SERIES II No. 39

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-2023

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Civil Supplies and

Consumer Affairs

–––

Notification

No. DCS/ENF/NFSA/VCTL/2022-23/3228

Read: Notification No. DCS/ENF/NFSA/VCTL/

/17-18 dated 17th January, 2018 published

in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 42

dated 18th January, 2018.

Amendment

In the above read order, the Vigilance

Committee for the Taluka Level under (I) North

Goa, ‘(E)’ shall be substituted as below.

(E) Vigilance Committee for Satari Taluka

(i)

Joint Mamlatdar-I

— Chairperson.

and Nodal Grievance

Redressal Officer

(ii)

Shri Sayyed Sarfaraz,

—

Member.

Member of Ward No. 07

of Valpoi Municipal

Council

(iii)

Shri Prashant P. Marathe, —

Member.

Member of Ward No. 1

of Village Panchayat of

Nagargao

(iv)

Smt. Rajashree Rajendra

—

Member.

Gawas

(v)

Shri Anand Gawade

—

Member.

(vi)

Shri Nitin Shivdekar

—

Member.

This Notification shall come into force on the

date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Panaji, 29th December, 2022 (Pausa 8, 1944)

2687

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Suresh Shanbhogue, Director & ex officio

Joint Secretary (Civil Supplies and Consumer

Affairs).

Panaji, 21st December, 2022.

———uuu———

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies

–––

Order

No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TSII/QZ/2018/RCS/3481

Read: 1) Order No. 48-8-2001/TS/RCS/III/4650 dated

26-02-2018.

2) Notification No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TSII/PZ/

2017/RCS/Suppl.5306 dated 10-02-2020.

3) Letter No. BMUCCS/2020-21/034 dated

08-12-2020.

4) Order No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS II/QZ/2018/

/RCS/367 dated 04-02-2021.

5) Letter No. ARCS/QZ/Rs Nominee/2012/613

dated 29-08-2022.

6) Letter No. ARCS/QZ/Rs Nominee/2012/899

dated 09-11-2022.

Whereas, vide Order read at No. 1 above issued

by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies u/s. 86 (1)

of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (Goa

Act No. 36 of 2001) (hereafter referred to as ‘Act’),

read with Rule 116 (1) of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Rules, 2003, Adv. Surendra M. Gaonkar

having Office at GFO-2, 1st Floor, Bldg. “G”,

Angelica Arcade, Quepem, Goa 403705 was

appointed as the Registrar Nominee for deciding

the

disputes

arising

any

the

Co-operative Societies referred to him by the

Registrar of Co-operative Societies/Asst. Registrars

of Co-operative Societies.

And whereas, vide letter read at No. 3 above, the

Balli Mahal Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd.,

Balli, Quepem, Goa submitted request for

appointment of Adv. Surendra M. Gaonkar as

2688

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

dedicated Registrar’s Nominee for their Society. The

Registrar of Co-op. Societies in exercise of the

powers conferred u/s. 123(B) of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 read with

Notification read at No. 2 above appointed said

Adv. Surendra M. Gaonkar as the dedicated

Registrar’s Nominee vide Order read at No. 4 above,

thereby authorizing him to entertain and decide

all the disputes submitted to him directly by the

said Society, without referring to this office. The

initial period of authorization was for 1 year from

04-02-2021 to 03-02-2022.

And whereas, the Asst. Registrar of Co-op.

Societies, Quepem Zone, Quepem vide letter

referred read at No. 5 above has submitted the

proposal of the Balli Mahal Urban Co-operative

Credit Society Ltd., Balli, Quepem, Goa for extension

of said authorization for a further period of one

year with retrospective effect from 04-02-2022 to

03-02-2023. And whereas the proposal was found

to be deficient of some supporting documents

which were sought vide Memorandum dated

27-10-2022 and which were submitted by ARCS

Quepem Zone vide letter read at No. 6 above.

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred under Section 123B of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, I, the undersigned

Registrar of Co-operative Societies do hereby

extend the said authorization of Adv. Surendra M.

Gaonkar having Office at GFO-2, 1st Floor, Bldg.

“G”, Angelica Arcade, Quepem, Goa 403705 as

dedicated Registrar’s Nominee for the Balli Mahal

Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Balli,

Quepem, Goa for a further period of 1 year with

retrospective effect from 04-02-2022 to 03-02-2023.

All other terms and conditions mentioned in the

Orders read at Nos. 1 & 4 above shall continue to

remain in force. The Registrar reserves the right to

withdraw this Order at any stage without assigning

any reason thereof.

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-operation).

Panaji, 21st December, 2022.

————

Order

No. 3/11/Urban Credit/TS II/NZ/2019/RCS/3488

Read: 1) Order No. 48-8-2001-TS-RCS/III/311 dated

21-04-2017.

2) Circular No. 6-13-81/EST/RCS/Part V/5833

dated 06-03-2020.

3) Order No. 3-18-Urban Credit/TS-II/NZ/

/2020/RCS/1558 dated 06-09-2021.

4) Letter No. ARCS/NZ/PLN/Registrar

Nominee/2546 dated 22-11-2022.

Whereas vide Order read at Sr. No. 1 above, Adv.

Shivaji B. S. Bhangui, 2nd Floor, SF-8, Housing Board

Commercial and Residential Complex, Journalist

Colony, Alto Betim, Porvorim, Bardez, Goa was

appointed as Registrar’s Nominee under Section

86(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001

(Goa Act 36 of 2001) read with Rule 116(1) of the

Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003 and his name

is reflecting at Sr. No. 24 of the said Order.

And whereas, vide this office Order read at Sr.

No. 3 above, Adv. Shivaji B. S. Bhangui was

authorized as dedicated Nominee of the Registrar of

Co-operative Societies for Jana Utkarsh Urban

Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. [Reg. No. RES (a)-

12/NZ/Goa], Khorlim, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa to

entertain all the disputes referred to him in matters

of recovery of outstanding loan of the said Society,

without routing through this Department.

And whereas, said authorization was initially for

period of one year w.e.f. 04-08-2021 to 03-08-2022.

And whereas, vide letter dated 22-11-2022 read at

No. 4 above, the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative

Societies, North Zone, Mapusa has forwarded the

request of the Jana Utkarsh Urban Co-operative

Credit Society Ltd. for extending said authorization

further till 03-08-2023.

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

under Section 123(B) of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 read with Rule 116 of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003, I, the

undersigned Registrar of Co-operative Societies do

hereby extend the authorization of Adv. Shivaji B. S.

Bhangui, 2nd Floor, SF-8, Housing Board Commercial

and Residential Complex, Journalist Colony, Alto

Betim, Porvorim, Bardez, Goa as a dedicated RCS

Nominee for a further period of one year with

retrospective effect from 04-08-2022 to 03-08-2023

for Jana Utkarsh Urban Co-operative Credit Society

Ltd. [Reg. No. [RES(a)-2/NZ/Goa], Khorli, Mapusa,

Bardez-Goa.

When a purported dispute is referred by the

Society, the above named dedicated Nominee is

authorized to first decide under sub-section (1) of

Section 86 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act,

2001 whether the matter referred by Society involves

a dispute and pass appropriate Orders under sub-

-section (1) of Section 86 of the Act.

Only upon the Nominee satisfying that there

exists a dispute, he shall proceed to adjudicate the

same and give Award accordingly. The nominee shall

abide by the terms and conditions on which he was

originally appointed as Registrar’s nominee vide

Order read at Sr. No. 1 above.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

2689

This extension of authorization is liable to be

withdrawn at any time without assigning any reason

at the discretion of the undersigned.

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-operation).

Panaji, 22nd December, 2022.

————

Corrigendum

No. 41/4/2008/TS/RCS/3486

Read: 1) This Office circular No. 41/4/2008/TS/RCS/

/5235 dated 10-02-2020 published in the

Official Gazette, Series III No. 46 dated

13-02-2020.

2) This Office Notification No. 41/4/2008/TS/

/RCS/1522 dated 06-08-2020 published in

the Official Gazette, Series II No. 20 dated

13-08-2020.

3) Corrigendum No. 41/4/2008/TS/RCS/2012

dated 18-09-2020 published in the Official

Gazette, Series II No. 26 dated 24-09-2020.

4) Corrigendum No. 41/4/2008/TS/RCS/3687

dated 05-02-2021 published in the Official

Gazette, Series II No. 46 dated 11-02-2021.

5) Corrigendum No. 41/4/2008/TS/RCS/743

dated 25-06-2021 published in the Official

Gazette, Series II No. 15 dated 08-07-2021.

6) Corrigendum No. 41/4/2008/TS/RCS/1900

dated 30-09-2021 published in the Official

Gazette, Series II No. 29 dated 14-10-2021.

7) Corrigendum No. 41/4/2008/TS/RCS/3075

dated 31-12-2021 published in the Official

Gazette, Series II No. 42 dated 13-01-2022.

8) Corrigendum No. 41/4/2008/TS/RCS/479

dated 13-05-2022 published in the Official

Gazette, Series I No. 8 dated 26-05-2022.

9) Corrigendum No. 41/4/2008/TS/RCS/2170

dated 29-09-2022 published in the Official

Gazette, Series I No. 27 dated 06-10-2022.

In the annexure to the notification dated

06-08-2020 read at serial No. 2 above, serial No. 4(a)

shall be substituted and read as under:-

“The last date of application to avail the OTS

scheme shall be decided by the Board. However,

the same shall not be extended beyond 31st March,

2023”.

Other contents of the guidelines and

corrigendum referred above remain unchanged.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary.

Panaji, 22nd December, 2022.

———uuu———

Department of Education, Art & Culture

Directorate of Art and Culture

–––

Order

No. DAC/5/Admn/376/Prom-Lib/2022/4937

On the recommendation of the Departmental

Promotion Committee as conveyed by the Goa

Public Service Commission vide Minutes of DPC

meeting No. 81/22 (Promotion) held on 09-12-2022,

Government is pleased to promote Smt. Vidya

Jurali @ Vidyabai Shirke to the post of Librarian,

Group ‘B’ Non-Gazetted on regular basis in the Pay

Matrix Level-6 with Grade Pay Rs. 4,200/- plus

usual allowance as admissible under the rules.

The above promotion shall be effective from the

date of joining to the post. The officer shall send

joining report to the Administration Section of this

Directorate. She shall be on probation for a period

of 2 years.

Smt. Jurali may exercise an option in terms of

Provision of FR 22(I)(a)(1) if she so desired within

one month from the date of the issue of this order

for fixing her pay in the respective promotional

grade.

The expenditure towards pay & allowances shall

be debited to the Budget Head 2205–Art & Culture,

00, 105–Public Libraries, 12–District Libraries (Plan),

01–Salaries under Demand No. 43”.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Sagun R. Velip, Director (Art & Culture) &

ex officio Addl. Secretary.

Panaji, 16th December, 2022.

————

Directorate of Higher Education

–––

Notification

No. RES-DEV-INN/GSRF/26/2021/30329

In exercise of the powers conferred under

Section 8 read with Section 7(1)(a) of the Goa State

Research Foundation Act, 2022, Government is

pleased to appoint Dr. M. K. Janarthanam, Senior

Professor (Retired), Goa University as a Chairperson

of the Goa State Research Foundation for a period

of three years with effect from 01-01-2023.

2690

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Avelina D’Sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 13th December, 2022.

———uuu———

Department of Labour

––

Notification

No. 28/02/2022-LAB/Part-IV/715

The following Award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 28-11-2022 in Case No.

Ref. LC-II/C-IT/05/2019 is hereby published as

required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 20th December, 2022.

––––

IN THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble Presiding

Officer)

Case No. Ref. LC-II/C-IT/05/2019

Shri Damu Kudalkar,

H. No. 56, Ward No. 1,

Mungul Grande,

Margao-Goa,

Rep. by Adv. Anand Kundaikar,

Panaji-Goa.

…… Complainant/Party I

V/s

M/s. Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd.,

Paraise de Goa,

Alto-Porvorim-Goa.

…… Employer/Party II

Complainant/Workman represented by Adv. Shri A.

Kundaikar.

Employer/Party-II represented by Adv. Shri P.

Agarwal.

Panaji, Dated: 28-11-2022.

AWARD

1. This shall determine the complaint dated

02-01-2019 by u/s 33-A of the ID Act, 1947.

2. It is the case of the Complainant in short that he

raised a dispute pertaining to the non-extending of

the 3rd Up gradation after completion of 30 years of

service thereby depriving the monetary benefits. He

stated that the said dispute ended in failure and was

referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal,

Panaji-Goa. He stated that the Hon’ble Industrial

Tribunal was pleased to assign the dispute to the

Labour Court-II for adjudication with the consent of

both parties to the dispute. He stated that the said

dispute was registered at reference No. IT/54/16 and

Award was passed by the Labour Court on

18-06-2018.

3. He stated that during the pendency of the said

dispute for adjudication before the Labour Court-II,

the Personal Officer by Order dated 12-01-2018

revised and refixed his pay scale in violation of the

provisions of Section 33(1) (a). He stated that the

said proceedings is registered at No. 1/18 and his

pending for adjudication. He stated that he invoke a

provisions of law and filed a complaint before the

Labour Court. He stated that the said complaint is

pending for adjudication. He stated that during the

pendency of the said proceedings bearing No. 1/18,

the Employer, by Order dated 23-10-2018, refixed the

pay fixation and the pay was refixed on 30-8-2012 in

pay band of Rs. 9550/- + Rs. 2400-MACP-III. He stated

that on recommendation of pay re-fixation, Order

dated 12-1-2018 shall superseded and the order

drawn subsequently. He stated that the order was

superseded by Order dated 23-10-2018 which was

the subject matter of complaint bearing No. 1/18 and

is pending for adjudication before the Labour

Court-II. He stated that the issue which was pending

for adjudication pertaining to the Order dated

12-1-2018 was superseded which amounts to gross

abuse of process of law and violation of Section

33(1) (a) of the I.D. Act.

4. He stated that during the pendency of the

dispute bearing No. 1/18, the General Manager, by

Order dated 29-11-2018, notified that in terms of BOD

decisions taken vide Resolution No. 93/17 in the 213th

Board Meeting held on 29-12-2017 extended the

monetary benefits of 7th Central Pay Commission to

the staff/Employees of the Corporation w.e.f.

01-11-2018. However, the benefits of the Revised Pay

Commission of the Employees shown at Annexure ‘A’

cases pending before the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal wherein his name is shown at Sr. No. 16 and

17 is differed till the disputes during the 6th Pay

Commission which is pending before the various

courts are resolved/settled. He stated that the case

pending before the Labour Court bearing No. 1/18 is

pertaining to challenge the Order dt.12-01-2018

which was passed during the pendency of the

reference bearing No. 54/16 and the case bearing

No. 2/18 is application filed u/s. 33-C-(2) for

computation of the amount based on Order dt.

12-01-2018 wherein it is specifically mentioned that

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

2691

on implementation of revised pay scale he is entitled

for arrears w.e.f. 01-01-2016. He stated that the issue

pending before the Labour Court is pertaining to the

computation of the arrears and legality of the Order

dated 12-01-2018 which is passed by the Personnel

Manager. He stated that the pendency of the cases

is not pertaining to the 6th pay scale and therefore

the order passed by the General Manager is illegal.

He stated that the General Manager did not give any

personal hearing to him nor the said order was served

upon him. He stated that he was not made eligible

for the benefits of the Central Pay Commission and

therefore applied under the Right to Information Act

for the copy which was made available to him. He

stated that during the pendency of the dispute before

the Labour Court-II, the General Manager, by order

dated 29-11-2018 notified that in terms of BOD

decisions taken vide Resolution No. 93/17 in the 213th

Board Meeting held on 29-12-2017 he was made

eligible for the 7th Pay Commission Scale however,

the same was differed on spacious plea of pendency

of 6th Pay Commission. He stated that there is no

cases pending pertaining to the 6th Pay Commission

and he is made eligible for 6th Pay Commission. He

stated that three Financial Up gradation as prevalent

in the Corporation and therefore he was also eligible

for the 7th Pay Commission. He stated that the act of

the General Manager is vindictive and also abject to

the act. He stated that the General Manager is liable

for violation of the service conditions and necessary

action deem fit to be taken against him. He stated

that the General Manager has no right of whatsoever

nature to pass impugned order altering the service

conditions to his prejudice unilaterally. He stated that

however, in the instance case, during the pendency

of the proceeding before the Labour Court-II, the

General Manager acted in abuse of process of law

and is therefore liable for action for violation of

provisions of Section 33-A of the ID Act. The

Complainant therefore prayed that the complaint be

allowed and be pleased to quash and set aside order

dated 29-11-2018 whereby the eligibility of 7th

Central Pay Commission is differed and be pleased

to initiate proceedings against the General Manager

Shri Sanjay Ghate for alteration of service conditions

during the pendency of the proceeding before the

Labour Court-II.

5. The Employer resisted the claim of the Workman

by filing its reply dated 19-09-2018 at Exb.9. The

Employer, as and by way of its preliminary objections,

submitted that the complaint is liable to be dismissed

as there is no alteration of service conditions as

alleged by the complainant and that what is referred

for adjudication is not a complaint as defined u/s

33-A of the I.D. Act.

6. The Employer stated that it is a Government

Company registered under Section 617 of the

Companies Act, 1956. The Employer stated that it is

a State Transport Undertaking under the purview of

the Motor Transport Act, 1988. The Employer stated

that the dispute in reference No. IT/54/2016 was

raised by the complainant regarding the

non-extending of the benefits of 3rd upgradation

(MACP) after completion of 30 years of his service.

7. The Employer sated that the 6th Central Pay

Commission in para 6.1.15 of its report, has

recommended Modified Assured Career Progression

Scheme (MACPS). The Opponent stated that on the

recommendation of the Departmental Promotion

Committee (DPC), the Complainant including other

Workmen were extended the benefits of the modified

Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS). The

Employer stated that as per Clause No. 1 of the

MACPS Scheme, an Employee is entitled for three up

gradations during his service tenure. The Employer

stated that the Complainant has been given three

financial up gradations and was communicated the

same from time to time. The Employer stated that

they had properly made the fixation of his wages after

giving the up gradation. The Employer stated that

the Complainant issued pay fixation Order dated

12-01-2018 whereby consequent upon adoption of

Office Memorandum dated 21-11-2016 vide BOD

Revolution No. 140/16 dated 13-12-2016 the pay of

the Complainant which was fixed vide order under

reference dated 08-10-2010 revised and refixed to Rs.

6590+Rs. 1800/G.P. w.e.f. 1-1-2006 by re-designating

him as Peon (Multi Tasking Staff) in the revised pay

band of Rs. 5200-20200/+Rs. 1800 Grade Pay under

the 6th Pay Commission. The Employer stated that

the said arrears amounting to Rs. 25,824/- was paid

to the Complainant along with his salary of April,

2018. The Employer stated that the Complainant has

filed dispute against them firstly application under

Section 33-C(2) of the I.D. Act, 1947 for payment of

alleged difference in salary paid on 30-8-2012 to

31-1-2018 in pursuance to the Order dated 12-1-2018

issued to him and secondly a complaint under Section

33-A of the I.D. Act alleging violation Section 33-1 (a)

for issuance of Order dated 12-1-2018 by them. The

Employer stated that both the above said disputes

are pending before the Hon’ble Court for

adjudication. The Employer stated that it has issued

Order dt. 29-11-2018 wherein it is stated that in terms

of BOD decision taken vide Resolution No. 93/17 in

the 213th Board Meeting held on 29-12-2017 and

subsequent Government approval conveyed by the

Directorate of Transport vide Letter dated

22-11-2018, its management is pleased to extend the

monetary benefits of the 7th Central Pay Commission

2692

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

to its staff/employees w.e.f. 01-11-2018. The Employer

stated that the benefits of the Revised Pay

Commission which are pending before the various

court of law are resolved/settled. The Employer

stated that the above mentioned default benefits of

Revised Pay Commission was due to conditions

mentioned in the circular dated 27-11-2017 issued

by the Dept. of Finance, Govt. of Goa. The Employer

denied the overall case as pleaded by the

complainant and prayed for dismissal of the present

complaint filed by the complainant.

8. Thereafter, the Complainant filed his rejoinder

dated 07-10-2019 at Exb. 10. The Complainant, as and

by way of his rejoinder, submitted that the written

statement filed by the Employer is contemporary and

frivolous and the Managing Director is liable for

perjury for making false statement. He stated that

the present controversy is resolved in view of the

Judgment in Writ Petition No. 114/2019 passed by

the Hon’ble High Court wherein Ld. Advocate

General has made a statement that the aforesaid

Clause 2(IV) will not apply in the facts and

circumstances in the present case. He submitted

that he emphatically denies the contents of the

written statement.

9. Based on the pleadings filed by the respective

parties’ hereinabove, this Hon’ble Labour Court II

framed the following issues on 18-10-2019 at Exb. 11.

1. Whether the complainant proves that the action

of the Employer differing the benefits of the 7th

Central Pay Commission is illegal and unjustified?

2. Whether the Complainant proves that his service

conditions has been altered pending the dispute

before this Court?

3. Whether the Employer proves that the complaint

of the Complainant is liable to be dismissed in view

of the reasons as stated in para 2 (a) & (b) of its reply?

4. What order? What Award?

10. My answers to the aforesaid issues are as under:

(a) Issue No. 1

Does not survive.

(b) Issue No. 2

Does not survive.

In the affirmative.

(d) Issue No. 4

As per final order.

I have heard the oral arguments of Ld. Adv. Shri P.

Agarwal, appearing for the Employer. On the

contrary Ld. Adv. Shri A Kundaikar appearing for the

Workman remained absent. I have carefully perused

the entire records of the present case. I have also

carefully considered the oral arguments advanced

by the Ld. Adv. Shri P. Agarwal appearing for the

Employer respective and is of the firm opinion as

under.

REASONS

11. Issue No. 1 and 2:

Indisputably, the Workman was appointed as Peon

by the Employer. A dispute was raised by the

Complainant pertaining to the non-extending of the

3rd up gradation after completion of service thereby

depriving him the monetary benefits. The said

disputes was registered as Ref. No. IT/54/16 and

Award was passed by the Labour Court on 18-6-2018.

During the pendency of the said dispute for

adjudication before the Hon’ble Labour Court-II, the

Personal Officer by order dated 12-1-2018 revised and

refixed his pay scale in resumed violation of the

provisions of Section 33(1) (a) which is registered as

reference No. 1/18 and is pending for his adjudication.

During the pendency of the said proceeding bearing

No. 1/18, the Employer, by order dated 23-10-2018,

refixed the pay fixation and his pay was refixed on

30-8-2012 in pay band of Rs. 9550+Rs. 2400 in MACP

III.

12. During the pendency of the reference, the

Employer has issued an Order dated 29-11-2018

stating that in terms of BOD decision taken vide

Resolution No. 93/17 in the 213th Board meeting held

on 29-11-2017 and subsequent Government approval

by the Directorate of Transport vide Letter dated

22-11-2018 extended the monetary benefits of 7th

Central Pay Commission to its staff/employees w.e.f.

01-11-2018, however, the benefits of the Revised Pay

Commission of the employee shown at Annexure ‘A’

case is pending before the Labour Court/Industrial

Tribunal is differed till the dispute under the 6th Pay

Commission which are pending before the various

court of law are resolved/settled.

13.

The Complainant mean while approached

the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa, against

the Employer as well as the Government of Goa by

filing Writ Petition No. 234 of 2020. The Hon’ble High

Court allowed the said Writ Petition and held that

the Employer is directed to process the case of

petitioner for receipt of benefits of the

recommendation of the 7th Pay Commission within

two months. Accordingly, the Complainant was

given the benefits of 7th Central Pay Commission vide

its Order dated 27-10-2021. In the light of the matter

being decided by the Hon’ble High Court and

compliance by Employer to High Court directions,

the issue does not survive.

14.

It is noticed that the Employer Corporation

is a Government undertaking as defined u/s 617 of

the Companies Act, 1956. The Employer is bound by

the financial discipline applicable to a Government

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

2693

Undertaking, the Financial Authority having been

vested in the Government of Goa. The General

Manager of the Employer Corporation could not have

taken a decision relating to financial aspects without

authorization from the Board of Directors to whom

he reports. The Board of Directors could not have

taken decision till the dispute was decided by the

Hon’ble High Court. There is no alteration in the

conditions of service of the Complainant. At his

highest, the matter was deferred pending the

decision of Hon’ble High Court. The Workman having

admittedly received his benefits as on dates

applicable to his service, the issue of changing

conditions does not survive. The issue No. 1 and 2

are therefore answered as does not survive.

Issue No. 3:

15. The Employer, as and by way of its preliminary

objections, submitted that the complaint is liable to

dismissed as there is no alterations of service

conditions as alleged by the complainant and that

what is referred for adjudication is not a complaint

as defined u/s 33-A of the I.D. Act, 1947.

16. While deciding the issue No. 2 hereinabove, I

have come to the conclusion that the service

condition of the complainant has not been altered to

his prejudice. The present complaint is filed by the

complainant u/s 33-A of the I.D. Act, 1947 and it is

not a reference. Hence, it is held that the Employer

proved that the complaint of the Complainant is liable

to dismissed in view of the reasons as stated in para,

2(a) of its reply. The issue No. 3 is answered as

affirmative.

Issue No. 4:

17. By the present complaint, the Complainant

prayed for passing an award holding that the

“differing” of the 7th Central Pay Commission is

illegal and considered the Workman for the eligibility

of the 7th Pay Commission from the date of

entitlement with consequential benefit in

accordance with the 7th Pay Commission and that

this Hon’ble Court be pleased to initiate proceedings

against General Manager u/s 31 for contravention of

provision of Section 33.

18. The Hon’ble High Court of Bombay, at Goa

Bench allowed the Writ Petition No. 234 of 2020 by

its Order dated 04-10-2021 and directed the Employer

to process the case of the Petitioner/Complainant for

receipt of benefits of the recommendation of the 7th

Pay Commission within two months from today.

Accordingly, the Employer has issued an addendum

dated 27-10-2020 to the Complainant in compliance

to the order of the Hon’ble High Court. As such, the

Employer has already granted recommendations of

the 7th Central Pay Commission to the Complainant.

19.

As regards initiating proceedings against

the General Manager u/s 31 for contravention of

provisions of Section 33, the Employer has issued an

Order dated 29-11-2018 wherein in terms of Board of

Directors decision taken vide resolution No. 93/17 in

the 213th Board Meeting held on 29-12-2017 and

subsequent Government approval by the Directorate

of Transport vide letter dated 22-11-2018, the General

Manager has issued an order of deferring the benefits

of the revised pay commission to the Complainant

and others in the dispute under 6th Pay Commission

which were pending resolution before the various

court of law. The General Manager of the Employer

Corporation was not made a party by the Complainant

in any capacity. The Complaint is against the

Employer Company which is an artificial body under

the Companies Act. The Employer has acted in good

faith on the circular issued by the Department of

Finance, Government of Goa and the General

Manager is not liable for the acts done by him in

furtherance of instructions by the Board of Directors

of the Corporation.

In view of above, I pass the following order.

ORDER

1. The Complainant has already been granted the

benefits of 7th Central Pay Commission. The

subject matter of the Complaint does not

survive. The Complaint is dismissed.

2. No order as to cost.

Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar)

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

————

Notification

No. 28/02/2022-LAB/Part-IV/716

The following Award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 28-11-2022 in Case No.

Ref. LC-II/C-IT/02/2019 is hereby published as

required under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 20th December, 2022.

––––

THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

2694

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble Presiding

Officer)

Case No. Ref. LC-II/C-IT/02/2019

Shri Jesus Luis,

H.V. Driver Badge No. 4168,

Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd.,

Margao Depot.

…… Complainant/Party I

V/s

M/s. Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd.,

Paraiso de Goa,

Alto-Porvorim-Goa.

…… Employer/Party II

Complainant/Workman represented by Adv. A.

Kundaikar.

Employer/Party-II represented by Adv. P. Agarwal.

Panaji, Dated: 28-11-2022.

AWARD

1. This award shall dispose off the Complaint dated

10-12-2018 filed by the Workman u/s 33-A of the I.D.

Act, 1947.

2. It is the case of the Workman in short that he

was appointed as “Heavy Vehicle Driver” on daily

wages w.e.f. 01-04-1993. He stated that his

appointment was extended from time to time upto

30-02-1994. He stated that he was thereafter

appointed on probation for six months w.e.f.

01-04-1994 in the pay scale of Rs. 950-20-1150-EB-25-

1600.

3. He stated that he raised a dispute pertaining to

the anomaly in his pay fixation thereby depriving

him from monetary benefits w.e.f. 01-07-2007. He

stated that vide Order dated 08-01-2014, the

Government of Goa, vide its Order dated 28-01-2014

referred a dispute pertaining to the legality and

justifiability of the action of the Employer pertaining

to anomaly in his pay fixation there by depriving him

from monetary benefits w.e.f. 01-07-2007 and if not to

what relief the Workman is entitled. He stated that

pending the aforesaid reference before this Hon’ble

Labour Court-II, the management was pleased to

extend the monetary benefits of the 7th Central Pay

Commission to its employees w.e.f. 01-11-2018. He

stated that during the pendency of the said reference

bearing No. IT/03/14, the Employer was pleased to

pass an Order dated 15-07-2015 on recommendation

of the Departmental Screening Committee. He stated

that the Workman, who have completed 20 years of

service, is granted second up gradation in the pay

band of Rs. 5200-20200+2800 under the Modified

Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS). He

stated that he was made eligible for the second up

gradation and his basic pay was fixed at Rs.

10700+2800 Grade Pay w.e.f. 01-09-2014. He stated

that the purported order is not in consonance with

MACP scheme. He stated that if the Workman

continue in the same cadre without any promotion

then the Workman shall be eligible for the second up

gradation under MACPs in PB-1 in the Grade Pay of

Rs. 2800 after completion of 18 years. He stated that

in accordance with the MACPs scheme, the Workman

shall be eligible for one increment at the time of

release of the second up gradation. He stated that he

shall be also eligible for 3% increase of the total pay

in pay band and grade pay drawn before such up

gradation. He stated that he has been deprived of

the said benefits resulting therein disparity in pay

fixation. He stated that a memorandum of settlement

was signed under Section 12 (3) r/w Section 18(3)

wherein Para 7 agreed to bind themselves by revised

pay scales till such time the scales of pay and other

benefits are further revised in future in respect of

Government servants/employees of the Government.

He stated that in accordance with provisions

contained in Rule 10 of CCS (RP) Rules, 2008, there

will be uniform rate of annual increment, viz 1st July

of every year employees completing six months and

above: He stated that in the revised pay structures

as on 1st July will be eligible to be granted the

increment on 01-01-2006 in the pre-revised scale as

one time measure. He stated that thereafter, he would

get the next annual increment in the revised pay

structure as on 01-07-2006 as per Rule 10 of CCS

Rules, 2008. He stated that the said office

memorandum was adopted by Government and

therefore the same is applicable to the corporation

in view of the settlement. He stated that the 6th

Central Pay Commission recommended Modified

Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) and

dispute is not in respect of 6th Central Pay

Commission as the Workman is made eligible for 6th

Central Pay Commission by virtue of memorandum

of settlement.

4. He stated that the General Manager, Shri Sanjay

L. Ghate by Order dated 09-11-2018 “differed” the

benefits of the Revised Pay Commission of the

employees as shown under Annexure A wherein his

name is appearing and the entitlement of 7th Pay

Commission was differed till the dispute pending

before the Labour Court is resolved/settled. He stated

that the General Manager, Sanjay Ghate is liable for

the violation of the service condition and necessary

action deem fit be taken against the General

Manager. He stated that he was not given personal

hearing nor any explanation was sought in respect

of denial of extension of 7th Central Pay Commission.

He stated that the Employer also failed to seek

approval of the Labour Court-II before “differing” the

implementation of the 7th Central Pay Commission

as the adjudication was pending before the Labour

Court and therefore the action of the General

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

2695

Manager is victimisation and unfair labour practice.

He stated that the General Manager failed to

appreciate that though some disputes are pending

before the Labour Court/Labour Commissioner, the

General Manager selectively “differed” the

implementation of the eligibility to pressurize him.

He stated that the act of the General Manager is

vindictive and has no right of whatsoever nature to

pass the impugned order altering the service

condition to his prejudice in the flagrant abuse of

the process of law and during the pendency of the

proceedings before the Labour Court-II. The

complainant therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court

be pleased to pass an award holding that the

“differing” of the 7th Central Pay Commission is

illegal and consider his eligibility for the 7th Pay

Commission from the date of entitlement with

consequential benefits in accordance with 7th Pay

Commission and to initiate proceedings against the

General Manager under Section 31 for contravention

of provisions of Section 33 of the I.D. Act.

5. The Employer resisted the claim of the Workman

by filing its reply dated 19-09-2018 at Exb. 9. The

Employer, as and by way of its preliminary objections,

submitted that the complaint is liable to be dismissed

as there is no alteration of service conditions as

alleged by the Workman and that what is referred for

adjudication is not a complaint as defined u/s 33-A

of the I.D. Act.

6. The Employer stated that it is a Government

Company registered under Section 617 of the

Companies Act, 1956. The Employer stated that it is

a State Transport Undertaking under the purview of

the Motor Transport Act, 1988. The Employer stated

that the dispute in Reference No. IT/03/2014 was

raised by the complainant regarding the legality and

justifiability pertaining to its demand pertaining to

anomaly in pay fixation of the complainant thereby

depriving from monetary benefits w.e.f. 01-07-2007.

The Employer stated that the said dispute is pending

for adjudication before this Hon’ble Court. The

Employer stated that the 6th Central Pay Commission

in para 6.1.15 of its report, has recommended Modified

Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS). The

Employer stated that on the recommendation of the

Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC), the

complainant including other Workmen were

extended the benefits of the Modified Assured Career

Progression Scheme (MACPS).

7. The Employer stated that they have issued an

Order dated 29-11-2018 wherein in terms of BOD

decision taken vide Resolution No. 93/17 in the 213th

Board Meeting held on 29-12-2017 and subsequent

Government approval conveyed by the Directorate

of Transport vide letter dated 22-11-2018, its

management is pleased to extend the monetary

benefits of the 7th Central Pay Commission to its staff/

/employees w.e.f. 01-11-2018. The Employer stated

that the benefits of the Revised Pay Commission of

the employees as shown under Annexure “A” and

“B” have been deferred till the dispute under the

6th Pay Commission which are pending before the

various court of law are resolved/settled. The

Employer stated that the above mentioned deferred

benefits of Revised Pay Commission was due to

condition mentioned in the circular dated

27-11-2017 issued by the Department of Finance,

Government of Goa. The Employer denied the overall

case as pleaded by the complainant and prayed for

dismissal of the present complaint filed by the

complainant.

8. Thereafter, the complainant filed his rejoinder

dated 07-10-2019 at exb. 10. The complainant, as and

by way of his rejoinder, submitted that the written

statement filed by the Employer is “contemporary”

and frivolous and the Managing Director is liable for

perjury for making false statement. He stated that

the Labour Court has passed an award in the pending

reference and therefore the dispute is resolved by

the Labour Court-II. He stated that since the dispute

is resolved that he be released the 7th Pay

Commission. He submitted that the controversy is

also resolved in view of the Judgment in Writ Petition

No. 114/2019 passed by the Hon’ble High Court. The

Complainant denied the contents of the written

statement.

9. Based on the pleadings filed by the respective

parties’ hereinabove, this Hon’ble Labour Court-II

framed the following issues on 18-10-2019 at Exb. 11.

1. Whether the Complainant proves that the action

of the Employer differing the benefits of the

7th Central Pay Commission is illegal and

unjustified?

2. Whether the Complainant proves that his service

conditions has been altered pending the

dispute before this court?

3.Whether the Employer proves that the

complaint of the Complainant is liable to be

dismissed in view of the reasons as stated in

para 2 (a) & (b) of its reply?

4. What order? What Award?

10.

My answers to the aforesaid issues are as

under:

(a) Issue No. 1

Does not survive.

(b) Issue No. 2

Does not survive.

In the affirmative.

(d) Issue No. 4

As per final order.

2696

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

11. I have heard the oral arguments of Ld. Adv.

Shri P. Agarwal, appearing for the Employer. On the

contrary Ld. Adv. Shri A. Kundaikar appearing for

the Workman remained absent. I have carefully

perused the entire records of the present case. I have

also carefully considered the oral arguments

advanced by the Ld. Adv. Shri P. Agarwal appearing

for the Employer and is of the firm opinion as under.

REASONS

12. Issue No. 1 and 2:

Indisputably, the Workman was appointed as

‘Heavy Vehicle Driver’. The earlier reference was

referred for adjudication to the Labour Court-II which

is registered as case No. REF/LC-II/03/2014. The said

reference pertaining to the legality and justifiability

of the demand of the Employer pertaining to anomaly

in pay fixation of the complainant thereby depriving

him from monetary benefits w.e.f. 01-07-2007 and if

not what relief the Workman is entitled to. During

the pendency of the aforesaid reference, the

Employer has issued an Order dated 29-11-2018

stating that in terms of Board of Directors decision

taken vide Resolution No. 93/17 in the 213th Board

Meetings held on 29-12-2017 and subsequent

Government approval by the Directorate of Transport

vide letter dated 22-11-2018, the Employer is pleased

to extend the benefits of the 7th Central Pay

Commission to its staff/Employees w.e.f. 01-11-2018.

The benefits of the Revised Pay Commission of the

Employees as shown as under Annexure A & B have

been deferred till the disputes under the 6th Pay

Commission which are pending before the various

court of law are resolved/re-settled.

13. The Complainant mean while approached the

Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa, against the

Employer as well as the Government of Goa by filing

Writ Petition No. 234 of 2020. The Hon’ble High Court

allowed the said Writ Petition and held that the

Employer is directed to process the case of petitioner

for receipt of benefits of the recommendation of the

7th Pay Commission within two months.

Accordingly, the Complainant was given the benefits

of 7th Central Pay Commission vide its Order dated

27-10-2021. In the light of the matter being decided

by the Hon’ble High Court and compliance by

Employer to High Court directions, the issue does

not survive.

14. It is noticed that the Employer Corporation is a

Government undertaking as defined u/s 617 of the

Companies Act, 1956. The Employer is bound by the

financial discipline applicable to a Government

Undertaking, the Financial Authority having been

vested in the Government of Goa. The General

Manager of the Employer Corporation could not have

taken a decision relating to financial aspects without

authorization from the Board of Directors to whom

he reports. The Board of Directors could not have

taken decision till the dispute was decided by the

Hon’ble High Court. There is no alteration in the

conditions of service of the Complainant. At his

highest, the matter was deferred pending the

decision of Hon’ble High Court. The Workman having

admittedly received his benefits as on dates

applicable to his service, the issue of changing

conditions does not survive. The issue No. 1 and 2

are therefore answered as does not survive.

Issue No. 3:

15. The Employer, as and by way of its preliminary

objections, submitted that the complaint is liable to

dismissed as there is no alterations of service

conditions as alleged by the complainant and that

what is referred for adjudication is not a complaint

as defined u/s 33-A of the I.D. Act, 1947.

16. While deciding the issue No. 2 hereinabove, I

have come to the conclusion that the service

condition of the complainant has not been altered to

his prejudice. The present complaint is filed by the

complainant u/s 33-A of the I.D. Act, 1947 and it is

not a reference. Hence, it is held that the Employer

proved that the complaint of the Complainant is liable

to dismissed in view of the reasons as stated in para

2(a) of its reply. The issue No. 3 is answered as

affirmative.

Issue No. 4:

17. By the present complaint, the Complainant

prayed for passing an award holding that the

“differing” of the 7th Central Pay Commission is

illegal and considered the Workman for the eligibility

of the 7th Pay Commission from the date of

entitlement with consequential benefit in

accordance with the 7th Pay Commission and that

this Hon’ble Court be pleased to initiate proceedings

against General Manager u/s 31 for contravention of

provision of Section 33.

18.

The Hon’ble High Court of Bombay, at Goa

Bench allowed the Writ Petition No. 234 of 2020 by

its Order dated 04-10-2021 and directed the Employer

to process the case of the Petitioner/Complainant for

receipt of benefits of the recommendation of the 7th

Pay Commission within 2 months from today.

Accordingly, the Employer has issued an addendum

dt. 27-10-2020 to the Complainant in compliance to

the order of the Hon’ble High Court. As such, the

Employer has already granted recommendations of

the 7th Central Pay Commission to the complainant.

19.

As regards initiating proceedings against

the General Manager u/s 31 for contravention of

provisions of Section 33, the Employer has issued an

Order dated 29-11-2018 wherein in terms of Board of

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

2697

Directors decision taken vide resolution No. 93/17 in

the 213th Board Meeting held on 29-12-2017 and

subsequent Government approval by the Directorate

of Transport vide letter dated 22-11-2018, the General

Manager has issued an order of deferring the benefits

of the revised pay commission to the Complainant

and others in the dispute under 6th Pay Commission

which were pending resolution before the various

court of law. The General Manager of the Employer

Corporation was not made a party by the Complainant

in any capacity. The Complaint is against the

Employer Company which is an artificial body under

the Companies Act. The Employer has acted in good

faith on the circular issued by the Department of

Finance, Government of Goa and the General

Manager is not liable for the acts done by him in

furtherance of instructions by the Board of Directors

of the Corporation.

In view of above, I pass the following order.

ORDER

1. The Complainant has already been granted the

benefits of 7th Central Pay Commission. The

subject matter of the Complaint does not

survive. The Complaint is dismissed.

2. No order as to cost.

Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar)

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

Department of Personnel

–––

Order

No. 6/9/2022-PER/5070

On the recommendation of the Goa Services

Board, the Governor of Goa is pleased to order the

transfer and posting of the following Senior Scale

Officer of Goa Civil Service, in public interest, with

immediate effect:-

Sr.

Name and present

Posted as

No.

posting of the

officer

1. Dr. Geeta Nagvenkar,

Director, Environment

Director (Admn.),

with additional

PWD with additional

charge of Member

charge of Executive

Secretary, Goa Coastal

Director, Sports

Zone Management

Authority of Goa

Authority and

Director (Admn.), PWD.

Shri Dashrath Redkar shall report to Department

of Personnel for further posting and he shall draw

salary against the vacant post of Leave and Training

Reserve.

The officers shall complete handing over and

taking over process with immediate effect and

submit compliance.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 15th December, 2022.

————

Order

No. 7/5/2015-PER/6024

In supersession of all Orders issued in this regard, the following shall be the standing arrangement

of Link Secretary for disposal of work relating to the Departments under their charge during their

absence due to tour/training/leave/transfer unless specific orders are otherwise issued.

Sr.

Name & designation

1st Link Secretary

2nd Link Secretary

No.

1. Dr. Puneet Kumar Goel,

Dr. V. Candavelou, IAS (1997),

Shri Sanjeev Ahuja, IAS (2008),

IAS (1991),

Principal Secretary (Finance)

Secretary (Tourism).

Chief Secretary

1. Vigilance/Chief

Vigilance Officer

2. Home

3. Personnel & ARD

4. PWD

5. Civil Aviation

6. Mines and Geology

2698

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

7. Forest

8. Town & Country Planning

Dr. V. Candavelou, IAS (1997),

Shri Sanjeev Ahuja, IAS (2008),

Shri Ramesh Verma, IAS (2009),

Principal Secretary (Finance)

Secretary (Tourism)

Secretary (Elections).

1. Finance

2. Industries, Trade & Commerce

3. Handicrafts, Textile and Coir

4. Ports

5. River Navigation

6. Planning & Statistics

7. DG, GIPARD

Shri Sanjeev Ahuja, IAS (2008),

Shri Ramesh Verma, IAS (2009),

Shri Sandip Jacques, IAS (2009),

Secretary (Tourism)

Secretary (Elections)

Secretary (GA).

1. Tourism

2. Information Technology

3. CEO, Goa CSR Authority

4. PPP

Shri Ramesh Verma, IAS (2009),

Shri Sandip Jacques,

Shri Subhash Chandra, IAS (2009),

Secretary (Elections)

IAS (2009),

Secretary (Water Resources).

1. Secretary (Elections)

Secretary (GA)

2. Chief Electoral Officer

3. Urban Development

4. Science, Technology and

Waste Management

5. Nodal Officer SBM (U)

(except Sr. No. 1 & 2)

and PMAY (U)

5. Shri Sandip Jacques,

Shri Subhash Chandra,

Shri Sarpreet Singh Gill,

IAS (2009),

Secretary (GA)

Secretary (Water Resources)

Secretary (Education).

1. General Administration

2. Law & Judiciary and

Legislative Affairs

3. Labour & Employment

4. Revenue

5. Co-operation

Shri Subhash Chandra,

Shri Sarpreet Singh Gill,

Shri Menino D’Souza, IAS (2011),

IAS (2009),

Secretary (Panchayats).

Secretary (Water Resources)

Secretary (Education)

1. Water Resources

2. Social Welfare

3. Tribal Welfare

4. Provedoria

5. Information & Publicity

6. Transport

7. Legal Metrology

Shri Sarpreet Singh Gill,

Shri Menino D’Souza,

Shri Arun Kumar Mishra,

IAS (2009),

IAS (2011),

IAS (2012),

Secretary (Education)

Secretary (Panchayats)

Secretary (Environment).

1. Education

2. Skill Development &

Entrepreneurship

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

2699

3. Official Languages

4. Public Grievances

5. Commissioner, State Taxes

Shri Menino D’Souza,

Shri Arun Kumar Mishra,

Shri Ajit Roy, IAS (2013),

IAS (2011),

IAS (2012),

Secretary to Chief Minister.

Secretary (Panchayats)

Secretary (Environment)

1. Panchayats

2. Rural Development

3. Archaeology

4. Archives

5. Nodal Officer SBM (R) &

PMAY (R)

6. Art & Culture

7. Museum

8. Goa Gazetteer

Shri Arun Kumar Mishra,

Shri Ajit Roy, IAS (2013),

Shri Sanjit Rodrigues, IAS (2013),

IAS (2012),

Secretary to Chief Minister

Secretary (Housing).

Secretary (Environment)

1. Environment

2. Health

3. Women & Child Development

4. Agriculture

5. Animal Husbandry &

Veterinary Services

6. Fisheries

10. Shri Ajit Roy, IAS (2013),

Shri Arun Kumar Mishra,

Shri Sanjit Rodrigues, IAS (2013),

Secretary to Chief Minister

IAS (2012),

Secretary (Housing).

1. Secretary to Chief Minister

Secretary (Environment)

2. Sports & Youth Affairs

3. Power

4. New & Renewable Energy

(except Sr. No. 1)

11. Shri Sanjit Rodrigues,

Shri Menino D’Souza,

Shri Sandip Jacques, IAS (2009),

IAS (2013),

IAS (2011),

Secretary (GA).

Secretary (Housing)

Secretary (Panchayats)

1. Housing

2. Printing & Stationery

3. Civil Supplies

4. Factories & Boilers

5. Protocol

6. Secretary, Goa State

Commission for Protection

for Child Rights

7. Special Secretary (Home,

Personnel)

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 20th December, 2022.

2700

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

Department of Public Health

–––

Order

No. 44/28/2017-I/PHD/1622

Government is pleased to transfer the below

mentioned doctor under Directorate of Health

Services, with immediate effect.

Sr.

Name of

Present place

Transferred

No.

the doctor

of posting

and posted at

1. Dr. Siddharth

North Goa

Community

Naik,

District

Health

Medical

Hospital,

Centre,

Officer

Mapusa

Canacona.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 22nd December, 2022.

————

Order

No. 4/13/2020-II/PHD/2147

Read: Memorandum No. 4/13/2020-II/PHD/943

dated 23-06-2022.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/I/5/30(3)/2019/93 dated 16-05-2022,

Government is pleased to appoint Dr. Akshay

Pratap Anchan to the post of Assistant Professor

in the Department of Plastic Surgery (Group “A”

Gazetted) under the Goa Medical College,

Bambolim-Goa on temporary basis in the Level-11

of Pay Matrix of 7th Pay Commission [Pay Band-3

Rs. 15600-39100 + Grade Pay of Rs. 6600/-

(pre-revised)] with immediate effect and as per the

terms and conditions contained in the

Memorandum cited above.

Dr. Akshay Pratap Anchan shall be on probation

for a period of two years.

Dr. Akshay Pratap Anchan has been declared

medically fit by the Medical Board and his

character and antecedents has been verified by Sr.

P. I., ‘G’ Branch, SB I, CID for Dy. Commissioner of

Police, Special Branch-I, C. I. D., Mumbai and there

is nothing adverse on intelligence records against

the said Doctor.

The appointment is made against the vacancy

occurred due to creation of additional posts of

Assistant Professor in Goa Medical College vide

Order No. 4/1/2018-II/PHD/1195 dated 14-08-2019

and allotted 01 post of Assistant Professor in the

Department of Plastic Surgery, Goa Medical College

vide Order No. 4/1/2018-II/PHD/Part-I/3383 dated

23-10-2020.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Gautami S. Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-I)/

/Link.

Porvorim, 20th December, 2022.

————

Corrigendum

No. 25/12/2019-I/PHD/1621

Read: Order No. 25/12/2019-I/PHD/1211 dated

12-08-2022.

In the Government Order dated 12-08-2022

referred above, the date of joining in column

No. 3 of annexure in respect of Dr. Baptisto

Mascarenhas, Medical Officer shall be corrected to

read as “20-09-2000” instead of “21-09-2000”.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 22nd December, 2022.

————

Directorate of Food & Drugs Administration

–––

Goa State Pharmacy Council

Form A

(See Rule 5)

Notice of Election

Election of a member or members of the Goa

State Pharmacy Council

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the provision

of Rule 5 of the Rules and Regulations of the Goa

State Pharmacy Council that the election of 6 (six)

members of the Goa State Pharmacy Council to

serve for the period expiring 1st April, 2028 is to

be held.

Nominations of eligible persons to fill the

vacancies are invited.

Each candidate must be nominated by a separate

nomination paper, but any person entitled to vote

at the election may sign the nomination paper of

any number of candidates not exceeding the

number to be elected and for which he/she is

entitled to vote.

Every nomination paper must be in the Form B

giving all the details required therein.

The nomination paper must reach the

undersigned not later than the 13th day of January,

2023 by 13:00 hours for which forms of nomination

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

2701

papers may be obtained by application from the

Office of Returning Officer, c/o Directorate of Food

and Drugs Administration, Bambolim-Goa on

payment of Rs. 200/- (Rupees Two hundred only).

Nomination papers in respect of which provisions

of Part I of the Rules have not been complied with

or which are not received by the Returning Officer

by the aforesaid date, will be invalid.

Programme of the Election:

1. Last date for nomination: 13th January, 2023.

2. Scrutiny of nomination papers: 16th-17th

January, 2023.

3. Date of withdrawal: 18th January, 2023.

4. Date of sending of voting papers: 20th

January, 2023.

5. Last date for receiving voting papers: 24th

February, 2023.

6. Date for counting of votes: 28th February,

2023.

Sd/-

(Jyoti J. Sardesai)

Returning Officer/Director

(Food & Drugs Administration).

———uuu———

Department of Revenue

–––

Order

No. 26/07/02/2020-RD-I/1527

On the recommendation of the Departmental

Promotion Committee conveyed by the Goa Public

Service Commission, vide it’s letter No. COM/II/

/11/29(1)/2017/364 dated 12-12-2022, Government

is pleased to promote Smt. Anisha A. Matondkar,

Inspector of Settlement & Land Records in the

Directorate of Settlement and Land Records to the

post of Superintendent of Survey and Land Records

(Group ‘B’ Gazetted) on regular basis in the Pay

Scale of Rs. 9,300-34,800 + Grade Pay of Rs. 4,600/-

(Level 7 of the Matrix) with immediate effect and

post her as SSLR, North.

She shall also exercise her option for pay

fixation within a period of one month from the

date of issue of this order, in terms of F.R. 22(I)(a)(1).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shubham Naik, Under Secretary (Rev.-I).

Porvorim, 20th December, 2022.

Notification

No. 28/4/3/2022/RD-I/1545

In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (a)

of Section 35 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968

(Act No. 9 of 1969) (hereinafter referred to as the

“said Code”), the Government of Goa, being of the

opinion that it is necessary in the public interest

for the purpose of carrying out the objects of the

said Code, hereby exempts the land admeasuring

an area of 1,064 sq. mts., surveyed under Survey No.

170, sub-division No. 1 of Village Curchorem,

Quepem Taluka, District South Goa, State of Goa,

from the payment of fees as specified in Clause (ii)

of sub-section (6) of Section 32 and penalty as

specified in Section 33 of the said Code subject to

the condition that the said land shall be used

exclusively for construction of Institutional Building

for Education purpose.

This Notification shall come into force on the

date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shubham Naik, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).

Porvorim, 22nd December, 2022.

———uuu———

Department of Science & Technology and

Waste Management

–––

Order

No. 363-10-2019/S&T-DIR/1063

The Government is pleased to modify the

existing pattern of assistance issued vide No.

363-10-2019/S&T-DIR/133 dated 24-05-2021 as

below, with effect from the date of publication in

the Official Gazette.

Sanction of the Government is hereby conveyed

to the Pattern of Assistance to incur an expenditure

of Rs. 30.00 lakhs per annum, subject to provision

in the budget as Grant-in-aid to Goa State Council

for Science & Technology (GSCST), functioning

under the administrative control of Department of

Science and Technology and Waste Management

(DST&WM), Government of Goa.

(i) The grants shall be utilized towards following

items:-

(a) Deficit for the salary component by Central

Ministry.

(b) Grant of MACPS to staff.

2702

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 39

29TH DECEMBER, 2022

(d) Hire charges for one vehicle for official use.

(ii) The grants shall be disbursed/sanctioned in

single installment to GSCST Saligao, Bardez-Goa,

after receipt of proposal for particular financial year.

(iii) The entire amount of the grant-in-aid should

be utilized within a period of one year from the date

of release and only for the purpose for which it is

sanctioned. Any portion of the grant which is not

ultimately required will be refunded to the

Government Treasury. After utilizing/refunding the

above sanctioned amount, an utilization certificate

should be furnished to the sanctioning authority as

required under Form GFR-12C.

(iv) The account of the Grantee in respect of this

grant should be audited by the Government

approved Auditor/Chartered Accountant concerned

immediately on completion of one year from the

date of release. The accounts of the grants shall be

maintained separately and properly from its normal

activities and submitted as and when required.

They shall be open to a test check by the

Comptroller and Auditor General of India at his

discretion.

(v) The Audited statement of accounts showing

the expenditure incurred by the Grantee from the

grants should be furnished to the Government as

soon as possible on completion of one year from the

date of release together with a certificate from the

Auditor to the effect that the grant was utilized for

the purpose for which it was sanctioned.

(vi) A performance-cum-achievement report

specifying in detail the achievements made by the

Grantee with the Government grants/amount

sanctioned should be furnished to concerned

Department as soon as possible.

(vii) No grants shall be allowed to be paid to any

other institutions/voluntary organizations out of

this grant, sanctioned by the Government.

(viii) The Grantee Institution must exercise

reasonable economy, observe all financial rules as

issued by the Government from time to time while

incurring the expenditure.

(ix) In case of misutilisation of grants, the amount

so misutilised shall be recovered from the Grantee

Institution.

(x) The amount remaining unspent out of this

grant shall be refunded back to the Government

Treasury by Challan immediately on completion of

one year from the date of release.

(xi) The amount shall be drawn from the

Directorate of Accounts on presentation of the bill

on Form GAR-32 duly countersigned by the Drawing

and Disbursing Officer, of the Department.

(xii) The Pattern of Assistance shall be valid for

3 years.

(xiii) The Pattern of Assistance to release the

grant-in-aid has been approved by the Finance

Department under U.O No. 1400086650 dated

16-11-2022.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Sanjeev Joglekar, I/C Director (S&T) and

ex officio Jt. Secretary.

Porvorim, 22nd December, 2022.

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 16.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—354/100—12/2022.