Panaji, 25th May, 2017 (Jyaistha 4, 1939)

SERIES II No. 8

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

1015

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2015-2017

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Agriculture

Directorate of Agriculture

Order

No. 2/14/95/Agri (Part)/20

Read: Order No. 2/14/95/Agri(Part)/74 dated

13-06-2016.

Government is pleased to extend the deputation

period of Shri Ranjit Babi Mhapsekar, Assistant

Agriculture Officer, to Raj Bhavan, Dona Paula-Goa,

for a period of one year w.e.f. 12-05-2017 to 11-05-2018.

The deputation of Shri Ranjit B. Mhapsekar shall

be governed by standard terms and conditions of

deputation as contained in the O.M. No. 13/4/74-PER

dated 12-02-1999 and 11-1-2007 issued by Personnel

Department and amended from time to time.

This issues with the concurrence of the

Government.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Ulhas B. Pai Kakode, Director & ex officio Joint

Secretary (Agriculture).

Tonca-Caranzalem, 12th May, 2017.

Department of Civil Aviation

Directorate of Civil Aviation

Order

No. DOCA/EST/Appt.Dy.Col/18/16-17/133

Read: Order No. DOCA/EST/Appt.Dy.Col/18/16-17/

/509 dated 1st December, 2016.

Addendum No. DOCA/EST/Appt.Dy.Col/18/

/16-17/925 dated 3rd January, 2017.

The contractual appointment of Shri N. D.

Agarwal, Retired Collector, South Goa as Advisor

in the Directorate of Civil Aviation is hereby

extended for a period of 4 months from 1st April,

2017 till 31st July, 2017. He shall be paid lumpsum

amount of Rs. 50,000 per month in addition to

pension and he will be provided a vehicle to be

hired from GTDC.

The expenditure shall be debited from the

following Budget Head:

Demand No. 84 (Civil Aviation)

3053 — Civil Aviation;

02 — Airport;

800 — Other Expenditure;

01 — Establishment of Airport Cell

(Plan);

50 — Other Charges.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Dr. S. Shanbhogue, Director & ex officio Joint

Secretary (Civil Aviation).

Porvorim, 16th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of General Administration

Notification

No. 25/4/95-GA&C/1533

On account of sad demise of Shri Anil Madhav

Dave, Union Minister of State (Independent charge)

Note:-

There are four Extraordinary issues to the

Official Gazette, Series II No. 7 dated 18-05-2017

as follows:—

(1) Extraordinary dated 18-05-2017 from pages 997

to 998 regarding Order from Department of

Elections.

(2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 22-05-2017 from

pages 999 to 1002 regarding Notification from

Department of Elections.

(3) Extraordinary (No. 3) dated 23-05-2017 from

pages 1003 to 1004 regarding Order from

Department of Home.

(4) Extraordinary (No. 4) dated 24-05-2017 from

pages 1005 to 1013 regarding Notifications from

Department of Panchayati Raj & Community

Development.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1016

for Environment, Forest and Climate Change, on

18-05-2017, as a mark of respect to the departed

dignitary, the National Flag will fly Half Mast on

18-05-2017 on all the buildings where it is regularly

flown in the State Capital.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Varsha S. Naik, Under Secretary (GA-II).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Labour

Order

No. 28/55/2016-LAB/338

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Pope John XXIII Higher

Secondary School, Quepem, Goa and it’s workmen

represented by the Higher Secondary and College

Attendants Association of Goa, in respect of the

matter specified in the Schedule hereto

(hereinafter referred to as the “said dispute”);

And whereas the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for

adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act

14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Act”), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said

dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal

of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under Section

7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

“(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Pope John XXIII Higher Secondary

School, Quepem, Goa, in refusing to concede

the following demands raised by the

Higher Secondary and College Attendants

Association of Goa vide their letter dated

28-09-2015, is legal and justified?

(a) Laboratory Attendants and Library

Attendants in Higher Secondary Schools

should be granted vacation as is

granted to Laboratory Assistants and

Librarian every year as per rules.

(b) Laboratory Attendants should be

allotted duties only in laboratories and

Library Attendants should be allotted

duties only in libraries as per rules.

Attendants and Library Attendants

should be 6 hours and 30 minutes every

day as per rules. Beyond 6 hours and

30 minutes work, Laboratory Attendants

and Library Attendants should be paid

overtime at the rate of double the gross

wages paid for that day. This overtime

should be paid retrospectively from the

date of joining till the date this issue is

settled.

(d) Laboratory Attendants and Library

Attendants should be treated as Group

“C” employees as per rules.

(e) Laboratory Attendants should be

provided Lab Coats and Lab Safety

Shoes while at work.

(2) If the answer to issue No. (1) above is in the

negative, then, what relief the workmen are

entitled to?”.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 15th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 28/49/2016-LAB/351

Whereas the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Indi Pharma Private Limited,

Plot No. 2-9, Bethora Industrial Estate, Bethora, Goa,

and their workmen, represented by the Gomantak

Mazdoor Sangh, in respect of the matter specified

in the Schedule hereto (hereinafter referred to as

the “said dispute”);

And whereas the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for

adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section

10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act

14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Act”), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said

dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal

of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under Section

7-A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

“(1) Whether the action of the management

of M/s. Indi Pharma Private Limited, Plot

No. 2-9, Bethora Industrial Estate, Bethora,

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1017

Goa, in retrenching the following seven

workmen with effect from 03-07-2008, is

legal and justified?

Sr.

Name

Designation

No.

Shri Vasudev B. Gaude

Operator.

Shri Ramnath Kodarkar

Operator.

Shri Prakash Naik

Operator.

Shri Ramdas K. Gaude

Operator.

Shri Prashant Naik

Operator.

Shri Ulhas Kanekar

Operator.

Shri Anand Kotharkar

Operator.

(2) If the answer to issue No. (1) above is in

the negative, then, what relief the workmen

are entitled to?”.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 17th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 24/3/87-Lab-Part-I/355

Read: Order No. 24/3/87-Lab-Part-I/310 dated 8-5-2017.

In partial modification to the above Order, the transfer and posting of the following Insurance Medical

Officers in E.S.I. Scheme, under office of Commissioner Labour & Employment is as indicated against their

names with immediate effect.

Sr.

Name of the Insurance

Present place of

Transferred vide order

Transferred and

No.

Medical Officer

posting

dated 8-5-2017, referred

posted at

above

1. Dr. Deepak Ramnathkar

E.S.I. Dispensary,

E.S.I. Dispensary, Honda

E.S.I. Dispensary,

Kundaim

Honda.

2. Dr. Reshma Hiremath

E.S.I. Dispensary,

E.S.I. Dispensary, Bicholim

E.S.I. Dispensary,

Mapusa

Panaji.

3. Dr. Pavitra Deshprabhu

E.S.I. Dispensary,

E.S.I. Dispensary, Panaji

E.S.I. Dispensary,

Bicholim

Mapusa.

4. Dr. Sunil Kavlekar

E.S.I. Dispensary, Honda

E.S.I. Dispensary, Kundaim

E.S.I. Dispensary,

(transferred to E.S.I.

Kundaim.

Dispensary, Corlim, but

not relieved)

5. Dr. Reena Choudhury

E.S.I. Dispensary, Corlim

Retained in E.S.I. Dispensary,

Retained in E.S.I.

(transferred to E.S.I.

Corlim

Dispensary,

Hospital, Margao but

Corlim.

not relieved)

6. Dr. Richa Saxena

E.S.I. Dispensary, Panaji

—

E.S.I. Dispensary,

Bicholim.

The transfer of the officials at Sr. No. 2 and 3 are made at their own request and hence not entitled

to claim TA/DA and joining time.

The transfers of the officials at Sr. Nos. 1, 4, 5 and 6 are made in public interest.

This order shall come into force with immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 17th May, 2017.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1018

Notification

No. 28/9/2017-LAB/Part-I/317

The following award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 10-04-2017 in reference

No. LC-II/IT/17/14 is hereby published as required

by Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 9th May, 2017.

______

THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble

Presiding Officer)

Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/17/14

Shri Jeetendra Lounde,

r/o. H. No. 27, Post Waddo,

Betul, N. C. Goa (403603)

… Workman/Party-I .

V/s

M/s. Gautam Shipping Corporation,

(Adani Enterprises),

405, Rayker Plaza, Kaiga Road,

Habhuvada, Karwar 581306 … Employer/Party-II.

Workman/Party-I represented by Adv. Shri P.

Gaitonde.

Employer/Party-II marked Ex-parte.

Panaji, Dated: 10-04-2017

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause

(d) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) the

Government of Goa, by order dated 26-06-2014,

bearing No. 28/11/2014-Lab/369, referred the

following dispute for adjudication to the Industrial

Tribunal of Goa at Panaji. Pending the matter for

adjudication before the Hon’ble Industrial Tribunal-

-cum-Labour Court, Panaji-Goa, the Govt. of Goa

vide its order dated 09-02-2016 transferred the

present reference for its adjudication to this Labour

Court II, Panaji-Goa.

“1. Whether the action of the management

of M/s. Gautam Shipping Corporation

(Adani Enterprises), Karwar, in refusing

employment to Shri Jeetendra Lounde,

Driver, with effect from 28-11-2012, is legal

and justified?

2. If not, what relief the Workman is entitled

to?”

On receipt of the reference, a case was

registered under No. IT/17/14 and registered A/D

notice was issued to the Parties. In pursuance to

the said notice, the Workman/Party I (for short

‘Workman’), put in his appearance. The Employer/

/Party II (for short ‘Employer’) was duly served by

registered A/D post. The Employer has however,

failed and neglected to appear in the Industrial

Tribunal, Panaji-Goa and also this Labour Court II

on the scheduled date of hearings without any

justifiable cause. The Employer was therefore

marked an ex-parte and an ex-parte proceedings

were conducted.

3. The Workman filed his Statement of Claim on

26-09-2014 at Exb-5. The facts of the case in brief

as pleaded by the Workman are that he was

employed with the Employer as First Class Engine

Driver w.e.f. 01-05-2011. He stated that he was

employed on M. V. Barge 8 of the Employer. He

stated that the said barge was carrying ore loaded

at Maina and unloaded at MPT (Berth No. 9) Vasco,

Goa. He stated that he had attended his duties

regularly and also used to sign the official log book

kept on the barge till 16-09-2012. He stated that

the Employer thereafter withdrawn the said official

log book and he was orally told not to report for

duties. He stated that however, he continued

attending duties till November, 2012 and handed

over the charge of the said barge to the Employer

on 28-11-2012. He stated that from June, 2012, the

said M. V. Barge No. 8 was docked at Old Goa and

he used to look after the maintenance of the said

barge.

4. He stated that he had been refused

employment w.e.f. 28-11-2012 on account of closure

of mines. He stated that he has not been paid his

earned wages for the month of October, 2012 and

November, 2012. He stated that he had filed an

application u/s. 33-c (2) of the I. D. Act, 1947, before

the Labour Court for non-payment of his earned

wages for the month of October and November,

2012. He stated that the said application is pending

for adjudication before the Labour Court II,

Panaji-Goa and bears registration No. LC-II/LCC/

/02/2013. He submitted that he has been refused

employment malafidely and no termination order

has been issued, which is mandatory as per the

service law/settlement and therefore refusal of

employment to him by the Employer is illegal,

arbitrary and bad-in-law. He submitted that the

closure of mines and barges remaining idle, are

not a ground for refusing him employment and

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1019

non-payment of wages as no termination order was

issued to him. He submitted that he was the only

earning member in the family, having dependent

on him, his wife and two school children. He

submitted that he is unemployed from the date of

refusal of his employment and have no source of

income to maintain his family. The Workman

therefore prayed that the Employer be directed to

reinstate him in service with full back wages and

other consequential benefits.

5. Neither the Employer appeared nor filed any

written statement.

6. Based on the pleadings filed by the Workman,

the Hon’ble Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour

Court framed the following issues on 20-03-2015 at

Exb. 07.

1. Whether the Party I proves that the refusal

of employment by Party II w.e.f. 28-11-2012

is illegal, arbitrary and bad-in-law?

2. What relief? What Award?

7. My answers to the aforesaid issues are as

under:

(a)

Issue No. 1: In the negative.

(b)

Issue No. 2: As per final order.

REASONS

8. Issue Nos. 1 and 2:

Ld. Adv. Shri P. Gaitonde chose to file synopsis

of written arguments on behalf of the Workman.

The burden to prove the issue No. 1 is on the

Workman. To prove his case, the Workman has

examined himself and produced on record certain

documentary evidence in support of his oral

evidence.

9. The Workman contended that he has been

refused the employment by the Employer w.e.f.

28-11-2012 on the ground that mines had been

closed down and the barges were idle. The

Workman contended that the said refusal of

employment to him is illegal as he has not been

paid wages for the month of October and November,

2012 after discharging regular duties. The Workman

further contended that he had been refused

employment malafidely and no termination order

has been issued to him, which is mandatory as per

the service law/settlement. I do not find any merits

in any of the aforesaid grounds chosen by

the Workman to contend that his refusal/

/termination from service by the Employer is illegal

and unjustified. The Workman also failed to

produce on record any service law or settlement,

which binds on the Employer to mandatorily

terminate the service of the Workmen only by

issuing termination letter in writing. Moresoever,

the Workman failed to point out or quote either in

his claim statement or in the evidence on record

that the Employer violates any of the provisions of

the I. D. Act, 1947 or any other law in force, while

terminating his services.

10. The evidence on record indicates that the

service of the Workman was refused/terminated by

the Employer on account of closure of its business.

Thus, the termination of service of the Workman is

otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way

of disciplinary action and the said termination does

not fall within the exception of retrenchment as

defined u/s. 2 (oo) of the I. D. Act, 1947. The

termination of services of the Workman therefore

amounts to retrenchment within the Section of 2

(oo) of the I. D. Act, 1947. Section 25-F of the I. D.

Act, 1947 laid down the condition precedent for a

valid retrenchment. The evidence on record

indicates that neither the Workman pleaded that

he was in continuous service during the period of

12 calendar months preceding the date of

termination of his service and that the termination

of his service is in violation of Section 25-F of the

I.D. Act, 1947 nor produced on record any evidence

to that effect. Thus, the Workman failed to prove

that the action of the Employer in refusing him

service w.e.f. 28-11-2012 is illegal and unjustified.

In the absence of any evidence on record, it is held

that the action of the Employer in refusing

employment to the Workman w.e.f. 28-11-2012 is

legal and justified. The Workman is therefore not

entitled to any relief. The issue Nos. 1 and 2 are

therefore answered in the negative.

In view of the above, I proceed to pass the

following order:

ORDER

1. It is held that the action of the management

of M/s. Gautam Shipping Corporation

(Adani Enterprises), Karwar, in refusing

employment to Shri Jeetendra Lounde,

Driver, with effect from 28-11-2012, is legal

and justified.

2. The Workman, Shri Jeetendra Lounde,

Driver, is not entitled to any relief.

3. No order as to costs.

Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar),

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1020

Notification

No. 28/9/2017-LAB/Part-I/318

The following award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 06-04-2017 in reference

No. LC-II/IT/08/16 is hereby published as required

by Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

(Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 9th May, 2017.

______

THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble

Presiding Officer)

Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/08/16

Mrs. Rita Vaz,

R/o. H. No. 593, Pedda de Numelo,

Near Reddisson Hotel,

Varca, Salcete-Goa.

… Workman/Party-I .

V/s

M/s. Green Earth Translogistics

Pvt. Ltd.,

T/41, T/42, Alfran Plaza,

M. G. Road, Panaji-Goa

… Employer/Party-II.

Workman/Party-I represented by Shri Subhash Naik

George.

Employer/Party-II represented by Adv. Shri P.

Chawdikar.

Panaji, Dated: 06-04-2017

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) the

Government of Goa, by order dated 31-03-2016,

bearing No. 28/6/2016-Lab/233, referred the

following dispute for adjudication to the Labour

Court II at Panaji, Goa.

“1. Whether the action of the management of

Green Earth Translogistics Pvt. Ltd., Panaji,

Goa, in terminating the services of Ms. Rita

Vaz, Travel Hostess, with effect from

20-01-2015, is legal and justified?

2. If not, what relief the Workperson is entitled

to?”

2. On receipt of the reference, a case was

registered under No. LC-II/IT/08/2016 and a

registered A/D notices were issued to both the

parties. In pursuance to the said notice, both parties

put in their appearances. The Workperson was

represented by Shri Subhash Naik George and

orally submitted that the Workperson do not wish

to file any statement of claim. The Employer was

represented by Adv. Shri P. Chawdikar and orally

submitted that as the Workperson did not file her

claim statement, the Employer also do not wish to

file any written statement.

3. Heard Ld. Adv. Shri P. Chawdikar appearing

for the Employer.

4. In the case of Baldev Singh V/s The Judge,

Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Labour

Court & ors., reported in 2007 II CLR 685, the

Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan by referring the

judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of

Virendra Bhandri V/s Rajasthan State Road

Corporation Ltd., & ors., reported in (2002)

9 SCC observed as under:

“…..a reference of certain Industrial Dispute

was made to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-

-Labour Court. The workman did not appear

before the Tribunal, therefore, Tribunal held

that there remains no Industrial Dispute.

However, subsequently, the Appropriate

Government again referred the dispute to the

Tribunal on the same question and on this

occasion, the Tribunal adjudicated the matter

and made an award. The High Court held that

the finding recorded by the Tribunal in the

first reference amounted to an “award” and,

therefore, second reference was incompetent.

The Hon’ble Apex Court held that all that was

stated was that the parties concerned had not

appeared before the Tribunal and in such an

event, the Tribunal should have noted its

inability to record the finding on the issue

referred to it, not that the dispute itself does

not exist. When there is no adjudication of

the matter on merits, it cannot be said that the

industrial dispute does not exist. If the

industrial dispute still exists as is opined by

the Government, such a matter can be referred

under Section 10 of the I. D. Act, as Industrial

Disputes are preferred to the Labour Court or

the Industrial Tribunal for maintenance of

industrial peace and not merely for

adjudication of the dispute between two

private parties. Therefore, it was permissible

for the Government to have made the second

reference. ……”.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1021

The principle laid down by the Hon’ble High

Court in its aforesaid judgment binds a precedent

upon me. Applying the law laid down by the

Hon’ble High Court in its aforesaid judgment, in

the case in hand no pleadings have been filed by

the Workperson as well as by the Employer before

this Court and as such I am unable to record the

findings on the issue referred to me.

In the circumstances, I pass the following order:

ORDER

1. It is held that this Court is unable to record

the finding on the issue referred by the

Appropriate Government.

2. No order as to costs.

Inform the Government accordingly.

(Suresh N. Narulkar),

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

________

Notification

No. 28/9/2017-LAB/Part-I/319

The following award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 27-03-2017 in reference

No. LC-II/IT/09/2015 is hereby published as

required by Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Georgina Saldanha, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 9th May, 2017.

______

THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble

Presiding Officer)

Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/09/2015

Shri Chandrakant Mahale,

H. No. 253, Gosawi Wada,

Barazan, Usgao,

Ponda-Goa.

… Workman/Party-I.

V/s

M/s. Goa Meat Complex,

Marasada, Usgaon-Goa.

… Employer/Party-II.

Workman/Party-I represented by Adv. Shri D. Naik.

Employer/Party-II represented by Adv. Shri J. Lobo.

Panaji, Dated: 27-03-2017

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947) the

Government of Goa, by order dated 18-06-2015,

bearing No. 28/27/2015-Lab/611 referred the

following dispute for adjudication to the Industrial

Tribunal of Goa. The Hon’ble Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court in turn

assigned the present dispute to this Labour

Court-II, vide her order dated 24-06-2015.

“(1) Whether the action of M/s. Goa Meat

Complex Limited, Marvasada, Usgao,

Goa, in terminating the services of

Shri Chandrakant Mahale, Butcher/Worker,

with effect from 16-05-2013, is legal and

justified?

(2) If not, what relief the workman is entitled

to?”

2. On receipt of the reference, a case was

registered under No. LC-II/IT/09/15 and registered

A/D notice was issued to the Parties. In pursuance

to the said notice, the Parties put in their

appearance. The Workman/Party-I (for short

‘Workman’), filed his Statement of Claim on

20-08-2015 at Exb-5. The facts of the case in brief

as pleaded by the Workman are that he was

employed with the Employer/Party II (for short

‘Employer’) as ‘Butcher/Worker’ at its establishment

at Usgaon, Ponda, Goa with effect from June, 2001.

He stated that he was issued an appointment order

dated 19-03-2002 by the Employer. He stated that

by another order dated 06-01-2003, he was

appointed on contract basis for a period of one

year. He stated that by order dated 20-02-2003,

the Employer revised his salary to Rs. 2,600/- from

Rs. 2,500/- p.m. He stated that he also received a

letter of the Employer dated 25-02-2003 calling for

an interview to be held on 10-03-2003. He stated

that however, he was not selected for the said

permanent post, though he was working with the

Employer since June, 2001. He stated that he was

again appointed on contract basis by the Employer,

vide its order dated 23-01-2004. He stated that by

order dated 01-07-2004, the Employer arbitrarily

reduced his salary to Rs. 2,500/- p.m. He stated that

he was assigned the duties of security guard, vide

its letter dated 07-06-2012. He stated that he used

to work sometimes even on Sundays and the

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1022

Employer used to pay to him from petty cash. He

stated that he was shocked and shattered that the

Employer, without following principles of natural

justice and without his fault, abruptly and illegally

terminated his services with immediate effect vide

order dated 10-05-2013. He submitted that he made

several requests to the Employer to take him back

in its service, but, no heed was paid to his requests.

3. He submitted that he was in continuous

service with the Employer since June, 2001. He

submitted that he has completed 240 days of

service in a period of 12 calendar months, ever

since he joined the services of the Employer in the

year June, 2001. He submitted that his services

has been illegally terminated by the Employer w.e.f.

16-05-2013, by its order dated 10-05-2013.

He submitted that his service was terminated on

account of an interim order dated 30-04-2013 passed

by the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa. He

submitted that by the said order of the Hon’ble

High Court of Bombay at Goa, the slaughter of

animals in the abattoir at GMCL has been kept in

abeyance. He submitted that the division bench of

Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa, vide it’s

another order dated 26-06-2013 allowed the

Employer to operate its establishment. He

submitted that the said illegal and arbitrary action

of the Employer amounts to unfair labour practices.

He submitted that he is now unemployed and has

a dependent family to support. He submitted that

he is in great financial difficulties to meet both the

ends. He submitted that the arbitrary action of the

Employer is totally illegal, unjustified and without

following the principles of natural justice. The

Workman therefore prayed that the action of the

Employer in terminating his services be declared

as illegal and unjustified and he be reinstated in

services with full back wages.

4. The Employer resisted the claim of the

Workman, by filing its written statement on

04-11-2015 at Exb. 10. The Employer, as and by way

of its preliminary objections, submitted that the

several documents relied upon by the Workman

have not been furnished to them and as a result of

which they cannot file a composite reply to the

statements made in the claim statement by the

Workman.

5. The Employer stated that the Workman was

not associated with them in any manner

whatsoever in June, 2001. The Employer stated

that the Workman has attempted to disguise

himself as its permanent employee. The Employer

stated that the services of the Workman were used

in its establishment purely on daily rated basis, as

and when required. The Employer admitted that

the Workman was appointed by them, vide its order

dated 19-03-2002. The Employer stated that the

Workman was given a consolidated wages of

Rs. 2,500/- p.m. as can be seen from the said order.

The Employer stated that the said order clearly

states that the appointment of the Workman was

purely on contract basis for a period of one year

only and no more i.e. from 11-02-2002 to

10-02-2003. The Employer stated that by its order

dated 06-01-2003, it has reminded the Workman

that his appointment order dated 19-03-2002 would

lapse on 10-02-2003, as the contract of one year

would come to an end and the services of the

Workman would not be required thereafter. The

Employer stated that its order dated 06-01-2003 is

infact a one month notice of termination. The

Employer stated that it has never paid the

Workman a monthly salary and therefore question

of modifying the order dated 19-03-2002 does not

arise, in the light of the fact that its effect had

already lapsed on 10-02-2003. The Employer stated

that if the Workman appeared for an interview held

on 10-03-2003 for a permanent post with them and

failed to get appointed from them, it would be

logical to surmise that the Workman was not fit to

be appointed to the said permanent post. The

Employer stated that its order dated 23-01-2004

addressed to the Workman is in fact a one months’

notice of termination as the contract comes to an

end within one month. The Employer stated that it

has not paid any salary or wages or remuneration

of any kind to the Workman on 01-07-2004 as the

contract of service of the Workman came to an end

on 23-02-2004. The Employer admitted that it has

assigned the Workman the duties as a security

guard, vide its order dated 07-06-2012. The

Employer denied that the Workman was in its

continuous service since June, 2001 and that his

services has been illegally terminated with effect

from 16-05-2013, vide its order dated 10-05-2013.

The Employer stated that the termination of

services of the Workman w.e.f. 16-05-2013, vide its

order dated 10-05-2013 on account of interim order

of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa dated

30-04-2013 is legal. The Employer submitted that

as the Workman was daily wage worker and his

services were used only as and when required by

them, the termination of his services is entirely

valid. The Employer stated that although, the order

of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa,

permitted the recommencement of its operations

in its premises, the operations were never began

due to renovation work, which began at the

premises and the said renovation work is still

persisting on the present date. The Employer stated

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1023

that it has complied with the principles of natural

justice by giving notice of termination to the

Workman, though not required. The Employer

denied each and every statement of the Workman,

which are contrary to their case and prayed for

dismissal of the present reference.

6. Thereafter, the Workman filed its re-joinder on

21-03-2016 at Exb. 13. The Workman, by way of his

re-joinder, confirms and reiterates all the

submissions and averments made by him in his

claim statement to be true and correct and denies

all the statements and averments made by the

Employer in its Written Statement, which are

contrary to the statements and averments made by

him.

7. Based on the pleadings filed by the respective

Parties, this Hon’ble Labour Court II has framed

the following issues at Exb. 15.

1. Whether the Workman/Party-I proves that

the he was employed with the Employer/

/Party II w.e.f. June, 2001 in the capacity of

Butcher/Worker?

2. Whether the Workman/Party I proves that

the action of the Employer/Party II in

terminating his services w.e.f. 16-05-2013

is illegal and unjustified?

3. Whether the Workman/Party II is entitled

to any relief?

4. What Order? What Award?

8. My answers to the aforesaid issues are as

under:

(a)

Issue No. 1.

: In the negative.

(b)

Issue No. 2

: In the negative.

(c)

Issue Nos. 3 & 4 : As per final order.

REASONS

9. Issue No. 1:

In the case of V. N. S. Engineering Services

V/s. Industrial Tribunal of Goa, Daman and Diu

and Anr., reported in 1987 II LLN 968, the Hon’ble

High Court of Bombay has held that “there is

nothing in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 that

indicates a departure from the general rule that he

who approaches a Court for relief, should prove his

case i.e. the obligation to lead evidence to establish

an allegation, the test being that he who does not

lead evidence, must fail. The Hon’ble High Court

of Bombay further held that the provisions of

Rule 10-B of the I. D. (Central Rules), 1957 which

requires the party raising a dispute to file a

statement of demands relating only to the issue in

the order of reference for adjudication within 15

days from the receipt of the order of reference and

forward copies to the opposite party involved, clearly

indicates that the party who raises the industrial

disputes is bound to prove the contention raised by

him and an Industrial Tribunal or Labour Court

would be erring in placing the burden of proof on

the other party to the dispute”.

10. In the case of V. K. Raj Industries V/s Labour

Court (I) and Ors. reported in 1981 (29) FLR, 194,

the Allahabad High Court has held that “the

proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal are

judicial in nature, even though the Indian Evidence

Act, is not applicable to the proceeding before the

Industrial Court, but the principle underlying the

said Act are applicable.” The High Court further

held that “it is well settled that if a party challenges

the validity of an order and if no evidence is

produced, the party invoking the jurisdiction must

fail. The High Court has also held that if the

Workman fails to appear or to file written statement

or produce evidence, the dispute referred by the

Government cannot be answered in favour of the

Workman and he will not be entitled any relief”.

The principle laid down by the Hon’ble High

Court in its respective case is still holds good.

Applying the law laid down by the Hon’ble High

Court, in the instant case, the order of reference

has been issued by the Government of Goa at the

instance of the workman, who has raised the

present dispute pertaining to his termination of

service by the Employer w.e.f. 16-05-2013, by

contending to be illegal and unjustified. The burden

to prove that the action of the Employer in

terminating his service w.e.f. 16-05-2013 is illegal

and unjustified, is on the Workman.

11. The Workman has however failed to produce

on record any cogent evidence either oral or

documentary in support of his case by remaining

absent. On 12-07-2016, Ld. Adv. D. Naik appearing

for the Workman, during the course of hearing,

orally submitted that the Workman has expired.

Ld. Adv. Shri D. Naik also produced on record a

copy of registered A/D notice duly served on the

wife of the deceased Workman, requesting her to

pursue the matter. However, no legal heirs/legal

representatives has approached this Court to

pursue the present reference though ample

opportunities were given to them. Consequently,

there is absolutely no evidence on record to prove

any of the issues framed by this Court. Thus, in the

absence of any evidence on record, it is held that

the Workman failed to prove that he was employed

with the Employer w.e.f. June, 2001 in the capacity

of ‘Butcher/Worker’. It is also held that the action

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1024

of the Employer in terminating the services of the

Workman w.e.f. 16-05-2013, is legal and justified.

The Workman is therefore not entitled to any relief.

The issue Nos. 1 to 3 are therefore answered in the

negative.

In view of the above, I proceed to pass the

following order:

ORDER

1. It is held that the action of M/s. Goa

Meat Complex Limited, Marvasada, Usgao,

Goa, in terminating the services of

Shri Chandrakant Mahale, Butcher/Worker,

with effect from 16-05-2013, is legal and

justified.

2. The Workman, Shri Chandrakant Mahale,

is not entitled to any relief.

3. No order as to costs.

Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar),

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

———‹———

Directorate of Skill Development and

Entrepreneurship

Notification

No. 9/14/2016/ATS/1174

Read:- Government Order No. 9/14/2004/ATS/57

dated 07-01-2005.

In exercise of the powers conferred by

sub-section (1) and sub-section (4) of Section 24

of the Apprentices Act, 1961 and Notification

No. 1/3322/75-LAB (AP) dated 22-04-1978, issued

by the State Government in exercise of powers

conferred by sub-section (5) of the said Act, the

Government of Goa is pleased to re-constitute the

State Apprenticeship Council, as under:-

1. Minister of Skill Develop-

— Chairman.

ment & Entrepreneurship

2. Secretary of Skill Develop-

— Vice-

ment & Entrepreneurship

-Chairman

Department

3. State Apprenticeship

— Member

Advisor/Director-Skill

Secretary.

Development & Entre-

preneurship

4. Other Members:

A. Representatives of employers in establish-

ments in the Public Sector:

(i) Chairman,

— Member.

Mormugao Port Trust,

Vasco-Goa

(ii) Chairman,

— Member.

Goa Shipyard Limited,

Vasco-Goa

(iii) Chairman,

— Member.

Economic Development

Corporation Limited,

Panaji-Goa

(iv) Chairman,

— Member.

Kadamba Transport

Corporation Limited,

Panaji-Goa

Representatives of employers in establish-

ments in the Private Sector:

(i) Chairman,

— Member.

Dempo Group of Companies,

Panaji-Goa

(ii) Chief Manufacturing

— Member.

Officer, Zuari Industries

Limited, Zuarinagar-Goa

(iii) Director-Corporate Human — Member.

Resources, Taj Group of Hotels,

Sinquerim, Bardez-Goa

(iv) The General Manager,

— Member.

M.R.F. Limited, Ponda-Goa

Representatives of Central Government:

(i) The Director-Apprentice- — Member.

ship Training Directorate

General of Training, Ministry

of Skill Development

& Entrepreneurship, Govern-

ment of India, New Delhi.

(ii) The Regional Director,

— Member.

Regional Directorate of

Apprenticeship Training

(Western Region), Govern-

ment of India, Sion-Mumbai

Representatives of State Government:

(i) Principal Chief Engineer, — Member.

Public Works Department,

Panaji-Goa

(ii) Labour Commissioner,

— Member.

Department of Labour and

Employment, Panaji-Goa

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1025

(iii) Director,

— Member.

The Directorate of Industries,

Trade and Commerce,

Panaji-Goa

E. Persons having special knowledge and

experience in the matters relating to

Industry, Labour and Technical Education:

(i) President,

— Member.

Confederation of Indian

Industry (CII) Goa State

Office (Western Region),

1st Floor, Salgaocar

Centre, Rua de Ourém,

Panaji-Goa

(ii) President,

— Member.

Goa State Industries

Association (GSIA),

Panaji-Goa

F. Representatives of the Board of Technical

Education or the State Council of Technical

Education:

(i) Chairman,

— Member.

Board of Technical Educa-

tion (Goa State) or his

Representative, Porvorim-Goa

(ii) Chairman,

— Member.

Goa Board of Secondary

and Higher Secondary

Education or his Represen-

tative, Porvorim-Goa

G. Representatives of State Government

Institutions:

(i) Director or his Represen- — Member.

tative, Department of

Education, Porvorim-Goa

The terms of reference of the Council shall be

as follows:-

1. Review from time to time the implementation

of the programmes of Apprenticeship

Training and make recommendations to the

Central Apprenticeship Council (through the

State Government) for possible improvements

and/or modifications considered necessary

in the standards of training already laid

down.

2. Conduct periodical inspection of establish-

ments, where the Apprenticeship Training

programmes are in operation, with a view to

finding out, if the requirements for

Apprenticeship Training laid down in the

Act and the Rules made thereunder are being

observed.

3. Arrange for the collection, dissemination and

display of any useful information pertaining

to the training of apprentices.

4. Arrange for the periodical assessment of the

requirement for trained persons in the

industries.

5. On the basis of such assessment, make

recommendations to the Central Apprentice-

ship Council (through the State Government),

regarding the additional trades, which

should be specified as designated trades and

the areas and industries, which should be

covered by the Act.

6. Generally to assist the Central Apprentice-

ship Council in the discharge of its

responsibilities.

The term of the Council shall be three years

from the date of its re-constitution. The non-official

members who attend the meeting/s shall be paid

honorarium of Rs. 1,500/- per meeting-sitting and

no other TA/DA shall be payable.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Aleixo F. Da Costa, State Director & ex officio

Joint

Secretary

(Skill

Development

and

Entrepreneurship).

Panaji, 19th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Law & Judiciary

Law (Establishment) Division

Order

No. LS/1077/93-Part II

Government of Goa is pleased to accept the

resignation tendered by Adv. Siddharth Bhatnagar,

as Standing Counsel, before the Hon’ble Supreme

Court of India, New Delhi with immediate effect.

Adv. Siddharth Bhatnagar shall return all the

briefs pending with him if any, to the Resident

Commissioner, Goa Sadan, New Delhi under

intimation to this Department.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).

Porvorim, 17th May, 2017.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1026

Notification

No. 8-17-2016-LD(Estt)/637

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section

78 A of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908), as

in force in the State of Goa, the Government of

Goa, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public

interest so to do, hereby remits the fee of

Rs. 17,09,440/- (Rupees seventeen lakhs, nine

thousand, four hundred and forty only) payable

under the said Act, in respect of the resignation

of a Deed of Sale pertaining to the land admeasuring

an area of 10,684 square meters, surveyed under

Survey No. 2/1, situated in village Rachol, taluka

Salcete, Goa, to be executed in favour of the

Diocesan Society of Education, Panaji.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Estt.).

Porvorim, 16th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Personnel

Order

No. 15/1/99-PER (Part)

On the recommendations of Goa Services Board

and with the approval of the Government, the

following Officers in the cadre of Block

Development Officers are transferred and posted

with immediate effect, in public interest:-

S/N

Name of the officer

Posted as

and designation

1. Shri Amitesh Anant

BDO-I, Salcete vice

Shirvoikar, BDO-II,

Kum. Prajakta Dina

Bardez

Goltekar transferred.

2. Kum. Prajakta Dina

BDO-II, Bardez vice

Goltekar, BDO, Salcete-I

Shri Amitesh Anant

Shirvoikar transferred.

All the above officers shall complete the process

of handing over/taking over within three days from

the date of issue of order and submit compliance.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 12th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 6/1/2017-PER

On the recommendation of Goa Services Board

and with the approval of the Government, the

following Senior Scale Officers of Goa Civil Service

are transferred and posted with immediate effect,

in public interest:—

S/N

Name of the officer

Posted as

and designation

1. Ms. Margaret Fernandes Secretary, Goa Human

awaiting posting

Rights Commission,

thereby relieving

Shri Siddhivinayak

Naik of additional

charge.

2. Shri Prasad Lolayekar,

Member Secretary,

Director of Art &

Goa Kala Academy

Culture

with addl. charge of

Director of Art &

Culture. Shri Lolayekar

shall hold charge of

the post of Director of

Higher Education

w.e.f. 01-06-2017.

3. Shri V. M. Paranjape,

Director (Admn.), PWD.

Additional Secretary

(Protocol)

4. Smt. Ruhi Redkar,

Director of Women &

Addl. Director of

Child Development,

Vigilance

thereby relieving Shri

S. V. Naik of additional

charge.

5. Shri Venancio Furtado, Director of Tribal

Director of Settlement

Welfare, thereby

& Land Records

relieving Shri S. V.

Naik of additional

charge.

6. Smt. Laura Britto

Joint Director, ICDS,

awaiting posting

Directorate of Women

& Child Development,

thereby relieving Shri

Ajit Panchwadkar of

addl. charge.

7. Shri Umeshchandra

Administrator,

L. Joshi

Sanjeevani Sakhar

awaiting posting

Karkhana, thereby

relieving Shri

Damodar Morajkar of

additional charge.

8. Smt. Sharmila

Joint Secretary

Zuzarte

(Protocol) vice Shri

awaiting posting

Paranjape transferred.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1027

Smt. Nila Mohanan, IAS, Collector-North shall

hold additional charge of the post of Director of

Settlement & Land Records vice Shri Venancio

Furtado transferred, until further orders.

Shri V. P. Dangui shall hold additional charge of

the post of OSD to Goa State Election Commission

till 16th June, 2017 and Managing Director,

Handicraft Rural Small Scale Industries w.e.f. 17th

June, 2017, thereby relieving Shri Naveen S. L.,

IAS, until further orders.

Shri Surendra F. Naik, Addl. Collector, Sub-

-District, Bardez shall hold additional charge of the

post of SLAO, Mopa Airport, thereby relieving Smt.

Pushpalata Arlekar of additional charge.

Shri Snehal Goltekar, Addl. Director of Vigilance-

II shall hold additional charge of the post of Addl.

Director of Vigilance-I, until further orders.

The appointment of Ms. Margaret Fernandes,

Shri Prasad Lolayekar and Shri Umeshchandra L.

Joshi shall be governed by deputation on standard

terms of deputation as contained in Office

Memorandum No. 13/4/74-PER dated 20-11-2013

and as amended.

All the concerned officers shall complete the

process of handing over/taking over within three

days from the date of issue of order and submit

compliance.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 12th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 22/2/2017-PER

The Governor of Goa is pleased to allocate the

charge of S. P. (FRRO) to Shri Bosco George, GPS,

S.P. (ACB), in addition to his own duties with

immediate effect, in public interest.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 12th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 22/5/2017-PER

Pursuant to Order No. 14020/04/2016-UTS-I dated

05-05-2017 from Government of India, Ministry of

Home Affairs, New Delhi, the Government of Goa

is pleased to relieve Shri Vivek Gogia, IPS (1991) in

the rank of ADGP Grade (L-15 in the Pay Matrix)

of AGMUT Cadre on 15-05-2017 (a.n.) from

this

Administration

report

Delhi

Administration.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Yetindra M. Maralkar, Addl. Secretary

(Personnel).

Porvorim, 15th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 6/13/2009-PER

Read: Order No. 6/13/2009-PER dated 18-04-2017.

Shri Sunil Masurkar, Additional Secretary

(Health) shall draw his salary against the post of

Leave & Training Reserve from 18-04-2017 till

31-05-2017. Shri Masurkar shall draw his salary

against the post of Additional Secretary (Health)

from June, 2017 onwards. Consequently, Shri Vinesh

Arlenkar, Secretary, State Police Complaint

Authority, shall draw his salary against the post of

Leave & Training Reserve from June, 2017 onwards,

until further orders.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 16th May, 2017.

________

Order

No. 7/1/2001-PER

On the recommendations of Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide its letter No. COM/

/11/12/4(3)/2017/617 dated 03-05-2017, the

Governor of Goa is pleased to declare that

Smt. Radha R. Bhave has satisfactorily comple-

ted her probation and to confirm her in the

post of Director of Museum in the Directorate

of Museum, Panaji-Goa with effect from 13-03-2014.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 17th May, 2017.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1028

Department of Power

Office of the Chief Electrical Engineer

Order

No. CEE/Estt-1-11-81/Trans(AE)/(B)/411

The Government is pleased to order the transfer and posting of the following Assistant Engineers

(Elect.), in the offices as shown against their respective names, with immediate effect, in public interest.

Sr.

Name of the officer

Present place of

Proposed place of transfer

No.

posting

1. Shri Vithal G. Haldankar

Division III (Elect.), Curti,

Sub-Division I under Division XI,

Ponda

Vasco vice Shri Vijay S. Bandikatte

transferred.

2. Shri Vijay S. Bandikatte

Sub-Division I under Division XI,

Office of the Superintending Engineer,

Vasco

Circle I (S), Margao.

3. Shri Pradip K. Narvenkar

Sub-Division III, Division I,

Sub-Division II under Division X, Ponda

Panaji

vice Shri Vallabh M. Samant transferred.

4. Shri Sharad S. Chodankar

Division VI, Mapusa

Sub-Division III under Division XVII,

Mapusa (vacant post on retirement of

Shri Chacko).

5. Shri Chandrakant P.

Sub-Division III under

Sub-Division II under Divsion XVII,

Aroskar

Division VI, Mapusa

Mapusa vice Shri Avelino J. F. Rodrigues

transferred and additional charge of

CSC till further order.

6. Shri Chandran A. K.

Sub-Division IV under

Sub-Division III under Division VI,

Division VI, Mapusa

Mapusa vice Shri Chandrakant P.

Aroskar transferred.

7. Shri Gangu Rama Kuticar

Sub-Division IV under

Division VI, Mapusa.

Division I, Panaji

8. Smt. Julliet N. V. Karekar

Division VIII (MRT) working

Division XI, Vasco.

arrangement R-APDRP

9. Shri Vallabh M. Samant

Sub-Divsion II under Divsion X,

Division III, Ponda vice Shri Vithal G.

Ponda

Haldankar transferred.

10. Shri Avelino J. F.

Sub-Division II under

Sub-Division IV under Division I, Panaji.

Rodrigues

Division XVII, Mapusa

11. Shri Denis F. C. Rodrigues Sub-Division III under

Sub-Division IV under Division VI,

Division XVII, Mapusa

Mapusa vice Shri Chandran A. K.

transferred.

12. Shri Ivo Dias

Division VI, Mapusa

Assistant Engineer (Com.), Sub-Division

IV under Division VI, Mapusa.

13. Shri Deepak K. Naik

Shift Duty, Sub-Station

Division XVI, Margao.

Thivim under Division IX,

Thivim

14. Shri V. M. Tembad

Sub-Division III, Navelim under

220/33 KV Cuncolim Sub-Station under

Division IV, Margao

Div. XII, Xeldem.

15. Shri Santana C. Silva

Sub-Division IV under

Sub-Division III, Navelim under Division

Division IV, Margao

IV, Margao.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1029

2. The transfers of the officers at Sr. No. 14 and 15 are made at their own request. The posting of Officer

at Sr. No. 15 on working arrangement at 220/33 KV Cuncolim Sub-Station stands cancelled.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Laxmikant D. Kolvekar, Chief Electrical Engineer & ex officio Add. Secretary.

Panaji, 9th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Public Health

Order

No. 4/18/2012-II/PHD/644

Read:

Memorandum No. 4/18/2012-II/PHD dated 22-03-2017.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

/I/5/30(3)/2012/525 dated 20-01-2017, Government is pleased to appoint Shri Madhusudan Premanand

Chatim to the post of Physicist in the Department of Radiology (Group ‘B’ Gazetted)

under Goa Medical College on temporary basis in the Pay Band–2 Rs. 9,300-34,800+Grade Pay of

Rs. 4,600/- (pre-revised) with immediate effect and as per the terms and conditions contained in the

Memorandum cited above.

Shri Madhusudan Premanand Chatim shall be on probation for a period of two years.

Shri Madhusudan Premanand Chatim has been declared medically fit by the Medical Board.

The appointment is made subject to the verification of his character and antecedents. In the event of

any adverse remarks noticed by the Government on verification of his character and antecedents, his

services will be terminated.

The appointment has been made against the vacancy occurred due to retirement of Dr. Bhagat Singh

Sonaye on attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f. 31-03-2016.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Smita Hede, Under Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 17th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Public Works

Office of the Principal Chief Engineer

Order

No. 34/4/2017/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/33

Government is pleased to order the transfers of the following Assistant Engineers/Assistant Surveyor

of Works/Engineering Assistants (Civil) in this Department and post them at the places shown against

their names in column No. 4 below, with immediate effect in public interest:

Sr.

Name

From

No.

1. Shri Prashant G. Gaude

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division I,

SSW’s Office, Altinho, Panaji

Division III (PHE), St. Inez, Panaji in the

existing vacancy.

2. Shri Sandeep Y. Gaude

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division

As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division III,

III, Division XXIV, Bicholim

Division XVI (Bldgs.), Ponda vice

Shri Sudhir Parab, AE, transferred.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1030

3. Shri Savio Reis Gomes

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division II,

Division III (PHE), Panaji

Division VI (Roads), Margao vice Shri M.

G. Aribenchi, AE, transferred.

4. Shri M. G. Aribenchi

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division

As Assistant Engineer in Sub-Division

II, Division VI (Roads), Margao

III, Division XXV (Roads), Canacona vice

Shri Pradeep T. Pednekar, AE, transferred.

5. Shri Pradeep T. Pednekar Assistant Engineer in Sub-

As Assistant Engineer in Sub-Division

-Division III, Division XXV

II, Division XIX (Bldgs.), Bambolim in

(Roads), Canacona

the existing vacancy.

6. Shri Dattaprasad Kamat

Assistant Engineer, Sub-

As Assistant Engineer in Sub-Division

-Division II, Division XV (NH),

I, Division XV (NH), Ponda vice Shri

Banastarim

Shashikant Dessai, AE, transferred.

7. Shri Shashikant Dessai

Assistant Engineer in Sub-

As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division III,

-Division I, Division XV (NH),

Division XV (NH), Ponda vice Smt. Urmila

Ponda

Dhavalikar, AE, transferred.

8. Smt. Urmila Dhavalikar

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division

As Assistant Surveyor of Works in

III, Division XV (NH), Ponda

Division XVIII (Roads), Ponda vice

Shri Uday Mahale, AE, transferred.

9. Smt. Mangala Jamble

Assistant Surveyor of Works in

As Assistant Surveyor of Works in

Division XVI (Bldgs.), Ponda

Division XV (NH), Ponda vice Smt. Megha

H. Dalvi, ASW, transferred.

10. Smt. Megha H. Dalvi

Assistant Surveyor of Works in

As Assistant Surveyor of Works in

Division XV (NH), Ponda

Division XVI (Bldgs.), Ponda vice Smt.

Mangala Jamble, ASW, transferred.

11. Shri Uday Mahale

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division I,

Division XVIII (Roads), Ponda

Division XVIII (Roads), Ponda vice

Shri N. P. Parsekar, AE, transferred.

12. Shri N. P. Parsekar

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division

As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division IV,

I, Division XVIII (Roads), Ponda

Division III (PHE), Daag, vice Shri Somnath

Devidas, AE, transferred.

13. Shri Somnath Devidas

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division

As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division II,

IV, Division III (PHE), Daag

Division XV (NH), Banastarim vice

Shri Dattaprasad Kamat, AE, transferred.

14. Shri Sudhir Parab

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division

As Assistant Engineer in Sub-Division

III, Division XVI, Ponda

V, Division III (PHE), Opa vice Shri

Swapnil Dessai, AE, transferred.

15. Shri Swapnil Dessai

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division

As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division I,

V, Division III (PHE), Opa

Division XXV, Canacona vice Shri Nagraj

Chipkar, AE, transferred.

16. Shri H. A. Adishesha

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division

As Assistant Surveyor of Works in

II, Division VIII (Bldgs.), Margao

Division II (Roads), Panaji in the existing

vacancy.

17. Shri Nagraj Chipkar

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division

As Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division II,

I, Division XXV, Canacona

Division VIII (Bldgs.), Margao, vice

Shri H. A. Adishesha, AE, transferred.

Further, Government is pleased to place the services of Shri G. C. Bisallahalli, ASW at the disposal of

the Executive Engineer, Division XX, Margao, purely on working arrangement as Assistant Surveyor of

Works. He shall continue to draw his pay & allowances as ASW, in SSW’s Office, Altinho, Panaji, until

further orders.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1031

With the issue of this, the transfer of Shri Prakash L. Pai, Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division I, Division

XXI (Sewerage), Margao who has been posted as Assistant Surveyor of Works in Division V (Bldgs.), Panaji

vide Order dated 16-03-2017 stands cancelled. Consequently, the posting of Shri Subash D. Parab, as

Assistant Engineer, Sub-Division I, Division XXI (Sewerage), Margao vide Order dated 16-3-2017, who has

been repatriated from Goa Industrial Development Corporation, Panaji and awaiting posting since

01-12-2016, stands modified and posted as Assistant Surveyor of Works in Circle Office VII(M/E), Altinho,

Panaji in the existing vacancy with effect from 01-12-2016.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

U. P. Parsekar, Principal Chief Engineer & ex officio Addl. Secretary (PWD).

Panaji, 11th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Sports & Youth Affairs

Directorate of Sports & Youth Affairs

Order

No. GFDC/01/01/2012/(Part-I)/541

Approval of the Government is hereby conveyed

for the reconstitution of the General Body and

Council Committee of the Goa Football Development

Council as shown below:-

General Body of the Goa Football

Development Council

1. Dr. Rufino Monteiro

— Chairman.

2. Member Secretary appointed — Member

by Government

Secretary.

3. Brahmanand Shankhwalkar

— Member.

4. Paresh Kamat

— Member.

5. Derric Pereira

— Member.

6. Antonio Estratonica Babush

— Member.

Rodrigues

7. Joao Niclau Crasto

— Member.

8. Jovito Lopes

— Member.

9. Sanjay Nagvekar

— Member.

10. Anita Rodrigues

— Member.

11. Pradeep Chodankar

— Member.

12. Franky Pereira

— Member.

13. Victor Fernandes

— Member.

14. Dr. Shrikant Ajgaonkar

— Member.

Council Committee

1. Dr. Rufino Monteiro

— Chairman.

2. Member Secretary appointed — Member

by Government

Secretary.

3. Brahmanand Shankhwalkar

— Member.

4. Paresh Kamat

— Member.

5. Pradeep Chodankar

— Member.

6. Antonio Estratonica Babush

— Member.

Rodrigues

7. Dr. Shrikant Ajgaonkar

— Member.

8. Jovito Lopes

— Member.

9. Sanjay Nagvekar

— Member.

10. Anita Rodrigues

— Member.

11. Andrew Rodrigues

— Member.

The tenure of the above committee shall be for

a period of one year.

If any member including the Chairman, remains

absent for three consecutive meetings of the

Council without prior intimation, his membership

shall automatically stand terminated. The

Government shall fill up vacancy so caused by

nominating a suitable replacement.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

V. M. Prabhu Desai, Director & Joint Secretary

(Sports & Youth Affairs).

Panaji, 15th May, 2017.

———‹‹‹———

Department of Tribal Welfare

Directorate of Tribal Welfare

Notification

No. DTW/STAT/PC/2012-13/62/1543

The Government of Goa is pleased to appoint

Dr. Uday Gaonkar, resident of Tilamol, Quepem-Goa

as member of the State Level Committee under the

Scheme “Pre Primary Schools for Scheduled Tribes

Children in Remote Areas” and is hereby published

for general information of public, which shall come

into the force from the date of Notification.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Venancio Furtado, Director & ex officio Joint

Secretary (TW).

Panaji, 17th May, 2017.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 8

25TH MAY, 2017

1032

Department of Urban Development

Municipal Administration

Order

No. 1/03/DMA/Admn/502

Read: Order No. 1/03/DMA/Admn/RTI/255 dated

30-4-2015.

In partial modification to the above referred order,

the Government has approved the appointment of

the following official of the Mapusa Municipal

Council in the State under the Right to Information

Act, 2005 to act as Officials under sub-section (2)

of Section 5 of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Sr.

Name of the

Designation

Office

No.

officials

Telephone

Number

1. Accounts/Taxation

Public Informa-

2262203

Officer

tion Officer

2. Head Clerk

Public Informa-

2262203

tion Officer

The Public Information Officer is responsible for

maintaining and updating all required information

and also receiving and disposing off applications

under Right to Information Act, 2005.

J. Ashok Kumar, IAS, Director (Urban Develop-

ment).

Panaji, 18th May, 2017.

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 18.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA–61/350–5/2017.