IN THE COURT OF THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 91/2022 of I.R. No. 01/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./1534
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Vengadesan (34),
S/o. Mohan,
No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam,
Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
[ 517]
Registered with the Registrar
of Newspapers for India
under No. 10410
Registered No. PY/44/2021-23
Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ
La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry
The Gazette of Puducherry
PART - I
E≈©A ÿkπX|
EXTRAORDINAIRE
EXTRAORDINARY
∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈
Publiée par
Published by
ÿkπX|
Autorité
Authority
®ı
Amflºƒˆ
A>[˛wÁ\
2022 }
Û[ |
15 {
No.
67
Poudouchéry
Mercredi
15
Juin
2022 (25 Jyaistha 1944)
No.
Puducherry
Wednesday
15th
June
2022
518
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
518
This petition along with case sheet is filed by Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Vengadesan (34), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani
Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 01/2022,
under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 19-04-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a
gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as anti-social activities thereby causes disturbance to the
public tranquility and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the
business people in the Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry limits. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life
with the money earned from the public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality,
being afraid of the Counter Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection,
the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
Sl.
Crime No. and Section
Name of the
Stage of the
No.
Police Station
case
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
Cr. No. 113/2007 under sections 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 06-05-2007.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
2
Cr. No. 177/2007 under sections 448, 427, 323, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC,
Muthialpet
Acquitted
dated 12-07-2007.
3
Cr. No. 189/2007 under section 34 BB of PP Act, dated 27-07-2007.
Muthialpet
Convicted
4
Cr. No. 48/08 under sections 341, 324, 307 IPC and 109 IPC r/w 34 IPC @
Muthialpet
Acquitted
341, 326, 307, 201 IPC and 109 IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 24-03-2008.
5
Cr. No. 185/09 under sections 294, 427, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated
Grand Bazaar
Acquitted
27-03-2009.
Police Station
6
Cr. No. 02/2009 under sections 324, 506(i) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 01-01-2009.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
7
Cr. No. 351/2009 under section 27 Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, dated
Muthialpet
Acquitted
08-11-2009.
8
Cr. No. 33/2010 under section 27 Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, dated
Muthialpet
Acquitted
12-02-2010.
9
Cr. No. 156/2010 under section 302 IPC @ 147, 148, 302 IPC and
Muthialpet
Acquitted
3 of Explosive Substances Act r/w 149 IPC, dated 09-07-2010.
10
Cr. No. 238/2010 under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated
Muthialpet
Acquitted
08-11-2010.
11
Cr. No. 113/2011 under section 188 IPC, dated 04-05-2011.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
12
Cr. No. 189/11 under sections 147, 148, 302, r/w 149 IPC, dated 21-08-2011.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
13
Cr. No. 104/2012 under section 27 of Arms Act & 34 B IX of PP Act,
Muthialpet
Acquitted
dated 01-06-2012.
14
I.R. No. 62/12 under section 151 Cr.P.C @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 08.08.2012.
Muthialpet
Closed
15
Cr. No. 222/12 under sections 34 B IX and 34 E1 of PP Act, 506(ii) IPC
Muthialpet
Acquitted
r/w 34 IPC, dated 25-12-2012.
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
519
16
I.R. No. 18/13 under section 151 Cr.P.C. @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 12-08-2013.
Muthialpet
Closed
17
I.R. No. 47/13 under section 144 Cr.P.C., dated 07-11-2013.
Muthialpet
Closed
18
Cr. No. 02/14 under section 188 IPC & 27(1) of Arms Act 1959, dated
Muthialpet
Acquitted
05-01-2014.
19
I.R. No. 30/2016 under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C., dated 04-06-2016.
Muthialpet
Closed
20
I.R. No. 08/2018 under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 26-02-2018.
Muthialpet
Closed
21
I.R. No. 23/2019 under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 13-03-2019.
Muthialpet
Closed
22
I.R. No. 60/2019 under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 07-10-2019.
Muthialpet
Closed
23
Cr. No. 95/2020 under sections 120(B), 147, 148, 341, 302, 109 IPC
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
r/w 149 IPC, dated 07-09-2020.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his rowdy gang to meet out in case trials and daily
expenses. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is not a law abiding person and therefore, his
criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking the mere security proceedings under the Cr.P.C.
5. The Petitioner further stated that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits, it is
apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault
and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence,
the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 of Cr.P.C.,
against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court for a period of two months as to
prevent danger to the human life and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 25-05-2022 to appear for the hearing
on 07-06-2022 at 10.00 a.m. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his mother,
Tmt. Pazhaniyammal. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 07-06-2022, the Petitioner Thiru P. Sivaprakassam, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present. The learned Counsel, Thiru B. Narasimmabalan was present
and represented on behalf of the Counter Petitioner.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police information report/petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner is in
such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order and public tranquility. He
has involved in crimes such as assault,murder, disturbance to the public peace and order, etc. There are 23 criminal
cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions of the Counsel
for the Counter Petitioner. The learned Counsel for Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this
false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to properties, etc., and
thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations
cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary
that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent
harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order;
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
520
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
520
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Vengadesan (34), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam,
Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional
Magistrate Court (North) for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed
by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned
to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this
order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 07th day of June, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 92/2022 of I.R. No. 02/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./1600
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Aravind @ Pipe Aravind (29),
S/o. Mohan,
No. 48, Palani Giramani Thottam,
Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Aravind @ Pipe Aravind (29), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani
Giramani Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 02/2022,
under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 19-04-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a
gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as anti-social activities thereby causes disturbance to the
public tranquility and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the
business people in the Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry limits. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life
with the money earned from the public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality,
being afraid of the Counter Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection,
the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
521
Sl.
Crime No. and Section
Name of the
Stage of the
No.
Police Station
case
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
253/08 under section 34 BB of PP Act, dated 06-11-2008
Muthialpet
Conviction
2
02/09 under sections 324, 506(i) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 01-01-2009.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
3
185/09 under sections 294, 427, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 27-03-2009.
Grand Bazaar
Acquittal
4
297/09 under section 34 E(i) of PP Act, dated 06-09-2009.
Muthialpet
Conviction
5
238/10 under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 08-11-2010.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
6
189/11 under sections 147, 148, 302, r/w 149 IPC, dated 21-08-2011.
Muthailpet
Acquittal
7
282/11 under sections 34 EI and 34 B IX of PP Act, dated 06-11-2011.
Muthialpet
conviction
8
311/11 under section 27 of Arms Act & 34 B-IX of PP Act, dated 07-12-2011.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
9
33/12 under sections 147, 427, 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 06-02-2012.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
10
85/12 under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, dated 27-04-2013.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
11
Ir. No. 50/12 under section 151 @ 110 Cr.PC., dated 06-06-2012.
Muthialpet
Closed
12
Ir. No. 65/12 under section 151 @ 110 Cr.PC., dated 15-08-2012.
Muthialpet
Closed
13
199/12 under section 27 of Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
14
221/12 under sections 34 B IX and 34 E1 of PP Act, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC. Muthialpet
Acquitted
15
41/13 under section 25 (1-A) of Arms Act, dated 18-03-2013.
Mudaliarpet
Acquittal
16
125/13 under sections 399, 402 IPC, dated 30-08-2013.
Muthialpet
Acquitted
17
22/14 under sections 399, 402 IPC, dated 21-02-2104.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
18
I.R No.86/2014 under section 144 Cr.P.C, dated 18-06-2014.
Muthialpet
Closed
19
I.R No.31/2016 under section 151 @ 110 Cr.P.C, dated 05-06-2016.
Muthialpet
Closed
20
I.R No.129/2016 under section 110 Cr.P.C, dated 09-11-2016.
Muthialpet
Closed
21
I.R. No. 06/2018 under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 21-02-2018.
Muthialpet
Closed
22
I.R No. 17/2019 under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 11-03-2019.
Muthialpet
Closed
23
I.R. No. 59/2019 under section 110 Cr.P.C., dated 07-10-2019.
Muthialpet
Closed
24
Cr. No. 95/2020 under sections 120(B), 147, 148, 341, 302, 109 IPC r/w
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
149 IPC, dated 07-09-2020.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his rowdy gang to meet out in case trials and daily
expenses. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is involved in selling of ganjas to teenagers and
he is not a law abiding person and therefore, his criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking the mere security
proceedings under the Cr.P.C.
5. The Petitioner further stated that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits, it is
apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault
and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence,
the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 of Cr.P.C.,
against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court for a period of two months as to
prevent danger to the human life and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
522
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
522
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner.A notice was served to both the parties on 25-05-2022 to appear for the hearing
on 07-06-2022 at 10.00 a.m. and further hearing on 08-06-2022. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter
Petitioner through the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter
Petitioner was received by his mother, Tmt. Pazhaniyammal. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 08-06-2022, the Petitioner Thiru P. Sivaprakassam, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police information report/petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner is in
such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order and public tranquility. He
has involved in various crimes such as assault, murder, disturbance to the public peace and order, etc. There are 24
criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions of the
Counter Petitioner. The Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior
motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to properties, etc., and
thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations
cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary
that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent
harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order;
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Aravind @ Pipe Aravind (29), s/o. Mohan, a resident of No. 48, Palani Giramani
Thottam, Vazhaikulam, Muthialpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the
Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North) for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further
orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when
you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may
represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 08th day of June, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 93/2022 of I.R. No. 05/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./1537
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
523
Vs
Thiru Prabu @ Narayanan (33),
S/o. Ganesan,
No. 17, Raja Gopal Giramani Thottam,
Chinnaiyapuram, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Prabu @ Narayanan (33), s/o. Ganesan, a resident of No. 17, Raja
Gopal Giramani Thottam, Chinnaiyapuram, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 05/2022,
under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 22-04-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a
gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as anti-social activities thereby causes disturbance to the
public tranquility and order. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the
business people in the Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry limits. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life
with the money earned from the public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality,
being afraid of the Counter Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection,
the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
Sl.
Crime No. and Section
Name of the
Stage of the
No.
Police Station
case
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
Cr. No. 169/2004 under section 34 BB of PP Act, dated 23-07-2004.
Muthialpet
Conviction
2
Cr. No. 09/2005 under sections 341, 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC.
Muthialpet
Conviction
3
Cr. No. 76/2005 under section 12 of PG Act, dated 06-5-2005.
Muthialpet
Conviction
4
Cr. No. 127/2005 under section 160 IPC, dated 12-07-2005.
Muthialpet
Conviction
5
Cr. No. 129/2005 under sections 341, 323, 506(ii) IPC, dated 13-07-2005.
Muthialpet
Conviction
6
Cr. No. 211/2007 under section 379 IPC, dated 16-08-2007.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
7
Cr.No. 01/2008 under section 3 of PDPP Act, dated 01-8-2008.
Muthialpet
Conviction
8
Cr. No. 116/2008 under section 379 IPC, dated 12-06-2008.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
9
Cr. No. 218/2011 under sections 144, 150 IPC r/w 149 IPC and 27 of Arms Act. Muthialpet
Acquittal
10
Cr.No. 230/2011 under sections 294, 506(ii) IPC and 120-B IPC r/w 34 IPC.
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
11
Cr.No. 03/2009 under sections 448, 323, 427, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC.
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
12
Cr.No. 38/14 under sections 399, 402 IPC, dated 16-03-2014.
Orlenpet
Acquittal
13
Cr. No. 871/2017 under section 286 IPC r/w 4(1) (b) 5, 6 of Explosive
Auroville
Pending Trial
Substance Act 1908 r/w 109 IPC.
14
Cr. No. 81/2018 under sections 114, 147, 148, 341, 302, 109, 120-B IPC r/w 149 IPC. Muthialpet
Pending Trial
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his rowdy gang to meet out in case trials and daily
expenses. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is involved in selling of ganjas to teenagers and
he is not a law abiding person and therefore, his criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking the mere security
proceedings under the Cr.P.C.
5. The Petitioner further sumbitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits,
it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault
and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence,
524
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
524
the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 of Cr.P.C.,
against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court for a period of two months as to
prevent danger to the human life and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner.A notice was served to both the parties on 25-05-2022 to appear for the hearing
on 07-06-2022 at 10.00 a.m. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice was received by the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 07-06-2022, the Petitioner Thiru P. Sivaprakassam, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police information report/petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner is in
such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order and public tranquility. He
has involved in crimes such as assault, murder, disturbance to the public peace and order, etc. There are 14 criminal
cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions of the Counter
Petitioner. The Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to properties, etc., and
thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations
cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary
that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent
harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order;
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Prabu @ Narayanan (33), s/o. Ganesan, a resident of No. 17, Raja Gopal
Giramani Thottam, Chinnaiyapuram, Muthialpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of
the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North) for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further
orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when
you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may
represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 07th day of June, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 94/2022 of I.R. No. 06/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./1536
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
525
Thiru Sivakumar @ Siva @ Track Siva (33),
S/o. Veerappan,
No. 07, Thiruvalluvar Street,
Viswanathan Nagar, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by Station House Officer, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Sivakumar @ Siva @
Track Siva to prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and
order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Sivakumar @ Siva @ Track Siva (33), s/o. Veerappan, a resident of
No. 07, Thiruvalluvar Street, Viswanathan Nagar, Muthialpet, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case submitted by the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 06/2022,
under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 22-04-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner have formed
a gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as disturbance to the public tranquility and order. The
Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the business people in the Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry limits. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the money earned from the
public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality, being afraid of the Counter
Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated
that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
Sl.
Crime
Section
Name of the
Stage of
No.
No.
Police station
the case
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
1
09/05
Under sections 341, 324, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC
Muthialpet
Convicted
2
42/05
Under sections 448, 427 506 (ii) r/w 34 IPC
Muthialpet
Acquittal
3
298/05
324 IPC r/w 34 IPC
Grand Bazaar
Acquittal
4
233/06
Under section 25 of Arms Act
Muthialpet
Acquittal
5
269/06
294, 427, 506 (ii) 34 IPC
Muthialpet
Acquittal
6
57/07
324, 506 (ii) r/w 34 IPC
Muthialpet
Acquittal
7
303/07
Under section 25 of Arms Act
Muthialpet
Acquittal
8
116/08
379 r/w 34 IPC
Muthialpet
Acquittal
9
302/10
Under sections 147, 148, 302 r/w 149 IPC
Grand Bazaar
Acquittal
10
307/10
324, 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC
Odiansalai
Acquittal
11
117/11
Under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC r/w 149 IPC and 3(a) of
Muthialpet
Acquittal
Explosive Substances Act, 1908.
12
05/12
Under sections 147, 387, 323 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 14-01-2012.
Kalapet
Acquittal
13
32/12
Under sections 147, 427, 324, 506(ii) r/w 149 IPC, dated 06-02-2012.
Muthialpet
Acquittal
14
218/12
Under sections 386, 427 IPC and 3 of Explosive Substances
Orleanpet
Pending Trial
Act r/w 34 IPC.
15
220/12
Under sections 399, 402 IPC
Orleanpet
Pending Trial
16
214/13
Under sections 398 IPC
Cuddalore OT,
Pending Trial
Muthu Nagar (TN).
526
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
526
17
110/13
Under sections 147, 148, 307, 399 and 27(i) of Arms Act and
Annamalai Nagar, Pending Trial
3 of Explosives Substances Act.
Chidambaram (TN).
18
23/17
Under sections 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
19
871/2017
Under section 286 IPC r/w 4(1) (b) 5, 6 of Explosive Substances
Auroville (TN)
Pending Trial
Act, 1908 r/w 109 IPC.
20
94/18
Under section 25(1) (A) Arms Act, 1959
Muthialpet
Pending Trial
21
108/19
Under section 294(b), 394 r/w 34 IPC
Reddiyapalayam
Pending Trial
4. The Petitioner has also submitted that the Counter Petitioner is not a law abiding citizen and he has
often violated the conditions imposed by the Court while he was released on bail. It is also stated that the Counter
Petitioner has become a source of terror among the public. It is further stated that he is involved in selling of
ganjas to teenagers and also very active notorious rowdy element and his associates are often doing rowdism,
collecting mamools from the business people and therefore, his criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking
the security proceedings under the Cr.P.C.
5. The Petitioner further sumbitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits,
it is apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault
and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence,
the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against
the Counter Petitioner to not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court for a period of two months as to prevent
danger to the human life and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner.A notice was served to both the parties on 25-05-2022 to appear for the hearing
on 07-06-2022 at 10.00 a.m. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his wife,
S. Santhiya. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 07-06-2022, the Petitioner Thiru P. Sivaprakassam, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police information report/petition, it is stated that the activities of Thiru Sivakumar @ Siva @
Track Siva is in such a manner that they may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order and
public tranquility. He has involved in crimes such as murder, assault, unlawful activities and disturbance to the
public peace and order. There were 21 criminal cases registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also
heard the oral submissions of the Counter Petitioner. The Counter Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has filed
this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to properties, etc., and
thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations
cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary
that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent
harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order;
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
527
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Sivakumar @ Siva @ Track Siva (33), s/o. Veerappan, a resident of No. 07,
Thiruvalluvar Street, Viswanathan Nagar, Muthialpet, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction
of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North) for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any
further orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier
except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter
Petitioner may represent against this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 07th day of June, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 97/2022 of I.R. No. 09/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./1533
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Gnanasegar (32),
S/o. Munusamy,
No. 53, Maravady Street,
Kurusukuppam, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Gnanasegar (32) to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Gnanasegar (32), s/o. Munusamy, a resident of No. 53, Maravady
Street, Kurusukuppam, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case is submitted by the Station
House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 07/
2022, under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 28-04-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has
formed a gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as disturbance to the public tranquility and order
by showing deadly weapons. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the
business people in the Muthialpet Police Station limits, Puducherry. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life
with the money earned from the public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality,
being afraid of the Counter Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection,
the Petitioner has stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
528
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
528
1. Cr. No. 33/12 under sections 147, 427, 324, 506(ii) r/w 149 IPC, dated 06-02-2012 of Muthialpet Police
Station, Puducherry.
2. Cr. No. 78/15 under sections 294 (b), 323, 324, 427, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 09-08-2015 of Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry.
3. Cr. No. 40/16 under sections 143, 341 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 05-05-2016 of Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
4. Cr. No. 44/16 under sections 341, 294(b), 323, 506(i) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 12-05-2016 of Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry.
5. Cr. No. 107/17 under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC r/w 149 IPC of Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry.
6. Cr. No. 132/17 under sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 25-11-2017 of Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry.
7. Cr. No. 37/2018 under sections 147, 148, 302 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 06-03-2018 of Grand Bazaar Police
Station, Puducherry.
8. Cr. No. 94/2019 under sections 120(B), 148, 341, 302, 109 r/w 149 IPC, dated 08-12-2019 of Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his rowdy gang to meet out in case trials and daily
expenses. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is not a law abiding person and therefore, his
criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking the mere security proceedings under the Cr.P.C.
5. The Petitioner further stated that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits, it is
apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault
and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence,
the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against
the Counter Petitioner to not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court for a period of two months as to prevent
danger to the human life and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 25-05-2022 to appear for the hearing
on 07-06-2022 at 10.00 a.m. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice was received by the Counter Petitioner.
7. On 07-06-2022, the Petitioner Thiru. P. Sivaprakassam, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present. The learned Counsel, Thiru B. Narasimmabalan, was present
and represented on behalf of the Counter Petitioner.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police information report/petition, it is stated that the activities of Thiru Gnanasegar is in such a
manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order and public tranquility. He has
involved in crimes such as murder, assault, unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There
are 8 criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral submissions
of the Learned Counsel for the Counter Petitioner. The Learned Counsel for the Counter Petitioner has stated that
the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to public properties, etc.,
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
529
and thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations
cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary
that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C. is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent
harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Gnanasegar (32), s/o. Munusamy, a resident of No. 53, Maravady Street,
Kurusukuppam, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate
Court (North) for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the
Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to
attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this
order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 07th day of June, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 98/2022 of I.R. No. 11/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C./1535
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr. P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs
Thiru Gnanavel (33),
S/o. Munusamy,
No. 53, Maravady Street,
Kurusukuppam, Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry,
praying to pass orders under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Gnanavel (33) to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Gnanavel (33), s/o. Munusamy, a resident of No. 53, Maravady Street,
Kurusukuppam, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case is submitted by the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station through the Superintendent of Police (East), Puducherry vide I.R.No. 11/2022,
under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 28-04-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed
a gang of rowdies and bent upon indulging in crime such as disturbance to the public tranquility and order by
showing deadly weapons. The Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and the business
530
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
530
people in the Muthialpet Police Station, limits Puducherry. It is also stated that he is leading lavish life with the
money earned from the public and business people by threatening. As a result, the people of the locality being
afraid of the Counter Petitioner, do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him. In this connection, the
Petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr.No. 03/2010 under sections 147, 148, 302 r/w 149 IPC, dated 07-01-2010 of Kirumampakkam Police
Station, Puducherry.
2. Cr. No. 156/2010 under sections 302 IPC @ 147, 148, 302 IPC and 3 of Explosive Substances Act r/w
149 IPC, dated 09-07-2010 of Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry.
3. Cr.No. 238/2010 under sections 147, 148, 307 IPC r/w 149 IPC, dated 08-11-2010 of Muthialpet Police
Station, Puducherry.
4. Cr.No. 189/2011 under sections 147, 148, 302, 109 r/w 149 IPC, dated 21-08-2011 of Muthialpet Police
Station, Puducherry.
5. Cr.No. 320/2011 under sections 27 of Arms Act and 34 B-IX of PP Act, dated 10-12-2011 of Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry.
6. Cr.No. 33/2012 under sections 147, 427, 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 149 IPC.
7. Cr.No. 143/2012 under sections 452, 427, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 26-07-2012.
8. Cr.No. 91/2012 under sections 147, 148, 341, 332, 333, 302, 307, 109 IPC, 3 of PDPP Act and 3 of Explosive
Substances Act, 1908 r/w 149 IPC, dated 10-08-2012.
9. Cr.No. 78/2015 under sections 294(b), 323, 324, 427, 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC, dated 09-08-2015.
10. Cr.No. 2/2016 under sections 294(b), 509, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 06-01-2016 of Muthialpet Police
Station, Puducherry.
11. Cr.No. 5/2016 under sections 294(b), 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC, dated 07-01-2016 of Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
12. Cr.No. 132/2017 under sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated 25-11-2017 of Muthialpet
Police Station, Puducherry.
13. Cr. No. 94/2019 under sections 120 (b), 147, 148, 302 IPC r/w 149 IPC of Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry.
4. It is also stated in the I.R. that the Station House Officer has received reliable information that the Counter
Petitioner is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain his rowdy gang to meet out in case trials and daily
expenses. The Petitioner further stated that the Counter Petitioner is involved in selling of ganjas to teenagers and
he is not a law abiding person and therefore, his criminal activities cannot be prevented by invoking the mere security
proceedings under Cr.P.C.
5. The Petitioner further stated that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside in Muthialpet limits, it is
apprehended that he would continue to indulge in serious offences like attempt to murder, hurt, damages, assault
and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence,
the Station House Officer, Muthialpet Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 Cr.P.C. against
the Counter Petitioner to not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court for a period of two months as to prevent
danger to the human life and properties and disturbance to the public tranquility and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter Petitioner to show cause against
the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was served to both the parties on 25-05-2022 to appear for the hearing
on 07-06-2022 at 10.00 a.m. It was instructed to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House
Officer, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was received by his wife Tmt.
G. Manju. The service was held sufficient for the Counter Petitioner.
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
531
7. On 07-06-2022, the Petitioner Thiru G. Kalaiarasan, Sub-Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station,
Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner were present. The learned Counsel, Thiru B. Narasimmabalan, was present
and represented on behalf of the Counter Petitioner.
8. I have heard both the sides and carefully gone through all the available records in file placed by the
Petitioner. In the Police information report/petition, it is stated that the activities of the Counter Petitioner is in
such a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order and public tranquility. He
has involved in crimes such as murder, assault, unlawful activities and disturbance to the public peace and order.
There are 13 criminal cases were registered against him in various Police Stations. I have also heard the oral
submissions of the Learned Counsel for the Counter Petitioner. The Learned Counsel for the Counter Petitioner has
stated that the Petitioner has filed this false case with an ulterior motive.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the opinion
that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will
continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, damages to properties, etc., and
thereby become a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations
cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary
that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent
harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
10. Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional Magistrate (North), Puducherry,
in exercise of the powers conferred under section 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and
prohibit the Counter Petitioner Thiru Gnanavel (33), s/o. Munusamy, a resident of No. 53, Maravady Street,
Kurusukuppam, Puducherry, from entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate
Court (North) for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the
Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to
attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this
order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 07th day of June, 2022, pronounced in the open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”
Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.