[237]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

\Vk‚¶ ¿]√]BV_ ®|¬Ô©√|D ..

238

Procédure du Magistrate de District .. 238

Procedings of the District

238

º\_Â¶kΩ¬ÁÔÔ^

Magistrate

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

244

Sentence arbitral du Travail

.. 244

Award of the Labour Court .. 244

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

249

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 249

Government Notifications

.. 249

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

251

Etablissements dangereux

.. 251

Dangerous Establishments

251

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

251

Annonces

.. 251

Announcements

251

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2023 }

\VÏﬂ |

14 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Mars

2023 (23 Phalguna 1944)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

14th

March

2023

238

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[14 March 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

No. 333/DRDM/C3/PAWN/2020.

Puducherry, the 23rd February 2023.

ORDER

Sub.

: DRDM – The Puducherry Pawn Brokers Act, 1966 – Public Auction – Sale of unredeemed

and time barred jewels – Permission Order – Issued – Reg.

Ref.

: 1. Application of Thiru Kaluram Jain, Kalu Bankers, Pawn Broker (L.No. 568), No. 29, Carpenter

Street, Nellithope, Puducherry, dated 15-09-2022.

2. Consent letter of Thiru B. Karthikeyan, 39A/32, Srinivasan Street, Thirupathiripuliyur,

Cuddalore Taluk – Authorized Auctioneer, dated 15-09-2022.

3. Report of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry vide Letter No. 6597/DC(R)N/

A5/2022/317, dated 07-02-2022.

Whereas, an application, dated 15-09-2022 was received from Thiru Kaluram Jain, Kalu Bankers, Pawn Broker

(L.No. 568), No. 29, Carpenter Street, Nellithope, Puducherry, a licensed Pawn Broker requesting permission of the

District Magistrate to sell unredeemed and time barred articles in public auction;

2. And whereas, the list of unredeemed and time barred articles submitted by the Pawn Broker was forwarded

to the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, for causing physical verification of the articles and ascertain

that they remain unredeemed after the time allowed for redemption;

3. And whereas, the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, has furnished the report vide

reference (3) cited, stating that the Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Puducherry, had conducted physical verification of the

articles that are unredeemed and time barred pledged with Thiru Kaluram Jain, Kalu Bankers, Pawn Broker

(L.No. 568), No. 29, Carpenter Street, Nellithope, Puducherry and reported that the articles mentioned in the

application remained unredeemed past the time allowed and the articles are kept in the licensed premises itself except

the eighteen items vide Catalogue Nos. 28, 91, 100, 103, 136, 139, 158, 159, 176, 180, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 196, 199 and

200 of the list, which were redeemed subsequently, after the application of the Pawn Broker cited at reference (1);

4. And whereas, the rule 12 of the Puducherry Pawn Brokers Rules, 1966 prescribes detailed procedure on

auctioning of pledges;

5. Now, therefore, Thiru B. Karthikeyan, Thirupathiripuliyur, Authorised Auctioneer, is permitted to conduct

within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order, the sale of time barred and unredeemed pledged articles, as

shown in the list enclosed and available with the Pawn Broker, Thiru Kaluram Jain, Kalu Bankers, Pawn Broker

(L.No. 568), No. 29, Carpenter Street, Nellithope, Puducherry, in public auction in the licensed premises of the Pawn

Broker at the above address, as per the list approved and sent to the Pawn Broker and the Auctioneer, except the

eighteen items vide Catalogue Nos. 28, 91, 100, 103, 136, 139, 158, 159, 176, 180, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 196, 199 and

200 of the list, which were redeemed. The Pawn Broker and Auctioneer shall observe the above formalities detailed

as required under the rules framed under the Puducherry Pawn Brokers Act, 1966, before conducting the sale of

time barred and unredeemed pledged articles in the public auction:

Sl.No.

Details of

Number of articles

articles

(Catalogue)

Gold

131

Silver

Others

—

Total

183

DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE.

244

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[14 March 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 04/AIL/Lab./T/2022,

Puducherry, dated 05th January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 30/2017, dated

28-11-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Puducherry, the in respect of the Dispute between the

Management of M/s PASIC, Puducherry and

Thiru M. Anandan, Puducherry, over reinstatement with

back wages.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s

G.O.Ms.No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby

directed by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that

the said Award shall be published in the Official

Gazette, Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. V. Sofana Devi, M.L.

Presiding Officer.

Monday, the 28th day of November, 2022.

I.D. (L) No. 30/2017

C.N.R. No. PYPY06-000037-2017

Thiru M. Anandan,

No. 13, Illupai Thoppu Street,

Veema Nagar, Thilaspet,

Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Vs.

The Managing Director,

M/s. Puducherry Agro Service and

Industries Corporation LImited (PASIC),

Agro House, Thattanchavady,

Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This Industrial dispute coming on 09-11-2022 before

me for final hearing in the presence of Thiru. P. Sankaran,

Counsel, for the Petitioner, Thiruvalargal B. Mohandoss,

P. Manivannan, Indrajith, K. Velmurugan, K. Sundarajan,

P. Kalirathinam, S. Vijayasanthi, T. Vijayashanthi and

K. Manopriya, Counsels, for the Respondent, and after

hearing the both sides and perusing the case records,

this Court delivered the following:

245

14 March 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

A W A R D

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No.74/AIL/LAB/T/2017, dated 02-05-2017 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to resolve the

following dispute between the Petitioner and the

Respondent, viz.,

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

Thiru M. Anandan against the Management of

M/s. Puducherry Agro Service and Industries

Corporation Limited (a Government of Puducherry

undertaking), Puducherry, over reinstatement with

back wages is justified or not? If justified, what relief

the Petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred

in the claim petition:

The Petitioner had joined in service of the

Respondent Corporation (PASIC) on 03-08-2007 as

voucher paid and subsequently as daily rated labour

from 01-07-2009 and was without any remark till he

was disengaged from service on 10-05-2014 after

nearly 7 years. The Petitioner was indisposed on

09-04-2014 due to fracture and was unable to move

anywhere as the Doctor had advised him rest for 30

days from 09-04-2014 and issued fitness from

09-05-2014. The Petitioner has informed his superior

Mr. Krishnamoorthy, Farm Supervisor, over phone

about his fracture and inability to attend duty.

Further, the Petitioner could not join duty as the pain

continued even though fitness was given by the

Doctor and he had to extend leave up to 22-05-2014.

(ii) The Petitioner has sent the leave letter along

with the Medical Certificate by Registered post to the

Respondent Management and reported for duty on

23-05-2014. But, the Petitioner was not allowed to join

duty and he was made to wait and approach different

authorities including the Respondent Management.

Despite his repeated approach and requests over a

long period of time, he was constrained to sent

representation to the Grievances Cell of the Hon’ble

Prime Minister of India, New Delhi, upon which it

seems that the same has been transmitted to the

Respondent who in turn gave a written reply to the

petitioner vide letter No. 6/1/5/4/Pasic/Esst./FTCC/

2015-2016/8822 dated 05-02-2016 stating that the

Petitioner has been disengaged from service with

effect from 10-05-2014 due to unauthorized absence

and then the Petitioner had been informed by the

Officials of the Respondent Corporation accordingly.

(iii) The question of unauthorized absence does

not arise since the Petitioner had informed his

superior over phone about his ill-health and leave and

only because he was not allowed to join duty.

(iv) That there was no willful unauthorized absence

by the Petitioner and it happened by the circumstances

beyond his control. There was Medical Certificate also

for the proof of condition for the period from

09-04-2014 to 09-05-2014 and so his absence could not

be treated as unauthorized absence. The Respondent

failed to issue any show cause notice asking for

explanation for his absence or intimation about the

disengagement from service to the Petitioner except

the letter consequent to the representation made the

Hon’ble Prime Minister’s Grievances Cell rendering

the disengagement arbitrary and illegal. The Petitioner

was forced to approach the Labour Officer

(Conciliation) where the Respondent has alleged other

issues like nature of job, status of job and staff service

rules, 1988 for which the Petitioner is in no way

answerable since the only question to be considered

is whether the Petitioner committed unauthorized

absence or not.

(v) Respondent is supposed to conduct Domestic

Enquiry under the Industrial Employment (Standing

Orders) Act, 1946 failure of which amounts to unfair,

unjust, biased, arbitrary, unlawful against natural

justice rendering the disengagement of the Petitioner

to be set aside and the Petitioner is entitled for

reinstatement with continuity of service, back wages

and all attendant benefits. The Petitioner was working

nearly for the past 7 years without any remark and he

is the only bread winner of his family with no other

source of income for his livelihood as there is no

availability of suitable alternative employment also for

his survival. Therefore, the petitioner prays to direct

the respondent for the reinstatement of the Petitioner

with continuity of service, back wages and all other

attendant benefits. Hence the Petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondent as follows:

The Petitioner was initially engaged as Voucher

Paid with effect from 03-08-2007 and was made daily

rated labour with effect from 01-07-2009. However,

there was no termination of his services by the

Respondent Management.

(ii) The Petitioner was only Daily Rated Casual

Employee and he was engaged on day-to-day basis

depending upon exigencies of work prevailing in the

organization. His employment was need based one

without any assurance for continuance of employment.

The above casual labour were not recruited in a formal

246

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[14 March 2023

manner in accordance with Rules and Regulations

relating to appointment. Such person employed does

not have right to hold the post in PASIC. His

conditions of service cannot be equated to regular

employees as well as permanent employees appointed

in accordance with Recruitment Rules. Under such

circumstances, he cannot have any grievance for his

non-employment.

(iii) The Petitioner did not report to duty from

09-04-2018 onwards till 09-05-2014 without submitting

leave letter or any information regarding his absence.

Later, only on 21-05-2014, the Petitioner submitted

leave letter on medical grounds for the above period

of absence. As the non-employment of Mr. Anandan

was by his own absence and as there was not

termination of his services, he cannot have any

grievance. The question of reinstatement does not

arise since he was engaged only to do casual work

on account of exigencies of work and as per PASIC

Staff Service Rules, 1988 ‘Employee’ means, a person

who is in the whole time employment of the

Corporation, but, does not include persons employed

on daily wages.

(iv) The Petitioner has to prove the allegations in

the claim petition that his absence was on medical

grounds. He is also obliged to state the reason why

he has not communicated to the Management for long

for nearly 11/2 months up to 22-05-2014, when he

states that he sustained fracture as early as on

09-04-2014 and he got fitness Certificate as early as

on 09-05-2014. There is nothing on record to prove

that the Petitioner has sought permission for his

absent so as to make it authorized one.

(v) The daily rated casual employees cannot claim

treatment on par with regular employees. Continuous

engagement of daily-rated casuals for years together

cannot confer on them right to regularization so as to

make them included in their cadre strength. They do

not have right to hold the post and hence, cannot

claim protection when their services are disengaged

by their employer.

(vi) The Petitioner has stated the provisions of

the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946

regarding conducting of Domestic Enquiry. The

Respondent has not framed any charge of misconduct

against the Petitioner and only for taking disciplinary

action against the workmen for misconduct Domestic

Enquiry is needed for imposing punishment on the

charged official. That there was no punishment

imposed by way of termination by the Respondent.

As the non-employment of the Petitioner is not by way

of termination by the Respondent by continuous

absence by the petitioner, there is no question of

reinstatement. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the claim

petition.

4. Rejoinder petition filed by the Petitioner

against the Counter Statement:

The burden of proof lies on the Respondent to

define the meaning of refusal of employment or

non-employment or disengagement from service or

abandonment of service or removal of name of the

Petitioner from attendance register for anauthorized

absence.

(ii) The Petitioner was only daily rated casual

employee and he was engaged on day-to-day basis

depending upon exigencies of work whereas, he

contradict the same in which he admits the continuous

engagement of the Petitioner as daily rated casual for

years together which is illegal and cannot come under

the definition of casual labour.

(iii) The Respondent does not disclose in what

way the petitioner was disengaged or under whatever

mode removed from service. In fact, the Petitioner

applied for Medical leave with proper Medical

Certificate, dated 21-05-2014 for which the Respondent

never replied for the same and also that only after the

petitioner had sent a representation to the Prime

Minister’s Grievances Cell vide Letter, dated

20-06-2015 received on 29-06-2015 by the PMO

Grievances Cell, the Respondent has given reply,

dated 05-02-2016 that is after nearly 2 years which

clearly proves the Respondents attitude of ignoring

law as a responsible Chief Executive of a Public

Undertaking like PASIC. Hence, the Petitioner prayed

to direct the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner

with back wages, continuity of service and all other

attendant benefits and costs.

5. Point for determination:

Whether the Petitioner is entitled for an order of

reinstatement with back wages and other reliefs as

claimed in the claim petition?

5A. On Point:

Petitioner himself examined as PW1 and Ex.P1 to

Ex.P9 were marked. On Respondent side, Thiru

Sivashanmugam, the Managing Director of the

Respondent Management, was examined as RW1 and

Ex.R1 marked.

6. On the point:

This present industrial dispute is for reinstatement

of the claim Petitioner Mr. M. Anandan, who was

disengaged on 10-05-2014. According to the claim

Petitioner, he suffered from a bone fracture on

09-04-2014 and he was under medical treatment from

09-04-2014 till 09-05-2014. He informed about his

inability to attend the work to his superior

247

14 March 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Mr. Krishnamoorthy, Farm Supervisor. He also

produced Fitness Certificate on 09-05-2014. Since, he

suffered pain, he extended his leave further till

22-05-2014. He joined duty on 23-05-2014 with the

Medical Leave Certificate. But the Management did

not allow him to join. By way of reply to grievance

petition addressed to the Hon’ble Prime Minister,

Management gave a reply dated 05-02-2016 that he

was disengaged from the service for the reason of his

unauthorized absence. The claim Petitioner urged that

it was not an unauthorized absence. He duly informed

about his inability to work to his Superior. Further, it

was contended that no show cause notice issued to

him by the Management before his disengagement

from services. No domestic enquiry under provisions

of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1948

conducted. So, he approached the Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Government of Puducherry. The matter

failed and the failure report dated 19-02-2016 filed by

the Labour Officer (Conciliation), Government of

Puducherry.

7. In order to substantiate the averments contained

in the claim petition, PW1 the Claim Petitioner himself

deposed before this Court and Ex.P1 to Ex.P9 marked.

The learned Counsel for Petitioner relied on the case law

reported in CDJ 2000 SC 541. On the other hand, the

Respondent Management has contended that

disengagement of the claim Petitioner done only because

of his own absence. Since, the claim Petitioner engaged

by the Respondent Management only as a daily rated

labour for doing causal work, no question of terminating

him from the services of the Respondent Management.

Consequently, there is no question of reinstatement as

claimed. On the side of the Respondent Management it

is strongly contended that the claim Petitioner did not

inform anybody about his absence orally or in writing.

Further, he submitted his leave only on 21-05-2014 on

Medical grounds for his absence from 09-04-2014 to

09-05-2014. Thus, he did not intimate the Respondent

Management about his leave for 1 and 1/2 months. Thus,

he concluded that since he was engaged for doing casual

work as daily rated labour and his initial engagement was

as voucher paid worker, there is no question of

Termination, conducting of Domestic Enquiry, and

issuance of Show Cause notices to the petitioner for his

unauthorized absence. The learned Counsel for the

Respondent Management referred and relied upon the

following case-laws during arguments: (i) (2016) 1 SCC

(L & S) 186 Vice-Chancellor, Lucknow University

Vs. Akhilesh Kumar; (ii) (2019) 2 SCC(L &S) 37; (iii)(2019)

2 SCC(L &S) 98 and iv) (2011) 1 SCC(L&S) 659.

8. Heard both. On perusal of case records it could be

seen from Ex.P1 that Medical Certificate, dated

09-04-2014 as well as Medical Fitness Certificate, dated

09-05-2014 issued to the Claim Petitioner are found in a

single sheet. But, Medical Certificate for the leave is

dated 09-04-2014 whereas, the Fitness issued by the

Doctor is dated 09-05-2014. Except Ex.P1 there is no

records pertaining to Medical Treatment produced by the

Claim Petitioner to prove the genuinity of the reasons

stated for his absence during such period. Ex.P2 is a

similar Medical Certificate and Fitness Certificate in a

single sheet both bear the same date 20-05-2014.

As stated above no medical records shown in this regard

to support Ex.P1 and Ex.P2. Ex.P3, dated 21-05-2014, the

copy of the leave letter seeking leave from 10-05-2014 to

22-05-2014.

Ex.P4

the

photocopy

the

acknowledgment card to prove the service of Ex.P3 on

Respondent Management. Ex.P5 is the reply given by the

Respondent Management to the Claim Petitioner stating

the reason for his disengagement. In said Ex.P5 it is

clearly mentioned that Petitioner has submitted the leave

letter on Medical grounds for the period of his

unauthorized absence from 09-04-2014 to 09-05-2014,

only on 21-05-2014 (Ex.P3) that is after he has been

disengaged from service due to unauthorized absence for

a continuous period of nearly one month and due to

which the works suffered due to his negligence and

dereliction of duty.

9. Ex.P6, the representation given by the claim

Petitioner to the Labour Officer (Conciliation), dated

19-02-2016. Ex.P7 is the reply statement dated 09-06-2016

given by the Respondent Management for Ex.P6. Ex.P8

is the Failure Report, dated 22-02-2017. Ex.P9 is the

Notification of Failure report. Except this no other oral

witnesses or documentary evidences filed to substantiate

that the claim petitioner suffered injury and was in need

of Medical rest for such period. Further, no proof

produced on the side of the Claim Petitioner to show that

he duly informed the Respondent Management about his

absence in time. Further, there is no reason found any

where in the claim petition or in the oral evidence adduced

by him about the delay in producing Medical Certificate.

In absence of this above evidences or proof, I find that

the claim Petitioner was remained absent for a long period

that is more than one month without any satisfactory

reason for his absence that to without any intimation to

his employer about his inability to attend the work, which

amounts to unauthorized absence.

10. In Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 the Certificates said to have

been issued for the period his absence, the Claim

Petitioner’s designation is mentioned as DRL that is

Daily Rated Labour. It is also the case of the Respondent

Management that he was only engaged as daily rated

labourer for the day to day work basis depending upon

exigencies of work prevailing in the Respondent

Management. Therefore, the argument made on the side

of the Respondent Management as well as RW1 evidence

248

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[14 March 2023

that issuance of Show Cause notice, initiating Domestic

Enquiry and issuance of Termination Order not at all

required for the daily rated labourer for disengagement

for his unauthorized absence, holds good and

sustainable.

11. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in RBI vs.

S. Mani reported in (2005) 5 SCC 100 held that in law 240

days of continuous service by itself does not give right

to claim permanence. Further, it has been held by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Himanshu Kumar

Vidyarthy vs. State of Bihar reported in 1997 IV ADSC

196 that admittedly they were not appointed to the posts

in accordance with the rules, but, were engaged on the

basis of need of the work. They are temporary employees

working on daily wages. Under these circumstances, their

disengagement from service cannot be construed to be

a retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act. The

concept of ‘retrenchment’ therefore, cannot be stretched

to such an extent as to cover these employees. Although

by way of definition of workman u/s.2(s) of Industrial

Disputes Act ‘daily wage’ worker also falls within the

definition of workman it cannot be said that daily wages

have all the rights and duties which are available to the

regular employee of the Respondent Management.

12. The same view has been taken by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court in State of Haryana vs. Jasmer Singh

reported in (2015) 4 SCC 458 that persons who were

employed on daily wages cannot be treated as on a par

with persons in regular service holding similar posts.

Daily rated workers are not required to possess the

qualification prescribed for regular workers, nor do they

have to fulfill the requirement relating to age at the time

of recruitment. They are not selected in the manner in

which the regular employees are selected. In other words

the requirement for selection are not as rigorous. There

are also provisions relating to regular service such as

the liability of a member of the service to be transferred,

and this being subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of

the authorities as prescribed, which the daily rated

workmen are not subjected to. They cannot, therefore,

be equated with regular workmen for the purpose for their

wages. Nor can they claim the minimum of regular Pay

Scale of the regularly employed.

13. In view of the decision in Magarasem vs. State of

UP and others reported in 2002 (2) AWC 1712 the daily

wagers engaged without any written appointment order

could be terminated without any written order. Therefore,

daily and casual workers who are engaged in disregard

of all rules cannot be allowed to continue when there is

no work and their engagement is not required. Daily

wagers are deployed on temporary assignment only

and not on sanctioned posts and even if, completion of

240 days work by daily wager cannot attribute status of

casual workman under Industrial Disputes Act and as

such it does not create right to claim for reengagement

as claimed in the petition.

14. From the above discussions that no oral witnesses

produced nor documentary evidences filed to

substantiate that the claim petitioner suffered injury and

was in need of Medical rest for such period. Further, no

proof produced on the side of the Claim Petitioner to

show that he duly informed the Respondent Management

about his absence in time. Further, there is no reason

found in the claim petition or in the oral evidence adduced

by him about the delay in producing Medical Certificate.

In absence of these above evidences or proof, I find that

the claim Petitioner was remained absent for a long period

that is more than one month without any satisfactory

reason for his absence that to without any intimation to

his employer about his inability to attend the work, which

amounts to un-authorised absence. On the whole, I don't

find any justification in the reference made before this

Court. Thus, the point for the determination is decided

as against the Claim Petitioner.

15. In the result, the reference is decided as unjustified

and Industrial Dispute is dismissed. No costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, on this

the 28th day of November, 2022.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness:

PW1

— 06-02-2019

Thiru Anandan

List of petitioner’s exhibits:

Ex.P1 — 09-04-2014

Photocopy of the Medical

Leave Certificate and

09-05-2014

Medical Fitness Certificate

of the Petitioner issued by

the I.G.M.C and Research

Institute, Puducherry.

Ex.P2 — 20-05-2014

Photocopy of the Medical

Leave Certificate and

Medical Fitness Certificate

of the Petitioner issued by

the Rani Hospital, Puducherry.

Ex.P3 — 20-05-2014

Photocopy of the Leave

Letter of the Petitioner.

Ex.P4 — 21-05-2014

Photocopy of the Postal

Acknowledgment Card.

249

14 March 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

————

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´∑

mÁð \Vk‚¶ g‚EBÏ (kÚkVF) ∂KkÈÔD, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_

®ı 8809/\VƒVg/ÔVÁ´/Ê3/2023.

∂§s¬ÁÔ

[Amﬂºƒˆ WÈ \VMB s] 1975, s] 60(iii)-[ ˇµ]

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´ƒV_ >∫Ô”¬z Œ©√Á¶ ÿƒFB©√‚¶ ˇµ¬ÔVbD WÈsk´∫Ô”Á¶B ÷¶›]_ >V∫Ô^ T| Ô‚¶V\ºÈV

∂_Èm zΩlÚ¬ÔV\ºÈV ÷Ú©√>[ JÈD >∫Ô”¬z kw∫Ô©√‚¶ WÈ Œ©√Á¶ gÁðl_ ÔVð©√|D

W√Õ>Á™ (2)án >V∫Ô^ ÔÁ¶∏Ω¬ÔV>Á> ∂§B°D.

Ex.P5 — 05-02-2016

Photocopy of the letter

given by the Respondent

Management to the Petitioner.

Ex.P6 — 19-02-2016

Photocopy of the reply

letter given by the Petitioner

the

Labour

Officer

(Conciliation), Puducherry.

Ex.P7 — 09-06-2016

Photocopy of the reply letter

given by the Respondent

to the Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Puducherry.

Ex.P8 — 22-02-2017

Photocopy of the Failure

Report given by the Labour

Officer

(Conciliation),

Puducherry.

Ex.P9 — 02-05-2017

Photocopy of the Notification

of the Labour Department,

Puducherry.

List of respondent’s witnesses:

RW1

— 05-07-2022

Thiru K. Sivashanmugam,

Managing Director, PASIC,

Puducherry.

List of Respondents’s Exhibits:

Ex.R1 — --

Photocopy of the PASIC

(Staff Service) Rules, 1988.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT

SECRETARIAT

[G.O. Ms. No. 05/2023-WCD(SW-IV)/342,

Puducherry, dated 24th February 2023]

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to

constitute a Steering Committee in the Union territory

of Puducherry, comprising the following Officers,

for effective implementation of distribution of fortified

rice and scaling up of fortification of rice under

Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS)/Mid-Day

Meals (MDM)/Public Distribution System (PDS).

1. Chief Secretary to Government

. . Chairman

2. Secretary to Government (Finance)

. . Member

3. Secretary to Government

. . Member

(Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs)

4. Secretary to Government

. . Member

(Health and Family Welfare)

5. Secretary to Government

. . Member

(School Education)

6. Secretary to Government

. . Member

(Women and Child Development)

7. Representative of Food Corporation . . Member

of India (FCI) to be nominated by

CMD, FCI.

The terms of reference of the Committee shall be

as under:–

(i) To ensure coordination/monitoring with the

Line Departments for effective implementation of

distribution of fortified rice under ICDS/MDM/PDS.

(ii) To periodically review the progress and

provide

inputs/suggestions

resolving

the

challenges/issues that may emerge during the process

of implementation of the distribution of fortified rice

under ICDS/MDM/PDS.

(iii) To help in scaling up of fortification of rice

under ICDS/MDM/PDS across the Union territory of

Puducherry through the concerned Departments.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

P. MUTHU MEENA,

Under Secretary to Government,

(Women and Child Development).

250

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[14 March 2023

kˆÁƒ

Œ©√Á¶ ÿ√u≈kˆ[ ÿ√BÏ

ÂÔ´/\Æ

WÈ›][

WÈ Œ©√Á¶

®ı

�ÆD xÔkˆ

∂·Ák ®ı

√´©√·°

gÁð ®ı

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

ÿ«. g.

ƒV.

®ı 19, sa]RÏ kÚkVF ˛´V\D

]Ú\] ∏´VðVD√V^,

68/17

42/91

Ô/ÿ√. ÷´V\ﬂƒÕ]´[,

g>ÈV_, ÷Àk§s©A ˛Á¶¬Ô©ÿ√u≈ 15 ÂV‚Ô”¬z^ >∫Ô”¬z kw∫Ô©√‚¶ ÷¶›]Á™ ∞[ ∂´ºƒ ]ÚD√

®|›m¬ÿÔV^·¬Ì¶Vm ®[√>uÔV™ ÔV´ð∫ÔÁ· ÷ÀkKkÈÔ›]uz› ÿ>ˆs¬zD√Ω ºÔ‚|¬ÿÔV^·©√|˛≈m,

÷m ÿ>V¶Ï√VÔ >V∫Ô^ ÔÚ›m ∞º>–D ÿ>ˆs¬Ô sÚD∏™V_ º�z§©∏‚¶ ÔVÈ¬ÿÔ|suz^ ˇµ¬ÁÔÿBV©√t‚|^·

∂]ÔVˆl¶D xÁ≈l¶ÈVD.

z§©∏‚¶ ÔVÈ¬ÿÔ|suz^ >V∫Ô^ ºÂˆºÈV ∂_Èm ÔΩ>D kVlÈVÔºkV >∫Ô·m ÔÚ›Á>› ÿ>ˆs¬ÔVsΩ_,

>∫Ôπ¶D ÔÚ›m¬Ì≈ ∞mD ÷_ÁÈ ®™¬ ÔÚ>©√‚| ÷>uz º\_ ®Õ> ∂§s©At[§ >∫Ô”¬z kw∫Ô©√‚¶

WÈ Œ©√Á¶ gÁð ´›m ÿƒFB©√|D.

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_, 2023 } ∏©´kˆ | 27 {,

∑. √V¸Ô´[,

mÁð g‚EBÏ (kÚkVF).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

HEALTH SECRETARIAT

(G.O. Ms. No. 09, Puducherry, dated 02nd March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation

of 65 years, Dr. T. Kamini, Senior Chief Medical Officer,

Government General Hospital, Mahe, is admitted into

retirement with effect from the afternoon of 28-02-2023.

(By order)

A. PUNITHAMARY,

Under Secretary to Government (Health).

————’

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

HEALTH SECRETARIAT

(G.O. Ms. No. 10, Puducherry, dated 02nd March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation,

Thiru A. Rajendhran, Manufacturing Chemist,

Department of Food and Drugs Testing, Puducherry, is

admitted into retirement with effect from the afternoon

of 28-02-2023.

(By order)

A. PUNITHAMARY,

Under Secretary to Government (Health).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 15, Puducherry, dated 06th March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to

appoint Selvi. Sangi Pateriya, who has been allotted to

the Pondicherry Civil Service by Department of

Personnal and Training, Government of India on the

basis of the results of Civil Services Examination, 2021,

to the Grade-II of Pondicherry Civil Service, with effect

from the forenoon of 23-02-2023, subject to the

conditions mentioned in the Offer of Appointment letter

No. A.19011/20/2022/DPAR/SS-I(2), dated 21-12-2022 of

this Department.

2. The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is also

pleased to order that Selvi. Sangi Pateriya will be a

probationer in the Pondicherry Civil Service (PCS) for a

period of two years from the forenoon of 23-02-2023.

3. Selvi. Sangi Pateriya, PCS Probationer, shall take

the Oath of Allegiance before the Deputy Secretary to

Government (Establishment), Chief Secretariat,

Puducherry and furnish Surety Bond in the prescribed

proforma within ten days from the date of this

Notification.

251

14 March 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

4. Selvi. Sangi Pateriya, PCS Probationer, is directed

to report before the District Collector-cum-District

Election Officer, Puducherry, for field training in

Revenue Department. She shall undergo Foundation

training Course in the Directorate of Training, Union

Territory Civil Service (UTCS), Delhi, as and when the

next batch commences for a period as may be prescribed

by Union Territory Civil Service (UTCS). She shall also

pass ‘Tamil Course for Non-Tamil PCS Officers’

conducted by the Puducherry Institute of Linguistics and

Culture, Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

V. JAISANKAR,

Under Secretary to Government.

YANAM MUNICIPALITY, YANAM

Yanam, the 6th March 2023.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested for permission to enhance the power to the following industry

within the Yanam Municipal limits, as detailed below.

Sl.

Name and address

Address of the

Power

No.

of the applicant

factory site

requirement

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Sri Vatshavai Lakshmi Narasayamma,

M/s. Sri Sai Srinivasa Polymers,

1642.05 H.P.

D. No. 1-13-026,

D. No. 5-1-066/A,

1st Cross Street,

Seetharama Nagar,

Gopal Nagar, Yanam.

Adivipolam, Yanam.

In conformity with the rule 8 of the Puducherry Municipalities (Grant of Licences and Permissions)

Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union Territory by the Puducherry Municipalities Act, 1973, objections, if any, for

change of power requirement of the above industry, are invited to reach the Commissioner, Yanam Municipality,

within ten days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections so received within the specified period will be considered by the Yanam Municipality.

KHANDAVILLY RAMA KRISHNA,

Commissioner.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Valli, daughter of Raju and wife of Vengadesan,

Indian inhabitant, aged 32 years and residing at the

house bearing Door No. 169, S.S Nagar, Villianur,

Puducherry-605 110, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate under Registration No. M/1990/

00343, in the Birth Certificate of my twin daughters,

by name Karishka and Kanishka, under

Registration Nos. PM/P/2010/8643 and PM/P/2010/

8644, respectively, and in the Savings Acount

Passbook of State Bank of India, Villianur Branch,

Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as ‘Valli’.

Electoral

Identity

Card,

under

No.YIQ0025544, my name has been mentioned as

‘Valli (k^π)’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 5791,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Valli. V (k^π. ÿk)’.

In my PAN Card, under No. CENPV4997N, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Valli.V’.

In the particulars of family members in the Family

Ration Card, under No. 327676, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Ai√k^π’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

252

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[14 March 2023

I state that hereainfter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Valli (k^π)’ for all

purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the

Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 28th day of

February 2023.

562254

V. VALLI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Gopinath, son of Govindan, Indian inhabitant,

aged 32 years and residing at the house bearing Door

No. B C 4, Telecom Staff Quarters, Jaya Nagar,

Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry-605 010, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may

concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate under Registration No. 14747, my

name has been mentioned as ‘G. Gopinath’.

In my School Transfer Certificate under Admission

No. 1140/2006-2008, my name has been mentioned as

‘Gopinath. G’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under

No. UEB0012682 and in my Aadhaar Card under No.

XXXX XXXX 8400, my name has been mentioned as

‘Gopinath (ºÔV∏ÂV›)’.

In the Family Ration Card under No. 001843, my

name has been mentioned as ‘ºÔV∏ÂV›’.

I state that I have renounced Hindu religion and

embraced Muslim religion, as such, in the Certificate,

dated 14-08-2020, under C.No. 15/2020, my Hindu

name has been mentioned as ‘Gopinath’ and my

assumed Muslim name has been mentioned as

‘Mohammed Aadil’.

In my Nikkah (Marriage) Certificate, dated

21-08-2020, my name has been mentioned as

‘Gopinath @ Mohammed Aadil’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known

and identified only by the name ‘Mohammed Aadil

(xÔ\m g]_)’ for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 24th day of

February 2023.

562255

G. GOPINATH.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Muthukumaran, son of Sagadevan, residing at

No. ll, Nehru Nagar, Kumarapalayam, Vazhudavur,

Puducherry-605 502, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Muthukumaran

(x›m¬z\´[)’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX

XXXX 6381, issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Aarimuthu @

Muthukumaran (gˆx›m @ x›m¬z\´[) in my

Elector’s Photo Identity Card No. DGL0256131, issued

by the Election Commission of India.

That my name is mentioned as ‘x›m¬z\´[’ in

my Family Ration Card bearing No. 441382, issued by

the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer

Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘gˆx›m’ in my

8th Standard School Transfer Certificate No. 68/05,

issued by the Department of School Education,

Government of Tamil Nadu.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is

‘gˆx›m’.

That the above particulars are true and correct to

the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the

Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 28th day of

February 2023.

562256

S. AARIMUTHU.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Mahendiran, presently third gender, previously son

of Jaganathan and Vijaya, residing at No. 27 A, Five

Quarters, Kann Doctor Thottam, Priyadharshini Nagar,

Orleanpet, Puducherry-605 001, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm to whomsoever it may concern as

follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

253

14 March 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

That my name is mentioned as ‘\ºÔÕ]´[’ in

my Family Ration Card No. 468265, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Government of Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Gracye (˛º´E)’ in

my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 9012 issued by

the Unique Identification Authority of India.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Crazy (˛º´L)’ in

my Elector’s Photo Identity Card No. TMC0170183,

issued by the Election Commission of India.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Mahendiran’ in my

Birth Certificate, under Registration No. M/2000/15174,

dated 22-11-2000, issued by Pondicherry Municipality,

Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Gracye’ in

my PAN Card under No. DUNPG8747Q, issued by

Government of India.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Gracye’ in my

Savings Account Passbook No. XXXXXX6097 of the

Indian Bank, Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry.

Further, I state that I transformed myself into third

gender through proper surgery and assumed a

feminine name ‘Gracye (˛º´E)’ as such in the

Discharge Summary issued by the Kumaran's Multi-

Speciality Hospital, Puducherry, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Gracye’

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that henceforth, I shall be known and

identified only by the female gender name ‘Gracye

(˛º´E)’ in all my future correspondence and

records etc.

That the above particulars are true and correct to

the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 01st day of

March 2023.

562258

GRACYE.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Gnanasekar, presently transgender, previously son

of Dhandapani and Valarmathi, at present residing at the

house bearing Door No. 103/32, Othavaadai Street,

Ariyapalayam, Villianur Commune, Puducherry-605 110, do

hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm to whomsoever it

may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that I was

born as a male, as such in my Certificate of Birth,

under Registration No. PM/M/1994/002964, registered

with Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry and in my

Provisional National Trade Certificate, issued by

Labour Department, Puducherry with Roll No. 2153/P,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Gnanasekar’.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificate under

Certificate S.No. SEC 7003585, Transfer Certificate

under Admission No. 7192 and in my Academic

Transcript, issued by the Open University, Malaysia,

under Registration No. PYI140530, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Gnanasekar. D’.

In my National Trade Certificate, under No. 794580,

my name has been mentioned as ‘D. Gnanasekar’.

Electoral

Identity

Card

under

No. IKU0598854, my name has been mentioned as

‘Gnanasekar (QV™ºƒÔÏ)’.

In my Passport, under No. M1063822, my surname

has been mentioned as ‘Dhandapani’ and my given

name has been mentioned as ‘Gnanasekar’.

Further, I state that later, I have transformed myself

into third gender through proper surgery and became

a transgender, as such in the Treatment Certificate,

dated 18-12-2020, issued by the Kannan Hospital,

Cuddalore, my name has been mentioned as ‘Ranjani’.

Accordingly, in my Aadhaar Card, under

No. XXXX XXXX 3478, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Ranjani (´ﬁƒM)’.

In the Family Ration Card, under No. 468260, my

name has been mentioned as ‘´ﬁƒM’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein. I state that henceforth, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Ranjani (´ﬁƒM)’ for

all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of

my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 01st day of

March 2023.

562259

D. GNANASEKAR.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Arul Mozhi, daughter of Durairaj and wife of

Dhayalan, Indian inhabitant, aged 65 years and residing

at the house bearing door No. 2, Third Cross Street,

Gnanapragasam Nagar, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may

concern as follows:

254

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[14 March 2023

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

previous Passport under No. R0242139, my given

name has been mentioned with spelling as

‘Arulmozy’.

In my present Passport under No.W9443688, my

given name has been mentioned with spelling and a

space in between the names as ‘Arul Mozhi’.

Similarly, in the Passport of my husband by name

Dhayalan under No. W0108531, my name has been

mentioned with spelling and a space in between the

names as ‘Arul Mozhi’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under

No. TN/11/063/0267614 and in my Aadhaar Card

under No. XXXX XXXX 6735, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Arulmozhi (∂Ú^ÿ\Va)’.

In the particulars of members in the Family Ration

Card under No. 165476, my name has been mentioned

as ‘∂Ú^ ÿ\Va’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name with spelling and with a

space in between the names as ‘Arul Mozhi (∂Ú^

ÿ\Va)’ for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of

my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the

Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 01st day of

March 2023.

562260

D. ∂Ú^ÿ\Va

∂Ú^ÿ\Va

∂Ú^ÿ\Va.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Francis Xavier Pinto son of Pinto Fernando, aged

39 years, residing at No. 25, Sivasakthi Nagar, Amaithi

Nagar Extension, Thattanchavady, Puducherry-605 009,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on

oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I know all the

facts of my deposition well.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned

as ‘Francis Xavier’ in my Birth Certificate, issued by

the Thoothukudi Municipality vide Registration No. 911,

dated 13-09-1983, in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card

issued by the Election Commission of India, vide No.

YSW0221473 and in my Marriage Registration

Certificate, issued by the Tuticorin Registration

Department vide Serial No. 2883/2012/M.No.2126/2011.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned

as ‘Francis Xavier P’ in my Marriage Extract received

from St. Jude's Shrine, Tuticorin Diocese, dated

15-08-2012 and in my Higher Secondary Course

Certificate, issued by Board of Higher Secondary

Examination, Tamil Nadu vide Certificate S.No. HSG

00193510 and Register No. 722030, and in my Higher

Secondary Course Transfer issued by the Petit

Seminaire Higher Secondary School vide Serial No. 71/

2000, Admission No. 107/98, and in my B.Tech

Engineering Degree Consolidated Mark List issued by

the Pondicherry University, Puducherry vide

No. 0004532 and in my India Driving Licence issued

by the Transport Department, Puducherry vide

DL No.PY-01 20040004691.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned

as ‘P.Francis Xavier’ in my Aadhaar Card, issued by

the Unique Identification Authority of India vide

No. XXXX XXXX 1252.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned

as ‘Francis Xavier Pinto’ in my PAN Card issued by

Income-tax Department vide No. AAKPF8059L.

Further, I submit to state that my given name is

mentioned as ‘Francis Xavier’ and surname is

mentioned as ‘Pinto’ in my Indian Passport, issued

by the Regional Passport Office, Chennai vide Passport

No. V8252175.

Further, I submit to state that my name is mentioned

as ‘∏´V[E¸ ºƒsBÏ’ in my Family Ration Card

issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and

Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry, vide No.

016786.

Hence, finally, I declare that the names viz., ‘Francis

Xavier’ ‘Francis Xavier P’, ‘P.Francis Xavier’, ‘Francis

Xavier Pinto’ given name ‘Francis Xavier’ and

surname ‘Pinto’ and ‘∏´V[E¸ ºƒsBÏ’ are denoting

one and the same, they representing myself only.

My correct name is ‘Francis Xavier Pinto’ only.

Henceforth, I would be called, signed and

known only as Francis Xavier Pinto.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 03rd day of

March 2023.

562261

FRANCIS XAVIER PINTO.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, D Pascalraj, son of Durai, residing at No. 8, First

Cross Street, Gnanathiyagu Nagar, Thattanchavady,

Puducherry-605 009, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm and state on oath as follows:

255

14 March 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Pascalraj

(√V¸Ô_´VÎ)’ in my Family Ration Card under No.

304307, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies

and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘D Pascalraj

(m √V¸Ô_´VÎ)’ in my Aadhaar Card under

No. XXXX XXXX 8853, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Baskalraj

(√V¸Ô_´VÎ)’ in my Electoral Identity Card No.

JTP0399634, issued by the Election Commission of

India.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Pascalraj’ in

my Birth Certificate under Registration No. OM/O/

1983/1639, dated 01-08-1983, issued by Oulgaret

Municipality, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘D Pascalraj’ in my

PAN Card No. GBCPD4590M, issued by the

Income-tax Department, Government of India.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Baskalraj’ in my

Savings Account Passbook No. XXXXXXXXXX6494

issued by the AXIS Bank, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘D. Pascal Raj’ in

my School Transfer Certificate S.No.1388, Admn.

No. 6039, Mark Certificate No.1443092, issued by

St. Joseph's Higher Secondary School, Thirupathiripuliyur,

Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu-607 002.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Pascal Raj D’ in

my 10th Standard Mark Sheet, S.No.1443092, Register

No. 459215, TMR Code No. A433393, dated

18-06-2001, issued by the Department of Government

Examinations, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Pascalraj’ in my

Marriage Certificate, S.M.No.210521406, dated

06-10-2021, issued by the Sub-Registrar Office,

Oulgaret, Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘D Pascalraj’ in

Court Order, C.M.P.No.176/2022, dated 19-01-2023,

Judicial Department, Government of Puducherry.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid

names are referred, identified and relate to one and the

same person that is me, the deponent herein.

Finally, I declare that hereinafter, I shall be called

only by the name ‘D Pascalraj (m √V¸Ô_´VÎ)’ in

all correspondence and records, etc., in future.

That the above particulars are true and correct to

the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at

Puducherry, on this 01st day of March 2023.

562262

D PASCALRAJ.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Kamalavalli, daughter of Perumal and wife of

M. Prabhu, Indian inhabitant, aged 19 years and residing

at the house bearing Door No. 64, M.G.R. Street, Raman

Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry-605 008, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may

concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate under Registration No. 352/04, my

name has been mentioned as ‘ÿ√. Ô\Èk^π’.

In my High School Transfer Certificate under

Admission No. 781, in my Diploma in Computer

Engineering, Transfer Certificate under No. 516 and

in the Residence Certificate, dated 15-07-2021, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Kamalavalli.P’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 5128,

issued by Unique Identification Authority of India,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Kamalavalli

(Ô\Èk^π)’.

In the Legal Heirship Certificate under No. 3297-

2014-∂7, my name has been mentioned with a space

in between my name’s spelling as ‘Ô\È k^π’.

In the particulars of famaly members in the family

in the Family Ration Card under No. 223337, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Ô\Èk^π’.

In the Sale Deed, registered as Document No. 6958

of the year 2006, my name has been mentioned as

‘Ô\ºÈ¸kˆ’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person, that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Kamalavalli (Ô\Èk^π)’

for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 3rd day of March 2023.

562263

P. KAMALAVALLI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, S. Shyamsundar, son of Subramani, aged 42 years,

residing at No. 0l, School Street, Madukkarai,

Puducherry-605 105, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm and state on oath as follows:

256

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[14 March 2023

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

That I am the deponent herein.

I state that my name is ‘S. Shyamsundar’ entered

in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 1496, issued

by the Unique Identification Authority of India.

I state that my name ‘Syam Sudar.S’ is entered in

my School Transfer Certificate, issued by K.G.H.S.S.,

Nettapakkam, Puducherry, my name ‘Siamsudar’ is

entered in my Birth Certificate vide Registration No.

NC/M/1981/17, issued by Nettapakkam Commune

Panchayat, Government of Puducherry and my name

‘EBVD ∑>VÔÏ’ is entered in my Family Ration Card

No.177385, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies

and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

I state that all the abovesaid names viz.,

‘S. Shyamsundar’, ‘Syam Sudar.S’, ‘Siamsudar’ and

‘EBVD ∑>VÔÏ’ are referring one and the same person

i.e., myself only.

Henceforth, I will be known only as

‘S. Shyamsundar’.

The above deposition is true and correct to the

best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material

has been concealed therein.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of March 2023.

562267

S. SHYAMSUNDAR.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Mourougammalle Mars, daughter of Mourougassamy

alias Rattinavelou Mars and wife of Ramasamy (late),

aged about 74 years, Hindu, residing at No. 243, Kaveri

Street, Ashok Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry-605 008,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on

oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I state that my deceased husband’s name

issued by Vanur Sub-Registrar Office, Villupuram

District, Government of Tamil Nadu vide No.145/04.

I state that my husband’s name is mentioned as

‘´V\ƒVt ∏^Á·’ in his Burial Permission Slip issued

by Station House Officer, Lawspet Police Station,

Puducherry and in his Brought Death Certificate,

his name is mentioned as ‘Ramasamy’ and in our

Family Ration Card, my husband’s name is mentioned

as ‘´V\ƒVt’.

Further, I state that my husband’s name

‘Ramassamy Poulle (´V\ƒVt ∏^Á·)’ is mentioned

in his Elector’s Photo Identity Card and also in my

Elector’s Photo Identity Card vide No. IPD 0174599.

Further, I state that my husband’s name is mentioned

his Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 6802 and

in his Bank Account Passbook of UCO Bank vide

Account No. XXXXXXXXXX4577, his name is

mentioned as ‘Ramaswamy M’.

Further, I state that is my husband’s Pension

Payment Order, his name is mentioned as ‘M Ramasamy’

vide No. 16660, issued by Directorate of Accounts

and Treasuries, Puducherry.

Further, I state that in our Marriage Certificate,

my husband’s name is mentioned as ‘Ramassamypoulle’

vide No. 100/1969.

Further, I state that my sons’ Birth Certificates

namely, Velavane alias Batmanabane, Subramaniyan

alias Rajagopalan and Rajendran, and in my daughter

Calaivany’s Birth Certificate, my husbands name is

mentioned as ‘Ramassamy Poulle’. Hence, I state and

declare that the names mentioned in the abovesaid

records and testimonials are referring, denoting and

identifying one and the same person, that is my

husband only. I state that hereafter, I shall use my

husband’s name only as ‘M. Ramasamy’.

Further, I state that my name is mentioned as

‘Mourougammalle Mars’ in my Birth Certificate issued

by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry vide

Registration No. PM/P/1948/000511, Voter’s Identity

vide No. IPD0174722, Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX

XXXX 5492.

Whereas, in my Pension Book vide PPO No. 15107

issued by Directorate of Accounts and Treasuries,

Puducherry, my name has been entered as

‘Mourougammalle’, in my Family Ration Card

No. 100295, my name is mentioned as ‘xÚÔD\V^’

issued by Department of Civil Supplies and

Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

I do hereby declare that the abovesaid my names

entered in the above records are referring, denoting

and identifying one and the same person, i.e., myself

only. I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Mourougammalle’.

Also declare that the above particulars are true

and correct, and nothing material has been false.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 08th day of March 2023.

562270

MOUROUGAMMALLE MARS.