SERIES II No. 46

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-2023

Panaji, 16th February, 2023 (Magha 27, 1944)

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Agriculture

Directorate of Agriculture

–––

Order

No. 2/14/95/Agri(Part)/Vol-II/1971

Read: Order No. 2/14/95/Agri(Part)/Vol.II/1521

dated 01-12-2022.

The transfer of the Officers at Sr. No. 1 & 2 in

the above referred Order is stands cancelled.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nevil Alphonso, Director (Agriculture) & ex officio

Jt. Secretary.

Tonca, Caranzalem, 14th February, 2023.

———

Order

No. 2/25/2022-23/D.Agri/1981

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission vide their letter No. COM/II/

/12/2(1)/2022/468 dated 27-01-2023, the probation

period of Shri Dattanand Kamat, Assistant

Engineer (Civil), Group ‘B’ Gazetted of this

Directorate in the pay scale of Rs. 9,300-34,800+

Rs. 4,600 Grade Pay (Level-7 of the 7th Pay

Commission Matrix) has been lifted, on

satisfactorily completion of probation period as

shown below:

2847

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

Note:- There is one Extraordinary issue to the Official

Gazette, Series II No. 45 dated 09-02-2023 namely,

Extraordinary dated 09-02-2023 from pages 2845

to 2846 regarding Notice of Election and Public

Notice from Department of Panchayati Raj and

Community Development.

Sr.

Name of

Date of

No.

the

appointment

lifting

Officer

in regular

service as

probation

Assistant

period

Engineer

(Civil)

1. Shri Dattanand

08-03-2019

07-03-2021.

Kamat

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nevil Alphonso, Director (Agriculture) & ex officio

Jt. Secretary.

Tonca, Caranzalem, 14th February, 2023.

———

Order

No. 2/25/2022-23/D.Agri/1982

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service

Commission vide their letter No. COM/II/

/12/2(3)/2014/467 dated 27-01-2023, the probation

period of Shri Kishor Bhave, Assistant Director of

Agriculture/Subject Matter Specialist (Agronomy/

/Horticulture/Plant Protection), Group ‘A’ Gazetted

of this Directorate in the pay scale of Rs. 15,600-

-39,100+Rs. 5,400 Grade Pay (Level-10 of the 7th

Pay Commission Matrix) has been lifted, on

satisfactorily completion of probation period as

shown below:

Sr.

Name of

Date of appointment

Date of

No.

the

in regular service

lifting

Officer

as Assistant Director

of Agriculture/Subject

probation

Matter Specialist

period

(Agronomy/Horticulture/

/Plant Protection)

Shri Kishor

20-09-2019

19-09-2021.

Bhave

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nevil Alphonso, Director (Agriculture) & ex officio

Jt. Secretary.

Tonca, Caranzalem, 14th February, 2023.

2848

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies

––

Notification

No. 3/11/Urban Credit/TS-II/NZ/2019/RCS/

/SUPPL/4280

Read: 1) Notification No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS II/PZ/

/2017/RCS/Suppl.5306 dated 10-02-2020.

2) Order No. 3/11/Urban Credit/TS-II/NZ/

/2019/RCS/3828 dated 15-02-2021.

3) Order No. 3/11/Urban Credit/TS-II/NZ/

/2019/RCS/3907 dated 29-03-2022.

4) Letter No. JUUCCS/2022-23/BOD/395

dated 10-01-2023.

5) Letter No. 4-4-00/TS/NZ/1/4215 dated

27-01-2023.

Whereas, vide Notification at reference No. 1

above issued by the Government exercising the

powers under Section 126A of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act 36 of 2001), (hereafter

referred to as ‘Act’) the provision of sub-section (1)

of Section 91D of the Act was modified and the

Registrar of Co-operative Societies was authorized

to appoint Officers of Co-operative Credit Societies,

V. K. S. S. Societies having credit counters and

Multipurpose Societies as Recovery Officer/Sale

Officer upon receipt of individual proposals subject

to the terms and conditions as may be incorporated

in the Order.

And whereas, vide Order read at Sr. No. 2 above

issued by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies,

the General Manager of The Jana Utkarsh Urban

Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., [Reg. No. Res. (a)-12/NZ/

/Goa dated 30-09-93] Khorlim, Mapusa-Goa, was

delegated with the powers to recover certain sums

by attachment and sale of property vested in

Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Section

91D of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001

read with Rule 124 of the Goa Co-operative Societies

Rules, 2003 subject to the following conditions:-

1. The Officer appointed and delegated with the

powers of Sales-cum-Recovery Officer shall

work

under

the

general

guidance,

superintendence and control of the Asstt.

Registrar of Co-op. Societies, Arbitration/

/Execution, North Zone, Mapusa-Goa.

2. The Board of Directors of the society shall be

fully responsible along with the General

Manager for any acts in contravention of the

Act, Rules and Bye-laws.

3. The Board of Directors shall review the

performance of the General Manager every

month and ensure compliance.

The delegation of powers was initially for a period

of 1 year till 14-02-2022 and same was further

extended vide order at ref. No. 3 above for another

year from 15-02-2022 to 14-02-2023. And whereas

vide letters at ref. Nos. 4 and 5 above, the Chairman

of The Jana Utkarsh Urban Co-op. Credit Society

Ltd., Khorlim, Mapusa-Goa has requested to grant

further extension to the General Manager of their

society to act as Sale-cum-Recovery Officer for their

society.

Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred

upon undersigned under Section 123B of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 read with

Notification read at ref. No. 1 above, the delegation

of powers to General Manager of The Jana Utkarsh

Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Khorlim,

Mapusa-Goa, made vide order ref. No. 2 above is

hereby further extended for a period of one year

with commencing from 15-02-2023 to 14-02-2024.

All the terms and conditions mentioned in the

Order referred to at Sr. No. 2 above shall continue to

apply. The undersigned reserves the right to

withdraw this Order at any stage without assigning

any reasons.

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies)

officio

Joint

Secretary

(Co-operation).

Panaji, 8th February, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2849

Office of the Asst. Registrar of Co-operative

Societies

–––

No. 5/157/11-12/ARPZ/HSG/ADM/1732

Before the Co-operative Officer of Co-operative

Societies, O/o the Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.

Societies, Sahakar Bhavan, Curti, Ponda-Goa.

Judgement

Whereas, the Board of Directors of Sayyadri Niwas

Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Durgabhat,

Ponda-Goa had incurred disqualification in terms of

Section 61 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act,

2001 for not complying statutory requirement of

Section 72, 74 and Rule 52 (i) respectively of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 and Rules, 2003.

And Whereas, the Board of Directors of the

aforesaid society were disqualified for a period of

5 years for being chosen as directors and shall be

ineligible to continue as directors of the said society

by order dated 03-02-2023. On account of incurring

deemed disqualification, the vacuume has been

created. In order to fill the same vacuume and to

manage the day to day affairs of the society, it is

necessary to appoint the Committee of

Administrator/Administrator.

In view of the above circumstances, I am inclined

to pass the following:

Order

In exercise of the power delegated to me vide

notification dated 30-09-2020 under Section 67A of

the Goa Co-op. Societies Act, 2001, I, Smt. Sangita S.

Naik, Co-operative Officer/Special Auditor, Co-op.

Societies, Ponda Zone, Ponda-Goa hereby appoint

Shri Shripad Kamat, as an administrator of Sayyadri

Niwas Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.,

Durgabhat, Ponda-Goa in order to manage the affairs

of the society for a period of six months or till the

new Board of Directors enters upon the office. The

Administrator so appointed shall make necessary

arrangement to get the accounts of the society up

to date audited and to constitute new Board of

Directors.

Given under my hand and seal on this 3rd day of

February, 2023.

Sangita S. Naik, Co-operative Officer (Co-op.

Societies), Ponda Zone.

Ponda, 06th February, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Environment & Climate Change

––

Order

No. 7/4/98/ENVT&CC/DIR/Part III/1508

Read: i) Notification No. 7/4/98/STE-DIR/Part I/922 dated 04-12-2007.

ii) Addendum No. 7/4/98/STE-DIR/Part I/1545 dated 15-01-2010.

iii) Addendum No. 7/4/98/STE-DIR/Part I/104 dated 23-04-2015.

iv) Addendum No. 7/4/98/STE-DIR/Part II/480 dated 12-09-2019.

v) Order No. 7/4/98/ENVT&CC/DIR/Part III/997 dated 09-11-2022.

Vide above read Notifications, the Government of Goa, in pursuance of Clause (c) of Rule 2 of the Noise

Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 (hereinafter called the “said Rules”), has designated various

Officers as ‘Authority’ for the maintenance of the ambient air quality standards in respect of noise under

the said Rules.

2. The Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa, Panaji vide its directives in MCA No. 588 of 2010 in Suo

Motu Writ Petition No. 4 of 2006 (The Citizens Committee on Noise Pollution v/s State of Goa); has directed

that the list of the Officers designated as ‘Authority’ under the said Rules, should be published for

information of the public alongwith details of their telephone numbers.

3. In pursuance of the directives of the Hon’ble High Court, Department of Environment & Climate

Change, hereby publishes the names and telephone numbers of the Officers designated as ‘Authority’

under the said Rules, for general information of the public.

2850

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

Sr.

Name and designation

Office Tel.

Fax

Mobile

No.

of the Officer

No.

Ms. Mamu Hage, IAS,

2223612

2426492

9953462311.

Collector & District Magistrate,

2225383

North Goa, Panaji

2427690

2225083

Mr. Asvin Chandru, IAS

2794412

2733026

9361128547.

Collector & District Magistrate,

2794414

2794402

South Goa, Margao

2794415

2794416

Mr. Sanjeev Gawasdesai,

2223418

2426492

9822383488.

Addl. Collector-(I) & Addl.

2225383

District Magistrate, North Goa, Panaji

2223612

Mr. Srinet Kotwale,

2794421

2733026

9422056976.

Addl. Collector-(I) & Addl.

2794423

District Magistrate, South Goa, Margao

Mr. Rajesh Azgaonkar,

2225511

9921389999.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Tiswadi, Panaji

Mr. Sitaram Sawal,

2312469

9511755108.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Ponda

Mr. Gurudas T. Dessai,

2250398

2262038

9422394914.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate-I, Bardez, Mapusa

Ms. Yashaswini B., IAS,

2262038

9731238209.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

2250398

Magistrate-II, Bardez, Mapusa

Mr. Rohan Kaskar,

2362058

9657104353.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

2360254

Magistrate, Bicholim

10.

Mr. Deepak Vaingankar,

2201142

9075289929.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Pernem

11.

Mr. Praveen Hare Parab,

2374800

–

9923700405.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Satari

12.

Mr. Uday Prabhudesai,

2794145

–

9764480571.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

2794146

Magistrate, Salcete, Margao

2794109

13.

Mr. Ravishekar Nipanikar,

2500565

2512688

8767114825.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Mormugao, Vasco

14.

Mrs. Sharmila Gaonkar,

2662241

2662228

9923581805.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Quepem

15.

Mr. Milindera Ganesh Velip,

2603141

–

8806325812.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Sanguem

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2851

16.

Mr. Ramesh N. Gaonkar,

2643696

9404758575.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Canacona

17.

Mr. Nilesh Dhaigodkar,

2614111

2614037

9607447316.

Dy. Collector & Sub-Divisional

Magistrate, Dharbandora

18.

Mr. Nidin Valsan, IPS,

2416100

2416243

7875756017.

Superintendent of Police

(North Goa), Panaji

19.

Mr. Abhishek Dhania, IPS,

2732218

2733864

7875756008.

Superintendent of Police

(South Goa), Margao

20.

Mr. Sudhesh Naik,

2226519

7875756021.

Sub-Divisional Police Officer,

Tiswadi, Panaji

21.

Mr. Ashish Shirodkar,

2317978

7875756035.

Sub-Divisional Police Officer,

Ponda

22.

Mr. Shivendu Bhushan, IPS,

2714449

7875756038.

Sub-Divisional Police Officer,

2710656

Salcete, Margao

2714454

2794151

23.

Mr. Salim Shaikh,

2500222

7875756048.

Sub-Divisional Police Officer,

Mormugao, Vasco

24.

Mrs. Jivba Dalavi,

2262207

7875756025.

Sub-Divisional Police Officer,

Mapusa-I for Pernem, Mapusa,

Colvale & Anjuna Police Stations

25.

Mr. Vishwesh Karpe,

2412723

7875756029.

Sub-Divisional Police Officer,

Porvorim for Calangute, Porvorim

& Saligao Police Stations

26.

Mr. Nilesh Rane,

2663900

7875756043.

Sub-Divisional Police Officer,

Quepem

27.

Mr. Sagar Ekoskar,

2363737

7875756025.

Sub-Divisional Police Officer,

Bicholim & Sattari

This order shall supersede the Order No. 7/4/98/ENVT&CC/DIR/Part III/997 dated 09-11-2022.

Dr. Geeta S. Nagvenkar, Director/ex officio Jt. Secy. (Env. & CC).

Panaji, 9th February, 2023.

2852

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

Department of Home

Foreigners and Citizenship Division

–––

Notification

No. 6/2/2021-HD(F&CD)/HAJ/75

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-

-section (1) of Section 17 read with Section 18 of the

Haj Committee Act, 2002 (Central Act No. 35 of

2002), the Government of Goa hereby re-constitutes

the Goa State Haj Committee, comprising of the

following members, namely:-

Shri Urfan Mulla

—

Member.

Shri Molali Shaikh

—

Member.

Shri Hyder Shah

—

Member.

Shri Tabib Mamlekar

—

Member.

Shri Nazir Shaikh

—

Member.

Shri Mahboob Makandar

—

Member.

Shri Amin Khan

—

Member.

Shri Bashir Shaikh

—

Member.

Shri Shaikh Shaizin

—

Member.

10.

Shri Azim Kamral

—

Member.

11.

Shri Azim Khan

—

Member.

12.

Shri Riyaz Shah

—

Member.

13.

Shri Ikbal Jafar Sayed

—

Member.

14.

Shri Sameer Palledar

—

Member.

15.

Shri Lalla Shah

—

Member.

16.

Under Secretary (Home)

—

Member

Secretary.

The term of the above Committee shall be for a

period of three years commencing on the day

following the publication of this Notification in the

Official Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek K. Naik, Under Secretary (Home-II).

Porvorim, 13th February, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Labour

––

Notification

No. 28/2/2023-LAB/90

The following Award passed by the Industrial

Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on

30-12-2022 in Appln. No. 02/2017 is hereby published

as required under Section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 27th January, 2023.

———

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

AND LABOUR COURT

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Mr. Anil Scaria, Hon’ble Presiding

Officer)

No. Appln. 02/2017

Mr. Leslie Fernandes,

Near the Church,

Neura, Ilhas-Goa

… Applicant/Party-I.

V/s

M/s. Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.,

Bethora, Ponda-Goa

… Opponent/Party-II.

Applicant/Party I represented by Learned Advocate

P. J. Kamat.

Opponent/Party II represented by Learned Advocate

Shri M. S. Bandodkar.

AWARD

(Delivered on this the 30th day of the month of

December of the year 2022)

This is an Application under Section 2(A)(2) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the

“said Act”).

2. The case of the Applicant/Party I is that the

General Manager, HRD and the Administration of

the Opponent/Party II appointed the Applicant/Party

I as a Driver by letter dated 27-11-1995. That the

appointment was with effect from 01-12-1995. That,

the Applicant/Party I was confirmed by letter dated

18-07-1996.

3. That, subsequently, there were various

disputes between the Applicant/Party I and the

Opponent/Party II. That one of the disputes relates

to transferring the Applicant/Party I to Dharwad in

Karnataka State. That upon a reference, being IT/47/

/2007, Labour Court-II, Panaji had by Award dated

13-06-2013 held that the transfer amounted to refusal

of employment in Goa and held it to be bad-in-law

and illegal. The Opponent/Party II was directed to

re-instate the Applicant/Party I in service with 50%

back wages.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2853

4. That the Opponent/Party II had its Factory at

Bethora, Ponda-Goa. That the Opponent/Party II

wrote a letter and a Notice both dated 09-10-2015 to

the Applicant/Party I. That by this letter and Notice,

the Opponent/Party II informed the Applicant/Party I

that all the operations in the Factory at Bethora will

be discontinued from 11-10-2015. That by this letter

the Opponent/Party II asked the Applicant/Party I to

report to a site at Nalagarh in Himachal Pradesh.

That the Applicant/Party I wrote letter dated

12-10-2015 to the Opponent/Party II. That by this letter

the Applicant/Party I informed the Opponent//Party

II that the action of the Opponent/Party II amounts

to transferring of the Applicant/Party I. That by the

letter the Opponent/Party II was also informed that

such transfer is contrary to the Certified Standing

Orders read with the Letter of Appointment of the

Applicant/Party I. In this letter it was also stated that

the transfer was in breach of Award dated

13-06-2013 of Labour Court-II at Panaji. That the

Applicant/Party I went to the Factory at Bethora,

Ponda on 12-10-2015 to report for work. That the

Applicant/Party I was refused employment w.e.f.

12-10-2015.

5. That immediately on the refusal of employment

to the Applicant/Party I by the Opponent/Party II,

the Applicant/Party I on the same date wrote a letter

dated 12-10-2015 to the Opponent/Party II

contending that the action of the Opponent/Party II

in refusing employment to the Applicant/Party I w.e.f.

12-10-2015 is illegal and non-est and that the

Applicant/Party I be reinstated in service within

7 days of the receipt of the same. That the Opponent/

/Party II received the letter dated 12-10-2015. That

the Opponent/Party II denied the contentions of the

Applicant/Party I, by its reply dated 16-10-2015 and

did not reinstate the Applicant/Party I at Bethora,

Ponda.

6. That thereafter the Applicant/Party I raised a

dispute before the Commissioner, Labour and

Employment at Panaji-Goa for intervention by letter

dated 19-10-2015. That the Asstt. Labour

Commissioner and Conciliation Officer by its Notice

No. IRM/CON/(24)/2015/5660 dated 20-11-2015 took

up the matter for discussions on 26-11-2015 and

17-12-2015 and thereafter the matter was not taken

up by the said Authority till date.

7. That the Opponent/Party II being a Factory is

an industrial establishment as defined under Section

25 L of the said Act. That the Opponent/Party II has

been employing more than 100 workmen from

January, 2014 to 12-10-2015 and even prior to that

and thus is governed by Chapter VB of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. That the Gomantak Mazdoor

Sangh, a Union of the workmen of the Opponent/Party

I had raised an industrial dispute in the matter of

Charter of Demands on the Opponent/Party II. That

the Applicant/Party I is concerned in the said dispute

as any settlement or Award will be applicable and

binding on the Applicant/Party I. That the said

Charter of Demands were not settled in conciliation

and the Government of Goa referred the said dispute

to the Industrial Tribunal and is pending adjudication

in reference No. IT/40/2013. That the industrial

dispute in reference No. IT/63/2012 and IT/23/2014

were also pending before the Industrial Tribunal in

2015. That the Applicant/Party I is also concerned

with IT/63/2012 and IT/23/2014. That during the

pendency of reference No. IT/28/2014, IT/63/2012 and

IT/40/2013, the Opponent/Party II refused

employment to the Applicant/Party I without taking

the approval/permission of the Tribunal as required

under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

8. Therefore, it is prayed that it be declared that

the refusal of employment to the Applicant/Party I

w.e.f. 12-10-2015 on the pretext of discontinuation of

manufacturing and other connected operations is

illegal, bad in law and non-est. That it be held that

the Applicant/Party I is entitled to full back wages

and other benefits from the date of illegal refusal of

employment to the date of Award or upto the date of

his retirement during the pendency of this case. That

it be held that the action of the Opponent/Party II is

in breach of Chapter VB and Chapter VII of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and for such other reliefs

as this Tribunal deems fit.

That the Opponent/Party II has filed its

Written Statement. The Opponent/Party II states that

the Application has been made under Section 2A of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That Section 2A of

the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 can be invoked

when the Employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches

or otherwise terminates the services of a workman.

That the Opponent/Party II has not discharged,

dismissed, retrenched or otherwise terminated the

services of the Applicant/Party I. That this

application is not maintainable. That the Opponent/

Party II has also not discontinued the manufacturing

or connected operations. That the Opponent/Party II

has not committed any breach of Chapter VB of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That this Tribunal does

not have the jurisdiction to deal with matters in

Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That

the Opponent/Party II started manufacturing

pharmaceutical formulation at Ponda, Goa in the year

2854

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

1968. That in the month of October, 2015, the

Opponent/Party II decided to shift its manufacturing

and connected activities to Nalagarh, Himachal

Pradesh. That the reasons for the decision were given

in Notice dated 09-10-2015. That the Opponent/Party

II also issued letter dated 09-10-2015 to its workmen.

That the Applicant/Party I has also been given the

said letter. That by this letter the workmen were

informed about the said decision and were asked to

report to the establishment/Factory of the Opponent

at Nalagarh, Himachal Pradesh on 16-11-2015. That

all the workmen were granted Special Leave from

09-10-2015 to 16-11-2015 for reporting at the Factory/

/Site of the Opponent/Party II at Nalagarh, Himachal

Pradesh. It is denied that letter dated 09-10-2015 is a

Transfer Order and is in contravention of the Certified

Standing Orders read with the letter of appointment

of the Applicant/Party I. It is also stated that the

alleged transfer is non-est and illegal.

10. That the Applicant/Party I did not report for

duty at Nalagarh, Himachal Pradesh. That the Award

dated 13-06-2013 passed by the Labour Court-II at

Panaji in reference No. IT/47/2007 is irrelevant in the

present case. That the said Award dated 13-06-2013

has been challenged in Writ Petition No. 93/2014

before the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa. That

there is no question of the Applicant/Party I

reporting for work at Ponda on 12-10-2015. It is denied

that the Applicant/Party I was refused employment

from 12-10-2015 onwards. It is admitted that by letter

dated 19-10-2015 the Applicant/Party I raised a

dispute before the Commissioner, Labour and

Employment. That the Commissioner of Labour and

Employment refused to entertain the dispute as the

Applicant was not terminated from service. That the

Applicant/Party I is not the member of any Union.

That the Applicant/Party I is not concerned with the

dispute raised by the Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh or

any other Union. That Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh had

placed Charter of Demands dated 01-12-2012. That,

the Charter of Demands gave rise to the case bearing

reference No. IT/40/2013. That reference IT/40/2013

has been disposed off by Award dated 31-01-2017.

That the Applicant is not concerned with reference

No. IT/63/2012 and reference No. IT/28/2014 which

have been disposed by Awards dated 31-01-2017. It

is denied that the Opponent/Party II refused

employment to the Applicant/Party I during the

pendency of reference No. IT/28/2014, reference No.

IT/63/2012 and reference No. IT/40/2013. That the

Opponent/Party II has not violated the provisions of

Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That

the Applicant/Party I is not entitled to any relief.

12. The Applicant/Party I has filed his Rejoinder.

That Applicant/Party I states that on the pretext of

shifting the manufacturing and connected activities

from Bethora, Ponda, Goa to Nalagarh, Himachal

Pradesh, the Opponent/Party II had temporarily

closed the manufacturing activities at Bethora,

Ponda, Goa and refused employment to the workers

at Goa from 12-10-2015 without following the

mandatory provisions of Chapter VB of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. It is denied that this Tribunal

does not have the jurisdiction to deal with Chapter

VB of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is denied

that the Applicant/Party I is in no way concerned

with reference No. IT/40/2013, reference No. IT/63/

/2012 and reference No. IT/28/2014. It is admitted

that all the references were disposed off by Awards

dated 31-01-2017. The Applicant/Party I denies that

the Opponent/Party II did not have to take approval/

/permission under Section 33 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947. It is denied that the Applicant/

/Party I is not entitled to any relief.

12. Heard arguments. The Ld. Advocate for the

Opponent/Party II, Shri M. S. Bandodkar has also filed

his Written Arguments.

13. The following issues and additional issues

were framed by this Tribunal and my findings thereon

are as follows:

ISSUES

1. Whether the Party I proves that the refusal of

employment with effect from 12-10-2015 on the

pretext of shifting of manufacturing activities

from Goa to Nalagarh at Himachal Pradesh is

illegal and unjustified?

2. Whether the Party I proves that he is entitled

for re-instatement in services, with full back

wages and continuity in services with

consequential benefits?

3. Whether Party II proves that the application is

not maintainable as it was not made by

following mandate of Section 2-A(2) of the

Industrial Disputes Act and no demand for

re-instatement was made with Assistant

Labour Commissioner, Panaji?

4. What Relief? What Order?

ADDITIONAL ISSUES

3A. Whether the Party I proves that the Party II

was employing more than 100 workmen

preceding 12 months of 12-10-2015?

3B. Whether the Party I proves that the Party II has

contravened Chapter V-B of the I. D. Act, 1947

while refusing employment to the Party I and

other workmen?

3C. Whether the Party I proves that the Party II has

altered the conditions of service of the Party I

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2855

and other workmen by discontinuing the

manufacturing operations at Ponda in Goa State

and asking the Party I and others to report to

Nalagarh in the State of Himachal Pradesh and

has thus contravened Section 33 of the I. D. Act,

1947?

3D. Whether the Party I proves that the action of

the Party II of shifting of manufacturing

activities from Ponda to Nalagarh amounts to

closure?

3E. Whether the Party I proves that the Party II has

refused employment to Party I with effect from

12-10-2015?

3F. Whether the Party II proves that the subject

matter of the present application is pending

before the Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition

93/2014 and therefore this application should

be rejected as not maintainable?

FINDINGS

Issue No. 1

In the affirmative.

Issue No. 2

Partly in the

affirmative.

Issue No. 3

In the negative.

Issue No. 4

As per order.

Additional Issue No. 3A :

In the affirmative.

Additional Issue No. 3B

In the affirmative.

Additional Issue No. 3C

In the negative.

Additional Issue No. 3D

In the affirmative.

Additional Issue No. 3E

In the affirmative.

Additional Issue No. 3F

In the negative.

Issue No. 1, Additional Issue No. 3D and

Additional Issue No. 3E:

14. The case of the Applicant/Party I is that on

the pretext of shifting manufacturing activities from

Goa to Nalagarh, Himachal Pradesh, the Opponent/

/Party II refused employment to the Applicant/Party

I and that such refusal is illegal and unjustified. That

the action of the Opponent/Party II in shifting the

manufacturing of activity from Ponda to Nalagarh

amounts to closure. That the Opponent/Party II has

refused employment to the Applicant/Party I with

effect from 12-10-2015.

15. The Applicant/Party I has examined 2

witnesses. The Applicant/Party I has examined

himself as Witness No.1 for the Applicant/Party I, Shri

Puti Gaonkar is Witness No. 2 for the Applicant/Party

I. He is the Secretary of the Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh.

16. The Opponent/Party II has examined one

witness, Shri Eurico Noronha is Witness No.1 for the

Opponent/Party II. He was the Vice President, Human

Resources for the Opponent/Party II.

17. The Applicant/Party I deposes that by letter

dated 09-10-2015, the Opponent/Party II contended

that all manufacturing and connected operations of

the Factory at Bethora, Ponda, Goa will be

discontinued w.e.f. 11-10-2015 and directed him to

report to the Nalagarh site by 16-11-2015. The

Applicant/Party I deposes that he told the Opponent/

/Party II that the said letter is nothing but his transfer

from Goa to Nalagarh at Himachal Pradesh and that

it is against his appointment letter and the Certified

Standing Orders. He deposes that he went to the

Factory at Ponda on 12-10-2015 to report to work, but

he was refused employment w.e.f. 12-10-2015. The

Applicant/Party I deposes that he wrote a letter dated

11-10-2015 asking for reinstatement in service within

7 days of the receipt of the same.

18. Shri Puti Gaonkar (Witness No. 2 for the

Applicant) deposes that he is the Secretary of

Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh and the workers of the

Opponent/Party II are members of the same. He

deposed that the action of the Opponent/Party II in

shifting its manufacturing and connected activities

from the State of Goa to the State of Himachal Pradesh

and asking workmen including the Applicant/Party

I to report to Nalagarh at Himachal Pradesh amounts

to transfer of service which is in contravention of the

Letter of Appointment and Certified Standing Orders

of the Company.

19. The testimony of the Applicant/Party I is

corroborated by the testimony of Shri Puti Gaonkar.

20. The Opponent/Party II has examined Shri

Eurico Noronha as witness No.1 for the Opponent/

/Party II. He is a retired Vice President, Human

Resources of the Opponent/Party II. He is presently

Advisor, Human Resources for the Opponent/Party

II. He deposes that by Notice dated 09-10-2015 and

letter dated 09-10-2015, the Opponent/Party II

informed the Applicant/Party I that all manufacturing

and connected activities at Ponda would be

discontinued by 10-10-2015 and shifted to Nalagarh,

Himachal Pradesh site from 11-10-2015. He deposes

that the Applicant/Party I was informed that he would

be deemed to be an employee of Nalagarh Factory

with effect from 11-10-2015. He deposes that the

Applicant/Party I was instructed by the said letter

not to report to the Factory at Ponda after 10-10-2015

and to report to the Nalagarh site on 16-11-2015. He

deposes that the Applicant was informed that during

the period from 11-10-2015 to 15-11-2015 he would

be given Special Leave for the purpose of relocation.

21. The Learned Advocate for the Opponent/Party

II, Shri M. S. Bandodkar has relied upon the law laid

down in Hindustan Lever Employees’ Union V/s

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. (1993 II CLR 847)

2856

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

and Innovations Garment Ltd. V/s S. K. Singe &

Anr. (2002 II CLR 902) to show that an Employer has

a right to shift his Factory from one place to another.

22. Let us look into these case-laws and ascertain

if they apply to the facts of this case.

23. In Hindustan Lever Employees’ Union V/s

State of Maharashtra and Ors. (1993 II CLR 847),

the Garg Committee Report had held the Nickel

Catalyst Department of the Employer was a pollution

hazard. Therefore, the staff working in the

department was shifted to other departments. The

State Government granted permission to shift the

Nickel Catalyst Department from Sewree (Bombay)

to Taloja in Raigad District. It was held that the

shifting was bonafide and was not vitiated by any

malafides and was thus not a closure.

24. In Innovations Garment Ltd. V/s S. K. Singe

& Anr. (2002 II CLR 902), the Petitioner had its

garment factory in Mumbai. The Bombay Municipal

Corporation objected to it being run in a residential

zone. The Petitioner shifted the Factory to another

place in Mumbai. The Bombay Municipal Corporation

once again objected. The Petitioner shifted the

Factory to Mussourie where it had its own land. It

was held that it was bonafide and not an act of

victimization or that it suffered from malafide. It was

held that such shifting did not amount to closure.

25. The above mentioned case laws show that

shifting of a Factory under duress of law is neither

malafide nor an act of victimization. It is a bonafide

act and cannot be deemed to be closure of the Factory.

On the basis of the above-mentioned principles let

us proceed to consider if the shifting of the Factory

of the Opponent/Party II was bonafide.

26. Exhibit 54 Colly (1) (in cross) is the Notice

issued by the Opponent/Party II to its workmen. It

states that the reasons for shifting its Factory to the

“site” at Village Bhatian, Nalagarh, District Solan,

Himachal Pradesh as follows:-

“The Ponda factory has been in operation for several

decades. With the ageing of the building and plant,

the utilities involved, the maintenance required, the

personnel employed and the low productivity, it is

observed in recent years that the costs of running the

factory have been increasing beyond an acceptable

limit. At present, the expenditure on the plant

compares unfavourably with the income generated

from the products manufactured at the plant. Also,

the cost of manufacturing products at the plant works

out to several times the cost of manufacturing them at

alternative locations.

Secondly, from the time the Factory was built,

various laws applicable to the factory and rules

thereunder have been changing over the years. These

include the drug laws (specially Schedule M and

GMP), factory laws environmental laws and fire safety

laws. Complying in full with the changing

requirements of the law for a factory that is 30 years

old has become technically unfeasible and financially

unaffordable. Thus it has become very difficult to

operate the Ponda factory in full compliance with all

applicable laws as they now stand.

Thirdly, we are unable to adequately increase prices

of our products to compensate for higher costs of

production and conversion due to existing

Government regulation under the Drug Price Control

Order.”

27.

In Exh. 54 (Colly)(1) (in cross) the workmen

were asked not to report to the “factory” at Ponda

after 10-10-2015 but to report to the “Nalagarh site”

from 16-11-2015.

28.

A plain reading of Exh. 54 Colly(1) (in cross)

shows that there was only a site at Nalagarh with a

factory yet to be built.

29.

If that be so the cost of construction of a new

factory at Nalagarh and the installation of new

machinery in it was to be almost equal to demolition

and reconstruction of the factory at Ponda and

installing new machinery in it. All the other problem

would be the same in Goa as it is in Himachal Pradesh

except for “personnel employed and the low

productivity”. The Notice at Exh. 54 Colly (1) (in

cross) clearly shows that the Opponent/Party II was

not happy with the “personnel employed”. Seen in

the light of the above-mentioned facts, the

Opponent/Party II is shifting its Factory to get rid of

the “personnel employed”. Witness No. 1 for the

Opponent/Party II has deposed that none of the

workers reported to Nalagarh. The workers found it

impossible to relocate.

30.

Nevertheless, witness No. 1 for the

Opponent/Party II has deposed that the Opponent/

Party II has a factory at Nalagarh from 2007. The

registration and licence to work the Factory is at Exh.

94. If that be so, the Opponent/Party II is expanding

an existing Factory at Nalagarh and not shifting the

establishment in Goa. There is no shifting of the

Factory. In other words they are closing down the

Factory at Ponda to expand a Factory at Nalagarh.

31. The Learned Advocate for the Opponent/

/Party II Shri M. S. Bandodkar argues that Employers

have a right to re-organize their business. Ld.

Advocate Shri M. S. Bandodkar has relied on M/s

Parry and Co. Ltd. and P. C. Pal and Others (1970 II

LLJ 429).

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2857

32. I agree with Mr. M. S. Bandodkar. An Employer

has the right to re-organize his business in a “bona

fide” manner. M/s Parry and Co. Ltd. and P. C. Pal

and Others (1970 II LLJ 429) also states that the

re-organization should be bonafide. Nevertheless,

the excess labour arising out of the re-organization

should be dealt with according to law. Asking the

workers to report to a location which is impossible

for them to come and join duty is not the solution.

The act of the Opponent/Party II was not bonafide.

33. For the reasons stated above, the alleged

shifting of the Factory from Goa to Himachal Pradesh

is not bonafide. It is calculated to get rid of the

personnel (workmen) working in Goa. The alleged

shifting was not under any duress of law.

34. Now let us consider, if the Applicant/Party I

could have been transferred to Himachal Pradesh.

35. It is the case of the Applicant/Party I that he

could not have been transferred to another State

without his consent as per the Certified Standing

Orders.

46. Witness No. 1 of the Opponent/Party II

deposes that the Applicant/Party I is governed by

the Staff rules and regulations and not by the

Certified Standing Orders.

47. Exh. 34 is the Letter of Appointment of Party I,

Clause 10 of the Letter of Appointment states as

follows:-

“You will abide by the conditions of service and/or

other Staff rules and regulations applicable to you

which may be in force or modified/framed from time

to time”.

48. Witness No.1 for the Opponent/Party II has

also deposed in reference No. IT/04/2007. His

Affidavit-in-Evidence in reference No. IT/04/2007 is

at Exh. 86-D (produced in cross). He has stated therein

that the transfer of the Applicant/Party I, in that case,

was under the provisions of the Appointment Letter

and the Certified Standing Orders.

49. Exh. 87-D (produced in cross), Exh. 88-D

(produced in cross) and Exh. 89-D (produced in cross)

are show-cause notices issued to the Applicant/

Party I alleging misconduct under various clauses of

the Certified Standing Orders.

50. Letter dated 26-05-2006 Exh. 86-D (produced

in cross) was issued to the Applicant/Party I under

the Certified Standing Orders.

51. Once Standing Orders are certified it would

apply to all workmen. One workman cannot be

excluded from the Certified Standing Orders by

making certain statement in his appointment orders.

The Certified Standing Orders has been invoked by

the Opponent/Party II in various show-cause notices

issued to the Applicant/Party I. The witness of the

Opponent/Party II has deposed in IT/42/2007 that the

Applicant/Party I was transferred earlier in

accordance with the Letter of Appointment and

Certified Standing Orders. A letter dated 26-05-2006

was also issued under the Certified Standing Orders.

The Staff rules and regulations alleged by the

Opponent/Party II has not been tendered in evidence.

Under these circumstances there can be no doubt

that the Certified Standing Orders apply to the

Applicant/Party I.

52. Now let us look at the Certified Standing

Orders and the Appointment Letter of the Applicant/

/Party I to find out if the Applicant/Party I could have

been transferred from one State to another.

53. The Certified Standing Order is at Exh. 55 (in

cross). Clause 21 of the Certified Standing Orders read

as follows:

“TRANSFERS, ETC. i) In the interest of the

Company/Firm an employee, shall be liable to be

transferred at the discretion of the Company/Firm

from one job to another or from one department/

/Section to another or from one unit or establishment

to another unit or establishment (existing or future)

or from one station to another of the Company/Firm

and, on such transfer he will be governed by the terms

and conditions of service applicable to the department,

Section, Unit or Establishment to which he is

transferred provided that the wages, grade, continuity

of service of the employee are not adversely affected by

such transfer.

Provided further that if an employee is transferred

from one place to another on a job which he is capable

of doing, and provided also that where the transfer

involves moving from one State to another such

transfer shall take place, either with the consent of the

employee or where there is a specific provision to that

effect in the letter of appointment, and provided also

that (i) responsible notice is given to such employee,

and (ii) reasonable joining time is allowed in case of

transfers from one station to another. The employee

concerned shall be paid travelling allowances

including the transport charges, and fifty percent

thereof to meet incidental charges.

ii) An employee will always be liable to do

alternate, reasonable work, provided by the

Company, in the event of lack of work on the

job for which he is normally employed,

provided he gets the same emoluments.

54. Clause 5(a) of the Letter of Appointment

(Exh. 34) deals with transfers. It reads as

follows:-

2858

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

5(a) You will be liable to be transferred to any

Department, Office or Establishment forming part of

our Organization and you will abide by the working

hours of the department, office or establishment

concerned without any extra remuneration.

55. Clause 21(1) of the Certified Standing Orders

deals with the general principles of transfer. These

principles are incorporate in Clause 5 (a) of the Letter

of Appointment.

56. The provisions of the Proviso to Clause 21(1) of

the Certified Standing Orders deal with an exception

to Clause 21(1) of the Certified Standing Orders. It

provides that when a workman is transferred outside

the State, it has to be either in accordance with his

Letter of Appointment or with his consent.

57. There is no provision in the letter appointing

the Applicant/Party I regarding transfer outside the

State. Therefore, the Applicant/Party I could have

been transferred outside the State only with his

consent. There is no such consent. Therefore the

transfer of the Applicant/Party I to Himachal Pradesh

is illegal.

58. For the reasons stated above, the Applicant/

/Party I has proved that the refusal of employment

with effect from 12-10-2015 on the pretext of shifting

of manufacturing activities from Goa to Nalagarh at

Himachal Pradesh is illegal and unjustified. The

Applicant/Party I has proved that the action of the

Opponent/Party II in shifting manufacturing

activities from Ponda to Nalagarh amounts to closure.

The Applicant/Party I has also proved that the

Opponent/Party II has refused employment to the

Applicant/Party I with effect from 12-10-2015. Hence,

I hold Issue No. 1 and Additional Issue No. 3D and

Additional Issue No. 3E in the affirmative.

Issue No. 2:

59. The Applicant/Party I states that he is entitled

to re-instatement in service with full back wages and

continuity of service.

60. The Applicant/Party I has deposed that he

became a Portuguese Citizen on 15-04-2016 and that

he is not entitled for employment in India.

61. Therefore, the Applicant/Party I is not entitled

to re-instatement or continuity of service from

15-04-2016.

62. The Applicant/Party I was illegally refused

employment from 12-10-2015. He remained

unemployed till he became a Portuguese Citizen on

15-04-2016. The Applicant/Party I is therefore

entitled to back wages from 12-10-2015 to 14-04-2016.

He would be deemed to be re-instated for the said

period from 12-10-2015 to 14-04-2016. Since he has

become a Portuguese Citizen, he is not entitled to

re-instatement thereafter and continuity of service

from 15-04-2016 onwards. Hence, I hold Issue No. 2

partly in the affirmative.

Issue No. 3:

63. The case of the Opponent/Party II is that this

Application is not maintainable as it was not made

by following the mandate of Section 2A(2) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and no demand for

re-instatement was made with the Assistant Labour

Commissioner, Panaji.

64. Exhibit 47 is the Demand Letter dated

12-10-2015 sent by the Applicant/Party I to the

Opponent/Party II. By this letter, the Applicant/Party

I told the Opponent/Party II that he was illegally

refused employment w.e.f. 12-10-2015. By the letter,

the Applicant/Party I also called upon the Opponent/

/Party II to re-instate him in service with full back

wages from 12-10-2015.

65. Exhibit 49 is the letter (Application) dated

19-10-2015 addressed by the Applicant/Party I to the

Commissioner, Labour and Employment, Government

of Goa for conciliation. This letter refers to the above-

mentioned demand letter dated 12-10-2015.

66. The Application under Section 2A(2) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was made on

12-05-2017. It is made after 45 days of making the

application for conciliation. It is also made within 3

years from the date of refusal of service. Therefore,

the Opponent/Party II has failed to prove that the

application is not maintainable as it was not made

following the mandate of Section 2A(2) of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and no demand for re-

-instatement was made with the Assistant Labour

Commissioner, Panaji. Hence, I hold Issue No. 3 in the

negative.

Additional Issue No. 3A:

67. The case of the Applicant/Party I is that the

Opponent/Party II was employing more than 100

workmen preceding 12 months of 12-10-2015.

68. Mr. Leslie Fernandes (Witness No.1 for the

Applicant/Party I) is the Applicant himself. He

deposes that the Opponent/Party II was employing

more than 100 workmen from prior to January, 2014

to 12-10-2015.

69. Shri Puti Gaonkar (Witness No. 2 for the

Applicant/Party I) deposes that there were 107

workmen employed by the Opponent/Party II in the

Factory on a permanent basis. He deposes that apart

from the 107 permanent workmen there were more

than 500 workmen employed on a temporary or

contract basis. He deposes that reference No. IT/03/

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2859

/2016 is pending before this Tribunal with respect to

103 temporary workmen. He deposes that he cannot

produce any document to show that more than 500

employees were employed in the Factory.

70. The testimony of Mr. Leslie Fernandes is

corroborated by the testimony of Shri Puti Gaonkar.

71. Shri Eurico Noronha (Witness No. 1 for the

Opponent) has not deposed that the number of

workmen working in the Factory is less than 100. He

deposes that he will not be able to produce the

62 of the Factories Act.

72. The testimony of the workman (Leslie

Fernandes) is corroborated by the testimony of the

Union Leader (Shri Puti Gaonkar). The witness of the

Opponent/Party II deposes that he will not be able to

produce the register of Adult Workers maintained

under Section 62 of the Factories Act. Therefore,

adverse inference should be drawn against the

Opponent/Party II. The Applicant/Party I has done

all that he could to obtain the register of Adult

Workers u/s 62 of the Factories Act, but the

Opponent/Party II has suppressed the same.

Therefore, the Applicant/Party I has proved that there

were more than 100 workmen employed by the

Opponent/Party II in the preceding 12 months of

12-10-2015. Hence, I hold additional Issue No. 3A in

the affirmative.

Additional Issue No. 3B:

73. The case of the Applicant/Party I is that the

Opponent/Party II contravened the provisions of

Chapter V-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

while refusing employment to the Applicant/Party I

and the other workmen.

74. For the reasons stated above there are more

than 100 workmen in the Factory. The Factory was

closed down without obtaining the permission of the

Government. The Opponent/Party II has violated the

provisions of Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947. Therefore, the Applicant/Party I has proved

that the Opponent/Party II contravened the

provisions of Chapter V-B of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 while refusing employment to the

Applicant/Party I and other workmen. Hence, I hold

Issue No. 3-B in the affirmative.

Additional Issue No. 3C:

75. The case of the Applicant/Party I is that the

Opponent/Party II has altered the conditions of

service of the Applicant/Party I and other workmen

by discontinuing the manufacturing operations at

Ponda, Goa and asking the Applicant/Party I and

others to report to Nalagarh in the State of Himachal

Pradesh and has thus contravened the provisions of

Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

76. The Applicant/Party I should restrict this case

to his right. He cannot plead and prove the rights of

other workmen.

77. The conditions of service of the Applicant/

/Party I was not changed. He was asked to report to

Nalagarh in Himachal Pradesh on the same terms

and conditions.

78. It is the case of the Applicant/Party I that his

conditions of service was altered during the

pendency of reference No. IT/28/2014, reference

No. IT/63/2012 and reference No. IT/40/2013. These

cases arose on demands made by Trade Unions. There

is no evidence to show that the Applicant/Party I

was a member of any Union. His own witness (Shri

Puti Gaonkar) has deposed that he does not know if

the Applicant/Party I was a member of his Union. He

is not concerned with the disputes in the above

mentioned cases. Therefore, the question of violating

the provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947 does not arise.

79. For the reasons stated above, the Applicant/

/Party I has failed to prove that the Opponent/Party

II has altered the conditions of service of the

Applicant/Party I and other workmen by

discontinuing the manufacturing operations at

Ponda in Goa State and asking the Applicant/Party I

and others to report to Nalagarh in the State of

Himachal Pradesh and has thus contravened Section

33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, I hold

Additional Issue No. 3C in the negative.

Additional Issue No. 3F:

81. The case of the Opponent/Party II is that the

subject matter of the present Application is pending

before the Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition No.

93/2014 and therefore this Application should be

rejected as not maintainable.

82. As seen above, there was a dispute between

the Parties on account of the Applicant/Party I being

transferred to Dharwad. It led to reference No. IT/47/

/2007 before the Labour Court-II, Panaji. The Labour

Court-II, Panaji disposed off the same by Award dated

13-06-2013. The Opponent/Party II has preferred Writ

Petition No. 93/2014 before the Hon’ble High Court

against the Award.

83.

The subject matter of Writ Petition No.

93/2014 and the subject matter of this case are

different. This case cannot be rejected solely on the

ground that Writ Petition No. 93/2014 is pending.

Therefore, the Opponent/Party II has failed to prove

2860

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

that the subject matter of the present application is

pending before the Hon’ble High Court in Writ

Petition No. 93/2014 and therefore the application

should be rejected as not maintainable. Hence, I hold

Issue No. 3F in the negative.

Hence, I pass the following Order:

ORDER

The Opponent/Party II, M/s Wallace

Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bethora, Ponda-Goa

shall pay the Applicant/Party I, Shri Leslie

Fernandes back wages from 12-10-2015 to

14-04-2016. The Applicant/Party I would be

deemed to be re-instated for the said period

from 12-10-2015 to 14-04-2016.

ii. No order as to costs.

iii. Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Anil Scaria)

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal and

Labour Court.

————

Notification

No. 28/02/2023-LAB/Part-I/91

The following Award passed by the Labour Court-II, at

Panaji-Goa on 05-01-2023 in Case No. Ref.

LC-II/IT/10/2012 is hereby published as required

under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 27th January, 2023.

–––

THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’blePresiding

Officer)

Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/10/2012

Shri Chandrakant Gawas,

R/o. 25, F Colony, Zuarinagar,

Sancoale-Goa

… Workman/Party-I.

V/s

M/s. New Era Handling Agency,

R/o. H. No. 2, 1st floor,

Mukund Bldg.,

Opp. State Bank of India,

F. L. Gomes Road,

Vasco-da-Gama-Goa

… Employer/Party-II.

Party-I/Workman represented by Adv. Shri M. Viegas.

Party-II/Employer represented by Adv. Shri M. S.

Bandodkar.

Panaji, Dated: 05-01-2023.

AWARD

In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (d)

of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), the

Government of Goa, by Order dated 31-10-2012,

bearing No. 28/40/2012-LAB/602 referred the

following dispute for adjudication to the Industrial

Tribunal of Goa. The Hon’ble Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court in turn

assigned the present reference for its adjudication

to the Labour Court-II vide its order dated 08-11-2012.

“(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. New Era Handling Agency, Vasco-da-Gama,

Goa, Contractor of M/s. Zuari Industries Ltd.,

Zuarinagar, Goa, in terminating the services

of Shri Chandrakant Gawas, Packer vide their

termination order dated 09-04-2012 is legal and

justified?

(2) If not, what relief the Workman is entitled to?

On receipt of the reference, a case was

registered under No. LC-II/IT/10/2012 and registered

A/D notice was issued to the parties. In pursuance to

the said notice, the parties put in their appearance.

The Workman/Party-I (for short ‘Workman’), filed his

Statement of Claim on 20-04-2014 at Exhibit-7. The

facts of the case in brief as pleaded by the Workman

are that, he is working with the Employer/Party-II

(for short ‘Employer’) as a ‘Packer’ Grade III. He stated

that he was posted at Zuari Industries Ltd. He stated

that he was continuously working in the packing

section for last 30 years and prior to that he was

working as a stitcher with the Employer. He stated

that he is a chronic Diabetic patient and his sugar

level gets fluctuated on and often. He stated that if

his sugar level reduces lower than the normal level,

he gets shivering and had to intake strepsils and/or

pass pass supari which contains certain ingredients

which help his sugar level. He stated that he has

produced a certificate from Dr. N. P. Sawaikar from

Vasco-da-Gama dated 07-03-2013 certifying that he

is suffering from type II Diabetes i.e. Mellitus and

that he is under regular treatment of the said Doctor.

He stated that he is the section President of the Goa

Kranti Sena Mazdoor Union, which hereinafter called

the said Union from October, 2009.

He stated that he was issued a charge sheet

dated 31-12-2011 by the Employer alleging that he

had committed alleged misconduct on 18-12-2011,

alleging that, while on duty and during the process

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2861

of packing, he stopped the operation of filling of the

bags to eat gutka/Tobacco from a sachet and that on

having gutka/Tobacco from a sachet, he deliberately

inserted the empty sachet in the bag which he then

used for filling the products and this action on his

part was an attempt to contaminate the product. He

stated that according to the management the said

commission/omissions are the misconduct as per the

certified standing order applicable to the

establishment. He stated that prior to the issuing

charge sheet, a show cause notice dated 31-03-2011

was issued to him making false and baseless

allegations. He stated that thereafter, he gave his

written explanation to the said charge sheet dated

21-12-2011, which is self-explanatory, wherein he had

specifically stated that on 18-12-2011 he was eating

strepsils as he had severe cough and cold. He stated

that the said charge sheet dated 31-12-2011 charged

against him with the following misconduct under

the following clauses of the Certifying Standing

Orders of the company.

(a) Clause 28(XI)—Drunkenness, riotous,

disorderly, indecent or improper behavior at

the work premises of the Company or outside

the work premises if it adversely affects or is

likely to affect working or discipline of the

Company/Principal Employer.

(b) Clause 28(XII) – Commission of any act

subversive of discipline or good behavior at

the work premises or Company’s office.

willful or due to irresponsible action, of

damage due to negligence or carelessness to

or of any property of the company/Principal

Employer.

(d) Clause 28(XXXV) – Bringing inside the

premises of the Establishment, possession of

any alcoholic drink or narcotic drugs within

the place of work premises of the Company or

reporting to work under the influence of

alcoholic drinks or narcotics.

(e) Clause 28(XLI) – Pursuance of any act or

conduct against the interest of the company.

4. He submitted that he has not committed any

misconduct as alleged in the charge sheet dated

31-12-2011 and the aforesaid charges against him are

totally false and baseless and are vehemently denied.

He stated that the Employer has appointed Shri S. K.

Mandrekar as an Enquiry Officer to conduct the

domestic enquiry into the said charge sheet. He

stated that Ld. Enquiry Officer, Shri S. K. Mandrekar

submitted his report dated 20-02-2012 with respect

to the said domestic enquiry holding him guilty of

misconduct. He stated that his services have been

terminated by the Employer vide his letter dated

05-04-2012. Aggrieved by the decision of the

Employer, he raised an Industrial Dispute before the

Dy. Labour Commissioner, Margao which ended in

failure.

5. He contended that no opportunity was given

to him during the enquiry to defend himself. He

submitted that he was not allowed to represented

by anybody. He submitted that the management has

failed to prove the charges levelled against him. He

submitted that the Ld. Enquiry Officer was acting in

biased manner throughout the enquiry. He submitted

that he was compelled to apologize during the

domestic enquiry by the employee on the

representation of its officer assuring that he would

be re-instated in case he apologized and agreed to

the charges. He submitted that he agreed to

apologize on being promised to be reinstated and

coupled with the fact that being a diabetic patient,

he cannot face any mental stress as the same is

effecting his health and therefore, he agreed to the

suggestion believing Mr. Vilas Dessai and accepted

his assurance in good faith. He submitted that the

apology tendered by him was done purely out of

duress on the aforesaid false representation of the

Employer that he would be reinstated. He submitted

that the findings were not based on evidence on

records and Ld. Enquiry Officer acted in biased

manner. He therefore, submitted that his termination

from services by the Employer is illegal and

unjustified. He submitted that the management has

terminated his services by way of victimization being

a leader of the Goa Kranti Sena Mazdoor Union which

had addressed various letter to the Employer for

redressal of the various grievances of the workmen.

6. He submitted that he has been unemployed

from the time of termination his services on

09-04-2012. He stated that though he has attempted

to seek employment, he has not been able to secure

the same on account of his advanced age and health

condition. He stated that he has been surviving on

his meagre savings and on the interest from the

meagre personal gold ornaments of his family

members which has been pawned in order to raise

finances to keep his body and soul and his family

together. He stated that he is married and has four

unmarried daughters, and one son and housewife.

The Workman therefore, prayed that the order of

termination dated 09-04-2012 be declared as illegal

and quashed and set aside and he be reinstated his

services of the Employer at the same or higher grade

as he is entitled to, with full back wages and

consequential benefits thereof.

2862

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

7. The Employer resisted the aforesaid claim of

the Workman by filing his written statement dated

26-06-2013 at Exb. 8. The Employer, as and by way of

its preliminary objections, submitted that the entire

reference is bad in law, not maintainable and ought

to be rejected as the Employer is in the business of

bagging and dispatch of the urea N.P.K. product,

which is transported all over India through wagon’s

and trucks. The Employer stated that he is the

contractor of M/s. Zuari Industries Ltd., Zuarinagar-

-Goa. The Employer stated that the Workman in the

reference was appointed as Belt Gide as per

settlement dated 30-09-1986 vide letter dated

01-10-1986 wherein the terms and conditions of

employment were specified and the same where

accepted by the Workman. The Employer stated that

on 18-12-2011 at around 19.30 hrs., where the

Workman was operating the packer scale No. 9 and

10, the Workman stopped the operation of filling the

bags and started eating Gutka/Tobacco from a sachet

and thereafter, he deliberately inserted the empty

sachet in the bag which he then used for filing the

product. The Employer stated that this has resulted

in contaminating the product and thereby he

committed serious acts of misconduct as per its

Certified Standing Orders. The Employer stated that

the Workman was therefore, issued a charge sheet

dated 31-12-2011. The Employer stated that

thereafter, an enquiry was conducted in respect of

the said charge sheet. The Employer stated that

during the enquiry, the Workman submitted his reply

to the charge sheet dated 10-01-2012. The Employer

denies the entire contents of the said reply. The

Employer stated that the Workman fully participated

in the enquiry. The Employer stated that it has

conducted the said enquiry in a fair and proper

manner by following the principles of natural justice.

The Employer stated that after completion of enquiry,

Ld. Enquiry Officer submitted his findings wherein

all the charges are found proved against the

Workman. The Employer stated that the findings of

the Ld. Enquiry Officer are based on the

documentary and oral evidence on the records of the

enquiry. The Employer stated that after going

through the entire proceeding of the enquiry, its

connected papers and the documents taken on

record, the management concurred with the findings

of the Enquiry Officer dated 20-02-2012. The Employer

stated that thereafter, they had issued a show cause

notice dated 31-03-2012 to the Workman alongwith

the copy of findings of the Enquiry Officer dated

20-02-2012. The Employer stated that the Workman

did not reply to the show cause notice issued to him.

The Employer stated that while issuing show cause

notice, they have perused the past record and other

circumstances and issued the show cause notice. The

Employer stated that considering the seriousness

and gravity of the misconduct found proved against

the Workman, the management came to a definite

conclusion that no leniency was warranted. The

Employer stated that thereafter, vide letter dated 09-

04-2012, they dismissed the services of the Workman

after taking into consideration all the factors

including past record. The Employer stated that

having regard to all the circumstances, including

past records it was fully justified in dismissing the

Workman from its services. The Employer stated that

the acts of misconduct committed by the Workman

are grave and serious in nature and the punishment

imposed upon him is appropriate and commensurate

with the acts of misconduct committed by the

Workman and therefore, the dismissal is just and fair

punishment and this Hon’ble Court should not

interfere with its said administrative decision. The

Employer stated that it has held fair and proper

enquiry by following principles of natural justice and

the finding of the enquiry are based on the evidence

on record of the enquiry proceedings and its

connected papers. The Employer stated that in any

event, if the Hon’ble Court comes to the conclusion

that the enquiry was not conducted properly or in

fair and proper manner or that the findings are

perverse and/or are not based on the evidence, then

the Employer craves leave to lead additional

evidence to justify its case. The Employer denied the

overall case as pleaded by the Workman and prayed

for dismissal of the reference.

8. Thereafter, the Workman filed his Rejoinder on

26-06-2013 at Exhibit-11. The Workman, as and by

way of his Re-joinder, denied each and every

statement, averments and submissions made by the

Employer vide their Written Statement filed in the

present proceedings and reiterates and confirms the

statements, averments and submissions made by him

in his statement of claim.

9. Based on the pleadings filed by the respective

Parties, this Labour Court-II framed the following

issues at Exb. 19.

1. Whether free, fair and proper enquiry has been

conducted against the Workman in accordance

with principles of natural justice?

2. Whether the charges of misconduct leveled

against the Workman have been proved to the

satisfaction of this court by an acceptable

evidence?

3. Whether the Workman/Party-I proves that the

action of the management of the Employer in

terminating his services vide their termination

order dated 09-04-2012 is illegal and unjustified?

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2863

4. Whether the Workman is entitled for any relief?

5. What Order? What Award?

10. On 29-09-2020 Ld. Adv. Mrs. S. Nagvenkar h/f

Adv. M. Viegas remained present and filed a fresh

Wakalatnama and also filed an application for

bringing legal heirs of the deceased Workman which

was allowed after hearing both the parties and the

matter was fixed for 12-10-2022. On 12-10-2022, Ld.

Adv. Mrs. S. Nagvenkar appearing for the legal heirs

of the deceased Workman carried out the amendment

as per order dated 29-09-2022. Ld. Adv. Mrs. S.

Nagvenkar appearing for the legal heirs of the

deceased Workman as well as Ld. Adv. Shri M. S.

Bandodkar appearing for the Employer, submitted

that the matter will be settled amicably between the

parties. Accordingly on 05-01-2023, Ld. Adv. Mrs. S.

Nagvenkar appearing for the legal heirs of the

deceased Workman as well as Ld. Adv. Shri M. S.

Bandodkar representing the Employer submitted

that they have settled the matter amicably on

payment of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only) full

and final settlements of all the claims of

Mr. Chandrakant Gawas and filed an application duly

signed by both parties which is on record at Exb. 96.

I have carefully gone through the terms of settlement

signed by both the parties and is of the opinion that

the terms of settlement are beneficial to both the

parties. Hence, I consented for the same.

In view of above, I passed the following order.

ORDER

1. In view of the settlement between the parties

hereinabove, the reference as to whether the

action of the management of M/s. New Era

Handling Agency, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa,

Contractor of M/s. Zuari Industries Ltd.,

Zuarinagar, Goa, in terminating the services of

Shri Chandrakant Gawas, Packer vide their

termination order dated 09-04-2012 is legal and

justified, does not survive.

2. Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar),

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

————

Notification

No. 28/02/2023-LAB/Part-I/111

The following Award passed by the Industrial

Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on

23-01-2023 in Ref. No. IT/36/2013 is hereby

published as required under Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of

1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 7th February, 2023.

———

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR COURT

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Mr. Anil Scaria, Hon’ble Presiding Officer)

Ref. No. IT/36/2013

Workmen

Rep. by the President,

Ramada Renaissance Resort

Employees Union,

Varca, Fatrade,

Salcete-Goa

… Workmen/Party-I.

V/s

M/s. Ramada Caravela Beach

Resort Goa,

Varca Beach, Fatrade,

Salcete-Goa

… Employer/Party-II.

Workmen/Party I represented by Learned Advocate

Shri Suhaas Naik.

Employer/Party II represented by Learned Advocate

Shri Rishi Ashok.

AWARD

(Delivered on this the 23rd day of the month of

January of the year 2023)

By Order dated 17-09-2013, bearing No. 28/43/

/2013-Lab/628, the Government of Goa in exercise of

powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘The Act’), has referred

the following dispute to this Tribunal for

adjudication:-

“(1)

Whether the demand of Ramada Renaissance

Resort Employees Union for payment of full

wages for the period from 20-08-2012 to

31-08-2012 i.e. the period of suspension of

operations by the management of M/s.

Ramada Caravela Beach Resort Goa, Varca, is

legal and justified?

(2)

If not, to what relief each of the workmen are

entitled?”

2864

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2. Upon receipt of the reference, it was registered

as IT/36/2013 and notices by registered post

acknowledgement due were issued to both the

Parties.

3. Party I has filed its Claim Statement. The case

of Party I is that Party II suspended operations from

20-08-2012 to 31-08-2012. That during this period, the

workmen were not allowed to report for work. Party

II did not pay the workmen their wages for the said

period. That the action of Party II is illegal and

unjustified. That the workmen are entitled to full back

wages. That the matter was referred to conciliation

before the Conciliation Officer-cum-Deputy Labour

Commissioner, Margao, Goa. That as the conciliation

failed, the matter was referred to this Tribunal for

adjudication. Therefore, it is prayed that the workmen

be paid wages for the period from 20-08-2012 to

31-08-2012 together with interest at the rate of

9% per annum.

4. Party II has filed its Written Statement. Party II

states that Party II had suspended operation from

20-08-2012 to 31-08-2012. That this was done to

upgrade the electric power and water system. That

notice dated 10-08-2012 was displayed on the Notice

Board regarding the same. That the workers were

informed that they would be paid 5 days wages for

the said period. That the workers were also given

the option to take 5 days leave so that they would

get the full salary.

5. That the suspension of operations was legal and

justified. That the workmen are not members of

Ramada Renaissance Resort Employees Union. That

they are members of the All India Trade Union

Congress. That Mr. Joao Anselmo Fernandes, General

Secretary of Ramada Renaissance Resort Employees

Union has no authority to sign the Statement of Claim.

Therefore, it is prayed that the demand of Party I be

rejected.

6. Party I has filed its Rejoinder. Party I states that

Ramada Renaissance Resort Employees Union is

affiliated to the All India Trade Union Congress. That

the General Secretary of the Ramada Renaissance

Resort Employees Union has the authority to sign

the Statement of Claims. It is denied that in the month

of July, 2012, the Management went ahead with a

major up-gradation (of electric power and water

system). It is denied that notice regarding the same

was given to the workers. It is denied that the

workmen were informed that they would get 5 days

wages for the period of suspension of operation. That

the workmen were also not informed that they would

get full wages if they applied for 5 days leave during

the said period. Therefore, it is prayed that the claim

of Party I be allowed.

7. The following issues were framed by this

Tribunal:-

ISSUES

1. Whether the Party I proves that their demand

for payment of full wages for the period from

20-08-2012 to 31-08-2012 i.e. the period of

suspension of operations by the Party II is legal

and justified?

2. What Relief? What Award?

8. That during the course of proceedings, the

following Consent Terms were filed before this

Tribunal:

“1) It is respectfully submitted that both the Parties

above named had arrived at an amicable settlement,

that the Workmen shall accept the offer of the

Management as per the notice dated 10-08-2012 and

apply for Privilege Leave for 50% of the days and it

shall be deemed to have sanctioned by the

Management/Leave sanctioning authority and the

Management shall pay salary for only 50% of the

days. Thus, the pending dispute in respect of claim

towards lockdown period for 10 days is amicably

resolved by this term.

2) In this back drop both the Parties submit the

reference may be treated as settled out of the Hon’ble

Court and any order passed by the Hon’be Court

shall not be binding upon me and I will not be a

beneficiary of the said Award if any passed by this

Hon’ble Court.”

9. As per the Consent Terms, the dispute has

been settled out of Court (Tribunal). Nothing further

requires to be done. The proceeding before this

Tribunal should be closed and the reference should

be returned to the Government for information.

Hence, I pass the following:-

ORDER

(i)

The proceedings are closed as settled out of

Court (Tribunal). The reference is returned

to the Government.

(ii) Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Aniil Scaria),

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal and

Labour Court.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2865

Department of Personnel

–––

Order

No. 4/5/2012-PER/342

Shri Akash S. Kantak, Deputy Director

(IT Infrastructure), Department of Information

Technology, Electronics & Telecommunications,

shall hold the additional charge of Managing

Director, Goa Information Technology Development

Corporation (GITDC) in addition to his own duties

with immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 7th February, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Public Health

–––

Order

No. 31/11/2004-I/PHD/Part/196

Read: 1) Government Order No. 31/11/2004-I/PHD/

/Part/2669 dated 26-11-2019.

2) Addendum No. 31/11/2004-I/PHD/Part/59

dated 07-01-2021.

In the Government Order and Addendum read

1 and 2,

1) Government is pleased to extend the tenure

of Sr. No. 9 i.e. Dr. Virendra Gaonkar, Paediatrician

as member of State Technical Committee for

monitoring of AEFI for further period of 03 years.

2) Sr. No. 14 i.e. A Cardiologist from GMC is

appointed as Memeber of the State AEFI

Committee.

The rest of the content remains the same.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 7th February, 2023.

———

Certificate

No. 22/3/2000-I/PHD/Part-I/193

Read: Government Order No. 22/3/2000-I/PHD/

/Part-I/40 dated 16-01-2023.

Certified that the character and antecedents of

Dr. Sunil Shyam alias Shyamba Gaude, Junior

Surgeon (Group “A” Gazetted) under Directorate of

Health Services has been verified by the District

Magistrate, South Goa, Margao vide letter No. 36/

/01/2022/VCA/MAG/270/M.O.271 dated 19-01-2023,

it is revealed that there is nothing adverse

reported against him.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 7th February, 2023.

———

Corrigendum

No. 21/10/2001-I/PHD/199

Read: Order No. 21/10/2001-I/PHD/52 dated 17-01-2022.

The date mentioned in the Government Order

dated 17-01-2022 read in preamble may be

corrected to read as “17-01-2023” instead of

“17-01-2022”.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health).

Porvorim, 8th February, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Public Works

Office of the Principal Chief Engineer

–––

Order

No. 34/2/2022-23/PCE-PWD-ADM(II)/141

On the recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee as conveyed by the Goa Public

Service Commission vide its letter No. COM/II/11/36(4)/2020/366 dated 12-12-2022, Government is pleased

to promote the following Technical Assistant (Civil)/Junior Engineer (Civil), to the post of Assistant

Engineer/Assistant Surveyor of Works/Engineering Assistant (Civil) Group “B”, Gazetted in the Pay Matrix

Level-7 of the 7th Pay Commission, in Public Works Department on regular basis with immediate effect

and post them in the places shown against their names in column No. 4 below.

2866

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

Sr.

Name of the Officer

Present place of

Place of posting on

No.

and designation

posting

promotion

Shri Anant R. Fadte Gaonkar,

Division XVIII (Roads), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

Technical Assistant

Ponda

Division VIII, PWD, Fatorda

vice Shri Augusto Pereira,

AE transferred.

Shri Cecil Peter Vaz,

Office of the Superintending

As Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

Junior Engineer

Engineer, C.O. IX (NH), PWD,

Division XXVIII, PWD, Panaji

Altinho

in existing vacancy.

Shri Vivekanand V. Kamat,

SW-II, Office of Superintending

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Surveyor of Works, PWD,

Works, SW-I (R&B), Design

Altinho

Cell, Office of the Superintending

Surveyor of Works, PWD,

Altinho in existing vacancy.

Shri Charles Mark D’Souza,

Division XXVII (Sew.), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

St. Inez

Works-II, Division XVII, PWD,

Porvorim in the existing vacancy.

Shri B. R. Satyapramod,

Division XVI (B), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD II,

Junior Engineer

Ponda

Division XVI, PWD, Ponda in

existing vacancy.

Shri Gurudatt J. Naik,

Division IX (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, Goa

Junior Engineer

Margao

Waste Management Corporation,

Saligao, Bardez on deputation.

Shri Umesh R. Shirodkar,

Division I (B), PWD, Junta

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

House, Panaji

Works I, Division XIII, Mapusa

vice Shri Robert D’souza,

ASW, transferred.

Shri Abhay A. Prabhukhadpe,

SW I, Office of Superintending

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Surveyor of Works, PWD,

Works-I, Division V, PWD,

Altinho

Panaji vice Shri Jayanand

Madkaikar, ASW transferred.

Shri Antonio Corte,

Division II (Roads), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Panaji

Works, Office of Engineering

Officer, PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.

10.

Shri Agnelo M. Rodrigues,

Office of the Superintending

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Engineer, C.O. IV, PWD,

Works II, Division XXV, PWD,

Margao

Margao in existing vacancy.

11.

Shri Madan Mohandas Desai,

Division III (WS), PWD, St. Inez

As Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

Technical Assistant

Division XXIV, PWD, Valpoi

vice Shri Soma Naik, AE

transferred.

12.

Smt. Chandrakala Sandip Prabhu

Division XI (QC), PWD, Panaji

As Assistant Surveyor of

Chodankar, Junior Engineer

Works I, Division I, PWD,

Panaji in existing vacancy.

13.

Smt. Sarita Pradeep Shirodkar,

Division III (WS), PWD, St. Inez

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Works, SW-II (WSS), Design

Cell,

Office

the

Superintending Surveyor of

Works, PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2867

14.

Shri Marcos D. Costa,

Division XXI(SW), PWD, Margao

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Works, Office of the Chief

Engineer, NH (R&B), PWD,

Altinho in existing vacancy.

15.

Shri Sandeep V. Phadte (OBC),

Division III (WS), PWD, St. Inez

As Assistant Engineer,

Junior Engineer

Revenue/NRW, SD I, Division

IX,

PWD,

Margao

existing vacancy.

16.

Smt. Smita Pundalik Gaonkar,

Division VIII(B), PWD, Margao

As Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

Junior Engineer

Division VIII, PWD, Vasco

vice Shri Nolasco Pereira, AE

transferred.

17.

Shri Dattaram S. Raikar,

Office of the Superintending

As Assistant Engineer, SD IV,

Technical Assistant

Surveyor of Works, PWD,

Division XVII, PWD, Porvorim

Altinho

vice Shri Vasudev Parab, AE

transferred.

18.

Shri Nagraj R. Adpaikar (OBC),

Division XIV(NH), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Technical Assistant

Margao

Works-II, Division XX, PWD,

Margao vice Shri Naresh Hede,

ASW transferred.

19.

Shri Jerominao Santan Vaz,

Division XXVIII (NH), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Technical Assistant

Margao

Works,

Office

the

Superintending Engineer,

C.O.IV, PWD, Margao vice

Shri Jose S.B. Mascarenhas

transferred.

20.

Shri Ghanashyam T. Gaude (ST),

Division III (WS), PWD, St. Inez

As Assistant Engineer,

Technical Assistant

Revenue/NRW, SD II, Division

III, PWD, Daag, Ponda in

existing vacancy.

21.

Shri Prashant Y. Kamat,

Division XV (NH), PWD, Ponda

As Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

Junior Engineer

Division XVI, PWD, Valpoi in

the existing vacancy.

22.

Shri Kashinath Vithal Shet Saraf,

Division III (WS), PWD, St. Inez

As Assistant Engineer, SD-IV,

Junior Engineer

Division III, PWD, Daag,

Ponda vice Yeshwant Mapari,

AE transferred.

23.

Shri Dattaprasad S. Gaonkar,

Division VII (NH), PWD, Panaji

As Assistant Engineer, SD IV,

Junior Engineer

Division I, PWD, Panaji vice

Guirish Sawant, AE transferred.

24.

Smt. Maria Fatima De Souza,

Division XIV (NH), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Margao

Works, Division XIV, PWD,

Margao vice Shri Mahanand

Shet, ASW transferred.

25.

Shri Ameya V. Lawande,

Division XVII (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Porvorim

Works, Division XI, PWD,

Panaji vice Shri Umesh Borkar,

ASW transferred.

26.

Shri Chanda Shankar

Division XV, PWD, Ponda

As Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

Parwar (SC), Junior Engineer

Division XV, PWD, Ponda in

existing vacancy.

2868

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

27.

Smt. Deeti G. Borker,

Division XV, PWD, Ponda

As Assistant Surveyor of

Technical Assistant

Works, Division XV, PWD,

Ponda in existing vacancy.

28.

Shri Truptesh Kushendra

Division IX (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Shirsat, Technical Assistant

Margao

Works, Office of the Chief

Engineer I, PWD, Altinho

vice Shri Anand Mishra, AE

transferred.

29.

Smt. Kashish Raosaheb Rane,

Division XXIII (R), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD I,

Technical Assistant

Bicholim

Division XXIV, PWD, Bicholim

in existing vacancy.

30.

Shri Sarvesh R. Madkaikar,

Division XI (QC), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Technical Assistant

Panaji

Works I, Division XXV, PWD,

Margao in existing vacancy.

31.

Shri Rohan S. Dessai,

Division XXV (R), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD II,

Technical Assistant

Margao

Division XXV, PWD, Quepem

in existing vacancy.

32.

Smt. Swati V. Sakhardande,

Division IX (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

Technical Assistant

Margao

Division IX, PWD, Vasco in

existing vacancy.

33.

Smt. Sridevi M. Badami,

Division XVII (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Porvorim

Works, SW-II (WSS), Technical

Cell, Office of the Superintending

Surveyor of Works, PWD,

Altinho in existing vacancy.

34.

Shri Mahesh R. Naik

Division III (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

Gaunekar, Junior Engineer

St. Inez

Division XXVI, PWD, Ponda

in existing vacancy.

35.

Smt. Uma Neurenkar,

Division XXVII (SW), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

St. Inez, Panaji

Works, Technical Cell, PCE’s

office, PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.

36.

Shri Casmiro C. S. Mascarenhas,

Division XXIV (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Bicholim

Works, Division XXIV, PWD,

Bicholim vice Shri Xec

Ussain, ASW transferred.

37.

Shri Pradeep Vasant Dessai,

Division XIX (B), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

Junior Engineer

Sanguem

Division IX, PWD, Margao in

existing vacancy.

38.

Shri Leslie F. Colaco,

Division VI (R), PWD, Margao

As Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

Junior Engineer

Division I, PWD, Altinho vice

Smt. Nalini Ajay, AE transferred.

39.

Shri Aneil A.C. Rodrigues,

Division VI (R), PWD, Margao

As Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

Junior Engineer

Division XXI, PWD, Vasco in

existing vacancy.

40.

Shri Vitorino G. Sequeira,

Division VII (NH), PWD, Panaji

As Assistant Engineer, SD II,

Junior Engineer

Division VII, PWD, Mapusa

vice Shri Dinesh Tare, AE

transferred.

41.

Shri Vinayak J. Shenvi,

Division XX (WS), PWD, Margao

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Works, Division XIX, PWD,

Sanguem in existing vacancy.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2869

42.

Shri Vincente B.S. Coelho

Division XIV (NH), PWD, Margao

As Assistant Surveyor of

Costa, Junior Engineer

Works,

Office

the

Superintending Engineer,

C.O. IX, PWD, Altinho, in

existing vacancy.

43.

Smt. Rosa Judith Carmel

SW-I, Office of Superintending

As Assistant Surveyor of

Sandra Santa Rita Lobo e

Surveyor of Works, PWD,

Works, Office of the Chief

Gonsalves, Junior Engineer

Altinho

Engineer II, PWD, Altinho

vice Smt. Dafia Pandit, ASW

transferred.

44.

Shri Chandrakant S. Paryenkar,

Division I (B), PWD, Panaji

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Works,

Office

the

Superintending

Engineer,

C.O. I, PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.

45.

Shri Prajesh P. Chodankar,

Division II (R), PWD, Panaji

As Assistant Engineer,

Junior Engineer

Revenue/NRW, SD-I, Division

III, PWD, St. Inez in existing

vacancy.

46.

Shri Marcel Neslie D’Silva,

SD-II, Division VI (R), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Margao

Works II, Division VI, PWD,

Margao vice Shri Meghashyam

Naik, AE transferred.

47.

Shri Dayanand D. Phaldessai,

Division VI (R), PWD, Margao

As Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

Junior Engineer

Division VI, PWD, Margao

vice Shri Tatoba Patil, AE

transferred.

48.

Shri Rajeshwar M. Chodankar,

Office of the Superintending

As Assistant Engineer, SD IV,

Junior Engineer

Engineer, C.O. II, PWD,

Division V, PWD, Pernem in

Altinho

existing vacancy.

49.

Shri Vinayak G. Bhat,

Division VIII(B), PWD, Margao

As Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

Junior Engineer

Division IX, PWD, Margao

vice Shri Prasad Sakhardande,

AE transferred.

50.

Smt. Maria de Jesus Savita

Office of Superintending

As Assistant Surveyor of

Marlene Ferrao e Noronha,

Surveyor of Works, PWD,

Works, Estate/Assests/Record

Junior Engineer

Altinho

Cell, Office of the Superintending

Engineer (Mon. & Eva.), PWD,

Altinho in existing vacancy.

51.

Shri Zeelbarao L. Desai,

Division XXIII (R), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-V,

Junior Engineer

Bicholim

Division I, PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.

52.

Shri Dinesh T. Bhandari,

Division XII (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

Junior Engineer

Sanguem

Division XVII, PWD, Calangute

in existing vacancy.

53.

Shri Wilson Pereira,

Division XVIII (R), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Ponda

Works, Division XXVIII, PWD,

Margao in existing vacancy.

54.

Shri Maheshwar S. Opkar (ST),

Division IX (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

Junior Engineer

Margao

Division XXVII, PWD,

Porvorim in existing vacancy.

2870

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

55.

Shri Deelip Tukaram Kerkar (ST),

Division XXV (R), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

Junior Engineer

Margao

Division XXV, PWD, Canacona

in existing vacancy.

56.

Shri Dinkar Fatti Malekar (ST),

Division III (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer,

Junior Engineer

St. Inez

Revenue/NRW, SD I, Division

XX, PWD, Curchorem in

existing vacancy.

57.

Shri Praveen B. Zambaulikar (ST),

Division I (B), PWD, Panaji

As Assistant Engineer, SD III,

Junior Engineer

Division III, PWD, Banastari

vice Shri Subhash Gaude,

AE transferred.

All the above promoted officers shall hold the charge of respective posts of Technical Assistant/Junior

Engineers until further orders or till the respective vacant posts are filled except Sr. No. 11, 14, 25, 33, 51

and 52.

The above promoted Officers will be on probation for a period of 2 years from the date of joining.

The deployment of the officers shown above on deputation to Goa Waste Management Corporation,

Saligao and SIDCGL, Panaji is for a period of one year and shall be governed by the terms and conditions

of the Government O.M. No. 13/4/74-PER dated 12-02-1999 and dated 11-01-2007 as amended from time to

time of the Department of Personnel, Secretariat.

Further, the DPC recommends the following Technical Assistant (Civil)/Junior Engineers (Civil) for

promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer/Assistant Surveyor of Works/Engineering Assistant (Civil)

Group “B”, Gazetted in the Pay Matrix Level-7 of the 7th Pay Commission, in the Public Works Department

on officiating basis with immediate effect and post them in the places shown against their names in

column No. 4 below.

Sr.

Name of the Officer

Present place of

Place of posting on

No.

posting

promotion

Shri Shivnath M. Gawas,

Division XIII (R), PWD, Mapusa

As Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

Technical Assistant

Division XIII, PWD, Pernem

vice Shri Laxman V. Naik,

AE transferred.

Smt. Wendy Jennifer Mendes

Division V (B), PWD, Panaji

As Assistant Engineer, SD I,

e Grao, Technical Assistant

Division V, PWD, Panaji in

existing vacancy.

Shri Shailesh S. S. Usgaonkar,

Division XX (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD I,

Technical Assistant

Margao

Division XX, PWD, Curchorem

in existing vacancy.

Shri Arvind A. Sawaikar,

Division XXIII (R), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer,

Technical Assistant

Bicholim

Revenue/NRW, SD-II, Division

XXIV, PWD, Valpoi in

existing vacancy.

Shri Thopil Sanjay,

Division XXV (R), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-IV,

Technical Assistant

Margao

Division XXV, PWD, Sanguem

in existing vacancy.

Shri Sagar S. Shet,

Division XIV (NH), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD III,

Technical Assistant

Margao

Division XIV, PWD, Canacona

in existing vacancy.

Shri Hemant G. Desai,

Division XXV (R), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

Technical Assistant

Margao

Division

XXV,

PWD,

Dharbandora in existing

vacancy.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2871

Shri Pravin Devu Naik (OBC),

Division XXV (R), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Margao

Works,

Office

the

Superintending Engineer

(Legal), PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.

Shri Jose A. R. Caldeira,

Division II (R), PWD,

As Assistant Engineer, SD II,

Junior Engineer

Panaji

Division XVII, PWD, Mapusa

vice Shri Mahesh Keneudekar,

AE transferred.

10.

Smt. Kosha Sajo @ Siddesh

Division VII (NH), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Gaonkar, Junior Engineer

Panaji

Works, Division VII, PWD,

Panaji in existing vacancy.

11.

Shri Ramanand M. Naik,

Division XII (WS), PWD,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Junior Engineer

Sanguem

Works II, Division I, PWD,

Panaji in existing vacancy.

All the above promoted officers on officiating basis shall hold the charge of respective posts of

Technical Assistant/Junior Engineers until further orders or till the respective vacant posts are filled

except Sr. No. 11.

All the above promoted officers shall exercise their option for pay fixation within a period of one month

from the date of issue of this order under F.R. 22 (I) (a) (1).

Further, Government is pleased to order the transfer of the following Assistant Engineer/Assistant

Surveyor of Works to the places shown against their names in column No. 4 below with immediate effect.

Sr.

Name of the Officer

Present place of

Place of posting on

No.

posting

promotion

Shri Guirish L. Sawant

Assistant Engineer, SD-IV,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division I, PWD, Junta

Works, Office of the

House, Panaji

Superintending Engineer

(Mon. & Eva.), PWD, Altinho

vice Shri Pranshankar

Mahajan, ASW transferred.

Shri Prashankar Mahajan

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Office of the Superintending

Works, Division XXIII, PWD,

Engineer (Mon. & Eva.), PWD,

Bicholim vice Smt. Rashmi

Altinho

Mayekar, ASW transferred.

Smt. Nalini Ajay

Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division I, PWD, Altinho

Works,

Office

the

Superintending Engineer,

C.O.II, PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.

Shri Digambar Naik

Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-V,

Division III, PWD, St. Inez

Division V, PWD, Porvorim

in the existing vacancy.

Shri Subhash Gaude

Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

Division III, PWD, Banastarim

Division XXVI, PWD, Ponda

in the existing vacancy.

Shri Mahanand Shet

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

Division XIV, PWD, Margao

Division II, PWD, Panaji in the

existing vacancy.

2872

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

Shri Laxman Naik

Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division XIII, PWD, Pernem

Works, Office of the Chief

Engineer, NH R&B, PWD,

Altinho in the existing

vacancy.

Shri Devesh Tanna

Assistant Surveyor of Works-I,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division XVII, PWD, Porvorim

Works, Road Engineering

Cell, Office of the Chief

Engineer, NH R&B, PWD,

Altinho in the existing vacancy.

Shri Nolasco A. Pereira

Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-I,

Division VIII, PWD, Vasco

Division I, PWD, Panaji in

the existing vacancy.

10.

Shri Naresh Hede (M/E)

Assistant Surveyor of Works

As Assistant Engineer, WTP,

II, Division XX, PWD, Margao

SD-II, Division XII, PWD,

Sanguem in the existing

vacancy

11.

Shri Meghashyam Naik

Assistant Surveyor of Works-II,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

Division VI, PWD, Margao

Division I, PWD, Porvorim in

existing vacancy.

12.

Shri Tatoba Patil

Assistant Engineer, SD II,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division VI, PWD, Margao

Works,

Office

the

Superintending Engineer,

C.O. IV, PWD, Margao in

existing vacancy.

13.

Shri Jayanand Madkaikar

Assistant Surveyor of Works-I,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

Division V, PWD, Panaji

Division II, PWD, Panaji on

existing vacancy.

14.

Shri Mahesh Kenavdekar

Assistant Engineer, SD II,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division XVII, PWD, Mapusa

Works-I, Division XVII, PWD,

Porvorim vice Devesh Tanna,

ASW transferred.

15.

Shri Vassudev Parab

Assistant Engineer, SD IV,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division XVII, PWD, Porvorim

Works-II, Division V, PWD,

Panaji in existing vacancy.

16.

Shri Augusto Pereira

Assistant Engineer, SD I,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division VIII, PWD, Fatorda

Works, Estate/Assests/Records

Cell, Office of the Superintending

Engineer (Mon. & Eva.),

PWD, Altinho in existing

vacancy.

17.

Shri Soma Naik

Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

As Assistant Engineer, SD I,

Division XXIV, PWD, Valpoi

Division XVII, PWD, Pernem

in existing vacancy.

18.

Shri Dinesh Tare

Assistant Engineer, SD-II,

As Assistant Engineer, SD-III,

Division VII, PWD, Mapusa

Division VII, PWD, Colvale

in existing vacancy.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 46

16TH FEBRUARY, 2023

2873

19.

Shri Xec Ussain

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division XXIV, PWD, Bicholim

Works, SW-I (R&B), Technical

Cell,

Office

the

Superintending Surveyor of

Works, PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.

20.

Shri Yeshwant Mapari

Assistant Engineer, SD-IV,

As Assistant Engineer, SD I,

Division III, PWD, Daag, Ponda

Division III, PWD, St. Inez

vice Shri Digambar Naik,

AE transferred.

21.

Smt. Dafia Pandit

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Office of the Chief Engineer II,

Works,

Office

the

PWD, Altinho

Superintending Engineer,

C.O. I, PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.

22.

Shri Prasad Sakhardande

Assistant Engineer, SD II,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division IX, PWD, Margao

Works, Division XXI, PWD,

Margao in existing vacancy.

23.

Shri Anand Mishra

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Engineer, SD

Office of the Chief Engineer I,

VI,

Division

PWD,

PWD, Altinho

Secretariat, Porvorim.

24.

Shri Jose S.B. Mascarenhas

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Engineer, SD I,

Office of the Superintending

Division XXI, PWD, Margao

Engineer C.O. IV, PWD, Margao

in existing vacancy.

25.

Shri Umesh Borkar

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division XI, PWD, Panaji

Works,

Office

the

Engineering Officer, PWD,

Altinho vice Reena Prassan

Kumar, ASW transferred.

26.

Shri Yatin Y. Naik (M/E)

Assistant Engineer, SD III,

As Assistant Engineer, SD II,

Division XXII, PWD, Ponda

Division XXII, PWD, Margao

vice Shri Manuel Fernandes,

AE transferred.

27.

Shri Manuel Fernandes (M/E)

Assistant Engineer, SD II,

As Assistant Engineer, SD III,

Division XXII, PWD, Margao

Division XXII, PWD, Ponda

vice Shri Yatin Naik, AE

transferred.

28.

Reena Prassan Kumar

Assistant Surveyor of Works,

As Assistant Engineer,

Office of the Engineering

Revenue/NRW, SD II, Division

Officer, PWD, Altinho

IX, PWD, Borda in existing

vacancy.

29.

Shri Robert D’Souza

Assistant Surveyor of Works-I,

As Assistant Surveyor of

Division XIII, PWD, Mapusa

Works, Office of the Chief

Engineer II, PWD, Altinho in

existing vacancy.