Panaji, 12th Januray, 2017 (Pausa 22, 1938)
SERIES II No. 41
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
789
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2015-2017
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Education, Art & Culture
Directorate of Education
__
Order
No. 1(2)-2-2016/SE/1298
Government is pleased to order placing the
services on deputation of Shri M. V. Gadgil,
Principal, Government Higher Secondary School,
Sanguem as Joint Secretary, Goa Board of Secondary
and Higher Secondary Education, Porvorim with
immediate effect.
Shri S. F. Koti posted on deputation as Joint
Secretary of the Goa Board of Secondary & Higher
Secondary Education, Porvorim is hereby
repatriated in the Directorate of Education, Porvorim
and posted as Deputy Education Officer, North
Educational Zone, Mapusa with immediate effect.
Shri S. F. Koti shall continue to hold the charge
of Asstt. Director of Education, Central Educational
Zone, Panaji in addition to his own duties until
further orders.
Shri Sairoj B. Dessai, Headmaster, Government
High School, Ambaulim, Quepem shall hold the
charge of Principal, Government Higher Secondary
School, Sanguem in addition to his own duties until
further orders.
Shri M. V. Gadgil, Principal, Government Higher
Secondary School, Sanguem shall hand over the
charge to Shri Sairoj B. Dessai and get self relieved.
The deputation of Shri M. V. Gadgil shall be
governed by standard terms of deputation as
contained in the Office Memorandum No. 13/4/74-
-PER dated 20-11-2013 and as amended from time
to time.
The date of joining and relieving should be
communicated to this office.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Gajanan P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Education).
Porvorim, 28th December, 2016.
———‹———
Directorate of Higher Education
__
Order
No. 8/1/2016-DHE/2765
On the recommendation of the Screening
Committee, Government is pleased to grant Senior
Scale (Pre-revised Rs. 10,000-325-15,200) (Revised
Rs. 15,600-39,100+AGP Rs. 7,000) and Selection
Grade/Reader Scale (Prerevised Rs. 12,000-420-
18,300) (Revised Rs. 15,600-39,100+AGP Rs. 8,000)
as per the University Grants Commission guidelines
to the following teaching faculty of the Sant
Sohirobanath Ambiye Government College of Arts
and Commerce, Pernem-Goa, with effect from the
date indicated against his name as under:-
Sr.
Name of the
Date of eligibility
Date of eligibility
No.
faculty
for Senior Scale
for Selection Scale
Pre-revised
Pre-revised
Rs. 10,000-325-15,200 Rs. 12,000-420-18,300
1
2
3
4
1. Dr. Balappa K.
23-12-2010
24-12-2010
Haravi,
(i.e. date of
Assistant
obtaining
Professor
Ph.D)
in Geography
Note:-
There are three Extraordinary issues to the
Official Gazette, Series II No. 40 dated 05-01-2017
as follows:—
(1) Extraordinary dated 05-01-2017 from pages 777
to 778 regarding Orders & Notification from
Department of Finance & Department of Home
respectively.
(2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 11-01-2017 from
pages 779 to 782 regarding Notifications from
Department of Elections.
(2) Extraordinary (No. 3) dated 11-01-2017 from
pages 783 to 788 regarding Notifications from
Department of Home.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
790
His pay shall be fixed as per the rules in force
accordingly.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Diwan N. Rane, Under Secretary (Higher
Education).
Porvorim, 28th December, 2016.
________
Order
No. 8/1/2016-DHE/2766
On the recommendation of the Screening
Committee, Government is pleased to grant Senior
Scale (Pre-revised Rs. 10,000-325-15,200)
(Pre-Revised Rs. 15,600-39,100+AGP Rs. 7,000) and
Selection Grade/Reader Scale (Pre-revised
Rs. 12,000-420-18,300) (Pre-Revised Rs. 15,600-
39,100+AGP Rs. 8,000) as per the University Grants
Commission guidelines to the following teaching
faculty of the Government College of Arts, Science
and Commerce, Quepem-Goa, with effect from the
date indicated against their names as under:-
(I) Seniority Scales:-
Sr.
Name of the faculty
Date of eligibility
No.
for Senior Scales
Pre-revised
(Rs. 10,000-325-15,200)
1. Shri Narayan Bandodkar,
05-08-1999
Assistant Professor in Physics
2. Smt. Maria Jacqueline,
01-10-2000
Assistant Professor in Chemistry
3. Smt. Sarita P. Usgaonkar,
13-09-2009
Assistant Professor in Commerce
4. Dr. Annie F. D. Souza e Gomes,
30-01-2013
Assistant Professor in Botany
(i.e. date of
obtaining Ph.D)
5. Ms. Olivia Soares,
27-06-2002
Assistant Professor in Computer
Science
6. Shri Filipe Rodrigues,
02-01-2004
Assistant Professor in Computer
Science
(II) Selection Grade Scales:-
Sr.
Name of the faculty
Date of eligibility
No.
for Selection Scales
Pre-revised
Rs. 12,000–420-18,300
1
2
3
1. Smt. Maria Jacqueline,
01-10-2005.
Assistant Professor in Chemistry
2. Smt. Sarita P. Usgaonkar,
14-09-2009.
Assistant Professor in Commerce
3. Dr. Annie F. D. Souza e Gomes,
20-10-2014
Assistant Professor in Botany
(i.e. date of
completing
2nd Refresher
Course).
4. Smt. Liana M. I. Da Costa,
08-09-2010.
Assistant Professor in Computer
Science
5. Ms. Olivia Soares,
27-06-2007.
Assistant Professor in Computer
Science
5. Shri Filipe Rodrigues,
02-01-2009.
Assistant Professor in Computer
Science
Their pay shall be fixed as per the rules in force
accordingly.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Diwan N. Rane, Under Secretary (Higher
Education).
Porvorim, 28th December, 2016.
———‹———
Directorate of Technical Education
College Section
__
Order
No. 16/441/SUP/PF/GEC/DTE/2016/4045
Read: Memorandum No. 16/139/Filling up
Posts/GEC/DTE/03-04/P.F.III/3575 dated
18-11-2016.
On the recommendations of the Goa Public
Service Commission conveyed vide their letter
No. COM/I/5/18(5)/2016/372 dated 07-11-2016,
Government is pleased to appoint Kum. Sneha Ulhas
Phadate on temporary basis to the post of Assistant
Professor in Electrical & Electronics Engineering
(Group ‘A’, Gazetted) at Goa College of Engineering,
Farmagudi, Ponda-Goa, with initial pay fixed at
Rs. 15,600/- (Pre-revised) in the Pay Band of
Rs. 15,600-39,100 (Pre-revised) plus Academic Grade
Pay Rs. 6,000/- (Pre-revised) w.e.f. the date of joining
as per the terms & conditions contained in the
Memorandum cited above.
The appointment is against the post of Assistant
Professor in Electrical and Electronics Engineering
created vide order No. 16/250/Creation & Revival of
posts of GEC/DTE/10/2403 dated 12-07-2010 and
subsequently revived vide order No. 16/250/
Creation & Revival of posts of GEC/DTE/10/756
1
2
3
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
791
dated 18-06-2013 (Non-Plan-second post at
Sr. No. 24), vacated by Kum. Jayanthi Prattipati with
effect from 01-01-2016.
Kum. Sneha Ulhas Phadate will be on probation
for a period of two years.
She should join duties within 30 days of the
receipt of this order, failing which this order is
liable to be cancelled without further notice.
She has been declared fit by Medical Board, Goa
Medical College & Hospital, Bambolim vide letter
No. 4/106/84/H/GMC/649 dated 02-12-2016. Her
character and antecedents have been verified and
nothing adverse is reported against her as
conveyed by the Additional District Magistrate,
North Goa, Panaji vide letter No. 2/6/2013-MAG/
VCA/4906 dated 13-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Vivek B. Kamat, Director & ex officio Additional
Secretary (Technical Education).
Porvorim, 23rd December, 2016.
———‹———
Directorate of Art & Culture
__
Order
No. DAC/Acctts/RBB-RBS/Committee/2017/9164
In exercise of powers conferred under clause 5
of the constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa,
the Government is pleased to nominate Shri
Shekhar Ramchandra Khadapkar as the Chairman
of Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa with immediate
effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 2nd January, 2017.
________
Order
No. DAC/Acctts/RBB-RBS/Committee/2017/9165
In exercise of powers conferred under clause 5
of the constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa,
the Government is pleased to nominate
Shri Chandrakant Krishna Gawas, New Vaddem,
Vasco-Goa as the Vice-Chairman of Ravindra
Bhavan, Baina-Goa with immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 2nd January, 2017.
Order
No. DAC/Acctts/RBB-RBS/Committee/2017/9166
In exercise of powers conferred under clause
7(vii) of the constitution of Ravindra Bhavan,
Baina-Goa, the Government is pleased to nominate
following members on the General Council of
Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa with immediate effect.
1. Shri Sanjay Vishnu Shetye, Vilaxan, Next to
Jain Temple, Chicalim, Vasco-Goa.
2. Shri Sanjay Vasant Satardekar, Near Desterro
Church, Desterro, Vasco-Goa.
3. Shri
Alexander
A.
Pachecho,
Near
Government High School, Headland, Sada,
Mormugao-Goa.
4. Shri Dhanu Babusha Dicholkar, Near Ganapati
Temple, Sanmolem, Baina, Vasco-Goa.
5. Shri Sham Krishna Chari, Sasmolem, Baina,
Vasco-Goa.
6. Smt. Nayana Nitin Bandekar, “Bandekar
Mansion”, Opposite Damodar Temple,
Vasco-Goa.
7. Shri Atmaram Govind Narvekar, Non Mon
Bandar, Vasco-Goa.
8. Shri Umesh Kashinath Salgaonkar, Driver Hill,
Vasco-Goa.
9. Shri Gildo Benicio Godinho, Mangor Hill,
Vasco-Goa.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 2nd January, 2017.
________
Order
No. DAC/Acctts/RBB-RBS/Committee/2017/9167
In exercise of powers conferred under clause 5
of the constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali
the Government is pleased to nominate
Shri Anand Kanekar, Sankhali-Goa as the Vice-
-Chairman of Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali-Goa with
immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 2nd January, 2017.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
792
Order
No. DAC/Acctts/RBB-RBS/Committee/2017/9168
In exercise of powers conferred under clause
7(vii) of the constitution of Ravindra Bhavan,
Sankhali, the Government is pleased to nominate
following members on the General Council of
Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali-Goa with immediate
effect.
1. Shri Upendra Karpe, Housing Board, Sankhali-
Goa.
2. Shri Kalidas Gauns, Naveli, Sankhali-Goa.
3. Shri Abhay Jog, Gaonkarwada, Surla, Post
Sankhali-Goa.
4. Shri Suresh Kamat, Gaonkarwada, Kudnem,
Sankhali-Goa.
5. Shri Rohidas Kansekar, Panaswadi, Naveli,
Sankhali-Goa.
6. Shri Gajanan Desai, Housing Board, Sankhali-
Goa.
7. Shri Rajendra Shetye, Vasant Nagar, Sankhali-
Goa.
8. Shri Agnel D’Silva, Near ICICI ATM, Gokulwadi,
Sankhali-Goa.
9. Shri Atmaram Desai, Near Ajoba Temple,
Honda, Post Sankhali-Goa.
10. Shir Umesh Sarnaik, Desai Nagar, Sankhali-
Goa.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 2nd January, 2017.
________
Order
No. DAC/Acctts/RGKM/Committee/2016-17/9169
Government is pleased to appoint Secretary,
Art & Culture as the Chairman of the following
Institutions under the Administrative Control of
this Directorate with immediate effect.
1. Kala Academy, Panaji-Goa.
2. Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali-Goa.
3. Ravindra Bhavan, Curchorem-Goa.
4. Rajiv Gandhi Kala Mandir, Ponda-Goa.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 2nd January, 2017.
Department of Civil Aviation
Directorate of Civil Aviation
__
Addendum
No. DOCA/EST/Appt. Dy. Col/18/16-17/925
Read: Order No. DOCA/EST/Appt. Dy. Col/18/16-
17/509 dated 1st December, 2016.
The following shall be added in the above
referred order.
The Cabinet in its XXXXIVth meeting held on 16-
12-2016 has accorded ex-post facto approval for
appointment of Shri N. D. Agarwal as Advisor in
the Directorate of Civil Aviation for a period of 4
months from 1st December 2016 to 31st March 2017
to expedite the disbursal of compensation amount
in respect to Mopa Airport Land Acquisition
awards. He shall be paid a lumpsum amount of
Rs. 50,000 per month in addition to pension and he
will be provided a vehicle to be hired from GTDC.
The expenditure shall be debited from the
following Budget Head:
Demand No. 84 (Airport)
3053 — Civil Aviation;
02 — Airport;
800 — Other Expenditure;
01 — Establishment of Airport Cell (Plan);
50 — Other charges.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Dr. S. Shanbhogue, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Civil Aviation).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Fisheries
Directorate of Fisheries
__
Order
No. DF/ENF/ORDER/2016-17
In exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 15
of the Goa Daman and Diu Fisheries Rules, 1981
and in supersession of the Government Notification
Nos. 1-34-73-FHS-Vol.II(a) and 1-34-73-FSH-Vol.II(b)
both dated 22-07-1982 published in the Official
Gazette, Series II No. 18 dated 29-07-1982. The
Government of Goa hereby authorise the Officers
specified in column (2) of the table below to
exercise the powers under various provisions of
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
793
the said Rules as specified against the
corresponding entries in column (3) of the table
below:
Table
Sr.
Officer
Provisions of the Goa,
No.
Daman and Diu
Fisheries Rules, 1981
1. Deputy Director, Direc-
torate of Fisheries
2. Superintendent of
Fisheries, Directorate
of Fisheries
3. Assistant Superinten-
dent of Fisheries,
Directorate of Fisheries
4. Fisheries Officer,
Directorate of Fisheries
5. Police Inspector
6. Police Sub-Inspector
7. Assistant Police Sub-
Inspector
8. Head Constable
9. Mamlatdar
10. Joint Mamlatdar
11. Block Development
Officer (B.D.O.)
This Notification shall come into force with
immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Dr. (Smt.) Shamila Monteiro, Director & ex officio
Joint Secretary (Fisheries).
Panaji, 2nd January, 2017.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Forest
__
Order
No. 9/3/2016/FOR/7
Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed
for appointment of 08 Forest Surveyors on contract
basis for a period of four months on a fixed
remuneration of Rs. 18,000/- per month, for carrying
out works of Private Forest identification &
demarcation in the State of Goa as per the directives
of Hon’ble National Green Tribunal, Western Zone,
Pune.
The expenditure shall be debitable to the Budget
Head Under Demand No. 68 APO 2016-17 (State
Plan) 101—Forest Conservation Development
& Regeneration) 13—Forest Conservation &
Development.
This issues with concurrence of Finance (R&C)
Department vide their U.O. No.1400028306 dated
21-10-2016 and approval of the Council of Ministers
in the cabinet meeting held on 30-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Shaila G. Bhosle, Under Secretary (Forests).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Home
Home—General Division
__
Order
No. 9/1/2014-HD (G)/4019
Read: Letter No. 13/01/2001/IGP/Vol. V/1570 dated
15-12-2016.
Whereas, it has been informed by the Inspector
General of Prisons that the entire establishment of
Sub Jail, Sada at Vasco, Goa needs immediate
repairs/renovation work due to which there is an
urgent need of shifting of the inmates/prisoners to
the Modern Central Jail at Colvale, Bardez, Goa as
an interim arrangement till the P.W.D. carries out
the repair/renovation work so as to prevent any
threat to the safety and security of the inmates/
prisoners;
And whereas, the Chairman of the Board of
Visitors and Hon’ble Principal District & Sessions
Judge, South Goa, Margao in his report dated
26-10-2016 on his surprise visit to the said Jail
observed that the walls of the cells of both male
and female had dampness and cracks and there is
a possibility of even the walls collapsing and
endangering the lives of the prisoners, besides
likelihood of escape;
And whereas, the Executive Engineer of P.W.D.
has informed that the entire first floor is vacant as
one of the walls had collapsed in July, 2016 due to
dampness in rainy season and seepage of toilet
water. The entire building requires to be repaired
on an urgent basis and this requires the entire Sub
Jail to be vacated for at least a period of six months.
Now therefore, in view of the safety and security
to the life of the inmates/prisoners of the Sub Jail
Sada, Vasco-Goa, the Government hereby directs
Sub-rules (2) and (3) of
rule 3, sub-rule (3) of
rule 4, rule 9, sub-rule
(2) of rule 10, sub-rules
(5), (7), (8) and (11) of
rule 11, sub-rules (2)
and (3) of rule 12, and
rule 13.
Sub-rules (2) and (3) of
rule 3, sub-rule (3) of
rule 4, rule 9, sub-rule
(2) of rule 10, sub-rules
(5), (7), (8) and (11) of
rule 11, sub-rules (2)
and (3) of rule 12.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
794
the Inspector General of Prisons to shift the entire
establishment alongwith the inmates/prisoners
from the Sub Jail, Sada, Vasco-Goa to the Modern
Central Jail at Colvale, Bardez, Goa by making all
the necessary arrangements in accordance with
the law and Prisons Manual and after following
due procedure for an initial period of six months.
The Inspector General of Prisons shall strictly
ensure the safety and security of the prisoners,
management of inventories etc. during the shifting
process. Further, the entire shifting process shall
be closely monitored and supervised by the
Inspector General of Prisons.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Neetal P. Amonkar, Under Secretary (Home).
Porvorim, 30th December, 2016.
________
Order
No. 25/2/2017-HD(G)/Gen. Assembly Elec./75
Sub.: Constitution of State Level Co-ordination Group for deployment of CAPFs in connection with the
Assembly Election-2017 in Goa.
Sanction of the Government is hereby accorded to the constitution of the following “State Level
Co-ordination Group” for better co-ordination and proper liaison in respect of deployment of CAPFs in
connection with the Asembly Election-2017 in the State of Goa with following composition:-
Sr.
Name of Officer & Designation
Phone number/fax/e-mail
Appointed as
No.
1
2
3
4
1.
Shri Vimal A. Gupta, IPS, Dy. Inspector
Off: 0832-2423606
Head of the
General of Police
Fax: 0832-2436925
Group/State
Mob: 7875756007
Level Co-ordination
e-mail: [email protected]
Group.
2.
Shri Kartik Kashyap, IPS, Superintendent
Off: 0832-2416100
Member.
of Police, Election Cell (North-Goa)
Fax: 0832-2416243
Mob: 7875756017
e-mail: [email protected]
3.
Smt. Chandan Chaudhary, IPS,
Off: 0832-2426220
Member.
Commandant 1st, 2nd & 3rd IRBn
Fax: 0832-2425220
Mob: 7875756013
e-mail:
[email protected]
4.
Smt. Priyanka Kashyap, Superintendent
Off: 0832-2425536
Member.
of Police (Special Branch)
Fax: 0832-2425536
Mob: 7875756016
e-mail: [email protected]
5.
Shri Vishram U. Borkar, GPS,
Off: 0832-2428124
Member.
Superintendent of Police (HQ)
Fax: 0832-2422672
Mob: 7875756010
e-mail: [email protected]
6.
Shri Shekhar Prabhudesai, GPS,
Off: 0832-2732218
Member.
Superintendent of Police,
Fax: 0832-2733864
Election Cell (South-Goa)
Mob: 7875756009
e-mail: [email protected]
7.
Shri Bosco George, Superintendent
Off: 0832-2428623
Member.
of Police (Security)
Fax: 0832-2428623
Mob: 7875756008
e-mail:
[email protected]
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
795
8.
(---------------------------------------)
—
Member.
Official from each of CAPFs to
be deployed in the State of Goa
9.
Shri Mohan S. Naik, GPS, Superintendent
Off: 0832-2428266
Member
of Police, Election Cell (PHQ)
Fax: 0832-2428266
Secretary.
Mob: 7875756018
e-mail: [email protected]
It is further ordered that the above Group would co-ordinate deployment of CAPFs/SAPs/IRBNs during
Assembly Election-2017 in the State of Goa, so as to ensure timely de-induction and assist in making
necessary arrangements for accommodation, transport & other logistics to the forces.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Neetal P. Amonkar, Under Secretary (Home-II).
Porvorim, 6th January, 2017.
________
1
2
3
4
Notification
No. 2/86/82-HD(G) Part II/53
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause
(d) of clause (8) of Section 2 of the Official Secrets
Act, 1923 (Central Act 19 of 1923) (hereinafter called
the “said Act”), read with Notification No. II/21019/
/2/89-IS(US.DII) dated 21-8-1989 of the Government
of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, the
Government of Goa hereby declares GAIL’s
installation SV-4G Curchirem encompassing an area
of 2622 sq. mtrs bearing survey No. 147/1, 148/8 &
148/9 in the Village of Curchirem, Bicholim, North
Goa, Goa and SV-5G Marcaim, encompassing an
area of 2860 sq. mtrs. bearing survey No. 391 in the
Village of Marcaim, Ponda, North Goa, Goa,
respectively to be prohibited place for the purpose,
of the said Act.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Neetal P. Amonkar, Under Secretary (Home).
Porvorim, 5th January, 2017.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Information Technology
__
Order
No. 5(8)/2008/DoIT/Per-Pra Vol Dy Dir (Tech)/1325
Read: File No. SAG-03/ADM-CO/PF-PV/DEPU/2014
Pursuant to the proposal from the Sports
Authority of Goa, Shri Praveen R. Volvotkar,
Dy. Director (Technical), Department of Information
Techlology shall hold the additional charge as
Director (Administration) in the Sports Authority
of Goa until the further order.
This issued with the approval of Competent
Authority.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Ameya Abhyankar, (IAS), Director (IT).
Panaji, 30th December, 2016.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Labour
__
Order
No. 24/18/2012-LAB/904
Read: 1) Government Order No. 24/18/2012-Lab/
/348 dated 07-05-2013.
2) Corrigendum No. 24/18/2012-Lab/84 dated
29-01-2014.
3) Government Order No. 24/18/2012-Lab/
/477 dated 21-08-2014.
4) Government Order No. 24/18/2012/759
dated 21-08-2014.
Ex-post-facto sanction of the Government is
hereby accorded for extension of re-employment of
Shri S. A. Deshprabhu as Advisor to the office of
the Commissioner, Labour and Employment, Panaji
for a period from 23-05-2016 to 31-08-2016.
2) His pay shall be fixed in terms of Central Civil
Service (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners)
Order, 1986. The Officer shall be entitled to draw
TA/DA as admissible to Group ‘A’ post when he is
required to go out of headquarters on official duties.
The officer shall also be entitled for office vehicle
for travel from residence to office and back and the
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
796
expenditure on the salary shall be debited to the
following Budget Head:
2230 — Labour and Employment;
01 — Labour;
103 — General Labour Welfare;
06 — Enforcement of Building and Other
Construction Workers Act (Plan);
01 — Salaries.
3) His engagement is subject to execution of
agreement with terms and conditions stipulated
therein.
4) The Finance (Revenue & Control) Department
has concurred vide their U. O. No. 1463422 dated
05-10-2016.
5) This issues with the approval of the Cabinet
in its XXXXIIIrd Meeting held on 25-11-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Shivanee S. Borkar, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 26th December, 2016.
________
Order
No. 24/3/87-LAB-Part-I/04
Government is pleased to order the transfer and
posting of the following Insurance Medical Officers
in E.S.I. Scheme, under the Office of the
Commissioner Labour & Employment with
immediate effect as under:
Sr. Name of the
Present place
Place of posting
No.
Insurance
of posting
on transfer
Medical Officer
1
2
3
4
1. Dr. Sunil
E.S.I. Dispensary,
E.S.I. Dispensary,
Kavlekar
Honda
Corlim.
2. Dr. Reena
E.S.I. Dispensary,
E.S.I. Hospital,
Choudhury Corlim
Margao.
The transfer of the official at Sr. No. 1 is made at
his own request and hence not entitled to claim
TA/DA and joining time.
This order shall come into force with immediate
effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 2nd January, 2017.
Notification
No. 28/1/2016-LAB/Part-IV/867
The following award passed by the Labour
Court-II at Panaji-Goa on 12-10-2016 in reference
No. LC-II/IT/13/10 is hereby published as required
by Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act 14 of 1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 29th November, 2016.
______
IN THE LABOUR COURT-II
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar,
Hon’ble Presiding Officer)
Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/13/10
Ms. Sulaksha K. Naik,
Rep. by the General Secretary,
Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh,
G-5, Macedo Appts.,
Tisk, Ponda-Goa.
… Workman/Party I
V/s
M/s Curchorem Cacora
Municipal Council,
Curchorem-Goa.
… Employer/Party II
Workman/Party I represented by Adv. Shri P.
Gaonkar.
Employer/Party II represented by Adv. Shri A. V.
Nigalye.
Panaji, Dated: 12-10-2016
AWARD
1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause
(d) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), the
Government of Goa by Order dated 23-08-2010,
bearing No. 28/23/2010-LAB referred the following
dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal
of Goa. The Hon’ble Presiding Officer, Industrial
Tribunal-cum-Labour Court in turn assigned the
present dispute to this Labour Court-II vide his
order dated nil.
“(1) Whether the action of M/s.Curchorem
Cacora Municipal Council, Cacora, Goa, in
not regularizing the services of Ms. Sulaksha
K. Naik, Community Organisor, on the post
of LDC and instead recruiting a fresh
candidate on the said post is legal and
justified?
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
797
(2) If not, what relief the workperson is entitled
to?”
2. On receipt of the reference, a case was
registered under No. LC-II/IT/13/10 and registered
A/D notice was issued to the Parties. In pursuance
to the said notice, the Parties put in their
appearance. The Workman/Party-I (for short
‘Workperson’), filed her Statement of Claim on
24-09-2010 at Exb-3. The facts of the case in brief
as pleaded by the Workperson are that she is
employed with the Employer/Party II (for short,
‘Employer’) as a ‘Community Organizer’ from
06-03-2003 without any break in service. She stated
that her services were extended by the Employer
on regular intervals. She submitted that although
she was designated as “Community Organizer”,
her main duties were clerical and technical in
nature. She stated that on 18-09-2006, the Employer
resolved to regularize her services as she was
continuously working with the Employer since
2003. She stated that in furtherance to the said
resolution No. 235, the Chief Officer of the Employer
addressed a letter dated 27-12-2006 to the Director
of Municipal Administration, Panaji, Goa,
requesting for regularization of her service on the
post of LDC. She stated that on 24-01-2007, the
Employer unanimously resolved to absorb her as
and when the vacancy arises. She stated that the
office of Director of Municipal Administration
replied to the Employer’s letter dated 27-12-2006,
by stating that as the Workperson was not
appointed by them, her service cannot be
regularized against the vacant post of LDC and
that the scheme viz. S.J.S.R.Y. does not provide for
posting of staff in the municipalities by the
Directorate of Municipal Administration / Goa State
Urban Development Agency. She submitted that
thus the Employer did not regularize her services
in the then vacant post.
3. She stated that on 11-01-2008, the Employer
unanimously resolved to increase her salary from
Rs. 4000/- to Rs. 5000/-p.m. She stated that on
02-06-2008, she made an application to the
Employer to regularize her services in the post of
LDC, which fell vacant on account of death of
Mr. Vinay Naik. She stated that she belongs to OBC
category and the vacant post of LDC should be
filled up from the same category. She stated that
she wrote another letter to the Employer on
28-08-2008, requesting to regularize her services.
She stated that by the said letter, she stated that
she was doing all the work of LDC and that vide
resolution No.124, the Employer had resolved to
give her first preference, in case of any vacancy.
She stated that she had also highlighted
the resolution No. 313 of the Employer dated
24-01-2007, resolving to regularize her services. She
stated that on 27-06-2009, the Employer published
an advertisement for filing up the post of LDC in
the newspaper. She stated that the Employer has
also reserved the said vacant post of LDC for OBC
category. She stated that on 10-07-2009, she once
again made a written request to the Employer to
regularize her services in the post of LDC in
accordance with its resolution No. 313. She stated
that the Employer directed her to file a proper
application for the post of LDC vide its letter dated
13-07-2009. She stated that she had made a formal
application to the post of LDC vide her application
dated 14-07-2009.
4. She stated that from August, 2012, she is being
forced to sign on the muster roll maintained for
contract workers. She stated that vide her letter
dated 06-08-2012, she requested the Employer to
allow her to sign on the regular muster roll as she
has been signing on the same since 2003. She
stated that on 06-08-2012 itself, the Employer issued
a warning letter to her for not signing the muster
roll maintained for the contract employees. She
stated that she replied to the said warning letter,
vide her letter dated 14-08-2012. She submitted
that it is not open for the Employer to change her
service condition without recourse to law.
5. She stated that she therefore raised a dispute
before the Labour Commissioner, vide her letter
dated 12-07-2009, through the Gomantak Mazdoor
Sangh union. She stated that on 12-08-2009, the
Labour Commissioner initiated the conciliation
proceedings and directed both the parties to
maintain status quo, after admitting the matter in
conciliation. She stated that the Employer has
however, did not honour the said directions given
by the Labour Commissioner. She stated that the
conciliation proceedings ended in a failure on
16-02-2010.
6. She submitted that the Employer failed to
justify by not regularizing her services in the post
of LDC, when she was eligible, as also had requisite
work experience for the said post. She submitted
that the Employer failed to consider the fact that
in the past, it has regularized the services of Mrs.
Shanta Ambi and Shri. Kiran Kakodkar in the post
of LDC, by absorbing them in the service. She
submitted that the Employer failed to justify by
not regularizing her services, when the Employer,
vide its resolution No. 313 dated 24-01-2007, had
resolved to regularize her services, as and when,
the vacancy arises. She submitted that the
Employer has failed to justify by offering the post
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
798
of LDC to a fresh candidate, when it had already
resolved to regularize her services in the vacant
post of LDC. She submitted that the appointment of
a new person in the said vacant post of LDC, even
after directing to maintain status quo is in violation
of Sec. 33 of the I.D. Act, 1947. She submitted that
the Chief Officer of the Employer was duty bound
to take steps to give effect to the resolution of the
Employer in terms of Sec.74 (b) of the Goa
Municipalities Act, 1968. She submitted that the
Employer erred to follow the procedure established
by law, in deciding the matter of regularization of
her services. She submitted that in terms of Sec. 73
of the Goa Municipalities Act, 1968, the Director is
authorized to absorb any servant in the services of
the Council. She submitted that the Employer failed
to justify its action in blindly following the
representation made by the office of the Director of
Municipal Administration that they were not
authorized for posting of staff in the municipalities.
She submitted that all the matters of recruitment
are well within the jurisdiction of the Director
under the Goa Municipalities Act, 1968. She
submitted that in view of the doctrine of promissory
estoppel, the Employer is stopped from denying
the benefits of the said promise to her. She
submitted that owing to the said promise given to
her by the Employer, vide resolution No. 313, she
never applied elsewhere for a better employment.
She submitted that the Employer has violated its
own promise, upon which, she had acted and
accordingly believed that she would be absorbed
and would be taken up in the post of LDC with the
Employer. She submitted that she was right in
legitimately expecting the Employer to keep its
word. She submitted that in view of the doctrine
of legitimate expectation, she is entitled to be
absorbed in service and posted as LDC with the
Employer. She submitted that the resolution No. 313
was passed with due authority and is valid. She
submitted that non-implementation of the said
resolution, even after following the due procedure,
shows malafide on the part of the Employer against
her. She therefore prayed that the action of the
Employer in not regularizing her services in the
post of LDC be declared as illegal, improper and
unjustified and direct the Employer to regularize
her services in the post of LDC with the Employer
Council.
7. The Employer resisted the claim of the
Workman by filing her written statement on
28-03-2011 at Exb. 9. The Employer, as and by way
of preliminary objection submitted that the
reference is not maintainable and is liable to be
rejected as there is/was no employer-employee
relationship between herself and the Workperson.
The Employer stated that the Workperson was an
employee of Community Development Society and
not herself. The Employer submitted that the
Community Development Society is not an
‘industry’ within the meaning of Sec 2 (j) of the I.D.
Act, 1947. The Employer submitted that the matter
referred to this Hon’ble Court is not an ‘industrial
dispute’ within the meaning of Sec. 2 (k) of the I.D.
Act, 1947. The Employer submitted that the Party I
is not a ‘workman’ within the meaning of Sec. 2 (s)
of the said Act. The Employer stated that the
Workperson is/was not employed in any industry
to do manual, unskilled, skilled, technical,
operational or supervisory work for hire or reward.
8. The Employer submitted that the Workperson
was employed on contract and her appointment
was for fixed tenure. The Employer stated that the
Workperson has/had no right to any post. The
Employer submitted that the recruitment in the
organization of the Employer is governed by the
Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 and the rules made
thereunder. The Employer submitted that no
recruitment whether by way of appointment,
promotion or regularization can be made to the
posts in the council without following the
provisions and the process prescribed by law. The
Employer therefore submitted that the claim of the
Workperson for regularization is therefore
untenable. The Employer submitted that the
demand raised by the Workperson is for
regularization in the employment of the Employer.
The Employer submitted that such a claim is not
an ‘industrial dispute’ u/s 2-A of the I.D. Act, 1947.
The Employer submitted that a demand of this
nature has to be espoused by a substantial number
of workmen in the establishment. The Employer
submitted that since the demand is not raised or
espoused by a substantial number of workmen, the
claim cannot be construed as a valid industrial
dispute.
9. The Employer stated that it is a municipal
council constituted under the Goa Municipalities
Act, 1968. The Employer stated that its affairs are
governed by the provisions of the said Act, the
rules made thereunder and the byelaws. The
Employer stated that the appointment of its Officers
and employees are governed by the provisions of
the Goa Municipalities Act, 1968. The Employer
stated that the appointment of Officers and
servants in the council can be made only to the
post created by following the procedure prescribed
in the said Act. The Employer stated that the
qualifications, pay, allowances and other conditions
of service and the method of recruitment are
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
799
determined by the said Act, rules and the orders
made by the Director of Municipal Administration,
Government of Goa. The Employer stated that
neither post can be created nor appointment can
be made thereto, without the sanction or prior
approval of the Director.
10. The Employer stated that the Government of
India has framed several schemes such as Swarna
Jayanti Shahari Rozgar Yojna (SJSRY), Antodaya
Anna Yojna (AAY) etc. for poverty alleviation in the
urban area of the country. The Employer stated
that for identifying the beneficiaries under these
programmes and for proper delivery of the benefits
of the schemes, the Government has created special
purpose vehicles at the centre and in the states.
The Employer stated that the Goa State Urban
Development Agency is the nodal agency for the
said purpose in the state of Goa. The Employer
stated that the said agency is registered under the
Societies Registration Act, 1860. The Employer
stated that in the municipal areas in Goa, there are
community development societies, which have
been constituted for the said purposes. The
Employer stated that a community development
society is also constituted in the municipal area of
Curchorem, Cacora and like other societies, it is
also a distinct and independent entity. The
Employer stated that the aims and objects of the
community development society is to identify the
beneficiaries of the schemes and proper delivery of
the benefits to the beneficiaries. The Employer
stated that its Chairperson is the Chairperson of
the said Community Development Society and its
Chief Officer is its Project Officer.
11. The Employer stated that the Workperson
was employed with the Community Development
Society of Curchorem, Cacora as Community
Organizer with effect from 06-03-2003 for a period
of three months. The Employer stated that on
completion of her tenure, she was periodically
issued appointment letters, appointing her on
contract basis for fixed tenure. The Employer stated
that the Workperson was not appointed to any
sanctioned post. The Employer stated that the
Workperson was also not in its employment. The
Employer therefore submitted that the Workperson
has no right to any post in the council or to
continue in the employment of the community
development society. The Employer stated that the
work of community organizer involves personal
initiative, motivation and leadership. The Employer
stated that some of the important responsibilities
of the community organizers are facilitating and
promoting, voluntarism and organizing community
structures/groups, guiding and assisting the
community in need assessment and formulating
plans, working with the community to implement
and monitor the programme, liaise with the sectoral
departments to establish initial contacts with
the community, facilitating community skill
enhancement through interactive experiences,
organizing community level training and
information sharing, identification of suitable
beneficiaries for self-employment ventures from
municipal area, preparation of the applications for
finance after approval of the beneficiaries name by
the CDS, and subsequent follow-up with the ULBs/
Banks/Administration until final disposal of the
application, regular follow-up with the finances
beneficiaries to monitor the progress of the self-
employment venture as also timely repayment of
loans etc., any other function as may be assigned
to her from time to time by GSUDA.
12. The Employer stated that though the
Workperson had no right to the post or employment
in the council, the Employer passed the resolutions
to regularize her service in its organization. The
Employer stated that accordingly a proposal was
made to the Director of Municipal Administration
to accord approval for employment of the
Workperson with them. The Employer stated that
however, the said proposal was rejected by the
Director. The Employer stated that the said
resolutions do not confer any right of employment
of a Workperson. The Employer stated that no offer
or letter of appointment was ever issued to her and
she cannot seek any benefit of the said resolution.
The Employer stated that unless an offer or letter
of appointment is issued to a candidate, no right
of employment or lien to the post vests in him. The
Employer stated that a post of LDC fell vacant in
its Municipal council in the year 2009. The
Employer stated that by letter dated 10-07-2009,
the Workperson made a claim for regularization to
the said post. The Employer stated that it had
replied to the said representation, by its letter
dated 13-07-2009, whereby she was informed that
she may file a proper application in response to
the advertisement for the post of LDC.
13. The Employer stated that in June, 2009, it
had issued advertisement for filing up the said
post of LDC. The Employer stated that the
Workperson applied for the said post and her
candidature was duly considered. The Employer
stated that however, she was not selected by the
departmental selection committee, consisting of
its Chief Officer, Chairperson of the council and
the representative of the Directorate of Municipal
Administration. The Employer stated that the best
available candidate was selected to the said post,
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
800
by the selection committee, after following the due
process of recruitment. The Employer stated that
in the meantime, the Workperson approached the
office of Dy. Labour Commissioner, Margao-Goa,
who initiated conciliation proceedings in the
matter, which ended in failure. The Employer
denied the overall case of the Workperson and
prayed for dismissal of the present reference.
14. Thereafter, the Workperson filed her rejoinder
on 08-04-2011 at Exb.10. The Workperson, by way
of her Re-joinder, confirms and reiterates all the
submissions and averments made by her in her
claim statement to be true and correct and denies
all the statements and averments made by the
Employer in the Written Statement, which are
contrary to the statements and averments made by
her. The Workperson submitted that the Employer
was directly controlling and supervising her
activities and duties, which goes a long way to
show that there was an employer-employee
relationship. The Workperson submitted that
moreover, she was directly paid by the Employer
without the involvement of the Community
Development Society. The Workperson submitted
that it is immaterial, whether the Community
Development Society is an ‘industry’ within the
meaning of Sec. 2 (j) of the I.D. Act, 1947. The
Workperson submitted that it is immaterial,
whether she was appointed on contract basis or
not, as the dispute refers to the action of appointing
another candidate, when the Employer had already
passed a resolution that the Workperson would be
given the first preference in case of vacancy.
15. Based on the pleadings filed by the parties
herein above respectively, this court framed the
following issues on 18-04-2011 at Exb. 11.
1. Whether the Workman/Party I proves that
she is a “workman” as defined u/s 2 (s) of
the I.D. Act, 1947?
2. Whether the Workman/Party I proves that
the action of the Employer/Party II in not
regularizing her services on the post of LDC
and instead recruiting a fresh candidate on
the said post, is illegal and unjustified?
3. Whether the Workman/Party I proves
that the Employer/Party II has violated
Section-33 of the I.D. Act, 1947?
4. Whether the Employer/Party II proves that
the present Order of Reference is not
maintainable in view of the grounds stated
in para- 2 (a), (b), (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h) of the
Written Statement?
5. Whether the Workman is entitled for any
relief?
6. What Order? What Award?
16. My answers to the aforesaid issues are as
under:
(a) Issue No. 1:
In the affirmative.
(b) Issue No. 2:
In the negative.
(c) Issue No. 3:
In the negative.
(d) Issue No. 4:
In the affirmative.
(e) Issue No. 5 & 6:
As per final order.
REASONS
17. Before going to the merits of the case, I would
like to decide first, an application of the Workperson
dated 21-06-2016, filed at the stage, when the matter
was fixed for final arguments. By the said
application, the Workperson prayed for permission
to withdraw and closing the present reference as
no dispute award, by stating that the Employer
Council, in its meeting resolved that the
Workperson would be considered for absorption,
once the post become vacant and that in view of
the assurance given by the Employer, she do not
wish to pursue the matter. No reply has been filed
by the Employer Municipal Council to the aforesaid
application of the Workperson.
I have heard Ld. Rep. Shri P. Gaonkar appearing
for the Workperson as well as Ld. Adv. Shri A. V.
Nigalye appearing for the Employer Council.
18. Undisputedly, the Workperson has filed the
said application, when the present matter was fixed
for final arguments, after both the parties led their
evidence respectively, in pursuance to the issues
framed by this court. More so ever, neither the
application of the Workperson is supported by any
of the terms of settlement etc. nor has it been
signed jointly along with the Employer Council.
The said application of the Workperson is
unilateral. The present reference has been issued
by the Appropriate Government u/s 10 (1) (d) of
the I.D. Act, 1947. This court is therefore duty bound
to answer the reference issued by the Appropriate
Government. In the circumstances, the application
of the Workperson dated 21-06-2016 at Exb. 47 for
permission to withdraw and closing the reference
as no dispute award, is without any merits. Hence,
the said application of the Workperson is hereby
rejected.
I have given opportunities to Ld. Rep. Shri P.
Gaonkar, appearing for the Workperson as well as
Ld. Adv. Shri. A.V. Nigalye, appearing for the
Employer to argue the matter on the merits of the
case. However, both the representatives appearing
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
801
for the respective parties, orally submitted that
they do not wish to argue the matter. I have
carefully perused the entire records of the present
case.
19. Issue No. 1:
The Employer, in its written statement, filed in
the present proceedings, as and by way of
preliminary objections, submitted that the Party I
is not a ‘Workman’ within the meaning of Section
2 (s) of the I.D. Act and that she was not employed
in any industry to do manual, unskilled, skilled,
technical, operational or supervisory work for hire
or reward. The burden to prove that she is a
‘workman’ within the meaning of section 2 (s) of
the I.D. Act, 1947, is therefore on the Workperson
at whose instance the present reference has been
issued by the Appropriate Government.
20. The evidence on record indicates that the
Workperson was initially appointed by the Chief
Officer of the Employer in the capacity of Project
Officer of the Community Development Society,
Curchorem-Goa, as ‘Community Organizer’, purely
on contract basis. The evidence on record further
indicates that the services of the Workperson as
Community Organizer were extended periodically
from time to time. The evidence on record further
indicates that the Workperson is/was performing
the typing work/other work allotted to her by the
Employer, in addition to her duties as Community
Organizer and for that purpose, she was paid an
additional amount of Rs. 12,000/- p.m. by the
Employer through its funds. The evidence on record
further indicates that the Chief Officer of the
Employer Municipality is issuing memorandum as
well as necessary orders from time to time. The
aforesaid evidence on record clearly indicates that
there exist an employer-employee relationship
between the Workperson and the Employer
Municipal Council. The evidence on record further
indicates that the Workperson was predominantly
performing the work of clerical nature as per the
instructions of the Employer Municipal Council in
addition to her own duties as Community
Organizer. It is not in dispute that the Employer
Municipal Council is not an ‘industry’ within the
meaning of Section 2 (j) of the I.D. Act, 1947. This
clearly proves that the Workperson was
predominantly performing the work of clerical
nature in the Employer Municipal Council and as
such the Party I is a ‘workman’ within the meaning
of Section 2 (s) of the I.D. Act, 1947. It is therefore
held that the Party I proved that she is a ‘workman’
within the meaning of Section 2 (s) of the I.D. Act.
The issue No. 1 is therefore answered in the
affirmative.
21. Issue No. 4:
I am deciding the issue No. 4 first prior to the
issue No. 2 and 3 as the said issue No. 4 goes to the
very root jurisdiction of this court to adjudicate the
present reference.
22. The Employer, in its written statement, filed
in the present reference, pleaded that there
is/was no employer-employee relationship between
the Party I and herself that neither the Party I is
not a ‘workman’ within a meaning of Section 2 (s)
of the I.D. Act, 1947, nor the dispute referred to
this Hon’ble Court is an ‘industrial dispute’ within
the meaning of Section 2 (k) of the I.D. Act, 1947
and that the dispute raised by the union on
behalf of the Workperson is not an ‘industrial
dispute’ u/s 2-A of the I.D. Act, 1947 as a demand
of this nature has to be espoused by a substantial
number of workmen in the establishment.
23. While deciding the issue No. 1 hereinabove,
I have come to the conclusion and held that there
is/was employer-employee relationship between
the Party I and herself and that the Party I is a
‘Workman’ within the meaning of Section 2 (s) of
the I.D. Act, 1947.
24. Undisputedly, the present reference has been
referred by the appropriate Government in exercise
of its power conferred by clause (d) of sub-section
(1) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947. It is therefore necessary to be seen whether
the Employer can raise objection that what is
referred is not in reality an industrial dispute
at all.
25. In the case of Iqbal Ahmed Kamaruddin
V/s P. L. Muzumdar, reported in 1992 (64) FLR
827, the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay, in para 8
of its Judgment has held as under:
“If what is referred to a Tribunal/Labour Court is
not an Industrial Dispute, it is always open to a
Party to show to the forum that the dispute referred
for adjudication though purported to be an
Industrial Dispute, is in reality not an Industrial
Dispute at all. This has always been recognized as
an exception to the general rule postulated in section
10 (4). It is therefore always permissible for an
Employer to raise an issue as to whether what has
been referred is an Industrial Dispute at all and
there can be no question of the Tribunal being bound
by the order of reference. It is a settled law that the
appropriate Government makes a reference upon the
prima facie view of the matter as to the existence or
apprehension of the Industrial Dispute. It is open to
the Parties to show that what is referred is not in
reality an Industrial Dispute at all”.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
802
26. In the case of Deepak Industries Ltd., and
anr. V/s State of West Bengal, reported in 1975
Lab. I. C. 1153, the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta
has held that “mere negotiations by some officials
of the union with the Employers for conciliations or
executing certain documents on behalf of the
Workman prior to reference are not conclusive proof
of the authority of the Union, to represent the
workman whose dispute it is espousing before the
Tribunal”.
27. The principle laid down by the Hon’ble High
Court of Bombay and the Hon’ble High Court of
Calcutta in their above referred respective cases
are still hold good.The said principle makes it clear
that the Employer is entitled to raise an objection
that the dispute referred is not an ‘Industrial
Dispute’, even after the reference is made by the
Government and the mere fact that the Employer
participated in the conciliation proceedings or did
not raise any objection during the conciliation
proceedings, does not debar the Employer from
raising the objection before the Tribunal in a
reference that the Union has no locus standi to
raise the dispute and hence there is no Industrial
Dispute.
Now it is to be seen whether the reference is
not maintainable because there is no ‘industrial
dispute’ as a demand of regularization in the
employment has to be espoused by a substantial
number of workmen in the establishment.
28. Industrial Dispute envisages a collective
dispute. Unless there is an Industrial Dispute, the
reference made by the Government of Goa is not
maintainable. However, after the introduction of
Section 2-A to the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, an
individual dispute as contemplated under the said
section, is deemed to be an ‘Industrial dispute’
within the meaning of the said Act. Section 2-A
contemplates individual dispute as an Industrial
Dispute when a workman is discharged, dismissed,
retrenched or his services are terminated by the
Employer. However, the dispute involved in the
present case, is as regards non-regularization of
the services of the Workperson on the post of LDC
and instead recruiting a fresh candidate on the
said post and not pertaining to the discharge,
dismissal, retrench or termination of services by
the Employer. Undisputedly, the Gomantak
Mazdoor Sangh has raised the present dispute on
behalf of the Workperson and not by the
Workperson herself in her individual capacity.
However, if the dispute is raised by the Union and
the Employer has challenged its authority to raise
the dispute, the Union must prove its authority by
producing some material evidence before the
Labour Court.
29. In the case of Workmen v/s M/s Dharam Pal
Premchand, reported in AIR 1966 SC 182, the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, has held that,
“When the Workman of an establishment have no
union of their own, some or all of them may join the
union of another establishment belonging to the
same industry and such an union may take up the
cause of a Workman working in the establishment
and it would be an Industrial Dispute.” The Hon’ble
Apex Court, however, further held that, “this Union
should have a representative character vis-à-vis the
employees employed in the establishment of the
Employer. i.e. an appreciable number of workmen
from the concerned establishment must have joined
the said Union”.
30. In the case of J.H. Jadhav v/s. M/s. Forbes
Gokak Ltd., reported in 2005 (104) FLR 1005, the
Hon’ble Apex Court in para 4 of its judgment has
laid down certain test to become a dispute as
‘industrial dispute’ within the meaning of the I.D.
Act, 1947.
4. The definition of “Industrial Dispute” in section
2 (k) of the Act shows that an industrial dispute
means any dispute or difference between an
employer and employers or between employers and
workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which
is connected with the employment or non-
-employment or the terms of the employment or with
the condition of labour, of any person. The definition
has been the subject-matter of several decisions
of this court and the law is well settled. The locus
classicus is the decision in workmen of
M/s. Dharampalpremchand (Saughandi) v. M/s.
Dharampal Premchand (Saughandhi) where it was
held that for the purposes of section 2 (k) it must be
shown that (1) the dispute is connected with the
employment or non-employment of workman, (2) the
dispute between a single workman and his employer
was sponsored or espoused by the Union of
workmen or by a number of workmen. The phrase
“the union” merely indicates the Union to which
the employee belongs even though it may be a Union
of minority of the workmen, (3) the establishment
had no Union on its own and some of the employees
had joined the Union of another establishment
belonging to the same industry. In such a case, it
would be open to that Union to take up the case of
the workmen if it is sufficiently representative of
those workmen, despite the fact that such union
was not exclusively of the workmen working in the
establishment concerned”.
31. In the case of Mellai Cotton Mills V/s Labour
Court, reported in 1965 I LLJ 95, the Hon’ble High
Courtof Madras, has held that, “In the case of
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
803
espousal of the dispute by a union, it is not sufficient
that the union had its membership a substantial
member of workmen from the establishment in
which the concerned workmen were employed”. The
Hon’ble High Court held that, “It must be further
shown that a substantial members of such workmen
participated in or acted together and arrived at an
understanding by a resolution or by other means
and collectively supported the dispute.”
The principle laid down by the Hon’ble Apex
Court as well as Hon’ble High Court of Madras in
its aforesaid judgments respectively is well
recognized.
32. In the case in hand, undisputedly, the
Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh has raised the present
dispute on behalf of the Workperson, vide its letter
dated 12-07-2009 (Exb.W/17) pertaining to the non-
regularization of her services by the Employer on
the post of LDC and instead recruiting a fresh
candidate on the said post. The Workperson, during
the course of her cross-examination, admitted that
she was not the member of the Gomantak Mazdoor
Sangh, who has raised the present dispute on her
behalf. The oral evidence of the Workperson on
record indicates that the Employer Municipal
Council is having 11 labourers, 5 drivers, 5 LDCs
and two peons. However, she do not know whether
the said employees of the Employer are the
members of the Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh. Neither
the General Secretary of the said union nor any
office bearer of the union examined before this
court to give evidence that the union had the
authority or locus standi to espouse the dispute of
the Workperson. There is no evidence on record to
show that as to how many employees of the
Employer Municipal Council had become the
members of the said union so as to give
representative character to the said union. Infact,
there is no evidence at all to show that any of the
employees of the Employer Municipal Council was
the member of the union, leave aside substantial
or appreciable number. The union has also failed
to produce on record any document in the form of
resolution or otherwise to show that the
Workperson had authorized the union to espouse
her cause by raising the dispute nor there is any
document in the form of resolution or otherwise to
show that the office bearers of the union were
authorized to take up the cause of the Workperson.
Therefore, it cannot be held that the Gomantak
Mazdoor Sangh could represent the Workperson so
as to transform the dispute between the
Workperson and the Employer into an ‘industrial
dispute’. Hence, it cannot be held that the union
had the authority or locus standi to espouse the
cause of the Workperson, the dispute referred by
the Government therefore does not partake the
character of an industrial dispute. In the
circumstances, the reference made by the
Government is bad-in-law. It is therefore held that
the Employer has succeeded in proving that the
dispute referred for adjudication is not an
‘industrial dispute’, within the meaning of Section
2 (k) of the I.D. Act, 1947. The issue No. 4 is therefore
answered in the affirmative.
33. Issue No. 2:
While deciding issue No. 4 hereinabove, I have
come to the conclusion and held that the reference
made by the Government is bad-in-law being
incompetent. The question of deciding the
remaining issues does not arise at all.
Even assuming for the sake of arguments that
the reference made by the Government competent,
the Workperson has also failed to make out a case
for grant of relief for the following reasons.
34. In the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka
v/s. Umadevi, reported in 2006 II CLR 261, the
constitutional bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court
of India, in para 48 of its judgment observed as
under:
“…..there is no Fundamental Right in those who
have been employed on daily or temporarily or on
contract basis, to claim that they have a right to be
absorbed in service. As has been held by this Court,
they cannot be said to be holders of a post, since, a
regular appointment could be made only by making
appointments consistent with the requirements of
Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The right to
be treated equally with the other employees
employed on daily wages, cannot be extended to a
claim for equal treatment with those who were
regularly employed. That would be treating unequals
as equals. It cannot also be relied on to claim a right
to be absorbed in service even though they have
never been selected in terms of the relevant
recruitment rules….”
35. In another case of Union of India and Ors.
v/s. A.S. Pillai and Ors., reported in 2011 1
CLR 43, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,
reiterated the ratio laid down in its aforesaid
constitutional bench judgment in the case of
Umadevi (Supra).
36. In the case of Municipal Council v/s. Arvind
S/o. Keshavrao Bhusari & Anr., reported in 2011
II CLR 770, the Hon’ble High of Bombay, after
relying upon the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble
Apex Court in its aforesaid case of Umadevi (supra)
in para 10 of its judgment held as under:
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
804
“10. In my view, the order, in so far as it directs
that the respondent should be considered for
regularization against any post in any other cadre,
is wholly unsustainable. The employment under the
Municipal Council is a public employment governed
by the Rules and Regulations and also the directions
issued by the State Government from time to time.
The retinue of the employees of the Municipal
Council is sanction by the State Government through
the Director of Municipal Administration and
therefore for appointment of any employee in any
cadre, the same can be done by adhering to the
statutory rules and regulation.”
The principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex
Court, in its aforesaid judgments are still hold good
and equally applicable to the case in hand.
37. In the case in hand, the Workperson was
appointed by the Chief Officer of the Employer,
being Project Officer of the Community
Development Society, Curchorem, Goa, as
‘Community Organizer’, purely on contract basis
and specifically on a condition precedent that the
Workperson shall not claim any regularization of
services or claim seniority on the above said post.
The evidence on record indicates that the services
of the Workperson was thereafter extended from
time to time by the Chairman/Chairperson of the
Community Development Society, Curchorem-Goa.
The evidence on record indicates that since
the Workperson is/was performing the typing
work/other work allotted to her by the Employer in
addition to her duties as Community Organizer,
she was paid an extra remuneration by the
Employer through its funds. The evidence on record
indicates that the Workperson was not employed
in any vacant post by the Employer by following
the due procedure and law. The evidence on record
indicates that the Chief Officer of the Employer
Municipality, vide its letter dated 27-12-2006
(Exb.W/4) requested for regularizing the services
of the Workperson on the post of LDC as and when
the vacancy arises in pursuance to the resolution
taken by the Employer Council in its meeting held
on 18-11-2006. The evidence on record indicates
that the Additional Director of Municipal
Administration, vide her letter dated 12-02-2007
(Exb.38), rightly rejected the proposal of the
Employer for regularization of services of the
Workperson against the vacant post of LDC in the
Employer Council. The evidence on record indicates
that the Workperson had applied to the post of
LDC in pursuance to the advertisement issued in
the month of June, 2009 by the Employer Council.
The evidence on record further indicates that
however, she was not selected by the departmental
selection committee of the Employer Council.
Thereafter, the union raised the present dispute
on behalf of the Workperson for regularization
of her service, vide its letter dated 12-07-2009
(Exb.W/17).
38. Thus, it is crystal clear that the employment
under the Employer Municipal Council is a public
employment governed by the Goa Municipalities
Act, 1968 and the Rules and Bye laws made
thereunder and also the directions issued by the
State Government from time to time. The affairs of
the Employer Municipality are governed by the
provisions of the said Act, the Rules made
thereunder and the byelaws. The appointment of
officers and servants in the council can be made
only to the post created by following the procedure
prescribed in the said Act. The qualifications, pay,
allowances and other conditions of service and the
method of recruitment are determined by the said
Act, rules and the orders made by the Director of
Municipal Administration, Government of Goa.
Neither post can be created nor can appointment
be made thereto, without the sanction or prior
approval of the director. Thus, no recruitment can
be made in the Employer Municipality without
following the mandatory provisions of law.
Similarly, no recruitment whether by way of
appointment, promotion or regularization can be
made to the posts in the council without following
provisions and the process prescribed by law. The
retinue of the employees of the Municipal Council
is sanctioned by the Director of Municipal
Administration. Applying the law laid down by
Hon’ble Apex Court as well as Hon’ble High Court
of Bombay in its aforesaid respective cases, it is
held that the action of the Employer Council in not
regularizing the services of the Workperson and
instead recruiting a fresh candidate on the said
post is just, fair and proper and in accordance with
the due procedure established by law as the
appointment of the Workperson in the Employer
Municipal Council is contrary to the statutory rules
and regulations in force.
39. The Workperson contended that in the past,
the Employer Municipal Council has regularized
the services of its two employees namely Smt.
Shanta Ambi and Shri. Kiran Kakodkar to the post
of LDC. The Workperson however, in her cross-
-examination admitted that Shri. Kiran Kadodkar and
Smt. Shanta Ambi were interviewed by the
Employer prior to their appointment. She however,
deposed that she do not know as to the Employer
Council had advertised the said post to be filled
up and that both the said employees were
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
805
interviewed along with other candidates. Thus,
the Workperson failed to prove that in the past, the
Employer Municipal Council has regularized the
services of its employees, namely, Smt. Shanta Ambi
and Shri KiranKakodkar, to the post of LDC. Even
otherwise, merely because the services of the
aforesaid two employees have been regularized by
the Employer Municipal Council, it cannot be a
ground to regularize the services of the Workperson
as it is the settled principal of law that even if, the
wrong committed in earlier case, the same cannot
be perpetuated. It is therefore held that the action
of the Employer Municipal Council in not
regularizing the services of the Workperson on the
post of LDC and instead recruiting a fresh
candidate on the said post is legal and justified.
The issue No. 2 is therefore answered in the
negative.
40. Issue No. 3:
The Workperson, in her pleadings, filed in the
present proceedings, claimed that the Employer
has violated Section 33 of the I.D. Act, 1947. Section
33 provides that during the pendency of any
conciliation proceedings before a conciliation
officer or a board or of any proceedings before a
Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal in
respect of industrial dispute, no Employer shall
alter to the prejudice of the Workman concerned in
such dispute the conditions of service applicable
to her immediately before the commencement of
such proceeding in regard to any matter connected
with the dispute or discharge or punish whether
by dismissal or otherwise any workman concerned
with such dispute for any misconduct connected
with the dispute. However, in the case in hand, the
Workperson has failed to produce on record any
cogent evidence to substantiate her claim of
violation of Section 33 of the I.D. Act, 1947 by the
Employer during the pendency of the conciliation
proceedings. More so ever, the Conciliation
Authority has no right of whatsoever nature to
direct the party to maintain status quo in the
conciliation proceedings held under the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, it is held that the
Workperson failed to prove that the Employer has
violated Section 33 of the I.D. Act, 1947. The issue
No. 3 is therefore answered in the negative.
41. Issue No. 5:
While deciding the issue No. 4, hereinabove, I
have come to the conclusion and held that the
reference made by the Government is bad-in-law
being incompetent. The Workperson is therefore
not entitled to any relief.
In view of the above, I proceed to pass the
following order:
ORDER
1. It is held that no industrial dispute existed
at the time when the Government made the
reference. It is further held that the reference
made by the Government is bad-in-law and
hence, rejected.
2. No order as to costs.
Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Suresh N. Narulkar)
Presiding Officer,
Labour Court-II.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Law & Judiciary
Law (Establishment) Division
__
Notification by the High Court of Judicature
Appelate Side, Bombay
No. A. 1201/G/2016/5268
I
The High Court has been pleased to make the
transfers and postings of the following Judicial
Officers:-
Sr.
Name & present
New Posting
No.
posting
1. Ms. Sherin Gerturde Paul,
District Judge-2
District Judge-1 &
& Additional
Additional Sessions Judge, Sessions Judge,
Margao.
Panaji, vice
Ms. V. M. Prabhu-
Tendulkar.
II
The High Court has further been pleased to make
the ranking of the Judicial Officers in the order as
shown herein below:-
Sr.
Name & present
New Posting
No.
posting
1
2
3
1. Ms. V. M. Prabhu-Tendulkar, District Judge-3
District Judge-2 &
& Additional
Additional Sessions Judge,
Session Judge,
Panaji.
Panaji,
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
806
2. Shri Edgar P. Fernandes
District Judge-1
District Judge-2 &
& Additional
Additional Sessions Judge,
Sessions Judge,
Margao.
Margao vice
Ms. Sherin
Gerturde Paul,
transferred.
High Court, Bombay
Sd/-
23rd December, 2016.
Registrar General
———‹‹‹———
Department of Personnel
__
Order
No. 15/6/2003-PER(part)Vol 1/3803
Read: Order No. 15/6/2012-PER dated 25-07-2012.
Order No. 15/6/2003-PER(part) Vol 1 dated
10-10-2013.
Order No. 15/6/2003-PER(part) Vol 1 dated
15-09-2014.
Order No. 15/6/2003-PER(part) Vol 1 dated
11-08-2015.
The ad hoc promotion of the following officers
in the cadre of Mamlatdar/Joint Mamlatdar/
Assistant Director of Civil Supplies is hereby
extended for a further period indicated against
their names or till the posts are filled on regular
basis, whichever is earlier:-
Sr. Name & Designation Ad hoc Promotion extended
No. of the Officer From To
1. Shri Pratap Gaunkar 25-07-2016 18-10-2016
2. Shri Shripad Majik
25-07-2016 19-10-2016
This issues with the approval of Goa Public
Service Commission conveyed vide their letter
No. COM/II/11/42(2)/2012/1183 dated 25-10-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Meghana Shetgaonkar, Under Secretary
(Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 21st December, 2016.
_______
Order
No. 7/30/2014-PER/3805
The Governor of Goa is pleased to order to allot
the work/Departments to Smt. Padma Jaiswal, IAS
(2003), Secretary (Co-operation) in addition to her
own duties with immediate effect, until further
orders as follows:—
1. Member Secretary, Goa State Commission for
Backward Classes.
2. Secretary, Goa State Commission for Protection
of Child Rights.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Yetindra M. Maralkar, Additional Secretary
(Personnel).
Porvorim, 23rd December, 2016.
________
Order
No. 6/3/2002-PER(Vol.I)/3810
Sanction of the Government is hereby accorded
for relaxation of qualifying service by one year by
invoking provisions of Rule 43 of Goa Civil Service
Rules, 2016 for the following Junior Scale Officers
of Goa Civil Service for considering them for the
promotion to the Senior Scale of Goa Civil Service:-
1. Kum. Biju R. Naik.
2. Shri Mahesh Corjuenkar.
3. Shri Johnson B. Fernandes.
4. Shri Umeshchandra L. Joshi.
5. Shri Surendra F. Naik.
6. Shri Ajit Panchwadkar.
7. Shri Agnelo A. Fernandes.
8. Shri Dashrath M. Redkar.
9. Shri Narayan M. Gad.
10. Shri Ajit Pawaskar.
11. Shri Devidas S. Gaonkar.
12. Smt. Sharmila Zuzarte.
13. Shri Pandharinath N. Naik.
14. Smt. Siddhi T. Halarnkar.
15. Shri Snehal P. Naik Goltekar.
16. Shri Vinayak P. Volvoikar.
17. Smt. Meghana V. Shetgaonkar.
18. Smt. Darshana S. Narulkar.
19. Smt. Florina S. Colaco.
20. Shri Ashutosh R. Apte.
21. Shri Parag M. Nagorcekar.
22. Shri Pradeep Shankar Naik.
This issues with the concurrence of Goa Public
Service Commission as conveyed vide its letter
No. COM/II/11/42(4)/2016 (Part file)/1552 dated
23-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 26th December, 2016.
1
2
3
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
807
Order
No. 5/16/2003-PER/3820
Read: i) Order No.13/7/2016-PER dated 29-07-2016.
ii) Order No.13/7/2016-PER dated 25-11-2016.
ii) Order No. 6/2/2002-PER(Part) dated
01-12-2016.
The Government of Goa is pleased to relieve
Shri N. P. Signapurkar w.e.f. 05-12-2016 (b.n.)
in pursuance to Government order read at
preamble (3).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II)
Porvorim, 27th December, 2016.
Order
No. 7/30/2014-PER/3841
In pursuance to the Government of India,
Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, Order
No.14020/04/2016-UTS-I dated 01-10-2016, the
Governor of Goa is pleased to relieve Shri Sachin
Shinde, IAS (AGMU:2008), Special Secretary
(Health) from this Administration w.e.f. 02-01-2017
to take up his new assignment at Government of
NCT of Delhi.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 29th December, 2016.
________
Order
No. 6/78/2011-PER/3844
On recommendations of the Goa Services Board and with approval of the Government, the transfer and
posting of the following Junior Scale Officers of Goa Civil Services is ordered with immediate effect and
in public interest as follows:-
Sl. No. Name of the Officer
Present posting
To be posted
1
2
3
4
1.
Shri Clen Madeira
Chief Officer, Mapusa
Dy. Collector, Revenue, Panaji.
2.
Shri Gurudas T. Desai
Dy. Collector,
Chief Officer, Mapusa.
Revenue, Panaji
3.
Kum. Roshell Fernandes
Asst. Dir (Admn),
Dy. Collector, LA, South.
Industries
4.
Smt. Sheru Appa Shirodkar Dy. Collector &
Addl. Director,
DRO, North
Directorate of Muncipal Administration.
5.
Smt. Snehal Prabhu
Dy. Registrar, Co-operative
Dy. Collector & SDO-II,
Societies
Salcete.
6.
Shri Akshay Potekar
Dy. Director, Tribal Welfare
Dy. Registrar, Co-operative Societies.
7.
Shri Rohit Kadam
Dy. Director, Fire
Dy. Director, Agriculture.
and Emergency
8.
Kum. Geeta Nagvekar
Deputy Director,
Deputy Commissioner,
Panchayat, North
Corporation of City of Panaji.
9.
Shri Kapil Chandrakant
Deputy Commissioner,
Deputy Director, Panchayat, North.
Phadte
Corporation of City
He shall continue to hold additional
of Panaji
charge of Administrative Officer,
Goa State Commission for Protection of
Child Right.
10.
Shri Rohan Janardhan
Under Secretary
Administrator of Communidade,
Kaskar
(Home-I)
North Zone.
11.
Shri Uday Prabhudesai
Deputy Collector
Deputy Collector & SDO, Salcete
South-1
thereby relieving Shri Ajit Panchawadkar
of additional charge.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
808
12.
Shri Pradeep Naik
Deputy Collector
Asst. Director (Admn.),
(Land Acquisition), North
Industries.
13.
Smt. Triveni Velip
Deputy Director
Deputy Director (Admn-II), GMC.
(Admn-I), GMC
Shri Sudhir Kerkar shall hold the additional charge of Deputy Collector & DRO, North.
Smt. Neetal Amonkar shall hold the additional charge of Under Secretary, Home-I.
Smt. Milan Kankonkar @ Deepti Kankonkar shall hold the additional charge of Deputy Director,
Tribal Welfare.
Shri P. P. Murgaonkar shall hold the additional charge of Deputy Director, Fire & Emergency Services.
Shri P. D. Halarnkar shall hold the additional charge of Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), North.
Smt. Fransquinha Oliveira shall hold the additional charge of Deputy Director (Admn-I), Goa Medical
College.
All the above officers shall complete their handing over and taking over process within 3 days and
submit compliance.
This order is issued with the approval of the Election Commission of India vide letter No. 437/6/GOA-
LA/2017 dated 29-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Shashank Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 29th December, 2016.
________
1
2
3
4
Order
No. 7/10/2014-PER C/12
On the recommendation of the Goa Services
Board and with the approval of the Government,
Governor of Goa is pleased to appoint Shri Devidas
S. Gaonkar, Joint Director, ICDS, Directorate of
Women & Child Department as Joint Chief Electoral
Officer in the Office of Chief Electoral Officer with
immediate effect.
This issues with the concurrence of the Election
Commission of India vide its order No. 154/GOA/
/2016-P.Admn dated 06-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Meghana Shetgaonkar, Under Secretary
(Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 2nd January, 2017.
________
Order
No. 7/10/2014-PER B/14
On the recommendation of the Goa Services
Board and with the approval of the Government,
Governor of Goa is pleased to appoint Shri N. S.
Navti, Joint Chief Electoral Officer as Additional
Chief Electoral Officer in the Office of Chief
Electoral Officer with immediate effect.
This issues with the concurrence of the Election
Commission of India vide its order No. 154/GOA/
/2016-P.Admn dated 06-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Meghana Shetgaonkar, Under Secretary
(Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 2nd January, 2017.
________
Order
No. 7/10/2014-PER D/15
On the recommendation of the Goa Services
Board and with the approval of the Government,
Governor of Goa is pleased to appoint Ms. Sangeeta
Naik, Deputy Collector (L.A.), Margao-Goa as
Assistant Chief Electoral Officer in the office of
Chief Electoral Officer with immediate effect.
This issues with the concurrence of the Election
Commission of India vide its order No. 154/GOA/
2016-P.Admn dated 06-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Meghana Shetgaonkar, Under Secretary
(Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 2nd January, 2017.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
809
Order
No. 4/4/2015-PER/33
On the recommendation of the Local Depart-
mental Promotion Committee, the Government is
pleased to appoint Shri Laxmikant D. Kolvekar,
Additional Chief Engineer-I to the post of Chief
Electoral Engineer in Electricity Department on
officiating basis with effect from 13-9-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary
(Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 2nd January, 2017.
________
Order
No. 6/9/2009-PER (Part II)/17
On the recommendations of the Goa Services
Board and with the approval of the Government,
the transfer and posting of the following Senior
Scale Officers of Goa Civil Services is ordered with
immediate effect and in public interest as follows:-
Sl.
Name of the
Present posting
Posted as
No.
Officer
1
2
3
4
1. Shri Parag
Commissioner
Director (Admn),
Nagarcenkar of Departmental Kala Academy.
Inquiries
He shall conti-
nue to hold
additional charge
as Commissioner
of Departmen-
tal Inquiries.
2. Shri Ajit
Member Secre-
M. D., Goa State
Panchawad-
tary, Ravindra
ST Finance Cor-
kar
Bhavan, Margao poration thereby
relieving Shri
Vinesh Arlekar
of additional
charge. He shall
hold additional
charge as Joint
Director, ICDS,
Directorate of
Women and
Child Develop-
ment.
Shri Y. B. Tavde, Chief Officer, Margao Municipal
Council shall hold the additional charge of Member
Secretary (Ravindra Bhavan), Margao, Goa.
All the above officers shall complete their
handing over and taking over process within 3
days and submit compliance.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Meghana Shetgaonkar, Under Secretary
(Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 2nd January, 2017.
________
Order
No. 7/41/2013-PER/27
In pursuance to the order No. 32012/6/2016-IFS-I
(AGMUT) dated 30-11-2016 of the Government of
India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate
Change, New Delhi, the Governor of Goa is pleased
to retain Dr. A. Anil Kumar, IFS (AGMUT:2002) and
post him on the promotional post to Conservator of
Forests as OSD to Goa Forest Development
Corporation Ltd. with immediate effect Dr. A. Anil
Kumar, IFS shall draw his salary against the post of
O.S.D. to Goa Forest Development Corporation Ltd.
with immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Yetindra M. Maralkar, Under Secretary (Personnel).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
_______
Order
No. 13/2/2016-PER/26
Whereas, the Government vide order No. 13/2/
/2016-PER dated 30-11-2016 was pleased to grant
extension in services to Dr. Padma Bhandare,
Associate Professor in the Department of
Pharmacology, Goa Medical College, Bambolim-Goa
beyond superannuation till the afternoon of the
last day of the month in which she attains the age
of sixty five years in public interest subject to
Vigilance Clearance, Concurrence of Finance
Department and approval of Cabinet;
And whereas, the Vigilance Department has now
submitted Vigilance Clearance in respect of
Dr. Padma Bhandare, Associate Professor in the
Department of Pharmacology stating that no
Disciplinary Proceedings/Vigilance cases are
pending or being contemplated against Dr.
Bhandare;
And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its
XXXXIVth meeting held on 16-12-2016 has
approved to grant ex-post facto approval for
extension in service beyond superannuation to
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
810
Dr. Padma Bhandare, Associate Professor in the
Department of Pharmacology, Goa Medical College,
Bambolim-Goa beyond superannuation till the
afternoon of the last day of the month in which she
attains the age of sixty five years.
Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to
grant extension in service beyond superannuation
to Dr. Padma Bhandare, Associate Professor in the
Department of Pharmacology, Goa Medical College,
Bambolim-Goa beyond superannuation till the
afternoon of the last day of the month in which she
attains the age of sixty five years.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary
(Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
_______
Order
No. 13/21/2015-PER/50
Whereas, the Government vide order No. 13/21/
/2015-PER dated 31-12-2015 was pleased to grant
extension in services to Shri Prakash A. N. Gurav,
Officer of the Cadre of Superintending Engineer of
P.W.D. who is presently on deputation as General
Manager (Engineering), Goa Industrial Develop-
ment Corporation, Patto, Panaji-Goa for a period of
six months w.e.f. 01-01-2016 to 30-06-2016;
And whereas, the Government vide order
No. 13/21/2015-PER/2091 dated 30-06-2016 was
pleased to grant extension in services to Shri Gurav
for further period of six months w.e.f. 01-07-2016 to
30-12-2016 subject to Vigilance Clearance,
concurrence of Finance Department and approval
of Cabinet;
And whereas, the Vigilance Department has now
submitted Vigilance Clearance stating that no
Disciplinary Proceedings/Vigilance cases are
pending or being contemplated against Shri Gurav;
And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its
XXXXIVth meeting held on 16-12-2016 has
approved to grant ex-post facto approval for
extension in service beyond superannuation to
Shri Prakash A. N. Gurav, Officer of the Cadre of
Superintending Engineer of P.W.D. who is presently
on deputation as General Manager (Engineering),
Goa Industrial Development Corporation
Patto, Panaji-Goa for a period of six months
w.e.f. 01-01-2016 to 30-06-2016 and further period
of six months w.e.f. 01-07-2016 to 30-12-2016;
Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to
grant extension in service beyond superannuation
to Shri Prakash A. N. Gurav, Officer of the Cadre of
Superintending Engineer of P.W.D. who is presently
on deputation as General Manager (Engineering),
Goa Industrial Development Corporation, Patto,
Panaji-Goa for a period of six moths w.e.f.
01-01-2016 to 30-06-2016 and further period of six
months w.e.f. 01-07-2016 to 31-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary
(Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
_______
Order
No. 13/22/2015-PER/52
Whereas, the Government vide order No. 13/22/
/2015-PER/2090 dated 30-06-2016 was pleased to
grant extension in services to Dr. Dilip Amonkar,
Professor and Head, Department of Surgery, Goa
Medical College & Hospital, Bambolim-Goa beyond
the superannuation till the afternoon of the last
day of the month in which he attains the age of
sixty five years subject to Vigilance Clearance,
Concurrence of Finance Department and approval
of Cabinet;
And whereas, the Vigilance Department has now
submitted Vigilance Clearance in respect of
Dilip Amonkar, Professor and Head, Department
of Surgery, Goa Medical College & Hospital,
Bambolim-Goa has stating that, the Major Penalty
Proceedings under Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules,
1965 approved against Dr. Dilip Amonkar, Professor
and Head, Department of Surgery, Goa Medical
College & Hospital and therefore vigilance
clearance is withheld.
And whereas, the Finance Department vide its
U.O. No. 1400030543 dated 17-11-2016 has
submitted that, the proposal being fate accompli,
may process the proposal in terms of Rule 7 (2) of
Rules of Business of Government of Goa, 1991;
And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its
XXXXIVth meeting held on 16-12-2016 has
approved to grant ex-post facto approval for
extension in service to Dr. Dilip Amonkar, Professor
and Head, Department of Surgery, Goa Medical
College & Hospital, Bambolim-Goa beyond
superannuation till the afternoon of the last day of
the month in which he attains the age of sixty five
years.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
811
Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to
grant extension in service to Dr. Dilip Amonkar,
Professor and Head, Department of Surgery, Goa
Medical College & Hospital, Bambolim-Goa beyond
superannuation till the afternoon of the last day of
the month in which he attains the age of sixty five
years.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary
(Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
________
Order
No. 7/30/2014-PER/56
The Governor of Goa is pleased to appoint
Dr. Ranbir Singh, IAS as Principal Secretary to
Governor in addition to his own duties, with
immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Meghana V. Shetgaonkar, Under Secretary
(Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
_______
Order
No. 13/8/2016-PER/65
Whereas, the Government vide order No. 13/8/
/2016-PER/3170 dated 31/10/2016 and Corrigendum
dated 12-12-2016 was pleased to grant extension
in services to Dr. Celina Barbosa Noronha, Medical
Officer, Directorate of Health Services, Panaji-Goa
beyond the date of her superannuation till the
afternoon of the last day of the month in which he
attains the age of sixty two years in public interest
subject to Vigilance Clearance, Concurrence of
Finance Department and approval of Cabinet;
And whereas, the Vigilance Department has
now submitted Vigilance Clearance in respect of
Dr. Celina Barbosa Noronha, Medical Officer,
Directorate of Health Services stating that no
Disciplinary Proceedings/Vigilance cases are
pending or against Dr. Barbosa;
And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its
XXXXIVth meeting held on 16-12-2016 has
approved to grant ex-post facto approval for
extension in service to Dr. Celina Barbosa Noronha,
Medical Officer beyond superannuation till the
afternoon of the last day of the month in which he
attains the age of sixty two years.
Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to
grant extension in service to Dr. Celina Barbosa
Noronha, Medical Officer beyond superannuation
till the afternoon of the last day of the month in
which he attains the age of sixty two years.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary
(Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
_______
Order
No. 13/6/2015-PER/66
Whereas, the Government vide order No. 13/6/
/2015-PER/2859 dated 30-09-2016 was pleased to
grant extension in services to Shri Bhaskar G.
Nayak, Principal, Government College of Arts,
Science and Commerce, Quepem with additional
charge of Director, Higher Education, Povorim for
a period of seven months w.e.f. 01-10-2016 to
30-04-2017 subject to Vigilance Clearance,
concurrence of Finance Department and approval
of Cabinet;
And whereas, the Vigilance Department has now
submitted Vigilance Clearance stating that no
Disciplinary Proceedings/Vigilance cases are
pending or being contemplated against Shri Nayak.
And whereas, the Finance Department vide its
U.O. No. 1400031608 dated 05-12-2016 has
submitted that, the proposal being fate accompli,
may process the proposal in terms of Rule 7 (2) of
Rules of Business of Government of Goa, 1991;
And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its
XXXXIVth meeting held on 16-12-2016 has approved
to grant ex-post facto approval for extension in
service beyond superannuation to Shri Bhaskar G.
Nayak, Principal, Government College of Arts,
Science and Commerce, Quepem with additional
charge of Director, Higher Education, Povorim
for a period of seven months w.e.f. 01-10-2016 to
30-04-2017.
Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to
grant extension in service beyond superannuation
to Shri Bhaskar G. Nayak, Principal, Government
College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Quepem
with additional charge of Director, Higher
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
812
Education, Povorim for a period of seven months
w.e.f. 01-10-2016 to 30-04-2017.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary
(Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
________
Order
No. 13/8/2016-PER/68
Whereas, the Government vide order No. 13/8/
/2016-PER/2857 dated 30-09-2016 was pleased to
grant extension in services to Dr. Doreen C. Dias,
Sr. Psychiatrist, Directorate of Health Services,
Panaji-Goa beyond the date of her superannuation
till the afternoon of the last day of the month in
which he attains the age of sixty two years in
public interest subject to Vigilance Clearance,
Concurrence of Finance Department and approval
of Cabinet;
And whereas, the Vigilance Department has
now submitted Vigilance Clearance in respect of
Dr. Doreen C. Dias, Sr. Psychiatrist, Directorate of
Health Services stating that no Disciplinary
Proceedings/Vigilance cases are pending or against
Dr. Dias;
And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its
XXXXIVth meeting held on 16-12-2016 has
approved to grant ex-post facto approval for
extension in service to Dr. Doreen C. Dias,
Sr. Psychiatrist beyond superannuation till the
afternoon of the last day of the month in which he
attains the age of sixty two years.
Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to
grant extension in service to Dr. Doreen C. Dias,
Sr. Psychiatrist beyond superannuation till the
afternoon of the last day of the month in which he
attains the age of sixty two years.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary
(Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
_______
Order
No. 13/9/2016-PER/69
Whereas, the Government vide order No. 13/9/
/2016-PER/3170 dated 31-10-2016 was pleased to
grant extension in services to Dr. Kishor Nagvenkar,
Resident Microbiologist, Goa Medical College &
Hospital, Bambolim-Goa beyond the date of his
superannuation till the afternoon of the last day of
the month in which he attains the age of sixty two
years in public interest subject to Vigilance
Clearance, Concurrence of Finance Department and
approval of Cabinet;
And whereas, the Vigilance Department has now
submitted Vigilance Clearance in respect of
Dr. Kishor Nagvenkar, Resident Microbiologist, Goa
Medical College & Hospital stating that, no
Disciplinary Proceedings/Vigilance cases are
pending or against Dr. N agvenkar;
And whereas, the Finance Department vide its
U.O. No. 1400031606 dated 13-12-2016 has
submitted that the proposal being fate accompli,
may process the proposal in terms of Rule 7 (2) of
Rules of Business of Government of Goa, 1991;
And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its
XXXXIVth meeting held on 16-12-2016 has
approved to grant ex-post facto approval for
extension in service to Dr. Kishor Nagvenkar,
Resident Microbiologist, beyond superannuation
till the afternoon of the last day of the month in
which he attains the age of sixty two years.
Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to
grant extension in service to Dr. Kishor Nagvenkar,
Resident Microbiologist beyond superannuation
till the afternoon of the last day of the month in
which he attains the age of sixty two years.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary
(Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
________
Corrigendum
No. 13/8/2016-PER/43
Read: Order No. 13/8/2016-PER/1294 dated
31-10-2016.
In the order referred to in the preamble above,
the words, “Dr. Celina Noronha Barbosa” shall be
read as “Dr. Celina Barbosa Noronha”.
The other content of the order remained
unchanged.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary
(Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 12th December, 2016.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
813
Department of Power
Office of the Chief Electrical Engineer
__
Order
No. CEE/Estt-31-25-88/GPSC/Part/4932
On the recommendation of the Departmental
Promotion Committee as conveyed by the Goa
Public Service Commission vide letter No. COM/II/
/11/16(2)/2011/485 dated 26-12-2016, the
Government is pleased to promote the following
Assistant Engineers (Elec.) to the posts of Executive
Engineer (Elec.), Group ‘A’ Gazetted in the pay scale
PB-3 Rs. 15,600-39100+Grade Pay Rs. 6,600 on
regular basis, with immediate effect and posted at
the places shown below against their respective
names, until further orders.
Sr.
Name of the
Place of posting
No.
Official
on promotion
1
2
3
1. Ramdas N. Bhat
Executive Engineer,
Division VII, Curchorem.
He shall hold the additional
charge as Executive
Engineer (Com), Panaji.
2. Shri Paul Fernandes Executive Engineer,
Division I, Panaji-Goa.
3. Shri Nizamuddin
Executive Engineer, Division
Shaikh
VIII (MRT), Margao.
He shall hold the additional
charge as Executive
Engineer, Division II(S & W),
Margao.
4. Shri Venkatesh G. S. Executive Engineer, Division
Kunkolienkar
X, Ponda.
He shall hold the additional
charge as Executive
Engineer, Division III, Ponda.
5. Shri Jose Elizeu
Executive Engineer, Quality
D’Mello
Control & Specification,
Office of the Chief
Electrical Engineer, Panaji.
He shall hold the additional
charge as Executive
Engineer, Plg./EHV,
o/o CEE, Panaji.
2. The promotee Officers shall be on probation
for a period of two years. They should exercise an
option for fixation of pay under F. R.-22(1) (a) (i)
within one month from the date of promotion.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Laxmikant D. Kolvekar, Chief Electrical Engineer
& ex officio Addl. Secretary (Power).
Panaji, 29th December, 2016.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Public Health
Directorate of Health Services
An order No. A. 11019/7/2016-EC/CCIM Election
dated 31-5-2016 was issued by the Central
Government is to be re-published in the Official
Gazette for the information of the general public.
Raju V. Gawas, Director (Admn.)/Returning
Officer CCIM, Election.
____
Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy,
Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH)
AYUSH BHAWAN, B Block,
GPO Complex, INA,
New Delhi-110023,
Dated: 31st May, 2016.
Order
No. A.11019/7/2016-EC/CCIM Election
Consequent upon the powers conferred by
clasue (d) of Rule 2 of the Indian Medicine Central
Council (Election) Rules, 1975, the Central
Government hereby appoints Shri Raju Gawas,
Director (Administration), Directorate of Health
Services, Secretariat, Porvorim, Goa as Returning
Officer to conduct the election for members of
Central Council of Indian Medicine from Ayurveda
System in the State of Goa. The appointment will
be effective from the date of issue of this order for
a period till the election work is over.
This issues with the approval of Secretary
(AYUSH).
Yours faithfully,
Franklin L. Khobung
Director
Tel.: 011-24651956
V. No. A—12,857/2017
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
814
Department of Public Works
Office of the Principal Chief Engineer
__
Order
No. 34/4/2016/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/225
Government is pleased to order the transfer Smt.
Deepa D. Jamble, Assistant Engineer, presently
attached to Sub Division II, Division XI (QC),
Bicholim in this Department and post her as
Assistant Engineer in Sub Division II, Division XXIII
(Roads), PWD, Valpoi in the existing vacancy, with
immediate effect, in public interest.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Uttam P. Parsekar, Principal Chief Engineer & ex
officio Addl. Secretary (PWD)
Panaji, 27th December, 2016.
________
Order
No. 34/4/2016/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/232
Government is pleased to order the transfer of the following Assistant Engineers/Assistant Surveyor
of Works/Engineering Assistants (Electrical/Mechanical) in this Department and post them at the places
shown against their names in column No. 4 below, with immediate effect in public interest:
Sr.
Name
From
To
No.
1
2
3
4
1. Shri Anthony F. T. D.
Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division V,
As Assistant Surveyor of Works
Fernandes
Division IV (M/E), Bambolim
in Circle Office VII(M/E), Altinho,
Panaji, vice Shri Julio Antonio
Bruno Fernandes, AE.
2. Shri Julio Antonio
Assistant Surveyor of Works, C.O.
As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division V,
Bruno Fernandes, AE
VII (M/E), Altinho, Panaji
Division IV (M/E), Bambolim, vice
Shri Anthony F.T.D. Fernandes, AE.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
U. P. Parsekar, Principal Chief Engineer & ex officio Addl. Secretary (PWD).
Panaji, 30th December, 2016.
________
Order
No. 34/4/2017/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/237
Government is pleased to order the transfer of the following Assistant Engineers/Assistant Surveyor
of Works/Engineering Assistants (Civil) in this Department and post them at the places shown against
their names in column No. 4 below, with immediate effect in public interest:
Sr.
Name
From
To
No.
1
2
3
4
1. Shri Digambar B.
Assistant Engineer on deputation
As Assistant Engineer in Sub-Division II,
Kulkarni
to DRDA, South, Margao
Division XXV (Roads), Quepem, vice
Shri D. G. Bhomkar, AE transferred.
2. Shri D. G. Bhomkar
Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division II,
As Assistant Engineer on deputation to
Division XXV (Roads), Quepem
DRDA, South, Margao, repatriated.
The deputation of the officers at Sr. No. (2) above, shall be governed by the terms & conditions
contained in O. M. No. 13/4/74-PER dated 12-2-1999 of the Department of Personnel, Secretariat as
amended from time to time.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
U. P. Parsekar, Principal Chief Engineer & ex officio Addl. Secretary (PWD).
Panaji, 3rd January, 2017.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
815
Notification
No. 24/7/PCE/PWD/EO/2016-17/200
In pursuance to Article 32.1 read with Article
32.2 (a) & (b) of the Memorandum and Articles of
Association of the Sewage and Infrastructural
Development Corporation Limited of the State of
Goa, the Government of Goa is pleased to
reconstitute the Board of Directors of the aforesaid
Sewage and Infrastructural Development
Corporation Limited with the following nominees
with immediate effect:
Sr.
Name of the Nominee
Designation
No.
1.
Shri Laxmikant Y. Parsekar,
Chairman.
Hon. Chief Minister holding
PWD Portfolio
2.
Shri Sanjeev N. Dessai,
Vice
S2, Vijayadurga Apartment,
Chairman.
B-Wing, Khadpabandh,
Ponda-Goa
3.
Secretary (PWD)
Director.
4.
Joint Secretary (Finance)
Director.
5.
Superintending Engineer,
Director.
Circle Office V (PHE), PWD
6.
Shri Arvind A. Patil,
Managing
Chief Engineer-PWD
Director.
The Board of Directors may invite special invitees
for Board meetings as and when required
depending upon exigencies.
This is issued in supersession of the Notification
No. 24-7-80-PCE-PWD-EO/22 dated 10-05-2012.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
U. P. Parsekar, Principal Chief Engineer &
ex officio Addl. Secretary (PWD).
Panaji, 27th December, 2016.
________
Corrigendum
No. 50/1/2016/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/231
Read: Order No. 50/1/2016/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/
/205 dated 08-12-2016.
The 1st & 3rd paras of the Order read at
preamble shall be substituted with the following
paras.
1st Para:
Government is pleased to appoint Shri Santosh
B. Bhimegovda, Junior Engineer (Electrical/
/Mechanical) in Public Works Department on
ad hoc basis to the post of Assistant Engineer/
/Liasoning Officer/State Co-ordinator, Group ‘A’,
Gazetted in the Pay Band Rs. 9300-34800+Grade
Pay Rs. 4600 for smooth and successful
implementation of Swachh Bharat Mission-Gramin
in the State of Goa. He shall draw his pay and
allowances.
3rd Para:
The expenditure towards his pay & allowance
shall be debited to the Budget Head 2215—Water
Supply and Sanitation, 02—Sewerage and
Sanitation, 107—Sewerage Services, 03—Swachh
Bharat Mission (Gramin) (P) (A), 01—Salaries, to be
maintained by Works Division XII(PHE), Sanguem.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Uttam P. Parsekar, Principal Chief Engineer &
ex officio Addl. Secretary (PWD).
Panaji, 30th December, 2016.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Rural Development & R.D.A
District Rural Development Agency
__
Order
No. DRDA-S/22/Mon./DISHA/2016-17
In terms of the guidelines issued by the Ministry
of Rural Development, Department of Rural
Development, Government of India, New Delhi vide
Do#Q-13016/2/2016-VMC dated 26-07-2016, the
District Development Co-ordination and Monitoring
Committee (DDCMC) ‘DISHA’ is being constituted
for South Goa District for monitoring and
implementation of the programmes and schemes
sponsored by Government of India in accordance
with the prescribed procedure and guidelines.
The composition of the Committee is as under:
1. Shri (Adv.) Narendra Keshav
Chairperson.
Sawaikar, Hon’ble Member of
Parliament (Lok Sabha),
South Goa District
2. Shri Shantaram Naik, Hon’ble
Co-Chairperson.
Member of Parliament (Rajya
Sabha)
3. All Members of the State
Members.
Legislative Assembly (MLAs),
South Goa District
4. District Collector, South Goa
Member
District
Secretary.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
816
5. All Chairpersons of Munici-
Members.
palities of South Goa District
6. Chairperson, Zilla Panchayat,
Member.
South Goa District
7. Chief Executive Officer,
Member.
Zilla Panchayat, South Goa
District
8. Project Director, District
Member.
Rural Development Agency,
South Goa District
9. Lead Bank Officer of South
Member.
Goa District
10. Senior Superintendent/
Member.
Superintendent of Postal
Department, South Goa
District
11. Nodal Functionaries of all the
Programmes under purview of
Disha, South Goa District
i. Principal Chief Engineer,
Member.
Public Works Department,
Althinho, Panaji
ii. Director, Directorate of Social
Member.
Welfare, Panaji
iii. Director, Directorate of Civil
Member.
Supplies, Panaji
iv. Member Secretary, Goa State
Member.
Urban Development Agency,
Panaji
v. Director, Directorate of Agricul-
Member.
ture, Tonca, Miramar, Panaji
vi. Director, Directorate of Settle- Member.
ment & Land Records, Panaji
vii. Chief Electrical Engineer,
Member.
Electricity Department, Panaji
viii.Director, Directorate of Health, Member.
Panaji
ix. Director, Directorate of Educa- Member.
tion, Porvorim
x. Project Director, Sarva
Member.
Shiksha Abhiyan, Porvorim
xi. Director, Directorate of Women
Member.
& Child Development, Panaji
xii. Captain of Ports, River Naviga- Member.
tion Department, Betim
xiii. Director, Directorate of Crafts
Member.
-men Training, Panaji
xiv. Director, Directorate of Informa-
Member.
tion & Technology, Althinho,
Panaji
xv. Director, Directorate of
Member.
Museums, Panaji
xvi. Managing Director, Goa State
Member.
Infrastructure Development
Corporation, Panaji
xvii.Members nominated by the
Member.
Chairman in consultation with
other Members of Parliament
in the Committee (Elected
Heads of Gram Panchayat)
1. Mrs. Poonam Samant, Sarpanch, Member.
Bethorda Kodar Nirankal
Panchayat
2. Mrs. Sharmila Bhandari,
Member.
Sarpanch, Vadi-Curdi,
Sanguem
3. Mrs. Alka Potdar, Sarpanch,
Member.
Balli Panchayat, Quepem
4. Mr. Sanzil D’Costa, Sarpanch,
Member.
Fatorpa, Quepem
5. Mr. Prashant Desai, Sarpanch,
Member.
Shristhal, Canacona
xviii. Finance Secretary, Finance
Member.
Department, Secretariat-Porvorim
xix. Shri Shailesh Patil, Chairman, Member.
Chanakya Foundation, Ponda
(NGO)
xx. Members nominated by the
Member.
Chairman
1. Shri Sanjay Gaude, Paniwada Member.
Borim, Ponda (ST)
2. Shri Vithu Morajkar, Margao
Member.
(SC)
3. Smt. Rajani Naik, Ghane-
Member.
morod, Xeldem (Women)
The Committee shall meet once in every quarter
to monitor and review the progress made by
implementing Departments/Agencies.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Sudhir Mahajan, I.A.S., Secretary (Rural Develop-
ment).
Margao, 27th December, 2016.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
817
Department of Science, Technology &
Environment
__
Notification
No. 232-10-2016/STE-DIR/975
It is hereby notified that the Department of
Science and Technology, Government of Goa has
been shifted from its old premises at Department
of Science, Technology and Environment Building,
Opp. Saligao Seminary, Saligao, Bardez-Goa 403 511
to this new address mentioned as below:-
Office of the Director,
Department of Science and Technology,
Government of Goa,
1st Floor,
Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bhavan,
Behind Pundalik Devasthan,
Near Sanjay School,
Porvorim, Bardez-Goa 403521.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Levinson J. Martins, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (S&T).
Saligao, 4th January, 2017.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Town & Contry Planning
Office of the Chief Town Planner
__
Order
No. 17/01/TCP/UD/TCP/2015-16/Pt-/5287
Read: 1. Order No. 17/1/TP-UD/TCP-08-11/3392 dated 08-08-2011.
2. Order No. 4-1-10-89-UDD-pt/2013/2839 dated 24-07-2013.
Government is pleased to transfer the following officers of the Town and Country Planning Department
in the public interest with immediate effect as per the posting shown below:-
Sr.
Name & designation
Present posting
Proposed poting
Additional works required
No.
of the officials
to be handled
1. Shri S. M. Byakod
Senior Town Planner
Senior Town Planner
—
(North Goa District Office,
(Head Quarter, Panaji)
Mapusa Goa)
2. Shri Rajesh J. Naik
Senior Town Planner
Senior Town Planner
Additional charge of
(Head Quarter, Panaji)
(North Goa District
TCP Board in Head
Office, Mapusa Goa)
Quarter.
The officer at Sr. No. 2 shall move first and report to his new posting.
This is issued with the approval of the Government vide note No. 17/01/TCP-UD/TCP/2015-16/Pt/5218
dated 27-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Dr. S. T. Puttaraju, Chief Town Planner & ex officio Joint Secretary.
Panaji, 30th December, 2016.
________
Notification
No. 36/1/TCP/280/2016/5248
Whereas, the Government of Goa has acquired
a land admeasuring an area of 2093 acres in the
villages of Mopa (part), Varconda (part), Virnoda
(part), Casarvanem (part), Chandel (part) and
Uguem (part) situated at Pernem Taluka (hereinafter
refer to as the “said area”) to develop an
International Airport;
And whereas, the Goa Town and Country
Planning Board has recommended to declare the
said area as a Planning Area and the Government
decided to declare the said area as “Mopa
International Airport Planning Area”;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers
conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 18
of the Goa, Daman and Diu Town and Country
Planning Act, 1974 (Act 21 of 1975), the
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
818
Government of Goa hereby declares the area as
specified in column (1) of the schedule hereto as
planning area with limits of such area as specified
in column (2) of the said schedule.
SCHEDULE
Area
Limits of area
1
2
Mopa International
North: By Survey Nos. 35, 25
Airport Planning area:
and 22 (Part) of Uguem
Comprising of part of
Village and Survey
the Village Panchayat
Numbers 18, 106, 105
areas of Uguem, Mopa,
& 70 of Mopa Village
Chandel, Casarvanem
and Maharashtra
and Varconda
State.
South: By Survey Nos. 44,
50, 47, 46, 45, 61, 66,
70 (Part), 85 (Part),
87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92,
94, 93, 102 (Part), 118
(Part), 117 (Part), 114
(Part), 112, 115 (Part),
109 (Part) & 108 of
Varconda Village and
Survey Numbers 236
(Part), 238 (Part), 225
(Part), 223 (Part), 222
(Part), 183 (Part), 205
(Part) & 219 (Part) of
Casarvanem Village.
East: By Survey Nos. 214,
277 (Part) & 264 (Part)
of Casarvanem and
Survey Nos. 266 (Part),
19 (Part) & 35 (Part)
of Chandel Village.
West: By Survey Nos. 33
(Part), 32 (Part), 31
(Part) & 34 (Part) of
Uguem Village and
Survey Nos. 38 &
37 of Varconda
Village.
The detailed plan of the above planning area is
annexed to this Notification.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Dr. S. T. Puttaraju, Chief Town Planner & ex
officio Joint Secretary.
Panaji, 28th December, 2016.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
819
Department of Tribal Welfare
Directorate of Tribal Welfare
__
Order
No. 1-75-2016-17/ADMN/DTW/9889
Read: Memorandum No. 1-75-2016-17/ADMN/
/DTW/9227 dated 09-12-2016.
On recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission vide their letter No. COM/I/5/82(1)/
/2016/377 dated 09-11-2016, the Government of Goa
is pleased to appoint Shri Gokuldas H. Parab to the
post of Assistant Director, Tribal Welfare, Group ‘B’,
Gazetted in the Directorate of Tribal Welfare,
Panaji on temporary basis in the pay scale of
Rs. 9,300-34,800+Grade Pay of Rs. 4,600/- (as per
6th Pay Commission) and other admissible
allowance with immediate effect, as per the terms
and conditions contained in the Memorandum
cited above.
Shri Gokuldas H. Parab shall be on probation for
a period of two years.
Shri Gokuldas H. Parab is declared medically fit
as per report of the Medical Board of Goa Medical
College.
As per the report of District Magistrate, North
Goa, nothing adverse is reported regarding
character and antecedents of Shri Gokuldas H.
Parab.
The expenditure towards pay and allowances of
the Assistant Director (Tribal Welfare) shall be
debited to the following Budget Head.
2225—Welfare of SC/ST/OBC; 02—Welfare
of ST; 001—Direction & Administration;
01—Directorate of Tribal Affairs (P); 01—Salaries.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Sandhya Kamat, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Tribal Welfare).
Panaji, 26th December, 2016.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Water Resources
Office of the Chief Engineer
__
Order
No. 3/25-5/87/WR/1139
On the recommendation of the Goa Public
Service Commission as conveyed vide confidential
letter No. COM/II/11/27(3)/2016/453 dated 12-12-2016,
Government is pleased to order the promotion of
the following Junior Engineer to the post of
Assistant Engineer in Water Resources Department
on regular basis in the pay scale of Rs. 9,300-
-34,800+Grade Pay Rs. 4,600/- with immediate effect
and post him against the place indicated below:-
Sr.
Name and designation
Place of posting
No.
on promotion
1. Shri Sashidharan P. M.,
Assistant Engineer,
Assistant Engineer
SD-V, WD-II, WRD,
Dharbandora.
The officer shall be on probation for a period of
two years as specified in column No. 9 of the
Recruitment Rules notified in the Official Gazette,
Extraordinary, Series I No. 28 dated 11-10-2001. This
is issued vide Government approval No. 8051/F
dated 20-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
S. T. Nadkarni, Chief Engineer & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (WR).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2017.
________
Addendum
No. 3/25-15/90/WR/1115
Read: Order No. 3/25-15/90/WR/953 dated
15-11-2016.
In this order cited above, the following para is
added:
“This is issued with the approval of Goa Public
Service Commission conveyed vide their letter
No. COM/II/11/27(2)/2016/1231 dated 03-11-2016”.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
S. T. Nadkarni, Chief Engineer & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (WR).
Porvorim, 29th December, 2016.
———‹‹‹———
Department of Women & Child Development
Directorate of Women & Child Development
__
Order
No. 4-3-2000/W&CD/Part/8140
Government is pleased to extend the ad hoc
appointment of Mukhya Sevika in respect of
Kum. Roshan Naik, Child Development Project
Officer, Block office, Sanguem and Smt. Rupa Dalvi,
Child Development Project Officer, Block office,
Tiswadi (Group ‘B’, Gazetted) in the pay scale of
Rs. 9,300-34,800+Grade Pay Rs. 4,200/- for a interim
period with effect from 11-05-2016 to 31-10-2016
i.e. 5 months 21 days.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 41
12TH JANUARY, 2017
820
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 32.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA–297/350–1/2017.
The expenditure in respeect of above posts
shall be debited to the Budget Head of Account
“2235—Social Security & Welfare; 102—Child
Welfare; 03—Integrated Child Development Project
Scheme including Health cover (Plan) (A);
01—Salaries”.
The above ad hoc extension of appointment shall
not bestow any substantive right for regular
appointment of regularization of the promotions.
This issues with the concurrence of the
Government vide U. O. No. 331/F dated 23-11-2016
and Goa Public Service Commission vide letter
No. COM/II/11/59(1)2015/1463 dated 09-12-2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
S. V. Naik, Director & ex officio Addl. Secretary
(Women & Child Development).
Panaji, 16th December, 2016.
Notification
No. 2-109(10)2016/DWCD/8394
In exercise of the powers conferred by the
Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa in Suo Motu
Writ Petition No. 2/2016, the inmates (ITPA, 1956)
of Protective Home, Merces, Goa are required to be
temporarily shifted on the first floor of the building
marked “C” in the complex of Apna Ghar, Merces,
Goa where presently the Juvenile Justice Boards
are functioning.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Shilpa Shinde, I.A.S., Director (Women & Child
Development)
Panaji, 2nd January, 2017.