298

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 April 2024

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 31/AIL/Lab./T/2024,

Puducherry, dated 12th March 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D. (L) No. 28/2015, dated

20-12-2023 of the Labour Court, Puducherry, in respect

of the dispute between the management of M/s. Poorvika

Mobile World Limited, Puducherry and its workman

Thiru N. Narayanasamy over non-employment and

disablement compensation has been received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the Notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present : Tmt. G.T. AMBIKA, M.L., PGDCLCF.,

Presiding Officer.

Wednesday, the 20th day of December, 2023

I.D. (L) No. 28/2015

CNR. No. PYPY06-000075-2015

Narayanasamy,

S/o. Nagappan,

No.10, Murugal Koil 2nd Street,

Pudhu Nagar,

Katterikuppam and Post,

Mannadipet Commune,

Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Versus

The Managing Director,

M/s. Poorvika Mobile World Limited,

No. 181, Anna Salai,

Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on 15-11-2023

before me for final hearing in the presence of

Thiruvalargal L. Rajendiran and R.T. Shankar, Counsel

for the Petitioner and Thiruvalargal R. Rajaprakash and

V. Veeraragavan, Counsel for the Respondent, upon

hearing both sides, upon perusing the case records,

after having stood over for consideration till this day,

this Court passed the following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry, vide G.O. Rt.

No. 52/AIL/Lab./J/2015, dated 18-06-2015 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry to resolve the following

dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz.

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

N. Narayanasamy against the Management of

M/s. Poorvika Mobile World, Puducherry over his

non-employment is justified? If justified, what relief

petitioner is entitled to?

(b) Whether the claim of the petitioner for the

reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by him

for his treatment at PIMS, since he met with an

accident during the course of employment and his

claim of disablement compensation as per Act is

justified? If justified, what relief the petitioner is

entitled to?

of money if, it can be so computed?

2. The averments set forth in the claim petition is

as follows:

(i) The petitioner was working from 24-07-2010

under the respondent management, i.e., Poorvika

Mobiles World Limited, at No. 181, Anna Salai,

Puducherry. As per the instructions of the respondent

management to have advertisement work at

marakanam he along with another employee attended

the company work at marakanam and after completing

the work, while returning to Puducherry at

Annumanthai he met with an road traffic accident

during the course of employment on 16-06-2013 at

about 2.00 p.m. and sustained serious spinal injury.

(ii) The

petitioner

family

contacted

the

respondent/management and they assured to extend

medical benefits and to provide employment to the

petitioner and also for reimbursement of the medical

expenses as there was no insurance coverage under

E.S.I. Act and the petitioner was admitted at PIMS

hospital for treatment. The petitioner undergone

surgery as inpatient for more than 15 days and after

surgery he was bedridden and took treatment as

outpatient for nearly four months.

299

16 April 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

(iii) The petitioner approached the management to

provide employment after the medical checkup and

as the Doctor certified him fit to perform his

duty. The management did not allow him to enter

the mobile shop and also refused to provide

employment and to refund the medical expenses. The

accident occurred only during office hours and the

management registered in E.S.I. only in the month of

February 2014 and only in the month of February the

petitioner submitted his family photo and the E.S.I.

temporary identity certificate provided only on

21-03-2014.

(iv) As there was no ESI coverage at the time of

accident, the petitioner had no right to claim benefit

under ESI Act for medical treatment. The petitioner

sustained injury only at the time of advertisement

work at Marakanam. Therefore, the petitioner

requested to provide employment with all legal

benefits and also provide medical expenses incurred

by his family members at PIMS hospital and also

disabled compensation as applicable under the Act.

(v) The management even though assured to

provide the employment during hospitalization of the

petitioner, but, refused to provide employment when

he approached for employment and compensation.

Therefore, he raised an Industrial Disputes before the

Labour Officer conciliation, Puducherry vide

representation, dated 13-03-2014 and 11-07-2014.

During the course of conciliation, there is no

representation from the management of Poorvika

Mobiles Limited, at Puducherry. As there is no

cooperation on the part of the management, the

conciliation proceedings ended in failure and referred

the matter to this Court.

3. The averments set forth in the counter is as

follows:

(i) The present Industrial Dispute as well as the

claim petition filed by petitioner is not maintainable

under Law. From the bare perusal of claim petition,

it is alleged that the respondent has not paid the ESI

contribution, therefore, the petitioner was not

beneffited under ESI Act. If, such the actual

grievance of petitioner, he ought to have approached

the ESI Corporation, Puducherry, for the alleged

non-payment of contribution by respondent. On the

other hand, the petitioner is also claiming

compensation and disablement compensation for the

alleged employment injuries sustained by him during

the course of employment. If, such is the actual facts

and grievance, the petitioner ought to have

approached the authority appointed under ESI Act.

Therefore, the present ID is not maintainable and

further, this Court may conduct the preliminary

enquiry on the above contentions before conducting

the full trial in the above Industrial Dispute.

(ii) The petitioner approached the ESI corporation

with a claim of refund of expenditures, who in turn

refused to entertain such claim citing that he has not

approached the ESI Hospital at first instance, but,

has taken complete treatment at PIMS Hospital

without getting approval from ESIC. The petitioner

is not in a position to file any claim petition under

Motor Vehicles Act as there is no FIR. Petitioner

devised a plan and opted to file such frivolous

petition against the respondent.

(iii) The petitioner is employed by respondent as

sales executive and it is true that he was assigned

an advertisement work at Marakanam on 16-06-2013

along with two other employees namely, Thiruvalargal

R. Thulasiraman and P. Vasanthakumar with a clear

and categorical instruction to go by bus to

Marakanam, but, the petitioner breached the very

condition imposed and went in two wheeler that too

in triples without wearing helmet and therefore, the

petitioner himself is liable for injuries sustained to

him and hence, the respondent is not liable to pay

any compensation.

(iv) The petitioner is covered under the ESI Act.

The ESI number was provided to him as early as from

27-04-2011, which is mentioned even in his monthly

salary slip. The truth of the matter is immediately

after the accident the petitioner was taken to PIMS

hospital. The other two employees intimated the

respondent about the accident and the Branch

Manager visited the petitioner at PIMS Hospital and

given a sum of ` 10,000 towards advance. The

respondent is not only paying ESI contribution to

its employees but also taking private insurance with

New India Assurance Co. Limited. The petitioner

submitted a claim of ` 15,588 to the respondent, who

in turn processed his claim form with its insurance

company and settled a sum of ` 8,391 from the

insurance and the respondent settled ` 6,265 to the

petitioner. But, with ulterior motives to extract and

extort money from respondent, the petitioner now

filed the present petition.

(v) The petitioner informed the respondent that

he could not immediately report to duty and he

requested the respondent to grant leave which was

accepted and paid monthly salary to petitioner till

December, 2013. The petitioner approached the

respondent with a request of employment who in turn

employed the petitioner on the same role which was

continued for 5 days by petitioner. Thereafter, the

petitioner himself has claimed that he could not stand

for long hours therefore, he is given up his

employment with respondent. Hence, it is very clear

that the respondent has not terminated the petitioner,

300

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 April 2024

but, it was the petitioner who informed the

respondent that he is moving from the respondent

because of the reason that he could not stand

for long. The respondent is still willing to

provide employment to petitioner by application

of principle of “No Work No Pay”. The petitioner

is now working in a private company at NRS mobile,

Villianur as Lava Promoters. Hence, the claim of

petitioner is liable to be dismissed.

4. Points for determination:

1. Whether the accident has occurred during the

course of employment and the injury sustained by

the petitioner is an employment injury?

2. Whether the petitioner is entitled for

reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by the

petitioner?

3. Whether the petitioner is entitled for disablement

compensation as claimed by the petitioner?

4. Whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief

of reinstatement with full back wages, continuity of

service and all other attendant benefits?

5. Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

over his non-employment is justified or not?

6. To what other relief the Petitioner is entitled to?

5. On the side of Petitioner, the Petitioner himself

was examined as P.W.1 and Exs.P1 to P10 was marked.

On the respondent side Mr. L. Ezhilarasan Branch

Manager of Respondent Management was examined as

R.W.1 and through him Exs.R1 to R8 were marked.

Mr. Dr. G. Parabakaran was examined as RW2 and Ex.C1

was marked through him.

6. On points 1 to 6:

The contention of the petitioner is that when the

petitioner was working in the respondent shop, the

respondent management had instructed the petitioner

to do advertisement work on 16-6-2013 in a place

called Marakanam along with two other employees

and thereby, the petitioner went to Marakanam along

with two employees and after completion of

advertisement work when the petitioner was

returning to Puducherry, the petitioner had met with

road accident and thereby sustained serious spinal

injury and the said accident had taken place during

the course of employment and when the family

members of the petitioner had immediately contacted

the respondent management it was assured by the

respondent to extend medical benefits to the

petitioner and to reimburse the medical expenses and

provide employment to the petitioner. Further, the

contention of the petitioner is that the father of the

petitioner had admitted the petitioner as inpatient in

the PIMS Hospital as there was no insurance

coverage under ESI Act and had spent several lakhs

amount for the treatment of the petitioner and later

when the petitioner recovered from the accidental

injuries and approached the respondent for work the

respondent has refused to provide job to the

petitioner and also refused to provide medical

expense and further, the respondent management got

registered with ESI only in the month of February,

2014 and provided ESI temporary Identity Card to the

petitioner on 21-03-2014 and therefore, the

respondent is liable to pay medical expense and

compensation and employment to the petitioner as

the respondent management had not paid the ESI

subscription properly and there was no ESI coverage

during the time of accident.

7. Whereas, the contention of the respondent is that

it is true that the respondent had assigned an

advertisement work at Marakanam on 16-06-2013 to the

petitioner and other two of its employees namely,

Thiruvalargal R. Thulasiraman and P. Vasanthakumar

with clear instructions to go by bus, but, the petitioner

had breached the said conditions and traveled in a two

wheeler with the said two employees without wearing

helmet and thereby the petitioner himself is liable for

the injuries sustained by him and hence, the respondent

is not liable to pay any compensation to the petitioner.

The further contention of the respondent is that the

petitioner is covered under ESI Act because the

respondent is not only paying ESI subscription, but,

also has taken private insurance to its employees and

thereby the petitioner ought to have taken treatment at

ESI hospital, but, has taken treatment at PIMS Hospital

at his own risk for which the respondent is not liable

to pay any medical expenses and further the respondent

has paid an advance amount of ` 10,000 at PIMS

Hospital and that apart when the petitioner has raised

claim for ` 15,588 the insurance company has settled a

sum of ` 8,391 and the respondent had paid ` 6,265

directly to the petitioner. It is the further contention of

the respondent that as the petitioner could not

immediately report to the duty the respondent on

humanitarian ground has paid monthly salary to the

petitioner till December, 2013 and later when, the

petitioner approached the respondent for work the

respondent had provided work to the petitioner but it

was the petitioner who himself has left the job stating

that he could not stand in the shop for hours, but,

however still the respondent is willing to provide

employment to the petitioner on the principle of

“No Work No Pay”.

8. In this case, the respondent admits that the

respondent management has instructed the petitioner

to do advertisement work at Marakanam on 16-06-2013

301

16 April 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

along with its two employees, but, contends that it was

the specific instruction of the respondent to the

petitioner that the petitioner had to commute by bus,

but, the petitioner violated the said instruction and had

travelled in a two wheeler along with the two other

employees without wearing helmet and thereby, it

cannot be said that the petitioner has sustained

employment injury. When, it is the specific contention

of the respondent that the respondent had instructed

the petitioner and two of its employees to commute by

bus then it is for the respondent to prove the same. The

respondent in this case has not examined either the

other two employees who traveled with the petitioner

or the concerned official who gave instruction to the

petitioner. That apart the R.W.1 during his cross-

examination has deposed that the respondent

had conducted enquiry as to why the other two

employees namely, Thiruvalargal R. Thulasiraman and

P. Vasanthakumar had travelled with the petitioner in a

two wheeler and further, deposed that the enquiry was

not conducted by issuing written notice regarding the

same.

9. This Court finds that had it been true that the

petitioner and other two employees were directed to

commute by bus to Marakanam and the employees have

breached such condition then the respondent at the

earliest point of time ought to have initiated enquiry or

call for explanation from the other two employees for

such conduct, but, in this case no such documents has

been produced to substantiate that the respondent has

taken action against the employees for alleged breach

of instructions. Therefore, in the said context this Court

finds that the contention of the respondent that the

respondent had instructed the petitioner and other two

employees to commute for advertisement work at

Marakanam by bus is found to be an after thought and

evasive one and stands unproved.

10. As the accident has occurred during the course

of employment and the injuries sustained by the

petitioner is also out of and in the course of his

employment this Court holds that the injury sustained

by the petitioner is employment injury. Now, the next

question that arises for consideration is whether the

petitioner ought to have taken treatment at ESI hospital

and not in a private hospital. The contention of the

respondent is that the respondent had been paying ESI

contribution and therefore, the petitioner ought to have

taken treatment at ESI Hospital. Whereas, the

contention of the petitioner is that the respondent has

not paid the ESI contribution regularly and further, only

in the month February, 2014 the respondent has

registered with ESI Corporation and thereafter has

issued ESI temporary Identity Certificate only on

21-03-2014.

11. The petitioner to substantiate the same has

produced Ex.P5 ESI temporary Identity Certificate and

on perusal of the same it is found that it is dated

31-03-2014. When, it is the contention of the respondent

that as stated in Ex.P5 the date of registration of

respondent concern with ESI Corporation was on

27-04-2011 and thereafter onwards the ESI contribution

was regularly paid to ESI Corporation and as on date

of accident there was the ESI benefits coverage then it

is for the respondent to substantiate the same. The

respondent during the cross-examination of P.W.1 has

suggested that in the salary receipt issued by the

respondent the ESI number details are available, the

P.W.1 by way of reply has deposed that the P.W.1 was

not given any salary receipt at any point of time and

he was given only Ex.P5 ESI temporary Identity

Certificate after completion of all treatments.

12. Thus, from the evidence of P.W.1 and Ex.P5 ESI

temporary Identity Certificate it could be inferred that

the case of the petitioner is that at the time of accident

he was not issued any ESI Identity Card and there was

no any ESI benefit coverage and further, the respondent

has not issued any salary receipt with ESI details to the

petitioner at any point of time. Whereas, the contention

of the respondent by way of cross-examination of P.W.1

is that in the salary receipt issued to the petitioner the

ESI details will be available. The respondent to

substantiate that in the salary slip issued by the

respondent the ESI details are available has produced

Exs.R2 to R7. On perusal of Exs.R2 to R7 it is found that

they are Salary receipt for the Month of May 2013 to

August 2013 and, November and December 2013 and

further, in the said salary receipt the ESI number is also

mentioned.

13. However, this Court finds that R.W.1 during his

cross-examination has deposed that the respondent

while disbursing salary used to affix stamp and obtain

the signature of the concerned employees in the Salary

receipt but on perusal of Exs.R2 to R7 it is found that

in the salary receipt there is either such stamps have

been affixed or signature of the petitioner is available.

The R.W1 during his cross-examination has admitted the

same and has deposed that Exs.R2 to R7 were

downloaded documents. This Court finds that when it

is the specific contention of the respondent that the

respondent used to affix stamps and obtain signature

of its employees in the salary receipt then in such case

the same ought to have been produced before this

Court, but, the respondent on other hand has produced

salary receipts which are stated to be downloaded one

and thereby this Court concludes that the genuineness

of Exs.R2 to R7 are doubtful and cannot be relied by

this Court.

302

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 April 2024

14. Therefore, this Court holds that the respondent

has failed to prove that ESI contribution was regularly

paid by the respondent and further, during the period

of accident ESI benefits coverage was available to the

petitioner. Hence, in the said context, this Court holds

that the respondent cannot contend that the petitioner

ought to have taken treatment at ESI Hospital and not

at PIMS Hospital. Hence, as the injury sustained by the

petitioner was of employment injury this Court holds

that the respondent is liable to pay the medical expense

and loss of income to the petitioner. The petitioner has

produced Ex.P8 bills issued by PIMS. On perusal of

Ex.P8 it is found that the total medical bills amount

comes to ` 22,926. The R.W.1 during his re-examination

has deposed that apart from ` 10,000 the respondent has

reimbursed 80% of Medical bills to the petitioner

through Medi Assist Company. This Court on perusal

of evidence of R.W.1 finds that the petitioner has not

disputed the same by way of further examination of

R.W.1. Further, more the petitioner has produced Ex.P10

letter issued by PIMS Hospital to Medi Assist India

certifying that at the time of accident the petitioner was

not under the influence of Alcohol and to do the

needful. Thus, from the evidence of P.W.1 and R.W.1

and Ex.P10 it could be inferred that the medical claim of

petitioner is found to have been settled through Medi

Assist India. Therefore, out of medical bills amount of

` 22,926 the respondent is found to have settled 80%

of bill amount that is ` 18,340 and hence, the respondent

is liable to pay balance medical bills amount of ` 4,586

to the petitioner.

15. As per Ex.P3 Discharge Summary, there is no any

finding that the petitioner when brought to hospital was

under the influence of alcohol and further, in Ex.P10 it

is clearly stated by the PIMS Hospital that the petitioner

was not under the influence of alcohol at the time of

admission. Therefore, the contention of the respondent

that at the time of accident the petitioner was under the

influence of alcohol is found to be an after thought

defence taken by the respondent. Similarly, the

contention of the respondent that the petitioner had

travelled in the two wheeler in triples and without

wearing helmet also stands unproved by the

respondent.

16. The yet another contention of the petitioner is

that the petitioner is entitled for loss of income from

the respondent. As per the evidence of P.W.1 during

cross-examination it is deposed that the respondent has

paid 50% of salary to the petitioner till December, 2013.

However, it is found that the petitioner has neither

deposed the quantum of monthly salary nor produced

any document to substantiate his monthly salary.

Therefore, in the said context this Court is unable to

compute and conclude any loss of income for the period

from July, 2013 to December, 2013. As per Ex.C1 the

percentage of disability is shown as 10%. Therefore, this

Court finds that it would be appropriate to direct the

respondent to pay a consolidated amount of ` 50,000

towards disability.

17. It is the case of petitioner that when he

approached the respondent in the month of February,

2014, the respondent refused to give employment to the

petitioner and whereas, it is the contention of the

respondent that it was the petitioner who had

abandoned the work stating that he was unable to stand

in the shop for hours and further, the respondent is

willing to provide employment to the petitioner at any

time on the basis of “No work No pay” but, the

respondent has not produced any document to

substantiate the same. The R.W.1 also admitted that the

respondent has not issued any notice to the petitioner

as to why the petitioner has not reported to duty. Hence,

in the said circumstances the contention of the

respondent that the petitioner himself has abandoned

the work stands unproved. Therefore, this Court holds

that the petitioner is entitled for the relief of

reinstatement with back wages.

18. Now, coming to the aspects of back wages and

other attendant benefits is concerned, this Court finds

that in this case the respondent has not proved that

the Petitioner was gainfully employed anywhere else

and earning income. However, it is found that the

Petitioner was sustaining his day to day life even in this

situation and the same could not be done without any

income. Hence, this Court on considering the

circumstances, deems fit that the Petitioner is entitled

for 30% back wages with continuity of service and

other attendant benefits. Thus, the points are answered

accordingly.

In the result this petition is allowed by holding that

the industrial dispute raised by the Petitioner as against

the Respondent Management over his non-employment

is justified and the Respondent Management is directed

to reinstate the Petitioner into service within two

months from the date of this Award and further, directed

to pay 30% of back wages from January, 2014 to till the

date of reinstatement with continuity of service and

other attendant benefits and further, directed to pay the

balance medical expense of ` 4,586 and compensation

of ` 50,000 towards temporary disablement. There is no

order as to costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this

the 20th day of December, 2023.

G.T. AMBIKA,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

303

16 April 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

List of petitioner’s witness :

PW1

— 26-04-2018 Thiru Narayanasamy

(Petitioner herein).

List of petitioner’s exhibits :

Ex.P1 — 05-12-2014 Photocopy of the Conciliation

Failure Report.

Ex.P2 — 18-06-2015 Reference of the Labour

Department, Puducherry.

Ex.P3 — 24-06-2013 Photocopy of the Discharge

Summary issued by the PIMS

Hospital.

Ex.P4 — 04-01-2014 Payment Voucher issued by

the Respondent.

Ex.P5 — 31-03-2014 Photocopy of the ESI Temporary

Identity Certificate.

Ex.P6 — 23-07-2010 Photocopy of the Appointment

Letter

issued

the

Respondent.

Ex.P7 —

—

Photocopy of the PIMS

Hospital Medical Records.

Ex.P8 —

—

Photocopy of the PIMS

Hospital Medical Records.

Ex.P9 —

—

Photocopy of the Identity

Card

issued

the

Respondent.

Ex.P10 — 21-06-2013 Photocopy of the No drunk

letter

issued

PIMS

Hospital, Puducherry.

List of respondent’s witnesses :

RW1

— 10-10-2019 Mr. Ezhilarasan, Branch

Manager of the Respondent

Management.

RW2

— 19-07-2023 Mr. Dr. Prabakaran, H.O.D.,

I.G.P.G.I, Puducherry.

List of respondent’s exhibits :

Ex.R1 — 10-10-2019 Photocopy

the

Authorization letter.

Ex.R2 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip

of the petitioner for the

month of May 2013.

Ex.R3 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip

of the petitioner for the

month of June 2013.

Ex.R4 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip

of the petitioner for the

month of July 2013.

Ex.R5 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip

of the petitioner for the

month of August 2013.

Ex.R6 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip

of the petitioner for the

month of November 2013.

Ex.R7 — 14-03-2014 Photocopy of the Salary Slip

of the petitioner for the

month of December 2013.

Ex.R8 — 27-04-2011 Photocopy of the ESIC

Employees details of the

petitioner.

List of court’s exhibits :

Ex.C1 — 11-08-2022 Disability Certificate issued

the

Medical

Board,

I.G.G.G.H.

and

P.G.I.,

Puducherry.

G.T. AMBIKA,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 38/Lab./AIL/S/2024,

Puducherry, dated 21st March 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, the Government is of the opinion that an

industrial dispute has arisen between the management

of M/s. Indian Red Cross Society, Health Department,

Puducherry and the Mission Director, Puducherry State

Health Mission, Puducherry, against the Puducherry,

Karaikal and Yanam Health Departments, 108 Ambulance

Service

Drivers Association,

Puducherry,

over

Regularization in respect of the matter mentioned in the

Annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of the Government,

it is necessary to refer the said dispute for adjudication;

Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority delegated

vide G.O. Ms. No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991 of

the Labour Department, Puducherry, to exercise the

powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1)

of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act XIV of 1947), it is hereby directed by the

304

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 April 2024

Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said dispute

be referred to the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, for

adjudication. The Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, shall

submit the Award within 3 months from the date of issue

of reference as stipulated under sub-section 2-A of

section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and in

accordance with rule 10-B of the Industrial Disputes

(Central) Rules, 1957. The party raising the dispute shall

file a statement of claim complete with relevant

documents, list of reliance and witnesses to the

Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry, within 15 days of the

receipt of the order of reference and also forward a copy

of such statement to each one of the opposite parties

involved in the dispute.

ANNEXURE

(i) Whether the industrial dispute raised by the

petitioners Association namely, the Puducherry,

Karaikal and Yanam Health Departments, 108

Ambulance Service Driver Association, Puducherry,

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 439-442/DSE/HSW/EC/SSLC/2024.

Puducherry, dated 1st April 2024.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original S.S.L.C Examination Mark Certificates

beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificates. If, anyone finds the

original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations (Sec), College

Road, Chennai – 600 006, for cancellation as it is/they are no longer valid.

Sl.

Name of the

Sl. No. of

School in which studied last

No.

applicant

session and

the Mark

year

Certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Thiru/Tmt./Selvi :

Mohanraj N

2951024 March

2021

20918462

Thillaiyadi Valliammai Government

High School, Kathirkamam,

Puducherry.

Sanjeevdharan B

5009157 March 2015

5305422

Kavingar Barathidasan Government High

School, Kuruvinatham, Puducherry.

Soniya M

549501 March 2008

5813946

Immaculate Heart of Mary Girls’

Higher Secondary School, Mission

Street, Puducherry.

Divya M

3012186

March 2014

3877202

St. Joseph Government Aided High

School, Muthialpet, Puducherry.

Dr. V.G. SIVAGAMI,

Joint Director of School Education.

against the management namely, Indian Red Cross

Society, Health Department, Puducherry and the

Mission Director, Puducherry State Health Mission,

Puducherry, over Regularization of Petitioners as

Drivers as detailed below:-

R. Prosper Roland, s/o. Roland Felix

S. Kannan, s/o. Seetharaman

R.Sivaprakasam, s/o. Renganathan

R.Sivakumar, s/o. Ramakrishnan

Muthukumaran, s/o. Chinnaiyan

are justified or not? If justified, what reliefs the

Petitioners, as mentioned above, are entitled to?

(ii) To what other relief the Petitioners, as

mentioned above, are entitled to?

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

305

16 April 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

(Magistrate Courts)

No. 433/JUD/CJM/PDY/2024.

Puducherry, dated 02nd April 2024.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the case records mentioned

in the Annexure will be destroyed after one month from

the date of publication of this Notification. Hence,

parties to those cases, who are willing to get any of

the documents or certified copies thereof, may

approach the Court within one month from the date of

this publication.

K. MOHAN,

Chief Judicial Magistrate.

————

ANNEXURE

IN THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE AT PUDUCHERRY

List of Cases for Destruction

Sl. No.

Case No.

Year-1989

STC 37/1989

Year-2003

STC 15/2003

STC 257/2003

Year-2004

STC 267/2004

Year-2005

STC 53/2005

STC 138/2005

STC 206/2005

STC 241/2005

STC 265/2005

STC 295/2005

Year-2006

STC 70/2006

STC 72/2006

STC 75/2006

STC 76/2006

STC 77/2006

STC 79/2006

STC 80/2006

STC 81/2006

STC 82/2006

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

STC 83/2006

STC 84/2006

STC 85/2006

STC 86/2006

STC 87/2006

STC 88/2006

STC 90/2006

Year-2007

STC 43/2007

STC 82/2007

STC 90/2007

STC 178/2007

Year-2008

STC 55/2008

STC 66/2008

STC 296/2008

STC 117/2008

STC 123/2008

STC 179/2008

STC 195/2008

Year-2009

STC 28/2009

STC 92/2009

STC 116/2009

STC 138/2009

STC 148/2009

STC 156/2009

STC 196/2009

STC 175/2009

STC 176/2009

STC 182/2009

STC 195/2009

STC 153/2009

Year-2011

STC 134/2011

STC 289/2011

Year-2014

STC 1/2014

STC 2/2014

STC 3/2014

STC 4/2014

STC 5/2014

STC 6/2014

STC 7/2014

STC 8/2014

STC 9/2014

STC 10/2014

STC 11/2014

STC 12/2014

STC 14/2014

STC 15/2014

STC 17/2014

STC 18/2014

STC 19/2014

STC 20/2014

STC 21/2014

STC 22/2014

STC 23/2014

STC 24/2014

STC 25/2014

STC 26/2014

STC 27/2014

STC 28/2014

STC 29/2014

STC 30/2014

STC 31/2014

STC 32/2014

STC 33/2014

STC 34/2014

STC 35/2014

STC 36/2014

STC 37/2014

STC 38/2014

STC 39/2014

STC 40/2014

STC 41/2014

STC 42/2014

STC 43/2014

STC 44/2014

STC 45/2014

STC 46/2014

STC 47/2014

STC 48/2014

STC 49/2014

STC 50/2014

STC 51/2014

STC 52/2014

STC 53/2014

STC 54/2014

STC 55/2014

STC 56/2014

STC 57/2014

STC 58/2014

STC 59/2014

STC 60/2014

STC 61/2014

STC 62/2014

STC 64/2014

STC 65/2014

STC 66/2014

STC 67/2014

STC 68/2014

STC 69/2014

STC 70/2014

STC 71/2014

STC 73/2014

STC 74/2014

STC 75/2014

STC 76/2014

STC 77/2014

STC 78/2014

STC 79/2014

STC 80/2014

STC 81/2014

STC 83/2014

STC 84/2014

STC 87/2014

STC 88/2014

STC 89/2014

STC 90/2014

STC 91/2014

STC 92/2014

STC 93/2014

STC 94/2014

STC 95/2014

306

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 April 2024

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

STC 96/2014

STC 97/2014

STC 98/2014

STC 99/2014

STC 100/2014

STC 101/2014

STC 102/2014

STC 103/2014

STC 104/2014

STC 105/2014

STC 106/2014

100

STC 107/2014

101

STC 108/2014

102

STC 109/2014

103

STC 110/2014

104

STC 111/2014

105

STC 112/2014

106

STC 113/2014

107

STC 114/2014

108

STC 115/2014

109

STC 116/2014

110

STC 117/2014

111

STC 118/2014

112

STC 119/2014

113

STC 120/2014

114

STC 121/2014

115

STC 122/2014

116

STC 123/2014

117

STC 124/2014

118

STC 125/2014

119

STC 126/2014

120

STC 127/2014

121

STC 128/2014

122

STC 129/2014

123

STC 130/2014

124

STC 131/2014

125

STC 132/2014

126

STC 133/2014

127

STC 134/2014

128

STC 135/2014

129

STC 136/2014

130

STC 137/2014

131

STC 138/2014

132

STC 139/2014

133

STC 140/2014

134

STC 141/2014

135

STC 142/2014

136

STC 143/2014

137

STC 144/2014

138

STC 145/2014

139

STC 146/2014

Year-2015

STC 1/2015

STC 2/2015

STC 3/2015

STC 4/2015

STC 5/2015

STC 6/2015

STC 7/2015

STC 8/2015

STC 11/2015

STC 12/2015

STC 13/2015

STC 14/2015

STC 15/2015

STC 16/2015

STC 17/2015

STC 18/2015

STC 19/2015

STC 20/2015

STC 21/2015

STC 22/2015

STC 23/2015

STC 24/2015

STC 25/2015

STC 26/2015

STC 27/2015

STC 28/2015

STC 29/2015

STC 30/2015

STC 31/2015

STC 32/2015

STC 33/2015

STC 35/2015

STC 36/2015

STC 37/2015

STC 38/2015

STC 39/2015

STC 40/2015

STC 41/2015

STC 42/2015

STC 43/2015

STC 44/2015

STC 45/2015

STC 46/2015

STC 47/2015

STC 48/2015

STC 49/2015

STC 50/2015

STC 52/2015

STC 53/2015

STC 54/2015

STC 55/2015

STC 57/2015

STC 58/2015

STC 59/2015

STC 60/2015

STC 61/2015

STC 62/2015

STC 63/2015

STC 64/2015

STC 65/2015

STC 66/2015

STC 67/2015

STC 69/2015

STC 70/2015

STC 71/2015

STC 72/2015

STC 73/2015

STC 74/2015

STC 75/2015

STC 76/2015

STC 77/2015

STC 78/2015

STC 79/2015

STC 80/2015

STC 81/2015

STC 82/2015

STC 83/2015

STC 84/2015

STC 85/2015

STC 86/2015

STC 87/2015

STC 88/2015

STC 89/2015

STC 90/2015

STC 91/2015

STC 92/2015

STC 93/2015

STC 94/2015

STC 95/2015

STC 96/2015

STC 97/2015

STC 98/2015

STC 99/2015

STC 100/2015

STC 102/2015

STC 103/2015

STC 104/2015

STC 105/2015

STC 106/2015

100

STC 107/2015

101

STC 108/2015

102

STC 109/2015

103

STC 110/2015

104

STC 111/2015

105

STC 112/2015

106

STC 113/2015

107

STC 147/2015

108

STC 114/2015

109

STC 115/2015

110

STC 118/2015

111

STC 119/2015

112

STC 120/2015

113

STC 121/2015

114

STC 122/2015

115

STC 123/2015

116

STC 124/2015

117

STC 126/2015

118

STC 127/2015

119

STC 128/2015

120

STC 129/2015

121

STC 130/2015

122

STC 131/2015

123

STC 132/2015

124

STC 134/2015

125

STG 135/2015

126

STC 136/2015

127

STC 137/2015

128

STC 139/2015

129

STC 140/2015

130

STC 141/2015

131

STC 142/2015

132

STC 143/2015

133

STC 144/2015

134

STC 145/2015

135

STC 116/2015

136

STC 146/2015

137

STC 148/2015

138

STC 133/2015

139

STC 149/2015

140

STC 150/2015

141

STC 151/2015

142

STC 152/2015

143

STC 153/2015

144

STC 154/2015

145

STC 155/2015

146

STC 157/2015

147

STC 158/2015

148

STC 159/2015

149

STC 160/2015

150

STC 161/2015

151

STC 162/2015

152

STC 163/2015

307

16 April 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

Year-2016

STC 1/2016

STC 2/2016

STC 3/2016

STC 4/2016

STC 5/2016

STC 6/2016

STC 7/2016

STC 8/2016

STC 9/2016

STC 11/2016

STC 12/2016

STC 13/2016

STC 14/2016

STC 15/2016

STC 18/2016

STC 19/2016

STC 20/2016

STC 21/2016

STC 22/2016

STC 23/2016

STC 24/2016

STC 25/2016

STC 26/2016

STC 27/2016

STC 29/2016

STC 30/2016

STC 31/2016

STC 32/2016

STC 33/2016

STC 34/2016

STC 35/2016

STC 36/2016

STC 37/2016

STC 38/2016

STC 39/2016

STC 40/2016

STC 41/2016

STC 42/2016

STC 43/2016

STC 44/2016

STC 45/2016

STC 46/2016

STC 47/2016

STC 48/2016

STC 49/2016

STC 50/2016

STC 51/2016

STC 52/2016

STC 53/2016

STC 54/2016

STC 55/2016

STC 56/2016

STC 57/2016

STC 58/2016

STC 59/2016

STC 60/2016

STC 61/2016

STC 62/2016

STC 63/2016

STC 64/2016

STC 65/2016

STC 66/2016

STC 67/2016

STC 68/2016

STC 69/2016

STC 70/2016

STC 71/2016

STC 72/2016

STC 73/2016

STC 74/2016

STC 75/2016

STC 76/2016

STC 77/2016

STC 78/2016

STC 79/2016

STC 80/2016

STC 81/2016

STC 82/2016

STC 83/2016

STC 84/2016

STC 85/2016

STC 86/2016

STC 87/2016

STC 88/2016

STC 89/2016

STC 90/2016

STC 91/2016

STC 92/2016

STC 94/2016

Year-2017

STC 1/2017

STC 2/2017

STC 3/2017

STC 6/2017

STC 7/2017

STC 8/2017

STC 9/2017

STC 10/2017

STC 11/2017

STC 12/2017

STC 13/2017

STC 14/2017

STC 15/2017

STC 16/2017

STC 17/2017

STC 18/2017

STC 21/2017

STC 22/2017

STC 23/2017

STC 24/2017

STC 25/2017

STC 26/2017

STC 27/2017

STC 28/2017

STC 29/2017

STC 30/2017

STC 32/2017

STC 33/2017

STC 34/2017

STC 35/2017

STC 36/2017

STC 37/2017

STC 38/2017

STC 39/2017

STC 40/2017

STC 41/2017

STC 42/2017

STC 43/2017

STC 44/2017

STC 45/2017

STC 46/2017

STC 47/2017

STC 48/2017

STC 49/2017

STC 50/2017

STC 51/2017

STC 52/2017

STC 53/2017

STC 54/2017

STC 55/2017

STC 56/2017

STC 57/2017

STC 58/2017

STC 59/2017

STC 60/2017

STC 61/2017

STC 62/2017

STC 63/2017

STC 64/2017

STC 65/2017

STC 67/2017

STC 66/2017

STC 68/2017

STC 69/2017

STC 70/2017

STC 71/2017

STC 72/2017

STC 73/2017

STC 74/2017

STC 75/2017

STC 76/2017

STC 78/2017

STC 80/2017

STC 81/2017

STC 82/2017

STC 83/2017

STC 86/2017

STC 87/2017

STC 88/2017

STC 89/2017

STC 90/2017

STC 91/2017

STC 92/2017

STC 93/2017

STC 94/2017

STC 95/2017

STC 96/2017

STC 97/2017

STC 98/2017

STC 99/2017

STC 100/2017

STC 101/2017

STC 102/2017

STC 103/2017

STC 104/2017

STC 105/2017

STC 106/2017

STC 107/2017

STC 108/2017

100

STC 109/2017

101

STC 110/2017

102

STC 111/2017

103

STC 112/2017

104

STC 113/2017

105

STC 114/2017

106

STC 115/2017

107

STC 116/2017

108

STC 117/2017

109

STC 118/2017

Year-2018

STC 3/2018

STC 8/2018

STC 9/2018

STC 10/2018

STC 11/2018

308

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 April 2024

STC 12/2018

STC 13/2018

STC 15/2018

STC 14/2018

STC 16/2018

STC 17/2018

STC 18/2018

STC 19/2018

STC 20/2018

STC 21/2018

STC 22/2018

STC 23/2018

STC 24/2018

STC 25/2018

STC 26/2018

STC 27/2018

STC 28/2018

STC 29/2018

STC 32/2018

STC 33/2018

STC 34/2018

STC 35/2018

STC 36/2018

STC 37/2018

STC 39/2018

STC 40/2018

STC 41/2018

STC 43/2018

STC 45/2018

STC 47/2018

STC 48/2018

STC 50/2018

STC 51/2018

STC 52/2018

STC 53/2018

STC 54/2018

STC 55/2018

STC 56/2018

STC 57/2018

STC 59/2018

STC 60/2018

STC 64/2018

STC 66/2018

STC 67/2018

STC 68/2018

STC 69/2018

STC 70/2018

STC 72/2018

STC 73/2018

STC 75/2018

STC 76/2018

STC 77/2018

STC 78/2018

STC 80/2018

STC 81/2018

STC 82/2018

STC 83/2018

STC 84/2018

STC 85/2018

STC 86/2018

STC 87/2018

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

Sl. No.

Case No.

STC 88/2018

STC 89/2018

STC 90/2018

STC 91/2018

STC 92/2018

STC 93/2018

STC 98/2018

STC 96/2018

STC 99/2018

STC 100/2018

STC 101/2018

STC 102/2018

STC 103/2018

STC 104/2018

STC 105/2018

STC 106/2018

STC 107/2018

STC 108/2018

STC 109/2018

STC 110/2018

STC 111/2018

STC 113/2018

STC 114/2018

STC 115/2018

STC 116/2018

STC 119/2018

STC 120/2018

STC 121/2018

STC 122/2018

STC 123/2018

STC 124/2018

STC 125/2018

STC 127/2018

100

STC 128/2018

101

STC 129/2018

102

STC 130/2018

103

STC 132/2018

104

STC 133/2018

105

STC 135/2018

106

STC 136/2018

107

STC 137/2018

108

STC 138/2018

109

STC 141/2018

110

STC 143/2018

111

STC 144/2018

112

STC 145/2018

113

STC 146/2018

114

STC 147/2018

115

STC 148/2018

116

STC 149/2018

117

STC 150/2018

118

STC 151/2018

119

STC 152/2018

120

STC 153/2018

121

STC 154/2018

122

STC 156/2018

123

STC 157/2018

124

STC 30/2018

125

STC 42/2018

126

STC 49/2018

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

NO. 935-939/DSE/HSW/EC/HSC/2024.

Puducherry, dated 03rd April 2024.

NOTIFICATION

It is hereby informed that the following candidates have lost their original Higher Secondary Course Examination

Mark Certificates beyond the scope of recovery, the necessary steps have been taken to issue duplicate certificates.

If, anyone finds the original Mark Certificate(s), it/they may be sent to the Secretary, State Board of School Examinations

(Hr.Sec.), College Road, Chennai – 600 006, for cancellation as it is/they are no longer valid.

Sl.

Name of the

Sl. No. of

School in which

No.

applicant

session and

the mark

studied last

year

certificate

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Ms. Soniya M

544353 March 2010

5137624

Immaculate Heart of Mary Girls’ Higher

Secondary School, Mission Street,

Puducherry.

309

16 April 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Divya M

568544 March 2016

11255423

Thiruvalluvar Government Girls’ Higher

Secondary School, Puducherry.

Sharli M

5838861 May

2022

32678430

Vivekanandha Higher Secondary School,

Sellaperumalpet, Puducherry.

Priyadharsini V

1576387 March 2018

13549635

Seventh Day Adventist Higher Secondary

School, Shanmugapuram, Puducherry.

Bhuvaneswari J

542458 March 2013

7985856

Immaculate Heart of Mary Girls’ Higher

Secondary School, Mission Street,

Puducherry.

Dr. V.G. SIVAGAMI,

Joint Director of School Education.

————

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Tmt./Selvi/Thiru :

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

(STATIONERY AND PRINTING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 19/S&P/2024,

Puducherry, dated 04th April 2024)

NOTIFICATION

The Notice of voluntary retirement given under

rule 48 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972

by Thiru V. Govindarajan, Private Secretary, Department

of Stationery and Printing, Puducherry is accepted.

2. Accordingly, he is admitted into voluntary

retirement with effect from the forenoon of 01/05/2024.

(By order of the Lieutenant-Governor)

T. SUDHAKAR,

Under Secretary to Government,

(Stationery and Printing).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

PLANNING AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Ms. No. 01/PRD/2024,

Puducherry, dated 5th April 2024)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Thiru N. Nagalingame Periane, Deputy Director

(Planning), Central Office, Public Works Department,

Puducherry is admitted into retirement from service with

effect from the afternoon of 31-07-2023.

(By order)

R. SHEELA,

Under Secretary to Government (Planning).

AFFIDAVIT

I, Arounadevi Soureka, daughter of Sundararajan,

Hindu, aged about 31 years and residing at No.8, Fourth

Cross Street, V.O.C Nagar, Muthialpet, Puducherry-

605 003, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and

state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well

known aware of the facts of my deposition.

1. That m y name has been given in my Birth

Certificate Registration No. C/1993/00033, issued by

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry as ‘Arounadevi

@ Soureka’.

2. That my name has been given in my Aadhaar

Card No. XXXX XXXX 1108, issued by Unique

Identification Authority of India as ‘Arounadevi

Soureka (∂ÚðVº>s ∑º´¬ÔV)’.

3. That my name has been recorded in the Family

Ration Card bearing No. 057717, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry as ‘∂ÚðVº>s (®) ∑º´¬ÔV’.

4. That in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card

bearing No. IVT0030932, issued by Election Commission

of India, my name is mentioned as ‘Arounadevi @

Soureka (∂ÚðVº>s @ ƒº´¬ÔV)’.

5. That my name has been given in my PAN Card

bearing No. BMSPA8308L, issued by Income-tax

Department, Government of India as ‘Arounadevi

Soureka’.

6. That my name has been registered in my

College Consolidated Grade Report vide Register No.

10T00756, issued by the Pondicherry University,

Puducherry as ‘Arouna Devi @ Soureka S’.

310

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 April 2024

Hence, all the abovesaid names such as

‘Arounadevi @ Soureka’, ‘Arounadevi Soureka

(∂ÚðVº>s ∑º´¬ÔV)’, ‘∂ÚðVº>s (®) ∑º´¬ÔV’,

‘Arounadevi @ Soureka’ and ‘Arouna Devi @

Soureka S’ are referring one and the same person i.e.,

myself only.

I furnish this affirmation towards my names

identity/proof and that all the names are belonging

and referring one and the same person of myself only.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 27th day of

March 2024.

562722

S. AROUNADEVI.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Pradeepan P. son of Anandan, aged about 52 years,

residing

No.

XII/405,

Parambath

House,

Koyyottutheru, Near Scholers School, Post Naluthara,

Mahe, holder of Aadhaar Card No. xxxx xxxx 1398, do

hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

1. That I am swearing this affidavit for and on behalf

of my son P. Alan Pradeep, who is minor, aged 13 years.

I am the lawful guardian of ‘P. Alan Pradeep’.

2. I swear and state that my son is the holder of

Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 9028, his name is

entered as ‘P Alan Pradeep’.

3. I swear and state that in my son’s Birth

Certificate, issued by the Sub- Registrar of Births and

Deaths, Kozhikode Corporation, Government of

Kerala vide Registration No. 23837/2010, dated

19-08-2010, his name is entered as ‘P. Alan Pradeep’.

4. I swear and state that my son is the holder of

Bona fied Certificate, issued by the Headmaster,

Kasthurba Gandhi Government High School, Palloor,

Mahe, on 27/11/2023, my minor son’s name is entered

as ‘P Alan Pradeep’.

5. I swear and state that in my Family Ration Card

vide No. 6546, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Mahe, my son’s name

is entered as ‘P. Alan Pradeep’ (in Malayalam).

6. I swear and state that I intent to change my

son’s name as ‘Alan Pradeep’ Therefore, I swear this

affidavit, for the knowledge of my relatives, friends,

officials concerned and others that hereinafter, my son

will be known only as ‘Alan Pradeep’ in all purposes.

All this is true.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Mahe, on this 26th day of March 2024.

562723 PRADEEPAN .P

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Iyyamperumal,son of Kaliyaperumal, Hindu, aged

about 38 years, residing at No. 32, Main Road,

Vizhidiur, Karaikal, Puducherry - 609 607, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as

follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that in

my Birth Certificate vide Registration No. O/1985/68 and

in my Electoral Identity Card vide No. CHD0173484,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Iyyamperumal

(∂FBDÿ√Ú\V^)’.

I state that in my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX

XXXX 1206, my name has been mentioned as

‘Iyyamperuamal K (nFBDÿ√Ú\V^ Ô)’.

I state that in my PAN Card vide No. IDFPK2530H,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Iyyamperumal K’.

I state that in the Family Ration Card under

No. 442527, my name has been mentioned as

‘Iyyamperumal nBD ÿ√Ú\V^’.

I state that in my College Transfer Certificate

under No. 520/2004-05, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Iyyam Perumal K’.

I state that in my Secondary School Leaving

Certificate (SSLC) Mark Sheet vide Certificates

No. SEC. 2295904 and in my Higher Secondary

Course Certificate (HSC) Mark Sheet vide

Certificate No. HSG.0876221, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Iyyamperumal K’.

I submit that the names described in the above

records, i.e., ‘Iyyamperumal (∂FBDÿ√Ú\V^)’,

‘Iyyamperuamal K (nFBD ÿ√Ú\V^ Ô)’, ‘Iyyam

Perumal K’ and ‘nFBD ÿ√Ú\V^’ are referring one

and same person i.e., myself only.

Further, I state that now, I have changed my name

as ‘S.K.Arul (∂Ú^)’ instead of ‘Iyyamperumal

(nBDÿ√Ú\V^)’ for numerological and sentimental

reasons.

Therefore, I declare that hereinafter, I shall be

called, known and distinguished only by the name

‘S.K.Arul’ for all my official and private purposes.

311

16 April 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

I state that what are all stated above is true and

correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and

information and there is no suppression or

misrepresentation of the facts.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 20th day of

March 2024.

562724 K. IYYAMPERUMAL.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Victor Vimal Raj, son of Charles Durai Raj, Indian

inhabitant, aged 34 years and residing at 2nd Main

Road, J.V.R. Nagar, Kumarapalayam, Thethampakkam,

Puducherry-605 502, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein. I state that I was

born as a Christian, as such in my Secondary School

Leaving Certificate under Certificate S.No. SEC.

1494291, in my Higher Secondary Course Certificate

under Certificate S.No. HSG 2228200 and in my

M.Phil. Computer Science College Transfer Certificate

under Admission No. A15MPCS15, my name has been

mentioned as ‘Victor Vimal Raj .C’.

In my Community Certificate under C. No. 378/2003,

my name has been mentioned as ‘s¬¶Ï s\_´VÎ’

In my Marriage Register Certificate under Marriage

No. 24/2016, my name has been mentioned as ‘C. Victor

Vimalraj’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 8167,

my name has been mentioned as ‘Victor Vimal Raj

(s¬¶Ï s\_ ´VÎ)’.íí

In my Elector ’s Photo Identity Card under

No. TVC0122986, my name has been mentioned as

‘Victorvimalraj (s¬¶Ïs\_´VÎ)’.

In my Family Ration Card under No. 212781,

my name has been mentioned as ‘s¬¶Ï s\_ ´VÎ’.

Further, I state that through a ceremony conducted

by Thirukailaya Parambarai, Srikandha Parambarai

Vamadeva Sri Sivakkirayogigal Thirumadam/

Aadhinam, Thiruvidaimarudur Taluk, I have renounced

Christian religion and embrased Hindu religion, as

such in the Certificate, dated 20-03-2024, my said

Christian name has been mentioned as ‘C. Victor

Vimal Raj (C. s¬¶Ïs\_´VÎ)’ and my Hindu name

has been mentioned as ‘C. Vimalan (C. s\È[)’

respectively.

Hence, I declare that hereafter, I shall be known

and identified only by the name ‘C Vimalan

(C. s\È[)’ only for all purposes.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs are true and correct to the best of my

knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 05th day of

April 2024.

562725 VICTOR VIMAL RAJ.

————

cÆ]ÿ\Va©

√›]´D

cÆ]ÿ\Va©

√›]´D

cÆ]ÿ\Va©

√›]´D

cÆ]ÿ\Va©

√›]´D

cÆ]ÿ\Va©

√›]´D

ÂÔÏ, ∏·V‚ ®ı 37 ÿÔVı¶ ÷_È›]_ kE¬zD ƒ´kð[

®[–Á¶B \ÔM[ ÿ√B´V™m, ®™m z|D√

P/2011/497-_ ‘Dheja’ ®[ÆD, ∂kÚÁ¶B g>VÏ

∂Á¶BV· ∂‚Á¶ ®ı: XXXX XXXX 7074-_

‘ºÔ º>¤V’ �ÆD ∂kÚÁ¶B √^π Study Certificate-_

ÿ√BÏÔ^ ∂Á™›mD ®[–Á¶B \ÔM[ ÿ√BÏÔ^>V[

®[ÆD, ÿkÀºkÆ Â√ÏÔπ[ ÿ√BÏÔ^ ÷_ÁÈ ®[Æ

÷>[ JÈD cÆ]Bπ¬˛º≈[. ÷MkÚD ÔVÈ∫Ôπ_

®™m \Ô[ ‘z.º>¤[ (K.Dhejan)’

®[º≈

∂Áw¬Ô©√|kVÏ.

º�√Ω, ÂV[ ∂π›> cÆ]ÿ\Va ƒD√Õ>\VÔ

∞º>–D E¬Ô_Ô^ ∞u√‚¶V_ ®™m ÿƒVÕ> ÿƒÈs_

yÏ›m¬ÿÔV^ºk[

®[ÆD,

∂´∑

®|¬zD

cÆ]Bπ¬˛[º≈[.

Amﬂºƒˆ ƒV[ÆÁ´QÏ x[MÁÈl_ 2024ágD gı|

562726

ƒ.z©AƒVt

ƒ.z©AƒVt.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory,

wife of M J Thomas, residing at No. 46, Fourth Cross

Street, Annai Theresa Nagar, Moolakulam, Puducherry

- 605 010, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and

state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

In my Birth Certificate vide Registration

No. PM/R/1957/000365, dated 30-10-1957, issued by

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, my name is

mentioned as ‘Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie

Flory’.

312

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 April 2024

In my Aadhaar Card vide No. XXXX XXXX 2560,

issued by Unique Identification Authority of India,

my name is mentioned as ‘Monique Marie Valentine

Danassoundarie Flory’.

Further, I declare that in my Marriage Certificate

vide Sl. No. 6260, issued by the Oulgaret Municipality,

Puducherry, my name is mentioned as ‘Monique

Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory’.

I also declare that in our Family Ration Card vide

No. 131462, my name is mentioned as ‘ÿ\VM¬\ˆ

kÈV›][ >™∑Õ>ˆ AºÈVˆ’.

I hereby state that my husband M J Thomas’s

Pension Payment Order Pensioner’s Portion vide

No. 24033, issued by the Directorate of Accounts and

Treasuries, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as

‘Monique Marie Valatine’.

I hereby declare that according to my PAN Card

vide No. AGOPF9111H, issued by the Income-tax

Department, Government of India, my name is

mentioned as ‘Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie

Flory’.

Hence, all the abovesaid names viz., ‘Monique

Marie Valentine Danassoundarie Flory, ‘ÿ\VM¬\ˆ

kÈV›][ >™∑Õ>ˆ AºÈVˆ’ and ‘Monique Marie

Valatine’ are denoting one and the same person, they

referring myself only.

Hearinafter, I shall be known and called by my

correct name ‘Monique Marie Valentine Danassoundarie

Flory’ only for my future needs.

Whatever stated in the above affidavit is true and

correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and

nothing material is concealed herein.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this

08th day of April 2024.

562727

MONIQUE MARIE.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Manickam Vivekananthan, son of K. Manickam,

Service No. 14568220 F, Rank Havildar, aged 60 years,

residing at No. 27, Kannadasan Street, Vivek Bharathi

Illam, Periyakalapet, Puducherry - 605 014, do hereby

solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as

follows:

That I am the deponent herein and made this

affidavit on behalf of myself.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Manickam

Vivekananthan’ in my Pension Payment Order, issued

by the Cheif Office of the C.D.A. (Pensions)

Allahabad, New Delhi, bearing Pension Payment

Order No. S/055647/2000 (Army).

I state that my name is entered as ‘Manickam

Vivekananthan’ in my Discharge Certificate Book,

issued by Indian Army.

I state that my name is entered as ‘M Vivekananthan’

in my ECHS Card, issued by the ECHS Bhawan,

New Delhi bearing No. CN0037763.

I state that my name is entered as ‘M. Vivekananthan’

in my School Transfer Certificate, issued by the

Headmaster, Government Boys’ Higher Secondary

School, Valavanur, Tamil Nadu bearing Certificate

S.No. A 078390, dated 07-06-1983.

I state that my name is entered as ‘M Vivekananthan’

in my Aadhaar Card, issued by Unique Identification

Authority of India bearing No. XXXX XXXX 3010.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Vivekananthan

M’ in my Joint Account Bank Passbook, State Bank

of India, Main Branch, Puducherry bearing Account

No. XXXXXXX979.

I state that my name is entered as ‘sºkÔV™Õ>[’

in my Family Ration Card, issued by the Department

of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry

bearing No. 024502.

I state that my name is entered as ‘M Vivekananthan’

in my PAN Card, issued by Income-tax Department,

Government of India bearing No. ALPPV3687E.

I state that my name is entered as ‘Vivekananthan M’

in my Driving Licence, issued by the India Driving

Licence, Puducherry bearing DL No. AP1120000010294,

dated 15-11-2000.

I state that my name is entered as ‘ Vivekananthan’

in my Elector’s Photo Identity Card, issued by Election

Commission of India bearing No. GKY0597328.

I state that my name is entered as ‘M Vivekananthan’

in my Marriage Certificate, issued by the Marriage

Officer, Oulgaret, Puducherry bearing No. 179 of 1996

dated 31-12-1996.

I state that my name is entered as ‘M. Vivekananthan’

in my (PONCARS) Society for the Care of the aged,

Pondicherry, issued by the Government of Puducherry

bearing M.No. 9100.

313

16 April 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

I submit that the names described in the abovesaid

records as ‘Manickam Vivekananthan’, ‘M Vivekananthan’,

‘sºkÔV™Õ>[’, ‘Vivekananthan M’ and ‘Vivekananthan’

are referring one and the same person i.e., myself

only.

Finally, I declare that my correct name is

‘M Vivekananthan’ only.

The statements in the abovesaid paragraphs are

true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Puducherry, on this 09th day of April 2024.

562728

MANICKAM VIVEKANANTHAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, E Malathi, wife of S Elango, aged 59 years (Date

of birth 27-07-1964), and residing at No. 38, 3rd Cross,

Vasantha Nagar, Thengaithittu Road, Puducherry-605 004,

do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and state on

oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Malathi Elango’ in my

husband’s Pension Payment Order No. 601199302139,

issued by Office of the Principal Controller of

Defence Accounts (Pensions), Prayagraj.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Malathi E’ in my

husband’s Pension Payment Order No. 31306 of

Directorate of Account and Treasuries, Puducherry,

of and date of birth as 27-07-1964.

That my name is mentioned as ‘B Malathi’ in

my PAN Card No. AGNPM8033C and date of birth is

27-07-1964.

That my name is mentioned as ‘B Malathi’ in my

Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 7544 and date of

birth is 27-07-1964.

That my name is mentioned as ‘E Malathi’ in my

ECHS Card No. CH 0000 0325 3847 and date of birth

27-07-1964, issued by ECHS Bhawan, New Delhi.

That my name is mentioned as ‘B Malathi’ in my

Passbook Joint Account No. XXXXX9473 of Indian

Bank (Defence Pension Account of my husband).

That my name is mentioned as ‘B Malathi’ in my

Department of School Education, Government of

Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Malathi’ in my

Elector’s Photo Identity Card No. IBI0167262.

That my name is mentioned as ‘\VÈ]’ in the

Family Ration Card No. 029327, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘÷. \VÈ]’ in my

Sale Deed Document No. 943/94, registered with

Sub-Registrar Office, Kumbakonam, Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as ‘E. \VÈ]’ in my

Sale Deed Document No. 897/2013, registered with

Sub-Registrar Office, Kuttalam, Tamil Nadu.

That my name is mentioned as ‘E. \VÈ]’ in my

Sale Deed Document No. 5658/2010, registered with

Sub-Registrar Office, Vanur, Tamil Nadu.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that these names,

i.e., ‘Malathi’, ‘Malathi Elango’, ‘E Malathi’,

‘Malathi E’, ‘B. Malathi’, ‘÷. \VÈ]’, ‘E. \VÈ]’ and

‘\VÈ]’ are referring one and same person, they

denoting myself only.

I state that hereinafter, I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘B Malathi’ for all

purposes.

That the above particulars are true and correct to

the best of my knowledge and belief.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this

10th day of April 2024.

562731

√V. \VÈ]

√V. \VÈ].

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Swaminathan Elango, son of Swaminathan,

Service No. 660691 A Sergeant, aged 64 years (date of

birth 06-10-1959), and residing at No. 38, 3rd Cross,

Vasantha Nagar, Thengaithittu Road, Puducherry-

605 004, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm, and

state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of my deposition.

That my name is mentioned as ‘S Elango’ in my

Discharge Book of Indian Air Force.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Swaminathan

Elango’ in my Pension Payment Order No. 601199302139,

issued by Office of the Principal Controller of

Defence Accounts (Pensions), Prayagraj.

That my name is mentioned as ‘S. Elango’ in my

Pensioner’s Identity Card, issued by Directorate of

Accounts And Treasuries, Government of Puducherry.

That my name is mentioned as ‘S Elango’ in my

PAN Card No. AADPE6945K.

314

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[16 April 2024

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

That my name is mentioned as ‘S Elango’ in my

Aadhaar Card No. XXXX XXXX 2173.

That my name is mentioned as ‘Elango S’ in my

ECHS Card No. CH 0000 0325 3771, issued by ECHS

Bhawan, New Delhi.

That my name is mentioned as ‘S Elango’ in my

Passbook Joint Account No. XXXXX9473 of Indian

Bank (Defence Pension Account).

That my name is mentioned as ‘Elango’ in my

Elector’s Photo Identity Card No. IBI0167064.

That my name is mentioned as ‘÷·∫ºÔV’ in my

Family Ration Card No. 029327, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Puducherry.

Therefore, I hereby declare that these names, i.e.,

‘S Elango’, ‘Swaminathan Elango’, ‘Elango S’,

‘Elango’ and ‘÷·∫ºÔV’ are referring one and same

person and they denoting myself only.

Hereinafter, I state that I shall be known and

identified only by the name ‘S Elango’ for all

purposes.

That the above particulars are true and correct to

the best of my knowledge and belief.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this

10th day of April 2024.

562732

S. ÷·∫ºÔV

÷·∫ºÔV

÷·∫ºÔV.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Packiasamy Pierre, son of Anthonysamy Pierre,

Indian, aged 72 years, residing at First Cross, Mass

Nagar Extension, Near Government Stadium, V.O.C Salai,

Karaikal Town and District Munsifi, do hereby solemnly

affirm and state on oath as follows:

1. In my Birth Certificate registered with the

Karaikal Municipality, Karaikal with Registration

No. K/1952, dated 03-01-1952, my name has been

entered as ‘Paquiassamy Pierre’.

2. In my PAN Card, issued by the Income-tax

Department with Card No. APYPP7570H, my name has

been entered as ‘Packiasamy Pierre’.

3. In my Aadhaar Card, issued by Unique

Identification Authority of India in Card No. XXXX

XXXX 7386, my name has been entered as

‘Packiasamy Pierre’.

4. In my Pension Payment Order, issued by Office

of the C.D.A (Pensions), Allahabad, my name has

been entered as ‘A S Pierre Packiasamy Pierre’.

5. In my Identity Card of Ex- Serviceman, my name

has been entered as ‘A Packiasamy Pierre’.

6. In my Savings Bank Passbook, of the State

Bank of India in Account No. XXX XXX 3928, my

name has been entered as ‘A Packiasamy Pierre’.

7. In my Elector’s Photo Identity Card, issued by

the Election Commission of India in Card

No. TNV0201137, my name has been entered as

‘Packiasamy Pierre’.

8. In my Certificate of Service with No. 1890,

issued by Signal Record, Jabalpure, Madhya Pradesh,

my name has been entered as ‘A Packiasamy Pierre’.

9. In my Family Ration Card, issued by the

Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,

Karaikal with No. 198327, my name has been entered

as ‘√V¬˛BƒVt ∏ºBÏ’.

10. Hence, I do hereby declare that the above-

mentioned names in the abovesaid documents are

refering one and same person i.e., myself only.

11. To avoid confusion towards my name’s, I have

decided to renounce my other name’s and I assumed

the name ‘Packiasamy Pierre’’. Hence, I will be called

and identified only by the name ‘Packiasamy Pierre’.

12. Therefore, I do hereby renounce and relinquish

the abovesaid names viz., ‘Paquiassamy Pierre’,

‘A S Pierre Packiasamy Pierre’, ‘A Packiasamy Pierre’

and ‘√V¬˛BƒVt ∏ºBÏ’ and do hereby declare that

I shall be identified and called only by the name

‘Packiasamy Pierre’ for all my future correspondence.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary

Public at Karaikal, on this 29th day of March 2024.

Ack No. 035

PACKIASAMY PIERRE.