Panaji, 18th May, 2017 (Vaisakha 28, 1939)

SERIES II No. 7

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

977

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2015-2017

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Notification

No. 6-13-2011/EST/RCS/Part I/502

The office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Ponda Zone, Ponda-Goa have been shifted

from 2nd floor, Government Office Building Complex, Ponda to “Sahakar Bhavan”, near Goa State Co-op.

Milk Producers Union, Curti, Ponda, Goa w.e.f. 2-5-2017.

Gurudas P. Pilarnekar, Registrar & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-op. Societies).

Panaji, 5th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Education, Art & Culture

Directorate of Education

Vocational Education Section

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/26

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Mrs. Bindiya P. Volvotkar,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,200/-

Damodar Hr. Sec. School,

B. Sc. (Home Science)

Gudi-Paroda, Quepem-Goa.

Note:-

There are five Extraordinary issues to the Official Gazette, Series II No. 6 dated 11-05-2017 as follows:—

(1) Extraordinary dated 16-05-2017 from pages 859 to 864 regarding Notification from Department of Panchayati

Raj & Community Development.

(2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 16-05-2017 from pages 865 to 874 regarding Order, Notice in Form No. 2 &

Notification from Deparment of Elections.

(3) Extraordinary (No. 3) dated 16-05-2017 from pages 875 to 972 regarding Corrigendum from Department

of Panchayati Raj & Community Development.

(4) Extraordinary (No. 4) dated 17-05-2017 from pages 973 to 974 regarding Notification & Corrigendums from

Department of Elections & Department of Panchayati Raj & Community Development.

(5) Extraordinary (No. 5) dated 17-05-2017 from pages 975 to 976 regarding Notification from Goa Legislature

Secretariat.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

978

Ms. Melissa D’Souza,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,600/-

Dip. in Hotel Mgt. &

Catering Tech.

Ms. Sima Pereira,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

B. Sc. (H.I.A.)

M. Sc. in Hospital

& Health Inf. Adm.

Mrs. Freda D’Souza,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

B. Sc., M. Sc. (Physics), B. Ed.

(IGNOU)

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/27

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Anthony Edilbert D’Souza,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

Gauncar Hr. Sec. School,

B. Sc. (Hotel Mgt. Catering Tech.

Raia, Salcete-Goa.

& Tourism)

M. Sc. (Tourism &

Hosp. Mgt.)

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/28

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Mrs. Dalima Leitao,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

Jawaharlal Nehru Hr. Sec.

B. Sc. (Home Science)

School, Fatorda, Margao-Goa.

M. Sc. (Fashion Technology)

Damodar Hr. Sec. School,

Gudi-Paroda, Quepem-Goa.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

979

Miss Sushma Bhatker,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

B. Sc. (Home Science)

M. Sc. (Hotel Mgt. Catering Tech.

& Tourism)

Mrs. Edgell Gomes,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

B. Sc. (Home Science)

M. Sc. (Hotel Mgt. & Catering

Technology)

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/29

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Ms. Maleeta J. Barretto,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,200/-

Fr. Basilio Andrade Memorial

B. Sc. (Home Science)

Hr. Sec. School, Majorda,

Salcete-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/30

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Mr. Savio D’Costa,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,600/-

St. Alex Hr. Sec. School,

Dip. in Hotel Mgt. & Cat. Tech.

Curtorim, Salcete-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

Jawaharlal Nehru Hr. Sec.

School, Fatorda, Margao-Goa.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

980

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/31

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Ms. Bruna Irence Dias,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,600/-

Guardian Angel Hr. Sec.

HSSC, Dip. in Hotel Mgt.

School, Curchorem-Goa.

& Cat. Tech.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/32

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Sadika Farhath M. Ali,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

Mount Mary’s Hr. Sec.

B. Sc. (Nutrition Food Service

School, Chinchinim-Goa.

Mgt. & Dietetics)

M. A. (Tourism Mgt.)

M. Phil. in Tourism Mgt.,

M. Sc. in Hotel Mgt.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/33

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Mr. Prathamesh P. Sankhalkar,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

Shri Bhumika Hr. Sec.

Dip. in Hotel Mgt. & Cat. Tech.

School, Parye, Satari-Goa.

Bachelor of Business Admn.

Master of Arts (Human Resource

Magt.)

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

981

Mr. Sandesh S. Sawant,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

Shri Bhumika Hr. Sec.

Bachelor of Hotel Mgt.

School, Parye, Satari-Goa.

Master of Arts (Tourism Mgt.)

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/34

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Mrs. Supriya D. Kambli,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,200/-

Harmal Panchakroshi

B. Sc. (Home Science)

Hr. Sec. School, Harmal-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/35

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Mr. Sandip D. Gawas,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

M. Com., B. Ed.

Mrs. Shilpa Dhawaskar/Gauns,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,200/-

B. Sc. (Nursing)

Mr. Sameer N. Gawas,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,600/-

XII Science, Dip. in Mech. Engg.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/36

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

Vividha Vidya Pratisthan’s V. R.

Gauns Mem. Hr. Sec. School,

Navelim, Sanquelim-Goa.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

982

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Ms. Sharin Udaikumar Arambolkar,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

St. Xavier’s Hr. Sec. School,

M. Com., B. Ed.

Mapusa-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/Part VI/37

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed for regularization of the services of below mentioned

full time vocational teachers who were on contract basis in accordance with Office Memorandum

No. DE/VOC/373/2016-17/P.VII/395 dated 22-11-2016. The regularisation shall be effective from the date

of issue of the said Office Memorandum.

Sr.

Name of full time teacher

Pay Scale

Name of the

No.

on contract basis

Hr. Sec. School

Mrs. Diksha D. Tarkar,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

M. A., M. Com., B. Ed.

Mr. Rajesh kumar M. Narulkar,

Rs. 9,300-34,800+G. P. 4,800/-

B. Com., M.C.A., P.G.D.C.A.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

G. P. Bhat, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

———‹———

Purushottam Walawalkar

Hr. Sec. School, Khorlim,

Mapusa-Goa.

Office of the Returning Officer, Goa Board of

Secondary and Higher Secondary Education

Notification

No. GBSHSE/IT/BRD-ELE/2017/1001

In pursuance of sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Goa,

Daman and Diu Secondary and Higher Secondary

Education Board Members Election Procedure

Rules, 1979, I, Shri Damodar Guna Phadte, the

Returning Officer hereby notify 16th July, 2017

(Sunday) to be the date for election to elect the

members referred to in clauses (iii), (iv), (v), (vi)

and (vii), under “Class B-Elected Members” of

sub-section (1) of Section 12 of the Goa, Daman and

Diu Secondary and Higher Secondary Education

Board Act, 1975 (Act No. 13 of 1975).

Shri Damodar Guna Phadte, Returning Officer.

Alto Betim, 11th May, 2017.

Directorate of Art & Culture

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017-18/864

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause 5

of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa,

the Government is pleased to nominate Shri Sanjay

Satardekar, as the Chairman of Ravindra Bhavan,

Baina-Goa with immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017-18/865

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause 5

of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa,

the Government is pleased to nominate

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

983

Dr. Dharmendra Prabhudessai, as the Vice-

-Chairman of Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa with

immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017-18/866

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause

7(vii) of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-

-Goa, the Government is pleased to nominate

following members on the General Council of

Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa with immediate effect.

1. Shri Mohan Dicholkar, Vasco-Goa.

2. Shri Santosh Naik, Vasco-Goa.

3. Shri Sudesh Bhosle, Vasco-Goa.

4. Shri Prasad Prabhugaonkar, Vasco-Goa.

5. Ms. Noela Rodrigues, Vasco-Goa.

6. Smt. Kamla Prasad Yadav, Vasco-Goa.

7. Shri Dhanu Dicholkar, near Ganapati Temple,

Sanmolem, Baina, Vasco-Goa.

8. Shri Pravesh Amonkar, Vasco-Goa.

9. Shri Anil Kondurkar, Vasco-Goa.

10. Shri Shyam Chari, Sasmolem, Baina, Vasco-

-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017-18/867

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause

11(viii) of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan,

Baina-Goa, the Government is pleased to nominate

following members on the Executive Board of

Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa with immediate effect.

1. Shri Mohan Dicholkar, Vasco-Goa.

2. Shri Santosh Naik, Vasco-Goa.

3. Shri Sudesh Bhosle, Vasco-Goa.

4. Shri Prasad Prabhugaonkar, Vasco-Goa.

5. Ms. Noela Rodrigues, Vasco-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017/868

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause 5

of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali,

the Government is pleased to nominate Dr. Pramod

P. Sawant, MLA, Sankhali-Goa as the Chairman of

Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali-Goa with immediate

effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017/869

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause 5

of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali,

the Government is pleased to nominate Shri Vithoba

Ghadi, Sankhali-Goa as the Vice-Chairman of

Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali-Goa with immediate

effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017/870

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause

7(vii) of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan,

Sankhali, the Government is pleased to nominate

following members on the General Council of

Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali-Goa with immediate

effect.

1. Shri Gokuldas Kamat, Sankhali-Goa.

2. Shri Gopinath Gauns, Sankhali-Goa.

3. Shri Damodar Satodkar, Sankhali-Goa.

4. Shri Sidhi Prabhu, Sankhali-Goa.

5. Shri Sunil Sinari, Sankhali-Goa.

6. Shri Rajendra Malik, Sankhali-Goa.

7. Shri Nitesh Naik, Sankhali-Goa.

8. Shri Manohar Volvoikar, Sankhali-Goa.

9. Shri Ajit Desai, Sankhali-Goa.

10. Shri Subhash Harwalkar, Sankhali-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

984

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017/871

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause

11(viii) of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan,

Sankhali, the Government is pleased to nominate

following members on the Executive Board of

Ravindra Bhavan, Sankhali-Goa with immediate

effect.

1. Shri Gokuldas Kamat, Sankhali-Goa.

2. Shri Gopinath Gauns, Sankhali-Goa.

3. Shri Damodar Satodkar, Sankhali-Goa.

4. Shri Sidhi Prabhu, Sankhali-Goa.

5. Shri Sunil Sinari, Sankhali-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017-18/872

In exercise of the powers conferred under Clause

5 of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan,

Curchorem-Goa, the Government is pleased to

appoint Shri Nilesh Cabral, Curchorem-Goa as

Chairman of Ravindra Bhavan, Curchorem-Goa with

immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DAC/Acctts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017-18/873

In exercise of the powers conferred under Clause

5 of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan,

Curchorem-Goa, the Government is pleased to

appoint Shri Keshav (Rajoo) M. Naik, Curchorem-

-Goa as Vice-Chairman of Ravindra Bhavan,

Curchorem-Goa with immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

Order

No. DAC/Accts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017-18/874

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause

7(vii) of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan,

Curchorem-Goa, the Government is pleased to

nominate following members on the General

Council of Ravindra Bhavan, Curchorem-Goa with

immediate effect.

1. Shri Rudresh G. Prabhu Tendulkar, H. No.

1092, Shiv Ashirwad, Opp. Power Station,

Pontemol, Curchorem-Goa.

2. Shri Jeetendra alias Navin J. Khandekar,

H. No. 712, Saraswati Niwas, Pontemol,

Curchorem-Goa.

3. Shri Riyaz Sheikh, “Zahida Manzil” Carrimodi,

Curchorem-Goa.

4. Ms. Jasmina Braganza, H. No. 407/2,

Cariamoddi, Curchorem-Goa.

5. Shri Vishwas Sawant Desai, Curchorem-Goa.

6. Shri Joaquim Fernandes, H. No. 769, Vodlemol,

Kakoda, Curchorem-Goa.

7. Shri Jaikumar Damodar Khandekar, H. No.

841/3, Khandiwada, Curchorem-Goa.

8. Shri Shailesh Dumuskar, Curchorem-Goa.

9. Shri Mukund Z. Naik, Curchorem-Goa.

10. Shri Shivrai Fondekar, Curchorem-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. DAC/Accts./RBB-RBS/Committee/2017-18/875

In exercise of powers conferred under Clause

11(viii) of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan,

Curchorem-Goa, the Government is pleased to

nominate following members on the Executive

Board of Ravindra Bhavan, Curchorem-Goa with

immediate effect.

1. Shri Rudresh G. Prabhu Tendulkar, H. No.

1092, Shiv Ashirwad, opp. Power Station,

Pontemol, Curchorem-Goa.

2. Shri Jeetendra alias Navin J. Khandekar,

H. No. 712, Saraswati Niwas, Pontemol,

Curchorem-Goa.

3. Shri Riyaz Sheikh, “Zahida Manzil” Carrimodi,

Curchorem-Goa.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

985

4. Ms. Jasmina Braganza, H. No. 407/2,

Cariamoddi, Curchorem-Goa.

5. Shri Vishwas Sawant Desai, Curchorem-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Prasad Lolayekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Art & Culture).

Panaji, 8th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Home

Home—General Division

—

Order

No. 27/14/2016-HD(G)/1303

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section

3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 (Central

Act 60 of 1952), the Government of Goa, being of

the opinion that it is necessary to do so, hereby

appoints a Commission of Inquiry consisting of

Shri Avinash Lavande, retd. Justice for the purpose

of making an inquiry into the various issues

highlighted in the August House in respect of Goa

State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Panaji-Goa.

The Commission shall complete the inquiry and

submit the report to the Government within a period

of 90 days from the date of publication of this

Notification in the Official Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Neetal P. Amonkar, Under Secretary (Home).

Porvorim, 9th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Industries

—

Order

No. 3/25/2014-IND/104

Government of Goa is pleased to appoint Chief

Executive Officer, Goa Investment Promotion and

Facilitation Board, Secretariat, Porvorim-Goa, as a

Nodal Officer of the State to interact and provide

assistance to Invest India, the National Investment

Promotion Agency set up by the Government of

India.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Industries).

Porvorim, 10th May, 2017.

Notification

No. 3/26/2014-IND/109

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section

3 of the Goa Investment Promotion Act, 2014

(Goa Act 13 of 2014), the Government of Goa hereby

re-constitutes the Goa Investment Promotion and

Facilitation Board consisting of the following

members, namely:-

1) Chief Minister of Goa and

— Chairperson

Minister for Industries

ex officio.

2) Minister for Information

— Vice-Chair-

and Technology

person

ex officio.

3) Minister for Tourism

— Vice-Chair-

person

ex officio.

4) Secretary (Industries)

— Member.

5) Secretary (Tourism)

— Member.

6) Mr. Atrey Sawant

— Member.

7) Mr. Ernest Dias

— Member.

8) Mr. Yatin Kakodkar

— Member.

9) Mr. Girish Bharne

— Member.

10) Mr. Rajkumar Kamat

— Member.

11) Mr. Shekhar Sardessai

— Member.

12) Chief Executive Officer

— Member

Secretary.

This Notification shall come into force with

immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Industries).

Porvorim, 12th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Labour

Order

No. 22/4/2001-Lab-Part-Vol-I/308

Read: 1) Government Order No. 22/4/2001-Lab-

-Part/690 dated 28-11-2014.

2) Government Order No. 22/4/2001-Lab-

-Part-Vol-I/1055 dated 14-12-2015.

Government is pleased to extend the ad hoc

promotion of Smt. Luisine Lopes Pereira,

Employment Counselling Officer (Group ‘B’,

Gazetted) in the Pay Band 2—Rs. 9,300-34,800 with

Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200/- or corresponding scale at

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

986

level 6 in the VIIth Pay Commission pay structure,

in the Office of the Commissioner of Labour and

Employment, Panaji-Goa for a further period of eight

months and four days with effect from 28-03-2016

to 30-11-2016 on the terms and conditions

mentioned in the order referred to in the preamble

above.

The expenditure shall be debited to the

Budget Head 2230–Labour and Employment;

02–Employment Service; 101–Employment Services;

05–Setting up of Job Development and Vocational

Guidance Unit (Non-Plan); 01–Salaries.

This issues with the concurrence of Goa Public

Service Commission vide their letter No. COM/II/

/11/28(4)/2015/78 dated 24-04-2017.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 24/3/87-Lab-Part-I/310

Government is pleased to order the transfer and posting of the following Insurance Medical Officers

in E.S.I. Scheme, under office of Commissioner Labour & Employment in public interest with immediate

effect as under:

Sr.

Name of the Insurance

Present place of posting

Place of posting on

No.

Medical Officer

transfer

1. Dr. Deepak Ramnathkar

E.S.I. Dispensary, Kundaim

E.S.I. Dispensary, Honda.

2. Dr. Reshma Hiremath

E.S.I. Dispensary, Mapusa

E.S.I. Dispensary, Bicholim.

3. Dr. Pavitra Deshprabhu

E.S.I. Dispensary, Bicholim

E.S.I. Dispensary, Panaji.

4. Dr. Sunil Kavlekar

E.S.I. Dispensary, Honda

E.S.I. Dispensary, Kundaim.

(transferred to ESI Dispensary,

Corlim but not relieved)

5. Dr. Reena Choudhury

E.S.I. Dispensary, Corlim

Retained in E.S.I. Dispensary, .

(transferred to ESI Hospital,

Kundaim.

Margao but not relieved)

This order shall come into force with immediate effect.

This supersedes earlier order No. 24/3/87-LAB-Part-I/04 dated 2-01-2017.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 8th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 28/12/2017-LAB/315

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Hindustan Foods Limited,

Marvasodo, Usgao, Ponda, Goa, and it’s workman,

represented by the Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule

hereto (hereinafter referred to as the “said

dispute”);

And whereas the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for

adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act

14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Act”), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said

dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court-II of

Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under Section 7(1)

of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

“(1) Whether Shri Hemant G. Shet, Sales

Representative could be construed as

“workman” as defined under Section 2(s) of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central

Act 14 of 1947)?

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

987

(2) If the answer to the issue No. (1) above is in

the affirmative, then, whether the action of

the management of M/s. Hindustan Foods

Limited, Marvasodo, Usgao, Ponda, Goa in

transferring the workman, Shri Hemant G.

Shet, Sales Representative to Jammu, with

effect from 10-10-2016, is legal and justified?

(3) If the answer to issue No. (2) above is in the

negative, then, what relief the workman is

entitled to?”

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 9th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 22/4/2001-Lab/Part-Vol-I/330

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/II/11/28(1)/2017/621 dated 05-05-2017,

Government is pleased to promote Shri Sunil A.

Gaonkar, Employment Counselling Officer to the

post of Employment Officer (Group ‘B’, Gazetted) in

Regional Employment Exchange, Office of the

Commissioner, Labour and Employment, Panaji, Goa,

on regular basis, in the pay scale of

PB–2 Rs. 9,300-34,800+4,600/- (Grade Pay) with

corresponding scale at Level 7 in the VIIth Pay

Commission Pay Structure with immediate effect.

The expenditure on pay and allowances shall

be debited to the Budget Head 2230–Labour

and Employment; 02–Employment Service;

101–Employment Services; 05–Setting up of Job

Development and Vocational Guidance Unit

(Non-Plan); 01–Salaries.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 11th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 22/4/2001-Lab/Part-Vol-I/332

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/II/11/28(2)/2017/618 dated 03-05-2017,

Government is pleased to promote Shri Bhalchandra

U. Sinai Kenkre, Assistant Employment Officer to

the post of Employment Counselling Officer (Group

‘B’, Gazetted) in Regional Employment Exchange,

Office of the Commissioner, Labour and Employ-

ment, Panaji, Goa, on regular basis, in the pay scale

of PB–2 Rs. 9,300-34,800+4,200/- (Grade Pay) with

corresponding scale at Level 6 in the VIIth Pay

Commission Pay Structure with immediate effect.

The Officer shall be on probation for a period of

two years from the date of joining and shall submit

Annual Assessment Report for the said period.

The expenditure on pay and allowances shall

be debited to the Budget Head 2230–Labour

and Employment; 02–Employment Service;

101–Employment Services; 05–Setting up of Job

Development and Vocational Guidance Unit (Non-

Plan); 01–Salaries.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 12th May, 2017.

________

Notification

No. 28/9/2017-LAB/Part-II/287

The following award passed by the Industrial

Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on

31-03-2017 in reference No. IT/57/2000 is hereby

published as required by Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of

1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 2nd May, 2017.

______

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND

LABOUR COURT

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Mr. Vincent D’Silva, Hon’ble Presiding

Officer)

Ref. No. IT/57/2000

Shri Ashok N. Kamat Dhakankar,

Cimas Apartments, Flat No. 2,

Behind Hotel Yebra,

Fatorda, Margao-Goa.

… Workman/Party I

V/s

The Managing Director,

M/s Varun Beverages Ltd.,

Arlem, Raia-Goa.

… Employer/Party II

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

988

Workman/Party I represented by Shri K. V. Nadkarny.

Employer/Party II represented by Ld. Adv. Shri G.

B. Kamat.

AWARD

(Delivered on this the 31st day of the month

of March of the year 2017)

By Order dated 07-08-2000, bearing No. IRM/

/CON/SG/(6)/1999/3947, the Government of Goa in

exercise of powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short The

Act), has referred the following dispute to this

Tribunal for adjudication.

“(1)

Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Goa Bottling Company Private Limited,

Arlem, Raia, Goa, in superannuating

Shri Ashok N. Kamat Dhakankar, Sr. Sales

Accountant, with effective from 6-1-1998, is

legal and justified?

(2)

If not, to what relief the workman is

entitled?”

2. On receipt of the reference, it was registered

as IT/57/2000 and registered A/D notices were

issued to both the parties. Upon appearance,

Party I filed a claim statement at Exhibit 3 and

Party II filed a written statement at Exhibit 4.

3. In short, the case of Party I in the claim

statement is that the Party I was employed with

Party II in the year 1971 in their factory at Raia,

Arlem. The Party I was not issued any letter of

appointment at the time of appointment in the

Company, however Party I was issued letters of

increment. Initially, when he was employed in the

Company, there were no Standing Orders of the

Company and that they were framed subsequently

and the age of retirement in the Company as

informed to him was 58 years. A Memorandum of

Settlement to amend Clause 27 of the Certified

Standing Orders of the Company was signed

between the management of the Company and the

Union. The Party I was initially appointed in the

Sales section and was given designation of Sr. Sales

Assistant and he continued to work under the same

designation till 1991, in which year it changed to

Sr. Sales Accountant and was carrying out work of

clerical in nature like maintaining party-wise

account of sales, etc.

4. The Party I on 6-1-1998 received a letter issued

by Executive (Legal and Taxation) informing him

that on crossing the age of superannuation he is

retired from the service of the Company with

immediate effect and was advised to collect the

final settlement dues on 7-1-1998 and was retired

from the service of the Company abruptly and

illegally from 6-1-1998, although on the date of

forceful retirement, he was just 55½ years of age,

whereas the age of retirement in the Company was

58 years as per the settlement with the Union. The

date of birth of Party I as admitted in the records

of the Company is 1-7-1942 and therefore he would

have attained the age of retirement which was 58

years as on 1-7-2000 as per the Certified Standing

Orders and the Memorandum of Settlement. The

action of the management in retiring him from

services at the age of 55½ years is illegal and bad-

in-law. Hence, the dispute.

5. In the written statement, Party II claimed that

it has formulated Standing Orders defining the

conditions of the employment of the workers which

Standing Orders are certified by Certifying Officer

as required under the law and as per clause 27 of

the Certified Standing Orders, the age of the

retirement or superannuation of the employee shall

on completion of 55 years or such other age as may

be agreed upon between the employer and the

employee. The workman completed 55 years of age

as on 1-7-1997 and accordingly issued a letter dated

6-1-1998 and was paid his final Settlement dues on

7-1-1998. The Memorandum of Settlement was

arrived at between the parties but the same was

not given effect to by modifying the existing

Certified Standing Orders in terms of Section 10 of

the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act,

1946 and as such clause 27 of Certified Standing

Orders providing the age of retirement/

/superannuation to be 55 years of age is in force

till today. The action of the Company in

superannuating the workman is perfectly legal and

justified.

6. In the rejoinder at Exhibit 5, the Party I denied

the case put forth by Party II in written statement.

It is claimed that the agreement enhancing the

age of retirement was given effect and most of the

workers were retired after attaining the age of 58

years, however Party I workman was victimized

and deprived of the benefits by the management.

7. It is a matter of record that Party II filed an

application at Exb. 16 for change of name of Party II

in the cause title of statement of claim by

substituting the existing name of M/s. Goa Bottling

Pvt. Ltd. with M/s. Varun Beverages Pvt. Ltd. as

pursuant to the approval of scheme of amalgamation

of M/s. Varun Beverages (International) Ltd. with

M/s. Varun Beverages Ltd. vide Order of Hon’ble

High Court of Delhi dated 12-3-2013, the said M/s.

Varun Beverages (International) Ltd. was merged

with M/s. Varun Beverages Ltd. w.e.f. 1-5-2013 and

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

989

pursuant to said merger, the said M/s. Varun

Beverages (International) Ltd. ceased to exist. The

said application was not objected to by Shri K. V.

Nadkarny for Party I and accordingly the

application was granted on 25-2-2016 and

necessary changes were made to the cause title.

8. Based on the above averments of the

respective parties, the following issues were

framed:

1. Whether the Party I proves that the action

of the Party II in superannuating him w.e.f.

6-1-1998 is illegal and unjustified?

2. Whether the Party II proves that Party I is not

a ‘Workman” within the meaning of

Sec. 2(s) of the I.D. Act, 1947?

3. Whether the Party II proves that the Party I

is gainfully employed after his superannua-

tion?

4. Whether the Party I is entitled to any relief?

5. What Award?

9. In support of his case, Party I, Shri Ashok

Kamat Dhakankar examined himself and produced

on record a copy of increment letter dated 31-1-1983

at Exb. W-1, a copy of increment letter dated

31-1-1985 at Exb. W-2, a copy of increment letter

dated Nil at Exb. W-3, a copy of increment letter

dated 7-2-1989 at Exb. W-4, a copy of increment

letter dated 2-8-1990 at Exb. W-5 and a copy of

increment letter dated 2-2-1991 at Exb. W-6, a copy

of promotion letter dated 28-2-1991 at Exb. W-7, a

copy of increment letter dated 6-2-1992 at

Exb. W-8, a copy of increment letter at 1-1-1994 at

Exb. W-9, a copy of letter dated 1-1-1995 at

Exb.W-10, a copy of increment letter dated

28-10-1996 at Exb. W-11 and letter dated 30-1-1997

at Exb. W-12, a copy of letter dated 6-1-1998 at

Exb. W-13, a copy of service certificate dated

7-1-1998 at Exb. W-14, a copy of representation

dated 9-12-1998 along with birth certificate at

Exb. W-14(a) colly, a copy of report of failure dated

10-7-2000 at Exb. W-15, a copy of amendment to

clause No. 27 of Memorandum of Settlement at

Exb. W-16, a copy of Statement of account along

with enclosure at Exb. W-17 colly, a copy of letter

dated 15-12-2000 at Exb. W-18, a copy of birth

certificate at Exb. W-19. The Party I also examined

Shri Datta R. Borkar and closed his case. Party II

did not lead any evidence in defence.

10. I have gone through the records of the case

and have duly considered the arguments advanced.

My answers to the above issues are as follows:

Issue No. 1

…

In the affirmative.

Issue No. 2

…

Not pressed.

Issue No. 3

…

Partly in affirmative.

Issue No. 4

…

In the affirmative.

Issue No. 5

…

As per final order.

REASONS

Issue No. 1:

11. Shri K. V. Nadkarny for the Party I has

submitted that Party I was employed in the year

1971 with Party II though he was not given any

appointment letter at the time of employment.

However, on 5-1-1998 he received a letter that he

is retired from services of Party II with immediate

effect on crossing the age of retirement on

1-7-1997 though the said letter is silent on what is

the age of retirement in the Company. The Party I

has protested the action of Party II by his

representation dated 7-1-1998 at Exb. W-4 and

brought on record that under Settlement at

Exb. W-16, the age of retirement was fixed as 58

years and according to the said settlement, the

workers like Ramesh Amonkar, Manuel Colaco and

Datta Borkar were retired at the age of 58 years.

The Party II had not led any evidence before the

Court. The materials on record prove that the age

of retirement in the Company was 58 years and

therefore Party I has proved issue No. 1.

12. Ld. Adv. Shri G. B. Kamat for the Party II has

submitted that the Settlement arrived at by and

between the Goa Shop and Industrial Workers

Union and the Party II whereby clause 27 of the

Certified Standing Orders was amended and the

age of superannuation of the male employees was

changed to 58 years clearly shows that the age of

superannuation of the male employees of Party II

was 55 years at the date of signing of the said

settlement. He further submitted that even though

said settlement is arrived at, the Certified Standing

Orders were not amended for incorporating the

said amendment by following the procedures as

prescribed in Section 10 of the Industrial

Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, which

provides for mode in which the amendment to the

Certified Standing Orders is to be carried out and

therefore even as on today as per Certified

Standing Orders of Party II, the age of

superannuation of the male employees is 55 years

only and not 58 years. It is therefore, for Party I to

prove that the age of superannuation as per

Certified Standing Orders of the Party II is 58 years

and not 55 years, which he failed.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

990

13. Ld. Adv. Shri G. B. Kamat further submitted

that the said settlement was not arrived at during

the course of conciliation proceedings which is

clear from the said settlement. The said settlement

was arrived at by an agreement between the Union

and Party II and therefore it is settlement within

the meaning of Section 2(p) read with Section 18(1)

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which lays

down that the settlement arrived at by an

agreement between the employer and the workmen

otherwise than in the course of conciliation

proceedings shall be binding on the parties to the

agreement and since Goa Shop and Industrial

Workers Union was a Party to the settlement on

behalf of the workers of Party II, the said settlement

was applicable to and binding only on the

employees who were the members of the said Union

at the time of entering into the settlement. It is

nowhere the case of Party I that he was anytime

member of the Union nor he has examined any

office bearer to prove as to how many and who

were the workers of Party II as on the date of

signing the said settlement and since the Party I

has failed to prove that he was the member, he

cannot take any benefit of the said settlement. The

employees namely Manuel Colaco or witness of

Party I, Shri Datta Borkar were superannuated at

the age of attaining 58 years and it was the

prerogative of Party II to decide as whether or not

to superannuate or continue the services of a

particular employee even after attaining the age of

superannuation as the said settlement was

inoperative and mere fact that the other employees

were given benefit of the settlement, the Party I

was not entitled to the said benefit by way of

right.

14. The Party I, Shri Ashok Kamat Dhakankar has

examined himself and has averred that he joined

the services of Party II on 16-1-1971 but was not

given an appointment letter. There is no dispute

about the joining of services by Party I which is

from 16-1-1971. He also claimed that he received a

letter dated 31-1-1983 from Party II that he has

been designated as Sr. Sales Assistant. He also

stated that on 6-1-98 he received a letter from

Party II informing him that he is retiring from service

on crossing the age of superannuation on 1-7-1997.

Exhibit W-13 is the said letter which states that

Party I has been retired from the services of the

Company on crossing the age of superannuation. It

is however not mentioned in the said letter what

was the age of superannuation or what was the

age of Party I on the date he retired from the service.

He also stated that he had made a representation

dated 9-12-98 to the Managing Director of Party II

wherein he had mentioned that he had attained

the age of 58 as on 1-7-2000 and that he be

reinstated with full back wages or in the alternate

he should be paid full wages till 1-7-2000. There is

no dispute that he was superannuated on 1-7-1997

and that Party I would have completed 58 years as

on 1-7-2000.

15. The Party I, Shri Ashok Kamat Dhakankar in

his cross examination has stated that there was a

settlement between the Union and the

management of Party II whereby the retirement

age of the male employees was increased to 58

years. Exhibit W-16 is the extract of amendment to

clause 27 of Company’s approved Standing Orders

dated 5-4-1979 wherein the age of superannuation

of the male employees was fixed at 58 years (Fifty

eight years). The amendment to the Standing

Orders has not been challenged nor disputed by

which the age of superannuation of male

employees has been increased to 58 years and that

it would be applicable with immediate effect. The

said amendment to clause 27 of Company’s Standing

Orders has been acted upon and put in practice as

from the documents at Exb. W-17 produced on

record reveal that one Shri Ramesh Amonkar has

been retired from the service at the age of 58 years

and not 55 years as claimed by Party II. The

documents at Exb. W-17 also show that one Manuel

Colaco was also retired at the age of 58 years on

3-1-2001.

16. There is no evidence on record that the above

referred persons were the members of the Union

nor it is the case of Party II that being the members

of Party II they have afforded the said benefits. The

contention of Party II that it is prerogative of the

Company to decide as whether or not to

superannuate or continue the services of a

particular employee even after completing 55 years

till 58 years as per Certified Standing Orders is

dehors record. In any event, it shows that the said

employees were superannuated at the age of 58

years as per the amended Certified Standing

Orders. The documents on record at Exb. W-17 and

Exb. W-18 also show that Ramesh Amonkar and

Manuel Colaco were relieved from services on

attaining the age of 58 years. The documents do

not support the contention of Party II about its

prerogative to relieve the workmen between 55 to

58 years of age.

17. Moreover, the witness, Shri Datta Rudraji

Borkar who was working with Party II as General

Manager has stated that as per the Certified

Standing Orders, the retirement age of an employee

was 55 years, but as per Settlement at Exb. W-16

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

991

which has been signed by him as representative of

Party II, the date of retirement of male employees

was changed to 58 from 55 years and that the said

settlement was implemented and in pursuant to

the said settlement, the male employees retired at

the age of 58 years and that he also retired at the

age of 58 years in terms of the said settlement. It

therefore shows that the settlement at Exb. W-16

fixes retirement age for male employees of Party II

as 58 years and according to the said settlement,

the workmen like Ramesh Amonkar and Manuel

Colaco were retired at the age of 58 years.

Moreover, the General Manager of Party II Company

who had signed the settlement at Exb. W-16 as a

representative of Party II has also been retired at

the age of 58 years in terms of the settlement,

which is indicative of the fact that the said

settlement was implemented and acted upon by

the parties to the settlement.

18. The contention of Ld. Adv. Shri G. B. Kamat

that as per the Standing Orders age of retirement

of the employee was 55 years and although, clause

27 of the said Certified Standing Orders were

amended to 58 years but the same was not

amended by following the procedure prescribed

under Section 10 of the Industrial Employment

(Standing Orders) Act, 1946 and therefore as on

today, the age of superannuation of the employees

is 55 years only and not 58 years cannot be

accepted, more so when, the said terms of

settlement at exhibit 16 was acted upon and

implemented and the employees including the

Manager himself were retired at the age of 58 years.

The contention of Ld. Adv. Shri G. B. Kamat that

mere fact that employees, namely Manuel Colaco

or Ramesh Amonkar were given benefits of the

settlement does not mean the settlement was

implemented also cannot be accepted, more so

when, Shri Datta Borkar, Manager of Party II has

clearly admitted that the settlement was

implemented and that he was retired at the age of

58 years in terms of the said settlement.

19. The evidence of Party I coupled with the

documents produced on record including the terms

of Settlement at Exb. W-16, so also the testimony of

the Manager of Party II, Shri Datta Rudraji Borkar

clearly show that the terms of settlement at

Exb. W-16 amends clause 27 of the Certified

Standing

Orders

regarding

the

age

superannuation of the employees and that in terms

of the said settlement, the age of superannuation

of the male employees of the Party II was changed

to 58 years and that the said terms of settlement

was implemented and acted upon by the parties.

There is also no dispute that Party I was

superannuated on 6-1-1998 from services at the

age of 55½ years as against the age of retirement

of 58 years, which is illegal and unjustified and in

contravention of the said Settlement at Exb. W-16.

It is therefore the action of Party II in

superannuating the Party I with effect from

6-1-1998 is illegal and unjustified.

Issue No. 2:

20. Both the Advocates submitted that they shall

not press for issue No. 2 as they are not disputing

the status of Party I as workman and therefore, the

question of answering the said issue does not arise.

Issue No. 3:

21. Ld. Adv. Shri G. B. Kamat for the Party II has

submitted that the action of the Party II in

superannuating the workman is perfectly legal and

justified and therefore, the Party I is not entitled to

any reliefs, however if the Tribunal comes to the

conclusion that the action of Party II in

superannuating Party I is illegal and that the Party I

is entitled for monetary benefits from the date of

his illegal superannuation till the date he

completes 58 years of age, the Tribunal may

consider the period from 1-5-1998 till 29-2-2000

when the Party I was gainfully employed, which

fact the Party I himself admitted and for which

said person is not entitled to any wages.

22. On the converse, Shri Nadkarny has

submitted that Party I has deposed that he was

unemployed for about 3-4 months, however from

1-5-1998, he started working with one Mr. Savio

Queiroz on a salary of Rs. 3,000/- per month and

that he worked for him till 29-2-2000, but did not

work in between for four months as he met with an

accident and subsequently his mother expired. He

also submitted that the last drawn salary of

Party I was Rs. 7,000/- approximately. He further

submitted that it is possible that rather than starve

while awaiting final decision on his complaint, the

workman may have taken alternate employment

and it would be fair to let the workman retain such

amount by way of solatium for the shock of having

has services terminated, the anxiety and agony

caused thereby and the endeavours perhaps often

fruitless, to find alternate employment.

23. In the case of Deepali Gundu Surwase

vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidhyalaya

(D.ED) & Ors., (2013) 10 SCC 324, the Division

Bench of Hon’ble Bombay High Court has held that

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

992

if the order of termination is void ab initio, the

workman is entitled to full back-wages. The

relevant Para 22 of the decision is extracted

hereunder:-

“22. The very idea of restoring an employee

to the position which he held before dismissal

or removal or termination of service implies

that the employee will be put in the same

position in which he would have been but for

the illegal action taken by the employer. The

injury suffered by a person, who is dismissed

or removed or is otherwise terminated from

service cannot easily be measured in terms of

money. With the passing of an order which

has the effect of severing the employer

employee relationship, the latter’s source of

income gets dried up. Not only the concerned

employee, but his entire family suffers grave

adversities. They are deprived of the source

of sustenance. The children are deprived of

nutritious food and all opportunities of

education and advancement in life. At times,

the family has to borrow from the relatives

and other acquaintance to avoid starvation.

These sufferings continue till the competent

adjudicatory forum decides on the legality of

the action taken by the employer. The re-

instatement of such an employee, which is

preceded by a finding of the competent

judicial/quasi-judicial body or Court that the

action taken by the employer is ultra vires the

relevant statutory provisions or the principles

of natural justice, entitles the employee to

claim full back-wages. If the employer wants

to deny back-wages to the employee or contest

his entitlement to get consequential benefits,

then it is for him/her to specifically plead and

prove that during the intervening period the

employee was gainfully employed and was

getting the same emoluments. Denial of back-

wages to an employee, who has suffered due

to an illegal act of the employer, would amount

to indirectly punishing the concerned

employee and rewarding the employer by

relieving him of the obligation to pay back-

wages including the emoluments.”

24. Needless to mention, Party I is not entitled

for re-instatement as he completed 58 years of age

as on 30-6-2000, however he has stated that he

remained unemployed for about three or four

months and from 1-5-1998 he started working with

one of his friends, Shri Savio Queiroz who was the

stockiest for Coca Cola. He worked with him till

29-2-2000 and during the above period, he did not

work with Mr. Queiroz for four months as he had

met with an accident and also his mother expired.

Mr. Queiroz was paying him Rs. 3,000/- per month.

He had not worked with any other Company or any

other person other than with Mr. Queiroz. His last

drawn salary was Rs. 7,000/- approximately at the

time his services were terminated by Party II. He

also stated that he would have completed 58 years

of age on 30-6-2000. He denied the suggestion in

the cross examination that from the next day of

termination of his services, he joined the services

of Coca Cola Company at Margao depot. There is

absolutely no evidence on record that Party I was

working with Coca Cola soon after his termination.

It is also not denied that Party I was working with

Mr. Queiroz from 1-5-1998 till 29-2-2000, but did not

work for about 4 months during the above period

as he was sick and his mother expired, which shows

that he worked for said Mr. Savio Queiroz for about

18 months. There is also no dispute that Mr. Queiroz

paid Rs. 3,000/- per month and that his last drawn

salary was approximately Rs. 7,000/- per month.

25. The next question is what should be the

amount of compensation and the Apex Court in

the case of O. P. Bhandari Vs. Indian Tourism

Development Corporation Ltd. and Others (1986)

4 SCC 337, has held that in appropriate case, such

compensation in lieu of re-instatement can be to

the extent of 3.33 years salary including allowances,

besides the usual retirement benefits as well as

cost and while doing so, the Apex Court had

noticed that the then prevailing rates of bank

interest was 15% p.a. and had found that the award

of compensation, equivalent to 3.33 years service,

would yield 50% of the annual salary and other

allowances to the employee. The Party I has stated

that his last drawn salary was Rs. 7,000/- per month.

The increment letters at Exb. W-11 and Exb. W-12

show that the last drawn salary of Party I was

around Rs. 7,000/- per month. There is no dispute

that the Party I was illegally terminated on

7-1-1998 and he would have completed 58 years of

age on 30-6-2000, which would be around 30

months. There cannot be any dispute that in

arriving at the amount of compensation, a

reasonable guess work and approximation, is

inherent and unavoidable. Even assuming that

Party I was earning Rs. 7,000/- per month and that

his unpaid back wages was for 30 months, the

amount which he would be getting was around Rs.

2,10,000/-.

26. The Party I has admitted that he was

gainfully employed with Mr. Savio Queiroz from

15-1-1998 till 29-2-2000 with salary of Rs. 3,000/-

with exception of 4 months. Even assuming that

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

993

he worked with said Savio Queiroz for 18 months

@ Rs. 3,000/- p.m., the said amount of Rs. 54,000/-

could be safely deducted from Rs. 2,10,000/- and

the amount would work out to Rs.1,56,000/-.

Admittedly, the Party I has been prosecuting his

claim before the Labour Commissioner since 1999

and before the Tribunal from the year 2,000 after

failure report was sent to appropriate Government.

The Party I has been fighting the litigation since

last 17 years and therefore the reasonable amount

towards interest would be around Rs. 2,38,680/-

assuming that the prevailing rate of interest at

present is around 9% p.a. although the rate of

interest assumed in the case of O.P. Bhandari, supra

was 15% p.a. The Party I is also entitled for cost of

litigation which he pursued for last 17 years

relentlessly as also for pain and agony as he has

suffered punishment for no fault of his own, which

would work out to Rs. 20,320/- approximately and

therefore equity demands taking into overall

consideration, a total monetary compensation of

Rs. 4,15,000/- (Rupees Four lakhs fifteen thousand

only) would serve the ends of justice, which would

be just, proper and equitable in the facts and

circumstances of this case. Hence, the above issue

is answered accordingly.

27. In the result, I pass the following:

ORDER

1) It is hereby held that the action of the

management of M/s. Goa Bottling Company

Private Limited, Arlem, Raia, Goa

(M/s. Varun Beverages Ltd., Arlem, Raia, Goa)

in superannuating Shri Ashok N. Kamat

Dhakankar, Sr. Sales Accountant, with

effective from 6-1-1998, is illegal and

unjustified.

2) The Party II is directed to pay to Party I

monetary compensation of Rs. 4,15,000/-

(Rupees Four lakhs fifteen thousand only)

within two months from the date of

publication of Award failing which the same

shall carry interest at the rate of 9% p.a.

3) Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Vincent D’Silva),

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal and

Labour Court.

Department of Personnel

Order

No. 7/22/2012-PER

Read: Order No. 12026/05/2016.IFS-I dated

24-04-2017.

The Governor of Goa is pleased to relieve

Shri Sunil Kumar Aggarwal, IFS (AGMUT: 1986),

Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

(APCCF) from this Administration w.e.f. 05-05-2017

to take up his new assignment as APCCF at

Regional office, Shillong, on deputation basis under

Central Staffing Scheme of Ministry of Environment,

Forest and Climate Change.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Meghana Shetgaonkar, Under Secretary

(Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 4th May, 2017.

________

Addendum

No. 7/30/2014-PER

Read: Notification No. 7/30/2014-PER dated

12-04-2017.

In the Government Notification read at preamble,

the following Work/Department shall be added to

Shri Ameya Abhyankar, IAS (2007):

“Director of Information Technology”

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shashank Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 10th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Public Health

Order

No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD/732

Read: Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 30-11-2012.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 17-01-2014.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 13-10-2016.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 30-11-2012.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 13-10-2016.

Order No. Misc/1/2010-I/PHD/PF III dated

13-03-2013.

Order No. Misc/1/2010-I/PHD/PF III dated

13-03-2013.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

994

Order No. Misc/1/2010-I/PHD/PF III dated

13-03-2013.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 30-11-2012.

Order No. Misc/1/2010-I/PHD/PF III dated

13-03-2013.

Order No. Misc/1/2010-I/PHD/PF III dated

13-03-2013.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 30-11-2012.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 30-10-2016.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 30-11-2012.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 30-10-2016.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 30-11-2012.

Order No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD dated 30-10-2016.

The Hospital Visiting Committees constituted for

all Hospitals, Community Health Centres, Primary

Health Centres under Directorate of Health Services

vide Government orders referred to above, stand

dissolved with immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Maria Seomara Desouza, Under Secretary

(Health-II).

Porvorim, 5th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Public Works

Office of the Principal Chief Engineer

Corrigendum

No. 34/3/2017/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/26

Read: Order No. 34/3/2016/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/209

dated 12-12-2016.

In the 3rd and 4th lines of 4th para of the order

read at preamble, the words “He shall draw his

pay and allowances against the vacant post of

Superintending Engineer, SIDCGL, Panaji” may be

read as “He shall draw his pay and allowances/

/Tours against the vacant post of Chief Engineer

(NHRB), PWD, Altinho, Panaji”.

The rest of the contents remain unchanged.

This is issued in supersession of the earlier

Corrigendum No. 34/3/2017/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/257

dated 27-03-2017.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Uttam P. Parsekar, Principal Chief Engineer & ex

officio Addl. Secretary (PWD).

Panaji, 4th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Revenue

Order

No. 14/27/2014-RD/790

Whereas, the Government vide Notification

No. 14/27/2014-RD dated 20-12-2016 pre-published

the draft Goa Land Revenue (Disposal of

Government Lands) (Eight Amendment) Rules, 2016

(hereinafter referred to as “said draft Rules”) in the

Official Gazette, Series I No. 38 dated 22-12-2016

and invited objections and suggestions to the said

Draft Rules;

And whereas, the Secretary to the Government

of Goa, Revenue Department, has received various

objections and suggestions to the said Draft Rules;

And whereas, in order to examine the said

objections and suggestions, the Government has

decided to constitute the following Committee

consisting of following members:-

1) Hon’ble Revenue Minister

—

Chairman.

2) Shri N. D. Agarwal,

—

Member.

Ex-Collector

3) Shri Tulshidas Naik,

—

Member.

Jt. Director of Accounts

The above committee shall complete the

scrutiny of all the objections and suggestions and

submit its report to Hon’ble Chief Minister within

30 days from the date of this order.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Sudin A. Natu, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).

Porvorim, 15th May, 2017.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

995

Department of Town & Country Planning

Notification

No. 4-5-2-84/UDD/TCP/pt/2012-17/1353

In exercise of the powers conferred by

sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 20 of the Goa,

Daman and Diu Town and Country Planning Act,

1974 (Act 21 of 1975), read with Rule 3 of the Goa,

Daman and Diu Town and Country Planning

(Planning and Development Authorities) Rules,

1977 and in supersession of the Government

Notification No. 4-5-2-84-UDD/pt/TCP/2012-15/3157

dated 31-07-2015, published in the Official Gazette,

Series II No. 19 dated 06-08-2015, the Government

of Goa hereby re-constitutes in respect of the Panaji

Planning Area and Mapusa Planning Area, declared

as such vide Government Notification No. 4-5-2-84-

-UDD(Part)/05/2737 dated 27-9-2005, published in

the Official Gazette, Extraordinary No. 3, Series I

No. 25 dated 27-09-2005 read with the subsequent

Government Notification No. 4-5-2-84-UDD(Part)/

/06/31 dated 03-01-2006, published in the

Extraordinary Official Gazette, Series I No. 39 dated

03-01-2006, the Government Notification No. 4-5-2-

-84-UDD/Pt/TCP/2012-15/4928 dated 9-12-2015,

published in the Official Gazette, Series I No. 38

dated 17-12-2015, and the Calangute-Candolim

Planning Area declared as such vide the

Government Notification No. 4-5-2-84-UDD/pt/TCP/

/15/60 dated 08-01-2015, published in the Official

Gazette, Series II No. 42 dated 15-01-2015 and

subsequently amended vide the Government

Notification No. 4-5-2-84-UDD/Pt/Tcp/2016/4297

dated 18-10-2016, published in the Official Gazette,

Series II No. 29 dated 20-10-2016, an authority to be

called the North Goa Planning and Development

Authority, consisting of the following members,

namely:-

1) Shri Michael Lobo,

— Chairman.

Hon’ble MLA, Calangute

2) Shri Francis D’Souza,

— Member.

Hon’ble MLA, Mapusa

3) Shri Sidharth S. Kuncalienkar,

— Member.

Hon’ble MLA, Panaji

4) Smt. Jeniffer Monserratte,

— Member.

Hon’ble MLA, Taleigao

5) Shri Glen Ticolo,

— Member.

Hon’ble MLA, Aldona

6) Chairperson of Mapusa

— Member.

Municipal Council

7) Shri Deepak Mhapsekar,

— Member.

Ex. Corporator CCP

8) Shri Shubham Chodankar,

— Member.

Corporator CCP

9) Shri Menino D’Cruz,

— Member.

Corporator CCP

10) Shri Dattaprasad Murari

— Member.

Dabholkar

11) Town Planning Officer

— Member

Secretary.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Dr. S. T. Puttaraju, Chief Town Planner & ex officio

Joint Secretary.

Panaji, 10th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Water Resources

Office of the Chief Engineer

Order

No. 3/25-15/90/WR/145

Read: Government Order No. 3/25-15/90/WR/76

dated 29-04-2015.

Government is pleased to extend the ad hoc

promotion of Shri Manguesh D. Sathe, Assistant

Engineer (Civil) in Water Resources Department for

the interim period of 11 months and 05 days

w.e.f. 29-04-2016 to 05-04-2017, as the Officer is

promoted on regular basis w.e.f. 06-04-2017 vide

Order No. 3/25-5/87/WR/41 dated 06-04-2017.

This is issued with the approval of Goa Public

Service Commission conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/II/11/27(2)/2016/73 dated 21-04-2017.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

P. J. Kamat, Chief Engineer & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (WR).

Porvorim, 9th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 3/25-15/90/WR/171

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission as conveyed vide confiden-

tial letter No. COM/II/11/27(1)/2016/619 dated

03-05-2017, Government is pleased to order the

promotion of the following Assistant Engineer to

the post of Executive Engineer in Water Resources

Department on regular basis in the pay Level 11

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 7

18TH MAY, 2017

996

with immediate effect and post him against the

place indicated below:-

Sr.

Name and designation

Place of posting

No.

on promotion

Shri Ramdas K. Naik,

Office of the Executive

Executive Engineer

Engineer, Works Divi-

sion-III, WRD, Ponda-

-Goa.

The Official at Serial Number 1 shall be on

probation for a period of two years as specified in

column No. 9 of the Recruitment Rules notified in

the Official Gazette, Extraordinary, Series I No. 28

dated 11-10-2001.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

P. J. Kamat, Chief Engineer (WR).

Porvorim, 11th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Women & Child

Development

Directorate of Women & Child Development

Notification

No. 2-103(128)-2017/DWCD/HLC/632

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section

16 (2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection)

Act, 2015, the Government of Goa hereby

constitutes the High Level Committee to review

the pendency of the cases of the Juvenile

Justice Board (North and South Goa) every six

months, consisting of the following members:-

1. Executive Chairpersons of the — Chairperson.

Goa State Legal Services

Authority, Panaji-Goa

2. Secretary (Home), Secretariat, — Member.

Porvorim

3. Secretary (Women & Child

— Member.

Development), Secretariat,

Porvorim

4. Director, Stop Child Abuse

— Member.

Now (Non Government

Organisation), Panaji

5. Member, Juvenile Justice

— Member.

Board (North Goa), Apna

Ghar, Merces-Goa

6. Member, Juvenile Justice

— Member.

Board (South Goa), Apna

Ghar, Merces-Goa

7. Dy. Director (Apna Ghar),

— Member

Apna Ghar, Merces-Goa

Secretary.

The above constituted committee shall monitor

the number of cases pending before the Board,

duration of such pendency, nature of pendency and

reasons thereof every six months.

The tenure of the above committee will be for

three years from the date of its constitution.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

S.V. Naik, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary

(W&CD).

Panaji, 9th May, 2017.

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 20.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA–47/350–5/2017.