SERIES II No. 26

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-2023

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies

–––

Order

No. 3/6/Urban Credit/TS-II/NZ/2018/RCS/2338

Read: 1. Order No. 48-8-2001-TS-RCS/III/311 dated

21-04-2017.

2. Circular No. 6-13-81/EST/RCS/Part V dated

06-03-2020.

3. This Office Order No. 3/6/Urban Credit/

/TS-II/NZ/2018/RCS/2013 dated 17-09-2020.

4. This Office Extension Order No. 3/6/

/Urban Credit/TS-II/NZ/2018/RCS dated

07-07-2022.

5. Letter No. ARCS/NZ/PLN/Registrar

Nominee/912 dated 05-09-2022.

6. This Office Extension Order No. 3/6/

/Urban Credit/TS-II/NZ/2018/RCS dated

10-10-2022.

7. Letter No. 4-21-00-TS/Vol.v/NZ/1164

dated 06-09-202.

Whereas, vide Order read at Sr. No. 1 above, Adv.

Shivaji B. S. Bhangui, C/o. Adv. P. J. Kamat, above

Bank of Maharashtra, 2nd floor, SF-8, Goa Housing

Board Comm. & Residential Complex, Journalist

Colony, Alto-Betim, Porvorim, Goa, 403521 was

appointed as Registrar’s Nominee under Section

86(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001

(Goa Act No. 36 of 2001) (hereafter referred as

“Act”) read with Rule 116(1) of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Rules, 2003 and his name is reflecting at

Sr. No. 24 of the said Order.

And whereas, vide this office Order read at

Sr. No. 3 above, Adv. Shivaji B. S. Bhangui was

authorized as dedicated Nominee of the Registrar

Panaji, 28th September, 2023 (Asvina 6, 1945)

689

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

of Co-operative Societies for Shree Kalika Urban

Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., [RES-(a)-4/NZ/Goa dated

18-01-1991], Kalika Bhavan, behind Maruti Temple,

Mapusa-Goa (hereafter referred as “said Society”) to

entertain all the disputes referred to him in matters

of recovery of outstanding loans of the said Society,

without routing through this Department.

And whereas, said authorisation was initially for

period of one year w.e.f. 17-09-2020 till 16-09-2021

and was further extended from time to time till

16-09-2023.

And whereas, vide letter dated 06-09-2023 read at

Sr. No. 7 above, the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative

Societies, North Zone, Mapusa-Goa, has forwarded the

request of Shree Kalika Urban Co-op. Credit Society

Ltd., [RES-(a)-4/NZ/Goa dated 18-01-1991], Kalika Bhavan,

behind Maruti Temple, Mapusa-Goa, for extending

the above referred authorization for a further period

of one year.

Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

under Section 123(B) of the Goa Co-operative Societies

Act, 2001 read with Rule 116 of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003, I, the undersigned

Registrar of Co-operative Societies do hereby extend

the authorization of Adv. Shivaji B. S. Bhangui, C/o.

Adv. P. J. Kamat, above Bank of Maharashtra, 2nd floor,

SF-8, Goa Housing Board Comm. & Residential

Complex, Journalist Colony, Alto-Betim, Porvorim,

Goa, as dedicated RCS Nominee for a period of one

year with effect from 17-09-2023 to 16-09-2024 for

Shree Kalika Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., [RES-

-(a)-4/NZ/Goa dated 18-01-1991], Kalika Bhavan,

behind Maruti Temple, Mapusa-Goa.

Further, when a purported dispute is referred by

the said Society, the above named dedicated

Nominee is authorized to first decide under

sub-section (1) of Section 86 of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 whether the matter referred by

the Society involves a dispute and pass appropriate

Orders under sub-section (1) of Section 86 of the Act.

690

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

Further, only upon the Nominee satisfying that there exists a dispute, he shall proceed to adjudicate the

same and give Award accordingly. The Nominee shall abide by the terms and conditions on which he was

originally appointed as Registrar’s Nominee vide Order read at Sr. No. 1 above.

The extension of this authorization is liable to be withdrawn at any time without assigning any reason

thereof at the discretion of the undersigned.

Given under the seal of this office.

Manuel Barreto, Registrar (Co-op. Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-operation).

Panaji, 15th September, 2023.

————

Addendum

No. 15-99-88-ADT/RCS(Suppl)/2323

Read: 1. Order No. 15-99-88/ADT/RCS(Suppl)/3045 dated 04-12-2020 published in Official Gazette,

Series II No. 40 dated 31-12-2020.

2. Addendum No. 15-99-88/ADT/RCS(Suppl)/4662 dated 23-03-2021 published in Official

Gazette, Series II No. 2 dated 8-04-2021.

3. Addendum No. 15-99-88/ADT/RCS(Suppl)/2073 dated 14-10-2021 published in Official

Gazette, Series II No. 34 dated 18-11-2021.

4. Addendum No. 15-99-88/ADT/RCS(Suppl)/1599 dated 18-08-2022 published in Official

Gazette, Series II No. 21 dated 25-08-2022.

In the above referred order at Ref. No. 1 read with three Addendums at Ref. Nos. 2, 3 & 4 and in

exercise of the powers vested under Section 74(2) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act

No. 36 of 2001) read with Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, I, the Registrar of Co-operative

Societies, Government of Goa with prior approval of the Government conveyed vide U.O. No. 504/F dated

21-08-2023, do hereby add/include the names of the following Auditors in the panel of Auditors under

Class A, after Serial No. 162 as under:-

Chartered Accountants-Class “A”

Sr.

Name of the C.A.

Telephone/Mobile No.

Firms/Registration/

No.

& address

Membership No.

163.

Divya Sachin Prabhu,

7875887818

156908W/198565

Prabhu Bam & Associates, A-402,

[email protected]

Clover Apt., near Muth Hall,

Gogol-Goa 403602

164.

Pradnya Akshay Bhat,

9545233663

WRO0339267

M/s. Pradnya A. Bhat & Co.,

[email protected]

148487W

Off. No. 11, 2nd Floor, Block-E,

Agri Bazar Market, Yard Bethoda Road,

Curti, Ponda-Goa 403401

165.

Mr. Royce Savio Pereira,

9923826595

15082W/172991

T8, “D” Block, Sonali Apartments,

[email protected]

Tonca, Caranzalem, Panaji-Goa

166.

Ms. Gayatri L. Behre & Co.,

9823567477

158175W/604864

F-3, 1st Floor, Swaroopa Co-op.

[email protected]

Housing Society, Dhavli,

Ponda-Goa 403401

167.

Vinni Audumbar Gaonkar,

9823260994

WRO0337754/171869

House No. 120, Deulmol, Shirvoi,

[email protected]

Quepem-Goa 403705

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

691

168.

SNRSN & Associates,

8180992793

156558W

Rajashree Sagar Nalawade,

[email protected]

167896

Smruti Manohar Nagdev,

7276194441

604683

C/o Sarika Purnanand Patil,

[email protected]

S-4, 2nd Floor, Balaji Bhawan-II,

Off. Hanuman Temple, Behind

Udipi Cafe, Warkhandem,

Ponda-Goa 403401

169.

Kunkolienkar Talauliker

9422439830

159167W/044909 &

& Associates, Pankaj Satchit

[email protected]

604427

Kunkolienkar

Saily Shubham Talauliker

29, Kadar Manzil, Second Floor,

opp. Old Hari Mandir,

Margao-Goa

170.

Sambhashiva Shivarama Bhat,

8310779502/9764532804

023322S

Shop No. 8, Rogtao Electricity

[email protected]

603296

Department, Power House circle,

Margao-Goa 403601

171.

Mr. Sankpal Kulkarni & Associates

9403375115

121256W/188781

C/o. Subhash Parulekar, H-5-15,

[email protected]

Near Saraswati Temple, Verem,

Bardez-Goa 403114

All other terms and conditions as stated in Order at Ref. No. 1 read with Addendums at Ref.

Nos. 2, 3 & 4 remain unchanged.

Given under the seal of this office.

Manuel Barreto, Registrar (Co-op. Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-operation).

Panaji, 15th September, 2023.

——————

Department of Fisheries

Directorate of Fisheries

–––

Order

No. DF/ADMN/RTI/VOL-IV/2019-20/3169

In pursuance to Clause 5 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”),

the following Officer/Officials are hereby appointed as Public Information Officer and Assistant Public

Information Officer for the Directorate of Fisheries, to deal with the applications received from the public

under the said Act.

Sr.

Name

Jurisdiction

No.

& designation

of the Public

of the Link

of the Assistant

of the Link

Information Officer

Public Information

Assistant-Public

Officer

Information Officer

1. Smt. Zigyasa Murkar,

Dr. Sunita Pauskar,

Shri Ganpat Chari,

Shri Siddesh

State of Goa.

Supdt. of Fisheries

Net Mending

Kerkar,

(FTC & Ela Fish Farm)

(Malim Jetty)

Instructor

Mechanical

Instructor

692

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

2. Dr. Sunita Pauskar,

Smt. Zigyasa Murkar,

Shri Deepak

Smt. Nishi

State of Goa.

Supdt. of Fisheries

Supdt. of Fisheries,

Kunkoliker,

Naik, Fisheries

(Malim Jetty)

(FTC & Ela Fish

Marketing Inspector

Surveyor

Farm)

The Assistant Public Information Officer shall on receipt of the applications for information or appeal

under the RTI Act, forward the same forthwith to the Public Information Officer, as required under sub-

-section (1) of Section 7.

The Public Information Officer shall on receipt of a request under Section 6 as expeditiously as possible

and in any case within thirty days of the request, either provides the information on payment of such fees

as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons of the specified under Section 8 & 9.

The above designated Officer/Officials shall exercise and perform the powers/functions laid down under

the RTI Act, 2005 with immediate effect.

The Dy. Director of Fisheries (Shri Chandrakant D. Velip) will be the First Appellant Authority for

Fishermen Training Centre and Ela Fish Farm, Ela, Old Goa under this Act to hear the appeals against the

decision of the Public Information Officer and Assistant Public Information Officer of the Department for

the Serial No. 1 above.

The Dy. Director of Fisheries (Dr. Smita A. Mazumdar) will be the First Appellant Authority for Malim

Jetty section under this Act to hear the appeals against the decision of the Public Information Officer and

Assistant Public Information Officer of the Department for the Serial No. 2 above.

Deepesh Priolkar, Director (Fisheries).

Panaji, 14th September, 2023.

——————

Department of General Administration

–––

NOtification

No. 37/3/2022-GAD-III/3428

Read: Notification No. 37/3/2022-GAD-III/3661 dated 19-10-2022.

In partial modification to the above mentioned Notification, Government is pleased to declare

28th September, 2023 (Thursday) as Special Holiday instead of 26th September, 2023 (Tuesday) on account

of EID-E-MILAD UN NABI.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Shaila G. Bhosle, Under Secretary (GA).

Porvorim, 18th September, 2023.

——————

Department of Labour

––

Notification

No. 28/02/2023-LAB/625

The following Award passed by the Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on

31-08-2023 in Ref. No. IT/17/2013 is hereby published as required under Section 17 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 11th September, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

693

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

AND LABOUR COURT

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Mr. Anil Scaria, Hon’ble Presiding Officer)

Ref. No. IT/17/2013

Shri Gitesh S. Chari & 33 others,

Rep. by the President,

Goa Trade and Commercial

Worker’s Union,

Panaji-Goa

..… Workmen/Party I.

V/s

1. The Proprietor,

M/s. Ananya Manpower Solutions Pvt. Ltd.,

202, Unitech City Centre,

M. G. Road,

Panaji-Goa

…. Employer/Party II(1).

2. M/s. G. K. B. Ophthalmics Ltd.,

16-A, Thivim Industrial Estate,

Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa

…. Party II(2).

Workmen/Party-I represented by Learned Advocate

Shri Suhaas Naik.

Employer/Party-II(1) represented by Learned Adv.

Shri P. J. Kamat.

Employer/Party II(2) represented by Learned Adv.

Shri A. V. Nigalye.

AWARD

(Delivered on this the 31st day of the month of

August of the year 2023)

By Order dated 06-08-2013, bearing No. 28/37/

/2013-Lab/538, the Government of Goa in exercise of

powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, has referred the following

dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

“(1) Whether the action of the Management of M/s.

Ananya Manpower Solutions Private Limited,

Unitech Centre, 2nd Floor, Panaji, a contractor

to M/s. G. K. B. Ophthalmics Limited, Thivim

Industrial Estate, Karaswada, Mapusa, Goa, in

terminating the services of the following thirty

three workmen, with effect from 01-04-2013, is

legal and justified?

(1)

Gitesh S. Chari.

(2)

Rakesh I. Patekar.

(3)

Manoj B. Varak.

(4)

Rajeshri P. Ghadi.

(5)

Vaman G. Mandrekar.

(6)

Mandar R. Sutar.

(7)

Dilip D. Karekar.

(8)

Mithesh M. Raul.

(9)

Rangnath K. Parab.

(10)

Sunil A. Matnekar.

(11)

Laklo G. Naik.

(12)

Lavu A. Naik.

(13)

Anil G. Varak.

(14)

Subray B. Kalangutkar.

(15)

Govind Dalvi.

(16)

Amit A. Naik.

(17)

Mohanish N. Karkotkar.

(18)

Shevanti N. Patkar.

(19)

Jairam G. Naik.

(20)

Digambar M. Samant.

(21)

Sameer P. Agarwadekar.

(22)

Shridhar M. Raul.

(23)

Sai Naik.

(24)

Rajesh R. Nimbalkar.

(25)

Prathamesh P. Kadam.

(26)

Mahesh A. Dhuri.

(27)

Dinanath C. Mahale.

(28)

Siddesh M. Talavnekar.

(29)

Santosh M. Satoskar.

(30)

Anand D. Tarpe.

(31)

Rakesh S. Vengulkar.

(32)

Prashant B. Mayekar.

(33)

Vinayak G. Dessai.

(2) If not,what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

2. It came to be registered in this Tribunal as

Reference No. IT/17/2013.

3. The Workmen/Party I has filed their Statement

of Claim. Party II(1) has filed its Written Statement.

Party I has filed their Rejoinder. During the course of

proceedings, Party II(2) was impleaded. Party II(2) has

filed its Written Statement. Party I has filed their

Rejoinder to the Written Statement of Party II(2).

4. The case of Party I is that the workmen were

employed by Party II(1) in the Factory of the Principal

Employer, namely; G.K.B. Ophthalmics Ltd. at

Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa/Party II(2). That the

Workmen (Party I) were in continuous employment

in the said Factory. That all the workmen named in

the present Order of Reference unionized themselves

under the banner of the “Goa Trade & Commercial

Workers’ Union”. That the 33 workmen who were

694

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

actively involved in forming the Union were

arbitrarily refused employment w.e.f. 01-04-2013. That

this was done by Party II(1) in collusion and in

consultation with Party II(2). That this was done in

order to spread fear among the other unionized

workmen. That the action of Party II(1) amounts to

unfair labour practice. That all the workmen (Party I)

are unemployed. Therefore, it is prayed that the

action of Party II(1) in refusing employment/

/termination of service of all the workmen named in

the present Order of Reference be held to be illegal,

unjust and bad in law. That all the workmen named

in the Order of reference be reinstated back in service

with full back wages, continuity in service and all

other consequential benefits.

5. The case of the Party II(1) is that Party II(1) and

M/s. G.K.B. Ophthalmics Limited/Party II(2) had

entered in various Staffing Services Agreements.

That the last of such agreements were for a period of

11 months from 02-01-2012 to 01-01-2013. That this

agreement was orally extended upto 31-03-2013.

That under these agreements, Party II(1) was

deploying trained workers to work in the Factory of

M/s. G.K.B. Opthalmics Limited/Party II(2). That upon

the termination of the agreement between M/s. G.K.B.

Opthalmics Limited/Party II(2) and Party II(1), the

workmen were instructed to report to the Office of

Party II(1) from 01-04-2013 to settle their accounts.

That the workers at Sr. No. 18, 21, 25 and 32 in the

Order of Reference absented from work w.e.f.

26-03-2013. That the Workmen (Party I) also did not

report to the Office of Party II(1) on 01-04-2013 as

notified. That the Workmen (Party I) were engaged

for a specific period of a contract which has been

terminated. That Party II(1) has no option but to

terminate the workmen w.e.f. 01-04-2013. That

thereafter some of the workers listed in the Order of

Reference approached Party II(1) stating that they

have secured alternate employment and they are not

interested in working for Party II(1). That these

workers have also withdrawn their Provident Fund.

It is denied that all the workmen named in the present

Order of Reference are unionized.

6. It is denied that the Workmen (Party I) have been

refused employment because they unionized

themselves. It is denied that it amounts to unfair

labour practice. It is denied that all the workmen

(Party I) are unemployed. That the Goa Trade and

Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus standi to

raise a dispute regarding the 33 workmen named in

the Order of Reference. That Party I are not entitled

to any relief.

7. Party I has stated in their Rejoinder to the

Written Statement of Party II(1) that none of the

workmen have obtained alternate employment and

none of them have withdrawn their Provident Fund.

It is denied that the workmen were employed for a

specific period of a contract which has been

terminated. It is denied that all the workmen were

instructed to report to the Office of Party II(1) from

01-04-2013 to settle their accounts as the work for

which the workmen were recruited had come to an

end. It is denied that the workmen at serial No.18, 21,

25 and 32 in the Order of Reference absented from

work w.e.f. 26-03-2013. It is denied that the Goa Trade

& Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus standi to

raise a dispute on behalf of the 33 workmen named

in the Order of Reference. Therefore, it is prayed that

the reliefs sought in the Claim Statement be granted.

8. Party II(2) has filed its Written Statement. Party II(2)

states that it has its Factory at Tivim Industrial Estate,

Mapusa-Goa. That Party II(2) has permanent

employees doing skilled and unskilled jobs. That

Party II(2) also engages contractors for doing certain

specific jobs. That one such contractor was Party II(1).

That Party II(2) and Party II(1) entered into a contract.

That the contract was for a period of 11 months from

02-01-2012 to 01-01-2013 which was orally extended

to 31-03-2013.

9. That the performance of Party II(1) was

unsatisfactory. That Party II(2) issued letter dated

01-03-2013 and terminated the contract with Party II(1)

with effect from 31-03-2013. That Party II(1) was

performing the contract by engaging its own

workers. That Party II(2) was not concerned with the

workmen of Party II(1). That on the termination of the

contract, Party II(1) withdrew its workmen from the

Factory premises. It is denied that Party I was in

continuous employment of Party II(1) and Party II(2).

It is denied that Party I were terminated from service

because they were organizing themselves under a

trade union. It is stated by Party II(2) (in Para 3 of the

Written Statement) that the Order impleading Party II(2)

is due to misappreciation of facts and law and the

said Order and consequent summons are liable to be

recalled. In Paras 4(a) to (h) of the Written Statement,

Party II(2) states that Party II(2) is neither a necessary

nor a proper Party. That there is no employer-employee

relationship between Party II(2) and Party I. That the

relationship between Party II(2) and Party II(1) was

that of a Contractor and Principal Employer. That the

contract has been terminated with effect from

31-03-2013. That all the workmen have settled the

matter with Party II(1) and have also withdrawn their

Provident Fund. That Goa Trade and Commercial

Workers’ Union has no locus standi to espouse the

claims of the Party I (Workmen). Therefore, it is prayed

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

695

that it be held that impleading Party II(2) to these

proceedings is bad-in-law and is not necessary to

decide this reference.

10. In their Rejoinder to the Written Statement of

Party II(2), Party I denies that impleadment of Party

II(2) is due to misappreciation of facts and law and is

liable to be recalled. It is denied that Party II(2) is

neither a necessary nor a proper Party. It is denied

that there is no employer-employee relationship

between Party II(2) and Party I. It is denied that the

contract between Party II(2) and Party II(1) has been

terminated with effect from 31-03-2013. It is denied

that all the workmen have settled the matter with

Party II(1) and have also withdrawn their Provident

Fund. It is denied that the Goa Trade and Commercial

Workers’ Union have no locus standi to espouse the

claim of Party I. It is denied that Party I are not entitled

to any relief.

11. The following issues and additional issues were

framed by this Tribunal:-

ISSUES

1. Whether the Party I/workmen prove that they

were in continuous employment of Party II(1)

in the Factory of the Principal Employer GKB

Ophthalmics Ltd. at Karaswada, Mapusa, Goa?

2. Whether the Party I proves that they have been

refused employment by Party II(1) in collusion

and in consultation with the Principal

Employer M/s. G.K.B. Ophthalmics Ltd. with

malice and malafide intention in order to take

revenge on them for unionizing themselves

under the Registered Trade Union w.e.f.

01-04-2013?

3. Whether the Party II(1) proves that Goa Trade

and Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus

standi to raise this dispute?

4. Whether the Party II(1) proves that no dispute

was raised against them by Party I or any of the

workmen mentioned in the order of reference?

5. What relief? What Award?

Additional Issues:

4A. Whether the Party II(2) proves that impleading

the Party II(2) is due to misappreciation of facts

and/or law as contended in para 3 of the

Written Statement of Party II(2)?

4B.Whether the Party II(2) proves that the

reference is not maintainable as against the

Party II(2) and the order impleading the Party

II(2) is liable to be recalled/withdrawn on the

grounds (a) to (h) of said para 4?

12. During the course of proceedings, Party I and

Party II(1) have filed the following terms of Settlement

(Exhibit 46 Colly):-

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT

I. The Parties agree that since the contract of

Contractor was terminated w.e.f. 01-04-2013

and that the workmen were not willing to

accept the job elsewhere, the workmen do not

press for reinstatement with the Party II(1) and/

/or Party II(2).

II. It is further agreed between the Parties that all

the workmen who are parties to the references

No. IT/13/2013; IT/17/2013 and IT/18/2013 shall

be paid a consolidated amount of Rs. 15,000/-

per worker in full and final settlement of all

their claims.

III. The workmen agree to permit deduction of

Rs. 446/- each from the gross amount payable

to each workperson and pay the said deducted

amount towards Union fund on or before

31-08-2023 and the Cheque will be drawn in

favour of “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”, Panaji, Goa, by the Contractor,

Ananaya Manpower Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

IV. It is agreed between the Parties that the amount

payable by the Contractor to the workmen in

the manner hereinabove provided for are in full

and final settlement and satisfaction of all the

claims of the workmen against the Contractor

including claims for compensation for loss of

office or otherwise whatsoever.

V. The Parties agree that these consent terms

shall be filed in pending Reference No. IT/13/

/2013; IT/17/2013 and IT/18/2013 for Award in

terms of this settlement.

VI. The Management of Contractor shall pay the

amount agreed, after deducting the Union

fund, to the workmen directly as and when

they approach the Contractor against a valid

receipt.

13. Party I and Party II(1) have filed an application

stating that an Award be passed in terms of the

settlement.

14. I have gone through the records of the case and

the Memorandum of Settlement at Exhibit 46 Colly

and I am convinced that the Memorandum of

Settlement are just and fair and are in the interest of

the Workmen/Party I and the Employer/Party II(1) and

therefore the same are accepted.

696

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

Hence I pass the following:-

ORDER

(i) The reference in IT/17/2013 stands awarded

as per the terms of Settlement filed by them

at Exhibit 46 Colly.

(ii) The Terms of Settlement are as follows:-

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT

I. The Parties agree that since the contract of

Contractor was terminated w.e.f. 01-04-2013

and that the workmen were not willing to

accept the job elsewhere, the workmen do not

press for reinstatement with the Party II(1) and/

/or Party II(2).

II. It is further agreed between the Parties that all

the workmen who are parties to the references

No. IT/13/2013; IT/17/2013 and IT/18/2013 shall

be paid a consolidated amount of Rs. 15,000/-

per worker in full and final settlement of all

their claims.

III. The workmen agree to permit deduction of

Rs. 446/- each from the gross amount payable

to each workperson and pay the said deducted

amount towards Union fund on or before

31-08-2023 and the Cheque will be drawn in

favour of “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”, Panaji, Goa, by the Contractor,

Ananaya Manpower Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

IV. It is agreed between the Parties that the amount

payable by the Contractor to the workmen in

the manner hereinabove provided for are in full

and final settlement and satisfaction of all the

claims of the workmen against the Contractor

including claims for compensation for loss of

office or otherwise whatsoever.

V. The Parties agree that these consent terms

shall be filed in pending Reference No. IT/13/

/2013; IT/17/2013 and IT/18/2013 for Award in

terms of this settlement.

VI. The Management of Contractor shall pay the

amount agreed, after deducting the Union

fund, to the workmen directly as and when

they approach the Contractor against a valid

receipt.

(iii) No orders as to costs.

(iv) Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Anil Scaria)

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal and

Labour Court.

Notification

No. 28/02/2023-LAB/Part-I/626

The following Award passed by the Industrial

Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on

01-09-2023 in Ref. No. IT/18/2013 is hereby

published as required under Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of

1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 11th September, 2023.

––––

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

AND LABOUR COURT

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Mr. Anil Scaria, Hon’ble Presiding Officer)

Ref. No. IT/18/2013

Shri Sameer P. Agarwadekar & 6 others,

Rep. by the President,

Goa Trade and Commercial

Worker’s Union,

Panaji-Goa

..… Workmen/Party I.

V/s

1. The Proprietor,

M/s. Ananya Manpower Solutions Pvt. Ltd.,

202, Unitech City Centre,

M. G. Road,

Panaji-Goa

…. Employer/Party II(1).

2. M/s. G. K. B. Ophthalmics Ltd.,

16-A, Thivim Industrial Estate,

Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa

…. Party II(2).

Workmen/Party-I represented by Learned Advocate

Shri Suhaas Naik.

Employer/Party-II(1) represented by Learned Adv.

Shri P. J. Kamat.

Employer/Party II(2) represented by Learned Adv.

Shri A. V. Nigalye.

AWARD

(Delivered on this the 1st day of the month of

September of the year 2023)

By Order dated 21-08-2013, bearing No. 28/38/

/2013-Lab/577, the Government of Goa in exercise of

powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, has referred the following

dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

“(1) Whether the action of the Management of M/s.

Ananya Manpower Solutions Private Limited,

Panaji, a contractor to M/s. G. K. B. Ophthalmics

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

697

Limited, Thivim Industrial Estate, Karaswada,

Mapusa, Goa, in terminating the services of the

following Seven workmen, with effect

from 26-03-2013, is legal and justified?

(1)

Shri Sameer P. Agarwadekar.

(2)

Shri Pratmesh Kadam.

(3)

Shri Manish Karbodar.

(4)

Shri Satyavn Manale.

(5)

Shri Ram Kerkar.

(6)

Ms. Shevanti N. Patkar.

(7)

Shri Prashant Mayekar.

(2) If not,what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

2. It came to be registered in this Tribunal as

Reference No. IT/18/2013.

3. The Workmen/Party I has filed their Statement

of Claim. Party II(1) has filed its Written Statement.

Party I has filed their Rejoinder. During the course of

proceedings, Party II(2) was impleaded. Party II(2) has

filed its Written Statement. Party I has filed their

Rejoinder to the Written Statement of Party II(2).

4. The case of Party I is that the workmen were

employed by Party II(1) in the Factory of the

Principal Employer, namely; G.K.B. Ophthalmics Ltd.

at Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa/Party II(2). That the

Workmen (Party I) were in continuous employment

in the said Factory. That by Resolution dated

24-03-2013, all the workmen named in the present

Order of Reference unionized themselves under the

banner of the “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”. That the 7 workmen who were actively

involved in forming the Union were arbitrarily

refused employment w.e.f. 28-03-2013. That this was

done by Party II(1) in collusion and in consultation

with Party II(2). That this was done in order to

spread fear among the other unionized workmen.

That the action of Party II(1) amounts to unfair labour

practice. That all the workmen (Party I) are

unemployed. Therefore, it is prayed that the action

of Party II(1) in refusing employment/termination of

service of all the workmen named in the present

Order of Reference be held to be illegal, unjust and

bad in law. That all the workmen named in the

Order of reference be reinstated back in service

with full back wages, continuity in service and all

other consequential benefits.

5. The case of the Party II(1) is that Party II(1)

and M/s. G.K.B. Ophthalmics Limited/Party II(2) had

entered in various Staffing Services Agreements.

That the last of such agreements were for a period

of 11 months from 02-01-2012 to 01-01-2013. That

this agreement was orally extended upto 31-03-2013.

That under these agreements, Party II(1) was

deploying trained workers to work in the Factory of

M/s. G.K.B. Opthalmics Limited/Party II(2). That

upon the termination of the agreement between

M/s. G.K.B. Opthalmics Limited/Party II(2) and

Party II(1), the workmen were instructed to report

to the Office of Party II(1) from 01-04-2013 to settle

their accounts. That the workers at Sr. No. 1, 2, 6

and 7 in the Order of Reference absented from work

w.e.f. 26-03-2013. That the Workmen (Party I) also

did not report to the Office of Party II(1) on

01-04-2013 as notified. That the Workmen (Party I)

were engaged for a specific period of a contract

which has been terminated. That Party II(1) has no

option but to terminate the workmen w.e.f.

01-04-2013. That thereafter some of the workers

listed in the Order of Reference approached Party II(1)

stating that they have secured alternate

employment and they are not interested in working

for Party II(1). That these workers have also

withdrawn their Provident Fund. It is denied that

all the workmen named in the present Order of

Reference are unionized.

6. It is denied that the Workmen (Party I) have

been refused employment because they unionized

themselves. It is denied that it amounts to unfair

labour practice. It is denied that all the workmen

(Party I) are unemployed. That the Goa Trade and

Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus standi to

raise a dispute regarding the 7 workmen named in

the Order of Reference. That Party I are not entitled

to any relief.

7. Party I has stated in their Rejoinder to the

Written Statement of Party II(1) that none of the

workmen have obtained alternate employment and

none of them have withdrawn their Provident Fund.

It is denied that the workmen were employed for a

specific period of a contract which has been

terminated. It is denied that all the workmen were

instructed to report to the Office of Party II(1) from

01-04-2013 to settle their accounts as the work for

which the workmen were recruited had come to an

end. It is denied that the workmen at Sr. No. 1, 2,

6 and 7 in the Order of Reference absented from

work w.e.f. 26-03-2013. It is denied that the Goa

Trade & Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus

standi to raise a dispute on behalf of the 7 workmen

named in the Order of Reference. Therefore, it is

prayed that the reliefs sought in the Claim

Statement be granted.

8. Party II(2) has filed its Written Statement. Party

II(2) states that it has its Factory at Tivim Industrial

Estate, Mapusa-Goa. That Party II(2) has permanent

698

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

employees doing skilled and unskilled jobs. That

Party II(2) also engages contractors for doing certain

specific jobs. That one such contractor was Party II(1).

That Party II(2) and Party II(1) entered into a contract.

That the contract was for a period of 11 months

from 02-01-2012 to 01-01-2013 which was orally

extended upto 31-03-2013.

9. That the performance of Party II(1) was

unsatisfactory. That Party II(2) issued letter dated

01-03-2013 and terminated the contract with Party II(1)

with effect from 31-03-2013. That Party II(1) was

performing the contract by engaging its own

workers. That Party II(2) was not concerned with

the workmen of Party II(1). That on the termination

of the contract, Party II(1) withdrew its workmen

from the Factory premises. It is denied that Party I

was in continuous employment of Party II(1) and

Party II(2). It is denied that Party I were terminated

from service because they were organizing

themselves under a trade union. It is stated by

Party II(2) (in Para 3 of the Written Statement) that

the Order impleading Party II(2) is due to

misappreciation of fact and law and the said Order

and consequent summons are liable to be recalled.

In Paras 4(a) to (h) of the Written Statement, Party II(2)

states that Party II(2) is neither a necessary nor a

proper Party. That there is no employer-employee

relationship between Party II(2) and Party I. That

the relationship between Party II(2) and Party II(1)

was that of a Contractor and Principal Employer.

That the contract has been terminated with effect

from 31-03-2013. That all the workmen have settled

the matter with Party II(1) and have also withdrawn

their Provident Fund. That Goa Trade and

Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus standi to

espouse the claims of the Party I (Workmen).

Therefore, it is prayed that it be held that

impleading Party II(2) to these proceedings is bad-

-in-law and is not necessary to decide this reference.

10. In their Rejoinder to the Written Statement of

Party II(2), Party I denies that impleadment of

Party II(2) is due to misappreciation of facts and

law and is liable to be recalled. It is denied that

Party II(2) is neither a necessary nor a proper Party.

It is denied that there is no employer-employee

relationship between Party II(2) and Party I. It is

denied that the contract between Party II(2) and

Party II(1) has been terminated with effect from

31-03-2013. It is denied that all the workmen have

settled the matter with Party II(1) and have also

withdrawn their Provident Fund. It is denied that

the Goa Trade and Commercial Workers’ Union have

no locus standi to espouse the claim of Party I. It is

denied that Party I are not entitled to any relief.

10. The following issues and additional issues

were framed by this Tribunal:-

ISSUES

1. Whether the Party I/workmen prove that they

were in continuous employment of Party II(1)

in the Factory of the Principal Employer GKB

Ophthalmics Ltd. at Karaswada, Mapusa, Goa?

2. Whether the Party I proves that they have

been refused employment by Party II(1) in

collusion and in consultation with the

Principal Employer M/s. GKB Ophthalmics Ltd.

with malice and malafide intention in order to

take revenge on them for unionizing

themselves under the Registered Trade Union

w.e.f. 26-03-2013?

3. Whether the Party II(1) proves that Goa Trade

and Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus

standi to raise this dispute?

4. Whether the Party II(1) proves that no dispute

was raised against them by Party I or any of

the workmen mentioned in the order of

reference?

5. What relief? What Award?

Additional Issues:

4A. Whether the Party II(2) proves that impleading

the Party II(2) is due to misappreciation of

facts and/or law as contended in para 3 of the

Written Statement of Party II(2)?

4B.Whether the Party II(2) proves that the

reference is not maintainable as against the

Party II(2) and the order impleading the

Party II(2) is liable to be recalled/withdrawn

on the grounds (a) to (h) of said para 4?

12. During the course of proceedings, Party I and

Party II(1) have filed the following Terms of

Settlement (Exhibit 45 Colly):-

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT

I. The Parties agree that since the contract of

Contractor was terminated w.e.f. 01-04-2013

and that the workmen were not willing to

accept the job elsewhere, the workmen do not

press for reinstatement with the Party II(1) and/

/or Party II(2).

II. It is further agreed between the Parties that all

the workmen who are parties to the references

No. IT/13/2013; IT/17/2013 and IT/18/2013 shall

be paid a consolidated amount of Rs. 15,000/-

per worker in full and final settlement of all their

claims.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

699

III. The workmen agree to permit deduction of

Rs. 445/- each from the gross amount payable

to each workperson and pay the said deducted

amount towards Union fund on or before

31-08-2023 and the Cheque will be drawn in

favour of “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”, Panaji, Goa, by the Contractor, Ananaya

Manpower Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

IV. It is agreed between the Parties that the amount

payable by the Contractor to the workmen in

the manner hereinabove provided for are in full

and final settlement and satisfaction of all the

claims of the workmen against the Contractor

including claims for compensation for loss of

office or otherwise whatsoever.

V. The Parties agree that these consent terms shall

be filed in pending Reference No. IT/13/2013;

IT/17/2013 and IT/18/2013 for Award in terms

of this settlement.

VI. The Management of Contractor shall pay the

amount agreed, after deducting the Union

fund, to the workmen directly as and when they

approach the Contractor against a valid receipt.

13. Party I and Party II(1) have filed an application

stating that an Award be passed in terms of the

settlement.

14. I have gone through the records of the case and

the Memorandum of Settlement at Exhibit 45 Colly

and I am convinced that the Memorandum of

Settlement are just and fair and are in the interest of

the Workmen/Party I and the Employer/Party II(1) and

therefore the same are accepted.

Hence I pass the following:-

ORDER

(i) The reference in IT/18/2013 stands awarded

as per the Terms of Settlement filed by them at

Exhibit 45 Colly.

(ii) The Terms of Settlement are as follows:-

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT

I. The Parties agree that since the contract of

Contractor was terminated w.e.f. 01-04-2013

and that the workmen were not willing to

accept the job elsewhere, the workmen do not

press for reinstatement with the Party II(1) and/

/or Party II(2).

II. It is further agreed between the Parties that all

the workmen who are parties to the references

No. IT/13/2013; IT/17/2013 and IT/18/2013 shall

be paid a consolidated amount of Rs. 15,000/-

per worker in full and final settlement of all their

claims.

III. The workmen agree to permit deduction of

Rs. 445/- each from the gross amount payable

to each workperson and pay the said deducted

amount towards Union fund on or before

31-08-2023 and the Cheque will be drawn in

favour of “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”, Panaji, Goa, by the Contractor, Ananaya

Manpower Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

IV. It is agreed between the Parties that the amount

payable by the Contractor to the workmen in

the manner hereinabove provided for are in full

and final settlement and satisfaction of all the

claims of the workmen against the Contractor

including claims for compensation for loss of

office or otherwise whatsoever.

V. The Parties agree that these consent terms shall

be filed in pending Reference No. IT/13/2013;

IT/17/2013 and IT/18/2013 for Award in terms

of this settlement.

VI. The Management of Contractor shall pay the

amount agreed, after deducting the Union

fund, to the workmen directly as and when they

approach the Contractor against a valid receipt.

(iii) No orders as to costs.

(iv) Inform Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Anil Scaria)

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal and

Labour Court.

——————

Department of Personnel

–––

Order

No. 6/16/2013-PER/Part/3685

Read: 1. Order No. 6/16/2013-PER/Part dated

21-04-2017.

2. Order No. 6/16/2013-PER/Part/431 dated

06-02-2020.

Whereas, on the recommendation of Departmental

Promotion Committee as conveyed by the Goa

Public Service Commission vide its letter No. COM/

/II/11/42(1)/2016/573 dated 19-04-2017 & letter

No. COM/II/11/42(1)/2019/338 dated 31-01-2020,

23 Officers holding the posts included in Schedule-II

of the Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016, were promoted

to Junior Scale of Goa Civil Service, Group ‘A’

Gazetted, in the Level 10 of the Pay Matrix vide

Orders read in the preamble;

700

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

And whereas, Shri Chandrakant B. Shetkar, one

of the Officer holding the post included in Schedule II

of the Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016 was also

considered by the D. P. C. for promotion to Junior

Scale of Goa Civil Service, but the findings of D. P. C.

were kept in sealed cover;

And whereas, the Directorate of Vigilance has

informed that no disciplinary proceedings are

pending against Shri Shetkar;

And whereas, the proposal was referred to the

Commission to open the sealed cover;

Now therefore, on the recommendation of the

Departmental Promotion Committee conveyed by

the Goa Public Service Commission vide its letter

No. COM/II/11/42(1)/2023/265 dated 01-09-2023, the

Governor of Goa is pleased to promote and appoint

Shri Chandrakant B. Shetkar to Junior Scale of Goa

Civil Service, Group ‘A’ Gazetted under Rule 17 of

the Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016 read with Rule 8 (b)

of the said Rules in Level 10 of the C.C.S. Revised

Pay Rules, 2016 w.e.f. 21-04-2017 and place him

below Shri Sudin Natu and above Shri S. P. Signapurkar

in the order read in preamble.

Shri Chandrakant B. Shetkar shall be on

probation for a period of two years with effect from

21-04-2017.

He shall exercise option for pay fixation in the

promotional grade in terms of provisions of

F.R. 22 (1)a(1) within a period of one month from the

date of issue of the order.

The option once exercised shall be final. He shall

be entitled for all the consequential benefits

enjoyed by his juniors promoted vide orders read in

the preamble.

Shri Chandrakant B. Shetkar shall continue in

the present posting, until further orders.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 15th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 22/10/2018-PER/3686

Read: Order No. 14020/01/2023-UTS.I dated

08-06-2023 issued by the Ministry of Home

Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi.

The Governor of Goa is pleased to relieve

Shri S. M. Prabhudessai, IPS, Principal, Police

Training School, Valpoi, from the State

Administration with effect from 15-09-2023 (a.n.) in

order to join his place of posting at Arunachal

Pradesh.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-II)/

/Link.

Porvorim, 15th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 15/18/2003-PER(Part-II)/3691

Read: Order No. 15/2/2019-PER/3575 dated

05-09-2023.

Sanction of the Government is hereby accorded

to depute the following Officers in the cadre of

Block Development Officers appointed vide order

read in preamble and on probation, for

Departmental training to be conducted at the Goa

Institute of Public Administration and Rural

Development, Ella Farm, Old Goa for 15 days with

effect from 25-09-2023 to 12-10-2023:-

1. Shri Emanuel Antonio Simao Da Costa.

2. Shri Omkar Naresh Manjrekar.

3. Shri Shubham Sadashiv Bhartu.

4. Shri Adarsh Jivottam Dessai.

5. Kum. Meeksha Nagesh Naik.

6. Shri Pranit Satyavan Naik.

7. Kum. Megna Budo Gavde.

8. Shri Savio Carvalho.

9. Shri Noel Gervasio Tavares.

The timings of the training shall be as specified

by the GIPARD. The officers shall report to

Ms. Seema Fernandes, Assistant Director, GIPARD

at 9.00 a.m. on 25-09-2023.

Instructions to the probationers trainees:

1. The trainee shall abide by the instructions

issued by GIPARD from time to time during the

period of training.

2. Punctuality during the entire course,

discipline and decorum in the Institute as well

as during study visits, etc. shall be maintained

by the trainees.

3. Every trainee shall maintain a daily diary,

compulsorily.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

701

4. No errant behavior, on part of the trainee, shall

be tolerated during the training and if

such behaviour is noticed deemed fit action

shall be initiated against the trainee.

5. No leave shall be granted during the period of

training except in unavoidable circumstances.

Absence from training will have to be justified

in writing.

6. Attendance of the trainee for the entire

training programme is compulsory.

7. All trainees shall be under the control of the

Goa Institute of Public Administration and

Rural Development during the entire training

period.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 15th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 5/23/2022-PER/3712

On the recommendation of the Goa Services

Board, the Governor of Goa is pleased to order

transfer of the following Junior Scale Officer of Goa

Civil Service, in public interest, with immediate

effect:-

Sr.

Name of the Officer

Posted as

No.

& present post

1. Shri Amitesh Shirvoikar,

Under Secretary,

Chief Officer, Mapusa

Goa Staff Selection

Municipal Council

Commission.

Shri Chandrakant B. Shetkar, SLAO (PWD) holding

additional charge of SLAO, National Highway shall

also hold the charge of Chief Officer, Mapusa

Municipal Council in addition to his own duties

until further orders.

The officer appointed on ex-cadre deputation

post shall be governed by the standard terms of

deputation, as amended from time to time.

The officers shall complete handing over and

taking over process with immediate effect and

submit compliance.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 25th September, 2023.

Notification

No. 7/17/2022-PER/3687

Read: 1. Notification No. 7/17/2022-PER/4036

dated 05-12-2022.

2. Notification No. 7/27/2022-PER/781 dated

21-03-2023.

3. Notification No. 7/17/2022-PER/1100

dated 18-04-2023.

4. Notification No. 7/17/2022-PER/3388

dated 14-08-2023.

In partial modification to the Notifications read

in the preamble, the Governor of Goa is pleased to

order allocation of work/Departments amongst the

following Secretaries to the Government, with

immediate effect:-

Sr.

Name & Designation

Department

No.

Shri Subhash Chandra,

1. Water Resources.

IAS (2009)

2. Social Welfare.

Secretary (Water

3. Provedoria.

Resources)

4. Information &

Publicity.

5. Transport.

6. Housing.

Shri Sanjit Rodrigues,

1. Civil Supplies.

IAS (2013)

2. Legal Metrology.

Secretary (Civil Supplies)

3. Printing & Stationery.

4. Factories & Boilers.

5. Protocol.

6. Secretary, Goa State

Commission for

Protection of Child

Rights.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 15th September, 2023.

————

Addendum

No. 22/1/2023-PER(I)/3716

Read: (1)

Order No. 22/1/2023-PER(I)/3519 dated

30-08-2023.

(2)

Addendum No. 22/1/2023-PER(I)/3600

dated 07-09-2023.

In the Government Order read at preamble, the

following para shall be added as last para:-

702

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 26

28TH SEPTEMBER, 2023

“The above promotions shall also be subject to

the outcome of Writ Petition No. 758 of 2023 (F) filed

in Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa, Porvorim”.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 25th September, 2023.

——————

Department of Public Health

–––

Order

No. 38/14/2023-I/PHD/Misc. Matters/Part/1321

Read:

Government Order No. 38/14/2023-I/PHD/

/Misc. Matters/Part/1170 dated 18-08-2023.

Government of Goa is pleased to re-constitute

the following Committee to review the present

Scheme/Insurance under Health Department:-

1. Secretary (Health)

—

Chairman.

Secretary to the Chief Minister —

Member.

3. Shri Prafull Dalal

—

Co-opted

Member.

Additional Secretary (Finance) —

Member.

5. Additional Secretary (Health)

—

Member.

6. Director, Director of Health

—

Member.

Services

7. Under Secretary (Health-II)

—

Member

Secretary.

8. Dean, Goa Medical College,

—

As expert.

Bambolim

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 15th September, 2023.

Order

No. 4/12/2022-II/PHD/1457

Read:

Memorandum No. 4/12/2022-II/PHD/1398

dated 05-09-2023.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service

Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/

/I/5/30(37)/2023/242 dated 16-08-2023, Government

is pleased to appoint Shri Vivek Prabhakar

Vajaratkar to the post of Associate Professor in

Occupational Therapy (Group “A” Gazetted) in

Allied Health Science Courses in Goa Medical

College & Hospital, Bambolim-Goa in Level-11 of

Pay Matrix [Pay Band-3 Rs. 15,600-39,100 + G.P.

Rs. 6,600/- (pre-revised)] with immediate effect.

Shri Vivek Prabhakar Vajaratkar shall be on

probation for a period of two years.

Shri Vivek Prabhakar Vajaratkar has been

medically examined by the Medical Board and his

character and antecedents have been verified by

the District Magistrate, North Goa District, Panaji-Goa

at the time of appointment as Lecturer in

Occupational Therapy, in Allied Health Science

Courses in Goa Medical College & Hospital,

Bambolim.

The appointment is made against the vacancy

occurred due to creation of post of Associate

Professor in Goa Medical College & Hospital,

Bambolim vide Order No. 4/1/2018-II/PHD/1195

dated 14-08-2019 and allotted 01 post of Associate

Professor in Occupational Therapy, Allied Health

Science Courses, in Goa Medical College & Hospital,

Bambolim-Goa vide order No. 4/1/2018-II/PHD/

/Part-I/3383 dated 23-10-2020.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health)/Link.

Porvorim, 15th September, 2023.

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 14.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—231/80—09/2023.