Panaji, 28th May, 2020 (Jyaistha 7, 1942)

SERIES II No. 9

103

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2018-20

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Order

No. 3/17/Urban Credit/TS-II/PZ/2020/RCS/320

Read: Letter No. 3/17/11-12/ARPZ/Urban/ADM/

/4030 dated 19-3-2020.

Whereas, the Mashel Mahila Co-operative

Credit Society Ltd., Deulwada, Marcel-Goa is a

“Resource Society” deemed to be registered under

the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 and Rules,

2003.

And whereas, the Asstt. Registrar of

Co-operative Societies, Ponda Zone, Ponda-Goa has

submitted a detailed report on the financial

stability/non-compliance of the statutory

requirements by the society.

And whereas, it is reported that the society has

failed to maintain required liquidity as per the

prescribed norms.

And whereas, it is observed from the said report

that the society has mobilized deposits to the

extent of Rs. 9,08,77,701.99 as on 31-3-2019 against

which liquidity of 2.65% is maintained. As per the

prescribed norms, the society is required to

maintain 25% i.e. 20% investment and 5% CRR.

However, the same is not found complied with.

And whereas, it is further reported that the

society has failed to maintain the required

documents while sanctioning loans to its members.

This gives scope to believe that the society is

sanctioning loans without obtaining the required

mandatory documents to safeguard the interest of

the society.

And whereas, it has also been reported that the

society has taken very casual view as far as recovery

of loans are concerned and thereby resulting

therein huge overdues and NPA beyond

permissible limit.

And whereas, it is also reported that the society

was failed to comply with the requirements of

Section 72 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act,

2001, thereby depriving the general members of

their legitimate right to attend the meeting and

participate in the business of the society.

And whereas, the above lapses appears to be of

serious nature which may have an adverse effect

on the financial stability of the society. Moreover,

being a Resource society, it should have been

endeavour of the management to comply with all

the statutory requirements so as to safeguard the

funds of the members parked with the society.

And whereas, the above circumstances gives

wide scope to believe that if the present situation

is allowed to continue further, it may encourage

the management to continue with the irregularities

as pointed out hereinabove and further deteriorate

the financial base to an irreparable extent. Hence,

it is felt expedient to take immediate action to

impose certain restrictions on the loaning activities

and on accepting deposits by the society.

Now therefore, I, Registrar of Co-operative

Societies, Government of Goa, Patto, Panaji in

exercise of the powers conferred under Section 69

of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 hereby

impose the following restrictions for initial period

of six months on the Mashel Mahila Co-operative

Credit Society Ltd., Deulwada, Marcel-Goa.

Note:-

There are two Extraordinary issues to the

Official Gazette, Series II No. 8 dated 21-05-2020

as follows:—

(1) Extraordinary dated 21-05-2020 from pages

99 to 100 regarding Orders from Department

of Home.

(2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 26-05-2020 from

pages 101 to 102 regarding Notification from

Department of Finance.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

104

1. The society is banned from accepting any form

of deposits of value exceeding Rs. 5000/- per

person per month and also disburse any

loans/advances.

2. The society shall not carry out further

collection of pigmy accounts except wherein

pigmy collections are adjusted against loan

shall continue.

3. No fresh accounts viz. Pigmy, Saving, Current,

Recurring, Fixed Deposit etc. shall be opened.

The Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies,

Ponda Zone, Ponda-Goa shall monitor and review

the progress of the society on weekly basis so also

ensure that the above restrictions are strictly

complied with and submit the report thereof to the

undersigned on fortnightly basis. Incase the society

shows improvement and compliance, these

restrictions will not be extended further.

The financial position shall be assessed on the

basis of the report submitted by Asstt. Registrar of

Co-operative Societies, Ponda Zone and accordingly

decide whether to relax the above restrictions or

otherwise.

Vikas S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies).

Panaji, 18th May, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Education, Art & Culture

Directorate of Higher Education

Certificate

No. ACAD III/SHEC/Filling of Posts/02/2019/

/Part II/777

Read: ACAD-III/SHEC/Filling of Posts/02/2019/Part

II/10948 dated 10-02-2020.

Certified that the character and antecedents of

Dr. Mahesh Satu Majik appointed to the post of

Associate Professor for Research, Development and

Innovation for State Higher Education Council

(Group “A” Gazetted) under Directorate of Higher

Education vide above referred Order has been

verified by the Addl. Collector & ADM, North, Office

of the District Magistrate, North Goa, Panaji-Goa

and nothing adverse has come to the notice of the

Government.

Premraj K. Shirodkar, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 5th May, 2020.

Department of Finance

Revenue & Control Division

Order

No. 8/1/2016-Fin(R&C)/Part/611

Read: 1. Order No. 8/1/2016-Fin(R&C)/(B) dated

30-11-2016.

2. Order No. 8/1/2016-Fin(R&C)/Part dated

01-08-2019.

3. Order No. 8/1/2016-Fin(R&C)/Part dated

08-11-2019.

In pursuance to the order of even number dated

01-08-2019 [read at (2) above], and on account of

COVID-19 Pandemic, Government is pleased to

extend the period/due date of submission of

revision of pension of pre-2016 Pensioners/family

Pensioners cases by the Heads of Department/

/Heads of Offices to the Directorate of Accounts

upto 31-07-2020 and further clearance by the

Directorate of Accounts upto 31-01-2021.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Daulat A. Hawaldar, IAS, Secretary (Finance).

Porvorim, 11th May, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Labour

Notification

No. 28/2/2020-LAB/308

The following Award passed by the Industrial

Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on

20-04-2020 in in reference No. IT/29/12 is hereby

published as required under Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

A. S. Mahatme, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 22nd May, 2020.

______

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND

LABOUR COURT

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Mr. Vincent D’Silva, Hon’ble Presiding

Officer)

Ref. No. IT/29/12

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

105

Shri Ajay Naik and another,

Rep. by the General Secretary,

Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh,

G-5, Macedo Apartments,

V/s

M/s. Putz Pump (India) Pvt. Ltd.,

190-191, Kundaim Industrial Estate,

Kundaim, Goa (403 115).

… Employer/Party II

Workmen/Party I represented by Ld. Adv. Shri S. P.

Gaonkar.

Employer/Party II represented by Ld. Adv. Shri P.

Chawdikar.

AWARD

(Delivered on this the 20th day of the month

of April of the year 2020)

By Order dated 28-5-2012, bearing No. 28/05/2012-

-LAB/764, the Government of Goa in exercise of

powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short The Act), has

referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for

adjudication.

“(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Putz Pump (India) Private Limited,

Kundaim, Goa, in dismissing from service

the following workmen, with effect from

15-12-2004, is legal and justified?

Serial No.

Name of workmen

Designation

Shri Ajay Naik

Fitter.

Shri Rajesh Palande

Electrician.

(2) If not, what relief the workmen are entitled

to?”

2. Upon receipt of the reference, IT/29/12 was

registered and registered A/D notices were issued

to both the parties. Upon appearance, Party I filed a

Claim statement at Exhibit 4 and Party II filed a

Written Statement at Exhibit 5.

3. In short, the case of Party I in the Claim

statement is that the Party I workmen Shri Ajay Naik

and Shri Rajesh Palande were working for the Party

II. All permanent workers formed a new union in the

establishment in the year 2004 which the Party II

was not in favour. The Union thereafter raised a

Charter of demands and on receipt of the same, the

management started harassing the office bearers of

the Union and fabricated false cases only to victimize

them. The Party II suspended both the Party I

workmen on the ground that they allegedly

committed misconduct. The Party I workmen were

the office bearers of the Union. They were not issued

charge sheet nor was any notice of enquiry served

on them. The management has also not followed the

principles of natural justice before their dismissal

nor paid any dues in accordance with the Act. The

dismissal of Party I workmen was made only to

victimize them for trade union activities and hence

their dismissal is illegal and unjustified.

4. In the Written statement, the Party II has

claimed that the reference is bad in law. There is no

existence of industrial dispute. The Party I workmen

committed misconducts including disorderly

behaviour, assault on or intimidation on security

guard and refusal to accept communication in

accordance with the rules. A formal enquiry was

conducted against the Party I workmen, however

they did not participate in the enquiry though they

were fully informed about the same and every

conceivable opportunity was granted to attend the

enquiry, however they did not attend and hence,

the Enquiry Officer had no other option but to

conduct the enquiry ex-parte. The Enquiry Officer

submitted the findings and the management after

considering their past records of service decided to

dismiss them from service. The management has

followed the principles of natural justice before

termination and hence their termination is legal.

5. Based on the above averments of the respective

parties, the following issues were framed.

(1) Whether the Party I prove that they have been

suspended by Party II only to victimize them

as they raised the charter of demands through

their union?

(2) Whether the Party I proves that the

management dismissed them w.e.f. 15-12-04

as they were the office bearers of the union

and had taken initiative to form the union?

(3) Whether the Party I proves that before

dismissal, the management did not issue them

the charge sheets or any notice of enquiry

was served on them and as such the dismissal

is illegal, unjustified and bad in law?

(4) Whether the Party II proves that the present

dispute of the workmen is not an “industrial

dispute” as defined under the I.D. Act, 1947?

(5) Whether the Party II proves that the present

dispute is barredby limitation, delay and

latches as it is raised several years from the

date of termination?

(6) What relief? What Award?

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

106

6. It is a matter of record that additional issues

were framed on 24-08-2018 at Exh. 59 which were as

follows:

1(A) Whether the Party I workmen were

dismissed after conducting a fair and

proper domestic enquiry as alleged by the

Employer/Party II?

1(B) Whether the findings of the Enquiry Officer

in the alleged domestic enquiry against the

workmen is perverse or not?

1(C) Whether the punishment of dismissal is

proportionate to the charges leveled against

the workmen?

7. It is a matter of record that additional issues

No. 1(A) and 1(B) were answered vide Award

(Part I) dated 15-04-2019 at Exh. 62 and held that

the findings of the Enquiry Officer against the Party

I workmen is not fair and proper and the charges

of misconduct leveled against the Party I workmen

are not proved to the satisfaction of the Tribunal by

acceptable evidence.

8. The Party I did not lead evidence on the other

issues. On the other hand, the Party II examined Shri

Bramh Dutt Shukla who produced on record the copy

of the complaint from security guard of Party II to

Police Inspector, Ponda dated 10-10-2004 at Exh. 65,

a copy of charge sheet issued to Mr. Ajay Naik dated

19-11-2004 at Exh. 66, a copy of Minutes of enquiry

proceedings dated 26-11-2004 at Exh. 67, a copy of

report of the Enquiry Officer in the charge sheet

dated 19-11-2004 issued to Mr. Ajay Naik at Exh. 68,

a copy of letter of dismissal issued to Party I dated

15-12-2004 at Exh.69, a copy of letter from workers

union to ALC, Ponda dated 16-12-2004 at Exh.70,

a copy of letter from ALC Ponda to Party II dated

17-12-2004 at Exh.71, a copy of letter from Party II to

Labour Commissioner, Panaji dated 27-12-2004 at

Exh.72, a copy of letter from ALC Ponda to the

President of Workers Union dated 29-12-2004 at

Exh.73, a copy of minutes of the discussion held

between the management and 4 workers before ALC

Ponda dated 31-12-2004 at Exh.74, a copy of letter

from Party II to ALC Ponda dated 25-1-2005 at Exh.75,

a copy of letter from Party II to ALC Ponda dated

14-3-2005 at Exh. 76, a copy of letter from ALC Ponda

to Party II dated 15-3-2005 at Exh. 77, a copy of letter

from Party II to ALC Ponda dated 19-3-2005 at Exh.78,

a copy of judgment passed by the Industrial Tribunal

dated 27-1-2010 at Exh.79, a copy of letter from

Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh to ALC Ponda dated

3-2-2011 at Exh. 80, a copy of letter from ALC Ponda

to Party II dated 4-2-2011 at Exh. 81, a copy of reply

from Party II to ALC Ponda dated 16-2-2011 at

Exh. 82, a copy of letter from Office of ALC Ponda to

Party II dated 9-3-2011 at Exh. 83, a copy of Reg. A/D

card along with envelope at Exh. 84, a copy of charge

sheet to Rajesh Palande at Exh. 85, a copy of Reg.

A/D card along with envelope at Exh. 86, a copy of

Reg. A/D card along with envelope at Exh. 87, a copy

of minutes of enquiry proceedings dated 9-12-2004

and the report of enquiry proceedings dated

14-12-2004 of Mrs. Rajesh Palande at Exh. 88. The

Party II also examined Shri Sudip Prabhu Desai as

second witness.

9. Heard arguments. Notes of Written arguments

came to be placed on record by Party I as well as

Party II.

10. I have gone through the records of the case

and have duly considered the arguments advanced.

My findings to the above issues are as follows:

Issue No. 1

…

Redundant.

Issue No. 2

…

In the Affirmative.

Issue No. 3

…

Redundant.

Issue No. 4

…

In the Negative.

Issue No. 5

…

In the Negative.

Issue No. 6

…

As per final order.

ADDITIONAL ISSUE

Issue No. 1(C)

…

In the Negative.

REASONS

Issue No. 1:

11. Admittedly, the present reference concerns

dismissal of Party I workmen namely Ajay Naik and

Rajesh Palande by the Party II w.e.f. 15-12-2004 and

therefore the issue No. 1 as to the suspension of the

said workmen does not arise in the present reference

and hence, issue No. 1 need not be answered as it is

redundant.

Issue No. 2:

12. There is no dispute that the Party I workmen

were dismissed from service w.e.f. 15-4-2004. It has

also come on record that they were the office bearers

of the union. It has been clearly held vide Award

(Part I) passed on 15-4-2019 that the Party II has

conducted a one day enquiry in haste and the

evidence on record does not support the charges

leveled and therefore it is apparent that the employer

had malice against the workers for joining the trade

union and hence, it amounts to legal victimization

of the workmen as rightly pointed out by Ld. Adv.

S. P. Gaonkar for the Party I. Hence, the above issue is

answered in the affirmative.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

107

Issue No. 3:

13. The Party I claimed that before dismissal the

management did not issue them the charge sheet

nor the notice of enquiry was served on them and as

such the dismissal is illegal, unjustified and bad in

law, however, the above issue does not arise as it has

been held that the findings of the Enquiry Officer

against the Party I workmen is not fair and proper

and the charges of misconduct leveled against the

Party I workmen are not proved to the satisfaction of

the Tribunal by acceptable evidence and therefore,

the issue No. 3 is no longer relevant and hence it is

answered accordingly.

Issue No. 4:

14. It is claimed by the Party II that the present

dispute of the workmen is not an industrial dispute

as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,

however there cannot be any quarrel that in terms

of Section 2-A(2), a dispute pertaining to the

dismissal of the workmen is deemed to be an

industrial dispute under the Act and therefore, the

contention of the Party II that the present dispute is

not an industrial dispute cannot be accepted. Hence,

it is answered in the negative.

Issue No. 5:

15. The Party II has claimed that the present

dispute is barred by limitation, delay and latches as

it is raised several years after termination. Needless

to mention, the workmen had initially made a

complaint under Section 33-A of the Act wherein

the Tribunal has observed that Section 33-A is not

attracted to the dismissal of the workmen. It is also

an admitted fact that thereafter the workmen raised

the present dispute. The time spent in pursuing the

complaint under Section 33-A by the Party I

workmen cannot be treated as delay and latches.

The reference is not dependent on the dismissal of

the earlier complaint filed under Section 33-A of the

Act. It is well settled in the case of management of

Tingalibam Tea Estate vs. P. O. Labour Court, (2016)

1 Gauhati Law Reports 246, that provisions of

Limitation Act have no application while making a

reference for adjudicating an industrial dispute

between the workmen and the management and

that the delay cannot be a ground for denying relief

to a workman. It is also held that principles of res

judicata or constructive res judicata are not attracted

in industrial disputes and therefore, it cannot be said

that the present dispute is barred by limitation, delay

and latches. Hence, the above issue is also answered

in the negative.

Issue No. 1(C):

16. Admittedly, the Party II led evidence to prove

the charges against the workmen and attempted to

justify its action of dismissal of the workmen. The

Party II have examined Shri Bramh Dutt Shukla, the

Factory Manager and Shri Sudip V. Prabhu Desai,

AGM-Accounts who had been already examined

during Part-I Award. Shri Bramh Dutt has claimed

that the enquiry was conducted by Shri S. R. Lotlikar,

Enquiry Officer and that he is filing the affidavit on

additional issues as well as other issues. He claimed

that Shri Rajesh Palande was charge sheeted for

having committed an act in violation of the rules

and threatening the Security Guard, Shri Swapnesh

Pal by saying “You come out and I will show you”

which amounts to disorderly behaviour and

intimidation. He also claimed that Shri Ajay Naik

was also charge sheeted for the said offence and

refusal to accept the communication. He claimed

that the findings of the Enquiry Officer were based

on the evidence. He had produced the documents

at Exh. 65 to Exh. 88.

17. Interestingly, the Party II through the above

two witnesses have produced and exhibited the

same documents which were produced through

their earlier witness, Shri Sudip V. Prabhu Desai at

the time of Part-I Award from Exh. 32 to Exh. 53. The

affidavit of Shri Bramh Dutt Shukla which is at Exh.

64 is verbatim to the earlier witness Shri Prabhu

Desai. The evidence of Shri Sudip Prabhu Desai, the

management representative in the enquiry is also

verbatim to his deposition before Part-I Award. The

Party II have not produced any new documents on

evidence to prove the charges and justify the

dismissal of the Party I workmen. Needless to

mention, where domestic enquiry has been set aside,

the employer is entitled to lead fresh evidence to

prove the charges and if the employer does not

submit fresh evidence as submitted before the

dismissal, charges cannot be accepted and the

enquiry must be set aside as held by the Hon’ble

Apex Court in the case of Neeta Kaplish v/s. P.O,

Labour Court, AIR 1999 SC 698.

18. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the above case has

clearly observed in Para 26 as follows: ‘The record

pertaining to the domestic enquiry would not

constitute ‘fresh evidence’ as those proceedings have

already been found by the Labour Court to be

defective. Such record would also not constitute

‘material on record’, as contended by the counsel for

the respondent, within the meaning of Section 11-A

at the enquiry proceedings, on being found to be bad,

have to be ignored altogether. The proceedings of the

domestic enquiry could be, and, were, in fact, relied

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

108

upon by the Management for the limited purpose of

showing at the preliminary stage that the action taken

against the appellant was just and proper and that

full opportunity of hearing was given to her

consonance with the principles of natural justice. This

contention has not been accepted by the Labour Court

and the enquiry has been held to be bad. In view of

the nature of objections raised by the appellant, the

record of enquiry held by the management ceased to

be ‘material on record’ within the meaning of Section

11-A of the Act and the only course open to the

management was to justify its action by leading fresh

evidence as required by the Labour Court. If such

evidence has not been led, the management has to

suffer the consequences.”

19. The Party II have not led any independent

evidence to prove the charges other than what they

have produced at the time of Part I Award. They have

examined Shri Bramh Dutt Shukla and produced the

same documents which have been produced earlier.

He admitted in the cross examination that his office

is not at the gate but in the factory premises and

that he did not remember whether he was on duty

on 8-10-2004. He also admitted that the factory gate

is attached to the public road and that on 8-10-2004,

he was not at the factory gate and that he has not

witnessed any incident on that day and that he does

not know whether the workers had formed a union

prior to the alleged incident. He also admitted that

in the Police complaint at Exh.65, name of Santosh

Sakhalkar was dropped and the name of Ajay Naik

was inserted. The Security Guard viz. Swapnesh Pal

to whom the Party I threatened have not been

examined. The whole enquiry was conducted in a

haste within one day. There is no fresh evidence led

by the Party II, which has already been found to be

defective and therefore, the evidence led by the Party

II with the same materials has to be ignored

altogether. It is therefore, in such circumstances and

in absence of fresh evidence, it has to be held that

the dismissal of the workmen is illegal and void and

the punishment is not proportionate to the charges

leveled against them. Hence, the above issue is

answered in the negative.

Issue No. 6:

20. Ld. Adv. Shri P. Chawdikar for the Party II has

submitted that M/s. Simem India Pvt. Ltd. has not

been arrayed as necessary party as Mr. Ajay Naik

was employed by M/s. Simem India Pvt. Ltd. and not

by Party II and that Mr. Ajay Naik was on the rolls of

M/s. Simem India Pvt. Ltd. and was working for the

said company. He further submitted that the charge

sheet which was issued to Mr. Ajay Naik is in the

name of Simem India Pvt. Ltd. and not by Party II. He

further submitted that Mr. Ajay Naik has stated in

the cross examination that he has been working in

the company known as Hitek Products Ltd. as per

the appointment letter at Exh.30 and that the

company had offered him the position of electrician

in their establishment w.e.f. 1-8-2005. He also

submitted that Shri Rajesh Palande has also

admitted in the cross examination that he is

presently working in some fields on daily wage basis

since December, 2004 and that he has not applied

for alternate employment in any company since the

date of dismissal. He further submitted that both

the Party I are gainfully employed and therefore not

entitled for any reliefs.

21. Per contra, Ld. Adv. Shri S. P. Gaonkar for the

Party I has submitted and rightly so that Shri Bramh

Dutt Shukla in his cross examination has admitted

that he was the Factory Manager of Simem (India)

Pvt. Ltd. and that both the factories i.e. Simem and

Party II are in the same premises and that he was

looking after the Simem (India) Pvt. Ltd. and that the

said Simem company is closed now and the name of

the company has been changed to Putz Pump (India)

Pvt. Ltd. and that from 1-5-2008, all the workers who

were on the rolls of Simem (India) Pvt. Ltd were

absorbed by Putz Pump (India) Pvt. Ltd. with

continuity of service. It therefore reveals that the

employer of the Party I was the same as Simem India

Pvt. Ltd. and the said fact was admitted by the Party

II in the written statement as well as by Shri Bramh

Dutt in the cross examination. Moreover, it is

admitted that the Simem (India) Pvt. Ltd. which is

part and parcel of Party II had signed a Settlement

dated 20-5-2005 and the absorption letters of all the

workmen of Simem India Pvt. Ltd. signed by the

witness, Shri Shukla has been produced at Exh. 15

and therefore, the contention of Adv. Shri Chawdikar

that Mr. Ajay Naik cannot claim any relief from

Party II as he was never the employee of Party II

cannot be accepted having any merits.

22. It is also well settled law in the case of

Novartis India Ltd. vs. West Bengal, (2009) 3 SCC

124 that merely because the dismissal from service

has been held to be illegal, it would not result in

automatic payment of back wages. It is also held in

the case of M. L. Singla vs. Punjab National Bank,

reported in 2018 SC, 4668 that in order to claim

back wages, it was necessary to the appellant to

plead and prove that he was not gainfully employed

after his dismissal with the aid of evidence and that

50% back wages would be just and proper.

Admittedly, Shri Ajay Naik has been working in the

company called Hitek Brass Products Ltd. as per the

appointment letter at Exh. 30 w.e.f. 1-8-2005. There

is nothing on record that Shri Ajay has tendered

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

109

resignation from said Hiteck Brass Products Ltd.

from the position of electrician. It therefore shows

that Shri Ajay Naik was gainfully employed in the

establishment of Hitek Brass Products Ltd. since

1-8-2005. He is therefore not entitled for

reinstatement. There is nothing on record nor it is

the case of Shri Ajay Naik that his emoluments are

less than what he was drawing when he was working

with the Party II. There is also no dispute that

Shri Ajay Naik was dismissed from service w.e.f.

15-12-2004 and that he was gainfully employed w.e.f

1-8-2005. He is therefore entitled for 50% back

wages from his date of dismissal i.e. 15-12-2004 to

31-07-2005 i.e. for a period of 7½ months.

23. Shri Rajesh Palande was also dismissed w.e.f.

15-12-2004. There is nothing on record that he is also

gainfully employed like Ajay Naik. He has however

admitted that he is presently working on daily wage

basis in fields since December, 2004. It cannot be

termed as gainful employment. The Party II has not

produced any documents that Shri Rajesh Palande

has been employed or secured better permanent

employment elsewhere. The Party I have proved that

the termination of the services of Shri Rajesh Palande

is illegal and without following the principles

of natural justice. It is also well settled that in

case of Deepali Gundu Survase v/s Kranti Junior

Adhyapak Mahavidhalaya and Ors, 2014 II

CLR 813 that in case of refusal or termination,

reinstatement and back wages is a normal rule. The

Party I having proved that the employer terminated

the services of Rajesh illegally and it is motivated

and that the employer has taken away his right to

work, contrary to the relevant law and has deprived

him of the earnings, Party I, Shri Rajesh Palande is

entitled for the reliefs of reinstatement in service

with 50% back wages, continuity in services and

consequential benefits attached to the post to which

he was working, which would be just, proper and

equitable in the facts and circumstances of the case.

Hence, the above point is answered accordingly.

24. In the result, I pass the following:

ORDER

(i)

The reference stands partly allowed.

(ii)

It is hereby held that the action of the

management of M/s. Putz Pump (India)

Private Limited, Kundaim, Goa, in dismissing

from service the Party I workmen, with effect

from 15-12-2004, is illegal and unjustified.

(iii) Consequently, Shri Ajay Naik shall be paid

50% back wages from date of his dismissal

i.e. 15-12-2004 to 31-07-2005 i.e. for a period

of 7½ months.

(iv) The Party II is directed to reinstate

Shri Rajesh Palande in service with 50%

back wages, continuity in services and

consequential benefits attached to the post

to which he was working at the time of the

retrenchment.

(v)

The Party II is directed to deposit back

wages before the Tribunal as stated above

within 60 days of the publication of the

Award, failing which the Party II shall pay

an interest @ 9% per annum.

(vi) Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Vincent D’Silva)

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal and

Labour Court.

———uuu———

Department of Law & Judiciary

Law (Establishment) Division

Order

No. 12/22/2019-LD(Estt)/849

On the recommendation of the Departmental

Selection Committee of the Hon’ble High Court of

Bombay conveyed to Government of Goa by the

Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa vide letter

No. HCB/GOA/CJJD & JMFC/CONF-98/2019 dated

20-12-2019 with the approval of the Appointing

Authority and upon acceptance by the selected

candidates of the terms and conditions of

appointment as specified vide Memorandum No.

12/22/2019/LD(Estt.)/246-251 dated 03-02-2020, the

Government of Goa in pursuance of Rule 4, read

with sub-rule 4(b) of Rule 6 of ‘The Goa Judicial

Service Rules, 2013’ hereby appoints the following

selected candidates to the post of Civil Judge,

Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class

(Group A Post), in the Pay Scale of Rs. 27700-770-

-33090-920-40450-1080-44770/- and other allowances,

as admissible under the Rules with effect from the

date he/she assumes the charge of the post.

Sr.

Name of the selected candidate

No.

Miss Ankita Ramesh Nagvenkar.

Miss Queency D’Silva.

Mr. Waseem Hussain Rizvi.

Miss Smita Ulhas Sail.

Miss Manashree Mohan Naik.

Miss Shabnam Pratap Nagvekar.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

110

The selected candidates at Sr. No. 1 to 6 for the

post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial

Magistrate First Class (Group A Post) in the State

of Goa, have been declared medically fit by the

Goa Medical Board and their character and

antecedents have been verified in terms of SR 196.

The apointees shall be on probation for the

period of two years which may be extended by the

Appointing Authority.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Amir Y. Parab, Under Secretary (Estt.).

Porvorim, 20th May, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Personnel

Order

No. 13/29/2016/PER/1190

Whereas, Government vide Order No. 13/29/2016-

-PER/3353 dated 29-11-2019 was pleased to grant

extension in services to Shri P. B. Seldarkar, Chief

Engineer, Public Works Department, Altinho,

Panaji-Goa beyond the date of his superannuation

for a period of one year w.e.f. 01-12-2019 to

30-11-2020 in public interest subject to vigilance

clearance, concurrence of Finance Department and

approval of Council of Ministers;

And whereas, the Vigilance Department has

submitted Vigilance Clearance stating that, no

Disciplinary Proceedings/Vigilance cases are

pending or being contemplated against Shri P. B.

Seldarkar. However, there are complaints filed

against Shri Seldarkar and the matters are under

enquiry and not reached final conclusion;

And whereas, the Finance Department vide its

U.O. No. 1400072398 dated 15-04-2020 concurred

the proposal for grant of extension to Shri P. B.

Seldarkar, Chief Engineer, Public Works

Department, Altinho, Panaji-Goa subject to Cabinet

approval and adherence of all Rules in force;

And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its

XXVIth meeting held on 13-05-2020 resolved to

grant ex-post facto approval for extension in service

beyond superannuation to Shri P. B. Seldarkar, Chief

Engineer, Public Works Department, Altinho,

Panaji-Goa for a period of one year w.e.f. 01-12-2019

to 30-11-2020;

Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to

confirm the Order No. 13/29/2016-PER/3353 dated

29-11-2019 granting extension in service beyond

superannuation to Shri P. B. Seldarkar, Chief

Engineer, Public Works Department, Altinho,

Panaji-Goa for a period of one year w.e.f. 01-12-2019

to 30-11-2020.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Maya Pednekar, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2020.

______

Order

No. 13/30/2016/PER/1191

Whereas, Government vide Order No. 13/30/2016-

-PER/3909 dated 31-12-2019 was pleased to grant

extension in services to Shri Deelip M. Dhavalikar,

Superintending Engineer posted as Chief General

Manager on deputation in Sewerage &

Infrastructural Development Corporation of Goa

Limited for a period of one year beyond the age of

his superannuation w.e.f. 01-01-2020 to 31-12-2020

in public interest subject to vigilance clearance,

concurrence of Finance Department and approval

of Council of Ministers;

And whereas, the Vigilance Department has

submitted Vigilance Clearance stating that, no

Disciplinary Proceedings/Vigilance cases are

pending or being contemplated against Shri Deelip

M. Dhavalikar;

And whereas, the Finance Department vide its

U.O. No. 1400072320 dated 15-04-2020 concurred

the proposal for grant of extension to Shri Deelip

M. Dhavalikar, Superintending Engineer posted as

Chief General Manager on deputation in Sewerage

& Infrastructural Development Corporation of Goa

Limited subject to Cabinet approval and adherence

of all Rules in force;

And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its

XXVIth meeting held on 13-05-2020 resolved to

grant ex-post facto approval for extension in service

beyond superannuation to Shri Deelip M.

Dhavalikar, Superintending Engineer posted as

Chief General Manager on deputation in Sewerage

& Infrastructural Development Corporation of Goa

Limited for a period of one year w.e.f. 01-01-2020 to

31-12-2020;

Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to

confirm the Order No. 13/30/2016-PER/3909 dated

31-12-2019 granting extension in service beyond

superannuation to Shri Deelip M. Dhavalikar,

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

111

Superintending Engineer posted as Chief General

Manager on deputation in Sewerage &

Infrastructural Development Corporation of Goa

Limited for a period of one year w.e.f. 01-01-2020 to

31-12-2020.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Maya Pednekar, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2020.

______

Order

No. 13/27/2016/PER/1194

Whereas, Government vide Order No. 13/27/2016-

-PER/3351 dated 29-11-2019 was pleased to grant

extension in services to Shri Mahesh V. Vengurlekar,

Principal, Goa College of Art, Altinho, Panaji-Goa

beyond the date of his superannuation for a period

of six months w.e.f. 01-12-2019 to 31-05-2020 in

public interest subject to vigilance clearance,

concurrence of Finance Department and approval

of Council of Ministers;

And whereas, the Vigilance Department has

submitted Vigilance Clearance stating that, no

Disciplinary Proceedings/Vigilance cases are

pending or being contemplated against Shri

Mahesh V. Vengurlekar;

And whereas, the Finance Department vide its

U.O. No. 1400072524 dated 25-04-2020 concurred

the proposal for grant of extension to Shri Mahesh

V. Vengurlekar, Principal, Goa College of Art,

Altinho, Panaji-Goa subject to Cabinet approval and

adherence of all Rules in force;

And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its

XXVIth meeting held on 13-05-2020 resolved to

grant ex-post facto approval for extension in service

beyond superannuation to Shri Mahesh V.

Vengurlekar, Principal, Goa College of Art, Altinho,

Panaji-Goa beyond the date of his superannuation

for a period of six months w.e.f. 01-12-2019 to

31-05-2020.

Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to

confirm the Order No. 13/27/2016-PER/3351 dated

29-11-2019 granting extension in service beyond

superannuation to Shri Mahesh V. Vengurlekar,

Principal, Goa College of Art, Altinho, Panaji-Goa

beyond the date of his superannuation for a period

of six months w.e.f. 01-12-2019 to 31-05-2020.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Maya Pednekar, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2020.

______

Order

No. 5/17/2019-PER/1215

On recommendation of the Goa Service Board

and with the approval of the Government,

Smt. Asha Harmalkar, Junior Scale Officer of Goa

Civil Service is posted as Dy. Director (Admn.), DoIT,

with immediate effect, in public interest.

Smt. Harmalkar shall also hold the additional

charge of the post of Dy. Director (Admn.),

Directorate of Printing & Stationery.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 21st May, 2020.

________

Memorandum

No. 6/4/2020-PER/1180

Read: (1) Memorandum No. 6/4/2016-PER dated 28-06-2016.

(2) Order No. 6/11/2017/2616-PER dated 23-10-2018.

(3) Order No. 6/11/2017-PER/1662 dated 14-06-2019.

(4) Order No. 6/11/2017-PER/1169 dated 15-05-2020.

Whereas, the final seniority of Junior Administrative Grade (JAG) Officers of Goa Civil Service was

issued vide Memorandum dated 28-06-2016 cited in preamble at Sl. No. 1;

And whereas, on the recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee held on 15-10-2018

conveyed by the Goa Public Service Commission for promotion to the post of Junior Administrative

Grade, 25 Senior Scale Officers were promoted to the post of Junior Administrative Grade in Level 12 of

CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2016 under Rule 32 of Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016 vide Order dated 23-10-2018

read at Sr. No. 2 in the preamble;

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

112

And whereas, in the review DPC held on 29-05-2019 and 11-05-2020, officers at Sr. No. 8, 27 and 19 were

promoted in the order of their merit with due regard to the seniority within their respective grading vide

order dated 14-06-2019 and 15-05-2020 read at Sr. No. 3 and 4 respectively in the preamble;

And now therefore, in accordance with their ranking of the select list prepared and conveyed by the

Commission vide DPC minutes from time to time, the tentative seniority of the Junior Administrative

Grade Officers is drawn as follows:

Sr.

Name of the Officer

Date of birth

Date of

Remarks

No.

appointment

in Junior

in Senior

in JAG

Scale

Shri Gurudas P. Pilarnekar

06-11-1964

11-04-2003

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

Smt. Shabari Manjrekar

09-12-1964

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

@ Ruhi Redkar

Shri Meghanath P. Porob

13-05-1968

11-04-2003

10-04-2017

23-10-2018

—

Shri Venancio Furtado

18-05-1966

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

Shri Narayan V. Prabhudessai

26-06-1962

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

Shri Derrik P. Neto

19-03-1967

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

Shri Srinet N. Kotwale

13-05-1979

25-07-2003

10-04-2017

23-10-2018

—

Shri Dipak Dessai

16-02-1968

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

14-06-2019

—

Shri V. P. Dangui

27-09-1973

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

10. Shri Dipak M. Bandekar

12-03-1967

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

11. Shri Vikas S. N. Gaunekar

21-08-1967

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

12. Smt. Deepali D. Naik

18-07-1968

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

13. Shri Raju V. Gawas

25-12-1969

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

14. Shri Anthony J. D’Souza

08-01-1973

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

15. Smt. Sandhya S. Kamat

15-07-1965

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

16. Shri Damodar S. Morajkar

22-03-1967

12-09-2006

10-04-2017

23-10-2018

—

17. Smt. Laura Britto e Madre

28-05-1964

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

Deus

18. Smt. Irene Vitoria Sequeira

12-04-1962

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

19. Shri Shivaji Dessai

15-06-1961

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

15-05-2020

—

20. Shri Vassudev N. Shetye

06-09-1971

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

21. Shri Rajendra D. Mirajkar

08-11-1964

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

22. Shri R. K. Satardekar

12-07-1969

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

23. Smt. Sneha S. Morajkar

21-09-1961

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

24. Shri Pravin M. S. Barad

20-05-1963

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

25. Shri Ashok V. Rane

13-07-1961

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

26. Smt. Upasana Mazgaonkar

01-07-1971

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

27. Shri Prashant Shirodkar

08-05-1967

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

14-06-2019

—

28. Shri Sanjeev C. Gauns Dessai

14-06-1970

12-09-2006

09-12-2016

23-10-2018

—

The seniority shall be subject to review DPCs, if any, pursuant to the order of Hon’ble High Court dated

12-04-2017, in WP No. 1089/2016.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

113

All the Junior Administrative Grade Officers of Goa Civil Service from Sr. No. 01 onwards are requested

to scrutinize the list and in case they have any objections as regards to seniority assigned, they shall

intimate in writing to the undersigned on or before 01-06-2020. Objections received thereafter, shall not

be entertained.

Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Public Health

Order

No. 44/28/2017-I/PHD/905

Government is pleased to transfer the following

Medical Officers under Directorate of Health

Services and post them at the places indicated in

Col. No. 4 against their names with immediate effect,

until further orders:-

Sr.

Name of the

Present place

Proposed

No.

Medical Officer

of posting

transfer at

1. Dr. Jose M. Tavares,

PHC,

CHC, Canacona

Medical Officer

Balli

vice Dr. Shaba

Gaonkar trans-

ferred.

2. Dr. Shaba Gaonkar,

CHC,

PHC, Balli vice

Medical Officer

Canacona Dr. Jose M.

Tavares trans-

ferred.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 14th May, 2020.

________

Order

No. 7/1/2001-I/PHD(Part-I)/919

On the recommendation of Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide letter No. COM/II/

/12/54(1)/2020/482 dated 05-05-2020, the

Government is pleased to declare satisfactory

completion of probation period of two years of Shri

Chandrakant R. Kambli, Senior Scientific Officer

(Food) under Directorate of Food & Drugs

Administration and to confirm him in the said post

with effect from the date of his completion of

probation period.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2020.

Order

No. 7/1/2001-I/PHD(Part-I)/920

On the recommendation of Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide letter No. COM/II/

/12/54(2)/2020/481 dated 05-05-2020, the

Government is pleased to declare satisfactory

completion of probation period of two years of Smt.

Nilima V. Mishal, Senior Scientific Officer (Drugs)

under Directorate of Food & Drugs Administration

and to confirm her in the said post with effect from

the date of her completion of probation period.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2020.

______

Order

No. 13/25/2002-I/PHD/921

On the recommendation of Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

/II/11/56(2)/07/480 dated 05-05-2020, the

Government is pleased to promote Smt. Prarthana

D. Kamat, Assistant Chemist (Drugs) in the

Directorate of Food & Drugs Administration to the

post of Chemist (Drugs) (Group ‘B’ Non-Gazetted)

in the Level 6 of Pay Matrix [PB-2 Rs. 9300-34800

plus Grade Pay Rs. 4200/- (pre-revised)] on regular

basis with immediate effect.

The above Officer shall be on probation for a

period of two years from the date of joining.

The promotion is made against the vacancy

occurred due to the promotion of Smt. Medha S.

Tarcar to the post of Junior Scientific Officer

(Drugs) in the Directorate of Food & Drugs

Administration.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2020.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

114

Order

No. 13/25/2002-I/PHD/922

On the recommendation of Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

/II/11/56(2)/07/480 dated 05-05-2020, the

Government is pleased to promote Shri Pundalik

Shankar Gawade, Assistant Chemist (Food) in the

Directorate of Food & Drugs Administration to the

post of Chemist (Food) (Group ‘B’ Non-Gazetted) in

the Level 6 of Pay Matrix [PB-2 Rs. 9300-34800 plus

Grade Pay Rs. 4200/- (pre-revised)] on regular basis

with immediate effect.

The above Officer shall be on probation for a

period of two years from the date of joining.

The promotion is made against the vacancy

occurred due to the retirement on superannuation

of Smt. Effie Monteiro, Chemist (Food) in the

Directorate of Food & Drugs Administration.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Swati A. Dalvi, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2020.

________

Order

No. 4/1/2003-II/PHD/Vol.I/1072

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/II/11/30(4)/14/484 dated 05-05-2020,

Government is pleased to promote Dr. Siddhesh

Prakash Prabhu, Lecturer to the post of Assistant

Professor in the Department of Anatomy in Goa

Medical College and Hospital, Bambolim on regular

basis in the Level 11 of Pay Matrix and other

allowances to be fixed as per rules with immediate

effect.

The promotion is made against the vacancy

occurred due to the promotion of Dr. Rajani

Dubhashi to the post of Associate Professor in the

Department of Anatomy vide Order No. 4/25/2002-

-II/PHD(Part) dated 12-02-2007 and subsequently

revived vide Order No. 4/1/2018-II/PHD/1194 dated

14-08-2019.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 19th May, 2020.

Order

No. 4/14/2003-II/PHD/Vol.IX/1078

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/II/12/30(2)/06/483 dated 05-05-2020, the

Government is pleased to declare Dr. Clarista

Meleena Quadros, Assistant Lecturer in the

Department of Anatomy, Goa Medical College as

having satisfactorily completed her probation

period of two years w.e.f. 06-09-2017 to 05-09-2019,

and to confirm her in the post of Assistant Lecturer

in the Department of Anatomy in Goa Medical

College, Bambolim, with effect from the date of

completion of her probation period.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 19th May, 2020.

________

Notification

No. 9/1/2018-III/PHD/1065

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section

45 read with Section 46 of the Mental Health Care

Act, 2017 (Central Act 10 of 2017) read with

Rule 3 of the Mental Healthcare (State Mental

Health Authority) Rules, 2018, the Government of

Goa hereby establishes the Goa State Mental

Health Authority consisting of the following

members, namely:-

Principal Secretary/Secretary — Chairperson

(Health)

ex officio.

Additional Secretary/

— Member

/Joint Secretary (Health)

ex officio.

Director of Health Services

— Member

ex officio.

Director of Social Welfare

— Member

ex officio.

Additional Secretary/

— Member

/Joint Secretary (Home)

ex officio.

Additional Secretary/

— Member

/Joint Secretary (Finance)

ex officio.

Additional Secretary/

— Member

/Joint Secretary (Law)

ex officio.

Professor and Head of

— Member

Department of Psychiatry

ex officio.

(IPHB)

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

115

Dr. Abhijit Nadkarni

— Non-Official

Member.

10. Dr. Gnnanaprakasham

— Non-Official

Member.

11. Smt. Deepali Naik

— Non-Official

Member.

12. Nitasha Bohra

— Non-Official

Member.

13. Smt. Yamuna Gurudas

— Non-Official

Pangam

Member.

14. Amanda Rodrigues

— Non-Official

Member.

15. Prashanti Talpankar

— Non-Official

Member.

16. Dr. Peter Castelino (COOJ)

— Non-Official

Member.

17. Mrs. Maryann Lobo D’mello

— Non-Official

(KALLJI)

Member.

18. Dr. Ravindra Agarwal

— Non-Official

(ANTARMAN)

Member.

19. Jinu J. Puliyampalliy

— Non-Official

(CHAITANYA)

Member.

This Notification shall come into force on the

date of it’s publication in Official Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health-I).

Porvorim, 18th May, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Town & Country Planning

Notification

No. 4-5-2-84-UDD(Pt)/2012-19/919

In exercise of the powers conferred by

sub-section (1) and (3) of Section 20 of the Goa,

Daman and Diu Town and Country Planning Act,

1974 (Act 21 of 1975), read with Rule 3 of the Goa,

Daman and Diu Town and Country Planning

(Planning and Development Authorities) Rules,

1977 and Section 21 of the General Clauses Act,

1897 (Act No. 10 of 1897), the Government of Goa

hereby amends the Government Notification

No. 4-5-2-84-UDD(PT)/12/2339 dated 17-09-2019,

published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 25

dated 19-09-2019 (hereinafter referred to as the

“said Notification”) as follows, namely:-

In the said Notification, for the entry against

serial No. 9, the following entry shall be

substituted, namely:-

“9. Shri Narayan Naik

Member of Village Panchayat

—

Member.”

of Sancoale

This Notification shall come into force on the

date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner & ex officio

Joint Secretary (Planning).

Panaji, 22nd May, 2020.

———uuu———

Department of Transport

Directorate of Transport

Notification

No. D.Tpt/EST/1452/293/2020/1167

Read: Notification No. D.Tpt/EST/1452/203/2014/

/396 dated 31-01-2014.

In partial modification to the Notification No.

D.Tpt/EST/1452/203/2014/396 dated 31-01-2014,

Government is pleased to amend sub-clause (iv) of

Clause 9 of Notification No. D.Tpt/EST/1452/2001/

/1339 dated 19-09-2001 of the Goa State Subsidy

for Replacement of old Passenger Buses Scheme,

2001 as follows:-

iv)

Shri Caetano Xavier,

—

Member.

Vaddem, near Merces Chapel,

Vasco-da-Gama, Goa

Representative of Bus Owners

Association

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Rajan Satardekar, Director & ex officio Addl.

Secretary (Transport).

Panaji, 21st May, 2020.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 9

28TH MAY, 2020

116

Department of Water Resources

Office of the Chief Engineer

Order

No. 3/25-4/87/CE-WRD/Adm.I/167

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service Commission as conveyed vide confidential letter

No. COM/II/11/27(2)/2020/478 dated 04-05-2020, Government is pleased to order the promotion of Foreman

(Agriculture) to the post of Soil Survey In-charge (SSI) in Water Resources Department on regular basis

in the Pay Matrix Level No. 6 with immediate effect and posted as indicated below:

Sr.

Name of promotee

Present designation and

Designation and place

Remarks

No.

place of posting

of posting on promotion

1. Shri Jairam U. G.

Foreman (Agriculture),

Soil Survey In-charge (SSI),

Promotion.

Dessai

O/o the Executive Engineer,

O/o the Superintending Engineer,

Works Division-XIV, W.R.D.,

Circle-IV, W.R.D., Gogal,

Rawandfond, Navelim,

Margao-Goa thereby relieving

Salcete-Goa

Smt. Kameshwari Raikar, Soil Survey

In-charge posted on deputation

to WRD

The officer shall be on probation for a period of two years as specified in the column No. 10 of the

Recruitment Rules notified in the Official Gazette, Series I No. 18 dated 01-08-2019.

This is issued vide Government approval No. 2904/F dated 18-05-2020.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

S. D. Patil, Chief Engineer & ex officio Addl. Secretary (WR).

Porvorim, 22nd May, 2020.

________

Order

No. 3/25-4/87/CE-WRD/Adm.I/168

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service Commission as conveyed vide confidential letter

No. COM/II/11/27(1)/2020/477 dated 04-05-2020, Government is pleased to order the promotion of Foreman

(Agriculture) to the post of Water Management Specialist (WMS) in Water Resources Department on

regular basis in the Pay Matrix Level No. 6 with immediate effect and posted as indicated below:

Sr.

Name of promotee

Present designation and

Designation and place

Remarks

No.

place of posting

of posting on promotion

1. Shri Shivanand

Foreman (Agriculture),

Water Management Specialist (WMS),

Promotion.

G. Naik Gaonkar

O/o the Executive Engineer,

O/o the Superintending Engineer,

Works Division-V, W.R.D.,

Circle-IV, W.R.D., Gogal,

Karapur, Tisk

Margao-Goa

The officer shall be on probation for a period of two years as specified in the column No. 10 of the

Recruitment Rules notified in the Official Gazette, Series I No. 18 dated 01-08-2019.

This is issued vide Government approval No. 2903/F dated 18-05-2020.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

S. D. Patil, Chief Engineer & ex officio Addl. Secretary (WR).

Porvorim, 22nd May, 2020.

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 14.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—59/160–5/2020.