[219]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

220

Sentence arbitral du Travail

.. 220

Award of the Labour Court .. 220

de Tribunal

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

227

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 227

Government Notifications

.. 227

Œ©√ ∂§s©AÔ^

232

Avis d’ appel d’ offres

.. 232

Tender Notices

.. 232

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

232

Etablissements dangereux

.. 232

Dangerous Establishments

232

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

233

Annonces

.. 233

Announcements

233

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2024 }

\VÏﬂ |

12 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Mars

2024 (22 Phalguna 1945)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

12th

March

2024

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

220

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 11/AIL/Lab./T/2023,

Puducherry, dated 24th January 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D (L) No. 34/2018, dated

13-10-2023 of the Labour Court, Puducherry, in respect

of the industrial dispute between the management of

M/s. Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research

Institute, represented by Senior Personal Manager,

Pillaiyarkuppam, Puducherry and Thiru Boominathan,

Kondur Post, Cuddalore, over continuity of service, full

back wages and all other attendant benefits has been

received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the Notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

P. RAGINI,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present :Tmt. G.T. AMBIKA, M.L., PGDCLCF.,

Presiding Officer.

Friday, the 13th day of October, 2023

I.D. (L) No. 34/2018

CNR. No. PYPY06-000069-2018

Boominathan,

S/o. Stalin,

No. 42, Vinayaga Nagar,

Kondur Post, Cuddalore.

. . Petitioner

Versus

Mahatma Gandhi Medical College

and Research Institute,

Rep. by its Senior Personal Manager,

SBV Campus, NH 45A,

Pondy - Cuddalore Main Road,

Pillaiyarkuppam, Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on 20-09-2023 before

me for final hearing in the presence of Thiruvalargal

P.R. Thiruneelakandan and A. Mithun Chakkaravarthy,

Counsels for the Petitioner, Thiruvalargal L. Sathish,

S. Velmurugan, V. Veeraragavan and E. Karthik, Counsels

for the Respondent and after hearing the both sides and

perusing the case records, this Court delivered the

following:

AWARD

This Petition filed under section 2(A) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, Amended Act 24 of 2010 to pass an

Award holding that the termination of the petitioner

service with effect from 23-06-2016 is arbitrary, illegal

and direct the respondent/management to reinstate the

petitioner in his service as Network Administrator with

continuity of service, full back wages and all other

attendant benefits with effect from the date of illegal

termination, i.e., on 23-06-2016.

2. The averments in the claim petition is as follows:

(i) The petitioner was appointed in the respondent

establishment on 09-06-2010 as a “Network

Administrator” and the respondent with an ulterior

motive to deny and deprive the status of permanent

workman and other monetary benefits and to deny

the other statutory protection of service condition

of the permanent workman to the petitioner has

stated in the appointment letter that the petitioner

was engaged on contractual basis only for 11 months

from 09-06-2010. The fact remains that even after

lapse of the said 11 months period, the petitioner was

continuously engaged as a Network Administrator

till he was illegally terminated from service in the

year 2016 and that itself is evident that the initial

appointment order of the petitioner was issued with

mala fied. In the year 2010, the petitioner was paid a

sum of ` 12,000 as monthly wage and then in the year

2011, the wage was increased to ` 16,000 per month.

After about 5 years till 2016, when the petitioner was

illegally terminated from his service there was no

wage increment and his service also was not

regularised as permanent employee and furthermore,

he was not event paid wage on par with the

permanent employee who did service similar nature

of work of the petitioner as Network Administrator.

(ii) Since, the petitioner rendered 6 years continuous

service as network administrator with fond of hope

that this service could be confirmed as permanent

employee and he will be paid wage and other benefits

as well as protection of service condition as permanent

employees, but, he was denied. Hence, the petitioner

demanded the respondent management to regularize

his service as permanent employee and extend the

benefits of the permanent employee including the

wage but, the respondent management did not come

forward to concede the legitimate demand of the

221

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

petitioner. On the other hand, the respondent decided

to terminate the service of the petitioner and

accordingly on 23-06-2016, the petitioner was

terminated from service on the allegation that

22-06-2016 he has indulged in the activities of

instigating the willing workmen to refrain from

discharging their duties. The allegation is absolutely

false and the petitioner was neither charge-sheeted

nor any enquiry was conducted against him for

aforesaid charge before his service was terminated.

(iii) Since, the petitioner’s initial appointment, the

petitioner has been working in the respondent

management under the direct control of the

respondent management but, the respondent

management in order to deny the regularization of

service has fabricated records as if, he was employed

through contractor. Hence, the Petition.

3. The averments in the counter filed by the

respondent is as follows:

The Respondent Management is a Multi-Specialty

Hospital and Trauma Care Centre, providing plethora

of medical facilities and treatment to people in and

around Puducherry region. It also runs a reputed

Medical and Nursing Colleges. The respondent is a

trauma care centre where hundreds of patients come

in for emergency treatments in any given day. Apart

from that, there are in-patients and out-patients, who

require constant medical attention. Respondent’s

hospital also has ICU and CCU wards, critical operation

theaters, where Doctors, Nurses, Technicians,

Assistants, Attendants and other workers provide

round the clock medical treatment and assistance to

patients. Respondent employs around 2,000 workers,

Nursing Staff, General Staff, Officers and Faculty out

of whom 15% employees are engaged through

contractors for peripheral works on periodical basis

as per due provision of law.

(ii) The petitioner was employed on 09-06-2010

vide offer of Temporary engagement to work for the

post of Network Administrator purely on contract

basis. Some of the important clause of offer of

Temporary engagement of petitioner, dated 09-06-2010

are as follows:

Clause 3: Your temporary engagement is only

for the specific period of eleven months only from

the date you start working. This engagement for

work will not be extended on the expiry of eleven

months and will, on the expiry of the period,

automatically stand terminated. This offer of

engagement for work will not bestow any right/

claim for your future continuous absorption in the

Institute.

Clause 4: You should be responsible in the

discharge of the work allotted to you and you

should carry out the same to the satisfaction of

your superiors. Punctuality in work timings and

daily attendance should be strictly observed by

you.

Clause 7: If, you performance during working

is found to be not satisfactory and in the event

of any acts of misconduct noticed during the

period, this temporary engagement for work will

be terminated without any notice.

Clause 13: Based on the understanding of the

above terms and conditions, this offer for your

temporary engagement is made to you.

(iii) Right from the date of engagement of

petitioner on contract basis, the petitioner had

exhibited short temperedness and would fight with

his co-workers and his superiors on trivial issues and

will disobey the orders of his superior. Petitioner

would constantly instigate other workers to bully the

management and make unreasonable demands. When

respondent’s official would request for a peaceful

negotiation of issues, he would immediately put his

foot down and instruct workers to engage in

demonstrations, slogan shouting and other kinds of

pressure tactics. This has been a routine for petitioner

and the respondent on number of earlier occasions

warned petitioner of serious consequences but, the

petitioner did not mend his ways and continued to

engage himself in such abhorring conducts.

(iv) Only two registered and recognized Unions

in the hospital namely, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth deemed

University and MGMCRI Labour and Employees

Union, (Registration No. 586/RTU/2009) and Mahatma

Gandhi Maruthuvam and Indiragandhi Palmaruthuva

Kallori Congress Employees Union, (Registration

No. 1582/RTU/2009), which represents majority of

workers in respondent’s Institution. Only with these

two Unions, respondent has always held discussions

on issues of general importance and has signed long

term settlements under section 12(3) of Industrial

Disputes Act. However, on 03-03-2016, a letter was

addressed by Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva Kallori

matrum Aaraichi Niruvana Niranthara Thozilalar

Vazhvurimai Sangam that they have formed and

registered a new Union and the placed a charter of

demands vide letter, dated 07-03-2016. Similarly, on

27-04-2016, respondent received yet another letter

signed by Mahatma Gandhi Muruthuva Kallori

Matrum Aaraichi Niruvana Opantha Thozhilalar

Vazhvurimai Sangam informing Niruvana Opantha

Thozhilalargal Sangam placed their 22 points

222

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

Charter of Demands and requested the respondent

to invite them for discussions on such charter of

Demand, petitioner herein claimed himself to be the

President of Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva Kallori

Mattrum Aaraichi Nuruvana Opantha Thozhilalargal

Vazhvurimai Sangam. Therefore, respondent received

letters signed by the petitioner and other leaders of

Union, dated 24-05-2016, claiming that if, the charter

of demands given by two newly formed Unions is

not met within 15 days, they shall indulge themselves

in strikes and demonstrations.

(v) That on 15-06-2016, the petitioner through

his Union addressed a letter to Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Government of Puducherry placing his

Union’s charter of demands and had once again

threatened of continuous illegal strike, if, their

demands are not met by the respondent. The said

Labour Officer (Conciliation) issued a Notice of

Conciliation, dated 20-06-2016 and thus, initiated

process of negotiation on industrial dispute raised

by Petitioner’s Union. Law thus mandates that once

conciliation process is initiated, both parties to

dispute were required to maintain decorum and were

not supposed to engage in illegal strike or lockout

but, the petitioner as the head of his Union was not

inclined to follow rule of law. He once again

addressed a letter through his Union, dated

21-06-2016, wherein, he declared that his Union shall

indulge in indefinite strike and other forms of

demonstrations with effect from 22-06-2016, which

would initially not be implemented at ICU, MICU,

Casualty, maintenance and Ambulance service for

two days and thereafter, those units will also be

subjected to be the continuous illegal strike.

(vi) Petitioner has worked as a Network

Administrator in respondent’s Institution on contract

basis, which is a very responsible position in its

hospital. The entire hospital activities of the

respondent were computerized and each and every

Department is interconnected and interlinked.

Petitioner was in a very responsible position of

managing smooth functioning of all the networks and

its connections. Petitioner was therefore required to

display utmost maturity and sincerity in his work and

was not suppose to engage himself in flash strikes,

demonstrations or picketing. The strike that was

called for by petitioner through his Union was clearly

illegal and he was fully aware of the fact that such

strike pending conciliation before services and illegal

strikes would jeopardize the life and limb of many

patients and would bring the entire hospital to a

standstill.

(vii) The petitioner and his Union namely,

Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva Kalloori Matrum

Aaraichi Niruvana Niranthara Thozhilalar Vazhvurimai

Sangam, along with few others, especially

R. Velmurugan, G. Anbarasan, D. Karthikeyan has

restored to illegal strike inside respondent’s

Institution on 22-06-2016 from 8.00 a.m. The strike

continued till 7.30 a.m. on 15-07-2016. They disturbed

and disrupted respondent’s daily activities,

especially treatment to the needy patients. Many of

the needy patients in respondent’s hospital required

emergency care and treatment. Petitioner and other

Union representatives along with their Unions

namely, Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva Kallori Matrum

Aaraichi Niruvana Niranthara Thozhilalar Vazhvurimai

Sangam and Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva Kallori

Matrum Aaraichi Niruvana Opantha Thozhilalargal

Vazhvurimai Sangam has threatened the other loyal

and willing employees and workers to join them in

their illegal strike. Petitioner, R. Velmurugan,

G. Anbarasan and D. Karthikeyan included a group

of workers to barge inside the laboratories where

costly equipments/specimens/investigation details

were kept and threatened laboratory staffs to support

their illegal strike, failing which they will destroy the

specimens obtained for patients and other laboratory

equipments in the lab. The efforts taken by respondent

to prevent petitioner and other members of the

Unions entering into respondent’s hospital resulted

in failure. Left with no other alternative, respondent

has displayed a notice, dated 22-06-2016, clearly

highlighting about disturbance caused to essential

service and intimated that appropriate disciplinary

proceedings would be initiated. Respondent also

gave a complaint, dated 23-06-2016 to the Senior

Police Officials and to Kirumampakkam Police Station

requesting them to provide adequate Police

protection in and around respondent's hospital and

requested them to prevent agitating workmen from

thwarting ingress and egress of men/materials/

patients/staffs/students and more particularly

intimated that life saving surgeries in operation

theater has been cancelled owing to non-availability

of workman from discharging their duties.

(viii) Since, the situation went out of control and

there was an imminent and lurking danger of loss of

line, limb and materials of the respondent, it

immediately moved a Civil Suit in O.S. No. 201/2016

on the file of Principal Sub-Judge, Puducherry,

seeking permanent and interim prohibitory injunction

against the petitioner, his associates, his Union and

other Union to restrain them from conducting any

illegal strike within the precincts of the respondents

223

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

hospital. Respondent obtained ex parte injunction

but, it could still not control the petitioner and his

associates from giving up the illegal strike.

(ix) Since, the petitioner was leading the entire

strike as President and D. Karthikeyan as Secretary

of Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva Kalloori Matrum

Aaraichi Niruvana Opantha Thozhilalar Vazhvurimai

Sangam along with others like R. Velmurugan and

G. Anbarasan of Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva Kallori

Matrum Aaraichi Niruvana Niranthara Thozhilalargal

Vazhvurimai Sangam and since, the situation in the

hospital has gone out of control and the respondent

was not able to control the rampaging workers

engaging in illegal flash strike in complete violation

section 22 of Industrial Disputes Act, it has not

options but, to take immediate and quick action

against petitioner. Entire situation in hospital has

become grim and even with Civil Court’s injunction

order, respondent has not able to control agitating

workers, who were fully charged up and instigated

by the petitioner. There was absolutely no time for

the respondent to issue charge-sheet, conduct domestic

enquiry and it has compelled by circumstances to

take immediate action against petitioner, who was the

main player in the strike. Further, petitioner was

engaged on contract basis and hence, respondent

was advised that it had every right to relieve

petitioner without any enquiry. Respondent was

advised that even if, any enquiry was required to be

conducted, it could done by the management after

defusing the grave situation. The respondent has

thus, compelled to take immediate action in the

interest of the Institution and thousands of patients

stranded inside hospital to diffuse illegal strike of

Union headed by petitioner. Hence, it terminated

petitioner with immediate effect vide its Order, dated

23-06-2016. Therefore, there is no merits in the

contention that petitioner was victimized for his

Union related activities. Hence, the petition filed by

the Petitioner is liable to dismissed.

4. Points for determination:

1. Whether the employment of the Petitioner in

the respondent Institution was a permanent or

contractual one?

2. Whether the termination order passed by the

respondent without conducting domestic enquiry is

sustainable or unsustainable one?

3. Whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief

to set aside the termination Order, dated 23-6-2016

and for reinstatement with continuity of service,

full back wages and other attendant benefits?

5. The petitioner examined himself as P.W.1 and

Exs.P1 to P12 were marked. On the side of respondent

R.W.1 was examined and Exs.R1 to R11 were marked.

Written arguments was filed on either side.

6. On points 1 to 3:

The contention of the petitioner is that the

petitioner was employed in the respondent Institution

on 09-06-2010 as a Network Administrator on

contractual basis for 11 months but, however, the

petitioner continued to work in the respondent

Institution till, he was illegally terminated from service

in the year 2016. The further specific contention of

the petitioner is that the respondent with an ulterior

motive to deny and deprive the status of a permanent

workman and other monetary benefits to the

petitioner has employed the petitioner on contractual

basis and in the year 2010 the petitioner was paid a

sum of ` 12,000 as monthly wages and in the year 2011,

the wage was increased to ` 16,000 per month and

thereafter, there was no any wage increment given

to the petitioner by the respondent. The petitioner’s

further contention is that though the work extracted

from the petitioner was similar to that of a permanent

employee work but, the petitioner was not paid wages

on par with the permanent employee and hence, the

petitioner has demanded the respondent management

to regularize his service as a permanent employer and

to extend all benefits of the permanent employee but,

the respondent without considering the legitimate

demand of the petitioner has terminated the service

of the petitioner on 23-06-2016 without providing

charge-sheet or conducting enquiry alleging that on

22-06-2016, the petitioner has indulged in the

activities of instigating the willing workmen to refrain

from discharging their duties.

7. Per contra, the contention of the respondent is

that the petitioner was appointed on 09-06-2010 to the

post of Network Administrator and his offer letter it is

specifically stated that the engagement to work in the

respondent Institution is for a period of 11 months and

the employment is purely on contract basis and further,

it is stated that the offer of engagement for work will

not bestow any right/claim for future continuous

absorption in the Institution and also in case, the

performance of the petitioner during the working period

is found to be not satisfactory or in the event of any

acts of misconduct is noticed then, the temporary

engagement of work will be terminated without any

notice and therefore, it is the specific contention of the

respondent that the petitioner was engaged in the

respondent Institution on a contractual basis without

any right to claim regularization of his employment and

224

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

further the petitioner being an educated youth and

having accepted the employment as per the terms of

offer letter is precluded from claiming the rights of a

permanent employee. Apart from that the respondent

contends that after engagement of petitioner on

contractual basis, the petitioner was exhibiting his short

temperedness to his co-workers and to his superiors and

disobeyed the orders of the superior and instigated

other workers to fight with management for unreasonable

demands and later the petitioner claimed himself to be

the President of Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva Kalloori

Matrum Aaraichi Niruvana Opantha Thozhilalargal

Vazhvurimai Sangam and gave a letter, dated 24-05-2016

signed by the petitioner and other leaders of the Union

stating that if the charter of demands given by two

newly formed unions is not considered within 15 days

then they would indulge in strikes and demonstrations

and on 15-06-2016 through his Union has addressed

a letter to Labour Officer Conciliation placing the

Union’s charter of demands and again threatened for

continuous illegal strike if the demands are not met with

by the respondent and on 22-06-2016 the petitioner and

his Union has indulged in indefinite strike and disrupted

the respondent institution from providing treatment to

the needy patients and though the respondent had

lodged complaint before Kirumampakkam Police Station,

Puducherry, seeking protection and also filed Civil Suit

in OS.201/2016 before Principal Sub-Judge, Puducherry,

but, the situation in the hospital became grim and

uncontrollable and therefore, the respondent was

constrained to take a drastic step and terminated the

petitioner from service without conducting Domestic

Enquiry.

8. In this case, the core question that arises for

consideration is whether the employment of the

Petitioner in the respondent institution was a permanent

one as contended by the petitioner or a contractual one

as contended by the respondent. The respondent to

substantiate that the petitioner was employed on

contractual basis has placed reliance upon the terms

stipulated in Ex.P1. This Court on perusal of evidences

adduced by both parties and the pleadings finds that

Ex.P1 is admitted by both parties. On perusal of Ex.P1

it is stated that it is an Offer for Temporary Engagement

to Work issued to the petitioner. Some of the important

terms and conditions as stated in Ex.P1 is extracted

hereunder for better appreciation:

The Management of Mahatma Gandhi Medical

College and Research Institute has decided to engage

S. Boominathan to work/serve as Network Administrator

on a purely contract basis.

This contract of engagement to work in our

institution is for a period of only Eleven months.

This offer of engagement for work will not bestow

any right/claim for your future continuous absorption

in the institute.

If, your performance during working is found to

be not satisfactory and in the event of any acts of

misconduct noticed during this period, this temporary

engagement for work will be terminated without any

notice.

9. Thus, in Ex.P1 offer letter it is distinctly stated

that the contract engagement of the petitioner to work

in the respondent institution is purely on contract basis

for a period of 11 months and further the said offer of

engagement for work will not bestow any right upon the

petitioner to claim for future continuous absorption in

the institute. The petitioner during his cross-examination

as P.W.1 has deposed that he has studied M.Sc., I.T.

and he has good proficiency in English and further, he

was well aware of the terms of employment as stated in

Ex.P1. Therefore, from the evidence of P.W.1 it could be

inferred that the petitioner was well aware of the terms

of offer for employment provided by the respondent and

further, the petitioner also has accepted the offer of

employment as per the terms as found in Ex.P1.

10. In this case though the petitioner accepts that

as per Ex.P1 offer for temporary engagement to work

issued by respondent stipulates that the respondent

had offered work to the petitioner purely on contract

basis for 11 months but contends that the respondent

continued the employment of petitioner more than

11 months and thereby the petitioner had worked in the

respondent institution from 09-06-2010 to 26-06-2016 on

regular basis and further, the respondent had extracted

from the petitioner all similar works that were done by

a permanent employee and therefore, the petitioner had

worked in the respondent institution only as a

permanent employee but, the respondent with mala fide

intention to deprive from providing the status and

benefits of permanent employee has wantonly stated in

the Ex.P1 that the petitioner is engaged to work in the

respondent institution purely on contract basis.

11. Therefore, in the said context it becomes

necessary to determine when the offer of employment

issued by the respondent states that the employment

is for eleven months and purely on contract basis then

whether the continuation of employment of petitioner

even after eleven months that is extension and

continuation of petitioner’s service for more than

six years would confer any rights of a permanent

employee upon the petitioner. The learned Counsel for

respondent contended that when the appointment made

was purely contractual, then the concerned person shall

not be entitled to claim any rights of a permanent

225

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

employee and further, in this case the petitioner being

an educated youth having understood the terms of offer

and having accepted the contractual appointment is

estopped from challenging the terms of appointment and

also claiming the rights of a permanent employee. The

Learned Counsel for petitioner to substantiate this

contention has relied upon the following citations:

(i) CDJ 1992 SC 118: The question is whether

the directions are valid in law to our mind, it is clear

that where the appointment is contractual and by

efflux of time, the appointment comes to an end, the

respondent could have no right to continue in the

post. Once this conclusion is arrived at, what

requires to be examined is, in view of the services of

the respondent being continued from time to time on

ad hoc basis for more than a year whether she is

entitled to regularization? The answer should be in

the negative.

In the instant case, there is no such rule. The

appointment was purely ad hoc and on the

contractual basis for a limited period. Therefore, by

expiry of the period of six months, the right to remain

in the post comes to an end.

(ii) CDJ 2016 BHC 107 : “Court Held - Perusal

of appointment orders clearly show that appointment

of complainant is contractual in nature for specific

period and is to come an end at period as specified

in the said order - It is not even evidence of

complainant that he is in continuous employment

either for period of not less than a year or for more

than 3 months - Thus, Single Judge has erred in

setting aside concurrent orders passed by the Labour

Court as well as the Industrial Court denying

reinstatement and continuity of service with back

wages - Hence, judgment and order passed by the

Single Judge is quashed and set aside and order of

the Industrial Court is maintained - Appeal allowed.

It is not the law that on completion of 240 days

of continuous service in a year, the concerned

employee becomes entitled to for regularization of his

services and/or permanent status. The concept of

240 days in a year was introduced in the industrial

law for a definite purpose. Under the Industrial

Disputes Act, the concept of 20 days was introduced

so as to fasten a statutory liabilities upon the

employer to pay compensation to be computed in the

manner specified in section 25-F of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 before he is retrenched from

services and not for any other purpose. In the event

a violation of the said provision takes place, termination

of services of the employee may be found to be

illegal, but, only on that account, his services cannot

be directed to be regularized. Direction to reinstate

the workman would mean that he gets back the same

status.

12. Thus, this Court finds that the Hon’ble Apex

Courts have held that it is not the law that on completion

of 240 days of continuous service in a year an employee

is entitled for regularization of his service or to claim

a permanent status. It is further, held that the concept

of 240 days in a year was introduced in the industrial

law so as to fasten a statutory liability upon employer

to pay compensation to be computed in the manner

specified in section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act

1947, when a workman is sought to be retrenched by

an employer. Similarly, it is held that the protection and

benefits provided under section 25-F of Industrial

Disputes Act will not apply in case of section (oo) (bb)

of Industrial Disputes Act, where a workmen is

terminated as a result of non-renewal of contract of

employment on its expiry or being terminated under a

stipulation in that behalf contained therein.

13. Therefore, even for claiming the benefits

provided under section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act,

the employment should not be one under contractual

basis. Likewise even for claiming regularization on the

basis of completion of 240 days of continuous service

in a year, the employment should not be one under

contractual basis and in case the employment is on

contractual basis then section 2 (oo) (bb) of Industrial

Disputes Act gets attracted whereby neither regularization

or benefits of retrenchment as stipulated under section

25F of Industrial Disputes Act cannot be claimed.

14. Similarly, the Hon’ble Apex Courts have held that

when the initial appointment was of a contractual nature

and not against a sanctioned post and not in compliance

with the rules or regulations then such appointment

would not give the concerned employee any right to

have his service regularized. Further, it is held that if it

is a contractual appointment, then the appointment

comes to an end at the end of the contract and a temporary

employee cannot claim to make him permanent on the

expiry of his term of appointment. Similarly, it is held

that because a temporary employee is continued for a

time beyond the term of his appointment, he would not

be entitled to be absorbed in regular service or made

permanent, merely on the strength of such continuance,

if, the original appointment was not made by following

a due process of selection as envisaged by the relevant

rules.

15. Therefore, this Court in the light of above

citations finds that as in this case the employment was

provided as per Ex.P1 which states that the petitioner

is engaged to work in the respondent institution on a

purely contract basis then in such case even when the

petitioner continued to work in the respondent

Institution for a period of 240 days in a year the same

cannot confer any right of regularisation upon the

petitioner since the employment of the petitioner was

on contractual basis. Hence, when such being so, the

petitioner cannot seek to treat him as a permanent

226

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

employee in the absence of regularisation and thereby

cannot seek to provide him all rights of permanent

employee more particularly to conduct domestic enquiry

before termination of service. As per Ex.P1 it is stated

that the petitioner being appointed on contract basis,

the respondent has reserved the right to terminate

without any notice and it is the contention of the

respondent that the same has been exercised by the

respondent.

16. Hence, this Court in view of above discussions

holds that the claim of the petitioner that the petitioner

ought to have given the rights of permanent employee

and further, ought to have afforded opportunity to

prove his innocence or disprove the charges leveled

against him by conducting domestic enquiry is found

to be untenable in view of terms of employment

stipulated in Ex.P1. Thus, this Court holds that there is

no any illegality in the termination order passed by the

respondent. Therefore, in the said facts and discussions

held supra, this Court holds that the Industrial dispute

raised by the petitioner as against the respondent

management, over his non-employment is not justifiable

one. Thus, the points are answered accordingly.

In the result this petition is dismissed. There is no

order as to costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, directly typed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this

the 13th day of October, 2023.

G.T. AMBIKA,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness:

PW.1 — 29-03-2022 T h i r u

B o o m i n a t h a n

(Petitioner herein).

List of petitioner’s exhibits:

Ex.P1 — 09-06-2010 Photocopy of the Petitioner’s

Appointment Order.

Ex.P2 — 23-06-2016 Photocopy of the Petitioner’s

Termination Order.

Ex.P3 — 28-12-2016 Photocopy of the dispute

raised by the Petitioner

before the Labour Officer

(Conciliation), Puducherry.

Ex.P4 — 18-02-2017 Photocopy of the reply given

by the Respondent to the

Labour Officer (Conciliation),

Puducherry.

Ex.P5 — 27-04-2016 Photocopy of the letter

given by the Union to the

Respondent for Demand and

Strike Notice.

Ex.P6 — 24-05-2016 Photocopy of the letter

given by the Union to the

Respondent for Demand and

Strike Notice.

Ex.P7 — 15-06-2016 Photocopy of the letter

given by the Union to the

Labour Officer (Conciliation),

Puducherry, for Demand and

Strike Notice.

Ex.P8 — 21-06-2016 Photocopy of the letter

given by the Union to the

Respondent for Strike.

Ex.P9 — 23-06-2016 Photocopy of the letter

given by the Union to the

Superintendent of Police.

Ex.P10 — 24-06-2016 Photocopy of the letter

given by the Union to the

Labour Officer (Conciliation),

Puducherry.

Ex.P11 — 29-06-2016 Photocopy of the letter

given by the Union to the

L a b o u r

D e p a r t m e n t ,

Puducherry.

Ex.P12 — 20-12-2021 Photocopy of the Judgment

and Decree in O.S. No. 201/

2016.

List of respondent’s witness:

RW1

— 30-09-2022 Balamukundan

(Senior

Personal Manager of the

Respondent Management).

List of respondent’s exhibits:

Ex.R1 — 08-12-2009 Photocopy of the Interim

and

Order in MP. No. 1 and 2 of

17-04-2012 2009 in WP. No. 25414/2009

and Order in WP. No. 25414/

2009.

Ex.R2 — 09-06-2010 Photocopy of the Temporary

engagement to work issued

the

Management

Petitioner.

Ex.R3 — 07-03-2016 Photocopy of the Charter of

Demands submitted by the

Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva

Kallori Matrum Aaraichi

N i r u v a n a

N i r a n t h a r a

Thozhilalar

Vazhvurimai

Sangam.

Ex.R4 — 21-06-2016 Photocopy of the Letter

issued by the Management to

Station

House

Officer,

Kirumambakkam

Police

Station, Puducherry, seeking

protection.

227

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Ex.R5 — 22-06-2016 Photocopy of the Notice

issued by the Management to

workers clearly highlighting

about disturbance caused to

e s s e n t i a l

s e r v i c e

a n d

intimated that appropriate

disciplinary

proceedings

would be initiated.

Ex.R6 — 23-06-2016 Photocopy of the Complaint

issued by the Management to

the Senior Police Officials and

to Kirumambakkam Police

Station requesting them to

provide

adequate

police

protection in and around

hospital.

Ex.R7 — 28-06-2016 Photocopy of the Circular

issued by the Management to

its contract labour.

Ex.R8 — 15-06-2016 Photocopy of the Strike

Notice

issued

the

Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva

Kallori Matrum Aaraichi

N i r u v a n a

N i r a n t h a r a

Thozhilalar

Vazhvurimai

Sangam and the notice issued

by the conciliation office on

20-06-2016.

Ex.R9 — 15-07-2016 Photocopy of the Strike

Notice

issued

the

Mahatma Gandhi Maruthuva

Kallori Matrum Aaraichi

N i r u v a n a

N i r a n t h a r a

Thozhilalar

Vazhvurimai

Sangam.

Ex.R10 — 30-06-2016 Photocopy of the Interim

injunction order passed in

OS. No. 201/2016 on the file

Principal

Sub-Judge,

Puducherry.

Ex.R11 — 27-09-2016 Photocopy of the Intimation

of no change of address by

the Petitioner to Management.

G.T. AMBIKA,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), KARAIKAL

NO. 2102/DDSE/KKL/E3(Exam.)/2024/60.

Karaikal, the 21st February 2024.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby notified that the following candidates have lost their original S.S.L.C. and H.S.C. Mark

Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificate(s). If, any

one finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations

(Sec.), College Road, Chennai – 600 006 for cancellation, as it is/they are no longer valid.

Sl.

Name of the

Sl. No. of

School in which

No.

applicant

session and

the mark

studied last

year

certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Thiruvalargal :

500067, March 2006

3578999

Thanthai Periyar Government Higher

Kumaresan. M

Secondary School, Kovilpathu, Karaikal.

483453, March 2008

3689767

V.O.C. Government Higher Secondary

School, Kottucherry, Karaikal.

Mohamed Muzzamil. H

1745715, April

2012

0752106

St. Mary’s Higher Secondary School,

Karaikal.

M. RADJESVARY,

Deputy Director (Secondary Education).

228

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´∑

mÁð \Vk‚¶ g‚EBÏ (kÚkVF) ∂KkÈÔD, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_

®ı 11243/\VƒVg/ÔVÁ´/Ê3/2024/166.

∂§s¬ÁÔ

[Amﬂºƒˆ WÈ \VMB s] 1975, s] 60(iii)-[ ˇµ]

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´ƒV_ >∫Ô”¬z Œ©√Á¶ ÿƒFB©√‚¶ ˇµ¬ÔVbD WÈsk´∫Ô”Á¶B ÷¶›]_ >V∫Ô^ T| Ô‚¶V\ºÈV

∂_Èm zΩlÚ¬ÔV\ºÈV ÷Ú©√>[ JÈD >∫Ô”¬z kw∫Ô©√‚¶ WÈ Œ©√Á¶ gÁðl_ ÔVð©√|D

W√Õ>Á™ (2)án >V∫Ô^ ÔÁ¶∏Ω¬ÔV>Á> ∂§B°D.

kˆÁƒ

Œ©√Á¶ ÿ√u≈kˆ[ ÿ√BÏ

ÂÔ´/\Æ

WÈ›][

WÈ Œ©√Á¶

®ı

�ÆD xÔkˆ

∂·Ák ®ı

√´©√·°

gÁð ®ı

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

ÿ«. g.

ƒV.

®ı 23, >È›ÿ>Ú kÚkVF ˛´V\D:

]Ú. ÿƒ_k´VÎ>V\¸, >/ÿ√. ¤V[,

A/1/26/48

435/05á06

]Ú\] ∂ﬁƒÁÈ, Ô/ÿ√. ÿƒ_k´VÎ>V\¸.

g>ÈV_, ÷Àk§s©A ˛Á¶¬Ô©ÿ√u≈ 15 ÂV‚Ô”¬z^ >∫Ô”¬z kw∫Ô©√‚¶ ÷¶›]Á™ ∞[ ∂´ºƒ ]ÚD√

®|›m¬ÿÔV^·¬Ì¶Vm ®[√>uÔV™ ÔV´ð∫ÔÁ· ÷ÀkKkÈÔ›]uz› ÿ>ˆs¬zD√Ω ºÔ‚|¬ÿÔV^·©√|˛≈m,

÷m ÿ>V¶Ï√VÔ >V∫Ô^ ÔÚ›m ∞º>–D ÿ>ˆs¬Ô sÚD∏™V_ º�z§©∏‚¶ ÔVÈ¬ÿÔ|suz^ ˇµ¬ÁÔÿBV©√t‚|^·

∂]ÔVˆl¶D xÁ≈l¶ÈVD.

z§©∏‚¶ ÔVÈ¬ÿÔ|suz^ >V∫Ô^ ºÂˆºÈV ∂_Èm ÔΩ>D kVlÈVÔºkV >∫Ô·m ÔÚ›Á>› ÿ>ˆs¬ÔVsΩ_,

>∫Ôπ¶D ÔÚ›m¬Ì≈ ∞mD ÷_ÁÈ ®™¬ ÔÚ>©√‚| ÷>uz º\_ ®Õ> ∂§s©At[§ >∫Ô”¬z kw∫Ô©√‚¶

WÈ Œ©√Á¶ gÁð ´›m ÿƒFB©√|D.

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_, 2024 } ∏©´kˆ | 23 {,

QV. ¤V[ƒ[,

mÁð g‚EBÏ (kÚkVF).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 20/Lab./AIL/S/2024,

Puducherry, dated 26th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry and Thiru P. Ranjithkumar, over reinstatement

along with all other attendant benefits, in respect of the

matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner

Thiru P. Ranjithkumar, against the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry, over reinstatement along with all other

attendant benefits is justified or not? If justified, to

give appropriate directions.

(ii) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

229

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 21/Lab./AIL/S/2024,

Puducherry, dated 26th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry and Thiru S. Bharathan, over reinstatement

along with all other attendant benefits, in respect of the

matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner

Thiru S. Bharathan, against the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry, over reinstatement along with all other

attendant benefits is justified or not? If justified,

to give appropriate directions.

(ii) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 22/Lab./AIL/S/2024,

Puducherry, dated 26th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry and Thiru A. Navanithakrishnan, over

reinstatement along with all other attendant benefits, in

respect of the matter mentioned in the Annexure to this

order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner

Thiru A. Navanithakrishnan, against the management

of M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry, over reinstatement along with all other

attendant benefits is justified or not? If justified, to

give appropriate directions.

(ii) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

230

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 23/Lab./AIL/S/2024,

Puducherry, dated 26th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry and Thiru J. Srinivasan, over reinstatement

along with all other attendant benefits, in respect of the

matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner

Thiru J. Srinivasan, against the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry, over reinstatement along with all other

attendant benefits is justified or not? If justified, to

give appropriate directions.

(ii) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 24/Lab./AIL/S/2024,

Puducherry, dated 26th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry and Thiru S. Charlie Suresh, over reinstatement

along with all other attendant benefits, in respect of the

matter mentioned in the Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government, it

is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-5-1991 of the

Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the powers

conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV

of 1947), it is hereby directed by the Secretary to

Government (Labour) that the said dispute be referred

to the Labour Court, Puducherry, for adjudication.

The Labour Court, Puducherry, shall submit the Award

within 3 months from the date of issue of reference as

stipulated under sub-section (2-A) of section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in accordance with

rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules,

1957. The party raising the dispute shall file a statement

of claim complete with relevant documents, list of

reliance and witnesses to the Labour Court, Puducherry,

within 15 days of the receipt of the order of reference

and also forward a copy of such statement to each one

of the opposite parties involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the dispute raised by the petitioner

Thiru S. Charlie Suresh, against the management of

M/s. Shree Mother Plast India Private Limited,

Puducherry, over reinstatement along with all other

attendant benefits is justified or not? If justified, to

give appropriate directions.

(ii) To compute the relief, if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed.

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

231

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 04/2024/1250, Puducherry, dated 28th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 7 of the Right to Fair Compensation

and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, the Government of Puducherry

hereby constitutes an Independent multi-disciplinary “Expert Group” with the following Members to evaluate the

Social Impact Assessment (SIA) report submitted by the Social Impact Assessment Team, in connection with

acquisition of lands at 69-Thavalakuppam Revenue Village, Puducherry District for the public purpose viz., “Provision

of pathway to the existing Government Middle School, Andiyarpalayam, Puducherry”. The Expert Group shall make

its recommendations within a period of two months from the date of its constitution namely:-

Sl.

Name and

Department/Organisation

No.

Designation

(1)

(2)

(3)

Thiruvalargal :

1 S. Shakthyvel, Director

Local Administration Department, Puducherry

. . Chairperson

2 M. Kandar Selvam,

Town and Country Planning Department, Puducherry

. . Member

Chief Town Planner.

3 Dr. C. Aruna,

Department of Sociology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry

. . Member

Assistant Professor.

4 Dr. C. Sathish Kumar,

Department of Social Work, Pondicherry University, Puducherry

. . Member

Assistant Professor.

5 V. Ramesh, Commissioner

Ariyankuppam Commune Panchayat, Ariyankuppam, Puducherry . . Member

6 G. Mohan, Secretary

Sharon Society of Pondicherry, No. 41, 3rd Cross, Kurinji Nagar, . . Member

Lawspet, Puducherry.

7 Sis. Arokiya Selvi

Joy Home, Immaculate Heart of Mary Social Service Society,

. . Member

No. 36, Uppalam Road, Colas Nagar, Puducherry.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

KULOTHUNGAN. A. I.A.S.,

Special Secretary to Government Revenue.

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL WING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 20, Puducherry, dated 29th February 2024)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation,

Thiru V. Mahadevan, Tahsildar, holding charge of

Director, Department of Sainik Welfare, Puducherry

under FR 49(iii), shall retire from service on the

afternoon of 29-02-2024.

(By order)

V. JAISANKAR,

Under Secretary to Government.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT (POWER)

DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 06, Puducherry, dated 01st March 2024)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation,

Thiru V. Sridharan, Superintending Engineer, O&M/PR

(on CDC), Electricity Department, Puducherry, shall

retire from service on the afternoon of 31-03-2024.

(By order)

K. CANDANE @ SIVARADJANE,

Under Secretary to Government (Power).

232

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´∑

®ømÿ√VÚ^

®ømÿ√VÚ^ �ÆD

�ÆD

�ÆD ∂ﬂ∑›mÁ≈

∂ﬂ∑›mÁ≈

∂´∑

∂´∑˛Á·

˛Á·

˛Á· ∂ﬂƒÔD,

∂ﬂƒÔD,

∂ﬂƒÔD, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_

Œ©√Õ>©A^π �ÆD ∞È ∂§s©A

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_ \Vk‚¶D, ºÔV‚|ﬂºƒˆl_ ÷B∫˛kÚD

∂´∑ ˛Á· ∂ﬂƒÔ›]_ ºƒÏÕmkÚD mı| Ôa°›>V^Ô^

�ÆD ∂‚Á¶ÔÁ· ®]ÏkÚD 01á04á2024 x>_

31-03-2025

kÁ´

{´Vı|

ÔVÈ›]uz

kV∫˛¬ÿÔV^k>uÔV™ JΩ x›]Á´l¶©√‚¶

Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔ^ k´ºkuÔ©√|˛[≈™.

2. ∂´¬z x›]Á´l¶©√‚¶ cÁ≈l[*m ‘mı|

Ôa°›>V^Ô^ �ÆD ∂‚Á¶ÔÁ· kV∫zk>uÔV™

Œ©√Õ>©A^π’

®™¬

z§©∏‚|,

∂Á>

ˇºw

ÁÔÿBV©√t‚¶kˆ[

∂KkÈÔ›]uz

®]ÏkÚD

28á03á2024 ∂[Æ ∏u√Ô_ 3.30 \Ë¬z^ kÕm

ºƒÚD√Ω ∂–©∏ Ák¬Ô©√¶ ºkı|D. ∂ÀkVÆ ∂–©∏©

ÿ√≈©√‚¶ Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔ^ ∂Á™›mD ∂[Á≈B

]™º\ \VÁÈ 4.00 \Ë¬z kÚÁÔ >Õ]Ú¬zD

Œ©√Õ>©A^π>V´ÏÔ^ ∂_Èm ∂k´V_ WBt¬Ô©√‚¶

∏´]W]Ô^ x[MÁÈl_ ∏ˆ¬Ô©√|D. Œ©√Õ> su√Á™

]™D ∂´∑ s|xÁ≈ ÂV·VÔ ÷Ú©∏[ ∂>uz ∂|›>

∂KkÈÔ ]™›>[Æ Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔ^ º�z§©∏¶©√‚¶

ºÂ´D kÁ´ ÿ√≈©√‚| ]≈¬Ô©√|D.

3. sÚ©√x^· Œ©√Õ>>V´ÏÔ^ ∂ﬂƒÔ© √ı¶Ô

ƒVÁÈl_ c^· mı| Ôa°›>V^Ô^ �ÆD ∂‚Á¶ÔÁ·

∂KkÈÔ ºÂ´∫Ôπ_ ºÂˆ_ kÕm √VÏÁkl¶ÈVD.

4. Œ©√Õ> su√Á™l_ ÔÈÕmÿÔV^”D Œ©√Õ>>V´ÏÔ^

x[Ák©A›

ÿ>VÁÔBVÔ

` 1,000-¬ÔV™(‘√VF {Ï

gl´D \‚|D) Banker Cheque in favour of the Deputy

Director, Government Branch Press, Karaikal or Deposit

at call-´Êm ∂_Èm ÿ´V¬Ô\VÔ Œ©√Õ>©A^π•¶[ ºƒÏ›m

ÿƒK›> ºkı|D. ÿku§ÿ√≈V> Œ©√Õ>©A^π>V´ÏÔπ[

x[Ák©A› ÿ>VÁÔ Œ©√Õ>√ËÔ^ xΩÕ>°¶[ ]Ú©∏›

>´©√|D.

5. sÁÈ ŒÚ ˛ºÈVsuz ®Àk·° ®[Æ su√Á™

kˆ ¿∫ÔÈVÔ ®ıðVKD, ®ø›>VKD z§©∏¶ ºkı|D.

ÂÁ¶xÁ≈l_ c^· su√Á™ kˆ ∏[™Ï kÛo¬Ô©√|D.

º>Ák ∞u√|D >ÚkVl_ WÏðl¬Ô©√‚¶ ∂]Ô√‚ƒ

Œ©√Õ>©A^πloÚÕm Œ©√Õ>>V´Ï x[MÁÈl_ √˛´∫Ô

∞ÈD Â¶›>©√|D.

6. ∂]Ô√‚ƒ\V™

ÿ>VÁÔ

ºÔ‚zD

Œ©√Õ>>V´Ï/

∞È>V´Ú¬ºÔ Œ©√Õ>D/∞ÈD ∂π¬Ô©√|D. Œ©√Õ>D/∞ÈD

ÿ√≈©√‚º¶VÏ ` 10,000 (‘√VF √›>Vl´D \‚|D) Ák©A›

ÿ>VÁÔBVÔ ÿƒK›] Œ©√Õ>D/∞ÈD ∞u√|›]¬ ÿÔV^·

ºkı|D.

7. ∂∫ˇÔˆ¬Ô©√‚¶ Œ©√Õ>>V´Ï/∞È>V´Ï ∂ﬂƒÔ ˛¶∫˛_

c^· mı| Ôa°›>V^Ô^ �ÆD ∂‚Á¶ÔÁ· ®∫z

®Õ> WÁÈl_ c^·º>V ∂ÀkVº≈ su√Á™ xΩÕ>

24 \Ë ºÂ´›]uz^ >∫Ô·m ÿƒVÕ> ÿƒÈsºÈºB

®Á¶º√V‚| ∂>uzı¶V™ ÿ>VÁÔÁB GST kˆ•¶[

∂KkÈÔ›]_ ÿƒK›]s‚| ®|›mﬂÿƒ_È ºkı|D. ∏[™Ï

ºƒÚD Ôa°ÔÁ· ∞È/Œ©√Õ>¬ÔVÈD xΩ•D kÁ´ ŒÀÿkVÚ

\V> ÔÁ¶E kV´›]_ ∂>uzı¶V™ ÿ>VÁÔÁB kˆ•¶[

ÿƒK›] s‚| ®|›mﬂÿƒ_È ºkı|D.

8. º\ºÈ z§©∏¶©√‚¶ º>] �ÆD ºÂ´›]uz© ∏[™Ï

kÚD Œ©√Õ>/∞ÈA^πÔ^ BV°D ∞uÆ¬ÿÔV^·©√¶\V‚¶Vm.

9. ®Às> ÔV´ðxD Ì≈V\_ ∂Á™›m ∂_Èm

∞º>–D {Ï Œ©√Õ>/∞ÈA^πÁB W´VÔˆ¬Ô ∂_Èm

∂∫ˇÔˆ¬Ô ˇºw ÁÔÿBV©√t‚|^·kÚ¬z xø cˆÁ\

cı|. ÷]_ ∞º>–D c¶[√VΩ[Á\ ∞u√‚¶V_

ˇµ¬ÁÔÿBV©√t‚¶kˆ[ xΩºk ÷Æ]BV™m.

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_, ÂV^ 06, \VÏﬂ, 2024.

xmWÁÈ Ôð¬z ∂]ÔVˆ,

\Vk‚¶ g‚EBÏ ∂KkÈÔD �ÆD

ÿ√VÆ©A

∂]ÔVˆ,

ÿ√VÆ©A

∂]ÔVˆ,

ÿ√VÆ©A

∂]ÔVˆ,

ÿ√VÆ©A

∂]ÔVˆ,

ÿ√VÆ©A

∂]ÔVˆ,

∂´∑ ˛Á· ∂ﬂƒÔD, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_.

ÿÂ‚¶©√V¬ÔD

ÿÂ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[

ÿÔVDR[

ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m,

√ﬁƒVB›m,

√ﬁƒVB›m, Amﬂºƒˆ

Amﬂºƒˆ

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

∂§s©A

ˇµ¬z§©∏¶©√‚|^· Â√Ï ÿÂ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›][ ®_ÁÈ¬z^ ∏[kÚD ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á>

∂Á\›m¬ÿÔV^· ÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›][ ∂–\] ºkı|˛≈VÏ.

kˆÁƒ

sıð©√>V´ˆ[

ÿ>Va_ mk∫Ô

c›º>E¬Ô©√‚|^·

º>ÁkBV™

g‚Ôπ[

®ı

ÿ√BÏ �ÆD

c^· ÷¶D

WÆk™› >BVˆ©A/

t[]≈[

®ıË¬ÁÔ

xÔkˆ

ÿƒFxÁ≈

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

]Ú. A. ∂ÚðVƒÈD

M/s. ∂ıðV\ÁÈBVÏ

gl_ t_

®ı 57, \VˆBD\[

gl_ t_,

z]Á´›

(ÿ√Vm

ºÔVs_ T], ∞ˆ©√V¬ÔD,

\Æ ∂·Ák ®ı 74/5,

]≈[.

√ËxÁ≈).

Â›>º\|,

∞ˆ©√V¬ÔD, Â›>º\| ˛´V\D,

Amﬂºƒˆá605 106.

∞ˆ©√V¬ÔD kÚkVF ˛´V\D,

ÿÂ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[

√ﬁƒVB›m, Amﬂºƒˆá605 106.

233

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

1973ágD gı| Amﬂºƒˆ ˛´V\D �ÆD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m¬Ô^ ƒ‚¶›][ JÈ\VF Amﬂºƒˆ Œ[§B›m

g‚E©√´©∏_ ∂xÈV¬Ô©√‚¶ Amﬂºƒˆ ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m¬Ô^ (cˆ\D �ÆD ∂–\] ∂π›>_) s]Ô^, 1976,

∏ˆ° 11á[ √Ω ÷›ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á> WÆ°k]™V_ cı¶VzD g‚ºƒ√Á™Ô^ ∞º>–D ÷ÚÕ>V_, ∂kuÁ≈ ÷Õ>

∂§s©A ÿkπBV™ º>]loÚÕm √›m ÂV‚Ô”¬z^ ÿÂ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m gÁðBÏ ∂kÏÔ”¬z

®ø›m JÈ\VF ÿ>ˆB©√|›mD√Ω ºÔ‚|¬ÿÔV^·©√|˛≈m.

z§©∏‚¶ ÔVÈkÁ´BÁ≈¬z^ ÿ√≈©√‚¶ g‚ºƒ√Á™Ô^ ÿÂ‚¶©√V¬ÔD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›>V_ √ˆÊo¬Ô©√|D.

ÿÂ‚¶©√V¬ÔD, 2024 } ∏©´kˆ | 26 {,

Ô. ´º\i,

gÁðBÏ.

————

NETTAPAKKAM COMMUNE PANCHAYAT, PUDUCHERRY

Nettapakkam, dated 26th February 2024.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The undermentioned person has requested permission to set up the following industry within the

Nettapakkam Commune Panchayat limits as detailed below.

Sl.

Name and

Address of the

Setting up of

Power

No. of

No.

address of

industry site

industry for/

required

workers

the applicant

manufacturing/

processing

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

1. Thiru A. Arunachalam,

M/s. Annamalaiyar Oil Mill,

Oil mill

3 H.P.

No. 57, Mariamman

Re-survey No. 74/5,

(general

Kovil Street,

Eripakkam Nathamedu Village,

shift)

Eripakkam,

Eripakkam Revenue Village,

Nathamedu,

Nettapakkam Commune Panchayat,

Puducherry-605 106.

In conformity with rule 11 of the Puducherry Commune Panchayats (Grant of Licences and Permissions)

Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union Territory by the Puducherry Village and Commune Panchayats Act, 1973,

objections, if any, to the setting up of the above industry, are invited to reach the Commissioner, Nettapakkam

Commune Panchayat within ten days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections, so received within the specified period will be considered by Nettapakkam Commune

Panchayat.

C. RAMESH,

Commissioner.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Jayasankar alias Sankar, son of Selvaraj, resident

of No. 20, Anthoniar Koil Street, Kumaragurupallam,

Puducherry-605 011, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That my name ‘Jayasankar Alias Sankar’ found in

my Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India, bearing No. XXXX XXXX 9182,

the name ‘ÿ¤Bƒ∫ÔÏ (®) ƒ∫ÔÏ’ found in the Family

Ration Card, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, bearing

No. 460646, the name ‘Jayasankar alias Sankar’

which is found in my son Vishvanath’s Aadhaar Card,

issued by the Unique Identification Authority of

India, bearing No. XXXX XXXX 4580.

The name ‘ÿƒ. ÿ¤Bƒ∫ÔÏ’ found in my Record

Sheet, issued by Headmaster, Middle School,

Keezhkoothappakkam, Vanur Panchayat Union,

Tamil Nadu, bearing Admission No. 871, the name

234

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

‘ÿ¤Bƒ∫ÔÏ’ found in my Community Certificate,

issued by the Tahsildar, Vanur Taluk, Tamil Nadu, the

name ‘Jayasankar’ which is found in my daughter

Hemalatha’s Aadhaar Card, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India, bearing No. XXXX

XXXX 6741.

The name ‘Sangar (ƒ∫ÔÏ)’ found in my Electoral

Identity Card, issued by Election Commission of India,

bearing No. IUM0013649, the name ‘Sankar’ which is

found in my Study Certificates respectively, issued

by the Headmaster, Societe Progressiste Government

Aided High School, Puducherry - 605 001, the name

‘Shankar’ which is found in my daughter Hemalatha’s

Birth Certificate, registered in the Pondicherry

Municipality, Puducherry, under Registration No. P/

2009/13411 dated 13-10-2009 and the name ‘Shankar’

which is found in my son Vishvanath’s Birth

Certificate, registered in the Oulgaret Municipality,

Puducherry, under Registration No. E/2012/10622 dated

21-11-2012 are referring one and the same person i.e.,

myself only.

Hence, I hereby declare that I shall at all times

hereinafter in all records, deeds and writings and

in all proceedings, dealings and transactions, private

as well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and

sign my name as ‘Jayasankar alias Sankar’ in place

and in substitution of my former names.

I declare that all the abovesaid facts are true to

the best of my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at

Puducherry, on this 20th day of February 2024.

562667

ÿ¤Bƒ

ÿ¤Bƒ∫ÔÏ

∫ÔÏ

∫ÔÏ.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, P.Murugavel, son of Perumal Indian inhabitant,

aged 41 years and residing at the house bearing Door

No. 651, Vazhuthavoor Salai, Dharmapuri, Puducherry-

605 009, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to

whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that I was

born to Hindu parents and was a Hindu by religion

as such named as ‘Murugavel’, in the previous

Aadhaar Card of mine under No. XXXX XXXX 8732,

my name has been mentioned as ‘P Murugavel

(ÿ√ xÚÔºk_)’.

In my previous Electoral Identity Card under

No. NOG0029033, my name has been mentioned as

‘Murugavel (xÚÔºk_)’.

In my Marriage Invitation, my name has been

mentioned as ‘D.xÚÔºk_ (®) ´VÎ’.

In the particulars of the family members, in my

Family Ration Card under No. 180531, my name has

been mentioned as ‘xÚÔºk_’.

I state that, I have renounced Christian religion

and embraced Hindu religion, as such in the Baptism

Certificate, dated 08-06-2014, with Ref. No. 84/2014,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Samuel’, later,

a Christian marriage has been performed on

07-05-2014, in a Register of Marriages, kept at Holy

Family Church, R.M.Nagar, Bangalore, my assumed

and renounced names have been mentioned

respectively as ‘Samuel (Murugavel. P)’.

In my latest Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX

8732, my name has been mentioned as ‘Samuel P

(ƒVxºk_ ÿ√)’.

Similarly, in my latest Elector’s Photo Identity Card

under No. YCV1381060, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Samuel (ƒVxºk_)’.

In my India Driving Licence under No. TN02

2 0 1 8 0 0 0 2 1 7 3 a n d i n m y PA N C a r d u n d e r

No. JNYPS2262A, my name has been mentioned as

‘Samuel P’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid

names are referred, identified and relate to one and

the same person, that is me, the deponent herein.

I state that hereafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Samuel (ƒVxºk_)’ for

all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 26th day of

February 2024.

562668

MURUGAVEL.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Dhanalakshmi, daughter of Munusamy, wife of

Murugavel, Indian inhabitant, aged about 38 years,

residing at the house bearing Door No. 651,

Vazhudavoor Salai, Dharmapuri, Puducherry - 605 009,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, to

whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that I was

born to Hindu parents and was a Hindu by

religion as such named as ‘Dhanalakshmi’, in the

235

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

previous Aadhaar Card of mine, under No. XXXX

XXXX 5309, my name has been mentioned as

‘M Dhanalakshmi (x >™È‚∑t)’.

In my previous Electoral Identity Card, under No.

DYD1860154, m y name has been entered as

‘Dhanalakshmi (>™È‚∑t)’.

In my Marriage Invitation, my name has been

mentioned as ‘M. >™È‚∑t’.

In the particulars of the family members in the

Family Ration Card, under No. 180531, my name has

been mentioned as ‘>™È‚∑t’.

I state that I have renounced Hindu religion and

embraced Christian religion, as such in the Baptism

Certificate, dated 08-06-2014, with Ref .No. 58/2014, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Elizabeth’, later

Christian Marriage has been performed on 07-05-2014, in

the Register of Marriages, kept at Holy Family

Church, R.M.Nagar, Bangalore, my assumed and

renounced names have been mentioned respectively,

as ‘Elizabeth (Dhanalakshmi)’.

In my latest Aadhaar Card, under No. XXXX

XXXX 5309, my name has been mentioned as

‘S Elizabeth (ƒV ®oƒÿ√›)’.

Similarly, in the latest Elector’s Photo Identity Card

of mine, under No. YCV1368299, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Elizabeth (®oƒÿ√¶›)’.

In my PAN Card, under No. ACXPE3370L, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Elizabeth’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person, that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that hereafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘Elizabeth (®oƒÿ√›)’ for

all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the

Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 26th day of

February 2024.

562669

M. DHANALAKSHMI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, P. Murugavel, son of Perumal, Indian inhabitant,

aged 41 years and residing at the house bearing Door

No. 651, Vazhuthavoor Salai, Dharmapuri, Puducherry-

605 009, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm,

to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein, I swear this

affidavit on behalf of my 15 years old minor son by

name ‘Venkatesh’. I state that at the time of birth of

my son, I was a Hindu by religion, as such named

my son as ‘Venkatesh’.

Therefore, in the Birth Record of my son under

Registration No. OM/J/2008/10499, his name has

been mentioned as ‘Venkatesh’.

In the particulars of the family members in the

Family Ration Card under No. 180531, my said son’s

name has been mentioned as ‘ÿk∫Ôº¶i’.

I state that I have renounced Hindu religion and

embraced Christian religion, as such in the Baptism

Certificate, dated 08-06-2014, with Ref. No. 64/2014,

my said son’s name has been mentioned as ‘Daniel’.

In his Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 3437,

my said son’s name has been mentioned as ‘Daniel S

(¶VMB_ ƒ)’.

Similarly, in his Study Certificate, issued by the

Headmaster, Government High School, Dharmapuri,

Puducherry, dated 18-11-2023 and in the Community

Certificate, issued by the Parish Priest, St. Andrew’s

Church, Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry, dated

29-11-2023, my said son’s name has been mentioned

as ‘Daniel.S’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid

names are referred, identified and relate to one and

the same person, that is my said minor son only.

I state that, hereafter, my said minor son shall be

known and identified only by the name ’Daniel.S

(¶VMB_.ƒV)’ for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 26th day of

February 2024.

562670

MURUGAVEL.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Rihan Khan, son of Venkatesan, Muslim, aged

about 48 years, Generator Mechanic by profession,

residing at No. 43, IV Cross Street, PSCB Nagar,

Mudaliarpet, Puducherry-605 004, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein, I swear this

affidavit and well acquainted with the contents of the

same.

236

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

I was born on 23-01-1976 to my parents Venkatesan

and Alamelu alias Tamizhselvi at Neravy, Karaikal

and the same has been duly registered in the Neravy

Commune Panchayat, Karaikal vide Registration

No. 14/76, dated 27-01-1976. My parents belong to

Hindu religion and I have only converted myself from

Hindu religion to Islamic religion from my family. My

actual name is ‘Sivakoumar’ and the same name finds

place in my said Birth Certificate. I have converted

myself to Islamic religion at my young age on my

own willing and in this regard, the Puducherry Town

Government Kazi has issued me a Certificate on

12-02-2024 corresponding Hijri date: 01-08-1445 vide

C.C. No. 198 : 04/2024, after conversion, I have been

named as ‘Rihan Khan’ and ever since, I have

abandoned my farmer name ‘Sivakoumar’. In view of

the same hereinafter, I shall be called and known

only as ‘Rihan Khan’. I shall also use my religion

Islam whenever and wherever it is required.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 26th day of

February 2024.

562671

V. RIHAN KHAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Leo Mosquline, daughter of Alexander and wife of

Arun Kumar, Indian inhabitant, aged 30 years and residing

at the house bearing Door No. 20, Third Main Road, Mariyal

Nagar, Reddiyarpalayam, Puducherry-605 010, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, to whomsoever it may

concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I am well aware of

the facts and statement of my affidavit. I swear this

affidavit on behalf of my minor daughter by name

‘Ancy Reanna’.

I state that in the Birth Certificate of my minor

daughter under Registration No. PM/P/2022/00371,

her name has been mentioned as ‘Ancy Reanna’.

Further, I state that for numerological reasons, I have

changed the name of my said minor daughter’s name

as ‘Ancy Leonna’, as such in the horoscope, issued

by the Sri Lalithambigai Jodhidalayam, my said

daughter’s name has been mentioned as ‘Ancy

Leonna’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that hereafter, my said

minor daughter shall be known and identified only by

the name with spelling as ‘Ancy Leonna (g[E oºBV™V)’

for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above paragraphs

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief

and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 27th day of

February 2024.

562672 LEO MOSQULINE.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Muhammed Zahal, son of Noushad Mandatholon,

aged 22 years, residing at AL Zuroor, Pandakkal, Mahe

- 673 310, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath

as follows:

1. I swear and state that I am the holder of Aadhaar

Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 0417, my name has been

entered as ‘Muhammed Zahal’.

2. I swear and state that I am the holder of

Secondary School Leaving Certificate vide Register

No. 522682, March 2017 and S.S.L.C. Card No.

S 577310, my name is entered as ‘Muhammed Zahal’.

3. I swear and state that in my India Driving

Licence vide No. PY03 20220000855, my name is

entered as ‘Muhammed Zahal’.

4. I swear and state I am the holder of Elector’s

Photo Identity Card vide No. AWB0236778, issued by

Election Commission of India for Mahe Constituency,

my name is entered as ‘Muhammed Zahal’.

5. I swear and state that in my PAN Card vide

No.IHUPM5119M, issued by Income-tax Department,

Government of India, my name is entered as

‘Muhammed Zahal’.

6. I swear and state that in the Family Ration Card

vide No. 7619, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Mahe, my name is

entered as ‘Muhammed Zahal T K’.

7. The name ‘Muhammed Zahal’ and ‘Muhammed

Zahal T K’ are referring one and the same person i.e.,

myself only.

8. I swear and state that I intend to change my

name as ‘Muhammed Zahal T K’ therefore, I swear

this Affidavit, for knowledge of my relatives, friends,

officials concerned and others that hereinafter, I will

be known only as ‘Muhammed Zahal T K’ for all

purposes and intends after the publications of the

Official Gazette.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public at

Mahe, on this 21st day of February 2024.

562673

MUHAMMED ZAHAL. T.K.

237

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

AFFIDAVIT

I, B. Ganga, wife of Boominathan, aged about

59 years, residing at No. 6, Iyyanar Koil Street, Kamaraj

Nagar, Gorimedu, Puducherry- 605 006, do hereby

solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

1. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Deivane’ in my Birth Certificate, under Registration

No. 137, issued by Ariyankuppam Commune

Panchayat, Puducherry.

2. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Ganga’ in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card, under

No. NOG0176651, issued by Election Commission of

India.

3. I state that my name has been entered as

‘B Ganga’ in my Aadhaar Card, under No. XXXX

XXXX 2948, issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India.

4. I state that my name has been entered as ‘Ô∫ÔV’

in our Family Ration Card No. 446158, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry.

5. I state that my name is entered as ‘Ganga B’ in

my Bank Passbook, issued by State Bank of India,

Kadirkamam Branch, Puducherry.

6. I state that my name has been entered as

‘B Ganga’ in my PAN Card No. DAWPG1671J,

issued by the Income-tax Department, Government

of India.

7. Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names viz., ‘Deivane’, ‘Ganga’, ‘Ô∫ÔV’,

‘Ganga B’ and ‘B Ganga’ are referring one and the

same person, i.e., myself only. Hereafter, I shall be

known and identified only by the name ‘Ganga’ for

all purposes.

8. I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs are true and there is no suppression or

misrepresentation of the facts.

I hereby declare that I shall at all times hereinafter

in all records, deeds and writings and in all

proceedings, dealings and transactions private as

well as upon all occasions whatsoever use and sign

my name as ‘Ganga’ in place and in substitution of

my former names. I hereby verify and confirm that

what has been stated above is true to best of my

knowledge and correct, and nothing material facts

have been concealed thereon.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the

Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 27th day of

February 2024.

562674

B. Ô∫ÔV

Ô∫ÔV

Ô∫ÔV.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Arumugam, son of Chinnakannu, aged 40 years,

residing at No. B13, Housing Board, Jawahar Nagar,

Boomiyanpet, Puducherry - 605 005, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this

affidavit on behalf of myself.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Chinnakannu’ in my Aadhaar Card, issued by

Unique Identification Authority of India bearing No.

XXXX XXXX 8275.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Chinnakannu’ in my Birth Certificate, issued by

Pondicherry Municipality bearing Registration No.

M/1984/08538.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Chinnakannu’ in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card,

issued by the Election Commission of India bearing

No. KVY0650267.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Chinnakannu’ in my PAN Card, issued by the

Income-tax Department bearing No. BEKPA6481E.

I state that my father ’s name is entered

a s ‘R. Chinna Kannu’ in my father’s particulars of

Pension, issued by Employee’s Provident Fund of

India bearing Pension Payment Order No. PC/MAS/

52632.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Chinnakannu’ in my father’s Elector’s Photo Identity

Card, issued by Election Commission of India bearing

No. UEB0147181.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Sinnacannou’ in my father’s Aadhaar Card, issued

by Unique Identification Authority of India bearing

No. XXXX XXXX 6428.

I state that my father’s name is entered as

‘Sinnacannou’ in my father’s Death Certificate,

issued by the Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry,

bearing Registration No. PM/P/2023/01821.

I submit that the names described in the above

records as ‘Chinnakannu’, ‘R. Chinna Kannu’ and

‘Sinnacannou’ are referring one and the same person

denoting i.e., my father only.

238

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

The above statements in the foregoing paragraphs

are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 27th day of February 2024.

562675

C. ARUMUGAM.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Madhu Kumarleon, son of Rampather, aged

38 years and residing at No. 11, Kali Koil Street, Thilarshpet,

Thattanchavady, Puducherry-605 009, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Madhukumar’

in my son’s Birth Certificate vide Registration

No. PM/M/2009/8280, dated 09-07-2009, issued by

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Mathu

Kumar Leon’ in my daughter’s Birth Certificate vide

Registration No. PM/P/2011/4102, dated 21-04-2011,

issued by Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Madhu

Kumar Leon’ in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card

No. HKD0364414, issued by Election Commission of

India and in my Marriage Certificate vide S.M. No.152/

2016, issued by Sub-Registrar, Oulgaret, Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Madhu

Kumarleon’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX

8747, issued by the Unique Identification Authority

of India, in my PAN Card No. EHYPM4465G, issued

by the Income-tax Department, Government of India

and in my Savings Bank Passbook vide Account

No.XXXXXXXXXXX0345, issued by Union Bank of

India, Housing Board Branch, Puducherry .

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Madhukumar

Leon’ in my son’s Aadhaar Card No. XXXX

XXXX 8770, issued by the Unique Identification

Authority of India, in my daughter’s Aadhaar Card

No. XXXX XXXX 2103, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India and in my India

Driving Licence D.L. No. PY0l 20170001309, issued

by Transport Department, Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘\m z\VÏ

oºBV[’ in our Family Ration Card No. 225598, issued

by Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry.

Hence, I declare that all the abovesaid names

viz., ‘Madhukumar’, ‘Mathu Kumar Leon’, ‘Madhu

Kumar Leon’, ‘Madhu Kumarleon’, ‘Madhukumar

Leon’ and ‘\m z\VÏ oºBV[’ are denoting one and

the same person, they referring myself only.

I state that hereafter, always writing and signing

my name as ‘Madhu Kumarleon’ on all records, papers

and all affairs of my life.

The above deposition is true and correct to the

best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material

has been concealed thereon.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Puducherry, on this 29th day of February 2024.

562676 R. MADHU KUMARLEON.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I , Kayathri, wife of Mathu Kumar Leon, aged

36 years and residing at No. 11, Kali Koil Street,

Thilarshpet, Thattanchavady, Puducherry-605 009, do

hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath

as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Gayathri’ in

my daughter’s Birth Certificate vide Registration No.

PM/P/2011/4102, dated 21-04-2011, issued by

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Kayathri’ in

my Birth Certificate vide Registration No.O/1987/03190,

dated 17-12-1987, issued by Oulgaret Municipality,

Puducherry, in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card No.

JTP0544932, issued by Election Commission of India, in

my Marriage Certificate vide S.M. No. 152/2016, issued by

Sub-Registrar, Oulgaret, Puducherry, in my Aadhaar

Card No. XXXX XXXX 0412, issued by the Unique

Identification Authority of India and in my PAN Card

No. GNJPK8661K, issued by the Income-tax Department,

Government of India.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Kayathri A’ in

my Secondary School Leaving Certificate Register No.

472519, issued by Secretary, State Board of School

Examinations, Tamil Nadu.

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘Kayathri M’

in my Savings Bank Passbook vide Account

No. XXXXXXXXXXX8048, issued by Bank of India,

Kadhirkamam Branch, Puducherry.

239

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

I state that my name is mentioned as ‘ÔVB›]ˆ’ in

our Family Ration Card No. 225598, issued by

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry.

Hence, I declare that all the abovesaid names viz.,

‘Gayathri’, ‘Kayathri’, ‘Kayathri A,’ ‘Kayathri M’ and

‘ÔVB›]ˆ’ are denotinbg one and the same person,

they referring myself only.

I state that hereafter, always writing and signing

my name as ‘Kayathri’ on all records, papers and all

affairs of my life.

The above deposition is true and correct to the best

of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material has

been concealed thereon.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Puducherry, on this 29th day of February 2024.

562677 KAYATHRI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Vilosana, d/o. Thillai Govindan, w/o. Muhammed

Rajudeen, Hindu, aged about 25 years and residing at

No. 5, Nadutheru, Panithittu, Kirumambakkam, Bahour

Taluk, Puducherry-607 402, do hereby solemnly and

sincerely affirm and state on oath as follows:

1. That I am the deponent herein.

2. I state that as per my Birth Certificate under

Registration No. COC/1998/02/022/003470/0, Registered

on 04-05-1998, issued by the Registrar of Births and

Deaths, City Health Officer, Greater Chennai

Corporation, Tamil Nadu, my name is mentioned as

‘Vilosana’.

3. I state that as per my Elector’s Photo Identity

Card No. YBP0091363, dated 12-01-2017, issued by

Election Commission of India, my name is mentioned

as ‘Vilosana’.

4. I state that as per my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX

XXXX 6021, dated 30-09-2011, issued by Unique

Identification Authority of India, my name is

mentioned as ‘T Vilosana’.

5. I state that as per my Secondary School Leaving

Certificate S. No. SEC3877090, dated 23-05-2014, issued

the

Secretary,

State

Board

School

Examinations(Sec), Tamil Nadu, my name is mentioned

as ‘Vilosana T’.

6. I state that as per my Higher Secondary Course

Leaving Certificate, S.No. HSG11272786, dated

17-05-2016, issued by the Member-Secretary, State

Board of School Examinations (Hr.Sec), Tamil Nadu,

my name is mentioned as ‘Vilosana T’.

7. I state that as per my Transfer Certificate

Admission. No. 20P0195, dated 29-09-2022,

issued by the Principal, Periyar Arts College,

Cuddalore - 607 001, Tamil Nadu, my name is mentioned

as ‘Vilosana J’.

8. I state that as per my Marriage Invitation,

dated 03-08-2023, my name is mentioned as

‘T. sºÈVƒ™V (®) ƒ™V‡√Ï’.

9. I state that as per my Marriage Certificate

Registration No. 20/84-P, dated 22-08-2023, issued by

the Executive Member, Muhammadhia Pallivasal,

Sulthanpet, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as

‘sºÈVƒ™V (®) ƒ™V‡√Ï’.

10. I state that as per my Community Certificate

No. PY/TOB/72/0011660, dated 23-01-2014, issued by

the Department of Revenue and Disaster Management,

Taluk Office, Bahour, Puducherry, my name is mentioned

as ‘Vilosana’.

11. I state that as per my Conversion Certificate

C.C. No. 174: 29/2023, dated 18-07-2023, issued by the

Government Town Kazi, Sulthanpet, Puducherry, my

name is mentioned as ‘Sanafer (ƒ™V‡√Ï)’.

12. I state that as per my Family Ration Card No.

313370, issued by the Department of Civil Supplies

and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, my name is

mentioned as ‘sºÈVƒ™V’.

Hence, I declare that I am a Hindu by birth and

I have been observing the faith of Islam (Muslim)

and as such I have converted myself from Hindu to

Islam (Muslim). Formerly, I was called as ‘Vilsona’.

Now, I have changed by name as ‘Sanafer’.

I made this affidavit in lieu of proof that I am

observing the Islam (Muslim) religion and have

changed my name as ‘Sanafer’ and facts stated by

me above are true to the best of my knowledge, belief

and information.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Puducherry, on this 28th day of February 2024.

562678 T. VILOSANA.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ganesan, son of Subramanian, aged 61 years

residing at Nos. 5 and 6, John Paul Nagar, Near 100 Feet

Road, Railway Gate, Mudaliyarpet, Puducherry-605 004,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on

oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I state that my name has been mentioned in my

Elector’s Photo Identity Card, issued by Election

Commission of India bearing No. LXL0265108 as

‘Ganesan’.

240

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

That my name has been mentioned in my Aadhaar

Card, issued by Unique Identification Authority of

India vide No. XXXX XXXX 2536 as ‘S P Ganesan’.

That my name has been mentioned in the Family

Ration Card vide No. 110978 as ‘Ôºðƒ[’.

That my name has been mentioned in my PAN

Card, issued by Income-tax Department, Government

of India vide No. ALNPG3786H as ‘GANESAN’.

That my name has been mentioned in my Passport,

issued by Regional Passport Officer, Chennai vide

No. U3162040 as ‘GANESAN’.

Hence, I declare that all the abovesaid names viz.,

‘Ganesan’,‘GANESAN’,‘S P Ganesan’ and ‘Ôºðƒ[’

are denoting one and the same person i.e., myself

only.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 29th day of February 2024.

562679

GANESAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Gopalakrishnan, son of Govindasamy, Hindu,

aged about 25 years, residing at No. 11, Subramaniya

Swamy Koil Street, Moorthikuppam Pet, Bahour,

Bahour Commune, Bahour, Puducherry-607 402, do

hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath

as follows:

I am the deponent of this affidavit and well

acquainted with the contents of the same.

I was born on 07-12-1998 to my parent’s

Govindasamy and Chinnapoonu at Government

Maternity Hospital, Puducherry and the same has

been duly registered vide Registration No. PM/M/

1998/014731, my name has been mentioned as

‘Gopalakrishnan’ issued by Pondicherry Municipality,

Puducherry..

In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card, my name has

been mentioned as ‘Gopalakrishnan’, issued by

Election Commission of India vide No. SWC0082883.

In my Aadhaar Card, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Gopalakrishnan’, issued by Unique Identification

Authority of India vide No. XXXX XXXX 3450.

In my PAN Card, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Gopalakrishnan’, issued by Income-tax Department

vide No. DWKPG8997R.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificate, my

name has been mentioned as ‘Gopalakrishnan G’

issued by the Secretary, State Board of School

Examinations (Sec), Tamil Nadu.

In my Nationality and Caste Certificate, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Gopalakrishnan’ issued by

the Tahsildar, Bahour, Puducherry.

Further, I state that now I have changed my name

as ‘Krishna’ instead of ‘Gopalakrishnan’ as per

numerological and sentimental reasons.

I hereby state that hereinafter, I shall be known

and identified only by the name ‘Krishna’.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and nothing material has been

concealed therein.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before the

Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 28th day of

February 2024.

562680

GOPALAKRISHNAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Covindarassou, son of Selvaraj, Hindu, aged about

51 years and residing at No. 29, Second Vanniyar Street,

Kanuvapet, Villianur, Puducherry - 605 110, do hereby

solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein.

I submit that I was born on 21-11-1973 at

Puducherry and in my Birth Certificate, in my

Elector’s Photo Identity Card and in my Aadhaar

Card, my name is mentioned as ‘Covindarassou’.

I state that in my Transfer Certificate, my name is

mentioned as ‘S. Covindarassou’and in my PAN Card,

my name is mentioned as ‘Govindarasu.

And whereas, in my India Driving Licence,

my name is mentioned as ‘Govindharaju. S’.

Further, I submit that I made this affidavit

declaring that the names viz., ‘Covindarassou’,

‘S. Covindarassou’, and ‘Govindharaju. S’ are

denoting one and the same person, they referring

myself only.

I sworn to state that what are all stated above is

true and that I have not suppressed any material facts

for the purpose of this affidavit. I undertake to face

any legal consequences in the event of the facts

stated above proved to be false.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, 02nd day of March 2024.

562681

S. ºÔVsÕ>´V∑

ÔVsÕ>´V∑

ÔVsÕ>´V∑.

241

12 March 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

AFFIDAVIT

I, Virouttamballe, daughter of Mounissamy, wife of

M. Tirounavoucarassou, Indian inhabitant, aged 56 years

and residing at the house bearing Door No. 1A, Thamarai

Kulam Street, Nonankuppam, Ariyankuppam, Puducherry-

605 007, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm,

to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in my

Certificate of Birth under Registration No. P/1967/

02875 and in my Marriage Certificate under Registration

No. 76/1995, my name has been mentioned as

‘Virouttamballe’.

In my Secondary School Leaving Certificate under

Certificate S.Nos. A 1503204, A 1803858 respectively,

and in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate under

Certificate S.No. A 423533, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Viroutamballe.M’.

In my Diploma in Nursing Certificate under Serial

No. 16930, my name has been mentioned as

‘Viroutamballe Mounissamy’.

In my Elector ’s Photo Identity Card under

No. FBN0243360 and in my Aadhaar Card under

No. XXXX XXXX 1117, my name has been mentioned

as ‘Virouttamballe (sÚ›>VD√V^)’.

In my PAN Card under No. ABYPV6103C, my name

has been mentioned as ‘Munusamy Viruthambal’.

In the Bio-Data submitted for employment, issued

by the Indira Gandhi Government General Hospital

and Postgraduate Institute, Puducherry and in the

Identity Card under No. CH0019, my name has been

mentioned as ‘M. Viruthambal’.

In the Family Ration Card under No. 172628, my

name has been mentioned as ‘sÚ›>VD√V^’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the above-

mentioned names are referred, identified and relate

to one and the same person that is me, the deponent

herein.

I state that hereafter, I shall be known and identified

only by the name ‘Virouttamballe (sÚ›>VD√V^)’ for

all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 4th day of

March 2024.

562682

M. VIROUTTAMBALLE.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Thilagavathy, wife of Nandhakumar, Hindu, aged

about 47 years, and residing at No. 2/3, 5th Cross

Street, Kavikuyil Nagar, New Saram, Puducherry-605 013,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on

oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that I got

married with one ‘Nandhakumar’ on 11-09-1995

at Puducherry. Further, I state that my husband

‘Nandhakumar’, who died on 16-08-2007 at Chennai.

Further, I state that in my Passport No. K0047883,

my husband’s name is wrongly entered as

‘Nadhakumar’ instead of ‘Nandhakumar’. My

husband’s name is spelt correctly as ‘Nandhakumar’

in my Aadhaar Card and in my Elector’s Photo

Identity Card, respectively.

I made this affidavit in lieu of proof of correct

name of my husband and to be produced before the

Regional Passport Office, Puducherry, for making

necessary rectification of my husband’s name as

‘Nandhakumar’ instead of ‘Nadhakumar’. I do hereby

undertake that I will not make any further correction

in respect of my Passport.

Hence, I do hereby declare that the above facts

are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,

belief and, information, and nothing material facts

have been concealed therein.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 28th day of February 2024.

562686

THILAGAVATHY.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, R.Sivasankar, son of Ramasamy, a g e d about

59 years, residing at No. 87, 8th Cross Street, J.J Nagar,

Moolakulam, Puducherry-605 010, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

1. I state that my name has been mentioned as

‘R.Sivasankar’ in my SSLC Book First Page bearing

Sl.No. 049144, issued by Government Higher

Secondary School, Valavanur, South Arcot District,

Tamil Nadu.

2. I state that my name has been entered as

‘R Sivasankar’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX

8768, issued by Unique Identification Authority of

India.

242

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[12 March 2024

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

3. I state that my name has been entered as

‘R.Sivasankar’ in my National Apprenticeship

Certificate vide No. 129691, issued by National

Council for Vocational Training, Ministry of Labour,

Government of India.

4. I state that my name has been entered as

‘R. Sivasankar’ in my Form-24 Certificate vide

No. 4109/GCP/Estt./B1/2017/510, issued by Government

Central Press, Directorate of Stationery and Printing,

Government of Puducherry.

5. I state that my name has been entered as

‘R.Sivasankaran’ in my Office Order vide No. 2537/

DSP/A1/Estt/96-97, dated 21-03-1996 and

No. 5760/DSP/Estt/A1/98, dated 05-03-1998, both

Orders issued by Directorate of Stationery and

Printing, Government of Puducherry.

6. I state that my name has been mentioned

as‘R.Sivasankaran’ in my Office Order vide No. 4992/

CGPP/Estt/B1/2004, dated 09-08-2004, issued by

Directorate of Stationery and Printing, Government

of Puducherry.

7. Further, I state that my name has been

mentioned as ‘Ekƒ∫ÔÏ’ in our Family Ration Card

vide No. 131589, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

8. Therefore, I do hereby declare that the

abovesaid names i.e., ‘R.Sivasankar’, ‘R Sivasankaran’

and ‘Ekƒ∫ÔÏ’ are referred, identified and relate to

one and the same person that is myself only.

Hereinafter, I shall be known and identified only by

the name ‘R.Sivasankar’ for all purposes.

9. I declare that what are all stated above is true

and there is no suppression or misrepresentation of

the said facts.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 07th day of

March 2024.

562688

R. SIVASANKAR.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Suvakin Annammal, wife of Andros, residing at

No. 15, Virama Munivar Street, Colas Nagar,

Puducherry-605 001, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm and state on oath as follow:

That I have married one ‘Andros’. Out of our

Marriage, my son was born to us on 05-10-2009 and

his birth was also registered with Registrar of Births

and Deaths, Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry

vide Registration No. PM/P/2009/012978, dated

06-10-2009, his name has been entered as ‘Yonaaswin’

whereas, my son’s name in the Family Ration Card is

mentioned as ‘ºBV™V ∂¸s[’.

However, my son’s name ‘Yonna’ is being the

adoptive name since his young age and the same is

being used to identify our son for a long time and

hence, the said name is included in his Aadhaar Card,

issued by the Unique Identification Authority of

India vide No. XXXX XXXX 6681 and his name is

mentioned therein as ‘Yonaaswin alias Yonna’.

I state that all our family members have renounced

my son’s name ‘Yonaaswin’ and have adopted the

name ‘Yonna’ alone to identify him to avoid

confusion in identification of my son’s name,.

I hereby declare that henceforth my son will be

called only as ‘Yonna’ alone for all future purposes.

Further, I state that all the abovesaid statements

are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief, and nothing has been

concealed therein.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Puducherry, on this 06th day of March 2024.

562691

A. SUVAKIN ANNAMMAL.