Panaji, 2nd January, 2020 (Pausa 12,1941)

SERIES II No. 40

711

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2018-20

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Education, Art & Culture

Directorate of Education

Order

No. 1-(2)-18-2017/SE/161

Government is pleased to transfer on deputation

Ms. Geraldina L. Mendes, from the cadre of Deputy

Education Officer/Principal, Teachers Training

College/Principal, Higher Secondary School/

/Vocational Education Officer/Deputy Director of

S.I.E., presently posted as Principal, Government

Higher Secondary School, Baina, Vasco as Joint

Secretary, Goa Board of Secondary & Higher

Secondary Education, Alto Betim with immediate

effect.

She shall be on deputation initially for a period

of three (3) years with effect from the date of her

joining and shall be governed by the standard terms

of deputation as contained in the O.M. No. 13/4/74-

-PER dated 20-11-2013 and as amended from time

to time.

Smt. Neeta P. Naik, Vice-Principal, Government

Higher Secondary School, Baina, Vasco shall hold

the Additional charge of Principal, Government

Higher Secondary School, Vasco in additional to

her own duties until further orders.

Ms. Geraldina L. Mendes, Principal, Government

Higher Secondary School, Baina, Vasco shall hand

over her charge to Smt. Neeta P. Naik, Vice-

-Principal, Government Higher Secondary School,

Baina, Vasco and get herself relieved.

The date of joining shall be communicated to

this office.

This issues with the concurrence of the GPSC

vide letter No. COM/II/4/15/(1)/2019/1210 dated

31-10-2019.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Vandana Rao, IAS, Director & ex officio Joint

Secretary (Education).

Porvorim, 25th November, 2019.

———u———

Directorate of Technical Education

College Section

Order

No. 16/150/Confirmation/GEC/04/P.F.II/3022

On the recommendations of the Goa Public

Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/II/12/18(1)/2019/266 dated 02-12-2019, the

Government of Goa is pleased to declare the

following Group ‘A’ Gazetted Officer of Goa College

of Art, Altinho, Panaji-Goa to have satisfactorily

completed his probation period and confirm him

in the post with effect from the date mentioned in

the respective column against his names.

Sr.

Name of

Designation

Date of completion

No.

faculty

of probation

period

1. Shri Mahesh

Principal

26-12-2002.

V. Vengurlekar

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Dr. Vivek B. Kamat, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Technical Education).

Porvorim, 26th December, 2019.

Note:-

There is one Extraordinary issue to the Official

Gazette, Series II No. 39 dated 26-12-2019 namely,

Extraordinary dated 30-12-2019 from pages

709 to 710 regarding Notification from Goa

Legislature Secretariat.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

712

Order

No. 16/150/Confirmation/GEC/04/P.F.II/3023

On the recommendations of the Goa Public

Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/II/12/18(1)/2018/269 dated 02-12-2019, the

Government of Goa is pleased to declare the

following Group ‘A’ Gazetted Officers of Goa College

of Engineering, Farmagudi, Ponda-Goa to have

satisfactorily completed their probation period and

confirm them in the post with effect from the date

mentioned in the respective column against their

names.

Sr.

Name of

Designation

Date of completion

No.

faculty

of probation

period

1. Dr. Vinayak N.

Professor in

28-08-2006.

Shet

Electrical &

Electronics

Engineering

2. Dr. J. A.

Professor in

23-06-2010.

Laxminarayana

Computer

Engineering

3. Dr. Ameeta G.

Professor in

03-07-2012.

S. Amonkar

Electronics &

Telecommunica-

tion Engineering

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Dr. Vivek B. Kamat, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Technical Education).

Porvorim, 26th December, 2019.

———uuu———

Department of Forest

Order

No. MS-REV.PF/DCF/WP/2018-19/393

Ref.: 1) Notification No. MS-REV.PF/DCF/WP/

/2018-19/989/296 dated 23-08-2019.

2) Addendum No. MS-REV.PF/DCF/WP/2018-19/

/316 dated 10-10-2019.

3) Order No. MS-REV.PF/DCF/WP/2018-19/383

dated 13-12-2019.

Government is pleased to constitute 07

inspection teams to carry out site inspection of the

properties as per Annexure in respect of the

identified Private Forest by the Review Committee

in its report dated 21-06-2019.

The 07 site inspection teams shall be headed by

the respective Inspector of Settlement and Land

Records (ISLR) of talukas with the Range Forest

Officers and Talathi of respective Saza as other two

members of the team.

The 07 site inspection teams are as follows:-

1) Tiswadi Taluka:

1) Inspector of Settlement and Land Records

(ISLR).

2) Shri Deepak Betqueikar, Range Forest

Officer.

3) Talathi.

2) Bardez and Pernem Taluka:

1) Inspector of Settlement and Land Records

(ISLR).

2) Shri Geerish G. Bailudkar, Range Forest

Officer.

3) Talathi.

3) Satari and Bicholim Taluka:

1) Inspector of Settlement and Land Records

(ISLR).

2) Shri Shamsunder L. Gawas, Range Forest

Officer.

3) Talathi.

4) Ponda and Dharbandora Taluka:

1) Inspector of Settlement and Land Records

(ISLR).

2) Shri Vivek Gaonkar, Range Forest Officer.

3) Talathi.

5) Salcete and Marmugao Taluka:

1) Inspector of Settlement and Land Records

(ISLR).

2) Shri Prakash Naik, Range Forest Officer.

3) Talathi.

6) Quepem and Sanguem Taluka:

1) Inspector of Settlement and Land Records

(ISLR).

2) Shri Siddesh Gaude, Range Forest Officer.

3) Talathi.

7) Canacona Taluka:

1) Inspector of Settlement and Land Records

(ISLR).

2) Shri Sangam Gawas, Range Forest Officer.

3) Talathi.

The site inspection teams shall submit their

respective reports to the Jt. Secretary (Revenue),

Chairman of the Review Committee by 06-01-2020,

so as to enable the committee to finalize the Review

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

713

Committee report dated 21-06-2019 for onward

submission to Government on or before 10-01-2020.

This issues with the approval of the Government.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Shaila G. Bhosle, Under Secretary (Forests).

Porvorim, 30th December, 2019.

———uuu———

Department of General Administration

Addendum

No. 37/5/2019-GAD-III/4182

Read: Notification No. 37/5/2019-GAD-III/3287

dated 10-10-2019.

The following Clause shall be added in the

Notification of Annexure-III in the list of the

Restricted Holiday for the year 2020 read in the

preamble:-

“Feast of St. Joseph Vaz (47) January 16,

Thursday”.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Shripad Arlekar, Under Secretary (GA-I).

Porvorim, 24th December, 2019.

———uuu———

Department of Labour

—

Notification

No. 28/2/2019-LAB/Part-I/818

The following award passed by the Industrial

Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on

06-11-2019 in Ref. No. IT/55/07 is hereby published

as required under Section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

A. S. Mahatme, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 10th December, 2019.

______

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND

LABOUR COURT

GOVERNMENT OF GOA AT PANAJI

(Before Mr. Vincent D’Silva, Hon’ble Presiding

Officer)

Ref. No. IT/55/07

Workmen

Rep. by the President,

Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’ Union,

2nd Floor, Velho’s Bldg.,

Panaji-Goa.

…

Workmen/Party I

V/s

M/s Adelphi Pharmaceuticals,

Tivim Industrial Estate,

Karaswada, Mapusa, Goa.

…

Employer/Party II

Workmen/Party I represented by Ld. Adv. Shri

Suhaas Naik.

Employer/Party II represented by Ld. Adv. Shri M.

S. Bandodkar.

AWARD

(Delivered on this 6th day of the month of

November, of the year 2019)

By Order dated 13-9-2007, bearing No. 28/50/

2006-LAB/855, the Government of Goa in exercise

of powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short The Act),

has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal

for adjudication.

“(a) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Adelphi Pharmaceuticals, Thivim

Industrial Estate, Karaswada, Mapusa, Goa,

in terminating the services of following

thirteen workmen with effect from 31-03-2005,

is legal and justified?

Sr.

Name of the workman

No.

1. Ms. Arati R. Salgaokar.

2. Ms. Shivani S. Dabholkar.

3. Ms. Usha Anant Harmalkar.

4. Mr. Satish M. Satoskar.

5. Mr. Pradeep Mhamal.

6. Ms. Chandan Kalangutkar.

7. Ms. Bhageshri Naik.

8. Ms. Suchita S. Harmalkar.

9. Ms. Sarita T. Halankar.

10. Ms. Ekta E. Shirodkar.

11. Ms. Anuradha A. Parab.

12. Ms. Asha Bicholkar.

13. Mr. Parshuram B. Patkar.

(2) If not, to what relief the workmen are

entitled?”

2. Upon receipt of the reference, IT/55/07 was

registered. Notices were issued to both the parties

under registered post, upon which both the parties

were served. Party I thereafter filed a Claim

statement at Exh.5 and the Party II filed a Written

statement at Exh. 6.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

714

3. In short, the case of the Party I is that the

Party II is engaged in manufacturing and supply of

pharmaceuticals products having its factory at

Thivim Industrial Estate, Thivim. The Party I

workmen are 13 permanent workmen employed at

the factory engaged in permanent and core

operations. The Managing Director of Party II on

31-3-2005 called all the workmen in his cabin in

presence of other management staff and informed

that they are selling the factory to the other party

and that they want clearance of all the workmen

before they take over the factory and that all the

workmen must resign and in case they do not,

their services would be terminated without any

compensation. The Managing Director obtained the

signatures of all the workmen on the resignation

letters under threat, duress and force and forcibly

handed over some amount to them purported to be

their final dues. The Party I never voluntarily

resigned from the services and had no intention of

resigning from their services. The management has

also not paid them their correct legal dues. The

Party I union raised the dispute before the office of

the Labour Commissioner and the Party II came

out with a defense that they have signed a

Memorandum of Settlement dated 31-03-2005. There

is however no mention as to under what provision

the purported Settlement dated 31-03-2005 had

been entered into and whether the workmen had

given an authority to the alleged union to sign the

purported settlement or whether it is registered or

not with the competent authority prescribed under

the statute. The purported Settlement dated

31-03-2005 is therefore illegal, unjustified and bad

in law and contracting out the statutory provisions

of the applicable law.

4. The Party I also claimed that the Party II has

blatantly violated Section 25-FFA, 25-FFF and

25-F of the Act and had used pressure tactics and

lured some of the workmen by giving them extra

benefits to sign the said purported settlement

which is totally one sided favouring the

management. The present case is an act of unfair

labour practice adopted by the employer to get rid

of the permanent workmen under the pretext of

signing the purported Memorandum of Settlement

dated 31-03-2005 which is illegal, unjustified, bad

in law, unfair, one-sided and totally favouring the

management. The Party II after terminating the

services of the workmen restarted the

manufacturing operations at the place of its

establishment at Thivim and at present the factory

of the Party II is fully operational with recruitment

of new workers in place of Party I workmen. There

is no closure of the business activities of the Party

II at its factory. It was obligatory on the part of

Party II to send intimation letters to Party I workmen

asking them to report for work and preference in

employment ought to have been given by Party II

to the Party I workmen involved in the present

reference and hence the said action of the Party II

is illegal, unjustified and bad in law. The Party I

workmen are therefore entitled for reinstatement

with full back wages and continuity in service.

5. In the Written statement, the Party II has

claimed that at no point of time the company has

terminated the services of 13 workmen concerned

in the reference. The said employees have

voluntarily resigned from the employment of the

company and their resignations cannot be termed

as termination. The workmen concerned in the

reference after resignation voluntarily accepted all

the dues and nothing is payable to them. The

Party II signed a valid settlement with the workers

after they voluntarily resigned and severed their

relationship. The Party I union has no locus standi

to represent the workmen concerned in the

reference. All the workers have accepted the

benefits arising out of settlement signed with the

Union. The Party II after paying all the dues to the

workmen including ex-gratia closed its activities

at the said establishment. Only 13 workmen out of

56 workmen have raised the dispute only after

voluntarily resigning and accepting the benefits.

The entire reference is bad in law, not maintainable

and ought to the rejected in limine. The Party I is

therefore not entitled for any relief.

6. In the rejoinder at Exh. 7, the Party I has

denied the case set up by the Party II in the written

statement.

7. Issues that came to be framed at Exh. 9 are as

follows:

(1)

Whether the Party I/workmen prove that

their resignation letters were obtained

under threat, duress, force and coercion?

(2)

Whether the Party I/workmen prove that

they were forced to accept the amount

purported to be final dues?

(3)

Whether the Party I/workmen prove that

they have not been paid correct legal

dues?

(4)

Whether the Party I/workmen prove that

the settlement dated 31-3-2005 is illegal

and unjustified?

(5)

Whether the Party I/workmen prove that

their termination is illegal?

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

715

(6)

Whether the Party II proves that the Goa

Trade and Commercial Workers Union have

no locus standi to represent the workmen?

8. In the course of evidence, the Party I examined

Shri R. D. Mangueshkar as witness No. 1 and

produced on record a copy of unionization letter

dated 5-10-2005 sent by Union to Party II and AD

slip along with a copy of resolution at Exh. 16 colly,

a copy of dispute dated 7-10-2005 at Exh. 17, a

copy of dispute dated 12-1-2010 raised by the Union

at Exh. 18, a copy of dispute dated 27-3-2007 raised

by Union before Secretary, Labour at Exh. 19, a

copy of the failure report along with minutes of

proceedings at Exh. 20 colly, a copy of dispute

dated 23-4-2008 raised by the Union at Exh. 21 and

a copy of names of the workmen along with

Annexure showing their salary, date of joining etc.

at Exh. 22 colly. The Party I also examined Shri

Rupesh Kothambikar and Shri Govind Sirsat who

produced on record a copy of extract of Form 9 at

Exh. 70 and a copy of details of Provident Fund

remittances by Party II at Exh. 71.

9. On the other hand, the Party II examined

Mrs. Lourdes D’Souza as witness and produced on

record a copy of settlement dated 31-3-2005 along

with annexures at Exh. 37 colly, a copy of letter

dated 22-10-2005 by Party II to Party I at Exh. 38, a

copy of letter dated 19-10-2005 by Party II to Union

at Exh. 39, a copy of letter dated 12-1-2006 by

Party II to ALC, Panaji at Exh. 40, a copy of letter

dated 3-11-2005 by Party II to ALC, Mapusa at

Exh. 41, a copy of letter dated 9-12-2005 by

Party II to ALC, Panaji at Exh. 42, a copy of minutes

held before ALC at Exh. 43, a copy of letter dated

3-6-2006 by Party II to ALC at Exh. 44, a copy of

failure report dated 18-7-2006 at Exh. 45, copies of

resignation letters of 13 workmen along with

enclosures at Exh. 46 colly to Exh. 58 colly. and

copies of Service certificates of 13 workmen at

Exh. 61 colly.

10. Heard arguments. Notes of Written

arguments came to be placed on record by Party II.

11. I have gone through the records of the case

and have duly considered the arguments advanced.

My answers to the above issues are as follows:

Issue No. 1

…

In the Negative.

Issue No. 2

…

In the Negative.

Issue No. 3

…

In the Negative.

Issue No. 4

…

In the Negative.

Issue No. 5

…

In the Negative.

Issue No. 6

…

In the Negative.

REASONS

Issue Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4:

12. Learned Advocate Shri Suhaas Naik for the

Party I has submitted that the Managing Director

of the Party II called all the workmen in his cabin

and informed that they have decided to sell the

factory to the other party and all the workmen

must resign and go home and that they obtained

signatures of all the workmen on the resignation

letters under threat and duress and forcibly handed

over some amount purported to be their legal dues.

The workmen have never voluntarily resigned from

the services. The management has not paid the

workmen their legal dues including retrenchment

compensation, notice pay, gratuity or leave wages.

The Settlement dated 31-3-2005 is illegal,

unjustified and bad in law which amounts to

contracting out the statutory provisions of the law,

which states that the agreement is arising out of

the closure but in an event, provisions of Section

25-FFA, 25-FFF and 25-F of the Industrial Disputes

Act have not been complied with as they adopted

unfair labour practice to get rid of permanent

workmen under the pretext of signing

Memorandum of Settlement dated 31-3-2005 which

was one sided and totally favouring the

management. The forcible resignations of the

workmen amount to the termination of the

workmen from the services and therefore the

Party I workmen are entitled for the relief claimed

and in support thereof, he relied upon the cases of

(i) Maharashtra General Kamgar Union vs. Glass

Containers Pvt. Ltd., 1983 ILLJ 326 Bom; (ii)

Industrial Perfumes Ltd. vs. Industrial Perfumes

Workers, (1998) II LLJ 1177 Bom; (iii) Aroor Carpet

Factories, Private vs. K. N. Henry and Ors, AIR

1964 Ker 162.

13. Per contra, Ld. Adv. Shri M. S. Bandodkar for

the Party II has submitted that the reference speaks

about the termination of services of 13 workmen

from 31-3-2005, although there were 56 workmen.

There is no evidence that the services of the

workmen have been terminated and in fact it is

not the case of the management that the factory

has been closed but it has offered VRS scheme to

all the workmen which was accepted by them vide

Settlement dated 31-3-2005. The documents

produced by the company clearly show that it was

a case of voluntary retirement and that the service

certificates have also been given to all the 56

workmen, including Party I which show the

workmen have left of their own accord. The

Memorandum of settlement along with annexure

showing the list of workmen clearly indicate that

the workmen have received gratuity, leave salary

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

716

and ex-gratia after they tendered resignations and

accepted all the legal dues before arriving at the

settlement and in support thereof, he relied upon

the cases of (i) The Chairman/Director, National

Bureau of Plants Genetics Resources, New Delhi

& Another vs. Shobha M. Dhore & Others, 2013(5)

LLN 164 (Bom.); (ii) Raijibhai Bhikhabhai Parmar

& Ors. vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. (Formerly

known as Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd.)

& Anr., 2016 LLR 673.

14. In fine, the substratum of controversy is

whether the Party II terminated the service of the

Party I workmen without complying the provisions

of the Act or whether the Party I workmen along

with other 43 workmen tendered their resignations

and accepted voluntary retirement scheme floated

by the company and thereby relinquished

employer-employee relationship.

15. The Party I have examined Shri R. D.

Mangueshkar, General Secretary of Goa Trade and

Commercial Workers’ Union who has filed affidavit

incorporating the statement of claim filed by the

Union. In the cross examination, he admitted that

the present dispute pertains to alleged illegal

termination of the 13 workmen, however he has

not produced any termination letters nor examined

any of the 13 workmen before the Court. There is

also no dispute that out of 56 workmen, only 13

have raised the dispute on 02-03-2006 when the

Settlement dated 31-3-2005 was signed by all the

workmen including Party I workmen. He admitted

that as per Exh. 20 colly, the case of the

management was that the workmen have

voluntarily accepted the VRS by submitting their

resignations and also collected their legal dues.

He however claimed that since the action of

termination is illegal, the payment of any amount

of dues is irrelevant. The Party I also examined

Shri Rupesh Kothambikar, Assistant Labour

Commissioner, Mapusa. He claimed that the Labour

Inspector Shri Rony Pereira carried out inspection

of Party II factory and told him that at the time of

inspection, the factory was functioning in the name

of Sigma Laboratories and there were 54 workers

in the factory. Be that as it may, the case of

Party I workmen that it was an illegal closure

therefore falls flat.

16. The Party II examined its Manager, Mrs.

Lourdes D’Souza who claimed that the employees

have voluntary resigned from the employment of

the company and accepted VRS scheme and all

the legal dues after signing a valid Settlement

dated 31-3-2005 with the workers thereby severing

their relationship. There is no dispute surviving

between the workers and the company and that

the present dispute has been raised only after

voluntarily resigning and accepting the benefits.

She claimed that the undertaking of the Party II

was permanently closed as per Settlement dated

31-3-2005. In the cross examination, she stated that

the copies of settlement were given to all the

authorities which was signed between the

company and Adelphi Pharmaceuticals Kamgar

Union and that after prolonged discussion between

the employees and the Union, VRS scheme was

signed with 56 workmen. She denied the

suggestion that the Union had no authority to enter

into any kind of understanding or settlement with

the company on behalf of other workers and that

the settlement is not a valid settlement. She also

stated that they have calculated and paid to each

of the 56 workmen their gratuity amount payable

to individual workman and paid the cheques with

the details of calculation including gratuity and

that 75 days compensation includes gratuity and

other benefits.

17. Be that as it may, the Party I have not

disputed the Memorandum of settlement entered

into between all the workmen and the management

by which VRS scheme was extended to them and

accepted by all. Exhibit 37 colly are the letters

issued to the concerned authorities along with the

settlement. The Memorandum of settlement was

produced before all the authorities who have not

objected to it nor have the workmen concerned

raised any objection nor led any evidence about

the shortcoming of the said settlement. A little

peep into the Memorandum of settlement clearly

shows that the Union along with the workers and

the management after prolonged discussion agreed

and entered into the terms of settlement by which

all the workers tendered their resignations in

writing. The letters of acceptance of resignation

and receipts of full and final settlement of dues at

Exh. 46 colly to 57 colly are pointer to that effect.

The Party I workmen have received the agreed

amount as per the said Memorandum of

understanding at the rate of 75 days of amount for

each completed years of service who were on the

muster roll of the company as on 31-3-2005

including leave encashment of their privilege

leave. The Annexure to the Settlement clearly

shows that all the workmen have signed the

annexure showing details of the calculation which

was paid to them. The Service certificates at

Exh. 61 colly of the Party I workmen are also

indication of the fact that they have left the services

on their own accord. None of the above documents

including the Settlement and calculation have been

disputed by Party I workmen, which clearly show

that the workmen have been paid gratuity, leave

salary and ex-gratia.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

717

18. Needless to mention, the Party I have not

challenged the Memorandum of settlement on the

ground that it was bad in law or entered into by

misrepresentation or fraud. The settlement has

been signed on 31-3-2005, resignations were also

tendered by all the workmen on 31-3-2005 and they

were accepted on the same day and the amounts

as per settlement were paid in April, 2005. There

is nothing produced on record that the Party I

workmen including other workmen were not paid

as per the settlement. The workmen have also

withdrawn the Provident Fund as shown in the

Extract of Form-9 and the details of remittances

produced by Shri Govind Sirsat at Exh. 70 and 71

respectively. He has stated that the workers have

given the reason for withdrawing the Provident

fund as ‘Left’ on 30-4-2005. They therefore cannot

challenge the settlement once it is admitted by

them that they have accepted the VRS scheme. It

is well settled that if the workmen want to

challenge the VRS compensation received by them

by raising an industrial dispute, they will have to

deposit the amount received towards VRS as held

by the Apex Court in the case of Raijibhai

Bhikhabhai Parmar & Ors., supra. The Party I

workmen have not deposited the amount of VRS

received by them and have challenged the VRS

scheme, which is not permissible and therefore,

the reference itself is not maintainable.

19. The case of Party I workmen as per the

schedule of reference is termination of services

with effect from 31-3-2005 on which date the

settlement was signed and that they have tendered

resignation letters, which were accepted by the

management. None of the workmen were examined

by the Union to justify its case as per statement of

claim. The evidence of witness, Shri R. D.

Mangueshkar is irrelevant as he is neither attended

the conciliation proceedings nor he knows the facts

of the case. He is also not the employee of the

company. Admittedly, the Memorandum of

Settlement was signed on 31-3-2005 and the dispute

was raised on 02-03-2006. The dispute has been

raised after a delay of 11 months and no explanation

is forthcoming as regards to the said delay. The

undisputed documents produced by the

management clearly show that the workmen

including Party I workmen have accepted the VRS

scheme floated by the company along with the

dues and have even collected the Provident Fund,

wherein it is stated that they have ‘left’ on their

own. There is absolutely no evidence on record

that the services of Party I workmen were

terminated by Party II or that there is a closure of

the establishment by Party II on 31-3-2005. None of

the documents produced by Party I indicates that

it is a closure. The failure report dated 18-7-2006 at

Exh. 20 shows that the workmen were disputing

VRS scheme but the documents produced by the

Party II clearly indicate that the Party I have

accepted VRS scheme by submitting resignation

letters and accepting the settlement.

20. Needless to mention, the documents

including resignation letters, acceptance letters,

receipts and the service certificates issued to

Party I clearly show that a lumpsum amount has

been paid to all the workmen including Party I

workmen in April 2005 inclusive of gratuity. The

Party I workmen therefore failed to show that the

settlement is one sided, bad in law, illegal, unfair,

unreasonable and amounts to contracting out the

statutory provisions of law and that the

management had used pressure tactics and has

lured the workmen by giving them extra benefits

and that it is an act of unfair labour practice

adopted by the employer to get rid of the permanent

workmen or that the company has not given

voluntary retirement scheme or that the

resignations were not given by the workmen on

their own accord.

21. Once it is established by the management

that the workmen have resigned from the services

which was accepted and the amount has been

paid to the workmen without any objection or that

the resignations were not forcibly taken and that

till date the resignation have not been withdrawn

nor the amount received under VRS scheme is

returned, it cannot be said that the settlement is

one sided or illegal, more particularly when all the

dues including ex-gratia have been paid to the

workmen concerned. It is thus clear that the

Party II have not terminated the service of the

Party I workmen, on the contrary, the Party I

workmen along with other 43 workmen have

tendered their resignations and accepted voluntary

retirement scheme floated by the company and

thereby

relinquished

employer-employee

relationship. The submissions and the reliance

placed by learned Adv. Shri Suhaas Naik on the

above citations turn on their own facts and

therefore not applicable to the case at hand. It is

therefore the Party I have failed to prove that their

resignation letters were obtained under threat,

duress, force and coercion and that they were forced

to accept the amount or that they have not been

paid correct dues or that the Settlement dated

31-3-2005 is illegal and unjustified. Hence, the above

issues Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 are answered in the negative.

Issue No. 5:

22. The Party I have claimed that their

termination of services which falls within provision

of Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

718

was without complying the provisions of Section

25 FFA, 25 FFF and 25-F of the I.D. Act and that it

is illegal. The witness, Shri R. D. Mangueshkar has

also stated that the action of termination of services

is illegal and the payment of any amount is

irrelevant. None of the workmen have been

examined by Party I to prove the case of termination

nor have any termination letters been produced.

The documents produced on record show to the

contrary. It is therefore, the Party I failed to prove

that there was alleged termination of their services

and that it was illegal. Hence, the issue No. 5 is

answered in the negative.

Issue No. 6:

23. There is nothing on record that the Party I

has no locus standi to raise the dispute from the

documents produced by Shri R. D. Mangueshkar

including letter along with resolution dated

5-10-2005 at Exh. 16 colly, letter addressed to

Party II at Exh. 17, letter dated 12-1-2010 to office

of the Commissioner, Labour at Exh. 18, letter dated

27-3-2007 addressed to the Secretary, Government

of Goa at Exh. 19, the failure report dated

18-7-2006, minutes of conciliation dated 7-6-2006

at Exh. 20 colly, and the letter dated 23-4-2008

addressed to Commissioner of Labour at Exh. 21.

The said documents clearly indicate that the Goa

Trade and Commercial Workers’ Union have locus

standi to represent the workmen. It is therefore,

the above issue is answered in the negative.

24. Pursuant to above discussions and the

Party I having failed to prove the issues cast on it,

I pass the following:

ORDER

(i)

It is hereby held that the management of

M/s. Adelphi Pharmaceuticals, Thivim

Industrial Estate, Karaswada, Mapusa, Goa,

have not terminated the services of thirteen

workmen mentioned in the reference with

effect from 31-03-2005, on the contrary, the

Party I workmen along with other workmen

have voluntary resigned from services by

accepting their dues.

(ii)

The Party I/Workmen are therefore not

entitled to any reliefs.

(iii)

No order as to costs.

(iv)

Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Vincent D’Silva)

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal

and Labour Court.

Department of Law & Judiciary

Law (Establishment) Division

Notification

No. 14/16/2019-LD (Estt.)/2434

The following Notification No. X(Gen)-1603/2019/

/1454 dated 13-11-2019 which has been issued by

the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Original

and Appellate Side, is hereby published for general

information of the public.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Amir Y. Parab, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).

Porvorim, 24th December, 2019.

______

Notification by the High Court of Judicature at

Bombay Original and Appellate side

No. X(Gen)-1603/2019/1454

The following is the list of holidays fixed for the

Courts and Offices of the High Court for the

year 2020

High Court of Bombay and its benches at

Nagpur and Aurangabad & High Court of

Bombay at Goa, Panaji

Sr.

Occasion

Date on which

Day

No.

the holidays fall

in the year 2020

1. Chhatrapati Shivaji

19 February

Wednesday.

Maharaj Jayanti

2. Holi (2nd day)

10 March

Tuesday.

3. Gudi Padwa

25 March

Wednesday.

4. Mahavir Jayanti

06 April

Monday.

5. Good Friday

10 April

Friday.

6. Holiday

13 April

Monday.

7. Dr. Babasaheb

14 April

Tuesday.

Ambedkar Jayanti

8. Maharashtra Day

01 May

Friday.

9. Buddha Pournima

07 May

Thursday.

10. Ramzan Id

25 May

Monday.

11. Bakri-Id

01 August

Saturday.

12. Independence Day

15 August

Saturday.

13. Anant Chaturdashi

01 September Tuesday.

14. Mahatma Gandhi

02 October

Friday.

Jayanti

15. Id-E-Milad

30 October

Friday.

16. Diwali Holidays

13 November Friday

21 November Saturday.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

719

17. Guru Nanak Jayanti 30 November Monday.

18. Christmas

25 December Friday.

The following Holidays have not been notified

as they fall on 4th Saturday and Sundays:-

1. Republic Day

26 January, 2020.

2. Parsi New Year

16 August, 2020.

3. Ganesh Chaturthi

22 August, 2020.

4. Moharrum

30 August, 2020.

5. Dasara

25 October, 2020.

Note:

1. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay,

Nagpur Bench, Nagpur.

will work on

observe holiday on

Saturday, 04 January, 2020

Wednesday,

26 August, 2020

(“Mahalaxmi/Gauri

Pujan”).

2. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay,

Aurangabad Bench, Aurangabad.

will work on

observe holiday on

Saturday, 29 August, 2020

Wednesday,

26 August, 2020

(“Mahalaxmi/Gauri

Pujan”).

Saturday, 19 September, 2020

Thursday,

17 September, 2020

(“Marathwada Mukti

Sangram Din”).

3. The High Court of Bombay at Goa, Panaji.

will work on

observe holiday on

Tuesday, 01 September, 2020

Friday,

(“Anant Chaturdashi”)

21 August, 2020

(“Hartalika”).

Saturday, 07 November, 2020

Thursday,

3 December, 2020

(“Feast of St. Francis

Xavier”).

The office of the High Court of Bombay at

Goa, Panaji will observe holiday on Saturday,

19 December, 2020 on account of “Goa Liberation

Day”.

Summer Vacation

: From Friday, 08 May, 2020 to

Saturday, 06 June, 2020

(both days inclusive).

Diwali Vacation

: From Monday, 09 November,

2020 to Saturday, 21 November,

2020 (both days inclusive)

(including Diwali Holidays

from 13 November, 2020 to

21 November, 2020).

Christmas Vacation : From Wednesday 23 December,

2020 to Saturday 02 January,

2021 (both days inclusive).

4. During the Summer, Diwali and Christmas

Vacations, the Offices on the original side will

remain open daily from 11.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. except

on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays. But no work,

except of an urgent nature, will be received after

4.15 p.m.

The offices on the Appellate Side will also

remain open daily from 11.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. except

on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays during the

Summer, Diwali and Christmas Vacations. The

Offices will however, remain closed for filing of

Judicial matters, except the following:-

a) Criminal cases.

b) Applications in Civil Cases seeking urgent

relief.

c) Matters to which the provisions of Section 4

of the Limitation Act, 1963, are not applicable.

By order of the Honourable the Chief Justice.

High Court of Judicature at

Surendra P. Tavade,

Bombay, 13th November, 2019

Registrar General.

________

Court of the Principal District &

Sessions Judge, North Goa

No. DSC/HOL/121/2019/13158

Approved List of Holidays and Vacations for

the Year 2020 for the District and Subordinate

Courts in the North Goa District

Sr.

Holidays

Date

Days of

No.

the week

01. New Year Day

01-01-2020

Wednesday.

02. Chhatrapati Shivaji 19-02-2020

Wednesday.

Maharaj Jayanti

03. Mahashivratri

21-02-2020

Friday.

04. Holi

10-03-2020

Tuesday.

05. Gudi Padava

25-03-2020

Wednesday.

06. Shree Ram Navami

02-04-2020

Thursday.

07. Maundy

09-04-2020

Thursday.

Thursday

08. Good Friday

10-04-2020

Friday.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

720

09. Dr. Babasaheb

14-04-2020

Tuesday.

Ambedkar

Jayanti (*)

10. May Day (*)

01-05-2020

Friday.

11. Ramzan-Id/Id-Ul-

25-05-2020

Monday.

-Fitr (**)

12. Id-Ul-Zuha

01-08-2020

Saturday.

(Bakri Id) (**)

13. Janmashtami

11-08-2020

Tuesday.

14. Independence Day (*) 15-08-2020

Saturday.

15. Hartalika

21-08-2020

Friday.

16. Mahatma Gandhi

02-10-2020

Friday.

Jayanti

17. Id-e-Milad (**)

30-10-2020

Friday.

18. Dhantrayodashi/

13-11-2020 to Friday to

/Diwali/Bhaubeej

19-11-2020

Thursday.

19. Feast of St. Francis 03-12-2020

Thursday.

Xavier

20. Feast of Immaculate 08-12-2020

Tuesday.

Conception

21. Goa Liberation

19-12-2020

Saturday.

Day (*)

22. Christmas Eve

24-12-2020

Thursday.

23. Christmas Day (*)

25-12-2020

Friday.

No days have been proposed as holidays on

account of

(1) Republic Day (*)

26-01-2020

Sunday.

(2) Ganesh Chaturthi

22-08-2020

4th Saturday.

(First Day) (*)

Summer Vacation

From: 08-05-2020 to 06-06-2020 (Both days

inclusive).

Winter Vacation

From: 23-12-2020 to 31-12-2020 (Both days

inclusive).

Note:-

1. Please note that the Hon’ble High Court has clarified

that the notified holidays and vacations are likely to be

modified in near future as per the recommendations of

Shetty Commission and directions issued by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India in Writ Petition No. 1022/89

(All India Judges’ Association Vs. Union of India and

others).

2. (*) The holidays at Sr. Nos. 9, 10, 14, 21 and 23 are

paid holidays for daily rated staff if they are in service

on the preceding and the succeeding working days and

also at Sr. No. 1 and 2 of the list of holidays that have

not been proposed on account of Sunday and 4th

Saturday.

3. (**) The holidays at Sr. Nos. 11, 12 and 17 will be

availed on the days the Government of Goa declares

public holidays.

Irshad Agha, Principal District Judge and

Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji.

Panaji, 13th December, 2019.

________

District & Sessions Court, South Goa

No. DSC/MAR/HOL-69/2019/12245

List of Holidays and Vacations for the

Year 2020 for the District and Subordinate

Courts in South Goa District

Sr.

Holidays

Date

Days of

No.

the week

01. New Year Day

01-01-2020

Wednesday.

02. Chhatrapati Shivaji 19-02-2020

Wednesday.

Maharaj Jayanti

03. Mahashivratri

21-02-2020

Friday.

04. Holi

10-03-2020

Tuesday.

05. Gudi Padava

25-03-2020

Wednesday.

06. Shree Ram Navami

02-04-2020

Thursday.

07. Maundy Thursday

09-04-2020

Thursday.

08. Good Friday

10-04-2020

Friday.

09. Dr. Babasaheb

14-04-2020

Tuesday.

Ambedkar

Jayanti (*)

10. May Day (*)

01-05-2020

Friday.

11. Ramzan-Id/Id-Ul-

25-05-2020

Monday.

-Fitr (**)

12. Id-Ul-Zuha

01-08-2020

Saturday.

(Bakri Id) (**)

13. Janmashtami

11-08-2020

Tuesday.

14. Independence Day (*) 15-08-2020

Saturday.

15. Hartalika

21-08-2020

Friday.

16. Mahatma Gandhi

02-10-2020

Friday.

Jayanti

17. Id-e-Milad (**)

30-10-2020

Friday.

18. Diwali Holidays

13-11-2020 to Friday to

(Dhantrayodashi/

19-11-2020

Thursday.

/Diwali/Bhaubeej)

19. Feast of St. Francis 03-12-2020

Thursday.

Xavier

20. Feast of Immaculate 08-12-2020

Tuesday.

Conception

21. Goa Liberation

19-12-2020

Saturday.

Day (*)

22. Christmas Eve

24-12-2020

Thursday.

23. Christmas Day (*)

25-12-2020

Friday.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

721

No days have been proposed as holidays on

account of

(1) Republic Day (*)

26-01-2020

Sunday.

(2) Ganesh Chaturthi

22-08-2020

4th Saturday.

(First Day) (*)

Summer Vacation

From: 08-05-2020 to 06-06-2020 (Both days

inclusive).

Winter Vacation

From: 23-12-2020 to 31-12-2020 (Both days

inclusive).

Note:-

1. Please note that the Hon’ble High Court has clarified

that the notified holidays and vacations are likely to be

modified in near future as per the recommendations of

the Hon’ble Justice Shetty Commission and directions

issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Writ Petition

No. 1022/89 (All India Judges’ Association Vs. Union of

India and others).

2. (*) The holidays at Sr. Nos. 9, 10, 14, 21 and 23 of

the list are paid holidays for daily rated staff if they are

in service on the preceding and the succeeding working

days and so also at Sr. No. 1 and 2 of the list of holidays

that have not been proposed on account of Sunday and

4th Saturday.

3. (**) The holidays at Sr. Nos. 11, 12 and 17 of the

list will be availed on the days the Government of Goa

declares public holidays.

B. P. Deshpande, Principal District & Sessions

Judge, South Goa, Margao.

Margao, 12th December, 2019.

Department of Personnel

Order

No. 13/30/2016-PER/3909

The Governor of Goa is pleased to grant

extension in service to Shri Deelip M. Dhavalikar,

Superintending Engineer posted as Chief

General Manager on deputation in Sewerage &

Infrastructural Development Corporation of Goa

Limited for a period of one year beyond the age of

his superannuation w.e.f. 01-01-2020 to 31-12-2020

in public interest. This order is subject to Vigilance

Clearance, concurrence of Finance Department and

approval of Council of Ministers.

The extension is further subject to termination

without assigning any reasons during the period

of extension.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 31st December, 2019.

________

Order

No. 2/1/2001-PER(Part-IV)/3907

Read: Order No. 2/1/2001-PER(Part.IV)/007 dated

01-01-2019.

The term of Shri Sharad G. Marathe, as

Ombudsman, appointed vide order read in

preamble, is further extended for a period of one

year w.e.f. 07-01-2020 to 06-01-2021 in terms of

Clause (b) of sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Goa

Government Employees (Redressal of Grievances

Forum) Scheme, 2001 as amended.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Maya Pednekar, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 30th December, 2019.

———uuu———

Department of Public Health

Order

No. 44/100/2012-I/PHD/Part I/2825

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service Commission conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

/II/12/24(5)/2017/267 dated 02-12-2019, the Government is pleased to declare satisfactorily completion of

probation period as well as Confirmation of following Doctors in the post of Public Health Dentist under

the Directorate of Health Services as under:-

Sr.

Name of the officer

Date of joining in

Date of completion of

Confirmed in the

No.

regular service as

probation period

post of

“Public Health Dentist”

Dr. Shishir Kamat

30-05-2016

29-05-2018

Public Health Dentist.

Dr. Swati Sidhesh Gauns

31-10-2016

30-10-2018

Public Health Dentist.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

722

3. Dr. Eesha Yeshwant Prabhu

31-10-2016

30-10-2018

Public Health Dentist.

Gaunker

4. Dr. Priyanka Dattaraj Mayenkar

31-10-2016

30-10-2018

Public Health Dentist.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Ajit S. Pawaskar, Joint Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 23rd December, 2019.

________

Order

No. 7/1/2013-I/PHD/2720

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/II/11/56(1)/2017/246 dated 06-11-2019,

Government is pleased to promote the following

Food Safety Officers to the post of Senior Food Safety

Officer under Directorate of Food & Drugs

Administration (Group “B” Non-Gazetted),

Bambolim on regular basis in the Level 6 of Pay

Matrix (PB-2 Rs. 9,300-34,800/- +GP: Rs. 4,200/-)

and other allowances to be fixed as per rules with

immediate effect:-

1. Smt. Flavia Rita de Souza.

2. Shri Rajaram P. Patil.

3. Shri Shailesh R. Shenvi.

4. Smt. Priya A. Desai.

5. Shri Shivdas S. Naik.

6. Smt. Shradha A. Khutkar.

The above officers shall be on probation for a

period of 02 years with effect from the date of

joining.

The promotion is made against the vacancy

occurred due to creation of the posts vide

Order No. 7/2/2017-I/PHD/(C)/1597 dated 28-06-2019.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Ajit S. Pawaskar, Joint Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 23rd December, 2019.

________

Order

No. 44/59/2018-I/PHD/2827

Government is pleased to accept the resignation

tendered by Dr. Siddhi Gaunekar, Medical Officer

attached to Sub District Hospital, Ponda under

Directorate of Health Services and she is hereby

relieved from the said post of Medical Officer under

Directorate of Health Services with immediate

effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Ajit S. Pawaskar, Joint Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 24th December, 2019.

Order

No. 4/14/2003-II/PHD/Part 3/2233

On the recommendation of Goa Public Service

Commission conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

/II/12/30(1)/2015/265 dated 02-12-2019, the

Government is pleased to declare Dr. Manasi

Prabhudessai,

Lecturer,

Department

Ophthalmology, Goa Medical College as having

satisfactorily completed her probation period of

two years w.e.f. 01-02-2017 to 31-01-2019, and to

confirm her in the post of Lecturer, Department of

Ophthalmology in Goa Medical College, Bambolim,

with effect from the date of completion of her

probation period.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 26th December, 2019.

________

Order

No. 44/10/2017-I/PHD/2830

Government is pleased to transfer Dr. Sruti Naik

Dessai, Medical Officer from the Primary Health

Centre, Sanguem to Urban Health Centre, Margao

under Directorate of Health Services against the

post of Medical Officer vacant due to acceptance

of the voluntary retirement tendered by

Dr. Christopher D’Mello, at her own request.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Ajit S. Pawaskar, Joint Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 30th December, 2019.

________

Notification

No. 9/1/2018-III/PHD/Part/2231

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (ii)

of Clause (l) of Section 2 of the Mental Healthcare

Act, 2017 (Central Act No. 10 of 2017), and with the

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

723

concurrence of the High Court of Bombay, at Goa,

conveyed vide letter No. A.1239/2019/2765 dated

06-11-2019, the Government of Goa, hereby

empowers all Judicial Magistrates First Class in

the State of Goa to perform the functions of a

Magistrate under the said Act.

This Notification shall come into force with

immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health-I).

Porvorim, 27th December, 2019.

———uuu———

Department of Town & Country Planning

Office of the Chief Town Planner (Planning)

Order

No. 17/01/TCP-UD/2015-16/Part/3585

The following transfers of officers in the Town and Country Planning Department is issued in public

interest as detailed below:-

Sr.

Name of the officer and

Present posting

Proposed posting

No.

designation

1. Ms. Vertika Dagur,

Member Secretary, Mormugao

Member Secretary,

Town Planner

PDA, Vasco

South Goa PDA, Margao.

2. Shri Vinod Kumar Chandra,

Town & Country Planning Dept.

Member Secretary,

Town Planner

(HQ), Panaji/Mormugao

Mormugao PDA, Vasco.

Taluka Office, Vasco

3. Shri Sandip P. Surlakar,

Town & Country Planning Dept.,

Town & Country Planning

Dy. Town Planner

North Goa District Office,

Dept., Ponda Taluka Office.

Mapusa

4. Shri Anand Deshpande,

Town & Country Planning Dept.

Town & Country Planning

Dy. Town Planner

(HQ), Panaji

Dept., Pernem Taluka Office/

/GIDC (additional charge).

5. Shri K. Ashok Kumar,

Member Secretary, South Goa PDA,

Town & Country Planning

Dy. Town Planner

Margao

Dept., Quepem Taluka Office/

/Canacona Taluka Office

(additional charge).

6. Shri Prakash P. Bandodkar,

Town & Country Planning Dept.,

Dy. Town Planner

Pernem Taluka Office/GIDC

North Goa District Office,

(additional charge)

Mapusa.

7. Shri R. N Volvoikar,

Town & Country Planning Dept.

Town & Country Planning

Dy. Town Planner

(HQ), Panaji

Dept., Bicholim Taluka Office.

8. Shri Sanjay Halornekar,

Town & Country Planning Dept.,

Town & Country Planning

Dy. Town Planner

Ponda Taluka Office

Dept. (HQ), Panaji.

9. Shri Ritesh Shirodkar,

Town & Country Planning Dept.,

Town & Country Planning

Dy. Town Planner

South Goa District Office, Margao

Dept. (HQ), Panaji.

10. Shri Manguirish Verenkar,

Town & Country Planning Dept.,

Dy. Town Planner

Quepem Taluka Office/Canacona

South Goa District Office,

Taluka Office (additional charge)

Margao.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 40

2ND JANUARY, 2020

724

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 14.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—314/160–1/2020.

11. Shri Zaidev R. Aldonkar,

Town & Country Planning Dept.,

Town & Country Planning

Dy. Town Planner

Bicholim Taluka Office

Dept. (HQ), Panaji/Mormugao

Taluka Office (additional

charge).

The officers are hereby directed to join their new place of posting with immediate effect without

availing joining time.

The officers shall complete handing over and taking over process with immediate effect and submit

compliance.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Daulat Hawaldar, IAS, Comm./Secretary (TCP).

Panaji, 31st December, 2019.

———uuu———

Department of Transport

Directorate of Transport

Order

No. 5/2/93-Tpt/2019/4347

The following Assistant Directors of Transport (Group ‘B’ Gazetted) are hereby transferred on

administrative grounds and in public interest:-

Sr.

Name of the Assistant

Present posting

Posting on transfer

No.

Director of Transport

Shri Abhay S. Naik

A.D.T., Vasco

A.D.T., Dharbandora.

Shri Ramkrishna @ Rajesh B. Naik

A.D.T., Mapusa

A.D.T., Vasco.

Shri Madan S. Fatarpekar

A.D.T., Ponda

A.D.T., Mapusa.

Shri Rajesh G. Naik

A.D.T., Dharbandora

A.D.T., Ponda.

The above Assistant Directors of Transport are hereby directed to join the new place of posting on

01-01-2020 and complete handing over/taking over formalities accordingly.

The said officers shall not avail joining period or any type of leave till they assume charge at the new

place of posting.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Rajan Satardekar, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Transport).

Panaji, 27th December, 2019.