[345]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

346

Sentence arbitral du Travail

.. 346

Award of the Labour Court .. 346

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

352

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 352

Government Notifications

.. 352

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

355

Annonces

.. 355

Announcements

355

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2023 }

∞©´_ |

25 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Avril

2023 (5 Vaisakha 1945)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

25th

April

2023

352

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[25 April 2023

Ex.P8 —

22-12-2016 Photocopy of the reply

of the petitioner on the Respondent’s

reply before the Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Government of

Puducherry.

Ex.P9 —

13-09-2017 Photocopy of the

Conciliation Failure Report.

List of Respondent’s witness:

RW.1 —07-07-2022 Thiru S. Sasikumar,

General Manager-Manufacturing

Respondent Management.

List of Respondent’s exhibits:

EX.R1 —

29-06-2015 Photocopy of the

Probation Order issued to the

P e t i t i o n e r b y t h e R e s p o n d e n t

Management.

Ex.R2—

06-01-2016 Photocopy of the

show cause notice issued to the

Petitioner by the Respondent

Management.

Ex.R3—

1 2- 0 3 - 2 0 1 6 P h o t o c o p y to t h e

memorandum issued to the Petitioner

by the Respondent Management.

Ex.R4—

15-03-2016 Photocopy of the

Termination Order issued to the

Petitioner by the Respondent

Management.

Ex.R5—

24-05-2016 Photocopy of the letter

sent by the Respondent to the

Petitioner intimating the credit of

legal dues into the Petitioner’s Bank

Account.

Ex.R6—

09-04-2016 Photocopy of the file

by the Respondent Management to

the Labour Officer (Conciliation),

Government of Puducherry.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 46/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 28th March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College, Karaikal

and the Union workman Thiru R. Johnson Raj Ramesh,

represented by the Union for all Staff in Vinayaka

Mission’s Medical College and Hospital, Karaikal, over

pay anomaly, in respect of the matter mentioned in the

Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the

Award within 3 months from the date of issue of

reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall

file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents,

list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal,

Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order

of reference and also forward a copy of such statement

to each one of the opposite parties involved in the

dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the industrial dispute raised by the

Union workman represented by Union for all Staff in

Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College and Hospital,

Karaikal, against the Management of M/s. Vinayaka

Mission’s Medical College, Kottucherry (PO), Kavaikal,

over pay anomaly of Thiru R. Johnson Raj Ramesh

and to refix his salary on par with his juniors Thiru

M.K. Dharmaraj and S. Mohan with arrears is justified

or not? If justified, what relief Thiru Johnson Raj

Ramesh is entitled to?

(ii) If justified, what relief Thiru R. Johnson Raj

Ramesh is entitled to?

(iii) To compute the relief in terms of money if,

it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

353

25 April 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 48/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 30th March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Bahadour Security Force, Puducherry and

Thiruvalargal M. Sengeni and K. Durai, over payment

of pending wage increase, bonus and other benefits, in

respect of the matter mentioned in the annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the

Award within 3 months from the date of issue of

reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall

file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents,

list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal,

Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order

of reference and also forward a copy of such statement

to each one of the opposite parties involved in the

dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the All India

United Trade Union Centre against the management

of M/s. Bahadour Security Force, Puducherry, over

payment of pending wage increase, bonus and other

benefits to Thiruvalargal M. Sengeni and K. Durai

from the year 01-01-2006 to 21-03-2018 (12 years of

service) and 01-01-2006 to 02-03-2019 (13 years of

service) amounting to ` 1,20,000 and ` 1,30,000

respectively, totaling ` 2,50,000 along with 12%

interest is legal and justified? If justified, give

appropriate direction?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 49/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 30th March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited and

Chremcrown Exports and Suolificio Linea Italia (India)

Private Limited Thozhilalargal Sangam, over Charter of

demands with regard to wage revision and other allied

welfare measures for the period from 2019-2022 in

respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the

Award within 3 months from the date of issue of

reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall

file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents,

list of reliance and witnesses to the Industrial Tribunal,

Puducherry, within 15 days of the receipt of the order

of reference and also forward a copy of such statement

to each one of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioners’

Union Chremcrown Exports and Suolificio Linea Italia

(India) Private Limited, the management of M/s.

Suolificio Linea Italia (India) Private Limited,

Puducherry, over charter of demands with regard to

wage revision and other allied welfare measures for

a period of 3 years (2019-2022) to the Union members

Thiruvalargal A. Subramanian and 119 others

(as mentioned in the Annexure) is justified or not?

If justified, to give appropriate direction?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

354

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[25 April 2023

ANNEXURE

Sl. No.

Names

(1)

(2)

A. Subramanian

E. Selvam

S. Ramesh

R. Murugan

K. Elumalai

K. Kaliyamoorthy

S. Makesh

P. Sekar

T. Seenuvasan

A. Arumaiselvam

K. Satchudhanandam

T. Stalin

V. Jayamoorthy

R. Sakkaramoorthy

S.K. Manikandan

D. Pachamuthu

S. Radhakrishnan

E. Arumugam

P. Jayamoorthy

J. Ramkumar

D. Balasundaram

A. Rajendran

S. Siva

K. Murugan

K. Muthu

N. Murali

S. Santhaseelan

D. Dhanasekar

E. Manikandan

V. Sakthivel

S. Ilango

S. Prabhu

B.S. Ramesh

A. Mohan

K. Pugazhendi

R. Iyyappandas

M.V. Vatchiravel

M. Raju

V. Selvamani

C. Vinoth

C. Murugan

S. Gandhinesan

S. Sathiyamoorthy

S. Ramanadhan

M. Saranraj

S. Surendar

B. Udhayakumar

K. Pachaiyappan

J. Jayakumar

S. Subbu

R. Manickaraj

D. Vignesh

T. Deva

G. Balamurugan

D. Tamilarasan

R. Jaganraj

A. Arumugam

G. Pazhaniraj

S. Natarajan

K. Honestraj

V. Thamizhmani

S. Kavitha

K. Geetha

V. Sathiya

M. Mahadevi

M. Geetha

D. Ramila

S. Geetha

G. Sridaran

B. Arulmurugan

T.K. Manikandan

A. Parasuraman

P.M. Pushpavel

S. Kamalakannan

M. Mathanraj

M. Poovarasan

C. Sasikumar

(1)

(2)

355

25 April 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

P. Veerachandarn

S. Boobalan

P. Muthu

M. Mathiyazhagan

E. Murugan

E. Saranraj

M. Purushothaman

A. Thamizharasan

K. Arulkumar

R. Murugan

M. Arun

K. Kalaiyarasan

V. Sathiyamoorthy

E. Ravikumar

S. Raghunath

T. Magesh

K. Poiyadhu

G. Dhanusu

S. Aravindh

A. Alexandar

K. Silambarasan

M. Ramarajan

100

A. Ayyanar

101

V. Patrick

102

A. Paramasivam

103

V. Vijayan

104

R. Saranraj

105

V. Vijayakumar

106

K. Selvakumar

107

T. Suresh

108

N. Ponnusamy

109

V. Vetrivendan

110

M. Selvakumar

111

S. Sampathraj

112

S. Murugan

113

V. Sureshkumar

114

T. Sudharsan

115

P. Balakrishnan

116

T. Govindhan

117

M. Ajithkumar

118

V. Kasinathan

119

M. Boobalan

120

M. Sekar

AFFIDAVIT

I, Dhatchanamoorthi, son of Egarajan (late), aged

about 28 years, residing at No. 20, Third Main Road,

Gokulam Nagar, Madagadipet Post, Villianur Commune,

Puducherry-605 107, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and well known the

facts of the affidavit.

I hereby state that according to my Birth Certificate,

bearing No. M/1995/01652, issued by Pondicherry

Municipality, Puducherry, my name is mentioned

as ‘Dhatchanamoorthi’.

Further, I state that in my SSLC Mark List, bearing

Examinations (Sec), Tamil Nadu, in my HSC Mark List,

bearing Register No. 609207 issued by State Board

of School Examinations (Hr. Sec.), Tamil Nadu, in my

Provisional Certificate, bearing Serial No. 0501668,

Consolidated Mark Sheet bearing Register No.

13213365, issued by Board of Examinations, Tamil

Nadu and in my Transfer Certificate, bearing Register

No. 13213365, issued by Motilal Nehru Government

Polytechnic College, Puducherry, my name is

mentioned as ‘Dhatchanamoorthi E’.

Further, I state that in my Elector’s Photo

Identity Card No. ZFD0064899, my name is

mentioned as ‘Dhatchanamoorthi’.

Further, I state that in my Aadhaar Card, bearing

No. xxxx xxxx 1894 issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India, my name is mentioned as

‘Dhatchanamoorthi’.

Further, I state that in my PAN Card No.

CQXPD4016Q, issued by Income-tax Department,

Government of India, my name is mentioned as

‘Dhatchanamoorthi’.

Further, I state that in my Driving Licence, bearing

No. PY01 20130012857 issued by Licensing Authority,

Transport Department, Puducherry, my name is

mentioned as ‘Dhatchanamoorthi. E’.

Whereas, in my Family Ration Card vide Serial No.

348906, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies

and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, my name is

mentioned as ‘>‚EðVJÏ›]’.

Further, I state that in my Partition Deed, registered

in the District Registrar Office, Puducherry vide

Document No. 4998/2011, my name is mentioned as

‘>‚EðVJÏ›]’.

(1)

(2)