Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23

[593]

®ı

Amflºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2022 }

gÔ¸‚ |

9 {

No.

32

Poudouchéry

Mardi

9

Août

2022 (18 Sravana 1944)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

9th

August

2022

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^..

594

Sentence arbitral du travail

.. 594

Award of the Labour Court

.. 594

de tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

..

597

Notifications du Gouvernement

.. 597

Government Notifications

.. 597

Œ©√ ∂§s©A

..

601

Avis d’ appel d’ offres

.. 601

Tender Notice

.

601

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

..

602

Etablissements dangereux

.. 602

Dangerous Establishments

..

602

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

..

604

Annonces

.. 604

Announcements

..

604

594

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[9 August 2022

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 110/AIL/Lab./T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 27th June 2022)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (T) No. 06/2019, dated

21-03-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Puducherry, in respect of the industrial dispute between

the management of M/s. Automotive Coaches and

Components Limited, P.L. Haulwel Trailers Division,

Industrial Area, Sedarapet, Puducherry and Union

workmen represented by P.L. Haulwel Trailers Labour

Union (AICCTU), Sithankudi, Puducherry, over illegal

layoff and closure;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

D. MOHAN KUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Thiru R. BHARANIDHARAN, M.L.

Presiding Officer.

Monday, the 21st day of March, 2022.

I.D.(T). No. 06/2019

in

C.N.R. No. PYPY06-000012-2019

The Secretary,

P.L. Haulwel Trailers Labour Union (AICCTU),

Old No. 16/2, New No. 22, III Cross Street,

Sithankudi,

Puducherry-605 013.

. . Petitioners

Versus

The Managing Director,

M/s. Automotive Coaches and

Components Limited,

P.L. Haulwel Trailers Division,

Nos. 17-19, Industrial Area,

Sedarapet,

Puducherry-605 111.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on this day before

me for hearing, in the presence of Thiruvalargal

Dr. L. Solomon Raja, C. Prabagarane, C. Nathiya @

Backiyalakshmi and M. Mahalakshmi, Counsels for the

petitioners and the petitioner called absent and set

ex parte, upon perusing the records, this Court passed

the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No. 32/AIL/Lab./T/2019, dated 28-02-2019 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following

dispute between the petitioner and the respondent,

viz.,-

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Union

workmen represented by P.L. Haulwel Trailers Labour

Union (AICCTU), Sithankudi, Puducherry, against the

management of M/s. Automotive Coaches and

Components Limited, P.L. Haulwel Trailers Division,

Industrial Area, Sedarapet, Puducherry, over illegal

layoff and closure of the Union workmen listed in

Annexure-I are justified or not? If justified, what relief

the Union workmen are entitled to?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

2. Today, when the case came up for hearing.

Petitioners called absent. No representation. Petition is

pending for ex parte arguments for a long time. There

is no progress. Hence, the reference is closed for

non-prosecution.

Written and pronounced by me in the open Court on

this the 21st day of March, 2022.

R. BHARANIDHARAN,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

ANNEXURE-I

Sl.

Name

No.

(1)

(2)

Thiruvalargal:

1.

R. Saravanan

2.

B. Saravanan

3.

E. Anandhan

595

9 August 2022]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

4.

G. Jagathalapradhapan

5.

I. Moorthy

6.

M. Ramachandiran

7.

K. Murugan

8.

R. Christudoss

9.

R. Ponnian

10.

R. Subramanian

11.

T. Palani

12.

S. Manivannan

13.

G. Thirunavukarasu

14.

D. Subrayan

15.

S. Ajees

16.

S. Kasinathan

17.

M. Pandi

18.

P.K. Murugan

19.

T. Balu

20.

S. Sundaramurthy

21.

K. Ganasundar

22.

R. Chandiran

23.

M. Anbu

24.

A. Sivakumar

25.

V. Kasinathan

26.

M. Vijayaboopathy

27.

R. Rajasekar

28.

K.T. Anilkumar

29.

R. Sarangapani

30.

A. Arockiyasamy

31.

J. Parthiban

32.

T. Ramkumar

33.

R. Periyasamy

34.

K. Munisamy

35.

S. Venkatesan

36.

S.P. Murugan

37.

S. Ramasamy

38.

M. Seenuvasan

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 111/AIL/Lab./T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 28th June 2022)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (T) No. 17/2018, dated

29-03-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Puducherry, in respect of the industrial dispute between

the management of M/s. Sri Lakshmi Narayana Institute

of Medical Sciences, Koodapakkam Post, Puducherry

and SLIMS Annaithu Thozhilalargal Nalasangam,

Nellithope, Puducherry, over charter of demands such

as to fix the basic wages for non-teaching staff in the

Pay Structure to ` 7,000 to fix the FDA for ` 3,000 to

fix the HRA for ` 2,000 to fix the Conveyance Allowance

for ` 2,000 and other allowances, etc.;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991 it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

D. MOHAN KUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Thiru R. BHARANIDHARAN, M.L.

Presiding Officer.

Tuesday, the 29th day of March, 2022.

I.D.(T). No. 17/2018

in

C.N.R. No. PYPY06-000075-2018

The President,

SLIMS Annaithu Thozhilalargal Nala Sangam,

No. 30, Savari Padayatchi Street,

Nellithope,

Puducherry-605 005.

. . Petitioner

Versus

(1)

(2)

Thiruvalargal:

596

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[9 August 2022

The Managing Director,

M/s. Sri Lakshmi Narayana Institute

of Medical Sciences,

Osudu, Agaram Village,

Villianur Commune,

Koodapakkam Post,

Puducherry-605 502.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on this day before me

for hearing, in the presence of Thiruvalargal R.T. Shankar,

A. Ashokkumar, P. Suresh and B. Balamurugan, Counsels,

for the petitioner and Thiruvalargal A. Sivakumar,

S.K. Sivasankaran and N. Sivaraman, Counsels, for the

respondent, upon perusing the records, this Court

passed the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No. 121/AIL/Lab./T/2018, dated 09-08-2018 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following dispute

between the petitioner and the respondent, viz., -

(i) Whether the dispute raised by SLIMS Annaithu

Thozhilalargal Nalasangam, Nellithope, Puducherry,

against the manangement of M/s. Sri Lakshmi

Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Koodapakkam

Post, Puducherry, over charter of demands such as

to fix the basic wages for non-teaching staff in the

Pay Structure to ` 7 ,000 to fix the FDA for ` 3,000

to fix the HRA for ` 2,000 to fix the Conveyane

Allowance for ` 2,000 and other allowances, etc., is

justified or not? If justified, what relief the petitioner

Union entitled to?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

2. Today, when the case came up for hearing.

Respondent’s Counsel present. Petitioner called absent.

No representation. Petitioner is continuously absent for

several hearings. There is no progress in this case for

so many hearings due to the absence of the petitioner.

Hence, the reference is closed for non-prosecution by

the petitioner.

Written and pronounced by me in the open Court on

this the 29th day of March, 2022.

R. BHARANIDHARAN,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 112/AIL/Lab./T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 28th June 2022)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 07/2021, dated

09-05-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Puducherry, in respect of the industrial dispute between

the management of M/s. RVS Educational Trust, Karaikal

and Thiru S. Suresh, Porayar, over non-employment;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

D. MOHAN KUMAR,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Thiru M. ELAVARASAN, B.SC., LLB.,

Presiding Officer (FAC).

Monday, the 09th day of May 2022.

I.D.(L). No. 07/2021

in

C.N.R. No. PYPY06-000015-2021

Thiru S. Suresh,

No. 5B/16, Parvathi Amman Koil Street,

Porayar, Karaikal.

. . Petitioner

Versus

The Managing Director,

RVS Educational Trust,

Kalikuppam,

Thiruvettakudi,

Kottucherry Commune,

Karaikal.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on this day before

me for hearing, in the presence of the petitioner party

in person and Thiru S. Balaji, Counsel, for the

respondent, upon perusing the records, this Court

passed the following:

597

9 August 2022]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No. 35/AIL/Lab./T/2021, dated 03-05-2021 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following

dispute between the petitioner and the respondent, viz.,-

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner

Thiru S. Suresh, Porayar, against the management of

M/s. RVS Educational Trust, Karaikal, over

non-employment is justified or not? If justified, what

relief the petitioner is entitled to?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

2. Today, when the case came up for hearing,

petitioner called absent. Already RPAD served to

the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for

default.

Written and pronounced by me in the open Court on

this the 09th day of May, 2022.

M. ELAVARASAN,

Presiding Officer (FAC),

Employees State Insurance Court,

Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 36/FD/F2/A2/2022-2023,

Puducherry, dated 19th July 2022)

NOTIFICATION

On acceptance of the Notice of voluntary retirement

given under rule 48 (A) (1) of Central Civil Service

(Pension) Rules, 1972 by Thiru M. Mahaboubatcha,

Senior Accounts Officer, Directorate of Health and

Family Welfare Services, Puducherry, he is admitted into

voluntary retirement from service with effect from the

afternoon of 31-08-2022.

(By order)

K. GOVINDARAJAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 114/Lab./AIL/T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 26th July 2022)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the

management of M/s. Puducherry Road Transport

Corporation (PRTC), Puducherry and PRTC Pattali

Oppantha Thozhilalargal Sangam, Puducherry, over

regularization of contract in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the

Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference

as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal,

Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order

of reference and also forward a copy of such statement

to each one of the opposite parties involved in the

dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner’s

Union, PRTC Pattali Oppantha Thozhilalargal Sangam,

against the management of M/s. Puducherry Road

Transport Corporation (PRTC), Puducherry, over

regularization of contract to the Drivers/Conductors

as mentioned in the Annexure who gave worked

continously for 240 days on par with the regular

workers from the year 2015 onwards is legal and

justified? If justified, to give appropriate direction to

what remedies to be entitled in this dispute?