[85]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

\Vk‚¶ ¿]√]BV_ ®|¬Ô©√|D ..

Procédure du Magistrate de District ..

Procedings of the District

º\_Â¶kΩ¬ÁÔÔ^

Magistrate

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

Sentence arbitral du Travail

Award of the Labour Court ..

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

101

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 101

Government Notifications

.. 101

∞È ∂§s©Ad

104

Vente publique

.. 104

Auction notice

104

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

105

Etablissements dangereux

.. 105

Dangerous Establishments

105

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

106

Annonces

.. 106

Announcements

106

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2023 }

ƒ™kˆ |

31 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Janvier

2023 (11 Magha 1944)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

31st

January

2023

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[31 January 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

No. 4582/DRDM/C3/PAWN/2016/7701.

Puducherry, dated 28th December 2022.

Present : E. Vallavan, I.A.S.,

District Collector-cum-District Magistrate.

Sub.

: DRDM – The Puducherry Pawn Brokers Act, 1966 – Public Auction – Sale of unredeemed

and time barred jewels – Permission Order – Issued – Reg.

Ref.

: 1. Application of Thiru N. Ajeet Kumar Jain, Pawn Broker, No. 67, Carpenter Street, Nellithope,

Puducherry-605 005, dated 15-09-2022.

2. Consent letter of Thiru B. Karthikeyan, 39A/32, Srinivasan Street, Thirupathiripuliyur,

Cuddalore Taluk – Authorized Auctioneer, dated 15-09-2022.

3. Report of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry vide Lt. No. 6636/DC(R)N/A7/

PB/2020-21/3456, dated 16-12-2022.

ORDER

Whereas, an application, dated 15-09-2022 was received from Thiru N. Ajeet Kumar Jain, Pawn Broker

(L.No. 199), No. 67, Carpenter Street, Nellithope, Puducherry-605 005, a licensed Pawn Broker requesting permission

of the District Magistrate to sell unredeemed and time barred articles in public auction;

2. And whereas, the list of unredeemed and time barred articles submitted by the Pawn Broker was forwarded

to the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, for causing physical verification of the articles and ascertain

that they remain unredeemed after the time allowed for redemption;

3. And whereas, the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, has furnished the report, stating that

the Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Puducherry, had conducted physical verification of the articles that are unredeemed and

time barred pledged with Thiru N. Ajeet Kumar Jain, Pawn Broker (L.No. 199), No. 67, Carpenter Street, Nellithope,

Puducherry-605 005 and reported that the articles mentioned in the application remained unredeemed past the time

allowed and the articles are kept in the licensed premises itself except the eight items vide Catalogue Nos. 81, 104,

119, 142, 150, 159, 235 and 248 of the list and the description of articles duly corrected in respect of the item at

Catalogue No. 39 vide letter cited under reference (3), which were redeemed subsequently, after the application of

the Pawn Broker cited at reference (1);

4. And whereas, the rule 12 of the Puducherry Pawn Brokers Rules, 1966 prescribes detailed procedure on

auctioning of pledges;

5. Now, therefore, Thiru B. Karthikeyan, Thirupathiripuliyur, Authorised Auctioneer, is permitted to conduct

within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order, the sale of unredeemed time barred articles, pledges as

shown in the list enclosed and available with the Pawn Broker, Thiru N. Ajeet Kumar Jain, Pawn Broker (L.No. 199),

No. 67, Carpenter Street, Nellithope, Puducherry-605 005, in public auction in the licensed premises of the Pawn Broker

at the above address, as per the list approved and sent to the Pawn Broker and the Auctioneer, except Catalogue

Nos. 81, 104, 119, 142, 150, 159, 235 and 248 of the list, which were redeemed. The Pawn Broker and Auctioneer shall

observe the above formalities detailed as required under the rules framed under the Puducherry Pawn Brokers Act,

1966, before conducting the sale of time barred and unredeemed pledged articles in the public auction:

Sl.No.

Details of

Number of articles

articles

(Catalogue)

Gold

212

Silver

Brass

—

Total

267

E. VALLAVAN, I.A.S.,

District Collector-cum-District Magistrate.

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[31 January 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 175/AIL/Lab./T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 15th December 2022)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (T) No. 16/2018, dated

15-09-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Puducherry, in respect of dispute between the

management of M/s. Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited,

Puducherry

and

Shasun

Chemical

Staff

Union,

Ariyankuppam, Puducherry, over inclusion of apprentice

period for counting the terminal benefits of Thiru. John Arthur.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette, Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. V. Sofana Devi, M.L.

Presiding Officer.

Thursday, the 15th day of September, 2022

I.D. (T) No. 16/2018

C.N.R. No. PYPY06-000070-2018

The President,

Shasun Chemical Staff Union,

No. 20, Cuddalore Road,

Ariyankuppam,

Puducherry-605 007.

. . Petitioner

Vs.

The General Manager,

M/s. Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals Limited,

R.S.No. 33 & 34, Mathur Road,

Periyakalapet,

Puducherry-605 014.

. . Respondent

This Industrial dispute coming on 06-09-2022 before

me for final hearing in the presence of Tvl. S. Kalimuthu

@ Lenin Durai, Counsel for the Petitioner and

Tvl. L. Sathish, S. Velmurugan, E. Karthik and

S. Sudarasanan, Counsel for the Respondent, upon

hearing both sides, perusing the case records, after

having stood over for consideration till this day, this

Court delivered the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute has been referred by the

Government as per the G.O. Rt.No.118/AIL/LAB/T/

2018, dated 31-07-2018 for adjudicating whether the

industrial dispute raised by Shasun Chemical Staff

Union, Ariyankuppam, Puducherry, against the

Management of M/s. Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals

Ltd., Puducherry, over inclusion of apprentice period

for counting the terminal benefits of Thiru. John

Arthur is justified or not? If justified, what relief the

Petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any awarded in terms

of money, if, it can be so computed?

2. Brief averments made in the claim Statement of the

Petitioner are as follows:

The petitioner Mr. Y. John Arthur had worked in the

respondent company from 07-09-1991 to 11-02-2014 for

23 years 1 month and 4 days till his superannuation.

The respondent company had given him the gratuity

amount by calculating the service period of the

petitioner as 20 years only, not for 23 years. For which

the reason stated by the respondent company is that

the petitioner employee had worked from

07-01-1991 to 30-09-1993 only as apprentice i.e.,

2 years 8 months and 23 days for the such apprentice

31 January 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

period the gratuity amount cannot be paid and thus,

such period of his apprenticeship had not been

included while calculating the gratuity. This

calculation excluding the apprenticeship period

amounts to an adverse impact on the calculation of

petitioner/ employee's pension benefits, gratuity and

other benefits. The refusal to include the apprentice

period for the purpose of calculating the gratuity of

the respondent company amounts to violation of

Industrial Disputes Act. Under section 2 (s) of

Industrial Disputes Act, apprentice also included

under the category of workman. Hence, the

respondent company is liable to pay ` 26,040 to the

petitioner employee towards the gratuity for the

period 07-01-1991 to 30-09-1993. Hence, the petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

respondent are as follows:

(i) Petitioner has raised a dispute against a

company which does not exist. There was and is no

company by name Strides Shasun Pharmaceuticals

Limited and hence, no claim can be raised against

such no-existent company.

(ii) The very cause title of the reference and claim

petition is defective. One M/s. Shasun Pharmaceuticals

Limited, was engaged in the business of

manufacturing tablets and pharmaceutical products.

The said company was merged with M/s. Strides

Arcolab Limited by way of a scheme of Amalgamation

by the order of Hon'ble High Court in company

petition No.149/2015, dated 16-06-2015. The

Amalgamated company was then named as M/s.

Strides Shasun Limited and registered with Registrar

of company vide certificate of incorporation, dated

18-11-2015. Again it was changed to M/s. Strides

Pharma Science Limited and approved by Registrar

of company vide certificate of incorporation dated

18-07-2018. Hence, the nomenclature of the

respondent in the cause title of the petition is

erroneous and needs to be amended.

(iii) The present ID is raised by petitioner's Union

on behalf of one Mr. John Arthur seeking payment

of gratuity from 07-01-1991 to 30-09-1993, i.e., for

2 years 8 months and 23 days as apprentice in the

erstwhile company of the respondent is not

maintainable and liable to be rejected on following

grounds:–

(a) All issues pertaining to payment of gratuity

can be decided only by the special authority

constituted under section 3 of Payment of Gratuity

Act. Therefore, this Court has no inherent jurisdiction

to decide this petition.

(b) Petitioner already filed a petition before

Controlling Authority, Payment of Gratuity,

Puducherry in PG.No.41/2017 raising the dispute of

miscalculation. Having approach the competent

authority for Payment of Gratuity, petitioner cannot

approach this court also for computation of gratuity,

whether for the same period or for some other period.

an apprentice is worker. Even assuming petitioner

was an apprentice from 07-01-1991, to the Controlling

Authority, Payment of Gratuity in PG. No. 41/2017, the

petition for computation of gratuity is still not

entertainable. Petitioner cannot invoke section 2(s)

of Industrial Disputes Act for making a claim of

gratuity when section 2 (e) of Payment of Gratuity

Act, which is a special Statute governing payment

of gratuity defines the terms worker/employee.

(d) As per section 2(e) of Payment of Gratuity Act,

for computing payment of gratuity, apprentice are

excluded from definition of term worker/employee and

apprentice is not eligible for gratuity and period

served by the worker/employee as apprentice cannot

be calculated for payment of gratuity.

(iv) Petitioner has no locus to raise the present

ID and the Government of Puducherry ought not to

have referred the dispute to this Court.

(v) Petitioner

was

employed

and

got

superannuated on 10-02-2014 and he was paid

gratuity by the erstwhile management to the tune of

` 1,73,608. It is absolutely false to claim the petitioner

ever worked as on apprentice and hence, the

petitioner has to prove the same. The petitioner has

not claimed that he was worked as apprentice before

the Controlling Authority, Payment of Gratuity in

PG.No.41/2017, which confirms that claims are

absolutely bogus. Hence, the claim of the petition is

liable to be dismissed.

4. The Points for consideration are:

(1) Whether the Petitioner is entitled for inclusion

of apprentice period for counting the terminal

benefits of Thiru. John Arthur and whether he is

entitled for ` 26,040 towards gratuity amount for the

apprentice period from the respondent company as

prayed in the claim ?

(2) To what relief the Petitioner is entitled?

5. On Points :

On the Petitioner side, Mr. Y. John Arthur / the

Petitioner himself was examined as PW1 and Exs. P1

and P2 were marked. On the respondent side,

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[31 January 2023

Mr. Balamurugan, Assistant Manager, HR of the

respondent company was examined as RW1 and

Ex. R1 to Ex.R7 were marked.

6. On the Points:

Three points of defence that have been raised on

the side of the respondent company are:–

(i) Petitioner has raised a dispute against a

company which does not exist. The very cause title

of the reference and claim petition is defective. The

nomenclature of the respondent in the cause title of

the petition is erroneous.

(ii) All issues pertaining to payment of gratuity

can be decided only by the special authority

constituted under section 3 of Payment of Gratuity

Act. Therefore, this Court has no inherent jurisdiction

to decide this petition. Petitioner already filed a

petition before Controlling Authority, Payment of

Gratuity, Puducherry in PG.No.41/2017 raising the

dispute of miscalculation. Having approach the

competent authority for Payment of Gratuity,

petitioner cannot approach this Court also for

computation of gratuity, whether for the same period

or for some other period. The petitioner has not

claimed that he was worked as apprentice before the

Controlling Authority, Payment of Gratuity in

PG.No.41/2017, which confirms that claims are

absolutely bogus. Hence, the claim of the petition is

liable to be dismissed.

(iii) Petitioner cannot invoke section 2(s) of

Industrial Disputes Act for making a claim of gratuity

when section 2 (e) of Payment of Gratuity Act, which

is a special Statute governing payment of gratuity

defines the terms worker/employee. As per section

2(e) of Payment of Gratuity Act, for computing

payment of gratuity, apprentice are excluded from

definition of term worker/employee and apprentice

is not eligible for gratuity and period served by the

worker / employee as apprentice cannot be calculated

for payment of gratuity.

7. As far as the first defence is concerned, the ID

raised as against the General Manager, M/s. Strides

Shasun

Pharmaceuticals

Limited,

Puducherry.

According to the respondent company, one M/s. Shasun

Pharmaceuticals Limited, was engaged in the business

of manufacturing tablets and pharmaceutical products.

The said company was merged with M/s. Strides

Arcolab Limited by way of a scheme of Amalgamation

by the order of Hon'ble High Court in company petition

No.149/2015, dated 16-06-2015. The Amalgamated

company was then named as M/s. Strides Shasun

Limited and registered with Registrar of company vide

certificate of incorporation, dated 18-11-2015. Again it

was changed to M/s. Strides Pharma Science Limited

and approved by Registrar of company vide certificate

of incorporation, dated 18-07-2018.

8. In support of his above contentions, the learned

Counsel for the respondent referred his documents

marked as EX.R4 to EX.R7 in order to substantiate the

above defence. From these Exhibits, I shall see that

since 18-07-2018, the company name is M/s. Strides

Pharma Science Limited. This ID has been raised in the

year 2018 under the reference, dated 30-07-2018 as

against the General Manager, M/s. Strides Shasun

Pharmaceuticals Limited, Puducherry, even much before

that the said company was merged with M/s. Strides

Arcolab Limited by way of a scheme of Amalgamation

and the order of Hon’ble High Court in company

petition No.149/2015, dated 16-06-2015 (EX.R4). The

Amalgamated company was then named as M/s. Strides

Shasun Limited and registered with Registrar of

company vide certificate of incorporation, dated

18-11-2015. Again it was changed to M/s. Strides Pharma

Science Limited and approved by Registrar of company

vide certificate of incorporation, dated 18-07-2018. The

above objection raised by the Respondent Management

that despite the wrong in describing the cause title was

indicated in the counter statement of the Respondent

Management, the petitioner has not come forward to

amend the nomenclature of the company in its Claim

Petition as M/s. Strides Pharma Science Limited is

sustainable.

9. According to the second and third defence are

concerned, when the Petitioner already could file a

petition before Controlling Authority, Payment of

Gratuity, Puducherry in PG. No.41/2017 raising the

dispute of miscalculation what prevented him to raise

this present issue of claiming gratuity for the

apprenticeship period in the same proceedings or before

the same forum. Photocopy of the petition filed by

Mr. John Arthur in PG.41/2017 before Controlling

Authority under payment of Gratuity is marked as

EX.R2, on respondent company side. It has not been

denied by the petitioner at any occasions before this

Court. To the contrary, he admitted while he was cross

examined by the respondent Counsel that, he filed

PG.41/2017 before Controlling Authority under payment

of Gratuity for correct calculation of Gratuity. For the

better appreciation, the relevant portion of PW1 oral

evidence during his cross-examination is reproduced

hereunder :

ÂV[ >V¬Ô_ ÿƒFm^· \>ƒVg.2ág™ 07-01-1911 º>]l‚¶

Shasun drugs WÆk™ Appointment order for the post of

Apprentice training ®[≈ c›>´s_ 3-km Clause-_ ®™¬z

\V>D º>VÆD ` 250 ®[–Á¶B apprentice ÔVÈ¬Ô‚¶›]uz

31 January 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

stiphend-gÔ kw∫Ô©√|D ®[ÆD ºkÆ ÷>´ Allowance-

Ôº·V, bonus ∂_Èm ÷>´ �≈ W´Õ>´ ÿ>VaÈV·ÏÔ”¬z

kw∫Ô¬ÌΩB √ð √È[Ôº·V kw∫˛¶ ÷BÈVm ®[Æ sˆkVÔ

z§©∏¶©√‚|^·m ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. º�√Ω W√Õ>Á™ÔÁ™

∞uÆ¬ÿÔVı|>V[, º�√Ω Shasun WÆk™›]_ apprentice

training-gÔ

ºƒÏÕº>[

®[≈V_

ƒˆ>V[.

º�√Ω

\>ƒVg.2á|¶[, ÂV[ º�√Ω WÆk™›]_ W´Õ>´ ÿ>VaÈVπBVÔ

ÿƒFB©√‚¶ ∏[™Ï, ∏©´kˆ 2014-D gı|¬zˆB \V>ﬂ ƒD√·

√‚ΩB_ s√´›Á> ÷Áð›m^º·[ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆ>V[.

∂Õ> √‚ΩBo_ ÂV[ √Ël_ ºƒÏÕ> ÂV^ 01-10-1993 ®[Æ

z§©∏¶©√‚|^·m ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. ÂV[ √Ël_ ÷ÚÕ>

ÔVÈ¬Ô‚¶›]_, ®[–Á¶B √Ël_ ºƒÏÕ> º>] 01-10-1993 ®™

z§©∏¶©√‚ΩÚ©√m >kÆ ®™ g‚ºƒ∏›m, ®ø›mJÈ\V™ \–

∞º>–D ÿÔV|›º>™V ®[≈V_ ˛Á¶BVm. ®™¬z kw∫Ô©√‚¶

Bonus, EPF ∏Ω›>D �ÆD ÷>´ ƒKÁÔÔ^ 01-10-1993 º>]ÁB

Á\B\VÔ Ák›m Ôð¬˛¶©√‚| kw∫Ô©√‚|^·m ®[≈V_

ƒˆ>V[. Payment of Gratuity Authority-l¶D ®™¬z

kw∫Ô©√‚¶ gratuity zÁ≈›m kw∫Ô©√‚|^·>VÔ Ì§ ŒÚ

\–Ák >V¬Ô_ ÿƒFm ∂m PG.No.41/2017 ®[≈ ®ıË_

WKÁkl_ c^·m ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ®™¬z ∂Õ> kw¬˛[

stage √u§ ÿ>ˆBs_ÁÈ. ∂Õ> \–s_ ®™¬z apprentice

ÔVÈ›]uzˆB gratuity kw∫Ôs_ÁÈ ®[Æ ºÔ‚|^º·™V

®[≈V_ ®™¬z ÿ>ˆBs_ÁÈ. ∂Õ> kw¬z x>o_ >V¬Ô_

ÿƒFB©√‚¶ kw¬z ®[ÆD, ∂>[ ∏[™º´ ÷Õ> ÿ>Vau>VkV

®ø©√©√‚¶m

®[Æ

ÿƒV[™V_

®™¬z

∂m

√u§B

s√´Dÿ>ˆBs_ÁÈ, Gratuity ƒD\Õ>\VÔ ÷´ı| ÿkÀºkÆ

÷¶∫Ôπ_ xÁ≈X|/\– >V¬Ô_ ÿƒFB ®™¬z ∂ÚÔÁ>l_ÁÈ

®[≈V_ ®™¬z ÿ>ˆBs_ÁÈ. Gratuity ƒ‚¶›]_ ®ÀkVÆ

gratuity kw∫Ô©√¶ ºkı|D ®™ ∂π¬Ô√‚ΩÚ¬zD s√´∫Ô^

z§›m ®™¬z ÿ>ˆBVm. Payment of Gratuity Act-√Ω

apprentice training ÔVÈ¬Ô‚¶›]uz gratuity kw∫˛¶ ÷BÈVm

®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ®™¬z ∂m √u§ ÿ>ˆBVm.

10. It is argued by the learned Counsel for the

respondent that having approach the competent

authority for Payment of Gratuity, petitioner cannot

approach this Court again for computation of gratuity,

whether for the same period or for some other period.

Further, he would contend that the petitioner has not

claimed that he was worked as apprentice before

the Controlling Authority, Payment of Gratuity in

PG. No. 41/2017. Thus, he concluded his argument on

this point that party can choose either of the forms but,

not the two forums for the same relief and relied on a

case-law on this aspect. In a case reported in CDJ 2014

SC 1238:

It is held in Page 4, Para 13 that: “............. in Chetak

Construction Limited, vs. Om Prakash and others,

1998(3) R.C.R. (Civil) 644: (1998) 4 SCC 577, wherein, this

Court has observed that a litigant cannot be permitted

‘choice’ of the ‘forum’ and every attempt at ‘forum-

shopping’ must be crushed with a heavy hand. In Tamil

Nadu

Mercantile

Bank

shareholders

Welfare

Association vs. S.C. Sekar and others, (2009)2 SCC 784,

it has been observed that the Superior Courts of this

Country must discourage forum-shopping”.

11. Further, the learned Counsel for the respondent

would stress upon that all issues pertaining to payment

of gratuity can be decided only by the special authority

constituted under section 3 of Payment of Gratuity Act.

Therefore, this Court has no inherent jurisdiction to

decide this petition. He would also argue that the

petitioner cannot invoke section 2(s) of Industrial

Disputes Act for making a claim of gratuity when

section 2 (e) of Payment of Gratuity Act, which is a

special statue governing payment of gratuity defines the

terms worker / employee.

12. Section 2(e) of Payment of Gratuity Act

‘employee’ means any person (other than an apprentice)

employed on wages, in any establishment, factory, mine,

oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop, to

do any skilled, semi-skilled, or unskilled, manual,

supervisory, technical or clerical work, whether the

terms of such employment are express or implied, and

whether or not such person is employed in a managerial

or administrative capacity, but, does not include any

such person who holds a post under the Central

Government or a State Government and is governed by

any other Act or by any rules providing for payment

of gratuity. As per section 2(e) of Payment of Gratuity

Act, for computing payment of gratuity, apprentice are

excluded from definition of term worker/employee and

apprentice is not eligible for gratuity and period served

by the worker/employee as apprentice cannot be

calculated for payment of gratuity. He also relied upon

the following case-laws on this aspect.

(i) In a case reported in CDJ 2006 APHC 683 :

It is held in Page 5 that, “the payment of Gratuity

Act is a self contained Code. It provides for deciding

the liability of an employer, to pay gratuity, and the

manner of calculation thereof. Section 8 of the Act

prescribes the procedure for recovery of amount

payable as gratuity”. It reads as under:

A Section 8 : Recovery of Gratuity :- If, the amount

of gratuity payable under this Act is not paid by the

employer, within the prescribed time, to the person

entitled thereto, the controlling authority shall, on

an application made to it in this behalf by the

aggrieved person, issue a certificate for that amount

to the Collector who shall recover the same, together

with compound interest thereon (at such rate as the

Central Government may, by notification, specify)

from the date of expiry of the prescribed time, as

arrears of land revenue and pay the same to the

person entitled thereto.

100

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[31 January 2023

Provided that the controlling authority shall,

before issuing a certificate under this section, give

the employer a reasonable opportunity of showing

cause against the issue of such certificate.

Provided further that the amount of interest

payable under this section shall, in no case exceed

the amount of gratuity payable under this Act.

This provision does not admit of, any doubt that

the only method to recover the amount of gratuity

is, to approach the controlling authority, section 14

of that Act gives an overriding effect upon the

provisions contained in any other enactment. In

State of Punjab vs. Labour Court, Jalandhar AIR 1979

SC 1981 the recovered by initiating proceedings

under section 33 C (2) of the Act.

(ii) In a case reported in CDJ 1979 SC 037:

It is held in Page 3 that, “......... The third

contention raised by the appellant is that the

employee respondents were not entitled to apply

under section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 for payment of the gratuity, and should have, if

at all, applied under the provisions of the Payment

of Gratuity Act. It is urged that the Payment of

Gratuity Act is a self-contained code incorporating

all the essential provisions relating to payment of

gratuity which can be claimed under that Act, and

its provisions impliedly exclude recourse to any other

statue for that purpose. The contention has force and

must be accepted”.

(iii) In a Order passed in W.P. (MD) No. 3490/2019:

It is held in Page 3 - Para 4 that : “This Court is of

the considered view that for the facts and

circumstances of the instant case, a period of two

years from 27-11-1983, i.e., up to 26-11-1985 will have

to be treated as an apprentice period for which, the

third respondent is not entitled for any gratuity

amount in terms of section 2(e) of the Payment of

Gratuity Act, 1972. Accordingly, the proportionate

gratuity amount for the apprentice period from

27-11-1983 to 26-11-1985 will have to be reduced from

and out of the gratuity amount awarded by the

second respondent in its order, dated 09-11-2017 in

P.G.No.68/2016. In so far as, the other findings of

the Authorities below are concerned, this Court does

not find any infirmity in the same and are hereby

confirmed”.

13. From the above, it is made clear that under the

provisions of Payment of Gratuity Act, there is an

express exclusion that employee means any person other

than an apprentice. Payment of Gratuity Act is a special

enactment provides for a scheme for the payment of

gratuity to employees engaged in factories, mines,

oilfields, plantations, ports, railway companies, shops

or other establishments and for matters connected

therewith or incidental thereto. The Petitioner has also

approached the Controlling Authority, Payment of

Gratuity in PG.No.41/2017 for alleged miscalculation of

his gratuity for the period of his regular employment,

i.e., 01-10-1993 to till his superannuation, dated

10-02-2014. No reason stated by the petitioner about

why he did not seek for the payment of gratuity amount

for his apprentice period before the Controlling

Authority, Payment of Gratuity in PG.No. 41/2017. From

the documents produced by the petitioner himself such

as Photocopy of the appointment order for the post of

Apprentice Trainee issued by M/s. Shasun Drugs,

Puducherry and photocopy of salary slip of the

petitioner for the month of February 2014 (EX.P2),

Photocopy of the petition filed by Mr. John Arthur in

PG.41/2017 before Controlling Authority under payment

of Gratuity (EXR2) and from oral admissions of the

petitioner as PW1 before this Court, it is clearly proved

that he was joined the company Shasun Drugs on

07-01-1991 as an apprentice vide appointment order

EX.P2 and his date of joining as regular employee was

only on 01-10-1993 and same has been reflected in his

salary slip for the month of February 2014, marked along

with his Apprentice Appointment Order EX.P2.

Therefore, he was joined and worked only as Apprentice

from 07-01-1991 to 30-09-1993 for 2 years 8 months 23

days. Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, apprentice is

excluded for payment of gratuity. Further, when there

is a special enactment under which an authority is

appointed for deciding the issue on gratuity and

anything incidental thereto and the petitioner having

approached same authority for alleged miscalculation,

but, not made any claim regarding the gratuity for his

apprentice period before such authority which has been

specially empowered to decide the issue under the

special statute, is highly fatal to his claim. Without

making such claim before the said authority and

subsequently claiming the same before this Labour

Court is not maintainable.

14. From the above discussions and findings, the

point for consideration is decided as against the

Petitioner employee and consequently he is not entitled

for any relief as sought for in the claim petition.

In the result, the reference is unjustified and the

Petitioner is not entitled for any relief. The industrial

dispute as raised by the Petitioner is dismissed. There

is no order as to costs.

101

31 January 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by her,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this

the 15th day of September, 2022.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner witness:

PW1

— 13-02-2020

Mr. John Arthur

List of petitioner side exhibits:

Ex.P1 — 13-02-2020

Form - F issued in favour of

representative by name

Mr. Durai Arumugam.

Ex.P2 — 07-01-1991

Photocopy

the

appointment order for the

post of Apprentice Trainee

issued by M/s. Shasun

Drugs, Puducherry and

photocopy of salary slip of

the petitioner for the month

of February 2014.

List of respondent’s witness:

Rw1

— 06-09-2021

Mr. Balamurugan

List of respondent side exhibits:

Ex.R1 — 21-08-2021

Letter of Authorization

authorizing Mr. Balamurugan

to depose evidence in the

present ID on behalf of

respondent company.

Ex.R2 — –

Photocopy of the petition

filed by Mr. John Arthur in

PG.41/2017

before

Controlling Authority under

payment of Gratuity.

Ex.R3 — –

Photocopy of the counter

statement filed by the

respondent in PG.41/2017.

Ex.R4 — 16-06-2015

Photocopy of the Orders

passed by the Hon'ble High

Court in company petition

No.149/2015.

Ex.R5 — 18-11-2015

Photocopy of the certificate

o f I n c o r p o r a t i o n o f

M/s. Strides Shasun Limited

issued by Registrar of

Companies, Puducherry.

Ex.R6 — 18-07-2018

Photocopy of the name of

M/s. Strides Shasun Limited

was changed to M/s. Strides

Pharma Science Limited and

was

approved

Registrar of Companies vide

certificate of Incorporation.

Ex.R7 — 25-03-2017

Photocopy of the Certificate

of Incorporation of M/s. Strides

Pharma Science Limited to

Solara

Active

Pharma

Science Limited.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), KARAIKAL

NO. 0601/DDSE/KKL/E3(Exam)/2022/528.

Karaikal, dated 06th January 2023.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the following candidates have lost their original Higher Secondary Course

(I-Year and II-Year)/S.S.L.C. Examination Mark Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps

have been taken to issue duplicate certificates. If, anyone finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be

sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec.), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation,

as it is/they are no longer valid.

102

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[31 January 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

(HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION)

(G.O. Ms. No. 04, Puducherry, dated 12th January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation,

Tmt. S. Malathy, Assistant Professor in English,

Tagore Government Arts and Science College,

Puducherry, shall retire on the afternoon of

31-01-2023.

(By order)

M.V. HIRAN,

Under Secretary to Government,

(Higher and Technical Education).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

HOME DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 02, Puducherry, dated 13th January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to

declare Holiday on 17th January, 2023 (Tuesday) for all

Government Offices and Institutions in all the regions

of Union territory of Puducherry on account of

“Uzhavar Thirunal” in lieu of Restricted Holiday

declared earlier vide G.O. Ms. No. 52, dated 13-10-2022 of

the Home Department, Puducherry, the 04th February,

2023, Saturday will be a compensatory working day.

2. This leave is not covered under, Negotiable

Instruments Act, 1881.

(By order)

M. V. HIRAN,

Under Secretary to Government.

Sl.

Name of the

Serial No. of the

School in which studied last

No.

applicant

session and year

mark certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Thiru Muruganandham, R.

4848593, I-Year

HSV

V.O.C Government Higher

March-2018.

2169394

Secondary School, Kottucherry,

Karaikal.

4848593, II-Year

–

March-2019.

Thiru Manikandan, R.

4928326, S.S.L.C.

Z1923622

Government Higher Secondary

March-2020.

School, Thenoor, Thirunallar,

Karaikal.

M. RADJESVARY,

Deputy Director,

(Secondary Education).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS

(PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 02, Puducherry, dated 13th January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

In pursuance of the Order No.14016/24/2022, UTS-I,

dated 30-12-2022 of the Ministry of Home Affairs, New

Delhi, Shri P. Jawahar, I.A.S., (AGMU:2007), Chief

Electoral Officer-cum-Secretary to Government on

promotion to Super Time Scale (Level-14 in the Pay

Matrix) with effect from 01-01-2023, is designated as Chief

Electoral Officer-cum-Commissioner-cum-Secretary to

Government, Puducherry. He has assumed charge in the

Super Time Scale on 01-01-2023. He shall continue to

hold charge of the subjects already held by him.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

RAJEEV VERMA,

Chief Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)

(G.O. Ms. No. 3, Puducherry, dated 19th January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation,

Thiru P. Vaitianadin, Assistant Architect, Architectural

Wing, Public Works Department, Puducherry, is admitted

into retirement on the afternoon of 31-01-2023.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE,

Under Secretary to Government (Works).

103

31 January 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LAW DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 02/2023-LD,

Puducherry, dated 20th January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

In exercise of the powers conferred under

sub-section (1) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 and in consultation with the High Court,

Madras, the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is

pleased to appoint Thiru K.S. Mohandass, Advocate as

the Public Prosecutor for the Government of

Puducherry, at the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at

Madras, for a period of three years with effect from the

date of assumption of charge.

2. The terms and conditions for the appointment of

Public Prosecutor at High Court, Madras, shall be as

set out in the Puducherry Law Officers (Appointment

and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2021 notified in

G.O. Ms. No. 22/2021-LD, Puducherry, dated 11th June

2021 of the Law Department, Government of Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

N. MURUGAVEL,

Under Secretary to Government (Law).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LAW DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 03/2023-LD,

Puducherry, dated 20th January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

In exercise of the powers conferred under

sub-section (1) of section 24 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 and in consultation with the High Court,

Madras, the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is

pleased to appoint Thiru M.V. Ramachandra Murthy,

Advocate as the Additional Public Prosecutor for the

Government of Puducherry, at the Hon’ble High Court

of Judicature at Madras, for a period of three years with

effect from the date of assumption of charge.

2. The terms and conditions for the appointment of

Additional Public Prosecutor at High Court, Madras,

shall be as set out in the Puducherry Law Officers

(Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2021

notified in G.O. Ms. No. 22/2021-LD, Puducherry, dated

11th June 2021 of the Law Department, Government of

Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

N. MURUGAVEL,

Under Secretary to Government (Law).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LAW DEPARTMENT

(G. O. Ms. No. 5/LD/2022,

Puducherry, dated 23rd January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to

order that the Retired Hon'ble Justices of the Madras

High Court, as detailed below, are empanelled as

Arbitrators under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

1996 for settlement of disputes arising out of the

Contracts of the Government of Puducherry:-

(i)

Hon'ble Mr. Justice. K. Kalyanasundaram,

Plot No. 406,

5th South Cross Street,

Kapaleeswarar Nagar,

Neelankarai, Chennai-600 115.

(ii)

Hon'ble Mr. Justice. K. Ravichandra Baabu,

No. 10, Crescent Castle, 13/6,

2nd Crescent Park Road,

Gandhi Nagar, Chennai-600 020.

(iii)

Hon'ble Ms. Justice. S. Kannammal,

D16, Casa Grande Aldea,

Thoraipakkam, Chennai-600 097.

(iv)

Hon'ble Mr. Justice. V. Bharathidasan,

No. 22, 2nd Main Road,

Kamarajar Nagar,

Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600 041.

(v)

Hon'ble Mr. Justice. N. Kirubakaran,

No. 36, 2nd Cross Street,

Rayala Nagar, Ramapuram. Chennai-600 089.

(vi)

Hon'ble Ms. Justice. T. Krishnavalli,

Stage I, H2, TNHB Colony,

Sreenivasaragavan Nagar,

V.M.Chatrum, Tirunelveli-620 011.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

N. MURUGAVEL,

Under Secretary to Government (Law).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LAW DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 07/2023-LD,

Puducherry, dated 24th January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation,

Thiru P. Nadaradjane, Deputy Law Officer, Law

Department, Puducherry, who is officiating in the post

104

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[31 January 2023

of Manager (Legal) at Pondicherry Industrial Promotion

Development and Investment Corporation Limited

(PIPDIC), Puducherry on deputation basis, is admitted

into retirement on the afternoon of 31-01-2023.

(By order)

N. MURUGAVEL,

Under Secretary to Government (Law).

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´∑

º√V¬zk´›m› mÁ≈

∂´∑ kVÔ™ √Ë\Á™

∞È ∂§s©A

(t[™b ÷ÁðB>· ∞ÈxÁ≈)

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´E[ √_ºkÆ mÁ≈Ô”¬zﬂ ÿƒVÕ>\V™

√B[√V‚Ω_ ÷_ÈV> ˇµ¬Ôı¶ √ÁwB ÂV[z

�ÆD

÷Úƒ¬Ô´

kVÔ™∫Ô^

“c^·m

c^·√Ω

WÁÈl_” (As-is-where-is-condition) ÷ÁðB>·D JÈD

(https://eauction.gov.in) 22á02á2023 ÔVÁÈ 10.00

\Ë x>_ 24á2á2023 \VÁÈ 4.00 \Ë kÁ´l_

∞ÈD ºƒÁkBÔ›][ >V™VÔ ¿‚Ω©A ÿ>V¶ÚD kÁ´ ∞ÈD

s¶©√¶ ÷Ú¬˛≈m. kVÔ™ sk´∫Ô^ ∏[kÚ\VÆ:

√B™u≈ ∂´∑ kVÔ™∫Ô^

(ÿ\V›>

(ÿ\V›> ®ıË¬ÁÔ

®ıË¬ÁÔ

®ıË¬ÁÔ : 143)

143)

√ÁwB ÷´ı| ƒ¬Ô´ kVÔ™∫Ô^

(ÿ\V›> ®ıË¬ÁÔ : 83)

1 . Ω.s.®¸. XL-50

3 5. ®[¨_‚ A_È‚

.. 6

2. Ω.s.®¸. 50

3 6. ´VÎ#‚

.. 2

3. Ω.s.®¸. Û©√Ï

.. 29 7. A_È‚

.. 5

4. Ω.s.®¸. ∏Fº´V .. 35

√ÁwB ÂV[z ƒ¬Ô´ kVÔ™∫Ô^

(ÿ\V›> ®ıË¬ÁÔ : 59)

1 . \ºÔÕ]´V ˝©

.. 5

13. ÿ¶Dº√V Ω´V¬¸

.. 2

2. \VÏº≠_ ˝©

.. 4 1 4. ¶V¶V ∑º\V (Victa) .. 2

3. ÔV\Vı¶Ï ˝©

1 1 5. ÿ\‚¶V¶Ï ºk[

.. 1

4. \ºÔÕ]´V º√Voº´V .. 3 1 6. ¸k´VÎ \¸>V

.. 1

5. ∂D√VE¶VÏ ÔVÏ

.. 12 1 7. ¶V¶V ƒ√Vˆ

.. 1

6. Ωÿ´¬ÔÏ

1 1 8. ¶V¶V ÷[ΩÔV

.. 1

7. º¶VBV‚¶V zkVo¸ .. 3 1 9. ◊[¶VF ∂ÿƒ[‚ .. 1

8. \ºÔÕ]´V tM √¸..

1 20. \ºÔÕ]´V Ω´V¬¶Ï .. 1

9. ®D. ÿ√[¸

1 21 . ÿ¶Dº√V Ω´VkÈÏ

.. 2

10. \VÚ] gDM

.. 3 22. √¤VÎ gDAÈ[¸

.. 1

11. ¶V¶V ∑º\V

.. 9 23. \VÚ] ∞¸ΩD

.. 1

12. ¶V¶V ¸º√EºBV

.. 2

√ÁwB Ô™´Ô kVÔ™∫Ô^

(ÿ\V›> ®ıË¬ÁÔ : 1)

1 .

¶V¶V kV‚¶Ï ÿ¶ı¶Ï RM‚

(z§©A: ŒÀÿkVÚ kÁÔ kVÔ™∫Ôπ[ ®ıË¬ÁÔ•D

∂Á¶©A¬ z§X‚Ω–^ z§©∏¶©√‚|^·m.)

sıð©√D, t[ ∞È ∂§s©A, s]xÁ≈Ô^,

W√Õ>Á™Ô^ �ÆD kVÔ™∫Ôπ[ sk´D ∂¶∫˛B

√Ωk∫ÔÁ· 31á01á2023ágD º>] x>_ https://

eauction.gov.in �ÆD https://transport.py.gov.in

®[≈ ÷ÁðB>· xÔkˆl_ √]s≈¬ÔD ÿƒFm

ÿÔV^·ÈVD.

Amﬂºƒˆ, 2023 } ƒ™kˆ | 27 {.

S. ƒ›]BJÏ›],

ƒ›]BJÏ›],

mÁð º√V¬zk´›m gÁðBÏ

�ÆD ÿƒBuÿ√V§BV·Ï (ÿ√VÆ©A).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT

GOVERNMENT AUTOMOBILE WORKSHOP

Puducherry, dated 27th January 2023.

AUCTION NOTICE

(e-Auction system)

Condemned/Old vehicles of various Departments of

Government of Puducherry (Two wheelers, Four wheelers

and Heavy vehicles) in “as-is-where- is-condition” will

be auctioned through e-auction system on https://

eauction.gov.in for the period from 22-02-2023 at 10.00

a.m. to 24-02-2023 at 4.00 p.m. or till bid continued.

TOTAL NUMBER OF OLD AUCTIONING VEHICLES – 143

Old two wheelers (Total numbers : 83)

1. TVS XL 50

. .

5. Enfield Bullet

. . 6

2. TVS 50

. .

6. Rajdoot

. . 2

3. TVS XL Super

. . 29

7. Bullet

. . 5

4. TVS Fiero

. . 35

Old four wheelers (Total numbers : 59)

1. Mahindra Jeep

. .

5 13. Tempo Trax

. . 2

2. Marshal Jeep

. .

4 14. Tata Sumo Victa

. . 2

3. Commandar Jeep . .

1 15. Matador Van

. . 1

4. Mahindra Bolero . .

3 16. Swarj Mazda

. . 1

5. Ambassador Car . . 12 17. Tata Safari

. . 1

6. Trekker

. .

1 18. Tata Indica

. . 1

7. Toyota Qualis

. .

3 19. Hyundai Ascent

. . 1

8. Mahindra Mini Bus . .

1 20. Mahindra Tractor . . 1

9. M. Benz

. .

1 21. Tempo Traveller

. . 2

10. Maruthi Omni

. .

3 22. Bajaj Ambulance

. . 1

11. Tata Sumo

. .

9 23. Maruti Esteem

. . 1

12. Tata Spacio

. .

105

31 January 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Old heavy vehicles (Total numbers - 1)

Tata Water Tender Unit

. .

(Note: Every make of total number of the vehicles are

mentioned within the bracket).

Application Form, e-auction Notice, terms and

conditions, list of Department vehicles of Annexure-I

and Annexure-II may be downloaded from the website

https://eauction.gov.in., https://transport.py.gov.in with

effect from 31-01-2023.

S. SATHIYAMOORTHY,

Deputy Transport Commissioner

-cum-Executive Engineer (in-charge).

\ıðVΩ©√‚|

\ıðVΩ©√‚| ÿÔVDR[

ÿÔVDR[

ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m,

√ﬁƒVB›m,

√ﬁƒVB›m, Amﬂºƒˆ

Amﬂºƒˆ

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

∂§s©A

ˇµ¬Ôı¶ Â√Ï \ıðVΩ©√‚| ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›][ ®_ÁÈ¬z^ ∏[kÚD ÿ>Va_ WÆk™]_ Ì|>_

t[ƒV´D ÿ√≈ ºkıΩ ÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›][ ∂–\] ºkı|˛≈VÏ.

kˆÁƒ

sıð©√>V´ˆ[

WÆk™D ∂Á\Õm^·

c›º>E¬Ô©√‚|^·

º>ÁkBV™

g‚Ôπ[

®ı

ÿ√BÏ �ÆD xÔkˆ

÷¶›][ xÔkˆ

WÆk™› >BVˆ©A/

t[ ]≈[

®ıË¬ÁÔ

ÿƒFxÁ≈

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1 M/s. ºÂ≠™_ √Vo∏·V¸‚

M/s. ºÂ≠™_ √Vo∏·V¸‚

∏·V¸Ω¬ ∏ˆ√VÏD¸,

1399.00 H.P.

(÷Õ]BV) ∏Á´ºk‚ ot‚¶‚,

(÷Õ]BV) ∏Á´ºk‚ ot‚¶‚, ∏·V¸Ω¬ ˛º´‚¸, A‚

to 1725.00

(J[Æ

\Æ ∂·Ák ®ıÔ^

\Æ ∂·Ák ®ıÔ^ 128/3

Ô[ÿ¶F™Ï �ÆD

H.P. (Ì|>_

√Ë

128/3 �ÆD 128/6,

�ÆD 128/6,

÷ﬁƒ¬≠[ º\V_¶‚

t[ƒV´D

xÁ≈Ô^).

NH ÿ\l[ º´V|,

]Úkı¶VÏºÔVl_,

∏·V¸Ω¬ gÏΩÔ_¸

326.00 H.P.)

]Úkı¶VÏºÔVl_,

kÚkVF ˛´V\D, Amﬂºƒˆ.

>BVˆ›>_.

Amﬂºƒˆá605 102.

1973ágD gı|, Amﬂºƒˆ ˛´V\D �ÆD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m¬Ô^ ƒ‚¶›][ JÈ\VF Amﬂºƒˆ Œ[§B›m

∏ˆ° 11á[√Ω ÷›ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›]uz Ì|>_ t[ƒV´D kw∫zk]™V_ cı¶VzD g‚ºƒ√ÁðÔ^ ∞º>–D

]ÚAkÁ™, 2023 } ƒ™kˆ | 18{,

ºk.

ºk. ®a_´V¤[,

®a_´V¤[,

gÁðBÏ.

————

MANNADIPET COMMUNE PANCHAYAT, PUDUCHERRY

Thirubuvanai, dated 18th January 2023.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested permission of the additional horse power to the exiting industry

within the Mannadipet Commune Panchayat limits, as detailed below.

106

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[31 January 2023

Sl.

Name and address

Address of the

Industry

Power

No. of

No.

of the applicant

industry site

proposed

required

workers

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1 M/s. National Polyplast (India)

M/s. National Polyplast

Manufacture/Activity

1399.00 H.P.

Private Limited, at Re-survey

(India) Private Limited,

of plastic preforms,

to 1725.00 H.P.

(Three

Nos. 128/3 and 128/6,

Re-survey Nos. 128/3

plastic crates, food

(Additional

shifts).

NH Main Road,

and 128/6,

container and injection

Power 326.00

Thiruvandarkoil,

Thiruvandarkoil Revenue, molded plastic articles.

H.P.)

Puducherry-605 102.

Village, Puducherry.

In conformity with rule 11 of the Pondicherry Commune Panchayats (Grant of Licences and Permissions)

Rules, 1976, promulgated of this Union Territory by the Puducherry Village and Commune Panchayats Act, 1973,

objections, if any, for enhancement of the additional horse power to the above proposed industry, are invited to

reach the Commissioner, within ten days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections received within the specified period will be considered by the Mannadipet Commune

Panchayat.

V. EJILERADJANE,

Commissioner.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Mahalakshmi, wife of Madavane, residing at the

house bearing Door No. 11, Bharathidasan Street,

Kamarajar Nagar, Gorimedu, Puducherry-605 006,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to

whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I swear this

affidavit in respect of different spelling in the name

of my husband. I state that in the Birth Certificate of

my husband, under Registration No. P/1959/00006, his

name has been mentioned as ‘Madavane’.

In the Birth Certificate of my daughter by name

Maragadam, under Registration No. M/1983/08647,

my husband’s name has been mentioned as

‘Madhavan’.

In my Elector ’s Photo Identity Card, under

No. NOG0131508, my husband’s name has been

mentioned as ‘Moorthi’ (‘JÏ›]’).

In my husband’s Elector’s Photo Identity Card

under No. DNX0326157, my husband’s name has

been mentioned as ‘Mourthy @ Madhavan’ [‘JÏ›]

(®) \V>k[’].

In my Aadhaar Card, under No. XXXX XXXX

0738, my husband’s name has been mentioned as

‘Madavane’ (‘\V>k[’).

In the Passbook of State Bank of India,

Kadirkamam Branch, Puducherry, my husband’s name

has been mentioned as ‘Madhavan’.

In the Family Ration Card, under No. 372156, my

husband’s name has been mentioned as ‘JÏ›] (®)

\V>k[’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and

relate to one and the same person, that is my said

husband only.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 09th day of

January 2023.

562200

\ÔVÈ‚∑t

\ÔVÈ‚∑t.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, N. Thamotharan, son of Nallathambi, Hindu, aged

about 50 years and residing at North Street Extension,

Thengaithittu, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry-605 004, do

hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely depose as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I state that I was born to my Hindu parents

Nallathambi and Kullammal on 07-04-1972 and I was

named as ‘Thamotharan’. The said name is found in

my Transfer Certificate vide No. 0102106 and in my

107

31 January 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 2410, whereas,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Â. >Vº\V>´[’ in

our Family Ration Card vide No. 448853.

Now, I have been enchanted with Christianity rites

and customs and I have converted myself to

Christianity from Hindu religion and I have been

changed my name as ‘N. Thomas’ after my Baptism

before Good Shepherd Holy Church India,

Marakkanam, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu, on

21-06-2020.

I do hereby declare that henceforth, I shall be

known and called as ‘N. Thomas’ and I do hereby

abandon the use of my former name ‘N. Thamotharan’.

I do hereby declare that what are all stated above

is true to the best of my knowledge, belief and

information, and nothing material has been concealed

thereon.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 18th day of

January 2023.

562201

N. THAMOTHARAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ranjith, son of Rajan, Aadhaar No. XXXX XXXX 0224,

aged about 20 years and residing at Door No. 26,

Pillaiyar Kovil Street, V. Manavely, Villianur Commune,

Puducherry -605 110, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I submit that as per the Certificate of Birth

registered under Registration No. M/2003/08850,

dated 02-07-2023 (Birth date 23-06-2003), issued by

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, my name is

mentioned as ‘Ranjith’.

Further, I submit that in my PAN Card No.

FJLPR2250E, my name is mentioned as ‘Ranjith’,

issued by the Income-tax Department of India.

Further, I submit that in my Aadhaar Card No.

XXXX XXXX 0224, my name is mentioned as

‘Ranjith’, issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India.

Further, I submit that in my School Transfer

Certificate Serial No. 14/2017-18, my name is

mentioned as ‘´V.´ﬁE›’, issued by the Headmaster,

Government Higher Secondary School, Koliyanur,

Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu.

Further, I submit that in my Bank Passbook

Savings Account No. XXXXXXX6959, my name is

mentioned as ‘Ranjith’ issued by the State Bank of

India, Villianur Branch, Puducherry. Further, I submit

that my name is mentioned as ‘p´VD’ vide Card No.

189714, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies

and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

Thus, all the names, ‘Ranjith viz., ´V.´ﬁE›’ and

‘p´VD’ are refering one and the same person i.e.,

myself only.

I hereby declare that I shall at all times hereinafter

in all records, deeds and writings and in all

proceedings, dealings and transactions, private as

well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign

my name as ‘Ranjith’ in place and in substitution of

my former names. I hereby verify and confirm that

what has been stated above is true to best of my

knowledge and correct, and nothing material facts

have been concealed thereon.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry,

on this 18th day of January 2023.

562202

R. RANJITH.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Harini alias Varalakshmi, daughter of G. Karunagiri,

Indian inhabitant, aged 22 years and residing at the

house bearing Door No. 1B, Jai Dev Apartments, 16A Cross,

Avvai Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry - 605 008, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may

concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate under Registration No. K/2000/3482,

m y n a m e h a s b e e n m e n t i o n e d a s ‘K. Harini

@ K. Varalakshmi’. In my Central Board of Secondary

Certificate under Roll No. 4623370, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Harini K @ Varalakshmi’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 9154,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Harini («ˆË)’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under

No. ZHN0207423, my name has been mentioned as

‘Harini Varalakshmi («ˆË k´È¬it)’.

In my PAN Card under No. APEPH0433B, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Harini’.

In my Driving Licence under No. PY01

20180006016, my name has been mentioned as ‘Harini

K Varalakshmi’.

108

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[31 January 2023

In my Passport under No. W8494560, my given

name has been mentioned as ‘Harini’.

In the Family Ration Card details under

No. 226187, my name has been mentioned as ‘«ˆË’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid

names are referred, identified and relate to one and

the same person that is me, the deponent herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only, by the name, ‘Harini («ˆË)’ for all

purposes and as such in future, I shall sign my

signature as ‘Harini’ in all documents. Similarly, the

signatures found as ‘Varalakshmi’, in the respective

documents and the signature to be signed as ‘Harini’

are signed by one and the same person that is me.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 18th day of

January 2023.

562203

HARINI ALIAS VARALAKSHMI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Baranikumar, son of Arumugam, residing at

No. 14, Middle Street, Periyakalapet, Puducherry-605 014,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on

oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein, in my Birth

Certificate vide Registration No. M/l982/08155, dated

06-12-1982, in my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX

7907, issued by the Unique Identification Authority

of India, in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card vide

No. GKY0421909, issued by Election Commission of

India, in my PAN Card vide No. CIXPK4062P, issued

by Income-tax Department, Government of India, in

my son Sainath’s Birth Certificate vide Registration

No. E/2011/03596, dated 26-09-2011 and in my another

son Dinesh’s Birth Certificate vide Registration

No. K/2014/344, dated 28-05-2014 and in my Marriage

Certificate vide Registration No. 348 of 2012, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Baranikumar’.

In my Savings Account Passbook of Axis Bank

vide Account No. XXXXXXXXXXX4339, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Kumar. A’.

In the Court Order copy, my name is mentioned

as ‘Kumar @ Baranikumar @ Baranikumar. A’ vide

order No. C.M.P.No. 193/2021, dated 13-12-2021.

In the School Transfer Certificate, my name is

mentioned as ‘Baranikumar. A’ vide Admission

No. 4860/97-98.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid

names are referred, identified and relate to one and

the same person that is myself the deponent herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Baranikumar’.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief

and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 20th day of January 2023.

562206

A. BARANIKUMAR.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Banumathi, daughter of Gurusamy, wife of

Kaleeswaran, Indian inhabitant, aged 49 years and

residing at the house bearing Door No. 13, Kurunji

Street, Kamaraj Nagar, Dhanvantry Nagar, Gorimedu,

Puducherry-605 006, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

School Transfer Certificate under Admission No.

3201/91-92, in my Secondary School Leaving

Certificate under S.No. A4047561, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Banumathi.G’.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificate under

S.No. A3575166, my name has been mentioned as

‘G. Banumathi’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under

No. JTP0374371 and in my Aadhaar Card under

No. XXXX XXXX 0843, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Banumathi (√V–\])’.

In my Bio-Data submitted for employment and in

the Identity Card under Emp.Code : AWD076, issued

by the Director, Directorate for the Welfare of

Backward Classes and Minorities, Government of

Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as

‘G. Banumathy’.

In the Family Ration Card under No. 135873, my

name has been mentioned as ‘√V–\]’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

109

31 January 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name with spelling as

‘Banumathi (√V–\])’ for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 20th day of

January 2023.

562207

G. BANUMATHI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Kamaraj alias Pandidorai, son of Kulasekaran,

Indian inhabitant, aged 60 years and presently residing

at the house bearing Door No. F-2, Preethi Apartment,

situated at No. 27, Vinayagar Kovil Street, Thilashpet,

Puducherry-605 009, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate under Registration No. P/1962/01201,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Kamaraj alias

Pandidorai’. In my Master of Science Education,

Degree Certificate under No. 221, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Kamaraj Pandidorai.K’.

In my Marriage Certificate under Serial Number

l179 of the year 2009, my name has been mentioned as

‘Kamaraj @ Pandidorai’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under No.

NOG0148627, my name has been mentioned as

‘Kamaraj @ Pandidorai (ÔV\´VÎ @ √VıΩ›mÁ´)’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 2210,

my name has been mentioned as ‘K Kamaraj alias

Pandidorai [z ÔV\´VÎ (®) √VıΩmÁ´]’.

In my PAN Card under No. AFUPK4365D, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Kamarajpandidorai’.

In the Saving Account Passbook, issued by IDBI

Bank Limited, Puducherry, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Kamarajpandidorai.K’.

In the Saving Account Passbook, issued by State

Bank of India, PBB Branch, Puducherry, my name has

been mentioned as ‘[email protected]’.

In the Saving Account Passbook issued by Karur

Vysya Bank Limited, Puducherry Branch, my name has

been mentioned as ‘Kamaraj.K’.

In the Birth Certificate of my son by name,

Rajadurai, under Registration No. M/1995/05088,

and in the Birth Certificate of my daughter by name

Chandraleka, under registration No. M/2000/00394,

my name has been mentioned, as ‘Kamaraj @

Pandidorai’ respectively.

In the details of the family members, in the Family

Ration Card under No. 032351, my name has been

mentioned as ‘ÔV\´VÎ (®) √VıΩmÁ´’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name, ‘Kamaraj alias

Pandidorai (ÔV\´VÎ ®[˛≈ √VıΩmÁ´)’, for all

purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of

my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 20th day of

January 2023.

562210

K. KAMARAJ.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Govindarassou, son of Ramachandiran, residing at

No. 6, First Cross Street, Sri Ram Nagar, Ariyankuppam,

Puducherry-605 007, do hereby solemnly affirm and

sincerely state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Govindarassou’ in

my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. 150/2022,

issued by Ariyankuppam Commune Panchayat,

Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Govindarassou’ in

my Driving Licence No. PY-01-19940000335, issued by

the Regional Transport Office, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘ Govindarassou R’

in my PAN Card No. AGYPG5664J, issued by the

Income-tax Department, Government of India.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Govindarassou

(ºÔVsÕ>´V∑)’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX

7746, issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

110

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[31 January 2023

That my name is mentioned as ‘R. Govindarassou’

in my Identity Card Salary Roll No. 422703, issued

by the The Oriental Insurance Company Limited.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Covindarassou’ in

my Marriage Certificate No. 003235, issued by

Ariyankuppam Commune Panchayat, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘R. Govindarassou’

in my 12th Standard Mark List vide Register No. 903001,

issued by the Board of Higher Secondary Examination,

Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as ‘ºÔVsÕ>´V∑’ in

my Family Ration Card No. 039298, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Counsumers

Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

That my name mentioned as ‘Govindarassou

(ºÔVsÕ>´V∑)’ in my Voter’s Identity No. ZQJ0198572,

issued by the Election Commission of India,

Government of India.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid

names are referred, identified and relate to one and

the same person that is me, the deponent herein.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is

‘Govindarassou’.

That the above Particulars are true and correct to

the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 27th day of January 2023.

562212

GOVINDARASSOU.