[ 1927 ]
IN THE COURT OF THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 182/2022 of I.R. No. 28/2022 Under Section 144 of Cr.P.C./2976
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Ariyankuppam Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs.
Thiru Sathish @ Mambazha Sathish @
Manikandan (27),
S/o. Dharmaraj,
No. 58, Sudalai Street,
Manavely, Ariyankuppam,
Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
Registered with the Registrar
of Newspapers for India
under No. 10410
Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ
La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry
The Gazette of Puducherry
PART - I
E≈©A ÿkπX|
EXTRAORDINAIRE
EXTRAORDINARY
∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈
Publiée par
Published by
ÿkπX|
Autorité
Authority
Registered No. PY/44/2021-23
®ı
Amflºƒˆ
A>[˛wÁ\
2022 }
ÂkD√Ï |
2 {
No.
144
Poudouchéry
Mercredi
2
Novembre
2022 (11 Kartika 1944)
No.
Puducherry
Wednesday
2nd
November
2022
1928
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
1928
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer,
Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section
144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Sathish @ Mambazha Sathish @ Manikandan (27) to
prevent imminent danger to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the
public tranquility and order, in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Sathish @ Mambazha Sathish @
Manikandan (27), son of Dharmaraj, No. 58, Sudalai Street, Manavely,
Ariyankuppam, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case
submitted by the Station House Officer, Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry,
through the Superintendent of Police (South), Puducherry vide I.R. No.28/2022
under sectiion 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 05-08-2022. Therein, it has been stated that the
Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and bent up on indulging in crime
such as murder, attempt to murder, dacocity, theft, hurt, explosive cases. The Counter
Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants. It is also stated that
he is extorting money from the local merchants and is leading lavish life with the
money earned through exortion. As a result, the people of the locality being afraid
of the Counter petitioner do not come forward to lodge any complaint against him.
It is also stated that even witnesses don’t come forward voluntarily to give evidence
against him in the cases where you are the accused. In this connection, the
petitioner had stated that the following criminal cases were registered against the
Counter Petitioner.
1. 3(2) of the Puducherry Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 2008
of Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
2. Cr.No. 23/2015 under sections 323, 324, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated
17-02-2015 of Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry – Pending
Trial.
3. Cr.No. 79/2015 under sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 323, 324, 506 (ii) IPC,
dated 15-06-2015 of Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry –
Pending Trail.
4. Cr.No. 01/2016 under sections 147, 148, 307, 341, 324, 323 IPC r/w 149
IPC, dated 01-01-2016 of Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry –
Pending Trial.
5. Cr.No. 04/2020 under sections 356, 379, IPC r/w 34 IPC of Nedungadu
Police Station, Karaikal – Pending Trial.
6. Cr.No. 127/2020 under section 34, A3 PP Act of Nedungadu Police
Station, Karaikal – Pending Trial.
7. Cr.No. 876/2020 under sections 147, 341, 108, 302 IPC and 3 of Explosive
Act of Kottakuppam Police Station, Tamil Nadu – Pending Trial.
4. The Petitioner further submitted that the Counter Petitioner is a
notorious rowdy element and become a source of terror among the public. It is
also stated that he has involved in various offences by using aruval, knife and
explosive substances to attack the victims.
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
1929
5. It is also stated in the I.R that the Station House Officer has received
reliable information that he is desperate and is in dire need of money to maintain
his group of rowdy elements and to meet expenses in connection with the trial in
the pending criminal cases against him. The Counter Petitioner hatching plans to
threaten the business people in the Puducherry urban and rural areas and extort
money from them by threatening and he violated the conditions imposed by the
Criminal Courts and have scant respect to the judiciary and rule of law. The
Petitioner also stated that the Counter Petitioner earned displeasure among a
section of other rowdy group in the area on account of the grudge against him and
hence, rival group is also waiting opportunity to take revenge upon him.
6. The Petitioner further submitted that if, Counter Petitioner is allowed
to reside in Ariyankuppam limits, it is apprehended that you would continue to
indulge in serious offences like murder, extortion, damages, to public and private
properties, assault, obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby emerged as a
perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order.
Hence, the Station House Officer, Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry, has
prayed to invoke provisions under section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter
Petitioner do not to enter into the jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two
months as to prevent danger to the human life and properties, and disturbance to
the public tranquility and order;
7. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter
Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was
served to both the parties on 11-10-2022 to appear for the hearing on 17-10-2022
and further hearings on 18-10-2022 and 19-10-2022 at 10.00 a.m. It was instructed
to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer,
Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner
was received by his sister, Ms. D. Sangeetha. The service was held sufficient for
the Counter Petitioner.
8. On 19-10-2022, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Palanisamy,
Sub-Inspector, Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry, was present. The Counter
Petitioner has failed to appear before the Court on hearing date.
9. I have heard the petitioner and carefully gone through all the available
records placed before me. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that
the activities of Thiru Sathish @ Mambazha Sathish @ Manikandan (27) is in such
a manner that he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order,
and public tranquility. He has involved in crimes such as murder, assault, unlawful
activities and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are 7 criminal cases
were registered against him in various Police Stations.
10. On perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner, I am of the
opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my
jurisdiction, Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious
offences like murder, exortion, damages to public and private properties, assault,
obstructions, annoyance, etc., and thereby become a perennial source of threat to
the community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be
handled effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law
and hence, it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is
invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and
properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order;
1930
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
1930
Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional
Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of powers conferred under section 144(1)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitoner
Thiru Sathish @ Mambazha Sathish @ Manikandan (27), son of Dharmaraj, a
resident of No. 58, Sudalai Street, Manavely, Ariyankuppam, Puducherry, from
entering into the region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court
(North), for a period of two months from the date of this order or till any further
orders are passed by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law,
whichever is earlier except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of
the Courts in Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against
this order before the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 19th day of October, 2022 pronounced in the
open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
IN THE COURT OF THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 183/2022 of I.R. No. 37/2022 Under Section 144 of Cr.P.C./2977
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Mettupalayam Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs.
Thiru Rangaraj @ Pullian Kottai (23),
S/o. Ramalingam,
No. 31, East Street,
Sanarapet,
Mettupalayam,
Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer,
Mettupalayam Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section
144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Rangaraj @ Pullian Kottai to prevent imminent danger
to human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order,
in the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Rangaraj @ Pullian Kottai (23), son of
Ramalingam, a resident of No. 31, East Street, Sanarapet, Mettupalayam, Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case
is submitted by the Station House Officer, Mettupalayam Police Station with the
recommendation of the Superintendent of Police (North), Puducherry vide I.R. No.37/
2022, under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 09-09-2022. Therein, it has been stated
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
1931
that the Counter Petitioner has indulging in crime such as dacocity, riot, hurt,
intimidation and disturbance to the public tranquility and order. It is also stated
that the Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local inhabitants and
he is leading lavish life with the money earned through extortion. As a result, the
people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not come forward
to lodge any complaint against him. It is also stated that even witnesses don’t
come forward voluntarily to give evidence against him in the cases where he is the
accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the following criminal
cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr.No. 06/2021 under sections 294(b), 385 IPC, dated 24-01-2021 of
Reddiyarpalayam Police Station, Puducherry.
2. Cr.No. 02/2021 under sections 324, 397 IPC, dated 04-01-2021 of
Reddiyarpalayam Police Station, Puducherry.
3. Cr.No. 11/2020 under sections 294(b), 427, 324, 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC, dated
29-01-2020 of D’Nagar Police Station, Puducherry.
4. Cr.No.46/2019 under sections 302, 109 IPC r/w 34 IPC and 3 of Explosive
Substances Act, 1908 @ 120-B, 302,109 IPC r/w 34 IPC & 3 of Explosive
Substances Act, 1908, dated 23-09-2019 of Kalapet Police Station,
Puducherry.
5. Cr.No. 94/2019 under sections 294(b), 324, 307, 3 of Explosive
Substances Act, 1908 @ 302 IPC, dated 15-04-2019 of Vanur Police
Station, Tamil Nadu.
6. Cr.No. 19/2019 under section 25 (1) (a) of Arms Act, 1959, dated
20-02-2019.
7. Cr.No. 68/2018 under sections 294 (b), 324, 506 (ii) r/w 149 IPC, dated
19-04-2018 of Odiansalai Police Station, Puducherry.
8. Cr.No. 363/2018 under section 399 IPC, dated 19-04-2018 of
Kottakuppam Police Station, Tamil Nadu.
9. Cr.No. 33/2018 under sections 294 (b), 427, 506 (ii) IPC r/w 34 IPC, dated
19-04-2018 of Mettupalayam Police Station, Puducherry.
4. The Petitioner further submitted that the Counter Petitioner is a very
active notorious rowdy element and become a source of terror among the public. It
is also stated that he has involved in various offences by using aruval, knife to
attack the victims and he violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts
and have scant respect to the judiciary and rule of law.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, Counter Petitioner is allowed to
reside in Puducherry North limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to
indulge in serious offences like murder, extortion, assault, obstructions, annoyance,
damages to public and private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial
source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and Order. Hence, the
Station House Officer, Mettupalayam Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions
under section 144 Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the
jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the
human life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
1932
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
1932
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter
Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was
served to both the parties on 11-10-2022 to appear for the hearing on 17-10-2022
and the further hearing on 18-10-2022 and 19-10-2022 at 10.00 a.m. It was instructed
to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer,
Mettupalayam Police Station, Puducherry. The notice for the Counter Petitioner was
served by affixing it at his house in presence of two witnesses due to absence of
the Counter Petitioner at his house. The service was held sufficient for the Counter
Petitioner.
7. On 19-10-2022, the Petitioner represented by Thiru Arul, Assistant
Sub-Inspector, Mettupalayam Police Station, Puducherry, was present. The Counter
Petitioner has failed to appear before the Court on hearing date.
8. I have heard the Petitioner and carefully gone through all the available
records placed before me. In the Police Information Report/Petition, it is stated that
the activities of Thiru Rangaraj @ Pullian Kottai is in such a manner that he may
cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public tranquility.
He has involved in crimes such as murder, assault, unlawful activities and
disturbance to the public peace and order. There are nine criminal cases were
registered against him in various Police Station.
9. On perusal of the records submitted by the Petitioner and the
recommendation of the Superintendent of Police (North), I am of the opinion that
if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside within the limits of my jurisdiction,
the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge in and also motivate serious offences
like murder, assault, extortion, obstructions, annoyance, damages to public and
private properties etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source of threat to the
community and disturb public peace and order. Such situations cannot be handled
effectively by taking recourse to usual procedures contemplated by law and hence,
it is necessary that special provision under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to
take action against the Counter Petitioner to prevent harm to life and properties of
citizens and uphold public peace and order.
Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional
Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of powers conferred under section 144(1)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitoner
Thiru Rangaraj @ Pulian Kottai (23), son of Ramalingam, a resident of No. 31, East
Street, Sanarapet, Mettupalayam, Puducherry, from entering into the region under
the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a period of two
months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed by the
Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier except
when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in Puducherry.
However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before the
undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 19th day of October, 2022 pronounced in the
open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
1933
IN THE COURT OF THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (NORTH)
AT PUDUCHERRY
Present : Thiru M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
M.C. No. 184/2022 of I.R. No. 39/2022 Under Section 144 of Cr.P.C./2974
ORDER
(UNDER SECTION 144 OF Cr.P.C.)
State Represented by the Station House Officer,
Mettupalayam Police Station,
Puducherry.
. .
Petitioner
Vs.
Thiru Dhinesh @ Kokkadi (23),
S/o. Rajendiran,
No. 28, Pump House Street,
Seran Nagar,
Muthirayarpalayam,
Puducherry.
. .
Counter Petitioner
This petition along with case sheet is filed by the Station House Officer,
Mettupalayam Police Station, Puducherry, praying to pass orders under section
144 of Cr.P.C., against Thiru Dhinesh @ Kokkadi to prevent imminent danger to
human lives and properties, and disturbance to the public tranquility and order, in
the jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The Counter Petitioner is Thiru Dhinesh @ Kokkadi (23), son of Rajendiran,
a resident of No. 28, Pump House Street, Seran Nagar, Muthirayarpalayam,
Puducherry.
3. The facts which led up to the petition are briefly as follows: The case
is submitted by the Station House Officer, Mettupalayam Police Station with the
recommendation of the Superintendent of Police (North), Puducherry vide I.R.
No. 39/2022 under section 144 of Cr.P.C., dated 22-09-2022. Therein, it has been
stated that the Counter Petitioner has formed a gang of rowdies and involved in
murder, rioting and indulging to crime such as by using lethal weapons and exortion.
It is also stated that the Counter Petitioner has created panic in the minds of local
inhabitants and he is leading lavish life with the money earned through extortion.
As a result, the people of the locality being afraid of the Counter Petitioner do not
come forward to lodge any complaint against him. It is also stated that even
witnesses don’t come forward voluntarily to give evidence against him in the cases
where he is the accused. In this connection, the Petitioner had stated that the
following criminal cases were registered against the Counter Petitioner.
1. Cr.No. 77/2017 under sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 324, 506(i) r/w 149 IPC,
dated 29-03-2017 of D’Nagar Police Station, Puducherry – Pending
Trial.
2. Cr.No. 94/2019 under sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 307, 302, 120(b) IPC
r/w 149 IPC, 73 of Explosive Substances Act of Vanur Police Station,
Tamil Nadu – Pending Trial.
1934
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[ PART-I
1934
3. Cr. No. 11/2020 under sections 294 (b), 427, 324, 506(ii) r/w 34 IPC, dated
15-04-2020 of D’Nagar Police Station, Puducherry – Pending Trial.
4. The Petitioner further submitted that the Counter Petitioner is a
notorious rowdy element and become a source of terror among the public. The
Counter Petitoner collect mamool through his associates from the business people
of Mettupalayam areas and also planned to attack his rival parties. It is also stated
that he has involved in various offences by using aruval, knife to attack the victims
and he violated the conditions imposed by the Criminal Courts and have scant
respect to the judiciary and rule of law.
5. The Petitioner further submitted that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed
to reside in Puducherry North limits, it is apprehended that he would continue to
indulge in serious offences like hurt, assault, obstructions, annoyance, damages
to public and private properties, etc., and thereby emerged as a perennial source
of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order. Hence, the Station
House Officer, Mettupalayam Police Station has prayed to invoke provisions under
section 144 of Cr.P.C., against the Counter Petitioner do not to enter into the
jurisdiction of this Court, for a period of two months as to prevent danger to the
human life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
6. The proceeding was started by affording an opportunity to the Counter
Petitioner to show cause against the petition filed by the Petitioner. A notice was
served to both the parties on 11-10-2022 to appear for the hearing on 17-10-2022
and the further hearings on 18-10-2022 and 19-10-2022 at 10.00 a.m. It was instructed
to serve the notice to the Counter Petitioner through the Station House Officer,
Mettupalayam Police Station, Puducherry. The notice was served to the Counter
Petitioner.
7. On 19-10-2022, the Petitioner represented by Thiru K. Arul, Assistant
Sub-Inspector, Mettupalayam Police Station, Puducherry and the Counter Petitioner
were present.
8. I have heard the both the sides and carefully gone through all the
available records placed by the Petitioner. In the Police Information Report/Petition,
it is stated that the activities of Thiru Dhinesh @ Kokkadi is in such a manner that
he may cause breach of peace and create a problem of law and order, and public
tranquility. He has involved in crimes such as murder, assault, unlawful activities
and disturbance to the public peace and order. There are three criminal cases were
registered against him in various Police Station.
9. Upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the records submitted by
the Petitioner I am of the opinion that if, the Counter Petitioner is allowed to reside
within the limits of my jurisdiction, the Counter Petitioner will continue to indulge
in and also motivate serious offences like murder, assault, extortion, obstructions,
annoyance, damages to public and private properties, etc., and thereby emerged
as a perennial source of threat to the community and disturb public peace and order.
Such situations cannot be handled effectively by taking recourse to usual
procedures contemplated by law and hence, it is necessary that special provision
under section 144 of Cr.P.C., is invoked to take action against the Counter Petitioner
to prevent harm to life and properties of citizens and uphold public peace and order.
PART-I ]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
1935
Hence, I, M. Kandasamy, do hereby, in the capacity of Subdivisional
Magistrate (North), Puducherry, in exercise of powers conferred under section 144(1)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pass this order and prohibit the Counter Petitoner
Thiru Dhinesh @ Kokkadi (23), son of Rajendiran, a resident of No. 28, Pump
House Street, Seran Nagar, Muthirayarpalayam, Puducherry, from entering into the
region under the jurisdiction of the Subdivisional Magistrate Court (North), for a
period of two months from the date of this order or till any further orders are passed
by the Competent Authority revoking this prohibition as per law, whichever is earlier
except when you are summoned to attend the cases in any of the Courts in
Puducherry. However, the Counter Petitioner may represent against this order before
the undersigned by post or by Counsel.
At Puducherry, dated on this 19th day of October, 2022 pronounced in the
open Court.
M. KANDASAMY,
Subdivisional Magistrate (North).
————
online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”
Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.