Panaji, 15th July, 2021 (Asadha 24, 1943)
SERIES II No. 16
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Co-operation
Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies
—
Order
No. 15-348-ADT/RCS/2020/765
Ref.: 1. Order No. 15-348-ADT/RCS/2020/2143
dated 25-09-2020.
Whereas, in terms of Section 68 of the Goa
Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, restrictions were
imposed on the various Co-operative Societies
for not complying the statutory provision of
Section 74(3) & (4) of the Goa Co-operative Societies
Act, 2001.
And whereas, the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative
Societies, Quepem Zone, Quepem-Goa, vide letter
dated 16-02-2021 has informed that society at
Sr. No. 21 Shree Kamaxi Urban Co-op. Credit Society
Ltd., Curchorem-Goa and society at Sr. No. 26, The
Loliem Poinguinim Secondary School Staff
Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Loliem-Goa of
order referred above, amongst the enlisted on
whom restrictions were imposed, have conducted
audit subsequently after imposition of restrictions.
And whereas, as per the provisions of Section 68(2)
of The Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, powers
to modify or cancel any directions issued under
sub-section (1) of Section 68 lies with the
Government.
Now therefore, considering aforesaid fact and
circumstances as mentioned above, in exercise of
the powers under Section 68(2) of the Goa
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-23
325
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, the Government
is pleased to withdraw the restrictions imposed on
Shree Kamaxi Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd.,
Curchorem-Goa and The Loliem Poinguinim Sec.
School Staff Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Loliem-Goa,
of the aforesaid order.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Arvind B. Khutkar, Registrar & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Co-op. Societies).
Panaji, 28th June, 2021.
________
Order
No. 15/344/ADT/RCS/2020/779
Whereas due to outbreak of Covid-19 which is
still continuing and due to various restrictions
imposed by the State Government, the societies
are findings it difficult to comply with the statutory
requirements within the time frame assigned under
the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act
36 of 2001) (hereinafter referred to as the “said
Act”). Further, due to social distancing norm
imposed by the Government, the societies are also
unable to convene their General Body meetings.
And whereas, the Government decided to
exempt the societies from the restriction of the
time limit specified in certain sections of the said
Act and allowed the societies further time to
comply with the provision of these sections.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers
conferred under Section 126A of the Goa Co-operative
Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act 36 of 2001), the
Government of Goa hereby exempt the Co-operative
Societies from the provisions to the extent
specified below:
(i) Under Section 72(2) of the said Act, meeting
as stated therein shall be held on or before
31st day of December, 2021.
Note:- There is one Extraordinary issue to the Official
Gazette, Series II No. 15 dated 08-07-2021
namely, Extraordinary dated 08-07-2021 from
pages 323 to 324 regarding Notification from
Department of General Administration.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
326
(ii) Under Section 73(4) of the said Act, the
accounts as stated therein shall be prepared
on or before 30th day of June, 2021.
(iii) Under Section 74(4) of the said Act, the
accounts as stated therein shall caused to
be audited on or before 31st day of December,
2021.
(iv) Under Section 81 of the said Act, returns
shall be filed on or before 31st day of
December, 2021.
This order shall come into force with immediate
effect and shall remain in force till 31st December,
2021.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Arvind Khutkar, Registrar & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Co-op. Societies).
Panaji, 28th June, 2021.
________
Order
No. 3/8/Urban Credit/TS II/QZ/2020/RCS/842
Read: 1. Order No. 3/8/Urban Credit/TS II/QZ/
/2020/RCS/5725 dated 02-03-2020.
2. Notification No. 3/3/Urban Credit/
/TS-11/PZ/2017/RCS/Suppl/5306 dated
10-02-2020.
3. Letter No. QUCCS/HORCS/2021-2022/137
dated 21-04-2021, received from the
Chairman of The Quepem Urban
Multipurpose Co-op. Society Ltd.,
Quepem-Goa.
In exercise of powers conferred upon me vide
Nofication read at Sr. No. 2 above and considering
the request made by the Chairman, The Quepem
Urban Multipurpose Co-op. Society Ltd., Quepem-
Goa vide letter referred to at Sr. No. 1 above I,
Arvind B. Khutkar, Registrar of Co-op. Societies,
hereby extend the term of the Sale-cum-Recovery
Officer appointed vide Order No. 3/8/Urban/Credit/
TSII/QZ/2020/RCS/5725 dated 02-03-2020 referred
to hereinabove, up to 31-03-2022.
All other terms and conditions mentioned in the
order shall remain unchanged.
Arvind B. Khutkar, Registrar (Co-op. Societies).
Panaji, 6th July, 2021.
Office of the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative
Societies
No. RES-(a)26/BZ/Goa/277
Read: 1. Certificate of Registration dated
04-09-1996 of Deendayal Nagari Sahakari
Path Saunstha Maryadit, Bicholim-Goa.
2. This office Memo No. RES-(a)26/BZ/Goa
dated 22-06-2021.
Consequent upon the change in classification
vide amendment as Sr. No. 02 of above, the
certificate of Registration of Deendayal Nagari
Sahakari Path Saunstha Maryadit, Bicholim is
amended as under:
Amended Certificate of Registration
The Certificate of Registration dated 04-09-1996
bearing code symbol No. RES(a)26/NZ/Goa stands
amended with immediate effect to the following
extent.
The sub-classification of the society appearing
in the registration certificate referred at Sr. No. 1,
be read as Deendayal Multipurpose Co-operative
Society Ltd., Deendayal Bhavan, Bicholim-Goa in
place of Deendayal Nagari Sahakari Path Saunstha
Maryadit, Bicholim Under classification No. 10(C)
under sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Goa Co-operative
Societies Rules, 2003.
Pankaj V. Marathe, Asstt. Registrar (Co-op.
Societies), Bicholim Zone.
Sankhali, 22nd June, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Education, Art & Culture
Directorate of Higher Education
__
Order
No. ACAD III/SHEC/Filling of Posts/02/2019/1790
Read: Memorandum No. ACAD III/SHEC/Filling
of Posts/02/2019/607 dated 28-04-2021.
On the recommendation of the Goa Public
Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter
No. COM/I/5/78(2)/2019/957 dated 17-02-2021,
Government is pleased to appoint Shri Niyan Joseph
Savio Marchon to the post of Professor for Teaching,
Learning and Educational Technology for State
Higher Education Council (Group “A” Gazetted)
under Directorate of Higher Education on temporary
basis in the Pay Matrix Level 14 with immediate
effect, and as per the terms and conditions
contained in the Memorandum cited above.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
327
Shri Niyan Joseph Savio Marchon shall be on
probation for a period of one year extendable by a
maximum period of one year in case of unsatisfactory
performance.
Shri Niyan Joseph Savio Marchon has been
declared medically fit by the Medical Board. The
appointment is made subject to the verification of
his character and antecedents. In the event of any
adverse remarks noticed by the Government on
verification of his character and antecedents, his
services shall be terminated.
He shall draw his salary against the newly
created post vide Order No. ADMN/ASSESSMENT
OF MANPOWER/28/2018/2843 dated 25-09-2018.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Prasad Lolayekar, IAS, Director (Higher
Education) & Executive Director (SHEC).
Porvorim, 05th July, 2021.
———u———
Directorate of Technical Education
College Section
__
Order
No. 16/286/OTT/GEC/DTE/12-13/695
Approval of the Government is hereby conveyed
for the transfer of Shri Balkrishna M. Chodankar,
Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering, Government
Polytechnic, Bicholim to Goa College of
Engineering, Farmagudi with effect from 29-06-2021
against the vacant post of Assistant Workshop
Superintendent at Goa College of Engineering,
Farmagudi, vacated by Shri D.V. Shirodkar w.e.f.
30-06-2016 (a.n.) vide No. 4/44/83-GEC(E)/1220 dated
30-06-2016.
Shri Balkrishna M. Chodankar shall sign a bond
to serve five years from the date of his joining at
Goa College of Engineering.
Shri Chodankar is transferred at his own request
and shall not be entitled for transfer TA and joining
time. He shall complete works of current academic
term at Government Polytechnic, Bicholim as per
schedule.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dr. Vivek B. Kamat, Director & ex officio
Additional Secretary (Technical Education).
Porvorim, 29th June, 2021.
———u———
Directorate of Art & Culture
__
Order
No. DAC/Acctts/RBB/Committee/2020-21/1071
In exercise of powers conferred under Clause 5
of the Constitution of Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa,
the Government is pleased to nominate Shri Jayant
Jhadav, R/o Sasmollem, Baina, Vasco-Goa as the
Chairman of Ravindra Bhavan, Baina-Goa with
immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sagun R. Velip, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Art & Culture).
Panaji, 8th July, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Environment & Climate Change
__
Order
No. 30-3-2021/ENVT&CC/DIR/COURT-MATTER/237
Sub.:-
Constitution of Committee as directed by the Hon’ble NGT (Principal Bench in O.A. No. 42/
/2021 (WZ) Royla C Fernandes V/s State of Goa & Ors. dated 22-06-2021.
Ref.:-
Order in O.A. No. 42/2021 (WZ) dated 22-06-2021.
That Royla C. Fernandes had filed application bearing OA No. 42/2021 (WZ) before the National Green
Tribunal seeking directions that the road constructed is in violations of environmental norms in
construction of balance stretch of Margao National Highway Western Bypass Road through the villages
Seraulim to Benaulim, which is 2.75 K.m. from wholesale fish market road Seraulim to Varca road (Ch. 31/
900 to Ch. 34/650. The road is being constructed by the PWD, Goa through Respondent No. 13 - M/s.
M. Venkata Rao, Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., Caranzalem, Goa.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
328
By the order dated 22-06-2021, the Tribunal had issued that following direction at para 10 stating as
“...... 10. Accordingly, we direct constitution of a ten member joint Committee comprising SEIAA, Goa, Goa
State Biodiversity Board, Goa State Wetland Authority, PWD, Goa, Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority
(GCZMA), District Magistrate, South Goa, Water Resources Department, State PCB, a nominee of National
Wetland Authority and a nominee of PCCF (HoFF), Goa. The State PCB and SEIAA, Goa will be the nodal
agency for co-ordination and compliance. A meeting of the Committee may be held within two weeks and
after taking stock of the situation, plan of action may be prepared and executed. The Committee may also
undertake visit to the site as early as possible. An action taken report may be filed within three months
by e-mail at [email protected] preferably in the form of searchable PDF/OCR Support PDF and not in the
form of Image PDF. The applicant is at liberty to make representation to the Committee through the nodal
agency.”
The State Government hereby constitutes the Committee with the following members:-
Sr. Agency
Representative
Designation
No.
1
2
3
4
1. GCZMA
Chairperson, GCZMA
Chairperson of Committee.
2. District Magistrate South
District Magistrate South
Member.
3. Goa-SEIAA
Member Secretary, Goa- SEIAA
Member.
4. GSBB
Member Secretary, GSBB
Member.
5. GSWA
Arch. Manguesh Prabhugaonkar,
Member.
Member, GSWA
6. PWD
Principal Chief Engineer or his
Member.
representative not below the rank
of Chief Engineer
7. WRD
Chief Engineer
Member.
8. NWA
Nominee appointed by NWA
Member.
9. PCCF
Shri Saurabh Kumar, CF
Member.
10. GSPCB
Shri Sanjeev Joglekar, Sr. EE
Member Convener/Nodal Person.
The term of reference of Committee are as mentioned in the NGT Order dated 22-06-2021. This is issued
with the approval of the State Government vide U.O. No. 4082 dated 06-07-2021.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Dasharath M. Redkar, Director & ex officio Jt. Secretary (Environment & Climate Change).
Panaji, 07th July, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Finance
Directorate of Accounts
__
Order
No. DA/Admn/45-2/2020-21/TR-495/82
On the recommendation of the D.P.C. as conveyed
by the Public Service Commission vide Letter No.
COM/II/11/1(1)/2021/55 dated 31-05-2021,
Government is pleased to promote the following
Assistant Accounts Officers under the Common
Accounts Cadre of the Directorate of Accounts to
the post of Dy. Director of Accounts/Accounts
Officer (Group “A” Gazetted) in Level 10 of the Pay
Matrix (i.e. Pay Band PB-3 Rs. 15,600-39,100, Grade
Pay Rs. 5,400/- pre-revised).
Sr.
Name of the Officers
No.
1
2
1. Smt. Shanti U. Lotlikar.
2. Smt. Sunita B. Singh.
3. Smt. Manisha D. Cascar.
4. Shri Uday C. Wadkar (SC).
5. Smt. Neeta A. Borkar.
6 Shri Marcelo Rodrigues.
7. Smt. Saroj S. Naik.
8. Smt. Victoria Gonsalves.
9. Smt. Bharati B. Pai.
10. Shri Devendra Arlekar (SC).
11. Smt. Jivi S. Jethaji (SC).
12. Smt. Filomena L. D’Cruz Rodrigues (ST).
13. Shri Naresh S. Mangueshker (ST).
14. Shri Agostinho Fernandes (ST).
15. Shri Nilesh R. Gaonkar (ST).
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
329
The above Officers shall be on probation for a period of two years from the date of joining to the post
of Dy. Director of Accounts/Accounts Officers.
Government is further pleased to order the posting of the following Dy. Director of Accounts/Accounts
Officers under the Common Accounts Cadre in the Departments shown against their names:-
Sr.
Name of the Dy. Director
Place of present posting
Proposed place of posting on
No.
of Accounts/
as Assistant Accounts
promotion to the post of
/Accounts Officer
Officer
Dy. Director of Accounts/
/Accounts Officer
1
2
3
4
1. Smt. Shanti U. Lotlikar
Government Polytechnic Mayem,
Directorate of Higher Education,
Bicholim-Goa
Porvorim-Goa, thereby relieving
Shri Subraj S. Kanekar, Deputy
Director of Accounts of the
additional charge.
2. Smt. Sunita B. Singh
Holding post of Dy. Director of
Department of Information
Accounts on officiating basis in
Technology, Altinho, Panaji-Goa.
the Department of Information
Technology, Altinho, Panaji-Goa
with additional charge in the
Department of Tourism, Panaji-Goa
3. Smt. Manisha D. Cascar
Holding post of Dy. Director of
Kala Academy, Campal, Panaji-
Accounts on officiating basis in
-Goa (on deputation).
the Directorate of Agriculture,
Tonca, Caranzalem-Goa with
additional charge in the Kala
Academy Goa, Campal, Panaji-Goa
4. Shri Uday C. Wadkar
Department of Tourism,
Department of Tourism, Panaji-
(SC)
Panaji-Goa
-Goa, thereby relieving Smt.
Sunita B. Singh, Deputy Director
of Accounts of the additional
charge.
5. Smt. Neeta A. Borkar
Directorate of Accounts,
Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Margao-
Panaji-Goa
-Goa (on deputation) thereby
relieving Shri Martinho
Fernandes, Deputy Director of
Accounts of the additional
charge.
6. Shri Marcelo Rodrigues
Directorate of Sports & Youth
Directorate of Accounts, South
Affairs, Panaji-Goa
Branch Office, Margao-Goa thereby
relieving Shri Francisco X. Rodrigues,
Deputy Director of Accounts of
the additional charge.
7. Smt. Saroj S. Naik
Directorate of Accounts,
Directorate of Accounts,
Panaji-Goa
Panaji-Goa.
8. Smt. Victoria Gonsalves
Central Education Zone,
North Goa Zilla Panchayat,
Panaji-Goa
Panaji-Goa (on deputation) there-
by relieving Shri Dilip S.
Morajkar, Dy. Director of
Accounts of the additional
charge.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
330
9. Smt. Bharati B. Pai
Directorate of Accounts,
Entertainment Society of Goa,
Panaji-Goa
Panaji-Goa (on deputation) there-
by relieving Smt. Milan S.
Vaingankar, Deputy Director of
Accounts of the additional charge.
10. Shri Devendra Arlekar (SC)
Corporation of the City of Panaji,
Directorate of Accounts, Panaji-
Panaji-Goa (on deputation)
-Goa and on working arrange-
ment in Imagine Panaji Smart
City Development Limited,
Panaji-Goa, thereby relieving Shri
Sarvottam P. Satardekar, Deputy
Director of Accounts of the
additional charge.
11. Smt. Jivi S. Jethaji (SC)
Government Polytechnic,
Food & Drugs Administration,
Altinho, Panaji-Goa
Bambolim-Goa.
12. Smt. Filomena L. D’Cruz
Directorate of Urban Development,
O/o the Administrative Medical
Rodrigues (ST)
Panaji-Goa
Officer, Employees State Insurance
Corporation, Panaji-Goa thereby
relieving Smt. Savita Kokodkar,
Dy. Director of Accounts of the
additional charge.
13. Shri Naresh S.
Directorate of Education,
Directorate of Agriculture,
Mangueshker (ST)
Porvorim-Goa
Tonca, Caranzalem, Tiswadi-Goa.
14. Shri Agostinho Fernandes
Directorate of Accounts, South
Goa Meat Complex, Panaji-Goa
(ST)
Branch Office, Margao-Goa
(on deputation) relieving thereby
Smt. Maria Brenda Colacao, Deputy
Director of Accounts of
additional charge.
15. Shri Nilesh R. Gaonkar (ST)
O/o the Principal Chief Engineer,
Commercial Taxes, Altinho,
PWD, Altinho, Panaji-Goa
Panaji-Goa.
The newly promoted Dy. Director of Accounts/Accounts Officers shall however continue to hold
additional charge of the post of Assistant Accounts Officers held by them prior to their promotion until
further orders.
Further, the Government is also pleased to order the transfer/additional charge to be held by the
following Deputy Director of Accounts/Accounts Officer under the Common Accounts Cadre in the
Department as shown against their names in public interest:-
Sr.
Name of the Dy. Director
Place of present posting
Proposed place of posting/
No.
of Accounts/
/additional charge
/Accounts Officer
1
2
3
4
16. Smt. Maria Brenda Colacao
Commercial Taxes, Altinho,
Sanjay School, Porvorim-Goa (on
Panaji-Goa
deputation) thereby relieving
Shri Kishore D. Kothambikar, Dy.
Director of Accounts of the
additional charge.
1
2
3
4
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
331
17. Shri Rudreshwar Shetye
Food & Drugs Administration,
Goa State Urban Development
Bambolim-Goa, with additional
Agency, Panaji-Goa (on
charge in Goa State Urban
deputation).
Development Agency, Panaji-Goa
The above promoted officers may exercise an option for fixation of pay under F.R. 22(1)(a)(i) within one
month from the date of promotion.
The posting of Officers at Sr. Nos. 3, 5, 8, 9, 14, 16 & 17 will be on deputation basis initially for a period
of one year. They shall be governed as per the standard terms of deputation contained in the O.M. No.
13/4/74-PER dated 20-11-2013 of the Personnel Department, Government of Goa. The Organization/Agency
shall be liable to pay to the Government leave salary and pension contribution in respect of these Officers
at the prescribed rates. On expiry of the deputation period, the Officers shall necessarily be relieved to
report back to the Parent Department, unless the deputation period is extended by the competent
authority. Overstayal for any reason whatsoever, shall render them liable for disciplinary action.
The above mentioned officers who are newly promoted to the post of Dy. Director of Accounts/Accounts
Officer shall join their promotional post within 15 days of issue of the promotion order.
On joining their promotional/new post, the officers shall send their CTC/Joining reports immediately to
this Directorate.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Dilip K. Humraskar, Director & ex officio Jt. Secretary (Accounts).
Panaji, 30th June, 2021.
———uuu———
1
2
3
4
Department of Labour
—
Order
No. 28/10/2021-LAB/297
Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the
opinion that an industrial dispute exists between
the management of M/s. Muktar Automobiles
Private Limited, Plot No. L-128, Phase III-B, Verna
Industrial Estate, Verna, Goa, and it’s workman,
Shri Yogesh Soundalkar, Technician, represented
by the Goa Union of Industrial Workers, in respect
of the matter specified in the Schedule hereto
(hereinafter referred to as the “said dispute”);
And whereas, the Government of Goa considers
it expedient to refer the said dispute for
adjudication.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers
conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as
the “said Act”), the Government of Goa hereby
refers the said dispute for adjudication to the
Industrial Tribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted
under Section 7A of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
“(1) Whether non-employment of Shri Yogesh
Soundalkar, Technician, with effect from
22-06-2020 in the organization of M/s. Muktar
Automobiles Private Limited, Plot No. L-128,
Phase III-B, Verna Industrial Estate, Verna, Goa,
amounts to refusal of employment or voluntary
resignation?
(2)
Based upon the findings on issue No. (1)
above, what relief the workman is entitled
to?”.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 25th June, 2021.
________
Notification
No. 28/2/2021-LAB/Part-II/276
The following award passed by the Industrial
Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on
16-04-2021 in Ref. No. IT/20/03 is hereby published
as required under Section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 18th June, 2021.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
332
IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND
LABOUR COURT
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Mr. Vincent D’Silva, Hon’ble Presiding
Officer)
Ref. No. IT/20/03
Workmen,
Rep. by Menezes Industrial
Complex Employees Association,
Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh,
Nirankal Road,
Curti, Ponda, Goa
… Workmen/Party I
V/s
1. M/s. Cosmed Analytical
and Central Services,
CMM Bldg., Rua de Ourem,
Panaji-Goa
… Employer/Party II (1)
2. M/s. Cosmed Analytical
and Central Services Pvt. Ltd.,
Rua de Qurem,
Panaji, Goa.
… Employer/Party II (2)
(Added as per order
dated 03-02-2005)
3. M/s. Cosme Farma
Laboratories Ltd.,
Dempo Towers, 5th Floor,
Patto, Panaji, Goa.
… Employer/Party II (3)
4. M/s. Wallace Pharmaceu-
ticals Pvt. Ltd.,
Dempo Towers, 3rd Floor,
Patto, Panaji, Goa.
.… Employer/Party II (4)
(Added as per order
dated 27-11-2008)
5. M/s. Beiersdorf (I) Ltd.,
Nirankal Road, Curti,
Ponda, Goa.
… Employer/Party II (5)
(Added as per order
dated 27-11-2008)
6. M/s. Colfax (India) Pvt. Ltd.,
Curti, Ponda, Goa.
… Employer/Party II (6)
(Added as per order
dated 27-11-2008)
Workman/Party I represented by Ld. Adv. Shri S. P.
Gaonkar.
Employer/Party II (1) absent.
Employer/Party II (2) Ex-parte.
Employer/Party II (3) represented by Ld. Adv. Shri P.
Chawdikar.
Employer/Party II (4) represented by Ld. Adv. Shri S.
M. Singbal.
Employer/Party II (5) represented by Ld. Adv. G. K.
Sardessai.
Employer/Party II (6) represented by Ld. Adv. Shri S.
M. Singbal.
AWARD
(Delivered on this the 16th day of the month
of April of the year 2021)
By Order dated 31-03-2003, bearing No. 28/26/
/2002-LAB/1047, the Government of Goa in exercise
of powers conferred by Section 10 (1)(d) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short The Act),
has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal
for adjudication.
“(1) a) Whether the action of the management of
M/s. Cosmed Analytical and Central
Services, Curti, Ponda-Goa in terminating
the services of their workpersons namely;
Ashok Vernekar, Sr. Lab. Assistant, Fatima
Rodrigues, Telephone Operator, Inacina
Afonso, Sr. Lab. Assistant, with effect from
1-11-2001, under the pretext of closure, is
legal and justified?
(b) If not, what relief the above workmen are
entitled to?
(2) (a) Whether the action of the management of
M/s. Cosmed Analytical and Central
Services, Curti, Ponda, Goa to refuse to
concede to the demands raised by Menezes
Industrial Complex Employees Association
to absorb these workmen by partner
Companies, as per staff settlement, is legal
and justified?
(b) If not, what relief the workperson are
entitled to?”
2. Upon receipt of the reference, it was registered
as IT/20/2003 and registered A/D notices were
issued to both the parties. Pursuant to service of
notices, Party I filed a claim statement at
Exhibit 4. It is a matter of record that Party II (2) to
Party II (6) were impleaded thereafter. The
Party II (2) filed the written statement at Exh. 9,
Party II (3) filed the written statement at Exh. 29,
Party II (4) filed the written statement at Exh. 33,
Party II (5) filed the written statement at Exh. 31
and the Party II (6) filed the written statement at
Exh. 32.
3. In short, the case of Party I is that the
Party II (1) is a partnership firm formed by CMM
Group of Companies to cater to the common
services such as personal, engineering, security,
quality control etc. The CACS was formed by
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
333
companies namely; CFL Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
(ii) Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and (iii)
Beiersdorf India Pvt. Ltd. The personnel and
administration was common and the personnel
were on the roll of CACS and they used to sign the
wage settlement on all behalf. The service
conditions and benefits such as pay scale and
allowances were common and governed by common
settlement. All the staff and workers of the group
companies were unionized and several settlements
were signed by the Union. The Party II in the month
of February, 2000 issued a closure notice but due
to intervention of Labour Commissioner it was
withdrawn and thereafter Party II started harassing
the workers in several ways. The Party II although
displayed a notice w.e.f. 01-11-2001 for closure
notice, it was not a closure at all and normal
working of common services were continued. The
activities of the Company were taken over by
M/s. Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., thus it was
clear that to avoid implementation of settlement,
fake closure was declared and the services of the
workmen were terminated and new workers were
employed by the Management. The activities of
Party I continued and the Companies agreed in the
settlement dated 13-04-1999 that employees would
be re-deployed and the Management will not resort
to retrenchment however, the said terms were not
implemented by the Management. The partners of
Party II (1) are all liable, jointly and severely and
therefore the demand of the workmen is legal and
justified. The termination of the workmen namely;
Ashok Vernekar, Fatima Rodrigues and Inacian
Alfonso is illegal and they were unemployed with
no source of income. Hence, they are entitled for
relief claimed.
4. In the Written Statement, Party II (2)/
/M/s. Cosmed Analytical and Central Services
Pvt. Ltd. submitted that the establishment of
Party II is closed. The termination of the services of
Party I workmen is a result of closure of the
establishment of Party II. The reference is bad-in-
-law as there is no industrial dispute existing or
apprehended. The salaries of all the workmen were
regularly paid by the Employer. Only Quality
Control Department was purchased by M/s. Wallace
Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. The workmen were
working for Party II and the services were
terminated on account of closure and all the
workmen were gainfully employed after the
termination. The termination of the workmen is in
compliance with provisions of law and therefore it
cannot be interfered.
5. In the Written Statement, the Party II (3)/
/M/s. Cosme Farma Laboratories Ltd., has submitted
that the Party II (3) along with 12 other partners
retired from CACS w.e.f. from 18-04-2000 and
therefore they are not aware of what transpired in
the employment of Party I workmen. However, the
said employees had continued to remain after
18-04-2000 with the employment of reconstituted
partnership firm CACS which was taken over by
Mr. Carlos Menezes and CACS Pvt. Ltd. The above
workmen were not on the rolls of M/s. CFL
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and therefore Party I are not
entitled to any relief against Party II (3).
6. In the Written Statement, the Party II (4) M/s.
Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., contended that
there is no liability of Party II (4) towards the claim
of Party I workmen since there never existed any
relationship of employer and employee between
Party I and Party II (4) as Party II (4) along with 12
other partners had retired from M/s. CACS w.e.f.
18-04-2000 as per Deed of Retirement dated
18-04-2000. However, the said employees continued
to remain in the services of M/s. CACS which was
operated by partners namely; Carlos Menezes and
CACS Pvt. Ltd. since they had taken over all assets
and liabilities of CACS. The alleged termination of
the workmen had taken place much after
Party II (4) retired from the partnership firm. The
retiring partners are not responsible or liable for
any demand of the employees or workers or any
other claim towards any statutory dues or liabilities
of the erstwhile firm as per the said Deed of
Retirement. There is no cause of action against
Party II (4) and as such reference is not
maintainable. No relief against Party II (4) therefore
could be granted.
7. In the written statement, the Party I I(5)/
M/s. Beiersdorf (I) Ltd. contended that there is no
liability towards claim of the Party I workmen and
there was no employer-employee relationship.The
Party II (5) retired from the partnership by way of
Deed of Retirement w.e.f. 18-04-2000 and as per the
said Deed the retiring partners shall not be liable
for demands of the employees and the workers by
virtue of the earlier settlement or otherwise and
the retiring partners shall not be liable or
responsible towards any statutory dues or
liabilities and consequent to the retirement of the
Party II (5), they are absolved of all the liabilities
and responsibilities of the erstwhile partnership.
There was no employer-employee relationship
between Party II (1) and Party II (5). The CACS was
merely a service provider not only to Party II (5) but
to other Companies too. The Party II(5) is a Company
incorporated under Companies Act and there was
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
334
no communality in the Books of Account vis-à-vis
the other Companies and therefore Party I is not
entitled for any relief.
8. In the Written statement, the Party II (6)/
M/s. Colfax (India) Pvt. Ltd. contended that there
is no liability towards the claim of the Party I
workmen since there never existed any relationship
of the employer-employee between Party II (1) and
Party II (6). The Party II (6) along with 12 other
partners retired from CACS w.e.f. 18-04-2000 and as
per the said Deed of Retirement there cannot exist
any such relationship however, the said employees
continues to remain in the services of CACS which
was operated by continuing partners namely;
Carlos Menezes and CACS Pvt. Ltd. since they have
taken over all the assets and liabilities of CACS
after 18-04-2000. The alleged termination of
workmen had taken place after they retired from
partnership. They are not responsible or liable for
any demand of the employees and workers by virtue
of the Deed of Retirement. There is no cause of
action against Party II (6) and as such the reference
is not maintainable.
9. In the rejoinder at Exh. 10, Exh. 34, Exh. 35
and Exh. 36, the Party I denied the case put forth
by the Party II companies in their Written
statements.
10. Based on the averments of the respective
parties, the following issues were framed at
Exh. 40.
1) Whether the Party I proves that the group of
companies had agreed to absorb the workers
on the roll as on 30-04-96?
2) Whether Party I proves that the closure is
fake and to avoid implementation of terms of
understanding dated 30-04-96?
3) Whether Party I proves that the termination
of services of the workmen was in violation
of understanding dated 30-04-96?
4) Whether the Party I proves that the group of
companies are liable to absorb the workmen?
5) What relief? What Order?
11. In support of the claim, Party I examined its
first witness, Smt. Fatima Rodrigues and produced
on record a copy of appointment letter dated
01-06-1973 at Exh. 49, a copy of confirmation letter
dated 28-12-73 at Exh. 50, a copy of transfer letter
dated 20-09-80 at Exh. 51, a copy of letter dated
20-09-80 to Party I by C.A.C.S. at Exh. 52, a copy of
settlement dated 13-04-99 between the Union and
the group of ten companies at Exh. 53, a copy of
letter dated 18-08-01 by C.A.C.S. to the office of
ALC at Exh. 54, and a copy of notice dated
01-10-01 by C.A.C.S. to the Secretary, Labour and
Employment at Exh. 55. During cross-examination,
a copy of the records from the Registrar Office is
taken and marked as Exh. 56. The Party I also
examined Shri Ashok Vernekar as second witness
and produced on record a copy of increment letter
dated 28-05-1975 at Exh. 59, a copy of his
promotion letter dated 24-11-97 at Exh. 60, a copy
of his increment letter dated Exh. 61 and a copy of
letter dated 22-06-74 at Exh. 62. On the other hand,
the Party II (4) M/s. Wallace Pharmaceuticals
examined Shri Eurico Noronha as witness and
produced a copy of certificate dated 30-10-2012 at
Exh. 69. The Party II (5), M/s. Beiersdorf India
Limited examined its witness Shri Praful Patil and
produced a copy of extract of register of Registrar
of Firms at Exh. 73. The Party II (4), M/s. CFL
Pharmaceuticals Ltd., examined Shri Uday
Deshpande as its witness. The Party II (6), Colfax
Laboratories (India) Private Limited examined Ms.
Elvina Noronha as witness and produced on record
a copy of letter dated 23-09-2013 of closure notice
of the Factory at Exh. 78.
12. Heard arguments. Notes of Written
arguments came to be placed on record by the
parties.
13. I have gone through the records of the case
and have duly considered the arguments advanced.
My answers to the above issues are as follows:
Issue No. 1
…
In the Affirmative
Issue No. 2
…
In the Affirmative
Issue No. 3
…
In the Affirmative.
Issue No. 4
…
In the Affirmative.
Issue No. 5
…
As per final order.
REASONS
Issue No. 1:
14. It is an admitted fact that Party I workmen
namely; Ashok Vernekar, Senior Lab Assistant,
Fatima Rodrigues, Telephone Operator and Inacian
Alfonso, Sr. Lab. Assistant were appointed by CACS
Firm w.e.f. 01-11-2001. Both Fatima Rodrigues and
Ashok Vernekar have been examined who claimed
that they were employed by CACS. There is no
dispute that CACS Firm was specifically formed to
cater to common services required by the Partner
Companies and that the Group used to sign
common settlements with the Union. Exh. 53 is one
such Joint Memorandum of Settlement dated
13-04-1999 u/s 2(p) of the Industrial Disputes Act
between the Employers of group of 10 companies
and the Union. There were various settlements for
increase in wages etc. which were handled
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
335
together for all the group companies who were the
individual partners in the CACS Firm as seen in
the settlement at Exh. 53 including the names of
partners involved in the present reference. The
said settlement clearly mandates in general clause
2 that surplus staff would be redeployed and the
Management would not resort to retrenchment. It
is, therefore, clear that all the partners had agreed
to absorb the workers as and when the
decentralization takes place. The said commitment
has not been followed by Party II partners as they
claim that they have been retired and the Firm has
been dissolved.
15. There is no dispute that CACS Firm had
never issued any closure notice and that one which
was issued was withdrawn by the partners as seen
from the Written Statement. No Deed of Retirement
or any document pertaining to the partnership
except the Registrar of firms have been produced
by the Parties. Learned Advocates for Party II have
contended that the partners namely; Wallace
Pharmaceuticals,
Beiresdorf
and
Colfax
Laboratories have retired from the partnership and
that the partnership firm was dissolved in the year
2000 and the cause of action pertaining to the
present reference is in the year 01-11-2001 and
therefore the Parties who have already retired from
the Firm cannot be made liable in order to grant
relief as prayed as all the liabilities have been
taken over by CACS Pvt. Ltd. as being the last
partner before dissolution and since winding up
petition is pending against CACS Pvt. Ltd., no
Award can be passed. They further submitted that
the settlement dated 13-04-1996 has been signed
by only two representatives on behalf of CMM
Group of Companies which is not a legal entity
and the said persons have not been examined
before the Court to prove that the settlement was
signed by Parties mentioned therein and as such
the settlement is not valid in the eyes of law as
Party I has failed to challenge the issue of closure
and filed a false claim.
16. Learned Adv. Shri S. P. Gaonkar for Party I
has submitted and rightly so that it is mandatory
on the part of the Parties contending that they
have retired from the partnership or that new
partners have been added or that the Firm itself
has been dissolved that the retirement, dissolution
or addition of the partners must be proved by
leading evidence of the procedure contemplated
under the Partnership Act, 1932. Needless to
mention, the Deed of Retirement is not produced
on record. Public notices and the notices in the
Official Gazette which is mandatory for retirement,
addition and dissolution as per Section 72 of the
Partnership Act, 1932 have also not been produced
on record and therefore in the absence of the above
documents, the partnership firm continues to be in
existence and all the partners are liable for such
act, notwithstanding their retirement, more so,
when the addition of CACS Pvt. Ltd is not proved.
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of
Anil Kumar Singh v/s Kanak Prabha Dutta, 2003
ALL LJ 2015 has held that in the absence of
retirement in the prescribed manner under the Act,
the partners continued in the partnership.
17. It is also well settled in the case of State of
Kerala v/s Saroja, AIR 1987 KER 239 that when a
partner pleads exemption from liability under
Partnership Act he has to prove retirement,
dissolution and addition etc. even if the other side
does not dispute the same. It is therefore for all
purposes the firm continues to be in existence so
does the liability of the partners. The addition of
CACS Pvt. Ltd. having not been proved in
accordance with the Partnership Act, they cannot
be considered as newly added partners. There is
also no effect of winding up of CACS Pvt. Ltd. as
firstly it in no longer a Party. Moreover, the winding
up of a Company does not affect a reference under
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as held in the
case of B. V. John v/s Coir Yarn and Textiles, AIR
1960 KER 247. The Party I workmen namely, Fatima
Rodrigues and Ashok Vernekar have reiterated their
cases by way of affidavit-in-evidence and
documents and thus proved their stands, on the
contrary, the witnesses of Party II (4), Shri Eurico
Noronha has stated that he joined in 2008 and
deposing based on records and admitted that no
public notices of retirement has been given and
that all the partners of CACS firm were availing
services of workers on the roll of CACS firm. The
witness of Party II (5) Shri Praful Patil has stated
that he was not involved with the company prior
to 2016 and did not know what services were being
taken from CACS firm. The witness of Party II (3)
Shri Uday Deshpande was also not involved with
the company prior to 2009. The witness of Party II
(6) Elvina Menezes did not know who the partners
of the partnership were and admitted that she had
not seen the documents mentioned in her affidavit.
It is therefore Party I has proved by way of evidence
and documents that the group of companies had
agreed to absorb the Party I workmen on its roll as
on 13-04-1996 in terms of the Memorandum of
understanding at Exh. 53 and hence the issue
No. 1 is answered in the affirmative.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
336
Issue No. 2:
18. There is no dispute that the only closure
notice referred to by the Parties is the one given by
CACS Pvt. Ltd., Party II (2). The Party II (2) although
has filed a Written Statement had not stepped into
the witness box. The said Partner Company was
not the employer of the Party I workmen nor any
documents have been brought on record to show
that it had taken over services of the workmen. It
is well settled in the case of The Manager,
M/s. Pyarchand Kesarimal Porwal Bidi Factory
v/s Onkar Laxman Thenge & Ors., AIR 1970 SC
823 that the transfer of services of a workman from
one employer entity to another is impermissible
without tripartite agreement, that is between the
employer, the employee and the third party, the
effect of which would be to terminate the original
contract of service and to make a new contract
between the employee and the third party and so
long as the contract of service is not terminated
and the new contract is not made, the employee
continues to be in the employment of the employer.
When an employer orders him to do a certain work
for another person, the employee still continues to
be in his employment. The third party may pay his
wages but the third party cannot dismiss him as
the right of dismissal is with the employer. In the
instant case, the Partner Companies, wanted to
dissolve the firm and as such they are bound by
the Settlement dated 13-04-1999 and because of
the obligation of absorption which was upon them,
they have made a claim of retirement and
dissolution which has not been proved by the
Party II partner companies. It is therefore the
Party I sufficiently proved that termination of the
services was in violation of Understanding dated
13-04-1999. Hence, issue No. 2 is answered in the
affirmative.
Issue No. 3:
19. There is no dispute that the Parties had
entered into the Settlement dated 13-04-1999 at
Exh. 53 and that the said terms of the settlement
have not been implemented by Party II group of
partner companies, although it was specifically
agreed that all the workmen on the rolls would be
absorbed but the same was not followed. When
the partnership was to be dissolved, the
Understanding dated 13-04-1999 were to be
honoured and therefore the termination/refusal of
employment by Party II group of partner companies
is in violation of Understanding dated 13-04-1999
and therefore Party I has proved issue No. 3 in their
favour.
Issue No. 4:
20. There is no dispute that all the three
workmen have worked for more than one year
continuously as seen from their letters of
appointment which are at Exh. 49 and 60 issued by
CACS. There is no dispute that once the workman
has completed one year continuous service in terms
of 25-B(1), the Employer is bound to follow mandate
of section 25-F which CACS has not followed and
therefore the termination of the Party I workmen
from 1-11-2001 under the pretext of closure is illegal
and void. Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act
places an embargo upon an Employer and that
they are barred from retrenching an employee who
has been in continuous service for not less than
one year. The workmen have shown that they were
with the Group since many years and once the
workmen proves that they had actually worked for
240 days, it will be deemed to be continuous service
for one year and therefore gets the protection of
Section 25-F and hence cannot be removed unless
retrenchment compensation have been paid to
them.
21. The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case
of Sarita Melwani v/s Pallavi Talekar, 2008 (2)
CLR 679 has held that under sub-section 1 of
Section 25-B there is no requirement to show actual
working for 240 days. Once it is proved by the
workmen that the Party II has failed to comply
with section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, the
next question is on whom the liability of the
workman would be fastened. It is well settled that
in a partnership firm each and every partner is
liable jointly and severely u/s 32 of the Act and
therefore the newly added Parties would be liable
for any Award passed in the present reference. The
contention of Advocates for Party II that since the
partners have retired by Deed of Retirement dated
18-04-2000, there would be no liability towards any
past claim cannot be accepted as u/s 32 of the
Partnership Act, the only way in which a partner
can be discharged from his liability towards the
third Party/workman would be by an agreement
between him, the third Party and the remaining
partners. There is no such agreement produced on
record. The Apex Court in the case of Syndicate
Bank v/s R.S.R. Engineering Works and Ors.
(2003) 6 SCC 265 has clearly held that the every
partner is personally liable for the acts done by the
partnership firm and therefore the Partner
Companies continue to be liable towards the claim
of the workman, hence all the partners are liable
for the relief prayed by Party I and it is not open
for partners to contend that the claim of workmen
is limited to the assets and liabilities of the firm
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
337
which is taken over by Party II (2). It is therefore
the partners group of companies are jointly and
severally liable to absorb the Party I workmen and
for other reliefs. Hence, issue No. 4 is also answered
in the affirmative.
Issue No. 5:
22. The Party II partners have admittedly not
paid any retrenchment compensation nor notice
given by them while terminating the services of
Party I workmen. It is well settled when the
termination is illegal and that Party II Employer
has not followed Section 25-F of the Industrial
Disputes Act, the normal rule is that Party I
workmen are entitled for reinstatement with full
back wages and continuity of services. Learned
Adv. Shri S. P. Gaonkar has submitted that the
factors to be considered for the relief of
reinstatement with full back wages are refusal of
employment/termination was without following
Section 25-F, long service put in by the workmen,
number of years took for litigation; that the
workmen are unemployed, date of refusal; and that
the Employer has not shown any evidence of
employment on the part of the workmen.
23. There is no dispute so also Learned
Advocates for Party II partners have submitted and
rightly so that the Party II workmen have already
attained the age of superannuation. Shri Ashok
Vernekar in his Affidavit has claimed that his age
was 63 years, so also Fatima Rodrigues in her
deposition has claimed that as on 13-03-2014, she
was 58 years then, so also Inacian Alfonso has not
been examined to prove date of birth nor there is
anything on record that they were employed from
the date of closure. The Party I therefore are not
entitled for re-instatement as they have already
attained the age of superannuation, however, they
are entitled for the back wages which have to be
calculated as full as they have been denied an
opportunity to serve the Party II partner companies.
Moreover, if the terms of settlement dated
13-04-1999 were honoured by the Employer, the
Party I workmen would be working with any of the
partner Companies which has been denied to them
and therefore they are entitled for the relief of full
back wages as claimed by them. Hence the above
point is answered accordingly.
24. In the result, I pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The reference stands partly allowed.
(ii) It is hereby held that the action of the
management of M/s. Cosmed Analytical and
Central Services, Curti, Ponda-Goa in
terminating the services of their workpersons
namely; Ashok Vernekar, Sr. Lab. Assistant,
Fatima Rodrigues, Telephone Operator,
Inacina Afonso, Sr. Lab. Assistant, with effect
from 1-11-2001, under the pretext of closure,
is illegal and unjustified.
(iii) The Party II (1) and its partner companies in
the reference are jointly and severally
directed to pay full back wages to Party I
workmen namely; Ashok Vernekar, Senior
Lab. Assistant, Fatima Rodrigues, Telephone
Operator and Inacina Alfonso, Sr. Lab.
Assistant, including the retrenchment
compensation under Section 25-F of the
Industrial Disputes Act.
(iv) The Party II (1) and its partner companies in
the reference are jointly and severally
directed to deposit back wages and the
retrenchment compensation before the
Tribunal as stated above within 60 days of
the publication of the Award, failing which
the Party II shall pay an interest @ 9% per
annum.
(v) Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Vincent D’Silva)
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal and
Labour Court.
———uuu———
Department of Personnel
—
Order
No. 6/6/2021-PER/1586
In exercise of the powers conferred under
Rule 43, of the Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016
(hereinafter to be called as said rules), the
Government, in consultation with the Goa Public
Service Commission, hereby relaxes Rule 38 of the
said Rules, to consider the crucial date of eligibility
for the appointment of the following Senior Scale
Officers of Goa Civil Service to the Junior
Administrative Grade from the date of completion
of the requisite service in the Senior Grade instead
of 1st April as provided under Rule 38 of the Rules:
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
338
Sr.
Name of the officer
No.
1
2
1. Kum. Biju R. Naik.
2. Shri Umeshchandra L. Joshi.
3. Shri Surendra F. Naik.
4. Shri Johnson B. Fernandes.
5. Shri Ajit Panchwadkar.
6. Shri Agnelo A. Fernandes.
7. Shri Dashrath M. Redkar.
8. Shri Narayan Gad.
9. Shri Devidas S. Gaonkar.
10. Smt. Florina S. Colaco.
11. Shri Ajit S. Pawaskar.
12. Smt. Sharmila Zuzarte.
13. Smt. Siddhi. T. Halarnkar
14. Shri Snehal P. Naik Goltekar.
15. Shri Vinayak P. Volvoikar.
16. Smt. Meghana V. Shetgaonkar.
17. Smt. Darshana S. Narulkar.
18. Shri Ashutosh R. Apte.
19. Shri Parag Nagarcenkar.
The order shall come into effect w.e.f. 04-07-2021.
This issues with the approval of the Goa Public
Service Commission conveyed vide letter No. COM/
/II/11/42(1)/2021/359 dated 29-06-2021.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Vishal C. Kundaikar, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 29th June, 2021.
1
2
________
Order
No. 5/2/2017-PER/1136
On the recommendation of the Goa Services Board, the Governor of Goa is pleased to order the transfer
and posting of the following Junior Scale Officers of Goa Civil Service, in public interest, with immediate
effect:-
Sr.
Name and present posting of
Posted as
No.
of the officer
1
2
3
1. Shri Ajay Gaude, Chief Officer Curchorem,
Deputy Collector (DRO), North with additional charge
Cacora Municipal Council with additional
of Deputy Collector (Revenue), North.
charge of Member Secretary, Ravindra
Bhavan, Curchorem
2. Shri Sudin Natu, Under Secretary in the
Under Secretary (Revenue-I).
office of Minister (Agriculture, TCP) with
additional charge of Under Secretary
(Revenue-I).
3. Shri Sachin Desai, Deputy Collector &
Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes with
SDO, Mormugao with additional charge
additional charge of OSD in Imagine Panaji Smart
of Member Secertary, Ravindra Bhavan,
City Development Ltd. (IPSCDL).
Baina
4. Smt. Veera Nayak, Deputy Collector (DRO),
Deputy Collector & SDO-II, Bardez.
North with additional charge of Deputy
Collector (Revenue), North
5. Shri Ramesh Gaonkar, OSD in Imagine
Deputy Collector, South-1 with additional charge of
Panaji Smart City Development Ltd.,
Deputy Collector (DRO), South.
(IPSCDL)
6. Shri Dattaraj Krishna Gauns Dessai,
Deputy Collector & SDO, Mormugao with additional
Deputy Collector, South-1 with additional
charge of Member Secretary, Ravindra Bhavan, Baina.
charge of Deputy Collector (DRO), South
7. Shri Avit S. Naik, Newly promoted Junior
Deputy Director (Admn.), Sports & Youth Affairs with
Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service
additional charge of Administrative Officer, Goa State
Commission for Protection of Child Rights.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
339
8. Shri P. A. Parab, Newly promoted Junior
Deputy Director (Admn.), Mines.
Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service
9. Smt. Pratima Braganza, Newly promoted
Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service
10. Shri Milagres Soares, Newly promoted
Under Secretary (Lokayukta).
Junior Scale Officer of Goa Civil Service
Shri Deepesh Priolkar, Deputy Director, Municipal Administration shall hold the charge of the post of
Under Secretary in the office of Minister (Agriculture, TCP) in addition to his own duties.
Shri Nilesh Dhaigodkar, Deputy Collector & SDO, Quepem shall hold the charges of the posts of Chief
Officer, Curchorem, Cacora Municipal Council & Member Secretary, Ravindra Bhavan, Curchorem in
addition to his own duties.
Shri Mandar Naik, Deputy Director (Admn.), DSLR shall hold the charge of the post of Member
Secretary, Goa Marathi Academy in addition to his own duties.
Dr. Geeta Nagvenkar, Administrator of Communidade, Central Zone shall draw her salary from the post
of Administrative Officer, Goa State Commission for Protection of Child Rights until further orders.
The officers shall complete handing over and taking over process with immediate effect and submit
compliance.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Vishal Kundaikar, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 3rd May, 2021.
________
Memorandum
No. 6/5/2021-PER/1561
Read: (1) Memorandum No. 6/4/2016-PER/3257 dated 24-10-2017.
(2) Order No. 6/3/2002-PER (Vol.I) dated 04-07-2017.
(3) Order No. 6/3/2002-PER (Vol.I)/3069 dated 11-10-2017.
(4) Memorandum No. 6/1/2015-PER/618 dated 20-01-2019.
(5) Order No. 6/3/2002-PER (Vol.I)/940 dated 25-03-2019.
(6) Order No. 6/3/2002-PER (Vol.I) 2373 dated 30-08-2019.
(7) Order No. 6/9/2008-PER (Part II) (B)/3275 dated 25-11-2019.
(8) Memorandum No. 6/39/2016-PER/351 dated 28-01-2020.
(9) Order No. 6/11/2019-PER/596 dated 19-02-2020.
(10) Order No. 6/13/2019-PER/972 dated 15-04-2020.
(11) Memorandum No. 6/4/2016-PER/1025 dated 28-04-2020.
(12) Order No. 6/16/2013-PER/Part A/1161 dated 13-05-2020.
(13) Memorandum No. 6/39/2016-PER/5183 dated 20-11-2020.
(14) Order No. 6/11/2019-PER/1160 dated 10-05-2021.
(15) Order No. 6/13/2019-PER/1393 dated 10-06-2021.
Whereas, the seniority of Senior Scale Officers was last finalized vide Memorandum cited at Sr. No. 1
in the preamble wherein the seniority of officers upto Sr. No. 73 was finalized and thereafter re-casted vide
Memorandum dated 28-04-2020 cited at Sr. No. 11 above to include 3 more officers;
And whereas, all the Senior Scale Officers in the seniority list issued vide Memorandum dated
28-04-2020 cited at Sr. No. 11 read in the preamble have been promoted to Junior Administrative Grade
or retired except officers at Sr. No. 17 and Sr. No. 41;
And whereas, Junior Scale Officers have been promoted to Senior Scale of Goa Civil Service vide Orders
read at Sr. Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 14 in the preamble;
1
2
3
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
340
And now therefore, in accordance with their ranking of the select list prepared and conveyed by the
Commission vide DPC minutes from time to time, the seniority of the Senior Scale officers of Goa Civil
Service is drawn as follows:
Sr.
Name of the Officer
Date of
Date of
Date of
Remarks
No.
Birth
appointment
appointment
in Junior
in Senior
Scale
Scale
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Shri Melvyn Vaz
09-03-1966
09-01-1998
29-07-2005
.............
2.
Shri Gopal Parsekar
04-02-1965
22-06-1999
09-12-2016
.............
vide order
dated
25-11-2019
3.
Kum. Biju R. Naik
12-02-1971
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
4.
Shri Mahesh Corjuenkar
10-01-1961
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
Retired
5.
Shri Umeshchandra L.
13-11-1961
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
Joshi
6.
Shri Surendra F. Naik
18-09-1972
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
7.
Shri Johnson B. Fernandes
25-05-1974
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
8.
Shri Ajit Panchwadkar
22-09-1967
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
9.
Shri Agnelo A. Fernandes
19-11-1968
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
10.
Shri Dashrath M. Redkar
04-10-1966
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
11.
Shri Narayan Gad
23-07-1968
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
12.
Shri Devidas S. Gaonkar
15-05-1967
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
13.
Smt. Florina S. Colaco
25-03-1978
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
14.
Shri Ajit S. Pawaskar
13-09-1963
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
15.
Smt. Sharmila Zuzarte
14-05-1967
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
(vide order
dated
25-03-2019)
16.
Shri Pandharinath N. Naik
13-06-1959
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
Retired.
17.
Smt. Siddhi T. Halarnkar
18-05-1977
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
18.
Shri Snehal P. Naik Goltekar 20-09-1974
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
19.
Shri Vinayak P. Volvoikar
25-02-1971
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
20.
Smt. Meghana V.
06-08-1978
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
Shetgaonkar
21.
Smt. Darshana S. Narulkar
29-08-1977
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
22.
Shri Ashutosh R. Apte
08-05-1978
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
23.
Shri Parag Nagarcenkar
05-11-1969
29-08-2011
04-07-2017
...............
(vide order
dated
11-10-2017)
24.
Shri Bhushan K. Savoikar
05-05-1975
29-08-2011
30-08-2019
...............
25.
Smt. Varsha S. Naik
15-02-1971
29-08-2011
30-08-2019
...............
26.
Smt. Anju S. Kerkar
23-07-1975
29-08-2011
30-08-2019
...............
27.
Shri Gouresh Kurtikar
25-05-1978
29-08-2011
30-08-2019
...............
28.
Shri Brijesh D. Manerkar
11-05-1976
29-08-2011
30-08-2019
...............
29.
Shri Santosh S. Kundaikar
19-11-1963
29-08-2011
30-08-2019
...............
30.
Smt. Aisha Amir
05-05-1972
29-08-2011
19-02-2020
...............
Vaingankar
31.
Shri Francisco X. L.
26-10-1961
01-07-2012
19-02-2020
...............
Ferrao
(vide order
(vide order
dated
dated
13-05-2020)
10-05-2021)
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
341
32.
Smt. Neetal P. Amonkar
16-05-1975
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
33.
Smt. Sushama D. Kamat
24-06-1962
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
34.
Smt. Maria Seomara De
29-08-1961
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
Sousa
35.
Shri Gaurish J.
25-02-1975
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
Shankhwalkar
36.
Shri Arvind B. Khutkar
02-07-1977
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
37.
Shri Pipi T. Murgaonkar
28-02-1961
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
.Retired.
38.
Shri Sagun R. Velip
22-04-1974
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
39.
Shri Mahadev J.
19-05-1967
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
Araundekar
40.
Shri Harish N. Adconkar
30-05-1977
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
41.
Smt. Sarita Sadashiv
16-03-1974
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
Marathe alias Gadgil
42.
Smt. Sangeeta Sakaram
20-08-1977
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
Rawool alias Porob
43.
Shri Umakant Nhanu
06-07-1962
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
Korkankar
44.
Smt. Fransquinha Oliveira
10-12-1974
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
45.
Shri Paresh M. Fal Desai
02-05-1974
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
46.
Shri Sudhir S. Kerkar
27-05-1974
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
47.
Shri Shankar B. Gaonkar
02-10-1980
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
48.
Smt. Triveni Paik Velip
28-04-1981
25-11-2014
19-02-2020
...............
The seniority shall be subject to the decison that may be taken by the Government in the order of
Hon’ble High Court passed in WP No. 1089/2016 and WP No. 240/2021.
The seniority shall be subject to the outcome of Civil Appeal No. 9587-9590 and 9591-9594/2016 filed
in Hon’ble Supreme Court.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Vishal C. Kundaikar, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 28th June, 2021.
———uuu———
1
2
3
4
5
6
Department of Power
Office of The Chief Electrical Engineer
__
Corrigendum
No. CEE/Estt.-31-25-88/GPSC/Part-III (B)/Vol.III/
/859
Read:
Order No. 1. CEE/Estt-31-25-88/GPSC/Part-
-III(B)/Vol.III/170 dated 27-04-2021.
In the order read at preamble above (1), the name
of the Official at Sr. No. 26 may be corrected to read
as “Kum. Shilpa Dilip Kabadi” instead of “Kum.
Shilpa Dilip Kapadi”.
All other contents of the order remain
unchanged.
Raghuvir G. Keni, Chief Electrical Engineer.
Panaji, 01st July, 2021.
Department of Public Health
__
Standard Operating
Procedures on
No. 42/16/2021-I/PHD/1330
Administration of 2nd dose of Covishield vaccine
prior to prescribed time interval (after 28 days but
before 84 days) to persons intending to undertake
international travel for education purpose for
joining employment in foreign countries and for
India’s contingent to Tokyo Olympics.
The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) issued
by Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government
of India vide D.O. letter No./2072903/2021/
/IMMUNIZATION dated 7th June, 2021 on
administration of 2nd dose of Covishield vaccine
prior to prescribed time interval (after 28 days but
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
342
before 84 days) to persons intending to undertake
international travel for education purpose, for
joining employment in foreign countries and for
India’s contingent to Tokyo Olympics, is annexed
herewith for awareness.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami S. Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 14th June, 2021.
SOPs on
Administration of Second Dose of Covishield
Vaccine Prior to Prescribed Time Interval (after 28
days but before 84 days) to persons intending to
undertake international travel for education
purpose, for joining employment in foreign
countries and for India’s contingent to Tokyo
Olympics.
1. Presently, based on the recommendations by
National
Expert
Group
on
Vaccine
Administration for COVID-19 (NEGVAC), the
schedule of Covishield vaccine under National
Covid-19 Vaccination Strategy is to administer
the 2nd dose at 12-16 weeks interval (i.e. after
84 days), after administration of 1st dose.
2. The Union Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
has received several representations for
allowing administration of second dose of
Covishield for such persons who have only
taken first dose of Covishield and are seeking
to undertake international travel for
educational purposes or employment
opportunities or for part of India’s contingent
for Tokyo Olympic games, but whose planned
travel dates fall prior to completion of the
currently mandated minimum interval of 84
days from the date of first dose.
3. The matter has been discussed in Empowered
Group 5 (EG-5) and appropriate recommenda-
tions have been received. In this context, with
a view to provide full coverage of vaccination
and facilitating international travel for such
geninue reasons, following procedure shall be
followed for administration of second dose of
Covishield vaccine for such beneficiaries:-
a. This special dispensation will be available
to -
(i)
Students who have to undertake
foreign travel for the purposes of
education.
(ii) Persons who have to take up jobs in
foreign countries.
(iii) Athletes,
Sportspersons
and
accompanying
staff
of
Indian
contingent attending International
Olympic Games to be held in Tokyo.
b. States/UT Governments shall designate a
competent authority in each District for
according
permission
for
such
administration of second dose of Covishield.
c. The competent authority shall check the
following before according a permission for
administration of second dose before the
period of 84 days after the date of first dose:-
(i)
Whether a period of 28 days has
elapsed after the date of first dose.
(ii) Genuineness of the purpose of travel
based on documents related to–
1. Admission offers or associated
formal communications for the
purpose of education.
2. Whether a person is already
studying in a foreign educational
institution and has to return to that
institution for continuing his/her
education.
3. Interview calls for a job or offer
letters for taking up employment
4. Nomination to participate in the
Tokyo Olympic games.
d. It is advised that vaccination may be
availed in such cases through Passport
which is one of the permissible ID
documents as per the current guidelines, so
that the passport number is printed in the
vaccination certificate. However, if Passport
was not used at the time of administration
of first dose, the details of the photo ID Card
used for vaccination will be printed in the
vaccination certificate and mention of the
Passport in the vaccination certificate is not
to be inisted upon. Wherever necessary, the
competent authority may issue another
certificate linking the vaccination certificate
with the passport number of the beneficiary.
e. This facility shall be available to those who
need to undertake international travel for
these specified purposes in the period up to
31st August, 2021.
f. All technical protocols as prescribed in the
Guidelines of the Ministry regarding COVID
Vaccination Centres and AEFI management
etc. shall have to be followed.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
343
4.
It is clarified that Covishield, produced by
the Serum Institute of India and approved
by the DCGI, is one of the vaccines
recognised by the WHO for emergency use
as on 3rd June, 2021. The relevant entry is at
S. No. 4 of the WHO EUL, available at https:/
/extranet.who.int/pqweb/sites/default/files/
documents/Status%20of%20COVID-
19%20Vaccines%20within%20WHO%20EUL-
P Q % 2 0 e v a l u a t i o n % 2 0 p r o c e s s % 2 0 -
%203%20June%202021.pdf. Mention of
vaccine type as “Covishield” is sufficient
and no other qualifying entries are required
in the vaccination certificates.
5.
The Co-WIN system will soon provide the
facility for administration of 2nd dose in such
exceptional cases.
6.
This is to clarify that these SoPs have been
issued specifically only for Covishield
because only the time interval between the
2 doses of Covishield has been increased
from 6-8 weeks to 12-16 weeks. The period
for COVAXIN has remained the same i.e.
4-6 weeks and hence there was no need for
any special dispensation for 2nd dose of
COVAXIN. It is also clarified that complete
vaccination with COVAXIN is also sufficient
for foreign travel.
________
Order
No. 23/20/2014-I/PHD/Part IV/1509
Read: Government Order No. 23/20/2014-I/PHD/
/Part IV/3093 dated 09-09-2020.
Government vide Order read at preamble had
appointed Dr. Rajesh Patil, Professor in Surgery, Goa
Medical College as the “Nodal Officer” for the South
Goa District Hospital, Margao (COVID-19 Hospital,
Margao).
In view of decline of COVID-19 cases in the State
of Goa, Government hereby relieves Dr. Rajesh Patil,
Professor in Surgery, Goa Medical College as the
“Nodal Officer” for the South Goa District Hospital,
Margao (COVID-19 Hospital, Margao) with effect
from 16th July, 2021.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami S. Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 30th June, 2021.
Order
No. 45/4/2008-I/PHD/1511
On the recommendation of Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide their letter No.COM/
/II/11/24(2)/2017/86 dated 18-06-2021, Government
is pleased to promote the following Health Officer
to the post of Chief Medical Officer under
Directorate of Health Services (Group ‘A’ Gazetted)
on regular basis in Level 11 of Pay Matrix in 7th Pay
Commission [PB-3 Rs.15,600-39,100 + GP: Rs. 6,600/-
(pre-revised)] and other allowances to be fixed as
per rules, with immediate effect:-
(1) Dr. Lorna Audrey Maria Fernandez.
The promotion is made against the vacancy
occurred due to voluntary retirement of Dr.
Maximiano De Sa, Chief Medical Officer w.e.f.
02-08-2019.
The posting Order shall be issued separately.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami S. Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 1st July, 2021.
________
Order
No. 42/21/2020-I/PHD/1487
Read: Government Order No. 23/20/2014-I/PHD/
/Part IV/884 dated 23-04-2021.
In view of reduced caseload of COVID-19 cases,
the E.S.I. Hospital, Margao is hereby de-notified as
COVID-19 Hospital, Margao w.e.f. 30-06-2021. Also
all outsourced and manpower services provided
through Directorate of Health Services shall be
discontinued w.e.f. 30th June, 2021.
The above Hospital shall be notified as COVID
Hospital in future if required depending on
exigencies.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Vikas S. N. Gaunekar, Additional Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 17th June, 2021.
________
Order
No. 2/2/2018-II/PHD/1246
Government is pleased to accept the technical res-
ignation tendered by Dr. Amitash Ramchandra
Balekar, Assistant Lecturer in the Department of
Nephrology, Goa Medical College, Bambolim vide
letter dated 03-06-2021 and he stands relieved from
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
344
the said post of Assistant Lecturer in the Department
of Nephrology, Goa Medical College, Barnbolim-Goa
with immediate effect in order to join his new place
of posting at Sub District Hospital, Ponda under Di-
rectorate of Health Services.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 29th June, 2021.
________
Order
No. 6/3/2021-III/PHD/1248
Consequent upon the superannuation of
Dr. Yvonne Da Silva Pereira, Professor & HOD, in
Psychiatry, IPHB w.e.f. 30-04-2021, Dr. Shilpa Waikar,
Associate Professor in Psychiatry, IPHB shall hold
the charge of Professor & Head of Department in
Psychiatry, IPHB with immediate effect in addition
to her own duties until further orders.
Consequent to above, Dr. Anil V. Rane, Lecturer
shall hold the charge of Medical Superintendent,
IPHB in addition to his own duties, until further
orders.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health-I).
Porvorim, 30th June, 2021.
________
Certificate
No. 4/14/2002-II/PHD/Vol.I/1282
Read: Government No. 4/14/2002-II/PHD/Vol.I/262
dated 08-02-2021.
Certified that the character and antecedents of
Dr. Pranav Pradip Nagarsenkar, Lecturer,
Department of Surgery in Goa Medical College and
Hospital, Bambolim mentioned in the above referred
Order have been verified by the District Magistrate,
South Goa District, Margao and nothing adverse
has come to the notice of the Government.
Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 06th July, 2021.
________
Corrigendum
No. 38/4/2016-I/PHD/1515
Read: Order No. 38/4/2016-I/PHD/1462 dated
28-06-2021.
In the second line of the Order dated 28-06-2021
read in preamble the health centre indicated in
respect of Dr. Kameshwari Kadnekar may be read as
“Community Health Centre, Sankhali” instead of
“Community Health Centre, Valpoi”.
Rest of the contents of the Order dated
28-06-2021, remains unchanged.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 05th July, 2021.
________
Corrigendum
No. 2/35/2003-II/PHD/1286
Read: Order No. 2/35/2013-II/PHD/114 dated
15-01-2021.
In the Government Order read at preamble, the
1st para shall be substituted to read as under:-
“Government is pleased to accept the notice of
voluntary retirement dated 29-10-2020 tendered by
Dr. Nadia Rangel Pinto, Lecturer in PSM, Goa
Medical College on completion of 15 years of
qualifying service in terms of Rule 48-A of CCS
(Pension) Rules, 1972 and as per the provisions of
O.M. No. 12/1/89/Fin(R&C) dated 29-11-1989 and is
permitted to retire from service voluntarily and
stand relieved with effect from 31-01-2021 (f.n.)”.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 05th July, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Revenue
__
Notification
No. 28/4/3/2019-RD-I/8327
In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (a)
of Section 35 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968
(Act No. 9 of 1969) (hereinafter referred to as the
“said Code”), the Government of Goa being of the
opinion that it is necessary, in the public interest
for the purpose of carrying out the objects of the
said Code, hereby exempts the land admeasuring
an area of 3038.00 sq. mts. surveyed under Survey
No./Sub-Div. No. 206/1-H of Village Anjuna, situated
at Village Anjuna Taluka Bardez, District North Goa,
State of Goa, acquired by the Government for the
purpose of proposed parking and providing of basic
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
345
amenities at Anjuna Beach at Village Anjuna of
Bardez Taluka, from the operation of the provisions
of Sections 30, 32 and 33 of the said Code subject to
the condition that the said land shall be used
exclusively for the purpose of proposed parking and
providing of basic amenities at Anjuna Beach.
This issues with the concurrence of the Finance
Department vide their U.O. No. 1400068640 date
22-12-2020.
This notification shall come into force on the date
of its publication in the Official Gazette.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sudin A. Natu, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).
Porvorim, 05th July, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Town & Country Planning
Office of the Chief Town Planner (Admn.)
—
Corrigendum
No. 1/3/TCP(Part File)/2017-19/1077
Read: Order No.1/3/TCP(Part file)/2017-19/949
dated 17-06-2021.
In the above cited Order conveying the transfer
of Group ‘A’ officers of the Town and Country
Planning Department, the name of the Officer at Sr.
No. 8 shall be read as “Shri Zaidev R. Aldonkar,
Deputy Town Planner”.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
James
Mathew,
Chief
Town
Planner
(Administration).
Panaji, 7th July, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Transport
Directorate of transport
—
Order
No. D.Tpt/EST/244/Dy. D.T./Part File-I/2021/1644
On the recommendation of the Goa Public
Service Commission, Panaji conveyed vide
their letter No. COM/II/11/49(1)/2006/87 dated
18-06-2021, the Government is pleased to promote
Shri Balchandra A. Sawant, Assistant Director of
Transport to the post of Deputy Director of
Transport (Group ‘A’ Gazetted) in the Pay Band of
Rs. 15,600-39,100+5,400/- (GP) corresponding to
Level 10 of Pay Matrix on regular basis with
immediate effect and post him as Deputy Director
of Transport, North, Panaji-Goa.
The said officer shall be on probation for a period
of two years.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Rajan Satardekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Tpt.).
Panaji, 30th June, 2021.
_______
Order
No. 5/2/93-Tpt/P.F./2021/1645
Consequent to the promotion of Shri Balchandra
A. Sawant and posting him as Deputy Director of
Transport, North, Panaji, Shri Pralhad Desai
presently posted as Deputy Director of Transport,
North, Panaji is transferred and posted as Deputy
Director of Transport, South, Margao with
immediate effect on administrative grounds and in
public interest.
The above Deputy Director of Transport is
hereby directed to join the new place of posting
immediately and complete handing over/taking
over formalities accordingly.
The said officer shall not avail joining period or
any type of leave till he assumes charge at the new
place of posting.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Rajan Satardekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Tpt.).
Panaji, 30th June, 2021.
_______
Order
No. 5/2/93-Tpt/P.F./2021/1646
The following Assistant Directors of Transport
(Group ‘B’ Gazetted) are hereby transferred with
immediate effect on administrative grounds and in
public interest as detailed hereunder:-
Sr.
Name of the Assistant
Present
Posting on
No.
Director of Transport
posting
transfer
1. Shri Sandeep B. Dessai
A.D.T.,
A.D.T.,
Dharban-
Ponda.
dora
2. Shri Meghashyam
A.D.T.,
A.D.T.,
Pilankar
Pernem
Bicholim.
3. Shri Rajesh G. Naik
A.D.T.,
A.D.T.,
Ponda
Pernem.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
346
Consequently, Shri Sandeep B. Dessai, Assistant
Director of Transport, Ponda (Link Officer) shall hold
additional charge as Assistant Director of Transport,
Dharbandora in addition to his duties until further
orders.
The above Assistant Director of Transport are
hereby directed to join the new place of posting
immediately and complete handing over/taking
over formalities accordingly.
The said officers shall not avail joining period or
any type of leave till they assumes charge at the
new place of posting.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Rajan Satardekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Tpt.).
Panaji, 30th June, 2021.
________
Order
No. 5/2/93-Tpt/P.F./2021/1669
The following Assistant Directors of Transport (Group ‘B’ Gazetted) are hereby transferred with
immediate effect on administrative grounds and in public interest as detailed hereunder:-
Sr.
Name of the Assistant
Present posting
Posting on
No.
Director of Transport
transfer
1
2
3
4
1.
Shri Sandeep B. Dessai
A.D.T., Dharbandora
A.D.T., Ponda.
2.
Shri Rajesh G. Naik
A.D.T., Ponda
A.D.T., Canacona.
3.
Shri Kamlakant B. Karapurkar
A.D.T., Canacona
A.D.T., Bicholim.
Consequently, Shri Sandeep B. Dessai, Assistant Director of Transport, Ponda (Link Officer) shall hold
additional charge as Assistant Director of Transport, Dharbandora in addition to his duties until further
orders.
The above Assistant Directors of Transport are hereby directed to join the new place of posting
immediately and complete handing over/taking over formalities accordingly.
The said Officers shall not avail joining period or any type of leave till they assume charge at the new
place of posting.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Rajan Satardekar, Director & ex officio Addl. Secretary (Transport).
Panaji, 02nd July, 2021.
________
Corrigendum
No. 5/2/93-Tpt/P.F./2021/1693
Ref: Order No. 5/2/93/Tpt/P.F./2021/1669 dated 2-07-2021.
In partial modification to the above referred Order dated 02-07-2021, the following Assistant Directors
of Transport (Group ‘B’ Gazetted) are transferred with immediate effect on administrative grounds and in
public interest as detailed hereunder:-
Sr.
Name of the Assistant
Present posting
Posting on transfer
No.
Director of Transport
1
2
3
4
1.
Shri Rajesh G. Naik
A.D.T., Ponda
A.D.T., Dharbandora with
additional charge as A.D.T.,
Canacona.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 16
15TH JULY, 2021
347
Consequently, Shri Sandeep B. Dessai, Assistant Director of Transport, Ponda stands relieved of the
additional charge as Assistant Director of Transport, Dharbandora.
The remaining contents of the said Order dated 02-07-2021 remain unchanged.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Rajan Satardekar, Director & ex officio Addl. Secretary (Transport).
Panaji, 05th July, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Women & Child Development
Directorate of Women & Child Development
—
Corrigendum
No. 2-103(63)-2021/DW&CD/1950
Read: 1) Notification No. 2-103(63)-2021/DW&CD/1649 dated 21-06-2021.
The name of the Member cited in Child Welfare Committee, North Goa at Sr. No. 4 may be read as
Chandru alias Chandan Gajanan Naik Shirodkar instead of Chandru alias Chandan Gajanan Naik.
The rest of the contents remain unchanged.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Deepali Naik, Director & ex officio Joint Secretary (Women & Child Development).
Panaji, 6th July, 2021.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 23.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—119/150–7/2021.