SERIES II No. 27

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-2023

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Agriculture

Directorate of Agriculture

–––

Order

No. 2/14/95/Agri(Part)Vol.II/1061

Government is pleased to order the transfer of the following Assistant Agriculture Officers, Group ‘B’

Gazetted of this Directorate as indicated below against their names with immediate effect:

Sr.

Name of the

Place of

No.

Officer

present posting

posting on transfer

Kum. Jovita Rosada Siqueira

Zonal Agriculture Office, Margao

Zonal Agriculture Office,

Quepem, against the vacant

post under the B.H.: 2401-00-

-001-02-01 Salaries.

Shri Nilesh alias Madhavrao

Farm Superintendent Office,

Zonal Agriculture Office,

Daulatrao Khanvilkar

Kalay, Sanguem

Margao, vice Kum. Jovita

Rosada Siqueira transferred.

This is issued with approval of Government vide entry No. 1386 dated 31-08-2023.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Nevil Alphonso, Director (Agriculture) & ex officio Jt. Secretary.

Tonca, Caranzalem, 3rd October, 2023.

——————

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies

–––

Notification

In exercise of the powers vested in me under Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001,

“Jardim Tropical Co-operative Housing Maintenance Society Ltd., Survey No. 2 sub-division No. 11, Sangolda,

Bardez, Goa, Pin 403114”-Goa is registered under code symbol No. RCSNZ2023240036.

Harish S. Naik, Asst. Registrar (Co-operative Societies), North Zone.

Mapusa, 11th September, 2023.

Panaji, 5th October, 2023 (Asvina 13, 1945)

703

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

704

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

Certificate of Registration

“Jardim Tropical Co-operative Housing

Maintenance Society Ltd., Survey No. 2 sub-division

No. 11, Sangolda, Bardez, Goa, Pin 403114”-Goa has

been registered on 11-09-2023 and its bears

registration code symbol No. RCSNZ2023240036 and

its classified as “Co-operative Housing Society”

under

sub-classification

“No.

7-(d)-

-Co-operative Housing Maintenance Society” in

terms of Rule 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies

Rules, 2003.

Harish S. Naik, Asst. Registrar (Co-operative

Societies), North Zone.

Mapusa, 11th September, 2023.

—–––––—

Notification

In exercise of the powers vested in me under

Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act,

2001, “Jewel Countryside Co-operative Housing

Maintenance Society Ltd., Near Thivim Rly. Station,

Sircaim, Bardez-Goa”-Goa is registered under code

symbol No. RCSNZ2023240037.

Harish S. Naik, Asst. Registrar (Co-operative

Societies), North Zone.

Mapusa, 14th September, 2023.

Certificate of Registration

“Jewel Countryside Co-operative Housing

Maintenance Society Ltd., Near Thivim Rly. Station,

Sircaim, Bardez-Goa”-Goa has been registered on

14-09-2023 and its bears registration code symbol

No. RCSNZ2023240037 and its classified as

“Co-operative Housing Society” under sub-

-classification “No. 7-(d)-Co-operative Housing

Maintenance Society” in terms of Rule 8 of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003.

Harish S. Naik, Asst. Registrar (Co-operative

Societies), North Zone.

Mapusa, 14th September, 2023.

——————

Department of Education, Art & Culture

Directorate of Higher Education

–––

Notification

No. 7/32/91-EDN/MISC/535/8455

In exercise of the powers conferred by Statute

SC-7 of the Goa University Statutes and in

consultation with the Goa University, the

Government of Goa is pleased to constitute the

College Tribunal, State of Goa with Ms. Dvijple V.

Patkar, President, Administrative Tribunal, Panaji--Goa

as Presiding Officer for a period of five years for the

whole State of Goa for the purpose of the said

Statute.

The Notification shall come into force with effect

from the date of its publication in the Official

Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Avelina D’sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Higher

Education).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

——————

Directorate of Technical Education

College Section

–––

Order

No. 16/26/86-EDN/Vol.I/2007

Approval of the Government is hereby conveyed

to extend the tenure of Governing Committee/

/Advisory Committee of Goa College of Architecture,

Altinho, Panaji for a period of 3 months with effect

from 24-08-2023 to 23-11-2023 which was

reconstituted vide Order No. 16/26/86-EDN/Vol.I/

/1174 dated 24-08-2020.

The roles and responsibilities mentioned in the

above referred will remain unchanged.

This issues with the approval of Government vide

U. O. No. 5354/F dated 08-09-2023.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Dr. Vivek B. Kamat, Director (Technical Education)

& ex officio Addl. Secretary.

Porvorim, 21st September, 2023.

——————

Department of General Administration

–––

Notification

No. 26/1/88-GAD/3496

Government is pleased to introduce a Single File

System in the Directorate of Public Grievances,

Panaji by declaring the “Director of Public

Grievances” as “Ex-Officio Additional/Joint

Secretary to the Government”, with immediate

effect, whereby the existing Department of Public

Grievances at Secretariat shall cease to exist.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

705

Consequently, all Secretariat work shall be

handled by the Head of Department declared as

Ex-officio Additional/Joint Secretary to the

Government. All papers would originate from the

Directorate and after obtaining orders from the

Secretary/Minister, concerned papers would go

back to the Head of Department for execution.

The existing Secretariat staff i.e. Section Officer,

Assistant, Junior Assistant and MTS shall be posted

in the Directorate of Public Grievances, Panaji under

Single File System and shall be regulated under

the following terms and conditions:-

(i) The officer/officials are posted to render

Secretarial assistance to the officer who has

been declared as Ex-officio Additional/Joint

Secretary and are required to carry out

duties to assist Secretary of the respective

Department.

(ii) The officer/officials shall be under the direct

administrative control of the officer who has

been declared as Ex-officio Additional/

/Joint Secretary and shall form part of his

personal staff.

(iii) The service matters and conditions of service

shall remain unchanged and shall continue

to be controlled from General Administration

Department from the Secretariat, including

promotion, transfer, sanction of Earned

Leave, all their advances like House Building,

G.P.F., etc.

(iv) All the officer/officials shall continue to draw

their pay and allowances from the General

Administration Department.

(v) They are also liable for transfer to any other

Secretariat Departments.

This issues with the approval of the Personnel

Department, concurrence of Finance (R&C)

Department vide their U.O. No. 1466190 dated

26-08-2023 and with the approval of the Council of

the Ministers in the XXXIst meeting held on

08-09-2023 as conveyed vide letter No. 1/20/2023-

GAD-II dated 12-09-2023.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Shaila G. Bhosle, Under Secretary (GA-I).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

Department of Home

Home—General Division

–––

Order

No. 21/7/2014-HD(G)/Part-I/2581

The Government of Goa, as a mark of respect and

in order to pay homage to the “Father of the Nation”,

Mahatma Gandhi, has decided that all gaming

operations at casinos in the State of Goa will remain

closed on 02nd October, 2023.

In this regard, all the casino licensees shall stop

the operation of the casinos in the State of Goa with

effect from 00:00 hrs. of 2nd October, 2023 (i.e.

intervening midnight of 1st and 2nd October, 2023)

to 00:00 hrs. of 3rd October, 2023 (i.e. intervening

midnight of 2nd and 3rd October, 2023) i.e. for the

period of 24 hrs. on 2nd October, 2023.

The above directions shall be adhered to

scrupulously.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek K. Naik, Under Secretary (Home-I).

Porvorim, 30th September, 2023.

——————

Department of Industries

–––

Corrigendum

No. 3/22/2023-IND/208

Order No. 3/22/2023-IND/189 dated

23-08-2023.

Order No. 3/22/2023-IND/190 dated

23-08-2023.

In partial modification to the orders read in

preamble above, the expression “PM Vishwakarma

Kaushal Samman (PM-Vikas) Scheme” mentioned in

the first para may be substituted to read as “PM

Vishwakarma Scheme”.

The rest of the contents of the above referred

Orders shall remain unchanged.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Industries).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

706

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

Department of Labour

–––

Order

No. 28/13/2023-LAB/632

Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Ecoclean Systems and

Solutions, Y-1, 5th Floor, Jairam Complex, Neugi

Nagar, Panaji, Goa and it’s workperson,

Mrs. Carmelina D’Souza, Housekeeping Attendant,

in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule

hereto;

And whereas, the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for

adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of

1947), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said

dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court-II of

Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under sub-section (1)

of Section 7 of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Ecoclean Systems & Solutions, Neugi

Nagar, Panaji, Goa, in terminating the

services of Mrs. Carmelina D’Souza,

Housekeeping Attendant, with effect from

29-04-2016, is legal and justified?

(2) If not, to what relief the workperson is

entitled?

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 12th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 28/22/2023-LAB/650

Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

Limited, Plot No. S-7, Colvale Industrial Estate,

Colvale, Bardez, Goa and it’s workmen, represented

by the Glenmark Mazdoor Sangh, in respect of the

matter specified in the Schedule hereto;

And whereas, the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14

of 1947), the Government of Goa hereby refers the

said dispute for adjudication to the Industrial

Tribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under

Section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Plot

No. S-7, Colvale Industrial Estate, Colvale,

Bardez, Goa, in transferring the services of:

(1) Shri Nagaraj Desai, Officer, w.e.f. 18-01-2023.

(2) Shri Sunil Jadhav, Officer, w.e.f. 18-01-2023.

(3) Shri Sandeep Kutte, Officer, w.e.f. 19-01-2023.

(4) Shri Subodh Ghatkar, Officer, w.e.f. 18-01-2023.

(5) Shri Amit Ajgaonkar, Officer, w.e.f. 18-01-2023.

(6) Shri Upendra Kumar, Jr. Officer, w.e.f.

19-01-2023.

(7) Shri Prasad Naik, Jr. Officer, w.e.f. 19-01-2023.

(8) Shri Umesh Gunjal, Officer, w.e.f. 19-01-2023.

(9) Shri Rahul Kalgutkar, Jr. Officer, w.e.f.

20-01-2023.

(10) Shri Vivek Ukirade, Officer, w.e.f. 19-01-2023.

(11) Shri Harshad Sawant, Jr. Officer, w.e.f.

20-01-2023.

(12) Shri Mandar Kulye, Jr. Officer, w.e.f. 20-01-2023.

(13) Shri Gajanan Govanakappa, Jr. Officer,

w.e.f. 18-01-2023.

(14) Shri Ghanshyam Gunggi, Officer, w.e.f.

18-01-2023.

(15) Shri Sangram Mohantey, Jr. Officer, w.e.f.

19-01-2023.

(16) Shri Vinod Desai, Officer, w.e.f. 20-01-2023.

(17) Shri Nitin Sharma, Officer, w.e.f. 19-01-2023.

(18) Shri Manjunath M., Jr. Officer, w.e.f. 19-01-2023.

(19) Shri Sandesh Bhatkhande, Jr. Officer, w.e.f.

19-01-2023.

(20) Shri Atul Patil, Officer, w.e.f. 19-01-2023, is

legal and justified?

(2) If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to?

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

707

Order

No. 28/24/2023-LAB/651

Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Omni Impex Private Limited,

Plot No. 64, 65, Pissurlem Industrial Estate, Honda,

Sattari, Goa and it’s workmen, represented by the

Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh, in respect of the matter

specified in the Schedule hereto;

And whereas, the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14

of 1947), the Government of Goa hereby refers the

said dispute for adjudication to the Industrial

Tribunal of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under

Section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

(1) Whether the demand of the Union for

payment of 20% bonus for the years 2017-18,

2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 to the workers

employed in their factory by the management

of M/s. Omni Impex Private Limited, Pissurlem

Industrial Estate, Honda, Sattari, Goa, is legal

and justified?

(2) If not, what relief the parties are entitled to?

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 28/20/2023-LAB/652

Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

Village Panchayat Siolim Marna, Siolim, Bardez, Goa

and their workperson, Mrs. Swara S. Vaigankar,

Computer Operator, in respect of the matter

specified in the Schedule hereto;

And whereas, the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14

of 1947), the Government of Goa hereby refers the

said dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court-II

of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under sub-section (1)

of Section 7 of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

“(1) Whether the action of refusal of employment

to Mrs. Swara S. Vaigankar, Computer

Operator, by her employer Village Panchayat

Siolim Marna, Siolim, Bardez, Goa, with effect

from 02-06-2022, is legal and justified?

(2) If not, what relief the workperson is entitled to?”

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 28/25/2023-LAB/658

Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

Ltd., Plot No. S-7, Colvale Industrial Estate, Colvale,

Bardez, Goa and their workman, Shri Sunil Jadhav,

in respect of the matter specified in the Schedule

hereto;

And whereas, the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14

of 1947), the Government of Goa hereby refers the

said dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court-II of

Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under sub-section (1)

of Section 7 of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited,

Plot No. S-7, Colvale Industrial Estate, Colvale,

Bardez, Goa, in terminating the services of

Shri Sunil Jadhav, Assistant-Production, with

effect from 13-02-2023, is legal and justified?

(2) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

708

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

Order

No. 28/26/2023-LAB/663

Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Himgiri Casting Private Limited,

Kundaim Industrial Estate, Kundaim, Ponda, Goa and

it’s workmen, Shri Ratankar Gawde and 48 Others,

represented by the Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh, in

respect of the matter specified in the Schedule hereto;

And whereas, the Government of Goa considers it

expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947),

the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dispute

for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa at

Panaji-Goa, constituted under Section 7A of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Himgiri Casting Private Limited, Kundaim

Industrial Estate, Kundaim, Ponda, Goa in

deducting one day wages for the month of

September, 2022 of the following workmen, is

legal and justified?

Sr. No.

Name of the Worker

Designation

Shri Ratankar Gawde

Helper.

Shri Umakant Gawde

Helper.

Shri Sandeep S. Naik

Operator.

Shri Sandeep Phadte

Operator.

Shri Sidha T. Shet

Operator.

Shri Ankash Gawas

Operator.

Shri Gokuldas Naik

Operator.

Shri Dilip V. Sawant

Operator.

Shri Sandeep Gawde

Operator.

10.

Shri Ragunath Gawde

Worker.

11.

Shri Uday Naik

Driver.

12.

Shri Ajay Mali

Worker.

13.

Shri Sharad Sutar

Worker.

14.

Shri Phirturama Rajbhare

Worker.

15.

Shri Semal Dey

Operator.

16.

Shri Philip Etwa Kerketta

Helper.

17.

Shri Kabi Chandra Das

Operator.

18.

Shri Mariyanus Soreng

Operator.

19.

Shri Dilber Sheikh

Helper.

20.

Shri Mansaram Rajbhar

Worker.

21.

Shri Rambadan Rajbhar

Worker.

22.

Shri Supat Burma

Operator.

23.

Smt. Lata Raya Gawde

Helper.

24.

Shri Raja Gawde

Helper.

25.

Smt. Reshma Jalmi

Helper.

26.

Shri Sudhir Kumar Sahu

Operator.

27.

Shri Gaddadar Mangaraj

Operator.

28.

Shri Charan Roytray

Helper.

29.

Shri Deepak Kalmiskar

Driver.

30.

Shri Maniram Rajbhar

Worker.

31.

Shri Nityanand Srichandra

Helper.

32.

Shri Mahinnath Roy

Operator.

33.

Shri Trinath Behra

Operator.

34.

Shri Babali Jena

Operator.

35.

Shri Narayan Rautraj

Operator.

36.

Shri Prananath Jujharasingh Operator.

37.

Shri Bhola Rajbhar

Helper.

38.

Shri Ajit Dumdum

Worker.

39.

Shri Anil Rajbhar

Operator.

40.

Shri Laxman Paikaray

Helper.

41.

Shri Vijay Pawar

Machinist.

42.

Shri Dilip Kumar

Worker.

43.

Smt. Poonam Tigga

Helper.

44.

Shri Nityanand Naik

Driver.

45.

Shri Pintu Rajbhar

Worker.

46.

Shri Parmatma Rajbhr

Worker.

47.

Shri Bullete Rajbhar

Operator.

48.

Smt. Gokul Prasad

Inspector.

49.

Smt. Nalini Gawde

Helper.

(2) If answer to issue No. (1) above is negative

then what relief the workmen are entitled to?

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 28/27/2023-LAB/665

Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Marksans Pharma Limited,

Plot No. L-82, L-83, Verna Industrial Estate, Verna,

Goa and it’s workmen, represented by Goa Trade and

Commercial Workers’ Union, in respect of the matter

specified in the Schedule hereto;

And whereas, the Government of Goa considers it

expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

709

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred

by Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947),

the Government of Goa hereby refers the said dispute

for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal of Goa at

Panaji-Goa, constituted under Section 7A of the said

Act.

S C H E D U L E

(1) Whether the action of the Management of

M/s. Marksans Pharma Limited, Plot No. L-82,

L-83, Verna Industrial Estate, Verna, Goa, in not

conceding the following Demands raised by

the President, Goa Trade and Commercial

Workers’ Union, Velho’s Building, 2nd Floor,

Opp. Municipal Garden, Panaji, Goa, is legal

and justified?

Demand No. 1: Flat Rise and Basic Salary:

That the basic salary as well as the Special

Allowance as existing on 31-08-2022 be added up

with effect from 01-09-2022 and each worker be paid

an additional Flat increase of Rs. 5,000/- per month

which together will form the fresh basic salary to be

placed and fitted in the respective Pay-Scales as given

below w.e.f. 01-09-2022.

Demand No. 2: Pay Scales and Grades:

After due deliberations we have arrived at the

conclusion that it is necessary to implement three

(3) simple grades and pay scales wherein the workers

will be placed as per their capability, qualification,

years of services and ability. These Pay-Scales are

elucidated as below and the annual increment will

be payable as on 1st September every year:

GRADE

PAY-SCALES

W -1

30,000-900-34,500-1,120-40,100-1,405-47,125.

W - 2

32,500-1,140-38,200-1,450-45,450-1,820-54,560.

W- 3

35,000-1,400-42,000-1,900-51,500-2,575-64,375.

In the event an employee crosses the threshold of

the respective pay-scale, he shall be eligible to the

last drawn increment every year.

Demand No. 3: House Rent Allowance:

That each worker be eligible to House Rent

Allowance (HRA) @ 50% on the new Basic salary with

effect from 01-09-2022.

Demand No. 4: Conveyance Allowance:

That each worker be paid a Conveyance

Allowance of 15% on the new Basic Salary with effect

from 01-09-2022.

Demand No. 5: Special Senority Weightage

Increment:

That with effect from 01-09-2022, those workers

who have completed 10 years or more of service shall

be paid a Special Seniority Weightage of Rs. 2,500/-

per month which shall be eligible for all direct and

indirect benefits such as PF, Overtime, ESIC, Gratuity

etc.

Demand No. 6: Variable Dearness Allowance

(VDA):

That with effect from 01-09-2022 each worker be

paid a Variable Dearness Allowance (VDA) @ Rs. 2.50/-

per point rise over and above the base 8000 points

AAICPI (1960=100). The Variable Dearness Allowance

(VDA) should be revised once in every quarter.

Demand No. 7: Medical Allowance and Insurance:

That with effect from 01-09-2022 each worker be

paid a Medical Allowance and Insurance in the

following manner:

(a) Medical Allowance: That with effect from

01-09-2022 all the workmen who are out of ESIS

coverage ought to be paid Medical Allowance

@ 5% on the gross salary. (Basic + FDA+ VDA).

(b) Incase a worker or his family members need to

undergo special hospital care all the expenses

shall be reimbursed and be paid for by the

Company. To meet this objective, the company

may work-out a Contributory Mediclaim

Insurance Policy.

of employment” the company shall ensurefull

treatment with paid leave till he/she recovers.

(d) Each employee should be insured on a 24 -

- hours basis to the extent of Rs. 5 Lakhs (Five

Lakhs).

(e) That Medical Insurance for those workers out

of ESIS should fully cover the entire family.

(f) That the Management should pay to each

worker in Marksans Pharma an amount

equivalent to Rs.1,000/- per month towards

reimbursement of Medical Expenses (RME).

Demand No. 8: Leave Travel Allowance (LTA):

That with effect from 01-09-2022 each worker shall

be entitled to Leave Travel Allowance at the rate of

Rs. 20,000/- per annum.

710

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

Demand No. 9: Shift Allowance Snacks and Tea:

(i) That w.e.f. 01-09-2022 each workperson be paid

a Shift Allowance on the following basis:

2nd Shift – Rs. 75/- per shift.

3rd Shift – Rs. 100/- per shift.

(ii) Those who work in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd shift

should be provided with snacks and tea.

Demand No. 10: Loan Facilities:

That each workperson should be entitled to an

interest–free loan of Rs. 2 Lakhs(Two Lakhs) for the

construction of house, purchase of plot, higher

education of children, his/her marriage, marriage of

the children. This loan ought to be recovered in 50-equal

installments. In case the loan remains unrecovered

due to retirement, death, it should be recovered from

the final dues payable to the workman.

Demand No. 11: Leave Facilities:

We demand the following Leave Facilities:

(a) Privilege Leave

… 30 days per annum to be

accumulated for a period

of 150 days as at present.

(b) Casual Leave

… 12 days per annum.

… 15 days per annum to be

accumulated for 30 days.

Those workers who are

outside th ESIS coverage

should be eligible to 20

days sick leave.

(d) Holidays

… 14 days per annum. The

list of holidays must be

f i n a l i z e d b y t h e

Management/Union at

the beginning of every

Calendar year.

Restricted Holidays:

4 restricted holidays in

a year.

(e) Special Sick Leave … 15 days in addition to

those workmen who are

outside the purview of

ESIS Facility.

(f) Leave Facilities to probationers:

The Probationers should be eligible to Casual and

Sick –Leave during the probationary period.

Demand No. 12: Canteen facility and Lunch

Allowance:

(i) That the Company should provide a well-

-furnished fullfledged free canteen facility in

the premises of the company. It is further

demanded that the food provided in the

canteen should be vegetarian as well as non-

-vegetarian. The Management and the Union

should elect a “Managing Committee”

consisting of atleast 10 members that is (5) five

from the Union and (5) five from the

Management and the elected Committee

should finalise the MENU of the company and

also oversee the overall administration of the

canteen.

(ii) Food Subsidy:

That the Management should bear 70% of food

charges, whereas the workers be required to pay 30%

on food and snacks, tea should be free.

Demand No. 13: Rainwear and Safety Shoes:

That the workers should be issued Raincoat (pant

and Shirt) every year in the month of May and a pair

of gum-boots and one pair of footwear per year. OR,

in the alternative, Rs. 1,000/- per year.

Demand No. 14: Bonus:

That each worker should be eligible to 20% Bonus

on the Basic+VDA without any ceiling.

Demand No. 15: Provident Fund:

That the Management should contribute 12%

Provident Fund on the Basic+VDA every month. The

present system is of PF deduction exclusively from

workers salaries towards Provident Fund should stop

forthwith.

Demand No. 16: Annual Picnic:-

That the company should provide free food/free

transport and beverages to all the workmen

attending the picnic to all parts of Goa.

Demand No. 17: Retirement Age:

(i) That the age of retirement/superannuation be

kept/pegged at 60-years.

(ii) Retirement Gifts:

When a worker retires from service, he should

be presented with a 20gms of Gold Coin on

behalf of the Company.

In the alternative, every worker who retires be

paid two months gross salary as retirement gift.

Demand No. 18: Gratuity:-

That the management should pay Gratuity at the

rate of 30 days per every year of service.

Demand No. 19: Overtime:

(a) That as and when a worker is required to work

on overtime on Sunday/Holidays/Weekly-off

days, he should be paid double the rate of

wages viz. Basic+VDA with a paid

compensatory-Off which should be allowed

to be availed by the worker within 10 days of

such work.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

711

(b) In case the management is unable to give a

paid off due to exigencies of work, the

workman should be allowed to accumulate the

said paid off.

of duty due to exigencies of work, he shall be

paid Overtime as above and be given a paid

compensatory off consequently.

(d) The workers demand that the weekly-off for

all should be on Sundays.

Demand No. 20: Soap and Napkins:

Soaps and Napkins to be made available in the

factory for hand-wash at all times (as and when

required).

Demand No. 21: Practices/Privileges and existing

facilities:

Those practices, privileges and existing facilities

which have not been expressly provided in the

Charter of Demands/Settlement but which are not

being accorded or may in future be accorded to the

employees shall not be discontinued.

Demand No. 22: Period of Settlement:

That the period of Settlement shall be for three

years effective from 01-09-2022 to 31-08-2025.

Demand No. 23: Interim Relief:

The Union demands that should discussions on

the Charter of Demands prolong beyond two months

from the date of its receipt-each of the workers

employed in Marksans Pharma Limited shall be paid

an Interim-Relief @ Rs. 10,000/- per month with effect

from 01-09-2022.

(2) If answer to issue No. (1) above is negative

then what relief the workmen are entitled to?

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 28/19/2023-LAB/666

Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

Limited, Plot No. S-7, Colvale Industrial Estate,

Colvale, Bardez, Goa and it’s workman, Shri Amit

Ajgaonkar, in respect of the matter specified in the

Schedule hereto;

And whereas, the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14

of 1947), the Government of Goa hereby refers the

said dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court-II

of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under sub-section (1)

of Section 7 of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited,

Plot No. S-7, Colvale Industrial Estate,

Colvale, Bardez, Goa, in terminating the

services of Shri Amit Ajgaonkar, Assistant-

-Production, with effect from 13-02-2023, is

legal and justified?

(2) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

—–––––—

Order

No. 28/21/2023-LAB/667

Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion

that an industrial dispute exists between the

management of M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

Limited, Plot No. S-7, Colvale Industrial Estate,

Colvale, Bardez, Goa and it’s workman, Shri Umesh

Gunjal, in respect of the matter specified in the

Schedule hereto;

And whereas, the Government of Goa considers

it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers

conferred by Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14

of 1947), the Government of Goa hereby refers the

said dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court-II

of Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under sub-section (1)

of Section 7 of the said Act.

SCHEDULE

“(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited,

712

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

Plot No. S-7, Colvale Industrial Estate,Colvale, Bardez, Goa, in terminating the services of Shri Umesh Gunjal,

Assistant-Production, with effect from 13-02-2023, is legal and justified?

(2)

If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?”

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 24/4/2011-Lab-ESI (Vol.I)/671

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service Commission conveyed vide their letter No. COM/II/

/12/28(1)/2023/291 dated 15-09-2023, Government is pleased to declare satisfactory completion of probation

period as well as confirmation of the following Specialist/Doctor in E.S.I. Scheme, under the Office of the

Commissioner, Labour & Employment with effect from the date of her completion of probation period:

Sr.

Name of the

Designation

Date of

Date of completion

No.

Official

regular appointment

of probation period

Dr. Karishma Ashok

Junior Pathologist

08-05-2020

07-05-2022.

Korgaonker

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

————

Notification

No. 28/02/2023-LAB/Part-II/654

The following Award passed by the Industrial

Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on

05-09-2023 in Ref. No. IT/12/2013 is hereby

published as required under Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of

1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

––––

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

AND LABOUR COURT

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Mr. Anil Scaria, Hon’ble Presiding Officer)

Ref. No. IT/12/2013

Shri Shankar S. Kerkar & 7 Others,

Rep. by the President,

Goa Trade and Commercial

Worker’s Union,

Panaji-Goa

..… Workmen/Party I.

V/s

1. M/s. Mahamaya,

Shop No. 8-B, Kamat Towers,

EDC Complex, Patto,

Panaji-Goa

…. Employer/Party II(1).

2. M/s. G. K. B. Ophthalmics Ltd.,

16-A, Thivim Industrial Estate,

Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa

…. Party II(2).

Workmen/Party-I represented by Learned Advocate

Shri Suhaas Naik.

Employer/Party-II(1) represented by Learned Adv.

Shri P. J. Kamat.

Employer/Party II(2) represented by Learned Adv.

Shri A. V. Nigalye.

AWARD

(Delivered on this the 5th day of the month of

September of the year 2023)

By Order dated 09-07-2013, bearing No. 28/31/

/2013-Lab/473, the Government of Goa in exercise of

powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, has referred the following

dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

“(1) Whether the action of the Management of M/s.

Mahamaya, Panaji a contractor to M/s. G. K. B.

Ophthalmics Limited, Thivim Industrial Estate,

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

713

Karaswada, Mapusa, Goa, in terminating the

services of the following eight workmen, with

effect from 26-03-2013, is legal and justified?

(1) Shri Shankar S. Kerkar.

(2) Shri Sachin N. Patkar.

(3) Shri Girish Mayekar.

(4) Shri Yogeh Govekar.

(5) Shri Pravin Rawool.

(6) Shri Deepak Rawool.

(7) Shri Girish Shirodkar.

(8) Shri Narendra Mayekar.

(2) If not,what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

2. It came to be registered in this Tribunal as

Reference No. IT/12/2013.

3. The Workmen/Party I has filed their Statement

of Claim. Party II(1) has filed its Written Statement.

Party I has filed their Rejoinder. During the course of

proceedings, Party II(2) was impleaded. Party II(2) has

filed its Written Statement. Party I has filed their

Rejoinder to the Written Statement of Party II(2).

4. The case of Party I is that the workmen were

employed by Party II(1) in the Factory of the Principal

Employer, namely; G.K.B. Ophthalmics Ltd. at

Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa/Party II(2). That the

Workmen (Party I) were in continuous employment

in the said Factory. That by Resolution dated

24-03-2013, all the workmen named in the present

Order of Reference unionized themselves under the

banner of the “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”. That the 8 workmen who were actively

involved in forming the Union were arbitrarily

refused employment w.e.f. 26-03-2013. That this was

done by Party II(1) in collusion and in consultation

with Party II(2). That this was done in order to spread

fear among the other unionized workmen. That the

action of Party II(1) amounts to unfair labour practice.

That all the workmen (Party I) are unemployed. That

after terminating the services of Party I, Party II(1)

has recruited new workmen. Therefore, it is prayed

that the action of Party II(1) in refusing employment/

/termination of service of all the workmen named in

the present Order of Reference be held to be illegal,

unjust and bad in law. That all the workmen named

in the Order of reference be reinstated back in service

with full back wages, continuity in service and all

other consequential benefits.

5. The case of the Party II(1) is that Party II(1) and

M/s. G.K.B. Ophthalmics Limited/Party II(2) had

entered in various Staffing Services Agreements.

That the last of such agreements were for a period of

11 months from 02-01-2012 to 01-01-2013. That this

agreement was orally extended upto 31-03-2013.

That under these agreements, Party II(1) was

deploying trained workers to work in the Factory of

M/s. G.K.B. Opthalmics Limited/Party II(2). That upon

the termination of the agreement between M/s. G.K.B.

Opthalmics Limited/Party II(2) and Party II(1), the

workmen were instructed to report to the Office of

Party II(1) from 01-04-2013 to settle their accounts.

That the workers in the Order of Reference absented

from work w.e.f. 26-03-2013. That the Workmen (Party I)

also did not report to the Office of Party II(1) on 01-04-2013

as notified. That the Workmen (Party I) were engaged

for a specific period of a contract which has been

terminated. That Party II(1)has no option but to

terminate the workmen w.e.f. 01-04-2013. It is denied

that Party II(1) has recruited new workmen. That

these workers have withdrawn their Provident Fund.

It is denied that all the workmen named in the present

Order of Reference are unionized.

6. It is denied that the Workmen(Party I) have been

refused employment because they unionized

themselves. It is denied that it amounts to unfair

labour practice. It is denied that all the workmen

(Party I) are unemployed. That the Goa Trade and

Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus standi to

raise a dispute regarding the 8 workmen named in

the Order of Reference. That Party I are not entitled

to any relief.

7. Party I has stated in their Rejoinder to the

Written Statement of Party II(1) that none of the

workmen have withdrawn their Provident Fund. It is

denied that the workmen were employed for a

specific period of a contract which has been

terminated. It is denied that all the workmen were

instructed to report to the Office of Party II(1) from

01-04-2013 to settle their accounts as the work for

which the workmen were recruited had come to an

end. It is denied that the workmen in the Order of

Reference absented from work w.e.f. 26-03-2013. It is

denied that the Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union has no locus standi to raise a dispute on behalf

of the 8 workmen named in the Order of Reference.

Therefore, it is prayed that the reliefs sought in the

Claim Statement be granted.

8. Party II(2) has filed its Written Statement.

Party II(2) states that it has its Factory at Tivim

Industrial Estate, Mapusa-Goa. That Party II(2) has

permanent employees doing skilled and unskilled

jobs. That Party II(2) also engages contractors for

doing certain specific jobs. That one such contractor

was Party II(1). That Party II(2) and Party II(1) entered

714

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

into a contract. That the contract was for a period of

11 months from 02-01-2012 to 01-01-2013 which was

orally extended upto 31-03-2013.

9. That the performance of Party II(1) was

unsatisfactory. That Party II(2) issued letter dated

01-03-2013 and terminated the contract with Party

II(1) with effect from 31-03-2013. That Party II(1) was

performing the contract by engaging its own

workers. That Party II(2) was not concerned with the

workmen of Party II(1). That on the termination of the

contract, Party II(1) withdrew its workmen from the

Factory premises. It is denied that Party I was in

continuous employment of Party II(1) and Party II(2).

It is denied that Party I were terminated from service

because they were organizing themselves under a

trade union. It is stated by Party II(2) (in Para 3 of the

Written Statement) that the Order impleading Party

II(2) is due to misappreciation of fact and law and the

said Order and consequent summons are liable to be

recalled. In Paras 4(a) to (h) of the Written Statement,

Party II(2) states that Party II(2) is neither a necessary

nor a proper Party. That there is no employer-

-employee relationship between Party II(2) and Party I.

That the relationship between Party II(2) and Party

II(1) was that of a Contractor and Principal Employer.

That the contract has been terminated with effect

from 31-03-2013. That all the workmen have settled

the matter with Party II(1) and have also withdrawn

their Provident Fund. That Goa Trade and

Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus standi to

espouse the claims of the Party I (Workmen).

Therefore, it is prayed that it be held that impleading

Party II(2) to these proceedings is bad-in-law and is

not necessary to decide this reference.

10. In their Rejoinder to the Written Statement of

Party II(2), Party I denies that impleadment of Party II(2)

is due to misappreciation of facts and law and is liable

to be recalled. It is denied that Party II(2) is neither a

necessary nor a proper Party. It is denied that there is

no employer-employee relationship between

Party II(2) and Party I. It is denied that the contract

between Party II(2) and Party II(1) has been

terminated with effect from 31-03-2013. It is denied

that all the workmen have settled the matter with

Party II(1) and have also withdrawn their Provident

Fund. It is denied that the Goa Trade and Commercial

Workers’ Union have no locus standi to espouse the

claim of Party I. It is denied that Party I are not entitled

to any relief.

11. The following issues and additional issues were

framed by this Tribunal:-

ISSUES

1. Whether the Party I/Union proves that the

workmen to this reference were employed of

Party II(1) in the Factory of the Principal

Employer GKB Ophthalmics Ltd. and were in

the continuous employment of Party II(1) in the

Factory of the aforesaid Principal Employer at

Karaswada, Mapusa, Goa?

2. Whether the Party I/Union proves that the

Party II(2) in collusion and in consultation with

the Principal Employer, illegally and

unjustifiably refused employment to these

workers w.e.f. 26-03-2013 in order to take

revenge on them for unionizing under the

Registered Trade Union?

3. Whether the Party I/Union proves that after

refusing employment to these workmen,

Party II(1) recruited new workers in the Factory

of the Principal Employer at Karaswada,

Mapusa, Goa?

4. Whether the Party I/Union proves that all the

workmen are unemployed and do not have any

source of income?

5. Whether the Party II(1) proves that the reference

is bad-in-law and not maintainable as Party I

did not raise the dispute with Party II(1) and

also because Party I/Union has no locus standi

to raise a dispute on behalf of the workmen

named in the Order of Reference?

6. What relief? What Award?

Additional Issues:

4A. Whether the Party II(2) proves that impleading

the Party II(2) is due to misappreciation of facts

and/or law as contended in para 3 of the Written

Statement of Party II(2)?

4B. Whether the Party II(2) proves that the reference

is not maintainable as against the Party II(2)

and the order impleading the Party II(2) is liable

to be recalled/withdrawn on the grounds (a) to

(h) of said para 4?

12. During the course of proceedings, Party I and

Party II(1) have filed the following terms of Settlement

(Exhibit 44 Colly):-

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT

I. The Parties agree that since the contract of

Contractor was terminated w.e.f. 01-04-2013

and that the workmen were not willing to

accept the job elsewhere, the workmen do not

press for reinstatement with the Party II(1) and/

/or Party II(2).

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

715

II. It is further agreed between the Parties that all

the workmen who are parties to the references

No. IT/12/2013 and IT/16/2013 shall be paid a

consolidated amount of Rs. 15,000/- per worker

in full and final settlement of all their claims.

III. The workmen agree to permit deduction of

Rs. 450/- each from the gross amount payable

to each workperson and pay the said deducted

amount towards Union fund on or before

31-08-2023 and the Cheque will be drawn in

favour of “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”, Panaji, Goa, by the Contractor, Mahamaya.

IV. It is agreed between the Parties that the amount

payable by the Contractor to the workmen in

the manner hereinabove provided for are in full

and final settlement and satisfaction of all the

claims of the workmen against the Contractor

including claims for compensation for loss of

office or otherwise whatsoever.

V. The Parties agree that these consent terms shall

be filed in pending Reference No. IT/12/2013

and IT/16/2013 for Award in terms of this

settlement.

VI. The Management of Contractor shall pay the

amount agreed, after deducting the Union

fund, to the workmen directly as and when they

approach the Contractor against a valid receipt.

13. Party I and Party II(1) have filed an application

stating that an Award be passed in terms of the

settlement.

14. I have gone through the records of the case and

the Memorandum of Settlement at Exhibit 44 Colly

and I am convinced that the Memorandum of

Settlement are just and fair and are in the interest of

the Workmen/Party I and the Employer/Party II(1) and

therefore the same are accepted.

Hence I pass the following:-

ORDER

(i) The reference in IT/12/2013 stands awarded as

per the terms of Settlement filed by them at

Exhibit 44 Colly.

(ii) The terms of Settlement are as follows:-

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT

I. The Parties agree that since the contract of

Contractor was terminated w.e.f. 01-04-2013 and

that the workmen were not willing to accept

the job elsewhere, the workmen do not press

for reinstatement with the Party II(1) and/or

Party II(2).

II. It is further agreed between the Parties that all

the workmen who are parties to the references

No. IT/12/2013 and IT/16/2013 shall be paid a

consolidated amount of Rs. 15,000/- per worker

in full and final settlement of all their claims.

III. The workmen agree to permit deduction of

Rs. 450/- each from the gross amount payable

to each workperson and pay the said deducted

amount towards Union fund on or before

31-08-2023 and the Cheque will be drawn in

favour of “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”, Panaji, Goa, by the Contractor Mahamaya.

IV. It is agreed between the Parties that the amount

payable by the Contractor to the workmen in

the manner hereinabove provided for are in full

and final settlement and satisfaction of all the

claims of the workmen against the Contractor

including claims for compensation for loss of

office or otherwise whatsoever.

V. The Parties agree that these consent terms shall

be filed in pending Reference No. IT/12/2013

and IT/16/2013 for Award in terms of this

settlement.

VI. The Management of Contractor shall pay the

amount agreed, after deducting the Union

fund, to the workmen directly as and when they

approach the Contractor against a valid receipt.

(iii) No orders as to costs.

(iv) Inform Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Anil Scaria),

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal and

Labour Court.

————

Notification

No. 28/02/2023-LAB/Part-I/655

The following Award passed by the Industrial

Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on

05-09-2023 in Ref. No. IT/16/2013 is hereby

published as required under Section 17 of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor

of Goa.

Vivek Naik, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

716

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

AND LABOUR COURT

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Mr. Anil Scaria, Hon’ble Presiding Officer)

Ref. No. IT/16/2013

Shri Dinesh V. Shetye & 55 Others,

Rep. by the President,

Goa Trade and Commercial

Worker’s Union,

Panaji-Goa

..… Workmen/Party I.

V/s

1. M/s. Mahamaya,

Shop No. 8-B, Kamat Towers,

EDC Complex, Patto,

Panaji-Goa

…. Employer/Party II(1).

2. M/s. G. K. B. Ophthalmics Ltd.,

16-A, Thivim Industrial Estate,

Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa

…. Party II(2).

Workmen/Party-I represented by Learned Advocate

Shri Suhaas Naik.

Employer/Party-II(1) represented by Learned Adv.

Shri P. J. Kamat.

Employer/Party II(2) represented by Learned Adv.

Shri A. V. Nigalye.

AWARD

(Delivered on this the 5th day of the month of

September of the year 2023)

By Order dated 06-08-2013, bearing No. 28/35/

/2013-Lab/549, the Government of Goa in exercise of

powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947, has referred the following

dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal:-

“(1) Whether the action of the Management of M/s.

Mahamaya, Shop B-6, Kamat Towers, Patto,

Panaji in terminating the services of the below

mentioned workmen, with effect from

01-04-2013, is legal and justified?

(1) Dinesh Vilas Shetye.

(2) Devanand P. Shetye.

(3) Sachin S. Halankar.

(4) Rama M. Kadam.

(5) Pradeep R. Gawas.

(6) Rajat N. Parsekar.

(7) Sneha U. Vaigankar.

(8) Shilpa M. Gawade.

(9) Babu B. Varang.

(10) Vithal A. Satardekar.

(11) Sandeep S. Dessai.

(12) Divyanka P. Gawkar.

(13) Gouresh V. Kasarpalkar.

(14) Narayan Vaikunth Naik.

(15) Vithal Uttam Mamlekar.

(16) Rupesh M. Gad.

(17) Shirvprasad C. Karpe.

(18) Dhondi P. Warang.

(19) Anant H. Sawant.

(20) Prashant V. Satarkekar.

(21) Vithal D. Kadam.

(22) Bhagwan P. Mestri.

(23) Rama V. Kadam.

(24) Siddhant D. Dangi.

(25) Vithal A. Satardekar.

(26) Uday V. Kinalkar.

(27) Rama P. Kinalkar.

(28) Sanjay R. Manerikar.

(29) Laxmiprasad M. Pednekar.

(30) Shiva J. Matnekar.

(31) Nitesh B. Shingadi.

(32) Govind N. Pandit.

(33) Shilpa M. Sawant.

(34) Devendra D. Goltekar.

(35) Gurudas D. Parab.

(36) Minesh B. Naik.

(37) Mkrand M. Manjrekar.

(38) Arun N. Bhagat.

(39) Mandar M. Mestry.

(40) Amar P. Asolkar.

(41) Ladu B. Rane.

(42) Vocky K. Kadam.

(43) Sandesh S. Vengurlekar.

(44) Prakash B. Rawool.

(45) Amit V. Kadam.

(46) Mohan V. Mulik.

(47) Sandeep D. Sawant.

(48) Hanumant K. Govekar.

(49) Pandurang G. Vardam.

(50) Pravin N. Tarpe.

(51) Salil S. Shetkar.

(52) Yatin G. Gawas.

(53) Sangam J. Arondekar.

(54) Vishanti V. Bhonsle.

(55) Pramod A. Kudav.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

717

(2) If not, what relief the workmen are entitled to?”

2. It came to be registered in this Tribunal as

Reference No. IT/16/2013.

3. The Workmen/Party I has filed their Statement

of Claim. Party II(1) has filed its Written Statement.

Party I has filed their Rejoinder. During the course of

proceedings, Party II(2) was impleaded. Party II(2) has

filed its Written Statement. Party I has filed their

Rejoinder to the Written Statement of Party II(2).

2. The case of Party I is that the workmen were

employed by Party II(1) in the Factory of the Principal

Employer, namely; G.K.B. Ophthalmics Ltd. at

Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa/Party II(2). That the

Workmen (Party I) were in continuous employment

in the said Factory. That by Resolution dated

24-03-2013, all the workmen named in the present

Order of Reference unionized themselves under the

banner of the “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”. That the 55 workmen who were actively

involved in forming the Union were arbitrarily

refused employment w.e.f. 01-04-2013. That this was

done by Party II(1) in collusion and in consultation

with Party II(2). That this was done in order to spread

fear among the other unionized workmen. That the

action of Party II(1) amounts to unfair labour practice.

That all the workmen (Party I) are unemployed.

Therefore, it is prayed that the action of Party II(1) in

refusing employment/termination of service of all the

workmen named in the present Order of Reference

be held to be illegal, unjust and bad in law. That all

the workmen named in the Order of reference be

reinstated back in service with full back wages,

continuity in service and all other consequential

benefits.

5. The case of the Party II(1) is that Party II(1) and

M/s. G.K.B. Ophthalmics Limited/Party II(2) had

entered in various Staffing Services Agreements.

That the last of such agreements were for a period of

11 months from 02-01-2012 to 01-01-2013. That this

agreement was orally extended upto 31-03-2013.

That under these agreements, Party II(1) was

deploying trained workers to work in the Factory of

M/s. G.K.B. Opthalmics Limited/Party II(2). That upon

the termination of the agreement between M/s. G.K.B.

Opthalmics Limited/Party II(2) and Party II(1), the

workmen were instructed to report to the Office of

Party II(1) from 01-04-2013 to settle their accounts.

That the workmen at Sr. Nos. 1, 4, 7, 17, 21, 23, 33, 34,

41, 43, 50, 52 and 54 in the Order of Reference have

withdrawn their Provident Fund with clear reason

that they have left the services for better prospect.

That the Workmen (Party I) did not report to the Office

of Party II(1) on 01-04-2013 as notified. That the

Workmen (Party I) were engaged for a specific period

of a contract which has been terminated. That

Party II(1) has no option but to terminate the workmen

w.e.f. 01-04-2013. It is denied that all the workmen

named in the present Order of Reference are

unionized.

6. It is denied that the Workmen (Party I) have been

refused employment because they unionized

themselves. It is denied that it amounts to unfair

labour practice. That the persons at Sr. Nos. 2, 3, 5, 8,

13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 25, 28, 30, 31, 32, 35, 36, 39, 40, 42,

44, 45, 46, 48, 51, and 53 of the Schedule to the Order

of Reference were not the employees of the Party II(1)

at the time of termination of contract by the Principal

Employer. That Party II(1) has not terminated the

services of the other workmen at Sr. Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 9,

10, 11, 14, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, 37, 38, 41,

43, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 54 and 55. It is denied that all the

workmen (Party I) are unemployed. That the Goa

Trade and Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus

standi to raise a dispute regarding the 55 workmen

named in the Order of Reference. That Party I are not

entitled to any relief.

7. Party I has stated in their Rejoinder to the Written

Statement of Party II(1) that none of the workmen

have withdrawn their Provident Fund. It is denied

that the workmen were employed for a specific period

of a contract which has been terminated. It is denied

that all the workmen were instructed to report to the

Office of Party II(1) from 01-04-2013 to settle their

accounts as the work for which the workmen were

recruited had come to an end. It is denied that the

Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus

standi to raise a dispute on behalf of the 55 workmen

named in the Order of Reference. It is denied that the

persons at Sr. Nos. 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 25, 28,

30, 31, 32, 35, 36, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 46, 48, 51 and 53 at

the Schedule to the Order of Reference were not the

employees of Party II at the time of termination of

contract by the Principal Employer. It is denied that

the other workers were not terminated. It is denied

that the workers at Sr. Nos. 1, 4, 7, 17, 21, 23, 33, 34, 41,

43, 50, 52 and 54 in the Order of Reference have also

withdrawn their Provident Fund with clear reason

that they have left the services for better prospects.

Therefore, it is prayed that the reliefs sought in the

Claim Statement be granted.

8. Party II(2) has filed its Written Statement.

Party II(2) states that it has its Factory at Tivim

Industrial Estate, Mapusa-Goa. That Party II(2) has

permanent employees doing skilled and unskilled

jobs. That Party II(2) also engages contractors for

doing certain specific jobs. That one such contractor

was Party II(1). That Party II(2) and Party II(1) entered

into a contract. That the contract was for a period of

11 months from 02-01-2012 to 01-01-2013 which was

orally extended upto 31-03-2013.

718

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

9. That the performance of Party II(1) was

unsatisfactory. That Party II(2) issued letter dated

01-03-2013 and terminated the contract with

Party II(1) with effect from 31-03-2013. That Party II(1)

was performing the contract by engaging its own

workers. That Party II(2) was not concerned with the

workmen of Party II(1). That on the termination of the

contract, Party II(1) withdrew its workmen from the

Factory premises. It is denied that Party I was in

continuous employment of Party II(1) and Party II(2).

It is denied that Party I were terminated from service

because they were organizing themselves under a

trade union. It is stated by Party II(2) (in Para 3 of the

Written Statement) that the Order impleading

Party II(2) is due to misappreciation of facts and law

and the said Order and consequent summons are

liable to be recalled. In Paras 4(a) to (h) of the Written

Statement, Party II(2) states that Party II(2) is neither

a necessary nor a proper Party. That there is no

employer-employee relationship between Party II(2)

and Party I. That the relationship between Party II(2)

and Party II(1) was that of a Contractor and Principal

Employer. That the contract has been terminated

with effect from 31-03-2013. That all the workmen

have settled the matter with Party II(1) and have also

withdrawn their Provident Fund. That Goa Trade and

Commercial Workers’ Union has no locus standi to

espouse the claims of the Party I (Workmen).

Therefore, it is prayed that it be held that impleading

Party II(2) to these proceedings is bad-in-law and is

not necessary to decide this reference.

10. In their Rejoinder to the Written Statement of

Party II(2), Party I denies that the Order impleading

Party II(2) is due to misappreciation of facts and law

and is liable to be recalled. It is denied that Party II(2)

is neither a necessary nor a proper Party. It is denied

that there is no employer-employee relationship

between Party II(2) and Party I. It is denied that the

contract between Party II(2) and Party II(1) has been

terminated with effect from 31-03-2013. It is denied

that all the workmen have settled the matter with

Party II(1) and have also withdrawn their Provident

Fund. It is denied that the Goa Trade and Commercial

Workers’ Union have no locus standi to espouse the

claim of Party I. It is denied that Party I are not entitled

to any relief.

11. The following issues and additional issues were

framed by this Tribunal:-

ISSUES

1. Whether the Party I/Workmen prove that they

were employed in the Factory of the Principal

Employer, GKB Ophthalmics Ltd. and were in

continuous employment of Party II(1)?

2. Whether the Party I/Workmen prove that they

have been refused employment in collusion and

in consultation with the Principal Employer,

GKB Ophthalmics Ltd. w.e.f. 01-04-2013 without

assigning any justified reasons of whatsoever

nature?

3. Whether the Party I/Workmen prove that refusal

of employment to them is illegal, unjustified, bad

in law and it also amounts to Unfair Labour

Practice?

4. Whether the Party II(1) proves that the reference

is bad-in-law and is not maintainable as no

dispute was raised against Party II(1) by the

Party I or by any of the persons mentioned in

the Order of Reference and also because

Party I/Union has no locus standi to raise a

dispute on behalf of the persons named in the

reference?

5. Whether the Party II(1) proves the reference is

bad in law and is not maintainable as the

persons at Sr. Nos. 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19,

20, 25, 28, 30, 31, 32, 35, 36, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 46,

48, 51 and 53 of the schedule were not the

employees of Party II(1) at the time of

termination of the contract by the Principal

Employer?

6. Whether the Party II(1) proves that the reference

is bad in law and is not maintainable as the

services of the workmen at Sr. Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 9,

10, 11, 14, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 33, 34, 37,

38, 41, 43, 47, 49, 50, 52, 54 and 55 in the order of

the reference are not terminated by them?

7. Whether the Party II(1) proves that the workers

of Sr. Nos. 1, 4, 7, 17, 21, 23, 33, 34, 41, 43, 50, 52, &

54 have settled the matter and have also

withdrawn their Provident Fund with clear

reason that they have left the services for better

prospects?

8. Whether the Party II(1) proves that upon

termination of contract by the Principal

Employer vide letter dated 01-03-13, it had

notified to their said workers that it shall

withdraw its employees from the establishment

of the Principal Employer w.e.f. 01-04-13 and had

instructed them to report its office for further

instructions?

9. What relief? What Award?

Additional Issues:

4A. Whether the Party II(2) proves that impleading

the Party II(2) is due to misappreciation of

facts and/or law as contended in para 3 of the

Written Statement of Party II(2)?

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

719

4B. Whether the Party II(2) proves that the

reference is not maintainable as against the

Party II(2) and the order impleading the

Party II(2) is liable to be recalled/withdrawn

on the grounds (a) to (h) of said para 4?

10.During the course of proceedings, Party I and

Party II(1) have filed the following terms of Settlement

(Exhibit 48 Colly):-

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT

I. The Parties agree that since the contract of

Contractor was terminated w.e.f. 01-04-2013 and

that the workmen were not willing to accept the

job elsewhere, the workmen do not press for

reinstatement with the Party II(1) and/or

Party II(2).

II. It is further agreed between the Parties that all

the workmen who are parties to the references

No. IT/12/2013 and IT/16/2013 shall be paid a

consolidated amount of Rs. 15,000/- per worker

in full and final settlement of all their claims.

III.The workmen agree to permit deduction of

Rs. 450/- each from the gross amount payable to

each workperson and pay the said deducted

amount towards Union fund on or before

31-08-2023 and the Cheque will be drawn in

favour of “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”, Panaji, Goa, by the Contractor, Mahamaya.

IV. It is agreed between the Parties that the amount

payable by the Contractor to the workmen in

the manner hereinabove provided for are in full

and final settlement and satisfaction of all the

claims of the workmen against the Contractor

including claims for compensation for loss of

office or otherwise whatsoever.

V. The Parties agree that these consent terms shall

be filed in pending Reference No. IT/12/2013 and

IT/16/2013 for Award in terms of this settlement.

VI. The Management of Contractor shall pay the

amount agreed, after deducting the Union fund,

to the workmen directly as and when they

approach the Contractor against a valid receipt.

13. Party I and Party II(1) have filed an application

stating that an Award be passed in terms of the

settlement.

14. I have gone through the records of the case

and the Memorandum of Settlement at Exhibit 48

Colly and I am convinced that the Memorandum of

Settlement are just and fair and are in the

interest of the Workmen/Party I and the

Employer/Party II(1) and therefore the same are

accepted.

Hence I pass the following:-

ORDER

(i) The reference in IT/16/2013 stands awarded as

per the terms of Settlement at Exhibit 48 Colly.

(ii) The terms of Settlement are as follows:-

TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT

I. The Parties agree that since the contract of

Contractor was terminated w.e.f. 01-04-2013 and

that the workmen were not willing to accept the

job elsewhere, the workmen do not press for

reinstatement with the Party II(1) and/or

Party II(2).

II. It is further agreed between the Parties that all

the workmen who are parties to the references

No. IT/12/2013 and IT/16/2013 shall be paid a

consolidated amount of Rs. 15,000/- per worker

in full and final settlement of all their claims.

III. The workmen agree to permit deduction of

Rs. 450/- each from the gross amount payable to

each workperson and pay the said deducted

amount towards Union fund on or before

31-08-2023 and the Cheque will be drawn in

favour of “Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’

Union”, Panaji, Goa, by the Contractor, Mahamaya.

IV. It is agreed between the Parties that the amount

payable by the Contractor to the workmen in

the manner hereinabove provided for are in full

and final settlement and satisfaction of all the

claims of the workmen against the Contractor

including claims for compensation for loss of

office or otherwise whatsoever.

V. The Parties agree that these consent terms shall

be filed in pending Reference No. IT/12/2013 and

IT/16/2013 for Award in terms of this settlement.

VI.The Management of Contractor shall pay the

amount agreed, after deducting the Union

fund, to the workmen directly as and when they

approach the Contractor against a valid receipt.

(iii) No orders as to costs.

(iv) Inform Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Anil Scaria),

Presiding Officer,

Industrial Tribunal and

Labour Court.

720

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

Department of Personnel

–––

Order

No. 6/5/2023-PER/3721

On the recommendation of the Goa Services Board, the Governor of Goa is pleased to order the transfer

and posting of the following Officers of Goa Civil Service, in public interest, with immediate effect:-

Sr. No.

Name and present posting of the Officer

Posted as

Shri Narayan M. Gad, Commissioner of Excise with

Director of Mines with additional charge of

additional charge of Additional Commissioner

Director, Small Savings and Lotteries.

of Excise and Director, Small Savings and Lotteries

Shri Brijesh D. Manerkar, Director (Training), GIPARD

Managing Director, Goa Human Resource

Development Corporation.

The officers appointed on ex-cadre deputation post shall be governed by the standard terms of deputation,

as amended from time to time.

The officers shall complete handing over and taking over process with immediate effect and submit

compliance.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 26th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 7/27/2022-PER/3722

The Governor of Goa is pleased to transfer and

post Ms. Ankita Mishra, IAS (AGMUT:2018), Special

Secretary (Revenue) as Commissioner of Excise

with additional charge of Chief Executive Officer,

Entertainment Society of Goa, with immediate

effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 26th September, 2023.

—–––––—

Order

No. 7/7/2020-PER(A)/3724

Dr. Suresh Shanbhogue shall hold the charge of

Director (Training), GIPARD with immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 26th September, 2023.

Order

No. 13/09/2023-PER/3741

Whereas, Government vide Order No. 13/09/2023-

-PER/1262 dated 28-04-2023 had granted extension

in service to Dr. Sushila Mendes, Professor in History,

Government College of Arts, Science and

Commerce, Quepem beyond the date of her

superannuation for a period of one year w.e.f.

01-05-2023 to 30-04-2024, in public interest subject

to vigilance clearance, concurrence of Finance

Department and approval of Council of Ministers;

And whereas, the Vigilance Department has

submitted vigilance clearance stating that, no

disciplinary proceedings/vigilance cases are

pending or being contemplated against Dr. Sushila

Mendes;

And whereas, the Finance Department vide its

U.O. No. 1400093786 dated 29-07-2023, concurred

the proposal for grant of extension in service to

Dr. Sushila Mendes, Professor in History,

Government College of Arts, Science and

Commerce, Quepem subject to Cabinet approval

and adherence of all Rules in force;

And whereas, the Council of Ministers in its XXXIst

meeting held on 08-09-2023 resolved to grant

ex-post facto approval for extension in service to

Dr. Sushila Mendes, Professor in History,

Government College of Arts, Science and

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

721

Commerce, Quepem beyond the date of her

superannuation for a period of one year w.e.f.

01-05-2023 to 30-04-2024, in public interest;

Now, therefore, the Government is pleased to

confirm the Order No. 13/09/2023-PER/1262 dated

28-04-2023 granting extension in service to

Dr. Sushila Mendes, Professor in History,

Government College of Arts, Science and

Commerce, Quepem beyond the date of her

superannuation for a period of one year w.e.f.

01-05-2023 to 30-04-2024, in public interest.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 7/17/2022-PER/3756

Read: Order No. 14020/01/2023-UTS.I dated

08-06-2023.

The Governor of Goa is pleased to relieve

Ms. Mamu Hage, IAS (AGMUT:2017), Collector, North

w.e.f. 29-09-2023 (a. n.) from the State Administration

to join her new place of posting at Arunachal Pradesh.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

—–––––—

Order

No. 7/17/2022-PER/3757

The Governor of Goa is pleased to post

Smt. Sneha S. Gitte, IAS (AGMUT:2019), as Collector,

North with additional charge of Director

(Environment) and Member Secretary, Goa Coastal

Zone Management Authority, w.e.f. 29-09-2023 (a. n.).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

—–––––—

Order

No. 7/17/2022-PER/3758

Shri Prasad Lolayekar, IAS (AGMUT:2014),

Secretary (Education) holding additional charge of

Director (Higher Education), shall hold additional

charge of Director of Vigilance, w.e.f. 29-09-2023 (a. n.).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

—–––––—

Order

No. 6/8/2022-PER/3766

Shri Prasad G. Volvoikar, Director, Public

Grievances, shall hold the charge of Director of

Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Services, in

addition to his own duties, with immediate effect.

This issues on the recommendation of the Goa

Services Board.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

—–––––—

Order

No. 7/3/92-PER (Vol.I)/Part/3767

Dr. Agostinho A. R. Misquita, shall hold the

charge of Managing Director, Goa Meat Complex

with immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 28th September, 2023.

—–––––—

Order

No. 13/19/2023-PER/3771

The Governor of Goa is pleased to grant extension

in service to Smt. Angelica Lianne Sarita Odette Da

Silva, Chief Engineer II, Public Works Department

beyond the date of her superannuation for a period

of six months w.e.f. 01-10-2023 to 31-03-2024, in

public interest. This order is subject to Vigilance

Clearance from Vigilance Department, concurrence

of Finance Department and approval of Council of

Ministers.

The extension is further subject to termination

without assigning any reasons during the period of

extension.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 29th September, 2023.

722

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

Order

No. 13/06/2023-PER/3775

The Governor of Goa is pleased to grant further

extension in service to Shri Krishnakant Patil,

Superintending Engineer, Water Resources

Department, beyond the date of his superannuation

for a period of six months w.e.f. 01-10-2023 to

31-03-2024, in public interest. This order is subject

to Vigilance Clearance from Vigilance Department,

concurrence of Finance Department and approval

of Council of Ministers.

The extension is further subject to termination

without assigning any reasons during the period of

extension.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 29th September, 2023.

————

Order

No. 13/05/2023-PER/3776

The Governor of Goa is pleased to grant further

extension in service to Shri Bossuet F. De A. M.

Silva, Superintendent of Police, Goa Police Services,

beyond the date of his superannuation for a period

of six months w.e.f. 01-10-2023 to 31-03-2024, in

public interest. This order is subject to Vigilance

Clearance from Vigilance Department, concurrence

of Finance Department and approval of Council of

Ministers.

The extension is further subject to termination

without assigning any reasons during the period of

extension.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Personnel-II).

Porvorim, 29th September, 2023.

——————

Department of Revenue

–––

Notification

No. 28/4/7/2022/RD-I/1113

In exercise of the powers conferred by the second

proviso to Clause (ii) of sub-section (6) of Section 32

of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 (Act No. 9 of 1969),

the Government of Goa hereby exempts the Diocean

Society of Education, St. John of the Cross High

School, Sanquelim, Bicholim-Goa, a society registered

under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (Act

No. 21 of 1860) before the Office of the Registrar of

Societies, Goa, Daman and Diu, Panaji under

No. 466/1974 dated 13-05-1974, from the payment of

fees amounting to Rs. 14,77,500/- (Rupees Fourteen

lakhs seventy seven thousand and five hundred only)

payable under the said Code for conversion of the

land admeasuring an area of 4925 sq. mts., surveyed

under Survey Nos. 27/1, 27/2, 27/3, 27/4, 27/5 and

27/6 of Village Cassabe de Sanquelim of Bicholim

Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa, subject to

the condition that the said land shall be used

exclusively for the purpose of Educational

Institution.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Durga Kinlekar, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).

Porvorim, 27th September, 2023.

——————

Department of Skill Development &

Entrepreneurship

Directorate of Skill Development &

Entrepreneurship

–––

Order

No. 2/123/DSDE/EST/2023/Vol-II/2021

On the recommendation of Goa Public Service

Commission vide their communication No. COM/II/

/11/60(1)/2023/235 dated 10-08-2023, Government is

pleased to promote Shri Kapil P. Aigal, Principal

(Jr. Scale), to the post of Principal, Senior Scale

(Grade-A) (Group “A” Gazetted) in the pay scale of

Rs. 15,600-39,100+ G.P. Rs. 5,400/- (Pay Matrix Level 10

as per 7th Pay Commission) on regular basis and

post him at Bicholim Government Industrial

Training Institute, with immediate effect.

Shri Aigal shall be on probation for a period of

two years.

The above promotion is made against the vacant

post created vide order No. 13/5/DSDE/EST/

/CREATION/2021/525 dated 02-06-2022.

The expenditure towards his salary shall be

debited to the Budget Head “2230—Labour and

Employment, 03—Training, 101—ITI, 05—Skill

Development of World Bank Project (Plan),

01—Salaries”.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

S. S. Gaonkar, Director (Skill Development &

Entrepreneurship) & ex officio Jt. Secretary.

Panaji, 27th September, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

723

Department of Town & Country Planning

–––

Notification

No. 36/18/102/17(2)/Tivim/262/20/TCP/2023/302

Whereas, the Department is in receipt of an

application dated 11-04-2023 (hereinafter referred to

as the “said Application”) under sub-section (2) of

Section 17 of the Goa Town and Country Planning

Act, 1974 (Act 21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Act”) for correction of inconsistent/

/incoherent zoning provisions in the Regional Plan

for Goa-2021 (RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land

admeasuring an area of 7325 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 262, sub-division No. 20 of Village Tivim,

Bardez Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa

(hereinafter referred to as the “said plot of land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the applicant has been scrutinized and

a Report of the Department alongwith the report from

a registered professional was submitted to the

Government for decision (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Reports”);

And whereas, the Government has considered the

said Reports and it is of the opinion that alteration/

/modification is necessary to be carried out to the

RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying inadvertent/

/inconsistent/incoherent error zoning that has

occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has directed the

Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry out alteration/

/modification to the RPG-2021 for the purpose of

correcting/rectifying the zone of part of the plot of

land surveyed under Survey No. 262, sub-division No. 20

of Village Tivim, Bardez Taluka admeasuring an area

of 1743 m2 only which is earmarked as Orchard as

per RPG-2021, to Settlement zone by issuing

Notification under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government and

in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the

Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act 21 of

1975), the following alteration/modification to the

RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of the plot of land

admeasuring an area of 1743 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 262, sub-division No. 20, of Village Tivim,

Bardez Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa which

is earmarked as Orchard as per RPG-2021 is hereby

corrected as Settlement zone.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Administration/

/Planning).

Panaji, 28th September, 2023.

Notification

No. 36/18/107/17(2)/Tivim/262/25/TCP/2023/303

Whereas, the Department is in receipt of an

application dated 11-04-2023 (hereinafter referred

to as the “said Application”) under sub-section (2)

of Section 17 of the Goa Town and Country Planning

Act, 1974 (Act 21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Act”) for correction of inconsistent/

/incoherent zoning provisions in the Regional Plan

for Goa-2021 (RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land

admeasuring an area of 2650 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 262, sub-division No. 25 of Village Tivim,

Bardez Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa

(hereinafter referred to as the “said plot of land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the applicant has been scrutinized

and a Report of the Department alongwith the

report from a registered professional was submitted

to the Government for decision (hereinafter referred

to as the “said Reports”);

And whereas, the Government has considered

the said Reports and it is of the opinion that

alteration/modification is necessary to be carried

out to the RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying

inadvertent/inconsistent/incoherent error zoning

that has occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has

directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry

out alteration/modification to the RPG-2021 for the

purpose of correcting/rectifying the zone of part of

the plot of land surveyed under Survey No. 262,

sub-division No. 25 of Village Tivim, Bardez Taluka

admeasuring an area of 840 m2 only which is

earmarked as Orchard as per RPG-2021, to

Settlement zone by issuing Notification under

sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government

and in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975), the following alteration/modification to

the RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of the plot of land

admeasuring an area of 840 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 262, sub-division No. 25, of Village Tivim,

Bardez Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa

which is earmarked as Orchard as per RPG-2021 is

hereby corrected as Settlement zone.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Administration/

/Planning).

Panaji, 28th September, 2023.

724

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

Notification

No. 36/18/95/17(2)/SJDA/73/1-I/TCP/2023/305

Whereas, the Department is in receipt of an

application dated 11-04-2023 (hereinafter referred

to as the “said Application”) under sub-section (2)

of Section 17 of the Goa Town and Country Planning

Act, 1974 (Act 21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Act”) for correction of inconsistent/

/incoherent zoning provisions in the Regional Plan

for Goa-2021 (RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land

admeasuring an area of 535 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 73, sub-division No. 1-I, of Village Sao

Jose De Areal, Salcete Taluka, District South Goa,

State of Goa (hereinafter referred to as the “said

plot of land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the applicant has been scrutinized

and a Report of the Department alongwith the report

from a registered professional was submitted to the

Government for decision (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Reports”);

And whereas, the Government has considered

the said Reports and it is of the opinion that

alteration/modification is necessary to be carried

out to the RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying

inadvertent/inconsistent/incoherent error zoning

that has occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has

directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry

out alteration/modification to the RPG-2021 for the

purpose of correcting/rectifying the zone of plot of

land surveyed under Survey No. 73, sub-division

No. 1-I of Village Sao Jose De Areal, Salcete Taluka

admeasuring an area of 535 m2 only which is

earmarked as Play Ground as per RPG-2021, to

Settlement Zone by issuing Notification under

sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government

and in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975), the following alteration/modification to

the RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of the plot of land

admeasuring an area of 535 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 73, sub-division No. 1-I, of Village Sao

Jose De Areal, Salcete Taluka, District South Goa,

State of Goa which is earmarked as Play Ground as

per RPG-2021 is hereby corrected as Settlement

Zone.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Administration/

/Planning).

Panaji, 3rd October, 2023.

Notification

No. 36/18/98/17(2)/Curtorim/451/16TCP/2023/306

Whereas, the Department is in receipt of an

application dated 17-05-2023 (hereinafter referred

to as the “said Application”) under sub-section (2)

of Section 17 of the Goa Town and Country Planning

Act, 1974 (Act 21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Act”) for correction of inconsistent/

/incoherent zoning provisions in the Regional Plan

for Goa-2021 (RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land

admeasuring an area of 150 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 451, sub-division No. 16, of Village

Curtorim, Salcete Taluka, District South Goa, State

of Goa (hereinafter referred to as the “said plot of

land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the applicant has been scrutinized

and a Report of the Department alongwith the report

from a registered professional was submitted to the

Government for decision (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Reports”);

And whereas, the Government has considered

the said Reports and it is of the opinion that

alteration/modification is necessary to be carried

out to the RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying

inadvertent/inconsistent/incoherent error zoning

that has occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has

directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry

out alteration/modification to the RPG-2021 for the

purpose of correcting/rectifying the zone of plot of

land surveyed under Survey No. 451, sub-division

No. 16 of Village Sao Jose De Areal, Salcete Taluka

admeasuring an area of 150 m2 only which is

earmarked as Paddy Field as per RPG-2021, to

Settlement Zone by issuing Notification under

sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government

and in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975), the following alteration/modification to

the RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of the plot of land

admeasuring an area of 150 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 451, sub-division No. 16, of Village

Curtorim, Salcete Taluka, District South Goa, State

of Goa which is earmarked as Paddy Field as per

RPG-2021 is hereby corrected as Settlement zone.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Administration/

/Planning).

Panaji, 3rd October, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 27

5TH OCTOBER, 2023

725

Notification

No. 36/18/106/17(2)/Raia/139/1/M/TCP/2023/307

Whereas, the Department is in receipt of an

application dated 31-05-2023 (hereinafter referred

to as the “said Application”) under sub-section (2)

of Section 17 of the Goa Town and Country Planning

Act, 1974 (Act 21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Act”) for correction of inconsistent/

/incoherent zoning provisions in the Regional Plan

for Goa-2021 (RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land

admeasuring an area of 1638 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 139, sub-division No. 1 (Part), of Village

Raia, Salcete Taluka, District South Goa, State of

Goa (hereinafter referred to as the “said plot of

land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the applicant has been scrutinized

and a Report of the Department alongwith the report

from a registered professional was submitted to the

Government for decision (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Reports”);

And whereas, the Government has considered

the said Reports and it is of the opinion that

alteration/modification is necessary to be carried

out to the RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying

inadvertent/inconsistent/incoherent error zoning

that has occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has

directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry

out alteration/modification to the RPG-2021 for the

purpose of correcting/rectifying the zone of plot of

land surveyed under Survey No. 139, sub-division

No. 1 Block M of Village Raia, Salcete Taluka

admeasuring an area of 1638 m2 only which is

earmarked as Paddy Field as per RPG-2021, to

Settlement Zone by issuing Notification under

sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government

and in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975), the following alteration/modification to

the RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of the plot of land

admeasuring an area of 1638 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 139, sub-division No. 1 Block M, of Village

Raia, Salcete Taluka, District South Goa, State of Goa

which is earmarked as Paddy Field as per RPG-2021

is hereby corrected as Settlement Zone.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Administration/

Planning).

Panaji, 3rd October, 2023.

Department of Women & Child Development

Directorate of Women & Child Development

–––

Notification

No. 4-19-96-SWO/WCD/5355

In exercise of the powers conferred under Section

4 of the Goa State Commission for Women Act, 1996

(Goa Act 10 of 1996) (hereafter called as the “said

Act”) read with Rule 3 of the Goa State Commission

for Women Rules, 1997, the Government of Goa,

hereby appoints the following members for the Goa

State Commission for Women to exercise the powers

conferred on and to perform the functions assigned

to it, under the said Act, and Rules namely:

Smt. Delilah Lobo, MLA,

—

Member.

Siolim Assembly Constituency,

House No. 181/15, Bhatti Vaddo,

Parra, Bardez-Goa

Dr. Prita Mallya, Principal,

—

Member.

VVM’s Shree Damodar College

of Commerce & Economics,

Margao, Goa

Dr. Vrinda Borkar, Principal,

—

Member.

S. S. Dempe College of Arts

& Science, Panaji, Goa

Smt. Aruna Dhuri, representing

—

Member.

an NGO “Janjagruti”,

Quepem, Goa

Dr. Jyoti Sawant, r/o Sarvan,

—

Member.

Karapur, Bicholim, Goa

Smt. Ketaki Parab Gadekar,

—

Member.

Prapti residency, G1 Zosh

Wado, Near Succoro Church,

Porvorim

Adv. Siddhi Parodkar,

—

Member.

Green Empire,

Row House No. 10,

Matt Road, Gogol,

Margao-Goa

The tenure of the above members shall be for the

three years from the date of its constitution.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Sangeeta M. Porob, Director & ex officio

Jt. Secretary (Directorate of Women and Child

Development).

Panaji, 3rd October, 2023.

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 23.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—241/80—10/2023.