[257]
ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD
SOMMAIRES
CONTENTS
√¬ÔD
Page
Page
ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..
258
Sentence arbitral du Travail
.. 258
Award of the Labour Court .. 258
de Tribunal.
∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^
..
262
Notifications du Gouvernement .. 262
Government Notifications
.. 262
g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^
..
265
Etablissements dangereux
.. 265
Dangerous Establishments
..
265
ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^
..
266
Annonces
.. 266
Announcements
..
266
Amflºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ
La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry
The Gazette of Puducherry
∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|
Publiée par Autorité
Published by Authority
Registered with the Registrar
of Newspapers for India
under No. 10410
Registered No. PY/44/2021-23
®ı
Amflºƒˆ
ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\
2023 }
\VÏfl |
21 {
No.
12
Poudouchéry
Mardi
21
Mars
2023 (30 Phalguna 1944)
No.
Puducherry
Tuesday
21st
March
2023
258
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[21 March 2023
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LABOUR DEPARTMENT
(G.O. Rt. No. 05/AIL/Lab./T/2023,
Puducherry, dated 19th January 2023)
NOTIFICATION
Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 08/2020, dated
12-12-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court, Puducherry, in respect of the Dispute between
the Tmt. V. Rajeswari, Thirubuvanai, Puducherry, and
the management of M/s. DXN Manufacturing (India)
Private Limited, Thiruvandarkoil, Mannadipet Commune,
Puducherry, over non-employment and compensation of
` 7,00,000 with 24% interest has been received;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with
the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.
No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed
by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said
Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,
Puducherry.
(By order)
P. RAGINI,
Under Secretary to Government (Labour).
————
BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-
LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY
Present :Tmt. V. SOFANA DEVI, M.L.,
Presiding Officer.
Monday, the 12th day of December 2022.
I.D. (L) No. 08/2020
in
CNR. No. PYPY06-000040-2020
Tmt. V. Rajeswari,
No. 10, Madhi Street,
Thirubuvanai Palayam,
Thirubuvanai,
Puducherry-605 107.
. . Petitioner
Versus
The Managing Director,
M/s. DXN Manufacturing (India)
Private Limited,
R.S. Nos. 141/4 and 142/5,
Whirlpool Road,
Thiruvandar Koil,
Mannadipet Commune,
Puducherry-605 102.
. . Respondent
This Industrial dispute coming on 07-11-2022 before
me for final hearing in the presence of Thiruvalargal
S. Nagarajan and A.P. Ilangovan, Counsels, for the
Petitioner, Thiruvalargal L. Sathish, S. Velmurugan and
E. Karthik, Counsels for the Respondent, Reported No
Instruction, Court Notice sent and same served on the
Respondent, Respondent remained ex parte and after
hearing the Petitioner side and perusing the case
records, this Court delivered the following:
AWARD
This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference
made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.
No. 70/AIL/Lab./T/2020, dated 15-07-2020 of the Labour
Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following
dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz.,
(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner
Tmt. V. Rajeswari, Thirubuvanai, Puducherry against
the Management of M/s. DXN Manufacturing (India)
Private Limited, Thiruvandar Koil, Mannadipet
Commune, Puducherry, over non-employment and
compensation of ` 7,00,000 with 24% interest is
justified or not? If justified, what relief the Petitioner
is entitled to?
(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms
of money if, it can be so computed?
2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner:
The Petitioner Workman was joined as operator in
the Respondent Management company on 07-04-2002
and the Petitioner kept maintained her good conduct
and best service to the fullest satisfaction of the
Respondent Management being a regular employee
ever since of joining to the employment as operator
under the Respondent management. The Respondent
company was engaged in manufacturing herbal
capsules in the name and style of “R.G. & G.L.”, and
being a multinational company was having surge of
customers over the world for the reason of the health
product of the Respondent company.
(ii) The Respondent Management was engaged
more than 60 employees in a shift per day for
manufacturing process and apart from other
employees for operational purpose. Few employees
among other were taken effort for formation of Union
in the year 2006 and by name “DXN Herbal
Manufacturing (India) Private Limited, Labour Union.
17 employees were targeted by the Respondent
Management for pangs of death, i.e., victimization
for the sole reason that they were being stubborn to
membership to the said Union. 17 employees were
terminated from of service without any valid cause
259
21 March 2023]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
and reason except their bare eager for membership
into the Union. The said dispute was referred to
Labour Officer, Conciliation from time to time.
(iii) On 01-03-2011 at about 05.30 p.m. the
Respondent Management was surprisingly displaced
a notice on the board that “The Office of Management
will not function from 02-03-2011 and the services of
notice mention employees are not required from
02-03-2011 and their terminal benefits will be settle
down on 08-03-2011 at the Office”. The statutory
machineries, viz., the Labour Commissioner and
Conciliation Officer took cognizance upon the
unlawful act, the Respondent Management immediately.
The Respondent Management was failed to appear
before the officials many hearing and bluntly ignored
them. On around 08-04-2011, the Respondent
Management filed its counter before the Conciliation
Officer in respect of the said Industrial Dispute. Vide
the said counter, the Respondent Management stated
that due to certain unavoidable circumstances had
forced the Management to cease to run the factory
and in view, the Management has proposed to
transfer the staff and their workmen to Himachal
Pradesh unit.
(iv) Some of the employees filed a Civil Suit vide.
O.S. No. 45/2011 before the Sub-Court, Puducherry,
against the Respondent Management and won the
Suit vide Judgment and Decree, dated 12-04-2012. In
view of the vengeance target, the Respondent
Management assailed a baseless allegation against
the Petitioner vide Charge-sheet, dated 22-06-2010 for
the reason of slow down the work. A similar charge
sheet was launched upon many employees who
showed their sheer inclination for membership into
the Union. Apart from the said issue was got the
shape of Industrial Dispute before this Court vide
I.D. No. 21/2011 and I.D. No. 10/2020. In fact the
present Petitioner was party to the Industrial Dispute
vide I.D. No. 10/2020. Whilst pending the above
disputes before this Court, the Respondent
Management desired for tripartite agreement under
section 12(3) of Industrial Disputes Act so as to
evade and escape from the stringent liabilities for
illegal closure of the company and illegal termination
of the employees including non-employment, etc.
(v) Accordingly, on 04-12-2017, a settlement under
section 12(3) arrived between the Respondent
Management and its Labour Union in the presence
of the Labour Commissioner. A final settlement
including terminal benefits was decided for all the
employees as a compensation measure against the
illegal closure, non-employment, termination, unfair
labour practice, victimization, etc., In view of arrival
of settlement, the Respondent Management was
uniquely decided to cease the service of employees
against the amount agreed for compensation towards
the employees. Accordingly, an amount of ` 3,50,000
(Rupees three lakhs fifty thousand only) was decided
as compensation quantum for each employees
irrespective of their status. The requisite condition
for the said settlement was cessation of employment
of all employees against the effect of illegal closure
and the Management was not intent to reopen the
said factory forever.
(vi) Whereas, the present nomenclature as to
refusal for employment with the Respondent
Management @ ` 3,50,000 as compensation and who
are willing to continue the service similar to the
Petitioner was paid nothing. Hence, the discriminative
classification for settlement of compensation among
the employees who were set to same foot for same
dispute upon same issue but, the ramified amount for
compensation among the employees was irrational
and illogical. The Petitioner opted to continue
service with Respondent management. However, the
Petitioner was not in a position to join and report
duty in lieu of the 12(3) settlement against her
personal inconvenience upon her matrimonial dispute
including the civic life of her children. Accordingly,
vide letter, dated 21-12-2017, the Petitioner requested
time for joining duty against her warranted reasons.
(vii)The letter, dated 28-12-2017, the Respondent
Management informed the Petitioner that merely
5 days only would be given to join and report duty
and in case of her failure within the set time, the
Management would consider that she is not
interested to continue as its employee and resigned
the job. In addition, Respondent Management sought
the Bank details of the Petitioner to deposit the one
time compensation/terminal benefits @ ` 40,000.
(viii) As a response to the Respondent
management’s letter content, the Petitioner submitted
her letter, dated 03-01-2018 for seeking one month
time for joining duty. The Respondent Management
was not in function yet then in lieu of the 12(3)
settlement, dated 04-12-2017 for the reason that the
Respondent Management and the factory unit was
completely closed down for more than 7 years
continuously. The Respondent Management was
stepped into the shoes of various authorities for
sanctioning the orders to resume the work at the
closed factory premise, viz., the electricity, water,
Municipal tax, environmental clearance, underground
water, measuring the safety clearance, etc.
260
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[21 March 2023
(ix) The letter, dated 09-01-2018 refused the
request of the Petitioner for one month time and
allowed just days time to join the duty. The Petitioner
had exposed her uncontrollable situation and against
which she sought considerable time around one
month vide letter, dated 03-01-2018 to the Respondent
management. Again, the Petitioner vide letter, dated
01-02-2018 sought time for joining muster role.
Whereas, against receipt of the above letter from the
Petitioner, the Respondent Management vide its letter,
dated 02-02-2018 by terminating the Petitioner from
the employment along with a Demand Draft bearing
No. 078388, dated 01-02-2018 for ` 40,000 as one time
compensation/terminal benefit. The Petitioner was
insisted to receive the said termination letter by the
Respondent Management along with the Demand
Draft. But, the Petitioner was however refused the
termination letter and the Demand Draft unlawfuly
assailed by the Respondent management. But, with
no option against irksome insistence of the Respondent
management, the Petitioner received the same with
objection as to no prejudice to her legal rights upon
litigation lie on the cause of action for the present
Industrial Dispute.
(x) The pre-mediated decision of the Respondent
Management for terminating her employment by
ceasing the employment and loosing the lieu over
employment in an unjust and unlawful manner
pertinently in lieu of effect of 12(3) settlement, dated
04-12-2017 between the Management and its Labour
Union after long illegal closure and illegal termination
of the employment of the employees. In precise, the
act of the Respondent Management is shear
victimization to the Petitioner and her employment
rights as per Industrial Dispute Act.
(xi) The letter, dated 18-05-2018 the Petitioner
submitted an appropriate complaint as to the
Industrial Dispute before the Labour Officer
(Conciliation), Puducherry, with the request for
reinstatement to the employment with compensation
of ` 7,00,000. The Respondent Management vide
letter, dated 10-05-2019 replied to the Labour Officer
(Conciliation) upon the Industrial Dispute of the
Petitioner and through with stoutly refused the
demands of the Petitioner and sought a failure report
from the Conciliation Officer. Against which a reply
by the Petitioner vide letter, dated 05-08-2019 was
submitted before the Labour Officer (Conciliation),
Puducherry.
(xii) The Labour Officer (Conciliation) vide his
proceedings No. 742/LO(C)/AIL/2018, dated 16-03-2012
submitted the failure report upon the Industrial
Dispute raised by the Petitioner vide her petition,
dated 18-05-2018. An illegal termination of the
Petitioner’s employment by the sole Respondent
herein pertinently without conducting even a
domestic enquiry against the Petitioner who infact
was regular employee working since, 07-04-2002, i.e.,
for more that 15 years. The Petitioner was drawn her
wage around ` 6,500 after deducting the admissible
contribution, viz., the ESI, the P.F etc., before the
effect of the 12(3) settlement, dated 04-12-2017.
Whereas, `10,500 was fixed as her wage in lieu of
the 12(3) settlement, dated 04-12-2017 apart from
other allowances admissible under the Respondent
Management from time to time. Hence, the claim for
the reinstatement.
3. Respondent Company was set ex parte on
11-08-2022.
4. Point for determination:
Whether the Petitioner is entitled for the prayer
of reinstatement and compensation of ` 7,00,000 with
24% interest as prayed in the Claim Petition?
5. On the Point:
Respondent Counsel reported no instruction on
20-07-2022. Court notice ordered and served on the
Respondent. Since, service sufficient, Respondent
called but, not appeared on 11-08-2022. Hence,
Respondent Management set ex parte. Proof affidavit
of the Petitioner filed and Ex.P1 to P12 marked.
6. Heard the Petitioner Counsel. Perused the case
records and Ex.P1 to P12 marked on the side of the
Petitioner.
7. The prayer in the Industrial Dispute is for
reinstatement with back wages and other benefits along
with the compensation of ` 7,00,000 with 24% interest
over the illegal termination and non-employment of the
Petitioner with cost. According to the Petitioner, in I.D.
No. 21/2011 and I.D. No. 10/2020 in which the Petitioner
was the party. Pending abovesaid IDs, Management
and Labour Union entered into a settlement under
section 12(3) on 04-12-2017 in the presence of Labour
Commissioner. In view of the settlement, the Respondent
Management agreed for compensation of ` 3,50,000 for
cessation of employment of employees against the
effect of illegal closure and the Management was not
intended to reopen the factory for work. But, the
employees who are willing to continue the service
including the Petitioner was paid nothing. The
discriminative classification for settlement of
compensation among the employees who were on the
same position, but, refused the compensation among the
employees was irrational and illogical.
261
21 March 2023]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
8. According to the Petitioner, she opted to continue
the service with Respondent Management and not in a
position to join immediately due to her personal
inconvenience. The same was informed to the
Management vide her letter, dated 21-12-2017, requesting
time for joining. The Respondent Management granted
only 5 days time for reporting duty vide its letter, dated
28-12-2017. Again, the Petitioner vide her letter, dated
03-01-2018 sought for one month time for joining the
duty. The Respondent Management refused the request
vide letter, dated 09-01-2018, but, given 5 days time for
joining duty. Again, the Petitioner sought one month
time to the Respondent Management vide her letter
01-02-2018. Whereas, the Respondent Management
vide its letter, dated 02-02-2018 had terminated the
Petitioner from the employment with the Demand Draft,
dated 01-02-2018 for ` 40,000 as one time compensation/
terminal benefits. The Petitioner has received the same
with objection. The above decision of the termination
of the Respondent Management is pre-mediated
decision and against the 12(3) settlement. The Petitioner
had approached the Labour Officer Conciliation. The
Respondent Management filed their objections, dated
10-05-2019. The Labour Officer Conciliation submitted
the Failure report on 16-03-2019.
9. It is submitted by the Petitioner Counsel that
` 10,500 was fixed as her wage in lieu of the 12(3)
Settlement, dated 04-12-2017 apart from other allowances
admissible under the Respondent Management from
time to time.
10. Though the Petitioner has agreed to join the
Respondent Management, but, she could not make it
immediately due to her personal inconvenience. This
version of the Petitioner has not been rebutted by the
Respondent
Management.
When
Respondent
Management had disbursed ` 3,50,000 to the employees
those who quit the job as per the Settlement under
section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, in absence
of any rebuttal pleadings, evidence and proof, this
Court is not in a position to reject the claim of the
Petitioner. But, at the same time, this Court is not
inclined to order the relief as such claimed by the
Petitioner in this claim petition in toto. On considering
the facts and circumstances, this Court finds that before
the closure, the Petitioner had received ` 6,500 as wage
after all deductions. Hence, taking into account as per
the 12(3) settlement though the Petitioner has agreed
to join the Respondent Management, but, she could not
make it immediately due to her personal inconvenience,
it is just and proper that if, ordered the same compensation
of ` 3,50,000 which was paid by the Respondent
Management to the employees those who quit the job,
be paid to the Petitioner herein with accrued interest.
Since, ` 40,000 already paid to the Petitioner Workman,
the same shall be deducted from the said compensation.
Thus, the point for determination is decided accordingly.
11. In the result, the Reference is justified and the
industrial dispute is partly allowed with the effect that
the Respondent Management is hereby directed to pay
` 3,10,000 (Rupees three lakhs and ten thousand only)
which was paid by the Respondent Management to the
employees those who quit the job, to the Petitioner
herein with accrued interest at the rate of 9% from the
date of their job cessation, i.e., 02-02-2018 till the date
of this Award and thereafter, 6% from the date of the
Award till the date of realization. Other claims claimed
by the Petitioner in the claim petition is rejected. No
costs.
Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him,
corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, on this
12th day of December 2022.
V. SOFANA DEVI,
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Puducherry.
List of petitioner’s witness:
PW.1
— 14-09-2022
Tmt. V. Rajeswari
List of petitioner’s exhibits:
Ex.P1
— 21-12-2017
Photocopy of the letter by
the
Petitioner
to
the
Respondent.
Ex.P2
— 28-12-2017
Original document of the
letter by the Respondent to
the Petitioner.
Ex.P3
— 03-01-2018
Photocopy of the letter by
the
Petitioner
to
the
Respondent.
Ex.P4
— 09-01-2018
Original document of the
letter by the Respondent to
the Petitioner.
Ex.P5
— 01-02-2018
Photocopy of the letter by
the
Petitioner
to
the
Respondent.
Ex.P6
— 02-02-2018
Original document of the
letter by the Respondent to
the Petitioner intimating
job cessation.
Ex.P7
— 01-02-2018
Photocopy of the Demand
Draft No. 078388 (Axis Bank).
Ex.P8
— 10-05-2019
O r i g i n a l d o c u m e n t o f
the reply of Respondent
Management before the
Labour Officer (Conciliation).
262
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[21 March 2023
Ex.P9
— 05-08-2019
Original document of the
rejoinder of the Petitioner
before the Labour Officer
(Conciliation).
Ex.P10 — 16-03-2020
Photocopy of the Failure
Report by Labour Officer
(Conciliation).
Ex.P11 — 15-07-2020
Photocopy
of
the
Notification of the Labour
Department, Government of
Puducherry.
Ex.P12 — 04-12-2017
Photocopy of the 12(3)
Settlement.
List of respondent’s witnesses: Nil
List of respondent’s exhibits: Nil
V. SOFANA DEVI,
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal-cum-
Labour Court, Puducherry.
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
(SECRETARIAT WING)
[G.O. Ms. No. 17/DI&C(SW)/T1/2022-23,
Puducherry, dated 28th February 2023]
NOTIFICATION
In pursuance of Article 7 of the Articles of Association
of the Puducherry Distilleries Limited (PDL) and in
accordance with the powers vested under Articles 10
and 13 of the Articles of Association of PDL, the
Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to
reconstitute the Board of Directors of Puducherry
Distilleries Limited (PDL), Puducherry, as follows with
immediate effect and until further orders.
1. Secretary to Government
. . Chairman
(lndustries and Commerce).
2. Secretary to Government (Labour)
. . Director
3. Secretary to Government (Excise)
. . Director
4. Director (Industries and Commerce) . . Director
5. Managing Director, Puducherry
. . Director
Distilleries Limited.
(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)
V. MOKAN KUMAR,
Under Secretary to Government
(lndustries and Commerce).
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
CHIEF SECRETARIAT (AGRICULTURE)
(G.O. Ms. No. 20/Ag., Puducherry, dated 1st March 2023)
NOTIFICATION
(Addendum)
The following clause shall be added at 2.1
Composition of State Level Consultative Committee
(SLCC) as Sl.No. XIV of the G.O. Ms. No. 14/Ag.,
dated 12-08-2020 of the Chief Secretariat (Agriculture),
Puducherry.
Representative of SFAC/NAFED/NCDC/ . . Member
any other Implementing Agency as
appointed by the Government of India
from time to time.
The following clause shall be added at 2.3 Composition
of District Level Monitoring Committee (DLMC) for
Puducherry District as Sl.No. XI of the G.O. Ms. No. 14/Ag.,
dated 12-08-2020 of the Chief Secretariat (Agriculture),
Puducherry.
Representative of SFAC/NAFED/NCDC/ . . Member
any other Implementing Agency as
appointed by the Government of India
from time to time.
The other conditions contained in the Government
Order remain unaltered.
(By order)
SUNDARA RAJAN. P,
Deputy Secretary to Government
(Agriculture).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
HEALTH SECRETARIAT
(G.O. Ms. No. 11, Puducherry, dated 06th March 2023)
NOTIFICATION
The Lieutenant-Governor of Puducherry is pleased
to confirm the services of the following 5 Dieticians and
to appoint them substantively in their entry grade with
effect from the dates indicated against their names:–
Sl.
Name of the
Entry grade
Date of
No.
officials
in which
confirmation
confirmed
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.
M. Kayalvizhi
Dietician
19-06-2017
2.
R. Kavitha
Dietician
22-06-2017
263
21 March 2023]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
3.
D. Sathiya
Dietician
26-06-2017
4.
G. Sathya
Dietician
22-06-2017
5.
M. Souzaane
Dietician
22-06-2017
(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)
A. PUNITHAMARY,
Under Secretary to Government (Health).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
LOCAL ADMINISTRATION SECRETARIAT
(G.O. Ms. No. 16/LAS/A1/2023,
Puducherry, dated 07th March 2023)
NOTIFICATION
Approval of the Hon’ble Lieutenant-Governor is
hereby accorded for extension of term of the Single
Member Commission for a further period of six months
with effect from 17-12-2022 onwards, to recommend
appropriate reservation for Other Backward Classes to
conduct Civic Elections in the Union territory of
Puducherry.
2. All the terms and conditions stipulated in the
G.O. Ms. No. 67/LAS/2021, dated 17-12-2021 of Local
Administration Secretariat, Puducherry, will remain the
same.
3. The expenditure is debitable to the relevant Head
of Account of the Local Administration Department,
Puducherry.
(By order)
S. SIVAKUMAR,
Under Secretary to Government
(Local Administration).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
No. (Exam.)/EDN/DD/FE/EC/2023.
Puducherry, dated 7th March 2023.
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred by the Decree of
8th September 1925, pertaining to the organisation of
the ‘Brevet Elementaire’ Examination.
Art: In derogation of the Article 12 of the Decree of
8th September 1925, The Committee (Board) of Examiners
to conduct the ‘Brevet Elementaire Examination’ for the
session of March and June 2023 and for the whole of
Union territory of Puducherry, is constituted as shown below:
The following Officials are being appointed as
INVIGILATORS:
Puducherry Centre
Thiru/Tmt.:
1. Dr. R. Venguattaramane,
. . Chairman
Dean, School of Humanities and
Head of Department,
Department of French (Retd.),
Pondicherry University,
Puducherry.
2. Dr. S. A. Vengada Soupraya Nayagar,
. . Vice-
Head of Department,
Chairman
Department of French,
Kanchi Mamunivar Centre for
Postgraduate Studies, Puducherry.
3. Dr. Rajan George, T.G.T.,
. . Member
CC(FS), Puducherry.
4. S. Mekala, T.G.T.,
. . Member
VSR GGHSS, Maducarai.
5. P. Muthuselvam, P.E.T.,
. . Member
Veeramamunivar GHS,
Puducherry.
Karaikal Centre
1. The Chief Educational Officer,
. . Chairman
Karaikal.
2. Thiru M. Mohan, T.G.T.(T),
. . Member
KGHS, Vadaimaraicadu, Karaikal.
Mahe Region
1. The Chief Educational Officer,
. . Chairman
Mahe.
2. Ms. Swapna Mohan, P.S.T., GLPS,
. . Member
Parakkal.
The following examiners are being appointed for
correction and conduct of Oral Examination:
Thiru/Tmt./Selvi:
1. Dr. R. Venguattaramane,
. . Chairman
Dean, School of Humanities and
Head of Department,
Department of French, (Retd.),
Pondicherry University,
Puducherry.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
264
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[21 March 2023
2. Dr. S. A. Vengada Soupraya Nayagar, . . Vice-
Head of Department,
Chairman
Department of French,
Kanchi Mamunivar Centre for
Postgraduate Studies, Puducherry.
3. Dr. Rajan George, T.G.T.,
. . Member
CC(FS), Puducherry.
4. Rajani Jose, T.G.T.,
. . Member
PJF, Puducherry.
5. B. Sarasvady, T.G.T.,
. . Member
CC(FS), Puducherry.
6. S. Edward Charles, T.G.T.,
. . Member
PJF, Puducherry.
7. D. Hemalatha, T.G.T.,
. . Member
CC(FS), Puducherry.
8. R. Ganessin Radja, T.G.T.,
. . Member
CC(E.S), Puducherry.
9. Albertine Kanchana, T.G.T.,
. . Member
CC(FS), Puducherry.
10.
S.Mekala, T.G.T.,
. . Member
CC(FS), Puducherry.
11.
Shakila. A, T.G.T.,
. . Member
PJF, Puducherry.
12.
C.E Resitha, Lecturer,
. . Member
EC&CC, Mahe.
13. James C. Joseph, T.G.T.,
. . Member
JNGHSS, Mahe.
14.
Lourdes Marie Gracia Rassou, T.G.T,
. . Member
CC(FS), Puducherry.
15.
Francois Sagayanadin, P.S.T. (Retd.), . . Member
CC(FS), Puducherry.
16. M. Udayabanu, T.G.T,
. . Member
PJF, Puducherry.
17. J. Hema, T.G.T. (Cons.),
. . Member
PJF, Puducherry.
18. S. Meenatchi Sundharam, P.S.T,
. . Member
CES, Karaikal.
19. V. Balakrishnan, P.S.T,
. . Member
CES, Karaikal.
20. V. Rekha, P.S.T,
. . Member
EC&CC, Mahe.
21. R.S. Murugasa Bharathi, FAT,
. . Member
CC(FS), Puducherry.
22. Patcheappane. P, FAT,
. . Member
PJF, Puducherry.
23. R. Rajamani, P.E.T,
. . Member
PJF, Puducherry.
24. R.Vally, Sewing Mistress (Retd.),
. . Member
PJF, Puducherry.
(By order)
R. SIVARAMA REDDY,
Deputy Director of Education (Women).
————
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
No. (Exam.)/EDN./DD/FE/EC/2023.
Puducherry, dated 7th March 2023.
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred by the Decree of
14-9-1939, pertaining to the organisation of the
‘Certificat d’Etudes Primaires Elementaires de Francais’,
the Committee (Board) of Examiners to conduct the
examination
of
‘Certificat
d’Etudes
Primaires
Elementaires de Francais’ for the session of April 2023
is constituted as follows:
Puducherry Centre
Thiru/Tmt./Selvi:
1.J. Pitcheammalle Dite Comady,
. . Chairperson
Headmistress Gr. II.
2.Dr. Rajan George, TGT, CC(FS)
. . Member
3.Rajani Jose, TGT, PJF
. . Member
4.D. Hemalatha, TGT, CC(FS)
. . Member
5.S. Mekala, TGT,CC(FS)
. . Member
6.Lourdes Marie Gracia, TGT, CC(FS)
. . Member
7.M.Udayabanu, TGT, PJF
. . Member
Karaikal Centre
Thiru/Tmt./Selvi:
1.S. Mary Margrette Jansi, TGT
. . Chairperson
Thiru/Tmt./Selvi:
Thiru/Tmt./Selvi:
265
21 March 2023]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›m, Amflºƒˆ
g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^
g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^
g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^
g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^
g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^
∂§s©A
ˇµ¬z§©∏¶©√‚|^· Â√Ï ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›][ ®_ÁȬz^ ∏[kÚD ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á>
∂Á\›m¬ÿÔV^· ÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›][ ∂–\] ºkı|˛≈VÏ.
kˆÁƒ
sıð©√>V´ˆ[
WÆk™D ∂Á\B
c›º>E¬Ô©√‚|^· º>ÁkBV™
g‚Ôπ[
®ı
ÿ√BÏ ï¿½ÆD xÔkˆ
c^· ÷¶›][
WÆk™› >BVˆ©A/
t[]≈[
®ıˬÁÔ
xÔkˆ
ÿƒFxÁ≈
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1
]Ú. S. ƒVtÂV>[, º\ÈV·Ï,
M/s. ÿ√V[ÁÈ‚ √V_
√>M¶©√¶V>
40
14
(P & I), √VıΩflºƒˆ Ì‚|≈° √V_
zπÏs¬zD gÁÈ,
zπÏÕ> √V_.
z]Á´›
(ÿ√Vm
cu√›]BV·Ï RMB[ otÿ¶‚,
\Æ ∂·Ák ®ı 220/4,
]≈[.
√ËxÁ≈).
®ı P.1, zÚD√V©º√‚Á¶,
ÔˆB\VˬÔD,
Amflºƒˆá605 009.
ÔˆB\VˬÔD kÚkVF
˛´V\D, ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD
ÿÔVDR[,
Amflºƒˆá605 106.
1973ágD gı| Amflºƒˆ ˛´V\D �ÆD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›m¬Ô^ ƒ‚¶›][ JÈ\VF Amflºƒˆ Œ[§B›m
g‚E©√´©∏_ ∂xÈV¬Ô©√‚¶ Amflºƒˆ ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›m¬Ô^ (cˆ\D �ÆD ∂–\] ∂π›>_) s]Ô^, 1976,
∏ˆ° 11á[ √Ω ÷›ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á> Wưk]™V_ cı¶VzD g‚ºƒ√ÁðÔ^ ∞º>–D ÷ÚÕ>V_, ∂kuÁ≈
÷Õ> ∂§s©A ÿkπBV™ º>]loÚÕm √›m ÂV‚Ô”¬z^ ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›m gÁðBÏ ∂kÏÔ”¬z
®ø›m JÈ\VF ÿ>ˆB©√|›mD√Ω ºÔ‚|¬ÿÔV^·©√|˛≈m.
z§©∏‚¶ ÔVÈkÁ´BÁ≈¬z^ ÿ√≈©√‚¶ g‚ºƒ√ÁðÔ^ ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √fiƒVB›>V_ √ˆÊo¬Ô©√|D.
ÿ‚¶©√V¬ÔD, 2023 } \VÏfl | 09 {.
ÂV. ÿ¤B¬z\VÏ,
ÂV. ÿ¤B¬z\VÏ,
ÂV. ÿ¤B¬z\VÏ,
ÂV. ÿ¤B¬z\VÏ,
ÂV. ÿ¤B¬z\VÏ,
gÁðBÏ.
2.S. Meenatchi Sundharam, PST
. . Member
3.V. Balakrishnan, PST
. . Member
Mahe Centre
Thiru/Tmt./Selvi:
1.Anima Pavithran, PST
. . Chairperson
2.Paul Shiboo, PST
. . Member
3.V. Vijayi, PST
. . Member
(By order)
R. SIVARAMA REDDY,
Deputy Director of Education (Women).
GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)
(G.O. Ms. No. 17, Puducherry, dated 10th March 2023)
NOTIFICATION
O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,
Thiru S. Kumar, Pondicherry Civil Service (Entry Grade)
(ad hoc) Officer, posted as Project Officer, District Rural
Development Agency, Puducherry, retired from service
on the afternoon of 30-06-2022.
(By order)
M. KANNAN,
Under Secretary to Government.
266
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[21 March 2023
AFFIDAVIT
I, Aroquiassamy, son of Lourdenadin residing at
No. 12, Pudupalayam Street, T.V. Nagar, Muthialpet,
Puducherry-605 003, do hereby solemnly affirm and
sincerely state on oath as follows:
That I am the deponent herein and well aware of
the facts of the deposition.
Further, I state that in my Birth Certificate issued
by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry vide
Registration No. P/1969/04099, dated 17-09-1969, my
name is mentioned as ‘Aroquiassamy’ only.
I hereby state that according to my School
Transfer Certificate vide No. 017439, Adm. No. 1016/
82-83, issued by Department of Education, Government
of Puducherry, my name is mentioned as ‘Arokiasamy. L’.
Further, I state that according to my Aadhaar Card
vide Sl.No. XXXX XXXX 6731, issued by Unique
Identification Authority of India, my name is
mentioned as ‘L. Aroquiassamy’.
Further, I state that according to my Elector’s
Photo Identity Card vide Sl.No. IVT0155168, issued
by Election Commission of India, my name is
mentioned as ‘Aroquiassamy’.
I also hereby state that according to my M.T.S.
(Security) Identity Card, issued by Government of
Puducherry, Public Health Division, Puducherry vide
Emp. Code: PH0839, my name is mentioned as
‘L. Aroquiassamy’.
Hence, I declare that the abovesaid names viz.,
‘Aroquiassamy’, ‘Arokiasamy. L’, ‘L. Aroquiassamy’ and
‘Aroquiassamy’ are denoting one and the same
person, they referring myself only.
The above facts are true to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry,
on this 06th day of March 2023.
562264
L. gº´V¬˛BƒVt
gº´V¬˛BƒVt
gº´V¬˛BƒVt
gº´V¬˛BƒVt
gº´V¬˛BƒVt.
NETTAPAKKAM COMMUNE PANCHAYAT, PUDUCHERRY
Nettapakkam, the 09th March 2023.
Dangerous Establishments
NOTICE
The undermentioned person has requested permission to set up the following industry within the
Nettapakkam Commune Panchayat limits as detailed below.
Sl.
Name and address of
Address of the industry site
Industry
Power
No. of
No.
the applicant
proposed
required
workers
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1. Thiru S. Saminathan, Manager,
M/s. Ponlait Milk Chilling Plant,
Raw chilled milk
40 H.P.
14
(P & I), The Pondicherry
Re-survey No. 220/4,
(General
Co-operative Milk Producer’s
Kariyamanickam,
shift).
Union Limited,
Kariyamanickam Revenue Village,
No. P.1, Kurumbapet,
Nettapakkam Commune,
Puducherry-605 009.
Puducherry-605 106.
In conformity with rule 11 of the Puducherry Commune Panchayats (Grant of Licences and Permissions)
Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union Territory by the Puducherry Village and Commune Panchayats Act, 1973,
objections, if any, to the setting up of the above industry, are invited to reach the Commissioner, Nettapakkam
Commune Panchayat within ten days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.
The objections, so received within the specified period will be considered by this Commune Panchayat.
N. JAYAKUMAR,
Commissioner.
267
21 March 2023]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
AFFIDAVIT
I, Ponnusamy, son of Kandasamy, aged 39 years and
residing at No. ll, First Street, Amma Nagar, Gopalankadai,
Puducherry-605 010, do hereby solemnly affirm and
sincerely state on oath as follows:
That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware
of the facts of the deposition.
I state that my name is mentioned as
‘K.Ponnusamy’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX
XXXX 4838, issued by the Unique Identification
Authority of India and in my PAN Card No.
BQDPP7627N, issued by Income-tax Department,
Government of India.
I state that my name is entered as ‘Ponnusamy’ in
my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. O/1997/4035,
issued by Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry, in
my Indian Passport No. U9529161, issued by the
Regional Passport Office, Chennai and in my Elector’s
Photo Identity Card No. JQW0232041, issued by the
Election Commission of India, in my Driving Licence
vide DL No. PY05 20200000798, issued by the
Transport Department, Government of Puducherry
and in my Community Certificate No. 9180/TOV/L/13,
issued by the Taluk Office, Villianur, Puducherry.
I state that my name is entered as ‘ÿ√V[–ƒVt’
in my Family Ration Card No. 386244, issued by the
Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,
Puducherry.
I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Ponnusamy K’,
issued by the State Bank of India, Thattanchavady
Branch, Puducherry and in my Academic Examination
Result vide Enrl. No. 420003182501, issued by the
National Institute of Open Schooling, Government of
India.
I state that as per horoscope, I have changed
my name as ‘A.C.K.Ponnusamy’.
Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the names, i.e.,
‘K.Ponnusamy’, ‘Ponnusamy’, ‘ÿ√V[–ƒVt’ and
‘Ponnusamy K.’ are referred, identified and relate to
one and same person that is myself only.
Hereafter, I shall be known and identified only by
the name ‘A.C.K.Ponnusamy’ for all purposes.
I hereby state that I shall at all times hereinafter
in all records, deeds and writings and in all
proceedings, dealings and transactions private as
well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign
my name as ‘A.C.K.Ponnusamy’ in place and in
substitution of my former names. I hereby verify and
confirm that what has been stated above is true to
the best of my knowledge and correct, and nothing
material facts have been concealed thereon.
Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before
the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of
March 2023.
562265
K. ÿ√V[–ƒVt.
ÿ√V[–ƒVt.
ÿ√V[–ƒVt.
ÿ√V[–ƒVt.
ÿ√V[–ƒVt.
————
AFFIDAVIT
I, Mounissamy, son of Radjakrichenan, Indian
inhabitant, aged 52 years and residing at the house
bearing Door No. 6, Varadhapillai Thottam, Mudaliarpet,
Puducherry-605 004, do hereby solemnly and sincerely
affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:
That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my
Birth Certificate under Registration No. P/1970/01615,
my name has been mentioned as ‘Mounissamy’.
In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 4985,
and in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under No.
IGW0168344, my name has been mentioned as
‘Mounissamy (xMƒVt)’.
In my PAN Card under No. BKVPM1557L, my name
has been mentioned as ‘Mounissamy’.
In my Driving Licence under DL No.PY01
19970005807, my name has been mentioned as ‘Raja
@ Munisamy’.
In the particulars of family members in my Family
Ration Card under No. 012424, my name has been
mentioned as ‘÷´V¤V (®) xMƒVt’.
In the Sale Deed, registered as Document No. 1614
of the year 2002, my name has been mentioned as
‘´V¤V (®) xMƒVt’.
In the Power of Attorney Deed, registered as
Document No. 1041 of the year 2003, my name has
been mentioned as ‘R. ´V¤V (®) xMƒVt’.
In the Electricity Consumption Demand Bill, under
Policy Code No. 01-05-05-0446-A2, my name has been
mentioned as ‘R.Raja @ Munisamy’.
In the Electricity Consumption Demand Bill, under
Policy Code Nos. 01-05-05-0503AC-A2, my name has
been mentioned as ‘Raja @ Mounisamy’.
In the water Consumption Demand Bill, under
Policy Code No. 71/413, my name has been mentioned
as ‘Raja @ Mounisamy.R’.
In the House-tax Demand Bill, under assessment
No. 10220300540, my name has been mentioned as
‘Raja @ Munusamy’.
268
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[21 March 2023
Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid
names are referred, identified and relate to one and
the same person that is me, the deponent herein.
I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and
identified only by the name ‘Mounissamy (xMƒVt)’
for all purposes.
I state that what are all stated in the above
paragraphs is true and correct to the best of
my knowledge, belief and information.
Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed
before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day
of March 2023.
562266
R. xMƒVt
xMƒVt
xMƒVt
xMƒVt
xMƒVt.
————
AFFIDAVIT
I, Gajalakshmi, daughter of Magadevane (late), wife
of Samicannou Gilbert Aroquiassamy Louis, residing at
No. 39/40, 2nd Floor, Singapore Avenue, Muthirayarpalayam
Road, Moolakulam, Puducherry- 605 010, do hereby
solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as
follows:
(1) My name is mentioned as ‘Kejalatchoumy’ in
my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. 281/1968,
dated 09-08-2004, issued by the Bahour Commune
Panchayat, Puducherry and also in my Marriage
Certificate vide Registration No. OMC/2004/75,
issued by Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry,
dated 16-09-2019.
(2) My name is mentioned as ‘Gajalakshmi’ in my
Aadhaar Card, Elector’s Photo Identity Card,
Passport and in my daughter’s Birth Certificate as
Grahalakshmi and Kirthanalakshmi.
(3) In my PAN Card, my name is mentioned as
‘Louis Gajalakshmi’. ‘Louis’ is my husband’s old
family name.
(4) My husband's name is ‘Samicannou Gilbert
Aroquiassamy’ (Gazette publication on the 26th of
August 2008, No. 35, page 584,) updated as
‘Samicannou Gilbert Aroquiassamy Louis’ (ECOP
No. 39/2018 and 41/2018). ‘Samicannou’ is my
husband’s family name. I wish to add my husband’s
family name ‘Samicannou’ with my name ‘Kejalatchoumy’.
(5) Further, I declare that all the names viz.,
‘Gajalakshmi’,
‘Kejalatchoumy’
and
‘Louis
Gajalakshmi’ are denoting one and the same person,
they referring myself only.
Hence, hereinafter, I shall be known and called
only as ‘Samicannou Kejalatchoumy’.
Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry,
on this 07th day of March 2023.
562271
GAJALAKSHMI.
————
AFFIDAVIT
I, Mubarak, son of Kalim, aged 26 years, residing at
No. 10, Ponnambalam Nagar, Kamaraj Salai, Pooranankuppam,
Puducherry-605 007, do hereby solemnly affirm and
state on oath as follows:
That I am the deponent herein.
I state that my name is entered as ‘Mubarak’ in
my Transfer Certificate vide Serial No. 467, issued by
Government Higher Secondary School, Nonankuppam,
Puducherry, in my PAN Card No. CZAPM7478M,
issued by Income-tax Department, Government of
India, in my Elector ’s Photo Identity Card
No. SQY0051516, issued by Election Commission of
India and in my Nationality and Residence Certificate
No. PY/TOP/71/0011981, issued by Taluk Office
Puducherry, Department of Revenue and Disaster
Management, Government of Puducherry.
I state that my name has been entered as ‘x√VϬ’
in our Family Ration Card No. 345146, issued by the
Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,
Puducherry.
I state that my name is entered as ‘K Mubarak’ in
my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 0471, issued by
the Unique Identification Authority of India.
Whereas, my name is ‘Mubarak’ and I intent to
change my name as ‘Barath’ as per numerology.
I promise to affix my signature as ‘Mubarak’.
The above deposition is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material
has been concealed thereon.
Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public
at Puducherry, on this 17th day of February 2023.
562272
MUBARAK.
————
AFFIDAVIT
I, Abitha, wife of Santhoshkumar, No. 562, 3rd Cross,
Murugan Koil Street, Orleanpet, Nellithope, Puducherry,
do hereby solemnly affirm and depose as follows:
That I am the deponent herein and I well known
all the facts of the affidavit.
269
21 March 2023]
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
I submit that my daughter who born on
23-07-2021 at Rajiv Gandhi Government Women
and
Children
Hospital,
Ellapillaichavady,
Puducherry-605 005 and the birth was duly registered
before Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry. In the
Birth Certificate, my daughter’s name has been
mentioned as ‘Dhanalakshmi’.
I submit that in the Aadhaar Acknowledgment
Card, issued by the Unique Identification Authority
of India, my daughter’s name has been mentioned as
‘Dhanalakshmi’.
I submit that due to numerological reasons, I have
changed my daughter’s name as ‘Jasvithasri’ instead
of ‘Dhanalakshmi’.
I submit that this was the proof in lieu that my
daughter’s name has been changed as ‘Jasvithasri’
instead of ‘Dhanalakshmi’ and the same has to be
produced it before the competent authority.
Hereinafter, she will be called only as ‘Jasvithasri’.
Hence, I submit that what are all stated in the
above paragraphs are true to the best of my
knowledge, belief and information, and nothing has
been concealed herein.
Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public
at Puducherry, on this 09th day of March 2023.
562273
S. ABITHA.
————
AFFIDAVIT
I, Kannan alias Satchidanandam, son of Baskaran,
Hindu, aged about 57 years, residing at No. 23, First
Floor, Montorsier Street, Puducherry-605 001, do hereby
solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as
follows:
1. I state that my name is entered as ‘Kannan alias
Satchidanandam’ in my Birth Certificate bearing
Registration No. PM/P/1965/004052, dated 21-10-1965,
10th Standard Matriculation Examination Mark Sheet
bearing Serial No. l5793A, dated 24-06-1982 and
further, I state that my name is entered as ‘Kannan
@ Satchidanandam. B’ in my Degree Certificate, dated
10-09-1997 with Registration No. 72139 in Bachelor
of Medicine and Surgery, issued by Pondicherry
University, Puducherry.
2. I state that my name is entered as ‘Kannan
Satchidanandam’ in my Aadhaar Card bearing
No. XXXX XXXX 4834, Elector’s Photo Identity Card
bearing No. IUM0077511, PAN Card bearing
No. AHUPK3638H and further, I state that my name
is entered as ‘Ôıð[ ƒflE>V™Õ>D’ in my Family
Ration Card bearing No. 191087, dated 01-07-2014,
issued by Department of Civil Supplies and
Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.
3. I state that my surname is entered as ‘Baskaran’
and my given name is entered as ‘Kannan’ in my
Indian Passport bearing No. R0942590, issued on
06-07-2017 at Chennai.
4. I state that my name is entered as ‘Dr. Kannan
Satchidanandam’ in my Driving Licence bearing
DL No. PY01 20050004655, dated 05-05-2005,
issued by Transport Department, Puducherry and
in my Savings Bank Passbook with Account
No. XXXXXXXXXXXX0415, issued by South
Indian Bank, Airport Road Branch, Lawspet,
Puducherry-605 008.
Hence, I declare that the abovesaid names viz.,
‘Kannan alias Satchidanandam’, ‘Kannan @
Satchidanandam. B’, ‘Kannan Satchidanandam’,
‘Ôıð[ ƒflE>V™Õ>D’ given name ‘Kannan’ with
surname ‘Baskaran’ and ‘Dr. Kannan Satchidanandam’
are referred one and the same person that is myself,
and not any other person, and I declare that
henceforth, I shall be known and called only as
‘Kannan Satchidanandam’, further, I state that what
are all stated in the above paragraphs is true to the
best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material
has been concealed herein above.
Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public
at Puducherry, on this 13th day of March 2023.
562274
KANNAN ALIAS SATCHIDANANDAM.
————
AFFIDAVIT
I, Anitha, daughter of Kandhan and wife of Syed
Ansari, Indian inhabitant, aged 22 years and residing
at the house bearing Door No. 23, Sixth Cross Street,
Pudhu Nagar, Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry-605 010,
do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm to whomsoever
it may concern as follows:
That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my
Birth Certificate, under Registration No. PM/M/2000/
9593 and in the Passbook of Indian Bank, Puducherry
Town Branch, my name has been mentioned as
‘Anitha’.
In my Primary School Transfer Certificate under
Admission No. 757 and in my High School Transfer
Certificate under Admission No. 4399, my name has
been mentioned as ‘Anitha.K’.
270
LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT
[21 March 2023
online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”
Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.
No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private
notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and
also for any other misrepresentations, etc.
In the Elector’s Photo Identity Card, under
No. UEB0133173 and in my Aadhaar Card under
No. XXXX XXXX 0445, my name has been
mentioned as and ‘Anitha’ (‘∂M>V’).
In the Family Ration Card under No. 455742, my
name has been mentioned as ‘∂M>V’.
I state that I have renounced, Hindu religion and
embraced Muslim religion, as such in the Certificate,
dated 08-02-2023, under C.C.No.147:02/2023, my
Hindu name has been mentioned as (‘∂M>V’)
‘Anitha’ and my assumed Muslim name has been
mentioned as ‘Aneesa’ (‘∂ÃV’).
In my Nikkah (Marriage) Certificate, dated
09-03-2023, my name has been mentioned as
‘∂M>V (®) ∂ÃV’.
Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the
abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate
to one and the same person, that is me, the deponent
herein.
I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and
identified only by the name ‘Aneesa’, ‘∂ÃV’ for all
purposes.
I state that what are all stated in the above
paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge, belief and information.
Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before
the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 13th day of
March 2023.
562275
ANITHA.
AFFIDAVIT
I, Thomas, son of Maria Jeganathan, residing at
No. 46, Fourth Cross Street, Annai Theresa Nagar,
Moolakulam, Puducherry-605 010, do hereby solemnly
affirm and state on oath as follows:
That I am the deponent herein and I am well
known the facts of my deposition.
In my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 4976, PAN
Card No. ATNPT6286H, Family Ration Card
No. 131462 and in my Marriage Certificate Sl.No. 6175,
my name has been mentioned as ‘Thomas (>V\¸)’.
In my Ex-Servicemen Identity Card Sl.No. 7218731,
Service No. l4283120-W, my name has been
mentioned as ‘MJ Thomas’.
But, in my Pension Payment Order No. S/023918/
86, my name has been mentioned as ‘Maria
Jaganathan Thomas’.
Hence, all the names viz., ‘Thomas (>V\¸)’,
‘MJ Thomas’ and ‘Maria Jaganathan Thomas’ are
denoting one and the same person, i.e., myself only.
My correct name is ‘Thomas (>V\¸)’ only.
What are all stated in the above affidavit is true
and correct to best of my knowledge and belief, and
nothing material is concealed herein.
Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry,
on this 16th day of March 2023.
562279
THOMAS.