[181]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

182

Sentence arbitral du Travail

.. 182

Award of the Labour Court .. 182

de Tribunal

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^/

188

l’ Notifications/Orders du

.. 188

Government Notifications/ .. 188

gÁðÔ^

Gouvernement

Orders

Œ©√ ∂§s©AÔ^

192

Avis d’ appel d’ offres

.. 192

Tender Notices

.. 192

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

193

Etablissements dangereux

.. 193

Dangerous Establishments

193

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

194

Annonces

.. 194

Announcements

194

]Ú›>D

198

Corrigendum

.. 198

Corrigendum

.. 198

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2024 }

∏©´kˆ |

27 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Février

2024 (8 Phalguna 1945)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

27th

February

2024

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

182

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[27 February 2024

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 124/AIL/Lab./T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 11th December 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 12/2019, dated

12-05-2023 of the Labour Court, Puducherry, in respect

of dispute between the M/s. Shree Mother Plast India

Private Limited, Thirubuvanai, Puducherry and

Thiru T. Sivakumar, Madagadipet Post, Puducherry,

over non-employment has been received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the Notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. V. SOFANA DEVI, M.L.,

Presiding Officer.

Friday, the 12th day of May, 2023.

I.D. (L). No. 12/2019

CNR. No. PYPY06-000018-2019

Sivakumar,

S/o. Thulasingam,

No. 48, Main Road, DBG Nagar,

Kalitheerthalkuppam,

Madagadipet Post,

Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

vs.

The Managing Director,

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Nos. A-43 to A-48,

PIPDIC Electronic Park,

Thirubuvanai, Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on 12-05-2023 before me

for final hearing in the presence of Thiru S. Asokkumar,

Counsel for the Petitioner, Thiru R. Ilancheliyan,

Counsel for the Respondent, and after hearing the both

sides and perusing the case records, this Court

delivered the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No. 23/AIL/Lab./T/2019, dated 11-02-2019 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following

dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondents,

viz.,

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

T. Sivakumar, Madagadipet Post, Puducherry, against

the Management of M/s. Shree Mother Plast India

Private Limited, Thirubuvanai, Puducherry,

over non-employment is justified or not? If justified,

what relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred

in the claim petition:

The Petitioner was worked as Machine Operator

under the Respondent Management M/s. Shree

Mother Plast India Private Limited, Puducherry,

for the past 15 years as permanent worker. The

Respondent Management is manufacturer of spare

parts/bed mould for whirlphool washing machine and

Godrej Products functioning at Puducherry. The

Respondent management with arbitrary power kept

the workmen at his mercy depriving of privileges of

the permanent workmen and such act comes under

unfair labour practice on the part of the Respondent

as per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act.

(ii) The Respondent issued show cause notice on

11-08-2014 for flimsy reason which is utterly false and

fabricated; the explanation was submitted by the

Petitioner on 08-09-2014 and on 18-09-2014. The

Respondent dissatisfied with explanation issued the

charge sheet on 15-11-2014 and initiated enquiry on

05-01-2015. As a result of enquiry, the Petitioner was

found guilty, and then the Petitioner was terminated

from service on 28-11-2017. Therefore, the Petitioner

raised conciliation on 25-01-2018. On receipt of the

representation, conciliation was initiated and ended

in failure.

(iii) Grounds of the Petition:

The Petitioner is working as Machine Operator

under the Respondent Management M/s. Shree

Mother Plast India Private Limited, Puducherry,

for the past 15 years as permanent worker. The

worker carried out the work to the satisfaction

of the management with flawless records.

183

27 February 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

The Respondent issued Suspension-cum-Show

Cause Notice on 11-08-2014, further, the Petitioner

was resisted from entering the industry premises

on 30-08-2014 and on 04-09-2014. Subsequently

charge-sheet was issued on 15-11-2014 and

initiated the enquiry on the 05-01-2015. The

Petitioner was suspended without seeking

explanation and all along this period, he was not

paid salary or subsistence allowance. The

Respondent without any reason terminated the

Petitioner which is against natural justice.

(iv) The Petitioner has joined as Member in the

“Shri Mother Plast Employees Union” which has

been established for protecting the worker’s rights

from the management. The Respondent management

was dissatisfied due to the involvement of the

Petitioner in the Union activities right from the

initiation of the Trade Union, the Respondent

Management treated the Petitioner unpleasant and

took unfair action against the Petitioner.

(v) The agitation was staged on behalf of

“Puthiya Jananayaga Thozhilalar Munnani” on

05-08-2014 for demanding eradication of contract

labour system under the contract labours Regulation

and Abolition Act, 2009. The Petitioner as a Member

of the Employees Union extended his Cooperation

and participated in the agitation. The participants

including women and children took part in the

agitation the labour contractors of Thirubuvanai in

order to dilute the demand attacked the participants

in the agitation with the support of hooligans, so,

an untoward incident took place in the agitation.

(vi) Even though, participants were attacked the

contractors with the support of political and muscle

power managed to register F.I.R. against the affected

participants. The Station House Officer, Thirubuvanai

Police Station registered a case against 20 and others

vide F.I.R. No. 90/2014. Due to his participation in

the agitation he was also added in the complaint, the

affected participants also approached the Police for

registering the complaint but, the same was refused

due to influence only on direction from the Court,

the complaint was registered.

(vii) The Respondent Management was already

dissatisfied with the Union activity of the Petitioner

and took this opportunity and suspended the

petitioner on 11-08-2014 without seeking any

explanation. Consequently the Petitioner was resisted

from entering the industry premises on 30-08-2014

and on 04-09-2014. The Petitioner submitted

a representation was addressed to the Respondent

Management on 08-09-2014 explaining the untoward

incident took place in the agitation. Further, the

Petitioner is not an offender and moreover, the

agenda in the agitation is common issue due to

involvement of political and muscle influence an

untoward incident took place otherwise than that

there is no personal association.

(viii) The Respondent Management without

considering the explanation of the Petitioner, dated

08-09-2014 issued the charge-sheet on 15-11-2014 and

initiated enquiry on 05-01-2015. The charge-sheet

does not find any substance it is fabricated only

put out the Petitioner from the Respondent/

Management for his involvement in the Union

activities. The Enquiry Officer never tendered any

reasonable opportunity to the worker to explain his

reasons for charges levelled against him. The enquiry

proceedings was unilateral without considering the

Petitioner to explain his reasons. Therefore, the Act

of the Respondent is against the Principles of Natural

Justice. Hence, the termination of the Petitioner is

not justified and liable to be set aside.

(ix) The evidence adduced by the Respondent

Management in the enquiry is not convincing and

the complaints are not reasonable, they are

fabricated only in order to suppress real fact. The

evidences were created with ulterior motive to

terminate the workmen at once. The management after

submission of the proper evidences by the workmen

refused to accept the same. The attitude of the

Respondent Management is put out of service of the

workmen due to his involvement in Union activities.

(x) In the enquiry proceedings, the Enquiry

Officer acted unilaterally in support of the

Management, she refused to record the statements

and evidence of the Petitioner. When this was

agitated by the Petitioner several times, so this act

of the Enquiry Officer prevented the Petitioner to

bring out the truth. The Management issued the

charge-sheet on 15-11-2014 and initiated the enquiry

on 05-01-2015. The method adopted by Enquiry

Officer is very hared and no justice finds place in it.

The Enquiry Officer acted for the benefit of the

Management all along the enquiry proceeding and

there is no fair play of justice in the enquiry

proceedings. The main object of the enquiry is to put

out the workmen who indulged in Union activities,

which displeasured the Respondent Management.

The punishment is also not as per the Standing

Orders, the whole proceeding is only to put out the

184

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[27 February 2024

workman. Therefore, the Petitioner prays for

reinstatement with continuity of service and pay full

back wages from the date of termination till the date

of reinstatement. Hence, the petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondent as follows:

The Petitioner was working in the Respondent

Company as an Operator and he was arrested by the

Thirubuvanai Police Station for indulging in criminal

Acts under sections 147, 148, 307, 323 r/w 149 IPC

on 05-08-2014. The Petitioner was under the Judicial

custody for about 20 days. However, the Petitioner

has not intimated the fact to the Management and

was on unauthorized absent from 06-08-2014.

Therefore, action was initiated for his unauthorized

absence and also for the suppression of facts.

Considering the general attitude and behavior of the

Petitioner, he was placed under suspension pending

enquiry with a view of conducting the enquiry in a

peaceful atmosphere. The Petitioner was also given

subsistence allowance during the period of

suspension under the Industrial Employment

Standing Orders Act, 1946.

(ii) Domestic Enquiry was conducted by an

independent Enquiry Officer during suspension

period. The Enquiry Officer had conducted her

enquiry in an unbaised manner by giving due

opportunities to the Petitioner and submitted her

report, dated 13-05-2017 stating that the charges

levelled against the Petitioner was proved.

Accordingly, a second show cause notice, dated

12-07-2018 was issued to the Petitioner communicating

the proposed punishment. The reply given by the

Petitioner was not satisfactory. Since, the management

considered it as a fit case for termination, the

Petitioner’s services were terminated in proportion to

the misconduct committed by him with effect from

01-12-2017.

(iii) The disciplinary action was taken under the

Certified Standing Orders of the company for the

misconduct committed by the Petitioner. Therefore,

the action taken by the management was completely

by the book and had no ulterior motive. The

punishment given to the Petitioner was in proportion

to the misconduct committed by him. The allegations

of the Petitioner mentioned in his petition are

vexatious and not maintainable. Hence, prayed for

dismissal of the claim petition.

4. Notice to both parties given. Both appeared

through their Counsel. Claim petition filed on the side

of the Petitioner/Workman. Counter also filed by the

Respondent/Management. On Petitioner side, PW1

examined in chief and Ex.P1 to P8 marked. PW1 was also

cross-examined by the Respondent/Management

Counsel. Petitioner side evidence closed with PW1. On

Respondent/Management side, RW1 examined in chief

and Ex.R1 to R21 marked. He was also cross-examined

by the Petitioner Counsel. Through RW1 during his

cross-examination, Ex.P9 was marked on Petitioner side

as his exhibits. Respondent side evidence also closed

with RW1. The case was posted for arguments.

5. When the case posted for hearing both side

arguments, both argued their respective cases and when

the arguments was in part and posted for reply on

either side, both the parties filed Joint Compromise

Memo signed by both the parties and their Counsel, as

the ID has been settled between them under section

18(1) settlement. The said copy of 18(1) settlement also

enclosed along with the Joint Compromise Memo.

6. Heard both on the Joint Compromise Memo,

perused the Joint Compromise Memo and Settlement

under section 18(1) and same recorded.

7. In view of the Joint Compromise Memo and the

Settlement arrived under section 18(1) of Industrial

Disputes Act between the parties of the Industrial

Dispute, the Award is passed as industrial dispute is

closed as mutually settled between the parties as per

the Settlement entered between them under section

18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act. The Joint Compromise

Memo and Settlement under section 18(1) of Industrial

Disputes Act, dated 06-05-2023 shall form part and

parcel of the Award. No Costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this

the 12th day of May, 2023.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness:

PW.1 —

06-07-2022

Sivakumar

List of petitioner’s exhibits :

Ex.P1

— 13-08-2014

Photocopy of the letter to

the Respondent Management

by the Petitioner’s mother.

Ex.P2

— 20-08-2014

Photocopy of the letter to

the Respondent Management

by the Petitioner’s mother

along with A/D Card.

185

27 February 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Ex.P3

— 30-08-2014

Photocopy of the letter to

the Respondent Management

by the Petitioner along with

A/D Card.

Ex.P4

— 04-09-2014

Photocopy of the letter to

the Respondent Management

by the Petitioner along with

A/D Card.

Ex.P5

— 28-08-2014

Photocopy of the Order in

Crl.O.P. No. 22614/2014 of

the Hon’ble High Court of

Madras.

Ex.P6

— 04-04-2015

Photocopy of the letter

given by the Petitioner to

the Enquiry Officer.

Ex.P7

— 16-06-2016

Photocopy of the letter

given by the Petitioner to

the Enquiry Officer.

Ex.P8

— 08-09-2014

Photocopy of the letter to

the Management by the

Petitioner.

Ex.P9

— 07-07-2012

Photocopy of the letter to

the Management by the

Petitioner Union.

List of Respondent’s witness:

RW1

— 14-11-2022

Sivamuthu, Senior Executive

of the Respondent Management.

List of Respondent’s exhibits:

Ex.R1

— 05-08-2014

Photocopy of the FIR filed

by Thirubuvanai Police

Station (Page 1 to 2).

Ex.R2

— 06-08-2014

Photocopy of the News

published in Malai Malar

Newspaper. (Pg. 4).

Ex.R3

— 06-08-2014

Photocopy of the News

published

Tamizh

Murasu (Pg. 3).

Ex.R4

— 11-08-2014

Photocopy of the Show

C a u s e

N o t i c e - c u m -

Suspension Order issued

by the Respondent.

Ex.R5

— —

Photocopy of the Postal

Cover refused and returned

to the Management.

Ex.R6

13-08-2014

Photocopy of the letter

Series

sent by the Petitioner’s

mother to the Respondent

and it was received on

18-08-2014 with postal

cover.

Ex.R7

— 20-08-2014

Photocopy of the letter

Series

sent by the Petitioner’s

mother to the Respondent

and it was received on

18-08-2014 with postal

cover.

Ex.R8

— 08-09-2014

P h o t o c o p y o f t h e

Series

Memorandum issued by the

Respondent with A/D Card.

Ex.R9

— 16-09-2014

P h o t o c o p y o f t h e

Series

Memorandum issued by the

Respondent with A/D Card.

Ex.R10 — 15-11-2014

Photocopy of the Charge-

Series

Sheet

with

Enquiry

Intimation issued by the

Respondent with A/D Card.

Ex.R11 — 18-05-2017

Photocopy of the Enquiry

Report.

Ex.R12 — 15-06-2017

Photocopy of the 2nd show

Series

cause notice issued by the

Respondent with A/D Card.

Ex.R13 — 23-06-2017

P h o t o c o p y o f t h e

Series

requisition letter sent by

the Petitioner for time

extension to give his reply

along with RPAD.

Ex.R14 — 26-06-2017

Photocopy of the reply

letter

sent

the

Respondent for granting

time for Petitioner’s reply.

Ex.R15 — 10-07-2017

Photocopy

the

requisition letter sent by

the Petitioner for time

extension to give his reply.

Ex.R16 — 12-07-2017

Photocopy of the reply

letter

sent

the

Respondent for granting

time for Petitioner’s reply

with postal receipt and A/D

Card.

186

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[27 February 2024

Ex.R17 — 23-08-2017

Photocopy of the reply

letter

given

the

Petitioner

along

with

Certificate and postal cover.

Ex.R18 — 28-11-2017

Photocopy

the

Termination Order issued by

the

Respondent

with

cheque for one month pay

with A/D Card.

Ex.R19 — —

Photocopy of the Certified

Standing Order of the

Company.

Ex.R20 — 08-09-2014

Photocopy of the letter

sent by the Petitioner to the

Respondent Management

with postal cover.

Ex.R21 — 18-09-2014

Photocopy of the letter

sent by the Petitioner to the

Respondent Management

with postal cover.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 125/AIL/Lab./T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 11th December 2023)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 30/2022, dated

15-05-2023 of the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, in

respect of Dispute between the M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto

Engineering Private Limited, Puducherry and the

petitioner’s Union Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering

Thozhilalargal Naam Thamizhar Thozhir Sangam, over

charter of demands regarding wage revision, protection

of service conditions of workers and other allowances,

etc., has been received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the Notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. V. SOFANA DEVI, M.L.,

Presiding Officer.

Monday, the 15th day of May, 2023.

I.D. (T). No. 30/2022

CNR. No. PYPY06-000065-2022

The President/Secretary,

Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Thozhilalargal

Naam Thamizhar Thozhirsangam,

No. 21, Bank Street, Thirubuvanai,

Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Vs.

The Managing Director,

M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering

Private Limited,

Plot No. A-25, PIPDIC Industrial Estate,

Electronic Park, Thirubuvanai,

Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This industrial dispute coming on 15-05-2023 before

me for final hearing in the presence of Thiruvalargal

K. Velmurugan and P. Preethi, Counsel for the Petitioner,

Thiruvalargal L. Sathish, T. Pravin, S. Velmurugan,

E. Karthick, S. Sudarsanan and E. Madhivanan, Counsel

for the Respondent and after hearing the both sides and

perusing the case records, this Court delivered the

following:

AWARD

This industrial dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No. 95/Lab./AIL/T/2022, dated 10-06-2022 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following

dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz.,

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner’s

Union “Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Thozhilalargal

Naam Thamizhar Thozhirsangam”, against the

Management of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering

Private Limited, Thirubuvanai, Puducherry, over

charter of demands regarding wage revision,

protection of service conditions of workers and other

allowances, etc., is justified or not? If justified, to

give appropriate direction to what remedies to be

entitled in this dispute?

(b) Whether the stand taken by the Management

of M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Private

Limited, Puducherry, regarding non-recognition of

the Petitioner’s Union duly registered under the

Trade Unions Act, 1926 is legal and justified?

If justified, to give appropriate direction.

187

27 February 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

of money, if it can be so computed?

2. Brief facts of the case of the Petitioner averred

in the claim petition:

On 28-12-2009 the Petitioner was appointed as

Operator by the erstwhile management of G.J. Engineering.

Later the Management of G.J. Engineering was taken

over by the present Respondent, i.e., M/s. Gencor

Pacific Auto Engineering Private Limited and

considering the unblemished services of the

Petitioner, the Respondent Management absorbed by

the Respondent in its company vide transfer-cum-

revised appointment letter, dated 21-01-2011. The

Petitioner along with other workmen in the factory

took initiative to start a Trade Union during the

month of April, 2021 and thereby Trade Union by

name M/s. Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Thozhilalargal

Naam Thamizhar Thozhir Sangam was registered

before the Registrar of Trade Union, Puducherry vide

Registration No. 1887/RTU/2021.

(ii) The Plant head of the Respondent Factory

started threatening the Office Bearers and other

members of Petitioner’s Union saying that he will

transfer them to some other unit if, they continue the

Trade Union activities any more further. The act of

the Respondent Management in curbing the lawful

Trade Union activities of the Petitioner Union is

unjustifiable, improper and illegal. An Advocate

notice, dated 10-06-2021 addressed both to the Office

of the Labour Commissioner, Puducherry and to the

Plant Head of the Respondent Factory. Subsequently,

the Petitioner Union has given charter of demands

to the Plant Head of the Respondent Factory but, he

willfully refused to receive the same.

The Petitioner has sent another Advocate notice,

dated 21-06-2021 along with the charter of demands

so as to hold negotiation talks and thereby to arrive

an amicable settlement. The Respondent issued a

reply notice, dated 23-06-2021 with false and

frivolous allegations. The Petitioner Union has also

given their representation, dated 21-06-2021 to the

Labour Officer (Conciliation), Puducherry, raising

various charter of demands and thereby initiated the

present industrial dispute.

(iii) The Respondent Management has filed its

reply, dated 03-08-2021 with vague and evasive reply.

The Petitioner Union has raised the present industrial

dispute before the Labour Officer (Conciliation),

Puducherry, in respect of revision of their wages and

also for recognition of their Trade Union by the

Respondent Management. Hence, the petition.

3. The brief averments of the counter filed by the

Respondent is as follows:

Law thus clearly mandates a Trade Union to have

at least 10% of total strength of workers engaged in

any establishment or Industry as its members for it

to function as Trade Union and when the Trade

Union looses such requisite numbers, its registration

is required to be cancelled under section 10(c) of

Trade Unions Act. Petitioner does not represent even

two or three workers of Respondent and hence, it has

no locus standi to seek recognition. Respondent has

already initiated steps for cancellation or registration

of Petitioner vide its letter, dated 13-11-2021.

(ii) The Petitioner doesn’t have the locus standi

to continue functioning as a Trade Union for it to

raise any industrial dispute. Petitioner in its claim

petition has not even pleaded the dates on which it

sought management's recognition and the date when

Respondent denied it. For an industrial dispute to be

referred to this Court for adjudication, there must

have been a demand made by the Union and it must

have been denied by the Respondent Management.

The charter of demands for wage revision and other

benefits is not supported, endorsed or backed by any

of the workers including the so called members of

the Union. The revised wage structure accepted by

all the current workers shall prevail over the charter

of demands of Petitioner Union and it cannot insist

on adjudication of their demand for wage revision.

Therefore, the charter of demands raised by the

Petitioner has become infructuous.

(iii) The essential elements for demand for wage

revision shall be region-cum-industry principle and

the cost of living index of the particular region. Once

again the Petitioner has not given any comparative

details on these vital aspects essential for the

Tribunal to even consider the demand for wage

revision. Hence, the gross wages that is being paid

by Respondent is much more than the minimum

wages fixed by the Government. Respondent gives a

standard annual increment of 7% to 10% to all its

worker in the normal circumstances. Apart from the

standard wages, it also pays monthly production and

sale incentives at 7% of gross wages based on

performance of workers. Hence, the claim petition is

liable to dismissed.

2. Notice served to both parties. Petitioner and

Respondent appeared through their Counsel. Claim

Statement filed. Counter also filed. The matter has been

posted to 09-05-2023 for enquiry. On 03-05-2023 an

application to advance the hearing filed by the

Respondent Counsel. The said application allowed on

04-05-2023 as there was no objection on the Petitioner

side. Hence, hearing was advanced to 04-05-2023 from

09-05-2023.

188

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[27 February 2024

3. On 04-05-2023, both parties present with their

respective Counsel. Memo filed by the Petitioner to

record the settlement under section 18(1) of the

Industrial Dispute Act. The said settlement also

enclosed along with hearing advance petition. Heard

both on the settlement. Copies of the identity proof filed

by the parties. In the memo filed by the Petitioner

requested for close the industrial dispute as settled out

of Court. In which notice has given to the Respondent.

In the said notice the Respondent Counsel submitted

as the matter is comprehensively settled, Reference

cannot be closed and requested to pass an Award in

terms of under section 18(1) settlement. Matter is posted

on 10-05-2023 for hearing both the Counsel.

4. Heard both on 10-05-2023. In view of the memo

and the settlement ended between the parties under

section 18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, Award is

passed to the effect that industrial dispute is closed as

settled between the parties under section 18(1) of

Industrial Disputes Act. The Settlement, dated

02-05-2023 entered between the parties under section

18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 shall form part

and parcel of the Award. No costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this

the 15th day of May, 2023.

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness

Nil

List of petitioner’s exhibits

Nil

List of Respondent’s witness

Nil

List of Respondent’s exhibits

Nil

V. SOFANA DEVI,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 04/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 04th January 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College and Hospital,

Keezhakasakudimedu, Karaikal and the Union workmen

represented by the Union for all Staff in Vinayaka

Mission’s Medical College and Hospital P.K. Salai,

Karaikal, over regularization of Fixed Term Contract

Staff as Permanent Staff in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this Order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it is

necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the industrial dispute raised by the

union workmen represented by Union for all Staff in

Vinayaka Missions Medical College and Hospital,

P.K. Salai, Karaikal, against the Management of

M/s. Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College and

Hospital, Keezhakasakudimedu, Karaikal, over

regularization of the ‘Fixed Term Contract Staff’

engaged in the designations as listed in Annexure-I

as Permanent Staff is justified or not?

(ii) If justified, what relief the Union workmen

entitled to?

(iii) To compute the relief in terms of money if, it

is so be computed?

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

ANNEXURE-I

Sl.

Designation

No.

(1)

(2)

Assistant Medical Record Officer

Speech and Hearing Assistant

Emergency Technician

189

27 February 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Medical Social Worker

Assistant

Assistant-Accounts

Lab Technician

Pharmacist

Marketing Executive

Clerk

Record Clerk

Radiological Assistant

O.T. Technician

Lab Assistant

Ophthalmic Technician

Physiotherapist

Dialysis Technician

Workshop Worker

Construction Assistant

Electrical Assistant

Driver

Programmer

Cardiac Technician

Plumbing Assistant

Assistant to Biochemical

Optometry Technician

Carpenter

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 05/Lab./AIL/T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 10th January 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management of

M/s. Indian Coffee Workers Co-operative Society Limited,

Puducherry and Thiru G. Sankar, over non-employment

and other attendant benefits in respect of the matter

mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry for adjudication.

(1)

(2)

The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(a) Whether the industrial dispute raised by the

petitioner Thiru G. Sankar against the management of

M/s. Indian Coffee Workers Co-operative Society

Limited, No.P.67, Puducherry, over non-employment

and other attendant benefits is justified or not?

If justified, to give appropriate direction.

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

(HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION)

(G.O. Ms. No. 03, Puducherry, dated 08th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation the following

Associate/Assistant Professors shall retire on the

afternoon of 29-02-2024.

Sl.

Name and

Name of the Institution

No.

Designation

(1)

(2)

(3)

Dr. S.S. Sreekumar,

Associate Professor

of Malayalam.

Mahatma Gandhi Government

Dr. Vinita Vasu,

Arts College, Mahe.

Assistant Professor

of Economics.

(By order)

V. SOUMYA,

Under Secretary to Government

(Higher and Technical Education).

190

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[27 February 2024

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 15, Puducherry, dated 12th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

The Lieutenant-Governor, Puducherry, is pleased to

appoint Thiru Dayanand Tendolkar, who has been

allotted to the Pondicherry Civil Service by Department

of Personnel and Training, Government of India, on the

basis of the results of Civil Services Examination – 2022

to the Grade-II of Pondicherry Civil Service, with effect

from the forenoon of 30-01-2024, subject to the

conditions mentioned in the Department’s Letter of Offer

of Appointment No. A.19011/12/2023/DPAR/SS-I(2),

dated 14-11-2023.

2. The Lieutenant-Governor is also pleased to order

that Thiru Dayanand Tendolkar will be a Probationer in

the Pondicherry Civil Service for a period of two years

from the forenoon of 30-01-2024.

3. Thiru Dayanand Tendolkar, Pondicherry Civil

Service Probationer, shall take the Oath of Allegiance

before

the

Deputy

Secretary

Government

(Establishment), Chief Secretariat, Puducherry and

furnish Surety Bond in the prescribed pro forma within

ten days from the date of this Notification.

4. Thiru Dayanand Tendolkar, Pondicherry Civil

Service Probationer, is directed to report before the

District Collector, Puducherry, for field training in

Revenue Department. He shall undergo Foundation

Training Course in Directorate of Training, UTCS, Delhi,

as and when the next batch commences for a period as

may be prescribed by UTCS. He shall also pass

‘Tamil Course for Non-Tamil Pondicherry Civil Service

Officers’ conducted by the Puducherry Institute of

Linguistics and Culture, Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

V. JAISANKAR,

Under Secretary to Government.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER

MANAGEMENT (EXCISE)

(G.O. Ms. No. 20/4943,

Puducherry, dated 12th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Thiru R. Ananda Nadaradjane @ Velmourougane,

Superintendent of this Office shall retire from service

with effect from the afternoon of 31-03-2024.

(By order)

M. MATHEW FRANCIS,

Under Secretary to Government (Revenue).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 428-435/DSE/HSW/EC/SSLC/2024.

Puducherry, dated 13th February 2024.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original S.S.L.C. Examination Mark

Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificates.

If, anyone finds the Original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School

Examinations (SEC), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is/they are no longer valid.

Sl.

Name of the

Sl. No. of

School in which

No.

applicant

session and

the Mark

studied last

year

Certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Selvi/Tmt./Thiru :

1 Kaviya L

5628593

March

2018

9245033

Amalorpavam Higher Secondary School,

Vanarapet, Puducherry.

2 Raja K

427407

April

2002

A399514

V.O.C. Government Higher Secondary School,

Mission Street, Puducherry.

191

27 February 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

3 Jayalakshmi A

328197

March

1994

AA3200451

Manimegalai Government Girls’ Higher

Secondary School, Kuyavarpalayam, Puducherry.

4 Ajith M

3004086

March

2014

3880955

Sri NKC Government Girls’ Higher Secondary

School, Kurusukuppam, Puducherry.

5 Balachandran S

525968

March

2007

4677058

Seventh Day Adventist Higher Secondary

School, Puducherry.

6 Logeswari N

5016453

March

2015

5303283

St. Joseph of Cluny Girls’ Higher Secondary

School, Lawspet, Puducherry.

7 Suba L

391600

March

2000

0168584

Government High School, Karayambuthur,

Puducherry.

8 Manikandajothi G

1662321

March

2017

8344138

Bridges Learning Vidyalaya Higher Secondary

School, Thanthai Periyar Nagar, Puducherry.

Dr. V.G. SIVAGAMI,

Joint Director of School Education.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 927-931/DSE/HSW/EC/HSC/2024.

Puducherry, dated 13th February 2024.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original Higher Secondary Course

Examination Mark Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate

certificates. If, anyone finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of

School Examinations (Hr.Sec.), College Road, Chennai – 600 006, for cancellation, as it is/they are no longer valid.

Sl.

Name of the

Sl. No. of

School in which

No.

applicant

session and

the Mark

studied last

year

Certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Tmt./Selvi/Thiru :

Padmavathy R

606476

March

2012

7040266

Indira Gandhi Government Higher Secondary

School, Indira Nagar, Puducherry.

Raja K

438076

March

2004

V552578

V.Venkatasubba Reddiar Government

Technical Higher Secondary School, Lawspet,

Puducherry.

Sakthinarayanan K

5810151

March

2019

13572322

V.Venkatasubba Reddiar Government

2810721

March

2020

15606522

Technical Higher Secondary School, Lawspet,

Puducherry.

Balachandran S

526017

March

2009

4486961

Calve College Government Higher Secondary

School, Puducherry.

Manikandajothi G

4854560

March

2019

2775121

Soorya International Higher Secondary

School, Muthialpet, Puducherry.

Dr. V.G. SIVAGAMI,

Joint Director of School Education.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Selvi/Tmt./Thiru :

192

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[27 February 2024

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND

DISASTER MANAGEMENT (EXCISE)

(G.O. Ms. No. 21/4951,

Puducherry, dated 15th February 2024)

ORDER

The Notice of voluntary retirement tendered by

Thiru M. Boopathy, Superintendent, working in the

Office of the Deputy Collector (Excise), Puducherry, by

invoking the Provisions of 48-A of the Central Civil

Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, is accepted and he is

admitted into voluntary retirement with effect from the

afternoon of 16-02-2024.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

M. MATHEW FRANCIS,

Under Secretary to Government (Revenue).

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´∑

ƒ‚¶©º√´ÁkﬂÿƒBÈÔD

Œ©√Õ>©A^π ∂§s©A

Amﬂºƒˆ ƒ‚¶©º√´Ákﬂ ÿƒBÈÔ ±ÈÔ›]uzﬂ ÿƒVÕ>\V™

ˇºw z§©∏¶©√‚|^· √ÁwB >tµ �ÆD g∫˛È

]™ƒˆÔ^, �ÆD c]ˆ √›]ˆ¬ÁÔÔÁ· kV∫zD ÿ√VÚ‚|

ŒÚ ˛ºÈVsuz ƒD\]›> sÁÈÁB¬ z§©∏‚| JΩ

x›]Á´l¶©√‚¶ Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔ^ k´ºkuÔ©√|˛[≈™.

ŒÚ

˛ºÈVsuÔV™

sÁÈ

(1) √ÁwB >tµ ÿƒF]›>V^Ô^

. . `

(2) √ÁwB g∫˛È ÿƒF]›>V^Ô^

. . `

(3) ]™ƒˆÔ^ (÷Á¶ ÷Á¶ºB

. . `

ÿk‚¶©√‚¶Ák).

2. JΩ x›]Á´l¶©√‚¶ cÁ≈l[ º\_ “√ÁwB

ÿƒF]›>V^Ô^ �ÆD c]ˆ √›]ˆ¬ÁÔÔ^ kV∫zk>uÔV™

Œ©√Õ>©A^π” ®[Æ z§©∏‚|, ÿƒBÈV·Ï, ƒ‚¶©º√´Ákﬂ

ÿƒBÈÔD, Amﬂºƒˆá605 001 ®[≈ xÔkˆ¬z 05á03á2024

∂[Æ \VÁÈ 4.00 \Ë¬z x[√VÔ kÕm ºƒÚD√Ω ∂–©∏

Ák¬Ô©√¶ºkı|D.

∂ÀkVÆ

∂–©∏©

ÿ√≈©√‚¶

Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔ^ ∂Á™›mD 06á03á2024 ∂[Æ xu√Ô_

11.00 \Ë¬z kÚÁÔ >Õ]Ú¬zD Œ©√Õ>>V´ÏÔ^

x[MÁÈl_ ∏ˆ¬Ô©√|D.

3. JΩ

x›]Á´l¶©√‚¶

Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔÁ·ﬂ

ƒ\Ï©∏¬zDº√Vm ∂>–¶[ ` 500 (‘√VF nÕ±Æ \‚|D)

x[Ák©A› ÿ>VÁÔBVÔﬂ ÿƒK›> ºkı|D. Œ©√Õ>›]_

ÿku§ ÿ√≈V> Œ©√Õ>>V´ÏÔπ[ x[Ák©A› ÿ>VÁÔ

Œ©√Õ>D ÷Æ] ÿƒF> ∏≈z ]Ú©∏› >´©√|D. º\KD,

Œ©√Õ>>V´ÏÔ^ ∂Á¶BV·›Á> W‘∏¬zD kÁÔl_ g>VÏ

∂‚Á¶ ÂÔ_ �ÆD ÿ√VÚ‚Ô^ �ÆD ºƒÁk kˆ (GST) √]°

ƒV[§>µ ÂÔoÁ™ Œ©√Õ>›m¶[ ÷Áð¬Ô ºkı|D.

4. º\ºÈ z§©∏¶©√‚|^· ºÂ´›]uzD, º>]¬zD

∏[kÚD Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔ^ BV°D ∞uÆ¬ÿÔV^·©√¶\V‚¶Vm.

5. BVÿ>VÚ ÔV´ðxD z§©∏¶V\_ ∂Á™›m ∂_Èm

∞º>–D

{Ï

Œ©√Õ>©A^πÁB

W´VÔˆ¬Ô

ˇºw

ÁÔÿBV©√t‚|^·kÚ¬z xø cˆÁ\ cı|.

6 . Œ © A ¬ ÿ Ô V ^ · © √‚ ¶ / ÷ Æ ]

ÿ ƒ F B © √‚ ¶

Œ©√Õ>©A^πl[ ∂]Ô√‚ƒ sÁÈÔ^ ∂§s¬Ô©√‚¶

º>]loÚÕm ŒÚ kÚ¶ ÔVÈ›]uz ∂\o_ ÷Ú¬zD.

7. Œ©√Õ>D ÷Æ] ÿƒFB©√‚¶ Œ©√Õ>>V´Ï ∂Á™›m

ÿ√VÚ‚Ôπ[ xø›ÿ>VÁÔÁB•D ÿƒK›]s‚| ∂k´m

ÿƒVÕ>© ÿ√VÆ©∏_/ÿƒÈs_ 24 \Ë ºÂ´›]uz^ ∂Á™›m

ÿ√VÚ‚ÔÁ·•D ®|›mﬂ ÿƒ_È ºkı|D. >k§™V_, ∂kÏ

ÿƒK›]B x[Ák©A› ÿ>VÁÔÁB ÷w¬Ô ºÂˆ|D.

8. su√Á™ xΩÕ>°¶[ ÿ√VÚ‚Ôπ[ >´D �ÆD

∂·Ák©√u§ ÷Õ>ﬂ ÿƒBÈÔD ®Õ>s>© ÿ√VÆ©AD ∞uÔVm.

9. ∞º>–D,

c¶[√VΩ[Á\

∞u√|\Vl[

ˇµÁÔÿBV©√t‚|^·

∂]ÔVˆ

∂kÏÔπ[

xΩºk

÷Æ]BV™m.

10. >uº√VÁ>B s]xÁ≈Ôπ[√Ω ƒ´¬z �ÆD

ºƒÁk kˆ (GST) Ì|>ÈVÔ kÛo¬Ô©√|D.

11. Œ©√Õ>›]_ z§©∏‚|^· √ÁwB ÿƒF]›>V^Ô^

�ÆD ÷>´ ]™ƒˆÔÁ· ÷ﬂÿƒBÈÔ ±ÈÔ ∏ˆs_

04-03-2024 º>]kÁ´ ∂KkÈÔ ºÂ´›]_ √VÏÁkl¶ÈVD.

Amﬂºƒˆ, ÂV^: 26, ∏©´kˆ, 2024.

¤.

¤. >BV·[,

>BV·[,

ÿƒBÈV·Ï.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT

Puducherry, the 26th February 2024.

TENDER NOTICE

Sealed tenders offering the rate per kilogram are invited

for purchase of old newspapers Tamil and English) and

old Dailies (cutting press clippings) belonging tothe

Legislature Library Section of Legislative Assembly

Secretariat, Puducherry, on as-is-whereis condition

basis.

Rate per

kilogram

(1) Old Tamil newspapers

. . `

(2) Old English newspapers

. . `

(3) Old Dailies (after cutting

. . `

press clippings)

193

27 February 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

2. The tenders in sealed covers should be

superscripted with the words “Tender for the purchase

of old newspapers old Dailies (cutting press clippings)”

and addressed to the Secretary, Legislative Assembly

Secretariat, Puducherry, so as to reach this Secretariat

on or before 05-03-2024 at 4.00 p.m. The tenders will be

opened on 06-03-2024 at 11.00 a.m. in the presence of

tenderers who are present in the Chamber of the

undersigned.

3. The tenderers should deposit an amount of ` 500

(Rupees five hundred only) as earnest money deposit

along with the tenders and the earnest money deposit

will be refunded to the unsuccessful tenderers

immediately after the tender is finalised. The tenderers

should furnish Photostat copy of Identity proof

(Aadhaar) and GST Registration Certificate.

4. The tenders received after the due date and time

will be rejected.

5. The undersigned reserves the right to accept or

reject any tender without assigning any reason

thereof.

6. The rates finalised/approved shall be valid for

a period of one year from the date of acceptance/

communication of the rates so approved.

7. The successful tenderer should pay the full

amount immediately after the finalisation of tender and

clear the old newspapers at his/her own expenses

within 24 hours, failing which earnest money deposit

will be forfeited.

8. No claim on the quantity and quality of the

newspapers will be entertained once the tender is

finalised.

9. In case of any dispute, the decision of the

undersigned will be the final.

10. GST will be collected separately as per rates

prevailing at the time of disposal/sale.

11. The old newspapers may be inspected in the

Library Wing of this Secretariat till 04-03-2024 during

the office hours.

J. DAYALANE,

Secretary.

s_oB˚Ï ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m, Amﬂºƒˆ

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

∂§s©A

∂Á\›m¬ÿÔV^· ÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›][ ∂–\] ºkı|˛≈VÏ.

kˆÁƒ

sıð©√>V´ˆ[

WÆk™D ∂Á\B

c›º>E¬Ô©√‚|^·

º>ÁkBV™

g‚Ôπ[

®ı

ÿ√BÏ �ÆD xÔkˆ

c^· ÷¶›][ xÔkˆ

WÆk™› >BVˆ©A/

t[ ]≈[ ®ıË¬ÁÔ

ÿƒFxÁ≈

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

]Ú. ®D. √wMƒVt,

M/s. ∏.®D.∏. ÷ı¶¸Ωˆ¸,

®_ Ω ∏·V¸Ω¬

®ı 39, ƒ¬] ÂÔÏ,

\Æ ∂·Ák ®ı 22/1/g,

ÔkÏ.

z]Á´›

(√Ë

JÏ›] ÂÔÏ ®¬¸¶[ƒ[,

\Á™ ®ı 16

]≈[.

xÁ≈ 1).

s_oB˚Ï,

®D.gÏ.®¸. ÂÔÏ,

Amﬂºƒˆá605 110.

zÚD√Vº√‚, Amﬂºƒˆ.

1973ágD gı| Amﬂºƒˆ ˛´V\D �ÆD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m¬Ô^ ƒ‚¶›][ JÈ\VF Amﬂºƒˆ Œ[§B›m

∏ˆ° 11á[√Ω ÷›ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á> WÆ°k]™V_ cı¶VzD g‚ºƒ√Á™Ô^ ∞º>–D ÷ÚÕ>V_, ∂kuÁ≈ ÷Õ>

V. ®a_´V¤[,

®a_´V¤[,

gÁðBÏ.

194

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[27 February 2024

VILLIANUR COMMUNE PANCHAYAT, PUDUCHERRY

Villianur, dated 16th February 2024.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested for permission to set up the following industry within the

Villianur Commune Panchayat limits as detailed below.

Sl.

Name and address

Address of the

Industry

Power

No. of

No.

of the applicant

industry site

proposed

required

workers

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Thiru M. Palanisamy,

M/s. P.M.P. Industries,

“LD plastic cover”

90 H.P.

No. 39, Sakthi Nagar,

Re-survey No. 22/1/A,

(Shift-I)

Moorthy Nagar Extension, Plot No. 16, M.R.S. Nagar,

Villianur,

Kurumbapet,

Puducherry-605 110.

Puducherry.

In conformity with rule 11 of the Puducherry Commune Panchayats (Grant of Licences and Permissions)

Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union Territory by the Puducherry Village and Commune Panchayats Act, 1973,

objections, if any, to the setting up of the above industry, are invited to reach the Commissioner, within ten

days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections so received within the specified period will be considered by the Villianur Commune

Panchayat.

V. EJILERADJANE,

Commissioner.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Valliammai @ Latha, wife of Palaniappan, aged

about 52 years, residing at No. 03, South Street,

Varichikudy Post, Varichikudy, Karaikal, do hereby

solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

1. In my Aadhaar Card bearing No. XXXX XXXX

0088, issued by Unique Identification Authority of

India, my name has been entered as ‘Valliammai Alias

Latha’.

2. In my PAN Card bearing No. ABRPV2883Q,

issued by Income-tax Department, my name has

been entered as ‘PL Valliammai Latha’.

3. In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card, issued by

Election Commission of India vide No. PY/01/022/

003319, my name has been entered as ‘Valliammai @

Latha’.

4. In my Degree Transfer Certificate, issued by

Fatima College, Madurai vide Admission No. 3284,

my name has been entered as ‘R. Latha’.

5. In my Family Ration Card, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry vide Card No. 191753, my name has been

entered as ‘È>V @ k^πBDÁ\’.

6. In my Passport, issued by the Regional Passport

Office, Chennai No.K6151544, my name has been

entered as ‘Palaniappan Latha’.

7. In all my Property Deeds, issued by Office of

the Sub-Registrar consern, my name has been

entered as ‘PL. È>V ®[≈ k^πBDÁ\’, ‘Latha @

Valliammai’ and ‘k^πBDÁ\ @ È>V’.

8. In my Partnership Deed of firm Sree Balaji

Traders Certificate No. IN-PY10567296413652O, my

name has been entered as ‘PL. Valliammai @ Latha’.

9. In my Savings Bank Passbook of Tamil Nadu

Mercantile Bank, Karaikal Branch, Karaikal with

Account No. XXXX XXXX XXX0044, my name has

been entered as ‘Latha. P’.

195

27 February 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

10. In my son’s Birth Certificate, issued by the

Department of Rural Development and Local

Administration, registered in Tiruppathur Town

Panchayat of Tirupathur Taluk vide Registration

No. 665/96, dated 18-06-1996, my name has been

entered as ‘Latha’.

11. In my daughter’s Birth Certificate, issued by

Department of Municipal Administration and

Water Supply, registered in Tirupathur Taluk,

Sivagangai District, Tamil Nadu vide Registration

No. 220/1991/01, dated 01-03-1991, my name has been

entered as ‘È>V’.

12. In all my Insurance Bonds, issued by LIC of

India, my name has been entered as ‘PL. Valliammai

@ Latha’.

13. Therefore, I do hereby declare that the names,

‘Valliammai alias Latha’, ‘PL Valliammai Latha’,

‘Valliammai @ Latha’, ‘R. Latha’, ‘È>V @

k^πBDÁ\’, ‘Palaniappan Latha’, ‘Latha @

Valliammai’, ‘k^πBDÁ\ ®[≈ È>V’, ‘PL. Valliammai

@ Latha’, ‘Latha. P’, ‘Latha’, ‘È>V’ and ‘PL Valliammai

@ Latha’ mentioned in the abovesaid documents are

referring one and the same person that is myself only.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 14th day of February 2024.

562655

PL. VALLIAMMAI @ LATHA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, S Sundari, daughter of Sekar, residing at No. 11,

2nd Street, Pudunagar, Mangalam, Puducherry-605 110,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on

oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is entered as ‘S Sundari’ in my

Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 2791, issued by

Unique Identification Authority of India.

That my name is entered as ‘Sundari’ in my

Elector’s Photo Identity Card vide No. YIQ0048801,

issued by Election Commission of India.

That my name is entered as ‘Sundari’ in my

Marriage Register Serial No. 72/2016, issued by the

Sub-Registrar, Villianur, Puducherry.

That my name is entered as ‘Sundari.S’ in my

School Transfer Certificate Register No. 549400,

issued by Government Higher Secondary School,

Sulthanpet, Puducherry.

That my name is entered as ‘∑Ô[BV’ in the Family

Ration Card No. 407539, issued by the Department

of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

I hereby declare that the names viz., ‘S Sundari’,

‘Sundari.S’, ‘Sundari’ and ‘∑Ô[BV’ are referring one

and the same person and they denoting myself only.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is

‘Sundari S’.

That the above particulars are true and correct to

the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 14th day of

February 2024.

562656

R. ∑Õ>ˆ.

∑Õ>ˆ.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, T Sundara Murthy, son of Thangavel, Service

No.199147 L, Rank NB/SUB, aged 71 years, residing at

Plot No.07, 3rd Cross, 1st Main Street, Vennisamy

Nagar, G.N.Palayam, Villianur, Puducherry-605 110, do

hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath

as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this

affidavit on behalf of me.

I state that my name is entered as ‘T Sundara Murthy’

in my Pension Payment Order, issued by the Office

of the Dy. C.D.A (A.F) New Delhi, bearing Pension

Payment Order No. S/038836/92 (ARMY).

I state that my name is entered as ‘T Sundara

Murthy’ in my Discharge Certificate Book, issued by

Indian ARMY.

I state that my name is entered as ‘T Sundara

Murthy’ in my ECHS Card issued by ECHS

BHAWAN, New Delhi bearing No. CH 0000 0554 6973.

I state that my name is entered as ‘T Sundaramurthy’

in my Savings Bank Passbook issued by Indian

Overseas Bank, Reddiyarpalayam Branch, Puducherry,

bearing Joint Account No. XXXXXXXXXXXX3472

dated 08-08-2003.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Sundaramurthy’

in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card, issued by Election

Commission of India bearing No. YIQ0212381 dated

14-05-2020.

I state that my name is entered as ‘T. Sundaramurthy’

in my Identity Card Ex-Servicemen, issued by the

Department of Sainik Welfare, Puducherry bearing

S.No. 2753.

196

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[27 February 2024

I state that my name is entered as ‘∑Õ>´JÏ›]’

in my Family Ration Card, issued by the Department

of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry

bearing No. 098516.

I state that my name is entered as ‘T Sundaramurthy’

in my Aadhaar Card, issued by Unique Identification

Authority of India bearing No. XXXX XXXX 1682.

I state that my name is entered as ‘T Sundaramurthy’

in my PAN Card, issued by the Income-tax Department,

Government of India bearing No. HFAPS5677M.

I state that my name is entered as ‘T. Sundaramurthy’

in my Secondary School Leaving Certificate, issued

by the Headmaster Government High School, Vikravandi,

Villupuram, Tamil Nadu bearing S.No. 023790, dated

14-02-1972.

I submit that the names described in the abovesaid

records as ‘T Sundara Murthy’, ‘T Sundaramurthy’,

‘Sundaramurthy’, ‘∑Õ>´JÏ›]’ and ‘T. Sundaramurthy’

are referring one and the same person that is myself

only.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is

‘T Sundaramurthy’ only.

The statements in the abovesaid paragraphs are

true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 17th day of February 2024.

562657

T SUNDARA MURTHY.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, S Kathavarayan, son of Sellappan, Hindu, aged

26 years, residing at No. 277, Rajiv Gandhi Street,

Periyakalapet, Puducherry-605 014, do hereby solemnly

affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well

known the facts of my deposition.

1. My name has been mentioned in my Aadhaar

Card No. XXXX XXXX 4638, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India, as ‘S Kathavarayan

(ÿƒ ÔV›>k´VB[)’.

2. My name has been mentioned in my Birth

Certificate vide Registration No. PM/M/1998/007483,

dated 06-07-1998, issued by the Pondicherry

Municipality, Puducherry, as ‘Kathavarayan’.

3. My name has been recorded in my Family

Ration Card bearing No. 402777, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry, as ‘ÔV›>k´VB[’.

4. My name has been recorded in my PAN Card

bearing No. JYSPK7916J, issued by Income-tax

Department, Government of India, as ‘S Kathavarayan’.

5. My name has been entered in my Elector’s

Photo Identity Card bearing No. ATT0092262,

issued by the Election Commission of India, as

‘Kathavarayan (ÔV›>k´VB[)’.

6. My name has been registered in my India

Driving Licence vide DL No. PY05 20200000463,

issued by the Assistant Licensing Authority,

Transport Department, Puducherry, as ‘Kathavarayan’.

7. My name has been enrolled in my Savings

Account Passbook vide Account No. XXXXXX6558,

issued by Indian Bank, Kalapet Branch, Puducherry,

as ‘S Kathavarayan’.

8. My name has been entered in my Secondary

Course Leaving Certificate bearing Sl.No.

SEC 5309975, Register No. 5013445, TMR Code

No. C1700384, dated 21-05-2015, issued by Secretary,

State Board of Examinations (Sec), Tamil Nadu-

600 006, as ‘Kathavarayan S’.

9. My name has been entered in my Higher

Secondary Course Mark Sheet, Certificate Sl.No.

HSG 12541728, Permanent Register No. 1710594022,

Roll No. 604022, TMR Code No. G643535, dated

12-05-2017, issued by the Secretary, State Board of

Examinations (Hr. Sec.), Tamil Nadu-600 006, as

‘Kathavarayan S’.

10. My name has been entered in my Higher

Secondary Course Transfer Certificate bearing Admn.

No. HSS-586, TC.No. 2009/646, dated 17-05-2017,

issued by Jothi Vallalar Higher Secondary

School, Periyakalapet, Puducherry-605 014, as

‘Kathavarayan.S’.

11. My name has been entered in my Course

Completion Certificate (Diploma Course in Mechanical

Engineering) No. 3739, Register No. 19253796, dated

18-07-2022, issued by Padaleswarar Polytechnic

College, K.K. Nagar, Vannarapalayam, Cuddalore-

607 001, as ‘S. Kathavarayan’.

Hence, I state and declare that I have changed

my name as per numerological reasons as ‘Sharath’

according to our traditional and sentimental reasons.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Sharath (≠´›)’ for all

purposes.

197

27 February 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Hence, I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 19th day of

February 2024.

562658

S. KATHAVARAYAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Fouzia Begum, wife of Abdul Ibounou, Muslim,

aged about 55 years and residing at No. 8A, Thirupur

Kumaran Street, Jeevanandapuram, Lawspet, Puducherry-

605 008, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and

state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I s u b m i t t h a t m y n a m e i s m e n t i o n e d a s

‘J. ÿ¤F›#[∏’ in my Wedding Invitation Card and

‘ÿ¤F›#[¨’ in my Nikkah Certificate.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘Zaithunbe’

in my son Abdul Bagat’s Birth Certificate vide

Registration No. M/1988/08155, issued by Pondicherry

Municipality, Puducherry.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘Jaithoon

Beebi. I’ in my Savings Bank Passbook vide Account

No. XXXXXXXXXXXX0460, issued by the Karur

Vysya Bank Limited, Puducherry.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘Bhavia

Begam Bojiya’ in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card

vide No. PY/01/021/054090, issued by Election

Commission of India.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘Fouzia

Begum’ in my Passport vide No. R3764943, issued by

Regional Passport Office, Chennai and in my Aadhaar

Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 1391.

I submit that my name is mentioned as ‘√°˜BV’

in the Family Ration Card vide No. 414188.

Thus all the names viz., ‘J. ÿ¤F›#[∏’,

‘ÿ¤F›#[¨’, ‘Zaithunbe’, ‘Jaithoon Beebi. I’,

‘Bhavia Begam Bojiya’, ‘Fouzia Begum’ and ‘√°˜BV’

are referring one and the same person that is myself

only.

Hereafter, I shall be known only by the name

‘Fouzia Begum (√°˜BV º√ÔD)’.

Hence, I hereby declare that I shall at all times

hereafter in all records, deeds and writings and in all

proceedings, dealings and transactions, private as

well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign

the name of ‘Fouzia Begum (√°˜BV º√ÔD)’ as my

name in place and in substitution of my former

names.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 19th day of

February 2024.

562659

FOUZIA BEGUM (√°˜BV º√ÔD

√°˜BV º√ÔD

√°˜BV º√ÔD).

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ravi, son of Rajagopal, Indian, inhabitant,

aged 60 years and residing at the house bearing Door

No. 2A, Sixth Cross Street, Rajaji Nagar, Lawspet,

Puducherry-605 008, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Certificate of Birth under Registration No. PM/P/1963/

001076, my name has been mentioned as ‘Banou alias

Ravy’.

In the Legal Heir Certificate of Lok Adalat under

O.S. No. 1428/2020, my name has been mentioned as

‘Banou @ Ravy’.

In my Central Board of Secondary Education Certificate

under Roll No. 28278, my name has been mentioned as

‘R Ravi’.

In the Degree of Master of Philosophy in English,

dated 27-08-1990, my name has been mentioned as

‘Ravi, R’. and in my Pension Payment Order under

PPO No. R0926258/EDG, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Ravi R’.

In my Marriage Certificate under Serial Number of

Marriage 103 of year 1996, my name has been

mentioned as ‘R. Ravi’.

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card under

No. UIJ0153676, my name has been mentioned as

‘Ravi (´s)’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 6115,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Ravi (´s)’.

In the PAN Card under No. AAPPR9589J and in

my India Driving Licence under DL No. PY01

19970001246, my name has been mentioned as ‘Ravi’.

In the particulars of members, in the Family Ration

Card under No.058716, my name has been mentioned

as ‘´s’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

above-mentioned names are referred, identified and

relate to one and the same person that is me, the

deponent herein.

198

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[27 February 2024

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

I state that hereafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name with initial as ‘R. Ravi

(´V. ´s)’ for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 19th day of

February 2024.

562661

R. RAVI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ezhilvarman P, son of Pragalathan, aged about 41 years,

residing at No. 1, Iyyanar Kovil Street, Thattanchavady,

Puducherry-605 009, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this

affidavit on behalf of my deceased father.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Ravipragalathan’ in my Birth Certificate, issued by

the Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry, bearing

Registration No. OM/O/1983/001105.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Pragalathan’ in his Death Certificate, issued by the

Oulgaret

Municipality,

Puducherry,

bearing

Registration No. OM/O/2023/00697.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Pragalathan’ in my Aadhaar Card, issued by Unique

Identification Authority of India, bearing No. XXXX

XXXX 0227.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Pragalathan’ in my Electoral Identity Card, issued by

Election Commission of India, bearing No. JTP0408682.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘∏´ÔÈV>[’ in our Family Ration Card, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry bearing No. 059335.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Raviprahalathan’ in my School Transfer Certificate,

issued by the Principal, Government Higher Secondary

School, Indira Nagar, Puducherry.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Pragalathan’ in my PAN Card, issued by the

Income-tax Department bearing No. ABHPE2916M.

I submit that the names described in the abovesaid

records viz., ‘Ravipragalathan’, ‘Pragalathan’,

‘Raviprahalathan’ and ‘∏´ÔÈV>[’ are referring one

and the same person i.e., my father only.

The above statements in the above paragraphs are

true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 21st day of February 2024.

562663 R. EZHILVARMAN.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (AGRICULTURE)

(G.O. Ms. No. 26/Ag.,

Puducherry, dated 15th February 2024)

CORRIGENDUM

Approval of the Hon’ble Lieutenant-Governor,

Puducherry, is hereby conveyed for issue of corrigendum

to the revised pattern of assistance read at III (below I-

Pattern of Assistance) appearing in the Official Gazette,

Part-II, Gazette No. 100, dated 12-12-2023, G.O. Ms.

No. 20/Ag., dated 07 December, 2023 of the Chief

Secretariat (Agriculture), Puducherry as follows:

For

Read

New Area brought under

cashew cultivation @

` 50,000 per ha (` 30,000

` 50,000 per ha (` 20,000/ha

under CSS-NHM) and

` 20,000/ha (under the

(` 30,000/ha under the

State Scheme) in three

instalments.

2. The other conditions contained in the abovesaid

G.O. remain unaltered.

3. This order is issued with the concurrence of the

Finance Department vide its ID No. 30757/FC/FD/F5/A2/

2024, dated 06th February, 2024.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

SUNDARARAJAN P

Deputy Secretary to Government

(Agriculture).