Panaji, 25th November, 2021 (Agrahayana 4, 1943)
SERIES II No. 35
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-23
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Animal Husbandry &
Veterinary Services
Directorate of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary
Services
__
Order
No. 2-14-93-AH/Part-IV/2021-22/4856
Read: No. 2-14-93-AH/Part-IV/2021-22/2278 dated
03-08-2021.
On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/
/I/5/3(l)/2020/122 dated 15-07-2021, the Government
of Goa is pleased to appoint Dr. Loveleen Maria Vaz
to the post of “Veterinary Officer”, Group ‘B’
Gazetted in the Directorate of Animal Husbandry &
Veterinary Services, Panaji, Goa on regular basis in
the Pay Scale of PB-2: Rs. 9,300-34,800/- with Grade
pay of Rs. 4,600/- plus 20% NPA (Level-7 of the 7th
Pay Commission) and other allowances as
applicable.
Her appointment will take effect from the date of
her joining the post. Her character and antecedents
has been verified by the District Magistrate North
Goa and she has been declared medically fit by the
Medical Board, Goa Medical College, Bambolim.
Upon joining the service she shall be posted at
Veterinary Dispensary, Vasco.
She shall draw her salary against the newly
created post vide Order No. 8-2(47)/18-19/4420 dated
17-10-2018 under Budget Head Demand No. 65
“2403—Animal Husbandry, 00—, 101—Veterinary
Services and Animal Health, 06—Veterinary
Dispensaries and Hospitals, 01—Salaries.”
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
729
Note:-
There is one Extraordinary issue to the Official
Gazette, Series II No. 34 dated 18-11-2021
Extraordinary dated 18-11-2021 from pages 723
to 728 regarding Order from Department of
Elections.
The above Officer shall be on probation for a
period of 2 years from the date of joining the Post.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dr. Agostinho Misquita, Director & ex officio Jt.
Secretary (AH).
Panaji, 16th November, 2021.
_______
Order
No. 2-14-93-AH/Part-IV/2021-22/4857
Read: No. 2-14-93-AH/Part-IV/2021-22/2277 dated
03-08-2021.
On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide their letter
No. COM/I/5/3(1)/2020/122 dated 15-07-2021, the
Government of Goa is pleased to appoint Dr. Deepika
Prabhakar P. to the post of “Veterinary Officer”,
Group ‘B’ Gazetted in the Directorate of Animal
Husbandry & Veterinary Services, Panaji, Goa on
regular basis in the Pay Scale of PB-2: Rs. 9,300-
-34,800/- with Grade pay of Rs. 4600/- plus 20% NPA
(Level-7 of the 7th Pay Commission) and other
allowances as applicable.
Her appointment will take effect from the date
of her joining the post. Her character and
antecedents has been verified by the District
Magistrate South Goa and she has been declared
medically fit by the Medical Board, Goa Medical
College, Bambolim. Upon joining the service she
shall be posted at Veterinary Dispensary, Savoi
Verem.
She shall draw her salary against the newly
created post vide Order No. 8-2(47)/18-19/4420 dated
17-10-2018 under Budget Head Demand
No. 65 “2403—Animal Husbandry, 00—, 101—
—Veterinary Services and Animal Health,
06—Veterinary Dispensaries and Hospitals,
01—Salaries.”
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
730
The above Officer shall be on probation for a
period of 2 years from the date of joining the Post.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dr. Agostinho Misquita, Director & ex officio Jt.
Secretary (AH).
Panaji, 16th November, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Co-operation
Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies
__
Order
No. 3/4/Urban Credit/TS-II/BZ/2017/RCS/2380.
Read: 1. Circular No. 6-13-81/EST/RCS/Part V/5833
dated 06-03-2020.
2. Order No. 48-8-2001-Ts-RCs/III/311 dated
21-04-2017.
3. Letter No. ARCS/BZ/ADT/CIRCULAR/639
dated 14-10-2021.
Whereas, Adv. Sushma T. Mandrekar alias
Sushma Harish Chodankar, having office at H. No. 713/
/33, Ardhawada Mayem, Bicholim-Goa was
appointed as Registrar’s Nominee under Section
86(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001
read with Rule 116 (1) of The Goa Co-operative
Societies Rules, 2003 vide Order read at Sr. No. 2
above and her name is reflecting at Sr. No. 21 in the
said Order.
And whereas, the Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.
Societies, Bicholim Zone, Sankhali vide letter at
Sr. No. 3 above, has forwarded the request of The
Bicholim Mahila Urban Co-operative Credit Society
Ltd., Bicholim-Goa to designate Adv. Sushma
T. Mandrekar alias Sushma Harish Chodankar as its
dedicated nominee to adjudicate dispute referred
by society.
In view of above, the above named nominee Adv.
Sushma T. Mandrekar alias Sushma Harish
Chodankar in exercise of powers conferred under
Section 123(B) of the Goa Co-op. Societies Act, 2001
I, the undersigned hereby authorize the above
named nominee to entertain the disputes referred
to her on recovery of loan overdue matter by The
Bicholim Mahila Urban Co-operative Credit Society
Ltd., Bicholim-Goa.
When a purported dispute is referred by the
society, the above named nominee is authorised to
first decide under sub-section (1) of Section 86 of
the Goa Co-operative Societies Act whether the
matter referred by society involves a dispute and
pass appropriate Orders under sub-section (1) of
Section 86.
Only upon the nominee satisfying that there
exists a dispute she shall proceed to adjudicate the
same and give award accordingly. The nominee
shall abide by the terms and condition on which he
was originally appointed as nominee read at
Sr. No. 2 above.
This appointment shall come into force with
immediate effect and shall remain in force for one
year and same can be withdrawn at any stage without
assigning any reason.
Arvind B. Khutkar, Registrar of Co-op Societies.
Panaji, 12th November, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Education, Art & Culture
Directorate of Education
—
Order
No. 1(2)-17-2016/SE/Part file/580
On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/
/I/5/15(1)/2019/202 dated 04-08-2021, Government
is pleased to appoint Shri Vidhyadatta Bhikaro Naik
to the post of “Assistant Director of Education”,
Group ‘A’ Gazetted on temporary basis under the
Directorate of Education in Level-12 of pay Matrix
as per VII Pay Commission corresponding to PB-3
Rs.15,600-39,100/- + Grade Pay Rs. 7,600/- (Part B)
under VI-Pay Commission Scale [+02 (two) non
compounded increment on initial pay] and other
allowances as admissible under the rules from time
to time on the same terms of appointment as stated
in his offer of appointment issued vide Memorandum
dated 02-11-2021.
The above appointment to the post of Assistant
Director of Education shall be with effect from the
date he reports for duty in the office where he is
posted.
He shall be on probation for a period of two years
from the date of his appointment.
On his above appointment, he is posted as
Assistant Director of Education (Academics) under
this Directorate against the vacant post.
He has been declared medically fit for the above
appointment by the competent medical authority
and nothing adverse is reported against him after
verification of Character and Antecedents by the
competent authority.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Bhushan K. Savaikar, Director & ex officio Jt.
Secretary (Education).
Porvorim, 17th November, 2021.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
731
Department of Finance
Office of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
____
Trade Circular
(No. 1 of 2021-22)
No. CCT/26-2/2021-22
Consequent upon implementation of Goods and Services Tax regime w.e.f. 01st July, 2017, an opportunity
for applying for the statutory Declaration Forms was given to the Dealers vide Trade Circular No. 1 of
2017-18 dated 14th September, 2017, published in the Official Gazette, Series I No. 25 dated 21st September,
2017 vide which last date for applying for statutory forms was stated as 31st October, 2017 which was
further extended from time to time and finally till 31st March, 2021 by issuing the below given Trade
Circulars.
Sr.
Trade Circular No.
Circular date
Last date prescribed
No.
for availing statutory
Declaration Forms
1
2
3
4
1.
1 of 2017-18
14-09-2017
31-10-2017.
2.
2 of 2017-18
31-10-2017
30-11-2017.
3.
3 of 2017-18
29-11-2017
27-12-2017.
4.
4 of 2017-18
04-01-2018
—
5.
5 of 2017-18
19-02-2018
31-03-2018.
6.
1 of 2018-19
11-09-2018
20-11-2018.
7.
3 of 2018-19
14-03-2019
30-04-2019.
8.
1 of 2019-20
21-11-2019
31-12-2019.
9.
1 of 2020-21
30-11-2020
31-03-2021.
This office has received several representations
that some statutory Declaration Forms are still
pending since the Dealers failed to apply in time by
availing the above given opportunities.
Since the prescribed limitation period for
completing the assessments under the Goa Value
Added Tax Act, 2005 for the period upto 30-06-2017
is now over, it is decided to permanently keep the
option of submitting online requests for issue of
statutory Declaration Forms.
The Dealers shall upload their requests for
statutory Declaration Forms online using their user
ID and the Appropriate Assessing Authority having
jurisdiction shall verify the application, and upon
being satisfied about the correctness and eligibility,
may approve the form or reject the request for valid
reasons after giving an opportunity of hearing to
the applicant Dealer.
The Appropriate Assessing Authority shall
carefully verify the following points before
approving or rejecting the request for statutory
Declaration Forms.
a.
Whether registration certificate of Dealer was
valid for the period for which Declaration
Forms are applied;
b.
Whether the transactions mentioned in the
statutory Declaration Forms were properly
disclosed in the returns filed by the Dealer;
c.
Whether the applicant Dealer is eligible for
the issue of statutory Declaration Forms.
The applicant dealer shall download, print, sign
and issue the Declaration Form at his end.
This issues with the approval of the Government.
Hemant Kumar, IAS, Commissioner (State Tax).
Panaji, 15th November, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Home
(Foreigners & Citizenship Division)
—
Order
No. 12/4/2017-HD(F&CD)/CEP/Vol. II/323
In pursuance of Clause (e) of Section 2 of the Goa
(Abolition of Proprietorship, Titles and Grants of
Lands) Act, 2014 (Goa Act 8 of 2014) (hereinafter
referred to as the “said Act”), the Government of
Goa hereby appoints Additional Collector-III, North
Goa, for the purposes of the said Act.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
732
Further, in pursuance of Clause (e) of Section 2
of the said Act read with Section 21 of the General
Clauses Act, 1897 (Act No.10 of 1897), the
Government of Goa hereby amends the Government
Order No. 12/4/2017-HD(F&CD)/CEP/Vol.II/351
dated 01-10-2018, published in the Official Gazette
(hereinafter referred to as the “principal order”) as
follows, namely:-
(1) Additional Collector I, North Goa.
(2) Additional Collector II, North Goa.
(3) Additional Collector I, South Goa.
(4) Additional Collector-II, South Goa.
In the principal Order, for the existing entry at
serial No. (2), the following entry shall be
substituted, namely:-
(2) “Additional Collector III, North Goa”.
This order shall come into force with immediate
effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Girish G. Sawant, Under Secretary (Home-II).
Porvorim, 18th November, 2021.
———u———
Home—General Division
__
Order
No. 24/51/2012-HD(G)/3918
On the recommendation of the Departmental
Promotion Committee as conveyed by Goa Public
Service Commission vide letter No. COM/II/11/
/58(2)/2011/366 dated 13-10-2021, the Government
is pleased to promote the following Assistant Public
Prosecutor to the post of Public Prosecutor (Group
“A” Gazetted) in the Directorate of Prosecution on
regular basis in Level 11 of the Pay Matrix as per
C.C.S. (Revised Pay) Rules, 2016 and other
allowances to be fixed as per Rules with immediate
effect.
1. Shri Darshan D. Gawas.
The above candidate shall be on probation for a
period of two years with effect from date of joining.
The pay of the above officers shall be fixed in terms
of provision of F.R. 22(1)(a)(1) and he shall exercise
his option within one month from the date of issue
of this order.
The expenditure towards the pay and allowances
shall be debited under:-
Demand No. 5
2014 —
Administration of Justice, 00
114 —
Legal Advisors & Counsels
01 —
Public Prosecutors (North Goa)
02 —
Public Prosecutors (South Goa)
01 —
Salaries”.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Girish G. Sawant, Under Secretary, II (Home).
Porvorim, 15th November, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Labour
__
Order
No. 28/41/2021-LAB/549
Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the
management of M/s. Galaxy Instrumentation, near
Maruti Temple, Gaulem Bhat, Chimbel, Tiswadi, Goa
and it’s workman, Shri Narendra Gaude, Validation
Technician, in respect of the matter specified in the
Schedule hereto (hereinafter referred to as the “said
dispute”);
And whereas, the Government of Goa considers
it expedient to refer the said dispute for
adjudication.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers
conferred by Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(Central Act 14 of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as
the “said Act”), the Government of Goa hereby
refers the said dispute for adjudication to the
Labour Court-II of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted
under Section 7(1) of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
“(1)
Whether the action of the management of
M/s. Galaxy Instrumentation, near Maruti
Temple, Gaulem Bhat, Chimbel, Tiswadi,
Goa in terminating the services of
Shri
Narendra
Gaude,
Validation
Technician, with effect from 01-06-2019, is
legal and justified?
(2)
If not, what relief the workman is entitled
to?”.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 15th November, 2021.
_______
Notification
No. 24/21/2021/Lab/566
In accordance with the guidelines issued by the
Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
733
Labour & Employment, New Delhi, vide D. O. letter
No. M-16011/01/2019-SS-III dated 13-08-2021 for
constitution of State Level Monitoring Committee
for monitoring the Implementation and Registration
of Unorganised Workers working in Unorganised
Sector in the State of Goa. The Government of Goa
hereby constitute the State Level Monitoring
Committee comprising of following members:-
I.
The Chief Secretary
— Chairperson.
II. The Secretary (Labour)
— Member.
a. The Secretary, Information
— Member.
Technology, Government
of Goa, Secretariat,
Porvorim-Goa
b. The Secretary, Rural
— Member.
Development Department,
Government of Goa,
Secretariat, Porvorim-Goa
c. The Secretary, Directorate
— Member.
of Panchayat, Government
of Goa, Secretariat,
Porvorim-Goa
d. The Secretary, Directorate
— Member.
of Health Services,
Government of Goa,
Secretariat, Porvorim-Goa
e. The Secretary, Directorate
— Member.
of Agriculture, Government
of Goa, Secretariat,
Porvorim-Goa
f. The Secretary, Industries
— Member.
Trade and Commerce,
Government of Goa,
Secretariat, Porvorim-Goa
g. The Secretary, Urban Affairs — Member.
Department, Government
of Goa, Secretariat,
Porvorim-Goa
h. The Secretary, Women &
— Member.
Child Development,
Government of Goa,
Secretariat, Porvorim-Goa
i. The Secretary, Information — Member.
and Publicity, Government
of Goa, Secretariat,
Porvorim-Goa
j. The Secretary, Directorate — Member.
of Education, Government
of Goa, Secretariat,
Porvorim-Goa
k. The Secretary, Directorate of
— Member.
Social Welfare, Government
of Goa, Secretariat,
Porvorim-Goa
l. The Secretary, Directorate of
— Member.
Fisheries, Government of
Goa, Secretariat,
Porvorim-Goa
III. The Commissioner, Labour
— Member
& Employment, Government
Secretary.
of Goa, Shram Shakti Bhavan,
2nd Floor, Patto Plaza,
Panaji-Goa
IV. The State Head, CSC
—
Member.
e- governance Services India
Ltd., Skylark Complex, 1st Floor,
Office No. 120, Plot No. 63,
Sector-11, Belapur, Navi Mumbai
V. The Welfare and Cess
— Member.
Commissioner, 2nd floor, Block
CGO Complex, Seminar Hills,
Nagpur, 440006
VI
a.
The President/General
— Member.
Secretary, (AITUC) All India
Trade Union Congress, Velho
Building, 2nd floor, Panaji-Goa
b.
The President/General
— Member.
Secretary, Gomantak Mazdoor
Sangh, G-5, Macedo
Apartment, Tisk, Ponda-Goa
c.
The President/General
— Member.
Secretary, Bharatiya Mazdoor
Sangh, Kamakshi Krupa,
Tisk, Ponda-Goa
d.
The President/General
— Member.
Secretary, Kamgarancho
Ekvott, Gurudatta Building,
3rd floor, Panaji-Goa
e.
The President/General
— Member.
Secretary, Indian National
Trade Union Congress, Goa
Branch, Panaji-Goa
f.
The President/General
— Member.
Secretary, Goa Toddy Tappers
Association, Lotus Apartment,
Vasco-da-Gama, Goa
g.
The President/General
— Member.
Secretary, Goa Shops &
Industrial Workers Union,
150 A, Comba, Margao-Goa
h.
The President/General
— Member.
Secretary, Goa Tourist Taxi
Association, Opp. Municipal
Garden, Velho’s Building,
2nd floor, Panaji-Goa
i.
The President/General
— Member.
Secretary (CITU), Central
Indian Trade Union,
Vasco-da-Gama, Goa
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
734
j.
The President, Mandovi
— Member.
Fishermen Marketing
Co-operative Society Limited,
Betim-Goa
k.
The President, Malim,
— Member.
Cutbona, Vasco Fisheries
Co-operative Societies Limited,
Cutbona, Salcete-Goa
l.
The Chairman, Akhil Goa
— Member.
Harkari Sahakari Saunstha,
Naik Villa, A. B. Borkar Road,
Panaji-Goa
m. The President, Goa Cashew — Member.
Manufacturers Association,
Menezes Braganza Road,
Miramar-Goa
The State Level Monitoring Committee shall have
the following functions:
I.
Review and monitor the process of
registration of unorganised worker with DCs/
/DMs/Collectors district wise.
II.
Monitor the working of field level Common
Service Centers (CSCs) and State Sewa
Kendras (SSK) district wise along with the
target defined.
III.
Monitor mobilization of target sub-Group of
Unorganised workers such as MGNREGA
Workers, SHG members under NRLM/NULM,
Street
Vendors,
Rickshaw-pullers,
construction (BOCW) workers, Mid-day meal
workers, Domestic workers, ASHA Workers,
Anganwadi Workers, Agriculture Labourers,
Fishermen and brick-kin workers through
respective line departments district-wise for
registration under eSHRAM.
IV.
Monitor registration of bulk registration of
BOCW/ASHA/Anganwadi/MGNREGA/
/Domestic Workers/Mid-day meal workers/
/Fishermen to register under the eSHRAM.
V.
Channelise labour union/workers associa-
tions/federations/civil society organisation
working for the welfare of unorganised
workers to convince and mobilize their
respective members to register under the
eSHRAM portal.
VI.
Ensure holding of regular registration Camps
at the district and CSC level for the
unorganised workers (Kamgars).
VII.
Strategies to have information, Education and
Communication (IEC) with prospective bene-
ficiaries of eSHRAM and their implementation
through State Labour Department and other
official machinery.
VIII. Devise and Monitor implementation of State
wideawareness
programs
through
discussions, seminars, public meetings,
students participation, Universities, Colleges,
media channels, News items, Campaigns,
Pamphlets, Posters, Banners, help-desk tables
in district labour offices/skill development
centers/strategic locations/other prominent
places of labour concentration.
IX. The Committee shall meet at least once in a
quarter.
This Order shall come into force on the date of
publication in the Official Gazette.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 17th November, 2021.
_______
Notification
No. 28/2/2021-LAB/497
The following Award passed by the Labour
Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 16-09-2021 in Case No.
Ref. LC-II/IT/05/2020 is hereby published as required
under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 12th October, 2021.
______
IN THE LABOUR COURT-II
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble
Presiding Officer)
Ref. No. LC-II/IT/05/2020
Shri Gopinath S. Naik,
Flat No. 1, Nazir Residency,
Maqdoom Ashraf Nagar,
Opp. Verna Industrial Estate,
Cortalim-Goa
….. Workman/Party-I
V/s
M/s. Deccan Queen Transport Company,
Opp. D-Link,
Near Navhind Times Godown,
Verna Industrial Estate,
Verna-Goa
.…. Employer/Party-II
Workman/Party-I remained absent.
Employer/Party-II remained absent.
Panaji, Dated: 16-09-2021.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
735
AWARD
In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (c)
of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), the
Government of Goa, by Order dated 23-04-2020,
bearing No. 28/9/2020-LAB/253/L referred the
following dispute for adjudication to this Labour
Court II of Goa at Panaji-Goa.
“(1) Whether Shri Gopinath S. Naik, overall
in-charge of the Verna Branch of M/s. Deccan
Queen Transport Company and having
managerial and supervisory, administrative
power could be construed as ‘Workman’ as
defined under Section 2 (s) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947)?
2. (a) If the answer to the above is in affirmative,
then, whether the action of the management
of M/s. Deccan Queen Transport Company,
Opp. D-Link, Verna Industrial Estate, Verna-
-Goa, in terminating services of Shri
Gopinath S. Naik, with effect from
12-08-2019, is legal and justified?
(b) If not, what relief the Workperson is entitled
to?”
2. On receipt of the reference, a case was
registered under No. LC-II/IT/05/2020 and registered
A/D notice was issued to the Parties. However,
neither the Workman nor the Employer remained
present before this court on the scheduled dates of
hearings, without any justifiable cause. Ample
opportunities have been given to both the parties
to appear before this court and pursue/defend their
matter. However, both parties failed to remain
present before this court and file their pleadings.
3. In the case of Baldev Singh v/s The Judge,
Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Labour
Court & ors., reported in 2007 II CLR 685, the
Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan by referring the
judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of
Virendra Bhandri v/s Rajasthan State Road
Corporation Ltd. & ors., reported in (2002) 9 SCC
observed as under:
“…..a reference of certain Industrial Dispute was
made to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court. The workman did not appear before the
Tribunal, therefore, Tribunal held that there
remains no Industrial Dispute. However,
subsequently, the Appropriate Government
again referred the dispute to the Tribunal on
the same question and on this occasion, the
Tribunal adjudicated the matter and made an
award. The High Court held that the finding
recorded by the Tribunal in the first reference
amounted to an “award” and, therefore, second
reference was incompetent. The Hon’ble Apex
Court held that all that was stated was that
the parties concerned had not appeared before
the Tribunal and in such an event, the Tribunal
should have noted its inability to record the
finding on the issue referred to it, not that the
dispute itself does not exist. When there is no
adjudication of the matter on merits, it cannot
be said that the industrial dispute does not
exist. If the industrial dispute still exists as is
opined by the Government, such a matter can
be referred under Section 10 of the I.D. Act, as
Industrial Disputes are preferred to the Labour
Court or the Industrial Tribunal for
maintenance of industrial peace and not merely
for adjudication of the dispute between two
private parties. Therefore, it was permissible
for the Government to have made the second
reference. ……”.
The principle laid down by the Hon’ble High
Court in its aforesaid judgment binds a precedent
upon me.
4. Applying the law laid down by the Hon’ble
High Court in its aforesaid judgment, in the case in
hand, no pleadings have been filed by the workman
as well as Employer before this court and as such
I am unable to record the findings on the issue
referred to me.
5. In the circumstances, I pass the following order:
ORDER
1. It is hereby held that this court is unable to
record the finding on the issue referred by the
Appropriate Government.
2. No order as to costs.
Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Suresh N. Narulkar),
Presiding Officer,
Labour Court-II.
______
Notification
No. 28/2/2021-LAB/498
The following Award passed by the Labour
Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 17-09-2021 in Case No.
Ref. LC-II/IT/04/2017 is hereby published as required
under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 11th October, 2021.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
736
IN THE LABOUR COURT-II
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble
Presiding Officer)
Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/04/2017
Shri Sanjay Hirlekar,
r/o. H. No.77/A, Gantamorod,
Aquem Baixo,
Navelim, Salcete-Goa
….. Workman/Party I
V/s
M/s. A. A. Walker Estates Pvt. Ltd.,
6/194, Kobra Waddo,
Calangute, Bardez-Goa ….. Employer/Party II
Party-I/Workman absent, marked as Ex-parte.
Party-II/Employer represented by Adv. Shri P.
Chawdikar.
Panaji, Dated: 17-09-2021.
AWARD
1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause
(c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), the
Government of Goa, by Order dated 02-03-2017,
bearing No. 28/02/2017-LAB/111, referred the
following dispute for its adjudication to this Labour
Court of Goa at Panaji-Goa.
“(1) Whether the action of management of M/s. A.
A. Walker Estates Private Limited, Calangute,
Bardez, Goa in terminating the services of their
Workman, Shri Sanjay Hirlekar, Driver, with
effect from 27-10-2015, is legal and justified?
(2) If not, to what relief the Workman is entitled?”
2. On receipt of the reference, a case was
registered under No. LC-II/IT/04/2017 and registered
A/D notice was issued to the Parties. In pursuance
to the said notice, the Parties put in their
appearance. The Workman/Party-I (for short
‘Workman’) filed his Statement of Claim on
04-08-2017 at Exb. 8. The facts of the case, in brief,
as pleaded by the Workman are that he joined in
the services of the Employer/Party-II (for short
“Employer”) as a driver w.e.f. December, 2007 at an
initial wage of Rs. 6500/- per month. He stated that
his job timing was not fixed and he was made to
work for 24 hours. He stated that on 09-10-2015, his
mother Smt. Devta Hirlekar fell sick on account of
low blood pressure. He stated that he immediately
attended to his mother from 09-10-2015 till
11-10-2015 and joined for his duties on 12-10-2015.
He stated that he personally informed
Mr. Chaudhary, the Director of the Employer that
he would not attend his duties from 09-10-2015 to
11-10-2015 on account of sickness of his mother. He
stated that said Mr. Chaudhary had permitted him
to go on leave for those three days. He stated that
the said Mr. Chaudhary temporarily left the
Employer and went to Calcutta for his holidays.
3. He stated that when he joined for his duties
on 12-10-2015, he was verbally told by the Managing
Director, Shri Ashwin Chandiok that his services
have already been terminated and that he was told
to wait in the office to get his salary. He stated that
from 12-10-2015 till 27-10-2015, he was attending
the office of the Employer to get his salary. He
stated that as at the relevant time, the Peon of the
Employer, Shri Ganesh Upadhay was on leave, he
was told to prepare tea to the directors and other
staff on duty for about two to three days with an
intension to humiliate and insult him. He stated
that he was also told to park the car of Major Vinod
Sharma. He stated that he used to agree all such
orders as he did not want to lose his job as a driver.
He stated that on 26-10-2015, when he approached
the Managing Director, Shri Ashwin Chandiok in
his cabin in the presence of Mr. Dev (CEO of the
Employer), he was abused by the Managing Director
and told that his services are no longer required for
the Employer. He stated that when he asked about
his pending wages to the CEO of the Employer, he
was told that they will settle his wages on
27-10-2015. He stated that he visited the Employer’s
office to receive his pending dues and wages,
however, the Employer failed to pay his legal dues
including wages. He stated that he called the
Managing Director of the Employer, however, he
refused to accept that any payment were due to
him from the Employer and told him that he could
go and complain to any authority.
4. He stated that he was earlier removed from
service by the Employer on 01-10-2014 without any
notice. He stated that he had to remain at home
without any employment for almost two months.
He stated that he was removed from service on
01-10-2014 on account of the fact that he had
submitted his food bills when he was on duty. He
stated that he had to eat out as could not reach
home for food. He stated that the practice of giving
the food bills while he was on duty and was
accepted by the Employer from the year 2007. He
stated that the said issue of bills was raked up
suddenly in October, 2014 to illegally expel him. He
stated that the Managing Director of the Employer
permitted him to furnish his food bills when he was
out on Employer’s duty and could not reach home
to eat his meals. He stated that he was reinstated
back in service on 17-11-2014.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
737
5. He stated that he has undergone tremendous
hardships, trouble, pain and sufferings during the
span of his employment with the Employer as he
was ill-treated, humiliated, harassed, abused and
insulted over and over again and finally removed
from his employment on 27-10-2015 for no reason.
He stated that on many occasions, he was
deliberately marked and shown as late on duty as
the Employer knew that he would never reach on
time for his work with an electric scooter provided
to him by the Employer. He stated that he was also
provided with a bike on rent by the Employer before
providing him with an electric scooter. He stated
that he was not even paid for the bike rent of
Rs. 6000/- for August and September, 2014 which
was paid by him from his salary. He stated that he
has not been paid wages for the period from April,
2014 till July, 2014 @ Rs. 3200/- each total
amounting to Rs. 12800/-. He stated that in addition
to the aforesaid amount of Rs. 12800/-, he is also
entitled to receive from the Employer an amount of
Rs. 1,21,265/- (Rupees one lakh twenty one thousand
two hundred sixty five only). He stated that he was
exploited and arbitrarily removed from his
employment without giving him any prior notice
and without affording any hearing w.e.f. 27-10-2015.
He stated that no notice/show-cause notice of
termination has been served upon him. He stated
that the action of the Employer in alleged
discharging/retrenching with effect from 27-10-2015
is therefore arbitrary, illegal and unjustified as the
principles of natural justice has not been complied
with. He submitted that the action of the Employer
in terminating his services is in violation of Section
25-F of the I.D. Act, 1947. The Workman therefore
prayed for setting aside his order of termination by
declaring that the action of the Employer in
terminating his services is illegal and unjustified
and that the Employer be directed to pay an amount
of Rs. 3,00,565/- (Rupees three lakhs five hundred
sixty five only) to him towards unpaid rental
accommodation, bike rent and compensation for
mental torture and agony caused to him.
6. The Employer resisted the claim of the
Workman by filing its Written Statement on
20-09-2017 at Exb. 10. The Employer, as and by way
of its preliminary objections, submitted that the
present claim filed by the Workman cannot be
construed as an ‘industrial dispute’ as defined u/s
2 (k) of the I.D. Act, 1947, that the present claim is
filed with malafide intensions and with ulterior
motives, that the reference is bad-in-law and that
the services of the Workman was terminated on
account of loss of confidence by way of discharge
simplicitor.
7. The Employer stated that it is real estate
company and having its office at Cobra Vado,
Calangute, Bardez, Goa. The Employer admitted that
the Workman was employed with them as a ‘car
driver’ w.e.f. August, 2009 on a monthly salary of
Rs. 6000/- per month. The Employer stated that
besides that salary, the Workman was also given
the benefits of room rent, medical, electricity and
water bills were paid by them. The Employer stated
that the total monthly salary paid to the Workman
as on the date of his discharge was Rs. 13200/- per
month, besides additional petrol allowance of Rs.
800/- per month and house rent allowances of Rs.
5500/- per month. The Employer stated that the
Workman used to remain unauthorizedly absent
from his duties for 10 days for the year 2009-2010,
27 days for the year 2010-2011, 35 days for the year
2011-12, 40 days for the year 2012-2013, 42 days for
the year 2013-2014, 129 days for the year 2014-2015
and 101 days for the year 2015-2016. The Employer
stated that from the records, it can be clearly seen
that the Workman was irregular and had practically
stopped attending his duties as per their
expectation from the year 2014 onwards. The
Employer stated that the Workman was prone to be
absent from work without any notice or without
taking sanction for leave. The Employer stated that
the Workman was counseled on several occasions.
The Employer stated that the Workman was also
given warnings on several occasions by its
Managing Director.
8. The Employer stated that they had not
permitted the Workman to go on leave for the period
of 09-10-2015 till 11-10-2015 as alleged nor the
Director, Mr. Chaudhary was on his holidays to
Calcutta. The Employer stated that in spite of the
payment of substantial/attractive amount of salary
and allowances to the Workman, he was not diligent
in his duties and was habitual unauthorized
absence. The Employer stated that the Workman
was given several opportunities to improve his
behaviour. The Employer stated that subsequently,
on account of his several behaviorial aspects/issues,
the Employer was left with no other options rather
than to discharge him on the ground of loss of
confidence. The Employer stated that the Workman
was prone to ask for advances from them and would
create tantrums in case it was denied or take money
for fuel for the cars or later say to put it as advance
in his name. The Employer stated that the Workman
had taken advances total amounting to Rs.
2,32,682/- (Rupees two lakhs thirty two thousand
six hundred eighty two only) on various occasions.
The Employer stated that they have recovered an
amount of Rs. 1,24,731/- (Rupees one lakh twenty
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
738
four thousand seven hundred thirty one only) from
the salary of the Workman and the balance of
amount of Rs. 1,07,951/- (Rupees one lakh seven
thousand nine hundred fifty one only) is yet to be
recovered. The Employer stated that from the
advances taken by the Workman on various
occasions, the Workman was not prepared to work
but was always asking for money. The Employer
stated that in view of the aforesaid misbehavior of
the Workman, they had issued him a notice for one
month and discharged him from service after the
notice period by way of a discharge simplicitor.
The Employer stated that its decision in terminating
the services of the Workman is therefore legal, just
and not in contravention of any law as alleged. The
Employer denied the overall case as pleaded by the
Workman and prayed for dismissal of the present
reference.
9. Thereafter, the Workman filed his Re-joinder
on 13-11-2017 at Exb. 11. The Workman, by way of
his Re-joinder denied each and every statement,
averments and submissions made by the Employer
vide their Written Statement filed in the present
proceedings and reiterates and confirms the
statements, averments and submissions made by
him in his statement of claim.
10. Based on the pleadings filed by the parties’
hereinabove, this court framed the following issues
on 31-07-2018 at Exb. 19.
1. Whether the Workman/Party I proves that
the action of the Employer in terminating
his services with effect from 27-10-2015 is
illegal and unjustified?
2. Whether the Employer/Party II proves that
the present reference is not maintainable in
view of the reasons mentioned in para (a) to
(d) of its Written Statement?
3. Whether the Workman/Party I is entitled to
any relief?
4. What Order? What Award?
11. My answers to the aforesaid issues are as
under:
(a) Issue No. 1
:
In the negative.
(b) Issue No. 2
:
In the negative.
(c) Issue No. 3 and 4 :
As per final order.
REASONS
12. After framing issues, the matter was fixed for
the evidence of the Workman. The Workman also
filed his affidavit in evidence and produced on
record certain documents in support of his oral
evidence. Thereafter, the Workman filed an
application for seeking to lead secondary evidence,
which has been allowed by order dated 13-02-2020
after hearing both parties. The Workman filed an
application for amendment of his Claim Statement,
vide his application dated 04-03-2020. The Employer
also filed reply dated 03-02-2021 to the aforesaid
application of the Workman for amendment of his
Claim Statement and the matter was fixed for
arguments on 17-02-2021. On 05-03-2021, Ld. Adv.
Shri A. D’Souza h/f Adv. M. Lobo remained present
and orally prayed for time to withdraw his
appearance on behalf of the Workman and case
was adjourned to 12-04-2021. However, on and from
12-04-2021 till 13-08-2021, neither the Workman nor
his Adv. Shri M. Lobo remained present. On the
contrary, Ld. Adv. M. Naik h/f Adv. P. Chawdikar
remained present on behalf of the Employer and
submitted that the Workman is not interested in
pursuing his reference and prayed for passing an
ex-parte order. It is noticed that neither the
Workman nor his Adv. Shri. M. Lobo remained
present on the scheduled dates of hearings and as
such this court passed an ex-parte order against
the Workman and also closed his evidence. Ld. Adv.
Shri M. Naik, representing the Employer submitted
that since the Workman has not lead his evidence,
the Employer also does not wish to lead any
evidence.
13. In the case of V.N.S. Engineering Services
v/s. Industrial Tribunal of Goa, Daman and Diu
and Anr., reported in 1987 II LLN 968 of Hon’ble
High Court of Bombay has held that “there is
nothing in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 that
indicates a departure from the general rule that he
who approaches a court for relief, should prove his
case i.e. the obligation to lead evidence to establish
an allegation, the test being that he who does not
lead evidence, must fail. The Hon’ble High Court of
Bombay further held that the provisions of
Rule-10-B of the I.D. (Central Rules), 1957 which
requires the party raising a dispute to file a statement
of demands relating only to the issue in the order of
reference for adjudication within 15 days from the
receipt of the order of reference and forward copies
to the opposite party involved, clearly indicates that
the party who raises the industrial disputes is bound
to prove the contention raised by him and an
Industrial Tribunal or Labour Court would be erring
in placing the burden of proof on the other party to
the dispute”.
14. In the case of V.K. Raj Industries v/s Labour
Court (I) and Ors. reported in the year 1981 (29)
FLR, 194 of Allahabad High Court has held that
the proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal are
judicial in nature, even though the Indian Evidence
Act, is not applicable to the proceeding before the
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
739
Industrial Court, but the principle underlying the
said Act are applicable. The High Court has held
that “it is well settled that if a party challenges the
validity of an order and if no evidence is produced,
the party invoking the jurisdiction must fail. The
High Court has also held that if the Workman fails
to appear or to file Written Statement or produce
evidence, the dispute referred by the Government
cannot be answered in favour of the Workman and
he will not be entitled any relief”.
15. The principle laid down by the Hon’ble High
Court in its respective case still holds good.
Applying the law laid down by the Hon’ble High
Court, in the instant case, the order of reference
has been issued by the Government of Goa at the
instance of the Workman, who has raised the
present dispute pertaining to the legality and
justifiability of the action of management of the
Employer in terminating his services with effect
from 27-10-2015. The Workman also appeared before
this court and filed his pleadings, setting up the
grounds of challenge of his order of termination
from service by the Employer w.e.f. 27-10-2015. The
Employer resisted the claim of the Workman by
contending that its decision in terminating the
services of the Workman by way of discharge on
account of loss of confidence in him. The court also
framed certain issues based on the pleadings filed
by the respective parties. It was therefore
incumbent upon the Workman to prove his case by
leading material evidence either oral or
documentary. However, the roznama proceedings
maintained by this court indicates that the
Workman failed to remain present even after seeking
several opportunities. Consequently, the evidence
of the Workman was closed. Thus, the Workman
failed to prove any of the issues burdened upon
him. In the circumstances, in the absence of any
evidence on record, it is held that the Workman
failed to prove that the action of the Employer in
terminating his services w.e.f. 27-10-2015 is illegal
and unjustified. The Workman is therefore not
entitled to any relief. The Employer also did not
lead evidence in rebuttal. The issue No. 1 to 3 are
therefore answered in the negative.
In view of above, I proceed to pass the following
order:
ORDER
1. In the absence of any evidence on record, it is
held that the action of management of M/s.
A. A. Walker Estates Private Limited,
Calangute, Bardez, Goa in terminating the
services of their Workman, Shri. Sanjay Hirlekar,
Driver, with effect from 27-10-2015, is legal
and justified.
2. The Workman, Shri Sanjay Hirlekar, Driver, is
not entitled to any relief.
3. No order as to costs.
Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Suresh N. Narulkar),
Presiding Officer,
Labour Court-II.
———uuu———
Department of Law & Judiciary
Law (Establishment) Division
__
Order
No. 14/13/2020-LD(Estt.)/2313
In exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 3 (2) of the Goa Administrative Tribunal
Act, 1965, the Government of Goa is pleased to
appoint Ms. D. V. Patkar, District Judge-2 and
Additional Sessions Judge, Margao, South Goa, as
President of the Goa Administrative Tribunal, Panaji,
on deputation basis under the Goa Administrative
Tribunal (Appointment, Conditions of service of
President and Additional President) Rules, 2010,
with effect from the date she takes over the charge,
till the post of the President is filled up on regular
basis.
This is issued on the recommendation of the
High Court of Bombay, conveyed vide their
confidential letter No. A-1220/G/97/2177/2021 dated
09-11-2021.
The deputation of Ms. D.V. Patkar, will be
governed by the usual terms of deputation.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amir Y. Parab, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).
Porvorim, 15th November, 2021.
_______
Order
No. 9-18-2004-LD(Estt.)Part-II(40)/2315
Read:
Order No. 9-18-2004-LD (Estt.) Part-II(40)/
/1961 dated 27-11-2020.
Whereas, the Government vide Notification
No. 9-18-2004-LD(Estt.)Part-II(40)/3085 dated
10-07-2009, published in the Official Gazette, Series
II No. 17 dated 23-07-2009, appointed Mr. Paulo
Francisco Rodrigues, Advocate (hereinafter referred
as the “Applicant”) as a Notary for period of five
years with effect from 10-07-2009, for the area of
Tiswadi Taluka;
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
740
And whereas, the Government vide certificate of
practice dated 10-07-2009 has certified that the
applicant is authorized to practice as a Notary for
a period of five years from 10-07-2009 for the area of
Tiswadi Taluka;
And whereas, the Government on the request of
the applicant had renewed his certificate of practice
as a Notary for subsequent 01 term and the period
of validity of the certificate of practice in the
endorsement dated 13-11-2014 issued to the
applicant and has expired on 09-07-2019.
And whereas, the applicant has failed to renew
his certificate of practice six months prior to expiry
of the period of validity of the said certificate of
practice until his period expired on i.e. 09-07-2019,
as required under sub-section (2) of Section 5 of the
Notaries Act, 1952 (Central Act 53 of 1952) and sub-
-rule (4) of Rule 8B of the Notaries Rules, 1956
(hereinafter referred as the “said Act” and “said
Rule”);
And whereas, the Government vide Order
No. 9-18-2004-LD(Estt.)Part-II(40)/1961 dated
27-11-2020 published in the Official Gazette,
Series II No. 37 dated 10-12-2020; the Government
of Goa removed the name of applicant entered as
a Notary from the register maintained by it under
Section 4 of the said Act; in pursuance of Clause (f)
of Section 10 of the said Act.
And whereas, the applicant in letter dated
06-09-2021 had requested the Government to
consider his renewal and withdraw the order
9-18-2004-LD(Estt.)Part-II(40)/1961 dated 27-11-2020
published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 37
dated 10-12-2020; as he was disturbed, since his
wife was suffering from ovarian cancer and he lost
some of his close relatives to COVID-19 pandemic.
And whereas, the Government has decided to
consider his request and withdraw the Order
No. 9-18-2004-LD(Estt.)Part-II(40)/1961 dated
27-11-2020 published in the Official Gazette,
Series II No. 37 dated 10-12-2020;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of Clause(f) of
Section 10 of the said Act, the read Section 21 of the
general clauses, the Government of Goa hereby
rescinds Government Order No. 9-18-2004-
LD(Estt.)Part-II(40)/1961 dated 27-11-2020 published
in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 37 dated
10-12-2020.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amir Y. Parab, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).
Porvorim, 16th November, 2021.
Department of Public Health
—
Order
No. 4/2/2021-II/PHD/2115
Read:
Memorandum No. 4/2/2021-II/PHD/1885
dated 08-10-2021.
On the recommendation of the Goa Public
Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter
No. COM/I/5/30(3)/2021/315 dated 20-09-2021,
Government is pleased to appoint Shri Mohit Kumar
Pandey to the post of Assistant Professor in Medical
Imaging Technology (Group “A” Gazetted) in Allied
Health Science Courses in Goa Medical College &
Hospital, Bambolim-Goa in Level-11 of Pay Matrix
[Pay Band-3 Rs. 15,600-39,100/- + G.P. Rs. 6,600/-
(pre-revised)] with immediate effect.
Shri Mohit Kumar Pandey shall be on probation
for a period of two years.
Shri Mohit Kumar Pandey has been medically
examined by the Medical Board and his character
and antecedents have been verified by the District
Magistrate, North Goa District, Panaji-Goa at the
time of appointment as Lecturer in Medical Imaging
Technology, in Allied Health Science Courses in Goa
Medical College & Hospital, Bambolim.
The appointment is made against the vacancy
occurred due to creation vide Order No. 4/1/2018-II/
/PHD/1195 dated 14-08-2019 & bifurcation order No.
4/1/2018-II/PHD/Part-I/3383 dated 23-10-2020 for the
post of Assistant Professor in Medical Imaging
Technology, Allied Health Science Courses, in Goa
Medical College & Hospital, Bambolim-Goa.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health).
.
Porvorim, 17th November, 2021.
_______
Order
No. 22/2/2020-I/PHD/2453
Read: Memorandum No. 22/2/2020-I/PHD dated
26-03-2021.
On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/
/I/5/24(2)/2020/785 dated 27-11-2020, Government
is pleased to appoint the following candidates to
the post of Tutor in Institute of Nursing Education
under Directorate of Health Services (Group “B”
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
741
Non-Gazetted) on temporary basis in the Level-6 of
Pay Matrix of 7th Pay Commission [Pay Band-3
Rs. 9,300-34,800 + Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/- (pre-
revised)] with immediate effect and as per the terms
and conditions contained in the Memorandum cited
above:-
1. Mitchel Alleluia Fernandes.
2. Olinda Fatima Toscano.
3. Fiola Savia Dorothy D’Costa.
4. Akshata Anant Mone.
5. Candida Maria D’souza.
6. John Mark Mota.
7. Cassandra Patricia Sequeira.
8. Gajanan Kashiram Kalangutkar (OBC).
9. Sanjita Shamsundar Gawande (OBC).
10.
Conceicao Vaz (ST).
11.
Sheelpa Manohar Gaonkar (ST).
The above candidates shall be on probation for
a period of two years.
The above candidates have been declared
medically fit by the Medical Board.
The character and antecedents of above
candidates have been verified by the District
Magistrates of North Goa District, Panaji-Goa and
South Goa District, Margao-Goa.
The appointments are made against the
vacancies occurred due to creation of the posts vide
Order No. 22/5/2013-I/PHD dated 30-05-2016 and
subsequently revived vide Order No. 22/7/2020-I/
/PHD/635 dated 24-03-2021.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami S. Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 17th November, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Printing & Stationery
—
Order
No. 8/15/98-P&S/827
On recommendation of Goa Public Service
Commission vide their letter No. COM/II/11/
/39(1)/2021/361 dated 13-10-2021, the Government
of Goa is pleased to promote Shri Samir N. Naik,
Artist Retoucher-cum-Compose Matter Paster and
Designer, Department of Printing & Stationery to
the Post of Deputy Director (Technical), Group ‘B’
Gazetted in the Pay Scale of PB- 2 Rs. 9,300-34,800
+ Grade Pay Rs. 4,600/- (Level -7) with immediate
effect.
He shall be on probation for a period of two years.
He shall exercise option for fixation of his pay in
the promotional grade, in terms of provision of F.R.
22(I)(a)(1), within a period of one month from the
date of receipt of this order.
The expenditure on his salary shall be debited to
the Budget Head of Account “2058—Stationery &
Printing, 00, 001—Direction & Administration,
01—Director (N.P.), 01—Salaries”.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Rajendra D. Mirajkar, Director/Additional
Secretary (Printing & Stationery).
Panaji, 18th November, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Revenue
__
Notification
No. 16/1/7/2021-Rev-I/8839
In exercise of the powers conferred by
Section 198 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968
(Act No. 9 of 1969) (hereinafter referred to as the
“said Code”), the Government of Goa hereby
delegates the powers conferred upon it under
Section 35 of the said code to the Collectors
appointed under Section 4 of the said code in
respect of land required for setting up of common
facility center under the Scheme of Fund for
Regeneration of Traditional Industries (SFURTI) of
the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise,
Government of India, with immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sapna S. N. Bandodkar, Under Secretary (Revenue-
I)-Link.
Porvorim, 15th November, 2021.
———uuu———
Department of Transport
Directorate of Transport
—
Notification
No. D. Tpt./STA/2565/2020/2988
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
-sections (1) and (2) of Section 68 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988 (Central Act 59 of 1988) read
with Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897
(Act No.10 of 1987), the Government of Goa, hereby
amends the Government Notification No. D.Tpt./
/STA/2565/2020/3105 dated 29-12-2020 published in
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 35
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
742
the Official Gazette, Series II No. 40 dated
31-12-2020, and further re-constitute The State
Transport Authority for Goa and the Regional
Transport Authority for Panaji respectively,
hereunder:-
State Transport Authority for Goa
I. Secretary, Transport
— Chairman.
II. Director of Transport
— Member
Secretary.
III. Shri Pramod Prabhakar
— Member.
Kamat, Mahalasa Prasad Bldg.,
St. Caitanowaddo, Merces,
Tiswadi-Goa
Mob. No. 9822984848
IV. Shri Sebastiao Damiao Pereira,
— Member.
H. No. 81, Chichalim Unddar,
Vasco-Da-Gama, Goa 403711.
Mob. No. 9822482721
V. Shri Vinod Sahadev Kinlekar,
— Member.
Sapana Enclave II,
Flat No. Ga-3, Near Ganesh
Temple, New Vaddem,
Vasco-Goa
Mob. No. 8408985137
Regional Transport Authority for Panaji
I. Dy. Director of Transport
— Chairman.
(South) Margao
II. The Asstt. Director of
— Member
Transport (Enforcement)
Secretary.
North, Panaji Goa
III Shri Edgar Antonio Dos
— Member.
Santos Gaspar,
Wagle Appartment, 1st Floor,
Flat No. 3, La Campala
Colony, Miramar, Panjim Goa.
Mob. No. 8888771771
This Notification shall come into force with
immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Rajan Satardekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Transport).
Panaji, 18th November, 2021.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 14.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—265/150–11/2021.