Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ
La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry
The Gazette of Puducherry
∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|
Publiée par Autorité
Published by Authority
Registered with the Registrar
of Newspapers for India
under No. 10410
Registered No. PY/44/2021-23
[593]
®ı
Amflºƒˆ
ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\
2022 }
gÔ¸‚ |
9 {
No.
32
Poudouchéry
Mardi
9
Août
2022 (18 Sravana 1944)
No.
Puducherry
Tuesday
9th
August
2022
ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD
SOMMAIRES
CONTENTS
√¬ÔD
Page
Page
ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^..
594
Sentence arbitral du travail
.. 594
Award of the Labour Court
.. 594
de tribunal.
∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^
..
597
Notifications du Gouvernement
.. 597
Government Notifications
.. 597
Œ©√ ∂§s©A
..
601
Avis d’ appel d’ offres
.. 601
Tender Notice
.
601
g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^
..
602
Etablissements dangereux
.. 602
Dangerous Establishments
..
602
ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^
..
604
Annonces
.. 604
Announcements
..
604
597
9 August 2022]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
AWARD
This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference
made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.
No. 35/AIL/Lab./T/2021, dated 03-05-2021 of the Labour
Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following
dispute between the petitioner and the respondent, viz.,-
(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner
Thiru S. Suresh, Porayar, against the management of
M/s. RVS Educational Trust, Karaikal, over
non-employment is justified or not? If justified, what
relief the petitioner is entitled to?
(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms
of money if, it can be so computed?
2. Today, when the case came up for hearing,
petitioner called absent. Already RPAD served to
the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for
default.
Written and pronounced by me in the open Court on
this the 09th day of May, 2022.
M. ELAVARASAN,
Presiding Officer (FAC),
Employees State Insurance Court,
Puducherry.
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Ms. No. 36/FD/F2/A2/2022-2023,
Puducherry, dated 19th July 2022)
NOTIFICATION
On acceptance of the Notice of voluntary retirement
given under rule 48 (A) (1) of Central Civil Service
(Pension) Rules, 1972 by Thiru M. Mahaboubatcha,
Senior Accounts Officer, Directorate of Health and
Family Welfare Services, Puducherry, he is admitted into
voluntary retirement from service with effect from the
afternoon of 31-08-2022.
(By order)
K. GOVINDARAJAN,
Under Secretary to Government (Finance).
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 114/Lab./AIL/T/2022,
Puducherry, dated 26th July 2022)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the
management of M/s. Puducherry Road Transport
Corporation (PRTC), Puducherry and PRTC Pattali
Oppantha Thozhilalargal Sangam, Puducherry, over
regularization of contract in respect of the matter
mentioned in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV
of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to
Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.
The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the
Award within 3 months from the date of issue of reference
as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with
rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,
1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement
of claim complete with relevant documents, list of
reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal,
Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order
of reference and also forward a copy of such statement
to each one of the opposite parties involved in the
dispute.
ANNEXURE
(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner’s
Union, PRTC Pattali Oppantha Thozhilalargal Sangam,
against the management of M/s. Puducherry Road
Transport Corporation (PRTC), Puducherry, over
regularization of contract to the Drivers/Conductors
as mentioned in the Annexure who gave worked
continously for 240 days on par with the regular
workers from the year 2015 onwards is legal and
justified? If justified, to give appropriate direction to
what remedies to be entitled in this dispute?
598
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[9 August 2022
(ii) If justified, to give appropriate direction to
what remedies the workmen, represented by the
PRTC Pattali Oppantha Thozhilalargal Sangam,
are entitled to?
(By order)
P. MUTHU MEENA,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
ANNEXURE
List of Drivers/Conductors
Sl.
Name of the workmen
Designation
No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Thiruvalargal:
1
R. Vinayagamoorthy
Driver
2
J. Chitra
Conductor
3
S. Sakthivel
Driver
4
P. Saravanan
Conductor
5
J. Thirunavukarasu
-do-
6
P. Vazhumuni
Driver
7
P. Muruganandhan
-do-
8
R. Madhanraj
-do-
9
K. Maduraimuthu
-do-
10
A. Chandrasekaran
-do-
11
K. Ramesh
Conductor
12
G. Venkatesan
Driver
13
A. Gnanapragasam
-do-
14
S. Thamizharasi
Conductor
15
J. Murugan
Driver
16
S. Raja
-do-
17
M. Anbumani
-do-
18
N. Ravi
Conductor
19
D. Vanisree
-do-
20
M.S. Kaarthigan
-do-
21
J. Vasantharaj
-do-
22
P. Balamurugan
Driver
23
B. Jayaprkash
-do-
24
T. Prakash
Conductor
25
S. Veerasamy
Driver
26
A. Baskar
-do-
27
V. Pathmarajan
Conductor
28
R. Rajeswararao
Driver
29
S. Kuppan
Conductor
30
J. Arulvinayagam
Driver
31
A. Nandakumar
-do-
32
D. Vetrivelan
Conductor
33
A. Anandababu
Driver
34
T. Durai
Conductor
35
R. Gangadaran
-do-
36
S. Thirumugam
-do-
37
R. Govindaraj
-do-
38
K. Iyyappan
Driver
39
N. Padmaraja
Conductor
40
G. Ulaganathan
Driver
41
G. Parthiban
-do-
42
V. Sankar
Conductor
43
R. Vadamalai
-do-
44
R Nandhinidevi
-do-
45
S. Tharaniraja
-do-
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 115/Lab./AIL/T/2022,
Puducherry, dated 26th July 2022)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College, Karaikal
and the Union workmen represented by Union for All
Staff in Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College and
Hospital, P.K. Salai, Karaikal, over grant of promotion
to Thiru V. Ramanathan, Theatre Assistant to the post
of Operation Theatre Technician or its equal pay, in
respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this
order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L., dated 23-05-1991, of
the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central
Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary
to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.
The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the
Award within 3 months from the date of issue of
reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of
(1)
(2)
(3)
Thiruvalargal:
599
9 August 2022]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in
accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall
file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the
Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the
receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy
of such statement to each one of the opposite parties
involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
1. Whether the industrial dispute raised by Union
for all staff in Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College
and Hosptial, Karaikal, against the management of
M/s. Vinayaka Missions’s Medical College, Karaikal,
over grant of promotion to Thiru V. Ramanathan,
Theatre Assistant to the post of Operation Theatre
Technician or its equal pay is justified or not?
2. If justified, what relief Thiru V. Ramanathan is
entitled to?
3. To compute the relief, in terms of money
if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
P. MUTHU MEENA,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 116/Lab./AIL/T/2022,
Puducherry, dated 26th July 2022)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited and
Chemcrown Exports and Suolificio Linea Italia (India)
Private Limited Thozhilalargal Sangam (Affiliated with
CITU), over payment of Bonus for the year 2020-21, in
respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this
order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L., dated 23-05-1991 of
the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the
powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central
Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary
to Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.
The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the
Award within 3 months from the date of issue of
reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in
accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall
file a statement of claim complete with relevant
documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the
Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the
receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy
of such statement to each one of the opposite parties
involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioners
Union Chemcrown Exports and Suolificio Linea Italia
(India) Private Limited Thozhilalargal Sangam,
against the management of M/s. Suolificio Linea Italia
(India) Private Limited, Puducherry, over payment of
maximum Bonus @ 20% for the year 2020-2021 along
with ` 10,000 as ex gratia amount is legal and
justified? If justified, to give appropriate direction?
(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms
of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
P. MUTHU MEENA,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
NO. 7234/Lab./E1/2019/1336.
Puducherry, the 27th July 2022.
NOTIFICATION
It is hereby informed that the original Provisional National Trade Certificate (PNTC) and original National
Trade Certificate (NTC) of the ex-trainee as mentioned below is reported to have been lost beyond the scope
of recovery.
600
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[9 August 2022
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 117/Lab./AIL/T/2022,
Puducherry, dated 28th July 2022)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an
industrial dispute has arisen between the management
of M/s. MRF Limited, Puducherry and Thiru J. Karlmarks,
over non-employment in respect of the matter mentioned
in the Annexure to this order;
And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is
necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated
vide G. O. Ms. No. 20/91/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the
Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers
conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV
of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to
Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred
to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The
Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award
within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as
stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with
rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,
1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement
of claim complete with relevant documents, list of
reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,
within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference
and also forward a copy of such statement to each one
of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.
ANNEXURE
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner
Thiru J. Karlmarx against the management of
M/s. MRF Limited, Puducherry, over non-employment
is justified or not? If justified, what relief he is
entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms
of money if, it can be so computed?
(By order)
P. MUTHU MEENA,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
(SECRETARIAT WING)
(G.O. Ms. No. 06/Ind.&Com./Tech/B4/RCP/2022-23,
Puducherry, dated 29th July 2022)
NOTIFICATION
In the D.O. Letter No. 9-250220/10/2020-EoDB, dated
10-08-2020 of the Department for Promotion of Industry
and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry,
Government of India, New Delhi, has stated that it has
been made the Nodal Department for coordinating the
exercise of minimizing regulatory compliance burden as
it also coordinates “Ease of Doing Business” and
“Global Competitiveness Index”, which relate to
compliance of different types across Ministries/
Departments. Apart from Central Ministries/Departments,
many of the regulatory compliances/filings/approvals/
licenses/permits, etc., emanate from State Level Acts and
Regulations.
Sl.
Name of the ITI
Name of the
Name of the
Year of
Sl. No. of
No.
trainee
trade
passing
PNTC/NTC
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1
Government I.T.I. (Men),
S. Venugopal
Fitter
July 1996
PNTC-15/FR
T. R. Pattinam,
NTC-110108.
Karaikal.
Hence, it is proposed to issue duplicate certificate to the candidate. If, the Provisional and National
Trade Certificates are found by anybody, they should be sent to the undersigned as they are no longer valid.
P. SARAVANAN,
Assistant Director (Training).
————
601
9 August 2022]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
2. In the light of above, it has requested the
Government to prepare a plan of action and roadmap
for reducing and rationalizing the overall compliance
burden emanating from the State/Union Territory:
(a)
By examining Acts and compliances which are
obsolete and to remove redundant laws and
compliances.
(b)
To do business process reengineering to
reduce, rationalize and simplify the multitude of
Acts, Rules and Administrative orders.
(c)
To digitise all processes so as to do away with
all physical submission of papers.
3. After considering the above, the Government
hereby entrusts the task of examining the Acts and
compliances which are outdated and removing
redundant laws and compliances to the Law Department,
Puducherry. The Law Department is requested to
examine the Laws/Rules/Regulations that are in force in
the Union territory of Puducherry and to suggest which
of the Acts/Rules/Regulations can be
(a)
Repealed.
(b)
Subsumed under other Acts.
(c)
Replaced or amended with new progressive
Acts.
(d)
Regulations which can be decriminalized.
4. In this regard, a Screening Committee, as composed
below shall be constituted and all the Heads of
Departments/Government Agencies concerned are
requested to identify their compliances on business,
take action in the examining Acts and compliances
which are outdated and remove redundant laws, and
compliances and to do business process reengineering
to reduce, rationalize and simplify the multitude of Acts,
Rules and Administrative Orders.
(i)
The Secretary to Government . . Chairman
(Law), Puducherry.
(ii)
The Under Secretary to
. . Member
Government (Law), Puducherry.
(iii)
The Head of Departments
. . Member
concerned Government of
Puducherry.
(iv)
The Additional Secretary to
. . Member-
Government (lndustries and
Convenor
Commerce), Government of
Puducherry.
5. In order to achieve the task of reducing
compliance burden within the time frame fixed by
Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal
Trade, Government of India, a Steering Committee
headed by the Chief Secretary is constituted to monitor
the compliance work done by all Heads of Departments
concerned on the action points at para 2 (a), (b) and
(c) ibid.
(i)
The Chief Secretary to
. . Chairman
Government, Puducherry.
(ii)
The Secretary to Government
. . Member
(Law), Puducherry.
(iii)
The Secretaries to Government . . Members
(Department Concerned),
Puducherry.
(iv)
The Secretary to Government
. . Member-
(Industries and Commerce),
Convenor
Puducherry.
6. Both the Screening Committee and Steering
Committee
shall
have
intensive
and
detailed
discussions to understand the ground level issues more
precisely and address the same. Special focus shall be
laid to identify more number of compliances for the
exercise of decriminalisation of existing Acts/Rules.
Status of compliances reduced/deleted/reengineered/
made on-line/simplified/reduced frequency/made forms
and submissions easier and hassle free regular update
on the Regulatory Compliance Portal shall also be
discussed. All the outcome of the discussions/actions
taken report shall be communicated to the Nodal Officer
for Regulatory Compliance Burden.
7. The Committees shall convene atleast once in
a month to review the work done in the process of
decriminalisation. However, based on the exigency of
service, the Committees shall meet more often as
required.
(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)
V. MOKAN KUMAR,
Under Secretary to Government
(Industries and Commerce).
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL
OULGARET, PUDUCHERRY
TENDER NOTICE
Sealed tenders offering the rates are invited for the
sale of old/unserviceable/obsolete furniture and dead
stock items as detailed in the Annexure belonging to
this Institution in “as is where is condition”.