Panaji, 5th November, 2020 (Kartika 14, 1942)
SERIES II No. 32
769
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2018-20
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Co-operation
Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies
__
Order
No. 3/11/2020/Urban/TS-II/RCS/2561
Read: 1. Notification No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS II/PZ/
/2017/RCS/Suppl. 5306 dated 10-02-2020.
2. Letter No. CUCCS/App of Reg Nomi/Rec/
/Sales Off/1189/2020-21 dated 15-09-2020
of the Cuncolim Urban Co-operative
Credit Society Ltd., Cuncolim, Goa.
In exercise of powers vested in me vide
Notification read at Sr. No. 1 above read with
Section 123(B) and Section 91D of the Goa
Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 along with Rule
124 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003.
The General Manager of the Cuncolim Urban
Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Cuncolim, Salcete,
Goa is hereby authorized to act as Sale-cum-
-Recovery Officer in relation to the recovery of debts
and to attach and sell the property of defaulters or
to execute any decree by attachment and sale of
property and execution of all recovery orders of
decree holder viz. The Cuncolim Urban Co-operative
Credit Society Ltd., Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa passed
by the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Arbitration/Execution or the Nominee of Registrar.
This appointment is subject to following
conditions:
1. The Officer appointed and delegated with
the powers of Sales-cum-Recovery Officer
shall work under the general guidance,
superintendence and control of the Assistant
Registrar
of
Co-operative
Societies,
Arbitration/Execution, South Goa District,
Margao-Goa.
2. He shall follow all the procedures as laid down
under the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001
and the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003
or in compliance with any other relevant
provisions of any other Act/Rules and also bye-
laws of the society concerned while execution
of decree.
3. The Board of Directors of the society shall be
fully responsible along with the Chief
Executive Officer for any acts in contravention
of the Act, Rules and Bye-laws.
4. The Board of Directors shall review the
performance of the General Manager every
month and ensure compliance.
5. This Order shall remain in force for one year
from date of its issue and the same can also
be withdrawn at any stage without assigning
any reasons thereof.
Biju Naik, Registrar (Co-op. Societies).
Panaji, 27th October, 2020.
________
Order
No. 3/11/2020/Urban/TS-II/RCS/2550
Read: 1. This Office Order No. 48-8-2001-TS-RCS/
III/1290 dated 16-07-2020.
2. Letter No. CUCCS/App of Reg Nomi/
/Rec/Sales Off/1189/2020-21 dated
15-09-2020 of the Cuncolim Urban
Co-operative Credit Society Ltd.,
Cuncolim, Goa.
Whereas, Adv. Ulhas Krishna Parwar, Savitri
Apartments, Chaudi, Canacona, Goa was appointed
as Registrar’s Nominee under Section 86(1) of the
Note:- There is one Extraordinary issue to the Official
Gazette, Series II No. 31 dated 29-10-2020 namely,
Extraordinary dated 29-10-2020 from pages
753 to 768 regarding Notification from Goa
Legislature Secretariat.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
770
Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 read with
Rule 116(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules,
2003 vide Order read at Sr. No. 1 above.
And whereas, now a request has been received
from the Cuncolim Urban Co-operative Credit
Society Ltd., Cuncolim, Salcete-Goa vide their letter
read at Sr. No. 2 above to designate Adv. Ulhas
Krishna Parwar, Savitri Apartments, Chaudi,
Canacona, Goa as their dedicated nominee to
adjudicate disputes referred by the Cuncolim Urban
Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Cuncolim,
Salcete-Goa.
In view of above, the above named nominee
Adv. Ulhas Krishna Parwar, Savitri Apartments,
Chaudi, Canacona, Goa in exercise of powers
conferred under Section 123(B) of the Goa
Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 read with Rule 116
of the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003, I, the
undersigned hereby authorise the above named
nominee to entertain all disputes referred to him
by the Cuncolim Urban Co-operative Credit Society
Ltd., Cuncolim, Salcete-Goa without routing it
through this Department.
When a purported dispute is referred by the
society, the above named nominee is authorised to
first decide under sub-section (1) of Section 86 of
the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 whether
the matter referred by society involves a dispute
and pass appropriate orders under sub-section (1)
of Section 86. Before admitting the dispute the
Registrar’s Nominee shall ensure that the
concerned society deposits the prescribed
admission fees with the Asstt. Registrar of
Co-operative Societies, Arbitration & Execution,
South Goa District, Margao-Goa.
Only upon the nominee satisfying that there
exists a dispute, he shall proceed to adjudicate the
same and give award accordingly. The nominee
shall abide by the terms and condition on which he
was originally appointed as nominee read at
Sr. 1 above.
This order shall remain in force for one year unless
renewed and shall be subject to withdrawal at any
time without assigning any reasons.
Biju Naik, Registrar (Co-op. Societies).
Panaji, 26th October, 2020.
________
Order
No. 3/7/Urban Credit/TS II/BZ/2018/RCS/2564
Read: 1. Order No. 48-8-2001-TS-RCS/III/311 dated
21-04-2017.
2. Letter No. VDUCCSL/20-21/113 dated
13-08-2020.
3. Letter No. 1-04-17/ARBZ/EST/347 dated
09-09-2020.
Whereas, Adv. Yeshwant V. Gauns, Valpoi, Satari-
-Goa was appointed as Registrar’s Nominee under
Section 86(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act,
2001 read with Rule 116(1) of the Goa Co-operative
Societies Rules, 2003 vide Order read at Sr. No. 1
above.
And whereas, now a request has been received
from Vishwadeep Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd.,
Bicholim-Goa vide their letter read at Sr. No. 2 above
to designate Adv. Yeshwant V. Gauns, as their
dedicated nominee to adjudicate disputes referred
by Vishwadeep Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd.,
Bicholim-Goa.
In view of above, the above named nominee Adv.
Yeshwant V. Gauns, in exercise of powers conferred
under Section 123(B) of the Goa Co-op. Societies
Act, 2001 read with Rule 116 of the Goa Co-operative
Societies Rules, 2003, is hereby authorized by
the undersigned to entertain all disputes referred
to him by Vishwadeep Urban Co-op. Credit Society
Ltd., Bicholim-Goa without routing it through this
Department.
When a purported dispute is referred by the
society, the above named nominee is authorized to
first decide under sub-section (1) of Section 86 of
the Goa Co-operative Societies Act whether the
matter referred by society involves a dispute and
pass appropriate Orders under sub-section (1) of
Section 86. Before admitting the dispute, the
Registrar’s Nominee shall ensure that the
concerned society deposits prescribed admission
fees with the Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies,
ABN/EXE, North Goa District.
Only upon the nominee satisfying that there
exists a dispute, he shall proceed to adjudicate the
same and give award accordingly. The nominee
shall abide by the terms and condition on which he
was originally appointed as nominee vide order to
be read at Sr. 1 above.
This appointment shall come into force with
immediate effect and shall remain in force for one
year and the same can be withdrawn at any stage
without assigning any reason.
Biju Naik, Registrar (Co-op. Societies).
Panaji, 26th October, 2020.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
771
Order
No. 3/9/Urban Credit/TS-II/PZ/2018/RCS/
/Suppl/2553
Read: 1. Notification No. 3/3/Urban Credit/PZ/
/2017/RCS/Suppl./5306 dated 10-02-2020.
2. Letter No. 3/40/2018-19/ARPZ/Gen/ADM/
/850 dated 30-09-2020 from Asstt.
Registrar of Co-op. Societies, Ponda Zone.
3. Letter No. PUCC/ARCS/20-21/82 dated
17-09-2020 from the Ponda Urban Co-op.
Credit Society Ltd., Ponda-Goa.
In exercise of powers vested in me vide
Notification read at Sr. No. 1 above read with
Section 123B and Section 91D of the Goa
Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 along with Rule
124 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003,
the Manager of the Ponda Urban Co-operative
Credit Society Ltd., Ponda-Goa is hereby
authorized to act as Sale-cum-Recovery Officer in
relation to the recovery of debts and to attach and
sell the property of defaulters or to execute any
decree by attachment and sale of property and
execution of all recovery orders of decree holder
viz. The Ponda Urban Co-operative Credit Society
Ltd., Ponda-Goa passed by the Asstt. Registrar of
Co-op. Societies, ABN/EXE or the Nominee of
Registrar. This appointment is subject to following
conditions:-
1. The Officer appointed and delegated with the
powers of Sales-cum-Recovery Officer shall
follow all the procedures as laid down under
the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 and
the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003 or
in compliance with any other relevant
provisions of any other Act/Rules and also bye-
laws of the society concerned while execution
of decree.
2. The Board of Directors of the society shall be
fully responsible along with the Chief
Executive Officer for any acts in contravention
of the Act, Rules and Bye-laws.
3. The Board of Directors shall review the
performance of the above Officers every month
and ensure compliance.
4. This appointment is valid for one year unless
renewed. The Order may also be withdrawn/
/revoked at any time without assigning any
reason.
Biju Naik, Registrar (Co-op. Societies).
Panaji, 26th October, 2020.
Department of Education, Art & Culture
Directorate of Art and Culture
__
Order
No. DAC/GIA/Committees/RBM/2020-21/1987
In exercise of powers conferred by Clause 5 of the
Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Margao-Goa, the
Government is pleased to appoint Shri Damodar
(Damu) G. Naik, r/o 3/4379, Gogol, Near Sai Mandir,
Margao-Goa as Chairman of Ravindra Bhavan,
Margao-Goa with immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sagun R. Velip, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 26th October, 2020.
________
Order
No. DAC/GIA/Committees/RBM/2020-21/1988
In exercise of powers conferred by Clause 14(viii)
of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Margao-Goa,
the Government is pleased to nominate following
Members on Executive Board of Ravindra Bhavan,
Margao-Goa with immediate effect.
1. Shri Chandan Narayan Nayak, Comba, Margao-
-Goa.
2. Shri Gajanan (Amey) Prakash Karmali, Fatorda,
Goa.
3. Shri Manohar Vishnu Borkar, Gogol, Margao-
-Goa,
4. Sou. Ranjita Sandesh Pai, Comba, Margao-Goa.
5. Shri Kalidas Mukund Verenkar, Fatorda-Goa.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sagun R. Velip, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 26th October, 2020.
________
Order
No. DAC/GIA/Committees/RBM/2020-21/1989
In exercise of powers conferred by Clause 9(viii)
of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Margao-Goa,
the Government is pleased to nominate following
Members on General Council of Ravindra Bhavan,
Margao-Goa with immediate effect.
1. Shri Sudesh Gurudas Nagvekar, Fatorda-Goa.
2. Shri Umesh Krishna Bandodkar, Fatorda-Goa.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
772
3. Shri Rosario Santano Araujo, Fatorda, Margao-
-Goa.
4. Shri Shridhar M. Pai Kane, Colmorod, Navelim,
Salcete, Goa.
5. Shri Conceicao Diago D’silva (Connie M),
Seraulim, Salcete.
6. Shri Chandan Narayan Nayak, Comba, Margao-
-Goa.
7. Shri Gajanan (Amey) Prakash Karmali, Borda,
Fatorda, Margao-Goa.
8. Shri Manohar Vishnu Borkar, Gogol, Margao-
-Goa.
9. Sou. Ranjita Sandesh Pai, Comba, Margao-Goa.
10. Shri Kalidas Mukund Verenkar, Vidyanagar,
Gogol, Fatorda, Margao-Goa.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sagun R. Velip, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 26th October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Environment & Climate
Change
__
Notification
No. 7/4/98/STE-DIR/PART-III/Vol.II/878
Read:
Order dated 23-10-2018, 30-10-2018 &
31-10-2018 in various IAs filed in Writ
Petition (Civil) No. 728 of 2015 and Ors. by
Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Whereas, the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its
Judgement & Orders read above has given certain
directions on manufacture, distribution and use of
Fire Crackers in the Country. In the light of these
directions and as per the modified directions
contained in Hon’ble Supreme Court order dated
30-10-2018, the State Government hereby prescribes
following timings for bursting of fire crackers
during the Diwali Festival in the year 2020.
1. On the day of the Diwali i.e. on 14th November,
2020 Fire Crackers are allowed to be burst in
the morning from 4.30 a.m. to 5.30 a.m. and in
the evening from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 p.m. strictly.
2. For the days during the Diwali Festival period
i.e. 15th & 16th November, 2020 which is being
observed in the State of Goa, the Fire Crackers
bursting time shall be strictly restricted
between 8.00 p.m to 10.00 p.m. only.
3. The Police Station in-charge of the respective
Police Station shall be fully responsible for
implementation of the Supreme Court
directions.
This Notification shall come into force with
immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Johnson Fernandes, Director/Jt. Secretary
(DoE & CC).
Porvorim, 04th November, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Finance
Revenue & Control Division
__
Order
No. 1-118-2020-21/DSSL/Part/673
The Government is pleased to nominate the
following serving/retired Group A/B/C officials as
the members of the Draw Committee constituted
vide Notification No. 1-118-2020-21/DSSL/Part/637
dated 20-10-2020 to conduct paper & online draws
during the working hours, after the working hours
and holidays including Saturdays & Sundays.
1.
Shri Tulsidas Naik, Joint Director of Accounts,
Retd. Group ‘A’ Officer.
2.
Shri Ramakant Talkar, Dy. Director, Retd. Group
‘A’ Civil Cadre Officer.
3.
Shri Ulhas Naik, Dy. Director Accounts, Group
‘A’ Officer.
4.
Shri Pandurang Salgaonkar, Section Officer,
Retd. Group ‘B’ Officer.
5.
Ms. Geeta D. Naik, Section Officer, Retd. Group
‘B’ Officer.
6.
Shri Upadesh D. S. Kossambe, Assistant Acctts.
Officer, Group ‘B’ Officer.
7.
Shri Bernard Devassy, Asst. Acctts. Officer,
Group ‘B’ Officer.
8.
Smt. Sheela U. Naik, Retd. Suptd., Group ‘B’
Officer.
9.
Shri Savio Gomes Pereira, Assistant Accounts
Officer, Group ‘B’ Officer.
Further, following three additional members are
also nominated as members of the Draw Committee
to act in place of resigns/withdrawn member to
form the quorum in the event of the aforesaid
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
773
members of the Draw Committee resigns or
withdraws as a member of the Draw Committee.
1.
Shri Dnyaneshwar U. Naik, Joint Director of
Accounts, ‘A’ Group Officer.
2.
Shri Prakash G. Lotlikar, Retd. Section Officer,
‘B’ Group Officer.
3.
Shri Suresh G. Divkar, Retd. Joint Director of
Accounts, ‘A’ Group Officer.
The Draw Committee shall consist of 1 Group ‘A’
and 2 Group ‘B’ or ‘C’ Officers each under (B) at
Sr. No. 1, 2 & 5 with the Group ‘A’ Officer being the
Chairman of the Committee and Group ‘A’ and ‘B’ or
‘C’ Officials under (A) at Sr. No. 2 & 3 of the
Notification No. 1-118-2020-21/DSSL/part/637 dated
20-20-2020 to supervise the conduct of the draw on
rotation basis during the office hours, after office
hours, holidays including Saturdays and Sundays.
They shall be paid remuneration as per the
provisions of Notification No. 1-118-2020-21/DSSL/
/part/637 dated 20-10-2020.
The nomination of the above members to the
Draw Committee for conduct of paper & online
draws during the working hours, after the working
hours and holidays including Saturdays & Sundays
shall be for a period of 2 (two) years from the
conduct of 1st draw.
The members of the Draw Committee shall
conduct the draws as per the instructions/
/guidelines and the rotation chart issued by the
Director, Directorate of Small Savings & Lotteries.
The expenditure towards payment of the
remuneration shall be debited to the Budget Head
of Account 2075–Miscellaneous General Services,
00, 103–State Lotteries, 01–Lotteries, 50–Other
Charges under Demand No. 30.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Pranab G. Bhat, Under Secretary, Finance (R & C).
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
________
Notification
No. 4/5/2005-Fin(R&C)(155)
In exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Goa (Recovery of
Arrears of Tax through Settlement) Act, 2009 (Goa
Act 17 of 2009) (hereinafter referred to as the “said
Act”), the Government of Goa hereby extends the
date for making an application for the purpose of
Section 4 of the said Act, till 31st day of December,
2020.
This notification shall come into force with
immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Pranab G. Bhat, Under Secretary, Finance (R&C).
Porvorim, 30th October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Fisheries
Directorate of Fisheries
__
Notification
No. DF/AQUA/NAT-MARI-POLICY-2019/2020-21
With reference to the Notification on “GOA
STATE MARICULTURE POLICY 2020” for
implementing cage fish farming notified in the
Official Gazette, Series I No. 21 dated 20th August,
2020, it is proposed to constitute an Expert
Committee for Zonation and Demarcation of the
Marine Waters for Mariculture as follows:
Expert Committee for Zonation and Demarcation
of the Marine Waters for Mariculture:
(a) Director of Fisheries, Directorate — Chairman.
of Fisheries, Government of Goa,
Panaji-Goa
(b) Dy. Director of Fisheries,
— Member
Directorate of Fisheries,
Convener.
Government of Goa,
Panaji-Goa
(c) Representative of National
— Member
Institute of Oceanography (NIO),
Panaji-Goa
(d) Representative of Central Marine — Member.
Fisheries Research Institute
(CMFRI), Karwar, Karnataka
(e) Representative of Fisheries
— Member.
Survey of India, Mormugao-Goa
(f) Representative of Krishi
— Member.
Vigyan Kendra, South Goa,
Department of Agriculture
Role of the Expert Committee for Zonation and
Demarcation of the Marine Waters for Mariculture.
1.
The Committee shall identify the Zones as per
“GOA STATE MARICULTURE POLICY 2020” for
sea cage farming and demarcate them as Zone
A and Zone B.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
774
2.
This Committee shall identify the site where
sea cage culture can be permitted by issuing
detailed geographical co-ordinates.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dr. Shamila Monteiro, Director & ex officio Jt.
Secretary (Fisheries).
Panaji, 26th October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Forest
__
Order
No. 4-3-2014/FOR/206
On recommendations of the Departmental
Promotion Committee as conveyed by the Goa
Public Service Commission vide letter No. Com/II/
/11/22(1)16/683 dated 16-10-2020, the Government
is pleased to promote the following two Assistant
Conservator of Forest (ACF), to the post of Deputy
Conservator of Forest (DCF), Group “A” Gazetted, in
the Pay Scale of PB-3 Rs. 15,600 - 39,100 + Grade
Pay Rs. 6,600/- (Level-11 of the 7th Pay Scale
Commission) on regular basis in the Office of the
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Forest
Department, Panaji, with immediate effect.
1. Shri Santosh H. Phadte.
2. Shri Raju Dessai.
The above Officers shall be on probation for a
period of two years.
The Officers shall exercise the option for fixation
of pay within one month from the date of this order
in terms of F. R. 22(I)(a)(1).
The pay of Officer on promotion shall be fixed as
per C.C.S. (RP) Rules, 2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Shaila G. Bhosle, Under Secretary (Forests).
Porvorim, 27th October, 2020.
________
Addendum
No. MS-REV.PF/DCF/WP/2018-19/393/205
Ref.:
1)
Notification No. DCF (WP)/Pvt. For/16(THC)/2013(WZ)/19-20/26 dated 21-01-2020.
2)
Notification No. DCF(WP)/Pvt.For/16(THC)/2013(WZ)/19-20/119 dated 18-06-2020.
3)
Notification No. MS-REV.PF/DCF/WP/2018-19/393/177 dated 18-09-2020.
In continuation to the Notification No. MS-REV.P.F/DCF/WP/2018-19/393/177 dated 18-09-2020,
Government is pleased to constitute 02 inspection teams in North Goa in addition to earlier 14 inspection
teams to carry out site inspection of the properties fulfilling/meeting Private Forests criteria of canopy
density and area, as per Forest Survey of India (FSI) map in respect of the provisionally identified private
forest areas by V.T. Thomas Committee and F.X. Araujo Committee. Further, sub-committee for Sangolda
Village will be added in site inspection team No. 4 for North Goa.
These 02 site inspection teams, as earlier 14 teams, shall work under direct supervision of concerned
Territorial Dy. Conservator of Forests and concerned Territorial Range Forest Officer shall act as Member
Secretary of respective sub-committee.
The 02 site inspection teams/additional sub-committees are as follows:-
NORTH GOA
Sr.
Taluka
Village
Members of Sub-Committee
No.
1
2
3
4
4 (Below
Bardez
Sangolda
ISLR
RFO
Talathi Sangolda.
Oxel Village)
Bardez
Keri
7
Ponda
Betora
ISLR Ponda
RFO
Talathi Betora.
Kundaim
Ponda
Talathi Kundaim.
Priol
Talathi Priol.
Cuncolim
Talathi Cuncolim.
Adcolna
Talathi Adcolna.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
775
Vagurme
Talathi Vagurme.
Nirancal
Talathi Nirancal.
Borim
Talathi Borim.
Queula
Talathi Queula.
Kodar
Talathi Kodar.
Panchawadi
Talathi Panchawadi.
Bandora
Talathi Bandora.
Ponda
Talathi Ponda.
Curti
Talathi Curti.
8
Satari
Keri
ISLR Bicholim RFO
Talathi Keri.
Podocem
Valpoi
Talathi Podocem.
Ponocem
Talathi Ponocem.
Vantem
Talathi Vantem.
Nagvem
Talathi Nagvem.
Rivem
Talathi Rivem.
Conquirem
Talathi Conquirem.
Xelpo-Curdo
Talathi Xelpo-Curdo.
Bicholim
Latambarcem
Talathi Latambarcem.
Terms of Reference of sub-committee:
1. To delineate private forest boundary on ground and to survey the area inside the delineated forest
boundary.
2. To carry out site inspection of the properties and collect data on percentage of forestry species by
total enumeration. The land owner will be given opportunity to remain present during enumeration.
3. To prepare georeferenced survey plan of areas qualifying 3rd criteria of Private forests i.e. 75% of
tree species of forestry type and submit field data sheets and survey plan to concerned territorial
Dy. Conservator of Forests for onwards submission to the Review Committee.
This issues with the approval of the Government.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Shaila G. Bhosle, Under Secretary (Forests).
Porvorim, 26th October, 2020.
———uuu———
1
2
3
4
Goa Legislature Secretariat
__
Order
No. LA/Admn./2020/1159
In pursuance of Rule 4 (2) of the Goa Legislature
Secretariat (Recruitment and Conditions of Services)
Rules, 1988, the Governor in consultation with the
“Board” is pleased to promote Smt. Anita Naik,
Senior Assistant of the Goa Legislature Secretariat,
Porvorim, to the post of Section Officer, Group ‘B’
(Gazetted) in the Pay Matrix Level 7, w.e.f.
23rd October, 2020 (f.n.) on regular basis.
2. The above appointment is made against the
vacancy of Section Officer caused due to demise of
Shri Ganpat Palni, Section Officer.
3. Smt. Anita Naik shall be on probation for a
period of 2 years from the date of her promotion.
4. The pay of Smt. Anita Naik shall be fixed as per
the rules.
5. The expenditure on account of this be debited
to the Budget Head “2011–Parliament/State/
/U.T. Legislature; 02–State/U.T. Legislature;
103–Legislative Secretariat; 01–Legislature
Secretariat of State; 01–Salaries.”
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
U. D. Bicholkar, Committee Officer, Legislature.
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
776
Order
No. LA/Admn./2020/1160
In pursuance of Rule 4 (2) of the Goa Legislature
Secretariat (Recruitment and Conditions of Services)
Rules, 1988, the Governor in consultation with the
“Board” is pleased to promote Smt. Farida Muzawar,
Senior Assistant of the Goa Legislature Secretariat,
Porvorim, to the post of Section Officer, Group ‘B’
(Gazetted) in the Pay Matrix Level 7, w.e.f. 23rd
October, 2020 (f.n.) on regular basis.
2. The above appointment is made against the
vacancy of Section Officer caused due to retirement
of Shri Deelip Korgaonkar, Section Officer on
superannuation.
3. Smt. Farida Muzawar shall be on probation for a
period of 2 years from the date of her promotion.
4. The pay of Smt. Farida Muzawar shall be fixed
as per the rules.
5. The expenditure on account of this be debited
to the Budget Head “2011–Parliament/State/
/U.T. Legislature; 02–State/U.T. Legislature;
103–Legislative Secretariat; 01–Legislature
Secretariat of State; 01–Salaries.”
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
U. D. Bicholkar, Committee Officer, Legislature.
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
________
Order
No. LA/Admn./2020/1191
The Governor of Goa after consultation with
the ‘Board’ under sub-rule (2) of Rule 4 of the
Goa Legislature Secretariat (Recruitment and
Conditions of Service) Rules, 1988 and with consent
of the Chief Minister, is pleased to extend the
services beyond the superannuation in October,
2020 of Shri Pradipkumar A. Karekar, Assistant
Accounts Officer, Goa Legislature Secretariat,
Porvorim-Goa, for a period of three months w.e.f.
01st November, 2020 (f.n.).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
U. D. Bicholkar, Committee Officer, Legislature.
Porvorim, 30th October, 2020.
Department of Industries
__
Notification
No. 11/9/2012-IND/523
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of
the Goa Industrial Development Act, 1965 (Act 22 of
1965), and in supersession of the Government
Notification No. 11/9/2012-IND/252 dated 28-09-2017,
published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 28
dated 12-10-2017 and all other Notifications issued
in this regard, the Government of Goa hereby
re-constitutes the Goa Industrial Development
Corporation consisting of the following, namely:
(1) Shri Glenn Souza Ticlo,
— Chairman.
MLA, Aldona
(2) Secretary (Industries),
— Director.
Government of Goa
(3) Secretary (Finance),
— Director.
Government of Goa
(4) Chief Electrical
— Director.
Engineer,
Government of Goa
(5) Director, Industries,
— Director.
Trade and Commerce,
Government of Goa,
Panaji-Goa
(6) President, Goa Chamber of
— Director.
Commerce and Industry
(7) President, Goa
— Director.
Small Scale Industries
Association
(8) Arch. Chandan
— Director.
Kalidas Paarab,
r/o Bicholim-Goa
(9) Shri Arman Bankley,
— Director.
r/o. Gogal-Goa
(10) Ms. Purti Kathpalia,
— Director.
r/o. Panaji-Goa
(11) Shri Jaivant Shivaji Desai,
— Director.
r/o. St. Inez, Panaji-Goa
(12) Managing Director,
— Chief Exe-
Goa Industrial Development
cutive and
Corporation, Panaji-Goa
ex officio
Secretary
to the
Corpora-
tion.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
777
This Notification shall come into force with
immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Premraj Shirodkar, Under Secretary (Industries).
Porvorim, 26th October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Labour
—
Notification
No. 28/2/2020-LAB/1028
The following Award passed by the Industrial
Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on
09-10-2020 in reference No. IT/12/96 is hereby
published as required under Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Premraj K. Shirodkar, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 28th October, 2020.
______
IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND
LABOUR COURT
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Mr. Vincent D’Silva, Hon’ble Presiding
Officer)
Ref. No. IT/12/96
Shri Navnath Gaonkar,
Rep. by the General Secretary,
Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh,
Kamakshi Krupa, Ground Floor,
Kadpabandh, Ponda,
Goa, 403401.
… Workman/Party I
V/s
1. The Management of M/s. Cosmed
Analytical and Central Services,
A C.M.M. Group of Companies,
Curti, Ponda, Goa.
… Employer/Party II(1)
2. M/s. Cosmed Analytical
and Central Services Pvt. Ltd.,
Rua de Qurem,
Panaji, Goa.
… Employer/Party II(2)
(Deleted vide order
dated 9-11-2009)
3. M/s. Cosme Farma
Laboratories Ltd.,
Dempo Towers, 5th Floor,
Patto, Panaji, Goa.
… Employer/Party II(3)
4. M/s. Wallace Pharmaceuticals
Pvt. Ltd., Dempo Towers,
3rd Floor, Patto,
Panaji, Goa.
… Employer/Party II(4)
5. M/s. Beiersdorf (I) Ltd.,
Nirancal Road, Curti,
Ponda, Goa.
… Employer/Party II(5)
6. M/s. Colfax (India) Pvt. Ltd.,
Curti, Ponda, Goa.
… Employer/Party II(6)
Workman/Party I represented by Ld. Adv. Shri S. P.
Gaonkar.
Employer/Party II(1) absent.
Employer/Party II(2) deleted.
Employer/Party II(3) represented by Ld. Adv. Shri P.
Chawdikar.
Employer/Party II(4) represented by Ld. Adv. Shri S.
M. Singbal.
Employer/Party II(5) represented by Ld. Adv. G. K.
Sardessai.
Employer/Party II(6) represented by Ld. Adv. Shri S.
M. Singbal.
AWARD
(Delivered on this the 9th day of the month
of October of the year 2020)
By Order dated 01-02-1996, bearing No. 28/64/
/96-LAB, the Government of Goa in exercise of
powers conferred by Section 10 (1)(d) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short The Act),
has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal
for adjudication.
“(1)
Whether the action of the management of
M/s. CMM Group of companies, Curti,
Ponda, Goa in refusing employment to the
workman Shri Navnath Gaonkar with effect
from August, 1993 is legal and justified?
(2)
If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?”
2. It is matter of record that vide Corrigendum
No. IRM/CON/PON/(14)/94/4045 dated 1-8-1997,
the appropriate Government corrected the name
of the Party II as M/s. Cosme Analytical and Central
Services, a C.M.M. Group of Companies at Exh. 11.
3. Upon receipt of the reference, it was registered
as IT/12/96 and registered A/D notices were issued
to both the parties. Pursuant to service of notices,
Party I filed a Claim statement at Exhibit 3 and
additional claim statement at Exh. 12. It is a matter
of record that Party II(2) to Party II(6) were
impleaded thereafter. The Party II(1) filed the
written statement at Exh. 4, Party II(2) filed the
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
778
written statement at Exh. 14, Party II(3) filed the
written statement at Exh. 54, Party II(4) filed the
written statement at Exh. 56, the Party II(5) filed
the written statement at Exh. 55 and Party II(6)
filed the written statement at Exh. 57.
4. In short, the case of Party I is that the
Party I is a workman under Industrial Disputes Act
employed since 1988 and that on 29-4-1994 when
he approached the Party II, he was refused to
resume his duty w.e.f. August, 1993. The Party II
has not conducted any enquiry nor principles of
natural justice were followed and therefore his
termination is illegal and unjustified. The Party I
workman was not paid any legal dues at the time
of his termination nor any enquiry was conducted.
The Party I in additional claim statement submitted
that whenever the vacancies existed in any one of
the companies of CMM Group of Companies as per
the common seniority, the senior most temporary
workman was regularized in the said companies
and the seniority of the Party I was not taken into
consideration. The Party I is unemployed and could
not succeed in getting the job till date and is
undergoing hardship due to unemployment. The
termination of services of Party I workman is illegal,
unjustified and bad in law and therefore prayed to
reinstate him with full back wages and continuity
of service. Hence, the dispute.
5. In the Written statement, Party II(1) contended
that the dispute is between the workman and the
employer, i.e. Partner of M/s. Cosmed Analytical
and Central Services who was rendering several
services to various companies including the units
of Cosme Mathais Menezes Group. The workman
was appointed for meeting exigencies of limited
period due to peak in demand which is temporary
in nature. The Party I was employed to cope up
additional work as temporary workman for a limited
purpose. The Party II has received a request from
M/s. CFL Pharmaceuticals Ltd. to recruit some
temporary workers and the Party II(1) found the
Party I as suitable candidate for temporary
appointment in the unit of CFL Pharmaceuticals
Ltd. and accordingly a letter of appointment
bearing No. TEMP/0148/93 dated 24-6-1993 was
issued to the workman as temporary workman
effective from 1-6-1993 on the terms and conditions
contained in the said letter where it is clearly
stated that he is appointed purely on temporary
basis upto 31-7-1993 and that he would be
terminated without assigning any reason by giving
one day notice. The contract for temporary
appointment of the workman expired on 31-7-1993
and after that date, there is no question of resuming
the duties or enquiry to be conducted. There is no
illegal and unjustified action on the part of the
employer as the employer has paid daily wages as
per the contract. The contract for temporary
appointment of Party I expired on 31-7-1993 after
which there is no question of workman resuming
duty. The workman was not in continuous service
but merely a temporary worker in terms of express
contract. The Party II has paid daily wages as per
the contract. The Party I is not entitled for any
reliefs.
6. In the Written statement, the Party II(2)
contended that the workman was appointed for
meeting exigencies on account of sudden spurt
due to peak in demand which is of temporary
nature. The Party I workman worked with the unit
of CFL Pharmaceuticals Ltd. from 1-6-1993 to
31-7-1993 as a temporary workman and worked for
total number of 79 days inclusive of leave and after
the expiry of the contract, the workman did not
continue with the Party II as the contract for
temporary service stood automatically terminated
due to non-renewal. The Party II has availed the
temporary services of the workman under previous
contract for specified contract of time for different
units with clear stipulation that on the expiry of
the contract and/or its non-renewable, the services
would be terminated. The workman is not entitled
for any relief under the Act.
7. In the Written statement, the Party II(3)
contended that the dispute is not an industrial
dispute. The Party II is a company and that upon
the Deed of retirement dated 18-4-2000, the earlier
partnership firm of M/s CACS was reconstituted
with only two surviving partners and M/s. CACS
Pvt. Ltd. had taken over all the liabilities of the
erstwhile partnership firm. M/s. CACS Pvt. Ltd. had
filed the Company Petition before the Hon’ble High
Court and by order dated 27-6-2007 the Court has
allowed the company to be would up w.e.f. the
above date and had appointed an Official
Liquidator. The CACS Pvt. Ltd. thereafter filed an
application that they may be deleted from the
present reference and the said party was deleted
as the representative of the Party I endorsed no
objection. M/s. CACS was dissolved w.e.f. 1-8-2000
and the business and the properties was vested
with CACS Pvt. Ltd. and after appointment of the
liquidator, the Party I ought to seek relief from
Official Liquidator by adding him as necessary
party. The Party II(3) had never engaged the services
of Party II(1) nor they have refused his services.
There was no employer-employee relationship with
the Party I and therefore the claim be dismissed.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
779
8. In the Written statement, the Party II(4)
contended that the dispute is not maintainable as
per the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act. The
Party I was a temporary employee on contract basis.
There is no liability towards the claim of the Party
I since there is no employer-employee relationship.
There is no alleged termination of services of the
workman. No case has been made out of alleged
termination. The workman allowed the deletion of
Party II(2) who was last employer and who had
taken the liabilities of the partnership firm. The
dispute against the last employer which is a
company under liquidation actually lies against
the Official Liquidator who is the actual and
necessary party. The workman was never on the
roll of the Party II as an employer at any point of
time. The Party I was a temporary employee on
contract basis and has no locus to raise any dispute.
There was also no alleged termination of services
and therefore he is not entitled for reliefs.
9. In the Written statement, the Party II(5)
contended that the claim of the Party I as against
the Party II(5) is barred by delay and laches. There
is no liability towards the claim of the Party II as
there was no employer-employee relationship. The
present dispute is not an industrial dispute. The
Party II(5) became a partner of CACS by a Deed of
partnership dated 28-12-1985 and the Party II(5)
retired from Deed of retirement dated 18-4-2000 as
per which the retiring partners shall not be liable
for any demands of the employees and workers.
The fact of dissolution of the partnership was
made known to all by a public notice. The
Party II(5) has been absolved of all the liabilities
and responsibilities of erstwhile partnership. The
Party II(5) was not a signatory for the purported
Minutes of understanding dated 30-4-1996. There
is no employer-employee relationship between
them and therefore conducting enquiry does not
arise. The Party I is not entitled for any reliefs.
10. In the Written statement, the Party II(6)
contended that the dispute is not maintainable
under the Industrial Disputes Act. The workman
was a temporary worker on contract basis and
therefore could not be treated as workman under
the Industrial Disputes Act. There is no liability
towards the Party I since there was no employer-
-employee relationship. The Party II(6) after its
retirement dated 18-6-2000 had nothing to do with
the dispute. The dispute against the last employer,
which company is under liquidation, actually lies
against the Official Liquidator. The Party I was
never on the roll of Party II(6) and the true
successor-in-interest is Cosmed Analytical and
Central Services which was allowed to be dropped.
The Party II(6) had closed its operation at the
factory at Ponda. The Party I is not entitled for any
reliefs.
11. In the rejoinder at Exh. 6, Exh. 15, Exh. 31
and Exh. 58, the Party I denied the case put forth
by the Party II companies in the Written statement.
12. Based on the averments of the respective
parties, the following issues were framed at Exh. 7.
1) Whether the Party I proves that he was
employed with the Party II since 1988 as a
general worker?
2) Whether Party I proves that the Party II
illegally and without justification refused
employment to him from August, 1988?
3) Whether Party II proves that the Party I is
not a “workman” as defined under the I. D.
Act, 1947 and hence this Tribunal has no
jurisdiction to decide the reference?
4) Whether the Party I is entitled to any relief?
5) What Award?
13. It is a matter of record that an additional
issue was framed on 6-4-1998 at Exb. 16 which is
as follows:
3A) Whether the Party II proves that the
reference is null and void and hence is liable
to be rejected?
14. It is also a matter of record that additional
issues were framed on 10-11-2014 at Exb. 65 which
are as follows:
3B) Whether the dispute raised by Party I is an
‘industrial dispute’?
3C) Whether the Party II(3) proves that Party I
has not given any justification for the
demands/claims raised against it and hence
such demands/claims cannot sustain?
3D) Whether the Party II(3),(4),(5) and (6) proves
that there is no employer-employee
relationship between them and Party I?
3E) Whether the Official Liquidator appointed
by the Hon’ble High Court is a necessary
Party to the present reference?
3F) Whether the Party II(4), (5) and (6) prove
that as per Clause 29 and 30 of the Deed of
dissolution dated 1-8-2000, they are not
liable for any dispute raised by Party I?
15. In support of his claim, Party I, Shri Navnath
Naik examined himself and produced on record a
copy of Settlement dated 21-3-1992 at Exh. W-1.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
780
The Party I also examined Shri Puti Gaonkar as
second witness and produced on record a copy
of list of temporary workers on 25-11-1992 at
Exh. W-2 and a copy of list of temporary workers
taken on probation from 1994 till date at Exh.
W-3. On the other hand, the Party II(3), M/s. Cosme
Farma Laboratories Ltd., examined Shri Uday
Deshpande as witness. The Party II(4), M/s. Wallace
Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., examined Shri Eurico
Noronha as witness and produced on record a
copy of certificate issued by ISO 9001:2008 dated
30-10-2012 at Exh. 74 (in cross). The Party II(5),
M/s. Beiesdorf (I) Ltd., examined Shri Praful Patil as
witness and produced on record a copy of extract
of Register No. 39/80 of the firm at Exh. 70 and a
copy of Public Notice dated 27-4-2000 published
on newspaper “Gomantak” at Exh. 71 and the Party
II(6), M/s. Colfax India Pvt. Ltd. examined Ms. Elvina
Menezes as witness and produced on record a copy
of letter dated 23-9-2013 of closure notice of the
factory.
16. Heard arguments. Notes of Written
arguments came to be placed on record by the
parties.
17. I have gone through the records of the case
and have duly considered the arguments advanced.
My answers to the above issues are as follows:
Issue No. 1
…
In the Affirmative
Issue No. 2
…
In the Affirmative
Issue No. 3
…
In the Negative.
Issue No. 3A
…
In the Negative.
Issue No. 3B
…
In the Affirmative.
Issue No. 3C
…
In the Negative.
Issue No. 3D
…
In the Negative.
Issue No. 3E
…
In the Negative.
Issue No. 3F
…
In the Negative.
Issue No. 4
…
As per final order.
Issue No. 5
…
As per final order.
REASONS
Issue No.: 1
18. Discernibly, the Party I has claimed that he
was employed by Party II as a general worker
since 1988 and when he approached Party II on
29-4-1994, he was refused employment with effect
from August 1993. He also stated that Party II
appointed him and asked him to work in various
companies of Party II whenever vacancies existed
in any of the companies of CMM Group and that he
was employed for three months each time and
thereafter was given a break for one month. He
also claimed that as per common seniority list, the
senior most temporary worker was regularized. The
Party II has admitted that they had engaged the
temporary workers to provide to partner companies
and that the Party I was sent to work for M/s CFL
Pharmaceuticals as he was found suitable to work.
The Party II has also claimed that he was issued a
letter of appointment dated 24-6-1993 stating
that the temporary employment would last unto
31-7-1993. The said letter of appointment has not
been produced by the Party II to prove its case of
temporary employment.
19. It is claimed by Party II that the workman
worked from 1-6-1993 to 31-7-1993 as temporary
worker for a total of 79 days during this period
including leave and holidays, however it is not
possible to work for 79 days as claimed by the
company in above 61 days period as per the case
of company. In any case, it gives credence to the
case of Party I that he was employed even prior to
1-6-1993 as claimed by him. The Party I has denied
regarding temporary workers being taken to meet
exigencies and has claimed that all temporaries
were called after the break as per the seniority and
confirmed in permanent vacancy available and that
junior workers were reemployed and regularized
but he was not allowed to work. He also claimed
that from August 1993 he was not given work by
M/s CFL Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and from 1998 to
2001 he was working for Crompton Greaves and
for the first time he worked in M/s CFL
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in the year 1991. The above
fact has not been specifically denied by Party II.
It is therefore clear that he was employed regularly
with breaks by CACS firm.
20. The Witness No. 2 of the Party I, Shri Puti
Gaonkar has claimed that as per Clause 21 of the
Settlement of Exh. W-1, temporaries were entitled
for confirmation whenever vacancies arose and that
the Party II has displayed the list of temporaries
who were to work with Colfax Laboratories on
25-11-1992 and that the workers in the said list
were confirmed in different companies of CMM
Group. He also claimed that the list of workers at
Exh. W-3 was handed over to CMM Group which
indicates that the list of temporaries was taken in
different companies of Party II since 1994 and that
all the temporaries in the said list were junior to
the Party I workman. The workman has also claimed
in his cross examination on 23-2-2017 that from
August, 1993 he was not given work by M/s. CFL
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. which has not been denied
by the Party II.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
781
21. The evidence led by Party II(5), M/s. Beiesdorf
(I) Ltd., through Praful Patil is also discrepant on
the aspect of Party I working with Party II. He has
claimed that he was not involved with the company
prior to 2016 and therefore he cannot say what
services were being taken from Party II(1). The
witness of Party II(4), M/s. Wallace Pharmaceuticals,
Shri Eurico Noronha has also stated that no dues
were paid to the employees of CACS firm at the
time of retirement of Wallace and that all the
partners of CACS were availing services of workers
on the roll of CACS firm and that CACS and Wallace
were at walking distance. The Party II(3), M/s. CFL
Ltd. has examined one Shri Uday Deshpande. His
deposition also does not help the Party II as he
was not involved with the company prior to 2009.
One Elvina Menezes has deposed on behalf of
M/s. Colfax Laboratories who has claimed that she
has not seen the documents mentioned by her in
her affidavit and does not know who the partners
of the Partnership were. The Party I has thus proved
that he was employed with the Party II since 1988
as a general worker. It is therefore, issue No. 1 has
to be answered in the affirmative.
Issue No.: 2
22. Needless to mention, the workman was
employed from 1988 till his date of refusal of
employment till August, 1993. The evidence clearly
shows that the Party I workman was employed
with CACS firm and was at the time of refusal
working with the CFL Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
regularly with breaks by CACS firm from 1988
onwards and therefore it can be safely concluded
that the Party I was in continuous service for one
year within the meaning of Section 25-B of the
Industrial Disputes Act. The breaks given are not
due to any fault on the part of Party I as
contemplated by Section 25-B and therefore the
breaks which were given amounted to cessation
of work and therefore for the purpose of Section
25-B, he would be considered in continuous
employment as rightly pointed out by Ld. Adv. Shri
S. Gaonkar for the Party I. It is thus clear that the
workman has completed one year of continuous
service in terms of Section 25-B(1) and the employer
has not followed the mandate of Section 25-F. The
fact that the Party I was refused employment is
also beyond doubt as the list at Exh. W-3 clearly
shows that the temporaries who joined after 1994
were taken on probation by partner companies and
since the name of the Party I was not reflected in
the said list, it was clear that he was refused
employment. The Party I has thus proved that
Party II illegally and without justification refused
employment to him from August, 1993. It is
therefore, the issue No. 2 is answered in the
affirmative.
Issues No.: 3 and 3(d)
23. Ld. Adv. Shri Singbal for Party II(4) has
submitted that it is the burden of workman to prove
that he was a regular employee preceding
termination and worked continuously for 240 days
and that the evidence is totally missing as letter of
appointment, salary slips have not been produced
nor have witnesses been adduced in this behalf.
He further submitted that there is no employer-
employee relationship and the Party I has not
proved that he was on the roll of CFL
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. or CACS firm at any time and
therefore the scope of reference cannot be widened.
Per contra, Ld. Adv. Shri S. P Gaonkar for the
Party I has submitted that the CACS has taken a
stand that the Party I is not a workman as defined
under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act
and that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide
the reference, nor CACS has led any evidence nor
partner companies have challenged the status of
Party I workman under the Industrial Disputes Act
and therefore, the above issues be answered in the
negative.
24. There is also no dispute that the Party I has
claimed that he has been employed since 1998
with CMM Group and since 1991 with CFL Ltd,
which has gone unrebutted. The Party I has also
explained how he was being given artificial breaks
of one month and again employed for 3 months
which has not been rebutted with contrary
evidence by Party II. The workman has shown that
he was in continuous service for one year in terms
of Section 25-B. There is no requirement in law
that in all cases the workman has to prove that he
has worked for 240 days in order to obtain reliefs.
Needless to mention, the concept of showing
completion of 240 days is mentioned in Section
25-B of the Act, which opens with the words ‘for
the purposes for this Chapter’ (Chapter V-B of the
Act). Section 25-F bars an employer from
retrenching any employee who has been in
continuous service for not less than one year and
to take the benefit of Section 25-F, the workman
must show that he has been in continuous service
for one year or more. The Party I workman
has shown that he was with CMM Group since
1988 and with CFL since 1991. Continuous service
as defined in Section 25-B is in two parts.
sub-clause 1 says that the workman will be said to
be in continuous service for a ‘period’, if for that
period he is in ‘uninterrupted service’ which
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
782
includes breaks due to sickness, authorised leave,
accident or legal strike, which in other words mean
that sub-clause 1 deals with he being in service
and not actual working of one year or more.
25. On the other hand, as rightly submitted by
Ld. Adv. Shri Gaonkar, sub-section 2 starts with
the expression ‘where workman is not in continuous
service within the meaning of Clause 1 for a period
of one year………….” which clearly shows that
sub-clause 2 comes into play only if the case is not
covered under sub-clause 1. Sub-clause 2 is a
deeming fiction by which if the workman is not
covered under sub-clause 1, then he has to only
show that during the last 12 months from
termination, he has actually worked with the
employer for 240 days. Once the workman proves
that he has actually worked with the employer for
240 days, it will be deemed to be continuous service
for one year. Once, he satisfies that he has one year
of continuous service, he automatically gets the
protection of Section 25-F and cannot be removed
unless retrenchment compensation has been paid
to him. The Party I has worked since 1988 with
CMM Group and since 1991 with CFL for more
than 240 days. The present case therefore comes
within sub-clause 1 of Section 25-B and therefore
there is no requirement to show actual working of
240 days as held by the Hon’ble Bombay High
Court in the case of Sarita S. Melwani (Mrs.) vs.
Pallavi V. Talekar & Ors., (2008) 2 CLR 679. The
Party II has thus failed to prove that the Party I is
not a workman or that the Tribunal has no
jurisdiction to decide the reference and/or that
there is no employer-employee relationship
between them and Party I. It is therefore, issue
No. 3 and 3-D have to be answered in the negative.
Issue No.: 3(A)
26. Discernibly, the Party II have not led any
evidence with respect to above issue whether the
reference is null and void and liable to be rejected
and therefore, the above issue is answered in the
negative.
Issue No.: 3(B)
27. Ld. Adv. Shri P. Chawdikar for the Party II(3)
has submitted that the Party I has not adduced
any evidence to prove that the dispute raised by
Party I is an industrial dispute and in the absence
of the materials, the claim put forth by the Party I
deserves no consideration and therefore, the above
issue be answered in the negative. However, as
rightly submitted by Learned Advocate Shri S. P
Gaonkar for Party I, the technical points raised
by the Party II are not tenable in view of
Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act which
makes all disputes in relation to termination of
service, a deemed industrial dispute as Section 2-A
clearly provides that whenever the employer
terminates the services of an individual workman,
it is deemed to be an industrial dispute. Hence,
the above issue is answered in the affirmative.
Issue No.: 3(C)
28. Needless to mention, the Party II(3) has not
shown by way of evidence that the Party I has not
given any justification for the demands/claim
raised by him. The above issue therefore is
answered in the negative.
Issue No.: 3(E)
29. Ld. Adv. Shri G. K. Sardessai for Party II(5) has
submitted that on the dissolution of the company
CACS Pvt. Ltd. and on appointment of the
Liquidator, the reference does not survive and any
claim of the workman lies before the Official
Liquidator appointed pursuant to the order of
Hon’ble High Court dated 22-6-2007. He further
submitted that in terms of the case of Silcal
Workers’ Union(CITU), Palakkad vs. Silcal
Mettalurgic Limited and anr., 2014 (1) LLN 493
(Mad.), and the order of the Tribunal in the case of
Uttam Jagtap and 121 ors. vs. Director, Amiantit
Fibreglass Pvt. Ltd. wherein it has been held that
the Tribunal will have no jurisdiction to entertain
or dispose the proceedings in respect of termination
of the employee as the said exercise of the
jurisdiction of the claim of the workman has to be
carried out by the Official Liquidator appointed by
the Hon’ble High Court.
30. Ld. Adv. Shri Sardessai has further submitted
that the Party II(5) in view of notice dated 29-2-2000
and a Deed of Retirement dated 18-4-2000 stood
legally and lawfully retired as the partner of CACS
Pvt. Ltd. and consequent upon the retirement, the
Party II(5) has been absolved of all the liabilities
and responsibilities of erstwhile partnership. The
services of the workman was allegedly terminated
w.e.f. August, 1993 and as the Party II has retired
from the partnership from 18-4-2000, the retiring
partners shall not be liable for demands of the
employees and workers by virtue of earlier
settlement or otherwise and the circumstances
under which the alleged termination of the
workman is effected is not known to the Party II(5).
The Party II was also not a signatory to the
purported Minutes of understanding dated
30-4-1996 and therefore any such minutes allegedly
signed cannot be enforced on Party II in view of
retirement of Party II(5) from earlier partnership.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
783
31. Ld. Adv. Shri S. P. Gaonkar for the Party I has
submitted and rightly so that the opposite parties
have been contending that they have retired from
the partnership and also that all liabilities are upon
CACS Pvt. Ltd. which had taken over the
partnership firm as being the last partner before
dissolution and that it has been contended that
since winding up is pending against CACS Pvt.
Ltd., before Official Liquidator, no award can be
passed. He further claimed that when a particular
Party contends that either they have retired from
the partnership or that new partners have been
added or even further that the firm itself has been
dissolved, it is mandatory that the retirement,
dissolution and addition must be proved by leading
evidence of the procedure contemplated for these
things under the Partnership Act, 1932.
32. Admittedly, the Deed of Retirement is not on
record. Public Notices and notice in Official Gazette
which is mandatory for retirement, addition and
dissolution as per Section 72 of the Partnership
Act, 1932 have also not been produced. It is
therefore for all legal purposes, the partnership
firm continues to be in existence and all partners
are liable notwithstanding their retirement. The
law in this regard has been settled. In Anil Kumar
Singh vs. Smt. Kanak Prabha Dutta & Ors. Etc.,
2003 ALL LJ 2015 the Hon’ble Allahabad High
Court has held that in absence of evidence of
retirement in the prescribed manner under the Act,
the partners continue in the partnership. Further,
there is no obligation upon the Party I workman to
challenge the retirement, dissolution or addition.
In State of Kerala and Ors. vs. Saroja and Ors.,
AIR 1987 Ker 239, it has been held that when a
partner pleads exemption from liability under
Partnership Act, he has to prove the retirement,
dissolution, addition, etc. even if the other side
does not dispute the same.
33. Moreover, there is no effect of winding up
of the CACS Pvt. Ltd. as firstly, it is no longer a
Party in the present proceedings. Secondly, in the
case of B.V. John and Ors. vs. Coir Yarn & Textiles
Ltd, AIR 1960 Ker 247, the Hon’ble Kerala High
Court has taken a view that the winding up of a
company does not affect a reference under the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Moreover, since the
claim is against the M/s CACS which is a
partnership firm and not against any particular
company under the Companies Act, the Official
Liquidator appointed by the Hon’ble High Court is
not a necessary Party to the present reference and
therefore, the submissions of learned Advocates
for Party II as stated above and the reliance placed
on the above citations pales into insignificance.
Hence, the above issue is answered accordingly.
Issue No.: 3(F)
34. Ld. Adv. Shri G. K. Sardessai, Ld. Adv. Shri P.
Chawdikar and Ld. Adv. Shri Singbal for the
Party II have submitted that in view of order dated
3-2-2005 of the Court, the successor-in-interest is
CACS Pvt. Ltd. after dissolution and therefore the
said company is a necessary and proper party,
however the workman had allowed deletion of
the said party and therefore the prayer for
re-instatement is infructuous. They further
submitted that as per Clause 29 and 30 of the Deed
of Dissolution dated 1-8-2000, they are not liable
for any dispute raised by Party I. The Partnership
firm of CACS with surviving partner Mr. Carlos
Menezes was dissolved by Deed of Dissolution
dated 1-8-2000 and accordingly CACS Pvt. Ltd. took
over all the assets and liabilities. The Party I was
a temporary worker and his services came to an
end by efflux of time and therefore there is no
question of termination or refusal of services.
35. Ld. Adv. Shri S. P. Gaonkar for the Party I has
submitted and rightly so that the so called Deed of
Dissolution has not been brought on record by any
of the parties. Moreover, the Deed of Retirement
has no effect on the past liability of the partners in
view of Section 32 of the Partnership Act. Moreover,
since the above partners have retired w.e.f.
18-4-2000, they cannot take the benefit of
subsequent Deed of 1-8-2000. There is however no
agreement between the retiring partners, workman
and the remaining partners with respect to
extinction of the liability of the said partners. It is
therefore the Party II(1) and its partner companies
continue to be liable towards the claim of the
Party I.
36. The next question is whether the partner
companies are personally liable for the acts done
by partnership firm. In the case of Ashutosh vs.
State of Rajasthan and Ors., (2005) 7 SCC 308, it
has been clearly held by the Hon’ble Apex Court
that every partner is personally liable for the acts
done by the partnership firm. There is no dispute
that when the Party I was appointed and refused
services in the company, all the above partner
companies of the Party II were in existence and
therefore it is not open for the Party II to submit
that the claim of the workman is limited to the
assets and liabilities of the firm which has now
been taken over by the CACS Pvt. Ltd. The Apex
Court in the case of Income Tax Officer (III) and
Anr. vs. Arunagiri Chettiar, (1996) 9 SCC 33, has
observed that the Section 25 of the Partnership
Act does not make a distinction between a
continuing partner or erstwhile partner. Its
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
784
principle is clear and specific namely that every
partner is liable for all the acts of the firm done as
he is a partner jointly along with other partners
and also severally. Therefore, it cannot be held
that the said liability ceases merely because a
partner has ceased to be partner subsequent to
said period.
37. It is therefore the partner companies are
jointly and severally liable for the acts done by the
partnership firm. There also cannot be any dispute
that under Section 25 of Partnership Act, any award
passed against the firm M/s. CACS will bind all the
partners as the liability is joint and several
including the partners who have since retired. The
erstwhile partners are also liable in addition to the
position carved out in Section 32 of the Act where
the retiring partners remain liable to third parties
unless an agreement is entered into. It is also
alleged that all the partners have not been brought
on record, however, the said fact is not a defect
which makes a reference non maintainable. The
reference is in the name of partnership and the
CACS is the partnership firm and all the partners
are subsequently added.
38. It is well settled in the case of Gambhir Mal
Pandiya (since deceased) and Ors. vs. J. K. Jute
Mills Co. Ltd., Kanpur and Anr., AIR 1963 SC
243, wherein it is clearly held that the rigours of
CPC does not apply to the Industrial adjudication
and Section 18 makes it clear that the award is
binding on the heirs/assigns of the employer even
if he is not personally added as party and therefore
the objection that the other partners have not been
added is not tenable under Industrial law.
Moreover, the reconstitution of the partnership firm
has never been shown nor any light has been shed
on it. It is also well settled that when the
reconstitution of the firm is not bonafide and is in
order to defeat liabilities of workers, the Tribunal
has jurisdiction to ignore the same as explained by
the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Saini and
Company vs. Gujarat Engineering and General
Kamgar Union, 2013 SCC online Guj 804 as well
as in the case of M/s. Hinduja Casuals vs. A.
Vitthal Rao and Ors., (1990) 4 Kant LJ 244 and
therefore the above submission of Ld. Adv for Party
II cannot be accepted having any merits. Hence,
the above issue is answered in the negative.
Issue Nos.: 4 & 5:
39. Ld. Adv. Shri S. P. Gaonkar for the Party I has
submitted that the factors to be considered for
relief of reinstatement with full back wages and in
the alternative for lumpsum compensation are that
(i) The workman is currently 48 years of age and
has quite many years of service left in him; (ii) the
refusal of employment was without following
Section 25-F or even Section 25-G as juniors were
absorbed by the Employer; (iii) the litigation has
taken almost 18 years; (iv) workman has made a
statement in his chief that he is unemployed from
the date of refusal. Also, he has explained that
during the pendency what work he was able to
get and the duration for which he has worked; (v)
his juniors were absorbed by the partner
companies; (vi) he missed out on the benefits of
the Minutes of Understanding 30-4-1996 because
his services were illegally terminated and therefore
he prayed that the workman be granted
reinstatement with full back wages and continuity
of service. Per contra, Ld. Advocates for Party II
companies have submitted that the Party I has
failed to prove any case in his favour. They further
submitted the Apex Court in the case of The
Management of Regional Chief..…vs. Their
workmen Rep. by District…… in Civil Appeal No.
9832 of 2018 passed on 20-9-2018 has held that
back wages could not be awarded as a matter of
right to the workmen consequent upon setting
aside of the dismissal/termination order or direct
his reinstatement as it is necessary for the workman
to plead and prove with the aid of evidence that
after the dismissal from service, he was not
gainfully employed anywhere and had no earnings
to maintain himself and his family and the employer
is also entitled to prove it otherwise and therefore
the workman is not entitled for any reliefs.
40. In the case of Deepali Gundu Surwase vs.
Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidhyalaya (D.ED)
& Ors., 2014 II CLR 813, the Division Bench of
Hon’ble Bombay High Court has held that if the
order of termination is void ab initio, the workman
is entitled to re-instatement with full back-wages.
The relevant Para 22 of the decision is extracted
hereunder:-
“22. The very idea of restoring an employee to
the position which he held before dismissal or
removal or termination of service implies that
the employee will be put in the same position
in which he would have been but for the illegal
action taken by the employer. The injury
suffered by a person, who is dismissed or
removed or is otherwise terminated from service
cannot easily be measured in terms of money.
With the passing of an order which has the
effect of severing the employer employee
relationship, the latter’s source of income gets
dried up. Not only the concerned employee,
but his entire family suffers grave adversities.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
785
They are deprived of the source of sustenance.
The children are deprived of nutritious food
and all opportunities of education and
advancement in life. At times, the family has to
borrow from the relatives and other
acquaintance to avoid starvation. These
sufferings continue till the competent
adjudicatory forum decides on the legality of
the action taken by the employer. The re-
instatement of such an employee, which is
preceded by a finding of the competent
judicial/quasi-judicial body or Court that the
action taken by the employer is ultra vires the
relevant statutory provisions or the principles
of natural justice, entitles the employee to claim
full back-wages. If the employer wants to deny
back-wages to the employee or contest his
entitlement to get consequential benefits, then
it is for him/her to specifically plead and prove
that during the intervening period the
employee was gainfully employed and was
getting the same emoluments. Denial of back-
wages to an employee, who has suffered due
to an illegal act of the employer, would amount
to indirectly punishing the concerned employee
and rewarding the employer by relieving him
of the obligation to pay back-wages including
the emoluments.”
41. The question therefore is what reliefs the
Party I/workman is entitled to, once it is held that
the refusal/termination is illegal, whether he is
entitled for re-instatement with full back wages
and continuity in service with consequential
benefits attached to the post or adequate monetary
compensation in lieu of reinstatement and back
wages.
42. Needless to mention, ordinarily a workman
whose service has been illegally terminated/refused
would be entitled to full back wages except to the
extent he was gainfully employed during the
enforced idealness. The Court may substitute
re-instatement by compensation on justifiable
ground viz. where the industry is closed or where
the employee has superannuated or going to retire
shortly and no period of service is left to his
credit or where workman has been rendered
incapacitated to discharge the duties and is not fit
to be reinstated or when he has lost confidence of
the management to discharge duties. The case of
Party II does not fall in any of the categories
mentioned above so as to justify compensation to
the Party I in lieu of reinstatement. The Party I is
48 years of age as of now and hence, he has
substantial years of service left in him.
43. The Party I has proved that the refusal of his
services is illegal and without following the
principles of natural justice. The employer has
refused the services of Party I w.e.f. August, 1993.
The workman has pleaded as well as deposed that
he is unemployed which is the only requirement
for claiming relief of reinstatement with back
wages as it is well settled that when the action of
the employer is in gross violation of principles of
natural justice, the Tribunal would be fully justified
in granting full back wages. There are no pleading
or evidence on behalf of the employer that the
workman was gainfully employed after the refusal
of service. It is also well settled that in cases
of wrongful termination/refusal of service,
reinstatement with continuity of service and back
wages is a normal rule. The Party II companies
have not followed the mandate of Section 25-F of
the Act and therefore refusal of employment to
Party I from August 1993 is illegal and void and
therefore, Party II (1) and its partner companies are
jointly and severally liable for the reliefs claimed.
44. The company is still functioning and is
carrying on business at Ponda including partner,
Beiesdorf. The partners can decide where to
accommodate the Party I workman. The other co-
employees working with the workman were
regularized in due course as per the settlement
whereas the Party I workman was refused
employment. The Party I would have received
benefits of the Memorandum of Understanding had
his services not been refused illegally. The last
drawn salary can be easily deduced from the
Settlement dated 21-3-1992 at Exh. W-1 which was
in force during the refusal of employment and was
signed by all the partner companies. A general
worker would be in Grade IV under the settlement
and since the practice was to take temporaries on
probation after absorption, the case would be
covered under Clause 19 of the settlement, which
speaks about the entry point in service. The Party
II has not produced any documents to show that it
is running in loss, closed down or is in severe
financial doldrums or that the Party I has been
employed or secured better permanent employment
elsewhere. The Party I having proved that the
employer terminated/refused his services illegally
and that the refusal is motivated and found to be
invalid and that the employer has taken away his
right to work, contrary to the relevant law and has
deprived him of the earnings, the Party I is entitled
for the reliefs claimed.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
786
45. In the result, I pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The reference stands allowed.
(ii) It is hereby held that the action of the
management of Party II(1) M/s. CMM Group
of Companies, Curti, Ponda, Goa and its
partner companies in the reference in
refusing employment to the workman, Shri
Navnath Gaonkar with effect from August,
1993 is illegal and unjustified.
(iii) The Party II(1) and its partner companies in
the reference are jointly and severally
directed to reinstate the services of the
Party I, Shri Navnath Gaonkar, with full
back wages, continuity in services and
consequential
benefits attached to the
post.
(iv) The Party II(1) and its partner companies in
the reference are jointly and severally
directed to deposit back wages before the
Tribunal as stated above within 60 days of
the publication of the Award, failing which
the Party II shall pay an interest @ 9% per
annum.
(v) Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Vincent D’Silva)
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal and
Labour Court.
———uuu———
Department of Law & Judiciary
Law (Establishment) Division
__
Order
No. 2/65/2016-LD(Estt)/1721
The Government of Goa is pleased to order the
posting to the following Civil Registrar-cum-Sub-
-Registrars, on promotion, Group ‘B’, Gazetted
Officers of Registration Department, Panaji, with
immediate effect:-
Sr.
Name of the staff
To be posted as
No.
1.
Shri Manuel
Jt. Civil Registrars-cum-
Vales
-Sub-Registrar, Salcete-II.
2.
Smt. Dalila P.
Jt. Civil Registrars-cum-
Rodrigues
-Sub-Registrar, District
Registrar, South.
The above Officers shall draw their pay and
allowances against their respective posts from the
date of acceptance/joining to the post of Civil
Registrars-cum-Sub-Registrar. They shall complete
the process of handing over/taking over of charge
with immediate effect and submit compliance.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amir Y. Parab, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).
Porvorim, 26th October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Mines
Directorate of Mines & Geology
__
Order
No. 01/112/2016/PER/ADM/MINES/PART/1438
Government is pleased to accept the technical
resignation tendered vide letter dated 05-10-2020
by Shri Mahesh Mayekar, Assistant Geologist of
Directorate of Mines & Geology, Panaji-Goa with
immediate effect in order to join the post of
Assistant Professor, Earth Science in the School of
Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences at Goa
University, Taleigao Plateau, Goa.
Government has also accorded approval to the
request of Shri Mahesh Mayekar to maintain lien
for the post of Assistant Geologist of Directorate of
Mines & Geology, Panaji-Goa for a period of two
years as per the provision under F.R. 13.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Vivek H.P., IAS, Director/Head of Department
(Mines & Geology).
Panaji, 29th October, 2020.
________
Order
No. 96/199/87/IIR-Mines/1458
Read: 1. Government Order No. DMG/MMDR/
/37VIO/02/2014/3342 dated 05-01-2018
published in the Official Gazette No. 41,
Series II dated 11th January, 2018.
2. Government Order No. 96/199/87/IIR-
-Mines/8477 dated 28-03-2019 published
in Official Gazette No. 1, Series II dated
4th April, 2019.
3. Government Order No. 96/199/87/IIR-
-Mines/11003 dated 02-01-2020 published
in Official Gazette No. 1, Series II dated
9th January, 2020.
In supersession of the Orders read at preamble,
in exercise of the powers conferred by Rules 17
& 18 of the Rules of Business of the Government of
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
787
Goa, and sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the Mines
and Minerals (Development and Regulation)
Act,1957; the Director of Mines & Geology,
Government of Goa, is hereby delegated the powers
of the State Government to hear and dispose of the
matters in terms of Rules 37 & 38 of the Mineral
Concession Rules, 1960, as existed, with immediate
effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Parimal Rai, IAS, Chief Secretary/Principal
Secretary (Mines).
Panaji, 30th October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Official Language and Public
Grievances
Directorate of Official Language
__
Order
No. 8/44/2015/DOL/Sch-Pub/Part/342
The Government is pleased to reconstitute the
Evaluation Committee under “Scheme for
publication in Official Language 2008”, consisting
of the following members:
1. Dr. Bhushan Bhave
—
Chairman.
(Head of Department,
Konkani, PES College,
Farmagudi, Ponda)
2. Dr. Prakash Parienkar
—
Member.
(Associate Professor,
Department of Konkani,
Goa University)
3. Dr. Sunita Umraskar
—
Member.
(Associate Professor,
Department of Marathi,
Goa University)
4. Shri Sushant
—
Member.
Mandrekar(Publisher)
5. Director of Official
—
Member
Language
Secretary.
The terms of reference to the Evaluation
Committee shall be as under:
i) To set the criteria for evaluation and
evaluate the manuscripts.
ii) To recommend the manuscripts for
publication.
iii) To decide on the appointment of subject-
expert, if necessary.
iv) Any other matter related to scheme.
The tenure of the committee shall be for the
period of three years from the date of publication
of this order in Official Gazette.
The non-official members of the committee shall
be entitled for seating honorarium admissible as
per the Government orders in force.
This issues with the approval of the Government
vide U.O. No. 6127/F dated 14-10-2020.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sagun Velip, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary
(Official Language).
Panaji, 26th October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Panchayati Raj and
Community Development
__
Order
No. 1/09/DP/Apt.GSEC/2016/7030
The Governor of Goa hereby accepts the
resignation tendered by Shri R. K. Srivastava, IAS
(Retd.) from the post of the Commissioner of the
Goa State Election Commission with effect from
the 30th day of October, 2020.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Narayan Gad, Director & ex officio Jt. Secretary
(Panchayats).
Panaji, 3rd November, 2020.
________
Order
No. 1/09/DP/Apt./GSEC/2016/7031
In pursuance of Clause (1) of Article 243-K of the
Constitution of India read with sub-section (1) of
Section 237 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994
(Goa Act 14 of 1994), the Governor of Goa hereby
appoints Shri Chokha Ram Garg (IAS), Secretary
(Law) as the Commissioner of the Goa State Election
Commission, in addition to his own duties, till
further orders.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Narayan Gad, Director & ex officio Jt. Secretary
(Panchayats).
Panaji, 3rd November, 2020.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
788
Department of Personnel
—
Order
No. 6/13/2017-PER/4077
On the recommendation of the Goa Services
Board, the Governor of Goa is pleased to order the
transfer and posting of the following officers of
Goa Civil Service, in public interest, with
immediate effect:-
Sr.
Name and present
Posted as
No.
posting of the Officer
1. Shri Dashrath M. Redkar,
Director, Environ-
Director, Settlement and
ment.
Land Records
2. Shri Johnson B.
Director, Settle-
Fernandes, Director,
ment and Land
Environment
Records.
3. Shri Santosh Kundaikar,
Secretary, Goa
Director, State Lotteries
Rehabilitation
Board.
4. Smt. Sushma Kamat,
Director, State
Secretary, Goa Reha-
Lotteries.
bilitation Board
5. Shri Arvind Khutkar,
Registrar of Co-op-
Additional Collector-III,
erative Societies.
South, Ponda
6. Ms. Biju R. Naik, Registrar
Joint Secretary,
of Co-operative Societies
General Adminis-
tration Depart-
ment.
7. Shri Gourish Kuttikar,
Additional Collec-
Joint Secretary,
tor-III, South
General Administration
Ponda
Department
Shri Sanjiv Gadkar, Administrator of Sanjivani
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., shall also hold additional
charge of Special Land Acquisition Officer, Mopa
Airport.
Smt. Meena Naik Goltekar, Project Director, DRDA
South, shall hold additional charge of M.D., Goa
State SC, OBC Finance Development Corporation
and Member Secretary, Goa State Commission for
Backward Classes.
Shri Santosh Kundaikar, shall draw the salary
from Leave and Training Reserve, until further
orders.
The Officers shall complete handing over and
taking over process with immediate effect and
submit compliance.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 30th October, 2020.
________
Order
No. 7/28/2017-PER/4078
Read: Order F. No. 14020/01/2020.UTS-I dated
29-09-2020.
The Governor of Goa is pleased to relieve Smt.
Isha Khosla, IAS (AGMUT:2011), Resident
Commissioner, Goa Sadan, New Delhi from the State
Administration with effect from 13-11-2020 (a.n.) to
join the new posting at Delhi.
Deputy Resident Commissioner, Goa Sadan,
New Delhi shall hold the charge of Resident
Commissioner, Goa Sadan in addition to his own
duties.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 30th October, 2020.
________
Order
No. 13/16/2015-PER(A)/4085
Read: 1) Order No. 13/16/2015-PER (A)/2989 dated
19-11-2018.
2) Order No. 13/16/2015-PER (A)/3219 dated
21-11-2019.
3) Order No. 13/16/2015-PER (A)/3219 dated
14-01-2020.
The Governor of Goa is pleased to extend the
contractual appointment of Shri P. Mathew Samuel,
(IAS) (Retd.), Director General, Goa Institute of
Public Administration and Rural Development
(GIPARD) for a further period of two months w.e.f.
01-11-2020 to 31-12-2020.
The extension is also subject to termination
without assigning any reasons at any time during
the period of extension.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Maya Pednekar, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 30th October, 2020.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
789
Department of Public Health
__
Order
No. 25/12/2019-I/PHD/3423
On the recommendation of the Screening Committee, the Officers of Directorate of Health Services
indicated in the enclosed Annexure who have completed the requisite years of regular service of 07 years
in Grade Pay of Rs. 8,700 in PB-4 including the service rendered in the pre-revised scale of Rs. 14,800-
-18,800 or 20 years of regular service are granted 4th financial upgradation under the Dynamic Assured
Career Progression (DACP) Scheme with effect from the date indicated against his/her name in column
No. 6 in terms of Order No. 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 16-07-2009 and 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 17-07-2009.
The Officers may exercise an option in terms of F.R. 22 (I) (a) (1) if he/she so desires within one month
from the date of issue of his/her Order for fixing pay in the 4th financial upgradation under Dynamic
Assured Career Progression Scheme.
Each Officer shall give an undertaking that in case any excess payment that may be found to have
been made as a result of incorrect fixation of pay or any excess payment detected in the light of
discrepancies noticed subsequently will be refunded by them to the Government either by adjustment
against future payments due to them or otherwise.
The expenditure on his/her pay and allowances shall be debited to the budget head under which their
salary is drawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
______
ANNEXURE
4th Financial Upgradation under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme
(For Doctors appointed in Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- in Pay Band-3 under Directorate of Health Services)
Sr.
Name & Designation
Date of
Present
Grade Pay to be
Date of
No.
joining
Grade Pay
made applicable
effect
under DACP
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Dr. Manish Narayan
09-05-1996
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
09-05-2016.
Gaunekar, Health Officer
2. Dr. Rashmi Kamat alias
13-05-1996
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
13-05-2016.
Khandeparkar,
Health Officer
3. Dr. Vallabh Ganpat
20-11-1996
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
20-11-2016.
Nadkarni, Health
Officer
4. Dr. Vidhya Anand
25-11-1996
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
25-11-2016.
Naik alias Parab,
Health Officer
5. Dr. Roshan Andrew
19-03-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
19-03-2017.
Nazareth, Health
Officer
6. Dr. Sunita Vasant Redkar 20-11-1996
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
20-11-2016.
alias Sunita Sunil Arlekar,
Medical Officer
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
790
1
2
3
4
5
6
7. Dr. Paresh P. Prabhu
09-06-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
09-06-2017.
Lawande, Medical
Officer
8. Dr. Damodar J. Raiker,
31-07-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
31-07-2017.
Medical Officer
9. Dr. Lalitha Umraskar,
16-10-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
16-10-2017.
Medical Officer
10. Dr. Samita Bhiva Gauns,
29-10-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
29-10-2017.
Medical Officer
11. Dr. Sabrina Felomena
16-10-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
16-10-2017.
Falcao (Voluntary
Retirement), Ex-Medical
Officer
12. Dr. Socorro Quadros,
15-10-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
15-10-2017.
Medical Officer
13. Dr. Damodar P. Sinai
20-10-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
20-10-2017.
Narvencar, Medical
Officer
14. Dr. Dinesh Krishna
20-10-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
20-10-2017.
Parab, Medical Officer
15. Dr. Smita Uttam
26-11-1997
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
26-11-2017.
Parsekar, Medical Officer
16. Dr. Megha M. Dalvi
16-03-1998
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
16-03-2018.
alias Megha Datta
Kudchadkar, Medical
Officer
17. Dr. Maria J. C. Mascarenhas, 05-03-1998
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
05-03-2018.
Medical Officer
18. Dr. Manguirish G. Audi,
18-06-1998
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
18-06-2018.
Medical Officer
19. Dr. Deelip Kuncolienkar
19-03-1999
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
19-03-2019.
alias Dilip A. Cuncolikar,
Medical Officer
20. Dr. Benedita Dias,
24-05-1999
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
24-05-2019.
Medical Officer
21. Dr. Wilson J. Fernandes,
10-05-1999
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
10-05-2019.
Medical Officer
22. Dr. Idinha D’Costa alias
24-06-1999
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
24-06-2019.
Sidhi Kansar, Medical
Officer
23. Dr. B. P. N. Mallika,
12-01-1995
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
12-01-2015.
Junior Gynaecologist
24. Dr. Vanita D. Talaulikar,
01-04-1999
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
01-04-2019.
Senior Radiologist
25. Dr. Lizette F. C. De Souza, 28-01-1999
G.P. – Rs. 8,700 in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
28-01-2019.
Public Health Dentist
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
791
Order
No. 25/18/2019-I/PHD/3425
On the recommendation of the Screening Committee, the Officers of Directorate of Health Services
indicated in the enclosed Annexure who have completed the requisite years of regular service of 04 years
in Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400 in PB-3 including the service rendered in the pre-revised scale of Rs. 8000-13,500
are granted 1st financial upgradation under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP) Scheme
with effect from the date indicated against his/her name in column No. 6 in terms of Order No. 25/1/
2003-I/PHD dated 16-07-2009 and 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 17-07-2009.
The Officers may exercise an option in terms of F.R. 22 (I) (a) (1) if he/she so desires within one month
from the date of issue of his/her Order for fixing pay in the 1st financial upgradation under Dynamic
Assured Career Progression Scheme.
Each Officer shall give an undertaking that in case any excess payment that may be found to have
been made as a result of incorrect fixation of pay or any excess payment detected in the light of
discrepancies noticed subsequently will be refunded by them to the Government either by adjustment
against future payments due to them or otherwise.
The expenditure on his/her pay and allowances shall be debited to the budget head under which their
salary is drawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
______
ANNEXURE
1st Financial Upgradation under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme
(For Doctors appointed in Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- in Pay Band-3 under Directorate of Health Services)
Sr.
Name & Designation
Date of
Present
Grade Pay to be
Date of
No.
joining
Grade Pay
made applicable
effect
under DACP
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Dr. Shubhada S.
01-07-2009
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-07-2013.
Mandrekar, Medical
Officer
2. Dr. Mrudul Meenanath 01-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Naik, Medical Officer
3. Dr. Navjyot Aldonkar,
16-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
16-04-2020.
Medical Officer
4. Dr. Sumentha Dsouza,
05-05-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
05-05-2020.
Medical Officer
5. Dr. Aarti Vasantrao
05-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
05-04-2020.
Divkar, Medical
Officer
6. Dr. Gaurish Tulsidas
18-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
18-04-2020.
Ganjekar, Medical
Officer
7. Dr. Navin Nanu Shirodkar, 01-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Medical Officer
8. Dr. Ankita Sukhanand
01-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Mashelkar, Medical
Officer
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
792
1
2
3
4
5
6
9. Dr. Afreen Motiwala,
02-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
02-04-2020.
Medical Officer
10. Dr. Shradha Uday
24-06-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
24-06-2020.
Chodankar, Medical
Officer
11. Dr. Querida Junella
07-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
07-04-2020.
Fernandes, Medical
Officer
12. Dr. Amey Tanaji Raikar, 01-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Medical Officer
13. Dr. Varsha Vithal
02-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
02-04-2020.
Kerkar, Medical
Officer
14. Dr. Joyce Meera Barreto,
15-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
15-04-2020.
Medical Officer
15. Dr. Arya Anand Shirodkar,
01-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Medical Officer
16. Dr. Pundalik Vasant
06-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
06-04-2020.
Gawandi, Medical
Officer
17. Dr. Sonali Ulhas Gosavi, 02-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
02-04-2020.
Medical Officer
18. Dr. Sneha Mayur Naik,
01-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Medical Officer
19. Dr. Amresh Nishikant
01-06-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-06-2020.
Naik, Medical Officer
20. Dr. Pranita Yadnesh
01-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Satardekar, Medical
Officer
21. Dr. Priteeja Rajaram
02-04-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
02-04-2020.
Parab, Medical Officer
22. Dr. Pooja Y. Prabhu
30-06-2012
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
30-06-2016.
alias Mahambrey,
Junior Anaesthetist
23. Dr. Shweta Jambhale,
15-12-2012
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
15-12-2016.
Junior Anaesthetist
24. Dr. Ameeta Viraj
05-01-2013
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
05-01-2017.
Namshikar, Junior
Anaesthetist
25. Dr. Divya Monteiro Pai,
01-06-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-06-2020.
Junior Anaesthetist
26. Dr. Anuradha Ghanekar, 05-01-2013
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
05-01-2017.
Junior Paediatrician
27. Dr. Anusha Kerkar
27-01-2014
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
27-01-2018.
alias Kholkar,
Junior Paediatrician
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
793
1
2
3
4
5
6
28. Dr. Vinda Vidhyadhar
28-03-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
28-03-2020.
Arlekar, Junior
Paediatrician
29. Dr. Anthony Judas
01-10-2012
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-10-2016.
Lawrence Gomes,
Junior Gynaecologist
30. Dr. Beena Paresh Desai, 26-12-2012
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
26-12-2016.
Junior Gynaecologist
31. Dr. Madhumita Tripaty, 24-12-2012
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
24-12-2016.
Junior Gynaecologist
32. Dr. Vinda Gaurav Pai
14-12-2012
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
14-12-2016.
Dukle, Junior
Gynaecologist
33. Dr. Nelishka Evelyn
30-07-2013
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
30-07-2017.
Marina Gomes,
Junior Pathologist
34. Dr. Pallavi Anup
12-12-2011
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
12-12-2015.
Kolvalkar, Junior
Radiologist
35. Dr. Shravani Govind
01-03-2013
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-03-2017.
Desai, Junior
Radiologist
36. Dr. Sudin Madhukar
12-07-2014
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
12-07-2018.
Naik, Public Health
Dentist
37. Dr. Ruby Ramnath Naik, 04-03-2014
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
04-03-2018.
Public Health Dentist
38. Dr. Ketaki D. Chodankar, 05-03-2014
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
05-03-2018.
Public Health Dentist
39. Dr. Purnima Shankar
05-03-2014
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
05-03-2018.
Shirodkar, Public
Health Dentist
40. Dr. Harish Damodar
06-03-2014
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
06-03-2018.
Sawant, Public
Health Dentist
41. Dr. Amar Vijay Govekar, 10-03-2014
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
10-03-2018.
Public Health Dentist
42. Dr. Sylvia Colaco,
05-03-2014
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
05-03-2018.
Public Health Dentist
43. Dr. Shishir S. Kamat,
30-05-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
30-05-2020.
Public Health
Dentist
44. Dr. Damodar alias
13-03-2013
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
13-03-2017.
Swapnil Subhash
Arsekar, Junior Physician
45. Dr. Anita N. Moraskar
30-05-2012
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
30-05-2016.
alias Anita Amit Naik,
Junior ENT Surgeon
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
794
46. Dr. Nicola Barreto,
01-02-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-02-2020.
Junior ENT Surgeon
47. Dr. Swayamsidha
01-07-2016
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-07-2020.
Hiraji Andhale,
Junior ENT Surgeon
48. Dr. Tribeni Pegu Sheth, 11-06-2012
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
11-06-2016.
Senior Ophthalmic
Surgeon
49. Dr. Sweta S. Gandhi,
11-07-2013
G.P. – Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
11-07-2017.
Homeopathic
Physician
________
Order
No. 25/13/2019-I/PHD/3429
On the recommendation of the Screening Committee, the Officers of Directorate of Health Services
indicated in the enclosed Annexure who have completed the requisite years of regular service of 04 years
in Grade Pay of Rs. 7,600 in PB-3 including the service rendered in the pre-revised scale of Rs. 12,000-
-16,500 are granted 3rd financial upgradation under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP)
Scheme with effect from the date indicated against his/her name in column No. 6 in terms of Order No.
25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 16-07-2009 and 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 17-07-2009.
The Officers may exercise an option in terms of F.R. 22 (I) (a) (1) if he/she so desires within one month
from the date of issue of his/her Order for fixing pay in the 3rd financial upgradation under Dynamic
Assured Career Progression Scheme.
Each Officer shall give an undertaking that in case any excess payment that may be found to have
been made as a result of incorrect fixation of pay or any excess payment detected in the light of
discrepancies noticed subsequently will be refunded by them to the Government either by adjustment
against future payments due to them or otherwise.
The expenditure on his/her pay and allowances shall be debited to the budget head under which their
salary is drawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
______
ANNEXURE
3rd Financial Upgradation under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme
(For Doctors appointed in Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- in Pay Band-3 under Directorate of Health Services)
Sr.
Name & Designation
Date of
Present
Grade Pay to be
Date of
No.
joining
Grade Pay
made applicable
effect
under DACP
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Dr. Siddhi S. Kansar
24-06-1999
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
01-04-2018.
alias Idniha E. D’Costa,
Medical Officer
1
2
3
4
5
6
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
795
1
2
3
4
5
6
2. Dr. Gayatri Kulkarni,
26-11-2011
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
01-04-2018.
Medical Officer
3. Dr. Surekha Rao
05-11-2001
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
01-06-2018.
Damaskar, Medical
Officer
4. Dr. Sherryl Egipsy,
17-02-2005
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
01-04-2018.
Medical Officer
5. Dr. Sameer Ravindra
15-05-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
15-05-2019.
Naik, Medical Officer
6. Dr. Babu V. Kerkar,
15-05-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
15-05-2019.
Medical Officer
7. Dr. Shubhra S. Bhonsle, 02-08-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
02-08-2019.
Medical Officer
8. Dr. Rupesh M.
16-08-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
16-08-2019.
Kunkalekar, Medical
Officer
9. Dr. Jude Ericson Victor 15-11-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
15-11-2019.
D’Souza, Medical
Officer in-charge
10. Dr. Viraj V. Parab,
14-12-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
14-12-2019.
Medical Officer
11. Dr. Utkarsh K. Betodkar, 15-12-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
15-12-2019.
Medical Officer
12. Dr. James Jose,
08-01-2007
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
08-01-2020.
Medical Officer
13. Dr. Sandesh K.
26-12-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
26-12-2019.
Fatarpekar,
Medical Officer
14. Dr. Sameer D. Sadekar,
17-11-2003
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
01-04-2018.
Ayurvedic Physician
15. Dr. Anjali Shirish Dessai 14-03-2007
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
14-03-2020.
alias Anjali Kajarekar,
Ayurvedic Physician
16. Dr. Savita Rajiv Naik,
15-03-2007
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
15-03-2020.
Ayurvedic Physician
17. Dr. Rakhi Kuvelkar,
01-12-2003
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
01-04-2018.
Senior Anaesthetist
18. Dr. Manisha Anne
03-10-2005
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
03-10-2018.
Fernandes, Senior
Anaesthetist
19. Dr. Anannya V. Bhobe
11-12-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
11-12-2019.
alias Shweta Nadkarni,
Senior Anaesthetist
20. Dr. Yurii Edward Egipsy, 01-10-2003
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
01-04-2018.
Senior Gynaecologist
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
796
21. Dr. Shami Kamat,
30-04-2001
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
01-04-2018.
Public Health Dentist
22. Dr. Puja Acharya,
24-04-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
24-04-2019.
Public Health Dentist
23. Dr. Manasvi Ganpat Alve, 18-04-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
18-04-2019.
Public Health Dentist
24. Dr. Shradha S. Naik
18-04-2006
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
18-04-2019.
Vaingankar, Public
Health Dentist
25. Dr. Shekhar Vasudeo
02-11-2005
G.P. – Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
02-11-2018.
Shetye, Homeopathic
Physician
________
Order
No. 25/13/2019-I/PHD/3428
On the recommendation of the Screening Committee, the Officers of Directorate of Health Services
indicated in the enclosed Annexure who have completed the requisite years of regular service of 07 years
in Grade Pay of Rs. 8,700 in PB-4 including the service rendered in the pre-revised scale of Rs. 14,300-
-18,300 are granted 3rd indicated upgradation under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP)
Scheme with effect from the date indicated against his/her name in column No. 6 in terms of Order
No. 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 16-07-2009 and 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 17-07-2009.
The Officers may exercise an option in terms of F.R. 22 (I) (a) (1) if he/she so desires within one month
from the date of issue of his/her Order for fixing pay in the 3rd financial upgradation under Dynamic
Assured Career Progression Scheme.
Each Officer shall give an undertaking that in case any excess payment that may be found to have
been made as a result of incorrect fixation of pay or any excess payment detected in the light of
discrepancies noticed subsequently will be refunded by them to the Government either by adjustment
against future payments due to them or otherwise.
The expenditure on his/her pay and allowances shall be debited to the budget head under which their
salary is drawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
______
ANNEXURE
3rd Financial Upgradation under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme
(For Doctors appointed in Grade Pay of Rs. 6,600/- in Pay Band-3 under Directorate of Health Services)
Sr.
Name & Designation
Date of
Present
Grade Pay to be
Date of
No.
joining
Grade Pay
made applicable
effect
under DACP
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Dr. Saleena Naik,
18-02-2004
G.P. – Rs. 8,700/- in PB-4
G.P. – Rs. 10,000/- in PB-4
01-04-2020.
Senior Ophthalmic
Surgeon
1
2
3
4
5
6
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
797
Order
No. 25/18/2019-I/PHD/3424
On the recommendation of the Screening Committee, the officers of the Directorate of Health Services
indicated in the enclosed Annexure who have completed the requisite years of regular service of 02
years in Grade Pay of Rs. 6,600 in PB-3 including the service rendered in the pre-revised scale of Rs.
10,000-15,200 are granted 1st financial upgradation under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression
(DACP) Scheme with effect from the date indicated against his/her name in Column No. 6 in terms of
Order No. 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 16-07-2009 and 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 17-07-2009.
The officers may exercise an option in terms of F.R. 22(I) (a) (1) if he/she so desires within one month
from the date of issue of his/her order for fixing pay in the 1st financial upgradation under Dynamic
Assured Career Progression Scheme.
Each officer shall give an undertaking that in case of any excess payment that may be found to have
been made as a result of incorrect fixation of pay or any excess payment detected in the light of
discrepancies noticed subsequently will be refunded by them to the Government either by adjustment
against future payments due to them or otherwise.
The expenditure on his/her pay and allowances shall be debited to the Budget Head under which their
salary is drawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
––––––
ANNEXURE
1st Financial upgradation under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme
(For Doctors appointed in Grade Pay of Rs. 6,600/- in Pay Band - 3 under Directorate of Health
Services)
Sr.
Name & Designation
Date of joining
Present Grade Pay
Grade Pay to be
Date of effect
No.
made applicable
under DACP
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Dr. Kalpana Satarkar,
18-11-2016
G.P.- Rs. 6,600/-
G.P.- Rs. 7,600/-
18-11-2018.
Senior Paediatrician
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
2.
Dr. Ram Murthy
02-12-2016
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
02-12-2018.
Shastry, Senior
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
Paediatrician
3.
Dr. Krupa Vaman Jog,
26-06-2014
G.P.- Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
26-06-2016.
Senior Pathologist
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
________
Order
No. 25/15/2019-I/PHD/3426
On the recommendation of the Screening Committee, the officers of the Directorate of Health Services
indicated in the enclosed Annexure who have completed the requisite years of regular service of 05 years
in Grade Pay of Rs. 6,600 in PB-3 including the service rendered in the pre-revised scale of Rs. 10,000-
-15,200 are granted 2nd financial upgradation under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP)
Scheme with effect from the date indicated against his/her name in Column No. 6 in terms of Order No.
25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 16-07-2009 and 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 17-07-2009.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
798
The officers may exercise an option in terms of F.R. 22(I) (a) (1) if he/she so desires within one month
from the date of issue of his/her order for fixing pay in the 2nd financial upgradation under Dynamic
Assured Career Progression Scheme.
Each officer shall give an undertaking that in case any excess payment that may be found to have been
made as a result of incorrect fixation of pay or any excess payment detected in the light of discrepancies
noticed subsequently will be refunded by them to the Government either by adjustment against future
payments due to them or otherwise.
The expenditure on his/her pay and allowances shall be debited to the Budget Head under which their
salary is drawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
________
ANNEXURE
2nd Financial upgradation under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme
(For Doctors appointed in Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- in Pay Band-3 under Directorate of Health
Services)
Sr.
Name & Designation
Date of joining
Present Grade
Grade Pay to be
Date of effect
No.
Pay
made applicable
under DACP
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Dr. Surekha Rao
05-11-2001
G.P.- Rs. 6,600/-
G.P.- Rs. 7,600/-
01-06-2014.
Damaskar,
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
Medical Officer
2.
Dr. James Jose,
08-01-2007
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
08-01-2016.
Medical Officer
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
3.
Dr. Dipti Furtado,
01-02-2007
G.P.- Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
01-02-2016.
Medical Officer
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
4.
Dr. Shubhada S.
01-07-2009
G.P. -Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
01-07-2018.
Mandrekar,
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
Medical Officer
5.
Dr. Satish Ramdas
01-12-2010
G.P. -Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
01-12-2019.
Komarpant,
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
Medical Officer
6.
Dr. Anjali Shirish Dessai 14-03-2007
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
14-03-2016.
alias Anjali Kajarekar,
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
Ayurvedic Physician
7.
Dr. Savita Rajiv Naik,
15-03-2007
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
15-03-2016.
Ayurvedic Physician
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
8.
Dr. Pramod R. Bhide,
27-01-2011
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
27-01-2020.
Ayurvedic Physician
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
9.
Dr. Manjiri M. Parsekar, 04-05-2009
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
04-05-2018.
Senior Anaesthetist
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
10. Dr. Mansi S. Bhakare,
15-10-2009
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
15-10-2018.
Senior Anaesthetist
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
799
11. Dr. Prity Sandip Shetye,
28-05-2010
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
28-05-2019.
Junior Paediatrician
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
12. Dr. Swecha S. Karande
01-04-2011
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
01-04-2020.
Kamat, Junior
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
Paediatrician
13. Dr. Chetana K. Altekar,
10-11-2009
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
10-11-2018.
Senior Paediatrician
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
14. Dr. Vibha Ajit Parsekar, 05-11-2009
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
05-11-2018.
Senior Paediatrician
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
15. Dr. Praveena Shailesh
19-01-2009
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
19-01-2018.
Hede, Junior
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
Gynaecologist
16. Dr. Roohie Eknath Naik, 14-12-2007
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
14-12-2016.
Junior Gynaecologist
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
17. Dr. Poornima Naik,
17-11-2008
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
17-11-2017.
Junior Gynaecologist
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
18. Dr. Siddhi Sachin
04-09-2009
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
04-09-2018.
Narvekar, Junior
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
Gynaecologist
19. Dr. Wendy M. D’Mello,
18-04-2006
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
11-03-2018.
Public Health Dentist
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
20. Dr. Vedesh Mahadev
25-07-2008
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
25-07-2017.
Jalmi, Public Health
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
Dentist
21. Dr. Rajesh Jogro Gaonkar,
06-07-2009
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
06-07-2018.
Public Health Dentist
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
22. Dr. Sweta Subhashchandra 29-01-2010
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
29-01-2019.
Kamat, Public Health
in P.B - 3
in PB - 3
Dentist
23. Dr. Shema Ajit Shirodkar, 14-09-2009
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
14-09-2018.
Senior ENT Surgeon
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
24. Dr. Poonam S. Kamat,
28-08-2009
G.P. - Rs. 6,600/-
G.P. - Rs. 7,600/-
28-08-2018.
Junior ENT Surgeon
in PB - 3
in PB - 3
________
Corrigendum
No. 45/4/2008-I/PHD/3490
Read: Order No. 45/4/2008-I/PHD/3402 dated 22-10-2020.
In the second para of the Government order read in preamble, the place of posting in respect of
Doctor at Sr. No. (2) shall be read as under:-
Sr.
Name of the doctor
Place of posting
No.
2.
Dr. Rajendra Manohar Borkar
District Immunization Programme, Panaji.
Rest of the contents of the order dated 22-10-2020, remains unchanged.
Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 29th October, 2020.
1
2
3
4
5
6
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
800
Department of Public Works
Office of the Principal Chief Engineer
—
Order
No. 40/2/2020/PCE-PWD-Tech.Cell/114
Government is pleased to order the transfer of the following Chief Engineers of this Department and post
them in the places shown against their names in column No. 4 below, with immediate effect, in public
interest:
Sr.
Name of the officer
Present place of
Place of posting
No.
posting
on transfer
1
2
3
4
1. Shri Dinesh C. Gupta
Chief Engineer, Sports Authority of Goa,
As Chief Engineer, NH, R & B,
Panaji-Goa
PWD, Altinho, Panaji-Goa.
2. Shri Umesh Kulkarni
Chief Engineer, NH, R & B, PWD,
As Chief Engineer, Sports
Altinho, Panaji-Goa
Authority of Goa, Panaji-Goa.
The deployment of the Officer at Sr. No. 2 on deputation and shall be governed by the terms and
conditions of the Government O. M. No. 13/4/74-PER dated 12-02-1999 and 11-01-2007 as amended from time
to time of the Department of Personnel, Secretariat, Porvorim.
Further, Shri Dinesh C. Gupta, Chief Engineer shall hold the additional charge of Project Director, JICA
Project, Altinho, Panaji, in addition to his own duties, until further orders.
This is issued with the approval of the Government.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
U. P. Parsekar, Principal Chief Engineer/ex officio Addl. Secretary (PWD).
Panaji, 26th October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Revenue
__
Order
No. 35/03/01/2020-RD-I/7224
In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (a)
of sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp
Act, 1899 (Central Act 2 of 1899), as in force in the
State of Goa, the Government of Goa hereby remits
stamp duty amounting to Rs. 1,44,161/- (Rupees
one lakh forty four thousand one hundred and sixty
one only) chargeable under the said Act on the
Deed of Lease to be executed between the
Government of Goa and the Goa State Pollution
Control Board, in respect of the premises
admeasuring an area of 603.74 sq. mts. on the 1st
Floor, Dempo Tower, Patto Plaza, Panaji-Goa, for the
lease period commencing from 06-09-2018 and
ending on 31-03-2021.
This issues with the concurrence of Finance
(R&C) Department vide their U. O. No. 1940/F
dated 11-07-2020.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Sudin A. Natu, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).
Porvorim, 22nd October, 2020.
Notification
No. 16/8/12/2018-Rev-I/7227
In exercise of the powers conferred by the second
proviso to Clause (ii) of sub-section (6) of Section
32 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 (Act No. 9
of 1969), the Government of Goa hereby exempts
the Seva Sankalp, an N.G.O., having it’s Office at
Rangraj building, 3rd Floor, Shellar, Canacona, Goa,
a Society registered under the Societies
Registration Act, 1860 (Act No. 21 of 1860), under
No. 166/Goa/2004, from payment of conversion fees
of Rs. 1,84,950/- (Rupees one lakh eighty four
thousand nine hundred fifty only) and a fine of Rs.
3,00,375/- (Rupees three lakhs three hundred and
seventy five only) payable for conversion of land
admeasuring an area 1370 sq. mts. surveyed under
Survey No. 150/4 of Village Loliem, Canacona
Taluka, District of South Goa, State of Goa, subject
to the condition that the said land shall be
used exclusively for the charitable purpose i.e.
construction of “Hostel Project” for needy destitute
girl students.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Sudin A. Natu, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).
Porvorim, 26th October, 2020.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
801
Notification
No. 6-2-2020-RD II/950
In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause
(bb) of Section 2 of the Goa Public Moneys
(Recoveries of Dues) Act, 1986, the Government of
Goa hereby appoints the PHE Executive Engineer
as Recovery Officer of Division III, IX, XII, XVII, XX,
XXIV PWD, to exercise and perform all the powers
and functions of a Collector under the said Act, in
respect of recovery of dues towards water bills and
sewerage bills payable to the Public Works
Department, Government of Goa.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Isha M. Sawant, Under Secretary (Revenue-II).
Porvorim, 23rd October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Sports and Youth Affairs
Directorate of Sports and Youth Affairs
__
Order
No. 69/Const of Committee/DSYA/Adm/2020/1499
1.
It is the endeavour of the Government to bring
about a transformative development in the
performance of sportspersons and to ensure
maximum participation of State sportspersons
in the Indian Teams.
2.
Towards this objective, there is a need for
binging about certain administrative reforms
and formulating programmes and policies in
respect of the sports infrastructure facilities
in the State.
3.
To recommend the implementation of the
same, the Government is pleased to constitute
Goa Sports Infrastructure Development
Taskforce Committee, consisting of the
following:
Sr. No.
Name
Designation
1
2
3
1.
Secretary (Sports)
Chairman.
2.
Director, Directorate of
Member.
Sports & Youth Affairs
3.
Executive Director, Sports
Member.
Authority of Goa
4.
Chief Engineer, Sports
Member.
Authority of Goa
5.
Jt. Director (Coaching),
Member.
Sports Authority of Goa
6.
Assistant Director (Projects),
Member.
Directorate of Sports &
Youth Affairs
7.
Assistant Secretary
Member
(Complexes), Sports
Secretary.
Authority of Goa
8.
Any other member as
special invitee as decided
by Chairman
4.
The committee shall undertake the following
broad-based agenda:
a) Formulation of a policy and framework for
maintenance and operation of sports
facilities.
b)
Formulation of a policy and framework for
optimum utilization of existing sports
facilities.
c) Ideate and recommend models for
development of sports facilities at existing
Departmental properties.
d)
Restructuring of the administrative setup
and functioning of SAG.
e) Any other agenda as may be necessary.
5. For undertaking any thorough exercise,
carrying out visits, pre-assessment/
/examination of information, the Committee
shall be empowered to establish sub-
committees.
6. The committee shall meet atleast once every
month to discuss, deliberate and attend to the
agenda. A quarterly report of activities
undertaken should be forwarded to the Hon’ble
Chief Minister for information through the
Hon’ble Dy. Chief Minister/Sports Minister.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Shashank Mani Tripathi, IAS, Director & ex officio
Jt. Secretary (Sports & Youth Affairs).
Panaji, 22nd October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Town and Country Planning
Office of the Chief Town Planner (ADM)
—
Order
No. 28/1/TCP/2018-19/PDA/Part-File/1673
Read: Order No. 28/1/TCP/2018-19/PDA/Part file/
/1350 dated 25-08-2020.
Ex-post facto approval of the Government is
hereby conveyed for the extension of deputation
period of Shri R. K. Pandita, Town Planner as
Member Secretary, North Goa Planning and
Development Authority, Panaji for the period of one
year w.e.f. 01-09-2020.
1
2
3
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 32
5TH NOVEMBER, 2020
802
This is issued with the approval of the Government vide Note bearing No. 28/1/TCP/2018-
-19/PDA/Part file/1502 dated 22-09-2020.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
James Mathew, Chief Town Planner (Admn.)/ex officio Jt. Secretary.
Panaji, 27th October, 2020.
———uuu———
Department of Urban Development
(Municipal Administration)
__
Order
No. 10/821-2019-DMA/Election to 11 MC/Part/4848
Whereas, the General Elections to the Eleven Municipal Councils, namely, the Municipal Councils of
Margao, Mormugao, Mapusa, Bicholim, Cuncolim, Curchorem-Cacora, Quepem, Valpoi, Sanguem, Canacona
and Pernem were scheduled on 18th October, 2020;
And whereas, in view of the current situation due to COVID-19 pandemic, the said General Elections
could not be conducted as scheduled on 18th October, 2020 and that the Goa State Election Commission
vide its Notification No. 4/21/GMCNSE/SEC/2019/1059 dated 17-08-2020 had ordered that the General
Elections to the said eleven Municipal Councils fixed for 18-10-2020 are postponed for a period of three
months;
And whereas, the term of the said eleven Municipal Councils has expired on 4th November, 2020;
And whereas, in view of the above, a situation has arisen whereby the administration of the said
eleven Municipal Councils cannot be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Goa
Municipalities Act, 1968 (Act 7 of 1969).
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 298 of
the Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 (Act 7 of 1969), the Government of Goa hereby appoints the officers
specified in column (2) of the Table below as the Municipal Administrators of the Municipal Councils
specified against the corresponding entries in column (3) of the Table below, in addition to their own
duties, until further Orders.
Sr.
Name of the officer
Name of the Municipal Council
No.
1
2
3
1.
Shri Prasanna Acharya
Margao Municipal Council.
2.
Shri Gurudas Pilarnekar
Mormugao Municipal Council.
3.
Shri Paresh Phaldesai
Mapusa Municipal Council.
4.
Shri Vikas S. N. Gaunekar
Bicholim Municipal Council.
5.
Smt. Florina S. Colaco
Cuncolim Municipal Council
6.
Shri Ashutosh Apte
Curchorem-Cacora Municipal Council.
7.
Smt. Deepali Naik
Quepem Municipal Council.
8.
Shri Rajesh Ajgaonkar
Valpoi Municipal Council.
9.
Shri Nilesh Dhaigodkar
Sanguem Municipal Council.
10.
Shri Johnson Fernandes
Canacona Municipal Council.
11.
Shri Ravishekhar Nipanikar
Pernem Municipal Council.
This order shall come into force with immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Dr. Tariq Thomas, IAS, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Municipal Admn./Urban Development).
Panaji, 5th November, 2020.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 34.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—233/160–11/2020.