[421]

ÿ√VÚ·¶¬ÔD

SOMMAIRES

CONTENTS

√¬ÔD

Page

ÿ>Va_ ¿]\[≈› yÏ©AÔ^ ..

422

Sentence arbitral du Travail

.. 422

Award of the Labour Court .. 422

de Tribunal.

∂´∑ ∂§s¬ÁÔÔ^

428

Notifications du Gouvernement .. 428

Government Notifications

.. 428

Œ©√ ∂§s©AÔ^

428

Avis d’ appel d’ offres

.. 428

Tender Notices

.. 428

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

431

Etablissements dangereux

.. 431

Dangerous Establishments

431

ƒVu≈§¬ÁÔÔ^

432

Annonces

.. 432

Announcements

432

Amﬂºƒˆ \VWÈ ∂´E>µ

La Gazette de L' État de Poudouchéry

The Gazette of Puducherry

∂]ÔV´D ÿ√u≈ ÿkπX|

Publiée par Autorité

Published by Authority

®ı

Amﬂºƒˆ

ÿƒÀkVF¬˛wÁ\

2024 }

Û[ |

4 {

No.

Poudouchéry

Mardi

Juin

2024 (14 Jyaistha 1946)

No.

Puducherry

Tuesday

4th

June

2024

Registered with the Registrar

of Newspapers for India

under No. 10410

422

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[4 June 2024

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 51/AIL/Lab./S/2024,

Puducherry, dated 23rd April 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D. (T) No. 13/2023,

dated 31-01-2024 of the Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry,

in respect of the industrial dispute between the

management of M/s. Bahadur Security Force,

Puducherry and Thiruvalargal M. Sengeni and K. Durai,

over payment of pending wage increase, bonus and

other benefits has been received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the Notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present : Tmt. G.T. AMBIKA, M.L., PGDCLCF.,

Presiding Officer.

Wednesday, the 31st day of January, 2024

I.D. (T) No. 13/2023

CNR. No. PYPY06-000056-2023

President/Secretary,

All India United Trade Union Centre

(AIUTUC), Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Versus

M/s. Bahadur Security Force,

Represented by Partners T. Lakshmi

and A. Ravi, Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on 25-01-2024 before

me for final hearing in the presence of Thiruvalargal

S. Sivakumar, Secretary of Petitioner Union, Respondent

remained ex parte and after hearing the Petitioner side

and perusing the case records, this Court delivered the

following:

AWARD

This Industrial Dispute arises out of the reference

made by the Government of Puducherry vide G.O. Rt.

No. 48/Lab./AIL/T/2023, dated 30-03-2023 of the Labour

Department, Puducherry, to resolve the following

dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent, viz.

(a) Whether the dispute raised by the Petitioner

All India United Trade Union against the

management of M/s. Bahadur Security Force,

Puducherry, over payment of pending wage increase,

bonus and other benefits to Thiruvalargal Sengeni

and K. Durai from the year 01-01-2006 to 21-03-2018

(12 years of service) and 01-01-2006 to 02-03-2019

(13 years of service) amounting to ` 1,20,000 and

` 1,30,000 respectively, totalling ` 2,50,000 along

with 12% interest is legal and justified? If justified,

what relief they are entitled to?

(b) To compute the relief if any, awarded in terms

of money if, it can be so computed?

2. The averments set forth in the petition is as

follows:

That in the respondent establishment there are

more than 150 workmen, but, the said establishment

did not provide proper allowances and benefits as

adumbrated under Labour laws to the workers and

in the said establishment one Thiru M. Sengeni and

Thiru K. Durai joined on 01-01-2006 and worked as

security, and later resigned the job on 21-03-2018 and

02-03-2019 respectively. Thiru M. Sengeni and

Thiru K. Durai should have been not provided with

bonus @ ` 8,000 per year from the date of joining

till the date of resignation nearly for 12 and 13 years

respectively, which comes to ` 96,000 and ` 1,04,000

respectively, with 12% interest and also with salary

increment @ ` 2,000 per year for 12 and 13 years

respectively, which comes to ` 24,000 and ` 26,000

respectively, with 12% interest, totalling ` 1,20,000

and ` 1,30,000 respectively, but, the respondent

establishment failed to provide necessary benefits

and allowances to the said workmen and their attempt

to settle the issues before Labour Officer,

Conciliation also ended in failure and therefore, the

present dispute has been raised.

3. Notice served to both the Petitioner and

Respondent. The Secretary of the Petitioner’s Union

appeared and filed Claim Statement but, the Respondent

inspite of receipt of notice has remained absent and

hence, the Respondent Management was set ex parte

on 21-08-2023.

423

4 June 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

4. Point for determination:

Whether the Petitioner Workmen are entitled for

the relief as prayed in the claim petition?

5. On Point:

Respondent remained ex parte and the Petitioner

filed Proof Affidavit and examined himself as P.W.1

and Exs.P1 to P8 were marked.

6. On the point:

The contention of the petitioner Union is that in

the respondent establishment there are more than

150 workmen but, the said establishment did not

provide proper allowances and benefits as

adumbrated under Labour Laws to the workers and

in the said establishment one Thiru M. Sengeni and

Thiru K. Durai joined on 01-01-2006 and worked as

security and later resigned the job on 21-03-2018 and

02-03-2019 respectively, but, the respondent

establishment failed to provide necessary benefits

and allowances to the said workmen and their attempt

to settle the issues before Labour Officer, Conciliation

also ended in failure and therefore, the present

dispute has been raised.

7. In this case, the respondent inspite of receipt of

notice has remained ex parte. This Court on perusal of

evidence of P.W.1 finds that it is the case of the

petitioner that the petitioner workmen are entitled for

bonus at ` 8,000 per year and ` 2,000 towards yearly

increment and therefore, as the workman Sengeni

worked for the period from 01-01-2006 to 21-03-2018 and

workman K. Durai worked for the period from 01-01-2006

to 02-03-2019 they are entitled for the bonus arrears for

the said period which totals at ` 96,000 and ` 1,04,000

and increment arrears at ` 24,000 and ` 26,000

respectively.

8. This Court on perusal of evidence of P.W.1 and

exhibits relied by the petitioner holds that the petitioner

has proved the claim and further, the evidence of P.W.1

remains unchallenged and unrebutted by the respondent.

Hence, this Court holds that the petitioner workmen are

entitled for the bonus arrears and wage increment

arrears as claimed in the petition. Similarly, as the

respondent establishment has failed to pay the claimed

amount in time, this Court holds that the petitioner is

entitled to claim the said amount with interest at the rate

of 9% p.a. Thus, the dispute raised by the petitioner is

held to be justified.

In the result, this industrial dispute petition is

allowed with modification and the respondent

management is directed to pay bonus and wage

increment arrears for the period from 01-01-2006 to

21-03-2018 at ` 96,000 and ` 24,000 respectively, to

workman Thiru M. Sengeni and to pay bonus and wage

increment arrears for the period from 01-01-2006 to

02-03-2019 at ` 1,04,000 and ` 26,000 respectively, to

workman Thiru K. Durai with interest at 9% p.a. There

is no order as to costs.

Partly typed by the Stenographer, partly typed by me

in my laptop, corrected and pronounced by me in open

Court on this 31st day of January, 2024.

G.T. AMBIKA,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness :

P.W.1 — 13-12-2023 Thiru S. Sivakumaran

List of petitioner's exhibits :

Ex.P1 — 23-12-2021 Photocopy of the Form-L

Ex.P2 — 20-07-2020 Photocopy of the Letter from

the Registrar of companies

(7 pages).

Ex.P3 — 25-04-2022 Photocopy of the Letter to

Labour Officer, Conciliation

by petitioner Union.

Ex.P4 — 04-07-2022 Photocopy of the letter to

Labour Officer, Conciliation

by petitioner Union.

Ex.P5 — 30-08-2022 Photocopy of the letter to

Labour Officer, Conciliation

by petitioner Union.

Ex.P6 — 17-11-2022 Photocopy of the letter to

Labour Officer, Conciliation

by petitioner Union.

Ex.P7 — 30-01-2023 Photocopy of the Failure

Report.

Ex.P8 — 30-03-2023 Photocopy of the Notification.

List of respondent’s witnesses : Nil

List of respondent's exhibits : Nil

G.T. AMBIKA,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

424

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[4 June 2024

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

LABOUR DEPARTMENT

(G.O. Rt. No. 52/AIL/Lab./T/2024,

Puducherry, dated 23rd April 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Whereas, an Award in I.D. (L) No. 26/2022,

dated 18-01-2024 of the Labour Court, Puducherry, in

respect of the industrial dispute between the

management of M/s. Siva Valli Vilas Jewellers, Bharathi

Street, Puducherry and Thiru G. Murugan, Saram,

Puducherry, over to reinstate the petitioner with his

usual employment of appraiser with full back wages and

all the benefits has been received;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), read with

the Notification issued in Labour Department’s G.O. Ms.

No. 20/9/Lab./L, dated 23-05-1991, it is hereby directed

by the Secretary to Government (Labour) that the said

Award shall be published in the Official Gazette,

Puducherry.

(By order)

S. SANDIRAKUMARAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Labour).

————

BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT AT PUDUCHERRY

Present : Tmt. G.T. AMBIKA, M.L., PGDCLCF.,

Presiding Officer.

Thursday, the 18th day of January, 2024

I.D. (L) No. 26/2022

CNR. No. PYPY06-000089-2022

Thiru G. Murugan,

S/o. Govindasamy,

Hindu aged 50 years,

Residing at No. 234, Naveena Garden,

Kuyavarpalayam, Saram,

Puducherry.

. . Petitioner

Versus

The Branch Manager,

Siva Valli Vilas Jewellers,

Having business at No. 157,

Bharathi Street,

Puducherry.

. . Respondent

This Industrial Dispute coming on this day before

me for hearing in the presence of Thiru J. Mayakrishnan,

Counsel for the Petitioner, Thiruvalargal V. Govindaradjou,

Counsel for the Respondent and upon hearing both

sides and perusing the entire records and having stood

over for consideration till this date, this Court delivered

the following:

AWARD

This Petition filed under section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 to pass an award to direct the

respondent to reinstate the petitioner with his usual

employment of appraiser with full back wages and all

the benefits and without any absence towards his

service for the said refusal period of the employment

and for the costs.

2. The averments in the claim petition filed by the

petitioner is as follows:

The petitioner was appointed by the respondent

concern as Appraiser on 07-07-2012 and on, and from

the date of appointment he was serving at the said

concern without any remark at all and towards his

employment he was given Employee Code number as

11234 and he is also member of the Association under

No. 731 and in the said Association he was acting

for the past 15 years as one of the members. The

respondent management to curtail the continuation

of employment, has suddenly dismissed the petitioner

on 18-10-2021 for the reasons as if, he valued the

gold without any notice in written.

(ii) In fact, the petitioner has not committed any

fault or defect towards the employment, but, due to

continuation of job for more than 10 years the

management had suddenly and surprisingly

dismissed the petitioner from the employment

purposely. The act of the management is against the

Labours Act and natural justice and therefore, the

said management has to answer for the same. Right

from the oral refusal of the petitioner from the

employment the petitioner had approached the

respondent and they has also assured to make

arrangements for reinstatement, but, they are

prolonging the same for the reasons best known to

them.

(iii) The petitioner issued legal notice to the

respondent on 05-05-2022 and the same was

acknowledged by the respondent, but they have not

come forward to reinstate the petitioner, whereas

issued reply, dated 24-06-2022 with false allegations

and invented story and therefore, after issuance of

said notice, the petitioner had also issued notice to

425

4 June 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

the Conciliation Officer, Labour Department,

Puducherry, on 30-05-2022 but, there was no

response, Hence, the petition.

3. The averments in the counter filed by the

Respondent is as follows:

The respondent submits that the present petition

filed by the Petitioner praying to reinstate him as an

appraiser in the respondent's shop with full back

wages with all benefits with continuity of service is

liable to be dismissed in liminie. The Petitioner is not

a workman as defined under section 2 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and further, the

respondent's Jewellery Shop is not an industry as

defined under section 2 of the Industrial Dispute Act.

In the absence of such relationship the application

filed by the Petitioner under section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act is not maintainable in Law.

If, at all the Petitioner has got any grievance he has

to approach the concerned authority appointed by

the Government of Puducherry under Pondicherry

Shops and Establishment Act and not by way of

raising a dispute before this Court.

(ii) The respondent submits that “Siva Valli Vilas

Jewellers” is a company registered under the

provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and doing

business like making, selling jewels and diamonds.

The petitioner served only on a contract basis and

not a regular employee, as alleged by the petitioner.

On many occasions the petitioner has abruptly sent

the customers by valuing their jewels at low costs,

who are approaching the shop, for exchanging their

old jewels with new ones. While receiving the old

jewels the respondent has instructed the Petitioner

to send those customers to the respondent for

negotiation, however, the petitioner has failed to do

the same for the reasons best known to him and

because of the act of the petitioner, the respondent's

business was much affected resulting loss of

customers.

(iii) On 17-10-2021 by the act of the petitioner

failed to consider the request of the customer for

enhancement of amount for his old jewels and further,

the petitioner has also failed to inform the customer

to approach the respondent for enhancement and due

to the said act, the customer has left the shop

abruptly. That after seeing the customer leaving the

shop, the respondent questioned the act of the

petitioner with regard to the customer who has left

the shop in this regard, but, the petitioner has kept

quiet and from the next day onwards the petitioner

has not turned up for work. Therefore, the allegations

made by the petitioner are incorrect, false and

mischievous without any iota of truth. Hence, prays

for dismissal of the claim petition.

4. Points for determination:

1. Whether the petitioner is a workman of

respondent?

2. Whether the respondent shop is an Industry

as defined under section 2 of the Industrial Disputes

Act?

3. Whether the petitioner was employed on

contract basis?

4. Whether the dispute raised by petitioner over

his non-employment is justified?

5. Whether the petitioner is entitled for the reliefs

as claimed in the claim petition?

5. Mr. Murugan was examined as P.W.1 and Exs.P1

to P7 were marked. On the Respondent side Mr. Ganesan,

Manager, of the Respondent Jewellery Shop was

examined as R.W.1 and Exs. R1 to R5 were marked

through him.

6. On points 1 to 5:

The contention of the petitioner is that he was

appointed in the respondent shop as appraiser on

07-07-2012 and from the date of appointment he was

serving without any remarks and further, he is also

one of the member of the association for past 15 years

and while so, the respondent has suddenly dismissed

the petitioner on 18-10-2021 for the reason that the

valuation of the gold made by the petitioner was

improper and therefore, the petitioner has issued

legal notice to the respondent on 05-05-2022 to

provide job to the petitioner, but, the respondent on

receipt of the said legal notice failed to provide job

and issued reply notice, dated 24-06-2022 with false

allegations and hence, the petitioner has raised the

present industrial dispute as against the respondent.

7. Per contra, the contention of the respondent is

that the petitioner is not a workman as defined under

section 2(s) of Industrial Dispute Act and further, the

respondent's Jewellery Shop is not an industry as

defined under section 2(j) of Industrial Dispute Act and

therefore, the present industrial dispute raised by the

petitioner is not maintainable and if at all, the petitioner

has any grievances, it is for the petitioner to approach

the authority appointed by the Government of

Puducherry under the Pondicherry Shops and

Establishments Act. Further the contention of the

respondent is that while the petitioner was working in

the respondent shop the petitioner has abruptly sent

a customer by valuing the jewels at low costs when

the customer had approached for exchange of old

jewels for new one and thereby the act of the petitioner

has affected the respondent’s business and further, on

17-10-2021 when a customer had approached for

426

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[4 June 2024

enhancement of amount for old jewels, the petitioner

has failed to inform the customer to approach the

respondent and thereby, the customer was constrained

to leave the shop abruptly and when the same was

questioned by the respondent, the petitioner has kept

quite and from the next day onwards the petitioner has

not turned up for work and therefore, the contention of

the petitioner that the respondent has dismissed the

petitioner from service is false and incorrect one.

8. In this case, it is not in dispute that the petitioner

was working in the respondent shop as appraiser, but,

it is the specific case of the respondent that the

petitioner is neither a workman as defined under

section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act nor the

respondent’s shop is an Industry as defined under

section 2(j) of Industrial Dispute Act and therefore, the

very maintainability of industrial dispute as raised by

the petitioner is unsustainable one. This Court, on

perusal of records finds that the respondent is a

Jewellery Shop and therefore, it becomes pertinent to

determine whether the Jewellery shop would come

within the ambit of Industry as defined under

section 2(j) of Industrial Dispute Act.

9. At this juncture, it would be appropriate to extract

the definition of Industry as defined under section 2(j)

of Industrial Dispute Act for better appreciation.

Section 2(j) : Industry : Industry means, any

business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling

of employers and includes any calling, service,

employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation or

avocation of workmen.

Therefore, as per section 2(j) of Industrial Dispute

Act, this Court finds that an Industry is defined as any

business, trade or undertaking, manufacturing or calling

of employers and includes any calling, service,

employment, handicraft or industrial occupation or

avocation of workmen.

10. In the present case it is admitted fact that the

respondent shop is doing the business of making and

selling of jewels and diamonds and the same has been

admitted by R.W.1 in his chief examination affidavit

where it is stated as follows:

“I submit that Siva Valli Vilas Jewellery is company

registered under the provision of the Company

Act, 1956 and doing business like making, selling

jewels and diamonds”.

Therefore, from the evidence of R.W.1 it can be

inferred that the respondent shop deals with making and

selling of gold jewels and diamonds and therefore, the

respondent shop is found to have been carrying the

business and trade. Therefore, in the said context the

respondent shop is found to fall within the ambit of

section 2(j) of Industrial Dispute Act.

11. The next point that arises for consideration is

whether the petitioner is a workman under the

respondent. The term workman is defined under

section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act which reads as

follows:

Section 2(s) : workman : Workman means, any

person (including an apprentice) employed in any

industry to do any manual, unskilled, technical,

operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or

reward, whether the terms of employment be express

or implies, and for the purpose of any proceedings

under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute,

includes any such person who has been dismissed,

discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as a

consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal,

discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute,

but, does not include any such person–

(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950

(45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950),

or the Navy Act, 1957, or the Army Act 1950

(46 of 1950), or Navy Act, 1957; or

(ii) who is employed in the Police service or as

an Officer or other employee of a prison; or

(iii) who is employed mainly in a managerial or

administrative capacity; or

(iv) who, being employed in a supervisory

capacity, draws wages exceeding (ten thousand

rupees) per mensem or exercises, either by the

nature of the duties attached to the Office or by

reason of the powers vested in him, functions

mainly of a managerial nature.

12. Therefore, as per the definition of workman as

adumbrated under section 2(s) of Industrial Dispute

Act, a workman means any person employed in any

industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical,

operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or

reward and does not included who is employed mainly

in a managerial or administrative capacity. In this case,

it is a admitted fact that the petitioner was working as

an appraiser and the respondent also in the evidence

as well as in the counter has stated that the petitioner

worked as an appraiser. Hence, as the petitioner did not

work in the managerial or administrative capacity, this

Court holds that the petitioner fits under the definition

of workman as defined under section 2(s) of Industrial

Dispute Act.

13. The other contention of the respondent is that

the petitioner was employed on contract basis but, to

prove the same the respondent has not produced any

documents which are required for engaging a person on

contractual basis. Further more, the nature of the work

427

4 June 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

done by the petitioner is appraiser which is of perennial

in nature and also of core activity of the establishment.

As per the provisions of Contract Labour (Regulation

and Abolition) Act, 1970, a workman cannot be

employed to do any core activity of an establishment

and also work of perennial in nature. In this case the

nature of work done by the petitioner being an

appraiser, this Court finds that the work of the petitioner

is of core activity of the establishment which is very

much required for running of day to day business of

the respondent's shop and further, perennial one.

Hence, in the said context, the contention of the

respondent that the petitioner was appointed on

contractual basis and not on a regular employee is found

to be untenable and unsustainable one.

14. Now coming to the contention of the respondent

that the petitioner has undervalued the old jewels of

the customers and thereby, the act of the petitioner

affected the business of the respondent and further, on

17-10-2021, the petitioner did not consider the request

of the customer to enhance the amount for the old

jewels and thereby, the customer has left the shop and

when the same was questioned by the respondent the

petitioner has kept quite and from the next day onwards

the petitioner has not turned up is concerned, this

Court finds that the same is unacceptable and unproved

one. Had such occurrence had taken place then the

respondent shop being registered under Companies Act

is bound to question the employee by way of written

notice or by initiating disciplinary action against the

petitioner. Here, in this case, no such action is found

to have been taken by the respondent. There is nothing

on record to show that the petitioner himself as

abandoned the job and the respondent has issued any

notice calling for explanation for such conduct of the

petitioner. Hence, this Court finds that the contention

raised by the respondent is unsustainable one and the

contention of the petitioner that the respondent failed

to provide job to the petitioner without any basis is

found to be acceptable one and thereby, the industrial

dispute raised by the petitioner is found to be justifiable

one.

In the result the industrial dispute is allowed and the

respondent is directed to reinstate the petitioner with

full back wages and all the benefits thereon. There is

no order as to costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her,

corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this

18th day of January, 2024.

G.T. AMBIKA,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

List of petitioner’s witness :

P.W.1 — 09-01-2023 Thiru G. Murugan

List of petitioner's side exhibits :

Ex.P1 — 08-04-2022 Copy of the Aadhaar Card of

the petitioner.

Ex.P2 — 07-07-2022 Copy of the Identity Card of

the petitioner towards his

employment.

Ex.P3 — 05-05-2022 Copy of the Legal notice by

the petitioner.

Ex.P4 — 30-05-2022 Copy of the Legal notice by

the petitioner to the Labour

Department, Puducherry.

Ex.P5 — 24-06-2022 Copy of the Reply by the

respondent.

Ex.P6 — 01-06-2022 Original Acknowledgment

Card.

Ex.P7 —

–

Copy of the Bank Passbook

of G. Murugan.

List of respondent’s witness :

RW.1 — 13-10-2023 Thiru S. Ganesan

List of respondent's side exhibits :

Ex.R1 —

–

Original Document of the

Authorization Letter.

Ex.R2 —

–

Copy of the Memorandum of

Association and Articles of

Association of Siva Valli Vilas

Jeweller Private Limited,

Puducherry.

Ex.R3 — 21-04-2023 Copy of the Registration

Certificate

issued

Government of India.

Ex.P4 — 01-03-2021 Copy of the Trade Licence

issued

Pondicherry

Municipality.

Ex.P5 — 10-10-2023 Copy

the

Computer

printout

Petitioner's

Attendance for the period

April to October, 2021 along

with

Certificate

under

section 65 B of Evidence Act.

(May 2021 shop closed due

to COVID-19).

G.T. AMBIKA,

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Labour Court, Puducherry.

428

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[4 June 2024

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT

(HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION)

(G.O. Ms. No. 15, Puducherry, dated 08th May 2024)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Dr. P. Madhavee Latha, Associate Professor of Zoology,

Dr. SRK Government Arts College, Yanam, shall retire

on the afternoon of 31-05-2024.

(By order)

V. SOUMYA,

Under Secretary to Government

(Higher and Technical Education).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (WORKS)

(G.O. Ms. No. 14, Puducherry, dated 16th May 2024)

NOTIFICATION

Thiru K. Soundararajan, Assistant Engineer,

Public Health Division, Public Works Department,

Puducherry, on attaining the age of superannuation,

stood retired on the afternoon of 30-09-2022.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE,

Under Secretary to Government (Works).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

HEALTH SECRETARIAT

(G.O. Ms. No. 19, Puducherry, dated 20th May 2024)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation, the

following Assistant Nursing Superintendents, Indira

Gandhi Government General Hospital and Postgraduate

Institute, Puducherry, are admitted into retirement with

effect from the dates noted against them.

Sl.

Name of the Assistant

Date of

No.

Nursing Superintendent

superannuation

(1)

(2)

(3)

1 Ms. L. Jane Christian Stella Mary

31-05-2024 (AN)

2 Ms. N. Vasanthi

31-05-2024 (AN)

(By order)

S. MURUGESAN,

Under Secretary to Government (Health).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

HEALTH SECRETARIAT

(G.O. Ms. No. 22, Puducherry, dated 22nd May 2024)

NOTIFICATION

On attaining the age of superannuation of 65 years,

Dr. R. Amudhavalli, Consultant, Indira Gandhi

Government General Hospital and Postgraduate Institute,

Puducherry, is admitted into retirement with effect from

the afternoon of 30-06-2024.

(By order)

S. MURUGESAN,

Under Secretary to Government

(Health).

————

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

CHIEF SECRETARIAT (HOUSING)

(G.O. Ms. No. 4/2024-Hg.,

Puducherry, dated 23rd May 2024)

NOTIFICATION

O n a t t a i n i n g t h e a g e o f s u p e r a n n u a t i o n ,

Thiru V. Vidjea Nehru, Junior Town Planner, Town and

Country Planning Department, Puducherry, shall retire

from service on the afternoon of 30-06-2024.

(By order)

P. EJOUMALE,

Under Secretary to Government

(Housing).

GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY

DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND

CHILD DEVELOPMENT

Puducherry, dated 24th May 2024.

TENDER-CUM-PUBLIC AUCTION NOTICE

Sealed tenders are invited for the sale of old

unserviceable articles like aluminium vessels, stainless

steel, wooden items, brass and iron items, etc., of

various Anganwadi Centres of Zone III (27 Centres)

under the control of ICDS Project V, Department of

Women and Child Development, Mudaliarpet,

Puducherry, as detailed in the Annexure, will be

disposed off in ‘as-is-where-is’ condition.

429

4 June 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

Terms and Conditions

1. The tenders in a cover should be addressed to the

Director, Department of Women and Child Development,

Puducherry, duly sealed and superscripted on the

envelope as “Tender for the purchase of old

unserviceable furniture and utensils items”. The tenders

should reach the undersigned on or before 27-06-2024

at 2.30 p.m. The tenders received after the due date and

time will be rejected.

2. All the intending tenderers may inspect the items

kept in the Coundanpalayam Anganwadi Centre (No. l2,

Mariamman Koil Street, Coundanpalayam, Puducherry)

with the permission of the concerned Officer on

25-06-2024 and 26-06-2024 from 10.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m.

3. The tender process will be conducted in the

Training Hall (III floor) of the Department of Women

and Child Development, New Saram, (Opposite to LIC

Office), Puducherry on 27-06-2024 at 3.00 p.m.

4. The tenders will be opened on 27-06-2024 at

3.00 p.m. in the presence of tenderers who are present

at the time of opening. If, the last day happens to be

a public holiday, the same will be opened on the next

working day.

5. If, the highest tender amount offered in the

Tender Form is found to be not acceptable by the

undersigned, then the public auction will be conducted

on the spot, keeping the highest tender amount as the

minimum price for the bid of auction.

6. The intending tenderers should deposit an amount

of ` 5,000 (Rupees five thousand only) in cash as

earnest money deposit at the time of submitting the

Tender Form. The earnest money deposit amount for

unsuccessful tenderers/bidders will be returned

immediately after the tender/bid process is over/

finalized. The tenders without earnest money deposit

will be rejected.

7. The tenderers/bidders should submit the following

self-attested photocopies, (i) A copy of valid GSTIN

(ii) A copy of a PAN Card and (iii) A copy of an Aadhaar

Card. If, any false representation is found during the

tender/auction process, the tender submitted by him/

her/them will be cancelled and the earnest money

deposit will be forfeited.

8. If any/all participants misbehaves during the

tender/auction process, the tenderer(s)/bidder(s) will be

removed from the place, also their tender/bid will be

rejected and earnest money deposit will be forfeited.

9. The successful tenderer/bidder should remit the

entire amount to the Cashier, Department of Women

and Child Development, Puducherry, immediately after

finalization of the tender/bid. The applicable rate of GST

will be charged on the tender amount as per the rules.

10. The entire unserviceable materials should be

removed within 24 hours after finalization of the tender/

auction at his/her own risk and cost. No claim on the

quantity and quality of the articles will be entertained

once the tender/auction is finalized. This Office will not

be held responsible for the items, once the tender/bid

is finalized. The earnest money deposit amount of

successful tenderer/bidder will be released after clearing

the unserviceable materials from the Coundanpalayam

Anganwadi Centre.

11. The undersigned reserves the right to accept/

reject any or all the tenders/bids without assigning any

reasons thereof, in the public interest.

12. In case of any dispute, the decision of the

undersigned will be the final.

P. MUTHU MEENA,

Director.

ANNEXURE

Sl.

Particulars of stores

Quantity

No.

(1)

(2)

(3)

No./Nos.

Aluminum Materials

Idly pot

Jally karandi

Deksha with lid

Dabara with lid

152

Oil can

Cooker

Measuring cup and mug

Karandi

Muram

Plastic Materials

Bucket

Kudam

Armed chair

Baby chair

Water Jug

430

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[4 June 2024

Wooden Materials

Thuddupu

Wooden table

Chair

Plate stand

Wooden stool

Wooden almirah

Veg scapper

Black board and stand

Brass Materials

Bell

Lock and key

Water drum with lid

Stainless Steel

Water drum with lid

Plate

1008

Tumbler

1008

Measuring cup and padi

Arivalmanai

Container with lid

Veg cutter

Jally karandy

Coconut scapper

Kuzhi karandi

Deksha with lid

Dabara with lid

Muram

Cooker SS

Nail cutter

Clock

Drum with lid

133

Vanal

Arivalmanai

Bucket

Stool

Almirah

Steel armed chair

Steel table

Bar weight machine

Folding chair

Name board

Weight machine round

Folding table

Coconut scrapper

Trunk box

Provision weight machine

Lock and key

Spring weight machine

Veg cutter

Salladai

Solar and ord. stove

Iron blow pipe

Ceiling fan

Total

3, 296

————

Amﬂºƒˆ ∂´∑

®ømÿ√VÚ^

®ømÿ√VÚ^ �ÆD

�ÆD

�ÆD ∂ﬂ∑›mÁ≈

∂ﬂ∑›mÁ≈

∂´∑

∂´∑˛Á·

˛Á·

˛Á· ∂ﬂƒÔD,

∂ﬂƒÔD,

∂ﬂƒÔD, ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_

Œ©√Õ>©A^π ∂§s©A

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_ \Vk‚¶D, ºÔV‚|ﬂºƒˆl_ ÷B∫˛kÚD

∂´∑ ˛Á· ∂ﬂƒÔ›]_ ºƒÏÕmkÚD mı| Ôa°›>V^Ô^

�ÆD ∂‚Á¶ÔÁ· ®]ÏkÚD 01á07á2024 x>_

30-06-2025 kÁ´ {´Vı| ÔVÈ›]uz kV∫zk>uÔV™

JΩ x›]Á´l¶©√‚¶ Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔ^ k´ºkuÔ©√|˛[≈™.

2. ∂´¬z

x›]Á´l¶©√‚¶

cÁ≈l[

‘Ôa°›>V^Ô^ÔÁ· kV∫zk>uÔV™ Œ©√Õ>©A^π’ ®™¬

z§©∏‚|, ∂Á> ˇºw ÁÔÿBV©√t‚¶kˆ[ ∂KkÈÔ›]uz

®]ÏkÚD 20á06á2024 (sBVw¬˛wÁ\) ∂[Æ \VÁÈ

3.30 \Ë¬z^ kÕm ºƒÚD√Ω ∂–©∏ Ák¬Ô©√¶

ºkı|D. ∂ÀkVÆ ∂–©∏© ÿ√≈©√‚¶ Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔ^

∂Á™›mD ∂[Á≈B ]™º\ \VÁÈ 4.00 \Ë¬z

kÚÁÔ >Õ]Ú¬zD Œ©√Õ>©A^π>V´ÏÔ^ ∂_Èm ∂k´V_

WBt¬Ô©√‚¶ ∏´]W]Ô^ x[MÁÈl_ ∏ˆ¬Ô©√|D.

Œ©√Õ> su√Á™ ]™D ∂´∑ s|xÁ≈ ÂV·VÔ ÷Ú©∏[

∂>uz ∂|›> ∂KkÈÔ ]™›>[Æ Œ©√Õ>©A^πÔ^

º�z§©∏¶©√‚¶ ºÂ´D kÁ´ ÿ√≈©√‚| ]≈¬Ô©√|D.

3. sÚ©√x^· Œ©√Õ>>V´ÏÔ^ ∂ﬂƒÔ© √ı¶Ô ƒVÁÈl_

c^· mı| Ôa°›>V^Ô^ �ÆD ∂‚Á¶ÔÁ· ∂KkÈÔ

ºÂ´∫Ôπ_ ºÂˆ_ kÕm √VÏÁkl¶ÈVD.

4. Œ©√Õ> su√Á™l_ ÔÈÕmÿÔV^”D Œ©√Õ>>V´ÏÔ^

\‚|D)-¬ÔV™ Banker Cheque in favour of the Deputy

Director, Government Branch Press, Karaikal or Deposit

>´©√|D.

5. sÁÈ ŒÚ ˛ºÈVsuz ®Àk·° ®[Æ su√Á™

∞ÈD Â¶›>©√|D.

(1)

(2)

(3)

No./Nos.

(1)

(2)

(3)

No./Nos.

431

4 June 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

6. ∂]Ô√‚ƒ\V™

ÿ>VÁÔ

ºÔ‚zD

Œ©√Õ>>V´Ï/

ÿ>VÁÔBVÔ

ÿƒK›]

Œ©√Õ>D/∞ÈD

∞u√|›]¬

ÿÔV^·ºkı|D.

c^· mı| Ôa°›>V^Ô^ �ÆD ∂‚Á¶ÔÁ· ®∫z

®Õ> WÁÈl_ c^·º>V ∂ÀkVº≈ su√Á™ xΩÕ>

24 \Ë ºÂ´›]uz^ >∫Ô·m ÿƒVÕ> ÿƒÈsºÈºB

®Á¶º√V‚| ∂>uzı¶V™ ÿ>VÁÔÁB GST kˆ•¶[

∂KkÈÔ›]_ ÿƒK›]s‚| ®|›mﬂÿƒ_È ºkı|D. ∏[™Ï

\V> ÔÁ¶E kV´›]_ ∂>uzı¶V™ ÿ>VÁÔÁB kˆ•¶[

ÿƒK›]s‚| ®|›mﬂ ÿƒ_Èºkı|D.

9. ®Às> ÔV´ðxD Ì≈V\_ ∂Á™›m ∂_Èm

∂∫ˇÔˆ¬Ô

ˇºw

xø

cˆÁ\•ı|. ÷]_ ∞º>–D c¶[√VΩ[Á\ ∞u√‚¶V_

ÔVÁ´¬ÔV_, ÂV^ : 27, º\ 2024.

xmWÁÈ Ôð¬z ∂]ÔVˆ,

\Vk‚¶ g‚EBÏ ∂KkÈÔD

�ÆD

ÿ√VÆ©A ∂]ÔVˆ.

\ıðVΩ©√‚|

ÿÔVDR[

ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m,

√ﬁƒVB›m,

√ﬁƒVB›m, Amﬂºƒˆ

Amﬂºƒˆ

g√›>V™ WÆk™∫Ô^

∂§s©A

∂Á\›m¬ÿÔV^· ÷¬ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›]_ ∂–\] ºkı|˛≈VÏ.

kˆÁƒ

sıð©√>V´ˆ[

WÆk™D ∂Á\B

c›º>E¬Ô©√‚|^·

º>ÁkBV™

g‚Ôπ[

®ı

ÿ√BÏ �ÆD xÔkˆ

c^· ÷¶›][ xÔkˆ

WÆk™› >BVˆ©A/

t[ ]≈[ ®ıË¬ÁÔ

ÿƒFxÁ≈

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

]Ú. P. xÚÁÔB[,

M/s. AB ˛Á´[ ¸∏ˆ‚¸

Blending and Bottling

122

∏·V‚ ®ı 24,

∏Á´ºk‚ otÿ¶‚,

Unit >BVˆ›>_.

z]Á´›

(ÿ√Vm

J[≈Vkm zÆ¬z ÿ>Ú,

\Æ ∂·Ák ®ıÔ^ 192/1pt.,

]≈[

√ËxÁ≈).

PSC º√∫¬ ÂÔÏ,

192/2, 192/3 �ÆD 192/4,

x>oBVÏº√‚Á¶,

P.S. √VÁ·BD,

Amﬂºƒˆá605 004.

kV>V–VÏ kÚkVF ˛´V\D,

Amﬂºƒˆ.

1973ágD gı| Amﬂºƒˆ ˛´V\D �ÆD ÿÔVDR[ √ﬁƒVB›m¬Ô^ ƒ‚¶›][ JÈ\VF Amﬂºƒˆ Œ[§B›m

∏ˆ° 11á[√Ω ÷›ÿ>Va_ WÆk™›Á> WÆ°k]™V_ cı¶VzD g‚ºƒ√Á™Ô^ ∞º>–D ÷ÚÕ>V_, ∂kuÁ≈ ÷Õ>

ºk. ®a_´V¤[,

gÁðBÏ.

————

MANNADIPET COMMUNE PANCHAYAT, PUDUCHERRY

Mannadipet, the 23rd May 2024.

Dangerous Establishments

NOTICE

The under mentioned person has requested for permission for setting up of new unit within the Mannadipet

Commune Panchayat limits as detailed below:

432

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[4 June 2024

Sl.

Name and address

Address of the

Industry

Power

No. of

No.

of the applicant

industry site

proposed

required

workers

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Thiru P. Murugaiyan,

M/s. AB Grain Spirits Private Limited,

Manufacture/Activity

122 H.P.

Plot No. 24,

Re-survey Nos. 192/1pt., 192/2, 192/3

of Blending and

(General

Third Cross Street,

and 192/4,

Bottling Unit.

shift)

PSC Bank Nagar,

P.S. Palayam, Vadanur Revenue Village,

Mudaliarpet,

Puducherry.

Puducherry-605 004.

In conformity with rule 11 of the Puducherry Commune Panchayats (Grant of Licences and Permissions)

Rules, 1976, promulgated in this Union territory by the Puducherry Village and Commune Panchayats Act, 1973,

objections, if any, to the setting up of the abovesaid industry, are invited to reach the undersigned within ten days

from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Gazette.

The objections so received within the specified period will be considered by this Commune Panchayat.

V. EJILERADJANE,

Commissioner.

AFFIDAVIT

I, Isabella Mary (Aadhaar No. XXXX XXXX 0516)

daughter of Aruldass and Mary Vijayarani, aged

27 years, Converted Muslim, residing at No. 21,

Saveriyar Kovil Street, Narikkarambai, Kurumbagaram,

Nedungadu Commune, Karaikal, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I was a Christian by birth and my birth name

is ‘Ísabella Mary’. As I have converted myself from

Christianity to Islamic religion, I had renounced my

birth name ‘Isabella Mary’ and assumed to myself the

Muslim name ‘Sarah Fathima (ƒV´V ‡√V›]\V)’.

I hereby relinquish my birth name ‘Isabella Mary’

and I shall hereafter be known, called, identified

and referred only as ‘Sarah Fathima’.

Solemnly affirmed and signed before the Notary Public

at Karaikal, on this 08th day of May 2024.

Ack No. 040

A. ISABELLA MARY.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, Manikandan. S., son of Sambath, aged 41 years and

residing at No. 17, Fourth Cross Street, Ganesh Nagar,

Muthialpet, Puducherry-605 003, do hereby solemnly

and sincerely affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and I am well aware

of the facts of the deposition.

1. I state that my name has been mentioned as

‘Manikandan alias Sugumaran’ in my Birth Certificate

bearing Registration No. M/1982/05400, issued by

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry.

2. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Manikandan @ Sugumaran S’ in my Matriculation

Mark Sheet bearing Certificate S.No. B0082171, issued

by the Secretary, Board of Matriculation Examination,

Tamil Nadu.

3. I state that my name has been entered

as ‘Manikandan @ Sugumaran S’ in my Higher

Secondary Course Certificate Mark Sheet bearing

Certificate S. No. HSG 00193634, issued by the

Secretary, Board of Higher Secondary Examination,

Tamil Nadu.

4. I state that my name has been entered

as ‘Manikandan Sugumaran S’ in my Bachelor of

Computer Applications Degree Certificate vide

No. CK01228, issued by University of Madras, Chennai.

5. I state that my name has been entered

as ‘Manikandan @ Sugumaran. S’ in my Master of

Human Resource Management Degree Certificate

bearing Enrolment No. 2003MR0074, issued by

Pondicherry University, Puducherry.

6. I state that my name has been mentioned

as ‘Manikandan alias Sugumaran S’ in my Renault Car

R.C. Book bearing Registration No. PY01BX 3499,

issued by the Transport Department, Government of

Puducherry.

7. I state that my name has been mentioned

as ‘Manikandan A Sukumaran S’ in my Yamaha

Two Wheeler R.C. Book bearing Registration

No. TN22AC 5330, issued by the Transport Department,

Government of Tamil Nadu.

433

4 June 2024]

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

8. I state that my name has been mentioned

as ‘Manikandan @ Sugumaran’ in my Marriage

Certificate bearing Sl. No.26/2013, issued by the Marriage

Registrar, Registration Department, Government of

Puducherry.

9. I state that my name has been entered

as ‘Manikandan @ Sugumaran’ in my son Ishaant’s

Birth Certificate bearing Registration No.

OM/E/2016/382 and in my daughter Jhanani’s Birth

Certificate bearing Registration No. OM/E/2012/

000770, both certificates issued by Oulgaret

Municipality, Puducherry.

10. I state that my name has been entered

as ‘Manikandan @ Sugumaran’ in my Bank Passbook,

issued by Axis Bank Limited, Bypass Velachery

Branch, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

11. I state that my name has been mentioned

as ‘Manikandan @ Sugumaran’ in my Elector’s Photo

Identity Card No. HKD0295204, issued by Election

Commission of India.

12. I state that my name has been entered

as ‘Manikandan alias Sugumaran’ in my Driving

Licence vide DL No. PY01 20020005759, issued by the

Transport Department, Puducherry.

13. I state that my name has been entered

as ‘S Manikandan alias Sugumaran’ in my Provident

Fund vide UAN 100218491146, issued by Employee’s

Provident Fund Organisation, India.

14. I state that my name has been entered as

‘Manikandan S’ in my PAN Card No. AMYPM1437D,

issued by the Income-tax Department, Government of

India.

15. I state that my name has been mentioned

as ‘Manikandan S’ in my Aadhaar Card No. XXXX

XXXX 3771, issued by Unique Identification Authority

of India.

16. I state that my name has been entered

as ‘Manikandan’ (given name), ‘Sambath’ (surname)

in my Indian Passport No. Z6865791, issued by the

Regional Passport Office, Chennai.

17. I state that my name has been mentioned

as ‘\ËÔı¶[á∑z\VÏ’ in the Family Ration Card

No. 060993, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that these names,

i.e., ‘Manikandan alias Sugumaran’, ‘Manikandan @

Sugumaran S’, ‘Manikandan Sugumaran S’,

‘Manikandan @ Sugumaran. S’, ‘Manikandan alias

Sugumaran S’, ‘Manikandan A Sukumaran S’,

‘Manikandan @ Sugumaran’, ‘Manikandan alias

Sugumaran’, ‘S Manikandan alias Sugumaran’,

‘Manikandan S’, ‘Manikandan (given name), ‘Sambath

(surname)’ and ‘\ËÔı¶[á∑z\VÏ’ are referred,

identified and relating one and the same person that

is myself only.

Hereafter, I shall be known and identified only by

the name of ‘Manikandan S’ for all purposes.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 21st day of

May 2024.

562786 MANIKANDAN. . . . . S.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, S. Irisappan, son of Selvam, residing at No. 12,

Nehru Street, Bhavani Nagar, Veerampattinam,

Puducherry-605 007, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, and state on oath as follows:

That I am the deponent herein and know the facts

of this affidavit.

I state that according to my Birth Certificate bearing

Registration No. R/1996/00029, issued by Ariyankuppam

Commune Panchayat, Puducherry, my name is

mentioned as ‘Irisappan’.

I state that in my Secondary School Leaving

Certificate Apr-1998, issued by the Secretary, Board

of Secondary Education, Tamil Nadu, bearing

‘Irissappan S’.

I state that in my Higher Secondary Course

Certificate, issued by the Secretary, Board of Higher

Secondary Examination, Tamil Nadu, bearing Register

No. 722721, my name is mentioned as ‘Irissappan S’.

I state that in my Diploma in Teacher Education,

issued by the Secretary, State Board of School

Examinations, Tamil Nadu, bearing Register No.

0213376, my name is mentioned as ‘Irissappan S’.

I state that in my Provisional Certificate bearing

‘Irissappan S’.

I state that in my Bachelor of Education bearing

Enrolment No. 080840790, my name is mentioned as

‘Irissappan S’.

I state that in my National Pension System Card,

my name is mentioned as ‘Irissappan’.

I state that in my Aadhaar Card bearing No. XXXX

XXXX 6177, issued by Unique Identification

Authority of India, my name is mentioned as

‘S Irissappan’.

434

LA GAZETTE DE L’ETAT

[4 June 2024

online publication at “https://styandptg.py.gov.in”

Published by the Director, Government Press, Puducherry.

No legal responsibility is accepted for the publication of advertisement regarding change of names and other private

notifications in the Gazette. Persons notifying the same will remain solely responsible for the legal consequences and

also for any other misrepresentations, etc.

I state that in my Electoral Identity Card bearing

No. FBN0267286, issued by Election Commission of

India, my name is mentioned as ‘Irissappan’.

I state that in my PAN Card bearing No. AAOPI7516D,

issued by the Income-tax Department, Government of

India, my name is mentioned as ‘Irissappan S’.

I state that in my India Driving Licence bearing

DL No. PY01 20160006287, issued by the Transport

Department, Puducherry, my name is mentioned as

‘Irissappan S’.

I state that in my Marriage Certificate bearing

No. 000053, my name is mentioned as ‘Irisappan’.

I state that in my son Pridhishwar’s Birth Certificate

vide Registration No. PM/M/2008/003523, issued by

Pondicherry Municipality, Puducherry, my name is

mentioned as ‘Irisappan’.

I state that in my daughter Thejaswini’s Birth

Certificate vide Registration No. E/2013/07205, issued

by Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry, my name is

mentioned as ‘Irisappan’.

Further, I state that in my Appointment Offer Letter

bearing No. 36699/DSE/Estt.II/C/2004, my name is

mentioned as ‘Irissappan.S’.

Whereas, in my Family Ration Card vide

No. 170586, issued by the Department of Civil

Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry, my name

Hence, I do hereby declare that all the abovesaid

names viz., ‘Irisappan’, Irissappan.S’, S Irissappan’,

one and the same person, they referring myself only.

Signed before the Notary Public at Puducherry,

on this 24th day of May 2024.

562787

S. IRISAPPAN.

————

AFFIDAVIT

I, M. Dhanaraj, son of deceased Munusami, Indian

inhabitant, aged 44 years and residing at the house

bearing Door No. 30, Subramaniya Siva Nagar, Villianur,

Puducherry-605 110, do hereby solemnly and sincerely

affirm, to whomsoever it may concern as follows:

That I am the deponent herein, I swear this

affidavit in respect of different spellings in the name

of my father, who is deceased. I state that in the Birth

Certificate of my father under Registration No.110/

1941/N, my said father’s name has been mentioned

as ‘Mouniane’.

In the Welfare of Scheduled Castes Identity Card

under No. 36637, my said father’s name has been

mentioned as ‘xMƒVt’.

In the Pension Payment Order under P.P.O.

No. 13982, my said father’s name has been mentioned

as ‘Munissamy. G’.

In the Electoral Identity Card of my said deceased

father’s under No. JQW0250746 and in my Electoral

Identity Card under No. JQW0252387, my father’s

name has been mentioned as ‘Munusamy (x–ƒVt)’.

In my Birth Certificate Registration No. K/1979/

00060 and in my Passport No. F3927080, my father’s

name has been mentioned as ‘Mounissamy’.

In my Transfer Certificate under Admission No. 157,

my father’s name has been mentioned as ‘Munisamy’.

In my Aadhaar Card under No. XXXX XXXX 6008,

my father’s name has been mentioned as ‘Munusami’.

In the Death Certificate under Registration

No. 2011/200013, my said father’s name has been

mentioned as ‘Munisamy’.

In the Family Ration Card under No. 108392,

my father’s name has been mentioned as ‘x–ƒVt’.

Therefore, I do hereby declare that all the

abovesaid names are referred, identified and relating

one and the same person, that is my said deceased

father only.

I state that what are all stated in the above

paragraphs is true and correct to the best of

my knowledge, belief and information.

Solemnly and sincerely affirmed, and signed before

the Notary Public at Puducherry, on this 27th day of

May 2024.

562788

M. DHANARAJ.