SERIES II No. 51

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-2023

Panaji, 23rd March, 2023 (Chaitra 2, 1945)

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Agriculture

Directorate of Agriculture

–––

Order

No. 3/3/Hort/SSS-GSHCL/1/2022-23/D.Agri/766

Read:

Order No. 2/12/98-D.Agri/Part II/48 dated

20-04-2022.

In pursuance of Article 76 (i) of Articles of

Association of the Goa State Horticulture

Corporation Ltd.; and further to above referred

Order, Government of Goa is pleased to appoint the

following as Members of Board of the Goa State

Horticulture Corporation Ltd.; in addition to those

appointed vide above referred Order dtd.

20-04-2022.

1.

Shri Vishwas Chodankar, r/o

—

Member.

Mayem, Bicholim-Goa

2.

Shri Santosh Malik, r/o

—

Member.

Cudnem, Bicholim-Goa

3.

Shri Ramesh Ghadi, r/o

—

Member.

Saligao, Bardez-Goa

4.

Shri Rupak Desai, r/o Flat

—

Member.

No. T-3, Bldg. No. 5-C,

Kurtarkar Nagari, St. Cruz,

Ponda-Goa

3033

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

Note:- There is one Supplement and one Extraordinary

issue to the Official Gazette, Series II No. 50 dated

16-03-2023 as follows:—

(1) Supplement dated 16-03-2023 from pages 3029 to

3030 regarding Notification from Department of

Town and Country Planning.

(2) Extraordinary dated 17-03-2023 from pages 3031

to 3032 regarding Notifications from Department

of Finance.

5.

Shri Kishor K. Naik, r/o

—

Member.

H. No. 155/26, Nr. Kamat

Nursing Home, Durghabhat,

Ponda-Goa

6.

Shri Prasad Kundaikar, r/o

—

Member.

Chodan, Mayem-Goa

7.

Shri Divakar Anand Pagi, r/o —

Member.

H. No. 50, Palolem,

Canacona-Goa

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nevil Alphonso, Director & ex officio Jt. Secretary

(Agriculture).

Tonca, Caranzalem, 15th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies

–––

Order

No. 19/01/2014/VUCCS/TS/RCS/part/Suppl./4814

Read: 1) This Office Order No. 19/01/2014/VUCCS/

/TS/RCS/part/1894 dated 29-09-2021.

2) This Office Addendum No. 19/01/2014/

VUCCS/TS/RCS/part/2466 dated 17-11-2021.

3) Letter No. VUCCS/Regis./letter/2022-23/

/184 dated 05-11-2022 from Vishwanath

A. Chodankar, Authorised Recovery and

Sales Officer of the Vasco Urban Co-op.

Credit Society Ltd., Vasco-da-Gama.

Whereas, vide order referred at Sr. No. 1 above,

Shri Vishwanath A. Chodankar, Branch Manager of

Margao Branch, the Goa State Co-operative Bank

Ltd., was empowered to recover certain sums by

attachment and sale of property and execution of all

recovery orders of decree holder viz. The Vasco Urban

Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., 3, Commerce

Centre, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa.

3034

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

And whereas, the addendum to the aforesaid

order was issued vide Sr. No. 2 referred above.

And whereas, aforesaid order at Sr. No. 1 was in

force for one year from 29-09-2021 to 28-09-2022.

And whereas, vide letter read at Sr. No. 3 above,

the Authorised Recovery and Sales Officer of the

Vasco Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Vasco-da-

-Gama has informed that the period of the order

read at Sr. No. 1 above is expired on 28-09-2022 and

requested to extend the powers delegated to him

vide said order for further period with retrospective

effect from 29-09-2022.

Now therefore, I, the undersigned Registrar of

Co-operative Societies, hereby extend the powers

delegated to the Authorised Recovery and Sales

Officer vide order referred at Sr. No. 1 above, with

retrospective effect from 29-09-2022 to 28-09-2024.

The undersigned reserves right to withdraw the

said order at any time without assigning any reason

thereof.

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co.op.).

Panaji, 14th March, 2023.

————

Notification

No. 42/4/2022/GEN/TS/RCS/4895

Read: 1. Notification No. 42/4/2008/TS/RCS/2200

dated 30-09-2020 published in Official

Gazette, Series II No. 28 dated 08-10-2020.

2. Notification No. 42/4/2022/GEN/TS/RCS/

/2504 dated 18-10-2022 published in

Official Gazette, Series II No. 30 dated

27-10-2022.

3. Order No. 42/4/2022/GEN/TS/RCS/3190

dated 30-11-2022 published in Official

Gazette, Series II No. 30 dated 27-10-2022.

4. Order No. RCS/Office order/TS/2001-02/

/Vol.I/Suppl/3248 dated 02-12-2022.

In exercise of the powers conferred under Section

4 read with Section 123B of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act No. 36 of 2001) (herein-

after referred to as “Act”) and in furtherance of the

delegation of powers made vide Notification dated

30-09-2020 read at No. 1 above subjected to

conditions imposed on the exercise of delegated

powers vide Nos. 2 to 4 above, and in public interest

to further streamline the functioning of this office,

the following arrangements are hereby made as

under regarding the exercise of delegated powers of

Registrar by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative

Societies (Tech.), Deputy Registrar of Co-operative

Societies (Admn.) and the Assistant Registrars of

Co-operative Registrars and the Co-operative

Officers posted at Head Office and working in

various sections at Head Office like Technical/

/Election/Audit/Inspection, etc. under the Head

Office situated at Panaji for the purpose of

discharging duties and functions under the Act and

Rules.

1) The existing Sections at Head Office viz. Audit

(ADT), Inspection (INSP), Technical Section-I (TS I),

Technical Section-II (TS II) & Election Section (ELE)

stands re-organized in such a manner that all the

activities of the said sections are brought under a

single section (Wing) under which all aspects of the

monitoring/supervision over functioning of Societies

starting from its registration till winding up affairs

(if needed) in relation to all Societies registered

under a particular Zone shall be dealt with/

processed by a single Section/Wing at Head Office

level consisting of a sectional head and a dealing

hand.

2) Consequent to above re-arrangements, the

Nomenclature of the existing sections at Head Office

and the reference to sectional heads Assistant

Registrar of Co-operative Societies (ARCS) and

Co-operative Officers (C.O.) is hereby changed and

re-aligned as under. All the work, duties and

responsibilities/tasks at the level of Head Office

assigned to the respective wings shall be as given

in the Annexure appended to this Notification. All

Sectional Heads/Wing Incharge shall work and

discharge all the duties and attached responsibilities

under the general guidance and supervision of the

respective Deputy Registrar who is the District Level

Incharge (D.L.I.), subject to the overall control and

superintendence of the Registrar.

Sr.

Existing Nomenclature

New Nomenclature

Nomenclature of Section &

No.

at H.O.

at H.O.

Area at work allotted

1

2

3

4

1.

Assistant Registrar (Audit)

Assistant Registrar (Wing I)

Wing I

All societies registered at Head

Office;

All proposals/correspondence of

Central Zone, Panaji.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3035

1

2

3

4

2.

Assistant Registrar (HQ)

Assistant Registrar (Wing II)

Wing II

All proposals/correspondence of

South Zone, Margao;

All proposals/correspondence of

Quepem Zone, Quepem.

3.

Assistant Registrar

Assistant Registrar (Wing III)

Wing III

(Elections North)

All proposals/correspondence of

Ponda Zone, Ponda.

4.

Assistant Registrar

Assistant Registrar (Wing IV)

Wing IV

(Elections South)

All proposals/correspondence of

North Zone, Mapusa.

5.

Assistant Registrar

Assistant Registrar (Wing V)

Wing V

(Marketing)

All proposals/correspondence of

Bicholim Zone, Bicholim.

6.

Co-operative Officer/

C. O. I

All proposals/correspondence of

/Special Auditor

South Zone, Margao and Quepem

(Technical I)

Zone, Quepem.

7.

Co-operative Officer/

C. O. II

All proposals/correspondence of

/Special Auditor

Head Office.

(Technical II)

All proposals/correspondence of

and Ponda Zone, Ponda.

8.

Co-operative Officer/

C. O. III

All proposals/correspondence of

/Special Auditor (Audit)

North Zone, Mapusa.

9.

Co-operative Officer/

C. O. IV

All proposals/correspondence of

/Special Auditor (Inspection)

Central Zone, Panaji.

10.

Co-operative Officer/Special

C. O. V

All proposals/correspondence of

Auditor, Election (North/South)

Bicholim Zone, Bicholim.

3) The Registrar may on administrative grounds

and in exigencies of public work, re-allocate or

reshuffle/modify the work allotted to any or all

Wings at Head Office.

4) The files/proposals shall be moved by

respective dealing hands through the respective

Co-operative Officers assigned to each Wing and

onwards to the Assistant Registrar and then

through respective Deputy Registrar/District Level

Incharge to the Registrar as per the delegation of

powers.

5) The respective Sectional Incharge/Wing

Incharge and the C.O. placed in the respective wing

shall be responsible for preparing/compiling/

/collating all such consolidated reports on the

statutory and such other administrative

compliances/reports from the respective Zone

allotted to concerned Wing. Apart from this, the

work of compilation/consolidation at Head Office

level as mentioned in detail in the Annexure

appended hereto shall be the responsibility of each

Wing at Head Office to which such work is allotted.

6) The timelines laid down under the Act/Rules/

/Notifications/Circulars/Orders, etc. shall be strictly

followed and in cases where there is no statutory

timeline, it shall be ensured that each

correspondence shall be put up within 10 working

days from the date of receipt of Tapaal/Daak/

/correspondence by concerned Wing from the

Inward section.

7) The respective Co-operative Officers shall

monitor the functioning of the dealing hands under

their control by taking weekly review and ensure

that all the Tapaal/correspondence is replied/

/disposed within 10 working days, unless a shorter

period is prescribed under the Act/Rules or any

other standing instructions and fix responsibility/

/liability to that effect on each individual official/

dealing hand by issuing precise work orders with

the approval of the Registrar.

8) The Establishment section shall maintain

record of the inward and outward flow of all

correspondence/files/registers/applications, etc.

received in the Head Office and shall be responsible

for distribution of the same among all the Wings.

3036

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

The Assistant Registrar and Co-operative Officer of

the respective wing shall also maintain up-to-date

records of all correspondence and files in systematic

manner with proper inventory of all records.

9) The numbering system of all files and

maintaining of records in the Wing shall be suitably

revised. While opening any new file, the file number

to be allotted shall contain the following details viz.

the subject head first, then year of opening file, the

wing number, followed by district abbreviation and

finally words RCS, separated using mark ‘/’. For

example, “No. 15/2023-24/Wing-I/North/RCS/”. The

specific subject head for giving file number shall be

defined in advance for handling different subjects.

The new files shall be opened accordingly as per

requirements and also by mentioning the details on

the file register. As far as practicable one separate

file for each society shall be opened/maintained to

deal with all correspondence of one particular

Society. The records of the society shall be

maintained as per provisions of the Act and time to

time weeding out procedure shall be followed to

avoid unnecessary pilling of records. The details of

indexing and file numbers shall be maintained by

EST/ADMIN Section.

10) The Asstt. Registrar and Co-operative Officer

of the respective wings shall ensure that all

correspondence is delivered to respective dealing

hands within shortest possible duration and in any

case within 3 working days from the date of receipt

at Inward Counter.

11) The Deputy Registrar (Tech.)/District Level

Incharge (North) and Deputy Registrar (Admin.)/

/District Level Incharge (South) as the case may be

shall assess the work allotment of respective wings

under their control at the end of every financial

year and may recommend any changes as per need.

12) The establishment Section, immediately

after the issue of this notification shall put up a

proposal for issue of a revised Order under

Provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005

(Central Act No. 22 of 2005) for designating the

Assistant Registrar incharge of the respective Wing

as the P. I. O. for their respective section/wing and

the concerned Co-operative Officer as A.P.I.O. The

respective Deputy Registrar/District Level Incharge

shall be designated as the First Appellate Authority

(F.A.A.) under the R.T.I. Act, 2005.

13) The concerned Assistant Registrar incharge

of the respective wing shall be responsible for

obtaining all the data/information/reports from the

Zonal offices and its compilation at State level for

submission to various authorities as may be needed

from time to time.

14) All the Assistant Registrar and Co-operative

Officers who are incharge of particular wing, shall

in addition to the above work assignment, perform

all additional responsibilities as per the Annexure

appended hereto.

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-operation).

Panaji, 20th March, 2023.

ANNEXURE

Sr.

Present

New

Area allotted

Statutory subjects

Other additional

No.

Nomenclature

Nomenclature

for work

alloted as per

subjects allotted

of the

at H.O.

Goa Co-operative

Section at H.O.

Societies Act, 2001 &

The Goa Co-operative

Societies Rules, 2003

and statutory reports

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

ARCS

ARCS

All Societies

1. All Statutory duties

(i) R.B.I. in respect of

(Audit)

Wing (I)

registered at

and responsibilities

Co-operative Banks

head office

under the Act/Rules

and other related

and Central

(from Chapter I to

matter.

Zone, Panaji

Chapter XIV of the Act)

(ii) All correspondence

2. All statutory reports

on State level Bankers/

as required to be

/SHG Committees/

prepared in respect of

/Executive Committees/

Zones pertaining to the

/Consumer protection

wing

Council etc.

3. Compilation of all

(iii) All Officers meeting

State level reports after

before Deputy Registrar,

obtaining information

RCS, Secretary and

Hon’ble Minister and

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3037

1

2

3

4

5

6

from all wings in respect Hon’ble Chief Minister

of Sections 4 to Section

Office, etc.

34 of the Act

(iv) All work relating

to amendment to G.C.S.

Act

and

Rules.

(v) Matter related to

d e v e l o p m e n t o f

e-Co-operative

management system.

(vi) Monthly attendance

of staff.

(vii) Maintenance of

inventory, dead stock,

weeding of records,

stationery, dead stock

etc.

(viii) All matter on LAQ,

RSQ, LSQ Assurances

& cut motion, zero-hour

mention, calling attention,

any other matter, etc.

as and when allotted.

(ix) All R.T.I. matters

related to the WING

and on other subject

matter allotted.

(x) Any other duties

and responsibilities

assigned by the

superiors from time to

time

2.

ARCS (HQ)

ARCS Wing

All societies

1. All statutory duties

(i) All court matters

(II)

registered at

and responsibilities

before various courts

South Zone,

under the Act/Rules

and report of cases

Margao and

(from Chapter I to

thereof.

Quepen Zone,

Chapter XIV of the

(ii) Para wise comments

Quepem

Act)

and briefing of Advocates

2. All statatury reports

on all court matters.

as required to be

(iii) Multi State

prepared pertaining

Co-operative Societies.

to the wing.

(iv) Matter related to

3. All State level reports

Central Registrar of

after obtaining information

Co-op. Societies.

from all wings pertaining

(v) Co-operative Award.

from Section 35 to

(vi) Co-operative week.

Section 57 of the Act.

(vii) NABARD lead

bank and other.

(viii) DRDA South and

North. Programme and

submission of MPRS,

QPRS thereof.

(ix) Monthly attendance

of staff.

3038

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

1

2

3

4

5

6

(x) All R.T.I. matters

related to the WING

and on other subject

matter allotted.

(xi) SLCC, REIC, etc.,

and all such other

National/State level

committees constituted

by various authorities

from time to time,

meetings, proceedings

and related corres-

pondence and follow-

up action.

(xii) Matters related to

public grievances and

referred at grievance

portal, PM portal on

grievances.

(xiii)

Report

on

attendance of staff.

(xiv) Maintenance of

inventory, dead stock,

weeding of records,

stationery, dead stock

etc.

(xv) All matter on LAQ,

RSQ, LSQ Assurances &

Cut motion, zero-hour

mention, calling attention

etc. as and when allotted.

(xvi) Any other duties

and responsibilities

assigned by the superiors

from time to time.

3.

ARCS

ARCS

All societies

1. All statutory duties

(i) All correspondence

(Election-

Wing (III)

registered at

and responsibilities under

received from other

North)

Ponda Zone,

the Act/Rules (from

Government and public

Ponda

Chapter I to Chapter

undertaking Departments.

XIV of the Act)

(ii) Release of Advertisement

2. All statutory reports

and processing of its bills.

as required to be

(iii) All matters related

prepared pertaining

to training to

to the Wing

co-operative sectors by

3. All State level reports

Vamnicom Pune and

after obtaining

all other correspondence

information from all

received from various

wings pertaining from

training

institutes

Section 58 to Section 82

in India.

of the Act.

(iv) Matter on study

tours of various training

institute of India.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3039

1

2

3

4

5

6

(v) All R.T.I. matters

related to the WING

and on other subject

matter allotted.

(vi) Maintenance of

inventory, dead stock,

weeding of records,

stationery, dead stock

etc.

(vii) All matter on LAQ,

RSQ, LSQ Assurances &

cut motion, zero hour

mention, calling attention

etc. as and when allotted.

(viii) Monthly attendance

of staff.

(ix) Any other duties

and responsibilities

assigned by the superiors

from time to time.

4.

ARCS

ARCS

All societies

1. All statutory duties

(i) OTS scheme for Bank

(Election-

Wing (IV)

registered at

and responsibilities under

and Societies.

South)

North Zone,

the Act/Rules (from

(ii) Deposit protection/

Mapusa

Chapter I to Chapter

/Guarantee Scheme.

XIV of the Act)

(iii) Matter related on

2. All statutory reports

exemption of stamp duty.

as required to be

(iv) All matters on issuing

prepared pertaining

of Circulars, Notifications,

to the Wing

Guidelines under the

3. All State level reports

provision of Act & Rules.

after obtaining

(v) Maintenance of

information from all

various funds:

wings pertaining from

a) Surplus Fund Account.

Section 83 to Section

b) Co-operative

100 of the Act

Development Fund

Account.

c) Election Fund

Account.

d) Account under

Deposit Guarantee

Scheme if any.

(vii) Matters related to

NCUI, IFFCO, NAFED,

bankers institute of

rural development, all

Government of India

undertakings, etc.

(viii) Monthly attendance

of Staff.

(ix) All R.T. I. matters

related to the WING

and on other subject

matter allotted.

3040

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

1

2

3

4

5

6

(x) Maintenance of

inventory, dead stock,

weeding of records,

stationery, dead stock

etc.

(xi) All matter on LAQ,

RSQ, LSQ Assurances &

cut motion, zero hour

mention, calling attention

etc. as and when allotted.

(xii) Any other duties

and responsibilities

assigned by the

superiors from time to

time.

5.

ARCS

ARCS

All societies

1. All statutory duties

(i) All matters related

(Marketing)

Wing (V)

registered at

and responsibilities under

to annual administrative

Bicholim Zone,

the Act/Rules (from

report.

Bicholim

Chapter I to Chapter

(ii) All matter related to

XIV of the Act)

money lending/Flat

2. All statutory reports

ownership Act and any

as required to be

other Act and Rules

prepared pertaining

and related

to the Wing

Correspondence.

3. All State level reports

(iii) All matters relating

after obtaining

to TAFCUB, TAFCUS of

information from all

all wings.

wings pertaining from

(iv) All matters pertaining

Section 101 to Section

to observation of RAO,

129 of the Act

House Committee,

Select Committee,

Public Account

Committee etc.

(v) Monthly, Quarterly

Departmental reports

submitted to Governor

other departments,

Report on developmental

activities and all other

state level reports to

be submitted to the

various authorities.

(vi) All R.T.I. matters

related to the WING

and on other subject

matter allotted.

(vii) Maintenance of

inventory, dead stock,

weeding of records,

stationery, dead stock

etc.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3041

1

2

3

4

5

6

(viii) All matter on

LAQ, RSQ, LSQ

Assurances & cut

motion, zero hour

mention, calling attention

etc. as and when allotted.

(ix) Monthly attendance

of staff.

(x) Any other duties

and responsibilities

assigned by the

superiors from time to

time.

———u———

Office of the Asst. Registrar of Co-operative

Societies

–––

Notification

In exercise of the powers vested in me under

Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001,

“Valpoi Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd.,

Near Hanuman High School, Velus, Thane Road,

Valpoi, Sattari-Goa”-Goa is registered under code

symbol No. RCSBZ2022-230008.

Mahadev N. Kalangutkar, Asstt. Registrar

(Co-operative Societies), Bicholim Zone.

Sanquelim, 10th March, 2023.

Certificate of Registration

“Valpoi Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd.,

Near Hanuman High School, Velus, Thane Road,

Valpoi, Sattari-Goa”-Goa has been registered on

10-03-2023 and it bears registration code symbol

No. RCSBZ2022-230008 and its classified as “Resource

Society” under sub-classification “No. 10-(c)-Service

Resource Society” in terms of Rule 8 of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003.

Mahadev N. Kalangutkar, Asstt. Registrar

(Co-operative Societies), Bicholim Zone.

Sanquelim, 10th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Education, Art & Culture

Directorate of Higher Education

–––

Order

No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF POST/50/2021/

/37891

Read:

Memorandum No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF

POST/50/2021/30018 dated 13-12-2022.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

/I/5/78(3)/2020/307 dated 21-10-2022, Government

is pleased to appoint Ms. Jofa Anton Gonsalves to

the post of Assistant Professor in Konkani in

Government College of Arts, Science and

Commerce, Quepem-Goa under Directorate of

Higher Education on temporary basis in the UGC

Pay Scale Matrix Level 10 with immediate effect,

and as per the terms and conditions contained in

the Memorandum cited above. She shall be on

probation for a period of two years.

Ms. Jofa Anton Gonsalves has been declared

medically fit by the Medical Board.

The appointment of Ms. Jofa Anton Gonsalves is

made subject to the verification of character and

antecedents. In the event of any adverse remarks

noticed by the Government on verification of

character and antecedents, her services shall be

terminated.

She shall draw her salary against the newly

created post vide Order No. 1/5/2017-DHE/1024

dated 07-06-2018.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Avelina D’sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 14th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF POST/50/2021/

/37892

Read:

Memorandum No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF

POST/50/2021/30020 dated 13-12-2022.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

3042

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

/I/5/78(1)/2020/(Part File I)/306 dated 21-10-2022,

Government is pleased to appoint Mrs. Sneha Shyam

Naik to the post of Assistant Professor in English

(OBC) in the Government College of Arts, Science

and Commerce, Quepem-Goa under Directorate of

Higher Education on temporary basis in the UGC

Pay Scale Matrix Level 10 with immediate effect,

and as per the terms and conditions contained in

the Memorandum cited above. She shall be on

probation for a period of two years.

Mrs. Sneha Shyam Naik has been declared

medically fit by the Medical Board. The character

and antecedents have been verified by the Addl.

Collector & ADM, South Goa, Margao and nothing

adverse has been reported against her.

She shall draw her salary against the newly

created post vide Order No. 1/5/2017-DHE/1024

dated 07-06-2018.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Avelina D’sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 14th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF POST/50/2021/

/37893

Read:

Memorandum No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF

POST/50/2021/30019 dated 13-12-2022.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

/I/5/78(5)/2018/305 dated 21-10-2022, Government

is pleased to appoint Mr. Adrel Gomes to the post

of Assistant Professor in Geography in Sant

Sohirobanath Ambiye Government College of Arts

& Commerce, Pernem-Goa under Directorate of

Higher Education on temporary basis in the UGC

Pay Scale Matrix Level 10 with immediate effect,

and as per the terms and conditions contained in

the Memorandum cited above. He shall be on

probation for a period of two years.

Mr. Adrel Gomes has been declared medically fit

by the Medical Board.

The appointment of Mr. Adrel Gomes is made

subject to the verification of character and

antecedents. In the event of any adverse remarks

noticed by the Government on verification of

character and antecedents, his services shall be

terminated.

He shall draw his salary against the newly

created post vide Order No. 1/5/2017-DHE/1024

dated 07-06-2018.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Avelina D’sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 14th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF POST/50/2021/

/37894

Read:

Memorandum No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF

POST/50/2021/30019 dated 13-12-2022.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/I/5/78(5)/2018/305 dated 21-10-2022,

Government is pleased to appoint Mr. Vishal

Raghoba Gaonkar to the post of Assistant Professor

in Geography (ST) in the Government College of

Arts, Science and Commerce, Sanquelim-Goa under

Directorate of Higher Education on temporary basis

in the UGC Pay Scale Matrix Level 10 with

immediate effect, and as per the terms and

conditions contained in the Memorandum cited

above. He shall be on probation for a period of two

years.

Mr. Vishal Raghoba Gaonkar has been declared

medically fit by the Medical Board. The character

and antecedents have been verified by the Addl.

Collector & ADM, South Goa, Margao and nothing

adverse has been reported against him.

He shall draw his salary against the newly

created post vide Order No. 1/5/2017-DHE/1024

dated 07-06-2018.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Avelina D’sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 14th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF POST/50/2021/

/37970

Read: Memorandum No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF

POST/50/2021/30019 dated 13-12-2022.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission as conveyed vide their letter

No. COM/I/5/78(5)/2018/305 dated 21-10-2022,

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3043

Government is pleased to appoint Ms. Shradha

Gurudas Pagui to the post of Assistant Professor in

Geography (OBC) in the Government College of Arts,

Science and Commerce, Quepem-Goa under

Directorate of Higher Education on temporary basis

in the UGC Pay Scale Matrix Level 10 with

immediate effect, and as per the terms and

conditions contained in the Memorandum cited

above. She shall be on probation for a period of two

years.

Ms. Shradha Gurudas Pagui has been declared

medically fit by the Medical Board. The character

and antecedents have been verified by the Addl.

Collector & ADM, South Goa, Margao and nothing

adverse has been reported against her.

She shall draw her salary against the newly

created post vide Order No. 1/5/2017 DHE/1024

dated 07-06-2018.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Avelina D’sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 16th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF POST/50/2021/

/37975

Read: Memorandum No. ACADIII/GC/FILLING OF

POST/50/2021/30021 dated 13-12-2022.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

/I/5/78(22)/2020/304 dated 21-10-2022, Government

is pleased to appoint Mr. Myron Pereira to the post

of Assistant Professor in Commerce (ST) in the Sant

Sohirobanath Ambiye Government College of Arts

& Commerce, Pernem-Goa under Directorate of

Higher Education on temporary basis in the UGC

Pay Scale Matrix Level 10 with immediate effect,

and as per the terms and conditions contained in

the Memorandum cited above. He shall be on

probation for a period of two years.

Mr. Myron Pereira has been declared medically

fit by the Medical Board. The character and

antecedents have been verified by the Addl.

Collector & ADM, South Goa, Margao and nothing

adverse has been reported against him.

He shall draw his salary against the newly

created post vide Order No. 1/5/2017-DHE/1024 dated

07-06-2018.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Avelina D’sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 16th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Environment & Climate Change

–––

Order

No. 8-15-2019/ENVT/NGT/Part/1687

In pursuance of order dated 21-10-2022 passed

by the Hon’ble National Green Tribunal (NGT), in

M.A. No. 74/2022, Original Application No. 976/2019,

Gurinder Singh & Ors. V/s Union of India & Ors.,

Government of Goa hereby constitute the three

members High Powered Committee for utilization

of Environment compensation funds.

The committee shall comprise of the following

members:

1. Chief Secretary,

— Chairman.

Government of Goa

2. Secretary (Environment

— Member.

& Climate Change),

Government of Goa

3. Secretary (Revenue),

— Member.

Government of Goa

The Hon’ble NGT has directed to create a

separate account and may be opened under the

office of the Chief Secretary.

The Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority

(GCZMA) will open a separate account in terms of

the direction of Hon’ble National Green Tribunal

and all transaction will be with approval of the

above committee.

The Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority,

Goa State Pollution Control Board and Goa State

Environment Impact Assessment Authority may be

directed to deposit the Environment Compensation/

Polluter Pay Principle fines collected by them in

the account created by the Goa Coastal Zone

Management Authority.

Department of Environment & Climate Change

in consultation with the concerned Boards and

Authorities under its Administrative Control may

prepare a State Specific Action Plan for utilization

3044

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

of the Environmental Compensation funds with

approval of the High Powered Committee.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Dr. Geeta S. Nagvenkar, Director (Environment &

Climate Change).

Panaji, 15th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. GSWA/2019-20/RTI/018/1700

In pursuance of Clause 5 of the Right to

Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as

“the said Act”), the following officers are hereby

appointed as Public Information Officer and

Assistant Public Information Officer in the Goa State

Wetland Authority (GSWA), to deal with the

applications received from the public under the said

Act.

Public Information

Ms. Urvee T. Kanekar,

Officer

Legal Assistant, GSWA.

Assistant Public

Ms. Shruti Salgaonkar,

Information Officer

Project Assistant, GSWA.

The Public Information Officer shall be

responsible for preparation and publication of

information manual and its updating from time to

time as per the said Act.

The Assistant Public Information Officer shall

ensure that the applications received under the said

Act are scrutinized and submitted to the Public

Information Officer for decision so as to furnish the

relevant information to the applicant as per the

said Act, on issues pertaining to the Goa State

Wetland Authority (GSWA).

The Member Secretary, Goa State Wetland

Authority (GSWA), will be the First Appellate

Authority under this Act against the decision of the

Public Information Officer/Assistant Public

Information Officer as far as the Goa State Wetland

Authority (GSWA), is concerned.

This order is issued in accordance to the

correspondence/decision of the Goa State Wetland

Authority (GSWA).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Dr. Geeta S. Nagvenkar, Director (Envt. & CC).

Panaji, 16th March, 2023.

Department of Finance

Revenue & Control Division

––––

Order

No. 6/1/2022-Fin(R&C)/Part File/3282

On the recommendation of the Goa Public

Service Commission as conveyed vide its letter No.

COM/II/12/43(1)2013/501 dated 02nd March, 2023,

the Government of Goa is pleased to declare the

following Officers to have satisfactorily completed

their probation period and confirm them in the

post of State Tax Officer in the Office of the

Commissioner of Commercial Taxes from the date

of their completion of probation period:-

1.

Shri Gaurish V. Khedekar.

2.

Smt. Sophia Lawrence Vaz.

3.

Shri Naresh Kushta Gaude.

4.

Smt. Ankita Anil Kamat.

5.

Shri Rohan Arvind Loliyekar.

6.

Shri Sirajuddin Gulamrasul Jamadar.

7.

Smt. Shweta Rohan Harmalkar alias

Sweta Shankar Gurav.

8.

Kum. Ashvita Ankush Goltekar.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Pranab G. Bhat, Under Secretary, Finance (R&C).

Porvorim, 17th March, 2023.

———u———

Debt Management Division

–––

Office Memorandum

No. 13/13/2023-FIN(DMU)/130

The Office Memorandum No. DPE/18(1)/2012-Fin

dated 08-05-2017 transcribed below regarding

Guidelines on Investment of Surplus Funds by the

CPSEs issued by Government of India, Ministry of

Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises, Department

of Public Enterprises, New Delhi has been adopted

by the State Government.

Pranab G. Bhat, Under Secretary, Finance (Bud-II).

Porvorim, 16th March, 2023.

———

F. No. DPE/18(1)/2012-Fin

Government of India

Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises

Department of Public Enterprises

Public Enterprises Bhavan,

Block No. 14, CGO Complex,

Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003

Dated: 08-05-2017

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3045

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub.: Guideline on Investment of Surplus Funds by

the CPSEs-regarding

..........

The undersigned is directed to enclose herewith

a copy of the “Guidelines on Investment of Surplus

Funds by the CPSEs” for taking necessary action to

ensure compliance of these guidelines. This is in

supersession of all Guidelines on Investment of

Surplus Funds by the CPSEs issued by Department

of Public Enterprises from time to time.

2. This issues with the approval of Minister (HI & PE).

Sd/-

(Kalyani Mishra)

Director

Tel.: 24362061

Encl.: As above.

———

F. No. DPE/18(1)/2012-Fin

Government of India

Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises

Department of Public Enterprises

Sub.:

Guidelines on Investment of Surplus Funds

by the CPSEs-regarding

Guidelines on investment of surplus funds

essentially deal with the management of surplus

funds with CPSEs to prevent the funds from lying

idle, and instead, generate returns.

2. The details of Guidelines on Investment of

Surplus Funds by the CPSEs issued by Department

of Public Enterprises from time to time are annexed.

In supersession of all these guidelines and other

guidelines, if any, issued by any other Ministries/

/Departments on investment of surplus funds by

CPSEs earlier, the Guidelines on Investment of

Surplus Funds by the CPSEs are issued as follows:

Applicability:

3. These Guidelines shall be applicable to all

CPSEs. The definition of CPSE for the purpose of

these guidelines shall be same as defined vide O. M.

No. PP/14 (0005)/2016 dated 20-06-2016 regarding

Capital Restructuring of Central Public Sector

Enterprises (CPSEs) as reproduced below:

“All corporate bodies where Government of India

and/or Government controlled one or more body

corporate have controlling interest.

i) Body

corporate

shall

include

body

incorporated under the provisions of the

Companies Act, 1956 or the Companies Act,

2013, or under any other Act as may be

applicable

except

Limited

Liability

Partnership.

ii) Controlling interest means control over the

composition of the Board of Directors; or

exercise or control over more than one-half of

the total share capital or able to exercise more

than 50 per cent voting rights in the meeting

of the members, Board of Directors or any other

similar executive structure, e.g., Governing

Body, Executive Committee, etc.

iii) A body corporate in which Government of

India and/or CPSEs including their

subsidiaries controls the composition of the

Board of Directors; or exercises or controls

more than one-half of the total share capital

shall be deemed to be a body controlled by

Government of India”.

3.1 However, these guidelines will not apply to

banks and insurance companies.

Scope:

4. These guidelines shall apply to surplus funds

available with CPSEs after meeting the business

requirements including operating expenses,

payment of taxes, working capital, debt servicing,

capital expenditure, replacement/revamping/

/renewal of business assets, etc. Cash surplus of

temporary nature including those available for a

few days or weeks would also come within the

purview of these guidelines. However, these

guidelines shall not apply to investments by CPSEs

in their core business activities or investment in

equity under disinvestment programme of the

Government and investments in subsidiaries/joint

ventures by way of equity capital.

5.CPSEs shall also ensure compliance with the

guidelines on “Capital Restructuring of CPSEs”

issued by Department of Public Enterprises on

20-06-2016 before investing the surplus funds

available with them in eligible instrument.

6. These guidelines shall apply to CPSEs subject

to the following:

i. If any statutory guidelines have been issued

by the sector regulatory authority like RBI,

SEBI, IRDA, etc., on investment of surplus

funds, these guidelines will be applicable to

CPSEs only to the extent these are not contrary

to the guidelines laid down by such regulatory

authority.

ii. If surplus funds have been earmarked for any

purpose under any scheme framed under

applicable laws/regulations, or Court

directions, these guidelines will be applicable

to the extent these are not contrary to the

provisions of the scheme made under such

laws/regulations or Court directives.

3046

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

iii. These guidelines will not apply to investment

of surplus funds kept outside India by CPSEs

or their overseas subsidiaries for normal

business purposes in compliance with

applicable Foreign Exchange Management

Act, 1999 (FEMA) regulations and the local

applicable laws.

iv. The CPSEs shall also comply with Section 186

of the Companies Act, 2013.

Principles of investment of surplus funds:

7. CPSEs shall invest their surplus funds as per

the following broad principles:

i. Investment shall be made in instruments

ensuring the safety of funds.

ii. There shall be no speculation on the yield

obtaining from the investment. It shall be

known at the time of making the investment

except for investment in debt mutual funds.

However, in case of investment in marketable

debt-instruments, (viz., mutual fund debt

instruments, Government securities and T bills)

there is a risk that final yield may differ from

yield estimated at the time of investment due

to movement in prices of the security, if such

debt-instruments are sold due to unforeseen

circumstances before final maturity date (i.e.,

they are not held to maturity). Such investment

will not be treated as having speculative yield.

Similarly, in case of premature encashment of

bank term deposits due to unforeseen

exigencies, the difference between fixed yield

at the time of investment and actual yield at

premature payment will not be speculative

yield.

iii. Since investment in debt schemes of mutual

funds are subject to market risks, thI track-

-record of the scheme shall be taken into

account for taking investment decisions.

iv. There shall be a proper commercial

appreciation and due diligence before any

investment decision of surplus funds is taken.

v. The forecast of surplus availability may be

worked out normally for a period of one year

at any point of time so as to deploy available

funds on longer term basis at better yields.

This forecasting exercise shall ideally be done

every month or quarter.

vi. In order to utilize the surplus funds effectively,

CPSE may also prepare best estimate of the

periods for which surplus funds would be

available to facilitate investment decisions for

such periods including on a day-to-day basis.

vii. Funds shall normally not be invested by a

CPSE at a particular rate of interest for a

particular period of time while the CPSE is

resorting to borrowing at an equal or higher

rate of interest for its requirements for the

same period. However, CPSEs may take

decisions on all matters relating to short term

cash management, as they would be the best

judge of asset-liability mismatch in the short

run.

viii. CPSEs shall put in place a centralized system

of liquidity management for optimum utilization

of liquidity for business operation.

Eligible Investments:

8. CPSEs shall invest their surplus funds in one or

more of the following instruments, subject to

principles outlined above:

i. Treasury bills and Government of India

securities.

ii. Term deposits with any scheduled commercial

bank incorporated in India and with a net

worth (i.e. the paid up capital plus free reserves

of the bank) of atleast Rs. 500 Crore, fulfilling

the capital adequacy norms as prescribed by

the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) from time to

time. Capital adequacy and net worth of Banks

may be assessed on the basis of their Annual

Accounts (audited) or as available on the

website of RBI, whichever is the latest. While

investing, CPSEs shall ensure that minimum

60% of funds placed in bank term deposits are

placed with public sector banks. Further, CPSEs

may obtain competitive quotations from Banks.

iii. Instruments issued by scheduled commercial

banks incorporated in India/all India term

lending and refinancing institutions including

their subsidiaries e. g. certificates of deposits,

deposits schemes, commercial paper or similar

instruments, which have been rated by any

two Credit Rating Agencies, registered with

SEBI and have been accorded the highest

safety credit rating.

iv. Loans/Deposits with CPSEs (including those

under inter-corporate borrowing programme)

subject to availability of highest credit rating

from any Credit Rating Agency registered with

SEE! for borrowing for the corresponding period.

v. Investment in Collateralized Borrowing and

Lending Obligations (CBLOs) where Clearing

Corporation of India Ltd. (CCIL) acts as

counterparty.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3047

vi. In mutual funds subject to the following

conditions:

a) Only Maharatna, Navratna and Miniratna

CPSEs are permitted to invest in debt based

schemes of SEBI regulated public sector

mutual funds.

b) Portfolio Management Schemes of any Asset

Management Company/or any other entity

will not be mutual funds for this purpose.

c) Investment in Mutual Funds shall not exceed

30% of the available surplus funds of the

concerned CPSE.

d) Public Sector Mutual Fund means the Mutual

Funds registered with and regulated by SEBI

where the Government of India, its financial

institutions and public sector banks holds/

/hold individually or collectively more than

50% of equity/shares in the Asset

Management Company of that Mutual Fund.

e) The mutual fund debt scheme should have

been accorded highest mutual fund rating by

any two of the Credit Rating Agencies

registered with SEBI.

f) The mutual fund debt scheme should have

corpus amounting to at least Rs. 1000 Crore

for the scheme at the time of investment. The

corpus may be reckoned from the latest

published information at the time of

investment.

g) The Board of Directors of the CPSEs should

decide the guidelines, procedures and

management control systems for investment

in such mutual funds and keep the

Administrative Ministry informed through the

Financial Adviser.

vii Any other debt instrument (including

commercial paper) of public sector entities,

subject to highest credit rating from any two

rating agencies approved by SEBI.

Maturity Period of Investment:

9. The period of maturity, including cases of

residual maturity, of any instrument of investment

shall not exceed one year from the date of

investment. However, in the case of term deposits

with banks and GOI securities, it may be up to

three years from the date of investment.

Competent Authority for Investment and

Reporting:

10. Decisions on investment of surplus funds

shall be taken by the Board of CPSE. However, Board

may delegate powers regarding investment of

short-term surplus funds up to one year maturity to

a designated group of Director(s), which should

invariably include CMD/MD and Director (Finance)

of the CPSE concerned upto such financial limits as

the Board may decide.

11. In case of Maharatna/Navratana CPSEs,

decisions regarding investment of short-term

surplus funds up to one year maturity may be

delegated to Director (Finance) up to prescribed

limits of investment as may be decided by the Board

provided that (i) the proposals are examined and

put up by an internal investment committee and (ii)

guidelines, systems and proper procedures are laid

down with the approval of Board. All such

investment should be reported to CMD at least on

a fornightly basis.

12. Where such delegation is made, the

delegation order should spell out criteria for

selection of party, party exposure limits, etc., which

should be strictly observed. Further, there should

be a proper system of reporting to the Board at least

on a quarterly basis.

13. An annual report on surplus funds invested

in different instruments and the yield thereon may

be placed before the Board.

14. The projected surplus availability for the

ensuring year shall be informed to the

Administrative Ministry at the beginning of

financial year.

General:

15. CPSEs shall ensure that all investment

decisions are in accordance with the regulations as

per the Company Law and Government of India

instructions and any other relevant legislation and

rules as applicable. Any investment already made,

which is not in conformity with these guidelines

should not be renewed after maturity/or at the

earliest opportunity as may be decided by the Board

of CPSE.

16. The Board of every CPSE shall arrange to

formulate suitable procedure and management

control systems for investment of surplus funds to

be followed by the company. Boards of CPSEs may

also lay down guidelines, procedures and systems

for estimation of surplus funds and investment of

these funds keeping in view the above guidelines

and giving due consideration to safety of funds, risk

on yield, requirement of liquidity and applicable

laws.

17. The operating instructions are to be

formulated keeping in view their suitability for

making financial investments.

3048

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

18. No agent/broker etc. in any form whatsoever

shall be involved on either side. Howerer, for

secondary market investment in Government

securities and treasury bills, invitation of quote/s

from a minimum of three primary dealers registered

with RBI may be obtained.

This issues in consultation with the Department

of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM),

Ministry of Finance and has the approval of Ministry

of Finance communicated to DPE vide O. M. No.

7/13/2016-Policy dated 3rd April, 2017.

ANNEXURE

Details of Guidelines on Investment of Surplus

Funds by the Central Public Sector Enterprises

(CPSEs) issued by Department of Public Enterprises

from time to time.

Sr. No.

O. M. Nos.

Dated

1.

DPE/14(19)190-Fin.

3rd January, 1992.

2.

DPE/4/3/92-Fin.

27th June, 1994.

3.

DPE/4(6)/94-Fin.

14th December, 1994.

4.

DPE/4(6)/94-Fin.

1st November, 1995.

5.

DPE/4(6)/94-Fin.

11th March, 1996.

6.

DPE/4(6)/94-Fin.

2nd July, 1996.

7.

DPE/4(6)/94-Fin.

14th February, 1997.

8.

DPE/4(6)/94-Fin. G-XVII

25th November, 1999.

9.

DPE/4(6)/1994-Fin.

29th September, 2005.

10.

DPE/11/47/2006-Fin.

31st August, 2007.

11.

DPE/11/47/2006-Fin.

4th December, 2007.

12.

DPE/11/47/2006-Fin.

11th April, 2008.

13.

DPE/11/47/2006-Fin.

15th April, 2008.

14.

DPE/11/47/2006-Fin.

14th August, 2008.

15.

DPE/18(1)/08-Fin.

15th December, 2008.

16.

DPE/11(15)/08-Fin.

12th January, 2009.

17.

DPE/18(15)/08-Fin.

24th February, 2009.

18.

DPE/14(24)/2011-Fin.

23rd April, 2012.

19.

DPE/18(1)/08-Fin.

13th August, 2012.

———uuu———

Department of General Administration

––––

Notification

No. 37/3/2019-GAD-III/1009

In pursuance to sub-section (1) of Section 40A of

the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (Goa Act No. 14 of

1994), the Government of Goa hereby declares

Saturday, the 25th March, 2023 (Chaitra 4, Saka

1944) as a “Paid Holiday” being the “Polling Day”

for the Bye Elections to Ward No. V of Village

Panchayat Velguem, Ward No. VI of Village

Panchayat Ona-Maulinguem Kudchirem, Ward

No. VI of Village Panchayat Orlim, Ward No. II of

Village Panchayat Calem, Ward No. IV of Village

Panchayat Balli-Adnem, Ward No. VII of Village

Panchayat Barcem-Quedem and Ward No. I of

Village Panchayat Rachol.

The aforesaid holiday shall be a “paid holiday”,

in addition to the holidays indicated in the

Notification No. 37/3/2022-GAD-III/3661 dated

19-10-2022, published in the Official Gazette, Series

II No. 30 dated 27-10-2022, to the workers of the

following establishments, provided they are the

voters for the aforesaid Bye-election:-

(i)

industrial workers of the State of Goa;

(ii)

daily wage workers of the Government

Departments and State Government

Industrial Departments;

(iii)

commercial and industrial workers of

private establishments in the State of Goa;

(iv)

all private establishments;

(v)

daily wage/casual workers employed in any

business, trade, industrial undertakings or

any other establishments.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Shaila G. Bhosle, Under Secretary (GA-I).

Porvorim, 15th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Goa Gazetteer

–––

Order

No. 1/4/2022-23/GAZ-321

Government is pleased to constitute an Expert

Committee of following members for preparation of

the Pernem Taluka Gazetteer:

1) Dr. Rohit Phalgaonkar,

— Chaiperson.

Assistant Professor, History,

Sant Sohirobanath Ambiye

Government College,

Virnoda, Pernem

2) Dr. Ishani Roy, Associate

— Member.

Professor, Geography, Sant

Sohirobanath Ambiye

Government College,

Virnoda, Pernem

3) Ms. Priyanka Sitaram Parab,

— Member.

Assistant Professor, Konkani,

Sant Sohirobanath Ambiye

Government College, Virnoda,

Pernem

4) Shri Mayur Arolkar,

— Member.

Assistant Professor of History,

DCT’s Dhempe College of

Arts & Science, Miramar, Goa

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3049

5) Shri Balaji Shenvy, Executive

— Member

Editor, Goa Gazetteer Department Secretary.

Scope of the Committee:

The scope of the Committee shall be as follows:

1) To assist the Department of Goa Gazetteer in

compilation of the Taluka Gazetteer and publish

the same within one year from the date of

publication of the Notification order of the

constitution of the Expert Committee in the

Official Gazette.

2) To prepare an outline for the Taluka Gazetteer.

3) To advise and suggest for speedy completion of

the task and assist the Department in

authenticating

the

data/material

for

publication.

4) Any other subject related to the speedy

completion of the Taluka Gazetteer.

5) The committee may co-opt any other member

for completion of the Taluka Gazetteer.

6) Any other subject as decided by the

Government from time to time.

Tenure of the Committee:- The tenure of the

Committee shall be one year from the date of

publication in the Official Gazette.

The non-official members may be entitled for the

Travelling Allowance as admissible by the

Government from time to time.

This order is issued with the approval of the

Government vide U.O. No. 2240/F dated 11-03-2023.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Balaji S. Shenvy, Executive Editor (Goa Gazetteer).

Panaji, 15th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. 1/4/2022-23/GAZ-327

Government is pleased to constitute an Expert

Committee of following members for preparation of

the Canacona Taluka Gazetteer:

1) Dr. Pandurang Phaldessai,

— Chairperson.

Director, Thomas Stephens

Konknni Kendra, Porvorim-Goa

2) Shri Kamlakar Mhalshi,

— Member.

Former Principal, Balaram

Higher Secondary School,

Canacnona-Goa

3) Dr. Manoj Kamat, Professor

— Member.

& Principal, Shree Mallikarjun

& Shri Chetan Manju Desai

College, Delem, Canacona-Goa

4) Ms. Domitel D’Souza,

— Member.

Associate Professor of History,

Shree Mallikarjun & Shri Chetan

Manju Desai College, Delem,

Canacona-Goa

5) Shri Balaji Shenvy, Executive

— Member

Editor, Goa Gazetteer Department

Secretary.

Scope of the Committee:-

The scope of the Committee shall be as follows:

1) To assist the Department of Goa Gazetteer in

compilation of the Taluka Gazetteer and publish

the same within one year from the date of

publication of the Notification order of the

constitution of the Expert Committee in the

Official Gazette.

2) To prepare an outline for the Taluka Gazetteer.

3) To advise and suggest for speedy completion of

the task and assist the Department in

authenticating the data/material for publication.

4) Any other subject related to the speedy

completion of the Taluka Gazetteer.

5) The committee may co-opt any other member

for completion of the Taluka Gazetteer.

6) Any other subject as decided by the Government

from time to time.

Tenure of the Committee: The tenure of the

Committee shall be one year from the date of

publication in the Official Gazette.

The non-official members may be entitled for the

Travelling Allowance as admissible by the

Government from time to time.

This order is issued with the approval of the

Government vide U.O. No. 2240/F dated 11-03-2023.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Balaji S. Shenvy, Executive Editor (Goa Gazetteer).

Panaji, 15th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Handicrafts, Textile & Coir

–––

Notification

No. 2/19/2022-(HT&C)/26

Read:

Notification No. 2/19/2022 (HT&C)/25 dated

19-04-2022, published in the Official Gazette,

Series II No. 4 dated 28-04-2022.

In pursuance of Article 65, read with Article 63,

of the Articles of Association of the Goa Handicrafts,

Rural and Small Scale Industries Development

3050

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

Corporation Limited and in supersession of the

Government Notification read above and any other

Notifications and Orders issued in this regard, the

Government of Goa hereby reconstitutes the Board

of Directors of the Goa Handicrafts, Rural and Small

Scale Industries Development Corporation Limited,

as follows, namely:-

1. Shri Pravin Arlekar, MLA,

— Chairman.

Pernem

2. Secretary (Handicrafts, Textile

— Director.

& Coir)

3. Finance Secretary or his

— Director.

nominee not below the rank

of Under Secretary from

Finance Department

4. Director of Handicrafts, Textile

— Director.

& Coir

5. Managing Director, Goa

— Director.

Handicrafts, Rural and

Small Scale Industries

Development Corporation Limited

6. Smt. Achal Verekar, r/o

— Director.

Khadpabandh, Ponda, Goa

7. Shri Pramod Kamat, r/o

— Director.

Merces, St. Cruz, Goa

8. Shri Madhu Parab, r/o

— Director.

Palye, Pedne, Goa

9. Shri Subodh Mahale, r/o

— Director.

Ugve, Pedne, Goa

10. Shri Jayesh C. Naik, r/o

— Director.

Karmali, Cumbharjua, Goa

11. Shri Mahadev V. Gawandi,

— Director.

r/o Devsu, Korgao, Goa

12. Shri Satish Shankar

— Director.

Korgaonkar, r/o Canca,

Siolim, Goa

This notification shall come into force with

immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

A. S. Mahatme, Under Secretary (HT&C).

Porvorim, 14th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Home

(F&CD)

G20 Cell

––––

Notification

No. G20 Cell/PoA/714/2022-23/75

Pattern of Assistance for the release of Grant-in-Aid to Home Department (F&CD), G20 Cell to meet

the expenditure towards G20 Summit events/meetings to be held in the State of Goa for the Financial

Year 2022-23 & 2023-24.

Background:

1. The Government is pleased to frame the Pattern of Assistance as Grant-in-Aid for the organization

of the G20 Summit events/meetings in the State.

2. Objective of the Scheme: India is holding Presidency of G20 from 1st December, 2022 to 30th

November, 2023. As per the G20 calendar, the State of Goa has been allotted following 08 events/meetings

by the G20 Secretariat, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi.

Sl.

Track

Level

Nodal

Meeting

Date

No.

Ministry/Agency

1

2

3

4

5

6.

1.

Sherpa

WG

MoHFW

2nd Health Working

17-19 April, 2023.

Group Meeting

2.

Finance

WG

MoF

3rd International

5-7 June, 2023.

Financial Architecture

Working Group Meeting

3.

Sherpa

WG

MEA

3rd Development

9-11 May, 2023.

Working Group

Meeting

4.

Sherpa

WG

Min. of Tourism

4th Tourism Working

19-20 June, 2023.

Group Meeting

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3051

1

2

3

4

5

6

5.

Sherpa

Ministerial

Min. of Tourism

Tourism Working

21-22 June, 2023.

Group MM

6.

EG

EG

CAG

SAI 20 Summit

12-14 June.

7.

Sherpa

WG

Min. of Power

4th Energy Working

19-20 July, 2023.

Group Meeting

8.

Sherpa

Ministerial

Min. of Power

Energy Working

22 July, 2023.

Group MM

* The dates of actual events/meetings may vary as per the instructions from G20 Secretariat, Ministry of External

Affairs, New Delhi.

3. Each of these events/meetings would be attended by around 250 delegates from various G20

Countries, International Organizations and other invites of Government of India. In addition, the recce

visits are also being organized by G20 Secretariat, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi as well as other

related Ministries of the Government of India.

4. All the events/meetings shall be organized as per requirements and directions of the G20 Secretariat,

Ministry of External Affairs, which has stated that hosting of G20 meeting would be an opportunity to

showcase the State’s level of development, infrastructure, culture and heritage to the world.

5. Therefore, in pursuance of sub-rule (1) of Rule 230 of the General Finance Rules, 2017, the Government

of Goa hereby prescribes the pattern of financial assistance to the tune of Rs. 2500.00 lakh as follows:

a) Purpose for which the grant-in-aid shall be sanctioned:

Sr. No.

Revenue Head

1

2

1.

Advertising, hoardings, banner etc.

2.

Advertising, Branding, Social Media (Print, electronic, local and national channels).

3.

Cultural presentations at airport during arrivals or at the meeting venue/lunch/dinner venue as

per ICCR approval.

4.

City Sprucing, civil works, roads, pavement, building, painting.

5.

Green spaces, horticulture, garden.

6.

Waste management, segregation of waste, waste disposal.

7.

Conservancy.

8.

Vehicles, transport arrivals, departures and site seeing excursions/tours/experiences (including

fuel).

9.

Health, Ambulance, Medical Facilities etc.

10.

Refreshment/Dinner/Lunch for all G20 meetings/events in the State for more than 400 people

(apprx.) at each meetings/events.

11.

Souvenirs/Kits/Bags/Gifts.

12.

Professional services, translation services including Regional language translation/translator etc.

13.

Honorarium, wages, salaries, hiring of staff and other services on contract, dress allowance, travel

allowance, stationery and other related office expenditure including setting up of office.

14.

Uninterrupted power supply arrangements to/at the venues.

3052

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

1

2

15.

Lighting up of prominent buildings and monuments.

16.

Facilitate high speed internet, essential for virtual attendance. Hiring/purchase of IT equipments

(Hardware & Software).

17.

Security during move and excursion (to also include police escorts etc.).

18.

Fire fighting arrangements.

19.

Creation/facilitation of stalls (for sale of specific products) at the venue/or any other places as per

instructions of G20 Secretariat, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi.

20.

Assistance in terms of transportation and accommodation facilities, if required beyond the planned

numbers.

21.

Co-ordination with the concerned institutions/organizations and other assistance (including English

speaking guides etc.) for conduct of excursion visit.

22.

Protocol/Hospitality, liaison officers/delegates accommodation, hotels and other amenities.

23.

Any other expenditure related to G20 Summit Event/Meetings.

6. The Drawing and Disbursing Officer shall maintain the register of the grant-in-aid sanctioned. Nodal

Officer for Overall Co-ordination G-20, Additional Secretary G20 and OSD (Accounts) shall be the cheque

signing authority. The Nodal Officer for Overall Co-ordination G20 Summit shall evolve its own procedure

and the manner in which the grants-in-aid are to be utilized for the purposes specified in this pattern of

assistance.

7. No grants-in-aid or part thereof shall be diverted or utilized for the purpose other than specified in

this pattern of assistance. Any portion which is not ultimately required shall be funded back to the

Treasury.

8. The grant-in-aid or part thereof shall be subject to audit by the Controller and Auditor General of

India and Directorate of Accounts of the Government.

9. The G20 Cell shall adhere to General Financial Rules (GFR), 2017, The Goa Delegation of Financial

Powers Rules (GDFPR), 2008 and such other Rules as followed by the Departments in the State Government.

10. The Home Department shall be the Budget Controlling Authority for the purpose of making budgetary

provision, release of grants, utilization certificate etc.

11. The funds once sanctioned in the grant-in-aid, shall be transferred to Bank Account opened in the

Nationalized Bank. The quantum of funds as grant-in-aid will be Rs. 2,500 lakhs. The funds under grant-

-in-aid shall be disbursed in two installment of Rs. 1500 lakh and Rs. 1000 lakh each. The funds sanctioned

shall be utilized for 02 financial years w.e.f. 2022-23, 2023-24.

12. The amount shall be drawn under Demand No. 23, Budget Head of Accounts 2070–Other

Administrative Services 00, 800–Other Expenditure, 01–G-20 Summit, 31–Grant-in-aid.

13. No grant shall be allowed to be paid to any other institutions/voluntary organizations out of this

grants sanctioned by the Government which is not related to G20 Summit.

14. The Grantee shall exercise reasonable economy, observe all financial propriety and the financial

rules as issued by the Government from time to time while incurring the expenditure.

15. This is issued with the concurrence of the Finance (Exp.) Department vide their U.O. No.

1510/F dated 16-02-2023.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Anthony J. D’Souza, Additional Secretary/Director (G20 Cell Admin.).

Porvorim, 28th February, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3053

Department of Labour

––

Notification

No. 28/02/2023-LAB/Part-II/151

The following Award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 30-01-2023 in Case No.

Ref. LC-II/IT/15/16 is hereby published as required

under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 24th February, 2023.

––––

IN THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble

Presiding Officer)

. Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/15/16

Shri Ramdas Mayenkar,

H. No. 689, Thorlim Bhat,

Dongrim-Goa. …… Workman/Party I

V/s

The Managing Director,

M/s. Pfizer Ltd.,

Plot No. L-137, Phase III-A,

Verna, Industrial Estate,

Verna, Salcete-Goa.

…… Employer/Party II

Workman/Party-I represented by Ld. Rep. Shri

Subhash Naik.

Employer/Party-II represented by Ld. Adv. Shri G. K.

Sardessai.

Panaji, dated: 30-01-2023.

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause

(c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), the

Government of Goa, by Order dated 23-6-2016,

bearing No. 28/25/2016-LAB/438 referred the

following dispute for adjudication to the Industrial

Tribunal of Goa. The Government of Goa, vide its

addendum dated 18-10-2016, transferred the present

matter to the Labour Court-II, for its adjudication.

“(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Pfizer Limited, Verna, Salcette, Goa, in dismissing

Shri Ramdas Mayenkar, Operator, with effect from

23-12-2015, is legal and justified?

(2) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

2. On receipt of the reference, a case was

registered under No. LC-II/IT/15/2016 and registered

A/D notice was issued to the parties. In pursuance

to the said notice, the parties put in their

appearance. The Workman/Party-I (for short

‘Workman’), filed his Statement of Claim on

30-01-2017 at Exhibit-4. The facts of the case in

brief as pleaded by the Workman are that the

Employer/Party-II (for short ‘Employer’) is a

Multinational Pharmaceutical Company engaged

in the production of tablets at its factory at Verna

Industrial Estate, Salcette, Goa. He stated that the

Employer was initially established at Verna in the

year, 2001 as Wyeth Lederle Ltd. which was

subsequently changed as Pfizer Ltd. in the year,

2009. He stated that he was employed with the

Employer as “Operator-Production” since

26-05-2002. He stated that he has not received a

single memo or a single charge-sheet except the

charge-sheet which is the subject matter of the

present reference. He stated that during his service

with the Employer, he received awards from the

Employer for his performance. He stated that he

also received several “employee of the month”

awards, long service awards, best nominee of the

month awards, certificates for improving

productivity and development, etc. He stated that

after formation of a trade Union in 2014, all the

workers of the Employer Company joined the said

union. He stated that he was elected as an office

bearer of the said union and as such he was a

Protected Workman as per the provisions of the I.D.

Act, 1947. He stated that initially all workmen

including himself were employed as Operator–

Productions. He stated that in the year, 2006, the

designations of all workmen were changed to that

of management associates Grade MA-01 and in year

2011, the grade of workers were changed to MA-02

although the duties performed by them remained

the same. He stated that all the workmen of the

Employer including himself were issued

appointment letters and all of them were confirmed

in the service of the Employer.

3. He stated that in June, 2014, workers formed a

Trade Union for the first time, when all the workers of

the Employer factory became members of Gomantak

Mazdoor Sangh Trade Union. He stated that the

Employer was informed about the formation of a Trade

Union. He stated that names of seven Union office

bearers of the Union including himself were also

communicated to the Employer. He stated that the

Employer did not appreciate the decision of the

workers to form a Trade Union and started harassing

the workers by withdrawing existing benefits and

3054

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

existing facilities. He stated that with effect from

20-04-2015, the Employer did not allot any work to

workers inside the factory and kept them idle as the

Employer was not happy with the workers forming a

Trade Union. He stated that with effect from

24-04-2015, all workmen were kept outside the

factory gates and were not allowed to resume work

inside the factory. He stated that this continued for

several months and later the Employer stated that

they would not allow the workmen to report for work

unless they gave an undertaking, the contents of

which were not disclosed to them. He stated that

later on, the Employer allowed all workmen to report

for work without undertaking and all workmen

reported for work with effect from 17-08-2015. He

stated that the Employer has till date not paid wages

of the workers from 20-4-2015 to 16-08-2015. He stated

that however, eleven workmen, who were issued

suspension orders pending enquiry, were not allowed

to report for work. He stated that meanwhile, after

formation of a Trade union, the Employer suspended

the services of all office bearers of the Union namely,

himself, Sagar Dhume, Krishnakant Gawas, Navin

Gaude, Susen Jalmi, Suraj Kurtikar, and Suraj

Salgaonkar.

4. He stated that all the aforesaid workers were

issued charge-sheets on trumped up and fabricated

charges. He stated that he himself and others replied

to the charge-sheets denying the allegations levelled

against them. He stated that the suspension of seven

union office bearers including himself was from

21-04-2015. He stated that four more workmen were

also suspended from service with effect from

23-04-2015 pending enquiry namely, Ankush

Gaonkar, Mangaldas Gaude, Umakant Chari, and

Samesh Naik. He stated that all eleven workmen

were suspended and were issued charge-sheets

based on false and fabricated charges. He stated

that as the workers were not happy with Gomantak

Mazdoor Sangh Union because of the developments

which took place which workers least expected. He

stated that all the workers, after holding a General

Body Meeting decided to resign from the said Union

and became the members of Kamgarancho Ekvott

Trade Union of which Subhash Naik George is the

President with effect from 20-05-2015 after resigning

from Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh. He stated that these

developments were informed to the Employer in

writing. He stated that the said Union Kamagarancho

Ekvott raised several Industrial Disputes with the

Employer such as Charter of Demands on behalf of

the workers, illegal and unjustified refusal of work

with effect from 24-04-2015, unfair labour practice,

non-payment of bonus, illegal termination of services

of workmen and illegal imposition of punishments to

workers etc. He stated that as the Employer did not

accept the demands, the union raised disputes

before Dy. Labour Commissioner who is also

Conciliation Officer of Government of Goa, where all

industrial disputes are pending conciliation and

some disputes have been referred to this Hon’ble

Tribunal for adjudication.

5. He stated that although all seven union office

bearers including himself were issued separate

charge-sheets, the Employer decided to hold

common enquiry. He stated that Shri Prashant

Agarwal, Advocate who was appointed as an Enquiry

Officer to conduct the enquiries in respect of charge

-sheets issued to seven union office bearers. He

stated that Shri Prasanna Chawadikar, Advocate was

appointed as Management Representative. He

stated that initially Puti Gaonkar was the Defense

Representative on behalf of charge-sheeted workmen

and later on, Subhash Naik George was appointed as

Defense Representative by himself and other charge-

-sheeted workers. He stated that on 02-06-2015 a

date was fixed by the Enquiry Officer Mr. Agarwal to

hold the enquiry. However, on that day Ld. Enquiry

Officer did not attend the enquiry at the hearing fixed

at Panaji-Goa. He stated that the Management

Representative, Shri Prasanna Chawadikar, who was

present for the enquiry, informed that Ld. Enquiry

Officer had gone to his native place to bring his wife

and he could not get tickets to return to Goa due to

vacation rush and that he is still travelling in the

train. He stated that the Management Representative

informed him and all other charge-sheeted workmen

as well as Defense Representative that Ld. Enquiry

Officer, Mr. Agarwal had resigned from the post of

Enquiry Officer and that he could not come for the

enquiry due to his personal reasons. He stated that

Management Representative informed that the next

date of enquiry would be communicated after the

management appointed a new Enquiry Officer.

6. He stated that after 5th June, 2015, no

communication either oral or writing was received

by him or his Defense Representative about the date

of enquiry or appointment of a new Enquiry Officer.

He stated that after few months, the Employer

dismissed the service of the four union office bearers

with effect from 16-06-2015 claiming that they held

enquiry against them and claiming that Ld. Enquiry

Officer held them guilty of the charges namely, Sagar

Dhume, Krishnakant Gawas, Navin Gaude, and Suraj

Salgaonkar. Aggrieved by the said blatantly illegal

and unjustified terminations, the Workman and three

other workmen raised an industrial disputes with

the Employer and later on with the Conciliation

Officer/Dy. Labour Commissioner which ended in

failure.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3055

7. He contended that during the pendency of such

disputes as per provisions of Section 33 of the I. D.

Act, 1947, the Employer cannot terminate the services

of the workmen without prior permission or without

approval of action taken by them. He submitted that

the Employer, as an afterthought, terminated the

services of remaining three office bearers namely,

Ramdas Mayenkar, Susen Jalmi and Suraj Kurtikar

with effect from 23-12-2015. He submitted that with

these termination, Employer have terminated all

Seven office bearers who were elected after formation

of Trade Union which clearly proves that this is a

clear case of victimization for trade union activities.

He submitted that since he himself, Susen Jalmi and

Suraj Kurtikar were protected workmen as per

provisions of I.D. Act, prior permission before

termination ought to have been obtained from this

Hon’ble Tribunal and/or Dy. Labour Commissioner,

failing which the termination is bad-in-law. He

submitted that the charge-sheet issued to him and

six other office bearers of the union and four other

union members were fabricated and cooked up

besides being false. He submitted that the same were

issued to him and others to victimize them for their

trade union activities as they had formed a union for

the first time in the company. He submitted that

Shailesh Redkar, whom the Employer claims to have

been appointed as Enquiry Officer, was never

appointed as Enquiry Officer and no intimation to

that effect has been sent to him. He submitted that

no intimation of dates of enquiry by the said Enquiry

Officer if any, was sent to him. He submitted that the

records of enquiry proceedings alleged to have been

conducted by Shailesh Redkar have not been

supplied to him till date. He submitted that the

Employer, before terminating his service has not

issued him a show cause notice enclosing copy of

the findings of the Enquiry Officer, if any, and records

of enquiry proceedings if any, seeking his views

before dismissal which is mandatory. He submitted

that no enquiry was held in respect of charges

levelled against him in the charge-sheet issued to

him. He submitted that the copy of the findings of

the enquiry if any, were not supplied to him before

termination of his services. He submitted that since

the date of dismissal, he is unemployed and is

dependent on his family and friends on sustainance.

He submitted that his termination is illegal and

unjustified as he has been dismissed from service in

total violation of principles of natural justice. He

submitted that no opportunity whatsoever was given

to him to defend himself in the enquiry. He submitted

that the management witnesses were not allowed to

cross-examine by him. He submitted that the charges

levelled against him have not been proved in a fair

and impartial manner and in accordance with the

principles of natural justice. He submitted that his

dismissal from services is malafide, vindictive, and

by way of victimization for trade union activities,

besides the same being discriminatory. The

Workman therefore prayed that he be reinstated in

service with full back wages and continuity of service

with costs.

8. The Employer controverted the claim of

Workman by filing its written statement on

03-05-2017 at Exb. 5. The Employer, as an by way of

its preliminary objections, submitted that the

reference is not maintainable and it ought to be

rejected as there is no “Industrial Dispute” as defined

under the I.D. Act, 1947, that the Workman has

accepted all the legal dues arising out of termination

in full and final settlement and hence, the Workman

is estopped from raising the present dispute, that

there is non application of mind by the Appropriate

Government while referring the present dispute and

that the present reference is therefore null and void.

9. The Employer stated that it is a Private Limited

Company incorporated under the provisions of the

Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at

the Capital, 1802, 1901 Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra

(East), Mumbai and the factory located at Verna

Industrial Estate, Verna, Salcette-Goa. The Employer

stated that it is engaged in the manufacturing of

pharmaceuticals at its factory located at Verna

Industrial Estate, Verna-Goa.

10. The Employer stated that the Workman was

issued a charge-sheet dated 07-05-2015 alleging as

under:

“It has been observed that from the month of

December, 2014, the workmen have deliberately and

willfully reduced production as a result of which the

Management suffered heavy losses. The fall in

production which commenced from the month of

December, 2014 gradually reached to a stage where

during the preceding week the production was

reduced to around 25% of the normal. The

management has consistently requested the

workmen to stop the unfair practice of lowering the

production and to restore normalcy. However, the

workmen continue with the unfair Labour practice

of lowering the productive process.

Subsequent by Notice dated 7th February, 2015,

letter dated 14th April, 2015 and through various

communications, Management invited the attention

of the workmen to the fall in production and

requested the workmen to restore normalcy.

However, instead of restoring normalcy, to the utter

shock and surprise of the Management, the workmen

3056

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

in a concerted manner stopped production from the

commencement of Second shift of 20th April, 2015

and started squatting within the factory premises.

As a consequence thereto, the entire productive

process came to a grinding halt. The Management

has suffered huge losses till date and continues to

do so. As they were aware, engaged in the

manufacturing of drugs which include life-saving

drugs like Wysolone, Folvite, Pacitane, Overal-L etc.

All these products are listed in the National List

of Essential Medicines (NLEM), issued by Ministry of

Health, Government of India. Wysolone is a life-

saving steroidal drug with anti-inflammatory

properties and controls the painful symptoms of a

temporary autoimmune condition called Polymyalgia

Rheumatic (PMR), Folvite, essentially taken by

women during the first trimester of pregnancy for

development of the foetus and also used for all kinds

of anaemic conditions, Pacitane, drug used by

Patients suffering from early symptoms of Parkinson’s

Disease and Overal-L. You are fully aware that the

discontinuation due to non-availability of these

drugs can have an adverse effect on the patients and

the society at large.

They had received various communications from

their dealers, hospitals and doctors informing them

of the serious consequences arising as a result of

drugs not being available in the market and the

suffering of the patients, especially those who had

already been prescribed such drugs and consuming

the same. The consequence of sudden

discontinuation of supply to the patients had an

expected adverse consequences on the health of the

patients.

You are an office bearer of Gomantak Mazdoor

Sangh. The Management had been consistently

communicating with you and other workmen who

have been participating in the go slow/stoppage of

work to desist from the unfair labor practice of

reducing willfully and deliberately the production.

The fall in production was a consequence of the

instigation and incitement of the workmen to

commence and continue with the reduction of

production. It has also been observed that you have

been actively inducing the workmen to continue with

the go slow.

The participation in the willful go slow and the

instigation and incitement of the workmen to initiate

the go slow and continue as such amounts to a

serious misconduct under the Model Standing

Orders.

The Management had therefore decided to

conduct an enquiry into the misconduct alleged

against you. You were suspended pending enquiry

by suspension order dated 21-04-2015.

Your above acts on your part constitute the

following Acts of Misconducts under the Model

Standing Orders:

a. Willful insubordination or disobedience,

whether alone or in combination with others,

to any lawful and reasonable order of a superior.

b. Willful damage to or loss of employer’s good or

property.

c. Habitual absence without leave or absence

without leave for more than 10 days.

d. Habitual breach of any law applicable to the

establishment.

e. Riotous or disorderly behavior during working

hours at the establishment or any act

subversive of discipline.

f. Neglect of work.

g. Striking work or inciting others to strike work

in contravention of the provision of any law, or

rule having the force of law”.

11. The Employer stated that the workmen was

suspended pending enquiry. The Employer stated

that Mr. Prashant Agarwal was appointed as Enquiry

Officer and Mr. Prasanna Chawadikar was appointed

as the Management Representative. The Employer

stated that Mr. Puti Gaonkar was appointed as

Defense Representative by the Workmen. The

Employer stated that Mr. Agarwal conducted the

enquiry on 15-05-2015 and 22-05-2015. The Employer

stated that thereafter the enquiry was fixed on

02-06-2015 at 3.30 p.m. The Employer stated that on

02-06-2015, Ld. Enquiry Officer was in personal

difficulty and hence, the enquiry could not held on

the said date. The Employer stated that in the mean

while Mr. Prashant Agarwal by his letter dated

04-06-2015 informed them due to prior commitments,

he is unable to continue with the conduct of the

enquiry and therefore has decided to withdraw from

the enquiry. The Employer stated that in view of

inability of Mr. Prashant Agarwal to continue with

the enquiry, Mr. Shailesh Redkar was appointed as

an Enquiry Officer vide appointment letter dated

05-06-2015. The Employer stated that on 05-06-2015,

by notice dated 05-06-2015 the Workmen were

informed that in view of the change of the Enquiry

Officer, and the appointment of new Enquiry Officer,

the enquiry was fixed on 06-06-2015 at 4.30 p.m. at

the same venue. The Employer stated that the letter

of appointment of new Enquiry Officer was also

served on the charge-sheeted workmen. The

Employer stated that the charge-sheeted workmen

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3057

however, refused to accept the notice of enquiry as

well as the letter of appointment and the amended

charge-sheet. The Employer stated that on

06-06-2015, none of the charge-sheeted workmen

were present. The Employer stated that the charge-

sheeted workmen stayed away from the enquiry

deliberately with the sole object of delaying the

enquiry proceedings in spite of being informed about

the enquiry fixed on 06-06-2015 at 4.30 p.m. The

Employer stated that Ld. Enquiry Officer on the basis

of documents on record and considering the

contentions of the Management Representative and

after being satisfied that it is a fit case to proceed ex-

parte and held enquiry ex-parte against the charge-

sheeted workmen. The Employer stated that the

enquiry was conducted by the Ld. Enquiry Officer in

an impartial manner and every opportunity was

given to the Workman to defend the charge-sheet

levelled against the charge-sheeted workmen. The

Employer stated that Ld. Enquiry Officer submitted

his findings dated 13-06-2015 and after appreciating

the evidence on record held the Workman guilty of

charges levelled against him. The Employer stated

that they considered the proceedings of the enquiry,

the findings of the Enquiry Officer and concurred

with the same. The Employer stated that they

considered the past record and did not find any

extenuating circumstances for mitigation of

punishment of dismissal from its service. The

Employer stated that considering the gravity of

proved misconduct, the Workman was dismissed from

its service vide letter dated 23-12-2015.

12. The Employer stated that the Workman was

paid full and final settlement of all his dues vide

cheque bearing No. 106324 drawn on Deutche Bank,

Mumbai for an amount of Rs. 1,36,180/- alongwith

the full and final computation statement on

30-01-2016 that includes basic pay, P.L. encashment,

house rent allowance, conveyance allowance,

medical allowance and LTA along with gratuity. The

Employer stated that the said amount has been

received by the Workman and has been credited to

his account on 23-03-2016. The Employer stated that

the Workman has also collected all his provident fund

dues and for the purpose of employees Provident Fund

and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, is an

excluded employees. The Employer stated that, since

the Workman is prosecuting this matter after having

received benefits/full and final settlements of all legal

dues arising out of termination, it would be equitable

to direct the Workman to return the benefits so

received from them with 8.5% interest on the said

money for prosecuting the reference on merits on

the principle of “Who seeks equity must do equity”.

The Employer stated that in the event this Hon’ble

Court sets aside the enquiry on any of the grounds,

they may be permitted to lead evidence before this

Hon’ble Court to prove the charges levelled against

the Workman. The Employer denies the overall case

as pleaded by the Workman and prayed that the

reference may be summarily rejected.

13. Thereafter, the Workman filed his Re-joinder

on 12-05-2017 at Exb. 06. The Workman, by way of its

Re-joinder, confirms and reiterates all his

submissions, averments and statements made in his

Claim Statement to be true and correct and denies

all the statements, averments and submissions made

by the Employer in its Written Statement, which are

contrary to its Statement and averments made in his

Claim Statement.

14. Based on the pleadings filed by the respective

parties, this Court framed the following issues at

Exb. 7.

1. Whether a free, fair and proper enquiry was

conducted against the Workman/Party I in

respect of charge-sheet dated 07-05-2015 in

accordance with the principles of natural

justice?

2. Whether the charges of misconduct levelled

against the Workman vide charge-sheet dated

07-05-2015 have been proved to the satisfaction

of this court by acceptable evidence?

3. Whether the Workman/Party I proves that the

action of the Employer in dismissing him from

service w.e.f. 23-12-2015 is in violation of Section

33 of the I.D. Act, 1947?

4. Whether the Workman/Party-I proves that the

action of the Employer/Party II in dismissing

him from service w.e.f. 23-12-2015, is illegal and

unjustified?

5. Whether the Employer/Party II proves that the

reference is not maintainable and bad-in-law

in view of the reasons stated in para (i) to (iv) of

its written statement?

6. Whether the Workman/Party-I is entitled to any

relief?

7. What order? What award?

15. Thereafter, both the parties led their evidence

on the preliminary issues No. 1 and 2. Thereafter,

the Employer filed an application for amendment of

its written statement which was allowed by order

dated 17-3-2020 after hearing both parties. The

Workman also filed its synopsis in his written

arguments. On 12-3-2022, Ld. Rep. Shri Subhash Naik

appearing for the Workman as well as Ld. Adv. Ms. N.

Gaonkar representing the Employer submitted that

the matter is likely to be settled amicably between

3058

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

the parties. Accordingly, on 20-01-2023, Ld. Rep. Shri

Subhash Naik along with the Workman as well as Ld.

Adv. Mrs. M. Rao h/f Adv. G. K. Sardessai representing

the Employer along with its Director remained

present and filed an application for Award in terms

of settlement along with Memorandum of settlement

u/s 2(P) r/w Sec-18 of the I.D. Act, 1947 between the

Employer and the Workman which is on record at

Exb. 47-colly and submitted that the matter be

disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at

between the parties hereinabove. The terms of

settlement as agreed between the parties

hereinabove are reproduced hereunder:

a. The Management agrees to pay the workman

Mr. Ramdas B. Mayenkar a sum of Rs. 21,00,000/-

(Rupees twenty one lakhs only), vide cheque

bearing No. 500004 dated 12-01-2023 drawn

on JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A., Mumbai

400098 Branch, in full and final settlement of

all his claims.

b. It is agreed between the parties that the

Management shall not deduct TDS from the

Settlement amount and Mr. Ramdas B.

Mayenkar undertakes to pay the Tax on the

said amount.

c. Accordingly, Mr. Ramdas B. Mayenkar agrees

not to pursue the references No. LC-II/IT/15/

/2016 before the Labour Court II or any dispute

raised individually or through any union

before any Tribunal, Court, Authority or Forum

and treat the same as settled.

d. It is agreed between the parties that this

settlement filed shall be before the Labour

Court II under reference No. LC-II/IT/15/2016

for an Award in terms of the present

settlement.

I have gone through the terms of settlement

signed by the parties hereinabove and is of the

opinion that the said terms of settlement are

beneficial to both the parties. The said terms of

settlement also useful for the harmonious relation

between the parties. Hence, I approved the same.

In view of above and with regards to the facts and

circumstances of the present case, I proceed to pass

the following order.

ORDER

1. It is hereby held that the reference as to whether

the action of the management of M/s. Pfizer

Ltd., Verna Industrial Estate, Verna, Salcette,

Goa, in dismissing Shri Ramdas Mayenkar,

Operator, w.e.f. 23-12-2015 is legal and justified,

does not survive.

2. Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar)

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

————

Notification

No. 28/02/2023-LAB/Part-III/153

The following Award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 30-01-2023 in Case No.

Ref. LC-II/IT/34/16 is hereby published as required

under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 24th February, 2023.

––––

IN THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble

Presiding Officer)

. Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/34/16

Shri Navin Gaude,

H. No. 39, Pani Wada,

Borim, Ponda-Goa (403401) …… Workman/Party I

V/s

The Managing Director,

M/s. Pfizer Ltd.,

Plot No. L-137, Phase III-A,

Verna Industrial Estate,

Verna, Salcete-Goa (403722) …… Employer/Party II

Workman/Party-I represented by Ld. Rep. Shri

Subhash Naik.

Employer/Party-II represented by Ld. Adv. Shri G. K.

Sardessai.

Panaji, dated: 30-01-2023.

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause

(c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), the

Government

of

Goa,

by

Order

dated

22-07-2016, bearing No. 28/16/2016-LAB/546

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3059

referred the following dispute for adjudication to

the Labour Court-II, Panaji-Goa.

“(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Pfizer Limited, Verna, Salcette, Goa, in

dismissing Shri Navin Gaude, Management

Associate, with effect from 16-06-2015, is legal

and justified?

(2)

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

2. On receipt of the reference, a case was

registered under No. LC-II/IT/34/2016 and registered

A/D notice was issued to the parties. In pursuance

to the said notice, the parties put in their appearance.

The Workman/Party-I (for short ‘Workman’), filed his

Statement of Claim on 19-08-2016 at Exhibit-5. The

facts of the case in brief as pleaded by the Workman

are that the Employer/Party-II (for short ‘Employer’)

is a Multinational Pharmaceutical Company engaged

in the production of tablets at its factory at Verna

Industrial Estate, Salcette, Goa. He stated that the

Employer was initially established at Verna in the

year, 2001 as Wyeth Lederle Ltd. which was

subsequently changed as Pfizer Ltd. in the year, 2009.

He stated that he was employed with the Employer

as “Operator-Warehouse” since 29-11-2001. He stated

that he has not received a single memo or a single

charge-sheet except the charge-sheet which is the

subject matter of the present reference. He stated

that during his service of the Employer, he received

awards from the Employer for his performance. He

stated that he also received several “employee of the

month” awards, long service awards, best nominee

of the month awards, certificates for improving

productivity and development, etc. He stated that

after formation of a trade Union in 2014, all the

workers of the Employer Company joined the said

union. He stated that he was elected as an office

bearer of the said union and as such he was a

Protected Workman as per the provisions of the I.D.

Act, 1947. He stated that initially all workmen

including himself were employed as Operator –

Warehouse. He stated that in the year, 2006, the

designations of all workmen were changed to that of

management associates Grade MA-01 and in year

2011, the grade of workers were changed to MA-02

although the duties performed by them remained the

same. He stated that all the workmen of the Employer

including himself were issued appointment letters

and all of them were confirmed in the service of the

Employer.

3. He stated that in June, 2014, workers formed a

Trade Union for the first time, when all the workers of

the Employer factory became members of Gomantak

Mazdoor Sangh Trade Union. He stated that the

Employer was informed about the formation of the

Trade Union. He stated that names of seven Union

office bearers of the Union including himself were

also communicated to the Employer. He stated that

the Employer did not appreciate the decision of the

workers to form a Trade Union and started harassing

the workers by withdrawing existing benefits and

existing facilities. He stated that with effect from

20-04-2015, the Employer did not allot any work to

workers inside the factory and kept them idle as the

Employer was not happy with the workers forming a

Trade Union. He stated that with effect from

24-04-2015, all workmen were kept outside the

factory gates and were not allowed to resume work

inside the factory. He stated that this continued for

several months and later the Employer stated that

they would not allow the workmen to report for work

unless they gave an undertaking, the contents of

which were not disclosed to them. He stated that

later on, the Employer allowed all workmen to report

for work without undertaking and all workmen

reported for work with effect from 17-08-2015. He

stated that the Employer has till date not paid wages

of the workers from 20-4-2015 to 16-08-2015. He stated

that however, eleven workmen, who were issued

suspension orders pending enquiry, were not allowed

to report for work. He stated that meanwhile, after

formation of the Trade union, the Employer

suspended the services of all office bearers of the

Union namely, Ramdas Mayenkar, Sagar Dhume,

Krishnakant Gawas, himself, Susen Jalmi, Suraj

Kurtikar, and Suraj Salgaonkar.

4. He stated that all the aforesaid workers were

issued charge-sheets on trumped up and fabricated

charges. He stated that he himself and others replied

to the charge-sheets denying the allegations leveled

against them. He stated that the suspension of seven

union office bearers including himself was from

21-04-2015. He stated that four more workmen were

also suspended from service with effect from

23-04-2015 pending enquiry namely, Ankush

Gaonkar, Mangaldas Gaude, Umakant Chari, and

Samesh Naik. He stated that all eleven workmen

were suspended and were issued charge-sheets

based on false and fabricated charges.

5. He stated that as the workers were not happy

with Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh Union because of the

developments which took place which the workers

least expected. He stated that all the workers after

holding a General Body Meeting decided to resign

from the said Union and became the members of

Kamgarancho Ekvott Trade Union of which Shri

Subhash Naik George is the President with effect

from 20-05-2015 after resigning from Gomantak

Mazdoor Sangh. He stated that these developments

were informed to the Employer in writing. He stated

3060

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

that the said Union Kamagarancho Ekvott raised

several Industrial Disputes with the Employer such

as Charter of Demands on behalf of the workers,

illegal and unjustified refusal of work with effect from

24-04-2015, unfair labour practice, non-payment of

bonus, illegal termination of services of workmen and

illegal imposition of punishments to workers etc. He

stated that as the Employer did not accept the

demands, the union raised disputes before Dy. Labour

Commissioner who is also Conciliation Officer of

Government of Goa, where all industrial disputes are

pending conciliation and some disputes have been

referred to this Hon’ble Tribunal for adjudication.

6. He stated that although all seven union office

bearers including himself were issued separate

charge-sheets, the Employer decided to hold

common enquiry. He stated that Shri Prashant

Agarwal, Advocate, was appointed as an Enquiry

Officer to conduct the enquiries in respect of charge-

sheets issued to seven union office bearers. He stated

that Shri Prasanna Chawadikar, Advocate, was

appointed as Management Representative. He

stated that initially, Puti Gaonkar was the Defense

Representative on behalf of charge-sheeted workmen

and later on, Shri Subhash Naik George was

appointed as Defense Representative by himself and

other charge-sheeted workers. He stated that on

02-06-2015 a date was fixed by the Enquiry Officer

Mr. Agarwal to hold the enquiry. However, on that

day Ld. Enquiry Officer did not attend the enquiry at

the hearing fixed at Panaji-Goa. He stated that the

Management Representative, Shri Prasanna

Chawadikar, who was present for the enquiry,

informed that Ld. Enquiry Officer had gone to his

native place to bring his wife and he could not get

tickets to return to Goa due to vacation rush and

that he was still travelling in the train. He stated

that the Management Representative informed him

and all other charge-sheeted workmen as well as

Defense Representative that Ld. Enquiry Officer, Mr.

Agarwal had resigned from the post of Enquiry

Officer and that he would not come for the enquiry

due to his personal reasons. He stated that

Management Representative informed that the next

date of enquiry would be communicated after the

management appointed a new Enquiry Officer.

7. He stated that after 5th June, 2015, no

communication either oral or writing was received

by him or his Defense Representative about the date

of enquiry or appointment of a new Enquiry Officer.

He stated that after few months, the Employer

dismissed the service of the four union office bearers

with effect from 16-06-2015 claiming that they held

the enquiry against them and claiming that Ld.

Enquiry Officer held them guilty of the charges

namely, Sagar Dhume, Krishnakant Gawas, himself,

and Suraj Salgaonkar. Aggrieved by the said

blatantly illegal and unjustified terminations, the

Workman and three other workmen raised an

industrial disputes with the Employer and later on

with the Conciliation Officer/Dy. Labour

Commissioner which ended in failure.

8. He contended that during the pendency of such

disputes as per provisions of Section 33 of the I. D.

Act, 1947, the Employer cannot terminate the services

of the workmen without prior permission or without

approval of action taken by them. He submitted that

the Employer, as an afterthought, terminated the

services of remaining three office bearers namely,

Ramdas Mayenkar, Susen Jalmi and Suraj Kurtikar

with effect from 23-12-2015. He submitted that with

these termination, Employer have terminated all

Seven office bearers who were elected after formation

of Trade Union which clearly proves that this is a

clear case of victimization for trade union activities.

He submitted that since he himself, Susen Jalmi and

Suraj Kurtikar were protected workmen as per

provisions of I.D. Act, prior permission before

termination ought to have been obtained from this

Hon’ble Tribunal and/or Dy. Labour Commissioner,

failing which the termination is bad-in-law. He

submitted that the charge-sheet issued to him and

six other office bearers of the union and four other

union activists were fabricated and cooked up

besides being false. He submitted that the same were

issued to him and others to victimize them for their

trade union activities as they had formed a union for

the first time in the company. He submitted that

Shailesh Redkar, whom the Employer claims to have

been appointed as Enquiry Officer, was never

appointed as Enquiry Officer and no intimation to

that effect has been sent to him. He submitted that

no intimation of dates of enquiry by the said Enquiry

Officer if any, was sent to him. He submitted that the

records of enquiry proceedings alleged to have been

conducted by Shailesh Redkar have not been

supplied to him till date. He submitted that the

Employer, before terminating his service has not

issued him a show cause notice enclosing copy of

the findings of the Enquiry Officer, if any, and records

of enquiry proceedings if any, seeking his views

before dismissal which is mandatory. He submitted

that no enquiry was held in respect of charges

levelled against him in the charge-sheet issued to

him. He submitted that the copy of the findings of

the enquiry if any, were not supplied to him before

termination of his services. He submitted that since

the date of dismissal, he is unemployed and is

dependent on his family and friends on sustainance.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3061

He submitted that his termination is illegal and

unjustified as he has been dismissed from service in

total violation of principles of natural justice. He

submitted that no opportunity of whatsoever was

given to him to defend himself in the enquiry. He

submitted that the management witnesses were not

allowed to cross-examine by him. He submitted that

the charges levelled against him have not been

proved in a fair and impartial manner and in

accordance with the principles of natural justice. He

submitted that his dismissal from services is

malafide, vindictive, and by way of victimization for

trade union activities, besides the same being

discriminatory. The Workman therefore prayed that

he be reinstated in service with full back wages and

continuity of service with costs.

9. The Employer controverted the claim of the

Workman by filing its written statement on

02-12-2016 at Exb. 7. The Employer, as an by way of

its preliminary objections, submitted that the

reference is not maintainable and it ought to be

rejected as there is no “Industrial Dispute” as defined

under the I.D. Act, 1947, that the Workman has

accepted all the legal dues arising out of termination

in full and final settlement and hence, the Workman

is estopped from raising the present dispute, that

there is non application of mind by the Appropriate

Government while referring the present dispute and

that the present reference is therefore null and void.

10. The Employer stated that it is a Private Limited

Company incorporated under the provisions of the

Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at

the Capital, 1802, 1901 Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra

(East), Mumbai and the factory located at Verna

Industrial Estate, Verna, Salcette-Goa. The Employer

stated that it is engaged in the manufacturing of

pharmaceuticals at its factory located at Verna

Industrial Estate, Verna-Goa.

11. The Employer stated that the Workman was

issued a charge-sheet dated 07-05-2015 alleging as

under:

“It has been observed that from the month of

December, 2014, the workmen have deliberately and

willfully reduced production as a result of which the

Management suffered heavy losses. The fall in

production which commenced from the month of

December, 2014 gradually reached to a stage where

during the preceding week the production was

reduced to around 25% of the normal.

The management has consistently requested the

workmen to stop the unfair practice of lowering the

production and to restore normalcy. However, the

workmen continue with the unfair labor practice of

lowering the productive process.

Subsequent there to by Notice dated 7th February,

2015, letter dated 14th April, 2015 and various

communications, Management invited the attention

of the workmen to the fall in production and

requested the workmen to restore normalcy.

However, instead of restoring normalcy, to the utter

shock and surprise of the Management, the workmen

in a concerted manner stopped production from the

commencement of Second shift of 20th April, 2015

and started squatting within the factory premises.

As a consequence thereto the entire productive

process came to a grinding halt. The Management

has suffered huge losses till date and continues to

do so. The Employer/Party II is engaged in the

manufacturing of drugs which include life-saving

drugs like Wysolone, Folvite, Pacitane, Overal-L etc.

All these products are listed in the National List

of Essential Medicines (NLEM), issued by Ministry

of Health, Government of India. Wysolone is a life-

saving steroidal drug with anti-inflammatory

properties and controls the painful symptoms of a

temporary autoimmune condition called Polymyalgia

Rheumatic (PMR), Folvite, essentially taken by

women during the first trimester of pregnancy for

development of the foetus and also used for all kinds

of anaemic conditions, Pacitane, drug used by

Patients suffering from early symptoms of Parkinson’s

Disease and Overal-L. You are fully aware that the

discontinuation due to non-availability of these

drugs can have an adverse effect on the patients and

the society at large.

We have received various communications from

our dealers, hospitals and doctors informing us of

the serious consequences arising as a result of drugs

not being available in the market and the suffering

of the patients, especially those who had already

been prescribed such drugs and consuming the same.

The consequence of sudden discontinuation of

supply to the patients has as expected adverse

consequences on the health of the patients.

You are an office bearer of Gomantak Mazdoor

Sangh. The Management had been consistently

communicating with the workmen who have been

participating in the go slow/stoppage of work to

desist from the unfair labour practice of reducing

willfully and deliberately the production. The fall in

production was a consequence of the instigation and

incitement of the workmen to commence and

continue with the reduction of production. It has

also been observed that the Party I have been

actively inducing the workmen to continue with the

go slow.

The participation in the willful go slow and the

instigation and incitement of the workmen to initiate

3062

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

the go slow and stoppage of work continued and as

such amounts to a serious misconduct under the

Model Standing Orders.

The Management had therefore decided to

conduct an enquiry into the misconduct alleged

against the Party-I. The Party-I was suspended

pending enquiry by suspension order dated

21-04-2015.

The above acts of the Party-I constituted the

following Acts of Misconducts under the Model

Standing Orders:

a. Willful insubordination or disobedience,

whether alone or in combination with others,

to any lawful and reasonable order of a

superior.

b. Willful damage to or loss of employer’s good

or property.

c. Habitual absence without leave or absence

without leave for more than 10 days.

d. Habitual breach of any law applicable to the

establishment.

e. Riotous or disorderly behavior during

working hours at the establishment or any

act subversive of discipline.

f. Neglect of work.

g. Striking work or inciting others to strike work

in contravention of the provision of any law,

or rule having the force of law”.

12. The Employer stated that the workmen was

suspended pending enquiry. The Employer stated

that management conducted an enquiry into the

above said charges. The Employer stated that the

enquiry was conducted by Mr. Shailesh Redkar the

Enquiry Officer who conducted the enquiry is an

impartial manner and every opportunity was given

to the Workman to defend the charges levelled

against him but the Workman failed to participate in

the inquiry. The Employer stated that the enquiry

was therefore, held ex-parte. The Employer stated

that Ld. Inquiry Officer submitted his findings dated

13-6-2015 and after appreciating the evidence on

records held the workman guilty of the charges

levelled against him. The Employer stated that they

considered the proceedings of the inquiry, the

findings of the Inquiry Officer dated 13-6-2015 and

concurred with the same. The Employer stated that

they considered the past records and did not find

any extenuating circumstances for mitigation of

punishment of dismissal from its service. The

Employer stated that considering the gravity of

proved misconducts, the Workman was dismissed

from its service vide letter dated 16-6-2015.

13. The Employer stated that a cheque bearing No.

101980 drawn on Deutsche Bank, Mumbai for an

amount of Rs. 1,57,510/- (Rupees One lakh fifty seven

thousand five hundred and ten only) was sent to the

Workman at his home address by Registered A/D in

full and final settlement of all his dues. The Employer

stated that the statement to that effect was sent

through Registered Post at his correspondence

address on 10-7-2015 and the same has been received

by him. The Employer stated that the Workman was

paid full and final settlement of all his dues which

included basic pay, P.L. encashment, House rent

allowance, Conveyance allowance, Medical

allowance, LTA alongwith gratuity. The Employer

stated that the said amount has been received by

the Workman and has been credited to his account

on 29-9-2015. The Employer stated that the Workman

has also collected all his Provident Fund dues and

for the purpose of Employees Provident Fund and

Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 is an excluded

employee. The Employer stated that since the

Workman is prosecuting this matter after having

received the benefits/full and final settlement of all

legal dues arising out of termination, it would be

equitable to direct the Workman to return the

benefits so received from Employer with 8.5% interest

on the said money for prosecuting the reference on

merits on the principle of “who seeks equity must do

equity. The Employer therefore prayed that the

Workman be directed to deposit the entire amount

in the Court and in the event the Workman fails to

deposit the amount within the period acquitted by

this Hon’ble Court, the defense of the Workman may

be struck off and the reference may be rejected or

the Workman may be stopped for mediating the

present reference.

14. The Employer stated that by notice dated

20-4-2015, the management informed the employee

that their act of stoppage of work from the second

shift amounts to willful stoppage and gross

indiscipline. The Employer stated that the

management advised the employees to report for

work as per the shift schedule. The Employer stated

that however, the employees continued with the

stoppage and continued squatting within the factory

premises. The Employer stated that, by notice dated

21-4-2015, invited the attention of the workmen in

the third shift of 20th April, and first shift of 21th

April, 2015, to the willful stoppage of work and again

advised them to report for work. The Employer stated

that however, they failed to report for duty and

continued to squat within the factory premises. The

Employer stated that the management also decided

to issue charge-sheets to some of the employees for

the misconducts committed by them. The Employer

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3063

stated that in view of the seriousness of the

misconducts alleged against them and in the interest

of conducting a proper inquiry, and to avoid any

interference with such inquiry, the management

decided to suspend them pending inquiry and formal

charge-sheets. The Employer stated that the said

workmen were suspended pending inquiry vide

letter of suspension dated 21-4-2015. The Employer

stated that in the letter of suspension, the

management informed the workmen that the

management has decided to institute an inquiry into

the acts of misconduct alleged against them. The

Employer stated that as the employees continued

with the work stoppage and failed to report for work

and on the contrary were sitting within the factory

premises, the management, by letter dated

23-4-2015, invited the attention of General Secretary

of the union Mr. Puti Gaonkar to the stoppage of work

by the employees from 20-4-2015 and to the notices

displayed on its notice board requesting the striking

employees to report for work. The Employer stated

that in the said letter, management informed the

union that the management is required to take

written undertaking from all the workmen that they

will perform their duties of manufacturing and

restored normalcy in the factory premises. The

Employer stated that the said letter was also

displayed on its notice board. The Employer stated

that alongwith the copy of the said undertaking, the

workmen was also required to sign a notice displayed

on its notice board and copies of the same were

placed at the security gate. The Employer stated

that on and from commencement of general shifts of

24-4-2015, the employees who had reported at the

security gate were advised to sign the undertaking.

The Employer stated that however, they refused to

do so and squatted outside the factory premises in

front of the security cabin from where all the

employees entered inside the factory premises

thereby, causing inconvenience to the employees

who reported for duty. The Employer stated that the

action of the employees of stoppage of work from

28-4-2015 is a concerted manner and continuing such

stoppage amounts to a strike which is illegal and

unjustified.

15. The Employer started that by notice dated

27-4-2015 displayed on 27-4-2015, the management

invited the attention of the workmen that stoppage

of work by way of illegal strike from 28-4-2015 and to

the undertakings which they declined to submit to

the management by giving an assurance of

restoration of normalcy. The Employer stated that

by the said notice, they were informed not to sit at

the security gate and squat outside the security gate

as it caused inconvenience as well as atmosphere of

fear and threat in the mind of managerial and other

employees as well as the customers, welders who

are entering the factory premises. The Employer

stated that the employees were therefore, advised

not to squat near the factory gate and to stay away

from the said place. The Employer stated that as the

workmen continued to commit illegalities, the

management filed a suit for permanent as well as

temporary injunction on 27-4-2015. The Employer

stated that in the meanwhile, the management, vide

its letter to the individual Workman dated 02-06-2015

called upon the workmen to withdraw the agitation

and report for work by giving declaration/

/undertaking as mentioned therein. The Employer

stated that the workmen however, did not responded.

The Employer stated that they again, by its letter

dated 23-6-2015, sent to individual Workman

requested to join the duties. The Employer stated

that the workmen did not respond. The Employer

stated that the management once again vide its

appeal dated 31-07-2015 sent to individual Workman

requested the workmen to report for work in their

shift as per their regular shift. The Employer stated

that on 16-07-2015, four employees who were the

members of “Kamgarancho Ekvott” resumed duties.

The Employer stated that thereafter, one more appeal

was sent to the workmen on 11-08-2015 wherein,

reference was given of the appeal of 23-06-2016,

3-07-2015, and 31-07-2015 to report for work in the

shift and the shift schedule was annexed thereto.

The Employer stated that finally on 17-08-2015 the

remaining workers resumed duties.

16. The Employer submitted that the Ld. Enquiry

Officer followed the principles of natural justice and

granted every conceivable opportunities to the

workmen to be present but however, failed to

participate in the enquiry and therefore Ld. Enquiry

Officer had no option but to conduct the inquiry ex-

parte. The Employer submitted that Ld. Enquiry

Officer on the basis of the evidence on record

submitted reasoned findings holding the Workman

guilty of the charges levelled against him. The

Employer submitted that the management

considered the findings of the Enquiry Officer,

concurred with the same and considering the gravity

of misconduct decided to dismiss him from the

service and hence the present application for

permission for dismissal of the Workman. The

Employer denies the case of the Workman as pleaded

by him and prayed for rejection of the present

reference.

17. Thereafter, the Workman filed his Re-joinder

on 13-12-2016 at Exb.8. The Workman, by way of its

Re-joinder, confirms and reiterates all his

submissions, averments and statements made in his

3064

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

Claim Statement to be true and correct and denies

all the statements, averments and submissions made

by the Employer in its Written Statement, which are

contrary to its Statement and averments made in his

Claim Statement.

18. Based on the pleadings filed by the respective

parties, this court framed the following issues on

5-4-2017 at Exb. 12.

1. Whether a free, fair and proper enquiry was

conducted against the Workman/Party I in

respect of charge-sheet dated 07-05-2015 in

accordance with the principles of natural

justice?

2. Whether the charges of misconduct leveled

against the Workman vide charge-sheet dated

07-05-2015 have been proved to the satisfaction

of this court by acceptable evidence?

3. Whether the Workman/Party I proved that his

dismissal from service is in violation of Section

33 of the I.D. Act, 1947?

4. Whether the Workman/Party-I proves that the

action of the Employer/Party II in dismissing him

from service w.e.f. 16-06-2015, is illegal and

unjustified?

5. Whether the Employer/Party II proves that the

reference is not maintainable and bad-in-law

and in view of the reasons stated in para 1(a) to

1(d) of its written statement?

6. Whether the Workman/Party-I is entitled to any

relief?

7. What order? What award?

19. Thereafter, both the parties led their evidence

on the preliminary issues No.1 and 2. Subsequently,

the Employer filed an application for amendment of

its written statement which was allowed by order

dated 17-3-2020 after hearing both parties. The

Workman also filed its synopsis in his written

arguments. On 12-3-2022, Ld. Rep. Shri Subhash Naik

appearing for the Workman as well as Ld. Adv. Ms. N.

Gaonkar representing the Employer submitted that

the matter is likely to be settled amicably between

the parties. Accordingly, on 20-01-2023, Ld. Rep. Shri

Subhash Naik alongwith the Workman as well as

Ld. Adv. Mrs. M. Rao h/f Adv. G. K. Sardessai

representing the Employer alongwith its Director

remained present and filed an application for Award

in terms of settlement along with Memorandum of

settlement u/s 2(P) r/w Sec-18 of the I.D. Act, 1947

between the Employer and the Workman which is

on record at Exb. 47-colly and submitted that the

matter be disposed of in terms of the settlement

arrived at between the parties hereinabove. The

terms of settlement as agreed between the parties

hereinabove are reproduced hereunder:

a. The Management agrees to pay the Workman

Mr. Navin Gaude, a sum of Rs. 21,00,000/-

(Rupees twenty one lakhs only), vide

cheque bearing No. 500007 dated 12-01-2023

drawn on JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A.,

Mumbai 400098 Branch, in full and final

settlement of all his claims.

b. It is agreed between the parties that the

Management shall not deduct TDS from the

Settlement amount and Mr. Navin Gaude

undertakes to pay the Tax on the said amount.

c. Accordingly, Mr. Navin Gaude agrees not to

pursue the references No. LC-II/IT/34/2016

before the Labour Court II or any dispute

raised individually or through any union

before any Tribunal, Court, Authority or

Forum and treat the same as settled.

d. It is agreed between the parties that this

settlement shall be filed before the Labour

Court II under reference No. LC-II/IT/34/

/2016 for an Award in terms of the present

settlement.

I have gone through the terms of settlement

signed by the parties hereinabove and is of the

opinion that the said terms of settlement are

beneficial to both the parties. The said terms of

settlement also useful for the harmonious relation

between the parties. Hence, I approved the same.

In view of above and with regards to the facts and

circumstances of the present case, I proceed to pass

the following order.

ORDER

1. It is hereby held that the reference as to whether

the action of the management of M/s. Pfizer

Ltd., Verna Industrial Estate, Verna, Salcette,

Goa, in dismissing Shri Navin Gaude,

Management Associate, w.e.f. 16-06-2015 is

legal and justified, does not survive.

2. Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar)

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

———uuu———

Department of Law & Judiciary

Law (Establishment) Division

––––

Order

No. 2/25/2014-LD(Estt)/494

Whereas, vide Order No. 15/02/2022-VIG/460

dated 04-04-2022 of the Director of Vigilance,

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3065

Altinho, Panaji, Shri Tushan Kunkolienkar, Civil

Registrar-cum-Sub Registrar, Bardez was placed

under suspension w.e.f. 04-04-2022 and ordered to

remain in the office of State Registrar-cum-Head of

Notary Services, Panaji, with entitlement of payment

of subsistence allowance, as per the Fundamental

Rule 53(1) (ii) (a), which shall be drawn against the

post of office of Civil Registrar-cum-Sub Registrar,

Bardez from 04-04-2022 to 30-09-2022.

Whereas, Shri Tushan Kunkolienkar has not

drawn the subsistence allowance for the period

from 01-10-2022 to 05-10-2022 from the Office of

Civil Registrar-cum-Sub Registrar, Bardez.

Whereas, Order No. 15/02/2022-VIG/Part-I/5 dated

06-10-2022, the suspension of Shri Tushan

Kunkolienkar has been revoked by the Director of

Vigilance, Altinho, Panaji w.e.f. 06-10-2022.

Whereas, vide joining letter dated 07-10-2022,

Shri Tushan Kunkolienkar has joined his duties w.e.f.

07-10-2022 (b.n.) in the office of State Registrar-

-cum-Head of Notary Services, Panaji.

Whereas, the post of Civil Registrar-cum-Sub

Registrar, Bardez has remained vacant from the

suspension period till the revocation period of

Shri Tushan Kunkolienkar.

And whereas, Shri Tushan Kunkolienkar was

transferred vide Order No. 2/25/204-LD(Estt)/1691

dated 21-10-2022 and posted as Joint Civil Registrar-

-cum-Sub Registrar, District Registrar, South and he

joined his duties on 25-10-2022 (b.n.).

Now therefore, in view of the facts in the forgoing

paras herein; the Government approval for the

following is hereby conveyed:

a) Shri Tushan Kunkolienkar to draw his

subsistence allowance for the period from

01-10-2022 to 05-10-2022 against the post of

Civil Registrar-cum-Sub Registrar, Bardez.

b) Considering the revocation of suspension vide

Order No. 15/02/2022-VIG/Part-I/5 dated

06-10-2022, Shri Tushan Kunkolienkar to draw

his salary w.e.f. 06-10-2022 to 24-10-2022

against vacant post of Civil Registrar-cum-Sub

Registrar, Bardez.

c) Vide Order No. 2/25/204-LD(Estt)/1691 dated

21-10-2022, Shri Tushan Kunkolienkar to draw

his salary against the post of Joint Civil

Registrar-cum-Sub Registrar, District Registrar,

South w.e.f. 25-10-2022.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Amir Y. Parab, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).

Porvorim, 16th March, 2023.

Department of Panchayati Raj and

Community Development

Directorate of Panchayats

–––

Notification

No. 17/22/DP-ACCTS/IIISFC/2022-23/2482

Read: 1) Notification No. 17/22/DP-ACCTS/IIISFC/

/2021-22/8908 dated 31-12-2021.

2) Notification No. 17/22/DP-ACCTS/IIISFC/

/2022-23/271 dated 09-01-2023.

The Government of Goa is pleased to notify the

award period of 3rd State Finance Commission as

Financial Year 2024-25 to 2028-2029. The 3rd State

Finance Commission has been constituted vide

notification read in the preamble at Sr. No. (1) above

and further the term of its functioning is extended

vide notification at Sr. No. (2) above.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Siddhi Halarnakar, Director & ex officio Joint

Secretary (Panchayats).

Panaji, 15th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Personnel

–––

Notification

No. 3/2/2012/PER/733

Read:

Notification No. 3/2/2021-PER/302 dated

02-02-2023.

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3

read with Section 4 of the Goa Human Resource

Development Act, 2012 (Goa Act 12 of 2012), and in

supersession of the Government Notification No.

3/2/2012/PER/1544 dated 09-07-2020, published in

Official Gazette, Series II No. 17 dated 23-07-2020

and Notification No. 3/2/2021-PER/302 dated

02-02-2023 published in Official Gazette, Series II

No. 45 dated 09-02-2023, the Government of Goa

hereby re-establishes the Goa Human Resource

Development Corporation consisting of the

following Directors, namely:-

1. Shri Rudolfo Fernandes,

— Chairman.

MLA, St. Cruz Constituency

2. Shri Deepak Dnyaneshwar — Vice-

Naik, Vasco

Chairman.

3. Chief Secretary

— Director.

4. Additional Secretary

— Director.

(Finance)

5. Joint Secretary (Personnel)

— Director.

6. Director of Health Services

— Director.

3066

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

7. Commissioner, Labour and

— Director.

Employment

8. Shri Arun Naik, Bicholim

— Director.

9. Shri Mariano Araujo,

— Director.

Cabesa, St. Cruz

10. Managing Director, GHRDC

— Managing

Director.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 15th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Planning

Directorate of Planning, Statistics & Evaluation

––––

Order

No. DPSE/1/ADMN/Filling-Prom.SO/2022-23/3767

On recommendation of the Goa Public Service

Commission, as communicated vide their letter No.

COM/II/11/38(2)/2020/504 dated 02-03-2023,

Government is pleased to promote Shri Sajjan A.

Fatarpekar, Research Assistant (Group ‘B’ Gazetted)

of Common Statistical Cadre to the post of Statistical

Officer (Group ‘B’ Gazetted) in the Pay Scale of Level 7

(44,900-1,42,400) as per VIIth Pay Commission on

regular basis with immediate effect and is posted

at Directorate of Planning, Statistics & Evaluation,

Porvorim in Publication Division.

Shri Sajjan A. Fatarpekar, shall hold additional

charge of the post of Dy. Director, Health

Intelligence Bureau, at Directorate of Health

Services, Campal, Panaji, with immediate effect until

further orders.

Shri Sajjan A. Fatarpekar, shall be entitled to draw

additional charge allowance as per O.M. No. 2/38/

/75-PER (Vol. III) dated 09-06-2008 issued by

Personnel Department.

The period of service for holding additional

charge will not be considered for future promotions.

1. The Officer will be on probation for a period

of 02 years from the date of joining. During probation

period, the Officer shall be required to undergo

such training or pass such examination as

prescribed by the Controlling Authority for

satisfactory completion of probation. The probation

period shall be liable to be extended till the time

the aforesaid condition is not fulfilled by the Officer.

2. The Officer shall exercise option to fix his pay

in terms of F. R. 22(I)(a)(1) within one month from

the date of promotion, if desire/applicable.

3. This issues with the Government approval vide

U.O. 2446/F dated 14-03-2023.

4. The Officer is required to submit joining report

to this Department for office record.

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Vijay B. Saxena, Director & ex officio Joint

Secretary (Planning).

Porvorim, 17th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Public Health

––––

Order

No. 47/1/2011-I/PHD/Part/417

Government is pleased to transfer the below mentioned Doctors under Directorate of Health Services,

with immediate effect:-

Sr. No.

Name of the Doctor

Present place of posting

Transferred at

1.

Dr. Dinesh Parab, Health Officer

Primary Health Centre,

Community Health Centre,

Candolim

Pernem.

2.

Dr. Vidhya Naik, Health Officer

Community Health Centre,

Primary Health Centre,

Pernem

Candolim.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 15th March, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3067

Order

No. 44/16/2016-I/PHD/422

Government is pleased to transfer the following Medical Officer under Directorate of Health Services,

with immediate effect:-

Sr. No.

Name of the Medical Officer

Present place of posting

Transferred at

1.

Dr. Shikandar Talwar, Medical

North Goa District Hospital,

Primary Health Centre,

Officer

Mapusa

Porvorim

(deployed at Primary

In place of Dr. Vikas Naik,

Health Centre, Porvorim)

M.O.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Gautami S. Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 15th March, 2023.

————

Corrigendum

No. 25/15/2019-I/PHD/386

Read: Order No. 25/15/2019-I/PHD/106 dated 24-01-2023.

In the Government Order dated 24-01-2023 referred above, the details shown against Sr. No. 23 of

annexure in respect of Dr. Raksha Ratankumar Borkar, Medical Officer shall be substituted and read as

under:-

Name &

Date of

Present Grade Pay

Grade Pay to be made

Date of effect

designation

joining

applicable under DACP

1

2

3

4

Dr. Raksha Borkar, 06-07-2012 G.P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3 G.P.- Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3 06-07-2021.

Medical Officer

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 10th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Tribal Welfare

Directorate of Tribal Welfare

––––

Order

No. 1-285-2022-23/ADMN/DTW/6108

Read: Order No. 1-285-2021-22/ADMN/DTW/203

dated 09-04-2022.

In exercise of the powers under provision of

Clause 116(3) of the Article of Association of the

Goa State Scheduled Tribes Finance and

Development Corporation Ltd., and in continuation

to Order No. 1-285-2021-22/ADMN/DTW/203 dated

09-04-2022, Government of Goa is pleased to

re-constitute the Board of Director of the GSSTFDCL

and to appoint the following persons as Directors

on the said Corporation with immediate effect until

further order:-

Sr.

Name of the

Designation

No.

Official/Member

1

2

3

1.

Shri Vishant Gaonkar,

Director.

r/o Canacona-Goa

2.

Shri Pradip Gaude,

Director.

r/o Pale, Bicholim-Goa

3.

Shri Anand Sawaikar,

Director.

r/o Savoi Verem, Ponda-Goa

4.

Shri Camilo Barretto,

Director.

r/o Borda, Margao-Goa

5.

Smt. Rajani Dayanand

Director.

Gaonkar, r/o Saljini,

Sanguem-Goa

6.

Shri Shashikant Sonu

Director.

Gaonkar, r/o Kirlapal,

Sanvordem-Goa

7.

Shri Narayan Kamat,

Director.

r/o Shiroda, Ponda-Goa

3068

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

1

2

3

8.

Shri Chandan Vargaonkar, r/o Cumbharjua, Tiswadi-Goa

Director.

9.

Shri Khushali Kust Velip, r/o Morpirla, Quepem-Goa

Director.

The non-official Directors shall be entitled for sitting allowance as per the Government Notification/

Orders issued from time to time.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Dasharath M. Redkar, Director (Tribal Welfare) & ex officio Joint Secretary (TW).

Panaji, 20th March, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Water Resources

Office of the Chief Engineer

–––

Order

No. 3/25-15/90/CE-WR/1022

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service Commission as conveyed vide confidential letter

No. COM/II/11/27(1)/2022/506 dated 03-03-2023, Government is pleased to order the promotion of the

following Assistant Engineers/Assistant Surveyor of Works (Civil) of the Water Resources Department,

Government of Goa to the post of Executive Engineers/Surveyor of Works/Engineering Officer (Civil),

Group-A Gazetted in Water Resources Department on regular basis in the Pay Scale of Rs. 15,600-39,100 +

Grade Pay Rs. 6,600/- (Matrix Pay Level No. 11 of 7th Pay Commission) with immediate effect and posted

them against the place indicated as below:-

Sr.

Name of the

Present designation

Designation and

Remarks

No.

Officer

and place of posting

new place of posting

1

2

3

4

5

1. Shri Milind Gaude

Assistant Engineer,

Executive Engineer,

Regular

SD-I, WD-I, WRD, Porvorim

Works Division VIII,

Promotion.

WRD, Karaswada-Goa

2. Shri Sumant S. Nadkarni

Assistant Engineer,

Surveyor of Works,

Regular

SD-I, WD-VII, WRD,

O/o the Superintending

Promotion.

Dhargal

Engineer, Circle-I,

WRD, Porvorim-Goa

3. Smt. Smita S. Dessai

Assistant Surveyor

Executive Engineer,

Regular

of Works, O/o the

Works Division XIV,

Promotion.

Superintending

WRD, Rawanfond,

Engineer, Circle IV,

Margao-Goa

WRD, Margao

4. Shri Menezes Jason

Assistant Engineer,

Executive Engineer,

Regular

Damian

SD-II, WD-X, WRD,

Works Division X,

Promotion.

Sanguem

WRD, Sanguem-Goa

5. Shri Gipson Miranda

Assistant Engineer,

Executive Engineer,

Regular

(ST)

SD-V, WD-III,

Works Division II,

Promotion.

WRD, Margao

WRD, Rawanfond-Goa

(he shall also hold

additional charge

of Executive Engineer,

WD-III, WRD, Ponda-Goa)

6. Shri Yatin G. Shirodkar

Assistant Surveyor

Surveyor of Works,

Regular

(ST)

of Works, O/o the

O/o the Addl. Chief

Promotion.

Superintending

Engineer (IP), WRD,

Engineer, Circle (II), WRD,

Porvorim-Goa

Karaswada

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

3069

The above Officers shall be on probation for the period of two years from date of joining as specified

in Column No. 9 of the Recruitment Rules notified in the Official Gazette, Extraordinary, Series I No. 28

dated 11-10-2001.

This is issued vide Government approval No. 2394/F dated 14-03-2023.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Sd/-, Chief Engineer (WR) & ex officio Addl. Secretary.

Porvorim, 14th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. 3/25-15/90/CE-WR/Adm.I/1023

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service Commission as conveyed vide confidential letter No.

COM/II/11/27(1)/2022/505 dated 03-03-2023, Government is pleased to order the promotion of Superintending

Engineer (Civil), Water Resources Department, Government of Goa to the post of Addl. Chief Engineer (IP)

& (MB), Group-A Gazetted in Water Resources Department on regular basis in the Pay Scale of

Rs. 37,400/- —67,000/-+ Grade Pay Rs. 8,700/- (Matrix Level No. 13 with immediate effect and posted

against existing vacancy indicated below:

Sr.

Name of the Officers

Present designation

Designation and place of

No.

and place of posting

posting on promotion

1

2

3

4

1.

Shri Dnyaneshwar Y. Salelkar (ST)

Superintending Engineer,

Additional Chief Engineer (I.P.),

O/o Superintending Engineer,

Irrigation Project, WRD,

CO II, WRD, Karaswada

Porvorim (shall hold charge of

Superintending Engineer, CO II,

WRD, Karaswada).

2. Shri Ankush G. Gaunker (ST)

Superintending Engineer,

Additional Chief Engineer

O/o Superintending Engineer,

(M.B.), Mhadei Basin, WRD,

CO IV, WRD, Gogal, Margao-Goa

Porvorim (shall hold charge of

Superintending Engineer,

CO-IV, WRD, Gogal, Margao-Goa).

This is issued vide Government approval No. 2393/F dated 14-03-2023.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

P. B. Badami, Chief Engineer (WR) & ex officio Addl. Secretary.

Porvorim, 14th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. 74-1-81/CE-WR/Adm.II/1024

Government is pleased to transfer Shri Nazareth Vaz, Surveyor of Works, O/o Superintending Engineer,

Circle I, WRD, Porvorim as Executive Engineer in the O/o Executive Engineer, Works Division I, WRD,

Porvorim against the existing vacancy, with immediate effect until further orders.

The concerned Head of Office shall relieve the above transferee and endorse the copy of the same to

this office.

This is issued with the approval of Government.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

P. B. Badami, Chief Engineer (W.R.) & ex officio Addl. Secretary.

Porvorim, 14th March, 2023.

3070

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 51

23RD MARCH, 2023

Government Printing Press

__

Subscription Rates

N o t i c e

The subscribers to the Official Gazette are kindly

reminded that their present subscription term ends

on the 31st March, 2023, being the end of financial year.

In case they wish to continue to be subscribers for the

ensuing financial year 2023-2024 they have to renew their

subscriptions from 1st April, 2023.

Subscriptions also can be opened for half year

i.e. from 1st April or 1st October or for any quarter,

beginning on 1st April, 1st July, 1st October or 1st January.

Renewal of subscription from 1st April should be

effected on or before 31st March, 2023 in order to avoid

interruption in the despatch of copies of the Gazette.

It should be noted that, in case the subscription is not

opened/renewed before the commencement of the period

to which it refers, the subscribers will be entitled to receive

copies of the Gazette only from the date the subscription

is actually opened/renewed.

Official Gazette is now available through e-mail

for an annual subscription of Rs. 250/- (Rupees two

hundred and fifty only).

The subscription charges are accepted either in cash,

postal order, demand draft or cheques (subject to

clearance) drawn only on State Bank of India, Panaji, in

favour of the Director, Printing and Stationery,

Panaji-Goa.

SUBSCRIPTION RATES

(Within the Union of India)

All 3

Series

Series

Series

Series

I

II

III

Rs. P.

Rs. P.

Rs. P. Rs. P.

For any quarter ..................

1200.00

600.00

500.00 300.00

(Postage) ...........................

60.00

15.00

15.00

15.00

For half year ........................

2300.00 1200.00 1000.00 600.00

(Postage) ...........................

60.00

30.00

30.00

30.00

For any period exceeding

6 months up to one year... 4350.00 2300.00 1850.00 1150.00

(Postage) ............................

110.00

60.00

60.00

60.00

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 38.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—458/100—03/2023.