Panaji, 27th August, 2020 (Bhadra 5, 1942)

SERIES II No. 22

587

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2018-20

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Order

No. 3-1-81/EST/RCS/Part/1534

The Government is pleased to order transfer of the following Asstt. Registrars of Co-op. Societies

(Group ‘B’ Gazetted) in public interest with immediate effect.

Sr.

Name and designation

Present posting

Posting on transfer

No.

Shri Sanjay S. Khajankar,

Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.

Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies,

Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.

Societies, Marketing, Panaji

Camp Court, Goa Urban Co-op. Bank

Societies

Ltd., Panaji-Goa.

Shri M. N. Kalangutkar,

Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.

Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies,

Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.

Societies, Camp Court,

North Zone, Mapusa.

Societies

Goa Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd.,

Panaji-Goa

Shri Santosh P. Naik,

Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.

Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies,

Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.

Societies, North Zone, Mapusa

Marketing, Panaji with additional

Societies

charge of Camp Court, the Goa

State Co-op. Housing Finance and

Federation Ltd., Panaji-Goa, once a

week.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Vikas S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-operative Societies).

Panaji, 7th August, 2020.

________

Order

No. 60/16/GSCB/TS/2016-17/Suppl./1569

Read: DO No. NB.Goa.DOS-HLC/2019-20 dated

30-05-2019 from General Manager of

NABARD, Goa Regional Office, Panaji-Goa.

The Government is pleased to constitute High

Level Committee (HLC) to monitor the health of

the Goa State Co-operative Bank Ltd., and discuss

other operational issues as under:-

1. The Chief Secretary

— Chairman.

2. Secretary (Co-operation)

— Member.

3. Regional Director, Reserve

— Member.

Bank of India, Panaji

4. Registrar of Co-op. Societies,

— Member.

Government of Goa, Panaji

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

588

5. Chairman, Goa State Co-op.

— Member.

Bank Ltd., Panaji

6. Managing Director, Goa State

— Member.

Co-op. Bank Ltd., Panaji

7. The General Manager/Office-

— Convenor.

-in-charge, NABARD, Goa

Regional Office

The committee shall meet on quarterly basis

within 45 days from the end of quarter.

The details of objectives, roles and functionings

of HLC are annexed herewith.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vikas S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar & ex officio Joint

Secretary (Co-operative Societies).

Panaji, 6th August, 2020.

_______

ANNEXURE

Details of objectives, roles and functions of

High Level Committee (HCL)

A. Objectives of High Level Committee:

1. Ensuring the financial soundness on a

continuous basis.

2. Adherence to regulatory compliance.

3. Capacity building and professionalizing of

Board members.

4. Improving accountability of the manage-

ment for putting the Banks into risk/causing

irregularities.

5. Autonomy in decision making.

6. Technology upgradation and improving

customer services.

7. Addressing operational and managerial

needs.

8. Other issues relating to governance and

management of the Bank.

9. Providing timely guidance in business

planning and business diversification.

B. Role and functions:

Overall review of the functioning of Goa State

Co-operative Bank in the State of Goa covering

mainly the following aspects:

1. (a) Bank-wise financial soundness and

efficiency covering capital adequacy

(CRAR), asset quality and NPAs, margins,

return on assets, profitability;

(b) The Bank may be provided with the

guided direction to ensure sustainable

financial soundness with improvement in

CRAR, quality of assets, return on assets

and adherence to regulatory compliance;

(MAP) and its review.

2. Compliance with important statutory

provisions of Banking Regulation Act, 1949

(AACS), RBI Act, 1934, RBI/NABARD

guidelines, KYC/AML guidelines, exposure

norms, compliance to RBI directions issued,

if any and compliance to inspection report

findings.

3. Review of Comprehensive Turn Around

Project (C-TAP).

4. Review of top 10 NPA Accounts.

5. Review of receipt of subsidies/other

receivables and other commitments of

Government.

6. Review of action by the Bank in improving

the supervisory rating.

7. Review of Bank’s major business parameters

like deposits, borrowings diversification of

loans and advances and investments,

liquidity position.

8. Review of conversion, re-schedulement

and re-phasement and accountability of

Board, measures for capacity building/

/professionalization of Board of Directors;

assessment of training needs for Board

members/CEO.

9. Human Resources issues including training

and capacity building.

10. Internal checks and control systems and risk

management systems, etc.

11. Audit related issues–Statutory Audit,

Internal Audit, Concurrent Audit, etc.

progress in conduct of audit, coverage,

quality thereof based on review.

12. Issues relating to technology upgradation

and offering Tech based products and CBS+

services to customers.

13. Technology upgradation of PACS.

C. Periodicity of meeting:

The meeting is to be held on quarterly basis

within 45 days from the end of quarter.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

589

Corrigendum

No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS-II/PZ/2017/RCS/Suppl/

1703

Read: 1. Order No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS-II/2017/

/RCS/Suppl/1450 dated 04-08-2020.

2. Order No. 21-1-99-TS-II/Shiroda/RCS/1437

dated 31-07-2020.

3. Order No. 3/18/Urban Credit/TS-II/PZ/

2020/RCS/1448 dated 04-08-2020.

4. Order No. 3/10/Urban Credit/TS-II/PZ/

/2018/1449 dated 04-08-2020.

5. Order No. 14/4/Service/TS-II/PZ/2020/

/RCS/1451 dated 04-08-2020.

In the first para of the above referred Orders,

after the expression “(hereinafter referred to as the

Nominee)” the following expression shall be added

“from the existing list of empanelled Registrar’s

Nominee”.

The other contents in the Order shall remain

unchanged.

Vikas S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies).

Panaji, 19th August, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Education, Art & Culture

Directorate of Higher Education

Order

No. 2/91/Goa State Pvt. Uni.Bill/DHE/2020/2590

In terms of Section (5) of the Goa Private

Universities Act, 2020, Government is pleased to

constitute a Committee for evaluation of proposal

for establishment of Private Universities in Goa

with the following composition:-

1. Hon’ble Chief Minister/

— Chairman.

/Education Minister

2. Vice-Chancellor, Goa University, — Member.

Taleigao Plateau, Goa

3. Dr. Satish Shetye,

— Member.

Ex-Vice-Chancellor,

Goa University

4. Dr. Gopal Mugeraya,

— Member.

Director, NIT, Goa

5. Prof. B. K. Mishra, Director,

— Member.

IIT, Goa

6. Adv. Narendra Keshav Sawaikar, — Member.

r/o Khadpabandh, Ponda-Goa

7. Secretary (Higher Education),

— Member.

Secretariat, Porvorim-Goa

8. Secretary (Finance),

— Member.

Secretariat, Porvorim-Goa

9. District Magistrate of concern — Member.

District

10. Principal Chief Engineer,

— Member.

Public Works Department,

Panaji-Goa

11. Director of Higher Education,

— Member

Porvorim-Goa

Secretary.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Tushar Halarnkar, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 17th August, 2020.

________

Order

No. ACADIII/GC-03/Misc.Matters/39/2019/2586

Government is pleased to transfer and post

Dr. Annie F. D’Souza Gomes, Assistant Professor in

Botany, Government College of Arts, Science and

Commerce, Quepem-Goa to Government College of

Arts, Science and Commerce, Sanquelim-Goa with

immediate effect in public interest against the

vacant post created due to retirement on

attaining the age of superannuation in respect of

Shri R. K. Tari, Associate Professor in Botany,

Government College of Arts, Science and

Commerce, Sanquelim-Goa.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Tushar T. Halarnakar, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 17th August, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Finance

Revenue and Expenditure Division

Directorate of Accounts

—

Office Order No. 1289

No. DA/Admn./45-2/19-20/256/TR-2735

Government is pleased to promote the following Assistant Accounts Officers under the Common

Accounts Cadre of the Directorate of Accounts to the post of Deputy Director of Accounts/Accounts

Officer (Group “A’’ Gazetted) in Level 10 of the Pay Matrix (i.e. Pay Band PB-3 Rs. 15600-39100, Grade Pay

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

590

5400/- pre-revised). The Officers from Sr. No. 1 to 5 are promoted on regular basis and Sr. No. 6 & 7 on

officiating basis from the date of taking over charge of the post.

Sr. No.

Name of the Officer

Smt. Seema M. P. Dessai.

Smt. Maria Alda Monteiro.

Shri Sarvottam P. Satardekar.

Smt. Maireen M. P. S. Menezes Barreto.

Smt. Sebastiana Silva (ST).

Smt. Sunita B. Singh.

Smt. Manisha D. Cascar.

Government is further pleased to order the posting of the following Deputy Director of Accounts/

/Accounts Officers under the Common Accounts Cadre in the Department shown against their names:-

Sr.

Name of the Dy. Director

Place of present posting

Proposed place of posting on

No.

of Accounts/Accounts

as Assistant Accounts

promotion to the post of Dy. Direc-

Officer

tor of Accounts/Accounts Officer

Smt. Seema M. P. Dessai

Directorate of Accounts,

O/o the Commissioner of Commer-

Panaji-Goa

cial Taxes, Panaji-Goa.

Smt. Maria Alda Monteiro

Directorate of Accounts,

Zilla Panchayat (North), Panaji-Goa

Panaji-Goa

(on deputation) thereby relieving

Shri Pandurang Mayanath, DDA of

the additional charge.

Shri Sarvottam P. Satardekar

O/o the Chief Engineer,

Directorate of Accounts, Panaji-

Water Resources Department,

Goa.

Porvorim-Goa

Smt. Maireen M. P. S.

Directorate of Accounts,

Directorate of Accounts, Panaji-

Menezes Barreto

Panaji-Goa

Goa.

Smt. Sebastiana Silva (ST)

O/o the Superintending

Sanjay School, Porvorim (on depu-

Engineer, Circle-I, Electricity

tation).

Department, Margao-Goa (on CCL)

Smt. Sunita B. Singh

O/o the Commissioner of

Department of Information Tech-

Excise, Panaji-Goa

nology, Altinho, Panaji-Goa

thereby relieving Shri Subraj

Kanekar, DDA of the additional

charge.

Smt. Manisha D. Cascar

Directorate of Education,

Directorate of Agriculture, Tonca,

Porvorim-Goa

Caranzalem-Goa, thereby relieving

Shri Dilip Morajkar, DDA of the

additional charge.

Further, the Government is also pleased to order the transfer/additional charge to be held by the

following Deputy Director of Accounts/Accounts Officer under the Common Accounts Cadre in the

Department as shown against their names in public interest:-

Sr.

Name of the Dy. Director

Place of present posting

Proposed place of posting/

No.

of Accounts/Accounts

of Deputy Directors/

/additional charge

Officer

/Accounts Officers

Smt. Pushpa Rosario Barreto

Directorate of Accounts,

District Rural Development Agency,

Panaji-Goa

North, Panaji-Goa (on deputation)

with additional charge in the Goa

Real Estate Regulatory Authority,

Panaji-Goa.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

591

Smt. Pramila Chodnekar

Sanjay School, Porvorim-Goa

Directorate of Accounts, South

(on deputation) with

Branch Office, Margao-Goa.

additional charge in the Goa

Housing Board, Porvorim, Goa

(on deputation)

10.

Shri Philomeno Pereira

District Rural Development

Directorate of Accounts, South

Agency (South), Margao-Goa

Branch Office, Margao-Goa.

(on deputation)

11.

Smt. Sandhya Phaldessai

Directorate of Education,

Goa Housing Board, Porvorim-Goa

alias Pai Khot

Porvorim-Goa

(on deputation).

12.

Shri Subhash Mandrekar

District Rural Development

Directorate of Education, Porvorim-

Agency, North, Panaji-Goa

Goa.

(on deputation)

13.

Shri Martinho Fernandes

Directorate of Accounts,

District Rural Development

Panaji-Goa

Agency (South), Margao-Goa

(on deputation) thereby relieving

Shri Ratnadas Sawant, DDA of

additional charge.

14.

Shri Francisco X. Rodrigues

Directorate of Accounts,

District Rural Development Agency

South Branch Office

(South), Margao-Goa (on deputation).

Margao-Goa

15.

Shri Pradeep A. Mirajkar

Directorate of Accounts,

River Navigation Department,

Panaji-Goa

Betim-Goa, thereby relieving

Shri Gajanan C. Arabekar, DDA

of the additional charge.

The above promoted officers may exercise an option for fixation of pay under F. R. 22(1)(a)(i) within one

month from the date of promotion.

The deputation of the Officers at Sr. Nos. 9, 10 and 12 stands curtailed from the date of being relieved

by the respective Autonomous Bodies/Corporations.

The posting of Officers at Sr. Nos. 2, 5, 8, 11, 13 and 14 will be on deputation basis initially for a

period of one year. They shall be governed as per the standard terms of deputation contained in the

O.M. No. 13/4/74-PER dated 20-11-2013 of the Personnel Department, Government of Goa. The Organization/

/Agency shall be liable to pay to the Government leave salary and pension/employer contribution in

respect of these Officers at the prescribed rates. On expiry of the deputation period, the Officers shall

necessarily be relieved to report back to the parent Department, unless the deputation period is

extended by the competent authority. Overstayal for any reason whatsoever, shall render them liable for

disciplinary action.

The above mentioned Officers who will be promoted to the post of Dy. Director of Accounts/Accounts

Officer shall join their promotional posts or convey the acceptance of the promotional post within 15 days

of issue of the promotion order.

On joining their promotional/new post, the officers shall send their CTC/Joining report immediately

to this Directorate.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

P. R. Pereira, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Accounts).

Panaji, 10th February, 2020.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

592

Department of Fisheries

Directorate of Fisheries

—

Corrigendum

No. 84/95-FSH-II(PART-I)

Read: (a) Notification No. 84/95-FSH-II(PART-I)

published in the Official Gazette,

Series II No. 35 dated 30-11-2006.

(b) Notification No. 84/95-FSH-II(PART-I)

published in the Official Gazette,

Series II No. 6 dated 12-05-2011.

In partial modification of the Notification referred

at (a) above, the name reflected at Sr. No. 2(d) and

3(d), Director, Department of Science, Technology

and Environment, Saligao-Goa may be corrected to

read as Director, Department of Environment and

Climate Change.

Further, the Notification No. 84/95-FSH-II(PART-I)

published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 6

dated 12-05-2011 stands cancelled.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Dr. Shamila Monteiro, Director/ex officio Joint

Secretary (Fisheries).

Panaji, 24th August, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Information and Publicity

—

Order

No. DI/INF/ADMN/Prom/IA-AIO/2020/13/1417

The Government on the recommendation of the

Goa Public Service Commission is pleased to

promote the below mentioned Assistant Information

Officer to the post of Information Officer (Group ‘B’

Gazetted) in Level 7 of the Pay Matrix (i.e. Pay

Band PB-2 Rs. 9,300-34,800, Grade Pay 4,600/- pre-

revised) on regular basis from the date of taking

over the charge of the post.

Sr.

Name of the Officer

No.

Shri Allwyn Xavier Pereira.

The above Officer shall convey the acceptance

of the promotional post within 15 days of issue of

this order.

The above Officer may exercise an option for

fixation of pay under F. R. 22(1)(a)(i) within one

month from the date of promotion.

This Order supercedes the O. No. DI/INF/ADMN/

/Prom/IA-AIO/2020/13 dated 1-07-2020.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Meghana Shetgaonkar, Director & ex officio Jt.

Secretary (Information & Publicity).

Panaji, 17th August, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Labour

—

Notification

No. 28/2/2020-LAB/Part-I/931

The following Award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 28-07-2020 in Case

No. LC-II/IT/12/2016 is hereby published as

required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1974 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

A. S. Mahatme, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 18th August, 2020.

______

IN THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble

Presiding Officer)

Case No. LC-II/IT/12/2016

Ms. Krishna Malik,

Rep. by the General Secretary,

Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh,

Tisk, Ponda-Goa.

… Workman/Party I

V/s

M/s. Swanson Plastics

(India) Pvt. Ltd.,

Honda, Satari-Goa.

… Employer/Party II

Workman/Party I represented by Adv. Shri S.P.

Gaonkar.

Employer/Party II represented by Adv. Shri M. S.

Bandodkar.

Panaji, Dated: 28-07-2020.

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section

10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central

Act 14 of 1947), the Government of Goa, by Order

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

593

dated 22-07-2016, bearing No. 28/22/2016-LAB/549,

referred the following dispute for its adjudication

to this Labour Court-II of Goa at Panaji, Goa.

“(1) Whether the action of the Management of

M/s. Swanson Plastics (India) Private

Limited, Honda, Satari, Goa, in dismissing

Shri Krishna Malik, QC Inspector, with effect

from 09-07-2015, is legal and justified?

(2) If not, what relief, the workman is entitled

to?”

2. On receipt of the reference, a case was

registered under No. LC-II-IT/12/2016 and

registered A/D notice was issued to the Parties. In

pursuance to the said notice, the Parties put in

their appearance. The Workman/Party-I (for short

‘Workman’), filed his Statement of Claim on

12-12-2016 at Exb. 3. The facts of the case in brief

as pleaded by the Workman are that the Employer/

/Party-II (for short ‘Employer’) is an industrial

establishment situated at Bhuipal, Honda, Satari,

Goa. He stated that initially, he was working

as ‘Q/C Technician’ since 07-07-2012. He stated

that since joining, he was continuously working in

the said establishment. He stated that the wages

paid to the workmen were very meagre and

insufficient to meet daily needs of family and hence

all the workers had decided to join the union. He

stated that in the general body meeting held on

02-02-2014, it was unanimously resolved to join the

Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh. He stated that the

union has submitted the Charter of Demand to the

Employer vide its letter dated 03-02-2014.

3. He stated that as the majority of the workmen

along with him joined the union, the management

was annoyed and hence the management started

harassing the unionized workmen including him.

He stated that as a part of harassment, the workman

was implicated in false and fabricated case. He

stated that he was illegally dismissed vide letter

dated 05-06-2015. He stated that on receipt of the

said dismissal letter, he made his representation

dated 17-06-2015. He stated that on receipt of his

representation, management has withdrawn his

dismissal order by its letter dated 29-06-2015. He

stated that he was again dismissed, vide letter

dated 09-07-2015.

4. He contended that before awarding the

punishment of second dismissal, no show-cause

notice was issued and principles of natural justice

was not followed and hence his dismissal is illegal

and bad in law. He submitted that his order of

dismissal was not signed by appointing authority

and hence his dismissal is illegal, bad-in-law. He

submitted that before his dismissal, the

management has not conducted fair and proper

enquiry and hence the Enquiry Officer was biased

and acted as agent of the management. He

submitted that the findings of the enquiry

proceedings was not based on the evidence on

record and in his findings, he has imported the

evidence, which is not on record. He submitted

that the Enquiry Officer has acted as the agent of

the management as he was the Personnel Manager

of the company and hence, he was an interested

person in dislodging the union and therefore he

cannot be considered as impartial and independent

person. He submitted that from the proceedings, it

is proved beyond doubt that he has acted in biased

manner. He submitted that the findings of the

enquiry are biased and perverse and hence findings

are illegal and bad-in-law. He submitted that the

Employer has not complied with the provisions of

law in force, hence, his dismissal is illegal and

bad-in-law. He is entitled for reinstatement with

continuity in service and with consequential

benefits with full back wages. He stated that after

his dismissal, he is unemployed and could not

succeed in getting the employment. He submitted

that the punishment awarded to him is harsh and

severe in nature and hence it is illegal and

unjustified. The workman finally prayed that the

action of the management in dismissing him from

service with effect from 09-07-2015 be declared as

illegal, unjustified and therefore set aside and quash

the same. He prayed that he may be granted the

relief of reinstatement with full back wages and

continuity in service with consequential benefits.

4. The Employer resisted the claim of the

Workman by filing its written statement on

15-03-2017 at Exb. 4. The Employer stated that the

workman was appointed as ‘QC Inspector’ in its

Quality Control Department of the Employer w.e.f.

09-07-2012, vide letter dated 07-07-2012. The

Employer stated that the said appointment was on

probation basis for a period of three months. The

Employer stated that thereafter the said period of

probation was extended for a further period of

three months w.e.f. 07-10-2012, vide letter dated

07-10-2012. The Employer submitted that the

services of the workman were confirmed in the

said post of ‘QC Inspector’ w.e.f. 07-01-2013 vide

letter dated 07-01-2013 on the same terms and

conditions as contained in the letter of appointment

dated 07-07-2012 and further extension letter dated

07-10-2012. The Employer stated that in the course

of working of workman as aforesaid, he was issued

a charge-sheet cum suspension letter cum notice

of enquiry dated 18-08-2014. The Employer stated

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

594

that the said charge-sheet was issued as they had

received several oral as well as written complaints

against the workman from his supervisors in respect

of which the workman was issued warning letters

dated 17-06-2014, 14-09-2012 and show cause

notices dated 30-07-2014 and 06-08-2014 regarding

his behaviour at the work place as well as his

performance at the work place. The Employer

stated that in spite of giving several opportunities

to the workman to improve his behaviour, he failed

to do so. He stated that in the circumstances, the

Employer was constrained to issue the said charge-

sheet. The Employer stated that the Workman was

issued charge-sheet in respect of the following

misconducts:

(a) Wilful insubordination or disobedience,

whether alone or in combination with others,

to any lawful and reasonable order of a

superior;

(b) Riotous or disorderly behaviour during

working hours of the establishment;

discipline or good behaviour on the premises

of establishment;

(d) Habitual negligence or neglect of work;

(e) Habitual breach of any law applicable to

the establishment;

5. The Employer stated that upon receipt of the

said letter/notice dated 18-08-2014, the workman

replied to the same vide his reply dated

19-08-2014, inter alia, alleging that the charge-

-sheet-cum-order of suspension issued to him was

illegal, unjustified, bad-in-law as it was in violation

of principles of natural justice. The Employer stated

that it was further alleged that the said charge-

sheet was issued to him only to victimize him as he

had joined the union and the same was vague and

based on false and fabricated allegations.

6. The Employer stated that without prejudice,

the workman submitted that he had not committed

any misconduct as alleged in the said charge-sheet

and as such requested for withdrawal of the

suspension order and to allow him to resume duty.

The Employer stated that in terms of the notice of

enquiry dated 18-08-2014, the Enquiry Officer

commenced the proceedings of the enquiry in

respect of the charge sheet dated 18-08-2014 from

22-08-2014 till 21-03-2015. He submitted that the

enquiry was concluded on 21-03-2015 and the

matter was fixed by the Enquiry Officer for

submitting his findings to the Employer in due

course of time. The Employer stated that after

conclusion of the enquiry proceedings as aforesaid,

the said Enquiry Officer submitted his findings

dated 27-05-2015, holding the workman guilty of

all the charges levelled against him in the charge-

-sheet as aforesaid. The Employer stated that

pursuant to the receipt of the enquiry report as

aforesaid, they submitted a copy of the said

findings/enquiry report to the workman on

01-06-2015 for his say/reply. The Employer stated

that the Workman submitted his reply vide letter

dated 03-06-2015. The Employer stated that

thereafter, vide letter dated 05-06-2015, they

informed the Workman that they were not satisfied

with his reply dated 03-06-2015. The Employer

stated that considering the gravity of the

misconduct levelled and proved against the

Workman, he was dismissed from service with

immediate effect. The Employer stated that

Workman was informed that the legal dues payable

to him shall be credited to his bank account. The

Employer stated that after passing of the order of

dismissal dated 05-06-2015, the workman

submitted his representation dated 17-06-2015

alleging that the order of dismissal was illegal,

unjustified and bad-in-law on various grounds

including that they had not followed Section 33 of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and demanded

for reinstatement in service with full back wages

and continuity of service. The Employer stated that

based on the said representation and on realizing

the procedural flaw in the order of dismissal, they

decided to revoke/withdraw the letter of dismissal

dated 05-06-2015 purely on technical grounds and

accordingly, withdrew/revoked the said dismissal

from service of the workman vide letter dated

29-06-2015 reserving the right to take appropriate

action in the matter in due course. The Employer

stated that accordingly, vide letter dated

09-07-2015, they informed the Workman that

considering the gravity of the misconducts levelled

and proved against the workman, he was dismissed

from service with immediate effect and that dues

as required to be paid under the law were

deposited in his bank account. The Employer stated

that the Workman challenged his dismissal from

service in the present reference.

7. The Employer submitted that the enquiry

proceedings were held against the Workman in a

fair and proper manner and in full compliance with

the principles of natural justice. The Employer

submitted that the workman was represented by a

Defense Representative of his choice. The Employer

submitted that during the said enquiry,

full opportunity was given to the Defense

Representative to cross examine the witnesses of

the Employer. The Employer submitted that the

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

595

copies of the proceedings of the enquiry held on

every day were furnished to the workman. The

Employer submitted that the findings of the

Enquiry Officer dated 27-05-2015 are based on the

evidence on record and except for bare and vague

allegations of perversity, no actual perversity has

been shown or pointed out in the claim statement,

which falsifies the said allegations. The Employer

submitted that the dismissal from service of the

workman is perfectly legal and justified and that

the workman is not entitled to any reliefs as prayed

for or to any other reliefs.

8. Thereafter, the union filed its Rejoinder on

15-03-2017 at Exb. 05. The Union, by way of its

re-joinder, confirms and reiterates all his

submissions, averments and statements made in

its Claim Statement to be true and correct and

denies all the statements, averments and

submissions made by the Employer in its Written

Statement, which are contrary to its Statement and

averments made in its Claim Statement.

9. Based on the pleadings filed by the

respective parties, this court framed the following

issues on 16-01-2018 at Exb.17.

1. Whether a free, fair and proper enquiries

was conducted against the Workman/

/Party-I in respect of charge-sheet dated

18-08-2014?

2. Whether the charges of misconducts leveled

against the Workman/Party-I vide charge-

-sheet dated 18-08-2014 have been proved

to the satisfaction of this court by acceptable

evidence?

3. Whether the Workman/Party-I proves that

the action of the Employer in dismissing him

from the service w.e.f. 09-07-2015 is illegal

and unjustified?

4. Whether the Workman/Party-I is entitled to

any relief?

5. What order? What award?

10. By Order dated 02-07-2019, passed in my

preliminary issues No.1 and 2, I have discussed the

said issues No. 1 and 2 and came to the conclusion

that a fair, proper and impartial inquiry was

conducted against the Workman in accordance

with the principles of natural justice in respect of

charge-sheet dated 18-08-2014 and that the

charges of misconduct levelled against the

Workman vide charge-sheet dated 18-08-2014 have

not been proved to the satisfaction of this court by

acceptable evidence. The Employer chose to lead

an additional evidence to prove the charges of

misconduct leveled against the Workman. The

Employer filed his Affidavit-in-Evidence and the

matter was fixed for further examination-in-chief

as well as cross-examination of the representatives

of the Workman and the case was adjourned to

28-02-2020. On 28-02-2020, the Ld. Adv. Shri S.

Gaonkar appeared on behalf of the Workman and

submitted that the Employer had offered the

monetary benefits to the Workman and further

submitted that the Workman insisted for his

reinstatement and as such the case was adjourned

to 30-03-2020. On 30-03-2020, the Ld. Rep. Shri P.

Gaonkar appeared on behalf of the Workman and

filed an application for closing the proceedings

and passing an Award. The Employer was

represented by its HR Manager Shri Nilesh Parab.

The case was fixed for the reply of the Employer as

well as arguments to 24-03-2020. However, on

account of lockdown in the State due to Corona

Virus pandemic, the matter could not take place

on 24-03-2020.

11. On 15-07-2020, Ld. Rep. Shri P. Gaonkar

appeared on behalf of the Workman. Ld. Adv. Shri

M. S. Bandodkar appeared on behalf of the

Employer. Both the Parties filed an application for

Consent Award in terms of settlement dated

13-07-2020 along with Memorandum of Settlement

at Exhibit-28 and submitted that the matter be

disposed off in terms of the Memorandum of

Settlement at Exb. 28.

12. I have carefully perused the terms of

settlement as spelt out in the Memorandum of

Settlement at Exb.28.The said terms of settlement

are beneficial to both the parties. Hence, I

consented for the same. Since the dispute under

reference is settled between the parties, I hold

that the dispute under present reference does not

survive.

In view of above, I pass the following Order:

ORDER

1. In view of the amicable settlement between

the Parties, it is held that the reference as

to whether the action of the Management of

M/s Swanson Plastics (India) Private Limited,

Honda, Satari-Goa in dismissing Shri Krishna

Malik, QC Inspector w.e.f. 09-07-2015, is legal

and justified, does not arise.

2. It is held that the Workman Shri Krishna Malik

is not entitled to any other relief.

Pronounced in the Open Court.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar)

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

596

Notification

No. 28/2/2020-LAB/Part-I/932

The following Award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 28-07-2020 in Case

No. LC-II/IT/19/2014 is hereby published as

required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1974 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

A. S. Mahatme, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 18th August, 2020.

______

IN THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble

Presiding Officer)

Case No. LC-II/IT/19/2014

Mr. Gopal Paryekar,

Rep. by the General Secretary,

Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh,

Tisk, Ponda-Goa.

… Workman/Party I

V/s

M/s. Swanson Plastics

(India) Pvt. Ltd.,

Honda, Satari-Goa.

… Employer / Party II

Workman/Party I represented by Adv. Shri P. S

Gaonkar.

Employer/Party II represented by Adv. Shri M. S.

Bandodkar.

Panaji, Dated: 28-07-2020.

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by

Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), the Government

of Goa, by Order dated 07-08-2014, bearing

No. 28/21/2014-LAB/445, referred the following

dispute for its adjudication to this Labour Court-II

of Goa at Panaji, Goa.

“(1) Whether the action of the Management of

M/s. Swanson Plastics (India) Private Limited,

Bhuipal, Honda, Satari, Goa, in refusing

employment to Shri Gopal Paryekar, with effect

from 12-12-2013, is legal and justified?

(2) If not, what relief, the workman is entitled

to?”

2. On receipt of the reference, a case was

registered under No. LC-II-IT/19/14 and registered

A/D notice was issued to the Parties. In pursuance

to the said notice, the Parties put in their

appearance. The Workman/Party-I (for short

‘Workman’), filed his Statement of Claim on

23-09-2014 at Exb. 4. The facts of the case in brief

as pleaded by the Workman are that the Employer/

/Party-II (for short ‘Employer’) is an industrial

establishment situated at Bhuipal, Honda, Satari,

Goa. He stated that initially, he was working as

‘Operator’ since 02-01-2013. He stated that he

was in continuous service. He stated that on

12-12-2013, he went to resume his normal duties,

however, he was not allowed to join the duty. He

stated that before refusal of employment, no charge-

-sheet was issued to him. He stated that as he was

not allowed to resume the duty, he made a

representation dated 14-12-2013 requesting the

Employer to allow him to resume the duty, however

he was not allowed to join the duty. He stated that

vide letter dated 20-12-2013, he raised an industrial

dispute before the Assistant Labour Commissioner,

Mapusa which ended in failure due to adamant

attitude of the Employer.

3. He contended that the Employer has not

conducted any inquiry before refusal of his

employment and hence violated the principles of

natural justice. He submitted that the Employer

has not paid any legal dues such as notice pay,

retrenchment compensation before refusal of his

employment and hence they failed to comply with

Section 25 (F) of the I. D. Act, 1947. He submitted

that the refusal of employment to him is illegal,

unjustified and bad in law. He submitted that

after refusal of employment, he is unemployed. The

Workman therefore prayed that the action of

the Employer in refusing him employment w.e.f.

12-12-2013 is illegal, unjustified and therefore

required to be quashed and set aside. The Workman

further prayed that he be granted the relief of

reinstatement with full back wages, continuity in

service with consequential benefits.

4. The Employer resisted the claim of the

Workman by filing its Written Statement on

15-01-2015 at Exhibit-6. The Employer, as and by

way of its preliminary objections submitted that

the Claim of the Workman in the present reference

is not an ‘industrial dispute’ as defined under

Section 2 (k) of the I. D. Act, 1947. The Employer

submitted that the Workman was employed with

them as an Operator on probation for a period of

one year w.e.f. 02-01-2013 vide Appointment Letter

dated 02-01-2013 and as such he is not a ‘Workman’

as defined u/s 2 (s) of the I. D. Act, 1947. The

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

597

Employer submitted that the performance of the

Workman was also appraised by them and the same

was found not satisfactory during the said

probationary period and as such the termination of

services of the Workman is discharge simplicitor

and that there is non-application of mind by the

Appropriate Government while referring the

present dispute.

5. The employer admitted that it is an industrial

establishment situated at Bhuipal, Satari-Goa. The

Employer admitted that the Workman was working

as an ‘Operator’ since 02-01-2013 and that since

joining he was in continuous service. The Employer

stated that the Workman was employed with them

as an Operator on probation for the period of one

year w.e.f. 02-01-2013 vide Appointment Letter

dated 02-01-2013. The Employer denied that on

12-12-2013, the Workman went to resume his

normal duty, however, he was not allowed to join

the duty. The Employer stated that the Workman

was on probationary period and hence his services

were terminated without giving him any charge-

-sheet as a discharge simplicitor. The Employer

stated that during the conciliation proceedings, it

was made clear that the performance of the

Workman was appraised by them and the same

was not found to be satisfactory during the

probationary period and hence his services were

terminated. The Employer admitted that vide his

letter dated 20-12-2013, the Workman raised an

industrial dispute before the Assistant Labour

Commissioner, Mapusa and that on receipt of the

said dispute, the Assistant Labour Commissioner,

Mapusa called both Parties for joint discussions on

several occasions. The Employer submitted that as

the Workman was on probation, there is no

necessity to conduct any inquiry against him. The

Employer denied that it has not complied with

Section 25 (F) or any other provisions of I. D. Act,

1947. The Employer submitted that the Workman

is gainfully employed immediately after termination

of his services. The Employer therefore prayed

that the claim of the Workman deserves no

consideration and as such be rejected with cost.

6. Thereafter, the Workman filed his Rejoinder

on 21-01-2015 at Exhibit-7. The Workman, by way

of his Rejoinder, confirms and reiterate all his

submissions, averments and statements made in

his Claim Statement to be true and correct and

denies all the statements, averments and

submissions made by the Employer in its Written

Statement which are contrary to his statements

and averments made in his Claim Statement.

7. Based on the pleadings, filed by the respective

Parties hereinabove, the Hon’ble Industrial

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court framed the following

issues on 12-08-2015 at Exhibit-10.

1. Whether the Party-I proves that he is a

‘Workman’ u/s 2 (s) of the I. D. Act, 1947?

2. Whether the Party-I proves that he was

working with Party-II as operator and was in

their continuous service?

3. Whether the Party-I proves that when

he went to resume his normal duty on

12-12-2013, he was not allowed to join the

duty by Party-II?

4. Whether the Party-I proves that before the

refusal of employment to him, Party-II did

not conduct any enquiry and hence violated

the principles of natural justice?

5. Whether the Party-II proves that before

refusal of employment to him, Party-II did

not comply with the requirements of

Sec. 25F of I. D. Act, 1947?

6. Whether the Party-II proves that the claim

of Party-I is not an ‘Industrial Dispute’

u/s 2 (k) of the I. D. Act, 1947?

7. What relief? What Award?

8. Thereafter, the Workman examined himself

and produced on record certain documentary

evidence in support of his oral evidence. He was

cross-examined by the Ld. Adv. appearing for the

Employer. After completion of the evidence of the

Workman, the Employer chose to examine its

Administrative Manager, Shri Nilesh Parab. He was

cross-examined by the Learned Advocate

appearing for the Workman. After completion of

the evidence of the Employer, the matter was fixed

for the final arguments of both the Parties on

19-08-2020.

9. However, on 15-07-2020 Ld. Adv. Shri M. S.

Bandodkar filed an application for preponing the

matter. The said application was allowed and the

matter was heard on the same day. On 15-07-2020,

Ld. representative Shri P. Gaonkar appearing for

the Workman, along with the Workman as well as

Ld. Adv. Shri M. S. Bandodkar appearing for the

Employer filed a joint application for consent Award

supported by a Memorandum of Settlement dated

NIL signed between the Workman represented by

its General Secretary Shri Puti Gaonkar and the

Employer at Exhibit-30 and submitted that the

matter be disposed off in terms of Memorandum of

Settlement at Exb. 30. I have carefully perused the

said terms of settlement at Exb. 30 signed by and

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

598

between the Employer and the Union. The said

terms of settlement are beneficial to both the

parties. Hence, I consented for the same. Since the

dispute under reference is settled between the

parties, I hold that the dispute under present

reference does not survive.

In view of the above, I proceed to pass the

following order:

ORDER

1. In view of the amicable settlement between

the Parties, it is held that the reference as to

whether the action of M/s Swanson Plastics,

Bhuipal, Satari-Goa in refusing employment

to its workman Shri Gopal Paryekar, Operator,

with effect from 12-12-2013, is legal and

justified?, does not survive.

2. The Workman, Shri Gopal Paryekar, is not

entitled to any relief.

3. No order as to costs.

Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar)

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

———u———

Inspectorate of Factories and Boilers

—

Notification

No. VI/BLR/(2)A-144(Part 1)/IFB/2020/1131

In exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 9 of

the Boiler Operation Engineers’ Rules, 2011 and in

supersession of the Government Notification

No. VI/BLR/(2)A-144/(Part-I)/IFB/2017/441 dated

27th April, 2017, published in the Official Gazette,

Series II No. 5 dated 4th May, 2017, the Government

of Goa hereby re-constitutes the Board of Examiners

for the State of Goa, as follows, namely:-

1. Shri Vivek P. Marathe,

—

Ex officio

Chief Inspector of

Chairman.

Factories and Boilers,

Altinho, Panaji-Goa

2. Shri H.V. Rao (Retired),

—

Member.

Manager Safety, M/s.

Reliance Salgaonkar

Power Co. Ltd.

3. Shri Oscar Colaco

—

Member.

(Retired), Manager

Utilities, M/s. M. R. F.

Ltd., Usgao, Ponda-Goa

4. Shri Vishwajit Desai,

—

Member.

r/o Priol, Ponda-Goa

5. Shri R. T. Korgaonkar,

—

Ex officio

Inspector of Boilers,

Secretary.

Altinho, Panaji-Goa

This Notification shall come into force with

immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek P. Marathe, Chief Inspector & ex officio

Joint Secretary (Factories & Boilers).

Panaji, 20th August, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Panchayati Raj and

Community Development

Directorate of Panchayats

—

Order

No. 15/2/DP/EST/AE-Promotion/2018/5639

Read:

Promotion Order No. 15/2/DP/EST/

/AE-Promotion/2018/3153 dated 18-06-2019.

Whereas, on the recommendation of the DPC as

conveyed by the Goa Public Service Commission,

vide letter No. COM/II/11/69(1)/16/69 dated

15-05-2019, the Governor of Goa was pleased to

promote 07 Technical Assistants/Junior Engineers

to Assistant Engineers vide Order read in preamble;

And whereas, the name of Shri Sandeep Apule,

Junior Engineer was also duly recommended by

D. P. C. as conveyed by the Goa Public Service

Commission vide letter No. COM/II/11/69(1)/16/69

dated 15-05-2019 for promotion to the post of

Assistant Engineer alongwith other 07 Technical

Assistants/Junior Engineers who were promoted

vide Order read in the preamble.

And whereas, prior to issuance of Order read in

the preamble, the Directorate of Panchayats was

in receipt of Order No. 5/21/2014-VIG/STE/795

dated 08-03-2019 of Director (Vigilance) & ex officio

Joint Secretary to the Government directing that

disciplinary action against Shri Sandeep Apule,

Junior Engineer shall be taken in common

proceeding alongwith other officials. The matter

regarding disciplinary proceeding against Shri

Sandeep Apule initiated by Directorate of

Vigilance was referred to the Government in

pursuance of which Government conveyed

approval to promote only 07 Technical Assistants/

/Junior Engineers to the post of Assistant Engineer

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

599

vide U. O. No. 1533/F dated 11-06-2019 and as such

the name of Shri Sandeep Apule was not included

in the list of officers promoted vide Order read in

the preamble.

And whereas, subsequently the Directorate of

Panchayats is in receipt of Order No. 5/21/2014-

-VIG/STE/4164 dated 18-12-2019 of Director

(Vigilance) & ex officio Joint Secretary to the

Government ordering closure of disciplinary

proceedings upon exoneration of all charges

framed against the official Shri Sandeep Apule,

Junior Engineer.

And

whereas,

matter

regarding

the

correspondence made by Director (Vigilance) &

ex officio Joint Secretary to the Government vide

Order No. 5/21/2014-VIG/STE/4164 dated

18-12-2019 in connection with closure of

disciplinary proceedings and the correspondence

made by the Directorate of Panchayats with the

Goa Public Service Commission for initiation of

process of promotion of 08 Technical Assistants/

Junior Engineers vide letter dated 13-05-2019 were

brought to the notice of the Government including

Personnel Department, wherein it is expressed by

the Personnel Department that further action may

be taken in consultation with Goa Public Service

Commission.

And whereas, the matter was referred to Goa

Public Service Commission whereby the

Commission vide letter No. COM/II/11/69(1)/16

dated 16-07-2020, instructed that necessary action

may be taken as per the recommendation conveyed

vide letter No. COM/II/11/69(1)/16/69 dated

15-05-2019 and instructed that copy of revised

order may be endorsed to the Commission.

And whereas, the matter was thereafter again

referred to the Government for granting approval

for issuance of revised order and the Government

has conveyed its approval to this effect vide

U.O. No. 4687/F dated 04-08-2020;

Now, therefore, based on recommendation of the

DPC held on 14-05-2019 conveyed by GPSC vide its

letter No. COM/II/11/69(1)/16/69 dated 15-05-2019,

subsequent letter of GPSC vide No. COM/II/11/

/69(1)/16 dated 16-07-2020 and approval dated

04-08-2020 of the Government and in partial

modification of the Order read in preamble, the

Governor of Goa is pleased to promote and appoint

notionally with effect from the date of issuance of

Order read in the preamble, Shri Sandeep G. Apule,

the Junior Engineer at Sr. No. 2 as given below to

the post of Assistant Engineer, Group ‘B’ Gazetted

on regular basis in Pay Matrix Level 7 under

Seventh Pay Commission in the following order:

Sr. No.

Name of the Officer

Smt. Vaidehi D. Shirodkar.

Shri Sandeep G. Apule.

Shri Ashish D. Patnekar.

Shri Vasant H. Parab.

Smt. Saloni Zarapkar.

Shri Ajit A. Jog.

Shri Marvando J. Mascarenhas.

Shri Saeesh S. Parab.

The officer at Sr. No. 2 shall be on probation for

a period of 02 years from the date of issue of Order

read in preamble. The officer at Sr. No. 2 shall

exercise his option for fixation of pay in promotional

grade in terms of provisions of F. R. 22(1)(a)(1)

within a period of one month from the date of

issue of this order. The option once exercised shall

be final.

The Officer at Sr. No. 2 is posted in the office of

Deputy Director of Panchayats, South, Margao-Goa.

The expenditure on pay and allowances shall

be debited to the Budget Head of Account:

2515–Other Rural Development Programme;

00–; 101–Panchayati Raj; 06–Strengthening of

Panchayati Raj Institution; 01–Salaries under

Demand No. 31.

On joining the new post by the officer at

Sr. No. 2, he shall submit the joining report to this

office.

This is issued vide Government approval vide

U. O. No. 4687/F dated 04-08-2020.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Narayan Gad, Director & ex officio Jt. Secretary

(Panchayats).

Panaji, 20th August, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Personnel

—

Order

No. 15/2/2020-PER/1924

On the recommendation of Goa Services Board,

the Governor of Goa is pleased to deploy on

working arrangement basis, Smt. Archana S.

Chodankar, Joint Mamlatdar II, Tiswadi to the office

of Hon’ble Minister of State (Independent Charge)

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

600

for Ayush and Minister of State for Defence,

Government of India, Shri Shripad Naik with

immediate effect.

The charge of Joint Mamlatdar (II), Tiswadi shall

be held by Mamlatdar, Tiswadi.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 20th August, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Public Health

Order

No. 21/12/97-I/PHD/2995

Government is pleased to accept the notice of

voluntary retirement dated 01-06-2020 tendered

by Dr. Sabrina Falcao, Medical Officer under

Directorate of Health Services posted at Post Partum

Programme, Goa Medical College, Bambolim-Goa

under Rule 48-A of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 and

to relieve her from the post of Medical Officer under

Directorate of Health Services with effect from

31-08-2020 (a.n.).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 17th August, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Women & Child

Development

Directorate of Women & Child Development

Notification

No. 2-107(98)2020/DWCD/ICPS/Constitution of

Inspection Committees/2348

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 54

of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of

Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the

“said Act”) read with Rule 41 of the Juvenile

Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Model Rules,

2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Rules”)

and on the recommendation of the Selection

Committee vide Notification No. 2-103(69-2004/

/DW&CD/PART-II/08981 dated 23-10-2014 published

in Official Gazette, Series II No. 30. The Government

of Goa had constituted the following Inspection

Committee at the State Level, at North Goa and

South Goa and District Level Inspection Committee

respectively for the State of Goa for the purpose of

the said Act and the same is renewed/extended

with immediate effect from 14th July, 2020 to

13th July, 2023.

Sr.

State Level Inspection Committee

No.

1. Secretary (Women and Child — Chairperson.

Development)

2. Chairperson of the Child

— Member.

Welfare Committee or

Member of the Juvenile

Justice Board-North/South

Goa

3. Chairperson of Child

— Member.

Rights Commission

4. Superintendent of Police

— Member.

5. Director, the Directorate of

— Member.

Health Services, Panaji

6. Director, the Directorate of

— Member.

Education, Porvorim

7. Non Government Organization— Member.

(NGO) Child Rights in Goa

8. Social Worker, Smt. Aparna

— Member.

Porob Palyekar

9. Director, Directorate of Women — Member

& Child Development,

Secretary.

Panaji-Goa

Sr.

North Goa District Inspection Committee

No.

1. Collector, North Goa

— Chairperson.

2. Superintendent of Police or

— Member.

its representative, North Goa

3. Representative of Child

— Member.

Rights Commission

4. Representative of Child

— Member.

Welfare Committee,

North Goa

5. Representative of Juvenile

— Member.

Justice Board, North Goa

6. Health Office or its represen- — Member.

tative, North Goa

7. Non Government Organization— Member.

or its representative (NGO),

North Goa

8. Social Worker, North Goa

— Member.

9. Child Development Project

— Member.

Officer (CDPO) of respective

Taluka or its representative

10. Probation Officer-Directorate — Member

of Women & Child Develop-

Secretary.

ment, Panaji-Goa

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 22

27TH AUGUST, 2020

601

Sr.

South Goa District Inspection Committee

No.

1. Collector, South Goa

— Chairperson.

2. Superintendent of Police or

— Member.

its representative, South Goa

3. Representative of Child

— Member.

Rights Commission

4. Representative of Child

— Member.

Welfare Committee,

South Goa

5. Representative of Juvenile

— Member.

Justice Board, South Goa

6. Health Office or its represen- — Member.

tative of respective taluka,

South Goa

7. Non-Government Organization — Member.

or its representative (NGO),

South Goa

8. Social Worker, South Goa

— Member.

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 15.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—169/160–8/2020.

9. Child Development Project

— Member.

Officer (CDPO) of respective

Taluka or its representative

10. Probation Officer-Directorate — Member

of Women & Child Develop-

Secretary.

ment, Panaji-Goa

1. The term of the State & District Inspection

Committee will be for a period of 3 years from

the date of issue of this notification.

2. The Inspection Committee should consist of

three members to maintain the quorum of

whom atleast one shall be a woman.

3. The non-official members shall be paid visiting

fee including TA/DA per day of the inspection.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Deepali Naik, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary

(Women & Child Development).

Panaji, 19th August, 2020.