[309]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

310

Sentence arbitral du Travail

.. 310

Award of the Labour Court .. 310

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

314

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 314

Government Notifications

.. 314

Œ©√ ∂§s©AÔ^

317

Avis d’ appel d’ offres

.. 317

Tender Notice

317

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

319

Etablissements dangereux

.. 319

Dangerous Establishments

319

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

320

Annonces

.. 320

Announcements

320

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2023 }

∞©´_ |

11 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Avril

2023 (21 Chaitra 1945)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

11th

April

2023

310

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[11 April 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 09/AIL/Lab./T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 24th January 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 09/2020, dated

12-12-2022 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Puducherry in respect of Dispute between the

Tmt. K. Hemamalini, Villianur, Puducherry against the

management of M/s. DXN Manufacturing (India) Private

Limited, Thiruvandar Koil, Mannadipet Commune,

Puducherry, over non-employment and compensation of

` 7,00,000 with 24% interest has been received.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. V. Sofana Devi, M.L.

Presiding Officer.

Monday, the 12th day of December, 2022.

I.D. (L) No. 09/2020

C.N.R. No. PYPY06-000041-2020

K. Hemamalini,

No. 7, Third Cross Street,

First Main Road,

Puducherry-605 110.

. . Petitioner

Vs.

The Managing Director,

M/s. DXN Manufacturing (India) Private Limited,

R.S Nos. 141/4 and 142/5, Whirlpool Road,

Thiruvandar Koil, Mannadipet Commune,

Puducherry-605 102.

. . Respondent

This Industrial dispute coming on 07-11-2022 before

me for final hearing in the presence of Thiruvalargal

S. Nagarajan and A.P. Ilangovan, Counsels for the

Petitioner, Thiruvalargal L. Sathish, S. Velmurugan and

E. Karthik, Counsels for the Respondent, Reported No

Instruction, Court Notice sent and same served on the

Respondent, Respondent remained ex parte and after

hearing the Petitioner side and perusing the case records,

this Court delivered the following:

A W A R D

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No. 78/AIL/Lab./T/2020, dated 15-07-2020 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry to resolve the following

dispute between the Petitioners and the Respondent,

viz.,

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

Tmt. K. Hemamalini, Villianur, Puducherry against the

Management of M/s. DXN Manufacturing (India)

Private Limited, Thiruvandar Koil, Mannadipet

Commune, Puducherry over non-employment and

compensation of ` 7,00,000 with 24% interest is

justified or not? If justified, what relief the Petitioner

is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner:

The Petitioner Workman was joined as operator in

the Respondent Management company on 01-04-2002

and the Petitioner kept maintained her good conduct

and best service to the fullest satisfaction of the

Respondent Management being a regular employee

ever since of joining to the employment as operator

under the Respondent Management. The Respondent

company was engaged in manufacturing a herbal

capsules in the name and style of “R.G. & G.L.” and

being a multinational company was having surge of

customers over the world for the reason of the health

product of the Respondent company.

(ii) The Respondent Management was engaged

more than 60 employees in a shift per day for

manufacturing process and apart from other employees

for operational purpose. Few employees among other

were taken effort for formation of Union in the year

2006 and by name “DXN Herbal Manufacturing

(India) Private Limited Labour Union”. 17 employees

were targeted by the Respondent Management for

pangs of death i.e., victimization for the sole reason

that they were being stubborn to membership to the

said Union. 17 employees were terminated from

service without any valid cause and reason except

their bare eager for membership into the Union. The

said dispute was referred to Labour Officer,

Conciliation from time to time.

311

11 April 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

(iii) On 01-03-2011 at about 05.30 p.m the

Respondent Management was surprisingly displaced

a notice on the board that “The Office of Management

will not function from 02-03-2011 and the services of

notice mention employees are not required from

02-03-2011 and their terminal benefits will be settle

down on 08-03-2011 at the Office”. The statutory

machineries viz., the Labour Commissioner and

Conciliation Officer took cognizance upon the

unlawful

act

the

Respondent

Management

immediately. The Respondent Management was failed

to appear before the officials many hearing and

bluntly ignored them. On around 08-04-2011, the

Respondent Management filed its counter before the

Conciliation Officer in respect of the said Industrial

Dispute. Vide the said counter, the Respondent

Management stated that due to certain unavoidable

circumstances had forced the Management to cease

to run the factory and in view the Management has

proposed to transfer the staff and their workmen to

Himachal Pradesh unit.

(iv) Some of the employees filed a civil suit vide

O.S. No. 45/2011 before the Sub Court, Puducherry

against the Respondent Management and won the suit

vide Judgment and decree, dated 12-04-2012. In view

of the vengeance target the Respondent Management

assailed a baseless allegation against the Petitioner

vide charge-sheet, dated 02-01-2010 and 29-06-2010

for the reason of slow down the work. A similar

charge-sheet was launched upon many employees

who showed their sheer inclination for membership

into the Union. Apart from the said issue was got the

shape of Industrial Dispute before this Court vide

I.D.No. 21/2011 and I.D.No. 10/2020. In fact the

present Petitioner was party to the Industrial

Dispute I.D.No. 10/2020. Whilst pending the above

disputes before this Court, the Respondent

Management desired for tripartite agreement under

section 12(3) of Industrial Disputes Act so as to

evade and escape from the stringent liabilities for

illegal closure of the company and illegal termination

of the employees including non-employment, etc.

(v) Accordingly on 04-12-2017, a settlement under

section 12(3) arrived between the Respondent

Management and its labour Union in the presence of

the Labour Commissioner. A final settlement including

terminal benefits was decided for all the employees as

a compensation measure against the illegal closure,

non-employment, termination, unfair labour practice,

victimization etc. In view of arrival of settlement the

Respondent Management was uniquely decided to

cease the service of employees against the amount

agreed for compensation towards the employees.

Accordingly an amount of ` 3,50,000 (Rupees three

lakhs fifty thousand only) was decided as

compensation quantum for each employees

irrespective of their status. The requisite condition

for the said settlement was cessation of employment

of all employees against the effect of illegal closure

and the Management was not intent to reopen the

said factory forever.

(vi) Whereas the present nomenclature as to refusal

for employment with the Respondent Management @

` 3,50,000 as compensation and who are willing to

continue the service similar to the Petitioner was paid

nothing. Hence the discriminative classification for

settlement of compensation among the employees who

were set to same foot for same dispute upon same

issue but the ramified amount for compensation

among the employees was irrational and illogical.

(vii) The Petitioner opted to continue service with

Respondent Management. However, the Petitioner was

not in a position to join and report duty in lieu of the

12(3) settlement against her personal inconvenience

upon her 17 year old daughter was supposed to stay

alone at home when the Petitioner is about to report

duty as directed by the Respondent Management.

Pertinently the Petitioner was very recently shifted her

rented home almost 15 kilometers away from the

erstwhile home. Apart from that the Petitioner was lone

lady to care and cater her 17 years old daughter since

her husband was in employment out of the state.

Accordingly vide letter, dated 21-12-2017, the

Petitioner requested time for same. However vide

letter, dated 28-12-2017, the Respondent Management

informed the Petitioner that merely 5 days only would

be given to join and report duty and in case of her

failure within the set time the Management would

consider that she is not interested to continue as its

employee and resigned the job. In addition Respondent

Management sought the bank details of the Petitioner

to deposit the one time compensation/terminal benefits

@ ` 40,000.

(viii) As a response to the Respondent Management’s

letter content, the Petitioner submitted her letter,

dated 02-01-2018 for seeking one month time for

joining duty. The Respondent Management was not

in function yet then in lieu of the 12(3) settlement,

dated 04-12-2017 for the reason that the Respondent

Management and the factory unit was completely

closed down for more than 7 years continuously. The

Respondent Management was stepped into the shoes

of various authorities for sanctioning the orders to

resume the work at the closed factory premise viz.,

the electricity, water, municipal tax, environmental

clearance, underground water, measuring the safety

clearance etc.

312

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[11 April 2023

(ix) The letter, dated 09-01-2018 refused the request

of the Petitioner for one month time and allowed just

days time to join the duty. The Petitioner had exposed

her uncontrollable situation and against which she

sought considerable time around one month vide letter

dated 02-02-2018 to the Respondent Management.

Whereas against receipt of the above letter from the

Petitioner, the Respondent Management vide its letter,

dated 02-02-2018 by terminating the Petitioner from

the employment along with a Demand Draft bearing

No. 078389 dated 01-02-2018 for ` 40,000 as one time

compensation/terminal benefit. The Petitioner was

insisted to receive the said termination letter by the

Respondent Management along with the Demand

Draft. But, the Petitioner was however refused the

termination letter and the Demand Draft unlawfuly

assailed by the Respondent Management. But with no

option against irksome insistence of the Respondent

Management, the Petitioner received the same with

objection as to no prejudice to her legal rights upon

litigation lie on the cause of action for the present

Industrial Dispute.

(x) The pre mediated decision of the Respondent

Management for terminating her employment by

ceasing the employment and loosing the lieu over

employment in an unjust and unlawful manner

pertinently in lieu of effect of 12(3) settlement, dated

04-12-2017 between the Management and its Labour

Union after long illegal closure and illegal termination

of the employment of the employees. In precise the

act of the Respondent Management is shear

victimization to the Petitioner and her employment

rights as per Industrial Dispute Act.

(xi) The letter, dated 18-05-2018 the Petitioner

submitted an appropriate complaint as to the Industrial

Dispute before the Labour Officer (Conciliation),

Puducherry with the request for reinstatement to the

employment with compensation of ` 7,00,000. The

Respondent Management vide letter, dated 10-05-2019

replied to the Labour Officer (Conciliation) upon the

Industrial Dispute of the Petitioner and through with

stoutly refused the demands of the Petitioner and

sought a failure report from the Conciliation Officer.

Against which a reply by the Petitioner vide letter,

dated 05-08-2019 was submitted before the Labour

Officer (Conciliation).

(xii) The Labour Officer (Conciliation) vide his

proceedings No. 740/LO(C)/AIL/018, dated 16-03-2012

submitted the failure report upon the Industrial

Dispute raised by the Petitioner vide her petition,

dated 18-05-2018.

(xiii) An illegal termination of the Petitioner’s

employment by the sole Respondent herein pertinently

without conducting even a domestic enquiry against

the Petitioner who infact was regular employee

working since, 01-04-2002 i.e., for more that 15 years.

The Petitioner was drawn her wage around ` 6,500

after deducting the admissible contribution viz., the

ESI, the P.F etc., before the effect of the 12(3)

settlement, dated 04-12-2017. Whereas ` 10,500 was

fixed as her wage in lieu of the 12(3) settlement, dated

04-12-2017 apart from other allowances admissible

under the Respondent Management from time to time.

Hence, the claim for the reinstatement.

3. Respondent Company was set ex parte on

11-08-2022.

4. Point for determination:

Whether the Petitioner Workman is entitled for the

prayer of reinstatement and compensation of

` 7,00,000 with 24% interest as prayed in the Claim

Petition?

5. On the Point:

Respondent counsel reported no instruction on

20-07-2022. Court notice ordered and served on the

Respondent. Since service sufficient, Respondent

called but not appeared on 11-08-2022. Hence,

Respondent Management set ex parte. Proof affidavit

of the Petitioner filed and Ex.P1 to P11 marked.

6. Heard the Petitioner counsel. Perused the case

records and Ex.P1 to P11 marked on the side of the

Petitioner.

7. The prayer in the Industrial Dispute is for

reinstatement with back wages and other benefits along

with the compensation of ` 7,00,000 with 24% interest

over the illegal termination and non-employment of

the Petitioner with cost. According to the Petitioner, in

I.D.No. 21/2011 and I.D.No. 10/2020 in which the

Petitioner was the party. Pending above said IDs,

Management and Labour Union entered into a settlement

under section 12(3) on 04-12-2017 in the presence of

Labour Commissioner. In view of the settlement, the

Respondent Management agreed for compensation of

` 3,50,000 for cessation of employment of employees

against the effect of illegal closure and the Management

was not intended to reopen the factory for work. But

the employees who are willing to continue the service

including the Petitioner was paid nothing. The

discriminative classification for settlement of

compensation among the employees who were on the

same position but refused the compensation among the

employees was irrational and illogical.

313

11 April 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

8. According to the Petitioner, she opted to continue

the service with Respondent Management and not in a

position to join immediately due to her personal

inconvenience. The same was informed to the

Management vide her letter, dated 21-12-2017 requesting

time for joining. The Respondent Management granted

only 5 days time for reporting duty vide its letter, dated

28-12-2017. Again the Petitioner vide her letter, dated

02-01-2018 sought for one month time for joining the

duty. The Respondent Management refused the request

vide letter dated 09-01-2018 but given 5 days time for

joining duty. Again the Petitioner sought one month time

to the Respondent Management vide her letter

02-02-2018. Whereas, the Respondent Management vide

its letter, dated 02-02-2018 had terminated the Petitioner

from the employment with the Demand Draft, dated

01-02-2018 for ` 40,000 as one time compensation/

terminal benefits. The Petitioner has received the same

with objection. The above decision of the termination of

the Respondent Management is pre-mediated decision

and against the 12(3) settlement. The Petitioner had

approached the Labour Officer Conciliation. The

Respondent Management filed their objections, dated

10-05-2019.

9. It is submitted by the Petitioner Counsel that

` 10,500 was fixed as her wage in lieu of the 12(3)

settlement dated 04-12-2017 apart from other allowances

admissible under the Respondent Management from time

to time.

10. Though the Petitioner has agreed to join the

Respondent Management but she could not make it

immediately due to her personal inconvenience. This

version of the Petitioner has not been rebutted by the

Respondent Management. When Respondent Management

had disbursed ` 3,50,000 to the employees those who

quit the job as per the Settlement under section 12(3) of

the Industrial Disputes Act, in absence of any rebuttal

pleadings, evidence and proof, this Court is not in a

position to reject the claim of the Petitioner. But, at the

same time, this Court is not inclined to order the relief

as such claimed by the Petitioner in this claim petition in

toto. On considering the facts and circumstances, this

Court finds that before the closure, the Petitioner had

received ` 6,500 as Wage after all deductions. Hence,

taking into account as per the 12(3) settlement though

the Petitioner has agreed to join the Respondent

Management but she could not make it immediately due

to her personal inconvenience, it is just and proper that

if ordered the same compensation of ` 3,50,000 which

was paid by the Respondent Management to the

employees those who quit the job, be paid to the

Petitioner herein with accrued interest. Since, ` 40,000

already paid to the Petitioner Workman, the same shall

be deducted from the said compensation. Thus the point

for determination is decided accordingly.

11. In the result, the Reference is justified and the

Industrial Dispute is partly allowed with the effect that

the Respondent Management is hereby directed to pay

` 3,10,000 (Rupees Three lakhs and ten thousand only)

which was paid by the Respondent Management to the

employees those who quit the job, to the Petitioner herein

with accrued interest at the rate of 9% from the date of

their job cessation i.e., 02-02-2018 till the date of this

Award and thereafter 6% from the date of the Award till

the date of realization. Other Claims claimed by the

Petitioner in the claim petition is rejected. No costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this

the 12th day of December, 2022.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness:

PW1

— 14-09-2022

Tmt. Hemamalini

List of petitioner’s exhibits:

Ex.P1 — 21-12-2017

Photocopy of the letter by

the

Petitioner

the

Respondent.

Ex.P2 — 28-12-2017

Photocopy of the letter by

the Respondent to the

Petitioner.

Ex.P3 — 02-01-2018

Photocopy of the letter by

the

Petitioner

the

Respondent.

Ex.P4 — 09-01-2018

Photocopy of the letter by

the Respondent to the

Petitioner.

Ex.P5 — 02-02-2018

Photocopy of the letter by

the

Petitioner

the

Respondent.

Ex.P6 — 02-02-2018

Photocopy of the Letter by

the Respondent to the

Petitioner intimating job

cessation.

Ex.P7 — 01-02-2018

Photocopy of the Demand

Draft No. 078389 (Axis

Bank).

Ex.P8 — 18-05-2018

Original document of the

Industrial Dispute complaint

of the Petitioner before the

Labour Officer (Conciliation).

314

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[11 April 2023

Ex.P9 — 10-05-2019

Photocopy of the reply of

Respondent Management

before the Labour Officer

(Conciliation).

Ex.P10 — 05-08-2019

Photocopy of the re joinder

of the Petitioner before the

Labour Officer (Conciliation).

Ex.P11 — 04-12-2017

Photocopy of the 12(3)

Settlement.

List of Respondent’s Witness: NIL

List of Respondents’s Exhibits: NIL

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 37/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 21st March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited, Puducherry

and Thiru L. Gasperraj, over his non-employment along

with back wages and other attendant benefits, in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

Thiru L. Gasperraj, represented by Shree Mother

Plast Employees Union, against the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry, over his non-employment is justified or

not? If justified, to give appropriate direction?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 38/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 21st March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management of

M/s. Manatec Electronics Private Limited, Karikalampakkam,

Puducherry and Thiru P. Narasingaperumal, over his

non-employment along with other attendant benefits,

in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to

this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

315

11 April 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

Thiru P. Narasingaperumal, against the management

of M/s. Manatec Electronics Private Limited,

Puducherry, over his non-employment along with

attendant benefits is justified or not? If justified,

what relief the petitioner is entitled to?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 39/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 21st March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited, Puducherry

and Thiru R. Sudhakar, over his non-employment along

with back wages and other attendant benefits, in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

Thiru R. Sudhakar, represented by Shree Mother Plast

Employees Union, against the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry, over his non-employment along with

attendant benefits is justified or not? If justified, to

give appropriate direction?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 40/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 21st March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited, Puducherry

and Thiru R. Irusappan, over his non-employment along

with back wages and other attendant benefits, in respect

of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication. The

Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

316

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[11 April 2023

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

Thiru R. Irusappan, represented by Shree Mother

Plast Employees Union, against the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry, over his non-employment is justified or

not? If justified, to give appropriate direction?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 21, Puducherry, dated 24th March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to

transfer and post Shri G. Sathiyamoorthy, I.F.S.

(AGMU : 2010), presently holding charge of Managing

Director, PIPDIC as Project Director, District Rural

Development Agency, Puducherry, with effect from

01-04-2023.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

RAJEEV VERMA,

Chief Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 22, Puducherry, dated 24th March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to

order the following allocation/reallocation of subjects

among I.A.S. Officers with effect from 01-04-2023.

1. Shri A. Kulothungan, I.A.S. (AGMUT: 2017) in

pursuance to Order No. 14020/1/2023.UTS.I, dated

23-02-2023 of the Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi

and on having reported for duty in this Administration

on the forenoon of 16-03-2023, is posted as District

Collector, Karaikal relieving Shri L. Mohamed Mansoor

of this charge.

2. Ms. Rishita Gupta, I.A.S. (AGMUT: 2019) is

transferred and posted as Director of Planning and

Research, Puducherry, relieving her of the charge of

Project Director, District Rural Development Agency,

Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

RAJEEV VERMA,

Chief Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)

(G.O. Ms. No. 13, Puducherry, dated 27th March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n

Thiru A. Rajasekharan, Executive Engineer on ad hoc

basis, presently holding the post of Superintending

Engineer on ‘Current Duty Charge’ basis, Circle-III,

Public Works Deprartment, Karaikal, is admitted into

retirement on the afternoon of 31-03-2023.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE,

Under Secretary to Government (Works).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CONFIDENTIAL AND CABINET DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 23, Puducherry, dated 29th March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to

order the withdrawal of “Ex-officio Status” conferred

upon the Director of ‘Adi Dravidar Welfare and

Scheduled Tribes Welfare’, Puducherry and the subject

‘Adi Dravidar Welfare and Scheduled Tribes Welfare’

shall be looked after by the Under/Deputy/Joint

Secretary to Government, to whom the subject is allocated

at the Chief Secretariat, Puducherry. The Secretariat Wing

hitherto functioning in the Department shall henceforth

function at the Chief Secretariat, Puducherry.

2. The Lieutenant-Governor is further pleased to

order that the Officers/Staff presently deployed on

service placement basis from the Chief Secretariat

(Estt.), Puducherry, to the Secretariat Wing of the

Department of Adi Dravidar Welfare and Scheduled

Tribes Welfare, Puducherry, shall report before the

Deputy Secretary to Government (Estt.), Chief

Secretariat, for further posting.

317

11 April 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

3. These orders shall take effect from 01-04-2023.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

RAJEEV VERMA,

Chief Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

[G.O. Ms. No. 24/DP&AR-SS.II(1),

Puducherry, dated 29th March 2023]

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, the

following Superintendents, shall retire from service with

effect from the afternoon of 31-03-2023.

Sl.

Name of the official and

No.

Department/Office

(1)

(2)

Tmt./Thiru:

R. Kalavathy,

Superintendent,

Directorate of Higher and Technical Education,

Lawspet, Puducherry.

P. Uma,

Superintendent,

SPM & Buildings, Electricity Department,

Puducherry.

D. Ramkumar,

Superintendent,

Public Health Division, Public Works Department,

Puducherry.

P. S. Selvam,

Superintendent,

Directorate of Economics and Statistics,

Puducherry.

(By order)

V. JAISANKAR,

Under Secretary to Government (Personnel).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

(SECRETARIAT WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 54, Puducherry, dated 31st March 2023)

ORDER

In pursuance of the recommendations of the Cabinet,

approval of the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is

hereby conveyed for renaming of the following

Government Schools in the Union territory of

Puducherry, as mentioned against each with immediate

effect:–

Sl.

Name of the School

To be renamed after

No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

1. R. Seenuvasan

Viduthalai Veerar

Government High School,

R. Seenuvasan

Mettupalayam, Puducherry. Government High

School, Mettupalayam,

Puducherry.

2. M.R. Suburayan

M.R. Subbaraya

Government Primary School,

Counder Government

Madukkarai, Puducherry.

Primary School,

Madukkarai,

Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

F.P. VERBINA JAYARAJ,

Under Secretary to Government

(School Education).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

INDIRA GANDHI GOVERNMENT GENERAL

HOSPITAL AND POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE

Puducherry, dated 28th March 2023.

TENDER-CUM-AUCTION NOTICE

Sealed tenders are invited by the undersigned for a

sale of unserviceable Radiological items (Non-Emitting

Radiation items) as detailed in the Annexure (enclosed)

in a single lot system belonging to this Institution in

as-is-where-is condition.

2. The participated tenderers/bidders are to be eligible

only Government Authorised E-waste Dismantling Unit,

the intending tenderers may inspect the items at the

office of the undersigned between 10.30 a.m. and 11.30

a.m. from 17-04-2023 to 21-04-2023 with the permission

of the officer concerned. Sale of Tender Form can

be had in person on payment of ` 100 (Rupees one

hundred only) plus GST as admissible (non-refundable)

from 17-04-2023 to 21-04-2023 up to 12.30 p.m.

3. Sealed tenders in the prescribed Tender Form

addressed to the Medical Superintendent, Indira Gandhi

Government General Hospital and Postgraduate Institute,

Puducherry, superscripted as “Tender for purchase of

Radiological items (Non-Emitting Radiation)”

318

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[11 April 2023

should reach this office on or before 24-04-2023 at 1.00

p.m. Each tenderer shall enclose a Demand Draft for an

amount of ` 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) drawn

in favoure of the Junior Accounts Officer, Indira Gandhi

Government General Hospital and Postgraduate Institute,

Puducherry, as earnest money deposit.

4. Tenders will be opened on 25-04-2023 at 3.30 p.m.

in the office of the undersigned in the presence of the

tenderers who are present at the time of opening.

5. If, the highest tender amount offered by the

tenderer is found to be not acceptable by the

undersigned, the public auction will be conducted on

the spot, keeping the highest tender amount as

minimum bid.

6. The following self-attested photocopy of the

documents/certificates must be enclosed along with

tenders-

(a) Valid GST Registration Certificate

(b) PAN Card

Government.

(d) Aadhaar Card/Valid Family Ration Card/Valid

Driving Licence. Tenders without these certificates/

documents will be rejected.

7. Individuals/Partner of a firm, who have/has been

punished under Criminal Procedure Code or any criminal

case is under process, is not eligible for participating

in the Tender-cum-Auction. Any false representation is

found during the tender/auction process, the tender/bid

offered by him/her/them will be cancelled and his/her/

their earnest money deposit will be forfeited.

8. If, any/all participant(s) misbehaves during the

tender/auction process, the tenderer(s)/bidder(s) will be

removed from the place of auction, also his/her/their

tender will be rejected and the earnest money deposit

will be forfeited.

9. The earnest money deposit of the successful

tenderer will be adjusted against the sale proceeds and

the earnest money deposit of the unsuccessful tender

will be discharged/returned immediately.

10. The other than the tenderer will not be admitted

at the time of opening the tender and auction.

11. Acceptance of the tender/auction will be intimated

to the successful tenderer/bidder after finalization of the

tender/auction. Successful tenderer/bidder or his/her

authorised person will be allowed to clear/remove the

sold materials.

12. The successful tenderer/auction should pay the

cost of articles plus applicable GST and make his/her

own arrangement to clear/remove the articles

immediately at his/her own cost. Otherwise, the earnest

money deposit will be forfeited.

13. The applicable GST on the sale proceeds may be

paid by the buyer (i.e., recipient) directly to the GST

Accounts on reverse charge basis as per the

notification vide G.O. Ms. No. 4/2017- Puducherry GST

(Rate), dated 29-06-2017 and G.O. Ms. No. 36/2017-

Puducherry GST (Rate), dated 24-10-2017.

14. The Government Authorized E-waste Recyclers

who is buying the X-ray equipment should necessarily

perform the dismantling of the equipment according to

the Government guidelines.

15. The Government Authorized E-waste Recycler has

to dismantle the equipment and dispose off it

appropriately, thus, removing the dismantled equipment

from the premises of Indira Gandhi Government General

Hospital and Postgraduate Institute, Puducherry. The

Government Authorized E-waste Recycler has to handle

the logistics of transporting the dismantled equipment

out of Indira Gandhi Government General Hospital and

Postgraduate Institute, Puducherry, to the appropriate

disposal site. (Welding/Any kind of machine should not

be used for cutting of materials inside the Indira Gandhi

Government General Hospital and Postgraduate

Institute, Puducherry, premisses).

16. This office will not be in any way held

responsible for the safe custody or any loss of the sold

articles. Once the tender/auction is finalized, no claim

on the quantity and quality of the materials will be

entertained.

17. The undersigned reserves the right to reject any

or all tenders/bids without assigning any reason thereof

and the decision of the undersigned in this regard will

be the final and binding on all the tenders/auction.

MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT.

ANNEXURE

Old Unserviceable Radiological Equipment’s

(Non-Emission of radio activity)

Sl.

Name of the Equipment

Quantity

No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

No.

1. Siemens 1.0 TesIa Magnetom Harmony

MRI System Sl. No. 49337.

319

11 April 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

2. Philips HD II Premium US with Colour

Doppler System Sl. No. US 40631652

3. Automatic X-ray Film Processor (3182)

4. Automatic X-ray Film Processor (3934)

5. Automatic X-ray Film Processor (4135)

6. Automatic X-ray Film Processor (3186)

7. Automatic X-ray Film Processor (1907)

8. Kodak 160 Lazer Camera

9. CT Scan INV/HV Cathode

(1)

(2)

(3)

No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

No.

ÿÂ‚¶©√V¬ÔD

ÿÔVDR[

ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m,

√ﬁƒVB›m,

√ﬁƒVB›m, Amﬂºƒˆ

Amﬂºƒˆ

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

∂§s©A

∂Á\›m¬ÿÔV^· ÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›][ ∂–\] ºkı|˛≈VÏ.

kˆÁƒ

sıð©√>V´ˆ[

WÆk™D ∂Á\B

c›º>E¬Ô©√‚|^·

º>ÁkBV™

g‚Ôπ[

®ı

ÿ√BÏ �ÆD xÔkˆ

c^· ÷¶›][ xÔkˆ

WÆk™› >BVˆ©A/

t[]≈[

®ıË¬ÁÔ

ÿƒFxÁ≈

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

]Ú. g_∏[ P. º\›R,

M/s. Aj {≠[ ¨kº´¤¸

IMFL ÔÈÁk �ÆD

350

186

\Æ ∂·Ák ®ıÔ^ 54/2

√VıΩ ∏Á´ºk‚ otÿ¶‚,

√V‚Ωo∫ gÁÈ.

z]Á´›

(ÿ√Vm

�ÆD 54/4,

\Æ ∂·Ák ®ıÔ^ 54/2

]≈[.

√ËxÁ≈).

ºÔVÏÔV| kÚkVF ˛´V\D,

�ÆD 54/4,

√VÌÏ >VKÔV,

ºÔVÏÔV| kÚkVF ˛´V\D,

Amﬂºƒˆá605 110.

√VÌÏ >VKÔV,

Amﬂºƒˆá605 110.

1973ágD gı| Amﬂºƒˆ ˛´V\D �ÆD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m¬Ô^ ƒ‚¶›][ JÈ\VF Amﬂºƒˆ Œ[§B›m

∏ˆ° 11á[ √Ω ÷›ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á> WÆ°k]™V_ cı¶VzD g‚ºƒ√ÁðÔ^ ∞º>–D ÷ÚÕ>V_, ∂kuÁ≈

ÂV. ÿ¤B¬z\VÏ,

gÁðBÏ.

————

NETTAPAKKAM COMMUNE PANCHAYAT, PUDUCHERRY

Nettapakkam, dated 29th March 2023.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested permission to set up the following industry within the

Nettapakkam Commune Panchayat limits as detailed below.

320

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[11 April 2023

Sl.

Name and

Address of the

Industry

Power

No. of

No.

address of

industry site

proposed

required

workers

the applicant

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1. Thiru Albin P. Mathew,

M/s. Blue Ocean Beverages

IMFL Blending

350

186

Re-survey Nos. 54/2 and 54/4,

Pondy Private Limited,

and bottling

H.P.

(General

Korkadu Revenue Village,

Re-survey Nos. 54/2 and 54/4,

plant.

shift).

Bahour Taluk,

Korkadu Revenue Village,

Puducherry-605 110.

Bahour Taluk,

Puducherry-605 110.

In conformity with rule 11 of the Puducherry Commune Panchayats (Grant of Licences and Permissions)

Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union Territory by the Puducherry Village and Commune Panchayats Act, 1973,

objections, if any, to the setting up of the above industry, are invited to reach the Commissioner, Nettapakkam

Commune Panchayat within ten days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections, so received within the specified period will be considered by this Commune Panchayat.

N. JAYAKUMAR,

Commissioner.

AFFIDAVIT

I, A. Sureshkumar, son of Azhagiri, Indian, Hindu,

aged 40 years residing at No. 26, Rajathiammal Street,

Jeyam Nagar, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry-605 004, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

2. That I am the deponent herein and I am well

aware of the facts of the deposition.

3. I state that my name is entered as ‘Suresh

Kumar.A’ in my Birth Certificate bearing Registration

No. 044/1982/1/00557, dated 21-5-2019.

4. I state that my name is entered as ‘Suresh

Kumar. A’ in my Transfer-cum-Conduct Certificate

bearing Adm. No. 35/2000-01, dated on 06-06-2003.

5. I state that my name is entered as ‘Suresh

Kumar. A’ in my PAN Card bearing No. BYHPS6875F.

6. I state that my name is entered as ‘Sureshkumar’

in my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 4455, and

in my Family Ration Card bearing No. 141522, my

name is mentioned as ‘∑º´i z\VÏ’.

7. I state that my name is entered as ‘Sureshkumar’

in my Driving Licence No. PY0l 20140003405, dated

on 17-04-2014.

8. Further, I declare that as per numerological

reasons, I have changed my name as ‘A.Suresh

Kumaar’ and I declare that hereinafter, I shall be

called and known only by the name ‘A.Suresh

Kumaar’.

The above deposition is true and correct to the

best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of

March 2023.

562268

A. SURESHKUMAR.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Vanaja @ Vennila, wife of Veerappan, Hindu, aged

about 49 years and residing at No. 148 A, Dr. Ambedkar

Salai, Nethaji Nagar-3, Uppalam, Puducherry-605 001,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on

oath as follows:

1. I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of the deposition.

2. I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Vanaja’

in my Birth Certificate under Registration No. P/1973/

03089, issued by the Pondicherry Municipality,

Puducherry, in my SSLC Mark Sheet vide Register

No. 525277, issued by the Secretary, Board of

Secondary Education, Tamil Nadu, in my Marriage

Certificate under Registration No. 1/1992/ND,

issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, in

my Elector’s Photo Identity Card No. IGW0131458,

issued by the Election Commission of India and in

my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 7608, issued by

the Unique Identification Authority of India.

321

11 April 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

3. I state that my name is mentioned in our Family

Ration Card No. 013569 as ‘k™¤V’, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Government of Puducherry.

4. I state that my home-calling name is ‘Vennila’

and I would like to change the name ‘Vennila’ for

astrological reasons.

5. I state that the above-mentioned names that is

‘Vanaja’, ‘Vennila’ and ‘k™¤V’ are referred, identified

and relate to one and the same person that is myself

only.

6. Hence, I declare that hereinafter, I shall be called

and referred as ‘Vanaja @ Vennila’ for all purposes.

7. I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 24th day of

March 2023.

562285

V. VANAJA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ashrafali, son of Sathakathulla, aged about 46 years

and residing at No. 4, Dhanalakshmi Garden, Solai

Nagar, Muthialpet, Puducherry-605 003, solemnly and

sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and well aware of

the facts of the same deposed hereunder.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘S Ashrafali’

in my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 7569,

issued by the Unique Identification Authority of

India.

Further, I state that my name is mentioned as

‘Ashrafali’ in my PAN Card vide No. EENPA4270P,

issued by Income-tax Department, Government of

India.

Further, I state that my name is mentioned as

‘Asharaf’ in my vehicle Auto vide Registration

No. PY 01 N 5383, issued by Regional Transport Office,

Government of Puducherry and in my Driving Licence

vide No. TN 31 1995 0001455, issued by Regional

Transport Office, Cuddalore, Government of

Tamil Nadu.

Further, I state that my name is mentioned as

‘Asraf Ali’ in my Electoral Identity Card vide

No. DSK9901810, issued by Election Commission of

India.

Further, I state that my name is mentioned as

No. 149715, issued by Department of Civil Supplies

and Consumer Affairs, Government of Puducherry.

Further, I declare that the abovesaid names viz.,

‘S Ashrafali’, ‘Ashrafali’, ‘Asharaf’, ‘Asraf Ali’ and

i.e., myself only.

I submit to state that I undertake unequivocal

responsibility for any of the information mentioned

above found to be untrue.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 30th day of

March 2023.

562286

S. ∂¸´©∂o

∂¸´©∂o

∂¸´©∂o.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Porchezhian, son of Parcunan, Hindu, aged 36 years

and residing at No. 2, Devaneyan Street, Packamudayanpet,

Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly affirm and

state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well

known all the entire facts of the affidavit.

I submit that I was born on 15-01-1986 at

Puducherry under the legal wedlock of Dayalane and

Parvathi viz., in my Birth Certificate, in my PAN Card,

my name is mentioned as ‘Porchezhian’ son of

Dayalane and in my Secondary School Leaving

Certificate, Higher Secondary Course Certificate,

Bachelor’s Degree and Master’s Degree, my name is

mentioned as ‘Porchezhian.D’.

Further, I submit that I was adopted by Parcunan

and Pushpagandhi on 31-12-2001 as per the Hindu

customs and the adoption was duly registered before

the Office of Sub-Registrar, Oulgaret, Puducherry

vide Document No.7/2022 on 07-01-2022. And then

I became a son of Parcunan and Pushpagandhi, and

in my Aadhaar Card, and in the Legal Heir Certificate

of Parcunan, my name is mentioned as ‘Porchezhian’

son of Parcunan and in the Family Ration Card, my

name is mentioned as ‘ÿ√VuÿƒaB[’.

Further, I submit that the names viz., ‘Porchezhian

Dayalane’, ‘Porchezhian.D’, ‘Porchezhian Parcunan’

and ‘ÿ√VuÿƒaB[’ are referring one and the same

person, that is myself.

Hence, I made this affidavit for declaration of

identity of my names and hereinafter, I will be called

only as ‘Porchezhian Parcunan’.

322

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[11 April 2023

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

I sworn in to state that what are all stated here is

true and that I have not suppressed any fact for the

purpose of this affidavit. I undertake to face any legal

consequence in the event of the facts stated herein

proved to be false.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 20th day of March 2023.

562287

PORCHEZHIAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Pajany, son of Sivapregassame, Indian inhabitant,

aged 59 years and residing at the house bearing Door

No. 13, Victoria Nagar Extension, Ellaipillaichavady,

Puducherry-605 005, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate, under Registration No.243 of the

year 1963 and in the Marriage Certificate, under

Registration No.96/1996, with Ariyankuppam

Commune Panchayat, Puducherry, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Pajany’. In my Elector ’s Photo

Identity Card, under No. KVY0521500 and in my

Aadhaar Card, under No. XXXX XXXX1347, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Palani’ ‘(√wM)’.

In the PAN Card, issued by Income-tax Department,

Government of India under No. BKPPP2615C, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Palani’.

In the Identity Card, under Sl.No. 7281, issued by

the Police Department, Government of Puducherry

and in the Bio-Data submitted for employment, my

name has been mentioned as ‘S.Palani’.

In my Passbook of State Bank of India, Main

Branch, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Palani.S’.

In the particulars of family members in the Family

Ration Card under No. 161231, my name has been

mentioned as ‘√wM’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person, that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that hereafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name with spelling as

‘S.Palani’ ‘(E.√wM)’ for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 05th day of April 2023.

562289

S. PAJANY.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Bhavana, son of Balakrishnan, aged 30 years,

residing at No. 30/1, Keezhaveli Mettu Street, Karaikal,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm state on oath as

follows:

That my name has been recorded as ‘Bhavana’ in

all my certificates and relevant documents, etc.

Currently, all the records, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Bhavana’. That I shall at all times

hereafter in all dealings and proceedings I shall sign

and use ‘Bhavanan’ as my name thereby substitution

my former name.

I do state that the names mentioned in the

abovesaid certificates are referring and denoting one

and same person that is myself only.

Further, I state and declare that I intent to change

my name as ‘Bhavanan (√Vk™[)’ as per sentimental

as numerological reasons.í

Further, I declare that hereafter, I will be known

and called only by the name ‘Bhavanan (√Vk™[)’ .

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Karaikal, on this 16th day of March 2023.

ACK. NO. 003 B. BHAVANA.