Panaji, 17th January, 2019 (Pausa 27,1940)
SERIES II No. 42
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2018-20
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
803
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Agriculture
Directorate of Agriculture
__
Corrigendum
No. 1/11/1/Staff Strength/2018-19/D.Agri/1340
Read: Order No. 1/11/1/Staff Strength/2018-19/D. Agri/978 dated 16-10-2018.
The post mentioned at Sr. No. 4 in the above order may be read as “Assistant Engineer (Civil)” instead
of “Assistant Engineer”.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Madhav B. Kelkar, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Agriculture).
Tonca-Caranzalem, 8th January, 2019.
———uuu———
Department of Education, Art & Culture
Directorate of Technical Education
College Section
__
Order
No. 8/1/70/LJP/PF/GCA/DTE/2018/2899
Read: Memorandum No. 8/34/86/EDN/Vol.IV/2175 dated 26-10-2018.
On the recommendations of the Goa Public Service Commission conveyed vide their letter No. COM/
I/5/6(2)/2017/214 dated 03-10-2018, Government is pleased to appoint Ms. Lorette Joyce Pinto on temporary
basis to the post of Assistant Professor in Fine Art (Painting) (Group ‘A’ Gazetted) at Goa College of Art,
Altinho, Panaji-Goa, on an initial pay at Level 10 [(i.e. on an initial pay of Rs. 15,600/- (pre-revised) in the
Pay Scale of Rs. 15,600-39,100 (pre-revised) (PB-3)+Academic Grade Pay of Rs. 6000/- (pre-revised)]
w.e.f. the date of joining as per the terms & conditions contained in the Memorandum cited above.
The appointment is against the post of Assistant Professor in Fine Art (Painting) created vide order
No. 8/26/81/WET dated 02-07-1983, vacated by Shri Digambar Singbal due to superannuation on
31-07-2016.
Ms. Lorette Joyce Pinto will be on probation for a period of two years.
She should join duties within 30 days of the receipt of this order, failing which this order is liable to
be cancelled without further notice.
Note:-
There is one Extraordinary issue to the Official Gazette, Series II No. 41 dated 10-01-2019
namely, Extraordinary dated 16-01-2019 from pages 801 to 802 regarding Notification from Department of
Elections.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
804
She has been declared fit by Medical Board, Goa Medical College & Hospital, Bambolim vide letter
No. 4/105/85-H/GMC/2018/878 dated 28-11-2018. Her character and antecedents have been verified and
nothing adverse is reported against her as conveyed by the Additional Collector & ADM, North Goa,
Office of the District Magistrate, North Goa, Magisterial Branch, Collectorate Bldg., Panaji vide letter
No. 2/6/2013-MAG/VCA/157 dated 08-01-2019.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Vivek B. Kamat, Director & ex officio Addl. Secretary (Technical Education).
Porvorim, 10th January, 2019.
———u———
Directorate of Education
Goa Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education
__
Addendum
No. GBSHSE/I.T./Brd-Ele-2017-2021/128
Read Goa Board of Secondary & Higher Secondary Education, Notification No. GBSHSE/IT/BRD-ELE/2017/
/2721 dated 17th November, 2017, Official Gazette, Government of Goa, 23rd November, 2017, Series II
No. 34.
Category
Respective clause of Class B—Elected Member
Name of the Member
1
2
3
Class B
iii) (a) One Principal of Higher Secondary Schools
1) Archana Krishnanand Naik
nominated
from South Goa District
Principal–Jawaharlal Nehru
members
Higher Secondary School,
Fatorda, Salcete-Goa.
Shri Ramkrishna Samant, Chairman (Goa Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education).
Alto-Betim, 14th January, 2019.
V. No. A–2063/2019.
———uuu———
Department of Home
Home–General Division
__
Order
No. 1/76/2012-HD(G)/GHRC/143
Read: Order No. 1/76/2012-HD(G)/GHRC/3546
dated 29-11-2017.
Corrigendum No. 1/76/2012-HD (G)/GHRC/
/3546 dated 16-04-2018.
Corrigendum No. 1/76/2012-HD (G)/GHRC/
/3546 dated 18-07-2018.
Order No. 1/76/2012-HD(G)/GHRC/3117
dated 18-10-2018.
Sanction of the Government is hereby accorded
to extend the term of contractual appointment of
Shri Premanand M. Gaonkar, retired Section Officer
of the Secretariat Cadre as Section Officer in the
Goa Human Rights Commission, Panaji for further
period of two months with effect from 01-09-2018
to 31-10-2018 (02 months) and further extension
of the contract for a period of one year w.e.f.
01-11-2018 or till the vacancy is filled up on regular
basis, whichever is earlier on the same terms and
conditions as stipulated in the Order/Corrigendum
cited at read above.
The expenditure on the above shall be
debited from the Budget Head Demand No. 23,
2070—Other Administrative Services; 00;
105—Special Commission of Enquiry; 03—Goa State
Human Rights Commission (NP); 01—Salaries.
This issues with the approval of the Department
of Personnel vide their U.O. No. 10057/F dated
30-11-2018 concurrence of the Finance (Revenue &
Control) Department vide their U.O. No. 1487027
dated 31-12-2018.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Neetal P. Amonkar, Under Secretary (Home-II).
Porvorim, 8th January, 2019.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
805
Department of Labour
__
Notification
No. 28/3/2018-LAB/Part-III/28
The following award passed by the Labour
Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 12-12-2018 in reference
No. LC-II/IT/39/2011 is hereby published as
required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
A. S. Mahatme, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 7th January, 2019.
______
LABOUR COURT-II
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble
Presiding Officer)
Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/39/2011
Ms. Surekha G. Haldankar,
H. No. 760/26, Sumagha Sadan,
Wadakade, Alto-Porvorim,
Bardez-Goa.
…
Workman/Party I
V/s
M/s. Goa Antibiotics &
Pharmaceuticals Ltd.,
Tuem, Pernem-Goa.
…
Employer/Party II
Workman/Party I represented by Adv. Shri Vijay
Palekar.
Employer/Party II represented by Adv. Shri Pravin
Naik.
Panaji, Dated: 12-12-2018
AWARD
1. In exercise of powers conferred by Clause (d)
of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), (for
short ‘The Act’) the Government of Goa by order
dated 10-11-2011 bearing No. 28/44/2011-LAB, has
referred the following dispute for adjudication to
the Industrial Tribunal of Goa. The Government of
Goa, by its another order dated 09-02-2016, referred
the present dispute for its adjudication to this
Labour Court-II.
“(1) Whether the action of M/s. Goa Antibiotics
& Pharmaceuticals Limited, Tuem, Pernem,
Goa in dismissing from services it’s workman
Ms. Surekha Haldankar, Account Assistant,
with effect from 01-04-2010, is legal and
justified?
(2) If not, what relief the workman is entitled?”
2. Upon receipt of the reference, IT/39/11 was
registered and registered A/D notices were issued
to both the parties. In pursuance to the said notice,
the parties put in their appearance. The Workman/
/Party-I (for short ‘Workman’) filed the claim
statement on 30-03-2012 at Exb. 7. The facts of the
case in brief as pleaded by the Workman are that
she was employed by the Employer/Party II (for
short, ‘Employer’) on 17-1-95 as Account Assistant.
She stated that on 25-8-05 she was transferred to
Production Department without any reason. She
stated that due to unhygienic conditions at
workplace, she fell sick. She stated that she was
then deputed to attend to sales tax work. She stated
that however there were false complains filed
against her by the Employer. She stated that she
gave detailed reply by letter dated 12-4-08.
She stated that no prima-facie enquiry was
conducted against her as per procedure on her
clarification. She stated that she was then
transferred to Finance Department where she was
made to work in dingy room full of spoiled furniture.
She stated that she wrote a letter to the Managing
Director regarding harassment by officers of
Employer by framing false complaint regarding
pending work, when in reality there was no
pending work at all. She stated that on 12-5-08
another show cause notice was served on her.
She stated that a vague and false charge sheet
was served on her on 28-5-08 alleging misconducts
under Clause 26(i), 26(xx), 26(xi) and 26(iii) of the
Certified Standing Orders of Employer. She stated
that w.e.f. 21-6-08, Workman was suspended pending
enquiry. She stated that Shri Ashok Gaikwad was
appointed as an enquiry officer into the alleged
charges and to furnish the findings. She stated that
the enquiry was not conducted in a fair and proper
manner and that the enquiry officer was completely
biased towards the management and his findings
do not reflect as to what transpired at the enquiry.
She stated that no charge have been proved during
the enquiry; that the findings given by the enquiry
officer are perverse and are liable to be set aside.
She stated that the objections raised by Workman
during the course of enquiry were disallowed by
the enquiry officer. She stated that the findings
given by enquiry officer were submitted to the
Disciplinary Authority who than terminated the
services of Workman w.e.f. 01-04-2010. She stated
that the dispute raised before the Asst. Labour
Commissioner, Mapusa regarding illegal
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
806
terminations ended in failure and hence this
reference. She has stated that she is unemployed
and could not succeed in getting employment.
Workman has prayed to reinstate her back in
service with full back wages and continuity in
service.
3. The Employer resisted the aforesaid claim of
the Workman by filing its written statement on
22-06-2012 at Exb. 8. The Employer has denied the
case of Workman and has stated that she was
posted at Production Department by order dated
25-8-05 and by order dated 29-6-06 she was
instructed to continue to report to Mr. G. Poke. The
Employer stated that they received complaints that
Workman was not obeying the instructions issued
to her and refusing to do the work entrusted to
her. The Employer stated that Asst. Manager
Commercial made a report dated 7-4-08 against
Workman contending that Workman refused to do
work. The Employer stated that Workman did not
do any work from 7-4-08 and remained idle till
9-5-08. The Employer stated that the services of
Workman were then transferred to Finance &
Accounts Department, however, the Workman
refused to obey the instructions of her superior in
this department. The Employer stated that the
Workman was issued show-cause notice dated
12-5-08 for her such acts and she filed her
explanation dated 17-5-08 which was not found to
be satisfactory. The Employer stated that charge-
-sheet dated 28-5-08 was then issued to her. The
Employer stated that enquiry conducted against
Workman was fair and proper and that it was
conducted in the presence of Workman up to
30-9-09 and concluded on 21-11-09 when Workman
failed to attend the enquiry in spite of notices to
that effect. The Employer stated that the enquiry
officer submitted his findings on 30-1-10 holding
the Workman guilty of charges such as (1) willful
insubordination and disobedience of lawful and
reasonable order of a superior, (2) failure to perform
her normal duties and responsibilities and any other
work for which she has basic skills and (3) making
false, malicious statement, public and otherwise
against the company and employees of the
company. The Employer stated that a copy of
enquiry report was furnished to Workman but the
Workman did not make any comments on the same.
The Employer stated that show-cause notice dated
04-02-2010 was then issued to Workman proposing
the punishment of dismissal. The Employer stated
that the Workman filed her reply dated 11-03-2010
which was found unsatisfactory. As such Workman
was dismissed from the services w.e.f. 01-04-2010
without notices. The Employer stated that the past
record of Workman was not good as several show-
cause notices were issued to her so also she was
orally warned to improve her conduct. The
Employer stated that the misconducts proved
against Workman are serious misconducts
which deserve punishment of dismissal. The
Employer submitted that therefore its action of
dismissal of Workman is legal, just and proper and
no interference is called for. The Employer stated
that in the event the enquiry conducted and the
findings of the enquiry officer are set aside, they
be allowed to prove the misconduct before this
court by adducing evidence in the matter. The
Employer submitted that Workman is not entitled
for reinstatement in service with full back wages
and continuity in service.
4. Thereafter, the Workman filed her rejoinder on
02-08-2012 at Exb. 9. The Workman, by way of her
rejoinder, denied each and every statement,
averments and submissions made by the Employer
in its written statements which are contrary and
inconsistent to the statements, averments and a
submission made in her statement of claim and
reiterates her case as pleaded in her statement of
claim.
5. Based on the pleadings filed by the respective
parties, the Hon’ble Presiding Officer, Industrial
Tribunal framed the following issues on 08-11-2012
at Exb. 12.
1. Whether the Workman/Party I proves that the
domestic enquiry held against her is not
fair, proper and is partial?
2. Whether the charges of misconduct leveled
against the Workman/Party I are proved to
the satisfaction of the Tribunal by
acceptable evidence?
3. Whether the Workman/Party I proves that
the action of Party II in dismissing her
from service w.e.f. 01-04-10 is illegal and
unjustified?
4. Whether the Workman/Party I is entitled to
any relief?
5. What relief? What Award?
6. My findings to the aforesaid issues are as
under:
(a) Issue No. 1
:
In the Affirmative.
(b) Issue No. 2
:
In the Affirmative.
(c) Issue No. 3
:
In the Affirmative.
(d) Issue No. 4 & 5
:
As per final order.
I have heard the oral arguments of Ld. Adv. Shri
Vijay Palekar, appearing for the Workman as well
as Ld. Adv. Shri Pravin Naik, appearing for the
Employer.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
807
7. Ld. Adv. Shri V. Palekar, representing the
Workman, during the course of his oral arguments
submitted that the Workman was held guilty of
the charges of misconduct such as wilful
insubordination and disobedience of lawful and
reasonable order of a superior, failure to perform
her normal duties and responsibilities and any other
work for which she has basic skills and making
false, malicious statement public and otherwise
against the company and employees of the
company. He submitted that the misconduct proved
against the Workman are not so serious which
warrants the dismissal from service. He submitted
that the Workman was in the services of the
Employer from the year 17-01-1995 till she was
dismissed from service w.e.f. 01-04-2010. He
submitted that there was no complaint against the
Workman till March, 2008 and that she worked
smoothly for the said period. He submitted that
the punishment of dismissal imposed upon the
Workman is severe and disproportionate to the
proved misconduct. He submitted that the
Employer has failed to take into consideration the
past unblemished record of the Workman as well
as any other extenuating or aggravating
circumstances that may exist while passing the
order of dismissal. He therefore submitted that the
order of dismissal issued to the Workman is illegal
and unjustified. He submitted that after
termination of her services, the Workman is
unemployed till date. He submitted that the
Workman is therefore entitled to be reinstated in
service with full back wages with consequential
benefits thereof. In support of his oral contentions,
he relied upon a judgment in the case of Raghubir
Singh v/s. General Manager, Haryana Road
ways, Hissar of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in
2014 10 SCC 301.
8. Per contra, Ld. Adv. Shri. P. Naik, representing
the Employer, during the course of his oral
arguments submitted that admittedly the Workman
was in the services of the Employer from
17-01-1995 till she was dismissed from service w.e.f.
01-04-2010. He submitted that the charges of
misconduct proved against the Workman are so
serious which warrants the punishment of
dismissal from service. He submitted that the
Employer has produced the past record of the
Workman. He submitted that the past record of the
Workman is blemished. He submitted that the
Workman remained idle without performing any
work for one month. He submitted that the order
of dismissal issued to the Workman is just, proper
and legal taking into consideration the facts and
circumstances of the present case. He therefore
submitted that the reference be answered that the
action of the Employer in dismissing the Workman
from its service is just and legal.
I have carefully perused the entire records of
the present case including the synopsis of written
arguments filed by the respective parties. I have
also carefully considered the oral submissions
advanced by the Ld. Advocates appearing for the
respective parties.
REASONS:
9. Issue No. 1 and 2:
Vide order dated 28-11-2014 passed in the
findings on preliminary issue No. 1 and 2, the
Hon’ble Industrial Tribunal, Panaji, Goa held that
the domestic enquiry held against the Workman is
fair, proper and impartial and further held that the
charges of misconduct levelled against the
Workman are proved to the satisfaction of this
Tribunal by acceptable evidence. The issue No. 1
and 2 are therefore answered in the affirmative.
10. Issue No. 3:
It appears from the pleadings of the Workman
that she challenged her dismissal from service
mainly on the ground that the enquiry conducted
against her was illegal as it is in violation of the
principles of natural justice and the charges of
misconduct has not been proved at all. The
Workman also challenged the order of her dismissal
on the ground that punishment of dismissal from
service imposed upon her is severe and
disproportionate to the proved misconduct.
11.
As already stated herein above, vide order
dated 28-11-2014 passed in the findings on
preliminary issue No. 1 and 2, the Hon’ble Industrial
Tribunal, Panaji, Goa held that the domestic enquiry
held against the Workman is fair, proper and
impartial and further held that the charges of
misconduct levelled against the Workman are
proved to the satisfaction of this Tribunal by
acceptable evidence. Thus, the only ground the
court has to determine as to whether the
punishment of dismissal imposed upon the
Workman is disproportionate to the proved
misconduct.
12. The Employer is governed by its own
Certified Standing Orders (CSO) applicable to its
workmen. Clause 26 of the Certified Standing
Orders provides for acts of misconduct. Clause 27
of the CSO provides for punishment. In terms of the
said Clause 27 (a) of the CSO, the punishment of
misconduct that may be awarded by the manager
or any person duly authorised by him shall be as
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
808
follows warning or censure, fine, suspension
without pay not exceeding four days, stoppage of
increment or reduction in the grade or reversion or
demotion to a lower grade, removal from service
without notice or payment in lieu of notice and
dismissal from service without notice. In terms of
Clause 27 (b) no order shall be passed punishing
for fine, suspension without pay not exceeding four
days and stoppage of increment or reduction in
the grade or reversion or demotion to a lower grade
unless the workman concerned has been informed
in writing of the alleged misconduct and given an
opportunity to explain the circumstances alleged
against him. In terms of Clause 27 (c) of the CSO no
order of discharge of dismissal as stated in Clause
27 (a) of the CSO shall be made except after holding
an enquiry against the workman concerned in
respect of the alleged misconduct in the manner
set out below. Further, in terms of the said Clause
27 (d) of the CSO if awarding the punishment the
management shall take into account the gravity of
the misconduct, the previous record of the
workman and any other extenuating or aggravating
circumstances that may exist, a copy of the order
passed by the management shall be supplied to
the workman concerned.
13. In the case in hand, the evidence on record
indicates that vide charge-sheet dated 28-05-2008,
the Workman was charged and also held guilty of
the charges of misconduct such as wilful
insubordination and disobedience of lawful and
reasonable order of a superior, failure to perform
her normal duties and responsibilities and any other
work for which she has basic skills and making
false, malicious statement public and otherwise
against the company and employees of the
company. The Workman was also issued a copy of
the findings of the Enquiry Officer for her
comments. The Workman has however, failed to
make any comments over the said findings of the
Enquiry Officer. The Workman was also issued a
show-cause notice on the proposed punishment of
dismissal. The Workman replied to the said
show-cause notice of the Employer dated 24-02-2010
by her letter dated 24-02-2010 and dated
11-03-2010. The Employer thereafter issued a
dismissal letter dated 31-03-2010 dismissing the
service of the Workman w.e.f. 01-04-2010 without
notice or salary in lieu thereof by stating that the
explanation offered by her is found to be
unsatisfactory and without any substance by taking
into consideration the gravity of misconduct. Thus,
the Employer has failed to take into consideration
the previous record of the Workman and any other
extenuating or aggravating circumstances that
may exist as stated in Clause 27 (d) of its CSO. The
evidence on record indicates that the Workman
was in the continuous services of the Employer
from 17-01-1995 till she was dismissed from service
w.e.f. 01-04-2010. The evidence on record indicates
that there was no complaints against the Workman
till March, 2008 and that she worked smoothly for
the said period. There is nothing on record to show
that the past record of the Workman is blemished.
The witness of the Employer namely, Shri
Bramhanand Parab in his affidavit in evidence
stated that the past record of the Workman was
not good and was issued several show-cause
notices. However, no documentary evidence has
been produced by the Employer on record to that
effect. The said witness of the Employer in his
affidavit in evidence further stated that the
Workman was orally warned in order to give her
opportunities to improve her conduct. However,
the Employer has failed to state as to when the
alleged oral warning was issued to the Workman
as well as cause for the same. In the absence of any
such cogent evidence, the action of the Employer
in dismissing the Workman is therefore in violation
of Clause 27 (d) of its CSO. In my considered
opinion, the punishment of stoppage of increment
or reduction in the grade or reversion or demotion
to a lower grade would have met the ends of justice
taking into consideration her past unblemished
record. In view of above, it is held that the Workman
proved that the action of the Employer in
dismissing her service w.e.f. 01-04-2010 is illegal
and unjustified. The issue No. 3 is therefore
answered in the affirmative.
14. Issue No. 4:
While deciding the issue No. 3 hereinabove, I
have discussed and come to the conclusion that
the action of the Employer in dismissing the service
of the Workman w.e.f. 01-04-2010 is illegal and
unjustified.
The Workman in her oral evidence stated that
on account of termination of her services she could
not get any employment anywhere as she have
become over aged for the same. The Workman has
nowhere stated in her affidavit in evidence her
age on the date of her termination of services.
However, the Workman disclosed her age of 40
years in her evidence recorded on 08-02-2013 before
the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Panaji,
Goa. It means that the age of the Workman as on
the date of her termination must be around 37
years. The said age of 37 years cannot be said to
be over age for the employment taking into
consideration the eligibility criteria adopted by
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
809
the State Government in filling the vacant posts in
several departments. The Workman, in her cross-
examination admitted that after termination of her
services by the Employer, she did not apply for
employment in any of the establishment/company.
In the circumstances, the Workman is entitled to
reinstatement in service without any back wages
and consequential benefits thereof.
In view of the above discussion and with regards
to the facts and circumstances of the case, I pass
the following order:
ORDER
1. It is held that the action of M/s. Goa
Antibiotics & Pharmaceuticals Limited,
Tuem, Pernem, Goa, in dismissing from
services it’s workman Ms. Surekha
Haldankar, Account Assistant, with effect
from 01-04-2010, is illegal and unjustified.
2. It is further held that the Employer M/s. Goa
Antibiotics & Pharmaceuticals Limited,
Tuem, Pernem, Goa, is hereby directed to
reinstate the Workman, Ms. Surekha
Haldankar, Account Assistant, in service
without any back wages and consequential
benefits thereof.
3. No order as to costs.
Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Suresh N. Narulkar)
Presiding Officer,
Labour Court-II.
———uuu———
Department of Law & Judiciary
Law (Establishment) Division
__
Order
No. 12/06/2018-LD/Estt/82
In pursuance of the Order of the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India in Writ Petition (Civil)
No. 643 of 2015 All India Judges Association versus
Union of India & Ors. dated 27-03-2018, the
Government of Goa is pleased to accept the
summary of recommendations made by a
Committee appointed by the Hon. Supreme Court
in the Report on Interim Relief (pay) to the Judicial
Officers, and as directed by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court by its Order at 27-03-2018 as follows:-
1. Interim relief to the extent of 30% of increase
in basic pay with accrued increments shall
be paid to all categories/ranks of Judicial
Officers.
2. The said increase in pay shall be treated as
a separate component and no D.A. is payable
thereon.
3. Arrears shall be worked out with effect from
01-01-2016 on the above basis.
4. On the same basis, the interim relief shall be
provided to the pensioners and family
pensioners with effect from 01-01-2016 and
the arrears to be paid accordingly.
Accordingly, the pay for the Judicial Officers
shall be payable with the above interim relief
for the month of January, 2019 and the arrears
w.e.f. 01-01-2016 to 31-12-2018 shall be paid by
31-03-2019.
The amount payable by way of interim relief are
liable to be adjusted against the future
determination pursuant to any directions of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court, as is accepted by the State
Government.
This issues with the concurrence of Finance
(Rev. & Cont.) Department vide their U.O. Nos.
1400054389 dated 15-11-2018 and 1400049186 dated
14-12-2018.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Anju S. Kerkar, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).
Porvorim, 10th January, 2019.
________
Order
No. 14/06/2018/LD(Estt.)/94
Whereas, a meeting was held on 08-09-2017,
between the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Goa and the
Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Court of Bombay,
in regards to matters relating to infrastructure,
allotment of funds etc.; besides the issue pertaining
to applicability of the Service Rules along with the
VIIth pay to the employees on the establishment of
the High Court of Bombay at Goa.
And whereas, in the aforesaid meeting, it was
decided that once the terms and conditions of
application of the Service Rules (as applicable to
Goa Government employees) to the employees of
the Establishment of High Court of Bombay at Goa
are settled, than the issues related to application
of Seventh Pay Commission, Pension etc.; will fall in
place.
And whereas, four employees of the Hon’ble High
Court of Bombay at Goa filed Misc. Application No.
645/2018 in Stamp Number (Appln.) No. 3582 of
2016 before the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at
Goa seeking the relief of applicability of VIIth Pay
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
810
Commission for the applicant and other eligible
staff members at the establishment of the High
Court of Bombay at Goa.
And whereas, the matter of application of the
Service Rules (as applicable to Goa Government
employees) to the employees on the establishment
of High Court of Bombay at Goa was under active
consideration of the High Court Administration in
consultation with the officers of the State
Government, and a draft of the rules viz., the High
Court of Bombay at Goa and the Members on the
Establishment (Recruitment and Conditions of
Service) Rules (hereinafter referred as ‘said Rules’)
is nearing finalization after the preliminary rounds
of discussions. The process for approval as per law
in force is due to be undertaken.
And whereas, vide Order dated 21-12-2018, the
Hon’ble High Court has directed that the following
interim arrangement shall be worked out and the
same will be operative until finalization of the said
Rules.
“1) The benefits would be given starting from
the salary of the respective employees for
the month of January, 2019.
2) As regards the posts where there is a
dispute with regard to equivalence of pay
scales in the State Government, presently,
the closest matching pay scale on the lower
side would be identified and the benefits
in terms of that scale would be given in
terms of Clause (1) above.
3) As far as the arrears from 01-01-2016 till
31-12-2018 are concerned, the manner of
payment of the same will be decided within
four weeks from the date the said Rules are
notified.
4) As regards the amounts which will be paid
and the balance amount to be paid in terms
of Clause (2) above, it is made clear that
the same will be subject to the said Rules
which would be notified and the present
arrangement is temporary in nature as a
working arrangement.”
Now, therefore, sanction of the Government is
hereby accorded for the interregnum implemen-
tation of revised pay as per the Order dated
21-12-2018 in Misc. Application No. 645/2018 in
Stamp Number (Appln.) No. 3582 of 2016 and as
per the Annexure appended to this Order.
The interim arrangements would be operative
until finalization of the said Rules and the pay
shall be fixed as per the CCS (Revised) Pay Rules,
2016.
This issues with the concurrence of Finance
(Rev. & Cont.) Department vide their U. O. No.
1400052534 dated 14-01-2019.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Anju S. Kerkar, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).
Porvorim, 15th January, 2019.
ANNEXURE
Sr.
Designation
Pay scales in VIth Pay Rules
Pay level in
No.
VIIth pay
matrix
A
B
D
E
Non Ministerial (Non Lapsable) Posts
1.
Registrar
51550-1230-58930-1380-63070
—
(Judicial Officers on deputation will follow their scale)
2.
Deputy Registrar
43690-1080-49090-1230-56470
—
(as per Maharashtra Government Resolution
dated 31-03-2018–Judicial Officers on deputation
will follow their scale)
3.
Senior Private Secretary
PB-3 Rs. 15,600-Rs. 39,100 plus GP Rs. 7600
Level 12
4.
Assistant Registrar
PB-3 Rs. 15,600-Rs. 39,100 plus GP Rs. 6600
Level 11
5.
Librarian
PB-3 Rs. 15,600-Rs. 39,100 plus GP Rs. 5400
Level 10
6.
Protocol Officer-cum-
PB-3 Rs. 15,600-Rs. 39,100 plus GP Rs. 6600
Level 11
-Court Keeper
7.
Junior Translator &
PB-2 Rs. 9300-Rs. 34,800 plus GP Rs. 4200
Level 06
Interpreter
8.
Accountant
Rs. 9300-Rs. 34,800 plus GP Rs. 4200
Level 06
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
811
9. Assistant Librarian
PB-1 Rs. 5200-Rs. 20,200 plus GP Rs. 2800
Level 05
10. Software Programmer
PB-2 Rs. 9300-Rs. 34,800 plus GP Rs. 4300
Level 06
Ministerial (Lapsable) Posts
11. Private Secretaries
PB-3 Rs. 15,600-Rs. 39,100 plus GP Rs. 6600
Level 11
12. Personal Assistant
PB-3 Rs. 15,600-Rs. 39,100 plus GP Rs. 5400
Level 10
13. Section Officers
Presently being drawn PB-2 Rs. 9300-Rs. 34,800
Level 07
plus GP Rs. 4,400 & after 4 years of regular
service (PB-2) Rs. 9300-Rs. 34,800 & GP Rs. 5400
14. Shorthand Writer (H.G.)
PB-2 Rs. 9300-Rs. 34,800 plus GP Rs. 4400
Level 07
15. Shorthand Writer (L.G.)
PB-2 Rs. 9300-Rs. 34,800 plus GP Rs. 4300
Level 06
16. Assistants
PB-2 Rs. 9300-Rs. 34,800 plus GP Rs. 4300
Level 06
17. Console Operator
PB-1 Rs. 5200-Rs. 20,200 plus GP Rs. 2800
Level 05
18. Clerks
PB-1 Rs. 5200-Rs. 20,200 plus GP Rs. 1900
Level 02
19. Drivers
PB-1 Rs. 5200-Rs. 20,200 plus GP Rs. 1900
Level 02
20. Chobdars
PB-1 Rs. 5200-Rs. 20,200 plus GP Rs. 1900
Level 02
21. Filer
PB-1 Rs. 5200-Rs. 20,200 plus GP Rs. 1900
Level 02
22. Binder
PB-1 Rs. 5200-Rs. 20,200 plus GP Rs. 1900
Level 02
23. Xerox Operators (*)
1S-Rs. 4440-Rs. 7440 plus GP Rs. 1600 (*)
Level 01**
24. Peons (*)
1S-Rs. 4440-Rs. 7440 plus GP Rs. 1300 (*)
Level 01**
25. Watchman
1S-Rs. 4440-Rs. 7440 plus GP Rs. 1300 (*)
Level 01**
26. Gardener
1S-Rs. 4440-Rs. 7440 plus GP Rs. 1300 (*)
Level 01**
27. Sweeper
1S-Rs. 4440-Rs. 7440 plus GP Rs. 1300 (*)
Level 01**
28. Cook
1S-Rs. 4440-Rs. 7440 plus GP Rs. 1300 (*)
Level 01**
(*) Designated as Multitasking Staff (MTS).
(**) The revised pay of the incumbents on the position as at Sr. No. (23) to (28) shall be fixed at level
01, provided they meet the qualification standards and/or fulfill the guidelines prescribed in this
regard, to the equivalent position in the State Government viz. MTS.
________
Notification
No. 8-21-2017-LD(Estt)/Part/76
Read: 8/21/2017-LD(Estt)/Part dated 27-07-2018.
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 78A of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908), as in
force in the State of Goa (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), the Government of Goa is hereby
pleased to grant refund of registration fees of an amount of Rs. 3,00,000 (Rupees three lakhs only) paid
by Matruchaya Trust, Ponda-Goa, towards purchase of land admeasuring 4297 square meters, bearing
Survey No. 32/7 and 31/12 of the Village of Talaulim of Ponda Taluka by way of Deed of Sale, for the
purpose of utilizing the same for rehabitation and education of under priviledged children.
This issues with the concurrence of Finance (Rev. & Cont.) Department vide U. O. No. 1400050568 dated
26-12-2018.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Anju S. Kerkar, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).
Porvorim, 9th January, 2019.
A
B
D
E
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
812
Department of Official Language
Directorate of Official Language
__
Notification
No. 5/12/2011/DOL/GKA/Gen-Coun/71
In exercise of power conferred by Clause 6 (i)
and 10 (xii) of the Constitution of Goa Konkani
Akademi, Panaji, Government is pleased to
nominate the below mentioned persons in Goa
Konkani Akademi, with immediate effect.
1. Shri Suresh G. Amonkar,
—
President.
r/o Mapusa, Goa
2. Shri Kanta Gaude,
—
Member.
r/o Veling, Mardol, Goa
3. Shri Arun Sakhardande,
—
Member.
r/o Mapusa, Goa
4. Shri Agnel D’Silva,
—
Member.
r/o Sankhali, Goa
This Notification is issued in supersession of
Government Notification No. 5/12/2011/DOL/GKA/
/Gen-Coun/260 dated 04-06-2015.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sneha S. Morajkar, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Official Language).
Panaji, 15th January, 2019.
———uuu———
Department of Personnel
__
Order
No. 1/1/2017-Addl. Secy (PER)/103
Read: 1) Order No. 1/1/2017-Addl. Secy(PER) dated
22-11-2017 published in Official Gazette,
Extraordinary, Series II No. 34 dated
24-11-2017.
2) Order No. 1/1/2017-Addl. Secy(PER)/3288
dated 10-12-2018.
Whereas, the Government vide Order No. 1/1/
/2017-Addl. Secy(PER)/3288 dated 10-12-2018 was
pleased to extend the validity of Inter Departmental
Committee of Officers (IDCO) and High Level
Empowered Committee (HLEC) constituted vide
order read at (1) in the preamble, upto 31st October,
2019 in public interest subject to approval of
Council of Ministers.
And whereas, Finance Department vide its
U.O. No. 1400043948 dated 23-10-2018 has
concurred the proposal to extend the validity of
the special mechanism.
And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its
XXXVIth Meeting held on 20-12-2018 resolved to
extend the validity of the special mechanism
created vide order dated 22-11-2017 till 31st
October, 2019 constituting the Inter Departmental
Committee of Officers (IDCO) and High Level
Empowered Committee (HLEC).
Now, therefore, Government is pleased to confirm
the order read in preamble at (2) extending the
validity of Inter Departmental Committee of Officers
(IDCO) and High Level Empowered Committee
(HLEC) till 31st October, 2019.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Yetindra Maralkar, Additional Secretary
(Personnel).
Porvorim, 8th January, 2019.
________
Order
No. 6/10/2014-PER/127
On recommendation of the Goa Service Board
and with the approval of the Government
Shri Narayan Sawant, Additional Secretary (Home),
is transferred and posted as Additional Chief
Electoral Officer, Goa, with immediate effect, in
public interest.
This issues with the approval of Election
Commission of India conveyed vide letter No. 154/
/Goa/2018-P. Admn dated 18-12-2018.
Consequently, Shri Narayan Navti shall report
to Department of Personnel for further orders.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Harish N. Adconkar, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 9th January, 2019.
________
Order
No. 5/14/2018-PER/138
Read: 1) Order No. 5/14/2018-PER/2828 dated
05-11-2018.
2) Order No. 5/14/2018-PER/2918 dated
13-11-2018.
3) Order No. 5/14/2018-PER/2943 dated
14-11-2018.
In continuation to the orders read in preamble,
the departmental training in respect of the
following officers at Sr. Nos. 8 to 16 is extended for
a further period till 15-01-2019 and the officers at
Sr. Nos. 1 to 7 are deputed for two days
departmental training on “Ethics and Values” on
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
813
14th & 15th January, 2019 at the Goa Institute of
Public Administration and Rural Development, Ela,
Old Goa from 9.30 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. Meals and
refreshments will be provided during the training
programme:
1. Smt. Maya Pednekar,
Awaiting posting.
2. Smt. Fransquinha Oliveira,
Deputy Director (Admn.), Agriculture
3. Shri Shripad Arlekar,
1) Deputy Director, Apna Ghar.
2) Member Secretary, Ravindra Bhavan,
Sanquelim.
4. Shri Chandresh Kunkalkar,
Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.
5. Smt. Shivanee Borkar,
1) Under Secretary (ARD).
2) Deputy Director (Admn.), Labour and
Employment.
3) Under Secretary (HT & C).
6. Smt. Snehal Shivram Prabhu,
Dy. Director, Panchayat-South.
7. Smt. Nayan Moroscar,
Assistant Commissioner of Excise-II.
8. Shri Kuldeep Ulhas Arolkar,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
9. Shri Sachin Santosh Desai,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
10. Shri Premraj Krishnanath Shirodkar,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
11. Shri Pranab Gajanan Bhat,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
12. Shri Kabir Krishna Shirgaonkar,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
13. Shri Sagar Babuli Gaude,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
14. Dr. Pooja Milind Madkaikar,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
15. Shri Vikas Shankar Kamble,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
16. Kum. Fiona Audrey Cardozo,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
17. Shri Nilesh Kushta Dhaigodkar,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
18. Shri Pritidas Upasso Gaonkar,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
19. Shri Mangaldas Budho Gaonkar,
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service.
The link arrangement issued vide order read in
preamble at Sr. No. 1 shall remain the same.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Harish N. Adconkar, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 11th January, 2019.
________
Order
No. 6/3/2002-PER(Vol.I)/142
On the recommendation of local DPC, the
Governor of Goa is pleased to promote on ad hoc
basis, the following Junior Scale Officers of Goa
Civil Service to Senior Scale in Level 11 of the CCS
Revised Pay Band Rules, 2016, with immediate
effect:-
1. Shri Bhushan K. Savoikar.
2. Smt. Sheru Appa Shirodkar.
3. Smt. Varsha Naik.
4. Smt. Anju S. Kerkar.
5. Shri Gaurish Shankar Kurtikar.
6. Shri Brijesh D. Manerkar.
7. Shri Santosh S. Kundaikar.
The above ad hoc promotion shall be for a period
of six months or till the post is filled on regular
basis whichever is earlier.
The above ad hoc promotion shall not bestow
on the promoted Officers any claim for regular
promotion and service rendered on ad hoc basis in
the Grade will not count for the purpose of seniority
in that grade or for eligibility for promotion to the
next higher grade.
The posting order of the officers is being issued
separately.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Harish N. Adconkar, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 14th January, 2019.
———uuu———
Department of Public Health
__
Order
No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD(Part)/96
In terms of newer guidelines of Ministry of Health
and Family Welfare, Government of India, New
Delhi, Government is pleased to constitute
Executive Committee of Rogi Kalyan Samiti
Committee for the T. B. Hospital, Margao under
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
814
Directorate of Health Services comprising of the
following Members as under:-
1. Deputy Collector, Salcete
— Chairperson.
Block
2. Cheif Medical Officer,
— Member
T.B. Hospital, Margao
Secretary.
3. BDO, Salcete Block
— Member.
4. Chief Officer, Margao
— Member.
Municipal Council
5. CDPO, Salcete Block
— Member.
6. Executive Engineer (PWD),
— Member.
Salcete Block
7. ADEI, Salcete Block
— Member.
8. Shri Vikas Haldipurkar
— Member.
(Prominent Citizen),
Flat No. 2/2nd floor, Pritvi
Apartments, Gogal, Margao
9. Ms. Beena Kulkarni
— Member.
(Prominent citizen),
H. No. 273/D, Opp. Datta
Mandir, Tolleband, Davorlim,
Salcete-Goa
10. PHN/Matron, T.B. Hospital,
— Member.
Margao
The terms of reference of the above Committee
shall be as under:-
1. The meeting of the Executive Committee
shall be convened by the Member Secretary
by giving clear 07 days notice in writing
alongwith the Agenda specifying the
business to be transacted, the date, time and
venue of meeting.
2. The Executive Committee will meet atleast
once in two months.
3. The quorum will be 50% Members. The
presence of the Chairman is essential.
4. The Executive Committee will implement the
decisions taken by the Governing Body and
will function within its powers.
5. The minutes of the Executive Committee
meeting will also be communicated to the
members of the Governing Body.
6. The Executive Committee can delegate some
of its financial powers to the Member
Secretary.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Maria Seomara De Souza, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2019.
Order
No. 31/11/2005-I/PHD(Part)/97
In terms of newer guidelines of Ministry of Health
and Family Welfare, Government of India, New
Delhi, Government is pleased to constitute
Governing Body (GB) of Rogi Kalyan Samiti
Committee for the T. B. Hospital, Margao under
Directorate of Health Services comprising of the
following Members as under:-
1. Dy. Collector, Salcete Block
— Chairperson.
2. BDO, Salcete Block
— Member.
3. Chief Officer, Margao
— Member.
Municipal Council
4. CDPO, Margao Block
— Member.
5. Executive Engineer (PWD),
— Member.
Salcete Block
6. ADEI, Salcete Block
— Member.
7. Shri Vikas Haldipurkar
— Member.
(Prominent Citizen),
Flat No. 2/2nd floor,
Pritvi Apartments,
Gogal, Margao
8. Ms. Beena Kulkarni
— Member.
(Prominent citizen),
H. No. 273/D, Opp.
Datta Mandir, Tolleband,
Davorlim, Salcete-Goa
9. CMO, T.B. Hospital, Margao
— Member
Secretary.
The terms of reference of the above Body shall
be as under:-
1. The GB will have full control of the affairs of
the Society and will have the authority to
exercise and perform all the powers, acts and
deeds of the society consistent with the aims
and objects of the society.
2. The GB shall take policy decisions related to
overall functioning of the RKS which would
be implemented by EC of RKS.
3. The GB shall review income & expenditure
statements, consider the annual budget and
the annual action plan of the committee,
subsequent alternations placed before it and
pass it with such modification as the GB may
think fit.
4. The GB shall monitor the financial position
of the society in order to ensure smooth funds
utilization and review annual audited
accounts.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
815
5. The GB shall review compliance to Indian
public health standards, and performance of
public grievance redressal at facility level. It
will also review compliance to standards &
protocols, and reports of the monitoring
committees on quality assurance.
6. The GB shall consider & approve financial
proposals that are beyond the powers of the
Executive Committee, i.e. over Rs. 10.00 lakhs
at the level of the DHS, Rs. 5.00 lakhs at the
CHC/SDH, and Rs. 1,75,000.00 at the PHC.
7. The GB shall have powers to engage
chartered accountant for audit purposes for
a period not exceeding three years.
8. The GB shall meet at least once in quarter.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Maria Seomara De Souza, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 3rd January, 2019.
________
Order
No. 44/28/2017-I/PHD/133
Government is pleased to transfer and post the
following Medical Officers under Directorate of
Health Services, with immediate effect.
Sr.
Name of the
Present place
Transferred at
No.
Medical Officer
of posting
1
2
3
4
1. Dr. Arya Shirodkar,
PHC, Quepem Sub-District
Medical Officer
Hospital,
Ponda vice
Dr. Reshmi
Dessai
transferred.
2. Dr. Reshmi Dessai,
Sub-District
PHC, Quepem
Medical Officer
Hospital,
vice Dr. Arya
Ponda
Shirodkar
transferred.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Maria Seomara Desouza, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 9th January, 2019.
________
Order
No. 44/16/2016-I/PHD/143
Government is pleased to transfer and post
Dr. Baptisto Mascarenhas, Medical Officer from
Primary Health Centre, Sanguem to Primary Health
Centre, Curtorim against the vacant post occurred
due to promotion of Dr. Vallabh Nadkarni to the
post of Health Officer, with immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Maria Seomara Desouza, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 9th January, 2019.
———uuu———
Department of Revenue
__
Order
No. 26/5/2015-RD/61
Ex-post facto approval of the Government is
hereby accorded for extension of ad hoc promotion
granted to Shri Sudesh K. Naik Bhaireli, as ISLR, at
the Directorate of Settlement and Land Records for
the interim period w.e.f. 01-01-2018 to 17-06-2018,
i.e. 05 months and 17 days.
This issues with the approval of G.P.S.C.
conveyed vide their letter No. COM/II/11/29(1)/
/2013/881 dated 19-11-2018.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sudin A. Natu, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).
Porvorim, 10th January, 2019.
———uuu———
Department of Transport
Directorate of Transport
__
Notification
No. D.Tpt/EST/839-V (Part File)/2018/1035
In exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (2), read with sub-section (4) of Section
215 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Central Act
No. 59 of 1988) and Section 21 of the General
Clauses Act, 1897 (No. 10 of 1897), the Government
of Goa hereby further amends the Government
Notification No. D.Tpt/EST/839/IV/2011 dated
13-01-2011, published in the Official Gazette,
Series II No. 44 dated 27-01-2011 (hereinafter
referred to as the “principal Notification”), as
follows, namely:-
In the principal Notification, after entry at serial
number 12B, the following entries shall be inserted,
namely:-
“12C.
Director of Panchayats,
—
Member.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 42
17TH JANUARY, 2019
816
12D.
Director of Municipal
—
Member”.
Administration
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Nikhil Desai, Director & ex officio Additional
Secretary (Transport).
Panaji, 7th January, 2019.
________
Corrigendum
No. D.Tpt/EST/285-IV/2019/105
Ref.: Order No. D.Tpt/EST/285-IV/2018/2181 dated
13-04-2018.
The Budget Head mentioned in the above
referred Order dated 13-04-2018 regarding reverting
of Shri Vinod R. Arlekar (S.C.) to the substantive
post of Motor Vehicles Inspector (Group ‘C’)
may be read as “3055—Road Transport;
00—001—Direction
and
Administration;
03—Rationalization of Road Transport Services;
01—Salaries” instead of “2041-00-102-01-01.”
The remaining contents of the said Order dated
13-04-2018 remain unchanged.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Nikhil Desai, Director & ex officio Additional
Secretary (Transport).
Panaji, 8th January, 2019.
Department of Urban Development
Municipal Administration
__
Order
No. 1/03/DMA/Admn/RTI/2950
Read: Order No. 1/03/DMA/Admn/2350 dated
14-11-2017.
In partial modification to the above referred
order, the Government has approved the
appointment of the following official of the Mapusa
Municipal Council in the State of Goa under the
Right to Information Act, 2005 to act as Officials
under sub-section (2) of Section 5 of the Right to
Information Act, 2005.
Sr.
Name of the
Designation
Office
No.
official
Telephone
No.
1. Municipal Engineer
Public Infor-
2262203
Grade-I
mation Officer
The Public Information Officer is responsible for
maintaining and updating all required information
and also receiving and disposing off applications
under Right to Information Act, 2005.
R. Menaka, IAS, Director (Urban Development).
Panaji, 4th January, 2019.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 14.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—319/160–1/2019.