SERIES II No. 3

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410

Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2021-2023

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

Department of Co-operation

Office of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies

–––

Order

No. 3/8/Urban/Credit/TSII/QZ/2020/RCS/102

Read: 1. Circular No. 6-13/81/EST/RCS/Part V/5833

dated 06-03-2020.

2. Order No. 48-8-2001/TS/RCS/IV/5400

dated 17-02-2020.

3. Order No. 3/8/Urban Credit/TSII/QZ/2020/

/RCS/3220 dated 06-01-2022.

4. Letter No. ARCS/QZ/R’s Nominee/2012/

/1541 dated 29-03-2023 received from the

Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies,

Quepem Zone, Quepem-Goa.

Whereas, vide Order read at Sr. No. 2 above issued

by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies u/s. 86 (1)

of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (Goa

Act No. 36 of 2001) (hereafter referred to as ‘Act’)

read with Rule 116 (1) of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Rules, 2003, Adv. Ramchandra alias Vinod

M. Dessai, having office at C/o. M. R. Dessai, H. No.

233, Islampur, Baina, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa was

appointed as the Registrar’s Nominee for deciding

the disputes arising in any of the Co-operative

Societies referred to him by the Registrar of

Co-operative Societies/Asst. Registrars of

Co-operative Societies.

And whereas, vide Order read at Sr. No. 3 above,

Adv. Ramchandra alias Vinod M. Dessai was

Panaji, 20th April, 2023 (Chaitra 30, 1945)

Note:- There are two Extraordinary issues to the Official

Gazette, Series II No. 2 dated 13-04-2023 as

follows:-

(1) Extraordinary dated 13-04-2023 from pages 79 to

80 regarding Notification from Goa Legislature

Secretariat.

(2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 19-04-2023 from

pages 81 to 82 regarding Order from Goa State

Election Commission.

appointed as the dedicated Registrar’s Nominee

thereby authorizing him to entertain and decide all

the disputes submitted to him directly by The

Quepem-Urban Multipurpose Co-operative Society

Ltd., Quepem, Goa without routing it through this

office. The said authorization was initially for a

period of one year w.e.f. 06-01-2022 to 05-01-2023.

And whereas, vide letter dated 29-03-2023 read

at Sr. No. 4 above, Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative

Societies, Quepem Zone, Quepem-Goa has

submitted the request letter from the General

Manager of the Quepem-Urban Multipurpose

Co-operative Society Ltd., Quepem, Goa for

extending said authorization.

Now therefore, in exercise of powers conferred

under Section 123B of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001, I, the Registrar of Co-operative

Societies hereby extend the authorization of Adv.

Ramchandra alias Vinod M. Dessai as dedicated

Registrar’s Nominee for The Quepem-Urban

Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd., Quepem-

-Goa for a further period of 1 year with retrospective

effect from 06-01-2023 to 05-01-2024.

All other terms and conditions mentioned in the

orders read above shall continue to remain in force.

The Registrar reserves the right to withdraw this

order at any stage without assigning any reason

thereof.

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretay (Co-operation).

Panaji, 12th April, 2023.

————

Order

No. 15-348-ADT/RCS/2020/120

Read: 1) Order No. 15-348-ADT/RCS/2020/2143

dated 25-09-2020.

2) Letter No. 14/13/20-21/ARCS (PZ)/Sec.68/

/Restriction/Goa/1525 dated 11-01-2023

received from Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.

Societies (Ponda Zone), Ponda-Goa.

83

Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]

84

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

Whereas, in terms of Section 68 of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, restrictions were

imposed by order dated 25-09-2022 referred to

above on the various Co-operative Societies for not

complying the statutory provision of Section 74(3)

& (4) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001.

And whereas, the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative

Societies, Ponda Zone, Ponda-Goa, vide letter dated

11-01-2023 has informed that society at Sr. No. 2

Adarsh V.K.S.S. Society Ltd., Shiroda, Ponda-Goa,

society at Sr. No. 3, Jai Bharat V.K.S.S. Society Ltd.,

Keri, Ponda-Goa, society at Sr. No. 9 Defence Civilian

Employees Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., C/o. 6TTR,

2STC, Ponda-Goa and society at Sr. No. 17 The

Kelbai Sateri Multipurpose Co-operative Society

Ltd., Curti, Ponda-Goa of order referred above,

amongst the enlisted on whom restrictions were

imposed, have conducted audit subsequently after

imposition of restrictions.

And whereas, as per the provision of Section

68(2) of The Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001

powers to modify or cancel any directions issued

under sub-section (1) of Section 68 of the said Act

lies with the Government.

Now therefore, after considering aforesaid fact

and circumstances as mentioned above, in exercise

of the powers under Section 68(2) of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, the Government

is pleased to withdraw restrictions imposed on the

societies at Sr. No. 2, 3, 9 and 17 of the aforesaid

order.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio (Jt. Secretary).

Panaji, 13th April, 2023.

————

Order

No. 20/3/164/Elec/BOD/HVCH/NZ/22/5030

Read:

Letter No. 1/624/Elec/BOD/HVCHMS/NZ/

/2022/4467 dated 24-02-2023 from Unit

Incharge III, North Zone, Mapusa, Goa to

grant exemption from applicability of

Section 59(4) and 60(3)(b) of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 to the

Highland Villas Co-op. Housing Maintenance

Society Ltd., (Reg. No. ARCS/NZ/HSG/

/399(d)/Goa), B. B. Borker Road, Porvorim-Goa.

[Under Section 126A of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act No. 36 of 2001)]

Whereas, The Highland Villas Co-op. Housing

Maintenance Society Ltd., B.B. Borker Road,

Porvorim-Goa, was registered on 27-04-2017 under

Code Symbol/registration No. [Reg. No. ARCS/NZ/

/HSG/399(d)/Goa] and is having as on date, total

membership of 55 as per the voters list (hereafter

referred as “said Society” or as “Society”).

And whereas, Unit Incharge III, North Zone,

Mapusa, Goa, vide letter dated 24-02-2023 requested

to grant exemption from the applicability of the

provisions of Section 59(4) and 60(3)(b) of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act No. 36 of

2001) (hereafter referred to as “said Act” or as “Act”)

by invoking powers under Section 126 A of the said

Act. The strength of the Board of the said Society

consists of 11 (eleven) Directors.

And whereas, as per the Circular No.

15-11-2017/RCS/2470 dated 01-08-2019 issued by

Registrar of Co-operative Societies (RCS), under

Clause “c” it has been specifically instructed that

“Exemption to Section 59(4) shall be proposed only

when no nominations from such categories are

received for the vacant posts reserved for SC/ST and

women, as the case may be, shall be filled by invoking

the provisions of Section 67A of the Act, after

obtaining willingness from such members subject to

fulfillment of the requirements of Section 60(3)(b) of

the Act. (In case of non fulfilment of any of the

provisions of Section 60(3), then exemption should be

sought under Section 126A of the Act). In case no

person from such category is willing to be appointed

to the vacancy, then in such cases exemption of

Section 59(4) shall be proposed under Section 126A of

the Act and these posts shall then be filled from

General category member by holding fresh election”.

The said Society fulfills the above criteria as there

are no members from the SC/ST category and has

also failed to convene its general body meetings in

accordance with Act. Unit Incharge III, North Zone,

Mapusa, Goa vide letter referred above have

proposed to grant exemption from applicability of

Section 59(4) and 60(3)(b) of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 to said Society so as to

successfully conduct the election of the BoD of said

Society and to hand over the charge to the newly

elected Board of the Society.

In view of above and in exercise of the powers

vested under Section 126A of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act No. 36 of 2001), the

Government of Goa is pleased to exempt said Society

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

85

from the applicability of provisions of sub-section

(4) of Section 59 and Clause (b) of sub-section (3) of

Section 60 of the Act for the term 2023-2028.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-operation).

Panaji, 28th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. 20/3/153/Elec/BOD/SPCH/NZ/22/5031

Read:

Letter No. 1/630/Elec/BOD/CLBACHS/NZ/

/2022/4538 dated 02-03-2023 from Asstt.

Registrar of Co-op. Societies, North Zone,

Mapusa, Goa to grant exemption from

applicability of Section 60(3)(b) of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 to the

Sabnis Park Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.,

[Reg. No. HSG(b) 214/NZ/Goa], Alto, Opp.

State Bank of India, Porvorim-Goa.

[Under Section 126A of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act No. 36 of 2001)]

Whereas, The Sabnis Park Co-op. Housing Society

Ltd., Alto, Opp. State Bank of India, Porvorim-Goa

was registered on 27-04-2017 under Code Symbol/

/registration No. [Reg. No. ARCS/NZ/HSG/399(d)/

/Goa] and is having as on date, total membership of

44 as per the voters list (hereafter referred as “said

Society” or as “Society”).

And whereas, Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies,

North Zone, Mapusa, vide letter dated 02-03-2023

requested to grant exemption from the applicability

of the provisions of Section 60(3)(b) of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act No. 36 of

2001) (hereafter referred to as “said Act” or as “Act”)

by invoking powers under Section 126 A of the said

Act. The strength of the Board of the said Society

consists of 09 (nine) Directors i.e. 6 (six) from the

General Category, 2 (two) from Women Category

and 1 (one) from SC or ST Category.

And whereas, as per the Circular No. 15-11-2017/

/RCS/2470 dated 01-08-2019 issued by Registrar of

Co-operative Societies (RCS), under Clause “a”, it

has been specifically instructed that “The

Exemption to Section 60(3)(b) of the Act shall be

proposed only when management of the society has

not convened at least three Annual General Body

meetings for the five years preceding the date of

election, due to which the eligibility criteria of having

attended at least three Annual General Body meetings

of the society during the period of five years

preceding the election cannot be fulfilled from the

applicability of above referred Section and a fresh

date of election should be fixed instead of resorting

to appoint the members on the Board by invoking

the provisions of Section 67 (A) of the Act”.

The said Society fulfills the above criteria as it

has failed to convene its general body meetings in

accordance with Act. Asstt. Registrar of Co-op.

Societies, North Zone, Mapusa vide letter referred

above have proposed to grant exemption from

applicability of Section 60(3)(b) of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 to said Society so

as to successfully conduct the election of the BoD

of said Society and to hand over the charge to the

newly elected Board of the Society.

In view of above and in exercise of the powers

vested under Section 126A of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act No. 36 of 2001), the

Government of Goa is pleased to exempt said Society

from the applicability of provisions of Clause (b) of

sub-section (3) of Section 60 of the Act for the term

2023-2028.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-operation).

Panaji, 28th March, 2023.

————

Order

No. 9-26-2023/EST/RCS/5095

Read: 1. Order No. 43/2/2005/TS/RCS/1246 dated 26-06-2018.

2. Order No. 43/2/2005/TS/RCS/5931 dated 11-03-2020.

In supersession of the Orders read above and all earlier orders to that effect and in exercise of the powers

conferred under sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 5 of the Right to Information Act, 2005

(Central Act 22 of 2005), I, the undersigned Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Government of Goa do

hereby designate the following Officers as the Public Information Officers (P.I.O.), Assistant Public Information

Officers (A.P.I.O.) and the First Appellate Authority (F.A.A.) in the respective offices for respective subjects/

/wings/sections as below.

86

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

Sr.

Name & Address

Particular Wing/

Public Information

Assistant Public

First Appellate

No.

of the Office/

/Section/Branch

Officer (P.I.O.)

Information

Authority

/Public Authority

of the office

designated

Officer (A.P.I.O.)

(F.A.A.)

designated

designated

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

O/o. Assistant

1) Establishment,

Assistant Registrar

Head Clerk

Deputy Registrar

Registrar of

Administration and

of Co-operative

of Co-operative

Co-operative Societies,

Accounts Sections

Societies who is

Societies (Admin.),

Central Zone, 1st Floor,

of the Zonal Office

the Head of Office

Head Office,

Sahakar Bhavan,

2) All residuary

Incharge of Zonal

Panaji.

Opposite Municipal

matters of Zonal

Office

Market, Panaji, Goa

office not specifically

covered under other

PIOs

In respect of all

Officer who is

Officer/Official Deputy Registrar

information

Unit Incharge

who is sub-

of Co-operative

pertaining to

of concerned

-unit Incharge

Societies at Head

Co-operative

Society at Zonal

of concerned

Office who is the

Societies held at

Office

Society at

District Level

Zonal Office under

Zonal Office

Incharge (D.L.I.)

the provisions of the

of respective

Goa Co-operative

Zonal Office.

Societies Act, 2001

and Rules framed

thereunder

In respect of all

Officer who is

Officer/Official Deputy Registrar

information

Unit Incharge

who is sub-

of Co-operative

pertaining to

of concerned

-unit Incharge

Societies at Head

Co-operative

Society at Zonal

of concerned

Office who is

Societies held by

Office to whom

Society at

the District

any

the information

Zonal Office

Level Incharge

a) Registrar’s

relates

to whom the

(D.L.I.) of

Nominees

information

respective Zonal

b) Auditors on

relates

Office.

panel of

Auditors

c) Reconciliators

d) Administrators

e) Liquidators

f) Other such persons

or a committee

appointed or

constituted by the

Registrar under the

provisions of the Goa

Co-operative Societies

Act, 2001 and Rules

framed thereunder

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative Societies).

Panaji, 31st March, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

87

Order

No. 9-26-2023/EST/RCS/5097

Read: 1. Order No. 43/2/2005/TS/RCS/1246 dated 26-06-2018.

2. Order No. 43/2/2005/TS/RCS/5931 dated 11-03-2020.

In supersession of the Orders read above and all earlier orders to that effect and in exercise of the powers

conferred under sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 5 of the Right to Information Act, 2005

(Central Act 22 of 2005), I, the undersigned Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Government of Goa do

hereby designate the following Officers as the Public Information Officers (P.I.O.), Assistant Public Information

Officers (A.P.I.O.) and the First Appellate Authority (F.A.A.) in the respective offices for respective subjects/

/wings/sections as below.

Sr.

Name & Address

Particular Wing/

Public Information

Assistant Public

First Appellate

No.

of the Office/

/Section/Branch

Officer (P.I.O.)

Information

Authority

/Public Authority

of the office

designated

Officer (A.P.I.O.)

(F.A.A.)

designated

designated

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

O/o. Assistant Registrar 1) Establishment,

Assistant Registrar

Head Clerk

Deputy Registrar

of Co-operative

Administration,

of Co-operative

of Co-operative

Societies, Ponda Zone,

Accounts Sections

Societies who is

Societies (Admin.).

Sahakar Bhavan,

of the Zonal Office

the Head of Office

Head Office,

Curti, Ponda, Goa

2) All residuary

Incharge of Zonal

Panaji.

matters of Zonal

Office

office not specifically

covered under other

PIOs

In respect of all

Officer who is

Officer/Official Deputy Registrar

information

Unit Incharge

who is sub-

of Co-operative

pertaining to

of concerned

-unit Incharge

Societies at Head

Co-operative

Society at Zonal

of concerned

Office who is the

Societies held at

Office

Society at

District Level

Zonal Office under

Zonal Office

Incharge (D.L.I.)

the provisions of the

of respective

Goa Co-operative

Zonal Office.

Societies Act, 2001

and Rules framed

thereunder

In respect of all

Officer who is

Officer/Official Deputy Registrar

information

Unit Incharge

who is sub-

of Co-operative

pertaining to

of concerned

-unit Incharge

Societies at Head

Co-operative

Society at Zonal

of concerned

Office who is

Societies held by

Office to whom

Society at

the District

any

the information

Zonal Office

Level Incharge

a) Registrar’s

relates

to whom the

(D.L.I.) of

Nominees

information

respective Zonal

b) Auditors on

relates

Office.

panel of

Auditors

c) Reconciliators

d) Administrators

e) Liquidators

f) Other such persons

or a committee

88

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

1

2

3

4

5

6

appointed or

constituted by the

Registrar under the

provisions of the Goa

Co-operative Societies

Act, 2001 and Rules

framed thereunder

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative Societies).

Panaji, 31st March, 2023.

————

Order

No. 9-26-2023/EST/RCS/5098

Read: 1. Order No. 43/2/2005/TS/RCS/1246 dated 26-06-2018.

2. Order No. 43/2/2005/TS/RCS/5931 dated 11-03-2020.

In supersession of the Orders read above and all earlier orders to that effect and in exercise of the powers

conferred under sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 5 of the Right to Information Act, 2005

(Central Act 22 of 2005), I, the undersigned Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Government of Goa do

hereby designate the following Officers as the Public Information Officers (P.I.O.), Assistant Public Information

Officers (A.P.I.O.) and the First Appellate Authority (F.A.A.) in the respective offices for respective subjects/

/wings/sections as below.

Sr.

Name & Address

Particular Wing/

Public Information

Assistant Public

First Appellate

No.

of the Office/

/Section/Branch

Officer (P.I.O.)

Information

Authority

/Public Authority

of the office

designated

Officer (A.P.I.O.)

(F.A.A.)

designated

designated

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

O/o. Assistant Registrar 1) Establishment,

Assistant Registrar

Head Clerk

Deputy Registrar

of Co-operative

Administration,

of Co-operative

of Co-operative

Societies, South Zone,

Accounts Sections

Societies who is

Societies (Admin.),

Quarters C-2, C-3

of the Zonal Office

the Head of Office

Head Office,

and C-4, SIP Bldg.,

2) All residuary

Incharge of Zonal

Panaji.

PWD Complex, Fatorda,

matters of Zonal

Office

Margao, Goa & Part

office not specifically

office housed at

covered under other

WRD premises in

PIOs

Sy. No. 31/6, village

Navelim at St. Pedro

Moll, Mandop,

Salcete, Goa

In respect of all

Officer who is

Officer/Official Deputy Registrar

information

Unit Incharge

who is sub-

of Co-operative

pertaining to

of concerned

-unit Incharge

Societies at Head

Co-operative

Society at Zonal

of concerned

Office who is the

Societies held at

Office

Society at

District Level

Zonal Office under

Zonal Office

Incharge (D.L.I.)

the provisions of the

of respective

Goa Co-operative

Zonal Office.

Societies Act, 2001

and Rules framed

thereunder

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

89

1

2

3

4

5

6

In respect of all

Officer who is

Officer/Official Deputy Registrar

information

Unit Incharge

who is sub-

of Co-operative

pertaining to

of concerned

-unit Incharge

Societies at Head

Co-operative

Society at Zonal

of concerned

Office who is

Societies held by

Office to whom

Society at

the District

any

the information

Zonal Office

Level Incharge

a) Registrar’s

relates

to whom the

(D.L.I.) of

Nominees

information

respective Zonal

b) Auditors on

relates

Office.

panel of

Auditors

c) Reconciliators

d) Administrators

e) Liquidators

f) Other such persons

or a committee

appointed or

constituted by the

Registrar under the

provisions of the Goa

Co-operative Societies

Act, 2001 and Rules

framed thereunder

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative Societies).

Panaji, 31st March, 2023.

————

Order

No. 9-26-2023/EST/RCS/5099

Read: 1. Order No. 43/2/2005/TS/RCS/1246 dated 26-06-2018.

2. Order No. 43/2/2005/TS/RCS/5931 dated 11-03-2020.

In supersession of the Orders read above and all earlier orders to that effect and in exercise of the powers

conferred under sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 5 of the Right to Information Act, 2005

(Central Act 22 of 2005), I, the undersigned Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Government of Goa do

hereby designate the following Officers as the Public Information Officers (P.I.O.), Assistant Public Information

Officers (A.P.I.O.) and the First Appellate Authority (F.A.A.) in the respective offices for respective subjects/

/wings/sections as below.

Sr.

Name & Address

Particular Wing/

Public Information

Assistant Public

First Appellate

No.

of the Office/

/Section/Branch

Officer (P.I.O.)

Information

Authority

/Public Authority

of the office

designated

Officer (A.P.I.O.)

(F.A.A.)

designated

designated

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

O/o. Assistant Registrar

1) Establishment,

Assistant Registrar

Head Clerk

Deputy Registrar

of Co-operative

Administration,

of Co-operative

of Co-operative

Societies, Quepem

Accounts Sections

Societies who is

Societies (Admin.),

Zone, H. No. 14,

of the Zonal Office

the Head of Office

Head Office,

1st Floor, Biptimoll,

2) All residuary

Incharge of Zonal

Panaji.

Quepem, Goa

matters of Zonal

Office

office not specifically

covered under other

PIOs

90

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

1

2

3

4

5

6

In respect of all

Officer who is

Officer/Official Deputy Registrar

information

Unit Incharge

who is sub-

of Co-operative

pertaining to

of concerned

-unit Incharge

Societies at Head

Co-operative

Society at Zonal

of concerned

Office who is the

Societies held at

Office

Society at

District Level

Zonal Office under

Zonal Office

Incharge (D.L.I.)

the provisions of the

of respective

Goa Co-operative

Zonal Office.

Societies Act, 2001

and Rules framed

thereunder

In respect of all

Officer who is

Officer/Official Deputy Registrar

information

Unit Incharge

who is sub-

of Co-operative

pertaining to

of concerned

-unit Incharge

Societies at Head

Co-operative

Society at Zonal

of concerned

Office who is

Societies held by

Office to whom

Society at

the District

any

the information

Zonal Office

Level Incharge

a) Registrar’s

relates

to whom the

(D.L.I.) of

Nominees

information

respective Zonal

b) Auditors on panel

relates

Office.

of Auditors

c) Reconciliators

d) Administrators

e) Liquidators

f) Other such persons

or a committee

appointed or

constituted by the

Registrar under the

provisions of the Goa

Co-operative Societies

Act, 2001 and Rules

framed thereunder

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative Societies).

Panaji, 31st March, 2023.

————

Notification

No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS-II/PZ/2017/RCS/Suppl/87

Read: 1. Notification No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS II/PZ/

/2017/RCS/Suppl.5306 dated 10-02-2020.

2. Order No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS II/PZ/

/2017/RCS/Suppl.5608 dated 25-02-2020.

3. Order No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS II/PZ/

/2017/RCS/Suppl.4394 dated 24-03-2021.

4. No. 3/3/Urban Credit/TS II/PZ/2017/RCS/

/Suppl.305 dated 28-04-2022.

5. Letter No. VPK/HO/march-23/6829 dated

15-03-2023.

Whereas, vide Notification read at No. 1 above

issued by the Government exercising the powers

under Section 126A of the Goa Co-operative

Societies Act, 2001 (Goa Act 36 of 2001) hereafter

referred to as ‘Act’, the provision of sub-section (1)

of Section 91 D of the Act was modified and the

Registrar of Co-operative Societies was authorized

to appoint Officers of Co-operative Credit Societies,

V. K. S. S. Societies having credit counters and

Multipurpose Societies as Recovery Officer/Sale

Officer upon receipt of individual proposals subject

to the terms and conditions as may be incorporated

in the Order.

And whereas, vide Order read at Sr. No. 2 above

issued by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies,

the Managing Director of the VPK Urban

Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., [Reg. No. ARCS/

/CZ/Credit-8(a)/75/Goa], Mardol-Goa was delegated

with the powers to recover certain sums by

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

91

attachment and sale of property vested in Registrar

of Co-operative Societies under Section 91D of the

Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 read with Rule

124 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003

subject to the following conditions:-

1. The Officer appointed and delegated with the

powers of Sales-cum-Recovery Officer shall

work

under

the

general

guidance,

superintendence and control of the Asstt.

Registrar of Co-op. Societies, Arbitration/

/Execution, North Goa District, Ponda-Goa.

2. The Board of Directors of the society shall be

fully responsible along with the Chief

Executive Officer for any acts in contravention

of the Act, Rules and Bye-laws.

3. The Board of Directors shall review the

performance of the General Manager every

month and ensure compliance.

The delegation of powers was for period of one

year from 01-04-2022 to 31-03-2023.

And whereas, vide letter read at No. 5 above, the

Chairman of the VPK Urban Co-operative Credit

Society Ltd., Mardol-Goa has requested to grant

further extension to the Chief Executive Officer of

their society to act as Sale-cum-Recovery Officer for

their society.

Now, therefore in exercise of the powers conferred

upon undersigned under Section 123B of the Goa

Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 read with

Notification at ref. No. 1 above, the delegation of

powers made to the Managing Director of the VPK

Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Mardol-Goa

is hereby extended for a further period of one year

with retrospective effect from 01-04-2023 to

31-03-2024.

All the terms and conditions mentioned in the

Order referred to at Sr. No. 2 above shall continue

to apply. The undersigned reserves the right to

withdraw this Order at any stage without assigning

any reasons.

Given under the seal of this office.

Vishant S. N. Gaunekar, Registrar (Co-operative

Societies) & ex officio Joint Secretary (Co-operation).

Panaji, 11th April, 2023.

Department of Fire & Emergency

Services

Directorate of Fire & Emergency Services

–––

Order

No. DFES/EST/U-1/289-V/RTIA/2023-24/125

Ref.:

Order No. DFES/EST/U-1/289/RTIA/2022-23

1545 dated 14-06-2022.

In supersession to all earlier orders and in

exercise of the powers vested in me under Section

5(1) and (2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005,

I hereby designate the following officials as State

Public Information Officer/State Assistant Public

Information Officer.

Sr.

State Public Information

Role/Responsibility

No.

Officer/State Assistant

Public Information

Officer

1

2

3

1.

Deputy Director

For Administration/

(Admn.), Directorate

/Establishment and

of Fire and Emergency

Accounts Section under

Services, St. Inez, Panaji

the Directorate of Fire

State Public Information

and Emergency Services.

Officer

2.

Deputy Director

For jurisdiction of

(Fire Services), Central

Central Zone having

Zone, Ponda

Ponda, Bicholim, Old

State Public Information

Goa, Kundaim and

Officer

Valpoi Fire Stations.

3.

Deputy Director

For jurisdiction of

(Fire Services), South

South Zone having

Zone, Margao

Margao, Verna, Curchorem

State Public Information

Cuncolim and Canacona

Officer

Fire Stations.

4.

Assistant Divisional

For jurisdiction of

Officer (Offg.), North

North Zone having

Zone, Panaji

Panaji, Mapusa, Pernem,

State Public Information

Porvorim, Vasco and

Officer

Pilerne Fire Stations.

5.

Office Superintendent,

For Administration/

Directorate of Fire

/Establishment and

and Emergency Services, Accounts Section under

St. Inez, Panaji

the Directorate of Fire

State Assistant Public

and Emergency Services.

Information Officer

6.

Station Fire Officer/

For jurisdiction of

/Officer In-Charge,

South Zone having

Fire Station, Margao

Margao, Verna, Curchorem,

State Assistant Public

Cuncolim and Canacona

Information Officer

Fire Stations.

92

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

1

2

3

7.

Station Fire Officer/

For jurisdiction of

/Officer In-Charge,

Central Zone having

Fire Station, Ponda

Ponda, Bicholim, Old

State Assistant Public

Goa, Kundaim and

Information Officer

Valpoi Fire Stations

8.

Station Fire Officer/

For jurisdiction of

/Officer In-Charge,

North Zone having

Fire Force Head-

Panaji, Mapusa, Porvorim

quaters

Pernem, Vasco and

State Assistant Public

Pilerne Fire Stations.

Information Officer

The State Assistant Public Information Officers

mentioned above shall exercise this function in

respect of any other Fire Station or unit that may be

placed under their jurisdiction hereafter.

The State Assistant Public Information Officers

shall receive the applications for information and

appeals under the Right to Information Act under

their jurisdiction and forward the same alongwith

detail information forthwith to the respective State

Public Information Officer, for further necessary

action at his end.

The State Public Information Officer on receipt

of the applications shall deal with requests from

persons seeking information within the prescribed

time period and render reasonable assistance to

the persons seeking such information.

Further, in terms of provision of Section 19 of the

said Act, the State Director of Fire and Emergency

Services, Panaji shall be the First Appellate

Authority for matters decided by the State

Information Officer.

The powers and functions of the above officers

are defined and specified in the Notification of

Right to Information Act, 2005.

Nitin V. Raiker, Director (Fire and Emergency

Services).

Panaji, 11th April, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Forests

–––

Memorandum

No. 4-4-2012/Seniority-FOR/107

Read: 1. Memorandum No. 4/4/2012/Seniority-FOR/308 dated 21-06-2021.

2. Memorandum No. 4/4/2012/Seniority-FOR/57 dated 20-02-2023.

The seniority of Assistant Conservator of Forests in the Forest Department was finalized vide

Memorandum dated 21-06-2021, read at (1) in the preamble.

A tentative seniority of Assistant Conservator of Forests in the Forest Department was circulated and

objections, if any, were invited vide Memorandum No. 4-4-2012/Seniority-FOR/57 dated 20-02-2023, read at

2 above.

The representations received have been examined and considered. Accordingly, the final seniority of

Assistant Conservator of Forests is hereby finalized as under:-

Sr.

Name of the Officer

Date of birth

Date of appointment

Promotee/Direct

Remarks

No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

1.

Shri Aniket P. Gaonkar

23-05-1988

03-05-2012

D

—

2.

Shri Nandakumar E. Parab

09-11-1975

03-05-2012

D

—

3.

Shri Vishal V. Surve

11-01-1981

03-05-2012

D

—

4.

Shri Amar A. Heblekar

18-08-1968

28-03-2016

P

—

5.

Shri Deepak Pednekar

06-04-1970

06-04-2016

P

—

6.

Shri Damodar Prakash

01-10-1982

21-11-2017

D

—

Salelkar

7.

Smt. Cliffa D’Costa

18-04-1967

06-06-2019

P

—

8.

Shri Vishwas K. Chodankar

04-09-1968

06-06-2019

P

—

9.

Shri Jose Colaco (ST)

05-10-1966

06-06-2019

P

—

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

93

1

2

3

4

5

6

10.

Shri Paresh C. Porab

15-04-1974

09-09-2020

P

—

11.

Shri Dyaneshwar M. Kudalkar (SC)

08-03-1967

15-12-2020

P

—

12.

Shri Minguel A. Fernandes (ST)

16-05-1973

15-12-2020

P

—

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Nathine S. Araujo, Under Secretary (Forest).

Porvorim, 13th April, 2023.

———uuu———

Inspectorate of Factories and Boilers

–––

Notification

No. VI/FAC-3/(GOA/1159)Part/2023-IFB/83

In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso

to Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 66 of the

Factories Act, 1948 (Central Act No. 63 of 1948)

(hereinafter called the “said Act”), the Government

of Goa hereby varies the limits laid down in said

Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 66 of the said

Act in respect of employment of women in the factory,

namely, M/s Cipla Limited, Plot No. M-61 to M-63 &

N-5, Verna Industrial Estate, Verna, Salcette, Goa,

thereby authorising the employment of women in

the said factory between the hours of 7 p.m. and 10

p.m., for a period of two years with effect from the

date of publication of this notification in the Official

Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

P. Pravimal Abhishek, IAS, Chief Inspector of

Factories and Boilers & ex officio Joint Secretary.

Panaji, 18th April, 2023.

–––

Notification

No. VI/FAC-3/(GOA/1021)Part/2023-IFB/84

In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso

to Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 66 of the

Factories Act, 1948 (Central Act No. 63 of 1948)

(hereinafter called the “said Act”), the Government

of Goa hereby varies the limits laid down in said

Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 66 of the said

Act in respect of employment of women in the factory,

namely, M/s Cipla Limited, Plot No. L-139,

L-140A, L-140B, L-141 to L-143, L-144A, L-144B,

L-145 & L-146, Verna Industrial Estate, Verna,

Salcette, Goa, thereby authorising the employment

of women in the said factory between the hours of

7 p.m. and 10 p.m., for a period of two years with

effect from the date of publication of this

notification in the Official Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

P. Pravimal Abhishek, IAS, Chief Inspector of

Factories and Boilers & ex officio Joint Secretary.

Panaji, 18th April, 2023.

–––

Notification

No. VI/FAC-3/(GOA/1045)Part/2023-IFB/85

In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso

to Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 66 of the

Factories Act, 1948 (Central Act No. 63 of 1948)

(hereinafter called the “said Act”), the Government

of Goa hereby varies the limits laid down in said

Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 66 of the said

Act in respect of employment of women in the

factory, namely, M/s Cipla Limited, Plot No. S-103 to

S-105 & S-107 to S-112, L-138, L-147, L-147/1, L-147/2,

L-147/3 & L-150, Verna Industrial Estate, Verna,

Salcette, Goa, thereby authorising the employment

of women in the said factory between the hours of

7 p.m. and 10 p.m., for a period of two years with

effect from the date of publication of this notifica-

tion in the Official Gazette.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

P. Pravimal Abhishek, IAS, Chief Inspector of

Factories and Boilers & ex officio Joint Secretary

Panaji, 18th April, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Labour

––

Notification

No. 28/02/2023-LAB/Part-II/152

The following Award passed by the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa on 30-01-2023 in Case No.

Ref. LC-II/IT/35/16 is hereby published as required

94

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,

1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).

Porvorim, 24th February, 2023.

––––

IN THE LABOUR COURT-II

GOVERNMENT OF GOA

AT PANAJI

(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble

Presiding Officer)

Case No. Ref. LC-II/IT/35/16

Shri Sagar Dhume,

H. No. 3, Tamsoda,

Sanguem-Goa (403705) …… Workman/Party-I.

V/s

The Managing Director,

M/s. Pfizer Ltd.,

Plot No. L-137, Phase III-A,

Verna Industrial Estate,

Verna, Salcete-Goa (403722) …… Employer/Party-II.

Workman/Party-I represented by Ld. Rep. Shri

Subhash Naik.

Employer/Party-II represented by Ld. Rep. Shri G. K.

Sardessai.

Panaji, dated: 30-01-2023.

AWARD

1. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause

(c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Industrial

Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947), the

Government of Goa, by Order dated 27-07-2016,

bearing No. 28/17/2016-LAB/579 referred the

following dispute for adjudication to the Labour

Court-II, at Panaji-Goa.

“(1) Whether the action of the management of

M/s. Pfizer Limited, Verna, Salcette, Goa, in

dismissing Shri Sagar Dhume, Management

Associate, with effect from 16-06-2015, is legal

and justified?

(2) If not, what relief the workman is entitled to?

2. On receipt of the reference, a case was

registered under No. LC-II/IT/35/2016 and registered

A/D notice was issued to the parties. In pursuance

to the said notice, the parties put in their

appearance. The Workman/Party-I (for short

‘Workman’), filed his Statement of Claim on

19-08-2016 at Exhibit-5. The facts of the case in

brief as pleaded by the Workman are that the

Employer/Party-II (for short ‘Employer’) is a

Multinational Pharmaceutical Company engaged

in the production of tablets at its factory at Verna

Industrial Estate, Salcette, Goa. He stated that the

Employer was initially established at Verna in the

year, 2001 as Wyeth Lederle Ltd. which was

subsequently changed as Pfizer Ltd. in the year,

2009. He stated that he was employed with the

Employer as “Operator-Production” since

18-03-2002. He stated that he has not received a

single memo or a single charge-sheet except the

charge-sheet which is the subject matter of the

present reference. He stated that during his service

with the Employer, he received awards from the

Employer for his performance. He stated that he

also received several “employee of the month”

awards, long service awards, best nominee of the

month awards, certificates for improving

productivity and development, etc. He stated that

after formation of a trade Union in 2014, all the

workers of the Employer Company joined the said

union. He stated that he was elected as an office

bearer of the said union and as such he was a

Protected Workman as per the provisions of the I.D.

Act, 1947. He stated that initially all workmen

including himself were employed as Operator–

-Production. He stated that in the year, 2006, the

designations of all workmen were changed to that

of management associates Grade MA-01 and in year

2011, the grade of workers were changed to MA-02

although the duties performed by them remained

the same. He stated that all the workmen of the

Employer including himself were issued

appointment letters when they joined and all of

them were confirmed in the service of the Employer.

3. He stated that in June, 2014, workers formed a

Trade Union for the first time, when all the workers of

the Employer factory became members of Gomantak

Mazdoor Sangh Trade Union. He stated that the

Employer was informed about the formation of the

Trade Union. He stated that names of seven Union

office bearers of the Union including himself were

also communicated to the Employer. He stated that

the Employer did not appreciate the decision of the

workers to form a Trade Union and started harassing

the workers by withdrawing existing benefits and

existing facilities. He stated that with effect from

20-04-2015, the Employer did not allot any work to

workers inside the factory and kept them idle as the

Employer was not happy with the workers forming a

Trade Union. He stated that with effect from

24-04-2015, all workmen were kept outside the

factory gates and were not allowed to resume work

inside the factory. He stated that this continued for

several months and later the Employer stated that

they would not allow the workmen to report for work

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

95

unless they gave an undertaking, the contents of

which were not disclosed to them. He stated that

later on, the Employer allowed all workmen to report

for work without undertaking and all workmen

reported for work with effect from 17-08-2015. He

stated that the Employer has till date not paid wages

of the workers from 20-4-2015 to 16-08-2015. He stated

that however, eleven workmen, who were issued

suspension orders pending enquiry, were not allowed

to report for work. He stated that meanwhile, after

formation of the Trade union, the Employer

suspended the services of all office bearers of the

Union namely, Ramdas Mayenkar, himself,

Krishnakant Gawas, Navin Gaude, Susen Jalmi, Suraj

Kurtikar and Suraj Salgaonkar.

4. He stated that all the aforesaid workers were

issued charge-sheets on trumped up and fabricated

charges. He stated that he himself and others replied

to the charge-sheets denying the allegations levelled

against them. He stated that the suspension of seven

union office bearers including himself was from

21-04-2015. He stated that four more workmen were

also suspended from service with effect from

23-04-2015 pending enquiry namely, Ankush

Gaonkar, Mangaldas Gaude, Umakant Chari, and

Samesh Naik. He stated that all eleven workmen

were suspended and were issued charge-sheets

based on false and fabricated charges. He stated

that as the workers were not happy with Gomantak

Mazdoor Sangh Union because of the developments

which took place which the workers least expected.

He stated that all the workers after holding a General

Body Meeting decided to resign from the said Union

and became the members of Kamgarancho Ekvott

Trade Union of which Shri Subhash Naik George is

the President with effect from 20-05-2015 after

resigning from Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh. He stated

that these developments were informed to the

Employer in writing. He stated that the said Union

Kamagarancho Ekvott raised several Industrial

Disputes with the Employer such as Charter of

Demands on behalf of the workers, illegal and

unjustified refusal of work with effect from 24-04-2015,

unfair labour practice, non-payment of bonus, illegal

termination of services of workmen and illegal

imposition of punishments to workers etc. He stated

that as the Employer did not accept the demands,

the union raised disputes before Dy. Labour

Commissioner who is also Conciliation Officer of

Government of Goa, where all industrial disputes are

pending conciliation and some disputes have been

referred to this Hon’ble Tribunal for adjudication.

5. He stated that although all seven union office

bearers including himself were issued separate

charge-sheets, the Employer decided to hold

common enquiry. He stated that Shri Prashant

Agarwal, Advocate, was appointed as an Enquiry

Officer to conduct the enquiries in respect of

charge-sheets issued to seven union office bearers.

He stated that Shri Prasanna Chawadikar, Advocate,

was appointed as Management Representative. He

stated that initially, Puti Gaonkar was the Defense

Representative on behalf of charge-sheeted workmen

and later on, Shri Subhash Naik George was

appointed as Defense Representative by himself and

other charge-sheeted workers. He stated that on

02-06-2015 a date was fixed by the Enquiry Officer

Mr. Agarwal to hold the enquiry. However, on that

day Ld. Enquiry Officer did not attend the enquiry at

the hearing fixed at Panaji-Goa. He stated that the

Management Representative, Shri Prasanna

Chawadikar who was present for the enquiry

informed that Ld. Enquiry Officer had gone to his

native place to bring his wife and he could not get

tickets to return to Goa due to vacation rush and

that he was still travelling in the train. He stated

that the Management Representative informed him

and all other charge-sheeted workmen as well as

Defense Representative that Ld. Enquiry Officer,

Mr. Agarwal had resigned from the post of Enquiry

Officer and that he would not come for the enquiry

for his personal reasons. He stated that Management

Representative informed that the next date of enquiry

would be communicated after the management

appointed a new Enquiry Officer. He stated that after

5th June, 2015, no communication either oral or

writing was received by him or his Defense

Representative about the date of enquiry or

appointment of a new Enquiry Officer.

6. He stated that after few months, the Employer

dismissed the service of the four union office bearers

with effect from 16-06-2015 claiming that they held

the enquiry against them and claiming that Enquiry

Officer held them guilty of the charges namely,

himself, Krishnakant Gawas, Navin Gaude, and Suraj

Salgaonkar. Aggrieved by the said blatantly illegal

and unjustified terminations, the Workman and three

other workmen raised an industrial disputes with

the Employer and later on with the Conciliation

Officer/Dy. Labour Commissioner which ended in

failure.

7. He contended that during the pendency of such

disputes as per provisions of Section 33 of the I. D.

Act, 1947, the Employer cannot terminate the services

of the workmen without prior permission or without

approval of action taken by them. He submitted that

the Employer, as an afterthought, terminated the

services of remaining three office bearers namely,

Ramdas Mayenkar, Susen Jalmi and Suraj Kurtikar

with effect from 23-12-2015. He submitted that with

96

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

these termination, Employer have terminated all

seven office bearers who were elected after formation

of Trade Union which clearly proves that this is a

clear case of victimization for trade union activities.

He submitted that since he himself, Susen Jalmi and

Suraj Kurtikar were protected workmen as per

provisions of I.D. Act, prior permission before

termination ought to have been obtained from this

Hon’ble Tribunal and/or Dy. Labour Commissioner,

failing which the termination are bad-in-law. He

submitted that the charge-sheet issued to him and

six other office bearers of the union and four other

union activist were fabricated and cooked up besides

being false. He submitted that the same were issued

to him and others to victimize them for their trade

union activities as they had formed a union for the

first time in the company. He submitted that Shailesh

Redkar, whom the Employer claims to have been

appointed as Enquiry Officer, was never appointed

as Enquiry Officer and no intimation to that effect

has been sent to him. He submitted that no

intimation of dates of enquiry by the said Enquiry

Officer if any, was sent to him. He submitted that the

records of enquiry proceedings alleged to have been

conducted by Shailesh Redkar have not been

supplied to him till date. He submitted that the

Employer, before terminating his service, has not

issued him a show cause notice enclosing copy of

the findings of the Enquiry Officer, if any, and records

of enquiry proceedings if any, seeking his views

before dismissal which is mandatory. He submitted

that no enquiry was held in respect of charges

levelled against him in the charge-sheet issued to

him. He submitted that copy of the findings of the

enquiry if any, were not supplied to him before

termination of his services. He submitted that since

the date of dismissal, he is unemployed and is

dependent on his family and friend on sustainance.

He submitted that his termination is illegal and

unjustified as he has been dismissed from service in

total violation of principles of natural justice. He

submitted that no opportunity of whatsoever, was

given to him to defend himself in the enquiry. He

submitted that the management witnesses were not

allowed to cross-examine by him. He submitted that

the charges levelled against him have not been

proved in a fair and impartial enquiry in accordance

with the principles of natural justice. He submitted

that his dismissal from services is malafide,

vindictive, and by way of victimization for trade

union activities, besides the same being

discriminatory. The workmen therefore, prayed that

he be reinstated in service with full back wages and

continuity of service with costs.

8. The Employer controverted the claim of the

Workman by filing its written statement on

02-12-2016 at Exb. 7. The Employer, as an by way of

its preliminary objections, submitted that the

reference is not maintainable and it ought to be

rejected as there is no “Industrial Dispute” as defined

under the I.D. Act, 1947, that the Workman has

accepted all the legal dues arising out of termination

in full and final settlement and hence, the Workman

is stopped from raising the present dispute, that there

is non application of mind by the Appropriate

Government while referring the present dispute and

that the present reference is therefore null and void.

9. The Employer stated that it is a Private Limited

Company incorporated under the provisions of the

Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at

the Capital, 1802, 1901 Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra

(East), Mumbai and the factory located at Verna

Industrial Estate, Verna, Salcette-Goa. The Employer

stated that it is engaged in the manufacturing of

pharmaceuticals at its factory located at Verna

Industrial Estate, Verna-Goa.

10. The Employer stated that the Workman was

issued a charge-sheet dated 07-05-2015 alleging as

under:

“It has been observed that from the month of

December, 2014, the workmen have deliberately and

willfully reduced production as a result of which the

Management suffered heavy losses. The fall in

production which commenced from the month of

December, 2014 gradually reached to a stage where

during the preceding week the production was

reduced to around 25% of the normal.

The management has consistently requested the

workmen to stop the unfair practice of lowering the

production and to restore normalcy. However, the

workmen continue with the unfair labour practice of

lowering the productive process.

Subsequent there to by Notice dated 7th February,

2015, letters dated 14th April, 2015 and various

communications, Management invited the attention

of the workmen to the fall in production and

requested the workmen to restore normalcy.

However, instead of restoring normalcy, to the utter

shock and surprise of the Management, the workmen

in a concerted manner stopped production from the

commencement of Second shift of 20th April, 2015

and started squatting within the factory premises.

As a consequence thereto the entire productive

process has come to a grinding halt. The

Management has suffered huge losses till date and

continues to do so. As you are aware, we are engaged

in the manufacturing of drugs which include

life-saving drugs like Wysolone, Folvite, Pacitane,

Overal-L etc.

All these products are listed in the National List

of Essential Medicines (NLEM), issued by Ministry

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

97

of Health, Government of India. Wysolone is a

life-saving steroidal drug with anti-inflammatory

properties and controls the painful symptoms of a

temporary autoimmune condition called Polymyalgia

Rheumatica (PMR), Folvite, essentially taken by

women during the first trimester of pregnancy for

development of the foetus and also used for all kinds

of anaemic conditions, Pacitane, drug used by

Patients suffering from early symptoms of Parkinson’s

Disease and Overal-L. You are fully aware that the

discontinuation due to non-availability of these

drugs can have an adverse effect on the patients and

the society at large.

We have received various communications from

our dealers, hospitals and doctors informing us of

the serious consequences arising as a result of drugs

not being available in the market and the suffering

of the patients, especially those who had already

been prescribed such drugs and consuming the same.

The consequence of sudden discontinuation of

supply to the patients has as expected adverse

consequences on the health of the patients.

You are an office bearer of Gomantak Mazdoor

Sangh, the Management has been consistently been

communicating with you and other workmen who

have been participating in the go slow/stoppage of

work to desist from the unfair labour practice of

reducing willfully and deliberately the production.

The fall in production is a consequence of your

instigation and incitement of the workmen to

commence and continue with the reduction of

production. It has also been observed that you have

been actively inducing the workmen to continue

with the go slow.

Further, on 23-3-2015, while you were in second

shift and operating cartonator. The machine was

under routine maintenance by service engineer who

gave the Ok report at 4.00 p.m. Machine setting was

done at the speed of 70 CPM and was handed over to

production. The machine was operational till 8.30

p.m. The speed was reduced to 60 CPM by our

engineer Mr. Raju Mane and minor issues were

resolved.

After the dinner break at 9.15 p.m. when the

machine was operational, you asked technician

Mr. Namdev Shinde, who was instructed by his

Manager to remain present near the machine and

observe the problem if any, to bring locktite for the

reasons best known to you. He requested to wait till

his engineer Mr. Raju comes as either of them was

instructed to be present in machine operation area,

however, you did not accept his request and insisted

on urgency on locktite.

Mr. Namdev Shinde left the area to bring locktite

and by the time he returned back, the machine was

non-operational and carton setting were found

disturbed and settings of the machines were

changed.

This adversely, affected the production in second

and third shift. During the oral discussion you have

not satisfactorily explained the reasons for which you

required locktite so urgently on the production line.

11. The participation in the willful go slow and

the instigation and incitement of the workmen to

initiate the go slow and continue, wilful damage to

or loss of employers good or properties as such

amounts to a serious misconduct under the Model

Standing Orders.

The Management therefore decided to conduct

an enquiry into the misconduct alleged against you.

You were suspended pending enquiry by suspension

order dated 21-04-2015.

Your above acts on your part constitute the

following Acts of Misconducts under the Model

Standing Orders:

a. Willful insubordination or disobedience,

whether alone or in combination with others,

to any lawful and reasonable order of a superior.

b. Willful damage to or loss of employer’s good or

property.

c. Habitual absence without leave or absence

without leave for more than 10 days.

d. Habitual breach of any law applicable to the

establishment.

e. Riotous or disorderly behavior during working

hours at the establishment or any act

subversive of discipline.

f.

Neglect of work.

g. Striking work or inciting others to strike work

in contravention of the provision of any law, or

rule having the force of law”.

12. The Employer stated that the workmen was

suspended pending enquiry. The Employer stated

that management conducted an enquiry into the

above said charges. The Employer stated that the

enquiry was conducted by Mr. Shailesh Redkar as

Enquiry Officer in an impartial manner and every

opportunity was given to the Workman to defend the

charges levelled against him and the Workman failed

to participate in the inquiry. The Employer stated

that the enquiry was therefore held ex-parte. The

Employer stated that Ld. Enquiry Officer submitted

his findings dated 13-6-2015 and after appreciating

the evidence on records held the workman guilty of

the charges levelled against him. The Employer

stated that they considered the proceedings of the

98

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

inquiry, the findings of the Enquiry Officer dated

13-6-2015 and concurred with the same. The

Employer stated that they considered the past

records and did not find any extenuating

circumstances for mitigation of punishment of

dismissal from its service. The Employer stated that

considering the gravity of proved misconducts, the

Workman was dismissed from its service vide letter

dated 16-6-2015. The Employer stated that a cheque

bearing No.101979 drawn on Deutsche Bank, Mumbai

for an amount of Rs.1,49,488/- (Rupees One lakh forty

nine thousand four eighty eight only) was sent to

the Workman at his home address by Registered A/D

in full and final settlement of all his dues and the

statement to that effect was sent through Registered

Post at his correspondence address on 10-7-2015 and

the same has been received by him. The Employer

stated that the workman was paid full and final

settlement of all his dues which includes basic pay,

P.L. encashment, House rent allowance, Conveyance

allowance, Medical allowance, LTA along with

gratuity. The Employer stated that the said amount

has been received by the Workman and has been

credited to his account on 29-9-2015. The Employer

stated that the workman has also collected all his

provident fund dues and for the purpose of

Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous

Provisions Act, 1952 is an excluded employee. The

Employer stated that since the Workman is

prosecuting this matter after having received the

benefits/full and final settlement of all legal dues

arising out of termination, it would be equitable to

direct the Workman to return the benefits so received

from Employer with 8.5% interest on the said money

for prosecuting the reference on merits on the

principle of “who seeks equity must do equity. The

Employer therefore prayed that the Workman be

directed to deposit the entire amount in the Court

and in the event the Workman fails to deposit the

amount within the period stipulated by this Hon’ble

Court, the defense of the Workman may be struck off

and the reference may be rejected or the Workman

may be stopped for agitating the present reference.

13. The Employer stated that by notice dated

20-4-2015, the management informed the employee

that their act of stoppage of work from the second

shift amounts to willful stoppage and gross

indiscipline. The Employer stated that the

management advised the employees to report for

work as per the shift schedule. The Employer stated

that however, the employees continued with the

stoppage and continued squatting within the factory

premises. The Employer stated that they, by notice

dated 21-4-2015, invited the attention of the

workmen in the third shift of 20th April, and first

shift of 21st April, 2015, to the wilful stoppage of work

and again advised them to report for work. The

Employer stated that however, they failed to report

for duty and continued to squat within the factory

premises. The Employer stated that the management

also decided to issue charge-sheets to some of the

Employees for the misconducts committed by them.

The Employer stated that in view of the seriousness

of the misconducts alleged against them and in the

interest of conducting a proper inquiry, and to avoid

any interference with such inquiry, the management

decided to suspend them pending inquiry and formal

charge-sheets. The Employer stated that the said

workmen suspended pending inquiry vide letter of

suspension dated 21-4-2015. The Employer stated

that in the letter of suspension, the management

informed the workmen that the management has

decided to institute an inquiry into the acts of

misconduct alleged against them. The Employers

stated that as the employees continued with the

work stoppage and failed to report for work and on

the contrary were sitting within the factory premises,

the management by letter dated 23-4-2015, invited

the attention of General Secretary of the union Mr.

Puti Gaonkar to the stoppage of work by the

employees from 20-4-2015 and to the notices

displayed on its notice board requesting the striking

employees to report for work. The Employer stated

that in the said letter, the management informed the

union that the management required a written

undertaking from all the workmen that they will

perform their duties of manufacturing and restored

normalcy in the factory premises. The Employer

stated that the said letter was also displayed on its

notice board. The Employer stated that at the copy

of the said undertaking that the workmen was

required to sign was also displayed on its notice

board and copies of the same were placed at the

security gate. The Employer stated that on and from

commencement of general shifts of 24-4-2015, the

employees who had reported at the security gate

were advised to sign the undertaking. The Employer

stated that however, they refused to do so and

squatted outside the factory premises in front of the

security cabin from where all the employees enter

inside the factory premises thereby, causing

inconvenience to the employees who report for duty.

The Employer stated that the action of the employees

of stoppage of work from 28-4-2015 is a concerted

manner and continuing such stoppage amounts to a

strike which is illegal and unjustified.

14. The Employer started that by notice dated

27-4-2015 displayed on 27-4-2015, the management

invited the attention of the workmen the stoppage

of work by way of illegal strike from 28-4-2015 and to

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

99

the undertakings which they declining to submit to

the management giving an assurance of restoration

of normalcy. The Employer stated that by the said

notice they were informed not to sit at the security

gate as squatting outside the security gate is illegal

and causes inconvenience and as well as atmosphere

of fear and threat in the mind of managerial and other

employees as well as the customers, welders who

are entering the factory premises. The Employer

stated that the employees were therefore advised

not to squat near the factory gate and to stay away

from the said place. The Employer stated that as the

workmen continued to commit illegalities, the

management filed a suit for permanent as well as

temporary injunction on 27-4-2015. The Employer

stated the Hon’ble Court after hearing them passed

order stating that the dependent union and its

members only those who are employed with them,

their agents, friends, relatives and representatives

are restrained from squatting within a radius of 200

meters from its factory premises at Verna, Salcette,

Goa and from blocking the entrance thereof and/or

preventing egress and ingress there from the other

staff and employees, customers, goods, vehicles, raw

material suppliers, there from till filing their reply

thereto. The Employer stated that in the meanwhile

the management, vide its letter to the individual

workman dated 02-06-2015, called upon the workmen

to withdraw the agitation and report for work by

giving declaration/undertaking as mentioned

therein. The Employer stated that the workmen

however, did not respond. The Employer stated that

they again by its letter dated 23-6-2015 sent to

individual workman requested to join the duties. The

workmen did not respond. The Employer stated that

the management once again vide its appeal dated

31-07-2015 sent to individual workers requested the

workmen to report for work in their shift as per their

regular shift. The Employer stated that on 16-7-2015

four employees who were members of “Kamgarancho

Ekvott” resumed the duty. The Employer stated that

thereafter, one more appeal was sent to the workmen

on 11-08-2015 wherein, reference was given of the

appeal of 23-06-2016, 3-07-2015, and 31-07-2015 to

report for work in the shift and the shift schedule

was annexed thereto. The Employer stated that

finally on 17-08-2015 the remaining workers resumed

duties.

15. The Employer submitted that the Ld. Enquiry

Officer followed the principles of natural justice and

granted every conceivable opportunities to the

workmen to be present and failed to participate in

the enquiry and therefore Ld. Enquiry Officer had no

option but to conduct the inquiry ex-parte. The

Employer submitted that Ld. Enquiry Officer on the

basis of the evidence on record submitted a reasoned

findings holding the Workman guilty of the charges

levelled against him. The Employer submitted that

the management considered the findings of the

Enquiry Officer, concurred with the same and

considering the gravity of misconduct decided to

dismiss him from the service and hence the present

application for permission for dismissal of the

Workman. The Employer denies the case of the

Workman as pleaded by him and prayed for rejection

of the present reference.

16. Thereafter, the Workman filed his Re-joinder

on 13-12-2016 at Exb. 8. The Workman, by way of his

Re-joinder, confirms and reiterates all his

submissions, averments and statements made in his

Claim Statement to be true and correct and denies

all the statements, averments and submissions made

by the Employer in its Written Statement, which are

contrary to his Statement and averments made in his

Claim Statement.

17. Based on the pleadings filed by the respective

parties, this Court framed the following issues on

5-4-2017 at Exb. 12.

1. Whether a free, fair and proper enquiry was

conducted against the Workman/Party I in

respect of charge-sheet dated 07-05-2015 in

accordance with the principles of natural

justice?

2. Whether the charges of misconduct leveled

against the Workman vide charge-sheet

dated 07-05-2015 have been proved to the

satisfaction of this court by acceptable

evidence?

3. Whether the Workman/Party I proved that his

dismissal from service is in violation of

Section 33 of the I.D. Act, 1947?

4. Whether the Workman/Party-I proves that the

action of the Employer/Party II in dismissing

him from service w.e.f. 16-06-2015, is illegal

and unjustified?

5. Whether the Employer/Party II proves that the

reference is not maintainable in view of the

reasons stated in para 1(a) to 1(d) of its written

statement?

6. Whether the Workman/Party-I is entitled to any

relief?

7. What order? What award?

18. Thereafter, both the parties led evidence on

the preliminary issues No. 1 and 2. Subsequently,

the Employer filed an application for amendment of

its written statement which was allowed by order

100

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

dated 17-3-2020 after hearing both parties. The

Workman also filed synopsis of his written arguments

on preliminary issues. On 12-3-2022, Ld. Rep.

Shri Subhash Naik appearing for the Workman as well

as Ld. Adv. Ms. N. Gaonkar representing the Employer

submitted that the matter is likely to be settled

amicably between the parties. Accordingly, on 20-

01-2023, Ld. Rep. Shri Subhash Naik along with the

Workman as well as Ld. Adv. Mrs. M. Rao h/f Adv. G.

K. Sardessai representing the Employer along with

its Director remained present and filed an

application for Award in terms of settlement along

with Memorandum of settlement u/s 2(P) r/w

Sec-18(1) of the I.D. Act, 1947 between the Employer

and the Workman which is on record at Exb. 53-colly

and submitted that the matter be disposed of in terms

of the settlement arrived at between the parties

hereinabove. The terms of settlement as agreed

between the parties hereinabove are reproduced

here under:

a. The Management agrees to pay the workman

Mr. Sagar A. Dhume a sum of Rs. 21,00,000/-

(Rupees twenty one lakhs only), vide

cheque bearing No. 500005 dated 12-01-2023

drawn on JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A.,

Mumbai 400098 Branch, in full and final

settlement of all his claims.

b. It is agreed between the parties that the

Management shall not deduct TDS from the

Settlement amount and Mr. Sagar Dhume

undertakes to pay the Tax on the said amount.

c. Accordingly, Mr. Sagar Dhume agrees not to

pursue the references No. LC-II/IT/35/2016

before the Labour Court II or any dispute

raised individually or through any union

before any Tribunal, Court, Authority or

Forum and treat the same as settled.

d. It is agreed between the parties that this

settlement shall be filed before the Labour

Court II under reference No. LC-II/IT/35/

/2016 for an Award in terms of the present

settlement.

I have gone through the terms of settlement

signed by the parties hereinabove and am of the

opinion that the said terms of settlement are

beneficial to both the parties. The said terms of

settlement are also useful for the harmonious relation

between the parties. It further creates industrial

harmony at the workplace. Hence, I approve the same.

In view of above and with regards to the facts and

circumstances of the present case, I proceed to pass

the following order.

ORDER

1. It is held that the reference as to whether the

action of the management of M/s. Pfizer Ltd., Verna

Industrial Estate, Verna, Salcette, Goa, in dismissing

Shri Sagar Dhume, Management Associate, w.e.f.

16-06-2015 is legal and justified, does not survive.

2. Inform the Government accordingly.

Sd/-

(Suresh N. Narulkar)

Presiding Officer,

Labour Court-II.

———uuu———

Department of Mines & Geology

Directorate of Mines & Geology

–––

Order

No. 01/72/ADM/2005/Mines/Part-I/193

In supersession of all the earlier orders issued in this regards and in pursuance to Section 19 of Right

to Information Act, 2005 (Central Act No. 22 of 2005), the Deputy Director of Mines and Geology-I, II & III

are hereby designated as First Appellate Authority according to the subject matters.

Further, in pursuance to Section 5 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (Central Act No. 22 of 2005), the

following are designated as State Public Information Officers in respect of the allocated subject matters

Sr.

Public Information

Public Information

Assistant Public

Section

No.

Officers

Officers (Link)

Information Officers

1

2

3

4

5

1.

Smt. Nelita O. Fernandes

Smt. Glancia Q.

Shri Suraj P. Kalgutkar,

Major Mineral.

e D’Silva, Assistant

Fernandes, Assistant

Technical Assistant

Geologist (Major Mineral

Geologist

Section Head)

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

101

1

2

3

4

5

2.

Shri Sudhir Mandrekar,

Shri Shyam Sawant,

Shri Gajanan Naik,

Minor Mineral.

Assistant Geologist

Assistant Geologist

Recovery Inspector

(Minor Mineral Section

Head)

3.

Shri Sankalp Shet Dessai,

Kum. Mary Ann Carvalho,

Shri Saklu Velip,

Technical General.

Assistant Geologist

Assistant Geologist

Head Clerk (Technical)

(Technical General

Section Head)

4.

Shri Jaiwant Kamat,

Shri Snehal Sangelkar,

Shri Milind M. Majgaonkar, Survey Section.

Surveying Officer

Head Surveyor

Draughtsman Gr. I

(Survey Section Head)

5.

Assistant Accounts

Research Assistant

Accountant

Accounts Section.

Officer (Accounts

Section Head)

6.

Research Assistant

Assistant Accounts

Statistical Assistant

Statistics Section.

Officer

7.

Office Superintendent

Shri Baban Gaonkar,

Smt. Girija Surme, UDC

Establishment

(Establishment Section

Head Clerk

Section.

Head)

Assistant Public Information Officers will compile all the information from the dealing hands and will

provide information to the Public Information Officers.

This order shall come into force with immediate effect.

Dr. S. Shanbhogue, Director (Mines & Geology)/ex officio Joint Secretary.

Panaji, 5th April, 2023.

———uuu———

Directorate of Museums

–––

Order

No. 1/330/2022/DM-316

On recommendation of the Departmental

Promotion Committee as conveyed by the Goa

Public Service Commission vide their letter No.

COM/II/11/64(1)/2023/21 dated 13-04-2023,

Government is pleased to promote Smt. Manisha G.

Govenkar, Guide Lecturer to the post of Curator

(Education), Group ‘B’ Gazetted on regular basis in

the Pay Matrix (Level-6) plus usual allowances as

admissible under the rules.

The above promotion shall be effective from the

date of joining to the post. The Officer shall submit

joining report to the Administration Section of this

Directorate.

Smt. Manisha G. Govenkar shall be on probation

for a period of 2 years. She may exercise an option

in terms of Provision of FR 22(I)(a)(1) if she so desired

within one month from the date of the issue of this

order for fixing her pay in the respective

promotional grade.

The expenditure towards pay and allowances

shall be debited to the Budget Head of Account

Demand No. 46, 2205—Art and Culture, 00,

107—Museums, 02—State Museum (Non Plan),

01—Salaries.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Upasana Mazgaonkar, Director (Museums) &

ex officio Joint Secretary.

Panaji, 18th April, 2023.

————

Order

No. 1/336/2023/DM-317

On recommendation of the Departmental

Promotion Committee as conveyed by the Goa

Public Service Commission vide their letter No.

COM/II/11/64(2)/2023/20 dated 13-04-2023,

Government is pleased to promote Smt. Vinie G.

Naik, Conservation Assistant to the post of

Conservator, Group ‘B’, Non Gazetted on regular

basis in the Pay Matrix (Level-6) plus usual

allowances as admissible under the rules.

102

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

The above promotion shall be effective from the

date of joining to the post. The Officer shall submit

joining report to the Administration Section of this

Directorate.

Smt. Vinie G. Naik shall be on probation for a

period of 2 years. She may exercise an option in

terms of Provision of FR 22(I)(a)(1) if she so desired

within one month from the date of the issue of this

order for fixing her pay in the respective

promotional grade.

The expenditure towards pay and allowances

shall be debited to the Budget Head of Account

Demand No. 46, 2205—Art and Culture, 00,

107— Museums, 01—Expansion of Museum (Plan),

01—Salaries.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Upasana Mazgaonkar, Director (Museums) &

ex officio Joint Secretary.

Panaji, 18th April, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Personnel

–––

Order

No. 7/27/2022-PER/1014

The Governor of Goa is pleased to transfer and

post Ms. Egna Cleetus, IAS (AGMUT:2020), Deputy

Collector & SDO, Ponda as Deputy Collector & SDO,

Quepem with additional charge of Forest Settlement

Officer (South), with immediate effect.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 6th April, 2023.

————

Order

No. 5/2/2017-PER/1015

On the recommendation of the Goa Services

Board, the Governor of Goa is pleased to order

transfer of the following Junior Scale Officers of

Goa Civil Service, in public interest, with immediate

effect:-

Sl.

Name of the Officer

Posted as

No.

& present post

1

2

3

1.

Shri Raghuraj Faldessai,

Deputy Collector

Deputy Collector (LA),

& SDO, Ponda.

South

1

2

3

2.

Smt. Sharmila Gaunkar,

Deputy Collector

Deputy Collector & SDO,

(LA), South.

Quepem with additional

charge of Forest

Settlement Officer, South

The officers shall complete handing over and

taking over process with immediate effect and

submit compliance.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).

Porvorim, 6th April, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Public Health

–––

Order

No. 5/1/2019-IV/PHD 522

Read: Order No. 13/52/89-IV/PHD(Part-II)/1366

dated 10-09-2019.

Government is pleased to re-nominate Dr. Ida de

Noronha de Ataide, Dean of Goa Dental College &

Hospital, Bambolim-Goa as a member of Dental

Council of India u/s 3(e) of the Dentists Act, 1948 to

represent the Government of Goa for a further

period of two years with effect from 18-07-2024 to

17-07-2026.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health-I).

Porvorim, 13th April, 2023.

————

Order

No. 44/14/2013-I/PHD/528

Government is pleased to accept the resignation

tendered by Dr. Damodar alias Swapnil Arsekar,

Senior Physician under Directorate of Health

Services and to relieve him from the post of Senior

Physician under Directorate of Health Services with

effect from 23-04-2023 (b.n.).

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).

Porvorim, 10th April, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

103

Directorate of Skill Development and

Entrepreneurship

Human Resource Development Foundation

Society

–––

Order

No. 3/4/2022/HRDF/PART(II)/1178

Read: Government Order 1) No. 3/4/99-HRDF/203/

dated 04-01-2008.

2) No. 3/4/2022/HRDF/

/PART(II)/611 dated

30-06-2022.

The Government is pleased to reconstitute the

Governing Committee of Human Resource

Development Foundation Society under the

Chairmanship of the Director of Skill Development

& Entrepreneurship and consisting of the following

members:

1. Director of Skill Development & — Chairman.

Entrepreneurship, Directorate

of Skill Development &

Entrepreneurship, 3rd Floor,

Shramashakti Bhavan, Panaji-Goa

2. Director of Education or his

—

Member.

representative, Directorate of

Education, Porvorim-Goa

3. Director of Technical Institute

—

Member.

or his representative, Directorate

of Technical Education,

Government of Goa

4. Addl. Secretary (Finance)/Jt.

—

Member.

Secretary (Finance), Finance

Department, Government of Goa

5. Assistant Apprenticeship

—

Member.

Advisor, Directorate of Skill

Development & Entrepreneurship,

3rd Floor, Shramashakti Bhavan,

Panaji-Goa

6. Deputy Director (Training),

—

Member

Directorate of Skill Development

Secretary.

& Entrepreneurship,

3rd Floor, Shramashakti Bhavan,

Panaji-Goa

7. Asst. Accounts Officer,

—

Treasurer.

Directorate of Skill Development

& Entrepreneurship, 3rd Floor,

Shramashakti Bhavan, Panaji-Goa

8. Deputy Director (Admn.),

—

Advisor.

Directorate of Skill Development

& Entrepreneurship, 3rd Floor,

Shramashakti Bhavan, Panaji-Goa

9. Non-Official Members:

a) President or his representative,

Goa State Industries Association,

4th Floor, Goa-IDC House, Patto

Plaza, Panaji-Goa.

b) President or his representative,

Confederation of Indian Industry,

Goa State Office-Western Region,

1st Floor, Salgaocar Center,

Next to Mary Immaculate Girls

High School, Rua de Qurem,

Panaji-Goa.

c) President or his representative,

Goa Chamber of Commerce &

Industry, Narayan Rajaram

Bandekar Bhavan, T.B. Cunha

Road, P.O. Box 59, Panjim-Goa.

d) President or his representative,

Travel & Tourism Association of

Goa, 609, Dempo Tower, 6th Floor,

Patto Plaza, Panaji-Goa.

e) Principal or his representative,

GNS Computers, Banastarim-Goa.

f) Principal or his representative,

International Institute of Hotel

Management, Indismart

Woodbourne Resort, Gonvoloy,

Nuvem, Salcete-Goa.

The tenure of the non-official members shall be

for a period of 2 years, with effect from the date of

issue of this order. The role, responsibilities and

functions of the non-official members shall be

specified in the Rules and Regulations of the said

society.

This issues with the approval of the Government.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Director (Skill Development &

Entrepreneurship) & ex offficio Jt. Secretary.

Panaji, 6th April, 2023.

———uuu———

Department of Town & Country Planning

–––

Notification

No. 14/17(2)/RPG-21/MOR/245/8/TCP-2023/32

Whereas, the Applicant, namely, M/s Gangareddy

Infra Private Limited have made an application dated

27-03-2023 (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Application”) under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

104

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”)

for correction of inconsistent/incoherent zoning

provisions in the Regional Plan for Goa-2021

(RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land admeasuring

an area of 13964 m2, surveyed under Survey No. 245,

sub-division No. 8, of Village Morjim, Pernem Taluka,

District North Goa, State of Goa (hereinafter referred

to as the “said plot of land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the Applicant has been scrutinized and

a Report of the Department alongwith the report

from a registered professional, namely, Ar. Sarvesh

Prakash Naik was submitted to the Government for

decision (hereinafter referred to as the “said Report”);

And whereas, the Government has considered the

said Reports and it is of the opinion that alteration/

/modification is necessary to be carried out to the

RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying inadvertent

error that has occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has

directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry

out alteration/modification to the RPG-2021 for the

purpose of correcting/rectifying the zone of part of

the said plot of land admeasuring an area of 12764 m2

which is earmarked as Orchard Zone as per

RPG-2021, to Settlement Zone by issuing

Notification under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government and

in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the

Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act 21 of

1975), the following alteration/modification to the

RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of part of the plot of

land admeasuring an area of 12764 m2, surveyed

under Survey No. 245, sub-division No. 8, of Village

Morjim, Pernem Taluka, District North Goa, State of

Goa which is earmarked as Orchard Zone as per

RPG-2021 is hereby corrected as Settlement Zone,

which is more particularly delineated in the plan

annexed.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Planning).

Panaji, 19th April, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

105

Notification

No. 15/17(2)/RPG-21/MOR/238/9/TCP-2023/33

Whereas, the Applicant, namely, M/s Gangareddy

Infra Private Limited have made an application dated

27-03-2023 (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Application”) under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”)

for correction of inconsistent/incoherent zoning

provisions in the Regional Plan for Goa-2021

(RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land admeasuring

an area of 18550 m2, surveyed under Survey No. 238,

sub-division No. 9, of Village Morjim, Pernem Taluka,

District North Goa, State of Goa (hereinafter referred

to as the “said plot of land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the Applicant has been scrutinized and

a Report of the Department alongwith the report

from a registered professional, namely, Ar. Sarvesh

Prakash Naik was submitted to the Government for

decision (hereinafter referred to as the “said Report”);

And whereas, the Government has considered the

said Reports and it is of the opinion that alteration/

/modification is necessary to be carried out to the

RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying inadvertent

error that has occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has

directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry

out alteration/modification to the RPG-2021 for the

purpose of correcting/rectifying the zone of part of

the said plot of land admeasuring an area of 16730 m2

which is earmarked as Orchard Zone as per

RPG-2021, to Settlement Zone by issuing Notification

under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government and

in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the

Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act 21 of

1975), the following alteration/modification to the

RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of part of the plot of

land admeasuring an area of 16730 m2, surveyed

under Survey No. 238, sub-division No. 9, of Village

Morjim, Pernem Taluka, District North Goa, State of

Goa which is earmarked as Orchard Zone as per

RPG-2021 is hereby corrected as Settlement Zone, which

is more particularly delineated in the plan annexed.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Planning).

Panaji, 19th April, 2023.

106

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

Notification

No. 8/17(2)/RPG-21/MOR/238/10/TCP-2023/34

Whereas, the Applicant, namely, M/s Gangareddy

Infra Private Limited have made an application dated

27-03-2023 (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Application”) under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”)

for correction of inconsistent/incoherent zoning

provisions in the Regional Plan for Goa-2021

(RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land admeasuring

an area of 7479 m2, surveyed under Survey No. 238,

sub-division No. 10, of Village Morjim, Pernem Taluka,

District North Goa, State of Goa (hereinafter referred

to as the “said plot of land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the Applicant has been scrutinized and

a Report of the Department alongwith the report

from a registered professional, namely, Ar. Sarvesh

Prakash Naik was submitted to the Government for

decision (hereinafter referred to as the “said Report”);

And whereas, the Government has considered the

said Reports and it is of the opinion that alteration/

/modification is necessary to be carried out to the

RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying inadvertent

error that has occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has

directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry

out alteration/modification to the RPG-2021 for the

purpose of correcting/rectifying the zone of the said

plot of land admeasuring an area of 7479 m2 which is

earmarked as Orchard Zone as per RPG-2021, to

Settlement Zone by issuing Notification under

sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government and

in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the

Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act 21 of

1975), the following alteration/modification to the

RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of the plot of land

admeasuring an area of 7479 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 238, sub-division No. 10, of Village Morjim,

Pernem Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa

which is earmarked as Orchard Zone as per

RPG-2021 is hereby corrected as Settlement Zone.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Planning).

Panaji, 19th April, 2023.

————

Notification

No. 11/17(2)/RPG-21/MOR/245/1/TCP-2023/35

Whereas, the Applicant, namely, M/s Gangareddy

Infra Private Limited have made an application dated

27-03-2023 (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Application”) under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”)

for correction of inconsistent/incoherent zoning

provisions in the Regional Plan for Goa-2021

(RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land admeasuring

an area of 17569 m2, surveyed under Survey No. 245,

sub-division No. 1, of Village Morjim, Pernem Taluka,

District North Goa, State of Goa (hereinafter referred

to as the “said plot of land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the Applicant has been scrutinized and

a Report of the Department alongwith the report

from a registered professional, namely, Ar. Sarvesh

Prakash Naik was submitted to the Government for

decision (hereinafter referred to as the “said Report”);

And whereas, the Government has considered the

said Reports and it is of the opinion that alteration/

/modification is necessary to be carried out to the

RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying inadvertent

error that has occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has

directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry

out alteration/modification to the RPG-2021 for the

purpose of correcting/rectifying the zone of the said

plot of land admeasuring an area of 17569 m2 which

is earmarked as Orchard Zone as per RPG-2021, to

Settlement Zone by issuing Notification under

sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government and

in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the

Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act 21 of

1975), the following alteration/modification to the

RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of the plot of land

admeasuring an area of 17569 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 245, sub-division No. 1, of Village Morjim,

Pernem Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa

which is earmarked as Orchard Zone as per

RPG-2021 is hereby corrected as Settlement Zone.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Planning).

Panaji, 19th April, 2023.

————

Notification

No. 23/17(2)/RPG-21/MOR/245/4/TCP-2023/36

Whereas, the Applicant, namely, Mr. Konidela

Ramcharan Tej have made an application dated

27-03-2023 (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Application”) under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Act”) for correction of inconsistent/incoherent

zoning provisions in the Regional Plan for Goa-2021

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

107

(RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land admeasuring

an area of 4337 m2, surveyed under Survey No. 245,

sub-division No. 4, of Village Morjim, Pernem Taluka,

District North Goa, State of Goa (hereinafter referred

to as the “said plot of land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the Applicant has been scrutinized

and a Report of the Department alongwith the

report from a registered professional, namely, Ar.

Sarvesh Prakash Naik was submitted to the

Government for decision (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Report”);

And whereas, the Government has considered

the said Reports and it is of the opinion that

alteration/modification is necessary to be carried

out to the RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying

inadvertent error that has occurred in the

RPG-2021 and it has directed the Chief Town

Planner (Planning) to carry out alteration/

/modification to the RPG-2021 for the purpose of

correcting/rectifying the zone of the said plot of

land admeasuring an area of 4337 m2 which is

earmarked as Orchard Zone as per RPG-2021, to

Settlement Zone by issuing Notification under

sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government

and in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975), the following alteration/modification

to the RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of the plot of land

admeasuring an area of 4337 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 245, sub-division No. 4, of Village Morjim,

Pernem Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa

which is earmarked as Orchard Zone as per

RPG-2021 is hereby corrected as Settlement Zone.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Planning).

Panaji, 19th April, 2023.

————

Notification

No. 21/17(2)/RPG-21/MOR/245/5/TCP-2023/37

Whereas, the Applicant, namely, Mr. Konidela

Ramcharan Tej have made an application dated

27-03-2023 (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Application”) under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Act”) for correction of inconsistent/incoherent

zoning provisions in the Regional Plan for Goa-2021

(RPG-2021) in respect of plot of land admeasuring

an area of 3486 m2, surveyed under Survey No. 245,

sub-division No. 5, of Village Morjim, Pernem Taluka,

District North Goa, State of Goa (hereinafter referred

to as the “said plot of land”);

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the Applicant has been scrutinized

and a Report of the Department alongwith the

report from a registered professional, namely, Ar.

Sarvesh Prakash Naik was submitted to the

Government for decision (hereinafter referred to as

the “said Report”);

And whereas, the Government has considered

the said Reports and it is of the opinion that

alteration/modification is necessary to be carried

out to the RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying

inadvertent error that has occurred in the

RPG-2021 and it has directed the Chief Town

Planner (Planning) to carry out alteration/

/modification to the RPG-2021 for the purpose of

correcting/rectifying the zone of the said plot of

land admeasuring an area of 3486 m2 which is

earmarked as Orchard Zone as per RPG-2021, to

Settlement Zone by issuing Notification under

sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government

and in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975), the following alteration/modification

to the RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

In the RPG-2021, the zone of the plot of land

admeasuring an area of 3486 m2, surveyed under

Survey No. 245, sub-division No. 5, of Village Morjim,

Pernem Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa

which is earmarked as Orchard Zone as per

RPG-2021 is hereby corrected as Settlement Zone.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Planning).

Panaji, 19th April, 2023.

————

Notification

No. 30/17(2)/RPG-21/MOR/ROAD/TCP-2023/39

Whereas, the Applicant, namely, M/s Gangareddy

Infra Private Limited has made an application dated

13-04-2023 (hereinafter referred to as the “said

Application”) under sub-section (2) of Section 17 of

the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act

21 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”)

for correction of inadvertent error as regards to the

existing road which is not reflected on the Regional

Plan for Goa-2021 (RPG-2021), as passing through the

properties bearing Sy. No. 253/24, 247/3, 6/1, 7/1,

108

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

246/2, 246/1 and 244/0 of Village Morjim, Pernem

Taluka, District North Goa, State of Goa;

And whereas, the correction/rectification as

requested by the Applicant has been scrutinized and

a Report of the Department alongwith the report

from a registered professional, namely, Ar. Sarvesh

Prakash Naik was submitted to the Government for

decision (hereinafter referred to as the “said Report”);

And whereas, the Government has considered the

said Reports and it is of the opinion that alteration/

/modification is necessary to be carried out to the

RPG-2021 for the purpose of rectifying inadvertent

error that has occurred in the RPG-2021 and it has

directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry

out alteration/modification to the RPG-2021 by

depicting the road having right of way of 6.00 mts.

through properties bearing Sy. No. 253/24, 247/3,

6/1, 7/1, 246/2, 246/1 and 244/0 of Village Morjim,

Pernem Taluka, by issuing Notification under

sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the said Act;

Now, therefore, as directed by the Government and

in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the

Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act 21 of

1975), the following alteration/modification to the

RPG-2021 is hereby carried out, namely:-

Depiction of the road in RPG-2021, having right of

way of 6.00 mts. through properties bearing Sy. No.

253/24, 247/3, 6/1, 7/1, 246/2, 246/1 and 244/0 of

Village Morjim, Pernem Taluka to, which is more

particularly delineated in the plan annexed.

Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Planning).

Panaji, 19th April, 2023.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

109

Department of Tribal Welfare

Directorate of Tribal Welfare

–––

Appointment Order

No. 1-268-2023-24/ADMN/DTW/230

Read: Memorandum No. 1-268-2022-23/ADMN/

/DTW/5671 dated 17-02-2023.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service

Commission, vide their letter No. COM/I/5/82(1)/

/2022/458 dated 27-01-2023, Shri Abhijeet Devidas

Jambhale (General Category) is offered a temporary

post of District Welfare Officer (Group “B” Gazetted)

in the Directorate of Tribal Welfare, Government of

Goa in the pay scale of (Rs. 35,400-1,12,400) in the

Pay Matrix Level 6. His pay will be fixed as per

Rules in accordance with the Central Civil Service

(Revised-Pay) Rules, 2016 with immediate effect.

Shri Abhijeet Devidas Jambhale has been

declared medically fit by the Medical Board. GMC

No. 4/105/85-H/GMC/2023/251 dated 03-04-2023.

The appointment of Shri Abhijeet Devidas Jambhale

is made subject to the verification of character &

antecedents. In the event of any adverse remarks

noticed by the Government on verification of

character & antecedents, his service shall be

terminated.

Shri Abhijeet Devidas Jambhale shall be on

probation for a period of two years with effect from

the date of joining, during which he shall undergo

a departmental training and shall have to pass the

Departmental Examination prescribed under the

rules.

The pay and allowances of Shri Abhijeet Devidas

Jambhale, District Welfare Officer shall be debited

to the Budget Head under Demand No. 81.

2225—Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, 02—Welfare of ST,

001—Direction & Administration, 01—Directorate of

Tribal Affairs (P), 01—Salaries.

He shall drawn his salary against the newly

created post vide order No. 1-1-2018-19/ADMN/

/DTW/6379 dated 27-11-2018 and Corrigendum

order No. 1-1-2020-21/ADMN/DTW/3182 dated

04-11-2020.

Shri Abhijeet Devidas Jambhale shall join the

duties in the Directorate of Tribal Welfare, within a

period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of this

order.

The appointment of Shri Abhijeet Devidas

Jambhale shall be subject to the verification of the

genuineness of his educational qualification

certificates & caste certificates (if applicable) which

will have to be produced by him within 03 months

from the date of joining the service.

By order and in the name of the Governor of

Goa.

Dasharath M. Redkar, Director (Tribal Welfare) &

ex officio Joint Secretary (TW).

Panaji, 17th April, 2023.

–––––—

Appointment Order

No. 1-268-2023-24/ADMN/DTW/231

Read: Memorandum No. 1-268-2022-23/ADMN/

/DTW/5670 dated 17-02-2023.

On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service

Commission, vide their letter No. COM/I/5/82(1)/

/2022/458 dated 27-01-2023, Shri Anup Deepak

Shenai (General Category) is offered a temporary

post of District Welfare Officer (Group “B” Gazetted)

in the Directorate of Tribal Welfare, Government of

Goa in the pay scale of (Rs. 35,400-1,12,400) in the

Pay Matrix Level 6. His pay will be fixed as per

Rules in accordance with the Central Civil Service

(Revised-Pay) Rules, 2016 with immediate effect.

Shri Anup Deepak Shenai has been declared

medically fit by the Medical Board. G.M.C. No.

4/105/85-H/GMC/2023/224 dated 23-03-2023. The

appointment of Shri Anup Deepak Shenai is made

subject to the verification of character &

antecedents. In the event of any adverse remarks

noticed by the Government on verification of

character & antecedents, his service shall be

terminated.

Shri Anup Deepak Shenai shall be on probation

for a period of two years with effect from the date

of joining, during which he shall undergo a

departmental training and shall have to pass the

Departmental Examination prescribed under the

rules.

The pay and allowances of Shri Anup Deepak

Shenai, District Welfare Officer shall be debited to

the Budget Head under Demand No. 81.

2225—Welfare of SC/ST/OBC, 02—Welfare of ST,

001—Direction & Administration, 01—Directorate

of Tribal Affairs (P), 01—Salaries.

He shall drawn his salary against the newly

created post vide order No. 1-1-2018-19/

/ADMN/DTW/6379 dated 27-11-2018 and

Corrigendum order No. 1-1-2020-21/ADMN/DTW/

/3182 dated 04-11-2020.

Shri Anup Deepak Shenai shall join the duties in

the Directorate of Tribal Welfare, within a period of

fifteen days from the date of receipt of this order.

110

OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA

SERIES II No. 3

20TH APRIL, 2023

The appointment of Shri Anup Deepak Shenai shall be subject to the verification of the genuineness

of his educational qualification certificates & caste certificates (if applicable) which will have to be

produced by him within 03 months from the date of joining the service.

By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.

Dasharath M. Redkar, Director (Tribal Welfare) & ex officio Joint Secretary (TW).

Panaji, 17th April, 2023.

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in

Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,

Government Printing Press,

Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.

PRICE–Rs. 28.00

PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—18/100—04/2023.