IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 388/2021 of I.R. No. 80/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./241
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Aravind @ Pipe Aravind (29),
S/o. Mohan,
No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam,
Muthialpet, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
[ 113]
Registered with the Registrar
of Newspapers for India
under No. 10410
Registered No. PY/44/2021-23
Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ
La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry
The Gazette of Puducherry
PART - I
E≈©A ÿkπX|
EXTRAORDINAIRE
EXTRAORDINARY
∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈
Publiée par
Published by
ÿkπX|
Autorité
Authority
®ı
Amflºƒˆ
ÿk^π¬˛wÁ\
2022 }
∏©´kˆ |
18 {
No.
28
Poudouchéry
Vendredi
18
Février
2022 (29 Magha 1943)
No.
Puducherry
Friday
18th
February
2022
114
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
114
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger
to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Aravind @ Pipe Aravind (29), S/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48,
Palani Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 80/2021,
under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 18-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a
gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as anti-social activities and thereby causes disturbance to
the public tranquility and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the
business people in the Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry limits. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life
with the money earned from the public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality,
being afraid of the Counter Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection,
the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
Sl.
Crime No. and Section
Name of the
State of the
No.
Police Station
case
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
253/08, under section 34 BB of PP Act, dated 06-11-2008.
Muthialpet
Conviction
2
02/09, under sections 324, 506(i) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 01-01-2009.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
3
185/09, under sections 294, 427, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 27-03-2009. Grand Bazaar
Acquittal
4
297/09, under section 34 E(i) of PP Act, dated 06-09-2009.
Muthialpet
Conviction
5
238/10, under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 08-11-2010.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
6
189/11, under sections 147, 148, 302, r/w 149 IPC, dated 21-08-2011.
Muthailpet
Acquittal
7
282/11, under sections 34 EI and 34 B IX of PP Act, dated 06-11-2011.
Muthialpet
conviction
8
311/11, under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, dated 07-12-2011. Muthialpet
Acquitted
9
33/12, under sections 147, 427, 324, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 06-02-2012.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
10
85/12, under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, dated 27-04-2013.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
11
I.R. No. 50/12, under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 06-06-2012.
Muthialpet
Closed
12
I.R. No. 65/12, under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 15-08-2012.
Muthialpet
Closed
13
199/12, under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
14
221/12, under section 34 B IX and 34 E1 of PP Act, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
15
41/13, under section 25 (1-A) of Arms Act, dated 18-03-2013.
Mudaliarpet
Acquittal
16
125/13, under sections 399, 402 IPC, dated 30-08-2013.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
17
22/14, under sections 399, 402 IPC, dated 21-02-2014.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
18
I.R. No. 86/2014, under section 144 Cr.P.C., dated 18-06-2014.
Muthialpet
Closed
19
I.R. No. 31/2016, under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 05-06-2016.
Muthialpet
Closed
20
I.R. No. 129/2016, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 09-11-2016.
Muthialpet
Closed
21
I.R. No. 06/2018, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 21-02-2018.
Muthialpet
Closed
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
115
22
I.R. No. 17/2019, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 11-03-2019.
Muthialpet
Closed
23
I.R. No. 59/2019, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 07-10-2019.
Muthialpet
Closed
24
Cr. No. 95/2020, under sections 120(B), 147, 148, 341, 302, 109 IPC r/w
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
149 IPC, dated 07-09-2020.
4. It is also stated in the additional information filed by the Station House Officer, dated 23-12-2021 that
the Counter Petitioner and his brother were roaming in the locality along with his associates and disturbing the
business people and extorting money from them by threatening. Also, it is reported that the Counter Petitioner
threatened the witnesses of one Ganesan murder case. It is further stated that the Counter Petitioner was recently
released from the Central Prison, Kalapet in connection with detention under Goondas Act and his presence is likely
to affect normalcy and public peace of the locality.
5. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his rowdy gang to meet out in case trials and daily
expenses. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is not a law abiding person and therefore, his
criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking the mere security proceedings under the Cr.P.C.
6. The Petitioner further stated that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits, it is
apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault
and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence,
the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against
the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent
danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
7. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing
on 21-12-2021 and further hearings on 23-12-2021 and 30-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter
Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter
Petitioner was received by his mother, Tmt. Pazhaniyammal. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
8. On 30-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru. G. Kalaiarasan, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present. The learned Counsel, Thiru B. Narasimmabalan
was present and represented on behalf of the Counter Petitioner.
9. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police information report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner is in
such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He
has involved in various crimes such as assault, murder, disturbance to the public peace and order, etc. There are 24
criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions of the
Counsel for the Counter Petitioner. The learned Counsel for Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has
filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
10. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to properties, etc., and
thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations
cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary
that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent
harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order;
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
116
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
116
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Aravind @ Pipe Aravind (29), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani
Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the
Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further
orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when
you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may
represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 30th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 389/2021 of I.R. No. 81/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./240
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Vengadesan (33),
S/o. Mohan,
No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam,
Muthialpet, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Vengadesan (33), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani
Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 81/2021,
under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 18-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a
gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as anti-social activities and thereby causes disturbance to
the public tranquility and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the
business people in the Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry limits. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life
with the money earned from the public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality,
being afraid of the Counter Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection,
the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
117
Sl.
Crime No. and Section
Name of the
State of the
No.
Police Station
case
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
Cr. No. 113/2007, under sections 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 06-05-2007 Muthialpet
Acquitted
2
Cr. No. 177/2007, under sections 448, 427, 323, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC,
Muthialpet
Acquitted
dated 12-07-2007.
3
Cr. No. 189/2007, under section 34 BB of PP Act, dated 27-07-2007
Muthialpet
Convicted
4
Cr. No. 48/08, under sections 341, 324, 307 IPC and 109 IPC r/w 34 IPC @ 341,
Muthialpet
Acquitted
326, 307, 201 IPC and 109 IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 24-03-2008.
5
Cr. No. 185/09, under sections 294, 427, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 27-03-2009
Grand Bazaar
Acquitted
6
Cr. No. 02/2009, under sections 324, 506(i) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 01-01-2009
Muthialpet
Acquitted
7
Cr. No. 351/2009, under section 27 Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act,
Muthialpet
Acquitted
dated 08-11-2009
8
Cr. No. 33/2010, under section 27 Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act,
Muthialpet
Acquitted
dated 12-02-2010.
9
Cr. No. 156/2010, under section 302 IPC @ 147, 148, 302 IPC and 3 of
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
Explosive Substances Act r/w 149 IPC, dated 09-07-2010.
10
Cr. No. 238/2010, under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 08-11-2010
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
11
Cr. No. 113/2011, under section 188 IPC, dated 04-05-2011
Muthialpet
Acquitted
12
Cr. No. 189/11, under sections 147, 148, 302 r/w 149 IPC, dated 21-08-2011
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
13
Cr. No. 104/2012, under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B IX of PP Act,
Muthialpet
Acquitted
dated 01-06-12.
14
I.R. No. 62/12, under section 151 Cr.P.C. @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 08-08-2012
Muthialpet
Closed
15
Cr. No. 222/12, under section 34 B IX and 34 E1 of PP Act, 506(ii) IPC
Muthialpet
Acquitted
r/w 34 IPC, dated 25-12-2012.
16
I.R. No. 18/13, under section 151 Cr.P.C. @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 12-08-2013
Muthialpet
Closed
17
I.R. No. 47/13, under section 144 Cr.P.C., dated 07-11-2013
Muthialpet
Closed
18
Cr. No. 02/14, under section 188 IPC and 27(1) of Arms Act 1959, dated 05-01-2014
Muthialpet
Acquitted
19
I.R. No. 30/2016, under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 04-06-2016
Muthialpet
Closed
20
I.R. No. 08/2018, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 26-02-2018
Muthialpet
Closed
21
I.R. No. 23/2019, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 13-03-2019
Muthialpet
Closed
22
I.R. No. 60/2019, under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 07-10-2019
Muthialpet
Closed
23
Cr. No. 95/2020, under section 120(B), 147, 148, 341, 302, 109 IPC r/w 149 IPC,
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
dated 07-09-2020.
4. It is also stated in the additional information filed by the Station House Officer, dated 23-12-2021, that
the Counter Petitioner and his brother were roaming in the locality along with his associates and disturbing the
business people and extorting money from them by threatening. Also, it is reported that the Counter Petitioner
threatened the witnesses of one Ganesan murder case. It is further stated that the Counter Petitioner was recently
released from the Central Prison, Kalapet in connection with detention under Goondas Act and his presence is likely
to affect normalcy and public peace of the locality.
118
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
118
5. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his rowdy gang to meet out in case trials and daily
expenses. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is not a law abiding person and therefore, his
criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking the mere security proceedings under the Cr.P.C.
6. The Petitioner further stated that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits, it is
apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault
and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence,
the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against
the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent
danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
7. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing
on 21-12-2021 and further hearings on 23-12-2021 and 30-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter
Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter
Petitioner was received by his mother, Tmt. Pazhaniyammal. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
8. On 30-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru G. Kalaiarasan, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present. The learned Counsel, Thiru B. Narasimmabalan
was present and represented on behalf of the Counter Petitioner.
9. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police information report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner is in
such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order and public tranquility. He
has involved in various crimes such as assault, murder, disturbance to the public peace and order, etc. There are 23
criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions of the
Counsel for the Counter Petitioner. The learned Counsel for Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has
filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
10. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to properties, etc., and
thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations
cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary
that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent
harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Vengadesan (33), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam,
Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional
Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed
by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned
to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this
order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 30th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
119
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 390/2021, I.R.No. 102/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./239
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Ponnusamy @ Nagaraj (24),
S/o. Ezhumalai,
No. 65, 4th Cross, Annai Indira Ninaivu Nagar,
Orleanpet, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Ponnusamy @ Nagaraj (24), son of Ezhumalai, a resident of No. 65,
4th Cross, Annai Indira Ninaivu Nagar, Orleanpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide
I.R. No. 102/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 29-10-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner
has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as murder, hurt, extortion and disturbance to the public
tranquillity and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the business
community in the city limit. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned through extortion.
As a result the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge any
complaint against him. It is also stated that even witnesses don't come forward voluntarily to give evidence against
him in the cases where he is the accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal
cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
Sl.
Crime No.
Section
Name of the
No.
Police Station
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
Cr. No. 145/2014
452, 427, 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC, dated 01-06-2014
Orleanpet
2
Cr. No. 88/2015
324, 323, 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC, dated 25-04-2015
Orleanpet
3
I.R. No. 59/2015
Under section 107 Cr.P.C
Orleanpet
4
Cr. No. 246/2015
Under sections 294 (b), 324, 323, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 22-10-2015
Orleanpet
5
Cr. No. 01/2019
Under section 34 B IX of PP Act, dated 02-01-2019
Orleanpet
6
Cr. No. 88/2019
Under section 307 IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 03-07-2019
Orleanpet
7
Cr. No. 127/2021
Under section 294(b), 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 30-08-2021
Orleanpet
120
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
120
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the
Counter Petitioner violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts while he was released on bail and he is
desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his group of rowdy elements and to meet expenses in connection
with the trial in the pending criminal cases against him. The Counter Petitioner is hatching plans to threaten the
business people in the Puducherry area and extort money from them by threatening. It is stated that the Counter
Petitioner is a young and very active rowdy element and have become a source of terror among the public. And
also, the Counter Petitioner earned displeasure among a section of other rowdy group in the area on account of the
grudge against him and hence, rival group is also waiting opportunity to take revenge upon him.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like riot, affray,
criminal intimidation, criminal trespass, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the public and private
properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and
order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under
section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of
two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and
order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing
on 28-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice was received by the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 28-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Ramachandiran, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet
Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner are in
such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He
has involved in crimes such as unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are 7 criminal
case was registered against him. I have also heard the oral submissions of the Counter Petitioner. The Counter
Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public and private
properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and
disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures
contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to
take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace
and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Ponnusamy @ Nagaraj (24), son of Ezhumalai, a resident of No. 65, 4th Cross,
Annai Indira Ninaivu Nagar, Orleanpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the
Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further
orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when
you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may
represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 28th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
121
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 391/2021, I.R.No. 108/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./237
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Stephanraj (21),
S/o. Sagayaraj,
No. 10, 1st Cross, Karunagarapillai Street,
Kosapalayam, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Stephanraj (21), son of Sagayaraj, a resident of No. 10, 1st Cross,
Karunagarapillai Street, Kosapalayam, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide
I.R. No. 108/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 02-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner
has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as attempt to murder, hurt, extortion and disturbance to
the public tranquillity and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the
business community in the city limit. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned through
extortion. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge
any complaint against him. It is also stated that even witnesses don't come forward voluntarily to give evidence
against him in the case where he is the accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following
criminal case was registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr.No. 124/2019, under sections 148, 120 (b), 302 IPC r/w 149 IPC of Reddiyarpalayam Police Station,
Puducherry – Pending Trial.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the
Counter Petitioner violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts while he was released on bail and he is
desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his group of rowdy elements and to meet expenses in connection
with the trial in the pending criminal cases against him. The Counter Petitioner is hatching plans to threaten the
business people in the Puducherry area and extort money from them by threatening. It is stated that the Counter
Petitioner is a young and very active rowdy element and have become a source of terror among the public. And
also, the Counter Petitioner earned displeasure among a section of other rowdy group in the area on account of the
grudge against him and hence, rival group is also waiting opportunity to take revenge upon him.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like riot, affray,
criminal intimidation, criminal trespass, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the public and private
properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and
order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under
122
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
122
section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period
of two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility
and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing
on 28-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice was received by the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 28-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Ramachandiran, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet
Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner are in such
a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has
involved in crimes such as unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There is one criminal
case was registered against him in Reddiyarpalayam Police Station. I have also heard the oral submissions of the
Counter Petitioner. The Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public and private
properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and
disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures
contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to
take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace
and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Stephanraj (21), son of Sagayaraj, a resident of No. 10, 1st Cross,
Karunagarapillai Street, Kosapalayam, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the
Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further
orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when
you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may
represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 28th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 392/2021, I.R.No. 109/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./236
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
123
Thiru Bharathi @ Bharathikumar (19),
S/o. Mischeal,
No. 08, 8th Cross, Murugan Koil Backside,
Periyar Nagar, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Bharathi @ Bharathikumar (19), son of Mischeal, a resident of No. 08,
8th Cross, Murugan Koil Backside, Periyar Nagar, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide
I.R. No. 109/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 05-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner
has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as attempt to murder, hurt, extortion and disturbance to
the public tranquillity and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the
business community in the city limit. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned through
extortion. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge
any complaint against him. It is also stated that even witnesses don't come forward voluntarily to give evidence
against him in the cases where he is the accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following
criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr.No. 150/2020, under sections 294 (b), 324, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC of Orleanpet Police Station,
Puducherry – Pending Trial.
2. Cr.No. 167/2021, under section 3 (2) (a) of PD PP Act of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Pending
Trial.
3. Cr.No. 185/2021, under section 34 D of PP Act of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Under
Investigation.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the
Counter Petitioner violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts while he was released on bail and he is
desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his group of rowdy elements and to meet expenses in connection
with the trial in the pending criminal cases against him. The Counter Petitioner is hatching plans to threaten the
business people in the Puducherry area and extort money from them by threatening. It is stated that the Counter
Petitioner is a young and very active rowdy element and have become a source of terror among the public. And
also, the Counter Petitioner earned displeasure among a section of other rowdy group in the area on account of the
grudge against him and hence, rival group is also waiting opportunity to take revenge upon him.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like riot, affray,
criminal intimidation, criminal trespass, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the public and private
properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and
order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under
section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of
two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and
order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing
on 28-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his mother, Tmt. Rajaveni.
The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
124
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
124
7. On 28-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Ramachandiran, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet
Police Station, Puducherry. The Counter Petitioner has failed to appear before the Court on hearing date.
8. I have heard the Petitioner and carefully gone through all the available records placed before me. In the
Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner are in such a manner
that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has involved
in crimes such as unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are 3 criminal case were
registered against him in Orleanpet Police Station
9. On perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner and the recommendation of the Superintendent of
Police (East), I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction,
the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages
to public and private properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to
the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse
to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of
Cr.P.C., is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens
and uphold public peace and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in
exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit
the Counter Petitioner Thiru Bharathi @ Bharathikumar (19), son of Mischeal, a resident of No. 08, 8th Cross,
Murugan Koil Backside, Periyar Nagar, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the
Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further
orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when
you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may
represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 28th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 393/2021, I.R.No. 110/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./238
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Manikandan (23),
S/o. Umapathy,
No. 33, 3rd Cross, Periyar Nagar,
Nellithope, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
125
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Manikandan (23), son of Umapathy, a resident of No. 33, 3rd Cross,
Periyar Nagar, Nellithope, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide
I.R. No. 110/2021 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 06-11-2021. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner
has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as attempt to murder, hurt, extortion and disturbance to
the public tranquillity and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the
business community in the city limit. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned through
extortion. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward to lodge
any complaint against him. It is also stated that even witnesses don't come forward voluntarily to give evidence
against him in the cases where he is the accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following
criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr.No. 254/2020, under section 307 IPC r/w 34 IPC of Odiansalai Police Station, Puducherry – Pending
Trial.
2. Cr.No. 167/2021, under section 3 (2) (a) of PD PP Act of Odiansalai Police Station, Puducherry – Under
Investigation.
3. Cr.No. 184/2021, under sections 294 (b), 324, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC of Odiansalai Police Station,
Puducherry – Under Investigation.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts while he was released on bail and he is desperate
and is in dire need of money to maintain his group of rowdy elements and to meet expenses in connection with the
trial in the pending criminal cases against him. The Counter Petitioner is hatching plans to threaten the business
people in the Puducherry area and extort money from them by threatening. It is stated that the Counter Petitioner
is a young and very active rowdy element and have become a source of terror among the public. And also, the
Counter Petitioner earned displeasure among a section of other rowdy group in the area on account of the grudge
against him and hence, rival group is also waiting opportunity to take revenge upon him.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like riot, affray,
criminal intimidation, criminal trespass, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the public and private
properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and
order. Hence, the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under
section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of
two months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and
order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 08-12-2021 to appear for the hearing
on 28-12-2021. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice was received by the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 28-12-2021, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Ramachandiran, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet
Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present.
126
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
126
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner are in
such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He
has involved in crimes such as unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are 3 criminal
cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions of the Counter
Petitioner. The Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public and private
properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and
disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures
contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to
take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace
and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Manikandan (23), son of Umapathy, a resident of No. 33, 3rd Cross, Periyar
Nagar, Nellithope, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate
Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the
Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to
attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this
order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 28th day of December, 2021, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 01/2022, I.R.No. 02/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./234
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20),
S/o. Vengadesan @ Iyyappan,
No. 06, 3rd Cross, Ambedkar Nagar,
Attupatti, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
127
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20) to prevent imminent
danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this
Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20), son of Vengadesan @ Iyyappan, a resident
of No. 06, 3rd Cross, Ambedkar Nagar, Attupatti, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide
I.R. No. 02/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 09-01-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner
has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as hurt, body harm cases and disturbance to the public
tranquility and order. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come
forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal
cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr. No. 124/2019, under sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 10-09-2019 of Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
2. Cr. No. 202/2020, under sections 341, 302 IPC r/w 34 IPC @ 147, 148, 341, 302 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated
04-10-2020 of Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
3. Cr.No. 41/2021, under sections 294(b), 506(ii), 116 IPC 27(1) of Arms Act r/w 34 IPC, dated 21-04-2021 –
Under Investigation.
4. Cr.No. 153/2021, under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC and 3 of Explosive Substances Act, r/w 149 IPC, dated
04-07-2021 of Odiansalai Police Station, Puducherry – Under Investigation.
5. I.R. No. 46/2021, under section 107 Cr.P.C.
4. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is a dangerous person habitually involved in
body offences by using deadly weapons for committing the crime and he is a notorious gangster and has a number
of associates in and around of Puducherry region. The Counter Petitioner is having close contact with local rowdies
and intentionally engaged persons by hiring them by providing liquors and insisting them to create problems with
their opposite groups. But, the activities of the Counter Petitioner would provoke enmity between the groups as
earlier.
5. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner along with his friends under drunken mood and designed to commit some cognizable offence at Attupatti.
On seeing the Police, the Counter Petitioner along with his colleagues was found escaped from the spot. On enquiry
it revealed that the Counter Petitioner along with his friends were frequently visiting there under the influence of
alcohol and threatening the general public. Also revealed that the Counter Petitioner is young and energetic and
shows his muscle power by picking up quarrels with others for petty reasons. It is further stated in the I.R. that he
is very active and may commit any cognizable offence in connection with the prevailing law and order situation in
that area. He is bad character and he may disturb the public peace and tranquility, which may cause damages to the
public and private properties in the Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits.
6. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like hurt, criminal
intimidation, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as
a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter
Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the
human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
128
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
128
7. The proceedings was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 10-01-2022 to appear for the hearing
on 11-01-2022. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his mother,
Tmt. V. Geetha. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
8. On 11-01-2022, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Murugesan, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner Petitioner has failed to appear before the Court on hearing date.
9. I have heard the Petitioner and carefully gone through all the available records placed before me. In the
Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20) is in such a
manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has
involved in crimes such as murder, explosive substances case, assault and disturbance to the public peace and
order. There are 5 criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations.
10. On perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner and the recommendation of the Superintendent
of Police (East), I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my
jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault,
damages to public and private properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of
threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking
recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section
144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of
citizens and uphold public peace and order.
11. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Sunil @ Kishorekumar (20), son of Vengadesan @ Iyyappan, a resident of
No. 06, 3rd Cross, Ambedkar Nagar, Attupatti, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of
the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further
orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when
you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may
represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 11th day of January, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 02/2022, I.R.No. 03/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./235
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
129
Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29),
S/o. Umapathy,
No. 87, Angunayakkar Thoppu,
Roadiarpet, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29) to prevent imminent
danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this
Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29), son of Umapathy, a resident of No. 87,
Angunayakkar Thoppu, Roadiarpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry, through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide
I.R. No. 03/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 09-01-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner
has formed a gang of rowdies and indulging in crimes such as hurt, body harm cases and disturbance to the public
tranquility and order. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come
forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal
cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr. No. 134/2016 , under sections 143, 341, 186 r/w 149 IPC, dated 06-06-2016 of Orleanpet Police Station,
Puducherry – Pending Trial.
2. Cr. No. 159/2016 , under sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 29-06-2016 of Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry – Conviction.
3. Cr.No. 107/2019 , under sections 147, 148, 302 IPC and 3 of Explosive Substances Act r/w 149 IPC, dated
03-09-2019 of Mudaliarpet Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
4. I.R. No. 02/2021 , under sections 151 @ 107 Cr.P.C., dated 05-01-2021.
4. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is a dangerous person habitually involved in
body offences by using deadly weapons for committing the crime and he is a notorious gangster and has a number
of associates in and around of Puducherry region. The Counter Petitioner is having close contact with local rowdies
and intentionally engaged persons by hiring them by providing liquors and insisting them to create problems with
their opposite groups. But, the activities of the Counter Petitioner would provoke enmity between the groups as
earlier.
5. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner along with his friends under drunken mood and designed to commit some cognizable offence at Roadiarpet.
On seeing the Police, the Counter Petitioner along with his colleagues was found escaped from the spot. On enquiry
it revealed that the Counter Petitioner along with his friends were frequently visiting there under the influence of
alcohol and threatening the general public. Also revealed that the Counter Petitioner is young and energetic and
shows his muscle power by picking up quarrels with others for petty reasons. It is further stated in the I.R. that he
is very active and may commit any cognizable offence in connection with the prevailing law and order situation in
that area. He is bad character and he may disturb the public peace and tranquility, which may cause damages to the
public and private properties in the Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry limits.
6. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like hurt, criminal
intimidation, assault, obstructions and annoyance, damages to the private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as
a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station House Officer,
130
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
130
Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against the Counter
Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the
human life and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
7. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 10-01-2022 to appear for the hearing
on 11-01-2022. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer,
Orleanpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his mother. The service
was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
8. On 11-01-2022, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Murugesan, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Orleanpet Police
Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner has failed to appear before the Court on hearing date.
9. I have heard the Petitioner and carefully gone through all the available records placed before me. In the
Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that the activities of Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29) is in such
a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility. He has
involved in crimes such as murder, explosive substances case, assault and disturbance to the public peace and
order. There are 4 criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations.
10. On perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner and the recommendation of the Superintendent
of Police (East), I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my
jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault,
damages to public and private properties, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of
threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking
recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section
144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of
citizens and uphold public peace and order.
11. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Sathish @ Sathish Kumar (29), son of Umapathy, a resident of No. 87,
Angunayakkar Thoppu, Roadiarpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the
Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further
orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when
you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may
represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 11th day of January, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”
Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.