P114 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Arumugam.
Ex.P115 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Krishnaraj @
Ariaputhiri.
Ex.P116 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Shanmugam.
Ex.P117 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Munisamy.
Ex.P118 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Irussappan.
Ex.P119 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman J. Rajaraman.
Ex.P120 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Ramkumar.
Ex.P121 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P, Datchinamoorthy.
Ex.P122 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Amaiappan.
Ex.P123 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Selvam.
Ex.P124 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Kumar @
Venkatarayan.
Ex.P125 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Dhayalan.
Ex.P126 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Mohankumar.
Ex.P127 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Balakrishnan.
Ex.P128 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. German.
Ex.P129 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman T. Masilamani.
Ex.P130 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Ramamurthy.
Ex.P131 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Gandhy.
Ex.P132 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Srinivasan.
Ex.P133 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Vasu.
Ex.P134 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Sendhilvinayagam.
Ex.P135 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Rouvier
Florent.
Ex.P136 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman D. Prosper.
Ex.P137 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Sankaradas.
Ex.P138 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Muthu.
Ex.P139 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman L. Sundararajan.
Ex.P140 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Arokiasamy.
Ex.P141 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Manickam.
Ex.P142 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Isack.
115
11 February 2020]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
Ex.P143 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Govindan.
Ex.P144 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman J. Kuppusami.
Ex.P145 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Rajalakshmi.
Ex.P146 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Gnanamurthy.
Ex.P147 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Sreedharan.
Ex.P148 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman B. Murugaiyan.
Ex.P149 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman E. Selvarassou.
Ex.P150 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Veerappan.
Ex.P151 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Rajaram.
Ex.P152 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Sugumaran.
Ex.P153 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Narayanasamy.
Ex.P154 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Tamilanban.
Ex.P155 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman C. Rapheliathan.
Ex.P156 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Venkatachalam.
Ex.P157 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Tamilkodi.
Ex.P158 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Karuppiah.
Ex.P159 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Chandra.
Ex.P160 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the I8t respondent
mills to the workman C. Jayapal.
Ex.P161 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Piragasam.
Ex.P162 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Shanmugam.
Ex.P163 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Kaliyamurthy.
Ex.P164 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Ganesan.
Ex.P165 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Samuel @
Kumar.
Ex.P166 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Srinivasan.
Ex.P167 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman T. Sattaiyappan.
Ex.P168 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman N. Vaithiyanathan.
Ex.P169 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the Ist respondent
mills to the workman R. Rathinasabapathy.
Ex.P170 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman C. Sathiyamoorthy.
Ex.P171 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Parimalam.
Ex.P172 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Elansezian.
Ex.P173 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Martin Louis
Devarayan.
Ex.P174 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Sekar.
116
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
Ex.P175 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Lakshmanan.
Ex.P176 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Moreau Bertin.
Ex.P177 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Nandakumar.
Ex.P178 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Karuppaiyan.
Ex.P179 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Narasimmane.
Ex.P180 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman J. Vijayalakshmi.
Ex.P181 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Jegadeesan.
Ex.P182 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Krishnamoorthy.
Ex.P183 — Photocopy of notice for payment of
gratuity given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Ramanujam.
Ex.P184 — Photocopy of notice for payment of
gratuity given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman T. Govindarasu
Perumal.
Ex.P185 — Photocopy of notice for payment of
gratuity given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman Patchaipillai.
Ex.P186 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Vaithilingam.
Ex.P187 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman J. Mathews.
Ex.P188 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Pourouchottamin.
Ex.P189 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Selvaraj.
Ex.P190 — Photocopy of notice for payment of
gratuity given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman G. Radhakrishnan.
Ex.P191 — Photocopy of notice for payment of
gratuity given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Palanisamy.
Ex.P192 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman T. Mahalingam.
Ex.P193 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Panchatcharam.
Ex.P194 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the Ist respondent
mills to the workman R. Rajaraman.
Ex.P195 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Sarada.
Ex.P196 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Arumugam.
Ex.P197 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Somasundaram.
Ex.P198 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman D. Arokiadass.
Ex.P199 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman V. Kesavalu.
Ex.P200 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman A. Kannan.
Ex.P201 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman M. Karunanidy.
Ex.P202 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman C. Alagappan.
Ex.P203 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Marimuthu.
Ex.P204 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman T. Nagarajan.
Ex.P205 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman P. Tamilarasan.
Ex.P206 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Kannan.
117
11 February 2020]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
Ex.P207 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman K. Gurunathan.
Ex.P208 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman E. Ramadass.
Ex.P209 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman R. Sundar.
Ex.P210 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman D. Pavadaisamy.
Ex.P211 — Photocopy of the calculation of ex gratia
payment given by the 1st respondent
mills to the workman S. Bharathy.
Ex.P212 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 24-10-2011
given by the petitioner union to the 1st
respondent mills.
Ex.P213 — Photocopy of the notice of enquiry,
dated 29-10-2001 sent by the Labour
Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P214 — Photocopy
of
the
letter,
dated
29-10-2001 sent by the petitioner Union
to the Labour Officer (Conciliation),
Puducherry.
Ex.P215 — Photocopy of the notice, dated 12-11-2001
issued by the 2nd respondent mills.
Ex.P216 — Photocopy of the notice, dated 13-11-2001
issued by the 1st respondent mills.
Ex.P217 — Photocopy of the notice of enquiry,
dated 11-10-2002 sent by the Labour
Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P218 — Photocopy of the 12(3) settlement
entered between the 2nd respondent
and all workers affiliated to it.
Ex.P219 — Photocopy of the notice of enquiry,
dated 11-06-2003 sent by the Labour
Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P220 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 30-09-2003
sent by the petitioner Union to the
Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P221 — Photocopy of the notice of enquiry,
dated 01-10-2003 sent by the Labour
Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P222 — Photocopy of the 18(1) settlement
entered between the 2nd respondent
and all workers affiliated to it.
Ex.P223 — Photocopy of the Bonus advances
recovered from the employees of the
1st respondent mills till 03-07-2004.
Ex.P224 — Photocopy of the Memorandum of
Understanding, dated 01-04-2005 entered
between PTC and NTC.
Ex.P225 — Photocopy of the agreed terms entered
between the 2nd respondent and all
workers affiliated to it before the Joint
Labour Commissioner, Coimbatore.
Ex.P226 — Photocopy
of
the
letter,
dated
22-04-2005 sent by the petitioner Union
to the Managing Director of 1st
respondent mills.
Ex.P227 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 17-03-2008
sent by the 1st respondent mills to the
2nd respondent.
Ex.P228 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 22-05-2009
sent by the 1st respondent mills to the
2nd respondent.
Ex.P229 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 06-04-2010
sent by the 1st respondent mills to the
2nd respondent.
Ex.P230 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 02-04-2012
sent by the 1st respondent mills to the
2nd respondent.
Ex.P231 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 30-06-2012
sent by the 1st respondent mills to the
2nd respondent.
Ex.P232 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 01-04-2013
sent by the 1st respondent mills to the
2nd respondent.
Ex.P233 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 11-11-2013
sent by the petitioner Union to the
Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P234 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 28-11-2013
sent by the 1st respondent mills to the
2nd respondent.
Ex.P235 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 02-12-2013
sent by the 2nd respondent to the
Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P236 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 11-12-2013
sent by the petitioner union to the
Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P237 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 20-01-2015
sent by the petitioner union to the
Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
118
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
Ex.P238 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 06-02-2015
sent by the petitioner union to the
Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P239 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 04-06-2015
sent by the petitioner union to the
Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P240 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 09-06-2015
sent by the petitioner union to the
Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P241 — Photocopy of the letter, dated 22-09-2015
sent by the petitioner union to the
Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P242 — Photocopy of the failure report, dated
29-10-2015 submitted by the Labour
Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry.
Ex.P243 — Photocopy of the order, dated 30-05-2016
issued by the Labour Commissioner,
Puducherry.
Ex.P244 — Photocopy of the Gazette Publication,
dated 21-06-2016.
List of respondent’s witnesses:
RW1
— 19-09-2018 N. Gunasekaran
List of respondent’s exhibits:
Ex.Rl
— 01-04-2005 Photocopy of Memorandum
of Settlement entered between
Pondicherry Textile Corporation
and 2nd respondent.
Ex.R2
— 20-04-2005 Photocopy of Circular issued
by the 2nd respondent,
Ex.R3
— 20-04-2005 Photocopy of agreed advice
issued by the Joint Labour
Commissioner, Coimbatore.
Ex.R4
— 30-06-2004 Photocopy of Settlement
entered under section 12 (3)
of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1946.
Ex.R5
— 07-11-1996 Photocopy of Settlement
entered under section 12 (3)
of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1946.
Ex.R6
— 09-11-1996 Photocopy of Settlement
entered under section 12 (3)
of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1946.
Ex.R7
— 07-12-2017 Letter of Authorization.
Ex.R8
— 20-08-2005 Photocopy of Letter sent
by the 2nd respondent to
the General Manager, Sri
Bharathi Mills, Pondicherry.
Ex.R9
— 28-02-2007 Photocopy of the letter sent
by
the Labour
Officer
(Conciliation).
Ex.R10 — 07-03-2007 Photocopy of the reply letter
sent by the 2nd respondent
to
the
Labour
Officer
(Conciliation).
Ex.R11 — 27-10-2007 Photocopy of the Gazette
Publication published by the
Gazette of India.
Ex.R12
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of M. Pachayappan (2402)
for the month of May 1996.
Ex.R13
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of M. Nagamuthu (2404) for
the month of May 1996.
Ex.Rl4
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of P. Ranganathan (349) for
the month of May 1996.
Ex.R15
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of A. Mohandoss (2204) for
the month of May 1996.
Ex.R16
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of V. Veeramany (2210) for
the month of May 1996.
Ex.R17
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of S. Rajendiran (2483) for
the month of May 1996.
Ex.R18
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of M. Mani (2223) for the
month of May 1996.
Ex.R19
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of B. Gunasekaran (2444) for
the month of May 1996.
Ex.R20
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of R. Jeeva (2447) for the
month of May 1996.
Ex.R21
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of A. Balasubramanian (1006)
for the month of May 1996.
Ex.R22
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of S. Kasinathan (2118) for
the month of May 1996.
119
11 February 2020]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
Ex.R23
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of K. Srimvasan (2231) for
the month of May 1996.
Ex.R24
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of G. Munisamy (2244) for
the month of May 1996.
Ex.R25
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of T. Sattaiyappan (2144) for
the month of May 1996.
Ex.R26
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of B. Namasivayam @
Shanmugam (2429) for the
month of May 1996.
Ex.R27
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of A. Pushpanathan (2464)
for the month of May 1996.
Ex.R28
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of S. Venkatachalam (1661) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R29
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of G. Kalivaradan (2596) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R30
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of S. Kuppan (1703) for the
month of December 1996.
Ex.R31
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of D. Narayanasamy (2330) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R32
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of A. Nagalingam (1731) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R33
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of G. Madurai (506) for the
month of December 1996.
Ex.R34
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of V. Sadayandi (2704) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R35
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of S. Datchinamoorthy (2947)
for the month of December
1996.
Ex.R36
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of E. Ramadoss (2313) for
the month of July 1997.
Ex.R37
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of R. Ramadoss (2238) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R38
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of R. Mannancatti (1660) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R39
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of K. Gurunathan (1660) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R40
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of M. Sankaralingam (2812) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R41
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of R. Varadaraj (2153) for the
month of December 1996.
Ex.R42
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of D. Nagarajan (1176) for
the month of December 1996.
Ex.R43
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of P. Tamilarasan (2012) for
the month of July 1997.
Ex.R44
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of D. Narayanasamy (2330)
for the month of July 1997.
Ex.R45
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of A. Nagalingam (1731) for
the month of July 997.
Ex.R46
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of S. Desingu (361) for the
month of July 1997.
Ex.R47
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of Madurai (506) for the
month of July 1997.
Ex.R48
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of V. Sadayandi (2704) for
the month of July 1997.
Ex.R49
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of S. Datcinamoorthy (2947)
for the month of July 1997.
Ex.R50
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of R. Sundar (2635) for the
month of July 1997,
Ex.R51
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of R. Ramadoss (2238) for
the month of July 1997.
Ex.R52
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of K. Gurunathan (1660) for
the month of July 1997.
Ex.R53
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of M. Sankaralingam (2812)
for the month of July 1997.
Ex.R54
—
Photocopy of the Salary Slip
of R. Varadaraj (2153) for the
month of July 1997.
120
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
ANNEXURE-I
Sl.
Name of Mill
Ticket
Date
Detail
No.
No.
of
of the
Leaving
amount
of bonus
which
was
waived/
write
off to
workers
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
`
1 R. Patchaipillai
394 19-03-2002 16,626.85
2 A. Babu Azhamadulla 9,714 19-03-2002 15,121.75
3 G. Selvaraj
384 01-09-1998
4,713.37
4 S. Sussai Marianathan
315 13-09-1998
3,581.18
@ Joseph
5 K. Balan @ Arikrishnan 2,358 16-09-1998
2,507.58
6 B. Mutharasan
3,806 16-09-1998
3,642.91
7 V. Sandanakrishnan
2,254 12-11-1998
8,638.05
8 K. Perumal
420 01-12-1998
5,349.49
9 R. Chandiran
437 01-01-1999
4,652.95
10 H. Nethralal Sharnia
3,819 01-05-1999
5,285.91
11 A. Kaliaperumal
363 11-06-1999
4,949.38
12 E. Munian
2,411 11-06-1999
5,792.75
13 S. Mohammad Haniffa 2,503 01-08-1999
3,277.04
14 M. Patchayappan
2,402 18-05-2000 13,512.24
15 P. Pandarinathan
3,815 07-12-2001 16,790.25
16 B. Raymont
2,355 19-03-2002 22,271.88
17 M. Irudhayanathan
2,382 19-03-2002 12,325.67
18 N. Subramanian
2,101 19-03-2002 21,150.67
19 I. Pathiyanathan
2,251 13-09-1998
6,395.19
20 Legal Heir Sagundala,
2,404 19-03-2002 18,636.93
W/o. Nagamuthu
(died).
21 R. Thangaraj
566 19-03-2002 16,394.80
22 K. Kannappan
1,086 19-03-2002
8,423.87
23 S. Ramalingam
1,091 19-03-2002 20,698.59
24 G. Radhakrishnan
1,096 19-03-2002
5,044.04
25 Legal Heir Santha,
308 19-03-2002 13,537.87
W/o. V. Subramanian
(died).
26 P. Gopalasamy
310 19-03-2002 14,377.78
27 P. Masilamani
625 19-03-2002 16,075.26
28 K. Tamilselvam @
330 19-03-2002 20,126.31
Nagamuthu
29 P. Ranganathan
349 19-03-2002 18,999.09
30 T. Dhandapani
347 19-03-2002 19,000.99
31 P. Velu
2,150 19-03-2002 18,064.46
32 P. Ezhumalai
3,002 19-03-2002 20,000.76
33 A. Arouquiasamy
2,412 19-03-2002 18,179.99
34 R. Devaraj
377 19-03-2002
1,687.90
35 G. Datchinamurthy
354 19-03-2002 16,650.83
36 S. Badmanaban
660 19-03-2002 22,813.05
37 M. Velou
2,107 19-03-2002
8,374.06
38 V. Lourdusamy Trinity 2,213 19-03-2002
1,917.70
39 A. Andre Norbertleon
680 19-03-2002
6,324.71
40 R. Devanathan
416 19-03-2002 17,715.80
41 S. Anandarayar
2,422 19-03-2002 11,230.48
42 P. Subramanian @
3,674 19-03-2002 16,044.45
Rajendiran
43 N. Subramanian
2,480 19-03-2002 13,317.94
44 R. Govindan @
2,410 19-03-2002 20,001.66
Thulasingam
45 K. Sivadasan
2,108 19-03-2002 12,790.42
46 R. Datchinamurthy
2,418 19-03-2002 18,961.70
47 A. Mohandass
2,204 19-03-2002 20,819.98
48 V. Veeramani
2,210 19-03-2002 14,831.31
49 S. Rajendiran
2,483 19-03-2002 17,485.27
50 A. Savoul Pelistere
1,073 19-03-2002 19,963.92
51 K. Ramadass
7,207 19-03-2002 17,811.25
52 Legal Heir
2,117 19-03-2002
8,610.07
Muthulakshmi,
W/o. Arumugam.
53 P. Mani
2,486 19-03-2002
3,285.25
54 N. Arumugam
8,261 19-03-2002
5,357.80
55 M, Lourdunathan
2,437 19-03-2002 18,068.73
56 A. Abdul Azis
2,440 19-03-2002 20,206.96
57 R. Kannan
2,439 19-03-2002 19,067.35
58 P. Tamil Bala Pedro
2,441 19-03-2002 17,030.20
59 M. Mani
2,223 19-03-2002
7,833.37
60 S. Purushothaman
2,443 19-03-2002 10,649.66
61 S. Pattabiraman
9,171 19-03-2002 13,996.31
62 A. Franswa
376 19-03-2002 16,962.81
63 S. Nithyanandam
1,078 19-03-2002
6,908.97
64 V. Padmanaban
2,146 19-03-2002 17,700.16
65 R. Balounaidu
386 19-03-2002 19,890.44
66 G. Boopalan
2,112 19-03-2002 18,084.20
67 B. Gunasegaran
2,444 19-03-2002 15,904.67
68 V. Jothikumar
2,119 19-03-2002
7474.60
69 L. Kaliappan
3,009 19-03-2002 18,932.03
70 S. Kengamuthu
2,506 19-03-2002 10,715.39
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
`
121
11 February 2020]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
71 S. Marie Julian Ambrose 2,507 19-03-2002 15,260.23
72 N. Kalivaradhan
9,172 19-03-2002 15,930.79
73 R. Anandakumar
1,688 19-03-2002
6720.07
74 S. Kanagaraj
9,226 19.03.2002 15,427.35
75 G. Sambandam
1,130 19-03-2002
1,175.33
76 R. Jeeva
2,447 19-03-2002 20,736.51
77 N. Balasubramanian
9,216 19-03-2002
8,641.17
78 K. Volvilori
9,790 19-03-2002 17,959.48
79 N. Narasimma Murthy 1,689 19-03-2002
9,317.49
80 K. Villalan
1,698 19-03-2002
6,466.83
81 M. Rayappan
2,455 19-03-2002 13,695.22
82 K. Mukundan
2,460 19-03-2002 20,510.38
83 Legal Heir Annammale, 2,121 19-03-2002
8,790.48
W/o. A. Isarayal
(died).
84 M. Rabiel
2,208 19-03-2002 18,716.02
85 K. Palanivelu @
2,226 19-03-2002 14,963.78
Dhandabani
86 R. Sugumaran
9,793 19-03-2002 18,393.58
87 Legal Heir Rajam,
2,216 19-03-2002 11,169.06
W/o. T. Paneerselvam
(died).
88 V. Vishwanathan
2,219 19-03-2002 13,928.77
89 E. Uthiravelu
2,463 19-03-2002 16,517.00
90 L. Ragothaman
968 19-03-2002 15,140.14
91 A. Balasubramanian
1,006 19-03-2002 16,497.95
92 A. Segaran
9,055 19-03-2002 12,786.64
93 V. Mohanan
2,492 19-03-2002 14,338.04
94 I. Sussai
2,426 19-03-2002 16,840.03
95 R. Angappan
2,123 19-03-2002 11,912.42
96 N. Kuppan
1,704 19-03-2002 13,557.82
97 T. Loganathan
2,494 19-03-2002 11,111.77
98 Legal Heir Thulasi,
2,118 19-03-2002
9,340.16
W/o. A. Kasinathan
(died).
99 K. Rajendiran
2,124 19-03-2002 17,538.23
100 G. Paneerselvam
9,061 19-03-2002 12,893.13
101 N. Parasuraman @
9,072 19-03-2002 13,178.67
Paramasivam
102 E. Rathinam
9,140 01-08-1999
4,070.59
103 K. Srinivasan
2,231 19-03-2002 12,526.07
104 A. Louis
2,468 19-03-2002
7,619.59
105 M. Sabidadevi
9,654 01-08-1999
5,656.14
106 K. Ravindran
1,117 19-03-2002
7,741.99
107 N. Sadanandan
1,532 19-03-2002
7,519.23
108 S. Adi Narayanan
430 19-03-2002 18,383.01
109 K. Sivairjanam
244 01-11-2002 13,671.19
110 M. Ambujam
9,023 19-03-2002
8,607.54
111 M. Arunachalam
9,684 01-05-1999
9,918.01
112 M. Jeeva Artist
2,475 19-03-2002
1,226.30
113 M. Sussai Marianathan 2,261 19-03-2002
2,944.57
114 R. Arumugam
2,233 19-03-2002
9,371.46
115 K. Krishnaraj @
2,250 19-03-2002
1,085.76
Ariaputhiri
116 M. Shanmugam
1,722 19-03-2002
6,402.83
117 G. Munisamy
2,244 19-03-2002 17,992.85
118 S. Irusappan
2,472 19-03-2002
2,656.47
119 J. Rajaraman
2,535 19-03-2002 10,848.11
120 V. Ramkumar
2,531 19-03-2002
6,470.86
121 P. Dakshinamurthy
2,530 19-03-2002 21,070.63
122 P. Ammayappan
2,270 19-03-2002
1,719.87
123 P. Selvam
1,710 19-03-2002
3,676.20
124 N. Kumar @
2,114 19-03-2002 13,101.87
Venkatrajan
125 K. Dayalan
1,723 19-03-2002 11,869.90
126 K. Mohankumar
1,792 19-03-2002 15,410.33
127 P. Balakrishnan
1,711 19-03-2002 13,254.14
128 G. Lourdemarie Chila, 9,251 19-03-2002
9,011.50
W/o. German (died).
129 M. Gunasundari,
2,540 19-03-2002 16,308.00
W/o. Masilamani
(died).
130 N. Ramamurthy
2,265 19-03-2002
9,741.77
131 K. Gandhi
2,271 19-03-2002 13,154.97
132 G. Srinivasan
2,543 19-03-2002
9,903.73
133 V. Vassu
2,572 19-03-2002
4,852.62
134 N. Senthil Vinayagam 1,608 01-07-2002
6,493.68
135 S. Rouvier Florent
2,129 19-03-2002
4,008.79
136 D. Proser
2,548 19-03-2002
9,381.51
137 R. Sangaradass
2,580 19-03-2002 11,989.64
138 S. Muthu
2,136 19-03-2002
5,989.26
139 L. Soundar Rajan
2,553 19-03-2002
8,833.30
140 S. Aroquiasamy
9,722 19-03-2002 12,387.84
141 K. Manickam
9,744 19-03-2002
1,897.04
142 S. Isack
9,743 19-03-2002
6,676.88
143 K. Govindan
2,586 19-03-2002
2,694.04
144 J. Kuppusamy
2,142 19-03-2002
1,194.95
145 V. Rajalakshmi
9,733 19-03-2002
1,789.25
146 J. Gnanamurthy
2,137 19-03-2002
1,624.55
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
`
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
`
122
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[11 February 2020
147 K. Sridharan
1,679 19-03-2002
2,252.07
148 B. Murugayan
1,797 19-03-2002
5,028.08
149 P. Selvarassou
34 19-03-2002
6,499.21
150 R. Veerappan
2,594 19-03-2002 14,187.99
151 K. Rajaram
35 19-03-2002
3,611.71
152 S. Sugumaran
18 19-03-2002
3,068.57
153 G. Narayanasamy
22 19-03-2002 10,408.47
154 G. Tamizanban
30 19-03-2002
6,345.10
155 S. Raphelnathan
2,135 01-02-2000
6,594.22
156 M. Vengadachalam
48 19-03-2002
2,123.86
157 M. Tamilkodi
56 19-03-2002
9,227.95
158 M. Karuppian
90 19-03-2002
3,832.65
159 A. Chandra
101 19-03-2002
4,815.33
160 C. Jayabal
94 19-03-2002
5,506.61
161 G. Piragasam
98 19-03-2002
8,694.03
162 R. Shanmugam
87 19-03-2002
9,097.73
163 K. Kaliamurthy
3,008 20-08-2002 11,938.10
164 G. Arulselvi,
1,803 01-11-2002 13,609.37
W/o. Ganesan (died).
165 G. Samuvel @ Kumar
355 12-02-2004 27,540.19
166 R. Srinivasan
2,438 30-04-2004
7,881.21
167 T. Sattayappan
2,144 27-05-2004 25,460.39
168 N. Vaithianathan
2,497 30-04-2004 15,706.18
169 R. Rathinasababathy
2,248 02-03-2004 10,641.22
170 C. Sathiamurthy
431 27-05-2004 17,058.67
171 R. Parimalam
9,715 17-05-2004 21,970.11
172 A. Elanjazhiyan
2,549 10-03-2004 25,772.19
173 A. Martine Lomce
2,556 06-03-2004 13,871.37
Devarajan
174 S. Sekar
1,676 10-03-2004 12,157.54
175 M. Lakshmanart
1,801 27-05-2004
5,999.47
176 V. Moreau Berlin
3,818 30-04-2004 20,922.90
177 P. Nandakumar
41 11-03-2004
7,195.01
178 M. Karuppaian
2,588 10-03-2004 21,191.52
179 K. Narasimman
91 09-03-2004
6,752.27
180 J. Vijayalakshmi
Typist
01-01-1997
4,950.00
181 V. Jagadeesan
Sr. Clerk 01-07-2000 16,991.11
182 V. Krishnamurthy
H.T.K.
01-03-1998
6,930.00
Chick
Clerk
183 R. Gowri,
Sr. Time 04-07-1998
7,380.00
W/o. Ramanujam
Clerk
(died).
184 T. Govindarasa
Sr. Clerk 14-07-1999 11,760.00
Perumal
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
`
185 G. Thulasingam
Sr. T.K
18-11-1999 16,722.85
186 K. Vaithilingam
Sr. Clerk 19-03-2002 24,367.30
187 J. Mathiew
Sr. Clerk 19-03-2002 24,146.99
188 M. Pourouchottamin Sr. Clerk 01-09-2000 16,602.15
189 K. Selvaraj
Sr. Clerk 01-07-2000 16,702.60
190 G. Radhakrishnan
Sr. Acct 31-05-2004 29,530.00
191 S, Palanisamy
Sr. Clerk 03-09-2001 22,030.44
192 T. Mahalingam
Staff OP 19-03-2002 22,110.87
193 S. Panchatcharam Staff OP 19-03-2002 19,936.30
194 R. Rajaram
2,147 01-11-1997
3,617.17
195 K. Saradha
9,647 19-03-2002 19,098.67
196 V. Arumugam
9,780 27-05-2004 19,479.79
(died) rep. by LRs
A. Saroja
197 P. Somasundaram
2,433 19-03-2002
4,812.14
(died) rep. by LRs
S. Bharathi
198 D. Arokiadass
2,484 26-05-2004 25,561.36
(died) rep. by LRs
Madeline Mary
199 V. Kesavelu
2,526 19-03-2002 20,405.11
(died) rep. by LRs
K. Meena
200 A. Kannan
2,513 19-03-2002 17,705.09
(died) rep. by LRs
K. Kasthuri
201 Karunanidy
2,407 30-04-2000 10,096.36
(died) rep. by LRs
K. Mariammal
202 C. Alagappan
2,408 27-12-1996
3,150.00
203 K. Marimuthu
1,478 11-01-1997
3,788.00
204 T. Nagarajan
1,176 19-12-1997
3,522.29
205 P. Tamilarasan
2,012 14-03-1998
5,809.13
206 K. Kannan
2,358 31-08-1999
2,537.30
207 K. Gurunathan
1,660 19-07-1999
8,347.19
208 E. Ramadass
2,313 28-02-1999
9,288.70
209 R. Sundar
2,635 27-02-1999
2,845.54
210 D. Pavadai Samy
1,733 29-07-1999
3,918.48
211 S. Bharathy
2,910 20-09-1999
3,196.83
Total Amount
24,86,071.67
V. PANDIARAJ,
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Puducherry.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
`