[171]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

172

Sentence arbitral du Travail

.. 172

Award of the Labour Court .. 172

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s©AÔ^

179

Notices du Gouvernement

.. 179

Government Notices

.. 179

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

183

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 183

Government Notifications

.. 183

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

187

Etablissements dangereux

.. 187

Dangerous Establishments

187

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

187

Annonces

.. 187

Announcements

187

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2023 }

∏©´kˆ |

21 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Février

2023 (2 Phalguna 1944)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

21st

February

2023

172

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 190/AIL/Lab./T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 28th December 2022)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D. (L) No. 25/2017, dated

28-11-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Puducherry, in respect of Dispute between the

Management of M/s. PASIC, Limited, Puducherry and

PASIC Workers Union over reinstatement Thiru

P. Annadassane and Thiru D. Tillegovindane with back

wages.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. V. Sofana Devi, M.L.

Presiding Officer.

Monday, the 28th day of November, 2022.

I.D. (L) No. 25/2017

C.N.R. No. PYPY06-000102-2017

The President,

PASIC Workers Union,

No. 7-8, Moovendar Street,

Mullai Nagar, Orleanpet,

Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Vs.

The Managing Director,

M/s. Puducherry Agro Service and

Industries Corporation Limited (PASIC),

Agro House, Thattanchavady,

Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on 09-11-2022 before

me for final hearing in the presence of Thiru

P. Sankaran, Counsel for the Petitioner, Thiruvalargal

B. Mohandoss, P. Manivannan, Indrajith, K. Velmurugan,

K. Sundarajan, P. Kalirathinam, S. Vijayasanthi,

T. Vijayashanthi and K. Manopriya, Counsels for the

Respondent and after hearing the both sides and

perusing the case records, this Court delivered the

following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry, vide G.O. Rt.

No. 63/AIL/Lab./T/2017 dated 27-04-2017 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry to resolve the following dispute

between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz.,

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the PASIC

Workers Union against the Management of

M/s. Puducherry Agro Service and Industries Corporation

Limited (PASIC), Puducherry over reinstatement of

Thiruvalargal P. Annadassane and D. Tillegovindane

with back wages is justified or not? If justified, what

relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money, if it can be so computed?

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred in

the claim petition:

Thiru P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane are

the President and Secretary of the Petitioner Union

called PASIC Workers Union. D. Tille Govindane

joined in service on 01-01-2003 and P. Annadassane

on 11-10-2004 respectively under the Respondent as

workman. Both of them were issued with Identity

Cards and Employee’s data sheets were secured from

them in the year 2012. EPF deductions were made from

their salary from the year 2005 as per the practice

followed by the Respondent. Mr. P. Annadassane was

in service till 16-07-2014 and D. Tille Govindane till

19-07-2014 respectively without any remark to the

satisfaction of their superiors whatsoever till they

were refused employment orally by the Respondent.

(ii) All of a sudden both were refused employment

and disengaged from 16-07-2014 and 19-07-2014

respectively without any reason except that they

formed an Union and extended moral support to the

fraternal Unions functioning in PASIC which clearly

amounts to victimization and unfair labour practice for

which the PASIC Workers Union objected and sent a

letter dated 11-08-2014 to the Respondent and pleaded

for restoration of both the workmen with back wages

and continuity of service etc., followed by the

Government Employees Associations letter, dated

23-09-2014 in which the PASIC Workers Union is

affiliated.

173

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

(iii) When the Union Office bearers and the

Confederation Office bearers met the Respondent, he

said that the disengagement was done as per the

orders of the Chairman. But the Chairman refused to

meet them informing that the Respondent only would

decide the matter. That when the same leaders met the

Secretary to Government he assured that the matter

would be decided in the governing body and they

would be reinstated with the approval of the governing

body. But finally, the Respondent replied to the

workman D. Tille Govindane through letter dated

05-08-2015 that the question of reinstatement does not

arise and so on when there are about 250 workmen

recruited along with them and continued in service.

Both P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane were

working for more than 10 years without any remark and

so the Respondent cannot say that both of them are

not workmen or disengage them calling by some

designation or the other which is against law and

justice and also the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The

Respondent’s disengagement and refusal of

employment to the workmen is clearly biased, arbitrary,

discriminatory and illegal even without giving an

opportunity of enquiry, terminal benefits etc., after

completion of 10 years of service which is against law

and natural justice.

(iv) The Respondent also admits the averments

of the Petitioner Union's averments regarding the

recruitment of service of both P. Annadassane and

D. Tille Govindane in the counter filed before Labour

Officer (Conciliation) but gives many meaningless and

untenable averments regarding the status and nature

of their job etc., which are not genuine, reasonable

and lawful for a public sector undertaking like PASIC

which is not any man’s personal property.

(v) Once they were appointed they are governed

by law and entitled for benefits under the Industrial

laws and the Respondent is also bound by such laws.

They worked for more than 10 years continuous

service in public sector undertaking like PASIC and

the Respondent is restrained from disengaging them

especially, when more than 200 similar workmen are

allowed to continue in service saying that the question

of reinstatement does not arise.

(vi) In PASIC Staff Service Rules, 1988 as there is

no educational and other qualifications prescribed for

any post under chapter III rule 7 classifications of

posts where there are grades from A, B, C and D with

only some difference in the quantum of salary between

them. There are no classifications like daily wages,

voucher-paid or casual labourers with rules of

recruitment, wages or allowance, leave rules, etc., the

workmen P. Annadassane and D. Thille Govindane

cannot be disengaged.

(vii) If at all the Respondent is genuine and

appointed the said two workmen as per the Service

Rules 1988, under rule 7 classification of posts he

should have issued appointment order at least under

category D with a scale of the maximum of which is

less than ` 1,150 per month to both of them with

effect from their respective dates of appointment and

they cannot be made the scapegoats for the

commissions and omissions of the Respondent.

(viii) As per the Industrial Employment (Standing

Orders) Act, 1946 the said workmen P. Annadassane

and D. Tille Govindane could not have been appointed

as casual labour since definition of casual labour

under the Act is not applicable to them as they were

working throughout the year without any break

continuously and also for more than 10 years which

confer them status of permanency of employment.

That as per the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 also since

they have completed more than 240 days of

continuous service they are entitled to be treated as

permanent for all purposes.

(ix) The Petitioner Union made several representations

to various Authorities and since there was no solution

or remedy raised an Industrial disputes before the

Labour Officer (Conciliation), vide letter dated

11-02-2016 for which the Respondent filed a reply

dated 09-06-2016 and Petitioner Union filed a rejoined

to it on 04-07-2016 for which the Respondent filed

reply dated 22-08-2016 and 12-09-2016 and since there

was no amicable settlement the Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Puducherry made failure recommending

for adjudication by this Court by report dated

17-02-2017. Both the Petitioners have worked for more

than 10 years without any remark to the satisfaction

of their superiors and there is no opportunity for

alternative employment and source of income for their

livelihood and their dependent parents, wife and

children would be put to many hardships and

handicaps and their future is dark and gloomy. Hence

the Petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondent as follows:

Mr. D. Tille Govindane and Mr. P. Annadassane

joined the service of the Respondent as workmen on

01-01-2003 and 11-10-2004 respectively. But, the

Petitioner Union has conveniently omitted to state that

they were initially engaged as voucher paid workmen

from the above stated days and they were made daily

rated labour with effect from 17-11-2005 and 01-10-2005

respectively. It is also admitted fact that deduction

towards EPF have been effected from the year 2005

onwards till they were disengaged with effect from

19-07-2014 and 16-07-2014 respectively.

174

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

(ii) The Thiruvalargal P. Annadassane and D. Tille

Govindane were only daily rated casual employees

and they were engaged on day-to-day basis

depending upon exigencies of work prevailing in the

organization. Their employment was need based one

without any assurance for continuance of employment.

The above casual labour were not recruited in a formal

manner in accordance with rules and regulations

relating to appointment. Such persons employed not

have right to hold the post in PASIC. The conditions

of service cannot be equated to regular employees as

well as permanent employees appointed in accordance

with Recruitment Rules. Under such circumstances,

they cannot have any grievance for their disengagement.

Moreover, their disengagement was without any

motive or malafide intention as alleged by the

Petitioner Union.

(iii) As pointed out in the letter, dated 05-08-2015

addressed to Thiru Tille Govindane, the question of

reinstatement does not arise since he was engaged

only to do casual work on account of exigencies of

work and as per PASIC Staff Service Rules 1988

“Employee” meant a person who is in the whole time

employment of the Corporation but does not include

persons employed on daily wages. The same status

only can be accorded to Thiru Annadassane and so

he cannot claim reinstatement. The dispute has been

raised by PASIC Workers Union, RTU/1709/2012 on

behalf of Annadassane and Tille Govindane, stating

that they are the President and Secretary of the said

Trade Union. As such it becomes necessary to find

out whether such Union is on the live registers of the

Registrar of Trade Unions, Puducherry and whether

that Union has got locus standi to raise dispute on

behalf of Thiruvalargal P. Annadassane and D. Tille

Govindane. As such the issue relating to locus standi

of the Petitioner Union to raise the dispute be decided

in the first instance before giving a finding on other

issues involved in the claim petition.

(iv) The daily rated casual employees cannot claim

treatment on par with regular employees. Continuous

engagement of daily-rated casuals for years together

cannot confer on them right to regularization so as to

make them included in their cadre strength. They do

not have right to hold the post and hence cannot claim

protection when their services are disengaged by their

employer. The above rule is applicable to all the

employees, irrespective of the fact whether they are

engaged in Trade Union work or not.

(v) The Petitioner Union has quoted several

statutory provisions out of context and without

understanding their legal significance. For example the

Petitioner Union has stated that workmen P. Annadassane

and D. Tille Govindane are entitled to be treated as

permanent as they have completed more than 240 days

of continuous service. The petitioner is not justified

in reading between the lines to suit its convenience

by wrong interpretation of law. Hence, prayed for

dismissal of the claim petition.

4. Rejoinder petition Filed by the Petitioner

against the Counter Statement:

The burden of proof lies on the Respondent to

define the meaning of refusal of employment or

non-employment or disengagement from service or

abandonment of service or removal of name of the

Petitioner from attendance register for unauthorized

absence, etc., if no termination of service as mentioned

in para 3 of the counter statement filed by the

Respondent Management.

(ii) The Petitioner was only daily rated casual

employee and he was engaged on day-to-day basis

depending upon exigencies of work whereas he

contradict the same in which he admits the continuous

engagement of the Petitioner as daily rated casual for

years together which is illegal and cannot come under

the definition of casual labour. If the disengagement

was without any motive or malafide, then whatever

reason for disengagement of the President and

Secretary of the Petitioner Union when all other about

250 workmen were continuously engaged who were

recruited along with them which remains a million

dollar question till date.

(iii) When the Respondent utterly failed to issue

any letter till 05-08-2015 after disengagement with

effect from 16-07-2014 and 19-07-2014 for nearly one

year and it was issued only after they made grievance

petition to the Central Home Ministry as mentioned

in the reference which exposes the fact that the

Respondent was least bothered about the law and

practice to be followed by an Authority in Public

Sector undertaking in dealing with the life and death

problems of employers. Hence the Prayer.

5. Point for determination:

Whether the claim Petitioners Thiruvalargal

P. Annadassane and D. Tille Govindane are entitled for

an order of reinstatement with back wages and other

relies as claimed in the claim petition?

5A. On Point:

Thiru. Annadassane himself examined as PW1 and

Ex.Pl to Ex.P15 were marked. On Respondent side,

Thiru. Sivashanmugam, the Managing Director of the

Respondent Management was examined as RW1 and

Ex.R1 marked.

175

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

6. On the point:

This Industrial Dispute has been referred by the

Government of Puducherry over reinstatement of

Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane with

back wages. The admitted facts are both were initially

engaged as voucher paid employees with effect from

01-01-2003 and 11-10-2004 respectively under the

Respondent Management. It is also an admitted fact

that deduction toward EPF have been deducted and

effected from the year 2005 till they were disengaged.

From the exhibits it could be seen that, the Respondent

Management also issued Identity Cards (Ex.Pl & P2)

to the claim Petitioners Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane

and Annadassane. The Respondent Management had

also issued employer data sheet for Mr. Tille

G o v i n d h a n ( E x . P l ) o n 1 5 - 0 3 - 2 0 1 2 a n d f o r

Mr. Annadassane (Ex.P2) on 16-03-2012. It is also an

admitted position between the parties to this dispute

that both Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and

Annadassane were orally informed about their

disengagement.

7. The point of dispute arises is that according to

the Petitioner Union all of a sudden without prior

notice and reasons, the Respondent Management

refused employment to Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane

and Annadassane orally which amounts to clear case

of victimization.

8. Whereas, on the side of the Respondent

Management, it is contended that Thiruvalargal Tille

Govindhane and Annadassane were only daily rated

casual labours and they were engaged on day to day

basis depending upon exigencies of work prevailing

in the Organization. Their employment was need based

one without any assurance for continuance of

employment. They are casual labourers and not

recruited in a formal manner in accordance to Rules

and Regulations relating to appointments. The learned

counsel appearing for the Respondent Management

would also refer the cross examination of PW1 and

submitted that while deposing before this Court he

has admitted the same.

9. The relevant portion is produced hereunder for

better appreciation ÂV–D ]_ÁÈºÔVsÕ>–D

11-10-2004 º>]l_ g´D√ WÁÈl_ Voucher paid

workmen ®[≈ WÁÈl_ √Ël_ ∂\Ï›>©√‚º¶VD

®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. ∏[ÂVπ_ ]™¬Ìo ªaBÏÔ·VÔ

01-10-2005 �ÆD 17-11-2005 x>_ √Ë¬z

∂\Ï›>©√‚º¶VD. 2005-D gı| x>_ PF ∏Ω›>D

ÿƒFB©√‚¶m ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. ∂ÀkVº≈ 16-07-2014

x > K D

1 9 - 0 7 - 2 0 1 4

x > K D

® ™¬ z D

]Ú. ]_ÁÈºÔVsÕ>–¬zD ®]Ï\–>V´Ï WÏkVÔ›>V_,

√Ë \Æ©A ÿƒFB©√‚¶m ®[≈VKD ƒˆ>V[. ]™¬Ìo

ªaBÏÔ^ ∂[≈V¶D º>Ák¬ºÔu√, ∂Àk©º√Vm

WBt¬Ô©√|kVÏÔ^ ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[. WÏkVÔ›][

º>Ák¬ºÔu√

WBt¬Ô©√‚¶>V_,

]™ƒˆ

√Ë

kw∫Ô©√|D ®[≈ cÆ]l_ÈV\_ WBt¬Ô©√‚º¶VD

®[≈V_ ƒˆB_È. ÂV∫Ô^ º>Ák¬ºÔu√ ]™ƒˆ

ªaBÏÔ·VÔ WBt¬Ô©√‚¶ WÁÈl_ Staff Service Rule

1988á[√Ω WBt¬Ô©√¶s_ÁÈ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_

ƒˆB_È. √Ël_ ºƒÏ©√>uz x[√VÔ ºÂÏÔVð_

Â¶›>©√‚¶m ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆB_È. x>ÈÁ\ﬂƒˆ[

√ˆÕmÁ´l[º√ˆ_

ÂV–D,

]_ÁÈºÔVsÕ>[

®[√kÏ ∂Á\ﬂƒÏ ]Ú. Â\ﬂEkVBD ∂kÏÔπ[

√ˆÕmÁ´l[º√ˆ_ WBt¬Ô©√‚º¶VD. Staff Service

Ruleá[√Ω ÂV∫Ô^ WBt¬Ô©√¶s_ÁÈ ®[≈VKD

∂>™V_ √Ël_ ¿Ω©√>uÔV™ cˆÁ\ ºÔVÚD

∂ÚÔÁ>l_ÁÈ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆB_È. ºkÁÈ

kVF©A ∂KkÈÔD JÈ\VÔ°D ÂV∫Ô^ √Ë WB\™D

ÿƒFB©√¶s_ÁÈ ®[≈V_ ƒˆ>V[.

10. Further PW1 deposed that, ®[Á™•D

]_ÁÈºÔVsÕ>Á™•D 16-07-2014 �ÆD 19-07-2014

º>]Ôπ_ √Ë \Æ©A ÿƒF>VÏÔ^ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_

ƒˆ>V[. ∂Õ> √Ë \Æ©A¬z ®]´VÔ ÂV∫Ô^ ®Õ>

cˆÁ\•D ºÔV´ >z]l_ÁÈ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_

ƒˆB_È. WÏkVÔ ∂]ÔVˆÔ”¬zD ®∫Ô”¬zD ÷Á¶ºB

®Õ>s> ÔÚ›m ºkÆ√V|D, sº´V>xD ÷_ÁÈ.

2012áD gı| PASIC Workmens Union ®[≈

ÿ√Bˆ_ ÿ>Vauƒ∫ÔD ÿ>V¶∫˛º™VD. ∂]_ ÂV[

>ÁÈk´VÔ°D. ]_ÁÈºÔVsÕ>[ ÿƒBÈV·´VÔ°D

÷ÚÕº>VD. ÿ>Vauƒ∫ÔD g´D∏¬Ô©√‚¶ ÂV^ x>_

®∫Ô”¬z 2014áD gı| √Ë \Æ©A ÿƒF> ÂV‚Ô^

kÁ´ WÏkVÔ›]uz ®∫Ô^ *m ®Õ> zu≈ﬂƒV‚|D

˛Á¶BVm. ∂>™V_ WÏkVÔD ®∫ÔÁ· √a kV∫zD

∂kEBt_ÁÈ ®[Æ ÿƒV[™V_ ƒˆB_È.

11. PW1 further deposed before this court as,

®∫Ô^ WÏkVÔ›][ WB\™ s]Ôπ[ ˇµ ÿ>VaÈVπ

®[≈ kÁ´BÁ´ xø ºÂ´ √ËBV·Ú¬z \‚|D>V[

ÿ√VÚÕmD, ]™¬Ìo ªaBÏÔ”¬z ÿ√VÚÕ>Vm ®[≈V_

ƒˆ>V[. ®∫Ô·V_ g´D∏¬Ô©√‚¶ PASIC ÿ>Vauƒ∫ÔD

÷[ÆÂV^

kÁ´¬zD

÷B∫˛¬ÿÔVıΩÚ¬˛≈m.

ÿ>Vauƒ∫Ô √]kV·Ï, ®∫Ô^ ÿ>Vauƒ∫Ô›]uz

∂∫ˇÔV´D kw∫˛•^·VÏ. ®∫Ô·m >M©√‚¶ √Ë

\Æ©A ƒD√Õ>\VÔ. >VkV ÿ>V¶∫zk>uz ®∫Ô^

ÿ>Vauƒ∫Ô›][ ƒVÏ√VÔ yÏ\V™D WÁ≈ºku≈©√‚¶m.

WÁ≈ºku≈©√‚¶ yÏ\V™D, ®[Æ WÁ≈ºku≈©√‚¶m

®[Æ

WÁ™s_ÁÈ

®[≈V_

ƒˆ>V[.

®∫Ô^

÷Úkˆ[ >M©√‚¶ ∏´ﬂƒÁ™ ƒD√Õ>\VÔ kw¬z

ÿ>V¶∫zk>uz yÏ\V™D WÁ≈ºku≈©√¶V> WÁÈl_,

ÿ>Vauƒ∫Ô›]uz

kw¬z

ÿ>V¶∫zk>uz

∂ÚÔÁ>l_ÁÈ ®[≈V_ ƒˆB_È.

12. Further, it is a case of the Respondent

Management that as per PASIC Staffs Service Rules,

1988 an employee means a person who is in the whole

time employment of the Corporation but does not

176

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

include persons employed on daily wages. The same

status only can be accorded to both Thiruvalargal Tille

Govindhane and Annadassane and so they cannot

claim reinstatement. Further, the learned counsel for

the Respondent Management stressed upon that

continuous engagement of daily rated casuals for years

together cannot confer on them a right to

regularization so as to make them included in their

cadre strength. They don’t have right to hold the post

and hence cannot claim protection when their services

are disengaged by their employer.

13. Therefore, the learned counsel for the

Respondent

Management

has

concluded

his

arguments that persons like casual labourers who were

not recruited in accordance with Rules and

Regulations don't have any right to hold the posts in

PASIC. The conditions of service cannot be equated

to regular employees as well as Permanent employees

appointed in accordance with the Recruitment Rules.

The learned counsel for the Respondent Management

referred and relied upon the following case-laws

during arguments: (i) (2016) 1 SCC (L & S) 186

Vice-Chancellor, Lucknow University vs. Akhilesh

Kumar; (ii) (2019) 2 SCC(L &S) 37; (iii) (2019) 2 SCC

(L &S) 98 and (iv) (2011) 1 SCC (L&S) 659.

14. Heard both. Perused the records.

15. On Petitioner Union side Ex.Pl to P15 were

exhibited to substantiate their case. Ex.Pl and P2 are

Employees Date sheet issued to both Thiruvalargal

Tille Govindhane and Annadassane. On perusal, it can

be seen that Tille Govindhane’s initial date of

engagement is 01-03-2003 as voucher paid employee

till 17-11-2005. Thereafter, he was engaged as daily

rated labourer from 17-11-2005 till his date of

disengagement. In Ex.Pl his Identity Card copy issued

by the Respondent Management also found place.

From his Identity Card it can be seen that he was

engaged as DRL that is Daily Rated Labourer. Along

with the Identity Card, his Employees Provident Fund

Scheme receipt also enclosed showing that EPF has

been paid for him for the Financial Year 2006-2007

and 2005-2006.

16. On perusal of Ex.P2, it can be seen that

Mr. Annadassane’s initial date of engagement is

11-10-2004 as contract employee till 30-09-2005.

Thereafter, he was engaged as daily rated labourer

from 01-10-2005 till his date of disengagement. In

Ex.P2 his Identity Card copy issued by the

Respondent Management also found place. From his

Identity Card it can be seen that he was engaged as

DRL that is Daily Rated Labourer. Along with the

Identity Card, his Employees Provident Fund Scheme

receipt also enclosed showing that EPF has been paid

for him for the Financial Year 2008-2009. Therefore,

from their own exhibits namely Ex.Pl and P2 admittedly

without any doubt they both were engaged by the

Respondent Management from their initial induction

till their disengagement as voucher paid employees,

contract and as daily rated labourers. It is also not

disputed on either side.

17. Ex.P3 is the representation of the Petitioner

Union to Chairman/Managing Director of the

Respondent Management (PASIC) requesting for

reengagement of Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and

Annadassane into the service of Respondent

Management, Ex.P6, Ex.P8 are the representations

given by the Petitioner Union before the Labour

Officer (Conciliation), Government of Puducherry.

Ex.P4 and Ex.P9 are the representations given by the

Petitioner Union to the Secretary (Agriculture),

Government of Puducherry. All these representations

given by the Petitioner Union for the same claim which

was made and referred before this Court. In all these

representations that is Ex.P3, Ex.P4, Ex.P6, P8 and P9,

Petitioner Union has raised the same plea that

Respondent Management was abruptly disengaged

Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and Annadassane who

were casual labourers without any valid reasons and

requested to restore them in the job. In addition, the

Petitioner Union has produced Ex.P14 and Ex.P15

regarding unpaid wages for 18 months for the period

from 2011 to 2014 to be paid to Thiruvalargal Tille

Govindhan and Annadassane respectively by the

Respondent Management. From the calculation made

by the Petitioner Union vide Ex.P14 and P15, the

arrears of wage for the said 18 months is ` 1,36,272.00

for each Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhan and

Annadassane. This fact of wage arrears in Ex.P14 and

P15 has not been disputed by the Respondent

Management anywhere in this case.

18. During arguments the learned counsel appearing

for the Petitioner Union submitted that having

deducted the EPF, they have to be considered as full

time workmen, illegal denial of employment is violative

of provisions of Industrial Disputes Act. The above

said argument seems to be incorrect for the reason

that EPF is a Social Security benefit such Provident

Fund must be provided to all employees/workers who

are engaged on contract/casual/daily wages basis

177

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

since there is no distinction between a person

employed on permanent, temporary, contractual or

casual basis under section 2(f) of the EPF Act.

Therefore, having EPF account and deductions

effected thereon, they should be considered as

Permanent Employee is not an acceptable argument.

Thus rejected.

19. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in RBI vs.

S. Mani reported in (2005) 5 SCC 100 held that in law

240 days of continuous service by itself does not give

right to claim permanence. Further, it has been held

by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Himanshu

Kumar Vidyarthy vs. State of Bihar reported in 1997

IV ADSC 196 that admittedly they were not appointed

to the posts in accordance with the rules but were

engaged on the basis of need of the work. They are

temporary employees working on daily wages. Under

these circumstances, their disengagement from service

cannot be construed to be a retrenchment under

Industrial Disputes Act. The concept of ‘retrenchment’

therefore, cannot be stretched to such an extent as to

cover these employees. Although by way of definition

of workman under section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes

Act ‘daily wage’ worker also falls within the definition

of workman it cannot be said that daily wages have

all the rights and duties which are available to the

regular employee of the Respondent Management.

20. The same view has been taken by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court in State of Haryana vs. Jasmer Singh

reported in (2015) 4 SCC 458 that persons who were

employed on daily wages cannot be treated as on a

par with persons in regular service holding similar

posts. Daily rated workers are not required to possess

the qualification prescribed for regular workers, nor

do they have to fulfill the requirement relating to age

at the time of recruitment. They are not selected in

the manner in which the regular employees are

selected. In other words the requirement for selection

are not as rigorous. There are also provisions relating

to regular service such as the liability of a member of

the service to be transferred, and this being subject

to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the authorities as

prescribed, which the daily rated workmen are not

subjected to. They cannot, therefore, be equated with

regular workmen for the purpose for their wages. Nor

can they claim the minimum of regular pay scale of

the regularly employed.

21. Undisputedly, in the present case both the claim

Petitioners Thiruvalargal Tille Govindhane and

Annadassane were daily wage labourers. Hence, they

have no right to the posts because the appointment

of daily wages are made by not complying or

observing the procedural formalities in consonance to

any rules, regulations or by observing the procedures

prescribed for the recruitment. Engagement of the

daily wager commences and ends every day. There is

a contractual deployment for every day. It is up to the

Employer/Respondent Management to allow to

continue the employment or disengage the daily

wager at any time in absence of work.

22. In view of the decision in Magarasem vs. State

of UP and others reported in 2002 (2) AWC 1712 the

daily

wagers

engaged

without

any

written

appointment order could be terminated without any

written Order. Therefore, daily and casual workers who

are engaged in disregard of all rules cannot be allowed

to continue when there is no work and their

engagement is not required. Daily wagers are deployed

on temporary assignment only and not on sanctioned

posts and even if completion of 240 days work by

daily wager cannot attribute status of casual workman

under Industrial Disputes Act and as such it does not

create right to claim for reengagement as claimed in

the petition.

23. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India upheld in

various cases that compelling the Management

employer to observe or to engage continuously the

persons who were engaged by the Respondent

Management as casual workers/daily rated labours for

a long period on the ground that such a practice is

violative of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution

would itself offend another aspect of Article 14 that

is by choosing initially such persons without any

rational procedure recognized by the Rules and

Regulations or by law but to continue them in

engagement of services without any need or exigencies

would definitely deprive eligible candidates who were

similarly situated to compete for such employment.

24. In view of the above ratios held by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India in various occasions it could

be seen that it is again and again reiterated that daily

wager cannot have a right to hold the claim for

reengagement. Hence, this Court is of the considered

view that the claim for seeking an order directing

reinstatement of service as daily rated employees, with

continuity of service and back wages cannot be

sustained.

25. In the result, the Reference is decided as

Unjustified and the Industrial Dispute is dismissed.

No Costs.

178

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this

the 28th day of November, 2022.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness:

PW1

— 06-02-2019

Annadasane

List of petitioner’s exhibits:

Ex.Pl

— 05-03-2012

Photocopy of the Employee

Data

Sheet,

Employee

Identity Card and EPF Slip of

the Tillegovindane.

Ex.P2 — 06-03-2012

Photocopy of the Employee

Data

Sheet,

Employee

Identity Card and EPF Slip of

the Annadassane.

Ex.P3 — 11-08-2014

Photocopy of the letter

given by the Petitioner

Union to the Respondent

Management.

Ex.P4 — 23-09-2014

Photocopy of the letter

given by the Confederation

of Puducherry Government

Employees’ Association to

the Respondent Management.

Ex.P5 — 05-08.2015

Photocopy of the letter

given by the Respondent

Management

the

Petitioner Tillegovindane.

Ex.P6 — 11-02-2016

Photocopy

the

representation submitted by

the

Petitioner

Union

before the Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Puducherry.

Ex.P7 — 09-06-2016

Photocopy of the reply

letter

given

the

Respondent to the Labour

Officer

(Conciliation),

Puducherry.

Ex.P8 — 04-07-2016

Photocopy of the Rejoinder

given by the Petitioner

Union to the Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Puducherry.

Ex.P9 — 18-07-2016

Photocopy of the letter

petition by the Confederation

of Puducherry Government

Employees’ Association to

the Secretary to Government

(Agriculture), Puducherry.

Ex.P10 — 22-08-2016

Photocopy of the reply (to

the

Rejoinder)

the

Respondent Management

to the Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Puducherry.

Ex.P11 — 12-09-2016

Photocopy of the letter

given by the Respondent

Management to the Labour

Officer

(Conciliation),

Puducherry

stating

the

non-appearance

the

Conciliation Proceedings.

Ex.P12 — 17-02-2017

Photocopy of the Failure

Report given by the Labour

Officer

(Conciliation),

Puducherry.

Ex.P13 — 27-04-2017

Photocopy

the

Notification of the Labour

Department, Puducherry.

Ex.P14 — July 2011 to

Photocopy of the Pending

March 2014 Salary Arrear detail of

Annadassane.

Ex.P15 — July 2011 to

Photocopy of the Pending

March 2014 Salary Arrear detail of Tille

Govindane.

List of respondent’s witness:

RW10 — 05-07-2022

K. Sivashanmugam, Managing

Director, PASIC, Puducherry.

List of respondents’s exhibits:

EX.R1 — —

Photocopy of the PASIC

(Staff Service) Rules, 1988.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

179

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (WOMEN), FRENCH SECTION

Puducherry, dated 30th January 2023.

NOTICE

FRENCH PUBLIC EXAMINATION – MARCH 2023

The various French Public Examinations will be held on the dates and places indicated in the following statements:

Sl.

Name of the

Date of

Place of

Centre

Place in which

Date and time

No.

examination

registration

examinations

in which the

are to be held

examination

will begin

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Brevet Elémentaire

01-02-2023

Office of the Deputy

Puducherry

St. Louis de

15-03-2023

Director (Women),

Gonzague

9.00 a.m.

15-02-2023

French Education,

Government Aided

Puducherry.

High School,

Puducherry.

Do.

Office of the Chief

Karaikal

College

Do.

Educational Officer,

d’Enseignement

Karaikal.

Secondaire,

Karaikal.

Do.

Office of the Chief

Mahe

Ecole Centrale et

Do.

Educational Officer,

Cours

Mahe.

Complementaries,

Mahe.

Certificat d’Etudes

16-02-2023

Office of the Deputy

Puducherry

Pensionnat de

03-04-2023

Primaires Elémentaire

Director (Women),

Jeunes Filles,

9.00 a.m.

de Français

28-02-2023

French Education,

Mission Street,

Puducherry.

Do.

Office of the Chief

Karaikal

College

Do.

Educational Officer,

d’Enseignement

Karaikal.

Secondaire,

Karaikal.

Do.

Office of the Chief

Mahe

Ecole Centrale et

Do.

Educational Officer,

Cours

Mahe.

Complementaries,

Mahe.

N.B. :— Private candidates for “Brevet Elémentaire” and “Certificat d’Etudes Primaires Elémentaire de Français”

must obtain their Hall tickets from the Headmaster of the respective Institutions at which they are to be examined

during the four days before the commencement of the examination by producing a certificate of identity.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD,

Director of School Education.

180

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (WOMEN), FRENCH SECTION

NOTICE

FRENCH PUBLIC EXAMINATION – JUNE 2023

The French Public Examinations will be held on the dates and places indicated in the following statement:

Sl.

Name of the

Date of

Place of

Centre

Place in which

Date and time

No.

examination

registration

examinations

in which the

are to be held

examination

will begin

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Brevet Elémentaire

03-04-2023

Office of the Deputy

Puducherry

D. Simon Cardinal

05-06-2023

Director (Women),

Lourdusamy

9.00 a.m.

15-04-2023

French Education,

Government Girls’

Puducherry.

High School,

Puducherry.

Do.

Office of the

Karaikal

College

Do.

Chief Educational

d’Enseignement

Officer, Karaikal.

Secondaire, Karaikal.

Do.

Office of the Chief

Mahe

Ecole Centrale et Cours

Do.

Educational Officer,

Complementaries, Mahe.

Mahe.

N.B. :— Private candidates for “Brevet Elémentaire” must obtain their Hall tickets from the Headmaster of

the respective Institutions (Centre of examination) at which they are to be examined during the four days before

the commencement of the examination by producing a certificate of identity.

*Only candidates who have secured the minimum marks (33.33%) of the aggregate are permitted to

appear for the session of June 2023 (II Session) and the Examinatiion Centres are subject to change considering the

number of candidates.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD,

Director of School Education.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (WOMEN), FRENCH SECTION

Puducherry, dated 30th January 2023.

NOTICE

FRENCH PUBLIC EXAMINATION – MARCH 2023

The various French Public Examinations will be held on the dates and places indicated in the following statement:

Sl.

Name of the

Date of

Place of

Centre

Place in which

Date and time

No.

examination

registration

examinations

in which the

are to be held

examination

will begin

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

Brevet Elémentaire

01-02-2023

Office of the Deputy

Puducherry

St. Louis de

15-03-2023

Director (Women),

Gonzague

9.00 a.m.

15-02-2023

French Education,

Government Aided

Puducherry.

High School,

Puducherry.

181

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Do.

Office of the Chief

Karaikal

College

Do.

Educational Officer,

d’Enseignement

Karaikal.

Secondaire,

Karaikal.

Do.

Office of the Chief

Mahe

Ecole Centrale et

Do.

Educational Officer,

Cours

Mahe.

Complementaries,

Mahe.

Certificat d’Etudes

16-02-2023

Office of the Deputy

Puducherry

Pensionnat de

03-04-2023

Primaires Elémentaire

Director (Women),

Jeunes Filles,

9.00 a.m.

de Français

28-02-2023

French Education,

Mission Street,

Puducherry.

Do.

Office of the Chief

Karaikal

College

Do.

Educational Officer,

d’Enseignement

Karaikal.

Secondaire,

Karaikal.

Do.

Office of the Chief

Mahe

Ecole Centrale et

Do.

Educational Officer,

Cours

Mahe.

Complementaries,

Mahe.

N.B. :— Private candidates for “Brevet Elémentaire” and “Certificat d’Etudes Primaires Elémentaire de Français”

must obtain their Hall tickets from the Headmaster of the respective Institutions at which they are to be examined

during the four days before the commencement of the examination by producing a certificate of identity.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD,

Director of School Education.

————

ETAT DE POUDOUCHÉRY

SERVICE DE L’ENSEIGNEMENT

No. (Exam.)8-49/Edn./DD/FE/EC/2023.

Poudouchéry, le 30-1-2023.

EXAMEN DU BREVET ELEMENTAIRE SESSION DE MARS 2023

CALENDRIER DES EPREUVES

Date

Matiere

Heures

(1)

(2)

(3)

Mercredi, le 15 Mars

2023

Composition Française

9h00 – 11h00

Jeudi,

le 16 Mars

2023

Anglais

9h00 – 11h00

Vendredi,

le 17

Mars

2023

Sciences

9h00 – 11h00

Lundi,

le 20 Mars

2023

Mathématiques

9h00 – 11h00

Mardi,

le 21 Mars

2023

Histoire et Géographie

9h00 – 11h00

Mercredi, le 22 Mars

2023

Orthographe

9h00

(45 minutes pour relire la dictée

et répondre aux questions)

Cet ordre ne doit en aucun cas être modifié.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD,

Director of School Education.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

182

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

ETAT DE POUDOUCHÉRY

SERVICE DE L’ENSEIGNEMENT

No. (Exam.)8-49/Edn./DD/FE/EC/2023.

Poudouchéry, le 30-1-2023.

EXAMEN DU CERTIFICAT D’ETUDES PRIMAIRES ELEMENTAIRES DE FRANÇAIS

SESSION D’ AVRIL 2023

CALENDRIER DES EPREUVES

Date

Matiere

Heures

(1)

(2)

(3)

Lundi, le 3 Avril 2023 (Matinée)

Composition Française

9h00

(Durée : 50 minutes)

Orthographe Française

10h00

(40 minutes pour relire la dictée

et répondre aux questions)

Calcul

11h00

(Durée : 50 minutes)

Lundi, le 3 Avril 2023 (Soirée)

Histoire, Géographie et

14h00

Sciences.

(Durée : 50 minutes)

Anglais

15h00

(Durée : 45 minutes)

Dessin

15h45

(Durée : 30 minutes)

Mardi, le 4 Avril 2023 (Matinée)

Lecture et Chant

9h00

Cet ordre ne doit en aucun cas être modifié.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD,

Director of School Education.

————

ETAT DE POUDOUCHÉRY

SERVICE DE L’ENSEIGNEMENT

No. (Exam.)8-49/Edn./DD/FE/EC/2023.

Poudouchéry, le 30-1-2023.

EXAMEN DU BREVET ELEMENTAIRE SESSION DE JUIN 2023

CALENDRIER DES EPREUVES

Date

Matiere

Heures

(1)

(2)

(3)

Lundi,

5 Juin

2023

Composition Française

9h00 – 11h00

Mardi,

6 Juin

2023

Anglais

9h00 – 11h00

Mercredi, le

7 Juin

2023

Sciences

9h00 – 11h00

Jeudi,

8 Juin

2023

Mathématiques

9h00 – 11h00

Vendredi,

9 Juin

2023

Histoire et Géographie

9h00 – 11h00

Lundi,

le 12 Juin

2023

Orthographe

9h00

(45 minutes pour relire la dictée

et répondre aux questions)

Cet ordre ne doit en aucun cas être modifié.

P. T. RUDRA GOUD,

Director of School Education.

183

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

(HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION)

(G.O. Ms. No. 08,

Puducherry, dated 06th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, the

following Associate Professors, shall retire on the

afternoon of 28-02-2023.

Sl.

Name and

Name of the

No.

Designation

institution

(1)

(2)

(3)

Dr. B. Ramachandra Reddy,

Kanchi Mamunivar

Associate Professor of

Government Institute

History.

for Postgraduate

Studies and Research,

Puducherry.

Dr. S. Babu,

–do–

Associate Professor of

History.

(By order)

M. V. HIRAN,

Under Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 11/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. REIL Electricals India Limited, Puducherry and

REIL Electricals India Limited, Welfare Union, over

charter of demands regarding wages revision and other

Allied Welfare measures, in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Tribunal Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The

Tribunal Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of reliance

and witnesses to the Tribunal Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the REIL

Electricals India Limited Welfare Union, against the

management of M/s. REIL Electricals India Limited,

Puducherry, over charter of demands with regard to

wages revision and other Allied Welfare measures is

justified or not? If justified, to give appropriate

direction?

(ii) To what other relief the workmen represented

by the Union are entitled to?

(iii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 12/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Nithya Packaging Private Limited, Puducherry

and Thiru P. Sivaraman, over reinstatement along with

attendant benefits, in respect of the matter mentioned

in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

184

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner

Thiru P. Sivaraman, against the management of

M/s. Nithya Packaging Private Limited, Puducherry,

over reinstatement along with attendant benefits is

justified or not? If justified, what relief the petitioner

is entitled to?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 13/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Private Limited,

Puducherry and the Petitioner’s Union Gencor Pacific

Auto Engineering Thozhilalargal Naam Thamizar

Thozhir Sangam, over strike by the Union workmen

towards transfer of Union President Thiru K. Ezhumalai

and Thiru S. Segar, Joint Secretary, in respect of the

matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner’s

Union “Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Thozhilalargal

Naam Thamizhar Thozhir Sangam”, against the

Management of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering

Private Limited, Puducherry and the Petitioner’s

Union Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Thozhilalargal

Naam Thamizhar Thozhir Sangam, over strike by the

Union workmen towards transfer of Union President

Thiru K. Ezhumalai and Thiru S. Segar, Joint Secretary

of the said Union by way of victimization is legal and

justified? If justified, to give appropriate direction to

what remedies to be entitled in this dispute?

(ii) Whether the stand taken by the management

of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Private

Limited, Puducherry, regarding veracity of the

Petitioner’s Union duly registered under the Trade

Unions Act, 1926 is legal and justified? If justified,

to give appropriate direction.

(iii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 14/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited, Puducherry and

185

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Hidesign India Private Limited, Labour Union, over

breach of settlement of wage revision and other allied

welfare measures, in respect of the matter mentioned in

the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the

Award within 3 months from the date of issue of

reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall

file a statement of claim complete with relevant

documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial

Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of

the order of reference and also forward a copy of such

statement to each one of the opposite parties involved

in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Hidesign

India Private Limited, Labour Union, over breach of

12(3) settlement over wage revisions and other allied

welfare measures has been arrived on 07-01-2021

before the Labour Officer (Conciliation) by the

management of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited,

Puducherry, is justified or not? If justified, to give

appropriate direction?

(ii) During the pendency of settlement arrived

between the same parties, whether the demand of the

Hidesign India Private Limited, Labour Union for new

Charter of demands towards wage revision and other

allied welfare measures during subsistence of 12 (3)

settlement arrived on 07-01-2021 which would remain

in force up to 30-09-2024 is legal and justified?

If justified, to give appropriate direction?

(iii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 15/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Anandu Brandy Shop, Bharathi Street, Puducherry

and Thiru Thamizhselvam, over his non-employment

and other attendant benefits, in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner

Thiru S. Thamizhselvam, against the management of

M/s. Anandu Brandy Shop, Bharathi Street, Puducherry,

over reinstatement along with attendant benefits or

` 5 Lakhs in lieu of reinstatement is justified or not?

If justified, give appropriate directions.

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

186

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 16/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 7th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited, Puducherry and

Hidesign India Private Limited, Labour Union, over

payment of bonus @ 19.25% for the year 2021-22, in

respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the

Award within 3 months from the date of issue of

reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall

file a statement of claim complete with relevant

documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial

Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of

the order of reference and also forward a copy of such

statement to each one of the opposite parties involved

in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Hidesign

India Private Limited, Labour Union, against the

management of M/s. Hidesign India Private Limited,

Puducherry, over payment of bonus @ 19.25% for the

year 2021-22, is legal and justified? If justified, to give

appropriate direction?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)

(G.O. Ms. No. 06, Puducherry, dated 09th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The Notice of voluntary retirement given under rule

43 (1) and (2) of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules,

2021 by Thiru M. Mahadoum, Assistant Engineer,

presently holding the post of Executive Engineer on

‘Current Duty Charge’ basis and deputed/designated as

General Manager (Planning) at Puducherry Smart City

Development Limited, Puducherry, has been accepted and

he is admitted into retirement with effect from the

forenoon of 16-02-2023.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE,

Under Secretary to Government (Works).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 08, Puducherry, dated 09th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The Notice of voluntary retirement given under

rule 43(1) of Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules,

2021 by Thiru M. Kasinathan, Pondicherry Civil Service

(Entry Grade) Officer ad hoc, Block Development Officer,

Ariyankuppam Block, Puducherry, is accepted and he

shall retire from service with effect from the forenoon

of 01-03-2023.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

V. JAISANKAR,

Under Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

(SECRETARIAT WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 45, Puducherry, dated 13th February 2023)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Ms. M. Kannagi, Vice-Principal, Dr. Ambedkar Government

Higher Secondary School, Kirumampakkam, Puducherry,

is admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon

of 28-02-2023.

(By order)

F.P. VERBINA JAYARAJ,

Under Secretary to Government

(School Education).

187

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

YANAM MUNICIPALITY, YANAM

Yanam, the 7th February 2023.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested for permission to setup a new establishment to the following

industry within the Yanam Municipal limits, as detailed below.

Sl.

Name and address

Address of the

Industry

Power

No.

of the applicant

industry site

proposed

requirement

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Tmt. Kalla Machara Krishna Bhavani,

M/s. Surya Polymers,

New establishment

70 H.P.

Proprietrix, D. No. 07-01-042,

D. No. 05-02-088,

Pydikondala Street, Yanam.

Adavipolam, Yanam.

In conformity with the rule 8 of the Puducherry Municipalities (Grant of Licences and Permissions)

Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union Territory by the Puducherry Municipalities Act, 1973, objections, if any, for

setting up of a new establishment of above industry, are invited to reach the Commissioner, Yanam Municipality

within ten days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections so received within the specified period will be considered by the Yanam Municipality.

K. RAMAKRISHNA,

Commissioner.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

NO. 49416/FD/F2/A2/2023.

Puducherry, dated 14th February 2023.

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub. : Finance – Notification of acceptance of

voluntary retirement of Tmt. A. Maria

Jacintha,

Senior

Accounts

Officer,

Co-operative Department, Puducherry,

Cancellation – Orders – Issued.

Ref. : l. This Department’s G.O. Ms. No. 91/FD/F2/

A2/2022-23, dated 20-12-2022 and

2. I.D Note No. 79767/Secy/Co-op/PA/23,

dated 05-01-2023 of the Chief Secretariat

(Cooperation), Puducherry.

The Notification of acceptance of voluntary

retirement of Tmt. A. Maria Jacintha, Senior Accounts

Officer, Co-operative Department, Puducherry, issued

vide reference first cited stands cancelled.

(By order)

K. GOVINDARAJAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

AFFIDAVIT

I, Heera @ Himsudha, w/o. Srihariharan, Hindu, aged

about 28 years, residing at No. 211, Chetti Street,

Puducherry, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and

state on oath as follows:-

That I am the deponent herein.

In my Birth Certificate registered with

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry under

Registration No. C/1994/02212, dated 08-09-1994, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Heera @ Himsudha’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under No.

IUM0052167, issued by the Election Commission of

India, my name has been mentioned as ‘Heera @

Himsudha’.

In my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 9250, issued

by the Unique Identification Authority of India, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Heera alias Himsudha’.

In my Bank Passbook of City Union Bank Limited,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Heera alias

Himsudha’.

188

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

In my Bank Passbook of UCO Bank, my name has

been mentioned as ‘Heera alias Himsudha’.

In my PAN Card, under No. AIUPH6295G, issued

by the Income-tax Department, Government of India,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Heera’.

In my Family Ration Card No. 005188, issued by

the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer

Affairs, Government of Puducherry, my name has

been mentioned as ‘Í´V (®) ND∑>V’.

Hence, I do hereby declare that all the above-mentioned

names viz., ‘Heera @ Himsudha’, ‘Heera alias

Himsudha’, ‘Heera’ and ‘Í´V (®) ND∑>V’ in the

above documents are referred to one and the same

person i.e. myself only.

I made this affidavit in lieu proof of my names’

identity.

I state that what are all stated above is true to the

best of my knowledge, belief and information and

nothing material has been concealed thereon.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Puducherry, on this 28th day of January 2023.

562225 S. HEERA @ HIMSUDHA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, T S K M Prasad son of Jayasuryam, aged about

44 years, residing at No. 39, 2nd Floor, Sundarar Street,

Thirukuralar Nagar, Arumparthapuram, Villianur Commune

Panchayat, Puducherry-605 110, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and well known the

facts of the affidavit.

I hereby state that according to my Community,

Nativity and Date of Birth Certificate vide No. 155200,

issued by Mandal Revenue Officer, Srisailam,

Sundipenta, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh my

name is mentioned as ‘T. Srinivasa Krishna Meher

Prasad’.

Further, I state that in my Secondary School

Certificate, vide Registration No. 0337054, issued by

Board of Secondary Education, Andhra Pradesh, in

my Pass Certificate-cum-memorandum of Marks vide

Registration No. 177290, issued by Board of

Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh, in my

Diploma Course Certificate vide No. 200304002,

issued by State Board of Technical Education and

Training, Andhra Pradesh and in Master of Business

Administration vide Register No. 113306, in my Hindu

Marriage Register vide serial No. 323 of 2008, issued

by Marriage Registrar, Villianur Sub-Registrar office,

Puducherry and in my Bank Account Passbook of

HDFC Bank, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as

‘T.S.K.M. Prasad’.

Further, I state that in my Aadhaar Card vide

No. XXXX XXXX 1550, issued by Unique Identification

of Authority of India, and in my Permanent Account

Number (PAN) vide No. CEVPM1629A issued by

Income-tax Department, my name is mentioned as

‘Thangella Palli Srinivasa Krishna Meher Prasad’.

Further, I state that in my Regional Passport

bearing No. R0916072 issued by Regional Passport

Office, Chennai, Republic of India, my surname is

mentioned as ‘Thangella Palli’ and my given name is

‘Srinivasa Krishna Meher Prasad’.

Whereas, in my Family Ration Card vide serial

No. 214408, issued by the Department Civil Supplies

and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, my name is

ÿ\«Ï ∏´ƒV›’.

Hence, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid

the names viz, ‘T. Srinivasa Krishna Meher Prasad’,

‘T.S.K.M. Prasad’, ‘Thangella Palli Srinivasa Krishna

Meher Prasad’, surname ‘Thangella Palli’ given name

pMkVƒ ˛Úið ÿ\«Ï ∏´ƒV›’ are denoting one

and same person, they referring myself only.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this

10th day of February 2023.

562228

T S K M PRASAD.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Mahamood Vala Ppakath, son of K.Kader Kutty @

Kallarakal Abdoulkader, aged 63 years, residing at Fadis,

Manjakkal, Mahe, do hereby solemnly affirm and state

on oath as follows:

1. I state that my name has been entered in the

Birth Certificate vide Registration No. M/1959/00309

as ‘Valappagatte Poutimpoureil Abdoulla’, issued by

Registrar of Births and Deaths, Mahe Municipality,

Mahe.

189

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

2. I state that my name has been entered as

‘V.P.Mahamood’ in my Family Ration Card No. 001530,

issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and

Consumers Affairs, Mahe, Government of Puducherry.

3. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Mahamood Vala Ppakath’ in my Aadhaar Card

No. XXXX XXXX 0193, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India.

4. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Mahamood Vala Ppakath’ in my Permanent Account

Number (PAN) Card BIMPM8967M, issued by the

Income-tax Department, Government of India.

5. I state that the above-mentioned names, viz.,

‘Valappagatte Poutimpoureil Abdoulla’, ‘V.P.Mahamood’

and ‘Mahamood Vala Ppakath’ are referring one and

same person they denoting me and my correct name

is ‘Mahamood Vala Ppakath’.

6. I state that to avoid the confusion and

difficulties towards my various names mentioned in

the above records in my present and future life,

I have decided to use my name as ‘Mahamood Vala

Ppakath’ in all my future Correspondents and records.

Therefore, I declare that hereinafter, I will be

called, known and identified by the newly assumed

name as ‘Mahamood Vala Ppakath’ only.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Mahe, on this 2nd day of February 2023.

562230

MAHAMOOD VALA PPAKATH.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, G. Jeeva, presently transgender, previously son of

Govindaraj and Selvi, at present residing at the house

situated at No. 4, 5th Street, Pudhu Nagar, Keezhagraharam,

Villianur, Puducherry-605 110, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm to whomsoever it may concern as

follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that I was

born as a male, as such in my Birth Certificate under

Registration No. PM/M/2003/5425, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Jeeva’.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificate under

SL. SEC 9275599, in my Higher Secondary Course

Certificate under SL.Nos. HSS 15604780, SL.No. HSF

13570582 and in my School Transfer Certificate under

Admission No. 3016, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Jeeva. G (˝kV. ºÔV)’.

In my Permanent Integrated Certificate under No.

PY/TOV/47/0032394, my name has been mentioned as

‘Jeeva’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under No.

TLS0272781, my name has been mentioned as ‘Jeeva

(˝kV)’.

In the particulars of family members, in the Family

Ration Card under No. 350258, my name has been

mentioned as ‘˝kV’.

Further, I state that later I have transformed myself

to third gender and became a transgender, in the

Medical Certificate, issued by the Mahatma Gandhi

Medical College and Research Institute, dated 24-01-

2022, my name has been mentioned as ‘G. Jeeva alias

G.Ananya Sri’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 8206,

my name has been mentioned as ‘G.Ananya Sri

(ºÔV. ∂™[BV ¸Z)’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein. I state that henceforth, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘G. Ananya Sri (ºÔV.

∂™[BV p)’, for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of

February, 2023.

562231

G. JEEVA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Arun Kumar, son of Rangarajan, residing at

No. 25, Pajaniraja Oudayar Street, Thillaikannu Amma Nagar,

Lawspet, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

190

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in

my Secondary School Mark Sheet vide S.No. Sec.

3582553, in my Higher Secondary School Mark Sheet

vide No. HSG 3692598, in my PAN Card vide No.

AXTPA4398P, issued by the Income-tax Department,

Government of India, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Arun Kumar R’.

In my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 1187,

issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India,

my name has been mentioned as ‘R Arunkumar’.

In my Savings Account Passbook of State Bank

of India, Lawspet Branch, Puducherry, vide Account

No. XXXXXXX0381, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Arun Kumar @ Muthukannan R’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card vide No.

ATT0024760, issued by the Election Commission of

India, in my Indian Passport vide No. V6780641,

issued by the Reginal Passport Office, Chennai, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Arunkumar’.

In my India Driving Licence vide No. PY01

20090002023, issued by the Assistant Licensing

Authority, Transport Department, Puducherry, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Arunkumar alias

Muthu Kannan R’.

In my Birth Certificate vide Registration No.

PM/M/1990/007176, issued by the Pondicherry

Municipality, Puducherry, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Arunkumar @ Muthukannan’.

In the Family Ration Card vide No. 010256, issued

by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer

Affairs, Government of Puducherry, my name has

been mentioned as ‘∂Úız\VÏ (®) x›m

Ôıð[’.

As I have converted myself from Hindu religion

to Muslim religion in the Certificate vide C.C. No.

142:32/2022, dated 27-10-2022, issued by Government

Town Kazi Office, my name has been mentioned as

In my Marriage Certificate vide Sl.No. 054, dated

28-12-2022, issued by the Masjid Nooraniya,

Muthialpet, Puducherry, vide Sl.No. 054, dated

28-12-2022, my name has been mentioned as

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein. I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Abdullah’.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 13th day of February 2023.

562232

ARUN KUMAR.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Veerapillai Govindasamy, son of Veerapillai, Service

No. JC156258P NB/Sub, aged 73 years, residing at Plot

No. 120, 6th Cross Street, Thirumagal Nagar, Velrampet,

Mudaliarpet, Puducherry-605 004, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this

affidavit on behalf of me.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Veerapillai

Govindasamy’ in my Pension Payment Order, issued

by the Office of the Principal, C.D.A. (Pensions),

Allahabad bearing PPO No. S/028241/88 (ARMY).

I state that my name is entered as ‘V Govindasamy’

in my Pension Payment Order, issued by the EPF

Organization Regional Office, Puducherry bearing

PPO No. TBPDY00063026, dated 10-06-2007.

I state that my name is entered as ‘V Govindasamy’

in my Discharge Certificate Book, issued by the

Indian Army.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Govindasamy V’

in my ECHS Card, issued by ECHS Bhawan, New

Delhi bearing No. CH 0000 0506 0517, dated

26-12-2019.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Govindasamy’

in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card, issued by the

Election Commission of India bearing No. IP10161703,

dated 19-10-2020.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Govindasamy V’

in my Secondary School Leaving Certificate, issued

by the Board High School, Peralam, Tamil Nadu

bearing Sl.No. 019439, dated 22-06-1966.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Govindasamy V’

in my Bank Passbook, issued by the Indian Overseas

Bank, Ambagarathur Branch, Karaikal, Puducherry

State

bearing

Savings

Account

No.

XXXXXXXXXXX1331, dated 05-09-2021.

191

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

I state that my name is entered as ‘V Govindasamy’

in my Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India bearing No. XXXX

XXXX 9067.

I state that my name is entered as ‘V Govindasamy’

in my PAN Card, issued by the Income-tax Department,

Government of India bearing No. AAIPG9448G, dated

15-01-2018.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Govindasamy’

in my Passport, issued by Regional Passport Office,

Chennai, Republic of India, bearing No. U2689292,

dated 06-10-2021.

I state that my name is entered as ‘ºÔVsÕ>ƒVt’

in my Family Ration Card, issued by the Department

of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government

of Puducherry bearing No. 119383, dated 15-07-2005.

Therefore, I declare that the names described in

the above records as ‘Veerapillai Govindasamy’,

‘Govindasamy V’, ‘V Govindasamy’, ‘Govindasamy’

and ‘ºÔVsÕ>ƒVt’ are referring one and the same

person i.e., myself only.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is

‘V Govindasamy’ only.

The above statements in the foregoing paragraphs

is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2023.

562233

VEERAPILLAI GOVINDASAMY.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, R.Harini, daughter of Rajasekaran, aged 21 years

and residing at No. 14, Middle Street, Kalitheerthalkuppam,

Madagadipet, Puducherry-605 107, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of the deposition.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘R. Harini’ in

my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 7241, issued by

the Unique Identification Authority of India, in my

PAN Card No. BFPPH8092Q, issued by the Income-

tax Department, Government of India.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Harini’ in my

Birth Certificate vide Registration No. J/2001/5452,

dated 09-08-2001, issued by Oulgaret Municipality,

Government of Puducherry and in my Elector’s

Photo Identity Card No. ZFD0234658, issued by the

Election Commission of India.

I state that my name is entered as ‘«ˆË’ in the

Family Ration Card No. 405295, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Harini R.’ in

my Student Grade Report of Bachelor of Pharmacy

vide Registration No. 19180226, issued by

Pondicherry University, Puducherry.

I state that as per horoscope, I have changed

my name as ‘Keerthi R (ˇÏ›]. R)’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names, i.e., ‘R.Harini’, ‘Harini’, ‘«ˆË’

and ‘Harini R.’ are referred, identified and relate to

one and same person, that is myself only. Hereinafter,

I shall be known and identified only by the name

‘Keerthi R’ for all purposes.

I hereby declare that I shall at all times hereinafter

in all records, deeds and writings and in all

proceedings, dealings and transactions private as

well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign

my name as ‘Keerthi R’ in place and in substitution

of my former names.

I hereby verify and confirm that what has been

stated above is true to the best of my knowledge and

correct, and nothing material facts have been

concealed thereon.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of

February 2023.

562234

R. HARINI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Eugene Arokiaraj Stephens, son of K. Joseph

Stephens, residing at No. 8, Vicent De Paul Street, Colas

Nagar, Puducherry-605 001, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I my Master of Business Administration

Certificate, issued by Queensland University of

Technology, dated 08-03-1996, in my Joint Account

Passbook of Indian Bank vide Account No.

XXXXX8813, my name has been mentioned as

‘Eugene Arokiaraj Stephens’.

In my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 1800,

issued by the Unique Identification Authority of

India, my name has been mentioned as ‘Eugene

Arokiaraj’.

192

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

In my Tenth Standard Matriculation Mark Sheet,

dated 13-07-1986 issued by Department of

Government Examinations, Madras, in my Higher

Secondary Course Mark Sheet vide Certificate

No. A 828195, issued by Government of Tamil Nadu,

in my Provisional Certificate vide Folio No. 2234,

issued by University of Calicut, in my Bachelor of

Technology in Engineering Certificate vide, dated

03-04-1993, issued by University of Calicut, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Eugene Arokiaraj. S’.

In my PAN Card vide No. EWNPS4325B, issued

by Income-tax Department, Government of India, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Eugene A.Stephens’.

In the Birth Certificate vide Registration

No. PM/P/1971/002045, issued by Pondicherry

Municipality, Puducherry, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Eugene Arokiaraj Dinesh’.

In my Family Ration Card vide No. 066327, issued

by the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer

Affairs, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as

‘•˜[’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person, that is myself the

deponent herein. I state that hereinafter, I shall be

known and identified only by the name ‘Eugene

Arokiaraj Stephens’.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2023.

562235

EUGENE AROKIARAJ STEPHENS.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, K. Vasuki, wife of Krishnasamy, aged 58 years,

residing at No. 66, Kamatchi Amman Koil Street,

Rajbhavan, Puducherry-605 001, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I was born at Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu on 04-12-1964

and my name ‘Vasuki’ as found in my Birth Certificate,

registered in the Cuddalore Municipality on

24-12-1964 under Registration No. 656/1964/06, the

name ‘Vasuki’ as found in the Family Ration Card,

issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and

Consumer Affairs, Puducherry vide No. 063704, the

name ‘Vasugi’ and the surname ‘krishnasamy’ as found

in my Passport issued by the Regional Passport

Office, Chennai on 15-11-2011, the name ‘Vasuki’,

father’s name ‘Sambandan’ as found in my PAN Card,

issued by the Income-tax Department (SYSTEMS)

vide No. AHIPV2824Q, the name ‘Vasuki’ as found

in my Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India vide No. XXXX

XXXX 2941, the name ‘Vasuki.K’ as found in my Bank

Passbook, issued by the City Union Bank Limited

and also the name ‘Vasuki.S’ as found in my B.Sc.

Degree Certificate, issued by University of

Madras are referred one and the same person that is

myself.

I hereby declare that henceforth, I shall be known,

called and referred only as ‘Vasuki’ and my surname

‘krishnasamy’ and not by any other name. I hereby

declare that I shall at all times hereinafter in all

records, deeds and writings and in all proceedings,

dealings and transactions private a well as upon all

occasions whatsoever use the name ‘Vauki’ as my

name and ‘krishnasamy’ as my surname in place and

in substitution of my other names.

I hereby declare that all the contents of my

affidavit are true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information, and I have now

concealed any material facts or information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of

February 2023.

562236

K. VASUKI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, J Vincent Gnanasamy Amalraj, son of Jeyaraj,

residing at No. 25, First Street, Salavaiyar Nagar,

Lawspet, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and well aware of

the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as ‘J Vincent Gnanaswamy

Amalraj’ in my Enrollment Roll No. 818/1987, issued

by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Vincent

Gnanasamy Amalraj. J’ in my Higher Secondary

Course Certificate No. A229812, issued by

Government of Tamil Nadu.

193

21 February 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

That my name is mentioned as ‘J Vincent Gnanaswamy

Amalraj’ in my Provisional Certificate No. 105, issued

by University of Madras, Madras.

That my name is mentioned as ‘J Vincent Gnanasamy

Amalraj’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 7127,

issued by the Unique Identification Authority of

India.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Vincent

Gna.Amalraj’ in my Electoral Identity Card No. PY/

01/004/015316, issued by Election Commission of

India.

That my name in short form is mentioned as

‘J.V.G. Amalraj’ in my Bank Safety Locker Memorandum

of Loan Deposit No. B-63, issued by the Bank of

India, Southern Zone, dated 12-12-1994.

That my name is mentioned as ‘J.V.G. Amalraj’

in my LPG Consumer Book No. 17302771, issued by

the Tillai Agencies, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘s[ÿƒ[‚

QV™ƒVt ∂\_´VÎ’ in my Family Ration Card

No. 086230, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of

Puducherry.

Hence, I hereby declare that the abovesaid names

viz., ‘J Vincent Gnanaswamy Amalraj’, ‘Vincent

Gnanasamy Amalraj. J’, ‘J Vincent Gnanasamy

Amalraj’, ‘Vincent Gna.Amalraj’, ‘s[ÿƒ[‚ QV™ƒVt

∂\_´VÎ’ and ‘J.V.G. Amalraj’ are referring one and

the same person, they denoting myself only.

Hence, this sworn in affidavit may kindly be

accepted to this effect.

I take oath and solemnly declare/affirm that the

particulars furnished by me above are correct and that

I have not concealed or misrepresented any facts.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2023.

562237

J VINCENT GNANASAMY AMALRAJ.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Naseemunisha Begam, wife of Syed Amjath Ali @

Syed Amjath and daughter of Syed Nazeer Ahamed,

Muslim, aged about 47 years, residing at No. 16, First

Floor,

First

Cross

Street,

Thirumal

Nagar,

Kuyavarpalayam, Puducherry-605 013, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as

follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I am fully aware of

the facts of the affidavit.

I state that my name has been mentioned as

‘Naseemunisha Begam’ (1) in my Birth Certificate

under Registration No. 312/1975/3, dated 21-05-1975,

issued by the Commissioner, Villupuram Municipality,

Department of Municipal Administration and Water

Supply, Government of Tamil Nadu, (2) in my Aadhaar

Card No. XXXX XXXX 0574, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India, (3) in my Bank

Passbook vide Account No. XXXXXX5667, issued

by Indian Bank, Kamaraj Salai Branch, Puducherry

and (4) in my PAN Card No. CKAPN6450M.

I state that my name has been mentioned as

‘Sajitha Begum’ in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card

bearing No. JGW0133793, issued by Election

Commission of India.

I state that my name has been mentioned as

‘ÂÊxM≠V º√ÔD’ in my Family Ration Card bearing

No. 65639, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies

and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names, i.e., ‘Naseemunisha Begam’,

‘Sajitha Begum’ and ‘ÂÊxM≠V º√ÔD’ are referred,

identified and relate to one and the same person that

is myself only. Hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Naseemunisha Begam’

for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 10th day of February 2023.

562238

NASEEMUNISHA BEGAM.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, P. Ellappan, son of Poucheppalingame, Indian

inhabitant, aged 46 years and residing at the house

bearing Door No. 12, Bharathipuram Main Road,

Govindasalai, Puducherry-605 011, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as

follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Certificate of Birth under Registration No. 1240/76

and in my Marriage Certificate under No. 107, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Elleappin’.

194

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[21 February 2023

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

In my Record Sheet under No. 127652, my name

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under

No. TMC0102665, my name has been mentioned as

No. XXXX XXXX 9466, my name has been mentioned

In my Driving Licence under DL No. PY01

19980004683, my name has been mentioned as

‘Ellappan @ Ramesh’.

In my PAN Card under No. AGJPR9342R, my name

has been mentioned as ‘P.Ramesh’.

In the Family Ration Card under No. 423431,

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person, that is me, the deponent

herein.

I declare that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name with initial and spelling

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 16th day of

February 2023.

562239

P. ELLAPPAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Magesh, son of Govindan, Indian inhabitant, aged

50 years, at present residing at the house bearing Door

No. 5, Paari Street, Mullai Nagar, Packamudaiyanpet,

Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate under Registration No.P/1972/03543,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Maguesh’.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificate under

S.No. A 3197943 and in my Higher Secondary Course

Certificate under Certificate S.No. A 2055891, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Magesh.G’.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificates

under S.Nos. A3475474 & A 4281897, my name has

been mentioned as ‘G. Magesh’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under

No. PY/01/020/030430, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Magesh (\ºÔi)’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 7670,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Magesh (\ºÔi)’.

In my PAN Card under No. AQOPM2949l, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Magesh’.

In my Passport under No. A6378954, my given

name has been mentioned as ‘Maguesh’.

In the Family Ration Card under No. 177588, my

name has been mentioned as ‘\ºÔi’.

Therefore, I do hereby state that all the abovesaid

names are referred, identified and relating one and

the same person, that is me, the deponent herein.

I declare that hereafter, I shall be known

and identified only by the name ‘G. Magesh’

(ºÔV. \ºÔi) for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of

February 2023.

562240

G. MAGESH.