Panaji, 16th June, 2022 (Jyaistha 26, 1944)
SERIES II No. 11
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-2023
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Agriculture
Directorate of Agriculture
–––
Order
No. 8-86/2022-23/D.Agri/324
Government is pleased to order the transfer of
Shri Omkar Gaonkar, Assistant Agricultural Officer,
Zonal Agriculture Office, Tiswadi, Group ‘B’
Gazetted against the vacant post of Assistant
Agricultural Officer, Extension Section at Head
Quarters under the B.H. 2401-00-001-01(NP)
-Salaries, with immediate effect.
This is issued with approval of Government vide
entry No. 1560/f dated 31-05-2022.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Nevil Alphonso, Director & ex officio Jt. Secretary
(Agriculture).
Tonca-Caranzalem, 9th June, 2022.
Department of Co-operation
Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies
–––
Order
No. 3/23/Urban Credit/TS-II/PZ/2021/RCS/716
Read: 1.Notification No. 3/3/Urban Credit/PZ/2017/
/RCS/Suppl/5306 dated 10-02-2020.
2.This Office Order No. 21-1-99-TS/Shiroda/
/RCS/2162 dated 29-9-2022.
3.This Office Extension Order No. 3/23/Urban
Credit/TS-II/PZ/2021/RCS/377 dated 25-5-2021.
4.Letter No. SUCCS/ASRO/2022-23/14 dated
29-05-2022.
In view of powers conferred upon me vide
Notification read at Sr. No. 1 above, the term of the
General Manager of the Shiroda Urban Co-operative
Credit Society Ltd., Shiroda-Goa, appointed and
empowered vide Order at Sr. No. 2 above and
extended at Sr. No. 3 to act as Sale-cum-Recovery
Officer as provided under sub-section (1) of Section
91 D of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, is
hereby extended with effect from 26-05-2022 for
further period of one year.
The other condition mentioned in the Order
referred to at Sr. No. 2 and 3 above shall continue to
remain in force.
The registrar shall reserve the right to withdraw
the Order at any stage without assigning any reason
thereof.
Arvind B. Khutkar, Registrar (Co-operative
Societies).
Panaji, 6th June, 2022.
————
Order
No. 3/12/21/Urban Credit/TS-II/SZ/RCS/724
Read: 1.Order No. 48-8-2001-TS-RCS/III/311 dated
21-04-2017.
2.Circular No. 6-13-81/EST/RCS/PartV/5833
dated 6-3-2020.
1389
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
Note:- There are five Extraordinary issues to the Official
Gazette, Series II No. 10 dated 9-06-2022 as
follows:—
(1) Extraordinary dated 09-06-2022 from pages 1347
to 1348 regarding Notification from Goa
Legislature Secretariat.
(2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 13-06-2022 from
pages 1349 to 1364 regarding Notification
from Department of Elections.
(3) Extraordinary (No. 3) dated 15-06-2022 from
pages 1365 to 1378 regarding Notification from
Department of Elections.
(4) Extraordinary (No. 4) dated 15-06-2022 from
pages 1379 to 1386 regarding Notification from
Department of Elections.
(5) Extraordinary (No. 5) dated 15-06-2022 from
pages 1387 to 1388 regarding Office
Memorandum from Department of Finance.
1390
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
3.Letter No. VAC/CHIN/2021-2022/01 dated
26th August, 2021.
4.Letter No. 29-8/20/ARSZ/ADT/R’sNominee/
/60 dated 5-4-2022.
Whereas, Adv. Dilip S. Gaonkar, having office at
A, 306, 3rd floor, Pereira plaza, opp. Hospicio
Hospital, Margao-Goa, was appointed as Registrar’s
Nominee under Section 86(1) of the Goa
Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 read with Rule
116(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003
vide Order read at Sr. No. 1 above.
And whereas, the Secretary of The VAC Urban
Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Chinchinim vide their
letter referred at Sr. No. 3 above has requested to
appoint Adv. Dilip S. Gaonkar as independent and
dedicated Registrar nominee to decide recovery
cases of their society.
And whereas, the Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.
Societies, Quepem Zone, Quepem-Goa vide letter
referred at Sr. No. 4 above, has forwarded the request
of VAC Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Chinchinim
to designate Adv. Dilip S. Gaonkar, as it dedicated
nominee to adjudicate dispute referred to him by
the society.
Therefore, in exercise of powers conferred under
Section 123 B of the Goa Co-op. Societies Act,
2001, I, the undersigned hereby authorize Adv. Dilip
S. Gaonkar to entertain all disputed referred to him
in the matter of Recovery of outstanding loans by
VAC Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Chinchinim,
without routing through this department.
When a purported dispute is referred by the
society, the above named nominee is authorised to
first decide under sub-section (1) of Section 86 of
the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 whether
the matter referred by society involves a dispute
and pass appropriate Orders under sub-section (1)
of Section 86 of the Act.
Only upon the nominee satisfying that there exist
a dispute he shall proceed to adjudicate the same
and pass an award accordingly. The nominee shall
abide by the terms and condition on which he was
originally appointed as Registrar’s nominee vide
order read at Sr. No. 1 above.
This appointment shall come in force with
immediate effect and shall remain enforces for one
year and same can be withdrawn at any stage
without assigning any reasons.
Arvind B. Khutkar, Registrar (Co-operative
Societies).
Panaji, 7th June, 2022.
Order
No. 3/17/Urban Credit/TS-II/PZ/2020/RCS/738
Read: 1. Order No. 3/17/Urban Credit/TS-II/PZ/2020/
/RCS/320 dated 18-05-2020.
2.This Office Extension Order No. 3/17/Urban
/Credit/TS-II/PZ/2020/RCS/2791 dated 12-11-2020.
3.This Office Extension Order No. 3/17/Urban
/Credit/TS-II/PZ/2020/RCS/566 dated 08-06-2021.
4.This Office Extension Order No. 3/17/Urban
/Credit/TS-II/PZ/2020/RCS/3206 dated 4-01-2022.
The restrictions imposed by Government on the
Mashel Mahila Co-operative Credit Society Ltd.,
Marcel-Goa vide Order referred to at Sr. No. 1 above
and extension granted vide orders read at Sr. No. 2,
3 and 4 above is hereby further extended with w.e.f.
21-5-2022 for further period of six months.
All the other terms and conditions shall remain
unchanged.
Arvind B. Khutkar, Registrar (Co-operative
Societies).
Panaji, 3rd June, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Finance
Debt Management Division
–––
Order
No. 2/17/2012-Fin(DMU)/915
In pursuance to Article 68 & 71, read with the
Memorandum of Association and Articles of
Association of M/s. EDC Ltd., Government of Goa is
pleased to appoint Shri B. S. Pai Angle, Joint
Managing Director, as Managing Director, M/s. EDC
Ltd., with effect from 01-05-2022.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Pranab G. Bhat, Under Secretary, Finance
(Budget-II).
Porvorim, 8th June, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Fire & Emergency Services
Directorate of Fire & Emergency Services
––
Order
No. DFES/CONF/08-Vol. VII/2022-23/1276
Read: 1. O.M. No. DFS/EST/U-1/PGO/06-07/3312
dated 17-01-2007.
2. O.M. No. DFS/EST/U-1/PGO/06-07/3612
dated 30-01-2007.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1391
3. O.M. No. DFS/EST/U-1/PGO/08-09/1550
dated 30-06-2008.
4. O.M. No. DFS/CONF/PGO/2010-11/2982
dated 13-09-2010.
5. O.M. No. DFES/EST/U-1/PGR/2014-15/5036
dated 30-01-2015.
6. Order No. DFES/CONF/08-Vol.VII/2021-22/
/5028 dated 15-12-2021.
In supersession of the Office Memorandum/
/Orders cited under reference and in pursuance to
Government instructions issued vide Office
Memorandum No. 12/4/2005-DPG dated 16-03-2005,
the following Officers are designated as Public
Grievance Officers.
Sl.
Public Grievance
Role/
No.
Officer
/Responsibility
1. Divisional Officer,
Public Grievances
Central Zone, Ponda
related to jurisdiction
of Central Zone having
Ponda, Bicholim, Old-
-Goa, Kundaim and
Valpoi Fire Stations.
2. Divisional Officer,
Public Grievances
South Zone, Margao
related to jurisdiction
of South Zone having
Margao, Verna,
Curchorem,
Canacona, and
and Cuncolim
Fire Stations.
3. Assistant Divisional
Public Grievances
Officer, North
related to jurisdiction
Zone, Panaji
of North Zone having
Panaji, Mapusa,
Pernem, Vasco, Pilerne
and Porvorim
Fire Stations.
The Public Grievance Officer shall redress the
grievances pertaining to the Fire Stations mentioned
above and shall dispose off the cases.
The Public Grievance Officer shall strictly comply
with the instructions of the Government and be
available to the public in their respective offices on
every Tuesday from 10:00 hours to 13:00 hours.
The Public Grievance Officer shall maintain
updated Register of the grievances received and
shall also submit a fortnightly report as required in
the said Government Office Memorandum.
This order comes into force with immediate
effect.
Nitin V. Raiker, Director (Fire & Emergency
Services).
Panaji, 31st May, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Forest
___
Order
No. 2-159-WL&ET(N)-2021-22-PART FILE-F.D/100
Sanction of the Government is hereby accorded
to incur an expenditure of Rs.13,72,618/- (Rupees
thirteen lakhs seventy two thousand six hundred
eighteen only) inclusive of all taxes towards the
work of “Renovation of Type III Quarter of Veterinary
Doctor at Bondla”.
The expenditure shall be debited to the Budget
Head as follows:-
Demand No. 68
4406 —
Capital Outlay on Forestry & Wildlife.
01 —
Forestry.
070 —
Communications and Buildings.
03 —
Communications and Construction (P).
53 —
Major Works.
This issues with the concurrence of Finance
Department vide its U. O. No. Finance (Exp.)
Department 1400082209 dated 30-05-2022.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Forests).
Porvorim, 13th June, 2022.
–––
Addendum
No. MS-REV.PF/DCF/WP/2020-21/97
Ref: 1.
Notification No. DCF(WP)/Pvt. For/16(THC)/
2013(WZ)/19-20/26 dated 21-01-2020.
2. Notification No. DCF(WP)/Pvt. For/16(THC)/
2013(WZ)/19-20/119 dated 18-06-2020.
3. Notification No. MS-REV.PF/DCF/WP/2018-
-19/393/177 dated 18-09-2020.
4. Addendum No. MS-REV.PF/DCF/WP/2018-
-19/393/205 dated 26-10-2020.
In continuation to the Notification No. MS-
REV.PF/DCF/WP/2018-19/393/177 dated 18-09-2020,
Government hereby add names of three villages viz.,
Chorao and Azzocim Villages of Tiswadi Taluka and
Casarvornem village of Pernem Taluka to the sub-
committee number 1 and 5 respectively, constituted
1392
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
earlier for North Goa, to carry out site inspection of the properties fulfilling/meeting Private Forests criteria
of canopy density and area, as per Forest Survey of India (FSI) map in respect of the provisionally identified
private forest areas by V.T. Thomas Committee and F.X. Araujo Committee.
Further, sub-committee Number 1 for Chorao and Azzocim Villages of Tiswadi Taluka and sub-committee
Number 5 for Casarvornem Village of Pernem Taluka shall work under direct supervision of concerned
Territorial Dy. Conservator of Forests and concerned Territorial Range Forest Officer shall act as Member
Secretary of below mention Villages & Taluka as per the same terms of Reference notified earlier vide
notification dated 18-09-2020.
North Goa
Sr. No.
Taluka
Village
Members of sub-committee
1. (Below
Tiswadi
Chorao
ISLR
RFO
Talathi
Gaulimaula
Tiswadi
Panaji
Chorao
Village)
Tiswadi
Azzocim
ISLR
RFO
Talathi
Tiswadi
Panaji
Azzocim
5 (Below Dhargal
Pernem
Casarvornem
ISLR
RFO
Talathi
Village)
Pernem
Pernem
Casarvornem
This issues with the approval of the Government.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Forests).
Porvorim, 03rd June, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Home
Home—General Division
–––
Order
No. 15/1/87-HD(G)/Vol.I/DSW/6887
Read: 1) Order No. 15/1/87-HD(G)/Part dated
15-07-2013.
2) Order No. 15/1/87-HD(G)/Part dated
27-07-2015.
3) Order No. 15/1/87-HD(G)/Part dated
11-07-2017.
4) Order No. 15/1/87-HD(G) Vol.I/3150 dated
25-11-2019.
On expiry of the term of the present State
Managing Committee of Special Fund for
Re-construction and Rehabilitation of Ex-
Servicemen, in the State of Goa, the Government of
Goa is pleased to re-nominate the present members
and re-constitute the Managing Committee of
Special Fund as shown below for the period upto
2 years:-
Chairman
— Governor of Goa.
Vice-Chairman
— Chief Minister, Goverment of
Goa.
Members
—
1. Chief Secretary,
Government of Goa.
2. Flag Officer, Commanding
Headquarters Goa area,
Vasco-da-Gama.
Nominees of the —
3. VADM Sunil K. Damle,
Chief of Staff
PVSM, AVSM, NM, VSM
(Retd.).
4. AVM Giles Gomez, VSM
(Retd.).
Nominees of
—
5. RADM Sudarshan
State Government
Shrikhande, AVSM
(Retd.)-Indian Navy.
6. Maj. Gen Pakala Venkates-
warlu, AVSM, VSM (Retd.)-
Indian Army.
7. Representative of Ministry
of Defence.
8. Representative of Director
General Re-Settlement/
/Kendriya Sainik Board.
Co-opted
—
9. Director Re-Settlement
Members
South, Pune Zone.
— 10. Station
Commander,
Station HQ, Panaji.
11. Collector, North-Goa.
12. Collector, South-Goa.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1393
Member Secretary — 13. Secretary, Department of
Sainik Welfare.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Girish G. Sawant, Under Secretary (Home-II).
Porvorim, 09th June, 2022.
———uuu———
Inspectorate of Factories & Boilers
––
Notification
No. VI/BLR/(2)/A-144/IFB/2022/771
Read: The Government Notification No.VI/BLR(2)/
/A-144/IFB/2019/4233 dated 14th February,
2019, published in the Official Gazette,
Series II No. 47 dated 21st February, 2019.
In exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 9 of
the Boiler Attendants Rules, 2011 and in supersession
of the Government Notification No. VI/BLR/(2)/A-144/
/IFB/2019/4233 dated 14th February, 2019, published
in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 47 dated 21st
February, 2019, the Government of Goa hereby
re-constitutes the Board of Examiners for the State of
Goa consisting of the following members, namely:-
1. The Chief Inspector
— Ex officio
of Factories & Boilers,
Chairman.
Altinho, Panaji
2. Shri Vishwajit N. Desai,
— Member.
Assistant Manager -
Maintenance, M/s. Punjab
Renewable Energy System
Pvt. Ltd., C/o. M/s. Deccan Fine
Chemicals (P) Ltd.
Santa Monica Plant, Corlim-Goa
3. Shri Surendra R. Prabhugaonkar,
— Member.
Head E & I- MCD, M/s. Vedanta
Sesa Goa Iron Ore, Metcoke
Division Navelim-Bicholim, Goa
4. Shri Manoj B. Patil,
— Member.
Chief Manager (Utilities)
M/s. Zuari Agro Chemicals
Ltd., Zuarinagar-Goa
5. Inspector of Boilers,
— Ex officio
Altinho, Panaji
Secretary.
This Notification shall come into force on the
date of its publication in the Official Gazette.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Vivek P. Marathe, Chief Inspector & ex officio
Joint Secretary (Factories and Boilers).
Panaji, 07th June, 2022.
Notification
No. VI/BLR/(2)/A-144/(Part-I)/IFB/2022/772
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1)
and (3) of Rule 9 of the Boiler Operation Rules, 2021
and in supersession of the Government Notification
No. VI/BLR/(2)A-144 (Part 1)/IFB/2020/1131 dated
20th August, 2020, published in the Official Gazette,
Series II No. 22 dated 27th August, 2020, the
Government of Goa hereby constitutes the
Committee of Examiners for the State of Goa
consisting of the following members, namely:-
1. The Chief Inspector
—
Ex officio
of Factories & Boilers,
Chairman.
Altinho, Panaji
2. Shri Deepak R. Dhume,
—
Member.
Dukle Heaven, 102,
Block 3, St. Inez, Panaji-Goa
3. Shri Pankaj V. Naik,
—
Member.
Deputy General Manager
(Phosphates & Offsites),
M/s. Zuari Agro Chemicals Ltd.,
Zuarinagar, Goa
4. Shri Madan R. Shanbhag,
—
Member.
Manager, Engineering
(Boiler House & Curing),
M/s. MRF Ltd.,
Tisca, Usgao, Goa
5. Inspector of Boilers,
— Ex officio
Altinho, Panaji
Secretary.
This Notification shall come into force on the
date of its publication in the Official Gazette.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Vivek P. Marathe, Chief Inspector & ex officio Joint
Secretary (Factories and Boilers).
Panaji, 07th June, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Labour
––
Notification
No. 28/02/2022-LAB/Part-II/183
The following Award passed by the Industrial
Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on
07-03-2022 in Ref. No. IT/39/2012 is hereby
published as required under Section 17 of the
1394
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of
1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 19th April, 2022.
IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
AND LABOUR COURT
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before M/s. Bela N. Naik, Hon’ble
Presiding Officer)
Ref. No. IT/39/2012
Shri Gaurish Phondekar & 33 Ors.,
Rep. by the President,
Goa Trade & Commercial
Workers’ Union, Panaji–Goa … Workmen/Party I.
V/s
1. M/s. Meta Copper & Alloys Ltd.,
Zuarinagar,
Sancoale- Goa …. Employer/Party II(1).
2. Canara Bank
Panaji–Goa …. Employer/Party II(2).
Workmen/Party I represented by Learned Advocate
Shri P. J. Kamat.
Employer/Party II(1) represented by Learned
Advocate Shri M. S. Bandodkar.
Employer/Party II(2) represented by Learned
Advocate Ms. A. Raikar.
A W A R D
(Delivered on this the 7th Day of the Month of
March of the Year 2022)
By Order dated 21-06-2012, bearing No. 28/22/
/2012-LAB/324, the Government of Goa in exercise
of powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘The Act’),
has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal
for adjudication.
“(1) Whether the action of the management of
M/s. Meta Copper and Alloys Limited, Zuarinagar in
suspending the operations of the factory and rendering
following 34 workmen jobless and without payment
with effect from 17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011, is legal
and justified?
Sr.
Names of workmen refused employment
No.
with effect from 17-06-2011.
(1)
Gaurish Phondekar.
(2)
Prakash Dabholkar.
(3)
Prasad Gurav.
(4)
Sajjan Mudkudkar.
(5)
Utkarsh Laad.
(6)
Ratikant Khandepar.
(7)
Vivekanand Naik.
(8)
Pravin Naik.
(9)
Dayanand Shetye.
(10)
Ramdeen Kewat.
(11)
Surendra Kossambe.
(12)
Avinash Tople.
(13)
Mangesh Naik.
(14)
Pramod Gawde
(15)
Premanand Bhat.
(16)
Shrikant Bhandari.
(17)
Mahesh Kambli.
(18)
Mohidin Bilagi.
(19)
Dilip Naik.
(20)
Jairam Naik.
(21)
Dinesh Naik.
(22)
Meghnath Rathod.
(23)
Manjunath Naik.
(24)
Rajesh Raut
(25)
Sunil Dabre.
(26)
Abhit Naik.
(27)
Pramod Naik.
(28)
Hanamagoud Biradar.
(29)
Vinod Naik.
(30)
Manoj Parab.
(31)
Dilip Kankonkar.
(32)
Anant Kanekar.
Sr. No. Names of workmen refused
employment with effect from
18-06-2011.
(33)
Mangesh Naik.
(34)
Prashant Parab.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1395
(2) If not, what relief the workmen are entitled
to?”
2. Upon receipt of the reference, it was registered
as IT/39/2012 and registered A/D notices were
issued to both the Parties. Pursuant to service of
notices, Party I filed a Claim Statement at Exhibit 4
and Party II filed its Written Statement at Exhibit 5.
3. In short, the case of the Party I/Workman is that
all the workmen named in the Schedule of Reference
are the unionized members of Goa Trade &
Commercial Workers’ Union (AITUC) and since then
Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’ Union is espousing
the cause of these workmen before every competent
forum and authority. The workmen/Party I submits
that Meta Copper & Alloys Ltd. is a factory which is
situated at Zuarinagar, Sancoale, Goa which was
earlier known as Meta Strips and the above factory
employed more than 400 workmen ever since its
inception at Zuarinagar, Sancoale, Goa.
4. The workmen/Party I submits that all the
workmen named in the present Order of Reference
were employed at the above factory for last many
years continuously. The factory of the Party II named
above was running in 3 shift operations by employing
more than 400 workmen at its above factory. However,
suddenly the Management of the Party II factory
refused to provide employment of all the willing
workmen including the workmen named in the
Schedule of Reference w.e.f. 17-06-2011 and
18-06-2011 respectively. The company was employing
more than 100 workmen at its factory prior to refusing
employment to these workmen and as such the
provisions of Chapter VB of the I. D. Act, 1947 are
applicable. It is submitted that when the workmen
named at Sr. No. (1) to (32) went to report for work at
the above factory on 17-06-2011 and the workmen
named at Sr. No. (33) & (34) went to report for work at
the above factory at Zuarinagar Sancoale, Goa on
18-06-2011, the Management refused to provide them
employment and forcibly kept them out of
employment by restraining them at the factory gate.
After this incident, all the workmen started sitting
near the factory gate waiting for an opportunity to
resume for their duties subsequent to their refusal of
employment and the workmen continued to sit near
the factory gate of the above factory. However, they
were not provided entry in the factory and were
refused employment.
5. The workmen/Party I submits that the action of
the management in refusing to provide employment
to these unionized workmen named in the present
Schedule of reference is illegal, unjust and bad in
law since all the workmen named in the present
Schedule of reference were everyday reporting at the
factory of the Party II(1) waiting for an opportunity to
resume for their normal duties. However, these
workmen were not allowed to resume for their duties.
All the workmen are offering themselves for
employment every day at the factory premises of the
Party II(1) employer. However, the Party II(1)/Employer
is refusing to provide them employment and there is
no severance of Employer employee relationship and
the contract of Master and servant/Employer-
employee still survives and continues and as such
all the workmen named in the schedule of Reference
are entitled for full wages w.e.f. 17-06-2011 and
18-06-2011 respectively.
6. The workmen/Party I submits that the action of
the management of Party II(1)/Employer in refusing
to provide employment to the unionized workmen
smacks of malice and malafides and is an unfair
labour practice which has been resorted by the
Party II(1) Employer to harass and victimize the
unionized workmen named in the present schedule
of Reference and that the Party II(1) has adopted this
illegal and unfair labour practices to get rid of
permanent workmen and has rendered permanent
workmen jobless without accepting any liability and
without following the procedure laid down in
Chapter-VB of the I. D. Act, 1947 which is otherwise
required to be followed by the Employer in case of
retrenchment/closure/lock-out of the Employer
factory and submits that refusing to provide
employment to the unionized workmen w.e.f.
17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 is nothing but illegally
denying the workmen the right to employment which
is unethical, illegal, unjust and bad-in-law and
further submits that all the workmen are entitled for
immediate employment with full back wages and
continuity in service.
7. In the circumstance above, it is prayed that the
action of the company/Party II(1) Employer, Meta
Copper and Alloys Ltd., Zuarinagar, Sancoale, Goa in
refusing to provide employment to the 32 willing
workmen named in the Order of reference w.e.f.
17-06-2011 and 2 willing workmen w.e.f. 18-06-2011
be held illegal, unjust and bad in law and prays that
all the workmen named in the present Schedule of
Reference be provided immediate employment in the
company of the Party II(1)/Employer, M/s Meta Copper
and Alloys Ltd., Zuarinagar, Sancoale, Goa with
immediate effect with full wages and continuity in
service.
8. During the pendency of the proceedings, an
amendment came to be filed by Party II(1) and as such
the amendment was made to the pleadings
accordingly. An application for impleadment of
Canara Bank was filed which has also been granted
1396
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
by my Learned Predecessor and said Canara Bank
was impleaded as Party II(2) to the present pleading.
9. In the Written Statement filed by the Party II(1)
it is submitted that the Party II was in the business of
manufacturing Copper and Brass products at
Upasnagar, Zuarinagar, Goa and that as the
Institutions which were providing working Capital
for daily operations suddenly stopped financing the
company, resulting in no money for purchase of raw
material for production and the company was unable
to continue its activities. The company further
submits that the entire suspension of the
manufacturing activities was due to the reason that
company had no funds to buy the raw materials as
bankers who were financing the company, suddenly
stopped financing and company has no money to buy
raw materials and, therefore the company had no
choice but to suspend its manufacturing operations,
till alternate arrangements for funds could be made.
The company therefore suspended its manufacturing
activities at its plant located at Zuarinagar w.e.f.
17-06-2011. The company further submits that it had
no funds to make the plant operative and for last 3
years the company was operating only 30% of its
installed capacity due to non-availability of funds.
The company was losing between Rs. 3-5 Crores every
month, after suspension of the manufacturing
activities. The company is still in the process of
seeking new investors/funds for reviving the
operations. The company had to keep some skeleton
staff for security and maintenance of its equipment,
land and building. The list of staff required to work
was displayed on the notice boards. The entire action
on the part of the management is totally legal and
fully justified.
10. The Party II(1) submits that the Plant was ready
somewhere around 1999. However, due to severe
local agitations, the Plant could not be started,
making the company suffer tremendous loss,
approximately around Rs.120 Crores. In fact not
allowing to start the said plant as planned in the
year 1999, back-bone in operating and financial terms
of the company, itself is broken and the company
therefore could start only after about 2 years. The
Party II(1) submits that by notice dated 30-05-2011,
the Party II had originally decided to suspend its
manufacturing activities from 7-6-2011 and since
there was residual work required to be completed,
the suspension of the manufacturing activities was
different and company ultimately suspended its
manufacturing activities w.e.f. 17-06-2011, by notice
dated 06-06-2011. The company displayed the names
of the workmen who are required to work and the
names of the workmen who are not required to work
during suspension of manufacturing activities on the
respective notice boards, and also outside the factory
gate and submits that the suspension of the
manufacturing activities still continues till date.
11. The Party II(1) further submits that during the
suspension of manufacturing activities, the company
was trying to find alternatives arrangements/funds
with the financial institutions, who gave loan to the
company. However, the said financial institution,
because the payment was not done on time, visited
the company premises and took possession of the
entire factory property under the provisions of
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002
on 15-02-2012. Thereafter on 29-05-2012 the
Institutions published a Sale Notice in the Navhind
Times, a local newspaper for the sale of the movable
and immovable properties of the entire factory under
Rules 6(2) and 8(6) & 9 of the Security interest
(Enforcement) Rules, 2002 and invited tenders for the
same. As no tenders were received for the sale notice
dated 29-05-2012, a second sale notice was published
on 22-09-2012 in the newspaper Navhind Times
towards Sale Notice of Moveable Properties Under
Rules 6(2) and Immoveable Properties Rules 8(6) & 9
of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 and
inviting tenders for the same. The Party II(1) further
submits that, as of today entire property of the Party
II(1) has been taken over by the financial institutions
and therefore they are necessary parties to this
reference. It is therefore submitted that Canara Bank-
Panaji Branch, Indian Over Seas Bank, Panaji and
Halcyon Financial and Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
(Halcyon), Mumbai be made as necessary parties to
the reference.
12. The Party II(1) submits that since
Mr. Prashant Parab who is at Sr. No. 34 in the Order of
reference had weekly off on 17-06-2011, he was
effected by the suspension of the manufacturing
activities from 18-06-2011 and that as far as
Shri Mangesh Naik is concerned there is repetition
of the same person at Sr. No. 13 and at Sr. No. 33 in the
Order of reference. Party II(1) submits that two
persons from the Order of Reference i.e. Prakash
Dabolkar, who is at Sr. No. 2 and Vivekanad Naik, who
is at Sr. No. 7, are Engineers, drawing salary more
than Rs. 10,000/- per month and they were working
in supervisory cadre and their work was of
supervisory nature, in their respective departments.
Therefore they cannot be construed as “Workmen”
under section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
and therefore should not entitled to any relief as
demanded by them. Further, the company submits
that the workmen concerned in the reference were
not forcibly refused employment, without assigning any
justifiable reasons. The reasons, for which they were
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1397
not taken inside the factory premises is that no work
could be provided to them from 17-06-2011, since
regular work activity, which was provided to them
was suspended by the notice dated 06-06-2011.
13. The Party II(1) submits that 13 workmen,
mentioned in the Order of Reference namely
Shri Gaurish Phondekar, who is at Sr. No. 1, Prasad
Gurav who is at Sr. No. 3, Sajjan Mudkudkar, who is at
Sr. No. 4, Pramod Gavde, who is at Sr. No. 14, Mohidin
Bilgi, who is at Sr. No.18, Manjunath Naik, who is at
Sr. No. 23, Sunil Dabre, who is at Sr. No. 25, Abhit
Naik, who is at Sr. No. 26. Pramod Naik, who is at Sr.
No. 27, Hanamagoud Biradar who is at Sr. No. 28, Dilip
Kankonkar who is at Sr. No. 31, Utkarsh Laad who is
at Sr. No. 5 and Mr. Prashant Parab who is at Sr. No. 34
have voluntarily resigned from the employment of
the company and their resignations have been
accepted. As such their resignations cannot be
termed as termination and on that ground alone the
reference ought to be rejected and they are not
entitled for any relief as they have voluntarily
resigned from the services of the company and further
submits that all the 13 workmen mentioned above,
who have voluntarily resigned from the services of
the company, have accepted all the dues and
therefore nothing is due and payable to them, except
for Utkarsh Laad, who is at Sr. No. 5 in the Order of
reference, his dues were not paid as we had received
a letter from the head office of Madgaum Urban
Co-operative Bank not to pay any dues arising out of
his resignation, though his resignation was
accepted and since there were Orders from the Court
that all his dues should be paid to the Bank as he
defaulted in non-payment of the personal loan he
had availed.
14. The Party II(1) submits that since the said
workmen has already severed the relationship
voluntarily with the company by submitting their
resignations and by accepting their dues, nothing
survives in respect of these 13 workmen and further
submits that the Goa Trade & Commercial workers
union has no locus standi to represent the workers
concerned in reference, as none of the persons
concerned in the reference are their members and
that since it has not terminated the services of these
33 workers, questions of legality and/or justifiability
of termination as contemplated in the order of
reference, does not arise and on that ground also the
reference is bad in law and not maintainable.
15. The Party II(1) further submits that after the
suspension operation by notice dated 16-06-2011 and
17-06-2011 of the manufacturing activities of the
undertaking, the Canara Bank, Panaji, Goa and others
took over the possession of land and building
(immoveable Assets) on 15-02-2012 entire plant and
machinery used in the manufacturing activities
(Moveable Assets) on 22-02-2012 under the
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002
and in exercise of power conferred under Section
13(12) read with rule 3 of security interest
(Enforcement) Rules, 2002 issued under demand
notice dated 09-11-2011. The Party II(1) further
submits that the possession and the ownership was
taken over by Canara Bank, Panaji, Goa and others of
Immoveable and Moveable assets of the undertaking
by virtue of operation of law on 15-02-2012 and
22-02-2012. Therefore subsequent to the Canara Bank
and others taking took over Immoveable Assets as
well as the Moveable Assets as referred to above, the
Party II(1) could never start its manufacturing
activities. The Party II(1) therefore submits that from
15-02-2012/22-02-2012 the functioning of
undertaking became none functional by virtue of law
and by taking possession and ownership by the bank
and therefore since the entire manufacturing
activities became none functional, the Party II(1) could
never start its manufacturing activities and none
functionality of the activity were due to unavoidable
circumstances beyond the control of the employer
and after filing of written statement there were
further developments and litigation between the
parties.
16. Without Prejudice to above, the Party II(1)
further submits that it gave notice to the workmen
about manufacturing activities becoming non-
functional and formal termination of service on
13-08-2016 vide displaying notice on the notice board
as also at the gate as also informed to the Government
that the manufacturing activities of the undertaking
closed for the reasons mentioned hereinabove. The
notice is given to the government as required under
Section 25FFA of the Act and that no notice to the
government and to the workmen was required to be
given since workmen were already aware of taking
of the assets by the Canara Bank and others. However,
as abundant caution that the Party II(1) has given
such notice. This can be seen from the fact that the
workmen was already aware of the possession of
assets taken over by Canara Bank, Panaji-Goa and
others prior to the giving of the notice because they
filed suit in Vasco Civil Court and appeal in the High
Court.
17. The Party II(1) further submits that since the
manufacturing activities of the undertaking at
Upasnagar, Zuarinagar has become none functional/
/closed by operation of law, the workmen are entitled
to the legal dues as per 25 FFF and closure
1398
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
compensation to the extent of 3 months only, since
manufacturing and closure is beyond control of
employer and that the workmen are not entitled to
any money or benefits which can be computed in
terms of money from 17-06-2011 or 18-06-2011 till
22-02-2012 and therefore till the disposal of reference,
since the suspension of the operation done by the
Party II(1) were due to unavoidable circumstances
beyond the control of the Party II(1) and closure was
also due to circumstances beyond the control of the
employer and further submits that after taking the
possession of the assets by the Canara Bank and
others on 15-02-2012 and 22-02-2012, since the
manufacturing activities had become non-functional
by operation of law due to unavoidable circumstance
beyond the control of the Party II(1), the workmen at
the most are entitled to compensation under Section
25-FFF of the Act not exceeding average pay for 3
month upto 22-02-2012 and therefore.
18. The Party II(1) further submits that in view of
the clear terms of reference this Hon’ble Court shall
have jurisdiction only to find out whether the
suspension of operation w.e.f. 17-06-2011 and
18-06-2011 is justified or not and this jurisdiction of
the Hon’ble Court would end up to 22-02-2012 only
when the undertaking of the Party II(1) became non-
functional by operation of law i.e. Canara Bank taking
over the possession of assets of the Party II(1). This is
because once the bank takes over the possession of
the assets as stated above, by no stretch of
imagination could the manufacturing activities of
the undertaking be activated. In fact the undertaking
become non-functional due to unavoidable
circumstance beyond the control of the employer and
the Party II(1) could never start the manufacturing
activities after 22-02-2012 as the bank has taken over
all the assets. Therefore it’s the case of the company
that the suspension of operation does not remain
thereafter and further process would be under The
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2013
and Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2012.
19. The Party II(1) submits that so called dispute
raised by the Union i.e. Goa Trade & Commercial
Workers Union and workmen is not an Industrial
Disputes as contemplated under Section 2(K) of the
Industrial Dispute Act,1947 and consequently entire
reference is bad in law and not maintainable and
incapable of adjudication. The Party II(1) submits that
in view of the relevant provisions of SARFEASI Act,
2002 the workmen are not entitled to any relief as
claimed by the workmen and therefore it is beyond
jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Tribunal to grant any relief
as prayed for and therefore reference ought to be
rejected.
20. In the Written Statement filed by the Impleaded
Party namely the Canara Bank who is Party II(2) in
the instant case and states that entire reference is
bad in law, not maintainable and ought to be rejected
for following reasons:
1. The Impleading Party Canara Bank is a Body
Corporate established and constituted under the
Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of
Undertakings) Act, 1947, having its Head Office
at 112, J.C. Road, Bangalore-560 001 in the State of
Karnataka and amongst others having an Asset
Recovery Management Branch at Panaji, Goa-403 001
at the address mentioned in the cause title
hereinabove. The Written Statements have been
signed and verified by Shri V. Viswaprakash, who
is the Senior Manager and who is duly authorized
and Power of Attorney holder of the Canara Bank.
Power of Attorney dated 27-11-2002 executed by
the Bank in favour of Shri V. Viswaprakash is duly
annexed hereto.
2. The Party II(1)/M/s Meta Copper and Alloys
Ltd. is a borrower of Impleading Party II(2)/Canara
Bank and they have availed various credit facilities
from Consortium of Banks which is reconstituted
from time to time/its assigns including Canara
Panaji Branch during 2000 for their business
purpose against the execution of various loan
document’s/agreements/guarantees and other
security documents on their moveable/
/immoveable properties creating securities in
favour of Bank.
3. For securing the limits, primary security
being all present and future stock of Raw material
such as Copper Cathode, Copper Scrap, Zinc, Brass
Honey Scrap, Master Alloys, etc, stock in process,
finished Goods, store & spares, Book-debts, etc. and
second charge on all present and future Moveable
fixed Assets such as vehicles, moveable plant and
machinery, machinery spares, tools and
accessories and other moveable, etc., and
Immoveable Fixed Assets such as Land and all
present and future Building, Plant & Machineries
embedded to earth or fastened to anything which
is embedded to earth, etc.
4. The conduct of account of the Party II(1) was
not satisfactory/out of order and hence the
accounts of the Party II(1) was classified as NPA in
the books of accounts of the Bank. Subsequently
impleading Party Canara Bank initiated recovery
action against the Party II(1) in respect to the
recovery of limits under various credit facilities.
5. The Impleading Party Canara Bank initiated
recovery action and filed Original Application
(OA) in the Debt Recovery Tribunal-III at Mumbai
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1399
in the year 2011 for its recovery of a sum of
Rs. 141,91,94,039.90 (Rupees one hundred forty one
crores ninety one lakhs ninety four thousand thirty
nine and paise ninety only) together with further
interest thereon @ 16.25% p.a and 18.75% p. a.
compounded with monthly interest from the date
of filing of the O.A. till payment and also for various
other reliefs as more particularly contained in the
said Original Application and that, the hearing
and final disposal of the above Original
Application, the Defendants have approached the
Applicant Bank or One Time Settlement of the
debt contained in the O. A. as well as the debts
payable by them to consortium lenders/its assigns
i.e. M/s Arihant Revival Enterprises (Assignee of
original Defendant No. 4 in OA), Canara Bank
(Applicant in OA) and ARCIL (Assignee of original
Defendant No. 5 in OA) and further states that
accordingly Consent Terms were entered into
between the Applicant Bank and Defendant Nos.
1 to 3 therein in the OA on 12-11-2014. Pursuant to
the said Consent Terms, the Learned Presiding
Officer has passed the order in terms of Consent
Terms on 12-11-2014 and pursuant to the said
Consent Terms dated 12-11-2014, the Defendants
have paid a sum of Rs. 1735.69 lakhs to the
Applicant.
6. The Party II(2) further states that, upon
receipt of the above said amount of Rs. 1,735.00
lakhs to the Applicant and Rs. 4,050.00 lakhs to
the Consortium Banks which were credited to the
loan account of Party II(1), with the Bank, the
Applicant Bank as well as other Consortium
Banks/its assigns have released the charge in
respect of the Plant and Machinery to the Party II(2)
herein (Defendant No. 1 in the OA) at the request
of the Party II(1) with the condition that the
Defendant No. 1 to 3 in the said OA shall pay a
sum of Rs. 5,160.00 lakhs to the Consortium of
Banks and that after payment of aforesaid sum of
Rs. 1735.00 lacs to the Impleading Party II(2)/Bank,
the Defendants therein have failed and neglected
to pay the balance amount to the Applicant Bank
as contained in said Consent Terms. The Applicant
therefore submits that since the Defendants have
committed default in repaying the amount under
the One Time Settlement/Consent Terms, the
concession granted to the Defendants under the
said Consent Terms dated 12-11-2014 is not
available to the Defendants and the Defendants
are bound and liable to pay the Applicant the
entire claim amount of Rs. 141,91,94,039.90
(Rupees one hundred forty one crores ninety one
lacs ninety forty thousand thirty nine an paise
ninety only) together with further interest
thereon @ 16.25% p.a. and 18.75% p.a.
compounded with monthly interest from the date
of filing of the O.A. till payment.
7. As the Party II(1) could not repay the amount,
the Bank has initiated recovery proceedings
including amongst others, action under SARFAESI
Act, 2002 on its properties and put the properties
on auction under SARFAESI Act. But even after
putting the property under public auction four
times on various occasions, the auction failed due
to want of bidders.
8. The Party II(2) further submit that the Party
No. II(1) Company had approached the Bank for
One Time Settlement of the debt contained in the
O.A. as well as the debts payable by them to other
Consortium Lenders to M/s Arihant Revival
Enterprises (Assignee of Original Defendant No. 4
in OA), Canara Bank (Applicant in OA) and ARCIK
(Assignee of original Defendant No. 5 in OA).
9. As the Party II(1) Company had approached
the Applicant Bank for an One Time Settlement of
their debt contained in the O.A. as well as dues to
the other Consortium Lenders, Party II(2) Bank has
deferred for the time being the proceedings for
sale of the immovable properties of the Company
under SARFAESI Act.
10. The Impleading Party II(2) therefore submits
that the impleading Party is not a necessary Party
in the proceedings herein and entire relief
claimed by the Party I/Workmen against the
Impleading Party is bad in law/not maintainable
and ought to be dismissed in limine.
21. In the Rejoinder at Exhibit 6, the Party I denied
the case put forth by Party II(1) in their Written
Statement.
4. Based on the above mentioned pleadings, my
Learned Predecessor has framed the Issues at
Exhibit 11 and the same are as follows:
I S S U E S
1. Whether the Party I proves that the management
of Party II refused to provide employment to the
workmen at Sr. No. (1) to (32) and Sr. No. (33) and (34)
in the reference order, on 17-6-11 and 18-6-11
respectively when they went to report to work at the
factory of Party II?
2. Whether the Party I proves that the action of the
management in refusing to provide employment to
these unionized workmen is illegal, unjust and bad
in law?
3. Whether the Party I proves that as Party II was
employing more than 100 workmen at its factory to
refusal of employment, the provisions of Chapter VB
of I. D. Act applicable?
1400
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
4. Whether the Party II proves that Goa Trade and
Commercial Workers Union has no locus standi to
represent the workers concerned in the reference to
file the claim statement on their behalf as none of
the employees are their members?
5. Whether the Party II proves that the company
had to suspend the manufacturing activities as it
had no funds to bring the raw material?
6. Whether the Party II proves that as of today its
entire property has been taken over by the financial
institutions and as such the said financial
institutions namely Canara Bank, Panaji, Goa, Indian
Overseas Bank, Panaji, Goa, Halcyon Finance and
Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd., (Halcyon), Mumbai are the
necessary parties to this reference?
7. Whether the persons at Sr. No. 2 Shri Prakash
Dabholkar and at Sr. No. 7 Shri Vivekanand Naik in
the reference order, are the workmen as defined
u/s 2(s) of I. D. Act?
8. Whether the Party II proves that the 13 workmen
named in the order of reference at Sr. Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 14,
18, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31 & 34 have voluntarily resigned
from the employment of Party II and therefore they
are not entitled for any relief?
9. Whether the Party II proves that there is nothing
due and payable to all the above 13 workmen who
have accepted all the dues, except at Sr. No. 5 as
there is order from the Court to pay all his dues to the
bank as he had defaulted in payment of personal loan
availed by him?
10. What relief? What order?”
5. Additional issues were framed at Exhibit 29
which are as follows:
1. Whether the Party II proves that subsequent to
taking over all assets by the Party II(2), the Party II
has become non-functional?
2. Whether the Party II proves closure of Party II
was due to unavoidable circumstances beyond
the control of Party II?
3. Whether the Hon’ble Tribunal have jurisdiction
to try and entertain the dispute after Party II(2)
taking over the assets under SARFAESI Act by
order dated 15-2-2012 and 22-2-2012?
6. In the course of the evidence, the Party I
examined its 1st witness Shri Ratikant Khandeparkar
and placed on record copy of letter dated 26-08-2016
of ESIC at Exh. 32, copy of return of contributions
from April, 2010 to Sept., 2010 sent by the Party II to
ESIC at Exh. 33, copy of challans of payment of
contributions for April, 2010 to Sept., 2010 at Exh. 34
Colly, copy of list of 348 employees in Form 6 employed
during the months from 4/10 to 09/10 at Exh. 35 Colly,
copy of returns of contribution for Oct., 2010 to March,
2011 at Exh. 36, copy of Challans or payment of
contributions for Oct., 2010 to March, 2011 at Exh. 37
Colly, copy of list of 331 employees in Form No. 6
employed during the months from Oct., 2010 to
March, 2011 at Exh. 38 Colly, copy of returns of
contributions in Form 5 of the employees employed
during the period from April, 2011 to Sept., 2011 at
Exh. 39, copy of notice dated 06-06-2011 at Exh. 40,
copy of list of employees dated 06-07-2011 who will
report on duty during temporary suspension period
at Exh. 41, copy of list of employees who are asked to
stay outside the gate during the suspension period
at Exh. 42. During cross-examination of this witness,
documents brought on record were copies of letter
of appointment (Trainees) dated 27-11-2000, letter of
appointment dated 29-11-2001 as Jr. Engineer and
letter of confirmation dated 20-06-2002 of Prakash
Dabholkar at Exh. 45 Colly, copies of letter of
appointment dated 15-07-2002 of Manguesh Naik
along with his photo at Exh. 46 Colly, copies of letter
of appointment (Trainee) dated 12-09-2000 and letter
of confirmation dated 07-05-2002 of Ratikant
Khandeparkar at Exh. 47 Colly, copy of letter of
appointment dated 10-08-2002 of Vivekanand M. Naik
at Exh. 48 and copy of letter of termination of Ratikant
Khandeparkar at Exh. 49.
7. The Party I also examined its 2nd witness
Shri Vivekanand M. Naik and during cross-
-examination brought on record copy of letter dated
22-06-2011 sent by the Union to the Labour
Commissioner at Exh. 54, copy of reply dated
11-07-2011 at Exh. 55, copy of resolution dated
12-06-2011 at Exh. 56 and the copy of Special Civil
Suit No. 3/16/B along with other documents from
pages 1 to 46 relied by Party II in Exh. 20 which is at
Exh. 57 Colly.
8. The Party II(1) examined its 1st witness Shri
Deepak Mathur and brought on record copy of
transfer of land of the Party II(1) to M/s Varama Sir
India Logistics & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. dated
10-03-2017 at Exh. 60, copy of no dues certificate from
Asset Reconstruction Co., (I) Ltd. to the Party II(1)
dated 26-04-2017 at Exh.61, copy of NOC/Releasing
the charges on land and building from Canara Bank
dated 19-07-2017 at Exh. 62, copy of Notice of
suspension of operations/manufacturing activities
dated 30-05-2011 at Exh. 63, copy of Memorandum of
Understanding dated 22-09-2009 at Exh. 64, copy of
notice regarding recall of credit facilities dated
26-10-2010 from Adv. K. Shetty on behalf of Canara
Bank along with enclosures at Exh. 65 Colly, copy of
notice dated 22-09-2011 from Adv. R. E. Pawar on
behalf of Ushdev Int. Ltd. to Party II(1) along with
enclosures at Exh. 66 Colly, copy of demand notice of
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1401
immovable property pertaining to M/s Meta Copper
by Indian Overseas Bank dated 15-122011 along with
enclosures at Exh. 67 Colly, copy of notice
proceedings of possession of immovable property
pertaining to M/s Meta Copper by Canara Bank Ltd.
dated 15-02-2012 at Exh. 68, copy of proceedings of
possession of movable property regarding secured
assets pertaining to M/s Meta Copper & Alloys Ltd.
by Canara Bank dated 22-02-2012 at Exh. 69, copy of
notice of sale of movable and immovable property
dated 28-05-2012 by Canara Bank at Exh. 70, copy of
notice of sale of movable and immovable property
dated 17-09-2012 by Canara Bank at Exh. 71, copy of
notice of sale of movable and immovable property
dated 22-01-2013 by Canara Bank at Exh. 72, copy of
stock register of scrap materials available with
Party II(1) for May, 2011 to July, 2011 at Exh. 73 Colly,
copy of stock register of various raw materials
available with Party II for the purpose of production
at Exh. 74 Colly, copy of production of log sheet of the
Party II(1) from 16-05-2011 to 07-06-2011 at Exh. 75
Colly, copy of issue/receipt register of raw material
available with the Party II(1) from 16-05-2011 to
17-06-2011 at Exh. 76 Colly, copy of balance sheet of
the company for 2008-09 at Exh. 77, copy of balance
sheet of the company for 2009-10 at Exh. 78, copy of
balance sheet of the company for 2010-11 at Exh. 79,
copy of appointment letter to Prakash Dabholkar
dated 29-11-01 along with enclosures at Exh. 80 Colly,
copy of promotion letter dated 12-12-2005 to Prakash
Dabholkar at Exh. 81, copy of promotion letter dated
26-05-2008 to Prakash Dabholkar at Exh. 82, copy of
appointment to Vivekanand Naik dated
10-08-02 along with enclosures at Exh. 83 Colly, copy
of promotion letter dated 11-04-05 to Vivekanand Naik
at Exh. 84, copy of promotion letter dated 26-05-08 to
Vivekanand Naik at Exh. 85, copy of resignation letter
of Gaurish Phondekar dated 18-01-12 along with
enclosures at Exh. 86 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Prasad Gurav dated 18-01-2012 along with
enclosures at Exh. 87 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Sajjan Mudukar dated 18-01-2012 along with
enclosures at Exh. 88 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Uttkarsh Lad dated 17-08-2011 along with
enclosures at Exh. 89 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Pramod Gawade dated 20-01-2012 along with
enclosures at Exh. 90 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Mohidin Bilgi dated 17-01-2012 along with
enclosures at Exh. 91 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Manjunath Naik dated 14-05-2012 along with
enclosures at Exh. 92 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Sunil Dabre dated 18-02-2012 along with
enclosures at Exh. 93 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Abhit Naik dated 18-01-2012 along with enclosures
at Exh. 94 Colly, copy of resignation letter of Pramod
Naik dated 18-01-2012 along with enclosures at
Exh. 95 Colly, copy of resignation letter of
Hanamagouda Biradar dated 18-01-2012 along with
enclosures at Exh. 96 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Dileep Kankonkar dated 18-01-2012 along with
enclosures at Exh. 97 Colly, copy of resignation letter
of Prashant Parab dated 31-12-20112 along with
enclosures at Exh. 98 Colly, copy of complaint dated
22-06-2011 to the Labour Commissioner along with
enclosures at Exh. 99 Colly, copy of reply of the Party II(1)
dated 11-07-2011 to the complaint at Exh. 100, copy
of minutes of conciliation before the Labour
Commissioner dated 23-08-2011 at Exh. 101, copy of
report on failure of conciliation proceedings dated
16-03-2012 at Exh. 102, copy of list of legal dues
payable to the workmen at Exh. 103, copy of order of
reference dated 19/21-06-2012 at Exh. 104, copy of
order of reference dated 11-12-2014 at Exh. 105, copy
of proceedings of possession of movable and
immovable property regarding secured assets
pertaining to Meta Copper & Alloys Ltd. along with
enclosures at Exh. 106 Colly, copy of letter dated
30-01-2016 from Canara Bank to Party II(1) at Exh. 107,
copy of commercial invoice dated 01-02-2016 at Exh. 108,
copy of order dated 29-04-2016 of Hon’ble High Court
at Exh. 109, copy of advertisement published in the
newspaper about the sale of the property at Exh.110,
copy of schedules of the names of the workmen who
were employed at the factory belonging to the Party II(1)
at Exh. 111, copy of statement showing the dues of
the workmen as on 31-12-2015 which amounts to
Rs. 3,56,99,796/- at Exh. 112, copy of letter of company
to Canara Bank dated 31-03-2009 at Exh. 113, copy of
letter of company to Canara Bank dated 05-01-2010
for renewal/restructuring proposal at Exh. 114, copy
of letter of company to Canara Bank dated 27-05-2010
for swift action on renewal/restructuring proposal
at Exh. 115, copy of recall notice from Canara Bank
dated 26-10-2010 at Exh. 116, copy of letter of
company to Canara Bank intimating them regarding
de-bonding the unit dated 18-02-2011 at Exh. 117,
copy of letter of company to lenders regarding steps
taken for revival of unit dated 25-07-2011 at Exh. 118,
copy of letter of company to lenders dated
23-08-2011 expressing company’s inability to run
operations for lack of resources at Exh. 119, copy of
notice of Canara Bank for repayment dated
09-11-2011 along with enclosures at Exh. 120 Colly,
copy of letter of company to Canara Bank dated
16-09-2011 regarding efforts made by company for
revival and disposal of assets along with enclosures
at Exh. 121 Colly, copy of demand notice by Indian
Overseas Bank dated 15-12-2011 along with
enclosures at Exh. 122 Colly, copy of proceedings of
possession of moveable and immoveable property
1402
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
regarding secured assets pertaining to Meta Copper
& Alloys dated 22-02-2012 along with enclosures at
Exh. 123 Colly, copy of auction notices dated
28-05-12, 17-09-12, 18-03-14 and 31-05-14 at Exh. 124
Colly, copy of letter of company to Canara Bank dated
08-08-2013 regarding stoppage of maintenance of
assets for lack of funds at Exh. 125, copy of reply of
Bank dated 17-08-2013 requesting company to
continue maintaining the plant at Exh. 126, copy of
parties contacted by bank for disposal of assets along
with enclosures at Exh. 127 Colly, copy of letter of
company to Canara Bank dated 19-09-2013 with
proposal for disposal at Exh. 128, copy of appointment
by company of Singhi Advisors for identification and
shot listing of potential clients dated 28-08-2013 at
Exh. 129, copies of various advertisements released
for disposal of assets at Exh. 130, copy of proposal for
One Time Settlement (OTD) dated 20-08-2014
submitted by company to lenders at Exh. 131, copy
of acceptance of OTS by banks dated 17-09-2014 at
Exh. 132, copy of Extension-1 of OTS by banks dated
22-05-2015 at Exh. 133, copy of Extension-2 of OTS by
banks dated 30-12-2015 at Exh. 134, copy of invoice
for sale of machinery dated 01-02-2016 at Exh. 135,
copy of confirmation of payment received by the
company dated 20-02-2016 at Exh.136, copy of release
on charge on the plant and machinery by banks
dated 30-01-2016 at Exh. 137, copy of request by
company to further extend validity of OTS dated
23-03-2016 at Exh. 138, copy of letter by banks dated
26-07-2016 for withdrawal of OTS at Exh. 139, copy of
High Court order dated 25-02-2016 for Writ Petition
No. 247/2016 at Exh. 140, copy of Civil Suit No. 3/
/2016/B filed by workmen in Vasco Court along with
enclosures at Exh. 141 Colly, copy of application for
temporary injunction filed by workmen in Vasco
Court dated 04-03-2016 at Exh. 142, copy of show
cause notice dated 05-03-2016 issued by Vasco Court
at Exh. 143 Colly, copy of Affidavit filed by company
against ex-parte injunction dated 10-03-2016 at
Exh. 144 Colly, copy of order issued by Vasco Court
on 19-04-2016 at Exh. 145, copy of reply by Regency
Enterprises to set aside ex-parte order at Exh. 146,
copy of order dated 21-04-2016 of Vasco Court
directing status quo at Exh.147, copy of order No. 27
of 2016 of High Court dated 29-04-2016 asking
company to deposit Bank Guarantee (BG) of Rs.1.00
Crore to Industrial Tribunal at Exh. 148, copy of
submission of BG of Rs. 1.00 Crore by company to
Industrial Tribunal on 24-05-2016 along with
enclosures at Exh. 149 Colly, copy of closure notice
dated 13-08-2016 along with the Annexure at
Exh. 150 Colly and copy of notice to all workers/staff
dated 13-08-2016 at Exh.151. During cross-
examination of this witness documents brought on
record were a copy of details of workmen employed
during June, 2011 along with their designations at
Exh. 152, a copy of list showing details of workmen
employed during January, 2010–December, 2011
along with date of joining, promotion and date of
leaving at Exh.153, copy of ESI returns for the period
October, 2011 to March, 2012 a Exh.154 and the copy
of statement of contribution paid to ESIC for the
period April, 2012 to September, 2012 at Exh.155.
9. The Party II (2) examined its first witness
Shri P. Lokesh and brought on record copy of letter
dated 16-11-2015 of M/s Regency Enterprises at
Exh.159, copy of letter dated 30-01-2016 reg. NOC at
Exh.160, copy of letter dated 09-03-2017 from Meta
Copper and Alloys Ltd. at Exh. 161 and copy of letter
dated 19-07-2017 from Canara Bank at Exh.162.
During cross-examination of this witness documents
brought on record were copy of authority letter to
depose in this matter at Exh.163, copy of application
filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT)-III at
Mumbai in the year 2000 along with the copy of the
order as stated in para-5 of his Affidavit at Exh.164
Colly, copy of the letter dated 08-09-2010 addressed
to Party II(1) along with Annexure A informing them
that their accounts had been classified as NPA at
Exh. 165 Colly and the copy of letters dated
28-12-2016 and 13-02-2017 issued by Meta Copper
and the Bank, respectively at Exh. 167 Colly.
10. Heard arguments. Learned Advocate P. J.
Kamat argued on behalf of Party I. Learned Advocate
Shri M. S. Bandodkar argued on behalf of Party II(1)
and Learned Advocate Ms. A. Raikar argued on behalf
of Party II(2) and all the Parties have placed on record
their written submissions.
11. I have gone through the records of the case
and have duly considered the arguments advanced
and also the arguments placed on record and after
going through the same, I have given my reasons
and findings on the issues which are framed and the
same are as follows:
Issue No. 1 and 2 ….
In the Affirmative
Issue No. 3
….
In the Affirmative
Issue No. 4
.…
In the Negative
Issue No. 5
….
In the Affirmative
Issue No. 6 and
Partly in the
Additional Issue No. 1
Affirmative and
partly in the negative.
Additional issue No. 1
is answered in the
negative.
Issue No. 7
….
In the Affirmative
Issue No. 8 & 9
….
In the Negative
Issue No. 10
….
As per final Order.
Additional Issue
….
In the Affirmative
No. 3
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1403
REASONS
Issues No. 1 and 2:
12. Issue No.1 and 2 are discussed together for the
sake of convenience and also as they are
interconnected. That, according to Party I workmen
the Party II(1) which is a Company incorporated
under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act
and Party I are/were its workmen and according to
Party I, the Party II(1) had in its employment more
than 400 workmen excluding Officers and the
managerial staff and all these workmen who were
amongst the other 400 workmen who were working
in the Factory of the Party II(1) continuously till
17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 and the said workmen
were not allowed to report for work from 17-06-2011
and 18-06-2011 and all the said workmen including
majority of other workmen of the Party II(1) were the
members of the Goa Trade and Commercial Workers’
Union were refused employment and were not
allowed to enter the Factory w.e.f. 18-06-2011 and as
such they started sitting near the Factory Gate
waiting for an opportunity to resume to their duties
but the Party II(1) did not give any employment nor
allowed entry to the said workmen and to other
workmen and has thus refused the employment to
the said workmen and to others w.e.f. 17-06-2011 and
18-06-2011 which also amounts to illegal termination
of the workmen without following the mandatory
provisions and Rules of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 and the action of Party II(1) in refusing to provide
employment to the said workmen is also malafide
and an unfair labour practice made by Party II(1) to
harass and victimize them and to get rid of them and
as such it also amounts to illegal refusal of
employment to the said workmen.
13. The first witness of the Party I,
Shri Ratikant Khandeparkar has clearly mentioned
in his Affidavit-in-Evidence the detailed facts of their
case which is also proved through the various
documents produced by him from Exhibit-32 to
Exhibit 42. His cross examination has also not been
shaken on any aspects and he has stated in his cross
that he was working as a Technician with Party II(1)
and he was drawing a monthly salary of Rs.11,000/-
at the time of his termination and he received the
Termination Letter on 13-10-2016. He is aware about
the Union which is known by the name Goa Trade
and Commercial Workers’ Union since 2011 and he
states that he was not having any relation with the
said Union and he does not know if other workers
concerned in the present reference were having any
relation with the said Union. And he also states that
the present dispute is in connection with refusal of
employment as they were kept out of the Company
premises. Though he has stated that they raised the
dispute through the Union, but he does not have any
receipt to show that he was the member of the union
and was paying full membership fees of the Union. It
is on this point Learned Advocate Shri M. S.
Bandodkar for Party II(1) has raised objection and has
argued that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to try
and entertain the present reference as according to
him since it is the allegation of the Party I that the
Company refused to provide employment means the
Union wants to make out the case that the
Management has illegally terminated the services
of workmen and the Union has no locus standi to
represent the workmen or to file the Claim Statement
as the reference has been made u/s 2(k) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and not under Section
2A. He has also argued that the Union/workmen have
not placed on record any documents to show that
the workmen were the members of the said Union at
the time when their services were terminated nor
there is any resolution passed by the Union to raise
the present industrial dispute and further argued
that it was therefore necessary on part of the Party I
to produce the Membership Register, receipt of
workmen, or any document showing that the
workmen were the members of the Union at that time.
There is no dispute that the workman/the first
witness of the workmen has stated very clearly in his
cross-examination that he does not have any receipt
to show that he was the member of the Union but
according to him he was paying full membership of
the Union but admittedly, no such documents are
produced by the workmen. To this, the second witness
of the Party I Shri Vivekanand Naik has stated in his
cross-examination that they had joined the Union
about three months prior to the suspension of
operations i.e. they joined the Union somewhere in
April, 2011. He also stated that they joined the Union
earlier and resolution for joining the Union was taken
on 12-06-2011. The copy of the said Resolution dated
12-06-2011 was shown to him and the same was
produced which is at Exhibit 56 (produced in cross).
As per this Resolution, it clearly states that the said
workmen shall follow all the rules and resolutions of
the Union, the details of which are specifically stated
in para-4 of Exhibit 56 (produced in cross). The said
Union which is Goa Trade and Commercial Workers’
Union is affiliated to All India Trade Union Congress
as per this Resolution. The first witness Shri Ratikant
Khandeparkar and the second witness Shri
Vivekananda Naik along with the other workmen had
resolved to join the said Union as per Exh. 56. The
document at Exh. 55 (produced in cross) is the reply
sent by the Management to the Party I Union replying
to the alleged refusal of employment to their
1404
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
workmen by the Management. This letter clearly
proves that the Union had made a letter in respect of
the said dispute dated 22-06-2011 which document
is at Exh. 54 (produced in cross) which is a complaint
made to the Labour Commissioner by the Party I
workmen in respect of their refusal of employment to
32 workmen named in Annexure-1 w.e.f. 17-06-2011
and two workmen named in Annexure-II w.e.f.
18-06-2011 by the Management. This also proves the
timely action taken by the Party I Union in respect of
their refusal to employment by the Management.
14. Learned Advocate Shri M. S. Bandodkar for
Party II(1) has placed reliance on the authority
reported in the following cases:
(i) In the case of Sindhu Resettlement
Corporation Ltd. V/s Industrial Tribunal of
Gujarat 1968 (I) LLJ 834 and in the case of
Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate V/s
Dimakuchi Tea Estate 1958 SCR 1156, it is
observed that an industrial dispute has to be
referred by the appropriate Government for
adjudication and the workman cannot approach
the Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal directly,
except in those cases which are covered by
Section 2A of the Act. Reference is made under
Section 10 of the Act in those cases where the
appropriate Government forms an opinion that
‘any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended’.
The words ‘industrial dispute exists’ are of
paramount importance unless there is an
existence of an industrial dispute (or the dispute
is apprehended or it is apprehended such a
dispute may arise in near future), no reference is
made. Thus, existence or apprehension of an
industrial dispute is a sine qua non for making the
reference. No doubt, at the time of taking a decision
whether a reference is to be made or not, the
appropriate Government is not to go into the
merits of the dispute. Making of reference is only
an administrative function. At the same time, on
the basis of material on record, satisfaction of the
existence of the industrial dispute or the
apprehension of an industrial dispute is necessary.
Such existence/apprehension of industrial
dispute, thus, becomes a condition precedent,
though it will be only subjective satisfaction based
on material on record. Since, we are not concerned
with the satisfaction dealing with cases where
there is apprehended industrial dispute,
discussion that follows would confine to existence
of an industrial dispute. Dispute or difference
arises when one Party make a demand and the
other Party rejects the same.
The observations indicate that an industrial
dispute, as defined, must be a dispute between
employers and employers, employers and
workmen and workmen and workmen and
according to him since in the case in hand there is
nothing to indicate that the workmen had
espoused the dispute, it has to be held that the
Union had no authority on behalf of the workmen
and that Party I Union has no locus standi to
espouse the dispute.
(ii) In the case of Air India Employees’ Guild
Air India Ltd., 2007 II LLJ 207 (Bom) in which
the employers decision to verify the membership
of staff by secret ballot was challenged by the
employees and while dealing with this subject the
Hon’ble Court by referring to Clause-9 of Code of
Discipline stated that membership of the Union
for the purpose of recognition has to be counted
on the basis of payment of subscription by the
workers.
(iii) The Bombay High Court in ANZ Grindlays
Bank v/s General Secretary, Grindlays Bank
Employees Union and Others (2001ILLJ)
judgement does not apply in the present case and
is clearly distinguishable as the same does not
deal with reference under Section 2(k) and the
same has been raised under 2(A). The Company
reserves its right to make oral submission at the
time of oral arguments.
15. I have perused all these authorities in deciding
the present case and there is no dispute about the
settled position of law as held in the above cases
relied upon. But, its applicability will be seen in the
light of authorities relied upon by Adv. Shri P. J. Kamat
for the Party I workmen.
16. Learned Advocate Shri P. J. Kamat for Party I
has placed reliance on the authority reported in the
following cases:
1. Steel Authority of India Ltd. v/s Hindustan
Steel Employees Union and Ors. reported in
(1998) ILJ 704 Calcutta wherein it has been held
by referring to Section 36 of the said Act which
refers to representation of Parties and it states that
a workmen who is a Party to a dispute shall be
entitled to be represented in any proceedings under
this Act by my – (c) where the worker is not a member
of any trade union, by (any member of the executive
or other office-bearer) of any trade union connected
with, or by any other workman employed in the
industry in which the worker is employed and
authorized in such manner as may be prescribed.”
The three things appear to be essential in the
context of Section 10 of the Act firstly, there should
be an industrial dispute, secondly, it should be
expedient to make reference, thirdly, the term of
reference should normally be specified to avoid
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1405
vagueness. If there is an industrial dispute is
supported by any Union of the workers or by
sufficient number of workmen. If there is no
industrial dispute in terms of Section 2-A of the
Act, then alone it would be necessary to see whether
the individual dispute has been espoused by the
Union or supported by sufficient number of
workmen. If there is an industrial dispute in terms
of Section 2-A of the Act then the Government has
merely to see whether it is expedient to refer the
dispute to the Tribunal. The expediency may be
due to practical necessity or otherwise desirable to
make reference for adjudication. The prima facie,
satisfaction may also induce the appropriate
Government to refer the dispute. The point is that
it should appear expedient from the circumstances
of the case. If the reference order indicates the point
in dispute for adjudication it would clearly show
that the Government was prima facie satisfied that
it would be expedient to refer the matter without in
any way influenced whether it is an industrial
dispute under Section 2-A of the Act or 2(k) of the
Act. The ratio applied in this case gets squarely
attracted to the facts of the present case. It is also
to be noted here that the authority relied upon by
Adv. Shri M. S. Bandodkar in the case of Sindhu
Resettlement as mentioned above is not applicable
to the facts of the present case as the conclusion
in this authority was in respect of the case relating
to retrenchment compensation of the workers
which is not so in the instant case as the present
dispute relates to illegal termination and
reinstatement. Further in the matter of Sindhu
Resettlement, it was a case law prior to the
introduction of Section 2A of the Industrial
Disputes Act and our Hon’ble High Court has held
in the case of Maharashtra General Kamgar
Union v/s Haldyn Glass Works reported in 2005
I CLR 668 (7) held that “a dispute falling u/s 2A is
a deemed industrial dispute under Section 2 (k)of
the said Act and there is no necessity that such
dispute is required to be espoused by the recognized
Union” and further held that “whether the
individual workman raises dispute by himself or
whether the dispute on his behalf is espoused by a
recognized Union or substantial number of
workmen in the industry would be irrelevant. The
reference would be maintainable as long as the
dispute falls within Section 2A of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947”. – That on going through the
deposition of Shri Deepak Mathur, the first witness
of Party II(1), it is seen that he has admitted in
cross that “it is true that in our letter at Exh. 100,
the Party II(1) had not disputed the locus standi of
the Union to take up the matter of the workmen of
the Party II(1)” and has further stated that “it is
true that workers at Exh. 42 who were not allowed
to report for work were not paid wages or any lay-
off compensation for the period they were kept out”
and further states that the Party II(1) also did not
inform the said workers named in Exh. 42 that they
need not come to the Gate during the said period
that they were kept out. He has also admitted that
in the notices at Exh. 40 and 63 he has not
mentioned that the said workers at Exh. 42 were
kept out on account of shortage of coal, power or
raw material or accumulation of stocks or the
breakdown of the machinery. He has also admitted
“it is true that on Exh. 39 the amount mentioned
that the workers who were kept out from
17-06-2011 were on account of temporary
suspension of activities”. And further states that
the Company did not issue any letters to the said
69 employees at Exh.41 subsequent to 17-06-2011
as they had resigned on finishing their work.
17. He has also stated in cross that the letter dated
11-07-2011 at Exh. 100 was addressed by the
Company to the said Union pertaining to the dispute
raised by it and he also admits that whenever any
dispute is raised by the Union in respect of the action
keeping the workers out, as per Exh. 63, the Company
was required to preserve the attendance and wage
records of all those workers for the said year. He has
also admitted that the workers whose names are
mentioned on Exh. 42 who were not allowed to report
for work were not paid wages or any of the
compensation for the period they were kept out and
also further admits that they did not inform the said
workers that they need not come to the Gate during
the period they were kept out and also states that all
such workmen who were listed at Exh. 42 were on
the Muster Roll of the Party II(1) as on 06-06-2011 and
thereafter upto the respective dates mentioned
against their names. Hence, his entire deposition
shows that he has admitted that the Party I workmen
were kept out from 17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 and
were not required to report for work as per the notice
at Exh. 100. A careful perusal on the notice dated
07-06-2011 at Exh. 40 and Exh. 42 shows that all these
workmen whose names are mentioned in the
reference were not allowed to report for work w.e.f.
17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 and this action taken by
Party II(1) continued upto 13-10-2016 when they
decided to declare the industrial establishment
closed w.e.f. 13-10-2016 and terminated the services
of all these workmen who were on the rolls of the
Party II(1) upto 13-10-2016.
18. Since it is the major grievance and allegation
of the Party I workmen that the action of Management
1406
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
in refusing to provide employment to the said
workers is illegal, unjust and bad-in-law, it becomes
necessary to look into the aspect whether first of all
the Party II(1) was vested with such powers to do so
under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act
or under Contract of Service with the workmen or in
respect of the Standing Orders of the Party II(1).
Learned Advocate Shri P. J. Kamat for the Party I on
this aspect places reliance on the following
authorities:
1. Workmen V/s Firestone Tyres Rubber Co.
Ltd. 1976 (32) FLR 170 SC wherein it has been
held that “when the workmen were laid off without
any authority or law or the power in the
management under the Contract of Service, such
action of the management is not legal; that where
there is a power in the management to lay off a
workman and to which the provisions of Chapter
VA apply, the question of payment of Compensation
will be governed and determined by the said
provisions.
2. Hotel Imperial, New Delhi and Ors. v/s
Hotel Workmen Union 1950-77 (6) SCLJ (page
3782 3786) = (1) SCR 476 it is observed that
namely “Ordinarily, therefore, the absence of such
power either as an express term in the contract or
in the rules framed under some statute would mean
that the master would have no power to suspend a
workmen and even if he does so in the sense that he
forbids the employee to work, he will have to pay
wages during the so called period of suspension.
Where, however, there is power to suspend either
in the contract of employment or in the statute or
the rules framed thereunder, the suspension has the
effect of temporarily suspending the relation of
master and servant with the consequence that the
servant is not bound to render service and the
master is not bound to pay”.
19. In the light of the above authorities, it is seen
that the Party II(1) has not produced any documentary
evidence to show that such powers were vested with
them for keeping these workmen out of employment.
The witness examined by the Party II(1) has not
produced any documents such as, Contract of Service
or the Certified Standing Orders to justify their
action. Therefore, it becomes necessary to look into
Section 12-A of the Standing Orders Act and the
Model Standing Orders prescribed in Schedule-I to
the Standing Orders under the Rules. A perusal on
clause-14 of the Model Standing Orders does not
provide for suspending the operations of the Factory
and rendering the workmen jobless without
payment. That under Clause-12 of the Model
Standing Orders there is a provision of “stoppage of
work” under certain circumstances such as Stoppage
of Work – the Employer may, at any time in the event
of fire, catastrophe and breakdown of machinery or
stoppage of power supply, epidemics, civil commotions
or other cause beyond his control, stop any section or
sections of the establishment wholly or partially for
any period or periods without notice. The present case
does not fall in any of the above categories. Therefore,
this action taken by the Party II(1) in refusing the
employment to the Party I workmen without they
having any power under the Contract of Service or
the Standing Orders are totally illegal and bad in
law. The act of Party II (1) in keeping all these
workmen whose names are mentioned at Exh. 42 on
account of temporary suspension of manufacturing
activities is not in accordance with the provisions of
the said Act as to my mind suspending the operations
of the Factory and keeping the workers jobless and
without payment would also not come under Section
2(kkk) of the said Act which refers to lay-off and the
lay-off has been defined under Section 2(kkk) of the
said Act as “2(kkk) lay-off (with its grammatical
variations and cognate expression) means the failure,
refusal or inability of an employer on account of
shortage of coal, power or raw material or the
accumulation of stocks or the breakdown of machinery
or natural calamity or from any other connected reasons
to give employment to a workman whose name is borne
on the Muster Rolls of his industrial establishment
and who has not been retrenched. The case of the
Party II(1) also does not come within the provisions
of the above sections.
20. Learned Advocate Shri P. J. Kamat at this
juncture places reliance on the authority reported in
the case of Jasbir K Dhaliwal V/s NEPC Airlines,
Madras and Ors. reported in 2002 I CLR 1076, para
9 after referring to the definition of lay-off under
Section 2 (kkk) of the said Act, has held that “it,
therefore, means that if an employer is unable to
provide work for the workman on account of shortage
of coal, power or accumulation of stocks or break-down
of machinery or if there is a failure or refusal on the
part of the Employer to provide work to a workman
whose name is on the Muster Rolls and he has not
been retrenched, such workman would be under lay-
off from the employment of the employer. The
explanation to the section provides that if the employer
does not offer work within 2 hours of the workman
presenting himself for work, it shall be deemed that
such person is laid-off for the day”. And to justify their
act the witness of the Party II(1) Shri Deepak Mathur
has not mentioned any of the above facts as according
to him on account of severe local violent agitations
in the year 1999 the Company suffered tremendous
loss and the Plant could not be started on time but
has not given any justification for keeping these
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1407
workmen jobless from 17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 and
then thereafter. He has admitted in cross that on their
reply dated 11-07-2011 at Exh.100, they have
mentioned that the suspension of activities in
keeping the workers out was on account of no funds.
He has admitted in cross “I have not mentioned that
the said workers at Exh. 42 were kept out on account
of shortage of coal, power or raw material or
accumulation of stocks or breakdown of machinery”
which goes to show that their case does not come
even within the provisions of 2(kkk) lay-off.
21. It is the objection raised by Learned Advocate
Shri M. S. Bandodkar on behalf of Party II(1) that the
present dispute cannot be considered as an
industrial dispute and it is legally required that the
Union should raise dispute in writing to the
Management first and the Management thereafter
must reject the demand of the Union in writing and
only thereafter Union can raise a genuine industrial
dispute before the Conciliation Officer/Government
and according to him in this case no such stages are
complied with as the Union nor the workmen did not
file any documents that Union raised industrial
dispute and there is no letter written by the Union to
the Management for raising any dispute and also
stated that the witnesses examined by the Party I
workmen have also admitted that they do not have
any documents to show that they were members of
the said Union and the workmen/Union have also
not produced any resolution on record passed by the
Union to raise the present industrial dispute and as
such according to him the Union has failed to prove
their locus standi to represent workmen and the
Company has also not received any letter from
workmen stating that they have joined the Union. In
support of this he has placed reliance in the authority
reported in the case of Prabhakar V/s Joint Director,
Sericulture Department & Anr. 2015 (147) FLR 341
wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that “a
dispute or difference arises when demand is made by
one side i.e. (workmen) and rejected by the other side
i.e. the Employer and vice versa and an industrial
dispute cannot be said to exist until and unless the
demand is made by the workman and it has been
rejected by the Employer”.
22. To this the Learned Advocate Shri P. J. Kamat
for Party I has argued that vide letter dated
22-06-2011 at Exh. 54, the Party I had made demands
with the Party II(1) to provide immediate employment
to all the workmen whose names were mentioned in
Annexure-I and Annexure-II of the said letter and
their letter dated 22-06-2011 at Exh. 54, produced in
cross has been produced by the Party I at the
instance of Party II (1) in cross-examination of Mr.
Vivekanand Naik. Further it is seen that Exh. 54
(produced in cross) has been replied by the Party
II(1) vide its letter dated 11-06-2011 which is at
Exhibit-55 and further Party I have also produced a
resolution dated 12-06-2011 at Exhibit-56 (produced
in cross) wherein the Party I Union had taken
resolution on 12-06-2011 admitting the workers as
the members of the Party I Union which goes to show
that the Party I was aware as on 11-07-2011 that the
workers were admitted as members of the said Union/
/Party I from 12-06-2011. The Party II(1) in its reply at
Exh. 56 has not disputed the membership of the
workmen of the Party II(1) nor they made any
grievance or took up the matter before the Labour
Commissioner in the dispute raised by the Party I
Union. Adv. Shri P. J. Kamat has placed reliance on
the authority reported in the case of Steel Authority
of India Ltd. v/s Hindustan Steel Employees Union
& Ors. 1997 (4) SCT – 78 Calcutta as mentioned
above. Hence, in view of the above reasons, issue
No. 1 and 2 are answered in the affirmative.
Issue No. 3:
23. It is the case of the Party I that the Party II(1)
was employing more than 100 workmen at its Factory
prior to refusal of employment and as such the
provisions of Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes
Act gets applicable to the present case. To this it is
seen that the first witness of the Party I, Shri Ratikant
Khandeparkar has clearly mentioned in his Affidavit
in Evidence that Party II(1) had in its employment
more than 400 workmen, excluding Officers,
Supervisors and Managerial Staff on all the days
preceding 12 months from 18-06-2011 and the Factory
was running in three shifts and he has also stated
that the present workmen are amongst the other 400
workmen who were working in the Factory of the
Party II(1) continuously till 17-06-2011 and
18-06-2011 when the said workmen were not allowed
to report for work on both these days and thereafter
as mentioned in the Order of Reference. This position
is also clear and stands confirmed in his cross-
examination wherein he has stated that there were
about 400 workmen working with Party II(1) and he
has admitted further that though he has not
produced the list of 400 workmen, but he has
produced the documents at Exh. 35 Colly and Exh.
38 giving the list of workmen employed by the Party
II(1) and on a careful perusal on both these exhibits
clearly shows that the Party II(1) had in its
employment more than 400 workmen excluding
Officers, Supervisors and managerial staff. This
position is also confirmed and corroborated through
the testimony of the second witness of the Party I,
Shri Vivekanand Naik who has also clearly stated
that he is also unable to produce the names of 400
workmen mentioned in Para-1 of his Affidavit-in-
1408
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
Evidence or any details about them but, he clearly
states further in cross that the names of 400 workmen
are as per ESI documents produced on record which
is at Exh. 33 to 39 Colly.
24. It is seen that the Party I has produced the
documents at Exh. 35 which is ESI Returns for the
period April, 2010 to September, 2010, Exh. 38 which
is ESI Returns for the period October, 2010 to March,
2011 and Exh. 39 which is ESI Returns for the period
April, 2011 to September, 2011. The documents more
specifically produced at Exh. 35 Colly and 38, 39 and
152 produced in cross clearly proves that at the time
the Party II(1) suspended the activities and kept the
said workers as mentioned on Exh. 42, the Party II(1)
was employing more than 100 workmen during the
preceding 12 months of June, 2011. Further it is seen
that the witness of Party II(1) Shri D. Mathur has
produced the list of 194 workmen employed in June,
2011 and has stated that out of the said list 20
employees are non-workmen categories but has not
led any evidence in support of this and therefore this
statement for want of specific evidence cannot be
believed.
25. The Party II(1) in its reply/Written Statement
has stated that the total strength of workmen is
around 225 workmen and therefore this statement of
Party II(1) vis-à-vis their documents at Exh. 35 Colly,
38, 39 and 152 shows that Party II(1) was employing
on an average more than 100 workmen for preceding
12 months of June, 2011 and is therefore covered
under Chapter VB of the said Act. It has been argued
by Learned Advocate Shri P. J. Kamat for the Party I
that even if it is assumed but not admitted that the
Party II(1) establishment is not governed by Chapter
VB but governed by Chapter VA of the said Act, the
Party I workmen who had been asked to stay outside
the Gate during temporary suspension period
amounts to lay-off and therefore would be entitled
for compensation u/s 25-C of the said Act from the
date they were kept out if the lay-off is legal and for
full wages till the date of termination of the services
of the said workmen on account of closure of the
establishment w.e.f. 13-10-2016 as informed vide
letter dated 13-08-2016 at Exh. 151.
26. It is also to be noted here that Shri Prakash
Dabholkar who is the second witness of Party II(1)
has clearly mentioned in his cross-examination that
“it is true that the Company Party II(1) had in its
employment more than 400 workmen excluding
Officers, Supervisors and management staff on all
the days preceding 12 months from 18-06-2011. It is
true that the Party II(1) was running in three shifts. It
is true that the workmen in this reference were
amongst 400 workmen who were working in the
Factory for the Party II(1) continuously till 17-06-2011
and 18-06-2011”. Hence, the testimony of this witness
conclusively proves that Party II(1) was employing
more than 100 workmen in its Factory prior to the
refusal of employment and therefore, the provisions
of Chapter VB of the I. D. Act gets applicable.
27. Party I submits that the Bombay High Court in
the matter of Hartex Tubes Pvt. Ltd. V/s Asstt.
Commissioner of Labour, Nagpur and Ors reporting
in 1998 (78) FLR 893 at page 899 has held as under:-
“However, what is more relevant in this case,
would be the provisions of Chapter V-B of course,
on behalf of the petitioners, it is contended that
change of weekly off is covered by Section 52 and as
they have fulfilled the requirement, the question of
lay off does not arise. In the instant case, the reason
for changing the weekly off is in terms of Notice
dated 22-08-1994. The Notice clearly contemplates
that the weekly off is being changed on account of
shortage of material. If the employees were refused
work, in such event, on any other day, the provisions
pertaining to lay off would be attracted. Can,
therefore the argument be sustained that because
the employer has chosen to shift the weekly off, then
in that event, it will cease to be a lay-off. As pointed
out earlier, the definition of lay-off itself is as set out
under Section 2(kkk) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
The reasons given in the notice dated 22-08-1994
would by itself indicate that the weekly off was
changed on account of shortage of material. In a
case, were the provisions of Chapter V-B are
attracted, contemplates that, permission is
required. Can the employer contend that because
in law under Section 52(1)(b) as it sought to be
argued, he can change the weekly off by giving
notice to the Inspector and put a Notice on Display
Board he can dispense with the requirement of
Chapter V-B. The answer must be clearly in the
negative. It is not possible for an employer to change
the weekly off solely on the ground that here was
no material available for work to be provided on a
particular date. Such exercise would be clearly a
colourable exercise to defeat the very object of the
weekly off. If in law there are statutory requirements
under Chapter V-B in seeking permission before the
lay-off is effected, ingenuity cannot be allowed to
defeat the requirement of law. In the instant case,
clearly the sole reason for change in the weekly off
was shortage of material. In such a case, if the
employer had to lay-off, he was bound to pay
compensation. This he cannot avoid by resorting
to change in the weekly off itself bearing in mind
the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of
John Douglas (supra)”.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1409
28. To this it is the contention of Learned Advocate
Shri M. S. Bandodkar that this issue needs to be
answered in the negative as according to him once
SARFAESI Act comes into operation, jurisdiction will
lie to different tribunal as per Section 34 and 13(4) of
the Act. If this court goes carefully through the
provisions of the Act, it can be seen that the Bank
took over movable and immovable property on
15-02-2012 and 22-12-2012 and it was only given to
the Company for maintenance and not to operate i.e.
operation was not visible thereafter. Therefore, once
SARFAESI Act came into force, jurisdiction of the
Tribunal to try and entertain dispute would be to the
extent of suspension of operation which vanished
once Bank took over the possession of assets. This
Court cannot go into Chapter VB of the Act as when
the Company is declaring lockout, question of
workmen being more than 100 and applicability of
Chapter VB of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not
arise. These arguments do not carry any weightage
as the Party I has succeeded in proving that the
Party II(1) was employing more than 100 workmen at
its Factory prior to refusal of employment and as such
the provisions of Chapter VB of the Industrial
Disputes Act gets applicable. It is also noted that
the Party I workmen were refused the employment
on 17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 when their services
were illegally terminated and by way of amendment
to the Written Statement by Party II(1) it is pleaded
that the Party II(2) and others took over the possession
of land and building (immovable assets) on
15-02-2012 and entire Plant and Machinery used in
the manufacturing activities which are movable
assets on 22-02-2012 under SARFAESI Act, 2002, that
the possession has been taken by Party II(2) by virtue
of operation of law on 15-02-2012 and 22-02-2012 due
to which the Party II(1) could never start the
functioning of the activities due to this unavoidable
circumstances beyond the control of the Employer.
Hence, this goes to show that at the time when the
workers were refused the employment the SARFAESI
Act, 2002 did not come into play as the illegal
termination is of the year 2011 and the possession of
the movable and immovable assets of Party II(1) was
taken by Party II(2) in the year 2012 and when the
refusal of employment happens to be of the Year, 2011,
the provisions of Chapter VB of the Industrial
Disputes Act gets applicable in view of the cogent
evidence brought on record by the Party I through
the witnesses vis-à-vis the documents. Hence, issue
No. 3 accordingly stands answered in the affirmative.
Issue No. 4:
29. Since it is the objection raised by Party II(1) in
the Written Statement that the Goa Trade and
Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus standi to
represent the workers concerned in the reference
and to file the Claim Statement on their behalf as
none of the employees are their members and in view
of this objection, this issue has been framed which is
a burden on Party II(1) to discharge the same. I have
discussed in detail while deciding issue No. 1 and 2
as to how and in what manner the said Union has
locus standi to represent the workers in the present
reference which was a major objection in the
arguments advanced by Learned Advocate Shri M.
S. Bandodkar for Party II(1) who has argued that the
Union has not shown nor produced any documents
of membership to show that these workmen were
members of the said Union to which Learned
Advocate Shri P. J. Kamat for Party I has argued that
it is not relevant as to when the workers had joined
the Union and the fact that the workers had joined
the Party I Union before the date of 17-06-2011 and
18-06-2011 is material to decide as to on the date of
making a demand the workers were the members of
the Party I Union or not. He places reliance on the
authority reported in the case of ANZ Grindlay Bank
V/s G. S. Grindlay Bank Employees Union & Ors.
reported in 2001 (89) FLR 375 wherein our Hon’ble
High Court has held that the membership of a Union
is not a condition precedent to espouse an industrial
dispute of the workman. The Union can espouse cause
of even a non-member who approaches them for help.
Further it is seen that vide Exh. 54, the Party I had
made demands with Party II(1) to provide immediate
employment to all the workmen whose names were
mentioned on the letter dated 22-06-2011 which is at
Exh. 54 and to this letter the Party II(1) has made a
reply dated 11-07-2011 which is at Exh. 55 produced
in cross. Moreover, the Party I has also produced a
resolution dated 12-06-2011 at Exh. 56 produced in
cross, wherein the Party I Union had taken resolution
on 12-06-2011 admitting the workers as the members
of the Party I Union. Hence, the Party II(1) was aware
on 11-07-2011 that these workers were admitted as
members of the Party I Union from 12-06-2011 and in
the reply dated 11-07-2011 at Exh. 55, the Party II has
not disputed the membership of the workmen of the
Party II(1) nor taken up the said issue before the
Labour Commissioner in the dispute raised by the
Party I Union. It is also seen that the Party II(1) vide
Exh. 48 had communicated to its workers to stay out
of the Gate during temporary suspension period and
this matter was taken up by the Party I Union vide its
letter dated 22-06-2011 at Exh. 54 before the Labour
Commissioner, Panaji–Goa by sending a copy to the
Party II(1). Therefore, these objections raised by the
Party II(1) do not carry any weightage and I have also
discussed the authorities relating to this issue in
detail while discussing issue No.1 and 2 and therefore
1410
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
the same are not repeated to avoid its repetition.
Hence, in view of the above reasons, issue No. 4
stands answered in the negative.
Issue No. 5:
30. It is the contention of the Party II(1) that the
Company had to suspend the entire manufacturing
activities as it had no funds to bring the raw material
and based on this, the present issue has been framed.
The witness of the Party II(1) Shri Deepak Mathur has
mentioned in his Affidavit-in-Evidence the entire
details of the fact as to how the Company had no
funds and further the bankers who were financing
them suddenly stopped financing and a such the
Company had no money to buy raw materials and as
such the Company had no choice but to suspend its
manufacturing operations till alternate arrangement
for funds could be made. He has further stated that
the Company therefore suspended its manufacturing
activities at its Plant located at Zuarinagar w.e.f.
17-06-2011 and according to him the Company had
no funds to make it operative and for last three years
before the suspension of operation, the Company was
operating at only 30% of its installed capacity due to
non-availability of sufficient funds. That according
to him, the Company was losing between Rs. 3 to 5
crores every month before suspension of the
manufacturing activities. He has also stated that the
Company had to keep some skeleton staff for security
and for the maintenance of its equipments, land,
building and also further he stated that during the
suspension of manufacturing activities the Company
was trying to arrange additional funds from its
financial institutions who had given loan to the
Company but these financial institutions because of
their past payments not being done on time refused
to provide additional funds. He has also mentioned
that how the entire Factory came under the
provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002. The documents
produced by this witness more specifically the
documents at Exhibit 63, 64, 65, 67 Colly, Exh. 68,
Exh. 69 to Exh.79 goes to show that the Company
was in heavy loses and had no funds to conduct
manufacturing activities.
31. Now coming to his cross-examination, he has
stated that though as per Exh. 63 which is a notice,
the manufacturing activities were to be suspended
w.e.f. 07-06-2011 but they did not suspend it on this
date and thereafter the manufacturing activities
were suspended vide notice dated 06-06-2011/
/Exh. 40 w.e.f. 17-06-2011. Further he has stated in
cross that in their reply dated 11-07-2011 at Exh. 100,
they have mentioned that the suspension of activities
on keeping the workers out was on account of no
funds and they have also mentioned other reasons
on it.
32. Admittedly, in this case the Company was in a
very weak financial position which is evident from
the various documents produced by Shri Deepak
Mathur but in my considered opinion, the Party II(1)
has not placed on record any such model/Standing
Orders applicable to them to show that they are
entitled for suspension of manufacturing activities
on account of financial loses. The Party II(1) has not
shown any documents in their contract of service
with the workers or in the Rules framed under some
statute to suspend the manufacturing activities for
lack of funds, financial loss and keep the workers
jobless. The very act of the Company in keeping all
these workmen jobless on 17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011
and refused them employment is not a justifiable act
even though the Company had no funds. But the fact
that the Company was in loses and there was lackof
finance is evident through the testimony of their
witness and the documents produced by him at
various exhibits and therefore having regards to the
said evidence issue No. 5 is answered in the
affirmative.
Issue No. 6 and additional Issue No. 1
33. It is the contention of the Party II(1) that as of
today the entire property of the Party II(1) has been
taken over by the financial institutions such as
Canara Bank, Panaji–Goa, Indian Overseas Bank,
Panaji, Halcyon Finance and Capital Advisors Pvt.
Ltd., Mumbai, are the necessary Parties and it is also
their case that subsequent to taking over all the
assets by the Party II(2)/Canara Bank, the Party II(1)
has become non-functional. Both these issues are
answered in the negative in view of the evidence
brought on record by Party II(1) and Party II(2).
34. The Canara Bank, Panaji-Goa has already been
made a Party to the present reference who is Party
II(2) in this case in view of the application filed for
impleadment. Therefore, the question of other
financial institutions to be made as Parties does not
arise. Ongoing through the evidence of Shri Deepak
Mathur, it is seen that he has clearly stated that on
account of financial loses and shortage of funds, the
entire suspension of manufacturing activities was
stopped as the financial institutions which were
giving them loan refused to give further loans on
account of their past non-payments. He has also
stated that the financial institutions visited the
Company premises and took over possession of the
entire Factory property under the provisions of
SARFAESI Act, 2002.
35. He has also stated further that after the
suspension operation on 17-06-2011 of the
manufacturing activities of the undertaking, Canara
Bank, Panaji-Goa and Indian Overseas Bank, Panaji
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1411
took over the possession of land and building
(immovable assets) on 15-02-2012 and 15-02-2012
respectively and entire Plant and Machinery used in
the manufacturing activities (Movable Assets) on
22-02-2012 under the Securitization and Recons-
truction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
Security Interest Act, 2002 and in exercise of power
conferred under Section 13(12) read with Rule, 3 of
the Security interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002
issued under demand notice dated 09-11-2011 and
15-12-2011 respectively. He further stated that the
possession and the ownership was taken over by the
Party II(2) and others of Immovable and Movable
assets of the Party II(1) by virtue of operation of law
on 15-02-2012 and 22-02-2012. Therefore subsequent
to the Party II(2) and others taking over Immovable
Assets and Movable Assets as referred to above, the
Party II(1) could never start its manufacturing
activities and from 15-02-2012 and 22-02-2012, the
functioning of undertaking became non-functional
by virtue of law and by taking possession and
ownership by the Bank and therefore since the entire
manufacturing activities became non-functional, the
Party II(1) could never start its manufacturing
activities and non-functionality of the activity were
due to unavoidable circumstances beyond the
control of the Employer and after filing of the written
statement there were further developments and
litigation between the Parties.
36. He further stated that after taking the
possession of the assets by the Canara Bank and
others on 15-02-2012 and 22-02-2012, since the
manufacturing activities has become non-functional
by operation of law due to unavoidable
circumstances beyond the control of Party II(1), the
workmen at the most are entitled for compensation
under Section 25-FFF of the Act not exceeding
average pay for 3 months in totality.
37. In his cross-examination he has stated that
the Canara Bank took over the possession of the
immovable assets on 15-02-2012 and of movable
assets on 22-02-2012 and further states that “it is true
that as per Exh. 68, the Canara Bank had only taken
symbolic possession of the secured assets mentioned
therein”. He has also admitted that as per the reply
of Canara Bank at Exh. 126 it was informed to the
Company that the Bank had taken symbolic
possession of the assets and the Company is required
to maintain the same. He also states that instead of
Canara Bank putting their own lock on the Gate,
they made them caretaker and asked them to
maintain the machines so that they do not become
scrap. Hence, his entire deposition goes to show that
the Canara Bank had only taken the symbolic
possession of the Company and not the physical or
the actual possession.
38. The first witness of Party II(2) Shri Lokesh on
behalf of Canara Bank has clearly mentioned in his
Affidavit in Evidence the exact financial condition
of the Party II(1) Company and he has also stated that
Party II(1) had availed various credit facilities from
various Consortium of Banks including their Bank
for their business purpose by executing various loan
documents, agreements, guarantees and other
security documents on their movable and immovable
properties creating securities in favour of the Bank.
He has also mentioned in detail that the Company
could not repay the loans and the Canara Bank
initiated recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI
Act, 2002 on their properties. He has produced four
documents which is a copy of letter dated 16-11-2015
at Exhibit 159, copy of the letter dated 30-01-2016 at
Exh. 160, the copy of the letter dated 09-03-2017 from
Meta Copper and Alloys Ltd. at Exh. 161 and the letter
dated 19-06-2017 from Canara Bank at Exhibit-162.
He clearly states in cross that their Bank had taken
only symbolic possession of the secured assets and
it was only paper possession and further states that
after taking symbolic possession the Bank had not
stopped the Party II(1) in continuing with its
manufacturing process and the Bank had not sold
the assets and properties of Party II(1) after taking
over the symbolic possession. But according to him
the Party II(1) had paid the amount to the Bank on
one-time settlement. He has also stated that their
Bank had made the Demand Notice on Party II(1) for
recovery of loan which documents are at Exhibit 67
Colly, Exh. 68 and Exh. 69. He has further stated that
the Party II(1) approached them for renewal of loan
and reconstructing of the loan on 05-01-2010 and the
Canara Bank was a lead Bank in consortium form
which included Indian Overseas Bank. He has further
stated that “it is true that as per the letter dated
17-08-2013 at Exh. 136 Colly, the Bank had told the
Company to maintain and safe keep the assets” which
shows that the Bank had told the Company to take
care of the machines and this is because the Bank
had not taken the physical possession of the assets
of the Company. Though questions are put in cross
that the Bank has the right to sell the property after
taking the possession without taking permission
from the Company but in this case, it is conclusively
proved that the Bank had only taken symbolic
possession. Therefore, putting such questions does
not absolve the Company from their liabilities.
39. Further Shri Prakash Dabholkar, the second
witness of Party II(1) states that Exhibit 17 which is
an application for impleadment for Canara Bank was
shown to him, it is seen that he had made this
application to implead Canara Bank as a Party to the
present reference. He states that he does not know
1412
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
what was the further step taken by the Canara Bank
against Party II(1) after taking possession of their
assets. He does not know if all the assets of the
Company were attached and sold by Canara Bank of
all the assets i.e. movable and immovable. Hence,
the entire evidence on record shows that only the
symbolic possession of the Party II(1) has been taken
over by the Canara Bank and the Indian Overseas
Bank is a consortium of the Canara Bank as stated by
Shri Deepak Mathur, the question of impleading other
financial institutions does not arise as the Canara
Bank has already taken the physical possession.
40. It is the contention of Party II(1) that subsequent
to taking over all assets by the Party II(2), the
Company has become non-functional. I am not in
agreement with this contention of Party II(1) because
as discussed above, the Party II(2) has taken only
symbolic possession and has told Party II(1) to take
care of the machinery and the equipment so that it
does not become scrap.
41. Hence, in view of the above reasons, Party II(1)
has failed to discharge the burden of issue No. 6 and
additional issue No.1. Hence, issue No. 6 is partly
answered in the affirmative and partly in the negative
and additional issue No.1 is answered in the negative.
Additional Issue No. 3:
42. In my considered opinion this Tribunal has
jurisdiction to try and entertain the dispute after
Party II(2) taking over the assets of the Party II(1) under
SARFAESI Act, 2002 as I have discussed in detail
while deciding the issue No. 6 and additional issue
No.1 that even after taking over the assets of
Party II(1) by Party II(2), the Party II(1) has not become
non-functional because it has come on record
through the deposition of the witness of Party II(1)
and Party II(2) that the Bank had taken only symbolic
possession of the properties of Party II(1) on
15-02-2012 and 22-02-2012 by virtue of Exhibit 68 and
69 which goes to show that the Bank had not taken
the physical possession of the assets of Party II(1)
and also at the time i.e. on 17-06-2011 and on
18-06-2011 when the Party II(1) had kept the workers
out. Further a perusal on Exh. 68 also shows that it is
mentioned on it that at the time when the assets
were taken over by the Bank the Company’s
representatives were present and they undertook to
hand over actual possession to the authorized
Officers as and when directed by the authorized
Officers. Hence, the entire assets of the Party II(1)
were always with them and Party II(2) had taken
symbolic possession in other words, the possession
was on paper and even it has also come on record
through the deposition of Shri Deepak Mathur that
the Party II(1) was not stopped by any financial
institution in continuing their manufacturing
process as more precisely Shri P. Lokesh, the witness
of the Party II(2) has clearly stated in his cross-
examination that the Bank had taken only symbolic
possession and the secured assets and it was only
paper possession. He has also admitted that after
taking the symbolic possession, the Bank had not
stopped the Party II(1) in continuing with its
manufacturing process and has further admitted that
“it is true that the Bank had not sold the assets and
properties of the Party II(1) after taking over symbolic
possession but the Party II(1) had paid the amount to
the Bank on one-time settlement which is also
admitted by Shri Deepak Mathur.
43. Further the Party II(1) has admitted the
possession of their Factory is with them and they
also maintained the same with the Staff. This is more
precisely on Exhibit-125. Further on Exh.126 which
is a reply dated 17-08-2013 by the Party II(2), they
have clarified that Party II(2) had taken only symbolic
possession of the assets of Party II(1) and it is the
duty of the Party II(1) to maintain and keep the said
assets safe of Party II(1). It is true that the Party II(1)
Company is not functioning but they cannot escape
from their liabilities for payment of wages or lay-off
compensation for their closure from 17-06-2011 to
18-06-2011. Hence, in view of the above, the
additional issue No. 3 is answered in the affirmative.
Issue No. 7:
44. By this issue, this Tribunal has to come to a
conclusion whether Shri Prakash Dabholkar at Sr. No.
2 and Shri Vivekanand Naik at Sr. No. 7 in the
reference order are the workmen as defined u/s 2(s)
of the Industrial Disputes Act and as such it becomes
useful to look into the evidence of both these
witnesses.
45. Shri Prakash Dabholkar has stated in his
examination in chief that he is the person concerned
in the present reference and so also he has given
evidence in all other references such as IT/30/14,
29/14, 03/15 and 31/14 and his deposition in all these
cases were shown to him from Exhibit 169, 170, 168
and his entire deposition on Exhibit 169 in IT/29/14.
Admittedly, presently, he is working elsewhere and
drawing a reasonable salary. He has stated in cross
that when he was working with Party II(1), he was
working as a Machine Operator and there were no
employees and nobody was working under him. He
states that he is an Engineer and in the year 2011,
Party II(1) had suspended the work and when the
suspension of work was made, he was kept out of
Factory on 17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 onwards and
their salaries were not paid. That, according to him
it was refusal of employment by the Employer and no
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1413
letter of termination was served on them nor any
letter was made to them stating that they are no more
employees of the said Company from 17-06-2011 or
18-06-2011. That, according to him there was no letter
of retrenchment, lay-off or closure was served to them
on both these two days and there was no lock-out on
both these days declared by Party II(1) by keeping
the workers out of the Factory. He does not know on
what basis he was terminated from the services. From
his deposition it is clear that he worked as an Machine
Operator and nobody was working under him.
46. The next witness of Party I, Shri Vivekanand
Naik whose name is at Sr. No. 7 of the order of reference
and he has also clearly stated in his deposition that
he is one of the workmen to the present reference
out of the total 400 workmen employed by the
Party II(1). He has also stated that though he and Shri
Prakash Dabholkar are Engineers, they were actually
doing the work of Operators along with the other
Operators and were paid the same wages and
allowances which were paid to the Operators. Even
in his cross-examination he has stated that even
though he was promoted as Sr. Engineer in the year
2008, he was working in the Production Department
as an Operator.
47. He has also admitted in cross that he cannot
produce any documents in support of his contention
of his statement in his cross-examination that the
employees whose names have been mentioned on
Exhibit 152 as non-workmen category and he
admitted that he cannot produce any records to
show as to how many of those employees as
mentioned by him whose names are mentioned in
Exhibit 41 were given powers to sanction leave of
the workmen. He further admitted that he cannot
produce any documents in support of his voluntary
statement as regards to the duties assigned to the
Officers and Executives and further stated that he
cannot state as to who were the Officers/Executives
working in Grade I to IV in June, 2011 which goes to
show that he could not describe the nature of the
duties assigned to the said workers precisely.
48. Further it is seen that on Exhibit 80 Colly to
Exhibit 85 which are the Appointment Letters of the
workers by Party II(1) it shows that these workers are
designated as “Jr. Engineer” in M-VII, but it does not
specify as to what supervisory, managerial or
administrative duties had to be done by these two
employees. Further the Letter of Promotion at Exh.
81 also shows that it is mentioned that there will be
no change in his emoluments. Therefore, when the
designation of Shri Prakash Dabholkar was of Jr.
Engineer and he was promoted as Sr. Engineer vide
Exh. 82, the nature of duties remained the same.
Similar is the case of Mr. Vivekanand Naik who was
promoted as Sr. Engineer in Grade M-V but there was
no change in his nature of duties.
49. Reliance is placed on the authority reported
in the case of VNT Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd. v/s
Ajitkumar S. Puri and Anr. reported in 2009 (120)
FLR 215, wherein our Hon’ble High Court has held
that when a Company raises an objection that its
employee was not a ‘workman’ within the meaning
of Section 2(s) of the Act, the onus was upon the
Company to prove the same. In this authority and so
also in this case, the Company failed to prove the
nature of the duties of both these persons working
under them and also held that the Company which
is a Pvt. Limited Company is bound by all the
provisions and the law applicable to the Private
Limited Company under the Companies Act as well
as other allied laws. In this case, the Party II(1) failed
to discharge its burden and explain what was the
nature/functions/duties assigned to both these
persons and as held in the above case, the mere
designation is not sufficient to show that both the
above said persons of Party I were not the workmen.
It also becomes necessary to decide this issue by
looking into the definition of a ‘workman’ which
comes under Section 2(2) of the Industrial Disputes
Act which reads as follows:
2(s) “workman” means any person (including an
apprentice) employed in any industry to do any
manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational,
clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward,
whether the terms of employment be express or
implied, and for the purposes of any proceeding
under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute,
includes any such person who has been dismissed,
discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as
a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal,
discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute,
but does not include any such person-1) who is
employed mainly in a managerial or administrative
capacity or
2) who being employed in a supervisory capacity,
draws wages exceeding Rs.10,000/- per mensem,
either by the nature of the duties attached to the
office or by any reason of the powers vested in
him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.
50. In this case, both the above mentioned persons
of Party I squarely falls within the definition of
‘workmen’ and accordingly issue No. 7 is answered
in the affirmative.
1414
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
Issue No. 8 & 9 and additional issue No. 2:
46. Issue No. 8 and 9 and additional issued No. 2
are discussed together for the sake of convenience
and also as they are covered under common
evidence. That, according to the Party II(1) the 13
workmen whose names are mentioned in the Order
of Reference at Sr. Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 14, 18, 23, 25, 26, 27,
28, 31 and 34 have voluntarily resigned from the
employment of Party II(1) and as such they are not
entitled for any relief and their liability to pay the
dues is only to the workmen at Sr. No. 5 and as there
is an order from the Court not to pay his dues as he
had defaulted in payment of personal loan availed
by him. To this, it is seen that no sufficient evidence
has been led by the Party II(1) and I say so because if
one goes through the evidence of Shri Deepak
Mathur, the witness of Party II(1) who has stated in
cross that the 69 workers who continued to report
for work during the suspension period as per the
notice at Exh. 41, were working till there was work
and thereafter these workmen were told not to come
for duty and it is subsequent to 17-06-2011 they had
resigned on finishing their work. This witness does
not make any mention of the said above mentioned
13 workers who according to them have voluntarily
resigned from the services of the Company
immediately after they were refused the employment.
He has produced the copy of resignation letters of all
these 13 workmen which are from Exhibit 86 Colly to
Exhibit 98 Colly and these resignation letters are of
the year 2012 and only of Shri Prashant Parab whose
name is at Sr. No. 34 has resigned on 31-12-2011 and
it is pertinent to note here that all these workmen
were refused employment on 17-06-2011 and
18-06-2011 and thereafter these workmen were
jobless and as such they had no option but to resign
from the said Company. Further, ongoing through
the cross-examination of Shri Deepak Mathur, it is
seen that he has admitted in cross that the notice at
Exhibit 63 which is a notice of suspension of
operations of manufacturing activities, was issued
under his signature and as per this notice the
manufacturing activities were to be suspended w.e.f.
07-07-2011 which the Party II(1) did not do, but
suspended their manufacturing activities vide
notice dated 06-06-2011 at Exhibit 40 w.e.f. 17-06-2011.
This goes to show that there was suspension of
manufacturing activities from 17-06-2011 and
therefore these 13 workmen were kept out and were
refused employment. He has also admitted that the
Party II(1) had displayed two annexures, i.e. the list
of workmen along with the said notice dated 06-06-2011
which list is at Exhibit 41 and Exhibit 42 and as per
the said list at Exh. 41 it shows that 69 employees
will report for duty during the suspension period from
17-06-2011 and the list of 46 employees as per
Exhibit-42 showed that these employees will stay
outside the Gate of Party II(1) during the suspension
period. He has also admitted that the said 69
employees as shown on Exh. 41 were allowed to
report for duty during the suspension period and
refused employment to other workmen as per
Exh. 42. He has clearly stated in cross;
“The notice at Exhibit 40 speaks that the Party II(1)
is unable to give employment to the workers
mentioned at Exhibit 42 from the dates mentioned
therein. It is true that the workers at Exhibit 42
who were not allowed to report for work were not
paid wages or any lay-off compensation for the
period they were kept out. It is true that the Party
II(1) also did not inform the said workers named in
Exh. 42 that they need not come to the Gate during
the period they were kept out. It is also true that the
Party II(1) did not inform the said workers that the
lay-off compensation for the period that they were
kept out will be paid to them. It is true that all such
workmen who are listed in Exh. 42 were on the
Muster Roll of the Party II(1) as on 06-06-2011 and
thereafter upto the respective dates mentioned
against their names.”
52. This goes to show that the Party II(1) allowed
some of it employees to work and conveniently chose
to refuse employment to the Party I/workmen
without any justification. That on Exhibit 11 all the
names of these workers are admittedly mentioned
on the rolls of Party II(1) on 17-06-2011 and on
18-06-2011 which is also clear from the notice at
Exhibit 42 that these workers were kept out along
with the other workmen and thereafter the said
workers have resigned on various dates as per Exhibit
86 Colly onwards. It is to be noted here that none of
the said workers have been paid wages from 17-06-2011
or 18-06-2011 to the date of their resignation which
is clear from the receipts produced along with
the resignations. Even though these workmen have
resigned, it does not mean that they are not entitled
for the relief as prayed because in my considered
opinion the entire action of Party II(1) in refusing the
employment to them is totally illegal and unjustified.
Shri Deepak Mathur has also admitted that some of
the workers mentioned on Exhibit 42 may have
resigned and as such their names were removed and
further states that no remarks were made on the
Muster Roll maintained by the Company in respect
of the workers at Exhibit 42 from the dates mentioned
on Exh. 42. He has also stated that the Company had
not taken prior permission from the Government of
Goa before issuing the notices at Exhibit 63 and
Exhibit 40 which also shows that the Party II(1) had
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1415
acted in a manner they wanted and not as per the
law. He also states in cross that from 17-06-2011 to
12-10-2016 the Party II(1) had not paid wages or any
lay-off compensation to the workers who were on the
Rolls for the said period and has also admitted that
the workers who were kept out were also not paid
wages or lay-off compensation. He admits that the
workers whose names are mentioned at Exhibit 41
and 42 were informed on 13-08-2016 that the Factory
would be permanently closed from 13-10-2016 vide
notice at Exhibit 151 and according to him for the
first time on 13-08-2016 vide Exhibit 151, the Party
II(1) had informed the workers that the Factory would
be closed from 13-10-2016.
53. If one peruses the notice of closure at Exhibit
151 it is seen that it is mentioned therein that the
closure of the Unit was on account of the taking over
of the Unit by the Canara Bank/Party II(2) and others
on 15-02-2012 and 22-02-2012 and therefore the
Company is not in position to run the manufacturing
activities of its under taking at Upasnagar,
Zuarinagar, Goa and that entire manufacturing
activity has become non-functional w.e.f. 22-02-2012
due to operation of law. Hence, it is clear that the
real reason for suspending the activities w.e.f.
17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 and keeping the workers
out and the subsequent act of closure w.e.f.
13-10-2016 was not on account of unavoidable
circumstances beyond the control of Party II(1) as
the Canara Bank had taken the symbolic possession
w.e.f. 15-02-2012 and 22-02-2012 and as such this was
the main reason for suspension of activities of Party
II(1) w.e.f. 17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 as per notice
dated 30-05-2011 at Exhibit 33. The contention of
Party II(1) that the closure of the Unit for reasons of
financial loss and difficulties cannot be equated as
unavoidable circumstances beyond the control of the
Employer. At this juncture, Section 25-FFF of the
Industrial Disputes Act makes it clear that an
undertaking which is closed down by reasons merely
of financial difficulties shall not be deemed to have
been closed down on account of unavoidable
circumstances beyond the control of the Employer
and in this case the Party II(1) is trying to take the
shelter of closure without following the required
procedures for it. The act of Party II(1) in allowing
some employees and refusing employment to others
cannot be termed as a closure as the closure is
defined to be permanent closing down of a place of
employment or part thereof.
54. As keeping few workmen out and providing
employment for others cannot be proved under
Section 2KKK of the said Act nor under any contract
of service with the workmen nor it would come under
the provisions of Standing Orders Act, 1946. The
Party II(1) has also not obtained prior permission for
the closure nor paid wages or lay-off compensation
to the Party I/workmen. The Party I/workmen were
not paid till 13-08-2016 and the Party I workers were
on the Rolls of the Party II(1) upto 13-10-2016 when
the Party II(1) closed the establishment as
communicated vide notice dated 13-08-2016 at
Exh.151 and that there was no agreement between
the Party I and the Party II(1) to the effect that after
45 days of lay-off, the workmen shall not be paid any
compensation and that the Party II(1) had not given
any alternative employment to the Party I/workmen
w.e.f. 17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 and that there is no
evidence brought by the Party II(1) that the Party I
were not reporting for work at the establishment once
a day and that the lay-off was not on account of any
act on the part of the Party I/workmen and even
otherwise the Party II(1) did not lead any evidence
on additional issue No. 2.
55. Therefore, according to me, the action of
Party II(1) in keeping out the workmen w.e.f.
17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 is illegal and unjust
without following any proper provisions and
therefore the Party I/workmen are entitled to full
back wages and the other consequential benefits
upto 12-10-2016 when Party II(1) closed their
establishment illegally. Hence, issue No. 8 and 9 and
additional issue No. 2 are answered in the negative.
56. Hence, guided by the above authorities and in
view of the above reasons, I pass the following Order:
O R D E R
1.
The action of the Party II(1)/M/s. Meta Copper
& Alloys Ltd., Zuarinagar, Sancoale-Goa in
refusing to provide employment to the 32
workmen named in the Order of Reference
w.e.f. 17-06-2011 and 2 willing workmen w.e.f.
17-06-2011 is illegal, unjust and bad-in-law.
2.
The Party I workmen are entitled for full back
wages from 17-06-2011 and 18-06-2011 till the
passing of this Award.
3.
No order as to cost.
4.
Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Bela N. Naik),
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal and
Labour Court.
Dated: 07-03-2022.
Place: Panaji, Goa.
1416
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
Department of Law & Judiciary
Law (Establishment) Division
Order
No.: 8-5-2015-LD (Estt)/518
In pursuance of the provisions of Section 6 of the Notaries Act, 1952 (Central Act 53 of 1952), read with
Rule 17 of the Notaries Rules, 1956, Government of Goa hereby publishes a list of Notaries appointed by
it and in practice at the beginning of the Year, 2022, as shown in the Schedule, annexed hereto.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Amir Y. Parab, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).
Porvorim, 29th April, 2022.
SCHEDULE
List of Notaries appointed and in practice at the beginning of the Year, 2022
(Rule 17 of the Notaries Rules, 1956, r/w. Section 6 of the Notaries Act, 1952).
Sr.
No.
Name of the Notary
Residential & Professional
Addresses
Qualification
Area in which
he/she is
authorized to
practice
Remarks
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Shri Fernando
Jorge Colaco
Res.: Ajanta, Flat No. 3,
1st Floor, opp.: Dr. Braganza
Pereira Road, Panaji-Goa
Off.: 104, Manguirish,
18th June Road, Panaji
Ph. No. 2228104 (O)
Law Graduate
Linecido,
Emdireito,
Legal
Practitioner
Since 1960
Panaji Senior
Division
2.
Shri Sudhanshu
Jaiwant Sardessai
Res.: Bella View Apts,
Altinho, Mapusa Bardez-Goa
Off.: Vishnu Smruti, Near
Civil Court Mapusa
Law Graduate
Bardez
Judicial Senior
Division
3.
Mrs. Irmina D’Costa
Fernandes
Res.: Ratnadeep Bldg.,
Flat No. C/21/B, opp. R. P
Stadium, Margao
Off.: H. No. 14/4/A, Hill View
Estate, Behind the Goa
Paradise Restaurant
Gaunlloy, Nuvem,
Salcete-Goa,
Ph. No. 2791764(O)/
/9822149547(M)
BA.L.L.B.
Margao
Judicial Senior
Division
4.
Shri Sanjiv G.
Sardessai
Res.: “Saroj” No. 226/9,
Housing Board Colony,
Mapusa, Goa
Off.: H. No. 13/133, Wagle
House, Feira Baixa, Near
Joao Menezes, Mapusa Goa,
Ph.No.(O)6529998/
/(M) 9822120186
BA.L.L.B.
Mapusa Area
5.
Shri Daniel Minguel
Rodrigues
Res.: Baira Alto, Ponda Goa.
Off.: Navelkar Bldg.,
Near Ponda Municipality,
Ponda, Ph. No. (O) 2314171
(M) 9822103035
BA.L.L.B.
Ponda Area
6.
Shri Gajanan
Govind Dhumatkar
Res.: Vidyanagar,
Near Vidya Prabhodini High
School, Alto, Porvorim,
Bardez-Goa
Off.: A-5, Hill Top
Apartments, Near Teen
Building, Alto Porvorim-
Bardez-Goa, Ph. No.:
(O) 2415688 (M) 9822154748
BA.L.L.B.
Bardez
Judicial Senior
Division
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1417
1
2
3
4
5
6
7.
Shri Prabhakar
Jaganath
Kunkolienkar
Res.: “Dambab” Bernando
F. Costa Road, Opp.
Damodar Sal, Margao,
Salcete-Goa
Off.: Ratnadeep Bldg., 1st
Floor, Opp. Rajendra
Prasad Stadium Margao,
Salcete-Goa
BSc. L.L.B.
Margao
Judicial Senior
Division
8.
Shri Upendra
Ramchandra Timble
Res.: Miramar Panaji
Off.: Fo-8, Atmaram
Commercial Complex,
Dr. A. B. Road, Panaji-Goa
L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Judicial Senior
Division
9.
Shri Prabhakar G.
Narulkar
Res.: Vaman Smruti Bldg.,
2nd floor, opp. Laxmi
Narayan Temple, Mapusa
Bardez-Goa
Off.: Saldanha Business
Towers, Off. No. 105, Block
E, 1st floor, Near Mapusa
Court, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa
Bsc. Hons.
L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
10.
Shri Francisco
Nicolau Veronica
Fernandes
Res.: Good will Farms,
Vodlemmoll Kakoda
Curchorem
Off.: H. No. 13A,
Opp. Municipal Garden,
Quepem,
New Addres:
Opp. Municipal Garden, 34,
2nd floor, Municipal
Market Building,
Quepem, Goa 403705
MA., L.L.B.
Quepem
Judicial
Division
11.
Shri Vithoo Krishna
Naik
Res. & Off.: 271, Bepkegale,
Curchorem
B.A. L.L.B.
Sanguem &
Quepem
Taluka
12.
Shri Ulhas Govind
Shetye
Res.: Melquiedes Bldg.,
Behind Court, Vasco
Off.: Melquiedes Bldg., 1st
Floor, Fr. Joseph Vaz Road,
Vasco-da-Gama
Ph. No.: 2513001, 2540768,
9822380114
B.G.L. L.L.B.
Mormugao
Judicial Senior
Division
13.
Shri Caetano
Gabriel Da Costa
Res.: Bandora, Ponda-Goa
Off.: Kaziwada, Bandekar
Building, 1st Floor, opp.
Bank of India Ponda-Goa
Ph. No. 2335074 (R)
2314385 (O)
BA.L.L.B
Ponda Judicial
Senior
Division
14.
Shri Marcelino C.
Fernandes
Res. & Off.: Raghunath
Apartment, Francisco Luis
Gomes Road, Vasco-Da-
Gama Ph. No.: 2511462
L.L.B.
Mormugao
Judicial Senior
Division
15.
Shri Paul Santana
Rodrigues
Res.: K.V. No. 1 Teachers
Quarters, Mangor hill,
Vasco-da-Gama, Goa
Off.: Aliados Bldg., Abade
Faria Road, Margao
Office-Guia Bldg., 3rd floor,
Vasco-Da- Gama
Ph. No.: 2734639(O)
2510865(R)
B.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
1418
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
16.
Shri Premanand
Shripad Naik
Res.: Indira Niwas, Bardem,
Bicholim-Goa,
Off.: 36-A, 1st floor,
Municipal Market Complex,
Bicholim
Bsc. Hons.
L.L.B.
Bicholim
Judicial Senior
Division
17.
Shri Vijay J. Gaycar
Res.: Canacona
Off.: Satyabhama Bldg.,
Shellar Canacona, Ph. No.
2643196 (O) 275256(R)
B.A. L.L.B.
South Goa
District
18.
Shri Suresh Balso
Gauns Dessai
Res.: Mapusa, Bardez-Goa
Off.: 1st Peter’s Bldg., 2nd
floor, office, No. 4, Opp.
Mapusa Clinic, Mapusa.
Ph. No.: 2263345
M.A. L.L.B
State of Goa
19.
Shri Satishchandra
V. Talaulikar
Res.: Vasco da Gama
Off.: 9-Karma Paes, Avenue,
2nd floor, opp. Civil and
Criminal Court,
Vasco-da-Gama, Goa
Ph. No.: 2518188
B.A. L.L.B.
Mormugao
Judicial Senior
Division
20.
Shri Yves, Emanuel
Carmo Jose
Martinha Zuzarte
Res.: Mapusa, Bardez-Goa.
Off.: C-1, Junta House,
behind Mapusa
Municipality Offices,
Mapusa, Bardez
Ph. No.: 2262127
B.Sc. L.L.B.
Bardez
Judicial Senior
Division
21.
Shri Goculdas M.
Naik
Res.: Housing Board,
Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
Off.: 3rd Excelsior Chamber
(b) opp. Entrance of
Rizvi Chambers,
Market, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2220010
B.A. (Hons)
B.Ed. LLB.
Panaji Judicial
Senior
Division
22.
Shri Edmunda
Vitaliano D’Costa
Res.: H. No. 203,
Nr. Hospital, Cansaulim,
Off.: f-1, 3rd floor, Apna
Bazar, Vasco-Da-Gama,
Ph. No.: 2511027 (O)
2733118 (R)
B.A. (Hons)
L.L.B.
Mormugao
Taluka
23.
Shri Vanmali
Dattaram Naik alias
Rajan D. Naik
Res.: Vasco Da Gama
Off.: Karma Poes Avenue
Chambers, N 5, 2nd floor,
Near Count Bldg.,
Vasco-da-Gama
Ph. No.: 2512463/5644129
B.A. L.L.B.
Mormugao
Area
24.
Shri Menino A.
Fernandes.
Res.: H. No. 467/2,
Cusmano, Quepem
Off.: C-204, Osia
Commercial Arcade,
SGPDA, Market Complex,
Margao, Goa,
Ph. No.: 982159068
B.Sc. L.L.B.
Quepem and
Salcete Taluka
25.
Shri Albino Santana
Cosme Vales
Res.: Baina,
Vasco Da-Gama
Off.: 42, 2nd Floor, Apna
Bazar, Vasco
Ph. No.: 2511041
B.Com.
(Hons) L.L.B.
Entire State of
Goa
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1419
1
2
3
4
5
6
26.
Shri Menino Patrick
Diniz
Off.: Curchorem
L.L.B.
South Goa
District
27.
Shri Emerico
Afonso
Res. & Off.: John Paul Bldg.,
1st floor, Garden Square,
Nr. Panaji Church,
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No: 2223403/2227208/
/9822149047
B.A., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
28.
Shri Arjun Krishna
Phadte
Res.: H. No. 96, C-S, Alto-
Mapusa
Off.: El Capitan Centre, 1st
floor, Room No.17, Near
Manjunath Hotel, Mapusa,
Ph. No.: 2252471 (O)
2254621(R)
B.A.(Hons)
L.L.B.
Bardez Area
29.
Shri Minino Teles
Res.: Altinho, Panaji
Off.: 1st floor,
Kamat Chambers,
Opp. Hotel Neptune, Panaji
Ph. No.: 2224465/2431905
B.Sc. L.L.B.
State of Goa
30.
Kum. Philomena Da
Silva
Res.: Nagoa, Verna
Salcete-Goa
Off.: Apna Bazar, F/6,
A/Bldg Varde Valaulikar
Road, Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2704110
M.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
31.
Miss Sharayu M.
Sawardekar
Res.: Sanvordem Curchorem
Off.: As-4, Vishwanath
Mansion, Nr. Kadamba Bus
Stand, Curchorem-Goa
B.A, L.L.B.
Quepem
Judicial Senior
Division
32.
Shri Ganesh V.
Khandeparkar
Res.: Khadpabandh
Ponda–Goa
Off.: Near Post Office,
Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 2314722/2313127
B.A. L.L.B.
Ponda Judicial
Division
33.
Shri Kishore
Premanath
Prabhudessai
Res.: Quepem Rivona
Off.: Cusmane, Apts. 1st
floor, Behind Bus Stand,
Quepem
L.L.B.
South Goa
Distrct
34.
Shri Jose Agnelo
Nelson Cardozo
Soares alias Nelson
Soares
Res.: Ward No. 7 Tisk, Near
Ponda Court, Ponda-Goa
Off.: Tisk, Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 2312536
L.L.B.
Judicial
Division of
Ponda
35.
Shri Victor Diniz
Res.: H. No. 64,
CusmanQuepem-Goa
Off.: Reliance
Magnum Building,
Off. No.: 206, 2nd Floor,
Opp. Kadamba Bus stand,
Madel, Margao, Goa,
Ph. No.: 2662258, 2664187
B.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
36.
Shri Uday Ganesh
Kudchadkar
Res.: Curchorem
Quepem Taluka
Off.: 1st Floor, Kudchadkar
Bldg., Opp. State Bank of
India, Curchorem–Goa
B.A., L.L.B.
Quepem
Judicial Senior
Division
1420
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
37.
Shri Agnelo
D’Costa
Res.: Near Bhandare
Hospital, Fountainhas,
Panaji-Goa
Off.: 31st January Road,
Opp. Hotel Vennite
Panaji-Goa,
Ph. No.: 2426028
BA., L.L.B.
Judicial
Division of
Tiswadi
38.
Shri Prakash V.
Borkar
Res.: Sunanda Niwas,
Chandrawado, Margao,
Salcete-Goa
Off.: S-4, 2nd floor, Laxmi
Plaza, Behind Grace
Church, Margao
Ph. No.: 2742624 (R)
2712386 (O)
B.A., L.L.B.
Margao
Judicial Senior
Division
39.
Shri Jose Joey
Rodrigues
Res.: Calata, Majorda
Salcete
Off.: Kamat Commercial
Centre, 2nd floor, Next to
Bombay Cafe, Station Road,
Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2715074 (O)
2739093 (R)
B.Sc. (Hons)
L.L.B. (Bomb)
Margao
Judicial Senior
Division
40.
Shri Shivanand
Manohas Singbal
Res.: Porvorim
Off: 4, Navelkar Arcade, 5th
Floor, Dr. A.B. Road,
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2232999
L.L.B.
Bardez
Judicial Senior
Division and
Tiswadi
Taluka
41.
Shri Shashikant
Anant Parab
Res.: Mayem, Bicholim
Off.: R. No. 33, Municipal
Market Complex, Bicholim
B.Sc.
(Hons) L.L.B.
Bicholim
Judicial Senior
Division
42.
Shri Mohandas
Pandurang
Sawaikar
Res.: Anya Prasad, Plot No.
148, Housing Board Colony,
Harvalem, Sankhalim-Goa
Off.: Opp. HDFC Bank, Near
Municial Ground, Bicholim
Goa, Ph. No.: 2365274 (R)
2361175 (O)
B.A.L.L.B.
Bicholim
Judicial Senior
Division
43.
Shri Mukund
Rawalu Malik
Res.: Kudne, Sanquelim,
Bicholim, H. No. 16,
Bhailipeth Bicholim
Off.: 1st Floor, Carlito
Tower Centre, Near K.T.C.
Bus stand, Bicholim-Goa
B.Sc., L.L.M.
Bicholim
Judicial Senior
Division
44.
Shri Bhavanishankar
Sukhtankar
Res.: Ponda, Off.: P-Central
Mansion, Flat S-1, Ponda
Ph. No.: 2312266 (O)
2314163 (R) 9422057356 (M)
B.Sc.L.L.B.
State of Goa
45.
Shri Ramakant
Mahadeo Lotlikar
Res.: Margao, Salcete-Goa
Off.: Raikar House,
Pe. Miranda Road,
Margao-Goa.
Ph. No.: 2715672
B.A. (Hons),
L.L.B.
Judicial
Division of
Salcete Taluka
46.
Shri Anant
Bhagwant Sawkar
Res.: Ansabhat, Mapusa,
Bardez-Goa
Off.: 2, 4th Floor
Communidade Ghor,
Nr. The 3 Mapusa Urban
Bank of Goa (HQ) Mapusa
B. Com. (Hons),
L.L.B.
State of Goa
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1421
1
2
3
4
5
6
47.
Shri Govind Hegde
Desai
Res.: H. No.108, Near Police
Station, Quepem
Off.: Cushban Enclav, F-1
First Floor, Near Bank of
India Quepem,
Ph. No.: 2662946/2662264/
/9822129070
B.Com, L.L.B.
South Goa
District
48.
Shri Babuso Savlo
Gaunker
Res.: 850/A/2, Parvati
Niwas, Journalist Colony,
Alto-Betim, Bardez-Goa,
Off.: Block-I, B-3,
Skylark Apts, Menezes
Braganza Road, Panaji-Goa
B.A.(Hons)
L.L.B.
North Goa
District
49.
Shri Tulsidas V.
Naik
Res.: Amrut Smruti, Saipem
Candolim, Bardez-Goa,
Off.: Phoenix Plaza, A-06,
Feira Alta, Mapusa, Bardez-
Goa, Ph. No.: 2255020 (O)
B.A.(Hons)
L.L.B.
Judicial
Division of
Bardez Taluka
50.
Shri Anant C.
Pansekar
Res.: Om Sai, Behind KTC
Bus Stand, Amona Road,
Marcela
Off.: S-4, 2nd floor,
Fatima Chambers,
Dr. Atmaram Borkar Road,
opp. Hotel Samrat,
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 6642154/2287828
B.A.(Hons)
L.L.B.
North Goa
District
51.
Smt. Kishori N.
Fugro
Res. & Off.: “Kinara
Darshan”
27, Lake View Colony,
Miramar, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2462603
B.A., (Hons)
L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
52.
Shri Ramkrishna
Ramdas Kamat
Res.: Nr. Canacona Police
Station, Canacona,
Off.: Manunath Bldg.,
Shellar, Canacona-Goa
Ph. No: 2643585
B.A. (Hons)
L.L.B.
Canacona
Taluka
53.
Shri Mahandev
Govind Bandekar
alias Mahesh
Bandekar
Res.: Urmila Apts.
St. Mary’S Colony Miramar
Off.: Akash Bhavan,
Gr. Floor, Opp Mathias
Plaza,
Panaji-Goa, Ph. No.:
2422384 (O)/2463923 (R)
B.Com, L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
54.
Shri Shivprasad V.
Manerkar
Res.: H. No. E-215,
Fountainhas, Panaji
Off.: 1st Floor, Albuquerque
Apts., Near Vaidya
Hospital Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2431739/2424222/
/2228030 (O)
B.Com, L.L.B.
State of Goa
55.
Smt. Meera M.
Medhekar
Res.: S/2, Lourdes Apts.,
Nr. Hotel Delmon, Panaji
Off.: S/2, 2nd floor, Pinto
Chambers, M.G. Road
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2421130/
/9822104365
B.Com, B.Ed.,
L.L.B.
State of Goa
1422
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
56.
Shri Jertudes
Santana Rebello
Res.: Flat No. 212,
Altesmanai Bldg.,
Caranzalem, Ilhas
Off:- Alfran Plaza, G-13,
M. G. Road, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2221451
M.A. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
57.
Shri Dilip P.
Dabholkar
Res.: H. No. A 40, Verem
Reis Magos, Bardez,
Off.: Opp. Old Sub
Registrar’s Office, Near SBI
(Agri Dev. Bank) Feira-Alto
Mapusa-Goa
Ph. No.: 2402245 (R)
/2262591(O)
B.Sc. (Hons).
L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
58.
Shri Ashok P. Naik
Res.: Cuncolim, Post
Mardol
Off.: Ponda 2, Priolkar Bldg.,
Near Cine Aisha-Goa, 1/3
Roshan Manzil, Near
National Cinema.
Ph. No: 2316009/2225881(O)
2395674(R)
B.A. L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
59.
Shri Shashikant
Narayan Joshi
Res.: Govt. Quarters, D-11-
9, Altinho Panaji-Goa
Off.: T-13, Jayaram
Complex, Rua de Aurem,
Neugi Nagar, Panjim
Ph. No.: 2230770(O)/
/2222612 (F) 9822102604
(M)
B.A.L.L.B.
State of Goa
60.
Shri Deelip
Yeshwant Govekar
Res.: H. No. 456, Guddem,
Siolim, Bardez-Goa
Off.: Pernem Division office,
near Bhagwati Temple
Pernem-Goa
Ph. No.: 2272511
B.A., L.L.B.
Pernem Junior
Division
61.
Shri Anthony
Stephen Santan
D’Mello
Res.: H. No. 35, Jacknim,
Parra, Bardez-Goa
Off.: 104, Commerce
Centre, Mapusa, Bardez
Ph. No.: 2251174/2250219
B.A., L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
62.
Shri Shrikant
Bhikaro Parab
Res.: Flat No. 6, 1st floor,
Marcela Township Apts.,
Khandola, Marcel, Goa
Off.: 47, 1st floor, Ponda
Commerce Centre,
Tisk, Ponda–Goa
Ph. No.: 2287349/2316553
B.Com, L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
63.
Shri Edwin Antonio
De Monte Furtado
Res.: “Vivenda” “Monte
Furtado”,
St. Mary’s Colony, Miramar
Off.: 12/1, Luis de Menezes
Road, Opp. Menezes & Cia,
Behind Head Post Office,
Panaji, Ph. No: 2221800/
/2225368/(R) 2422939 (O)
B.A.L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1423
1
2
3
4
5
6
64.
Shri Mahendra
Vasudev Gavas
Res.: H. No. 78,
Pimpolcotta, Quepem
Off.: 1st floor, Municipal
Bldg., Quepem, and C/o,
Cuckoos Nest, Dando
Sanguem Ph. No.: 2662452/
/2662315 (R)
B.A. L.L.B.
Quepem,
Sanguem and
Salcete Taluka
65.
Shri Ramkrishna S.
Naik
Res.: G-11, Ground Floor,
Fonseca Arcade, Tisk, Opp.
O/o. the Mamlatdar,
Ponda-Goa
Off.: 57, 2nd Floor, Ponda
Commerce Centre, Ponda
Ph. No.: 2315045
B.Com, L.L.B
Ponda Taluka
66.
Shri Hanumant G.
Gawandi
Res.: H. No. 143, Yeshodee
Niwas, Gawandiwada
Parse, Pernem
Ph. No.: 2246215/2291260
B.Com. L.L.B.
Pernem
Taluka
67.
Shri Prakash
Corgaonkar
Res.: H. No. 381, Tambudki,
Arpora, Bardez-Goa,
Off.: Gr. Floor, Carvalho’s
Bldg., Nr. Joao Menezes
Pharmacy, Mapusa-Goa
M.A., L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
68.
Shri Shantaram
Vassudev
Kudchadkar
Res.: Gurudev Mansion,
Curchorem
Off.: Kapdi Bldg., Station
Road, Bepkegal, and
Curchorem-Goa
Ph. No: 2650162
M.Com, L.L.B.
Quepem and
Salcete Taluka
69.
Smt. Vidhya Arjun
Shet
Res.: A/6, Sai Complex
Co-op. Hsg. Sty., Regina
Mundi Road, Chicalim
Off.: No. 47, Gr. Floor, Apna
Bazar, Near Vasco Civil
Court, Vasco-Goa
Ph. No.: 2514130 (O)/
/2540010 (R)
B.A., L.L.B.
State of Goa
70.
Shri Prem Pal Singh
Res.: C, Kancho Apts.,
Margao
Off.: Awani Lamp
Industries, 4th Floor, Velho
Building, Panaji
2) 2nd floor, D’Costa’s
Chambers, opp. Metropole
Theatre, Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2224694/2228094/
/2730947/9822126579 (M)
B.Sc., Ma, LLM,
PGDLLR
Salcete Taluka
71.
Shri Rajendra
Tukaram Naik
Res.: H. No. 219/A
Dattawadi, Sanvorderm,
Curchorem
Off.: 16/A, Sateri chambers,
2nd floor, Sarvodaya High
School Road, Curchorem,
Ph. No.: 2605711/
9823953046
B.A.,(Hons),
L.L.B.
Judicial
Jurisdiction of
Sanguem,
Quepem and
Ponda Taluka
1424
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
72.
Shri Somnath V.
Patil
Res.: Vasanti 443,
Uddswaddo, Goa Velha,
Off.: 205, 2nd floor, Wagle
Vision Bldg., 18th June
Road, Panaji-Goa,
Ph. No.: 2221932(O)/
/2218509 (R)
B.Com, L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
73.
Shri Subhash
Pundalik Sawant
Res.: Porvorim, Bardez-Goa
Off.: Velho Bldg., 3rd floor,
Panaji-Goa Ph. No.:
2444554 (R)/2426115 (O)
BA, L.L.B.
State of Goa
74.
Shri Nishakant
Suryaji Shinde
Res.: Karaswada, Khorlim,
Mapusa
Off.: 5, Karekar Bldg.,
Mapusa Clinic Road, Opp.
Laxmi Narayan Temple,
Mapusa-Goa, Ph. No.:
2262973 (O) /2255534 (R)
BA., L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
75.
Shri Govind Usno
Bhobe
Res.: Nerul, Bardez-Goa
Off.: 2/8, Roshan Manzil,
Near Cine National Panaji-
Goa, Ph. No.: 2401933 (R)
/2427944 (O)
B.A. L.L.M.
Tiswadi
Taluka
76.
Shri Prashant Datta
Rajadhyax
Res.: Shaligram,
Ghantamord Aquem Baixo,
Navelim
Off.: 101, 1st floor, Phase II,
Damodar Bldg., Near
Gomant Vidya Niketan,
Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2662263 (O)
2765059 (R)
B.Sc., L.L.M.
South Goa
District
77.
Shri Rajiv Mukund
Shinkre
Res.: H. No. 44, Borda,
Margao-Goa, Off.: Behind
Municipality
Post Box No. 270, Margao-
Goa Ph. No: 2732329 (R)/
/2732212(O)
B.A.,(Hons),
L.L.B.
South Goa
District
78.
Shri Shailesh
Janardhan
Kalangutkar
Res.: H. No. 508, Tithawada
Nerul Bardez, Off.: T-7, 3rd
floor, Vrindavan Chambers,
Patto, Panaji-Goa
B.Sc., L.L.B.
North Goa
District
79.
Shri Jayant
Shridhar Prabhu
Shanbhag
Res.: 135/C, Baga Dovorlim,
Navelim, Salcete-Goa.
Off.: 2nd Floor, Data Prasad
Bldg., Dioga Costa Road,
Near Popular High School,
Comba, Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2737045 (O)/
/2714808 (R)
B.A., (Hons)
L.L.B.
Judicial
Division of
Salcete Taluka
80.
Shri Bruno
Nazareth alias
Bruno Caetano
Nazare
Res.: Machevol,
Assagao, Bardez-Goa
Off.: A-107, 1st Floor,
Saldanha Business Towers,
St. Xavier’s College Road,
opp. Civil Court, Altinho
Mapusa, Bardez-Goa
Ph. No: 2253062/2250012
B.A., L.L.B.
State of Goa
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1425
1
2
3
4
5
6
81.
Shri Surexa
Pandurang Lotlecar
Res. & Off.: H .No. 52,
Abade Faria Road, Opp.
Damodar Temple, Old
Market, Margao
Ph. No: 2702675
B.A., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
82.
Shri Sanjay Suryaji
Malkarnekar
Res.: Baga Curchorem, Goa
Off.: Sanzgiri Bhavan
Curchorem-Goa
Ph. No: 26550554
B.Sc., L.L.B.
South Goa
District
83.
Shri Narhari Datta
Keni
Res. & Off.: Flat. No. 302,
IIIrd floor,
Laxmi A-2, Building,
Data Giri Co-op. Hsg.
Society,Varde Valaulikar
Road, Margao, Salcete-Goa
B.A., L.L.B.
State of Goa
84.
Shri Nanda alias
Nandkumar R. Bale
Res.: “Asro”, F-2, Asro
Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd.,
Near BPS Club, Margao
Off.: T-5, 3rd Floor,
Chandan Bldg., Erasmo
Carvalho street, Margao
B.A., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
85.
Shri Durgaram
Shankar Naik
Res.: AF/17, Kamat Arcade,
St. Inez, Panaji
Off.: 1st Floor, Vijaya Apts.,
Above Satkar Hotel,
18th June Road, Panaji
L.L.B.
North Goa
District
86.
Shri Dene Noe
Rosario
Res.: 249/A, Soareswaddo,
Maina, Siolim, Bardez-Goa
Off.: 1st Floor, Milan
Apartments, Behind Hotel
Shiv Sagar, Panaji
Ph. No.: 2270109 (R)
2425030 (O) 9822153322
(M)
B.Com., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
87.
Shri Damodar
Premanand Agni
Res.: E-161, “Laxmi”, Opp
Sangam lodge,
Mala, Panaji-Goa
Off.: Near Pharmacy E
Menezes, Joao de Crasto
Road, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2227980 (R)
/2232601 (O)/
/9822147799 (M)
B.Com., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
88.
Smt. Deepa Arun
Sinai Singbal
Res.: F-4, Gaurish
Aprtments, Khadpaband,
Ponda-Goa
Off.: Near Pharmacy E
Menezes, Joao de Castro
Road, Panaji
Ph. No.: 2227980 (R)
2232601(O) 9822147799 (M)
B.A.(Hons),
L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
89.
Shri Anand Mohan
Redkar
Res.: “Anand” Bldg.,
Dr. Antonio Colaco Road
Margao
Off.: S-4, Kurtarkar Manor,
Near Santosh Garage,
Aquem Margao
B.Com, L.L.M.
South Goa
District
1426
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
90.
Shri Madhav
Shankar Bandodkar
Res.: “INDU”, Bunglow
No. 6, Bel Air Condo, Bye
pass Road, Gogol,
Margao-Goa
Off.: G-26, Ground floor,
Phoenix Estate, Byepass
Road, Gogol,
Margao-Goa,
Ph. No.: 2759684
M.A.L.L.B.
State of Goa
91.
Mrs. Kamala Nair
alias Mavila Kamala
Kutty
Res.: D-9-C Govt. Flats,
St. Inez, Panaji-Goa
Off.: A-4, Shop No. 17,
3rd Floor, Navelkar Trade
Centre, M.G. Road,
Panaji-Goa Ph. No.:
2229021 (R) 2426332 (O)
B.A., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
92.
Shri Gluck Nanny
D’Souza
Res.: Opp. Airport Plaza,
Dabolim, Goa
Off.: Room No. 105, Hotel
Ricone, Vasco-Da-Gama
Mormugao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2555742 (R)
2511723 (O)
B.Sc.(Hons),
L.L.B.
Mormugao
Taluka
93.
Shri Ulhas
Venkatesh Shirodkar
Res.: Flat. No. 303, Khalap
Mansion, Vasco-da-Gama,
Goa
Off.: 1St Floor, Santa
Pelagia Bldg., Opp. Khalap
Mansion, Vasco-Da-Gama
Ph. No: 9890838969
BA., L.L.B.
Mormugao
Taluka
94.
Miss Kunda
Ramchandra Naik
Ganthe
Res.: 4th floor, Midaas
Touch,
Opp. Eldorado Plaza,
Rua Heliodoro, Salgado
Municipal Market
Panaji-Goa
Off.: Hotel Ashok Plaza –z
square, Samrat Ashok
Theatre Complex,
18th June Road, Panaji-Goa
B.A., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
95.
Shri Madhu Ramesh
Redkar
Res.: Shapora Dabolwaddo,
Bardez.
Off.: Off. No. 3 First Floor,
Souza Sanctuary Building,
Near Mapusa Municipal
Council, Feira Baixa,
Mapusa, Bardez-Goa.
Ph. No: 2273815/
/9763819276
B. Com., L.L.B.
.
Bardez Taluka
96.
Shri Rajendra
Ganoba Raut Dessai
Res.: Kurtarkar Modern
Homes, Co-op. Hsg. Society
Ltd., Flat No. F-1,
Bldg. No. A-2, Rawanfond,
Aquem, Baixo
Navelim, Salcete
Off.: Same as above
Ph. No.: 2765969
B.A.(Hons),
L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1427
1
2
3
4
5
6
97.
Smt. Ranjana C.
Salgaonkar
Res.: Doz, Phoenix, Plaza,
Feira Alto, Mapusa,
Bardez-Goa
Off.: BO4, Phoenix Plaza,
Feira Alto,
Mapusa, Bardez-Goa
Ph. No.: 2263066 (R)/
/2251354 (O)
B.Com, L.L.B.
State of Goa
98.
Shri Jose Fulvio Da
Piedade Colaco
Res.: Opp. Mother Care
Hospital, Borda, Margao
Off.: Office No. 8
2nd floor, Midaas Touch
Building, Opp. District &
Session Court, Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2733410
B.Com., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
99.
Shri Krishnanath
Ladu Gaonkar
Res.: Flat No. C-4, 3rd Floor,
Shivam Apts, Upper Bazar,
Ponda
Off.: S-O-7, Ponda
Commerce Centre, Ponda
Ph. No.: 2314 705 (R)
2317980 (O)
B.Com, L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
100.
Shri Kishore Laxman
Bhagat
Res.: H. No. 617, Samarth
Niwas, Ganesh Nagar,
Khandola-Marcela,
Ponda-Goa
Off.: 3rd Floor, Shabana
Chambers, Municipal
Market, H. Salgado Road,
Panaji Ph. No.: 2288013/
/9881313831
B.A. L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
101.
Shri Joaquim
Godinho
Res.: S-2, 2nd floor, Ivory
Towers,
St. Marys Colony Rd.,
Miramar, Panaji
Off.: Navelkar Trade Centre,
C/S-3, IInd floor, M.G. Road,
Opp. Azad Maidan, Panaji
B. Com., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
102.
Shri Vinayak Krishna
Narvekar
Res.: Bazarwada, Marcela.
Off.: 1st floor, Mosquitos
House,
Near Vistar Hotel,
Panaji-Goa.
Ph. No.: 2287780(R)
2431297 (O)
M.A., L.L.B.
State of Goa
103.
Smt. Tolentina
Xavier
Res: H. No. 377/A, Banda,
Telaulim, Salcete-Goa
Off.: OS2, Maria Luiza
Plaza, Comba, Margao-Goa.
B.Sc., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
104.
Mrs. Sawli Sainath
Arolkar
Res.: Flat No. 2, 2nd Floor,
Andrade Bldg., Behind
Bicholim Municipal Council
Bicholim, Goa
Off.: No. 5, Laxmi Parvati
Arcade,
Near Bicholim Municipal
Council, Bicholim.
Ph. No: 9860026790
B.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
1428
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
105.
Shri Sanjay M.
Chodankar
Res.: H. No. 427,
Battywaddo, Tamdeg,
Carmona, Salcete-Goa
Off.: 203, 2nd floor,
Damodar, Phase II, Near
Gomant Vidhya Niketan,
Margao, Salcete-Goa
Ph. No.: 2744852(R)
2702631 (O) /9890792631
B.A., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
106.
Shri Uday D.
Chodankar
Res.: Dongorwada, Dessai
Residential and
Commercial Complex,
Fatorda,
Margao-Goa
Off.: 2nd floor, Apna Bazar
Building, Margao.
Ph No:-2742282(R)/
/2737458 (O)
B.Com. (Hons),
L.L.B.
State of Goa
107.
Shri Narayan P.
Sawant
Res.: H. No.124,Vithalapur,
Sankhli-Goa
Off.: Office No. 5, 1st floor,
Vassudeva Arcade, near
Chatrapati Shivaji
Maidan, Bicholim
Ph. No.: 2364698
B.Com., L.L.B.
Bicholim
Taluka
108.
Shri Joao Emerico
Maria Agnelo
Pereira
Res.: Lacksha Jyot
Complex, Mundvel
Vasco-Da-Gama
Off.: S-6, 2nd floor,
Patto, Centre
Near KTC bus stand,
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No. 2438225/
/9822964394
M.A., L.L.B.
State of Goa
109. Smt. Kala Premanad
Dalal
Res. & Off.: H. No. 386,
Near Post Valpoi,
Sattari-Goa,
Ph. No: 2374175/2374219/
/9423810665
B.Sc. L.L.B.
Sattari Taluka
110.
Smt. Maria Ruth De
Noronha
Res. & Off.: H. No.176, Near
Holy Spirit Church, Margao
Ph. No.: 2711781
B.A.L.L.B.
State of Goa
111.
Shri Dipak Gurudas
Shet
Res.: Tonca, St. Estevam
Ilhas-Goa
Off.: C/o Deep Stationers,
Magnum Centre
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2287921 (R)
5641028 (O)
B.Com. L.L.B
Tiswadi
Taluka
112.
Shri Pranay Kamat
Res.: Flat No. 2, Joemac
Building, Pundalik Nagar,
Porvorim-Goa
Off.: AF-2, Casa
Immaculada Bldg., Near
Church & Progress High
School, Panaji-Goa.
Ph. No.: 5612124/
/9422386975
B.A., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1429
1
2
3
4
5
6
113.
Shri Somdas Krishna
Manjrekar
Res.: G-102, Goa Housing
Board Colony, Gogol,
Margao-Goa.
Off.: C/o Adv. M.S.
Bandodkar, G-26, Gr floor,
Pheonix Estate,
Bye pass road, Gogol
Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2750787
B.Com., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
114.
Shri Govind
Tukaram Dhavjekar
Res.: B-6/212, Guarden
Centre I,
Opp. Police Station
Mapusa, Bardez-Goa
Off.: 203, Commerce
Centre, Near Municipality
Mapusa,Bardez-Goa
Ph. No.: 2262565/
/9420818400
B.Sc. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
115.
Shri Vilas Anant
Naik
Res.: C-2, Rohini
Apartments, old Market,
Margao-Goa, Off.: F-5, 1st
floor, Kurtarkar Shopping
Centre, Near Hari Mandir
Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2733640 (R)
2733171 (O) 9822108929
B.A., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
116.
Shri Nagesh C.
Gaonkar
Res. & Off.: 302, Louiss
Olive Apts.,
Near Civil & Criminal
Courts, Mapusa,
Bardez-Goa
Ph. No.: 2251498
B.A., L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
117.
Shri Ravindra F.
Ayir
Res.: H. No. 222, Near
Damodar English High
School & Higher Secondary
School, Gudi Paroda,
Quepem-Goa
Off.: B-19 Wing, Ground
Floor, Osia Commercial
Arcade, Opp. SGPDA
Market Complex
Margao, Salcete-Goa
Ph. No: 2710844(O)
2860634(R)
B.A., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
118.
Shri Dominick
Benedict Nazareth
alias Benedict
Dominic Nazare
H. No. 994/1, Ambirna
Socorro, Bardez-Goa
Off.: o-5, 4th floor,
Communidade Ghor
Angod, Mapusa
Bardez-Goa
Ph. No.:2262615/2415071/
/9822151691
B.Com., B.Ed.,
L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
119.
Smt. Sangeeta G.
Deshprabhu
Res.: Ganesh Smtuti Bldg.,
Below Tar Dental Clinic,
Feira, Alta, Mapusa-Goa
Off.: same as above.
Ph. No.: 9403176239
B.A., L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
1430
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
120.
Shri Rajendra S.
Prabhudessai
Res.: Flat No. BF-5, 1st
floor, (Block-B-2) C.D.
Patanga. Co-op. Hsg.
Society Ltd., N. D. Naik
Road, Aquem,
Alto, Margao-Goa
Off.: 222, 2nd floor, Ashish
Co-op. Hsg. Society, Ltd.
Aashirwaad Bldg.,
Opp. Isidore Baptista Road,
Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2736259/2752820
B.A., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
121.
Shri Sanjay Anand
Shirodkar
Res.: H. No.13, Rua de
Saudade, Pajifond, Margao,
Salcete-Goa
Off.: S-19” A bldg., 2nd
Floor, Apna Bazar V.V.
Road, Margao, Salcete-Goa
Ph. No.: 2713755/2750853
B.Com, L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
122. Shri Rama Laxman
Mapari
Res: H. No. 241, Cudnem,
Sanquelim-Goa 403505
Off.: F-4, Vassudeva
Arcade, Opp Chatrapati
Shivaji Maidan, Bicholim
B.A., L.L.B.
Bicholim Taluka
123.
Shri. Satishkumar
ShambaShenvi
Pilgaonkar
Res.: “Datta Laxmi Niwas”
I.D. Hospital Road, Ponda
Off.: 410/411, 4th floor,
Rajdeep Galleria, Above
Axis Bank, Sadar Ponda-
Goa Ph.No: 2314434 (O)/
/2313949 /(R) 9822155647
(M)
B. Com., L.L.B.
.
Ponda Taluka
124.
Shri Nandkumar N.
Naik
Res.: Saikunj, Behind
Almeida High School,
Khadpabandh, Ponda-Goa
Off.: F-G, 1st floor,
Paihouse, Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 2318073 (R)
B.Com, L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
125.
Shri. Prashant N.
Kamat
Res.: C-11, Padmanarayan
Estate,
Near Mutt, Gogol, Margao-
Goa
Off.: Kamat Commercial
Centre, 2nd floor, Station
Road, Margao-Goa.
Ph. No.: 2759247 (R)
2737025 (O)9822128774 (M)
B.Com. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
126.
Shri Manohar
Chandru Adpaikar
Res.: H. No. W/9/13/12,
Khadpabandh, Ponda-Goa
Off.: f-6, 1st floor, Baba
Associate Bldg., opp. O/o
Mamlatdar of Ponda,
Tisk, Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 9822167033/
/2314515
B.A., L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1431
1
2
3
4
5
6
127.
Shri Ramkrishna
Govind Bale
Res: H. No.111, Old Bazar,
Margao, Salcete-Goa
Off.: s-4, 2nd Floor, Bldg. D,
Behind Collectorate Bldg.,
Margao, Salcete-Goa
Ph. No: 2736860/2736862
B.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
128.
Shri Jaiprakash
Venkatesh Naik
Res: 407/1,F/1, Vijaya
Apartments,
opp. Chodankar Nursing
Home,
Pilerne-Alto, Porvorim-Goa
Off.: 167/1, Ground floor,
31st Jan. Road, Opp. Hotel
Vinite, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2235470/
/9923623818
B.A.L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
129. Shri Harishchandra
Ladu Naik
Res.: 2020/1, Sashtiwada,
Bordem Bicholim
Off.: E-1 & 2, 1st flr.,
Vassudev Arcade Bicholim-
Goa Ph. No.: 2362604/
/6530414/9226421718
B.A. (Hons)
L.L.B.
Bicholim
Taluka
130.
Shri Rajkumar Nagba
Naik
Res.: H. No. 85, J.N.C.
Viernagar
Co-op. Hosg. Society,
Chicolna, Bogmalo, Vasco
Off.: Shop No. 54, 2nd floor,
Apna Bazar Bldg.,
Next to Civil & Criminal
Court, Vasco-da-Gama
Ph. No.: 9423819813/
/9890547717
B.Com. L.L.B.
State of Goa
131.
Shri Surajkumar
Nagba Naik
Res: H. No. 85, J.N.C.
Vieranagar
Co-op. Hsg. Society,
Chicolna Bogmalo
Off.: Shop No. 54, 2nd floor,
Apna Bazar Bldg.,
Next to Civil & Criminal
Court, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa
Ph. No.: 9423310194/
/9960366967
B.Com. L.L.B.
State of Goa
132.
Mrs. Harsha Rajiv
Naik
Res.: H. No. A/53,
Ambekhand,
Verem, Bardez
Off.: H. No. 252,
Cardozwado,
Taleigao-Goa
Ph. No. 9225902610/
/2421225
B.A., L.L.B.
State of Goa
133.
Shri Janardhan
Shivram Parshekar
Res.: H. No. 101, Vancio
Waddo,Guirim, Bardez-Goa
Off.: 5, La Brag Chambers
Above Mapusa Clinic
Mapusa
Ph. No.: 9637290191/
/2254476
B.Com. L.L.B.
.
Bardez Taluka
1432
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
134.
Shri Ramakant B.
Vernekar
(28/02/1939)
Res.: H. No. 103/3,
“SUKRUT” Grande
Vanelim, Colva,
Salcete-Goa
Off.: F/5, Champa Vihar,
Near Popular High School,
Comba, Margao-Goa
M.Sc., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
135.
Shri Ghanashyam
Vasant Poi Lotlikar
Off.: A/1, F-12, 1st floor,
Jairam Kurtarkar Complex,
Neugi Nagar, Panaji-Goa.
Ph. No.: 9371558383
B.Com, B.D.P.S.,
LLB.
Tiswadi
Taluka
136.
Shri.Marshall
Fernandes
Res.: H. No. 38, Dando
Sanguem
Off.: Cockoos Nest, Dando
Sanguem.
Ph. No.: 9623910233/
/9823693474
B.A., L.L.B.
South Goa
District
137.
Miss. Sushma L.
Chodankar
Res.: 3, Salkar Colony,
Vaddem,
Vasco-da-Gama
Off.: 4, Our lady of Coguila
Bldg., above Commercial
Tax Office, 3rd floor, F.L.
Gama Road
Vasco-Da-Gama.
Ph. No.: 9822143440
B.A., L.L.B.
Mormugao
Taluka
138.
Shri Ravindra
Purushottam
Pednekar
Res.: H. No. 13/3, 33/3, flat
B/4,1st floor, Navketan,
Hsg. Colony, St. Inez
Panaji-Goa
Off.: Rani Pramila Arcade,
2nd floor, SF-3 18th June
Road, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 9404144073/
/2432993
B.Sc., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
139.
Shri Sachin
Sadashiv Kolwalkar
Res.: A-2/4, Sapna Spendor,
near costa Hospital,
Fatorda-Goa
Off.: T-3, Laxmi Plaza, 3rd
floor, Behind Grace Church
Varde Valaulikar Road
Margao-Goa Ph. No.:
9422642729/2710628
B.Com, L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
140.
Shri Suresh
Subba Rao Aithal
Res.: “Kaveri”Alto,Aquem,
Post Box No. 66, South Goa
District, Margao-Goa
Off.: No 7, 1st floor, Chase
chambers, P.B.147,
South Goa District
Vasco-da-Gama
B.Sc., M.B.A.,
L.L.B.
Mormugao
and Salcete
Taluka
141.
Shri Vinod Pundalik
Halarnkar
Res.: H. No. 114/B,
Suprabhat, Ward No.V,
Zariwado, Dovorlim,
Salcete-Goa
Off.: Off. No.113 & 114, 1st
floor, Gracias Plaza, Behind
Loyola High School
Margao, Salcete-Goa
M.A. D.A.M,
L.L.M.
Salcete Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1433
1
2
3
4
5
6
142. Shri Virendrakumar
Pandurang Dessai
Res.: H. No. 1386/1,
Rangallim-Betul, Velim,
Salcete-Goa
Off.: T-9, 3rd floor, Fatima
Chambers, Near ICICI
Bank, Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 9822183176
B.Com. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
143.
Shri Sunil Shankar
Naik
Res.: Mercury chambers,
Flat No-G-2,Ground Floor,
Fondvem, Wadda
Raibandar-Goa
Off.: SF-4, 2nd floor,
Padmavati Towers, 18th
June Road, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 9850456465
B.A., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
144.
Shri Shahsikant V.
Nabar
Res.: “Vipul”,
H. No.: 2/104/C, Cotula,
Goletim, Saligao, Bardez
Off.: Milan Apts., 1st flr
Bh. Hotel Shiv Sagar,
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 9823219757/
/2278185 /2425030
B.A.L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
145.
Shri Kashinath Shiva
Mhalshekar
Res.: “Shivneri” H. No.381,
Mhalshewada, Parye,
Sattari, Goa
Off.: Apa Commercial
Complex
Block No-5, Valpoi Sattari
Ph. No.: 9763131392/
/2374939
B.A., L.L.B.
Sattari Taluka
146.
Shri Sayed Abbas
Res.: 304. Zarina Towers,
Magnum Plaza Nr. Ganpati
Temple, St. Inez,
Panaji-Goa
Off.: Edcon Towers, opp.
Skylark Apts, Near Dena
Bank, Panaji-Goa
B.A., (hons)
L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
147.
Smt. Rupa Babi
Kotkar alias Rupa
Amit Kumar Dublay
Res.: H. No. 277,
Kikotkarwada,
Pernem-Goa
Off.: Ground Floor, Mary
Blessings Building, Near
Civil & Criminal Court,
Pernem-Goa
Ph. No.: 9422056634/
/2201466
B.A., L.L.B.
Pernem and
Tiswadi
Taluka
148.
Shri Menino
Piedade Gomes
Res.: H. No. 121, Bhamai,
Pali-Goa.
Off.: Ponda Commerce
Centre, Ponda-Goa.
Ph. No.: 6573018
B.Com. L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
149.
Shri Vishwanath B.
Thali
Res.: H. No. 1502/33,
“Samarth Datta” Model
Hsg. Board Colony
Madel Tivim, Bardez-Goa
Off.: St. Peter building
Opp. Old Mapusa Clinic
Mapusa, Bardez-Goa.
Ph. No.: 651079
B.A. L.L.B.
Bardez and
Pernem
Taluka
1434
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
150.
Smt Maria Agnela
Honorina Araujo
Res.: Villa De- Iberetade-
Neura, Grande, Ilhas, Goa
Off.: H. No.: 805-A, Post
St. Lawrence Malwara
Agassaim
Pilar-Goa.
Ph. No: 2208412/3260093
B.Sc., L.L.B.
State of Goa
151.
Shri Krishna
Nayrayan Naik
Res.: H. No. 923/155, Opp.
Morais S.T.D, Near Village
Panchayat of Socorro
Porvorim, Bardez-Goa
Off.: Opp. Civil Court of
Pernem, Mausawada,
Pernem, Ph. No.: 2901604/
/9422451267/9421250386
B.Com. L.L.B.
North Goa
District
152.
Shri Joao Vincent
Fernandes
Res: H. No. 229,
Copelabhat, Reao,
Quepem-Goa.
Off.: Shop No. 104, 1st floor,
Zeferino Commercial
Complex. Ph. No.:
9822169547/2663837
B.A. L.L.B.
Quepem
Taluka
153.
Smt. Ujjwala Girish
Aras
Res.: H. No. 81, Aras Blg.,
Nr. Mahalaxmi Temple,
Panaji-Goa
Off.: Ghanekar Bldg., Nr.
Old Secretariat, Jose Falcao
Road, Panaji
Ph. No.: 2224019/2225363
B.A. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
154.
Smt. Lucia Fatima
Fernandes
Res. & Off.: H. No. 201/2
Mollar Corlim, Ilhas Goa
Ph. No.: 2285765
B.A. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
155.
Miss. Geeta
Manohar Payaji
Res.: Near Swami Samarth
Temple, Siolim, Bardez-Goa
Off.: same as above.
Ph. No.: 9823129536
B.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
156.
Smt. Sandra Vaze
Corriea
Res. & Off.: 55-, Newton
Apts. II, Mangor Hill,
Vasco-Da-Gama-Goa
Ph. No.: 9422063637/
/2531111
B.A. L.L.B.
Mormugao
Taluka
157.
Shri Sanjay A.
Gaonkar
Res.: AT/1, Annapurna
Apartment, opposite
Gomantak Press,
St.Inez Panaji-Goa
Off.: 1st Floor, Vikas Bldg,
Nr Pharmacy College, St.
Inez Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2223243/2424279
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
158.
Miss. Shilpa Bhikaji
Salgaonkar
Res & Off:-H.No. 852/1,
Journalist Colony, Alto
Porvorim, Bardez-Goa
Ph.No:- 2412984/
9423311843/
B.A. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
159.
Smt. Sandra
Fernandes e
D’Souza
Res.: Noronha Heritage
Apts., Dongorwaddo,
Fatorda, Goa
Ph. No.: 2743455/
9823951401
B.A. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1435
1
2
3
4
5
6
160.
Smt. Ruby
Venkatesh
Shirodkar alias
Pradnya G. Borkar
Res.: Mascarenhas wado,
Goa Velha, Tiswadi Goa.
Off.: H. No. 528,
Mascarenhas vaddo
Goa Velha,
Ph. No.: 2218147/
/9823882032
B.Sc. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
161.
Smt. Deepti D.
Kandolkar
Res.: H. No. 714/6, Near
R.N.D. workshop, Betim
Bardez-Goa
Off.: Shabana chambers,
T-3, 3rd Floor, Panaji
Municipal Market,
Panaji-Goa
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
162.
Smt. Swati Kamat
Wagh
Res.: A-3 Akbarali Karmali
Bldg. ,
Next to CBI, Altinho,
Panaji-Goa
Off.: 305, 3rd floor, Central
Towers, Near Sai Baba
Temple, Boca de Vaca,
Panjim-Goa
Ph. No.: 9822387442/
/6510228
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
163.
Shri Iftikhar Aga
Res.: 4-S-2, Rosary Apts.,
Miramar, Panaji-Goa.
Off.: 1) G-3 “Anandi”
Adwalpalkar Apts.,
Lyceum Road, Nr. High
Court of Bombay at Goa,
Altinho, Panaji-Goa
2) 1st flr., Mhamai Kamat
bldg., Old Secretariat,
Panaji Ph. No.: 9422450228
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
164.
Smt. Aruna K.
Shahapurkar @
Rutuja Chetan
Kubal
Res.: H. No. 290, Mhalpe,
Vinorda, Pernem-Goa.
Off.: Near Mahadev
Temple, Pernem Goa
Ph. No.:- 9422386965
B.A. L.L.B
Pernem
Taluka
165.
Shri Mark Anthony
Menezes
Res.: Menezes Home, 1st
floor, Opp. Tarsanzor. Near
Babu Naik House,
Vidyanagar, Aquem,
Margao-Goa
2) Pelican Building, 2nd
floor, No. 1 opp. Lohia
Maidan, Margao
Ph. No.: 9323863717/
/2724654/6555290
B.Com. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
166.
Shri Sandesh G.
Shigaonkar
Res.: H. No. M-46, Housing
Board colony, Gogol,
Margao Goa
Off.: same as above
Ph. No.: 9422640567/571554
B.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
1436
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
167.
Smt. Asha P. Rane
alias Ashwita A.
Dessai
Res.: G-10-A, Ground floor,
Ditoza Residency, Behind
SBI Bank, Cuncolim
Salcete-Goa
Off.: T-7, 2nd floor, Laxmi
Plaza Bldg, Behind Grace
Church, Margao Ph. No.:
9763133778/2763650
B.A., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
168.
Smt. Cristina
Candelina Dias
Res.: Angel Violla, Opp
Glorio Bar, South Stand
Stadium Road, Fatorda
Margao.
Off.: B-III, B wing, Osia
Commercial Arcade,
S.G.P.D.A Market Complex
Margao, Ph. No.: 6694198/
/9823387394
B.Com., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
169.
Shri Noel
Domingos Dias
Sapeco
Res.: H. No.: E 60, Segundo
Bairro, Santa Cruz, P.O.
Tiswadi-Goa
Off.: Above Ajanta Hotel,
Opp. New Patto Bridge, old
Bus stand, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2449817
B.A., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
170.
Shri Ajay G. Naik
alias Ajay G.N.
Dessai
Res.: H. No. 72-D,
Culvaddo, Cuncolim
Salcete-Goa
Off.: T-7, 2nd floor, Laxmi
Plaza Bldg., Behind Grace
Church, Margao,
Ph. No.: 2763650/
/9850477425
B.Com. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
171.
Smt. Ujwala
Tukaram
Kouthankar
Res.: Flat No. F-7 Ribandar
Residency, Co-operative
Housing Society Ltd.
Near Divar Ferry, Sao Pedro
Ribandar-Goa
Off.: Villa Olievant
Marchom Bldg., 2nd floor,
Near Geeta Bakery, Panaji-
Goa, Ph. No.: 9850651403
B.A., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
172.
Shri Suryakant
Murali Naik
Res.: Flat No. 202, 2nd
phase, Sankalp Garden,
Bicholim Goa.
Off.: 1st Floor,
Tari Building,
Bandar wada, Bicholim.
Ph.No.: 9226316179/
/6530228
B.A., L.L.B.
.
Bicholim
Taluka
173.
Smt. Roshan Suresh
Palkar
Res.: H. No.: 79, Vodlem
Bhat, Bambolim,
Tiswadi-Goa.
Off.: 2nd floor, Gurudatt
Bldg., Dr. Dada Vaidya
Road, Panaji-Goa,
Ph. No.: 2458033/
/9923379470
B.A., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1437
1
2
3
4
5
6
174.
Shri Silvano
Estibeiro
Res.: H. No. 341/2,
Copremorddi, Assolda, P.O.
Chandor, Salcete-Goa
Off.: S-17, 2nd floor, Casa
Dos Alidos Bldg., Abade
Faria Road, Behind Gomant
Vidya Niketan, Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2784065/
/9822175639
B.A., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
175.
Shri Godfrey
Norton
Res.: Silva Norton Building,
Station road, Margao-Goa
Off.: same as above
Ph. No.: 2736892/
/9422058660
B.Sc. L.L.B.
State of Goa
176.
Shri Damodar M.
Dhond
Res.: H. No. B/329, Shantai,
Plot No. 40,
Near Vista Do Rio Resort,
Volant, Alto Porvorim
Off.: SF 586, Sukerkar
Mansion, Opp. Govt.
Printing Press, M.G. Road,
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2901008/2232068/
/2422364/9823034081
B.Sc. (Hons),
L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
177.
Ms. Savita
Guiridhar Kurtarkar
Res.& Off.: H. No. 315,
Comba, Margao
Ph. No.: 2714045
B.A., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
178.
Smt. Rajashri Patil
Res.: C-@-A, PHE complex,
(PWD), Daag, Ponda-Goa,
Off.: S-10, IInd floor, Coelho
Apartments, Sadar,
Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 9404911539/ -
/9371176696/9404959895
B.A., L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
179.
Shri Udaynath
Raghuvir Bicholkar
Res.: H. No. 87, Near
Railway station, Thorlemol,
Kalay, Sanguem-Goa
Off.: Cusmane Apartments,
1st floor, Quepem-Goa
B.A. L.L.B. &
Diploma in
Computer
Programming in
Personal
Management
South Goa
District
180.
Ms. Kavita
Purushottam
Karekar
Res. & Off.: H. No. 83 A,
ward No. 6, Altinho
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 9923196904/
/2262943
B.Com., L.L.B.
State of Goa
181.
Shri Arthur Menino
Fernandes
Res.: Flat No.1, 1st floor,
Raghunath Apts., Francisco
Luis Gomes Rd.,
Vasco-Da-Gama, Goa
Off.: 17, 1st flr, Apana
Bazar, Vasco-Da-Gama-Goa
Ph. No.: 2511462/2517140
/9822140434
B.Com., L.L.B.
Mormugao
and Salcete
Taluka
182.
Shri Krupesh
Narhari Patil
Res.: H. No. 1995, Tisco
Valley, Opp. M.R.F. Factory,
Tisca-Usgaon, Ponda-Goa.
Off.: 2nd floor, Netalkar
Complex, Above Bank of
India, Ponda-Goa.
Ph. No.: 9422439471
B.Com., L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
1438
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
183.
Ms. Nishigandha N.
Shet
Res.: C-101, Dhanlaxmi
Nagar, Bhatlem, Panaji-Goa
Off.: B-4, Dhanlaxmi Nagar,
Bhatlem, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 2230713/
/99231449856/6512006
Bsc., L.L.B,
L.L.M.
Tiswadi
Taluka
184.
Mr. Mohammed
Ibrahim
Res. & Off.: “REHMAT” H.
No. 2/J/3, near Dayanand
Narvekar’s Residence,
Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa
Ph. No.: 2255003/
/9822157300
B.Com., L.L.B.
Bardez
Taluka
185.
Mrs. Sharmila T.
Patil alias Paryekar
Res.: H. No.178/135, Behind
Indian Oil Petrol Pump,
Honda Post, Pratap Nagar,
Sattari-Goa
Off.: 178/137/C, Near Indian
Oil Petrol Pump, Honda
Post, Pratap Nagar, Taluka
Sattari-Goa
Ph. No.: 9823880946
B.Sc, L.L.B.
Sattari Taluka
186.
Smt. Nilima Dipu
Gaude
Res.: H. No. 401, Kolmamol,
Bori, Ponda (Temp)
H. No. 149, Shirshire, Bori,
Ponda, Goa
Off.: A-105, 1st floor,
Block –A heritage princess
Ponda-Goa.
Ph. No.: 9822382952
B.A., L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
187. Shri Pratapsingh
Mohanrao Nimbalkar
Res.: H. No. 1876, Desai
Nagar, Sanquelim Taluka,
Bicholim-Goa 403505
Off.: 73, Gokulwadi,
Sanquelim Taluka, Bicholim
Ph. No.: 9822382952
B.A., L.L.B.
Bicholim
Taluka
188.
Ms. Anita Nitant
Khandeparkar nee
Anita Surendra
Borkar
Res.: H. No. 269,
Purshottam Niwas Kadsal,
Khandepar,
Ponda, Taluka-Goa
Off.: Shop No. 2, Ground
floor, “Taarangan”
Next to Civil & Criminal
Court, Tisk, Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 2344883/
9422439883
B.A, L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
189.
Ms. Zenia Hermina
Fernandes-e Vas
Res.: H. No. 66-B ,
Ratvaddo, Navelim,
Salcete-Goa
Off.: A-321, 3rd floor,
Reliance trade centre, Opp.
Grace Nursing Home,
Margao, Salcete-Goa.
Ph. No.: 2758500/
9923657937
B.A. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1439
1
2
3
4
5
6
190.
Mr. Prakash
Manuel Caeiro
24-04-1964
Res.: H. No.114/A, Dhadio,
Talaulim, Navelim,
Salcete-Goa
Off.: No. EF-8, 1st floor,
Pancharatna Co-op. Hsg.
Society, Margao.
Off.: No.104, 1st floor, Niana
Gracias Plaza, Near Fatima
Convent, Margao,
Salcete –Goa
Ph. No.: 2757744
B.A. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
191.
Ms. Akshata M.
Redkar
24-12-1978
Res.: H. No. 43, W.No.10,
Shanti Nagar, Khorlim,
Mapusa- Bardez-Goa.
Off.: Opp. Old S.T. Stand,
Behind Maruti Mandir,
Mapusa.
Ph. No.: 94221248133
B.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
192.
Ms. Lalana Bhaskar
Shirodkar
Res.: H. No.187/1A,
Ruzaiwaddo Duler,
Mapusa, Bardez-Goa
Off.: No. 108, Block E, First
Floor, Saldanha Business
Tower, Nr. Mapusa Court,
Mapusa
Ph. No.: 9823882976
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
193.
Ms. Deepti Dilip
Sanvordekar alias
Surekha S. Kerkar
06-11-1978
Res.: H. No. 85, Sampada
Niwas, Keri, Pawanwada,
Pernem-Goa 403524
Off.: Next to Sanjivani
Patho lab, Arambol,
Pernem Goa.
Ph. No.: 2249323/
/9921878020
B.Com. L.L.B.
Pernem
Taluka
194.
Ms. Tejaswini
Shirodkar
Res.: Sonum Township, Flat
No. 1, 1st floor, Atlantic
Mill, Sao Jose de Areal,
Nessai, Salcete-Goa
Off.: same as above
Ph. No.: 9822175138/
/8805020813
L.L.M.
Salcete Taluka
195.
Ms. Pradnya
Pradeep alias
Purushottam Bhobe
alias Pradnya
Ajinkya Salelkar
Res.: “Shivam” H. No.
644/4, Madhyegal, Kakoda,
Curchorem, Quepem-Goa.
Off.: 8, “Shriniwas”, Kapdi
Building, next to SBI,
Curchorem, Quepem-Goa
Ph. No.: 2651142/
/9822124845
B.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
1440
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
196.
Shri Bhikaji
Atmaram Gawas
Res.: H. No. 271, Near
P.W.D. Colony Keri, Sattari-
Goa 403505
Off.: C/o, Dr. G. R. Sharma,
Advocate, High Court, 210,
2nd floor, Nizari Bhavan
Panaji-Goa
New office: Shop No. 2
Mahadev Kanekar, Building
Near Valpoi police station,
Valpoi Sattari-Goa
Ph. No.: 2369283/2225555/
9420159453
B.A. L.L.B.
Sattari Taluka
197.
Smt. Abhilasha
Manguesh Dessai
Res.: H. No.: 565/A,
Karashirmoll, Agonda,
Canacona-Goa 403702.
Off.: 2/154/1, F-1, Savitri
Apartment, Chaudi,
Canacona
Ph. No.: 2647367/2647208/
/9421152151
B.A. L.L.B.
South Goa
District
198.
Shri Prashant
Vishranti
Painginkar
Res.: H. No. 799,
Mhalwada, Painguinim,
Canacona-Goa
Off.: No-14, 1st floor,
Anandi Apts., Chaudi
Canacona-Goa
Ph. No.: 2641220/
/9423813570/9673846357
B.Com. L.L.B.
Canacona
Taluka
199.
Smt.Anjali Anand
Faldessai alias
Kavyanjali Kishor
Naik Gaunkar
Res & Off.: H. No. 149,
Nagorcem, Canacona-Goa
403702
B.A. L.L.B.
6 months
Computer
diploma
Canacona
Taluka
200.
Ms. Donella Do
Rozario
Res.: UG-2, Sahyadri
Enclave, Durgabhat, Ponda
Goa 403401
Off.: 3, Varadh apartments,
Nr. Corporation Bank,
Shantinagar, Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 9422388233
B.Com. L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
201.
Smt. Prachi Bhate
alias Prachi Vad
Res. & Off.: H. No. 1358,
Housing Board Colony ,
Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa
Ph. No.: 2417637/
/9822689296
B.Sc. L.L.M.
Bardez Taluka
202.
Shri Vinoj K. Daniel
Res.: A/17/1, Goa
University, Campus,
Taleigao Plateu-Goa
Off.: 1) S-I, Bock-B, 2nd
floor, Colaco Bldg., Opp.
Vibes, Comba-Margao
2) C/o-CA, Ahmed, Sindhu
Bldg,1st flr, behind ICICI
bank, A.B. Road, Panjim
Ph. No.: 9422446363
B.Com. L.L.B.
L.L.M.
State of Goa
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1441
1
2
3
4
5
6
203.
Ms. Elsa Santana
Fernandes
Res.: H. No. 659,
Bamanbhat, Cujira, St.
Cruz, Ilhas-Goa
Off.: Adcon Apts, 2nd floor,
Near Hotel Fidalgo,
Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 9422642199
B.A. L.L.B.
State of Goa
204.
Smt. Raksha
Hemant
Phadte
Res.: Marwa Co-operative
Housing Society, F-3,1st
floor, Dhawali, Ponda-Goa
Off.: 36, 2nd floor, Ponda
Commerce Centre,
Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 7798677342
B.Sc. L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
205.
Smt. Reshma
Kanchan
Karapurkar
Res.: Flat No.G-1, Karishma
Apts., Gaulebhat, Chimbel.
Off:- C/o. Adv. Manoj H.
Govekar, T-1-13, 3rd flr.,
Satta-adhar Chambers,
Opp. PWD, Govt Quarters,
Nr. Ruchi Hotel, Patto,
Panaji.
Ph.No.: 9921719942
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
206.
Shri Vishnu
Dattaram Naik
Res.: H. No. 217, near
Rukmini Apts, St. Inez
Panaji-Goa
Off.: Chamber No. 6
Lawyers Bldg, High Court
Annexure, Altinho, Panaji.
Ph. No.: 2231954/
/9850891212
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
207.
Smt. Sonali
Siddharth Samant
Res.: Flat No.109, Bldg-3,
Kamatr Reveira,
Caranzalem-Goa-403001
Off.: 405, 4th floor, Wagle
Vision, 18th June Road,
Panaji
Ph. No.: 2425587/2465632
B.Sc. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
208.
Smt. Vimmy V.
Redkar alias Devika
alias Vimmy D.
Korgaonkar
Res. & Off.: F-2, 1st floor,
Laxmi Narayan Niwas,
Belabai, Vasco-da-Gama
403802
Ph. No.: 2530687/
/9823623248
B.A. L.L.B.
Mormugao
Taluka
209.
Ms. Rupali Govind
Panashekar
Res.: H. No. 38, Kothiwada,
Karapur, Bicholim-
Off.: S-4, 2nd floor, Fatima
Chambers Dr. A.B. Rd.,
Hotel Samrat, Panaji-Goa.
Ph. No. 2295100/2262493/
/9850450823
B.A. L.L.B.
Bicholim and
Tiswadi
Taluka
1442
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
210.
Smt. Salome Dinesh
Naik
Res.: Flat No. S-3, 2nd Flr.,
Axle Residency, Alto Torda,
Alto Porvorim
Off.: No. 211, 2nd floor, Bldg.
No. S-2, Nova Cidade Comm.
Complex, Above Indus Sea
Farers Welfare & Health
Centre, Alto Porvorim.
Ph. No.: 9850926413
B.GL.,
L.L.B.(Hons)
Bardez Taluka
211.
Shri Shankar
Mukund Phadte
Res.: H. No.109,”Shankar
Smruti”, Hanumant wada,
Ekoshi, Post, Betim,
Bardez-Goa 403501
Off.: G-9, Deepti Chambers,
Near Canara Bank,
Mapusa-Goa 403507
Ph. No.: 2295100/
/2262493/9850450823
B.A. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
212.
Shri Premanath
Anand Dessai
Res.: Flat No. S-1, 2nd floor,
Verekar Apts.,
Silvanagar, Ponda
Off:- S-3, 2n floor, Gateway
Towers, Tisk, Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 2316095/
/9823253128
B.A. L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
213.
Shri Sandeep
Baburao Raikar
Res. & Off.: Lobowaddo,
Parra
Ph. No.: 9822585404
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
214.
Shri Venefreda
Clarina Pallavil
Perpetua Barreto
Gracias
Res.: 6/75-A, Behind Priety
Chapel, Cobra waddo,
Calangute
Off.: 6/78-A/AG-1, Bh.
Preity Chapel, Cobra
waddo, Calangute
Ph.No.: 2277459/
/9822984598/9822179967
B.A. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
215.
Mr. Ashley
Anthony Gonsalves
Res.: H. No. 27/1/ Cana
Benaulim, Goa
Off.: 203, 2nd floor, Naina
Gracias Plaza, Margao
Ph. No.: 278862/
/9822152635
B.Com., L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
216.
Ms. Luiza Antao
06/02/1976
Res.: H. No. 27, Bindimoll,
Behind Municipal Council,
Quepem, Goa 403507
Off.: Shop No. SF-1,
Caserose Mag. Arcade,
Near Guardian Angel
School, Curchorem.
Ph. No.: 9049775949
B.Com. M.Com.
L.L.B.
Quepem
Taluka
217.
Shri Sandeep
Babusso Dessai
Res.: H. No. 559/2, Murida,
Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa
403703
Off.: R-6, IInd floor,
Montezinha Bldg., Above
Mayur-Kamat Hotel, Old
Market, Margao-Goa.
Ph. No.: 3226950
M.A. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1443
1
2
3
4
5
6
218.
Shri Pramod D.
Shetgaonkar
Res.: Flat No. 205, 2nd floor,
Satt Addhar Arcade,
Peddem, Mapusa,
Bardez-Goa
2) H. No. 2223, Kattewadda
Morjem,
Pernem-Goa 403512
Off.: 405, 4th floor, ATRIA
Near Court junction
Altinho-Mapusa
Goa 403507
Ph. No.: 9822663544
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
219.
Ms. Panchami
Tulsidas Naik
Res.: House No. 457/1, First
Floor, Malawada,
Kumbharjua,
Tiswadi Goa 403107.
Off.: Office No.7 Ground
floor, upstair, Tech Avenue,
Shiv Tower, Patto,
Panaji-Goa
L.L.B.(Hons),
L.L.M. P.G.D.
(HR)
State of Goa
220.
Mrs. Pratibha
Anandu Gane
Dessai
Res.: H. No. 1/A,
Karvem, Gaodongrim,
Canacona-Goa 403702
Off.: Char Rasta,
Canacona-Goa
Ph. No.: 9420760351
B.A., L.L.B.
Diploma in
Computer
applications
Canacona
Taluka
221.
Shri Ulhas Krishna
Parwar
Res.: Vadamol, Shristal
Canacona-Goa 403702
Off.: Savitri Apt., Chaudi
Canacona-Goa
Ph. No.: 9326130998
B.A., L.L.B.
Canacona and
Salcete Taluka
222.
Mrs. Ashwina
Ubaldina Valdares
Res.: H. No.527, Penha de
Franca, Malim P.O. Betim,
Bardez-Goa.403101
Off.: H. No. 435/31, Chogam
Road, Savlem, Opp. Rose
Garden School, Alto –
Pilerne, Porvorim,
Bardez-Goa 403501
Ph. No.: 9822383343/
/2413702
L.L.B.(Hons)
Bardez Taluka
223.
Mr. Alfred
Fernandes
Res.: H. No. 255, Novo
waddo, Ugvem,
Sanguem-Goa 403704
Off.: Shop No. 117, SMC
Adm. Bldg., Sanguem-Goa.
Ne Off.: 1st Floor, Shrison
Plaza Building Sanguem
Goa. 403704
Ph. No.: 8275381976/
/9049510648
M.Com. L.L.B.
South Goa
District
1444
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
224.
Mr. Ravindra
Gajanan Tilve
Res.: H. No.15, Opp.
Sanguem Court, Sanguem,
Goa. 403704
Off.: F-8, 1st floor, Nr. Big
“G” Chamundi Bldg.,
Marties Dias Road, Malbhat
Margao-Goa 403601
Ph. No.: 2732845/
/9822983562
B.Com, L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
to Sanguem &
Quepem
Taluka
225.
Ms. Jyotsna Anant
Sawaikar
Res.: Vyankatesh Sadan, H.
No. 445, Opp to Syndicate
Bank, Dhavali,
Ponda Goa 403401
Off.: Shop No.1, Ground
Floor, Ray Aurtin Plaza,
Sadar, Ponda-Goa
Ph. No.: 2314509
B.Com.,L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
226.
Ms. Audrey
Edociana Vales
Res.: 137/B, Villa Viola
Chicalim Goa 403711.
Off.: 45, Second floor, Apna
Bazar, Vasco-Da-Gama.
Off.: 2555663/2511041/
/9823092542
B.A.
(Economics)
L.L.B., L.L.M.
State of Goa
227.
Mr. Dewal
Purushottam Naik
Res.: H. No. 235/A, Nagzar
Curti, Ponda-Goa 403401
Off.: Off No. 13, Second floor,
Ponda Commerce Centre
Tisk, Ponda-Goa 403401
Ph. No.: 9921343792
B.Com, M.Com,
L.L.B.
South Goa
Distrct
228.
Ms. Preeti P.
Prabhu Agrasani
alias Preeti Vinayak
Bhat
Res.: Flat No. S-2, Krishna
Kunj, near Nagdev Temple,
Murida Fatorda Margao.
Off.: No. 309, 3rd Flr,
Reliance Magnum, opp.
K.T.C. Bus Stand , Above
Navtara Rest, Madel,
Margao
Ph. No.: 2742927/
/9423812132
B.G.L. (Hons)
L.L.B. (Hons)
State of Goa
229.
Vinay V. Naik
Res.:Bhatwada, Mallem,
Sacorda , Dharbandora,
Goa
Off.: C/o Adv. Vikas Dessai,
Tamsodo, Dharbandora
Taluka Dharbandora Goa
Ph.No.: 9422018771
B.Com. L.L.B.
Dharbandora
Taluka
230.
Ms. Melvina
Marcelina D’Laura
Fernandes
Res.: H. No. 534, Poresbhat,
Verna, Salcete-Goa 403722
Off.: H. No. 534,
Verna-Goa 403722
Ph. No.: 2782486
B.A. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
231.
Shri Utkarsh
Yeshwant Verenkar
Res.: H. No. 117, Fatorda
Margao-Goa. 403602
Off.: Near Holy Spirit High
School, Borda Margao-Goa
Ph. No.: 2740471/2705075
9422059753
B.Com. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1445
1
2
3
4
5
6
232.
Shri Somnath B.
Karpe
Res.: H. No. 255/B, Janaki
Niwas, Molocco, Merces,
P.O. St. Cruz, Ilhas
Goa 403005
Off.: No. 4, Bhanav Apts.,
5th floor, Nr. Mahalaxmi
Temple, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 9822587373/
/2447374/2222771
B.A, L.L.B.
State of Goa
233.
Mrs. Geta
Purshottam
Kantake Bhagat
Res.: Shree Damodar
Housing Co-op. Scty.,
B/6/2, Aquem, Alto
Margao-Goa
Off.: (1) No. 8, Anna Felicia
Bldg, Above Vibes Music
Store, Comba,
Margao-Goa 403601
2) Off.: No. GF-3, B-2, Block
Anusaya Apts. Opp. Multi
Purpose School, Borda,
Margao, Goa
Ph. No.: 9822583185
B.A. L.L.B. (spl)
Salcete Taluka
234.
Sweta Subhash
Naik Gaunekar
Res.: B-6 Kundaikar Nagar,
Dr. Dada Vaidya Road,
Panaji, Tiswadi Taluka
Off.: Gr. Floor, Kamdhenu
Bldg, Dr. Dada Vaidya
Road, Panaji-Goa 403001
Ph. No.: 2223438
L.L.B. (Hons)
Tiswadi
Taluka
235.
Mr. Rajendra T.
Chodankar
Res.: Rich Builders
Residency, BS-%/6 Cabesa,
St. Cruz, Ilhas-Goa, 4030054
Off.: Casa Immaculada
Bldg., 2nd floor, Jose Falcao
Road, Nr. Progress High
School, Panaji-Goa 403001
Ph. No. 2445754/2236036
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
236.
Mr. Francisc
D’Souza
Res.: Kamakshi Prasad
Bldg., Next to Department
of Tourism, IIIrd floor, Flat
No. 304, Patto,
Panaji-Goa 403001
Off.: Same as above.
Ph. No.: 9822774778
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
237.
Shri. Surendra G
Narulkar
Res.: Flat No. A-7, Block A
Feira Alta Apatments, Feira
Alta, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa
Off.: Kolwalkar’s Complex,
F-1, 1st floor, Near Cine
Alankar, Behind L.I.C.,
Bldg., Mapusa,
Bardez-Goa 403507
2) Shop No. I, Upper ground
floor, El-Capitan Centre,
opp. Caffe coffee day
Altinho, Mapusa,
Bardez-Goa
Ph. No.: 9422445546
M.A. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
1446
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
238.
Mrs. Amina Shaikh
alias Amina Phadte
Res.: H. No. 27, Ward No.
19, Behind Clecy Store,
Mala Portais,
Panaji-Goa 403001
Off.: 4th floor, Off. No. 15,
Navelkar Trade centre, opp.
Azad Maidan, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No.: 9822138396
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
239.
Shri Satish
Shrinivas Pai
Raiturkar
Res. & Off.: H. No. 163,1st
floor, Yeshwant, opp. State
Bank of Mysore, Isidoro,
Bpatista Road, Margao
Ph. No.: 9922482537
B.A.L.L.B.
Salcete
Taluka
240.
Ms. Maria Alice
Silvia Sa Misquita
Res.: H. No. 1397/C,
Nr. St.Anthony Chapel,
Dangvaddo, Benaulim,
Salcete-Goa
Off.: same as above.
Ph. No.: 2771834/
/9881715541/9822486040
B.A.L.L.B.
Salcete
Taluka
241.
Mr. Laxmikant M.
Gajinkar
Res.: Dattaguru Sadan,
Flat No. 1, Near Azad
Bhavan, Porvorim
Off.: F-2,1st floor,
Dattaguru Sadan, Near
Azad Bhavan,
Porvorim-Bardez
Ph. No.: 9503482481
B.Sc. L.L.B.
Bardez
Taluka
242. Ms. Pratima
Rajaram Khobrekar
Res.: H. No. 446,
Sawanwada, Mayem,
Bicholim Goa. 403504
Off.: C/o Diginet Off. No.
f/115, 1st Floor, Zeib
Tower, Bicholim Market,
Bicholim-Goa
Ph. No. 2387098/
/9823711006
L.L.B. (Hons)
State of Goa
243.
Ms. Pramila
Kunkolienkar
Res.: H. No. 42/B,
Medkevado, Dicarpale,
Navelim, Salcete-Goa
403707
Off.: S-23, Ground floor,
“Souza Enclave” Madel
Margao
Ph. No.: 9960706074
B.A. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
244.
Shri Pandurang P.
Banaulikar
Res.: “Saikunj” Ganeshpuri,
Mapusa, Bardez-Goa.
403507
Off.: B-206, Saldanaha
Business Tower, Near Civil
and Criminal Court
Mapusa-Goa
Ph. No.: 2475223/
/9423313888
B.A. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1447
1
2
3
4
5
6
245.
Shri Bhagwan D.
Shirodkar
Res.: H. No. MA-1/6,
Gaunswaddo, Bhilwas, Bh.
Priti International Hotel,
P.O. Mapusa
Off.: 24, Mapusa Trade
Centre, Above Royal Foods,
Opp. Sub Registrar
Building, Morod, Mapusa,
Bardez, Goa 403507
Ph. No. 9822133302
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
246.
Babuso Rama
Sawant
Res.: Flat No. TF-302, 3rd
floor, Gurukupa Building,
Opp. Madhuban Shopping
Complex, Tamdi Mati, St.
Inez, Panaji-Goa 403001
Off.: No. 15, 2nd flr,
Gurudatta Building,
Dr. Dada Vaidya Road,
Panjim-Goa
Ph. No. 9764759889
B. A. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
247.
Ms. Shubhada C.
Dessai alias Ms.
Shubhada A. Raul
Res.: H. No. 202/99,
Kailasnagar, Assonora,
Bardez
Off.: Archie Fantacy Bldg.,
Flat No. 53, 2nd floor,
Assonora, Bardez-Goa
Ph. No. 9923881353
L.L.B. (Hons)
Bardez Taluka
248.
Ms. Muktabai S.
Parab alias Anu A.
Shetgaonkar
Res. & Off.: H.No. 650,
Urmal Bagwada,
Morjim, Pernem
Ph. No. 9423318933
B.Com.L.L.B.
Pernem
Taluka
249.
Shri Mahesh Anant
Shetgaonkar
Res.: H. No. 510, Ram
Niwas, Canca Bandh,
Parra, Bardez Goa
Off.: L-2, Upper Gr. Flr,
Saldanha Business Tower,
Court Circle, Altinho,
Mapusa Bardez-Goa
Ph. No. 2255438/
/9370567466
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
250.
Ms. Reshma R.
Prabhu
Res.: H. No. 297/1,
Ravalnath Nagar, Rangado,
Corlim-Goa
Off.: C/o Bholanath Saw
Mill, Betora Road,
Ponda- Goa.
New Off. Add.: Off. No. 34,
1st floor, Ponda Commerce
Centre, Tisk,
Ponda-Goa
Ph. No. 2285092/
/9923326626.
B.Com. L.L.B.
State of Goa
1448
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
251.
Shri Vishwas
Gopinath Naik
Res.: H. No. 431/7,
Ghanemorod, Quepem,
Goa 403705
Off.: Ashok Apts., opp.
Corporation Bank,
Curchorem-Goa 403706
Ph. No. 9822130917/
/2651544
B.A. L.L.B.
Quepem
Taluka
252.
Shri Santosh G.
Naik
Res.: Flat No. 202, B (b),
Fatima Apts., Arlem, Raia,
Salcete-Goa 403720
Off.: R/o 310, 3rd floor,
Antivierza Bldg., New
Market, Margao,
Salcete-Goa
Ph. No. 2742286/
/9326160404
B.A. L.L.B.
D.I.R.P.M.
Salcete Taluka
253.
Ramnath A. S.
Kharangate
Res.: Midland Apts., 2nd
floor, opp. Fatima Convent
High School, Margao.
Off.: 1) Cruz Mansion, 2nd
floor Opp. Panchaaratha
Complex, Margao
2) H. No. 107, Paroda Post,
Quepem, Goa
Ph. No. 2869516/
/9822136600/915840009
M.Com. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
254.
Shri Purushottam
Krishna Phaldessai
Res.: H. No. 30/1, Amona,
Post Quepem
Off.: Shop No.F-8, 1st floor,
Dasha Classic Bldg, opp.
Municipal Market,
Quepem.
Ph. No. 9922542344/
/2663815
B.A. L.L.B.
South Goa
District
255.
Smt. Vandana
Sushant Naik
Res.: Kamaxi Niwas,
Mahalwada, Madkai-Goa
Off.: Mahalwada, Karanjal,
Madkai, Ponda Taluka
Ph.No.9923248371 /
2392293
M.Com. L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
256.
Shri Subhash
Krishna Kanekar
Res.: Bhavani Prasad, Plot
No. 62, Housing Board
Colony, Gogol, Margao,
Salcete
Off.: S-2, 2nd floor, D’Wing,
Nr. Café Tato, Apna Bazar,
Margao - Goa
Ph. No. 9823916502
M.A. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
257.
Shri Purushottam
Ramkrishna Karpe
Res.: Janki Niwas, H. No.
255/A, Molloco, Merces,
Ilhas-Goa 403005
Off.: Datta Prasad Bldg.,
Flat No.1, 3rd floor, M. G.
Road, Panaji - Goa
Ph. No. 2445929/
/9881245929
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1449
1
2
3
4
5
6
258. Shri Amol
Purushottam Thali
Res.: Plot No. 5, PDA
Colony, Mallar, Corlim,
Tiswadi
Off.: No. 302, 3rd floor,
Wagle Vision, 18th June
Road, Panaji-Goa 403001
Ph. No. 9822179135/
/2285497
B.Com. L.L.M.
Tiswadi
Taluka
259. Shri. Bharat F. Naik
Res.: H. No. 289, Parkebhat,
Carambolim, Tiswadi-Goa
Off.: Bhomkar Chambers
Bldg., Flat No. GF—6,
Ground floor, Mollar,
Corlim, Tiswadi
Ph. No. 2284213/
/9226319460
B.A. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
260. Shri. Manguirish U.
Kenkre
Res.: Flat No. V-C, 5th flr,
St. Andrews Residency,
A’Block V-C, opp. KTC Bus
Stand, Vasco-da-Gama
Goa 403802
Off.: FO-3, Gurukrupa
Bldg., F. L. Gomes Road,
Vasco-da-Gama Goa.
Ph. No. 2515969, 2511770
B.Com. L.L.B.
Mormugao
Taluka
261. Shri Ganpat
Pandurang
Gaonkar
Res.: H. No.18,
Kumbharhkham, Sattari
Off.: Shop No. 8, Quba
Commercial Complex,
Thane Road, Valpoi,
Sattari-Goa
Ph. No. 9423810995
B.A. L.L.B.
Sattari Taluka
262. Shri Sarvadnya D.
Patil
Res.: Flat No. X-III,
Braganza Trade Centre,
Rajwado, opp. Renanso
Hospital, Mapusa- Goa.
Off.: No. 22, Grnd. Flr,
Phoenix Plaza, Alto,
Near H. P. Gas,
Mapusa, Goa
Ph. No. 9637628070/
/9422635454
L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
263. Shri Shailendra G.
Madkaikar
Res.: H. No. 376, Simepain,
Veling Post, Mardol-Goa
Off.: F-15, 1st floor,
Kurtarkar Commercial
Arcade, Bh. Canara Bank,
Kaziwada, Ponda
Ph. No. 2343331/
/9422641807
B.A. L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
1450
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
264.
Ms. Rashmi R.
Manerkar alias
Rashmi Siddhesh
Padiyara
Res. & Off.: H. No.121,
Paroda, Quepem-Goa
Ph. No. 2662983/98501127
B.Com. L.L.B.
Quepem
Taluka
265.
Shri Gajanan K.
Korgaonkar
Res.: Flat No. XS-8, 2nd flr.,
Sunset Boulevard,
Near Mapusa Industrial
Estate, Mapusa-Goa
Off.: 315 & 316, 3rd floor,
Cosmos Centre, Morod
Mapusa-Goa
Ph. No. 2253677/2262320
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez
Taluka
266.
Shri Arjun Vaman
Gawandi
Res.: H. No. 502(1),
Mahalaxmi Niwas,
Deulwada, Tuem, Pernem
Off.: Near Mahadev
Temple, Bazarpeth,
Pernem 403512
Ph. No. 9423821307
B.A. L.L.B.
Pernem
Taluka
267.
Shri Chetan
Pundalik Shirodkar
Res. & Off.: H. No. 242,
Agapur, Ponda-Goa
Ph. No. 9822828825/
/9765182429
B.A. L.L.B.
Ponda Taluka
268.
Shri Suraj Rohidas
Naik
Res.: Type III, Block-D, Flat
No. 26, GMC Complex,
Bambolim
Off.: H. No.E-71, Bhatlem,
Panaji
Ph. No. 9860322618/
/9860322619/2458641
B.Com. L.L.B.
State of Goa
269.
Shri Dhaktu Gopi
Pal
Res.: M-1, 15,
Mahamaya Nagar Hsg.,
Board Colony, Bordem,
Bicholim-Goa. 403504
Off.: F-8,1st Floor,
Vassudev Arcade,
Nr. Shivaji Maidan,
Bicholim
Ph. No. 2361452/
/ 9422018582
M.A., L.L.M.
Bicholim
Taluka
270.
Shri Arun Anant
Naik
Res.: H. No. 98, Tapalwada
Kumbharjua, Tiswadi-Goa
403407.
Off.: 1st flr, Misquita
House, Nr. Hotel La
Capital, Panaji-Goa.
Ph. No. 9371196126/
/2431297
M.A., L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
271.
Shri Prasad Suresh
Naik
Res. & Off.: Row Villa No. 6,
Marelda Residency,
Laymati, Davorlim,
Salcete-Goa 403707
Ph. No. 2756345
B.Sc. PGDCA,
L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1451
1
2
3
4
5
6
272.
Shri Noel Parras
D’Cruz
Res.: H. No. 211,
Bogmalo Beach,
Vasco-da-Gama Goa.
Off.: 1) Shop No. 4, 1st flr,
Ave Maria Bldg.,
Margao-Goa
2) Shop No. 2, Ground flr.,
Ave Maria Bldg.,
Margao-Goa
Ph. No. 2731274
L.L.B.
State of Goa
273.
Shri Nilesh Ashok
Manerkar
Res.: G-3, Estrocio Apts.,
Near Ganesh Prasad Bldg.
Altinho, Panaji-Goa
Off.: G-6, Pinto Chambers,
Opp. Dena Bank, Menezes
Braganza Road, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No. 2220833/
/9422443434
B.Sc. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
274.
Shri Edwin Mauro
Menezes Mathew
Res.: H. No. 1054/1, Bairo-
Dias, Goa Velha, Ilhas-Goa.
Off.: C-5, 3rd floor, Sapana
Regency, above Mens
Baron Showroom,
Dr. Shirgaonkar Road,
Panaji, Goa
Ph. No. 9822383895/
/2218524
B.A.L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
275.
Ms. Sulekha S.
Kamat
Res.: Bldg. No. 5B2, Dukle
Residency, Tamdi Mati,
Taleigao-Goa 403002
Off.: 302, Durga Chambers,
Third flr, 8th June Road,
Panaji-Goa, 403001
New Off.: Shop No. 8,
Bhomkar Residency, Opp.
ICAR Research Centre,
Near Petrol Pump, Old Goa
Ph. No. 99850682477/
/2422031
B.A.L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
276.
Shri Shantaram
Pundalik Naik
Res. & Off.: H. No.1726,
Coelho wado,
Penha-da-Franca,
Bardez-Goa
P.O. Betim 403401,
Ph. No. 9049610041/
/2218524
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
277.
Shri. Vikesh
Krishna Harmalkar
Res.: H. No. 5/3, Nr. Hotel
Spice Goa, Karaswada,
Mapusa
Off.: A-503, 5th flr.,
Saldanha Business Towers,
Nr. Court Circle,
Altinho, Mapusa
Ph. No. 9923484499/
/2253538
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
1452
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
278.
Shri. Pandurang
Surya Amonkar
Res.: 102, Carvalhos Apts.,
Comba, Margao Goa
Off.: No. 110, 1st floor,
Guru Ashish Bldg., New
Market, Margao Goa
Ph. No. 2705670/
9822181296
B.A. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
279.
Shri. Raghvenda
Namdev
Kalangutkar
Res.: H. No. 165,
Carmibhat, Merces,
Tiswadi-Goa
Off.: Cabin No. 2, Z-square
Business centre, Hotel
Ashok Plaza, 18th June
Road, Panaji-Goa
Ph. No. 9822987576
B.G.L. L.L.B.
(Hons) LLM
Tiswadi
Taluka
280.
Ms. Madhumita
Avadhut Nayak
Salatry
Res.: H. No. 890/2,
“Venkatesh”, Near Holy
Family High School,
Porvorim-Bardez
Off.: C/o Adv. Avadhut V.
Nayak Salatry, Vithalwadi,
Ansabhat,Mapusa
Bardez-Goa 403507
Ph. No. 2417861(R)/
/2250068 (O)
Bachelor of law
(Hons)L.L.B.
Hons
Bardez Taluka
281. Mrs. Karuna Shriram
Bakre
Res. & Off.: H. No. 80/B,
Vithalapur, Sankhli
Goa 403504
Ph. No.: 2366541/
/9420979535
B.Com., L.L.B.
State of Goa
282.
Mrs. Darshana C.
Gauns Desai alias
Mrs. Darshana S.
Naik Dessai
Res.: H. No. 61/C,
Ratwaddo, Navelim,
Salcete -Goa
Off.: H. No. 506, Near
Borkar super stores,
Ratwaddo, Navelim,
Salcete-Goa
Ph. No.9932657896/
/ 2738051
B.A. L.L.B.
Salcete Taluka
283.
Ms. Varsha Naik
Volvoikar
Res.: 115, Savorfond,
Sancoale, Cortalim.
Off.: Shop No. 16/A, 1st
floor, Karma Express Bldg.,
Above O/o. Sub- Registrar
Vasco.
Ph. No. 9881283471
B.Com. L.L.B.
South Goa
District
284.
Shri. Vilas Soma
Goltekar
Res.: H. No. 814/1-A,
Vascar waddo, Shirgal,
Dhargal, Pernem-Goa
Off.: Ninho D’Souza,
Business Centre, Ground
floor, G-6, Alto Feira,
Mapusa, Bardez-Goa
403507
Ph. No. 9860243470
B.A. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1453
1
2
3
4
5
6
285.
Miss Dipali Zilu
Naik
Res. & Off.: Near Kasturba
Matoshri High School, Jose
Falcao Road, Panaji-Goa
403001.
Ph. No. 9823194038/
/2234038 (R)
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi and
Quepem
Taluka
286.
Shri Shridhar S.
Kamat
Res.: H. No. 250/3,
Near Railway Station
Bus Stop, Sirsaim,
Thivim, Bardez-Goa
Off.: Off. No.7, 2nd flr.,
Riturai Plaza, Keriwaddo,
Mapusa-Goa
Ph. No. 9822139060/
/2298415
B.Com. L.L.B.
Bardez Taluka
287.
Shri Linus
Emmanuel
Res.: H. No. E-333, Yasmin
Manzil, opp. St. Inez, Post
Office, Panaji-Goa
Off.: 3rd floor, Trionora
Apts., Navtara
Panaji-Goa 403001
Ph. No. 2420534/2421194/
/6643420
B.Com. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
288.
Shri Sandip alias
Babi Ramkrishna
Parab
Res. & Off.: 524, C/o Sapna
Stores, Nr Saibaba
Temple, New Vaddem,
Vasco-da-Gama
Ph. No. 9923037687/
/2510358
B.Com. L.L.B.
Mormugao
Taluka
289.
Mrs. Sudha Santosh
Lad alias Sugandha
Ramchandra Patil
Res.: 5/F/5, Shantaban Hsg.
Complex, opp. Swami
Samarth Mandir, Merces
Off.: 413, Shiv Towers,
Patto, Panaji
Ph. No. 9422065476
B.A. L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
290.
Shri Arun Anant
Wadkar
Res.: H. No. 221/1, Wadi
wada, Betki, Marcel,
Ponda Goa 403107
Off.: G/4, Ground floor,
Omkar Commercial Centre,
Behind Tivrem Orgao
Panchayat Marcel,
Ponda Goa
Ph. No. 9823680183
B.Com. L.L.B.
Ponda and
Tiswadi
Taluka
291.
Mrs. Roya Laticia
Laura Ferrao
Res.: SF4, IInd floor,
Rorigues Apts., Co. op.
Society, Behind Edmar
House, Ela Old Goa 403402
Off.: TF1, Third floor,
Rorigues Apts., Co. op.
Society, Behind Edmar
House, Ela Old Goa 403402
Ph. No. 9822103985
B.Com. L.L.B.
State of Goa
292.
Mr. Paulo Francisco
Rodrigues
R/o AF-3 & AF-5, Casa
Immaculada Building, Jose
Falcao Road, Near Panjim
Church, Panaji-Goa
L.L.B.
Tiswadi
Taluka
1454
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
Department of Personnel
–––
Order
No. 4/1/2004-PER(Part)/3106
Shri J. M. R. Noronha, Workshop Superintendent,
shall look after the charge of Principal of
Government Polytechnic, Panaji till Shri Luis
Fernandes, Principal, Government Polytechnic,
Panaji resumes duties or until further orders.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim 2nd June, 2022.
–––––—
Order
No. 22/9/2022-PER/3122
In pursuance to the Order No. 14020/02/2020-
-UTS.I dated 20-04-2022 issued by the Ministry of
Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi, the
Governor of Goa is pleased to appoint Shri Omvir
Singh, IPS (2004), as the Inspector General of Police,
Goa, with immediate effect.
Shri Omvir Singh, IPS (2004), shall also hold the
charge of Deputy Inspector General of Police in
addition to his own duties.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 6th June, 2022.
––––––
Order
No. 24/2/2016-PER/3137
On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/
/II/11/58(1)/2017/118 dated 30-05-2022, the Governor
of Goa is pleased to promote the following Officers
to the post of Joint Secretary (Law) in the Law
Department (Legal Affairs), on regular basis in the
Level 11 of Pay Matrix with immediate effect.
1.
Smt. Medhavini M. Sawaikar.
2.
Smt. Shubhangi L. Humraskar.
The Officers shall exercise the option for fixation
of pay within one month from the date of this Order
in terms of F. R. 22(I)(a)(1).
The pay of the Officers on promotion shall be
fixed as per C.C.S. (RP) Rules, 2016.
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 7th June, 2022.
–––––—
Order
No. 7/5/2022-PER/3148
Read: Order No. 46011/1/2019-IFS-I (AGMUT)
(Part-I) dated 31-08-2021.
In pursuance of Order read in preamble, issued
by Government of India, Ministry of Environment,
Forests and Climate Change, New Delhi; the
Governor of Goa is pleased to post Shri Amit
Gemawat, IFS Probationer of AGMUT:2020 batch as
Assistant Conservator of Forests (On Job Trainee) in
the office of the Deputy Conservator of Forests, North
Goa Division, Ponda with immediate effect.
Shri Amit Gemawat, IFS, Probationer of
AGMUT:2020 batch has taken charge as Probationer
in the O/o Principal Chief Conservator of Forests on
19-05-2022 (a.n.).
Shri Amit Gemawat, IFS, shall draw his salary
against the post of Leave Training Reserve w.e.f.
07-05-2022.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim 8th June, 2022.
––––––
Order
No. 7/14/2022-PER/3159
In pursuance of Order No. 14020/02/2020.UTS-I
dated 20-05-2022 issued by the Government of India,
Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi; Shri A. Asvin
Chandru, IAS (AGMUT:2019) has joined this
Administration on 26-05-2022 (b.n.).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 8th June, 2022.
————
Order
No. 6/10/2017-PER/Part/3186
On the recommendation of the Goa Services
Board, the Governor of Goa is pleased to order the
transfer and posting of the following Senior Scale
officers of Goa Civil Service, in public interest, with
immediate effect:-
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1455
Sr. No.
Name and Present posting of the Officer
Posted as
1
2
3
1.
Shri Agnelo Fernandes,
Member Secretary,
Member Secretary,
Ravindra Bhavan, Margao.
Goa State Commission for Backward Classes
2.
Smt. Sandhya Kamat,
Additional
Member Secretary,
Secretary (Housing).
Ravindra Bhavan,
Margao
3.
Shri Devidas S. Gaonkar,
Member Secretary,
Awaiting posting
Goa State Commission
for Backward Classes.
4.
Shri Vikas S. Naik Gaunekar,
Additional Secretary
Additional Secretary
(Finance).
(Health)
5.
Shri Sunil P. Masurkar,
Additional
Additional Secretary
Secretary (Health).
(Finance)
Shri Levinson J. Martins, Managing Director, Goa Solid Waste Management Corporation Ltd., shall hold
additional charge of Director, Science & Technology, in addition to his own duties.
Dr. Snehal P. Naik Goltekar shall report to Department of Personnel for further posting and shall draw
salary against the vacant post of Leave and Training Reserve.
The officers appointed on ex-cadre deputation post shall be governed by the standard terms of deputation.
The officers shall complete handing over and taking over process within three days and submit
compliance.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 10th June, 2022.
———uuu——
Department of Public Health
––
Order
No. 46/2/2006-I/PHD/849
Government is pleased to transfer the following doctor under Directorate of Health Services, with
immediate effect:
Sr. No.
Name of Doctor
Present place of posting
Posted at
1
2
3
4
1.
Dr. Angelica Siona Gomes,
Deputy Director (Medical)
Project Director, Goa State
Deputy Director (Public Health)
AIDS Control Society.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 3rd June, 2022.
1456
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
Order
No. 7/1/2001-I/PHD(Part).I/851
On the recommendation of Goa Public Services
Commission as conveyed vide letter No. COM/II/
/12/54(1)/2021/71 dated 05-05-2022, the Government
is pleased to declare satisfactory completion of
probation period of two years of Smt. Natasha N.
Shirodkar @ Vaigankar, Drugs Inspector under
Directorate of Food and Drugs Administration and
to confirm her in the post with effect from the date
of her completion of probation period.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 2nd June, 2022.
————
Notification
No. 47/5/2011-I/PHD/Part/(Vol.II)/852
Government is pleased to constitute a Committee
under the Chairmanship of Secretary (Health) to
examine all the issues concerning the Goa Clinical
Establishment (Registration & Regulation) Act, 2019
& Goa Clinical Establishment (Registration &
Regulation) Rules, 2021 as under:-
(1) Secretary (Health)
—
Chairman.
(2) Director of Health Services
—
Member.
(3) Dean, Goa Medical College
—
Member.
(4) Representative of Indian
—
Member.
Medical Association
(5) Dr. Rajnanda Desai
—
Member.
(6) Under Secretary (Health-II)
—
Member
Secretary.
The above Committee shall submit the report to
the Government within 03 months.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 2nd June, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Revenue
–––
Order
No. 35/2/2013-RD/615
In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (b)
of sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp
Act, 1899 (Act No. 2 of 1899), as in force in the State
of Goa, the Government of Goa hereby permits the
Life Insurance Corporation of India, Goa Divisional
Office, Panaji (hereinafter referred to as the “LIC
Goa”) to pay consolidated stamp duty of
Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty five lakhs only)
chargeable on sums to be insured in the insurance
policies issued by its offices in the State of Goa with
effect from 1st January, 2022 upto 31st December,
2022 in lieu of affixing stamps upon individual
insurance policies, subject to the following
conditions, namely:-
(a) In case the stamp duty chargeable on the
insurance policies issued during the above
mentioned period falls short of the stamp
duty consolidated herein and paid to the
Government, the excess consolidated stamp
duty shall be adjusted for the next calendar year of
2023.
(b) In case the stamp duty chargeable on the
insurance policies issued during the above period
exceeds the stamp duty consolidated herein and
paid to the Government, the balance amount due
towards the stamp duty shall be paid to the
Government Treasury by LIC Goa latest by the first
week of January, 2023.
(c) A detailed report of the total stamp duty
charged on the sums insured in the insurance
policies issued by the offices of the LIC Goa in the
State of Goa during the above period shall be
submitted to the Secretary (Revenue), Revenue
Department, Government of Goa on or before
31-12-2022.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Girish Sawant, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).
Porvorim, 1st June, 2022.
———
Order
No. 26/11/2015-RD/626
Read: Order No. 26/11/2015-RD/493 dated 17-05-2022.
Shri Mangesh Kholkar, ISLR, Panaji, shall hold
additional charge of the post of ISLR, Tiswadi in
addition to his duties, until further orders.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Girish G. Sawant, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).
Porvorim, 3rd June, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Science and Technology
and Waste Management
–––
Proclamation
No. 5-4-2021/S&T&WM/250
Whereas, the Government of Goa proposes to:-
a) Declare the area as specified in the schedule
hereto (hereinafter referred to as the “said area”) as
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
1457
Waste Management area/site for the purpose of
establishing facilities for waste management and
waste disposal in terms of clause (a) of sub-section
(1) of Section 36 of the Goa Waste Management Act,
2016 (Goa Act 19 of 2016) ( hereinafter referred to as
the “said Act”);
b) appoint Assistant Accounts Officer of the Goa
Waste Management Corporation (hereinafter called
as “said Officer”) for the purpose of the assessment
and recovery of taxes, as per the provisions of law as
in force in the said area in terms of Clause (b) of
sub-section (1) of Section 36 of the said Act;
c) declare that the provisions of any law relating
to local authorities providing for control and erection
of buildings, levy and collection of taxes, fees and
other dues to the local authorities which are in force
in said area shall cease to apply thereof and the local
authorities which were recovering house tax from
the occupants, of the said areas, under their
respective laws, shall be compensated by the
Government to the extent of the last financial year’s
collection of taxes, for period of five years in terms of
Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 36 of the said
Act;
d) authorize the said officer to exercise all powers
such as, control or erection of buildings, levy and
collection of taxes, fees and other dues, in respect of
the said local authorities, which are in force in the
said area. All such taxes, fees and other dues shall be
deposited with the Goa Waste Management
Corporation, immediately, by the said officer, after
such collection is done.
(hereinafter collectively called the “said
proposals”).
Now, therefore, in pursuance of sub-section (2) of
Section 36 of the said Act, the Government of Goa
hereby invites, all persons, who have any objections
to the said proposals to submit the same in writing
with reasons therefor to the Director, Department of
Science and Technology and Waste Management,
Porvorim-Goa with one month from the date of
publication of this Proclamation in the Official
Gazette.
SCHEDULE
a) Area: 1,71,312 Sq. m.
b) Village: Bainguinim.
c) Taluka: Tiswadi.
d) Survey No.: 20/1-I, 20/2-A and 20/3-A-1(Old
Survey No. 20/1(P), 20/2(P) & 20/3-A(P).
e) Boundaries:
North : Survey No. 21/2, 20/1-J, 20/1-K.
South : Village Boundary of Gouli Moula.
East : Survey No. 19/1(P).
West : Survey No. 20/3-A(P), 20/3-B(P).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dr. Levinson J. Martins, Director & ex officio Jt.
Secretary (S&T &WM).
Porvorim, 10th June, 2022.
———uuu———
Department of Town and Country Planning
–––
Order
No. 4-1-10/89/Part/2018-19/904
Ref.: 1. Offer of appointment vide Memorandum
No. 4-1-10/89/Part/2018-19/650 dated
28-04-2022.
2. Government approval obtained vide note
moved under Ref. No. 4-1-10/89/Part/
/2018-19/592 dated 20-04-2022.
On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide letter No. COM/I/5/
/50(1)/2021/41 dated 19-04-2022 and Government
approval obtained vide Note moved under Ref. No.
4-1-10/89/Part/2018-19/592 dated 20-04-2022 and
approved by Government on 26-04-2022, the
Government of Goa is pleased to appoint Ms. Nadia
Terence Fernandes to the post of Dy. Town Planner
(Group ‘A’ Gazetted) in Level-10 of the Pay Matrix
(i.e. PB-3 Rs. 15600-39100, GP-5400 pre-revised) on
temporary basis. She is posted at Town & Country
Planning Department (HQs), Panjim-Goa. Her
appointment shall be as per the terms and
conditions mentioned in the Memorandum referred
to above and her pay shall be fixed as per rules.
Ms. Nadia Terence Fernandes is directed to report
to her duties immediately.
Ms. Nadia Terence Fernandes shall be on
probation for a period of one year.
The expenditure shall be debited to the budget
head:-
2217 — Urban Development.
00 —
001 — Direction and Administration.
01 — Town & Country Planning Department
(NP).
01 — Salaries.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Puneet Kumar Goel, Chief Secretary (Town and
Country Planning).
Panaji, 08th June, 2022.
1458
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 11
16TH JUNE, 2022
Department of Urban Development
–––
Notification
No.10/840/2020-DMA/917
Whereas, the meeting of the Corporation was
convened on 30-3-2022 at 11.00 a.m. to elect the
Mayor and Dy. Mayor as per the City of Panaji
Corporation Act, 2002.
Whereas, the Mayor and the Dy. Mayor were
elected as per the City of Panaji Corporation Act,
2002 in the said meeting.
Now, therefore, in terms of Section 16 of the City
of Panaji Corporation Act, 2002, it is hereby notified
that the following Councillors as listed below shall
take the charge of Mayor and Dy. Mayor w.e.f.
30-03-2022.
1. Shri Rohit Joe Monserrate
—
Mayor.
2. Shri Sanjeev Shamsundar Naik
— Dy. Mayor.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gurudas P. Pilarnekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Urban Development).
Panaji, 8th June, 2022.
––––––
Notification
No. 10/840/2020-DMA/918
Whereas, the meeting of the Corporation was
convened on 30-3-2022 at 11.00 a.m. to elect the
Mayor and Dy. Mayor as per the City of Panaji
Corporation Act, 2002.
Whereas, the Standing Committee, Public Works
Committee, Public Health & Market Committee and
Women & Child Welfare Committee were elected
as per the City of Panaji Corporation Act, 2002 in
the said meeting.
Now, therefore, in terms of Section 16 of the City
of Panaji Corporation Act, 2002, it is hereby notified
that the following Councillors as listed below shall
take the charge of the respective Committees w.e.f.
30-3-2022.
Standing Committee
1. Shri Rohit Joe Monserrate
—
Chairman.
2. Shri Karan Y. Parekh
—
Member.
3. Shri Dennis Edward Francis
—
Member.
Jorge
4. Smt. Shayani S. Chopdekar
—
Member.
5. Shri Nelson F. Cabral
—
Member.
6. Shri Narsinvha C. Morajkar
—
Member.
Public Works Committee
1. Shri Silvestre Fernandes
—
Chairman.
2. Shri Santosh Dhananjay
—
Member.
Surlikar
3. Mrs. Sandra Maria Da Cunha
—
Member.
4. Mr. Yuvraj F. Fernandes
—
Member.
5. Shri Shubham G. Chodankar
—
Member.
6. Shri Pramay P. Mainkar
—
Member.
Public Health & Market Committee
1. Shri Bento Silvester Lorena
—
Chairman.
2. Shri Vithal D. Chopdekar
—
Member.
3. Smt. Carolina Po
—
Member.
4. Smt. Asmita Kerkar
—
Member.
5. Shri Prasad P. Amonkar
—
Member.
6. Ms. Aditi Chopdekar
—
Member.
Women & Child Welfare Committee
1. Smt. Manish Manerkar
—
Chairman.
2. Smt. Varsha H. Shetye
—
Member.
3. Smt. Diksha D. Mainkar
—
Member.
4. Smt. Pranjal P. Naik
—
Member.
5. Smt. Shubhada R. Shirgaonkar
—
Member.
6. Smt. Lorraine S. Dias
—
Member.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gurudas P. Pilarnekar, Director & ex officio Addl.
Secretary (Urban Development).
Panaji, 8th June, 2022.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 70.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—78/150—6/2022.