[403]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

\Vk‚¶ ¿]√]BV_ ®|¬Ô©√|D ..

404

Procédure du Magistrate de District .. 404

Procedings of the District

404

º\_Â¶kΩ¬ÁÔÔ^

Magistrate

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

407

Sentence arbitral du Travail

.. 407

Award of the Labour Court .. 407

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

412

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 412

Government Notifications

.. 412

∂´∑ ∂§s©AÔ^

415

Notices du Gouvernement

.. 415

Government Notices

.. 415

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

416

Annonces

.. 416

Announcements

416

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2023 }

º\ |

16 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Mai

2023 (26 Vaisakha 1945)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

16th

May

2023

404

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 May 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

No. 4582/DRDM/C3/PAWN/2015/3238.

Puducherry, dated 18th April 2023.

ORDER

Present :

E. Vallavan, I.A.S.,

District Collector-cum-District Magistrate.

Sub.

DRDM – The Puducherry Pawn Brokers Act, 1966 – Public Auction – Sale of unredeemed

and time barred jewels – Permission Order – Issued – Reg.

Ref.

: 1. Application of Thiru J. Manish Kumar, Sethi Bankers (L.No. 440), No. 288, Kosakadai Street,

Puducherry-605 001, dated 18-01-2023.

2. Consent letter of Thiru B. Karthikeyan, 39A/32, Srinivasan Street, Thirupathiripuliyur,

Cuddalore Taluk – Authorized Auctioneer, dated 18-01-2023.

3. Report of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry vide Letter No. 6636/DC(R)N/

A7/PB/2022/764, dated 23-03-2023.

Whereas, an application, dated 18-01-2023 was received from Thiru J. Manish Kumar, Sethi Bankers

(L.No. 440), No. 288, Kosakadai Street, Puducherry, a licensed Pawn Broker requesting permission of the District

Magistrate to sell unredeemed and time barred articles in public auction;

2. And whereas, the list of unredeemed time barred articles submitted by the Pawn Broker was forwarded

to the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, for causing physical verification of the articles and ascertain

that they remain unredeemed after the time allowed for redemption;

3. And whereas, the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry, has furnished the report vide

reference (3) cited, stating that the Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Puducherry, had conducted physical verification of the

articles that are unredeemed and time barred pledged with Thiru J. Manish Kumar, Sethi Bankers (L.No. 440),

No. 288, Kosakadai Street, Puducherry and reported that the articles mentioned in the application remained

unredeemed past the time allowed and the articles are kept in the licensed premises itself except the twelve items

vide Catalogue Nos. 8, 15, 17, 30, 32, 34, 61, 78, 84, 86, 102 and 106 of the list, which were redeemed subsequently,

after the application of the Pawn Broker cited at reference (1);

4. And whereas, the rule 12 of the Puducherry Pawn Brokers Rules, 1966 prescribes detailed procedure on

auctioning of pledges;

5. Now, therefore, Thiru B. Karthikeyan, Thirupathiripuliyur, Authorised Auctioneer, is permitted to conduct

within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order, the sale of time barred and unredeemed pledged articles, as

shown in the list enclosed and available with the Pawn Broker, Thiru J. Manish Kumar, Sethi Bankers (L.No. 440),

No. 288, Kosakadai Street, Puducherry, in public auction in the licensed premises of the Pawn Broker at the above

address, as per the list approved and sent to the Pawn Broker and the Auctioneer, except the twelve items vide

Catalogue Nos. 8, 15, 17, 30, 32, 34, 61, 78, 84, 86, 102 and 106 of the list, which were redeemed. The Pawn Broker

and Auctioneer shall observe the above formalities detailed as required under the rules framed under the Puducherry

Pawn Brokers Act, 1966, before conducting the sale of time barred and unredeemed pledged articles in the public

auction:

Sl.No.

Details of

Number of articles

articles

(Catalogue)

Gold

Platinum

Others

—

Total

E. VALLAVAN, I.A.S.,

District Collector-cum-District Magistrate.

407

16 May 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 53/AIL/Lab./T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 25th April 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 14/2018, dated

09-03-2023 of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

Puducherry, in respect of industrial dispute

between M/s. Deccan Enterprises, Puducherry and

Thiru S.A. Rahamadullah, Villupuram, over non-payment

of legal dues has been received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

408

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 May 2023

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. V. SOFANA DEVI, M.L.,

Presiding Officer.

Thursday, the 9th day of March 2023.

I.D. (T) No. 14/2018

CNR. No. PYPY06-000052-2018

S.A. Rahamadullah,

No. 36/205, Singara Thoppu,

Villupuram,

Tamil Nadu.

. . Petitioner

Versus

The Managing Director,

M/s. Deccan Enterprises,

Vazhudavour Road,

Kurumbapet,

Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This industrial dispute coming on 07-03-2023

before me for final hearing in the presence of

Thiru T.H. Nizamudeen, Counsel for the Petitioner,

Thiruvalargal George K. Rajan, R. Balaji and S. Bagavathi,

Counsels for the Respondent and after hearing the both

sides and perusing the case records, this Court

delivered the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No. 63/AIL/Lab./T/2018, dated 11-04-2018 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following

dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz.,

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

Thiru S.A. Rahamadullah, Villupuram against the

Management of M/s. Deccan Enterprises, Puducherry,

over non-payment of legal dues is justified or not?

If justified, what relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money, if, it can be so computed?

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred

in the claim petition:

The Petitioner had joined in the Respondent’s

company as a Tailor in the readymade dress

manufacturing Unit which is an Export Company

registered before the Registrar of Companies under

Factories Act. The Petitioner was appointed in the

Respondent’s company on 19-02-2007 as “Line

Supervisor” vide his Identity Card No. 986 and the

petitioner worked in the Respondent’s company very

sincerely and out of his hard work, the Petitioner was

appreciated by the Respondent Company and

consequently he was promoted to the post of Final

Checker and in the year 2014, he was once again

promoted as Finishing In-charge.

(ii) Though the Petitioner was promoted to the

higher post, the Petitioner was not paid more salary

for the works he carried on in the Respondent’s

company. He was paid minimum wages of ` 2,363 in

the beginning and finally ` 6,183 for the post of

Finishing In-charge. Inspite of his repeated demands

and requests made with the Respondent Company,

his request was not considered by the Respondent

Company. The Petitioner has to travel in the bus from

Villupuram to the Respondent Company for the work,

so, he incurred ` 1,500 per month for travel expenses.

Whereas, the Respondent advised the petitioner to

resign himself and to rejoin in the Respondent’s

Company and as such the Petitioner resigned his job

on 17-06-2014 believing the false assurance that was

given by the Respondent Management.

(iii) Further, the Petitioner was refused to induct

in his job which he was doing in the Respondent

Management, whereas, the Respondent Management

did not accept his demand and came forward to pay

any more wages along with the perks and incentives

and the Petitioner faces more loss of gratuity, balance

of wages for layoff period to him after resigning his

job and even the Respondent company remitted the

ESI Contribution for him as assured by the

Respondent Management. The Petitioner was forced

to approach the Conciliation Authority to intervene

in this matter and to take appropriate action against

the Management of the Respondent Management so

as to enable him to get gratuity amount, balance

amount of layoff period, ESI benefits and all other

perks which the Petitioner legally entitled to.

(iv) The Conciliation enquiry held on various

dates and negotiations were held for an amicable

solution and settlement in this matter but, there was

no response on the Respondent Management.

Hence, the Petitioner prays to direct the Respondent

to pay the gratuity, balance of wages for layoff period

to him after resignation, ESI benefits and all other

legal dues and work to the Petitioner. Hence, the

petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondents are as follows:

The Respondent Company is an export garment

manufacturer. Due to global recession in the garment

industry and consequently no further orders the

Respondent was forced to downsize the factory and

409

16 May 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

doing job work orders. The Respondent denies that

the Petitioner was appointed in the Respondent

Company as Line Supervisor and he was joined in

the factory as a Tailor and later given the post of

Finishing In-charge. The Petitioner’s last drawn

(basic) wages was ` 3,615 and allowance (conveyance)

` 2,025 per month.

(ii) The Petitioner was in service for the period of

7 years as per the Respondent’s records. Petitioner

resigned his job on 16-06-2014 by submitting his

resignation letter, dated 16-06-2014 voluntarily and

left his work on his own volition. The Petitioner

never approached the management nor submitted his

present address and Bank details for settling his

legal dues. Instead of approaching the Respondent

Management for his legal dues, approached the

Labour Officer and filed a false representation against

the Respondent Management. The Petitioner was

never advised to resign his job nor rejoin the work

and no such assurances given by the Respondent

Management. Further, the Respondent Management

gives annual increments to workers based on

performance and not by any assurance to worker.

The Respondent Management requested the Labour

Officer (Conciliation) to advice the Petitioner to

accept the legal dues offered by the Respondent

Management which was not accepted by the

Petitioner, since the Petitioner demanded ` 50,000 and

not willing to accept the legal settlement the

Conciliation ends with failure and the amicable

settlement could not be reached. Hence, prayed for

dismissal of the claim petition.

4. Additional Counter statement filed by the

Respondent Management as follows:

The Petitioner was holding the post of Finishing

In-charge, which is supervisory in nature and the

Petitioner has no scope to file this petition as he

does not come under the scope of workman under

section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Hence, prays for dismissal of this petition.

4. Point for determination:

Whether the Petitioner Employee is entitled for

the reliefs as claimed in the claim petition?

5. On Point:

Petitioner, himself was examined as PW1 and

Ex.P1 to P11 were marked. On Respondent side

Mr. K.S. Madhusudhana Rao, Manager of the

Respondent Management was examined as RW1.

No exhibits were marked on the side Respondent.

No written arguments were filed on either side.

6. On the point:

The first and foremost defence taken by the

Respondent Management is that the Petitioner herein

was working as Finishing In-charge at the time, he

was resigning his job from the Respondent

Management i.e., 17-06-2014. Therefore, Petitioner

who was holding the post of Finishing In-charge,

which is Supervisory in nature, does not come under

definition of workmen under section 2(s) of Industrial

Disputes Act 1947. Therefore, this industrial dispute

at the threshold to be rejected on this Count.

7. On the other hand, learned Counsel appearing for

Petitioner would contend that initially the Petitioner was

appointed as Line Supervisor on 19-02-2007 and thereafter,

got promoted to the post of Finishing In-charge with

the salary of ` 6,183 per month. To substantiate his last

drawn salary, the Petitioner relied upon Ex.P5 Pay details

for the month May 2014. He resigned in June 2014.

Further, he would rely upon details of Pay for the month

of February 2011 (Ex.P3) wherein, it is mentioned as the

Petitioner as Tailor; Pay details for November 2013

(Ex.P4) wherein, the Petitioner was shown as Line

Supervisor. Further, the learned Counsel appearing for

the Petitioner would also rely upon Ex.P2 the Identity

card issued to the Petitioner by the Respondent

Management, wherein, date of his joining mentioned as

19-02-2007.

8. As the category of the Petitioner is disputed, it

is necessary to decide first the issue before going into

the other issues. Whether the employee concerned in

the proceeding is covered under the ambit of

“Workman” as per provisions of I.D. Act? As per

section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 when the

category of the work is Supervisory in nature and the

salary for the said Supervisory work is above ` 10,000

then the said person cannot be categorized under the

“workmen” under the Industrial Disputes Act. Further,

it is settled proposition that the nature of work should

be decide whether he is placed out of the definition

under section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act. The

designation of an employee is not of much importance

and what is important is a nature of duties being

performed by the employee the determinative factor is

the main duties of the employee concern and not some

works incidentally done. In other words, what is, in

substance, the work which employee does or what in

substance, he is employed to do. Viewed from this

angle, if, the main work is of manual, clerical or of

technical nature, the mere fact that some supervisory

or other work is also done by the employee incidentally

or only a small fraction of working time is devoted to

some supervisory work, the employee will come within

410

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 May 2023

the purview of “workmen” as defined in section 2(s) of

Industrial Disputes Act. Furthermore, his salary is

undisputedly below ` 10,000, i.e., ` 6,183 per month.

Though, the Respondent Management raised a plea that

he is not a workmen as defined under section 2(s) of

the Act 1947, no piece of evidence either oral or

documentary in nature placed to rebutt the evidence

adduced on the side of the Petitioner in this regard. It

is also pertinent to mention here that Respondent

Management had not raised such plea of “not a

workman” initially in its counter as well as in the

conciliation proceedings held. This abovesaid point of

defence has been raised before this Court for the very

first time by way of an additional counter.

9. On consideration of evidence placed before this

Court, I find that, Management has failed to show that

Finishing In-charge is work of supervisory nature. Be

that as it may, the salary of the Petitioner at that time

of resigning was only ` 6,183. Therefore, from all angles,

I do not have any hesitation to decide this issue in favour

of the Petitioner to the effect that he comes under the

category of workmen as defined under section 2(s) of

Industrial Disputes Act.

10. Next limb of the arguments placed before this

Court is about layoff compensation. The case of the

Respondent Management is that the Petitioner himself

resigned his work from the Respondent Management on

17-03-2014 on his own volition. Resigning himself from

the service does not amount to layoff by the

Respondent Management. When there is no layoff, the

claim of compensation for layoff also does not arise.

Hence, the Respondent Management submitted that it

is no way liable to pay any compensation. So, the

Petitioner is not entitled for any layoff compensation

as claimed in his claim petition.

11. By way reply, the learned Counsel appearing for

the Petitioner would say that only on believing the false

assurances of better job offer given by the Respondent

Management the Petitioner resigned his job. It is totally

false to state that the Petitioner has resigned on his

own volition. Therefore, it should be treated as layoff

and the Petitioner is entitled for the layoff compensation

as provided under section 25(A) of the Industrial

Disputes Act.

12. Layoff refers to the removal of employees by the

employer for reasons other than the employee’s fault.

A layoff is temporary in nature and it indicates the

incapability of an employer to continue the employment

of the workers for a short period. Section 2 (kkk) of

Industrial Disputes Act 1947 defines the term “layoff”

as the inability, failure, or refusal of the employer to

provide employment to a workman whose name is

mentioned in the muster roll of his Industrial

Establishment and who is not retrenched due to the lack

of power, coal, raw materials, accumulation of stocks,

break down of machinery or natural calamity for any

other relevant reason.

13. As per section 25 (A) of the Industrial Disputes

Act 1947, the compensation accrued from the layoff

provisions mentioned in the said Act shall not apply

with workman himself resigned his services from the

Management. Here, in the present case, the Petitioner

workman himself resigned his service and the same has

been admitted categorically by the workmen in various

occasions. It is the bounden duty of the person to

prove what he alleges/pleads before the Court. The

workman, who pleads that only on the assurance given

by the Respondent Management of better job, he

resigned his service, has to prove the same before this

Court. But, the Petitioner workman failed to prove that

it was done by the Petitioner on assurance/compulsion

inflicted upon by the Respondent Management. Therefore,

this Court holds that once he resigned from service, the

workman cannot ask for any compensation much less

than lay off compensation as it did not amount to layoff.

14. The third contention made on the side of the

Respondent Management is that amount of ` 23,412

towards the gratuity lying in the hands of the

Respondent Management and it is ready to pay the said

amount to the Petitioner workman. The said fact has

been fairly conceded even during the Conciliation

proceeding and the same has been mentioned and found

placed in the Failure Report. For the non-disbursement

of said gratuity amount till date, the reasons stated by

the Respondent Management is that “the petitioner

having resigned his job never approached the

Management nor submitted his present address and

Bank details for settling his legal dues. The Petitioner

instead of approaching the Management for his legal

dues, approached the Labour Office and filed a false

representation against the Respondent Management”.

15. Gratuity is payable to an employee on the

termination of his employment after he has rendered

continuous service under the conditions mentioned in

section 4(1) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The

term “continuous service” has been defined in section

2(c) to mean uninterrupted service and includes service

which is interrupted, among others, by leave or

cessation of work not due to any fault of the employee

concerned. Explanation-I to this section provides that

an employee, who is not in uninterrupted service for

one year, shall be deemed to be in continuous service,

if, he has been actually employed by an employer during

411

16 May 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

the twelve months immediately preceding the year for

not less than 240 days except when he is employed in a

seasonal establishment. Explanation-II provides that an

employee of a seasonal establishment shall be deemed

to be in continuous service if, he has actually worked

for not less than 75% of the number of days on which

the establishment was in operation during that year.

16. On close and careful perusal of documents

available in this Court, I find that the Respondent

Management offered before the Labour Officer

(Conciliation) to pay ` 23,412 to the Petitioner workman

being payment of gratuity and other legal dues. During

cross-examination PW1, the Petitioner Workman herein

has admitted that he had received other dues. The

Failure Report has been marked as Ex.P10. Ex.P2 is the

Photocopy of Identity Card of Petitioner workman

issued by the Respondent Management. In Ex.P2, the

Residential address of the Petitioner Workman has been

mentioned as “No. 36/25, Singarathoppu, Villupuram”.

From the claim statement it could be seen that the

Petitioner still resides in the same address. Therefore,

the contention of the Respondent Management that the

address of the Petitioner Workman was not available and

thus, it could not able to settle the legal dues of the

Petitioner Workman is totally untenable. No steps have

been shown to be taken on the side of the Respondent

Management for disbursing the amount due to the

Petitioner. It is contended that Management has

tendered cheque to the Petitioner workman during the

conciliation proceeding held before the Labour Officer

(Conciliation). But, there is no such mention about the

cheque in the failure report. During cross-examination

also, PW1 has categorically denied the questions put

by the Respondent Management Counsel in this regard.

Hence, the factum that the Respondent was ready to

pay the arrears amount due to the Petitioner workman

remains unproved. Mere pleadings that the Management

is ready to pay the arrears due to the Petitioner does

not help in any way to decide in its favour. Management

could have adopted any mode of payment of arrears due

to the petitioner Employee such as Bank Transfer,

Demand Draft or Cheque through Post. But, the

Respondent Management did not avail any such mode

for making payments for the reason best known to it.

Withholding the arrear amount due for more than 4 years,

cannot be brush aside as such. The inconvenience

caused due to the non-payment of such arrear due

should be compensated in terms of money.

17. Admittedly, the Petitioner Workman resigned his

service on 16-06-2014. Till date, his legal dues have not

been paid by the Respondent Management. Considering

the length of time, this Court finds that it is just and

necessary to order for payment of gratuity of ` 23,412

and any other legal dues if, any lying with the

Respondent Management to the Petitioner Workman by

the Respondent Management with the interest at the

rate of 12% from the date of due till the date of this

Award and thereafter 6% from the date of Award till the

date of realization. As the point with regard to layoff is

decided as against the Petitioner Workmen, no layoff

compensation is ordered. Thus, the point for

determination is answered accordingly.

18. In the result, reference is justified and the

Industrial Dispute is partly allowed to the effect that

the Respondent Management is liable to pay the legal

dues of ` 23,412 (Rupees twenty three thousand four

hundred and twelve only) (gratuity amount) and any

other legal dues if any lying with the Respondent

Management to the Petitioner Workman with the interest

at the rate of 12% from the date of his resignation till

the date of this Award and thereafter 6% from the date

of the Award till the date of realization by the Petitioner

Workman. Though, no compensation is ordered as

Layoff compensation, ` 5,000 is ordered to be paid by

the Respondent Management to the Petitioner Workmen

for the inconvenience caused due to the delay in

making the arrears payment. With regard to other reliefs

the Industrial Dispute is dismissed. With costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by

him, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court

on this 9th day of March, 2023.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness:

PW.1

— 06-10-2021

Thiru S.A. Rahamathullah

List of petitioner’s exhibits:

Ex.P1

— 27-05-2013

Photocopy of the Aadhaar

Card of the Petitioner.

Ex.P2

— 19-02-2007

Photocopy of the Identity

Card of the Petitioner issued

by the Deccan Enterprises.

Ex.P3

— February

Pay Bill of the Petitioner.

2011

Ex.P4

— November

Pay Bill of the Petitioner.

2013

Ex.P5

— May 2014

Pay Bill of the Petitioner.

Ex.P6

— 18-08-2015

Complaint given by the

Petitioner to Labour

Department.

412

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 May 2023

Ex.P7

— 23-01-2016

Notice of Remarks to the

Respondent

Labour

Officer

(Conciliation),

Puducherry.

Ex.P8

— 02-03-2016

Notice

Enquiry/

Conciliation sent by the

Labour Officer to the

Petitioner.

Ex.P9

— 17-10-2016

Notice

Enquiry/

Conciliation sent by the

Labour Officer to the

Petitioner.

Ex.P10 — 31-01-2018

Conciliation Failure

Report by Labour

Officer

(Conciliation),

Puducherry.

Ex.P11 — 11-04-2018

G.O. Rt. No. 63/AIL/Lab./T/

2018, Gazette Notification

by Labour Department,

Puducherry.

List of respondent’s witness:

RW1

— 20-01-2023

Thiru K.S. Madhusudhana

Rao,

Manager

the

Respondent Management.

List of respondent’s exhibits: Nil

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 127/F2/2022-23,

Puducherry, dated 31st March 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Tmt. R. Chitra, Joint Director of Economics and

Statistics, Directorate of Economics and Statistics,

Puducherry, is atmitted into retirement with effect from

the afternoon of 31-03-2023 on attaining the age of

superannuation.

(By order)

K. GOVINDARAJAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Finance).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 08/FD/F2/A2/2023-24,

Puducherry, dated 28th April 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On acceptance of the notice of voluntary retirement

given under rule 48 (1) (a) of Central Civil Service

(Pension) Rules, 1972 by Tmt. N. Vasanthi, Junior

Accounts Officer, Rajiv Gandhi Government Women and

Children Hospital, Puducherry, she is admitted into

voluntary retirement from service with effect from the

afternoon of 30-04-2023.

(By order)

RATNAGHOSH KISHOR CHAURE,

Deputy Secretary to Government

(Finance).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LAW DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 14/2023-LD,

Puducherry, dated 28th April 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to

appoint the below mentioned Advocate(s) for appearance

on behalf of the Government of Puducherry, before the

Courts Subordinate to the Hon’ble High Court, Madras,

with effect from the date of assumption of charge,

temporarily until afresh selection is made. However, in

respect of Thiru N. Vinayagam, his tenure shall be as

per G.O. Ms. No. 27 /2022-LD, dated 14-12-2022 of the

Law Department, Government of Puducherry.

Sl.

Name of the

Designation and name of the

No.

Advocates

Court allotted

(1)

(2)

(3)

1 Thiru K. Ranganathan

Additional Public

Prosecutor (III ADJ).

2 Thiru N. Vinayagam

Additional Public Prosecutor

(II ADJ)-cum-Special Public

Prosecutor – NDPS Act, 1985

(III ADJ).

3 Thiru P. Kumarasan

Special Public Prosecutor –

POC Act, 1988 (PDJ) and

SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989

(II ADJ).

413

16 May 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

4 Thiru A. Raju

Additional Public Prosecutor

for Assistant Sessions

Courts (CJM, PSJ & ASJ)-

c u m - S p e c i a l P u b l i c

Prosecutor – Food Safety

and Standards Act, 2006

(CJM).

(1)

(2)

(3)

2. The terms and conditions for the abovesaid

Law Officers shall be as set out in the Puducherry

Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service)

Rules, 2021 notified in G.O. Ms. No. 22/2021-LD,

Puducherry, dated 11th June 2021 of the Law Department,

Government of Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

N. MURUGAVEL,

Under Secretary to Government (Law).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), KARAIKAL

NO. 0205/DDSE/KKL/E3(Exam)/2023/01.

Karaikal, dated 02nd May 2023.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidate has lost his original HSC II Year Mark Certificate beyond

the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificate. If, anyone finds the

original Mark Certificate, it may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec.), College Road,

Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

Sl.

Name of the

Sl. No. of

School in which

No.

applicant

session and

the Mark

studied last

year

Certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Thiru Thamizhselvan S

565377, March 2016

HSG 11266173

Government Higher Secondary School,

T.R.Pattinam, Karaikal.

M. RADJESVARY,

Deputy Director (Secondary Education).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (AGRICULTURE)

(G.O. Ms. No. 04/Ag, Puducherry, dated 03rd May 2023)

NOTIFICATION

In exercise of the powers conferred by clause 28A of

the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control)

Order, 1985, read with section 3 of the Essential

Commodities Act, 1955 (Act. No. 10 of 1955) and in

pursuance of Order No S.O. 623(E), dated 08-02-2023 of the

Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, New Delhi

and notified in the Gazette No. 594, dated 08-02-2023 of

the Government of India, the Lieutenant-Governor of

Puducherry hereby notifies the Joint Director of

Agriculture (Chemistry) as Authority for keeping the

Fertilizer samples in his/her custody as drawn by

Fertilizer Inspectors notified under the G.O Ms. No. 6/Ag/

2019, dated 15th July 2019 of the Chief Secretariate

(Agriculture), Puducherry and sending for second part

for analysis to National Test House and Referral

laboratory at Central Fertilizer Quality Control and

Training Institute, Faridabad and keep the third sample

for referee analysis as prescribed under this order.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

SUNDARARAJAN. P,

Deputy Secretary to Government

(Agriculture).

414

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 May 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KARAIKAL

NO. 0405/CEO/KKL/E3(Exam)/2023/866.

Karaikal, dated 04th May 2023.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidate has lost his original SSLC Mark Certificate beyond the

scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificate. If, anyone finds the original

Mark Certificate, it may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec.), College Road, Chennai –

600 006 for cancellation, as it is no longer valid.

Sl.

Name of the

Sl. No. of

School in which studied last

No.

applicant

session and

the Mark

year

Certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Thiru Esvararaj R

522693, March 2007

4681114

Jawaharlal Nehru Government Higher Secondary

School, Nedungadu, Karaikal.

K. RAJASEKARAN,

Chief Educational Officer.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

(HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION)

(G.O. Ms. No. 16, Puducherry, dated 08th May 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, the

following Associate/Assistant Professors shall retire

on the afternoon of 31-05-2023.

Sl.

Name, Designation

No.

and Institution

(1)

(2)

1. Thiru A. Balachandran,

Associate Professor in Economics,

Tagore Government Arts and Science College,

Puducherry.

2. Dr. A. Salila,

Associate Professor in French,

Tagore Government Arts and Science College,

Puducherry.

3. Dr. M. Natarajan,

Assistant Professor in Sociology,

Tagore Government Arts and Science College,

Puducherry.

(By order)

V. SOUMYA,

Under Secertary to Government

(Higher and Technical Education).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)

(G.O. Ms. No. 18,

Puducherry, dated 08th May 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, Thiru

S. Mahalingam, Superintending Engineer, presently

holding the post of Chief Town Planner, Town and

Country Planning Department (on transfer on

deputation basis) is admitted into retirement on the

afternoon of 31-05-2023.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE,

Under Secertary to Government

(Works).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

HEALTH SECRETARIAT

(G.O. Ms. No. 26, Puducherry, dated 08th May 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation of 65 years,

Dr. K. Suseela, Senior Chief Medical Officer, Rajiv

Gandhi Government Women and Children Hospital,

415

16 May 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Puducherry, is admitted into retirement with effect

from the afternoon of 30-04-2023.

(By order)

K. CANDANE @ SIVARADJANE,

Under Secertary to Government

(Health).

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´∑

mÁð \Vk‚¶ g‚EBÏ (kÚkVF) �ÆD

WÈ gÏ˜> ∂]ÔVˆ ∂KkÈÔD,

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_

®ı. 3974/m\Vg/Wg/2021.

∂§s©A

÷>™V_ ÿ>ˆs©√m ®[™ÿk[≈V_, 2013-gD

gı|, WÈD ÁÔBÔ©√|›m>_, \ÆkVµkπ©A �ÆD

\ÆzΩB\Ïs_ ºÂˆB ƒˆX| �ÆD ÿkπ©√Á¶›>[Á\

cˆÁ\ﬂ ƒ‚¶D, c‚∏ˆ°Ô^ (1) �ÆD(2) ∏ˆ° 7á[ √Ω,

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´ƒV_, ÷Õ]B ®ˆkV• gÁðB›]uÔV™

∂KkÈÔD �ÆD ∏´VÕ]B ®ˆkV• º\ÈVıÁ\

Á\BD Ô‚|©√V‚| ∂Á≈ Ô‚|k>uz ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_

\Vk‚¶›]_ ºÔVs_√›m kÚkVF ˛´V\›]_ WÈD

ÁÔBÔ©√|›mk>uÔVÔ, ƒx>VB >V¬Ô¬ ÔË©A

zøs™´V_ ƒ\Ï©∏¬Ô©√‚¶, >™m ƒx>VB >V¬Ô¬

ÔË©A ∂§¬ÁÔÁB \]©¨| ÿƒF•D ÿ√VÚ‚|, ŒÚ

∑>Õ]´\V™ √_kÁÔ mÁ≈l™ˆ[ k_KÂÏ zø Œ[Æ

∂Á\¬Ô©√‚¶m.

÷Õ> k_KÂÏ zø, ƒx>VB >V¬Ô¬ ÔË©A

∂§¬ÁÔl[

*m^·

>™m

∂§¬ÁÔÔ^

�ÆD

√ˆÕmÁ´ÔÁ·

÷ÀkKkÈÔ›]_

ƒ\Ï©∏›m^·™Ï.

∂Àk§¬ÁÔÔ^ �ÆD √ˆÕmÁ´Ô^ ˇµ¬Ôı¶

∂KkÈÔ∫Ôπ_

ÿ√Vm

\¬Ô^

�ÆD

WÈ

cˆÁ\BV·ÏÔ^ √VÏÁk¬ÔVÔ Ák¬Ô©√‚|^·m. ÷Õ>

∂§s©A ÿkπl‚¶ º>]loÚÕm 7 ÂV‚Ô”¬z^

ÿ√Vm\¬Ô^

�ÆD

WÈ

cˆÁ\BV·ÏÔ^

∂ÀkKkÈÔ∫Ôπ_ ºkÁÈ ÂV‚Ôπ_ √VÏÁkl‚|

kÚÁÔÁB √]° ÿƒFmÿÔV^·ÈVD.

1. \Vk‚¶ g‚EBÏ ∂KkÈÔD,

®ı 1, ˘©·¬¸ ÿ>Ú, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_.

2. mÁð \Vk‚¶ g‚EBÏ (kÚkVF) ∂KkÈÔD,

®ı 2, ˘©·¬¸ ÿ>Ú, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_.

3. k‚¶V‚EBÏ ∂KkÈÔD, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_.

4. ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_ ÂÔ´V‚E ∂KkÈÔD, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_.

ƒx>VB› >V¬Ô¬ ÔË©A k_KÂÏ zø ∂§¬ÁÔÁB

“karaikal.gov.in” ®[≈ kÁÈ>·›]KD ÔVðÈVD.

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_, ÂV^ 2023 }, º\ | 4 {.

QV.

QV. ¤V[ƒ[,

¤V[ƒ[,

mÁð \Vk‚¶ g‚EBÏ(kÚkVF) �ÆD

WÈ gÏ˜> ∂]ÔVˆ.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR

(REVENUE) -CUM- LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

KARAIKAL

No. 3974/DCR/LA/B1/2021

Karaikal, dated 4th May 2023.

NOTICE

It is informed that the Government of Puducherry

has constituted the independent Multi-disciplinary

“Expert Group” under sub-section (1) and (2) of

section 7 of the Right to Fair Compensation and

Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation

Resettlement Act, 2013, to evaluate the Social Impact

Assessment Report submitted by the Social Impact

Assessment Team in respect of Acquisition of Land at

Kovilpathu Revenue Village for “Construction of GAIL

Office Building-cum-Regional Gas Management Centre

(RGMC) Control Room for GAIL, Karaikal”.

The Expert Group has submitted their Reports/

Recommendations on the Social Impact Assessment

Report. The said Reports/Recommendations are placed

in the following offices for public view for 7 days from

the date of this Notice. The public in general and

landowners in specific may view the reports on any

working day in the below mentioned offices:

Office of the District Collector,

No. l, Duplex Street, Karaikal.

Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue),

No. 2, Duplex Street, Karaikal.

Taluk Office, Karaikal.

Office of the Karaikal Municipality, Karaikal.

The Expert Group’s Report is also available in the

website “karaikal.gov.in”.

G. JOHNSON,

Deputy Collector (Revenue)-cum-

Land Acquisition Officer.

416

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 May 2023

AFFIDAVIT

I, Thalinjin, son of Palanisamy, Indian, aged 54 years,

residing at No. 03, Veeramamunivar Street, Dr. Radhakrishanan

Nagar, Kathirkamam, Puducherry-605 009, do hereby

solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I hereby state that according to my Birth

Certificate vide Registration No. P/1968/0539, dated

12-12-1968 issued by Pondicherry Municipality,

Puducherry, my name has been entered as ‘Talindja’.

I hereby state that according to my Secondary

Leaving Certificate vide Register No 35 of 1986-1987,

dated 23-09-1986, my name has been entered as

‘Mudaliar Thalinjan Palanisamy’.

Further, I submit to state that in the Job Profile

Record of the Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Government of India, my name has been entered as

‘Mudaliar Thalinjan Palanisamy’.

I hereby state that according to my Elector’s

Photo Identity Card issued by Election Commission

of India vide No. JTP0349191, dated 18-05-2017, my

name has been entered as ‘Thalinjan’.

Further, I submit to state that in the Passport

issued by the Regional Passport Office, Chennai,

Republic of India vide No. Z4558675, dated

25-07-2018, my name has been entered as ‘Thalinjan’.

Further, I submit to state that in the PAN Card

issued by the Income-tax Department, my name has

been entered as ‘Thalinjan’.

Whereas, in my Family Ration Card issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry, bearing Card No. 340000 107578, my

name has been entered as ‘Thalinjin’ (‘>πﬁƒV[’).

Whereas, in my Aadhaar Card issued by the

Unique Identification Authority of India, vide Card

No. XXXX XXXX 4991, dated 24-09-2011, my name

has been entered as ‘P. Thalinjan’.

Whereas, in my Driving Licence issued by the

Government of Puducherry vide No PY01 19970002216,

dated 08-05-1997, my name has been entered as

‘Mudaliarthalinjan’.

Whereas, in my Annual Statement of General

Provident Fund Account Statement (Account No. 1819)

my name has been entered as ‘T P Mudaliar’.

Hence, I hereby declare that all the abovesaid

names viz., ‘Talindja’, ‘Mudaliar Thalinjan Palanisamy’,

‘Thalinjan’, ‘P. Thalinjan’ (‘>πﬁƒV[’), ‘Mudaliarthalinjan’

and ‘T P Mudaliar’ are denoting one and the same

person, they referring myself only.

Hereinafter, I will be called and referred only as

‘Thalinjan’ and I will use for my signature as by this

name only that is ‘Thalinjan’ for all purposes in

future.

The above facts are true to the best of my

knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 29th day of April 2023.

562326

THALINJAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Tangapregassam, son of Ranganadin, aged 53 years,

residing at No. 19, Dr. Rozha Street, Vanarapet,

Puducherry-605 001, India, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this

affidavit on behalf of myself.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Thangaprakash’

in my Aadhaar Card bearing No. XXXX XXXX 6290,

issued by the Unique Identification Authority of

India.

state

that

name

entered

‘Thangapragasam’ in my Elector’s Photo Identity

Card, issued by the Election Commission of India,

bearing No. IGW0114900.

state

that

name

entered

‘Tangapregassam’ in my Birth Certificate, issued by

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, bearing

Registration No. PM/P/1969/000265.

state

that

name

entered

‘Tangapregassam’ in my Indian Passport, issued by

the Regional Passport Office, Chennai, Republic of

India, bearing No. A8168860.

I submit that the names described in the above

records as ‘Thangaprakash’, ‘Thangapragasam’ and

‘Tangapregassam’ are referring one and the same

person that is myself only.

The statements in the abovesaid paragraphs are

true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 02nd day of May 2023.

562327

TANGAPREGASSAM.

417

16 May 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

AFFIDAVIT

I, K Vijaya Gandhi, son of Krishnasamy, residing at

No. 11,

1st

Cross

Street,

East

Gate

Nagar,

Nainarmandapam, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry-605 004, do

hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

(a) That my name has been spelled in all my

official records are stated here as follows:

(i) In my Birth Certificate as K Vidjeagandy vide

Registration No. P/1966/00714, dated 01-10-2012,

issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry.

(ii) In my Eelctoral Identity Card as

‘Vijayagandhi’ vide No. CMS0317644, dated

29-05-2005, issued by the Electoral Registration

Officer, Puducherry.

(iii) In my Passport as ‘Vijaya Gandhi’ vide

Passport No. P9176510, dated 19-04-2017, issued by

the Passport Office, Chennai.

(iv) In my Driving Licence as ‘Vijay Gandhi K’

vide DL No. PY01 20050011268, dated 19-10-2005,

issued by the Transport Department, Puducherry.

(v) In my PAN Card No. BCRPV1015J

as ‘K Vijaya Gandhi’.

(vi) In my Aadhaar Card as ‘K Vijaya Gandhi’

vide No. XXXX XXXX 4783, dated 19-03-2013.

(vii) In my Family Ration Card as ‘˛. s¤FÔVÕ]’

vide No. 340000072538.

(b) That I am producing this Affidavit for the

purpose of evidence for my name.

referring one and the same person that is myself only.

(d) That I shall at all times hereinafter in all

records, deeds and writings and in all proceedings

dealings and transactions, private as well as under

all occasions whatsoever be known only as ‘K Vijaya

Gandhi’.

(e) That what is stated above is true and correct

to best of my knowledge, information and belief, and

nothing material has been concealed thereon.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on

this 04th day of May 2023.

562328

K VIJAYA GANDHI.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Rekha, wife of Kamban, aged about 40 years and

residing at Door No. ASl, Janani Subiksham Apartment,

Sri Sathiya Sai Nagar, Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry-605

010, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state

on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein, as a natural

guardian I submit the affidavit on behalf of

my 17 years old minor daughter ‘Saathvekha’.

I submit that in my minor daughter’s Birth

Certificate No. 468/2005/03, her name is mentioned as

‘Saathvekha’, dated 19-10-2005, issued by the

Commissioner, Cuddalore Municipality, Cuddalore,

Tamil Nadu.

Further, I submit that in my minor daughter’s

Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 8575, her name is

mentioned as ‘K.R. Saathvekha’, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India.

Further, I submit that in my minor daughter’s

Passport No. P1887051, her name is mentioned as

‘Saathvekha’, issued by the Regional Passport Office,

Chennai.

Further, I submit that in my minor daughter’s

Secondary School Examination 2021 Marks Statement-

cum-Certificate vide Registration No. M121/56804/

0143, dated 03-08-2021, her name is mentioned as

‘K.R. Saathvekha’, issued by the Central Board of

Secondary Education, New Delhi.

Further, I submit that in my Family Ration Card No.

190543, my minor daughter’s name is mentioned as

‘ƒV›sÔV’, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of

Puducherry.

Thus, all the names viz., ‘Saathvekha’, ‘K.R. Saathvekha’

and ‘ƒV›sÔV’ are referring one and the same person

i.e., my minor daughter only.

I hereby declare that she shall at all times

hereinafter in all records, deeds and writings and in

all proceedings, dealings and transactions, private

as well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and

sign my minor daughter's name ‘K.R. Saathvekha’ in

place and in substitution of my minor daughter’s

former names.

I hereby verify and confirm that what has been

stated above is true to the best of my knowledge and

correct and nothing material facts have concealed

thereon.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 03rd day of May 2023.

562329

H. REKHA.

418

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 May 2023

AFFIDAVIT

I, Raja, son of Dandapaani, aged 40 years and

residing at No.18, Pavanar Nagar, Boomianpettai,

Puduherry-605 005, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this

affidavit on behalf of myself.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Raja’ in my

Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India, bearing No. XXXX XXXX 8324.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Raja’ in my

Electoral Identity Card, issued by the Election

Commission of India, bearing No. UEB0029710.

´V¤V’ in my Marriage Invitation, dated 11-02-2008.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Raja’ in my

daughter Supriya's Birth Certificate, issued by the

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, bearing

Registration No. M2008/ 17461, dated 22-12-2008.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Raja’ in my

daughter Podhanai Selvi's Birth Certificate, issued by

the Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry, bearing

Registration No. E/2014/00574, dated 05-02-2014.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Kuppan’ in my

Birth Certificate, issued by the Pondicherry

Municipality, Puducherry, bearing Registration

No. M/1982/04466, dated 17-07-1982.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Raja’ in my PAN

Card, issued by the Income-tax Department, bearing

No. DBSPR1213J.

I state that my name is entered as ‘´V¤V’ in my

Family Ration Card, bearing No. 455660, issued by

the Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer

Affairs, Puducherry.

Hence, I submit that the names described in the

´V¤V’ and ‘´V¤V’ are referring one and the same

person i.e., they denoting myself only.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is ‘Raja’.

The

above

statements

the

abovesaid

paragraphs are true to the best of my knowledge and

belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 03rd day of May 2023.

562330

RAJA.

AFFIDAVIT

I, K. Menaka, daughter of Karmegam, wife of

R. Babu, Hindu, aged about 41 years and residing at

Plot No. 9, Kamarajar Street, Pappanchavady,

Puducherry-605 004, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘K Menaka’

in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate, bearing

Secondary Examination, Tamil Nadu.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘Menaka K

in my M.B.,B.S. Degree Certificate bearing

Registration No. 52001369, issued by Tamil Nadu

Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘K. Menaka’

in my Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) bearing Roll No.

250513, issued by Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma

University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘Menaka,

Karmegam’ in my Medical Registration Certificate

bearing Registration No. 78658, issued by Tamil Nadu

Medical Council, Chennai.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘Karmegam

Menaka’ in my Admission Certificate bearing Roll No.

000840, issued by Union Public Service Commission,

New Delhi.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘Karmegam

Menaka’ in the recommendation Letter, No. F. No. 1/

90(31)/2006-R.I/SPC-II/R. No. 840, issued by Union

Public Service Commission, New Delhi.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘Karmegam

Menaka’ in the Office Memorandum, dated 28-03-2008,

issued by Health Secretariat, Government of

Puducherry, in the Memorandum, dated 03-04-2008.

No. A. 19015/DHFWS/A2/2008/378, issued by

Directorate of Health and Family Welfare Service,

Government of Puducherry, in the Office Order, dated

02-01-2018, No. 9869/ RGGWCH/Estt./El/2018 issued by

Rajiv Gandhi Government Women and Children Hospital,

Government of Puducherry, in the Memorandum, dated

03-11 -2017, No. A. 19015/DHFWS/Estt./A2/2006/F.32/

875, issued by Directorate of Health and Family Welfare

Services, Government of Puducherry,

Thus, all the names viz., ‘K Menaka’ and

‘Menaka K’, ‘K. Menaka’, ‘Menaka, Karmegam’ and

‘Karmegam Menaka’ are denoting one and the same

person that is myself and no one else.

419

16 May 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

The abovesaid facts are true and correct to the

best of my knowledge, belief, and information and

nothing has been concealed thereon.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Puducherry, on this 03rd day of May, 2023.

562331

K. MENAKA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, T.Bharatsatyakrishna, son of I.Thangaraj,

aged 19 years and residing at No. 12, Anna Street,

Dr. Radhakrishnan Nagar, Kadirkamam Post,

Puducherry-605 009, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well know

and aware of the facts of the deposition.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘T. Bharat

Satya Krishna’ in my Birth Certificate vide

Registration No. COC/2003/05/066/000726/1, issued

by the Department of Public Health, Corporation of

Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

state

that

name

entered

‘T. Bharatsatyakrishna’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX

XXXX 9053, issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India, in my PAN Card No. FVBPB8398P,

issued by the Incom-tax Department, Government of

India.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Bharat Satya

Krishna’ in my Secondary School Examination Marks

Statement vide Roll No.310001192005, issued by the

National Institute of Open Schooling, Noida,

Government of India and in my Diploma in Chemical

Engg. (Sandwich) 3rd Semester Mark Statement vide

Enter Registration No.21700346, issued by the

Directorate of Technical Education, Government of

Tamil Nadu.

I state that my name is entered as ‘√V´› ƒ›B

˛ÚiðV’ in our Family Ration Card No.114319,

issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and

Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid

names,

i.e.,

‘T. Bharat

Satya

Krishna’,

‘T. Bharatsatyakrishna’, ‘Bharat Satya Krishna’ and

‘√V´› ƒ›B ˛ÚiðV’ are referred, identified and

relate to one and same person that is myself only.

Hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only

b y t h e n a m e ‘T. Bharatsatyakrishna’ for all

purposes.

I hereby declare that I shall at all times hereinafter

in all records, deeds and writings and in all

proceedings, dealings and transactions private as

well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign

my name as ‘T. Bharatsatyakrishna’ in place and in

substitution of my former name. I hereby verify and

confirm that what has been stated above is true to

the best of my knowledge and correct, and nothing

material facts have been concealed thereon.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed and signed before the

Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of May 2023.

562332

T. BHARATSATYAKRISHNA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Manikandan, son of Velin and Vijaya, aged 27 years

and residing at the house bearing Door No. 20,

Velayutham Pillai Street, Muthialpet, Puducherry -605 003,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm to whomsoever

it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate, under Registration No. PM/M/ 1996/

003858, In the Driving Licence of mine under No. PY01

20180003776 and in my PAN Card, under No.

FBDPM5911B, my father’s name has been mentioned

as ‘Velin’

In my Transfer Certificate, under No. 130514, my

said father’s name has been mentioned as ‘Velan’.

In my Aadhaar Card, under No. XXXX XXXX

8821, my father’s name has been mentioned as

‘Velin (ºko[)’.

In the Birth Certificate of my father, under

Registration No. P/1962/03555, his name has been

mentioned as ‘Velin’.

In my father’s, PAN Card under No. BRZPV1935Q,

his name has been mentioned as ‘Velin.R’.

In the Family Ration Card, under No. 003236, my

said father’s name has been mentioned as ‘ºkÈ[’.

In the Passport of mine under No. S2860280, my

surname and my said father's name has been

mentioned respectively, as ‘Velan’.

Therefore, I do hereby state that the abovesaid

names viz., ‘Velin’, ‘ºko[’, ‘ºkÈ[’, ‘Velin.R’ and

‘Velan’, are referred, identified and relates to one and

the same person that is my father’s only.

420

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 May 2023

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of

my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 08th day of

May 2023.

562334

MANIKANDAN.V

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ayappane, son of Sinouvasane, Indian inhabitant,

aged 46 years and residing at the house bearing

Door No. 10, Bajanai Madam Street, Manjini Nagar,

Muthialpet, Puducherry-605 003, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as

follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate, under Registration No. P/1977/00112,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Ayappane’.

In my Elector ’s Photo Identity Card under

No. HKD0251942, my name has been mentioned as

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 6755,

my name has been mentioned as ‘S Ayyappan

(Ê nB©√[)’.

In my Community-cum-Residence Certificate,

under Certificate No. 695, similarly, in the Residence

Certificate of my daughter, by name Selvapriya, under

Certificate No. P21RS58900, issued by the Taluk

Office, Puducherry, my name has been mentioned

with spelling as ‘Iyyappan’.

In the particulars of members in the Family Ration

Card under No. 39269, my name has been mentioned

as ‘nFB©√[’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name with spelling as

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of

my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 08th day of May 2023.

562335