[887]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

888

Sentence arbitral du Travail

.. 888

Award of the Labour Court .. 888

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

894

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 894

Government Notifications

.. 894

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

899

Etablissements dangereux

.. 899

Dangerous Establishments

899

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

902

Annonces

.. 902

Announcements

902

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

Registered No. PY/44/2021-23

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2023 }

ΩƒD√Ï |

26 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Décembre

2023 (5 Pausa 1945)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

26th

December

2023

888

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 104/AIL/Lab./T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 1st December 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 4/2016, dated

18-05-2023 of the Labour Court, Puducherry, in respect

of the industrial dispute between the management of

M/s. MAS Computer Forms, PIPDIC Industrial Estate,

Mettupalayam, Puducherry and Thiru N. Punniyakodi,

over non-employment and other settlement benefits, has

been received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the Notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the official gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. V. SOFANA DEVI, M.L.,

Presiding Officer.

Thursday, the 18th day of May, 2023

I.D. (L) No. 04/2016

CNR. No. PYPY06-000038-2016

N. Punniyakodi,

S/o. Nagappan,

No. 7, Solai Nagar,

Muthialpet,

Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Versus

The Managing Director,

MAS Computer Forms,

C-91, 16th Cross,

PIPDIC Industrial Estate,

Mettupalayam, Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on 16-05-2023 before

me for final hearing in the presence of Thiruvalargal

A. Kanniappan and K. Balaji, Counsels for the Petitioner,

Thiru B. Mohandoss, Counsel for the Respondent, and

after hearing the both sides and perusing the case

records, this Court delivered the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry, vide G.O. Rt.

No. 25/AIL/Lab./T/2016, dated 21-04-2016 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following

dispute between the Petitioners and the Respondent,

viz.,

(a) Whether the dispute raised by Thiru N. Punniyakodi,

against the Management of M/s. MAS Computer

Forms, PIPDIC Industrial Estate, Mettuapalaym,

Puducherry, over his non-employment and other

settlement benefits are justified or not?. If justified,

what relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred

in the petition

(i) The Petitioner was working as Supervisor from

the year 1990 in M/s. Vetri Carbons which is a

manufacture of Carbon Papers. The said company

M/s. Vetri Carbons was later renamed as Ganesh

Carbons, Ganesh Computer Carbons and lastly as

Hayagriv Carbons. The said company M/s. Hayagriv

Carbons was purchased in the year 2002, by the

Respondent Company. The Managing Director of

Respondent Company called the Petitioner and asked

him to continue to work in Hayagriv Carbons and

assured to pay the salary that the Petitioner was

drawing earlier. The Petitioner continued to work as

Supervisor in Hayagriv Carbons. Suddenly in the

month of December 2009, the said Hayagriv Carbons

was closed and the Respondent called the Petitioner

and orally informed him that Petitioner’s service

stand terminated with effect from 31-12-2009. No

reasons for the termination and no notice of

termination to the Petitioner sent Considering his

family situation and having no other option, the

Petitioner gave a resignation letter under coercion,

but, the Petitioner continued to work in the

Respondent Company from 01-01-2010 and collected

the outstanding dues to both Hayagriv Carbons and

MAS Computer Forms company from its customers

such as Girija Enterprices, Sakthi Traders, Sindhu

Agencies, S.S. Computers and Yasmin Traders. The

Respondent paid salary to the Petitioner only till

December 2009.

889

26 December 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

(ii) In the year 2012, MAS Computer Forms was

closed and the Managing Director of the Respondent

Company paid retrenchment benefits and other

benefits such as Gratuity, Bonus, etc., and retrenched

other employees and co-workers of the Petitioner.

The Respondent assured that he will not terminate

the service of the Petitioner and requested the

Petitioner to look after the collection of outstanding

dues of MAS Computers. Believing his words, the

petitioner continued to work in Respondent Company

and collected the company's outstanding dues till

2013. After collection work was over, when the

Petitioner approached the Respondent for job and

arreras of salary from January 2010. the Respondent

refused to gite any job'and stated that Petitioner

stands terminated from service. The Petitioner is

56 years old and he is unable to secure a job due to

his age. The Petitioner was last drawing a salary of

` 9,500+` 1,850 as House Rent Allowance till

December 2009. The Petitioner gave a Police

complaint dated 07-11-2013 against the Respondent,

but, the Police advised the Petitioner to approach the

Labour

Department

Court

and

issued

Non-Cognizance Report dated 13-11-2013.

(iii) The Petitioner gave petition to the Labour

Officer (Conciliation) on 18-12-2013 and 15-07-2014.

But, since the Respondent did not appear before the

Labour Officer, the Conciliation talks failed.

Therefore, the Petitioner prayed that this Court may

be pleased to pass an order directing the Respondent

to reinstate the Petitioner in service with back wages

from January 2010 till date of reinstatement and

directing the Respondent to regularize the services

of the Petitioner. Hence, the petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondent is as follows

The business establishment MAS Computer Forms

is only a partnership firm of which Thiru K. Mohan

and Thiru Sengupta are partners and it is not a

private limited company. As such the cause title of

the Respondent restablishment as described by the

Petitioner is wrong and needs rectification. The

Respondent has no knowledge about the “Petitioner’s

working as Supervisor from the year 1990 in M/s. Vetri

Carbons and his subsequent employment under

Ganesh Carbons and Ganesh Carbons as the

Management of the Respondent establishment had

nothing to do with the said establishments. When,

the Petitioner approached the Conciliation Officer

through representation dated 18.02.2013, he stated

that he had been employed in Hayagriv Carbons

from the year 1990 onwards which was an utter lie.

As such the Respondent filed reply version, dated

22-03-2014 to the Conciliation Officer pointing out

that the Industrial undertaking by name Hayagriv

Carbons was started only in the year 1997 (vide

Permanent Registration Certificate No. 590306028

dated 11-12-1998, issued by Director of Industries,

Pondicherry) and the date of commencement of

production of the above industry was 29-12-1997.

When, the above facts were proved by the

Respondent before the Conciliation Officer, the

Petitioner accepted the same. That is why before this

Court, he has not taken the plea that he was

employed in Hayagriv Carbons from the year 1990

onwards.

(ii) The Industrial undertaking by name Hayagriv

Carbons was taken over by the new Management on

16-08-2002 in which Mr. Jayaraman and Mrs. Kalpana

Mohan were partners which was originally conducted

by Mr. Jayaraman alone. As per the records

maintained by the said undertaking, the Petitioner

N. Punniyakodi was employed only from 16-08-2002

onwards upto 31-10-2009. After closure of the

undertaking Hayagriv Carbons, its machineries were

purchased by MAS Computers Forms and only

because of the trade relationship between the

Hayagriv Carbons and MAS Computer Forms, the

Petitioner Punniyakodi was given employment in

MAS Computer Forms from 01-11-2009, on

humanitarian grounds. The Petitioner Punniyakodi

did not come for employment after 31-12-2009 and he

did not submit any leave letter nor did he give any

information to the Respondent Management

regarding his absence subsequently. The Petitioner

submitted letter of resignation dated 13-01-2010

requesting the Management to settle his accounts as

he had to go to his native Village and requested the

Management to settle his accounts by payment of

the amounts due in his account to his wife P. Selvi.

The Petitioner used to collect the dues from the

various customers until he left his employment but

he has not handed over the amounts collected from

the customers to the Respondent.

(iii) The Management is not at fault in termination

of employment, as the Petitioner voluntarily choose

to put an to his employment by submitting his

resignation. The management has paid the arrears of

Wages, Leave Salary and other allowances due to

him. However, his termination benefits could not be

granted on account of his obligation to pay the

amounts due to the company. The Respondent

establishment was closed in the year 2012, but, the

Petitioner has made several mis-statement of facts in

this regard. The Respondent would like to submit

890

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

that in accordance with the provisions of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, it issued closure notice

and closed the Industry with effect from 11-06-2012.

It was challenged by the Registered Trade Union,

namely, the Pondicherry Branch of INTUC through

representation dated 19-06-2012. Thereafter the

Conciliation proceedings were initiated by the Labour

Officer (Conciliation) which endered in settlement

under section 12(3) of the ID Act resulting in

Payment of compensation to all the 22 workmen who

were in the payrolls of the Respondent Establishment.

Since, the Petitioner’s service with the Respondent

Establishment came to an end on 31-12-2009 itself by

virtue of his resignation, the notice of closure did

not refer to him. The abovesaid Trade Union did not

include the name of the Petitioner in the list of

employees eligible to get closure compensation. The

Petitioner is estopped from disputing the resignation

letter, he having requested the Respondent to settle

his accounts by paying the same to his wife and it

was acted upon by the Management.

(iv) There is no question of reinstatement of the

Petitioner with back wages as there was no

termination of services of the Petitioner by the

Respondent. Granting of the relief of reinstatement

is not possible as the very establishment is not in

existence, it having been closed in the year 2012

itself. Similarly, the prayer for regularizing the

services of the Petitioner deserves dismissal as a

person can be regularized only in a post which he

holds. Hence, the claim petition is liable to dismissed.

4. The brief averments of the additional counter

filed by the Respondent is as follows

Recently, the Respondent company has some to

know that the Petitioner did not come for employment

from January 2010 onwards only on account of his

active involvement in the business of sale of one time

carbon paper under the name and style of Lakshmi

Hayagriv Carbons. His wife Selvi being its sole

proprietor. The above business place is the same in

which originally establishment Hayagriv Carbons

dealing with one-time carbon paper was ruuntil

31-10-2009. The Petitioner was engaged in the

business activities in connection with Lakshmi

Hayagriv Carbons from the year 2010 onwards. But,

the Petitioner has suppressed the same and has made

a fraudulent claim against the Respondent for

reinstatement with back wages, alleging the

employment under the Respondent until the year

2013. The Respondent would like to point out that

the Petitioner has made a false claim with the ulterior

motive of getting unjust enrichment.

5. Reply Statement filed by the Petitioner side on

11-07-2022.

6. Industrial Dispute was taken on file under the

reference made by the Labour Department, Government

of Puducherry, over non-employment and other

settlement benefits. Both parties appeared in this

industrial dispute. Claim statement filed. Counter also

filed. In enquiry, PW1 was examined in Chief. No

exhibits were marked on the side of the Petitioner. Cross

examined. When, the matter is posted for further

Petitioner side evidence, as he did not produce further

witnesses on his side, it was closed by ihis Court on

11-10-2019. While, the matter was pending for

Respondent side evidence, petition to receive additional

counter filed in I.A. 02/2020 and same was allowed on

11-05-2020. Additional counter received. Reply

statement liied on 11-07-2022. Opportunities for

adducing additional evidence given. On Petitioner side

endorsement made as No additional evidence.

Respondent side evidence closed by this Court on

12-09-2022 as sufficient opportunities given to the

Respondent side. On petition, Respondent side

reopened as per the order passed in LA. 05/2023. RW1

examined. Ex. Rl to R13 marked. RW1 cross partly done.

When, the matter was posted for cross continuation of

RW1, the matter has been settled between the parties

and the Joint Compromise Memo entered between them

and same filed before this Court.

7. Heard both on 11-05-2023. Joint Compromise

Memo filed and submitted by both the Counsels

appearing for the parties of this Industrial Dispute that

Petitioner agreed to receive a sum of ` 60,000 towards

full and final settlement of the claim, payable by the

Respondent in 12 monthly installments of ` 5,000 per

month on or before 15th of every month. In view of the

Joint Compromise Memo and the submissions made by

both the parties and their respective Counsel. Award is

passed to the effect that Industrial Dispute is closed

as settled between the parties as per Joint Compromise

Memo, dated 11-05-2023. The said Joint Compromise

Memo, dated 11-05-2023 entered between the parties

shall form part and parcel of the Award. No costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this

the 18th day of May, 2023.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

891

26 December 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

List of petitioner’s witness:

PW.1 —

07-03-2018

Thiru N. Punniyakodi

List of petitioner’s exhibits : Nil

List of Respondent’s witness:

RW1

— 24-01-2023

Tmt. Bhuvaneswari, Ex.

Executive, H.R., Department

of Respondent Management.

List of Respondent’s Exhibits:

Ex.R1 — 11-12-1998

Photocopy

the

Permanent

Registration

Certificate.

Ex.R2 — 11-12-1998

Photocopy of the Certificate

Commencement

of]

business in respect of

establishment

Hayagriv

Carbons.

Ex.R3 — 31-12-2002

Photocopy of the Deed of

Partner

between

the

Partners in respect of the

Firm Hayagriv Carbons.

Ex.R4 — 01-08-2003

Photocopy

the

Partnership

Retirement

Deed between the Partners

in respect of the Firm

Hayagriv Carbons.

Ex.R5 — —

Photocopy of the ESI

Corporation

declaration

form

relating

the

Petitioner showing his date

of appointment in the

Respondent as 01-11-2009.

Ex.R6 — —

Photocopy of the Salary

Statement for the month of

December 2009 in respect of

Employees of the Respondent.

Ex.R7 — 13-01-2010

Photocopy

the

Resignation letter submitted

by the Petitioner to the

Respondent.

Ex.R8 —

Photocopy

the

Allowance Statement for

the months of December

2009 to January 2010.

Ex.R9 — 13-01-2010

Photocopy of the Cash/

Bank Debit Voucher for

settling Leave Salary of the

Petitioner by the Respondent.

Ex.R10 — 14-08-2009

Photocopy of the Invoice

raised by Hayagriv Carbons

in favour of Mrs. Yasmeen

Traders.

Ex.R11 — —

Photocopy of the TIN

verification in respect of

business

Lakshmi

Hayagriv Carbons.

Ex.R12 — —

Photocopy of the letter,

dated 13-01-2014 sent by

the

Labour

Officer

(Conciliation)

the

Respondent enclosing copy

of the representation dated

18-12-2013 of Petitioner.

Ex.R13 — 26-04-2014

Photocopy of the reply

submitted

the

Respondent to the Labour

Officer (Conciliation).

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 105/AIL/Lab./T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 1st December 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (T) No. 22/2022, dated

15-05-2023 of the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, in

respect of Dispute between the “Gencor Pacific Auto

Engineering Thozhilalargal Naam Thamizhar Thozhirsangam”,

against the management of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto

Engineering Private Limited, Puducherry, over unfair

labour practice to Transfer of Thiru T. Jayakumar has

been received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

892

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. V. SOFANA DEVI, M.L.,

Presiding Officer.

Monday, the 15th day of May 2023.

I.D. (T) No.22/2022

CNR. No. PYPY06-000044-2022

The President/Secretary,

Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering

Thozhilalargal Naam Thamizhar

Thozhirsangam,

(Reg. No. 1887/RTU/2021),

No. 21, Bank Street, Thirubuvanai,

Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Versus

The Managing Director,

M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering

Private Limited,

Plot No. A-25, PIPDIC Industrial Estate,

Electronic Park, Thirubuvanai,

Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This Industrial dispute coming on 20-04-2023 before

me for final hearing in the presence of Thiruvalargal

K. Velmurugan and P. Preethi, Counsels for the Petitioner,

Thiruvalargal L. Sathish, T. Pravin, S. Velmurugan,

E. Karthick, S. Sudarsanan and E. Madhivanan, Counsels

for the Respondent, and after hearing the both sides

and perusing the case records, this Court delivered the

following:

AWARD

This Industrial dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No. 43/Lab./AIL/T/2022, dated 21-03-2022 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry to resolve the following

dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz.,

(a) Whether the Dispute raised by the Petitioner’s

Union

“Gencor

Pacific

Auto

Engineering

Thozhilalargal Naam Thamizhar Thozhirsangam”,

against the Management of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto

Engineering

Private

Limited,

Thirubuvanai,

Puducherry, alleging that the Management has

indulged in unfair labour practice, against the Union

over transfer of Thiru T. Jayakumar, Secretary of the

Union by way of victimization is legal and justified?

If justified, to give appropriate direction to what

remedies to be entitled in this dispute?

(b) Whether the demand of the said Union over

non-recognition of Trade Union by the Management

of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Private

Limited, Puducherry is justified or not? If justified,

to give appropriate direction.

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred

in the claim petition:

On 28-12-2009 the Petitioner was appointed as

Operator by the Erstwhile management of

G.J. Engineering. Later the Management of

G.J. Engineering was taken over by the present

Respondent i.e., M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering

Private Limited and considering the unblemished

services of the Petitioner, the Respondent management

absorbed by the Respondent in its company vide

transfer-cum-revised appointment letter, dated

21-01-2011. The Petitioner along with other workmen

in the factory took initiative to start a Trade Union

during the month of April, 2021 and thereby Trade

Union by name M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering

Thozhilalargal Naam Thamizhar Thozhir Sangam was

registered before the Registrar of Trade Union,

Puducherry vide Registration No. 1887/RTU/2021.

(ii) The Plant head of the Respondent Factory

started threatening the office bearers and other

members of Petitioner’s Union saying that he will

transfer them to some other unit if they continue the

Trade Union activities any more further. The act of

the Respondent Management in curbing the lawful

trade union activities of the Petitioner Union is

unjustifiable, improper and illegal. An Advocate

notice, dated 10-06-2021 addressed both to the office

of the Labour Commissioner, Puducherry and to the

Plant Head of the Respondent Factory. Subsequently,

the Petitioner Union has given charter of demands

to the Plant Head of the Respondent Factory but he

willfully refused to receive the same. The Petitioner

has sent another Advocate notice, dated 21-06-2021

along with the charter of demands so as to hold

negotiation talks and thereby to arrive an amicable

settlement. The Respondent issued a reply notice,

dated 23-06-2021 with false and frivolous allegations.

The Petitioner Union has also given their

representation, dated 21-06-2021 to the Labour

Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry, raising various

charter of demands and thereby initiated the present

Industrial Dispute.

(iii) Pending Conciliation proceedings, the

Respondent with a mala fide intention and without

any administrative exigencies has issued transfer

order, dated 02-07-2021 to the Petitioner on

05-07-2021 through registered post and ordered the

893

26 December 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Petitioner to report to duty at Oragadam Unit,

Chennai from 07-07-2021 onwards without any

breathing time and thereby altered the service

conditions of the Petitioner discarding the provisions

of Industrial Dispute Act.

(iv) The Petitioner has filed Writ Petition before

the Hon’ble High Court of Madras under W.P. No.

16148/2021 against the illegal transfer of the

Respondent Management. The Hon’ble High Court

of Madras on 03-08-2021 has granted interim

injunction till 24-08-2021 against the Respondent

Management from altering the service conditions.

The Hon’ble High Court vide Order, dated 26-08-2021

has held that “if at all the 3rd Respondent/

Management intends to alter the service conditions

of the members of the Petitioner Union, such an

action shall be in accordance with law”.

(v) Meanwhile domestic enquiry proceedings

were conducted from 12-08-2021 onwards. Domestic

enquiry was not conducted in a fair and proper

manner. The Enquiry Officer without proper

appreciation of oral and documentary evidences

let-in by the Petitioner has mechanically submitted

his enquiry report, dated 31-12-2021 to the

Management concluding that most of the charges

against the petitioner were duly proved. The

Respondent Management vide letter, dated 06-01-2022

sought explanation from the Petitioner workman

furnishing a copy of the enquiry report. The Petitioner

has sent letter, dated 10-01-2022 through registered

post to the Plant Head of the Respondent Management

informing him that he has received the letter, dated

06-01-2022 by registered post only on 08-01-2022

alone and his Trade Union advisor was out of station

due to his personal works and hence the Petitioner

sought 15 days time to submit his detailed

explanation.

(vi) The Petitioner Workman has submitted his

explanation letter, dated 20-01-2022 refuting all the

charges levelled against him. The Respondent

Management has issued Dismissal order, dated

22-01-2022, against the Petitioner and thereby

imposed major punishment of Termination of services.

The Petitioner Union has raised the present

Industrial Dispute before the Labour Officer

(Conciliation) Puducherry, over illegal transfer of the

Petitioner Workman by the Respondent Management.

The Labour Officer (Conciliation) submitted his

failure report on 03-02-2022, following which the

Government of Puducherry, through the Labour

Department has made the reference of the dispute.

Hence, the petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondent is as follows:

Law thus, clearly mandates a trade union to have

atleast 10% of total strength of workers engaged in

any establishment or industry as its members for it

to function as Trade Union and when the Trade

Union looses such requisite numbers, its registration

is required to be cancelled under section 10(c) of

Trade Unions Act. Petitioner does not represent even

two or three workers of Respondent and hence, it has

no locus to seek recognition. Respondent has

already initiated steps for cancellation or registration

of Petitioner vide its letter, dated 13-11-2021.

(ii) The Petitioner doesn’t have the locus standi

to continue functioning as a Trade Union for it to

raise any industrial dispute. Petitioner in its claim

petition has not even pleaded the dates on which it

sought management's recognition and the date when

Respondent denied it. For an industrial dispute to be

referred to this Court for adjudication, there must

have been a demand made by the Union and it must

have been, denied by.the Respondent Management.

(iii) First of all, the allegation of unfair labour

practice cannot be raised as an industrial dispute for

adjudication before this Court. That there was

absolutely no mala fide intention on the part of the

Respondent in transferring Mr. Jayakumar to its Unit

No.1 to Oragadam, Chennai. It is true that Petitioner

Union got itself registered on 24.05.2021. However,

the intimation about formation of the trade union was

never given by the Petitioner directly. It received

such intimation only in July 2021 when the

Respondent received the original registration

certificate from the Labour Department and a notice

from Petitioner’s Advocate, dated 21-06-2021. Charter

of demands, demanding wage revision and other

benefits, even without holding the bare minimum

representative capacity and that too at a time when

the entire world was grappling with Covid and

Nationwide lockdown. The Petitioner also issued a

legal notice, filed writ petition and created all possible

troubles to the respondent to ensure that

Respondent factory do not function smoothly.

(iv) The transfer of T. Jayakumar has absolutely

no links or connection with the formation of Union

or any of the disputes raised by its Office bearers.

The transfer was purely innocuous for administrative

reasons and it was well within the powers of the

Respondent to transfer T. Jayakumar. He was in fact

transferred only because his service were required

at Oragadam unit of the Respondent. The transfer

was purely for administrative reasons and in terms

of contract of employment between Respondent and

T. Jayakumar.

894

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

( v ) C l a u s e 1 o f t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n o f

Mr. Jayakumar’s letter of appointment, dated

21-01-2011 as “Your (Petitioner) initial place of work

will be at our factory at PIPDIC Industrial Estate,

Thirubuvanai, Puducherry. However, the Management

of the company reserved its right to transfer or

depute you to any of its branches or factories or its

group companies in India or abroad at its sole

discretion and at its own terms irrespective of them

existing on the date of your appointment or not or

established thereafter. You may be given adequate

notice and helped to transit depending upon the

needs and demands of the circumstances”.

(vi) Mr. T. Jayakumar, who is an education youth

and who have previously worked in another

organization had read the entire offer of engagement,

understood scope of his employment, accepted the

same without demur or reservation by signing the

appointment order. Thus, the Petitioner was fully

aware that his job is transferable depending upon the

requirements of other units of Respondent. Therefore

there was absolutely no ill will or ill intentions in

transferring the Petitioner T. Jayakumar. Transfer is

an incident of service and the Petitioner is liable to

serve at all such places where the Respondent needs

his services and merely because Petitioner union had

raised a charter of demand and Mr. T. Jayakumar

happened to be a Secretary of the Union, it does not

proscribes the Respondent from transferring him as

per the terms of employment, especially, when his

presence was required at that point of time.

(vii) There is absolutely no mala fides in transfer

of Mr. T. Jayakumar as it has been done only in terms

of contract of employment with the Petitioner. The

contention of Petitioner that Mr. Jayakumar was

thereafter dismissed from service after a full fledged

domestic enquiry for his failure to receive the

transfer order and reporting to duty at the place of

transfer is not only false but totally irrelevant for the

purpose of this dispute. Hence, the claim petition is

liable to dismissed.

2. Notice served to both parties. Petitioner and

Respondent appeared through their Counsel. Claim

Statement filed. Counter also filed. The matter has been

posted to 09-05-2023 for enquiry. On 03-05-2023 an

application to advance the hearing filed by the

Respondent Counsel. The said application allowed on

04-05-2023 as there was no objection on the Petitioner

side. Hence, hearing was advanced to 04-05-2023 from

09-05-2023.

3. On 04-05-2023, both parties present with their

respective Counsel. Memo filed by the Petitioner to

record the settlement under section 18(1) of the ID Act.

The said Settlement also enclosed along with hearing

advance petition. Heard both on the settlement. Copies

of the Identity proof filed by the parties. In the memo

filed by the Petitioner requested for close the Industrial

Dispute as settled out of Court. In which notice has

given to the Respondent. In the said notice the

Respondent Counsel submitted as the matter is

comprehensively settled. Reference cannot be closed

and requested to pass an Award in terms of under

section 18(1) Settlement. Matter is posted on 10-05-2023

for hearing both the Counsel.

4. Heard both on 10-05-2023. In view of the memo

and the settlement ended between the parties under

section 18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, Award is

passed to the effect that Industrial Dispute is closed

as settled between the parties under section 18(1) of

Industrial Disputes Act. The Settlement, dated

02-05-2023 entered between the parties under section

18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 shall form part

and parcel of the Award. No costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this

the 15th day of May, 2023.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness: NIL

List of petitioner’s exhibits: NIL

List of respondent’s witnesses: Nil

List of respondent’s exhibits: Nil

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 97/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 29th November 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Ravikumar Distilleries Limited, Katterikuppam,

Puducherry and All India United Trade Union Centre,

over payment of Bonus for the year 2019-20 to

Thiruvalargal S.Vinayagamurugan and 40 other Workmen

in respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to

this order;

895

26 December 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991, of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall submit the

Award within 3 months from the date of issue of

reference as stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall

file a statement of claim complete with relevant

documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the

Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the

receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy

of such statement to each one of the opposite parties

involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner's

Union All India United Trade Union Centre against

the management of M/s. Ravikumar Distilleries

Limited, Katterikuppam, Puducherry, over payment of

Bonus @ ` 15,000 for the year 2019-2020 to

Thiruvalargal S.Vinayagamurugan and 40 other

Workmen (as mentioned in the Annexure) is legal and

justified? If justified, to give appropriate direction?

(ii) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

ANNEXURE

List of 41 Retrenched Workmen

Sl.

Name

No.

(1)

(2)

S.Vinayagamurugan, s/o. Subramani.

K.Manimegalai, w/o. Kaliaperumal.

V. Muniyammal, w/o. Venkatessan.

P. Gnanaselvi, w/o. Ramesh.

G. Sengeni, w/o. Ganesan.

E.Prema, w/o. Ezhumalai.

R.Dhanalakshmi, w/o. Ramesh.

V. Mahalakshmi, w/o. Ezhumalai.

E. Mahalakshmi, w/o. Ezhumalai.

A.Thangam, w/o. Arumugam.

K.Sumathi, w/o. Kumar.

S.Revathi, w/o. Sankar.

R.Sarasu, w/o. Ramu.

Porkalai, w/o. Ramadass.

P. Sangeetha @ Manimegalai, w/o. Palanisamy.

S. Sundari, w/o. Seenuvasan.

K. Uma, w/o. Krishnamoorthy.

M.Vanitha, w/o. Murugan.

S.Villiammal, w/o. Somu.

M. Egavalli, w/o. Mahalingam.

E.Saroja, w/o. Ezhumalai.

G.Sathya, w/o. Ganesh.

K. Davamani @ Kanniammal, w/o. Kaali.

M. Malar, w/o. Mannangatti.

N.Jaya, w/o. Nagalingam.

R. Jaya, w/o. Ramesh.

M.Parimala, w/o. Iyyappan.

S.Bhavani, w/o. Siva.

P. Lakshmi, w/o. Palanisamy.

K.Lakshmi, w/o. Karunamoorthy.

P. Kuppammal, w/o. Padmanaban.

V.Anjalatchi, w/o. Vinayagam.

J.Chitra, w/o. Janarthanan.

G.Chandra, w/o. Gunasekaran.

J. Jayalakshmi, w/o. Jayaraman.

A.Krishnaveni, w/o. Anbazhagan.

K.Kalaiselvi, w/o. Karthikeyan.

S.Valli, w/o. Sathyamoorthy.

A.Anjalai, w/o. Arjunan.

D.Agayavani, w/o. Dharman.

V. Karpagavalli, w/o. Veerappan.

(1)

(2)

896

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 98/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 29th November 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that

an industrial dispute has arisen between the

management of M/s. Ravikumar Distilleries Limited,

Katterikuppam, Puducherry and All India United Trade

Union Centre (AIUTUC), over non-employment of Thiru

S. Vinayagamurugan, in respect of the matter mentioned

in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the claim of the Management for

strict compliance of section 36 of Industrial Dispute

Act, 1947 is justified or not?

(b) If so, whether All India United Trade Union

Centre (AIUTUC) is having right to raise the dispute.

Union, All India United Trade Union Centre

(AIUTUC), against the management of M/s. Ravikumar

Distilleries Limited, Katterikuppam, Puducherry, over

reinstatement of Thiru S. Vinayagamurugan along

with back wages, continuity of service and all other

attendant benefits is justified or not? If justified,

what relief he is entitled to?

(d) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE

No. 4203/Ag./Estt./A1/2023/70/2429.

Puducherry, dated 11th December 2023.

NOTIFICATION

In continuation to the Final Seniority list of Fieldmen, issued vide this Department’s Notification No. 4203/

Ag./Estt./A1/2016, dated 17-11-2017, the Tentative Seniority of the 19 Fieldmen of this Department who were

subsequently appointed to the Post during the year 2018 to 2020 was circulated to all concerned calling for objections,

if any, to the Seniority proposed to be assigned to them vide this Department’s Memorandum No. 4203/Ag./Estt./

A1/2002/63, dated 26-10-2023.

2. As no objections were received, the Final Seniority of Fieldmen shall be as indicated in the Annexure to

this Notification.

(By order)

P.S. RAVICHANDRAN,

Deputy Director (Administration).

897

26 December 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

ANNEXURE

Sl. Seniority Name of the

Office in which

Date

Category Whether

Date of

Remarks

No.

Fieldman

working/worked

of birth

promotee/

regular/

direct

notinal

recruit

appointment

in the grade

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

Thiruvalargal:

212

D. Mahendiran

Office of the Additional

23-03-1963

Promotee

01-12-2018

Retired on

Director of Agriculture,

31-03-2023

Karaikal.

213

S. Kuppusamy

Office of the Additional

04-06-1960

Promotee

28-11-2018

Retired on

Director of Agriculture,

30-06-2020

Karaikal.

214

N. Bhaskaran

Office of the Additional

30-12-1964

Promotee

28-11-2018

—

Director of Agriculture

(T&V), Puducherry.

215

S. Sridhar

Office of the Additional

14-04-1964

Promotee

01-02-2018

—

Director of Agriculture,

Karaikal.

216

V. Pandian

Office of the Additional

30-05-1965 PwBD

Promotee

01-12-2018

—

Director of Agriculture,

Karaikal.

217

P. Govindasamy

Office of the Additional

09-05-1967

Promotee

01-12-2018

—

Director of Agriculture,

Karaikal.

218

A. Carounanidy

Office of the Additional

01-07-1962

Promotee

01-12-2018

Retired on

Director of Agriculture,

30-06-2022

Karaikal.

219

V. Sahadevan

Office of the Additional

01-06-1963

Promotee

01-12-2018

Retired on

Director of Agriculture,

31-05-2023

Karaikal.

220

L. Gunasekaran

Office of the Additional

15-03-1963

Promotee

29-11-2018

Retired on

Director of Agriculture

31-03-2023

(T&V), Puducherry.

221

K.V. Subba Rao Office of the Additional

03-07-1965

Promotee

06-12-2018

—

Director of Agriculture

(T&V), Puducherry.

222

E.V. Sunil Kumar

Office of the Deputy

10-06-1969

Promotee

03-12-2018

—

Director of Agriculture,

Mahe.

898

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

223

K.P. Sumesh Babu Office of the Deputy

10-06-1975 PwBD

Promotee

10-12-2018

—

Director of Agriculture,

Mahe.

224

K. Manoj

Office of the Additional

01-06-1972

Promotee

24-12-2018

Expired on

Director of Agriculture

14-06-2021

(T&V), Puducherry.

225

P. Coumarane

Office of the Additional

01-12-1961

Promotee

10-07-2020

Retired on

Director of Agriculture

30-11-2021

(T&V), Puducherry.

226

M. Rajendiran Office of the Additional

04-07-1960

Promotee

10-07-2020

Retired on

Director of Agriculture

31-07-2020

(T&V), Puducherry.

227

S. Mouttayen Office of the Additional

02-04-1962

Promotee

10-07-2020

Retired on

Director of Agriculture

30-04-2022

(T&V), Puducherry.

228

E. Murugan Office of the Additional

01-02-1975

Promotee

10-07-2020

—

Director of Agriculture

(T&V), Puducherry.

229

Ibrahim

Office of the Additional

08-10-1972

Promotee

10-07-2020

—

Khalilulla Khan

Director of Agriculture

(T&V), Puducherry.

230

K. Latchoumanane Office of the Additional

29-12-1970

Promotee

10-07-2020

—

Director of Agriculture

(T&V), Puducherry.

————

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

Thiruvalargal:

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIES AND

CONSUMER AFFAIRS, PUDUCHERRY

(G.O. Ms. No. 07, Puducherry, dated 13th December 2023)

NOTIFICATION

The resignation tendered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice

R. Pongiappan (Retd.), President, State Consumer

Disputes Redressal Commission, Puducherry vide Letter

No. 332/SCDRC/2023, dated 24-11-2023, is hereby

accepted by the Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry and

accordingly, Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Pongiappan (Retd.)

is relieved of his duties, with immediate effect.

(By order)

D. DAYALANE,

Under Secretary to Government

(Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

HEALTH SECRETARIAT

(G.O. Ms. No. 63, Puducherry, dated 18th December 2023)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation of 65 years,

Dr. D. Reddappa, Senior Chief Medical Officer, Indira

Gandhi Government General Hospital and Postgraduate

Institute, Puducherry, is admitted into retirement with

effect from the afternoon of 31-12-2023.

(By order)

K. CANDANE @ SIVARADJANE,

Under Secretary to Government

(Health).

899

26 December 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 83, Puducherry, dated 18th December 2023)

NOTIFICATION

In pursuance of the Office Order (VII) No. 46011-l-2019-

IFS-I (AGMUT) (Part-I), dated 04-12-2023 of the

Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change,

New Delhi, Shri G. Sathiyamoorthy, I.F.S. (AGMU:2010),

Deputy Conservator of Forests, Puducherry, officiating

as Project Director, DRDA, Puducherry, is relieved from

this Administration with immediate effect to take up his

new assignment in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands

Administration.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

RAJEEV VERMA,

Chief Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 84,

Puducherry, dated 18th December 2023)

NOTIFICATION

In pursuance of the Order No. 14016/12/2022. UTS-I,

dated 20-11-2023 of the Ministry of Home Affairs,

New Delhi and on having reported for duty in this

Administration on the forenoon of 15-12-2023,

Shri Soma Sekhar Apparao Kotaru, I.A.S., (AGMUT:

2021) is posted as Sub-Collector, Revenue (South),

Puducherry, with immediate effect.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

RAJEEV VERMA,

Chief Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (HOUSING)

(G.O.Ms. No. 18/2023-Hg,

Puducherry, dated 19th December 2023)

NOTIFICATION

In exercise of the powers conferred under rule 11 of

Criminal Civil Service (CCA) Rules, 1965, the

Disciplinary Authority imposed the major penalty of

‘Compulsory Retirement’ on Thiru D. Rajendran, Junior

Town Planner (under suspension), Town and Country

Planning Department, Karaikal, with immediate effect,

vide Order No. C.13012/8/2017-C.V.O./3739, dated

24-11-2023 of the Chief Vigilance Office, Confidential and

Cabinet Department, Puducherry.

2. Accordingly, Thiru D. Rajendran, Junior Town

Planner (under suspension), Town and Country Planning

Department, Karaikal, is imposed with major penalty of

‘Compulsory Retirement’ with effect from the afternoon

of 24-11-2023.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE,

Under Secretary to Government (Housing).

√VÌÏ ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m, Amﬂºƒˆ

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

g√›>V™

WÆk™∫Ô^

∂§s©A

ˇµz§©∏¶©√‚|^· Â√ÏÔ^ √VÌÏ ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›][ ®_ÁÈ¬z^ ∏[kÚD ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á>

∂Á\›m¬ÿÔV^· ÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›][ ∂–\] ºkı|˛≈VÏÔ^.

kˆÁƒ

sıð©√>V´ˆ[

WÆk™D ∂Á\B

c›º>E¬Ô©√‚|^·

º>ÁkBV™

g‚Ôπ[

®ı

ÿ√BÏ �ÆD xÔkˆ

c^· ÷¶›][ xÔkˆ

WÆk™› >BVˆ©A/

t[ ]≈[ ®ıË¬ÁÔ

ÿƒFxÁ≈

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

]Ú. K. Â¶´V¤[

M/s. p ˛ÚiðV ©º·VÏ

“WÈ¬Ô¶ÁÈ cÁ¶›m

3.00

(cˆÁ\BV·Ï),

�ÆD gl_ t_,

®ıÿðlÁ™

z]Á´›

Â√ÏÔ^

®ı 6, √ÁwB ∂ﬁƒ_

®ı 23, √V´] ÂÔÏ (sˆ°),

∏aÕm ®|›>_”

]≈[

∂KkÈÔ T],

˛Ú\VD√V¬ÔD,

(\´ﬂÿƒ¬z)

˛Ú\VD√V¬ÔD,

√VÌÏ ÿÔVDR[, Amﬂºƒˆ.

900

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

]Ú. ÿ¤. Ê–kVƒ[

M/s. Ê– ˛´V∏¬¸,

“ΩÁƒM∫ �ÆD

3.00

(cˆÁ\BV·Ï),

∏ˆıΩ∫ �ÆD ΩÁƒM∫,

∏ˆıΩ∫ (∏·¬¸

z]Á´›

Â√ÏÔ^

®ı 16, ∂‡´ÔV´D T],

º√VÏ‚¸ �ÆD

]≈[

√VÌÏ, Amﬂºƒˆ.

º√™Ï¸)”.

1973ágD gı| Amﬂºƒˆ ˛´V\D �ÆD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m¬Ô^ ƒ‚¶›][ JÈ\VF Amﬂºƒˆ Œ[§B›m

g‚E©√´©∏_ ∂xÈV¬Ô©√‚¶ Amﬂºƒˆ ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m¬Ô^ (cˆ\D �ÆD ∂–\] ∂π›>_) s]Ô^, 1976,

∏ˆ° 11á[√Ω ÷›ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á> WÆ°k]™V_ cı¶VzD g‚ºƒ√Á™Ô^ ∞º>–D ÷ÚÕ>V_, ∂kuÁ≈ ÷Õ>

∂§s©A ÿkπBV™ º>]loÚÕm √]Á™Õm ÂV‚Ô”¬z^ √VÌÏ ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m gÁðBÏ ∂kÏÔ”¬z ®ø›m

JÈ\VF ÿ>ˆB©√|›mD√Ω ºÔ‚|¬ÿÔV^·©√|˛≈m.

z§©∏‚¶ ÔVÈkÁ´BÁ≈¬z^ ÿ√≈©√‚¶ g‚ºƒ√Á™Ô^ ÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›>V_ √ˆÊo¬Ô©√|D.

√VÌÏ, ÂV^ : 8 ΩƒD√Ï 2023.

´V.

´V. ÔVÏ›]ºÔB[,

ÔVÏ›]ºÔB[,

gÁðBÏ.

————

BAHOUR COMMUNE PANCHAYAT, PUDUCHERRY

Bahour, dated 08th December 2023.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned persons have requested for permission to set up the following industries within the

Bahour Commune Panchayat limits as detailed below:

Sl.

Name and address

Address of the

Industry

Power

No. of

No.

of the applicant

industry site

proposed

required

workers

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Thiru K. Natarajan

M/s. Sri Krishna flour and Oil Mill

“Cold pressed

3.00 H.P.

(Proprietor),

No.23, Bharathi Nagar (Extn.),

Oil Machinery”

Nos.

No. 6, Old Post Office

Kirumampakkam,

(Marasekku)

Street, Kirumampakkam,

Bahour Commune,

Puducherry.

Thiru J. Srinivasan

M/s. Seenu Graphics

“Designing and

3.00 H.P.

(Proprietor),

Printing and Designing,

Printing”

Nos.

No. 16, Agragaram Street,

No.16, Agragaram Street,

(Flex Boards and

Bahour, Puducherry.

Banners)

In conformity with rule 11 of the Puducherry Commune Panchayats (Grant of Licences and Permissions) Rules,

1976, promulgated in this Union territory by the Puducherry Village and Commune Panchayats Act, 1973, objections,

if any, to the setting up of the above industries, are invited to reach the Commissioner, Bahour Commune

Panchayat, within fifteen days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections so received within the specified period will be considered by this Commune Panchayat.

R. CARTIQUEYANE,

Commissioner.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

901

26 December 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

ÿÂ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m, Amﬂºƒˆ

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

∂§s©A

∂Á\›m¬ÿÔV^· ÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›][ ∂–\] ºkı|˛≈VÏ.

kˆÁƒ

sıð©√>V´ˆ[

WÆk™D ∂Á\B

c›º>E¬Ô©√‚|^·

º>ÁkBV™

g‚Ôπ[

®ı

ÿ√BÏ �ÆD xÔkˆ

c^· ÷¶›][ xÔkˆ

WÆk™› >BVˆ©A/

t[]≈[

®ıË¬ÁÔ

ÿƒFxÁ≈

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

]Ú. P. ´sz\VÏ

M/s. ´s ºÈ› ÿkVÏ¬¸,

Ô‚Ω¶¬ ÔÁÈ �ÆD

05 Â√Ï

>/ÿ√. √›\ÂV√[,

ÿ√V§lB_

z]Á´›

(ÿ√Vm

Ô>° ®ı 12, ÿ>uz T],

ºÔVÏ¬ÔV| kÚkVF ˛´V\D, Â¶kΩ¬ÁÔÔ^,

]≈[.

√ËxÁ≈).

ºÂVðV∫z©√D,

ÿ>Va_O‚√ ºƒV>Á™

Amﬂºƒˆá605 007.

Amﬂºƒˆ,

�ÆD √z©√VF°

1973ágD gı| Amﬂºƒˆ ˛´V\D �ÆD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m¬Ô^ ƒ‚¶›][ JÈ\VF Amﬂºƒˆ Œ[§B›m

∏ˆ° 11á[ √Ω ÷›ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á> WÆ°k]™V_ cı¶VzD g‚ºƒ√ÁðÔ^ ∞º>–D ÷ÚÕ>V_, ∂kuÁ≈

Ô.

Ô.Ô.

Ô.

Ô. ´º\i,

´º\i,

gÁðBÏ.

————

NETTAPAKKAM COMMUNE PANCHAYAT, PUDUCHERRY

Nettapakkam, dated 12th December 2023.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested permission to set up the following industry within the

Nettapakkam Commune Panchayat limits as detailed below.

Sl.

Name and

Address of the

Industry

Power

No. of

No.

address of

industry site

proposed

required

workers

the applicant

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1. Thiru P. Ravikumar

M/s. Ravi Lathe Works,

Architecture and

S/o. Padmanaban,

No. 64, Abdulkalam Avenue,

engineering activities,

H.P.

(General

Door No.12, South Street,

Korkadu Revenue Village,

technical testing and

shift).

Nonankuppam,

Nettapakkam Commune,

analysis

Puducherry-605 007.

Puducherry.

In conformity with rule 11 of the Puducherry Commune Panchayats (Grant of Licences and Permissions)

Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union territory by the Puducherry Village and Commune Panchayats Act, 1973,

objections, if any, to the setting up of the above industry, are invited to reach the Commissioner, Nettapakkam

Commune Panchayat within ten days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections, so received within the specified period will be considered by this Commune Panchayat.

C. RAMESH,

Commissioner.

902

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

AFFIDAVIT

I, Anandou, son of Mannar, aged 65 years and

residing at the house bearing Door No. 124, Lourde Apartment,

Kandappa Mudaliar Street, Puducherry-605 001, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm to whomsoever it may

concern as follows:

1. That my name has been entered as ‘Anandou’

in my Birth Certificate under Registration No. 425,

issued by Ariyankuppam Commune Panchayat,

Puducherry.

2. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Anwar Basha’ in my Aadhaar Card No. xxxx xxxx 2718,

issued by Unique Identification Authority of India.

3. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Anandan Mannangadi’ in my Permanent Account

No. (PAN) AHLPA2288E, issued by Income-tax

Department, Government of India.

4. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Anwar Basha’ in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card

No. JTP0488999, issued by Election Commission of

India.

5. I state that my name has been entered as

‘g™Õ>[’ in the Family Ration Card No. 114227,

issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and

Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

6. I hereby state that my name is mentioned as

‘∂[kÏ √V≠V’ in my Religious Conversion Certificate,

issued by Puducherry State Wakf Board, Government

of Puducherry.

7. I hereby declare that my name is mentioned as

‘M. g™Õ>[ (®) ∂[kÏ √V≠V’, dated 28-01-2016, in

my Nikka Certificate, issued by Chellancheri Jama,

Attharkal, Cuddalore Taluk, Thennarkadu District,

Tamil Nadu.

8. I declare that all the abovesaid names viz.,

‘Anandou’, ‘Anwar Basha’, ‘Anandan’, ‘g™Õ>[’

and ‘∂[kÏ √V≠V and M. g™Õ>[ (®) ∂[kÏ √V≠V’

are denoting one and same person i.e., referring

myself only.

9. Further, I declare that hereinafter, I shall be

called, known and distinguished only by the name

‘Anwar Basha’ for all my official and private purposes.

10. I declare that what are all stated above is

true and there is no suppression or misrepresentation

of the facts.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry on this 19th day of

December 2023.

562570

ANANDAN.

AFFIDAVIT

I, S.V. Yogasri Yogammal, daughter of Sundramoorthy,

wife of Varatharasu, Indian inhabitant, aged 58 years and

residing at the house bearing Door No. 34, Madukarai

Main Road, Pudukuppam, Puducherry-605 106, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may

concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Elector’s Photo Identity Card under No. YBP0104711,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Yogashri @

Yogammal (ºBVÔp ® ºBVÔD\V^)’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 0375,

my name has been mentioned as ‘V Yogasri Yogammal

(k ºBVÔp ºBVÔD\V^)’.

In the Office Identity Card, issued by the

Department of Women and Child Development,

Puducherry, my name has been mentioned as

‘S. Yogammal’.

In the Bio-Data submitted for Office employment,

my name has been mentioned as ‘S. Yogammalle’.

In the PAN Card under No. ALSPY3829L, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Yogashri alias Yogammal’.

In the Marriage Invitation my name has been

mentioned as ‘ºBVÔp (®) S.ºBVÔD\V^’.

In the particulars of members in the Family Ration

Card under No. 322867, my name has been mentioned

as ‘ºBVÔp’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names ‘Yogashri @ Yogammal’, ‘V Yogasri

Yogammal’, ‘S. Yogammal’, ‘S. Yogammalle’, ‘Yogashri

alias Yogammal’, ‘ºBVÔp ® ºBVÔD\V^’, ‘ k ºBVÔp

ºBVÔD\V^’, ‘ºBVÔp (®) S.ºBVÔD\V^’ and ‘ºBVÔp’

are referred, identified and relate to one and the same

person, that is me, the deponent herein.

I state that, what are all stated in the above paragraphs

are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,

belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of

December 2023.

562571

S.V. YOGASRI YOGAMMAL.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Saranya K, wife of Santhosh Kalyan Nambiar, aged

29 years and residing at No. VI 463 B Sayoojyam, Near

Keezhanthoor Temple, Chalakkara, Mahe-673 311 and

presently camedown to Puducherry, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

903

26 December 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Saranya. K’

in my S.S.L.C. Mark Sheet bearing Certificate

No. K-080741, issued by the Secretary, Board of

Public Examinations, Kerala and in my H.S.C. Mark

Sheet bearing Certificate No. HSE 1493372, issued by

the Board of Higher Secondary Examinations,

Government of Kerala.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Saranya, K’ in

my Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery

(Ayurvedacharya) vide Certificate Register No. 13AY0032,

issued by Pondicherry University, Puducherry.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Dr. Saranya. K’

in my Medical Registration Certificate vide

Registration No. 1459, issued by Tamil Nadu Board

of Indian Medicine, Chennai.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Saranya K’

in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 3456, issued

by Unique Identification Authority of India.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Saranya K’ in

my PAN Card No. HWJPS2545Q, issued by

Income-tax Department, Government of India.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Saranya. K’ in

my Hindu Marriage Register under Serial Number of

Marriage 2304120222 of year 2023, issued by the

Sub-Registrar, Thirukkanur, Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned in Malayalam

version as ‘Saranya’ in our Family Ration Card

vide No. 003067, issued by the Regional

Administrator, Mahe, Puducherry State.

Further, I state that I have now changed my name

as ‘Saranya K Nambiar’ for numerological and

sentimental reasons.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that the abovesaid

names, i.e., ‘Saranya. K’, ‘Saranya, K.’, ‘Dr. Saranya. K’,

‘Saranya K’, ‘Saranya. K’ and ‘Saranya’ (in Malayalam)

are referred, identified and relate to one and same

person that is myself only. Hereinafter, I shall be

known and identified only by the name ‘Saranya K

Nambiar’ for all purposes.

I hereby declare that I shall at all times hereinafter

in all records, deeds and writings and in all

proceedings, dealings and transactions private as

well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign

my name as ‘Saranya K. Nambiar’ in place and in

substitution of my former names.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of

December 2023.

562572

SARANYA K.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Santhi Sekar, wife of Jaganathan Segar Sekar,

Service No. 618170, Ex-CPL, aged 60, residing at No. 7,

2nd Cross Street, Puthu Nagar, Thattanchavady Post,

Villianur, Puducherry-605 110, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this

affidavit on behalf of me.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Santhi Sekar’

in my husband’s Pension Payment Order, issued by

the Office of the Dy. C.D.A. (A.F) New Delhi, bearing

P.P.O. No. 08/14/B/20350/1988.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Santhi’ in my

Husband’s Pension Payment Order, issued by the

Office of the Directorate of Accounts and Treasuries

Puducherry, P.P.O. No. 23618, 19-10-2012.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Santhe’ in my

husband’s Discharge Certificate Book, issued by the

Indian Air Force.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Santhi’ in my

Bank Passbook, issued by the State Bank of India,

Villianur Branch, Puducherry, bearing Account No.

XXXXXXX3889.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Santhi’ in my

Elector’s Photo Identity Card, issued by Election

Commission of India, bearing No. YIQ0197384.

I state that my name is entered as ‘ƒVÕ] (®) Ôwo’

in the Family Ration Card, issued by the Department

of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry

bearing No. 122563.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Santhi’ in my

Birth Certificate issued by the Villianur Commune

Panchayat, Villianur, Puducherry under Registration

No. M/1963/00027.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Santhi’ in my

Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India bearing No. XXXX XXXX 0477.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Santhi’ in my

PAN Card, issued by the Income-tax Department,

Government of India bearing No. KYVPS1324C.

I submit that the names described in the abovesaid

records as ‘Santhi Sekar’, ‘Santhe’, ‘Santhi’, and

‘ƒVÕ] (®) Ôwo’ are referring one and the same

person i.e., myself only.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is ‘Santhi’

only.

The above statements in the foregoing paragraphs

are true the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 13th day of December 2023.

562573

SANTHI SEKAR.

904

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

AFFIDAVIT

I, V.Venkatesan, son of Velayoudam, aged 57 years

and residing at No. 12, Fifth Cross Street, Sankaradass

Swamigal Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry-605 008,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on

oath as follows:

1. That my name has been entered as

‘Vengadessin’ in my Birth Certificate under

Registration No. P/1966/04493, issued by Pondicherry

Municipality, Puducherry.

2. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Vengadessin’ in my Livret de Famille (Marriage

Certificate) under S.R.N. No. 67402, issued by

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry.

3. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Vengadessin’ in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card

under No. PY/01/001/054065, issued by the Election

Commission of India.

4. I state that my name has been entered as

‘V.Venkatesan’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX

2566, issued by Unique Identification Authority of

India.

5. I state that my name is entered as

‘V.Venkatesan’ in my Employee Identity Card, vide

Emp. Code: PWB028, issued by the Executive

Engineer, Buildings and Roads (Central) Division,

Public Works Department, Puducherry.

6. I state that my name has been entered as

‘V.Venkatesan’ in my PAN Card No. AHWPV3544P,

issued by Income-tax Department, Government of

India.

7. I state that my name has been entered as

‘ÿk∫Ôº¶ƒ[’ in my Family Ration Card No. 057450,

issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and

Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

8. Hence, I declare that all the abovesaid

names viz., i.e., ‘Vengadessin’, ‘V.Venkatesan’ and

‘ÿk∫Ôº¶ƒ[’ are referring one and same person, i.e.,

myself only.

9. I declare that what are all stated above is true

and there is no suppression or misrepresentation of

the facts.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 15th day of

December 2023.

562575

V.VENKATESAN.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Mohamed Mubeen, son of Mohamed Ruknudeen

and Mehaiounnissa, aged 24 years, Muslim, Engineer,

residing at No. 78, Masthan Palli Street, Karaikal, do

hereby solemnly sincerely affirm and state on oath as

follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I was born at Karaikal on 27-08-1999 and my birth

has been duly recorded under Birth Registration No.

K/1999/03424 with Karaikal Municipality, Karaikal. In

my said Birth Certificate my name is registered as

‘Mohamed Mubeen’. In my Diploma in Civil

Engineering Certificate, dated 19-06-2017, issued by

State Board of Technical Education and Training,

Chennai, my name is entered as ‘Mohamed

Mubeen.M’. In my Indian Passport under No.

U9943221, my surname is written as ‘Mohamed’, my

given name is written as ‘Mubeen’ in my Aadhaar

Card No. XXXX XXXX 3459 and in my Transfer

Certificate, dated 05-05-2017, issued by Karaikal

Polytechnic College, Karaikal, my name is entered as

‘Mohamed Mubeen’. And whereas, in my Family

Ration Card under No. 198497, issued by Department

of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Karaikal, my

name is entered as ‘xÔ\m x∏[’.

I hereby declare that I relinquish all my abovesaid

names and I shall henceforth, be known, called and

identified only as ‘Mohamed Mubeen Mohamed

Ruknudeen’.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Karaikal, on this 15th day of December 2023.

562577

MOHAMED MUBEEN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Prabu Kaliyan, son of Kaliyan, aged 33 years

No. 37, Kamban Street, Radhakrishnan Nagar,

Ariyankuppam, Puducherry-605 007, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may

concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Birth Certificate under Registration No. AC/A/1990/

415, PIC Form No. PY/TOP/43/0010720, Passport No.

Z4714805 and Electoral Identity Card No.

ZQJ0005603, my name has been mentioned as

‘Prabu’.

In my Higher Secondary Course Certificate and

Secondary School Leaving Certificate, my name has

been mentioned as ‘Prabu.K’.

905

26 December 2023]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 1590,

PAN Card No. GSNPP6390D, and in the Indian

National Database of Seafarers Certificate, my name

has been mentioned as ‘K.Prabu’.

In my Proficiency in Fire Prevention and Fire

Fighting, Proficiency in Personal Safety and Social

Responsibilities, Proficiencyin Elementary First Aid,

Proficiency in Personal Survival Techniques

Certificates, issued by the AMET University and

Study Certificate, issued by the AMET University,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Kaliyan Prabu’.

In my Profiles up to February 2016, issued by the

AMET University, Summary of attainment up to

February 2016, issued by the AMET University and

Diploma Certificate, issued by the AMET University,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Prabu Kaliyan’.

In the details of the family member in the Family

Ration Card under No. 00174, my name has been

mentioned as ‘∏´A’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

I sate that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Prabu Kaliyan (∏´A

ÔoB[)’ for all purposes.

Hence, I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 19th day of

December 2023.

562578

K. PRABU KALIYAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, K. Vinayagamoorthy (Aadhaar No. XXXX XXXX

9325), son of Krishnamoorthy, Hindu, aged about

39 years and presently residing at No. 16, Fourth Cross

Street, Thirukameeswarar Nagar, Villianur and Post,

Nettapakkam Commune, Puducherry-605 110, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on oath as

follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I state that I am originally named and spelled as

‘Vinayagamoorthy’ and the same has been mentioned

in my Aadhaar Card bearing Aadhaar No. XXXX

XXXX 9325, issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India, in my Elector’s Photo Identity

Card bearing Sl.No. JZL0322016, issued by the

Election Commission of India, in my School Transfer

Certificate bearing Sl. No. 71000, Admission No. 7520,

issued by the Vivekanda Government Boys’ Higher

Secondary School, Villianur, Puducherry and in my

Family Ration Card as ‘sÂVBÔJÏ›]’ bearing Card

Sl.No. 206254, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

I state that in my Driving Licence, my name has

been mentioned as ‘Vinayagam’ bearing D.L.No. PY-

01-20032311, dated 05-05-2023 India Driving Licence

(Pondicherry) duly, issued by the Assistant Licensing

Authority, Transport Department, Puducherry.

I state that my names mentioned in the aboved

said records as ‘Vinayagam’, ‘Vinayagamoorthy’and

‘sÂVBÔJÏ›]’ are belonging and referring one and

the same person of myself only and not any other

person.

I declare that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name with initial and spelling

as ‘K.Vinayagamoorthy (K. sÂVBÔJÏ›])’ for all

purposes.

The above deposition is true and correct to the

best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing

materials have been concealed thereon. The contents

of the above affidavit has been read out and

explained to me in Tamil.

Solemnly affirmed, and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 20th day of December 2023.

562579

K. VINAYAGAMOORTHY.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Guida @ Geetha, daughter of Nadessane, wife of

Jayachandiran, Hindu, aged about 46 years and residing

at No. 2, Kuruvanpet, Madukarai, Puducherry-605 105,

solemnly affirm as under :

That I am the deponent herein.

I state that in my Birth Certificate vide

Registration No. 111, issued by the Mannadipet

Commune Panchayat, Thirubuvanai, Puducherry, my

name is mentioned as ‘Guida’.

Further, I state that in my Aadhaar Card vide

No. XXXX XXXX 8990, issued by Unique Identification

Authority of India, my name is mentioned as ‘J. Geetha’.

Further, I state that in my Elector’s Photo Identity

Card No. AJJ0097394, issued by Election Commission

of India, my name is mentioned as ‘Getha’.

Further, I state that in the Family Ration Card,

issued by the Department of Civil Supplies and

Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, my name is mentioned

as ‘ˇ>V’.

906

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[26 December 2023

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

Further, I state that in my Secondary School

Leaving Certificate, issued by the Secretary, Board

of Secondary Education, Tamil Nadu, my name is

mentioned as ‘Guida N’.

Further, I state that in the Higher Secondary

Course Certificate, issued by the Secretary, State

Board of School Examinations (HR.SEC) Tamil Nadu,

my name is mentioned as ‘Guida J’.

Further, I state that in my Degree Certificate and

Transfer Certificate, issued by Annamalai University,

my name is mentioned as ‘Guida N’.

Further, I state that in the Memorandum of

Appointment, issued by Indira Gandhi Medical

College and Research Institute, Puducherry, my name

is mentioned as ‘Geetha. J’.

Further, I state that I have obtained Certificate of

Identity from the Hon’ble Principal District Munsif,

Puducherry vide C.M.P No. 86/2023, dated 22-06-2023,

the Certificate was issued declaring the name ‘Guida’,

‘Guida N’, ‘Guida J’, ‘J Geetha’ and ‘Geetha. J’ are

referring one and the same person i.e., myself only.

Further, I state that the names ‘J Geetha’ as found

in my Aadhaar Card, ‘Guida’ as found in my Birth

Certificate, ‘Guida N’ as found in the Secondary

School Leaving Certificate, Transfer Certificate and

Degree Certificate, ‘Guida J’ as found in my Higher

Secondary Course Certificate, ‘Getha’ as found in

Elector’s Photo Identity Card, ‘ˇ>V’ as found in the

Family Ration Card and ‘Geetha. J’ as found in my

Memorandum of Appointment, are referring one and

the same person i.e., myself only. Hereinafter, I shall

be known and identified by name ‘Guida @ Geetha’.

I do hereby further undertake that I have not

concealed any true facts or misrepresented and the

facts stated above are true to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information, and nothing has

been concealed therein.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 16th day of December 2023.

562585

J. GEETHA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, M Santhiya, wife of Muthukumaran, aged 33 years

and residing at the house bearing Door No. 05, Bharathi

Street, M G R Salai, Ananthapuram, Ariyur, Puducherry-

605 102, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm to

whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That my name has been entered as ‘Santhiya’ in

my Birth Certificate under No. B-2022:

33-14362-000001, issued by Kulathur Village

Panchayat, Villupuram TK and District, Tamil Nadu.

2. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Santhiya’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX

2283, issued by Unique Identification Authority of

India.

3. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Santhiya’ in the Permanent Account No. (PAN)

FZYPS0822N, issued by the Income-tax Department,

Government of India.

4. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Santhiya’ in the Elector’s Photo Identity Card

No. XGI0145318, issued by Election Commission of

India.

5. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Santhiya (ƒÕ]BV)’ in the Family Ration Card

No. 208356, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

6. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Sandhiya K’ in my 10th Mark Statement vide

Registration No. 510387, issued by the Secretary,

State Board of School Examinations, Government of

Tamil Nadu.

7. I state that my name has been entered as

‘K. ƒÕ]BV’ in my Transfer Certificate, issued by the

Headmaster, Government High School, Kandamanadi,

Villupuram District, Government of Tamil Nadu.

8. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Sandiya.K’ in my Office Order vide Emp. No. 1834,

issued by the Pondicherry Co-op. Milk Producers’

Union Limited, Puducherry.

9. Hence, I declare that all the abovesaid names

viz., ‘Santhiya’, ‘ƒÕ]BV’, ‘Sandhiya K’, ‘K. ƒÕ]BV’

and ‘Sandiya.K’ are denoting one and same person,

i.e., referring myself only.

10. Further, I declare that hereinafter, I shall be

called, known and distinguished only by the name

‘M. Santhiya’ for all my official and private purposes.

11. I declare that what are all stated above is true

and there is no suppression or misrepresentation of

the above facts.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 21st day of

December 2023.

562588

M. SANTHIYA.