[219]

TAMIL NADU

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

[Regd. No. TN/CCN/467/2012-14.

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU

[R. Dis. No. 197/2009.

2021

[Price: Rs.4.00 Paise.

No. 24]

CHENNAI, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 16, 2021

Aani 2, Pilava, Thiruvalluvar Aandu–2052

Part II—Section 2

Notifications or Orders of interest to a section of the public

issued by Secretariat Departments.

NOTIFICATIONS BY GOVERNMENT

CONTENTS

D.T.P.—II-2 (24)—1

Pages.

HOME DEPARTMENT

Family Courts Act.—Appointment on Transfer of

Certain District Judges Posted as Judges

and Principal Judges of the Family Courts

in Certain Districts

220-221

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

Act.—Appointment on Transfer of Presiding

Oﬃ cer as II Additional Special Court for

exclusive Trial of cases Chennai Act etc.

221

LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

The Tamil Nadu Trade Unions Regulations,1927

Trade Unions Act, 1926

221

LABOUR WELFARE AND SKILL

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

Industrial Disputes Act.—Dispute for arbitration

of the agreement entered between the

Management of Renault Nissan Automotive

India Private Limited and Renault Nissan India

Thozhilalar Sangam

221-227

PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL

INITIATIVES DEPARTMENT

Acquisition of Lands

Amendment to Notiﬁ cation

227-228

HOME DEPARTMENT

Notiﬁ cations under the Family Courts Act.

Appointment on Transfer of Certain District Judges

Posted as Judges and Principal Judges of the Family

Courts in certain Districts under the Act.

[G.O. Rt. No. 269, Home (Courts-II), 27th May 2021,

¬õè£C 13, Hôõ, F¼õœÀõ˜ Ý‡´-2052.]

No.II(2)/HO/328/2021.—In exercise of the powers

conferred under sub-section (i) of section 4 of the Family

Courts Act, 1984 (Central Act 66 of 1984), the Governor

of Tamil Nadu, with the concurrence of the High Court,

Chennai hereby makes the following appointment on transfer.

Sl.

(1)

Name and

Designation

Thiru / Tmt / Selvi

(2)

Ordered to be posted as

(3)

Dr.

S.T.

Lakshmi

Ramesh, Sub Judge,

Arakkonam, Ordered

to be promoted and

posted as Chairman,

Permanent

Lok

Adalat, Tiruppur

Judge, Family Court, Tiruppur

in the existing vacancy.

R Joseph Joy, Deputy

Director,

Regional

Centre

Tamil

Nadu State Judicial

Academy,

Madurai

Ordered

promoted and posted

as Additional District

Judge

(Fast

Track

Court), Nagercoil

Judge, Family Court, Nagercoil

in the existing vacancy.

V.P. Suganthi, Special

Judge, Special Court

for

trail

cases

under Prevention of

Corruption Act, Salem

(Promotee

District

Judge)

Judge,Family Court,Dindigul

vice Thiru. K.Singaraj, to be

transferred.

[G.O. D. No. 573, Home (Courts-II), 27th May 2021,

¬õè£C 13, Hôõ, F¼õœÀõ˜ Ý‡´-2052.]

No.II(2)/HO/329/2021.—In exercise of the powers

conferred under sub-section (i) of Section 4 of the Family

Courts Act, 1984 (Central Act 66 of 1984), the Governor

of Tamil Nadu, with the concurrence of the High Court,

Chennai hereby makes the following appointment on transfer.

Sl.

(1)

Name and

Designation

Thiru / Tmt / Selvi

(2)

Ordered to be posted as

(3)

M.D.

Sumathi

Principal

District

Judge, Ariyalur

Principal Judge, Family Court,

Chennai,

the

existing

vacancy.

S. Bhuvaneswari

III Additional District

Judge, City Civil

Court, Chennai

Judge,

Family

Court,

Cuddalore

the

existing

vacancy.

M. Vetricheivi,

I Additional Distict

Judge, Vellore

J u d g e , F a m i l y C o u r t ,

Chengalpattu

vice

Tmt. K.Geetha Rani, to be

transferred.

V. Thangamariappan,

Rgeistrar

(District

Judiciary) High Court

of Madras, Chennai

I Additional Principal Judge,

Family

Court,

Chennai

Vice Tmt. J. Shanthi, to be

transferred.

M. Selvam, Sessions

Judge, Special Court,

for exclusive trial of

cases under POCSO

Act, Vellore

Judge,

Family

Court,

Krishnagiri

the

existing

vacancy.

K. Singaraj, Judge,

Family Court, Dindigul

Judge,

Family

Court,

Srivilliputhur in the existing

vacancy.

K. Arivoli, Chairman,

Permanent

Lok

Adalat, Krishnagiri

Principal Judge, Family Court,

Coimbatorei, in the existing

vacancy.

P.Chenthoorpandi,

Sessions

Judge,

Sessions Court for

Exclusive

trial

Bomb Blast Cases,

Chennai

II Additional Principal Judge,

Family Court, Chennai, in the

existing vacancy.

M . J e e v a n a n d a m ,

Additional

District

Judge, Dharmapuri

Judge, Family Court, Tiruvallur,

vice

Tmt.

Mavis

Deepika

Sundaravadhana

transferred.

V. Thenmozhe, Judge,

II Additional Special

Court for Exclusive

Trial of cases under

N.D.P.S. Act, Chennai

Judge, Family Court,

Villupuram, vice

Tmt. G. Subathira Devi to be

transferred.

K.S. Jayamangalam,

III Additional District

Judge, Kallakurichi

III Additional Principal Judge,

Family Court, Chennai, Vice

Thiru D. Kingsly Christopher to

be transferred.

A.Muraleetharan,

Presiding

Oﬃ cer,

Principal

Labour

Court, Vellore

Additional

Principal

Judge,

Family

Court,

Coimbatorei

vice Thiru P. Srikumar to be

transferred.

K. Balasubramanian,

Sessions

Judge,

Magalir

Neethi

Mandram (Fast Track

Mahila Court), Vellore

IV Additional Principal Judge,

Family Court, Chennai, Vice

Tmt. A. Packia Jothi, to be

transferred.

P. S w a m i n a t h a n ,

Registrar

(IT

cum

Statistics) High Court

of Madras, Chennai

Judge,

Family

Court,

Thoothukudi in the existing

vacancy.

A. Packia Jothi, IV

Additional

Principal

Judge, Family Court,

Chennai

V Additional Principal Judge,

Family Court, Chennai, Vice

Thiru S. Ravi to be transferred.

220

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

[Part II—Sec. 2

NOTIFICATIONS BY GOVERNMENT

M.A.

Kabeer

VII

Additional

Principal

Judge, Family Court,

Chennai.

VI Additional Principal Judge,

Family Court, Chennai, Vice

Tmt J.Sridevi to be transferred.

S. Ezhi Velan,

Sessions Judge,

Special Court for

exclusive trial of case

under POCSO Act,

Nagercoil.

VII Additional Principal Judge,

Family Court, Chennai, Vice

Thiru M.A. Kabeer to be

transferred.

Notiﬁ cations under the Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances Act.

Appointment on Transfer of Presiding Officer as

Judge II Additional Special Court for exclusive Trial

of Cases Chennai under the Act.

[G.O. (Rt). No. 272, Home (Courts-II), 27th May 2021,

¬õè£C 13, Hôõ, F¼õœÀõ˜ Ý‡´-2052.]

No.II(2)/HO/330/2021.—In exercise of the powers

conferred under sub-section (2) of Section 36 of the Narcotic

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Central

Act 61 of 1985), the Governor of Tamil Nadu, with the

concurrence of the High Court, Chennai hereby makes the

following appointment on transfer.

Sl.

(1)

Name and

Designation

Thiru / Tmt / Selvi

(2)

Ordered to be posted as

(3)

Thiru G. Narayanan,

Presiding Oﬃ cer, III

Additional Labour

Court, Chennai.

Judge, II Additional Special

Court for exclusive trial of

cases N.D.P.S. Act, Chennai

vice Tmt. V. Thenmozhe to be

transferred.

Appointment on Transfer of District Judges as Judge

Special Court for exclusive Trial of Cases Villupuram

under the Act.

[G.O. D. No. 574, Home (Courts-II), 27th May 2021,

¬õè£C 13 Hôõ, F¼õœÀõ˜ Ý‡´-2052.]

No.II(2)/HO/331/2021.—In exercise of the powers

conferred under sub-section (2) of section 36 of the Narcotic

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 (Central

Act 61 of 1985), the Governor of Tamil Nadu, with the

concurrence of the High Court, Chennai hereby makes the

following appointment on transfer.

Sl.

(1)

Name and

Designation

Thiru / Tmt / Selvi

(2)

Ordered to be posted as

(3)

M. Suba Anbumani,

District

Judge

Tamil

Nadu

State

Judicial

Service,

now functioning on

deputation

the

Puducherry

Judicial

Service

IInd

Additional

District

Judge, Puducherry

Judge,

Special

Court

for

exclusive trial of cases under

N.D.P.S. Act, Villupuram in the

existing vacancy.

S.K. PRABAKAR,

Additional Chief Secretary to Government.

LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

Amendment to the Tamil Nadu Trade Unions

Regulations,1927 under the Trade Unions Act, 1926.

[G.O. Ms. No. 70 Labour and Employment (K2),

10th May 2021, CˆF¬ó 27, Hôõ F¼õœÀõ˜

Ý‡´-2052.]

No.II(2)/LE/332/2021.—In exercise of the powers

conferred by Section 29 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926

(Central Act, XVI of 1926), the Governor of Tamil Nadu

hereby makes the following amendment to the Tamil Nadu

Trade Unions Regulations, 1927, the draft of the same

having been previously published, as required under sub-

section (1) of Section 30 of the said Act.

Aඕඍඖඌඕඍඖගඛ

In the said Regulations after regulation 3, the following

regulation shall be inserted, namely:-

“3-A. The Registrar of Trade Unions, if he is satisﬁ ed

that the application for registration complies with all

requirements laid down in the Act and these regulations

relating to registration, shall register the Trade Union and

issue a certiﬁ cate of registration, within a period of 45 days

from the date of receipt of such application’’.

Md. NASIMUDDIN,

Additional Chief Secretary to Government.

LABOUR WELFARE AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT.

Dispute for arbitration of the agreement entered between

the Management of Renault Nissan Automotive India

Private Limited and Renault Nissan India Thozhilalar

Sangam under the Industrial Disputes Act.

[G.O. (D) No. 227 Labour Welfare and Skill Development

(A2) 9th June 2021, ¬õè£C 26 Hôõ, F¼õœÀõ˜ Ý‡´-2052.]

No.II(2)/LWSD/333/2021.—In exercise of the powers

conferred by Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Governor of

Tamil Nadu hereby refer the Industrial Dispute raised between

the Management of Renault Nissan Automotive India Private

Limited and Renault Nissan India Thozhilalar Sangam for

Arbitration and hereby publish the following terms of reference

agreed in the Joint Memorandum dated 29.03.2021 in the

Tamil Nadu Government Gazette.

J඗එඖග Mඍඕ඗කඉඖඌඝඕ

The Parties, the Management of Renault Nissan

Automotive India Private Limited and Renault Nissan India

Thozhilalar Sangam submit the following :-

1. The Parties agreed that the issue relating to the charter

of demands of the workmen as well as the Management, as

well as certain other related issues as speciﬁ ed in the terms

of reference in the Joint Memo be referred for arbitration

before a Sole Arbitrator under Section 10A of the Industrial

Disputes Act. For this purpose, the parties agree that the

Sole Arbitrator would be Hon’ble Justice Mr. P. Jyothimani,

Retd Judge, Hon’ble High Court.

The fees for arbitration would be borne by the

Management in its entirety with no ﬁ nancial commitment

whatsoever in this regard on the part of the Respondent

Union/Workmen.

June. 16, 2021]

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

221

The arbitrator’s remuneration has been accepted by

the Management at Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty

Thousand) per sitting and that the Management would pay

the same in advance for each block of 5 sittings.

The venue/location for arbitration proceedings would

be at a place mutually convenient to the parties and to the

convenience of the Learned Arbitrator. The arrangements

for arbitration would be made by the Management.

Both parties agree that the arbitrator is entitled to

visit the plant for the purpose of adjudication/ arbitration of

the issues referred herein.

The parties hereby undertake to furnish all such

evidence directed by the Learned Arbitrator to so produce

which is within their capacity to produce. This would be

apart from such other evidence the parties may wish to

bring on record in support of their pleadings. Both parties

agree that it is open to the Learned Arbitrator to hear

such other parties as he may ﬁ nd necessary for complete

adjudication/arbitration of the referred disputes herein.

The

parties

agree

co-operate

speedy

conclusion of the arbitration proceedings, within a period of

three months from the date of publication of the reference

by the Government or such extended period as the Hon’ble

Arbitrator may decide.

a) To enable such early conclusion, the parties will

exchange pleadings and copies of evidence including

proof aﬃ davits and be ready for trial from the date of

ﬁ rst sitting by the Ld. Arbitrator. In view of the prevailing

pandemic,

both

parties

agree

that

for

the

purpose

of decision of interim relief payable to the workers

pending the dispute as well as the issue relating to

non-employment of Mr. Balaji (Employee No_RNT02814) will

be done through virtual mode on the link to be provided

by the Ld. Arbitrator.

It is also agreed by the Management that they would

bear the clerical expenditure for such assistance as the Ld.

Arbitrator may need for the completion of the arbitration.

It is agreed by the Management that the suspension

pending enquiry of M/s.Parthasarathy and Logeswaran will be

lifted forthwith, viz., from the date of the order of the Writ

Petition. Both the employees will agree to co-operate with

the speedy completion of the enquiry proceedings, viz., within

four months. If, upon completion of the enquiry proceedings,

the employees are found guilty of the charges leveled,

then, such appropriate punishment other than termination

/ dismissal from service would be imposed.

As regards bonus for years 2018-19 and 2019-

20, the Management has not paid bonus to such of those

technicians who do not qualify for bonus under the Payment

of Bonus Act, 1965. The Management agrees to extend the

minimum statutory bonus of 8.33%, as calculated under the

payment of Bonus Act, 1965 as a onetime gesture, even to

those persons who did not qualify for receiving this bonus and

who were not paid such minimum bonus for the respective

years. Such payment will be made to those technicians who

have not received the payment within the period of one month

from the date of the order of the Hon’ble High Court. The

Union disputes the claim that those persons who have not

been paid bonus are disentitled or disqualiﬁ ed, as claimed

by the management. However, as to whether the Technicians

who are on the rolls of the employment on the date of

publication of the Arbitration Award are entitled to bonus over

and above the statutory bonus for the respective years viz.,

2018-19 and 2019-20 would also be referred for arbitration

as referred in the terms of reference.

It is agreed that the parties would request the

Hon’ble Arbitrator to take up the issue relating to interim

relief as well as the termination of Mr.Balaji speciﬁ ed in item

Nos.35 and 36 of the terms of reference and decide the

same in the ﬁ rst instance within 15 days of the reference

for arbitration or such extended period as the arbitrator

may decide, before deciding the other issues under the

arbitration.

It is open to the Hon’ble Arbitrator to pass such

interim awards / award as deemed appropriate, on any of

the terms of reference during the pendency of the arbitration

proceedings, as deemed ﬁ t.

During the pendency of the dispute before the

Hon’ble Arbitrator and / or a settlement being arrived at,

the parties shall ensure smooth functioning of the factory

operations and not act in any manner that may cause

disruption in the operations. The Union will not commence

any strike or direct action with regard to the issues set

out herein for the purpose of arbitration. In other words,

during the pendency of arbitration, the Respondent Union

will not commence any strike or direct action in pursuit of

its demands referred for arbitration.

The venue of the arbitration would be as mutually

agreed by the parties and the convenience of the Hon’ble

Arabitrator.

TERMS OF REFERENCE TO THE HON’BLE

ARBITRATOR

No.

Demands

Demand No.1 – Basic Wages:- Presently, the

basic wage of technicians is between 8499 and

18139. The basic pay ﬁ xation has not been done

in a rational manner. In that, the technicians

who have longer experience draw less basic

pay. Everybody’s basic pay should be level at

Rs.18,000/- per month and a further amount of

Rs.5000/- to be paid so that the basic pay is

Rs.23,000/- per month and a pay scale ﬁ xed on

that basis for all technicians.

DEMAND No.2 – FIXED DEARNESS ALLOWANCE:-

Presently technicians are paid Variable Fixed

Dearness Allowance at the rate of 10% of the

basic pay for the year and therefore there is

a disparity in the matter of Fixed Dearness

Allowance. Technicians receive variable fixed

dearness allowance ranging from Rs.2,833/- to

Rs.6,046/-. This has to be changed to Rs.6,000/-

as Fixed Dearness Allowance for all technicians

and they should be given an increase of another

Rs.6,000/- as Fixed Dearness Allowance so that

the technicians will receive Rs.12,000/- as Fixed

Dearness Allowance.

222

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

[Part II—Sec. 2

No.

Demands

DEMAND No.3 – VARIABLE DEARNESS

ALLOWANCE:- Presently there is no

Variable Dearness Allowance paid to the

technicians. The technicians should be

paid Variable Dearness Allowance on the

cost-of-living index Chennai 2001 series at

the rate of Rs.25 per point above 100 points.

For example, for the month of December

2018, the cost-of-living index Chennai 2001

series is 274. After reducing 100 points the

remaining is 174 points for which at the rate of

Rs.25 per point the amount comes as Rs.4,350/-.

DEMAND No.4 – ANNUAL INCREMENT:-Whether

the demand of the Union for payment of annual

increment of Rs.500/- per year is justiﬁ ed ? If

so, to pass suitable orders.

DEMAND No.5 – HOUSE RENT ALLOWANCE:-

Whether the demand of the union for payment of

House Rent Allowance uniformly for all Technicians,

a sum of Rs.18,000/- per month as against

the existing practice of diﬀ erential House Rent

Allowance between Rs.6,798 to Rs.14,511/- is

justiﬁ ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

DEMAND No.6 – EDUCATION ALLOWANCE:-

Whether the demand of the Union that the

Technicians should be paid Rs.2,000/- per month

as education allowance is justiﬁ ed ? If so, to

pass suitable orders.

DEMAND No.7- WASHING ALLOWANCE:- Whether

the demand of the Union for grant of increase

in washing allowance from the existing sum of

Rs.100/- per month to Rs.1,500/- per month is

justiﬁ ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

DEMAND No.8 – SHIFT ALLOWANCE:- Whether the

demand of the Union for increase in shift allowance

for Technicians from Rs.30/- to Rs.100/- For B Shift

i.e., from 15:30 hours – 00:00 hours and for increase

from Rs.83/- to Rs.150/- for C Shift i.e., from 00:00

hours – 07:00 hours is justiﬁ ed ? If so, to pass

suitable orders.

DEMAND No.9 – SUNDAY ALLOWANCE:- Whether

the demand of the Union for increase in Sunday

Allowance for Technicians working on Sundays

from existing Rs.200/- to Rs.400/- is justiﬁ ed ?

If so, to pass suitable orders.

10)

DEMAND No.10 – HEAT ALLOWANCE:- Whether

the demand of the Union for increase in Heat

allowance for Technicians from Rs.100/- per month

to Rs.200/- per month is justiﬁ ed ? Whether the

demand of the Union for Rs.500/- per month for

Technicians working in Body Shop, Casting Shop

and Heat Treatment Division over and above

the Heat Allowance of Rs.200/- given to all the

Technicians thereby totaling Rs.700/- per month

is justiﬁ ed? If so, to pass suitable orders.

No.

Demands

11)

DEMAND No.11 – CHEMICAL ALLOWANCE:-

Whether the demand of the Union for payment

of Rs.500/- per month as chemical allowance for

technicians working Paint Shop is justiﬁ ed ? If

so, to pass suitable orders.

12)

DEMAND No.12 – LEAVE TRAVEL ALLOWANCE:-

Whether the demand of the Union for payment

of one month’s gross salary as Leave Travel

Allowance, as against the existing one month’s

basic pay and Dearness Allowance is justiﬁ ed ?

If so, to pass suitable orders.

13)

DEMAND No.13 – PRODUCTION INCENTIVE:-

Whether the demand of the Union for payment

of Production incentive at 1% of the sale proﬁ t

to be divided equally to the Technicians including

contract workers directly engaged in production

process and the payment to be made on 7^th

of May every year is justiﬁ ed ? If so, to pass

suitable orders.

14)

DEMAND No.14.1(a) – INSURANCE FACILITIES:-

Whether the demand of the Union for increase in

the medical insurance scheme for technicians and

family members from the existing Rs.2,00,000/- to

Rs.6,00,000/- is justiﬁ ed ? If so, to pass suitable

orders.

Demand No.14.1(b) – Whether the demand of the

union for increase in the Outpatient treatment

for the Technician and family members from the

existing Rs.250/- per month (viz., Rs.3,000/- per

annum) to Rs.500/- per month (viz., Rs.6,000/- per

annum) is justiﬁ ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders

14.2 – GROUP TERM LIFE INSURANCE

COVERAGE:- Whether the demand of the

Union for increase in Group Term Life Insurance

Coverage for death due to natural causes or

accident, from the existing Rs.15,00,000/- or twice

the annual CTC, to Rs.25,00,000/- or thrice the

annual CTC, whichever is higher, is justiﬁ ed ?

If so, to pass suitable orders.

14.3 –GROUP PERSONAL ACCIDENT:- Whether the

demand of the Union for increase in the Group

Personal Accident Insurance for Technicians from

Rs.5,00,000/- to Rs.10,00,000/- is justiﬁ ed? If so,

to pass suitable orders.

14.4 – Mediclaim:- Whether the Demand of the

Union for increase in the mediclaim insurance to

ensure the following is justiﬁ ed ?

a) Room rent covered by insurance should be

raised to Rs.3,500/- per day.

b) Network Hospitals covered under insurance

should be increased.

June. 16, 2021]

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

223

No.

Demands

c) The buﬀ er insurance amount should be increased

twice as that of the present insurance coverage

considering the fatality of disease or the nature

of the accident and the medical expenditure

spent exceeding the present insurance coverage.

d) Six of the technician’s family members (including

Father-In-Law and Mother-In-Law) besides the

technician himself should be covered by the

general medical insurance.

15)

DEMAND No.15 – UNIFORM& SAFETY SHOES:

Whether the demand of the Union for increase in the

uniforms from the existing pre-stitched 2 T-Shirts,

2 Shirts and 3 pants to 3 readymade T-Shirts and

unstitched material for 3 shirts and 4 pants together

with a sum of Rs.3,500/- towards stitching charges is

justiﬁ ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

Whether the demand of the Union for providing

one pair of safety shoes as every year as the

previous policy, as against the existing practice

of a pair of safety shoe for every two years is

justiﬁ ed ? If so, to pass suitable orders.

16)

DEMAND No.16 – RAINCOAT:–Whether the demand

of the Union for providing a rain-jacket cum

wind-cheater every year during rainy and winter

seasons is justiﬁ ed ? if so to pass suitable orders.

17)

DEMAND No.17 – COCONUT OIL & HORLICKS:–

Whether the demand of the Union for increase of

coconut oil from half liter to one liter and from

half kg Boost to one Kg Horlicks is justiﬁ ed ?

if so to pass suitable orders.

18)

DEMAND No.18 – WORKLOAD: Whether the

demand of the Union for ﬁ xing the workload at

390 minutes for a 8 hour shift and appointment

of one reliever for ten technicians for the purpose

of attending calls of nature is justiﬁ ed ? if so to

pass suitable orders.

19)

DEMAND No.19 – LEAVE:

1. Whether the demand of the Union for increase

in the casual leave and sick leave of seven days

each and earned leave of 21 days annually, to

casual leave and sick leave of ten days each

and thirty days of earned leave is justiﬁ ed ?

2. Whether the demand of the Union for encashment

of surrender of earned leave from the existing

practice of basic pay, to gross salary is justiﬁ ed?

3. Whether the demand of the Union for permission

with prior sanction upto four hours in a month

without deductions of salary is justiﬁ ed ?

4. Whether the demand of the Union for increase

of leave of one day for death of family member

to three days is justiﬁ ed?

5. Whether the demand of the union for increase

in the paternity leave from three days to six

days is justiﬁ ed?

No.

Demands

6. Whether the demand of the Union for grant

of special leave of three days for the marriage

of technician, besides regular casual leave, sick

leave and earned leave is justiﬁ ed?

7. Whether the demand of the Union for payment

of additional sum of Rs.100/- per additional wage

day for working more than six days in a week

is justiﬁ ed?

8. Whether the demand of the Union for

reimbursement of 20% of the leave in case

of accident and serious illness and where the

employee exhausts his leave arising out of the

same, is justiﬁ ed?

9. Whether the demand of the Union for transfer of

leave at credit from one technician to another in

case of any accident or serious illness of such

technician and arising out of which he does not

have enough leave to avail, is justiﬁ ed?

10. Whether the demand of the Union for increase in

the maternity leave from six months to 12 months is

justiﬁ ed ?

11. Whether the demand of the Union for grant of

leave as recommended under statute, in case of

the technician undergoing birth control surgery,

is justiﬁ ed ?

20)

DEMAND No.20 – AYUDHA PUJA GIFT: Whether

the demand of the Union for Ayudha Pooja gift

coupons worth Rs.10,000/- or 4 grams of gold

coins every year, is justiﬁ ed ?

21)

DEMAND No.21 – SPECIAL CAR SCHEME: Whether

the demand of the Union for providing discount

of 30% for car manufactured by the company,

as against the existing 4% is justiﬁ ed?

Whether the demand of the Union for sale of used

car at discounted price of 50% to the technicians

on seniority basis is justiﬁ ed ?

22)

DEMAND No.22 – FUNERAL EXPENSES:- Whether

the demand of the Union for increase in the funeral

expenses to family members of Technicians from

Rs.25,000/- to Rs.50,000/- is justiﬁ ed ?

23)

DEMAND No.23–Death Relief & Compassionate

appointment :- Whether the demand of the

Union for increase in the deduction of contribution

towards death relief from Rs.200 per month to

Rs.300 per month is justiﬁ ed ?

Whether the demand of the Union for providing

employment to the family member of the Technician

on compassionate grounds by treating the position

as vacant, as against the existing practice of

considering the appointments based on vacancies

during recruitment process, is justiﬁ ed?

224

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

[Part II—Sec. 2

No.

Demands

24)

DEMAND No.24–Taste and Quality of the Food

& Canteen:-

a. Whether the demand of the Union for improvement

in the quality and taste of foodstuﬀ and the

expenditure for the same to be increased twice

is justiﬁ ed?

b. Whether the demand of the Union for providing

air-conditioned dining halls is justiﬁ ed?

c. Whether the demand of the Union for providing

a separate fund for improving the kitchen and

quality of food, is justiﬁ ed?

d. Whether the demand of the Union for providing

eggs along with the food on all days and

increasing the non-vegetarian food from three

days to four days, besides Sundays and for

avoiding the same kind of non-vegetarian

food and to provide varieties in the food, is

justiﬁ ed ?

25)

DEMAND No.25–Soap and Washing Powder

Whether the demand of the Union for providing

2 Hamam Soaps, ½ Kg of Surf Excel, and 3

washing soaps to Technicians, is justiﬁ ed ?.

26)

DEMAND No.26–Women Technicians:- Whether the

demand of the union for providing lesser workload

to women technicians and also for allotment of

work only during the ﬁ rst shift hours viz., from

7:00 hours and 15:30 hours or in the general

shift, is justiﬁ ed ?.

27)

DEMAND No.27–Transport Facilities:-

a. Whether the demand of the Union for maintenance

of the bus provided for transportation for Technicians

be improved and that the buses should be

changed once in 4-5 years is justiﬁ ed ?

b. Whether the demand of the Union that the

drivers of the buses be provided proper breaks

and time for rest as well as provide a room to

take rest and to avail food in the dining hall, is

justiﬁ ed ?

c. Whether the demand of the Union that qualiﬁ ed

drivers be appointed, is justiﬁ ed?

d. Whether the demand of the Union for providing

air-conditioned buses for commutation is justiﬁ ed?

28)

DEMAND No.28 – PRODUCTION PLAN:- Whether

the demand of the Union for providing the monthly

production plan 7 days in advance, is justiﬁ ed ?

29)

DEMAND No.29 – LONG TERM AWARD:- Whether

the demand of the Union for increase in the

long term award as per clause 4(1) of the 12(3)

Settlement dated 20/02/17 from Rs.10,000/- to

Rs.15,000/- and also providing additionally, 4

grams Gold Coin is justified ? Whether the

demand of the Union for providing a long term

award of Rs.25,000/- and 6 Grams of gold for

those Technicians completing 15 years of service,

is justiﬁ ed ?

No.

Demands

30)

DEMAND No.30 – DISASTER MANAGEMENT

RELIEF:- Whether the demand of the Union

for a refundable relief of Rs.50,000/-, when the

technician or his family members or his assets are

aﬀ ected by natural disaster without any interest,

to be recovered in ten monthly instalments and

additionally, a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards non-

refundable relief, is justiﬁ ed ?

31)

DEMAND No.31 – Whether the demand of the

Union for not deploying 13 robots in body shop

and 15 robots in paint shop, which poses potential

threat to employment of technicians, is justiﬁ ed?

32)

DEMAND No.32 – Leave Procedure:-

(A) As the present procedures of the leave system

are improper, the management should revert

to the old policy of giving acknowledgement in

hand after submission of the leave application.

(B) In an unforeseen circumstance where a technician

takes leave without giving prior notice, he should

be allowed to give notice within 24 hours of

resuming his employment.

advance for the purpose of attending a family

function, the application should be disposed of

expeditiously without any unreasonable delay.

In case of a rejection, the management should

give in writing the reason for such rejection.

(D) If the reason for the rejection of the

leave is found to be not genuine,

then the technician should be paid

3 days of wages for that day.

33)

DEMAND No.33 – SOME OF THE BENEFITS

UNDER SETTLEMENT DATED 20.02.2017 YET

TO BE IMPLEMENTED, NOT IN DEROGATION

OF CERTAIN OTHER BENEFITS YET TO BE

IMPLEMENTED:-

(A) Back wages pending to the technicians should

be paid immediately as under clause 8(c) of

the 12 (3) settlement dated 20. 02. 2017.

(B) The pending construction of the gym should be

resumed immediately.

immediately.

(D) The stone bed should be constructed immediately

as per Clause 5.2 of the 12(3)-settlement dated

20.02.2017.

(E) As per Clause 5.5 of the 12(3) settlement

dated 20/02/17 the team building activity

did not take place as mentioned in the

settlement. Therefore, every technician

should be paid Rs.600/- once every

6 months and the same should be raised to

Rs.1000/- in the future.

June. 16, 2021]

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

225

No.

Demands

34)

DEMAND No.34–Interim Relief:- Whether the

demand of the Union for grant of interim relief

of Rs.20,000/- pending the hearing and resolution

of the industrial dispute, is justiﬁ ed ?

35)

DEMAND No.35–Termination of Balaji (Employee

No_RNT02814):- Whether the Management is

justiﬁ ed in terminating the services of Mr.Balaji

for certain acts of misconduct vide order dated

16.12.2019. If not, to what relief the workman

is entitled to ?

36)

DEMAND No.36–Bonus for the years 2018-19 and

2019-20:- Whether the demand of the Union for

payment of bonus over and above the statutory

minimum of 8.33% for the years 2018-19 and

2019-20 is justiﬁ ed ?

37)

DEMAND No.37–Sunday Working:-

1) Whether the cessation of payment of twice of

wages for working on Sundays from December

2019 by the Management is an alteration of

condition of service and whether such alteration

is void for violation of Section 9A of the Industrial

Disputes Act? To what relief the workers are

entitled to ?

2) Whether the demand of the Union for restoring

the earlier practice of providing twice the wages

for those workmen who are called for work on

Sundays, together with one alternate holiday, is

justiﬁ ed?

38)

DEMAND No.38–Appointment of Enquiry Oﬃ cer:-

Whether the demand of the Union for ﬁ xing

a panel of Enquiry Officers by the Hon’ble

Arbitrator for conducting any domestic enquiry

and any domestic enquiry into the allegations

of the workmen be conducted by any one such

Enquiry Oﬃ cer from and among the panel of

Enquiry Oﬃ cers as decided by the Arbitrator, is

justiﬁ ed ?

No.

Demands

DEMANDS OF THE MANAGEMENT

39)

DEMAND No.39–Wage Increase:- Whether the

demand of the Management that in view of the

current business scenario and COVID-19 pandemic

situation, there would not be any increase in wages

till the date of the award that may be passed

by the Arbitrator and as such, any increase will

only be prospective from the date of the Award,

is justiﬁ ed?

40)

DEMAND No.40–Key Performance Indicator for

grant of increase in basic / DA / Increment, etc.,

Whether the demand of the Management for ﬁ xing

Key Performance Indicators, comprising safety,

discipline, attendance, productivity, quality and

delivery volume as parameters, in the following

manner is justiﬁ ed ?

· Key Performance Indicators is ﬁ xed for the proposed

wage increase for Technicians and establish the

linkage between wage increase and performance.

· Any wage increase will be subject to the

achievement of above mentioned KPIs.

· Technicians will get full wage increase after

achievement of 100% of the KPI’s. The wage

increase will be paid on prorate basis based

upon the actual achievement numbers in case

the achievement is lower than 100%.

· At the beginning of every ﬁ nancial year, the Key

Performance Indictors will be communicated to

the Technicians through notice boards.

Category

Entity

Individual

KPI

Initiation

Validation

Approve

Weight-

age %

Payout

Frequency of

Measurement

Evaluation

Criteria

Stake

Holder

Safety

Individual Unsafe

Act-Without

accidents

SV/SSV

Manager

Not more than 1 / Year -100%

2 / Year 75%

>2 / Year

All Working

Days

As per fact

ﬁ le

All GMs

Discipline

(Individual

Driven)

Individual Misconduct

Warning

Letter

Suspension

SV/SSV

Manager

-Warning Letter 50%

-Suspension - 0%

All Working

Days

Disciplinary

Trackers

All GMs

Attendance

(Individual

Driven)

Individual No of LOP

days

SV/SSV

Manager

0 days LOP -0%(No Cut)

1-3 Days LOP -50% Cut

>3 LOP days - 100% Cut

Monthly

Attendance

Kronos- HR

Team

GM-HR

Productivity

Individual

SOS / JA

Adherence

(Core /

Non core

SV/SSV

Manager

12/12 Adherence -100%

11/12 Adherence -75%

10/12 Adherence -50%

<10/12 Adherence -0%

Monthly

Jo Sheet

All GMs

226

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

[Part II—Sec. 2

No.

Demands

41)

DEMAND No.41–Leave beneﬁ ts:- Whether the

demand of the Management to reduce the present

accumulation of earned leave from 180 days to a

maximum of 30 days and providing encashment

of the leave beyond the said maximum days on

the existing practice of basic wages, is justiﬁ ed ?

Whether the demand of the Management for

reduction of national and festival holidays from

the existing 12 days to 9 days, as provided in

the statute, is justiﬁ ed ?

42)

DEMAND No.42–Annual Master Health Check-

up:-Whether the demand of the Management to

amend the current periodicity for annual master

health check-up for Technicians as once in three

years up to 40 years and once in 2 years for

above 40 years is justiﬁ ed?

43)

DEMAND No.43–Dependents medical insurance

coverage:- While the Management is bearing the

entire cost of insurance premium for the technician,

spouse and two children, the Management has

demanded 50% insurance premium for the parents

/ in-laws subject to a maximum of six persons

(Technician + 5 persons) ? whether such a

demand of the Management is justiﬁ ed ?

44)

DEMAND No.44–Treatment of shutdown holidays:-

Whether the demand of the Management to

treat all maintenance shutdown days declared by

management as holidays and adjust the leave on

the earned / casual leave at credit is justiﬁ ed ?

Whether the demand of the Management to only

pay normal wages for such technicians who

are called for duty during such shutdown days

is justiﬁ ed ?

45)

DEMAND No.45–Treatment of Non-Production days

(NPD):-Whether the demand of the Management to

treat non-production days (other than maintenance

shut down days) as holidays with 50% wages

for the Technicians is justiﬁ ed ?

46)

DEMAND No.46–Canteen Facility:- Whether the

demand of the Management for having the

canteen expenses on a cost sharing basis at

50-50 is justiﬁ ed ?

47)

DEMAND No.47–Transportation:-Whether the

demand of the Management for having the

transportation facility on a cost sharing basis of

50-50 is justiﬁ ed ?

48)

DEMAND No.48–Staggered Weekly Off:-

Whether the demand of the Management for

introduction of staggered weekly off for all

departments as and when the Management

introduces a continuous working, is

justiﬁ ed ?

No.

Demands

49)

DEMAND No.49–Lockdown Wages:-Whether the

demand of the Management for adjustment of

wages paid for COVID 19 pandemic lockdown

days is justiﬁ ed?

50)

DEMAND No.50–Flexibility in working:-Due to

volatility in business situation, the company will

take a decision based to market situation. Sunday

working (Comp oﬀ ) and Over Timework will be

announced. All technicians should co-operate fully

without any demand.

51)

DEMAND No.51–Cost to the Company:-Whether

the demand of the Management that any increase

that may be granted under the Award of the

Hon’ble Arbitrator would be based on cost to

company basis, viz., a consolidated increase will

be arrived and which would be split into various

components apart from Shift allowance / Sunday

Allowance.

52)

DEMAND No.52–Bonus Payment:-Whether the

demand of the Management that any bonus

so payable would be only in accordance with

the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, without any

demand thereafter.

53)

DEMAND No.53–Automation & Technology

Advancement:-

Whether the demand of the Management that

the Technicians should co-operate with all new

technological changes including such changes

that will improve productivity and also co-operate

by actively participating in such trainings /

programmes that will improve the productivity /

quality, is justiﬁ ed ?

Whether the demand of the Management that the

technicians should extend their full co-operation

in all the internal compliances training, Global

Engagement Survey, Prevention of Sexual

Harassment (POSH)., etc as planned from time

to time, is justiﬁ ed ?

R. KIRLOSH KUMAR,

Secretary to Government.

PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL

INITIATIVES DEPARTMENT

Acquisition of Lands

Amendment to Notiﬁ cation

[Letter No. 3708/PD&SI (SI)/2020, Dated: 21.05.2021]

The following amendment to the Notiﬁ cations No.II(2)/

PDSI/182/2021 under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of

Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land or Industrial Purposes Act,

1997 (Tamil Nadu Act 10 of 1999) approved in G.O.Ms.No.104,

Planning, Development and Special Initiative (S.I) Department,

dated 23.02.2021 Published in the Tamil Nadu Government

Gazette No.10 in Part II-Section 2 dated 10.3.2021 for

the acquisition of lands in Chennai District, Egmore

Taluk,Nungambakkam Village is issued:-

June. 16, 2021]

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

227

PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF STATIONERY AND PRINTING, CHENNAI

ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU

Sl.

No.

Land Owner Name

Block

No.

T.S. No.

extent mentioned in

G.O. as Sq. ft.

Changes to be amended

as Sq.mtr.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Ariyat Galeeli, Nicbar A. Galeeli minor)

guardian M. Afzar Galeel and others

49/9 Part

72 Sq.ft.

72 Sq. mtr.

Syd Ali Akbar Trustee Isabani Trust

50 Part

605 Sq.ft.

605 Sq. mtr.

Institute of Chartered Accounts Rep by

C.P. Mukkarjee

51/1 Part

326 Sq.ft.

326 Sq. mtr.

G. Ravindra

146/1 Part

89 Sq.ft.

89 Sq.mtr.

Jeyalaxmy Sridhar W/o Sridhar, Dr. Rajesh

S/o

Swamynathan,

Narayani

Ganesh

D/o R. Geminiganeshan

146/2 Part

23 Sq.ft.

23 Sq.mtr.

J.P. Santhammal, Ragumannisha &

4 others

146/3 Part

7 Sq.ft.

7 Sq.mtr.

The most Rev. Arch Bishop of Madras

155 Part

240 Sq.ft.

240 Sq.mtr.

A.R.R.M. Umaiyal Achi, A.R.R.M.

Ramanatha Chettiyar, Valliammal Achi,

N. Chockalinga Chettiyar

156/1 Part

616 Sq.ft.

616 Sq.mtr.

Institute of Chartered Accounts Rep by

C.P. Mukkarjee

156/6 Part

35 Sq.ft.

35 Sq. mtr.

Total

2013 Sq.ft.,

2013Sq.mtr.

M.A. SIDDIQUE,

Principal Secretary to Government.

228

TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE

[Part II—Sec. 2