SERIES II No. 17
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-2023
Panaji, 27th July, 2023 (Sravana 05, 1945)
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Co-operation
Office of the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies
–––
FORM “ELECTION-9”
(See Rule 74)
Form of declaration of result of uncontested election
Election to the Board of Directors of “The Bori Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Borim, Ponda-Goa”.
Year of Election:- 2023
Number of Seats:- 11
In pursuance of the provisions contained in the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003, I, declare that
the following contesting candidates have been duly elected to fill the seats on the Board of Directors of the
above mentioned society as they were the only contesting candidates as stated below.
General Category - (08 Nos.)
Sr. No.
Name of the Candidates
Address
1
2
3
1.
Borkar Premanand Krishna
H. No. 8/144, Deulwada, Borim.
2.
Devari Dattatray Vinayak
Near Navdurga Temple, Bori, Ponda-Goa.
3.
Karekar Anay alias Pundalik Anant
H. No. 169, Khajorde, Bori, Ponda.
4.
Naik Manurai @ Manuray Sagun
H. No. 118, Adulshem, Bori, Ponda-Goa.
5.
Naik Pandurang Venkatesh
Khajorda, Bori, Ponda-Goa.
6.
Phadte Devanand Gajanan
Godgowad, Borim, Ponda-Goa.
7.
Prabhu Borkar Utkarsh Sitaram
Khajordem, Bori, Ponda-Goa.
8.
Prabhudesai Vishwas M.
H. No. 230, Chunnat Tarvalem, Shiroda.
Reserve Category (Women) - (02 Nos.)
1.
Paiderker Supriya Purnanand
Deulwada, Bori, Ponda-Goa.
2.
Vaidya Prachi Durgaprasad
H. No. 129, Vaidyanagar, Dattagad Bethoda, Ponda--Goa
Reserve Category (SC/ST) - (01 No.)
1.
Gaude Pundalik B.
H. No. 131, Conwada-Dhavali, Queula, Ponda-Goa.
I also certify and declare that the above mentioned relevant number of seats to be elected to form the
Board of Directors (11 Nos.) candidates have been duly elected unopposed.
Sumitra S. Naik, Returning Officer for Election to the BOD of The Bori Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd.,
Borim, Ponda-Goa.
Ponda, 30th May, 2023.
393
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
394
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
Department of Forests
–––
Order
No. 5/3/2022-FOR/198
Read: 1. Order No. 1-V-116-2020(Part)/FOR/153
dated 17-08-2022.
2. Corrigendum No. 5/3/2022-FOR/27 dated
18-01-2023.
The post of Assistant Conservator of Forests
upgraded vide Order dated 17-08-2022, cited at
Sr. No. 1 above, read with Corrigendum dated
18-01-2023, read at 2 above, is re-classified as
Group ‘A’ Gazetted, with effect from 17-08-2022.
This issues with the approval of the Finance
(R&C) Department vide their U.O. No. 1400079370
dated 10-06-2023 and concurrence of the Goa
Public Service Commission as conveyed vide their
letter No. COM/II/11/22(1)/2022/531 dated
04-07-2023.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Forest).
Porvorim, 20th July, 2023.
——————
Department of Labour
––
Notification
No. 28/02/2023-LAB/Part-I/458
The following Part Award passed by the
Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa
on 28-06-2023 in Ref. No. IT/33/2010 is hereby
published as required under Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of
1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor
of Goa.
Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 11th July, 2023.
___
IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
AND LABOUR COURT
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Mr. Anil Scaria, Hon’ble Presiding Officer)
Ref. No. IT/33/2010
Shri Premanand Naik,
Rep. by Goa M. R. F. Employees Union,
House No. 282, Dr. P. S. Ramani Road,
Wadi-Talaulim,
Ponda-Goa
… Workmen/Party I.
V/s
M/s. M. R. F. Limited,
Tisk, Usgao,
Ponda-Goa
… Employer/Party II.
Workperson/Party-I represented by Learned
Advocate Shri P. Agrawal.
Employer/Party-II represented by Learned Advocate
Ms. S. Vaigankar holding for Adv. S. B. Karpe.
PART AWARD
(Preliminary Issues No. 1, 2, 3 and 5)
(Delivered on this the 28th day of the month of
June of the Year 2023)
By Order dated 19-11-2010, bearing No. 28/38/
/2010-LAB/581, the Government of Goa in exercise
of powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, has referred the
following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-
“(1) Whether the action of the Management of
M/s. MRF Limited, Tisk, Usgao, Goa in
dismissing it’s workman Shri Premanand
Naik, Operator, with effect from 21-10-2009, is
legal and justified?
(2) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”
2. The Workman/Party I has filed his Statement of
Claim. The Employer/Party II has filed his Written
Statement. The Workman/Party I has filed his
Rejoinder.
3. The case of Party I is that the Workman (Premanand
Naik) was employed in the Factory of Party II in
Ponda-Goa. That the Workman was suspended by
letter dated 07-02-2009. That, subsequently, the
workman was issued charge-sheet dated 09-02-2009.
That the charge-sheet was signed by an unauthorized
person. That the allegation against the Workman is
that on 06-02-2009, the workman caused bodily
injuries to his co-workman Mr. Bhadragauda,
T. No. 501721 by operating the moving fabric table of
M/C No. 8 while he was on duty in Shift III. That the
Workman denied the charges leveled against him by
letter dated 06-03-2009. That the Workman requested
for copies of complaint/report to file a detailed reply.
That the copies were not furnished. That Party II fixed
the enquiry on 10-03-2009. That Party II had decided
to take punitive action against the Workman even
before seeking a reply to the charge-sheet.
4. That the enquiry commenced on 16-05-2009 and
concluded on 17-08-2009. That by letter dated
29-05-2009, the Workman asked the Enquiry Officer
to expedite the enquiry. That by this letter the
Workman also brought it to the notice of the Enquiry
Officer that he was paid less subsistence allowance,
than is due to him. That the Workman requested the
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
395
Enquiry Officer to give him a copy of Exhibit EO1.
That the Enquiry Officer refused to give the copy on
the ground that it was shown to the Workman.
5. That on 12-06-2009, the MR (Management
Representative) submitted a copy of the Statement
of the Subsistence Allowance (Exh. MR16) paid to
the Workman. That the WR (Workman Representative)
pointed out the subsistence allowance does not
contain compensatory allowance as required under
the Certified Standing Orders. That on 26-06-2009
during the cross-examination of MW2, the WR
(Workman’s Representative) asked MW2 to produce
his payment slip of February, 2009. That the MR
(Management Representative) objected to the same
and the Enquiry Officer (EO) rejected the request of
the WR (Workman’s Representative). That on 03-08-2009,
while the cross-examination of the Workman was in
progress the MR (Management Representative)
produced some irrelevant documents. That the
Workman and the WR (Workman’s Representative)
objected to the same, but the Enquiry Officer took
them on record. That the E.O. (Enquiry Officer)
refused to direct the Management Representative
to produce findings of the enquiry conducted about
the charge-sheet dated 06-07-2007. That the E.O.
(Enquiry Officer) also failed to make a record of the
incident in the enquiry proceedings. That on
17-08-2009 the Workman examined a witness namely
Mr. Sushant Shinde who was working on
M/C No. 9 in Shift III on 06-02-2009. That the said
witness had made a statement that he had seen
Mr. Bhadragaude working on the liner rewinder at
about 5.05 a.m. That the Enquiry Officer completed
the enquiry and submitted his report dated
04-09-2009 holding the workman guilty of the charges
leveled against him.
6. That after the enquiry, the workman was not
given a reasonable opportunity to show cause
against the report of the Enquiry Officer or the
proposed punishment. That the Enquiry Officer
conducted the enquiry against the principles of
natural justice. That the Workman was terminated
from service by letter dated 21-10-2009. That the
letter dated 21-10-2009 was signed by an
unauthorized person. That the Termination Order
was for collateral purposes and to victimize the
Workman for his continued allegiance to his trade
union. That there was no evidence against the
Workman. That the findings of the Enquiry Officer
are perverse and shows bias and non-application of
mind.
7. That a conciliation proceeding between Party I
and Party II was pending before the Conciliation
Officer with regard to illegal lay-off. That the
Workman was terminated from service during the
pendency of the conciliation proceedings. That Party II
has violated the provisions of Section 33 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That the termination of
the said Workman is an act of unfair labour practice.
That the punishment imposed on the Workman is
disproportionate to the charges leveled against him.
Therefore, it is prayed that the Workman be reinstated
with continuity of service and full back wages. That
the Workman be awarded compensation at the rate of
two days’ wages for every one day of enforced
unemployment.
8. Party II has filed its Written Statement. The case
of Party II is that the Workman was employed by the
Management in the Band Building Department. That
on 06-02-2009, the Workman was working in Shift III
as a Band Builder on M/C No. 8. That Bhadragauda B.
Gaudra was operating a machine between the fabric
table of M/C No. 8 and a drum. That the Workman
operated the moving fabric table of M/C No. 8 thereby
squeezing Mr. Bhadragauda B. Gaudra between the
table and the drum. That Bhadragauda B. Gaudra was
injured. That when Bhadragauda B. Gaudra was crying
in pain, the Workman merely laughed without
releasing the fabric table of the machine. That when
questioned by his Superiors, the Workman did not have
any reply to offer. That the acts of the Workman
constitute the following misconduct under the
Certified Standing Orders of Party II.
i. CL 21 Item XXVIII: Conduct on the part of the
workman within the precincts of the company
which endangers the life or safety of any
person.
ii. CL 21 Item VIII: Interference with work of any
other workman or person in manner inimical to
the interests of the Company.
iii. CL 21 Item LII: Any act subversive of discipline.
9. That the Workman was suspended by letter
dated 07-02-2009. That it was followed by a charge-
sheet dated 09-02-2009. It is admitted that the said
Workman tendered his explanation dated 06-03-2009
requesting for copies of complaint/report. It is denied
that these documents were not furnished.
10. That Mr. Prashant Shetty was appointed as
Enquiry Officer. That the enquiry commenced on
16-05-2009 and ended on 17-08-2009. That the
Workman participated in the enquiry along with his
representative. That the enquiry was conducted in
accordance with the principles of natural justice. That
the enquiry was fair and proper. It is admitted that by
letter dated 29-05-2009 the Workman asked the
Enquiry Officer to expedite the enquiry. It is admitted
that the workman also pointed out that he was paid
396
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
less subsistence allowance and requested the
Enquiry Officer to direct the MR (Management
Representative) to produce the details of the break-up
of the subsistence allowance. That the Enquiry
Officer appreciated the evidence on record and held
Party I guilty of the charges leveled against him. The
Enquiry Officer submitted his findings dated 04-09-2009.
That the Management concurred with findings of
the Enquiry Officer. That Party I was dismissed from
service by letter dated 21-10-2009 which was signed
by an authorized person.
11. That on 12-06-2009, the MR (Management
Representative) produced a copy of the Statement of
Subsistence Allowance paid to the workman. It is
admitted that the WR (Workman Representative)
stated that the subsistence allowance does not
contain compensatory allowance as required under
the Certified Standing Order. It is denied that the
Workman requested the Enquiry Officer to give him
a copy of Exh. EO1 which the Enquiry Officer refused
on the ground that the same was shown to the
Workman. It is denied that on 26-06-2009 during
cross-examination of MW2, the WR (Workman’s
Representative) asked MW2 to produce his payment
slip of February, 2009. It is denied that the MR
(Management Representative) objected to the same
and the Enquiry Officer rejected the request of the
WR (Workman Representative). It is denied that on
03-08-2009 while the cross-examination of the
workman was in progress, the MR (Management
Representative) produced some irrelevant documents
to which the Workman and WR (Workman Representative)
objected but the EO (Enquiry Officer) took the same
on record. It is denied that the Enquiry Officer (EO)
refused to direct the Management Representative
(MR) to produce the findings of the enquiry
conducted on charge-sheet dated 06-07-2007 when
requested and even failed to record the same in the
enquiry proceedings. Party II states that the findings
of enquiry conducted on charge-sheet dated
06-07-2007 are a part of records in the enquiry
conducted in this case.
12. It is denied that the Workman was victimized
for his legitimate trade union activities. It is denied
that the punishment is grossly disproportionate to
the charges against the workman. It is denied that
there was a conciliation proceeding pending with
respect to a dispute with regard to illegal lay-off
wherein the workman is a Party. It is denied that Party II
violated the provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. It is denied that the termination
of the Workman is unfair labour practice. That there
is no industrial dispute between the Parties as
defined under Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947. That the Government of Goa has made the
reference in haste and without application of mind.
13. That the reference is therefore null and void.
The question as to the existence of an industrial
dispute and the question as to whether the reference
is made in undue haste and without application of
mind be tried as preliminary issues. Therefore, it is
prayed that the termination of the workman be
upheld as legal and justified.
14. Party I has filed a Rejoinder. It is denied that no
industrial dispute exists. It is denied that the
Government of Goa has made this reference in haste
and without application of mind. That Party II wants
the above mentioned facts to be tried as preliminary
issues only to delay the proceedings. It is denied that
the enquiry was fair and proper and is in accordance
with the principles of natural justice. That the records
of the enquiry are not true and correct records of the
proceedings and they are fabricated to suit Party II.
That Bhadragauda B. Gaudra was not injured. That
he worked for the full shift without seeking medical
assistance.
15. Heard arguments on preliminary issues. The
Learned Advocates for the Parties have filed Written
Arguments.
16. The following issues were framed by this Court
and my findings thereon are as follows:-
I S S U E S
1. Whether Party I/Union proves that the domestic
enquiry held against the workman is not fair
and proper?
2. Whether the charge of misconduct leveled
against the workman is proved to the
satisfaction of the Tribunal by acceptable
evidence?
3. Whether Party I/Union proves that the order of
termination is in violation of Section 33 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?
4. Whether Party I/Union proves that the
termination of the workman tantamounts to the
act of unfair labour practice under item 5 (a),
(b), (d), (f) and (g) as well as item 13 and 14 of 5th
schedule of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?
5. Whether the Party II proves that there is no
Industrial Dispute exists between the parties
as defined u/s 2 (k) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947?
6. What Order.
17. Issues No. 1, 2, 3 and 5 are treated as preliminary
issues. My findings thereon are as follows:-
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
397
Issue
Issues
Findings
No.
1.
Whether Party I/Union
In the Negative.
proves that the domestic
enquiry held against the
workman is not fair and
proper?
2.
Whether the charge of
In the Negative.
misconduct leveled against
the workman is proved to
the satisfaction of the
Tribunal by acceptable
evidence?
3.
Whether Party I/Union
In the Affirmative.
proves that the order
of termination is in
violation of Section 33
of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947?
5.
Whether the Party II
In the Negative.
proves that there is
no industrial Dispute
exists between the
parties as defined u/s 2 (k)
of theIndustrial Disputes
Act, 1947?
R E A S O N S
18. Issue No. 1:- The case of Party I/Workman is
that the domestic enquiry held against the workman
is not fair and proper. Party II/Employer has denied
the same.
19. Party I has examined one witness. Premanand
Naik (Witness I for Party I) is the dismissed workman.
20. Party II has examined 2 witnesses. Shri
Prashant Shetty (Witness No. 1 for Party II) is the
Enquiry Officer. Mr. Michael Rodrigues is witness 2
for Party II. He is the Deputy Manager–Human
Resources of Party II.
21. During the course of enquiry before the Enquiry
Officer, Party II examined 3 witnesses. Sudhir Dessai
(MW1) is a person working as Supervisor in the Band
Building Department of the Factory of Party II.
Bhadragauda Gaudra (MW2) is the injured workman.
Mangesh J. Manerkar (MW3) is a Shift Foreman of
Party II.
22. The workman (Premanand Naik) examined
himself as CSW in the enquiry before the Enquiry
Officer. The workman (Premanand Naik) has examined
Sushant Shinde as CSW W1. He is a co-workman.
23. Charge-sheet dated 09-02-2009 (Exh. 18) was
issued to the workman. The workman replied to the
same by Reply dated 06-03-2009 (Exh. 20). By this
Reply, the workman denied the charges leveled
against him and demanded copies of complaint/
/report made against him so that he could file a proper
reply.
24. Copies of the said compliant/report was not
given to the workman and the matter was posted for
enquiry.
25. The workman was allowed to be represented
by a co-worker (Gokuldas Gawde) of his choice.
26. After each of the Management witnesses were
examined, the workman/workman’s representative
(MR) was allowed to cross-examine them.
27. The workman has examined himself and a
witness in his defence.
28. Thereafter, the Enquiry Officer submitted his
findings of enquiry (Exh. 30 Colly) to the Management
of Party II.
29. It is to be noted that by his reply (Exh. 20) to
the charge-sheet, the workman has asked for a copy
of the complaint or report made against him.
Although at that time the said copy was not
furnished, it was subsequently produced by the
Management Representative during enquiry at
Exh. MR11 and a copy of the same furnished to the
workman.
30. For the reasons stated above, it is seen that
the principles of natural justice were complied with.
31. To put up a credible defence, the workman
needs subsistence allowance. Enquiry without
subsistence allowance is not fair and proper.
32. It is the case of the workman, that he was not
given his full subsistence allowance as per the
Certified Standing Orders.
33. During the course of enquiry, Party II (Employer)
produced the payment details of the subsistence
allowance of the workman (Premanand Naik) at
Exh. MR-16. It is the case of the workman that he has
not been paid the “other compensatory allowance”
of the subsistence allowance payable to him under
the Certified Standing Orders. But the workman
(Witness I for Party I before this Tribunal and CSW in
the enquiry before the Enquiry Officer) has not
specified the compensatory allowances not paid to
him. Therefore, we are unable to hold that the
workman was not paid any portion of his subsistence
allowance.
34. Therefore, Party I/Union has failed to prove that
the domestic enquiry held against the workman is
not fair and proper. Hence, I hold issue No. 1 in the
negative.
398
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
35. Issue No. 2:- Party II has to prove that the charge
of misconduct leveled against the workman is proved
to the satisfaction of this Tribunal by acceptable
evidence.
36. The records of the enquiry proceedings and
the findings of enquiry are at Exh. 30 Colly.
37. Bhadragauda Gaudra is the injured workman.
The Management examined him as MW2 during the
enquiry. He states that he was completing the
incomplete band at Band Building Machine No. 8 at
around 5.00 a.m. MW2 states that the workman
(Premanand Naik) had allowed him to do so. MW2
states that while he was at his work, Premanand Naik
opened the Table Operation Switch and he got
pressed between the drum and the table. MW2 states
that the workman (Premanand Naik) started
laughing. MW2 states that he asked for help and after
some time the workman (Premanand Naik)
deactivated the switch. MW2 states that he was
unable to walk properly. MW2 states that after 10
minutes, he went to the Supervisor and he sent him
for First Aid. MW2 states that some spray was applied
to him. MW2 states that after 10 minutes he was
asked to report back to the Department. MW2 states
that he did not work thereafter as he was getting
pain in the back.
38. Sudhir Dessai is the Supervisor. The
Management has examined him as MW1 during the
enquiry before the Enquiry Officer, MW1 states that
he was working in Shift III on 06-02-2009. He states
that the injured workman (MW2) told him that he
was standing between a drum and a sliding table
and applying braker fabric on the bands. He states
that the injured workman told him that Premanand
Naik (workman) activated the sliding table and that
the injured workman got stuck between the drum
and the sliding table roller. He (MW1) states that the
injured workman shouted for help and Premanand
Naik (workman) without deactivating the switch
laughed at him. He (MW1) states that after some time
Premanand Naik (workman) deactivated the switch.
He states that the injured workman was unable to
walk for some time. He (MW1) deposes that he
referred the injured workman for first aid. He deposes
that he inquired from Premanand Naik (workman)
and he told him that he had accidentally activated
the switch. He (MW1) deposes that there was no
chance of such an accident as safety guards were
provided. He (MW1) deposes that this was an act of
misconduct deliberately done by Premanand Naik
(workman).
39. Mangesh J. Manerkar is the Shift Foreman of
Party II. Party II has examined him as MW3 before the
Enquiry Officer. MW3 deposes that on 06-02-2009 he
was working as Shift Foreman. He (MW3) states that
on 06-02-2009 at about 5.20 p.m. the Band Building
Supervisor, Shri Sudhir Dessai (MW1) reported to him
that the injured workman was working at the Band
Building Machine No. 8. He states that Premanand
Naik (workman) activated the switch of the Sliding
Table Roller and that the injured workman got
jammed between the table and the drum. He (MW3)
states that Sudhir Dessai (MW1) also told him that
the injured workman shouted for help and that
Premanand Naik (MW1) laughed without releasing
the switch. He (MW3) states that the injured
workman was in pain and was referred for first aid by
Sudhir Dessai. He (MW3) states that he asked
Premanand Naik (workman) regarding the incident
and Premanand Naik (workman) told him that while
getting up his hand accidently touched the operating
switch of the table. He (MW3) deposes that what
Premanand Naik (workman) said was not true as the
switch was well inside the table protected by
metallic plate.
40. The testimony of the injured workman (MW2)
is corroborated by the testimonies of the Supervisor
(MW1) and the Foreman (MW3).
41. The workman has examined himself as CSW.
The CSW states that he does not know anything
about the incident.
42. Sushant Shinde is a person working for Party II.
The workman has examined him as CSW W1. He (CSW
W1) states that on 06-02-2009 he was working in shift III
on the Band Building Machine No. 9. He deposes that
he along with Premanand Naik returned from
breakfast at 5.05 a.m. He states that he saw
Bhadragauda Gaudra (alleged injured workman)
working on machine No. 8 after he returned from
breakfast.
43. The testimony of the workman (CSW) is
corroborated by the testimony of his co-worker (CSW W1).
44. The Employer has adduced oral evidence in
support of its case. The workman has adduced oral
evidence in support of his case. The oral evidence is
equally balanced against each other. Therefore, let
us look into medical evidence and documents to
ascertain the truth.
45. The injured workman (MW2) has stated that
he was sent for first aid and some spray was applied
to him and he was asked to report back to the
department after 10 minutes.
46. The records of medical treatment were marked
during the enquiry before the Enquiry Officer at
Exh. MR17. It shows that there were no open injuries
on the body of the injured. It also shows that ice
therapy and crocin were given to the injured
workman.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
399
47. Exh.14 Colly is the Liner Rewinder Worksheet
Details on 06-02-2009 for Shift III. It shows that
injured workman has worked for 8 hours. It also shows
that he has done more work than another liner
rewinder who worked on that day.
48. There were no open injuries on the body of the
injured workman. The medical records show that he
was given ice therapy. The medical records do not
show any spray applied on the injured. Injured
Workman states that some spray was applied to him
and was asked to report to the department after 10
minutes. No mention is made by the injured workman
about ice therapy. He has also stated that he had not
worked after that due to back pain. But records show
that he had done 60% more work on that day than a
co-worker who was doing the same type of work.
Witnesses can lie, but circumstances do not lie.
Circumstances show that false allegations were
made against the workman. The preponderance of
probabilities is that he was falsely implicated in this
case. The case of the workman that he was falsely
implicated in case appears to be most probably true.
Therefore, Party II has failed to prove to the
satisfaction of this Tribunal by acceptable evidence
the charge of misconduct leveled against the
workman. Hence, I hold Issue No. 2 in the negative.
49. Issue No. 3:- The case of Party I/Union is that
the Order of Termination is in violation of Section 33
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Party II/Employer
has denied the same.
50. The case of Party I/Union is that a conciliation
proceeding was pending between Party I and Party
II with regard to illegal lay-off. That the workman
was terminated from service during the pendency of
the conciliation proceedings. That the order of
termination is in violation of Section 33 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
51. Party II/Employer has denied the same.
52. A Certified True Copy of the Roznama in the
conciliation proceedings and a Certified True Copy
of the minutes of the conciliation proceedings held
on 22-03-2010 have been produced.
53. The Roznama and the Minutes of the
conciliation proceedings dated 22-03-2010 were not
tendered in evidence. Nevertheless, since they are
certified copies of public documents, they are being
looked into.
54. The report of failure of conciliation proceedings
dated 26-03-2010 sent to the Secretary (Labour),
Secretariat, Porvorim-Goa has been tendered in
evidence at Exh. 36 (in cross).
55. A conjoint reading of these documents show
that the Conciliation Officer held meetings for
preliminary discussion from 25-06-2009 onwards.
Nevertheless, a formal Order admitting the matter to
conciliation was made only on 22-03-2010. On the
same day, the conciliation proceedings were closed
stating that it ended in failure.
56. The workman (Premanand Naik) was
terminated from service on 21-10-2009.
57. The Ld. Advocate for Party I, Shri P. Agrawal
submits that for the purpose of Section 33 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, conciliation
proceedings commence when the matter is taken up
by the Conciliation Officer for preliminary discussion.
Shri P. Agrawal has relied upon the law laid down in
Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. V/s Shankarprasad
(AIR 1999 SC 2423) in support of his argument.
58. The Ld. Advocate for Party II/Employer, Shri S.
B. Karpe argues that the conciliation proceedings
does not commence when the matter is taken up for
preliminary discussion. Shri S. B. Karpe argues that
the conciliation proceedings commences only when
a formal notice is given to the Parties declaring the
Conciliation Officers’ intention to commence
conciliation under Rule 10 of the Industrial Disputes
(Central) Rules, 1957. Shri. S. B. Karpe argues that the
statement Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. V/s
Shankarprasad (AIR 1999 SC 2423) that it
commences when the Conciliation Officer takes the
matter for preliminary discussion is in the obiter. Shri
S. B. Karpe argues that a reading of Gujarat Ambuja
Cements Pvt. Ltd. V/s U. B. Gadhe (MANU/GJ/
/0650/2005) will show that the said statement made
in Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. V/s Shankarprasad
(AIR 1999 SC 2423) is in the obiter.
59. Even the propositions of law laid down by the
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the obiter deserves the
highest respect. Gujarat Ambuja Cements Pvt. Ltd.
V/s U. B. Gadhe (MANU/GJ/0650/2005) is passed
by the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat. A Judgment
by a Hon’ble High Court cannot be allowed to override
a statement made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
60. It has been held in Lokmat Newspapers Pvt.
Ltd. V/s Shankarprasad (AIR 1999 SC 2423) as
follows:
“The Conciliation Officer took the dispute in
conciliation within his discretion even though as
Appellant’s concern was not a public utility service it
was not mandatory for the Conciliation Officer to start
conciliation proceedings. As the report of the
Conciliation Officer submitted to the State Government
shows, he invited the management and the
respondent’s Union for preliminary discussions on
400
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
14-04-1982 in his office and thereafter the matter was
adjourned during conciliation from time to time.
It can, therefore, be said that by 14th April, 1982
the matter was taken up for investigation and thus
the conciliation proceedings had commenced.”
61. A reading of the abovementioned Judgment
shows that for the purpose of Section 33 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, conciliation
commences at the time of the starting of the
preliminary discussions.
62. The preliminary discussion in the conciliation
started on 25-06-2009. The conciliation ended in
failure on 22-03-2010. The Workman (Premanand
Naik) was terminated from service on 21-10-2009. The
provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 were not complied with. Therefore, Party I/
/Workman has proved that the Order of Termination
is in violation of the provisions of Section 33 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, I hold issue
No. 3 in the affirmative.
63. Issue No. 5:- The case of Party II/Employer is
that there is no industrial dispute between the
Parties as defined under Section 2(k) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. Party I has denied the same.
64. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
reads as follows:-
“(k) “industrial dispute” means any dispute or
difference between employers and employers,
or between employers and workmen, or
between workmen and workmen, which is
connected with the employment or non-
employment or the terms of employment or with
the conditions of labour, of any person.”
65. As seen above, the Workman (Premanand Naik)
was working for Party II. He was terminated from
service on 21-10-2009. His Union/Party I has taken up
his cause resulting in a reference under Section
10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. There is
a dispute between Employers and Workmen
regarding the non-employment of Premanand Naik
(Workman). Therefore, Party II/Employer has failed
to prove that there is no industrial dispute between
the Parties as defined under Section 2 (k) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, I hold issue
No. 5 in the negative.
Hence, I pass the following:-
O R D E R
The domestic enquiry held against the Workman
(Premanand Naik) is fair and proper.
The charge of misconduct leveled against the
workman is not proved to the satisfaction of the
Tribunal by acceptable evidence.
The order of termination is violative of Section 33
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
There is an industrial dispute between Parties as
defined under Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947.
No orders as to costs.
Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Anil Scaria),
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal and
Labour Court.
————
Corrigendum
No. 24/6/2013-Lab-ESI/513
Read: Order No. 24/6/2013-Lab-ESI/310 dated
05-05-2023.
In the Government Order read at preamble, the
date of relieving shall be read as “30-04-2023 (a. n.)”
instead of 30-04-2023 (f. n.).
All other contents of the Order remain
unchanged.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 24th July, 2023.
——————
Department of Law & Judiciary
Law (Establishment) Division
–––
Order
No. 2-3-2020-LD(Estt.)/1246
Read: 1. Memorandum No. 2-3-2020-LD(Estt)/799
dated 09-05-2023;
2. Memorandum No. 2-3-2020-LD(Estt)/797
dated 09-05-2023;
3. Memorandum No. 2-3-2020-LD(Estt)/796
dated 09-05-2023.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
401
On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission conveyed in letter No. COM/I/5/55(1)/
/2022/64 dated 27-04-2023, the Governor of Goa is
pleased to appoint the following candidates to the
post of Civil Registrar-cum-Sub Registrar (Group B
Gazetted) in the Registration Department,
Government of Goa, on temporary basis in the Pay
Scale of Rs. 9300-34800 with the grade pay of
Rs. 4600/- in Pay Level-7, with immediate effect:
1. Kum. Firdous Saba Bepari.
2. Kum. Rishwa Tukaram Prabhu.
3. Govindraj Narasinha Prabhu.
The above appointees have been declared
medically fit by the Medical Board, Goa Medical
College, Bambolim, vide letter Nos. 4/105/85-H/
/GMC/2023/509 dated 04-07-2023 and 4/105/85-H/
/GMC/2023/534 dated 10-07-2023. The character
and antecedents of the above appointees have been
verified and nothing adverse is reported against
them, as conveyed by the Dy. Collector (LA), South
Goa, Margao vide letter Nos. 36/09/2023/MISC/
/MAG/245/X/M.O. 1784 dated 06/07/2023, letter
No. 36/09/2023/MISC/MAG/245/X/M.O. 1869 dated
14-07-2023 and the District Magistrate, North, Panaji,
vide letter No. 2/86/2014-MAG/VCA/1918 dated
17-07-2023.
The above appointees shall be on probation for a
period of two years.
The pay and allowances of the above officers
shall be debited to the Budget Head controlled by
the State Registrar and Notary Services, Panaji,
wherever they are posted from time to time.
They shall report to the Law Department
(Establishment) for posting.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amir Y. Parab, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).
Porvorim, 21st July, 2023.
——————
Department of Official Language
Directorate of Official Language
–––
Notification
No. 5/12/2011/DOL/GKA/Gen-Coun/449
In continuation to the Notification No. 5/12/
/2011/DOL/GKA/Gen-Coun/1133 dated 15-01-2020,
the Government is pleased to extend the term of
the Committee of Goa Konkani Akademi till the
constitution of new committee.
This issues with the approval of the Government
vide U.O. No. 292/F dated 18-07-2023.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Raju V. Gawas, Director (Official Language) & ex
officio Joint Secretary.
Panaji, 19th July, 2023.
——————
Department of Personnel
–––
Order
No. 22/10/2018-PER/3057
The Governor of Goa is pleased to transfer and post the following IPS and GPS Officers with immediate
effect:-
Sr. No.
Name of the Officer and posting
Posted as
1.
Shri Shekhar Prabhudessai, IPS,
Principal, Police Training School, Valpoi.
Superintendent of Police (HQ), holding
additional charge of Superintendent
of Police (ACB)
2.
Shri Nelson Albuquerque, Principal,
Superintendent of Police (ACB).
Police Training School, Valpoi
Smt. Sunita Sawant, Superintendent of Police (EOC) shall hold the additional charge of Superintendent
of Police (HQ), with immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 14th July, 2023.
402
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
Order
No. 7/25/2022-PER/3094
Whereas, Shri Sreekanth T., IAS (AGMUT: 2004),
was posted in Goa Segment of AGMUT Cadre vide
Ministry of Home Affairs, Order No. 14020/03/2022-
-UTS.I dated 07-09-2022, and had joined Goa
administration on 12-09-2022;
And whereas, Shri Sreekanth T., IAS, has tendered
notice of voluntary retirement vide letter dated
18-07-2023, and the said notice has been forwarded
to Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India for
decision of competent authority;
And whereas, the competent authority has
decided to repatriate Shri Sreekanth T., IAS from the
State administration;
And now therefore, the Government of Goa is
pleased to relieve Shri Sreekanth T., IAS (AGMUT:
2004) from the State administration, w.e.f.
19-07-2023 (a.n.) to report to Ministry of Home
Affairs, Government of India.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 19th July, 2023.
Order
No. 22/10/2018-PER/3096
Shri Nelson Albuquerque, Superintendent of
Police (ACB), shall hold the additional charge of
Superintendent of Police (HQ), with immediate
effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 19th July, 2023.
Order
No. 5/8/2022-PER/3132
In exercise of the powers conferred under
Rule 43 of Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016, the
Government of Goa is pleased to relax the criteria
of undergoing Departmental training and passing
Departmental Examination required under Rule 23
of Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016 in respect of the
following Junior Scale officers of Goa Civil Service.
Sr. No.
Name of the Officer
1.
Shri Rajesh S. Ajgaonkar.
2.
Smt. Seema Salkar @ Veera Nayak.
3.
Shri Madhu G. Narvekar.
4.
Shri Deepak Pandharinath Vaingankar.
5.
Smt. Sapna S. Naik Bandodkar.
6.
Smt. Isha Mayur Sawant.
7.
Shri Abhir Chandrakant Hede.
8.
Shri Ramesh N. Gaonkar.
9.
Smt. Nancy Fernandes.
10.
Shri Mandar Mohan Naik.
11.
Smt. Gautami Sachin Parmekar.
12.
Shri Dattaraj Krishna Gauns Dessai.
13.
Shri Eshant Vasudev Sawant.
14.
Kum. Amalia Olivia Fatima Pinto.
15.
Smt. Sharmila Ulhas Gaunkar.
This issues with the approval of Council of
Ministers in its XXVIth meeting held on 12-07-2023
conveyed vide letter No. 1/15/2023-GAD-II dated
14-07-2023.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 21st July, 2023.
Order
No. 15/18/2003-PER(Part-II)/3138
Read:
Order No. 15/5/2022-PER/2099 dated
10-07-2023.
Sanction of the Government is hereby accorded
to depute the following Officers in the Cadre of
Mamlatdars/Joint Mamlatdars/Vigilance Officers
appointed vide order read in preamble and on
probation for Departmental training to be
conducted at the Goa Institute of Public
Administration and Rural Development, Ella Farm,
Old Goa for 15 days with effect from 25-07-2023 to
09-08-2023:-
1. Kum. Dayle Rebello.
2. Kum. Ruchika Swapnil Birje.
3. Kurn. Shannon Chika De Almeida.
4. Shri Dattaprasad Shrikant Toraskar.
5. Shri Vishnu Mahadev Rane.
6. Shri Sidharth Ashok Prabhu.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
403
7. Shri Gajanan Anil Halarneker.
8. Shri Abhijit Ganesh Gaonkar.
9. Kum. Shruti Suhas Kumtekar.
10. Shri Gajesh Prakash Shirodkar.
The timings of the training shall be as specified
by the GIPARD. The officers shall report to
Ms. Seema Fernandes, Assistant Director, GIPARD
at 9.00. a.m. on 25-07-2023.
Instructions to the probationers trainees:
1. The trainee shall abide by the instructions
issued by GIPARD from time to time during
the period of training.
2. Punctuality during the entire course,
discipline and decorum in the Institute as
well as during study visits, etc. shall be
maintained by the trainees.
3. Every trainee shall maintain a daily diary,
compulsorily.
4. No errant behavior, on part of the trainee, shall
be tolerated during the training and if such
behaviour is noticed deemed fit action shall
be initiated against the trainee.
5. No leave shall be granted during the period of
training except in unavoidable circum-
stances. Absence from training will have to
be justified in writing.
6. Attendance of the trainee for the entire
training programme is compulsory.
7. All trainees shall be under the control of the
Goa Institute of Public Administration and
Rural Development during the entire training
period.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 24th July, 2023.
————
Office Memorandum
No. 2/7/76-PER(Vol.III)Part-I/3108
Read: O.M. No. 2/7/76-PER(Vol.III)Part-I dated
02-03-2015.
The Government is pleased to re-constitute the
following Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC)
for grant of Senior Scale and Selection Scale to
Government Teachers in Group ‘A’ & ‘B’ and Group
‘C’ post Teachers who are eligible for the pay scale
attached to Group ‘B’ post:-
1) Secretary of the
— Chairman.
Administrative Department
2) Head of Department
— Member.
3)
Director (Admin.)/Dy. Director
— Member.
(Education)/Senior most
Officer next below the HOD
Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).
Porvorim, 19th July, 2023.
——————
Department of Public Health
–––
Order
No. 25/18/2019-I/PHD/1021
On the recommendation of the Screening Committee, the Officers of Directorate of Health Services
indicated in the enclosed Annexure who have completed the requisite years of regular service of 02 years
in Grade Pay of Rs. 6,600 in PB-3 including the service rendered in the pre-revised scale of Rs. 10,000-15,200
are granted 1st financial upgradation under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP) Scheme with
effect from the date indicated against his/her name in column No. 6 in terms of Order No. 25/1/2003-I/PHD
dated 16-07-2009 and 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 17-07-2009.
The Officers may exercise an option in terms of F. R. 22 (I) (a) (1) if he/she so desires within one month
from the date of issue of his/her Order for fixing pay in the 1st financial upgradation under Dynamic
Assured Career Progression Scheme.
404
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
Each Officer shall give an undertaking that in case any excess payment that may be found to have been
made as a result of incorrect fixation of pay or any excess payment detected in the light of discrepancies
noticed subsequently will be refunded by them to the Government either by adjustment against future
payments due to them or otherwise.
The expenditure on his/her pay and allowances shall be debited to the budget head under which their
salary is drawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 14th July, 2023.
___
ANNEXURE
1st Financial Upgradation under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme
(For Doctors appointed in Grade Pay of Rs. 6,600/- in Pay Band-3 under Directorate of Health Services)
Sr.
Name & Designation
Date of
Present
Grade Pay to be
Date of
No.
joining
Grade Pay
made applicable
effect
under DACP
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Dr. Rachel Gomes,
27-09-2016
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 7,600/- in PB-3
27-09-2018.
Senior Surgeon
————
Order
No. 25/18/2019-I/PHD/1022
On the recommendation of the Screening Committee, the Officers of Directorate of Health Services
indicated in the enclosed Annexure who have completed the requisite years of regular service of 04 years
in Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400 in PB-3 including the service rendered in the pre-revised scale of Rs. 8,000-13,500
are granted 1st financial upgradation under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP) Scheme with
effect from the date indicated against his/her name in column No. 6 in terms of Order No. 25/1/2003-I/PHD
dated 16-07-2009 and 25/1/2003-I/PHD dated 17-07-2009.
The Officers may exercise an option in terms of F. R. 22 (I) (a) (1) if he/she so desires within one month
from the date of issue of his/her Order for fixing pay in the 1st financial upgradation under Dynamic
Assured Career Progression Scheme.
Each Officer shall give an undertaking that in case any excess payment that may be found to have been
made as a result of incorrect fixation of pay or any excess payment detected in the light of discrepancies
noticed subsequently will be refunded by them to the Government either by adjustment against future
payments due to them or otherwise.
The expenditure on his/her pay and allowances shall be debited to the budget head under which their
salary is drawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 14th July, 2023.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
405
ANNEXURE
1st Financial Upgradation under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme
(For Doctors appointed in Grade Pay of Rs. 5,400/- in Pay Band-3 under Directorate of Health Services)
Sr.
Name &
Date of
Present
Grade Pay to be
Date of
No.
Designation
joining
Grade Pay
made applicable
effect
under DACP
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Dr. Carol Grace
15-04-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
15-04-2020.
Menezes, Medical
Officer
2.
Dr. Gaurav Pradeep
01-04-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Arsekar, Medical
Officer
3.
Dr. Prajakta Amey
30-03-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
30-03-2020.
Lotlikar, Medical
Officer
4.
Dr. Steffi Lourdes
07-04-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
07-04-2020.
Coelho, Medical
Officer
5.
Dr. Sruti Shivanand
01-04-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Naik Dessai,
Medical Officer
6.
Dr. Maya Kashinath
01-04-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Nagueshkar,
Medical Officer
7. Dr. Manjusha Gurudas 02-05-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
02-05-2020.
Gaude alias Manjusha
Amitash Balekar,
Medical Officer
8. Dr. Pranjali Pandurang 01-07-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-07-2020.
Chodankar alias
Pranjali Chandra
Bhushan Prasad,
Medical Officer
9. Dr. R. Rahul,
01-04-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-04-2020.
Medical Officer
10. Dr. Shital Rama
16-09-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
16-09-2020.
Gaude, Medical
Officer
11. Dr. Kreda Fernandes, 27-09-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
27-09-2020.
Medical Officer
12. Dr. Errol Cosme
07-09-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
07-09-2020.
Bento Rodrigues,
Medical Officer
13. Dr. Suvidha Subash
21-09-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
21-09-2020.
Khandolkar, Medical
Officer
14. Dr. Vijaya Durgesh
22-09-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
22-09-2020.
Naik, Medical Officer
406
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
1
2
3
4
5
6
15. Dr. Aatasia Arthur
08-09-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
08-09-2020.
D’Silva, Medical
Officer
16. Dr. Vinesh Vinayak
11-11-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
11-11-2020.
Gaonkar, Medical
Officer
17. Dr. Liviea Colaco,
21-09-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
21-09-2020.
Medical Officer
18. Dr. Robin Atmaram
03-09-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
03-09-2020.
Morajker, Medical
Officer
19. Dr. Prijya Ajay Shet
15-09-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
15-09-2020.
alias Prijya Prakash
Naik, Medical Officer
20. Dr. Sneha Sharadkumar
28-09-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
28-09-2020.
Chodankar, Medical
Officer
21. Dr. Prajwala Prakash
15-09-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
15-09-2020.
Velip, Medical Officer
22. Dr. Jamina Oliveira,
03-09-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
03-09-2020.
Medical Officer
23. Dr. Anuja Digambar
16-12-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
16-12-2020.
Dabholkar, Medical
Officer
24. Dr. Radhesh Shaba
29-04-2011 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
29-04-2015.
Kerkar, Medical
Officer
25. Dr. Pushparaj Laxman
09-06-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
09-06-2020.
Amonkar, Ayurvedic
Physician
26. Dr. Gauri S. Prabhu,
31-10-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
31-10-2020.
Ayurvedic Physician
27. Dr. Mahesh U. Verlekar,
31-10-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
31-10-2020.
Ayurvedic Physician
28. Dr. Archana A.
01-11-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-11-2020.
Gaonkar, Ayurvedic
Physician
29. Dr. Shivdatta alias
31-10-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
31-10-2020.
Viraj M. Manerikar,
Ayurvedic Physician
30. Dr. Aditya M. Barve,
31-10-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
31-10-2020.
Ayurvedic Physician
31. Dr. Supriya U. Prabhu
15-11-2016 G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
15-11-2020.
Dessai alias Dhond,
Ayurvedic Physician
32. Dr. Siddhesh Shankar
02-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
02-11-2020.
Parab, Ayurvedic Physician
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
407
1
2
3
4
5
6
33. Dr. Vaibhavi S. Barve,
01-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-11-2020.
Ayurvedic Physician
34. Dr. Santosh Ganapati 01-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-11-2020.
Vernekar, Ayurvedic
Physician
35. Dr. Sairandri Heramb 02-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
02-11-2020.
Shet Parker,
Ayurvedic Physician
36. Dr. Siddhi A. Velingker, 15-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
15-11-2020.
Ayurvedic Physician
37. Dr. Pankaj Babu Velip, 01-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-11-2020.
Ayurvedic Physician
38. Dr. Diwakar Arjun
01-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-11-2020.
Velip, Ayurvedic
Physician
39. Dr. Deepali Anand
04-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
04-11-2020.
Fatarpenkar,
Ayurvedic Physician
40. Dr. Amina Govind
01-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-11-2020.
Patre, Ayurvedic
Physician
41. Dr. Sneha Damodar
01-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-11-2020.
Borkar, Ayurvedic
Physician
42. Dr. Anupa C. Naik,
08-11-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
08-11-2020.
Ayurvedic Physician
43. Dr. Trupti S. Prabhu
19-06-2017
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
19-06-2021.
Alvenkar, Ayurvedic
Physician
44. Dr. Shilpa Amit
19-06-2017
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
19-06-2021.
Kaisukar, Ayurvedic
Physician
45. Dr. Sneha S. Naik
19-06-2017
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
19-06-2021.
Chopdencar,
Ayurvedic Physician
46. Dr. Puja Nijanand Vasta, 19-06-2017
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
19-06-2021.
Ayurvedic Physician
47. Dr. Ramaa Audhut
14-06-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
14-06-2020.
Kamat, Jr. Pathologist
48. Dr. Rohan Fernandes, 10-07-2017
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
10-07-2021.
Jr. Gynecologist
49. Dr. Ana Maria Vas,
17-12-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
17-12-2020.
Jr. Gynecologist
50. Dr. Elyska Hedvig
05-02-2018
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
16-05-2020.
De Sa, Jr. Paediatrician
51. Dr. Celina Escolastica 16-05-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
31-10-2020.
De Xavier Andrade,
Jr. Paediatrician
408
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
1
2
3
4
5
6
52. Dr. Swati Sidhesh
31-10-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
31-10-2020.
Gauns, Public Health
Dentist
53. Dr. Eesha Yeshwant
31-10-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
31-10-2020.
Prabhugaonkar,
Public Health Dentist
54. Dr. Priyanka Dattaraj 31-10-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-09-2020.
Mayenkar, Public
Health Dentist
55. Dr. Rhuta R. Shevade, 01-09-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
01-02-2020.
Junior Ophthalmic
Surgeon
56. Dr. Vinita Torquato,
01-02-2016
G. P.- Rs. 5,400/- in PB-3
G. P.- Rs. 6,600/- in PB-3
16-05-2020.
Jr. Pathologist
————
Order
No. 7/23/87-I/PHD/1036
On the recommendation of Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/
/II/11/24(1)/2023/138 dated 23-06-2023, Government
is pleased to promote Dr. Pooja Yogesh Prabhu alias
Madhav Prabhu Mahambrey, Junior Anaesthetist
to the post of Senior Anaesthetist under Directorate
of Health Services (Group ‘A’ Gazetted) on regular
basis in Level 11 of Pay Matrix in 7th Pay
Commission (PB-3 Rs. 15600-39100+GP: Rs. 6600/- +
NPA and other allowances to be fixed as per rules,
with immediate effect.
The posting order shall be issued separately.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 17th July, 2023.
Order
No. 45/3/2004-I/PHD/1037
On the recommendation of Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/
/II/11/24(1)/2023/139 dated 23-06-2023, Government
is pleased to promote Dr. Sandeep T. Borkar, Junior
Gynaecologist to the post of Senior Gynaecologist
under Directorate of Health Services (Group ‘A’
Gazetted) on regular basis in Level 11 of Pay Matrix
in 7th Pay Commission (PB-3 Rs. 15600-39100 + GP:
Rs. 6600/- + NPA and other allowances to be fixed
as per rules, with immediate effect.
The posting order shall be issued separately.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 17th July, 2023.
————
Order
No. 44/16/2016-I/PHD/1038
Government is pleased to transfer the below mentioned Doctors under Directorate of Health Services,
with immediate effect:-
Sr. No.
Name of the Doctor
Present place of posting
Transferred at
1
2
3
4
1.
Dr. Navjyot Aldonkar,
Primary Health Centre, Balli
Community Health Centre, Curchorem
Medical Officer
in place of Dr. Shawn Dias.
2.
Dr. Shawn Dias,
Community Health Centre,
Primary
Health
Centre,
Balli
Medical Officer
Curchorem
vice Dr. Navjyot Aldonkar transferred.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 17th July, 2023.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
409
Order
No. 44/16/2016-I/PHD/1056
Read: Order No. 44/16/2016-I/PHD/1038 dated
17-07-2023.
The Government Order dated 17-07-2023 read in
preamble stands withdrawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dattaram Sardessai, Additional Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 21st July, 2023.
————
Order
No. 2/9/2004-II/PHD/1097
Government is pleased to accept the notice of
voluntary retirement dated 29-04-2023 tendered by
Dr. Mrinalini G. Sahasrabhojanee, Associate
Professor in the Department of Obst. & Gynaecology,
Goa Medical College, under Rule 48-A of CCS (Pension)
Rules, 1972 and to relieve her from the post of
Associate Professor, Department of Obst. &
Gynaecology, Goa Medical College w.e.f.
31-07-2023 (a. n.).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 12th July, 2023.
————
Notification
No. 44/15/2023-I/PHD/1073
Subsequent to X.11035/346/2021-DRS dated
13-09-2022 issued by MOHFW-GOI, the Essential List
of Medicines (ELM) as appropriate for the
Directorate of Health Services at District Hospital
level (Annexure II) and Sub District Hospital level
(Annexure III) under the State of Goa is hereby
notified and will come into force with immediate
effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health).
Porvorim, 20th July, 2023.
——————
Department of Water Resources
Office of the Chief Engineer
–––
Order
No. 3/25-15/90/CE-WR/Adm.I/325
Shri Dilip R. Naik, Executive Engineer, Works Division IX (Mhadei Cell), WRD, Gogal, Margao-Goa shall
hold additional charge of Superintending Engineer, O/o. Superintending Engineer, CO III, WRD, Gogal,
Margao-Goa (on officiating basis) until further order.
This is issued vide Government approval No. 2811/F dated 30-06-2023.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
P. B. Badami, Chief Engineer (WR) & ex officio Addl. Secretary.
Porvorim, 19th July, 2023.
________
Order
No. 3/25-15/90/CE-WR/Adm.I/326
Government is pleased to promote the following Executive Engineer/Engineering Officer (Civil) of
this Department to the post of Superintending Engineer, Group-A Gazetted post on ad-hoc basis, in the Pay
Matrix Level No. 12 under 7th Pay Commission plus other allowances, with immediate effect, initially for
six months and posted them in the offices mentioned against their name in column No. 4
410
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 17
27TH JULY, 2023
Sr.
Name of Officers
Present designation and place of posting
Posting as ad-hoc promotion and
No.
1
2
3
4
1. Shri Ram Nakul Gauns
Executive Engineer, Works Division-V,
Superintending Engineer,
WRD, Karapur, Tisk, Goa
O/o. Superintending Engineer,
CO V, WRD, Gogal, Margao-Goa
(on ad-hoc basis) & shall hold
additional charge of Executive
Engineer, Works Division-V,
WRD, Karapur, Tisk, Goa until
further orders.
2. Shri Shantaram B. Ghantkar Engineering Officer, O/o. the Chief
Superintending Engineer,
Engineer, WRD, Porvorim-Goa
O/o. Superintending Engineer,
Central Planning Organisation,
WRD, Porvorim (on ad-hoc basis)
& shall hold additional charge
of Engineering Officer, O/o. the
Chief Engineer, WRD, Porvorim,
Goa until further orders.
The promotion is purely on ad-hoc basis and will not bestow any claim for regular appointment and
service rendered on ad-hoc basis in the grade will not count for the purpose of seniority in the grade and
for eligibility for promotion to next higher grade.
This is issued vide Government approval No. 2811/F dated 30-06-2023.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
P. B. Badami, Chief Engineer (WR) & ex officio Addl. Secretary.
Porvorim, 19th July, 2023.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 18.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—151/80—07/2023.