SERIES II No. 44
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2024-2026
Panaji, 1st February, 2024 (Magha 12, 1945)
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Animal Husbandry &
Veterinary Services
–––
Notification
No. 13-91/M S Kamd/61/2023-24/5956
Read: Mukhyamantari Sudharit Kamdhenu Scheme
Notification
(1) No. 13-91/MS Kamd/2023-24/1640 dated
07-07-2023 published in Official Gazette,
Series I No 15 dated 13-7-2023.
(2) No. 13-91/Kamd(S)/2023-24/458 dated
08-05-2023 published in Official Gazette,
Series I No 6 dated 11-05-23.
Mukhyamantari Sudharit Kamdhenu Scheme
Whereas, the Government had notified the
Mukhyamantari Sudharit Kamdhenu Scheme vide
Notification number 1640 read above.
Whereas, the Government vide Notification No. 458
has registered The Gratize Venture Consulting
Service Pvt. Ltd. (Pashushala.com), Registered office
at Regus-Brigade IRV centre, Narllurahalli,
Whitefield, Bangalore, Karnataka as registered
dealer for supply of milch animals to the farmers/
/applicants in the State of Goa for the period of 5 years.
1059
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
Note:- There are two Extraordinary issues to the Official
Gazette, Series II No. 43 dated 25-01-2024 as
follows:-
(1) Extraordinary dated 25-01-2024 from pages 1055
to 1056 regarding Order from Department of
Finance.
(2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 30-01-2024 from
pages 1057 to 1058 regarding Order from Goa
State Election Commission.
Whereas, Clause 8 of Mukhyamantari Sudharit
Kamdhenu Scheme has to be purchased from the
registered supplier appointed by the Government.
Whereas, Rajendra D. Valivade, r/o Talsande,
Kolhapur and Abdul Rahman, r/o Erode, Tamil Nadu
have signed an agreement with the Government of
Goa for the supply of milch animals under the
Mukhyamantari Sudharit Kamdhenu Scheme for the
period of 2 years.
Therefore, the Government has appointed
Rajendra D. Valivade and Abdul Rahman as
registered dealers for the supply of milch animals
under the Mukhyamantari Sudharit Kamdhenu
Scheme for the period of 2 years.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Prasad G. Volvoikar, Director & ex officio Joint
Secretary (AH).
Panaji, 29th January, 2024.
——————
Department of Co-operation
Office of the Asst. Registrar of Co-operative Societies
––
Notification
In exercise of the powers vested in me under
Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001,
“The Shetye Avenue Co-operative Housing
Maintenance Society Limited Near Yeshwant Hall,
Shantinagar, Ponda”-Goa is registered under code
symbol No. RCSPZ2023240046.
Pankaj V. Marathe, Asst. Registrar (Co-operative
Societies), Ponda Zone.
Ponda, 28th December, 2023.
Certificate of Registration
“The Shetye Avenue Co-operative Housing
Maintenance Society Limited, Near Yeshwant Hall,
1060
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
Shantinagar, Ponda”-Goa has been registered on
28-12-2023 and its bears registration code symbol
No. RCSPZ2023240046 and its classified as
“Co-operative Housing Society” under sub-
-classification “No. 7-(d)-Co-operative Housing
Maintenance Society” in terms of Rule 8 of the Goa
Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003.
Pankaj V. Marathe, Asst. Registrar (Co-operative
Societies), Ponda Zone.
Ponda, 28th December, 2023.
—–––––—
Notification
In exercise of the powers vested in me under
Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act,
2001, “S M Silversky Co-operative Housing Society
Ltd., Curti, Ponda Goa”-Goa is registered under code
symbol No. RCSPZ2023240034.
Pankaj V. Marathe, Asst. Registrar (Co-operative
Societies), Ponda Zone.
Ponda, 17th July, 2023.
Certificate of Registration
“S M Silversky Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.,
Curti, Ponda Goa”-Goa has been registered on
17-07-2023 and its bears registration code symbol
No. RCSPZ2023240034 and its classified as
“Co-operative Housing Society” under sub-
-classification “No. 7-(b)-Co-partnership Housing
Society” in terms of Rule 8 of the Goa Co-operative
Societies Rules, 2003.
Pankaj V. Marathe, Asst. Registrar (Co-operative
Societies), Ponda Zone.
Ponda, 17th July, 2023.
No. 3-11/11-12/ARPZ/Urban/Reg/Vol-I/2748
Read: 1. Certificate of Registration dated
20-05-1998 of Orgao Urban Co-op. Credit
Society Ltd., Deulwada, Marcel-Goa.
2. This Office Order No. 3-11/11-12/ARPZ/
/Urban/Reg/Vol-I/2571 dated 22-12-2023.
3. This Office Memo No. 3-11/11-12/ARPZ/
/Urban/Reg/Vol-I/2747 dated 15-01-2024.
Consequent upon the change in classification
vide amendment at Sr. No. 03 of above, the
Certificate of Registration of the Orgao Urban
Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Deulwada, Marcel-Goa
is amended as under:-
Amended Certificate of Registration
The Certificate of Registration dated 20-05-1998
bearing registration code symbol ARCS/CZ/8-(a)-
-109/Goa stands amended as ARCS/PZ/Ser-Reso/
/MP/21/Goa with immediate effect to the following
extent.
The sub-classification of the Society appearing
in the registration certificate referred at Sr. No. 1,
be read as the Orgao Multipurpose Co-operative
Society Ltd., Deulwada, Marcel-Goa under
classification No. 10(C) under sub-rule (1) of
Rule 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules,
2003.
Pankaj V. Marathe, Asst. Registrar (Co-operative
Societies), Ponda Zone.
Ponda, 15th January, 2024.
——————
Office of the Asstt. Election Officer & Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies
–––
FORM “ELECTION-9”
(See Rule 74)
Form of declaration of result of uncontested election
Election to the Board of Directors of “Wagle High School Staff Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Mangeshi,
Mardol-Goa”.
Year of Election:- 2023
Number of Seats:- 09
In pursuance of the provisions contained in the Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003, I, declare that
the following contesting candidates have been duly elected to fill the seats on the Board of Directors of the
above mentioned society as they were the only contesting candidates as stated below.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1061
General Category - (06 Nos.)
Sr. No.
Name of the Candidates
Address
1
2
3
1.
Gawade Bhagwan Baburao
Flat No. 82, Block ‘C’, Goa Housing Board Complex,
Alto Porvorim-Goa.
2.
Manerikar Savita Kedar
F1, Mahalasa Bldg. Sukhshanti Garden, Simepine,
Mangeshi-Goa.
3.
More Sambhaji Dattaram
H. No. 27B, Sonal, Sattari-Goa.
4.
Naik Manoj Dattaram
H. No. 335, Near Mahalaxmi Temple, Holibhat,
Talaulim, Ponda-Goa.
5.
Satarkar Rajendra Mahadev
H. No. 1038, Gauthan, Priol, Mardol-Goa.
6.
Vacant.
Reserve Category (Women) - (02 Nos.)
1.
Aigal Mithasha Manjunath
H. No. 32/3, Chaitanya Ganganagar, Curti, Ponda-Goa.
2.
Kurtarkar Preeti Rajendra Shet
H. No. 3/1-A, Kalyanmastu, Shantadurga, Shapur,
Ponda-Goa.
Reserve Category (SC/ST) - (01 No.)
1.
Vacant.
I also certify and declare that the above mentioned relevant number of seats to be elected (09 Nos.)
to form the Board of Directors and only 07 candidates have been duly elected unopposed.
Somnath M. Gaude, Returning Officer for Election to the BOD’s of Wagle High School Staff
Co-operative Credit Sty. Ltd., Mangeshi, Mardol-Goa.
Ponda, 20th November, 2023.
——————
Department of Education
Directorate of Technical Education
Polytechnic Section
–––
Order
No. 17/3/96/2023/DTE/3354
Read: 1. Notification No. 23/1/87-GA&C (Vol V)/1984 dated 06-06-2022.
2. Order No. 17/3/96/2023/DTE/3319 dated 23-01-2024.
In view of the above referred order, approval of the Government is hereby conveyed for relieving of Shri
Subhash P. Borkar, Principal, Government Polytechnic Bicholim from the duties and responsibilities of
additional charge of the post of Principal, Government Polytechnic Panaji with effect from the date of
joining of Dr. Pramodini S. Naik on the post of Principal, Government Polytechnic Panaji.
Shri Subhash P. Borkar shall hand over the charge of the post of the Principal, Government Polytechnic
Panaji to Dr. Pramodini S. Naik accordingly.
This is issued with approval of the Government vide U.O. 8653/F dated 17-01-2024.
This order supersedes order No. 17/3/26/2010/DTE/Vol I/Part II/2971 dated 14-12-2022.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Dr. Vivek B. Kamat, Director (Technical Education) & ex officio Addl. Secretary.
Porvorim, 25th January, 2024.
1062
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
Goa Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education
–––
Addendum
Read: Goa Board of Secondary & Higher Secondary Education, Notification No. GBSHSE/IT/
/BRD-ELE/2021-2025/18 dated 04-01-2024, Official Gazette, Government of Goa, Series II No. 40.
Category
Respective clause of Class B-Elected Member
Name of the Member
1
2
3
Class B
vi)
Six teachers of Secondary Schools
vi)
For Designated Area:
Elected
from six designated areas
Quepem/Canacona
Member
Mrs. Shubha Subhash
Phal Dessai,
Teacher,
Sarvodaya Educational
Society’s High School,
Curchorem-Goa.
Shri Bhagirath G. Shetye, Chairman, Goa Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education.
Alto-Betim, 30th January, 2024.
V. No. AP-1217/2024.
——————
Department of Environment & Climate Change
–––
Notification
No. 41/4/2006/ENVT &CC/DIR/1534
Read:
Notification No. 41/4/2006/STE-DIR/207
dated 29-06-2021.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
-section (1) of Section 29 of the Air (Prevention and
Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 (Central Act 14 of
1981) (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) and
in supersession of the Government Notification
No. 41/4/2006/STE-DIR/207 dated 29-6-2021,
published in Official Gazette, Series II No. 15 dated
8-7-2021, the Government of Goa appoints the
following officials to be Government Analysts for
the purpose of analysis of samples of air or emission
sent for analysis to any laboratory established or
specified under sub-section (1) of Section 28 of the
said Act.
1. Mrs. Vidhya Pavir Gauns Dessai, Environmental
Assistant.
2. Miss Chriselda Saviola Rodrigues, Scientific
Assistant.
This Notification shall come into force with
immediate effect.
This is issued with the approval of the
Government vide U.O. 66/F dated 15-01-2024.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Johnson B. Fernandes, Director & ex officio Jt.
Secretary (Environment & Climate Change).
Panaji, 25th January, 2024.
Notification
No. 41/4/2006/ENVT & CC/DIR/1535
Read:
Notification No. 41/4/2006/STE-DIR/208
dated 29-06-2021.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
-section (2) of Section 53 of the Water (Prevention
and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (Central Act 6 of
1974) (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) and
in supersession of the Government Notification
No. 41/4/2006/STE-DIR/1592 dated 10-2-2015,
published in Official Gazette, Series II No. 47 dated
19-2-2015, the Government of Goa appoints the
following officials to be Government Analysts for
the purpose of analysis of samples of water or of
sewage or trade effluent sent for analysis to any
laboratory established as specified under sub-
-section (1) of Section 52 of the said Act.
1. Mrs. Anika Deepak Naik, Environmental
Assistant.
2. Miss Sujal Ravindra Bukkam, Scientific
Assistant.
3. Mrs. Vidhya Pavir Gauns Dessai, Environmental
Assistant.
4. Miss Chriselda Saviola Rodrigues, Scientific
Assistant.
This Notification shall come into force with
immediate effect.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1063
This is issued with the approval of the Government vide U.O. 66/F dated 15-01-2024.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Johnson B. Fernandes, Director & ex officio Jt. Secretary (Environment & Climate Change).
Panaji, 25th January, 2024.
——————
Department of General Administration
–––
Notification
No. 37/3/2019-GAD-III/424
Read: Notification No. 37/3/2019-GAD-III/278 dated 17-01-2024.
Pursuant to the declaration of no Bye Election in the Ward No. IV of Village Panchayat Arpora-Nagoa,
Taluka Bardez, North Goa District by the State Election Commission on account of candidate being elected
unopposed, the “Paid Holiday” declared vide Notification dated 17-01-2024 read above, on Sunday, the 28th
January, 2024 (Magha 8, Saka 1945) being the “Polling Day” for the Bye Elections to Ward No. IV of Village
Panchayat Arpora-Nagoa, Taluka Bardez, North Goa District in the State of Goa, for the voters of the said Bye-
elections, stands cancelled.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Shreyas Dsilva, Under Secretary (GA-II)/Link.
Porvorim, 25th January, 2024.
——————
Institution of Goa Lokayukta
–––
Order
No. ADMN/75/2013-IGL/74
In exercise of powers conferred upon me, as per the provisions of Section 5(1) of the Right to Information
Act, 2005, I, Shri Justice (Retd.) Ambadas H. Joshi, Goa Lokayukta do hereby designate the following
Officials as Public Information Officers and Assistant Public Information Officer to provide information to
persons, requesting for the information under the Act.
Sr. No.
Designation of the Officers
Designated as
01.
Registrar
Public Information Officer with regards to complaints and
grievances.
02.
Accountant
Public Information Officer with regards to administrative
and accounts.
03.
Bench Clerk
Assistant Public Information Officer.
And designate the Under Secretary to Goa Lokayukta as First Appellate Authority, who is senior in rank
to the above Public Information Officers.
Further, the Public Information Officers are also directed to update all its records, as under Section 4
of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in the time bound manner, as provided in the Act and make it available
on the website of this Institution.
Justice (Retd.) Ambadas H. Joshi, Goa Lokayukta.
Ribandar, 25th January, 2024.
1064
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
Department of Labour
––
Notification
No. 28/02/2024-LAB/Part-II/54
The following Award passed by the Industrial
Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on
12-01-2024 in Ref. No. IT/02/2016 is hereby
published as required under Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of
1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Asha Harmalkar, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 29th January, 2024.
––––
IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
AND LABOUR COURT
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Mr. Anil Scaria, Hon’ble Presiding Officer)
Ref. No. IT/02/2016
Shri Yeshwant Kudav & 3 others,
Rep. by the President,
Goa Trade & Commercial Workers’ Union,
Panaji-Goa.
…… Workmen/Party I
V/s
M/s. G.K.B. Hi-Tech Lenses Pvt. Ltd.,
50, Thivim Industrial Estate,
Karaswada,
Mapusa-Goa.
…… Employer/Party II
Workmen/Party I represented by Learned Advocate
Shri Suhaas Naik.
Employer/Party II represented by Learned Advocate
Ms. M. Rao holding for Adv. G. K. Sardessai.
AWARD
(Delivered on this the 12th day of the month of
January of the year 2024)
By Order dated 04-09-2015, bearing reference No.
28/45/2015-Lab/845, the Government of Goa in
exercise of powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘The
Act’), has referred the following dispute to this
Tribunal for adjudication:-
“(1)
Whether the action of the Management of
M/s GKB Hi-Tech Lenses Private Limited, 50,
Tivim Industrial Estate, Karaswada, Mapusa,
Goa, in refusing employment to Shri Yeshwant
Kudav, Shri Sanjay Shetye, Shri Santosh Gawas
and Shri Dinesh Tulaskar, Junior Operators
with effect from 11-3-2015, is legal and
justified?
(2) If not, what relief each of the workmen are
entitled to?”
2. It came to be registered as reference No. IT/
/02/2016 and notices were issued to the Parties.
3. The Workmen (Party I) have filed their
Statement of Claim. The Employer (Party II) has filed
its Written Statement. The Workmen (Party I) have
filed their Rejoinder to the Written Statement.
4. The case of the Workmen (Party I) in their
Statement of Claim is that the workmen unionized
themselves under the “Goa Trade and Commercial
Workers’ Union”. That thereafter, the Employer
(Party II) started harassing and victimizing the
members of the Union. Shri Yeshwant Kudav, Shri
Sanjay Shetye, Shri Santosh Gawas and Shri Dinesh
Tulaskar were working as Junior Operators for the
Employer (Party II). That they were members of the
Union. That on 11-03-2015, these workmen were not
allowed to punch their Attendance Cards by the
General Manager-HR. That, the General Manager-
HR told these workmen that their services stood
terminated. That, the Workmen (Party I) raised an
industrial dispute before the Assistant Labour
Commissioner, Mapusa.
That the conciliation proceedings ended in
failure. Therefore, it is prayed that the refusal of
employment of Shri Yeshwant Kudav, Shri Sanjay
Shetye, Shri Santosh Gawas and Shri Dinesh
Tulaskar with effect from 11-03-2015 be held to be
illegal, unjustified and bad-in-law. That, they be
reinstated back in service with full back wages and
continuity in service at the Employer’s Factory at
Karaswada, Mapusa-Goa.
5. The case of the Employer (Party II) is that by
letters of promotion dated 10-03-2015, Shri Yeshwant
Kudav, Shri Sanjay Shetye, Shri Santosh Gawas and
Shri Dinesh Tulaskar were promoted as “Supervisors
Production” and were transferred to Cochin,
Hyderabad, Chennai and Guwahati respectively
with effect from 24-03-2015. That, Party I are not
workmen. That, they did not report to duty at the
places to which they were transferred. That,
Yeshwant Kudav has resigned by letter dated
10-06-2016. That the Employer/Party II has accepted
the resignation and has paid him Rs. 13,132/- by
way of Cheque as full and final settlement. That,
show-cause notices dated 06-04-2015 and
09-04-2015 were issued to the other three workmen
for non-compliance with promotion and posting
orders. That, by letter dated 13-04-2015, these three
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1065
workers were informed that they would not be paid
from 24-03-2015 on account of “no work, no pay”. It
is denied that the Employer/Party II harassed and
victimized the unionized workmen. It is denied that
the Party I are presently unemployed. Therefore, it
is prayed that the prayers of the Party I be rejected.
6. In their Rejoinder to the Written Statement, the
Workmen/Party I have denied that by letters dated
10-03-2015, Shri Yeshwant Kudav, Shri Sanjay Shetye,
Shri Santosh Gawas and Shri Dinesh Tulaskar were
promoted as Supervisors-Production. That they had
not accepted such letters of promotion. That the
question of them being transferred to Cochin,
Hyderabad, Chennai and Guwahati respectively
does not arise. It is denied that Yeshwant Kudav
submitted his resignation and accepted Rs. 13,132/-
by way of Cheque as his full and final settlement.
It is denied that for the other three workmen, the
Employer/Party II had issued notices for non-
compliance of posting and promotion orders.
Therefore, it is prayed that the reliefs prayed for in
the Statement of Claim be granted.
7. During the course of proceeding, all Parties
except Yeshwant Kudav filed the terms of
settlement. A Part Award dated 30-11-2023 was
passed in disposing of the disputes between all the
Parties except Yeshwant Kudav and Party II.
8. The dispute between Yeshwant Kudav and
Party II was put to trial.
9. The following issues were framed and my
findings thereon are as follows:
Issue No.
Issues
Findings
1
2
3
1.
Whether the Party I proves
In the
that they are ‘workmen’
negative.
as defined under Section 2(s)
of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947?
2.
Whether the Party I proves
In the
that the the action of Party II
negative.
in refusing their
employment w.e.f. 11-03-2015
is illegal and unjustified?
3.
Whether the Party I proves
In the
that they are entitled to
negative.
reinstatement in services
with full back wages and
continuity in services with
all other consequential benefits?
4.
What Relief?/What Order?
As per the
final order.
REASONS
10. Issue No. 1, 2 and 3: The case of Yeshwant
Kudav is that he is a ‘workman’. It is his case that
he was refused employment w.e.f. 11-03-2015 in an
illegal and unjustified manner. That, he is entltled
to reinstatement with continuity in service, full
back wages and with all other consequential
benefits.
11. Yeshwant Kudav and Party II have not
adduced any evidence.
12. Therefore, Yeshwant Kudav has failed to prove
that he is a ‘workman’. He has failed to prove that
the action of Party II in refusing him employment
w.e.f. 11-03-2015 is illegal and unjustified. Yeshwant
Kudav has also failed to prove that he is entitled to
reinstatement in service, with continuity of service,
full back wages and other consequential benefits.
13. As seen above, all other workmen have settled
their dispute with Party II.
14. For the reasons stated above, I hold issues
No. 1, 2 and 3 in the negative.
Hence, I pass the following:-
ORDER
(i)
The claim of Yeshwant Kudav is disallowed.
(ii)
No orders as to cost.
(iii)
Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Anil Scaria)
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal and
Labour Court.
————
Notification
No. 28/02/2024-LAB/42
The following Award passed by the Industrial
Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on
09-01-2024 in Ref. No. IT/05/2017 is hereby
published as required under Section 17 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of
1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Asha Harmalkar, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 19th January, 2024.
1066
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
AND LABOUR COURT
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Mr. Anil Scaria, Hon’ble Presiding Officer)
Ref. No. IT/05/2017
Workmen,
Rep. by the General Secretary,
Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh,
G-5, Macedo Apartments,
Tisk, Ponda-Goa. …… Workmen/Party I
V/s
1. M/s Majorda Beach Resort,
Majorda,
Salcete-Goa. ……
Employer/Party II(1)
2. M/s. Eastern International Hotels Ltd.,
Balraj Sahani Marg,
Juhu Beach
Mumbai 400049.
…… Party II (2)
Workmen/Party I represented by representative Shri
P. Gaonkar.
Employer/Party II(1) and Party II (2) represented by
Shri M. S. Bandodkar.
AWARD
(Delivered on this the 9th day of the month of
January of the year 2024)
By order dated 17-03-2017, bearing No. 28/05/
/2017-LAB/141, the Government of Goa in exercise
of powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has referred the
following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication:-
“(1) Whether S/Shri Yatin Chodenkar, Jose
Francisco Mories, Savio Dias, Vincent
Miranda, Ms. Candida D’Costa and Ms. Diana
Almeida, are workmen defined under Section 2(s)
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central
Act 14 of 1947)?
(2)
If answer to the issue No. (1) is in the
affirmative, then, whether the action of the
management of M/s Majorda Beach Resort,
Majorda, Salcete, Goa, in terminating the
services of the above mentioned workmen
with effect from 07-06-2016, is legal and
justified?
(3) If the answer to the issue No. (2) is in the
negative, then, what relief the workmen are
entitled to?”
2. Upon receipt of the reference it was registered
as Reference No. IT/05/2017 and notices were served
on the Parties.
3. The Workmen/Party I filed their Statement of
Claim. The Employer/Party II filed its Written
Statement. The Workmen/Party I filed their
Rejoinder.
4. During the course of proceedings, 4 workmen
namely Mr. Jose Francisco Moraes, Mr. Savio Dias,
Ms. Candida D’Costa and Ms. Diana Almeida and
Party II filed Consent Terms dated 29-07-2019
(Exh. 33 Colly). An Award (Part) dated 13-08-2019 was
made in terms of the Consent Terms.
5. Yatin Chodnekar and Vincent Miranda were
not Parties to the consent terms. They proceeded to
contest the case. We have to decide the dispute
between Yatin Chodnekar and Vincent Miranda and
Party II.
6. The case of Party I in the Statement of Claim
is that Party II appointed Yatin Chodnekar by
Appointment Letter dated 01-04-1985 as an
Account Assistant. That he had to physically make
Purchase General Vouchers, physically write
general ledgers, bank reconciliation, physically
make statutory payments and do other clerical
works of accounts.
7. That, Party II appointed Vincent Miranda as an
Assistant Steward by Letter of Appointment dated
01-01-1991. That it is a physical and technical work.
That he was physically serving the guests and the
restaurant. That, he was physically setting buffets,
setting tables in the Conference Hall and doing
other services as per the orders of the F & B
Manager. That Vincent Miranda was the President
of the Union. That, to disable him from being the
Union’s President, he was re-designated as Manager.
That he was doing the same work as before. That,
he was not authorized to take any decisions on
behalf of Party II. That he was not having any
supervisory or managerial powers. That, Vincent
Miranda was not having powers to sanction the
leave of any workman. That his work was of a skilled
and technical nature.
8. That on 07-06-2016, Party II terminated the
services of the abovementioned workmen by an
unsigned Letter of Termination. That after the
termination of Party I, the affairs of all other
workmen were settled by paying 55 days’ wages
per year as ex-gratia, in addition to retrenchment
compensation, gratuity etc.
9. That the workmen/Party I made a representation
dated 06-07-2016 stating that their termination was
illegal, unjustified and bad in law. It was further
stated in the representation that there was no
enquiry against them and no retrenchment
compensation was paid. That charge-sheet was also
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1067
not issued. That the Employer/Party II has not
complied with the provisions of Sections 25F, 25H
and 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. That
more than 200 workers are employed by Party II and
Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is
applicable. That Party II has not obtained
permission for retrenchment under Section 25N of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
10. The Workmen/Party I states that in the month of June,
2016, they joined a Union, namely, Gomantak
Mazdoor Sangh and the dispute of illegal
termination was raised before the Deputy Labour
Commissioner, Margao. That, conciliation
proceedings ended in failure due to the adamant
attitude of the Employer/Party II. Therefore, it is
prayed that it be declared that Party I are workmen
as defined under Section 2(s) of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. That it be declared that the
termination of Party I is illegal, improper and
unjustified. That the Employer/Party II be directed to
pay the workmen/Party I ex-gratia at the rate of 55
days pay per year of service in addition to
retrenchment compensation and other legal dues
and cost and any other relief.
11. Party II has stated in its Written Statement
that Mr. Yatin Chodnekar was initially appointed as
an Account Assistant in the year 1984. That in
January, 1988, he was promoted to the post of
Accounts Supervisor. That in June, 1989, he was
designated as Junior Accountant in the Executive
Cadre. That, in April, 1997, he was promoted as
Assistant Manager-Accounts. That, thereafter, he
was promoted as Dy. Manager-Accounts. That, when
his services were terminated, he was working as
Dy. Manager-Accounts. It is denied that Yatin
Chodnekar was physically making purchase general
vouchers, physically writing general ledgers, bank
reconciliation and physically making statutory
payments and other clerical work of accounts. That
he was the authorized signatory of the Company
and was signing cheques, vouchers, petrol vouchers
etc. That he was authorizing the purchase general
vouchers which were punched by the accounts
staff. That once the purchase general vouchers and
bank vouchers are punched in the computer system,
it automatically generates the general ledger and
there is no need of writing the general ledger
separately. That bank reconciliation is a
supervisory/managerial job. That, statutory
payments are done online and only executives are
given access to the username and password to do
the payments.
12. That, Yatin Chodnekar being an Executive/
/Manager was covered under the superannuation
scheme and was receiving other benefits which are
otherwise applicable to Executives/Managers. That,
he was having his meals at the Executive dining
room and was also having extras through
refreshment slips. That, he was getting the benefits
of Group Mediclaim which was given only to
Executives. That, he was paid Leave Travel
Allowance as an executive. That he used to sign
Store Requisitions and sanction advances of staff.
That he used to claim travel benefits, domiciliary
medical reimbursement at the executive level. That,
he was granting leave of staff in the capacity of
Department Sectional Head.
13. Party II states that Mr. Vincent Miranda joined
Majorda Beach Resort as a Training Apprenticeship
on 01-02-1990. That on 01-01-1991, he was appointed
as Assistant Steward. That, his services were
confirmed on 01-04-1991. That, on 24-11-1995, he
was promoted as Steward. That, on 24-11-2005, he
was promoted as a Asst. Restaurant Manager in the
Executive Cadre. That on 14-10-2008, he was
promoted as Restaurant Manager.
14. That, Vincent Miranda was covered under
the superannuation scheme applicable to the
executives. That he was having the facility to have
meals in the executive dining room and also having
extras through refreshment slips. That he was also
having the benefits of Group Mediclaim and Leave
Travel Allowance available to the Executives.
15. It is denied that Vincent Miranda was
physically making service to the guests or physically
setting buffets or setting tables in the Conference
Hall or providing service as per order of the F & B
Manager. It is submitted that as a Restaurant
Manager, his duty was only to supervise and brief
his subordinate staff in regard to Banquets and
arrangements. That, Vincent Miranda used to sign
store requisitions. That he was recommending/
/sanctioning leave of the staff working under his
control and supervision. That he used to put remarks
on the Leave Cards of the staff. It is denied that
Vincent Miranda was re-designated as Manager to
prevent him from being the president of the Union.
16. That, because Mr. Vincent Miranda was an
Executive/Manager, he was paid two months’ notice
pay, leave salary, ex-gratia for two months for the
years 2015-16 and 2016-17. That, he was also paid a
gratuity amount. That, he was also paid the benefits
under the superannuation scheme.
17. That, M/s Majorda Beach Resorts has been
running under loss for the past several years. That,
Party II has closed the activities of the Hotel. That,
the existing management has no intention of
1068
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
restarting the activities of the hotel. That, if at all
the activities of the hotel are to be restarted, it
would be managed by a reputed/international
Company. Therefore, Party I is not entitled to any
relief.
18. Party I have filed their Rejoinder. It is denied
that the establishment was continuously running
under loss for the past several years. It is denied
that Party I were working in managerial category
and were getting the benefits of the managerial
categories. It is denied that they were sanctioning/
recommending the leave of their subordinate staff.
It is denied that they were getting additional
facilities given only to executive/administrative and
managerial personnel. It is stated that the
Superannuation Benefit Scheme has nothing to do
with the termination of services of Party I. That,
meals in executive dining room, extras through
refreshment slips and group mediclaim facility has
nothing to do with the termination of services of
Party I. That, the actions of Party II are malafide,
illegal and unjustified and bad in law.
19. Heard arguments. The Union Representative
Mr. P. Gaonkar and the Learned Advocate for Party II,
Mr. M. S. Bandodkar have filed their written
arguments.
20. The following issues were framed by this
Tribunal and my findings thereon are as follows:-
Issue
Issues
Findings
No.
1
2
3
1.
Whether the Party I proves
In the
that they are the workmen
negative.
as defined under Section 2(s)
of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947?
2.
Whether the Party I proves
In the
that the action of the Party II
negative
in terminating their services
w.e.f. 07-06-2016 is illegal
and unjustified?
3.
What relief? What Order?
As per final
order.
REASONS
21. Issue No. 1: The case of Party I is that they
are workmen as defined under Section 2(s) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
22. Section 2 (s) of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 reads as follows:-
Section 2(s): “workman” means any person
(including an apprentice) employed in any industry
to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical,
operational, clerical or supervisory work for hire or
reward, whether the terms of employment be express
or implied, and for the purpose of any proceeding
under this Act in relation to an industrial dispute,
includes any such person who has been dismissed,
discharged or retrenched in connection with, or as a
consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal,
discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute,
but does not include any such person–
(i)
Who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45
of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or
the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or
(ii) Who is employed in the police service or as an
officer or other employee of a prison, or
(iii) Who is employed mainly in a managerial or
administrative capacity, or
(iv) Who being employed in a supervisory
capacity, draws wages exceeding (ten
thousand rupees) per mensem or exercises,
either by the nature of the duties attached to
the office or by reason of the powers vested in
him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.
23. Party I has examined Shri Yatin Prabhu
Chodnekar as Witness 1 for Party I.
24. Party II has examined Mrs. Meena Vaswani as
Witness 1 for Party II. She is the Corporate Financial
Controller of Party II.
25. Yatin Prabhu Chodnekar (Witness 1 for Party
I) deposes that Party II had appointed him as
Accounts Assistant by letter dated 01-04-1985. He
deposes that his duties at the relevant time were as
follows:-
i.
Physically preparing purchase vouchers. These
purchase vouchers are prepared on a computer
software which requires an unique username
and password, which was given to him by
the Party II. The account software was called
ISG (Interface System Generated), all the
records which would show that he had
prepared the purchase vouchers using the
software which are only available with the
management.
ii.
Physically writing general ledgers.
iii. Bank reconciliation, visiting banks for
deposits and withdrawal in absence of the
general cashier.
iv.
Physically making statutory payments and
other clerical work of accounts.
v.
Making journal entries for the purpose of
accounting.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1069
vi. The Chief Accountant Mr. A. Krishna was
the authorized signatory for all the bills. Only
in his absence he used to sign on his
instruction.
vii. Arranging money from the cashier for
payment of VAT.
viii.Payment of petty cash after requisitioning
the same from the general cashier on a daily
basis.
ix. Every month he had to physically go to every
department to check crockery, cutlery and
glassware and to maintain the record of such
inventory.
x.
The hotel had a contract for car service which
petrol bills he used to maintain monthly.
xi. He used to also check the requisition for the
stores.
26. Yatin Prabhu Chodnekar (Witness 1 for Party I)
deposes that he was not authorized to take any
decision on behalf of the management. He deposes
that he was not involved in the administration and
did not have supervisory or managerial powers. He
deposes that the Chief Accountant Mr. A. Krishnan
used to grant the leave applications. He deposes
that in the absence of A. Krishnan, he used to
merely endorse the leave applications provided he
had instructions from A. Krishnan. He deposes that
all leave applications had to be made to the H.O.D.
and signed by the HOD. He deposes that although
he was designated as Deputy Accounts Manager,
his duties were of clerical nature. He deposes that
he was not given any job description of nature of
work to be carried out by the management in
writing. He deposes that he did not supervise any
employee of the hotel at any point of time. He
deposes that he was engaged in skilled and clerical
work and as such he was a ‘workman’.
27. Mrs. Meena Vaswani (Witness 1 for Party II)
deposes that the book of accounts are computer
generated i.e. Purchase Journal Vouchers, Purchase
Day Book, Cash Book, Bank Book, Trial Balance,
General Ledger Reports and Sales Reports. She
deposes that only Petty Cash Vouchers were being
maintained by hand. She deposes that the clerical
jobs were done by the Accounts Assistants. She
deposes that there was no question of writing
General Ledger, Bank Reconciliation etc. She
deposes that Yatin Chodnekar was working as Dy.
Manager-Accounts when he was terminated. She
deposes that his was a managerial, supervisory and
administrative job on a monthly salary of Rs. 26,270/-.
She deposes that Yatin Chodnekar was working in
the executive category for accounts payable. She
deposes that Maria Ratos-Supervisor, Suema Barreto-
Supervisor, Hansika Karekar-Accounts Assistant,
Luiza Alvares-Accounts Assistant, Belmira Dias-
Accounts Assistant, James Mendonsa & Valerian-
Controls Assistant were working under the
supervision and control of Yatin Chodnekar.
28. She deposes that as per the records available,
Mr. Yatin Chodnekar was promoted to the executive
cadre as Junior Accountant, Grade-VI by letter
dated 20-05-1989. She deposes that he voluntarily
resigned from the Majorda Beach Resort Employees
Union because he was promoted in a supervisory
and administrative capacity. She deposes that as a
Junior Accountant he was to supervise activities of
accounts receivables, checking and verifying the
accounts, ensuring that the account entries are
correctly recorded by the Assistant and others
working under him, seeing that the accounts
statements are rendered on a timely basis, follow
up for collections, exercise control and supervise
overnight audit functions. She deposes normal
charter of demands settlements were not applicable
to him.
29. She deposes that he was promoted as
Accounts Executive on 01-04-1996, Asst. Manager-
Accounts w.e.f. 09-06-1997 and as Dy. Manager-
Accounts on 08-11-2000. She deposes that by Board
Resolution dated 07-11-2008 (Exh. 35 D Colly),
Mr. Yatin Chodnekar was given powers to sign and
operate the bank accounts along with Mr. Krishnan
and herself. She deposes that he was authorized to
sign petrol slips for filling petrol in the vehicles of
Party II. She deposes that Yatin Chodnekar used to
sign and sanction leave applications (Exh. 39 D
Colly) of the employees working under him. She
deposes the he sanctioned leave till his last working day.
30. She deposes that Yatin Chodnekar was also
authorised to sign room requisition as department
head and sanctioning petty cash disbursement
vouchers. She deposes that he was approving
mediclaim of the employees.
31.
She further deposes that he was enjoying
the insurance policy applicable to executive
category. She deposes that he could order
refreshments free of charge for himself by signing
refreshment slips and use executive dining room.
She deposes that he had the facility of free stay
with family at the establishment at Mumbai. She
deposes that he was second in command in the
entire Accounts Department of Party II (1). She
1070
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
deposes that he was directly reporting to
Chandrakant Sangavar, Vice President and General
Manager of Party II(1).
32. Witness 1 of Party I deposed in favour of
himself Witness 1 of Party II deposed in favour of
Party II (1) and Party II (2).
33. Now let us look into their testimonies in cross-
-examination and documents to ascertain the truth.
34. Yatin Chodnekar (Witness I for Party I) deposes
in cross-examination that after he was promoted as
Assistant Manager- Accounts, he was the sole
responsible person for the Accounts Department
who used to sign cheques and other relevant
documents for Party II (1). He admits that he was
directly reporting to Chandrakant Sangavar (Deputy
General Manager). He admits that from December,
1999, he was controlling the Food and Beverages
and the Stores. He admits that he was entitled to
executive dining, mediclaim, insurance cover, LTA,
uniform reimbursement, conveyance reimbursement,
superannuation, ex gratia and ordering refreshment.
35. Mr. Yatin Chodnekar (Witness 1 for Party I)
admits in cross-examination that Petrol Requisition
Slips for hotel cars were authorized by him. He
admits that Stores Requisition were approved by
him. He admits that Dy. Accounts Manager is
second in command in the Accounts Department.
He admits that he left the Union once he became an
Accounts Supervisor and thereafter at no point of
time joined it. He admits that there is lot of
difference in the pay scale of Accounts Assistant to
Dy. Accounts Manager. He admits that after his
promotion from Accounts Assistant onwards, he
was getting the benefits of managerial staff.
36. Mr. Yatin Chodnekar (Witness 1 for Party I)
admits that the refreshment slips (Exhibit 37D)
were approved by him. He admits the Petrol Slips
(Exhibit 38D and 48D Colly) duly approved by him.
He admits leave applications of his staff (Exhibit
39D Colly) duly sanctioned by him. He admits Petty
Cash Disbursement (Exhibit 40D Colly and Exhibit
44D) duly approved by him. He admits the Purchase
Journal Voucher dated 22-01-2016 (Exhibit 41D and
51D Colly) duly verified by him. He admits store
room requisitions (Exhibit 43D Colly) approved by
him. He admits letter (Exhibit 49D) addressed to
Kunde Service Station, Margao stating that he is
the authorized signatory to sign the petrol slips. By
letter dated 01-01-1988, Yatin Chodnekar was
re-designated as Accounts Supervisor. Yatin
Chodnekar admits the genuineness of this letter.
37. Exhibit 52D is Board Resolution dated
01-12-1999 authorizing Yatin Codnekar to sign and
operate Bank Accounts. By Board Resolution dated
06-02-2001 (Exhibit 53 D), Yatin Chodnekar was
authorized to represent Party II (1) in a Suit filed
against M/s Nehshaft Systems. By Board Resolution
dated 11-08-2001 (Exhibit 54D) Yatin Chodnekar was
authorized to operate accounts with the State Bank
of India and Saraswat Co-operative Bank, Margao.
By letter dated 16-02-1993 (Exhibit 56D), Yatin
Chodnekar has asked the Company’s Lawyer,
Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira to take action with respect
to an outstanding amount from Goa Peuta. Yatin
Chodnekar has signed letter dated 01-02-1992
asking Goa Peuta to settle payments. He has also
signed an application for Renewal of Registration
Certificate (Exhibit 58) under the Shops and
Establishment Act.
38.
Exh. 66 is the job description of Yatin
Chodnekar. It reads as follows:
1. To assist the Chief Accountant in the
management of the accounting functions.
2. To assist and check the working of the Wage
Accountant.
3.
To continually check the accounts payable in
order to ensure that no outstanding bills are
kept pending.
4.
To constantly check and reduce the
outstandings and make efforts for speedy
collection of bills.
5.
To check the working and reports of the Night
Auditor and the Income Accountant.
6.
To inform the Chief Accountant about possible
doubts in accounts.
7.
To assist the Chief Accountant in carrying
out inventory checks.
8.
Responsible for checking the following:
Salary and wages bills and statements, Payroll
taxes and employees benefits.
9.
To deposit all taxes and Provident Fund
deductions from employees with the
Government.
10. To assist in the preparation of all financial
statements, income statements, forecasts and
budgets, etc.
11. To deputize for the Chief Accountant in his
absence or whenever required to do so.
12. To attend departmental meetings and in the
absence of the Chief Accountant to attend the
General Manager’s meetings.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1071
In addition to the above mentioned duties and
job functions, any other assignment given
occasionally or on a daily basis by the immediate
superior for the Management.
39. The admissions by Yatin Chodnekar in his
testimony shows that he was responsible for the
Accounts Department when he was promoted as
Assistant Manager-Accounts and that at the
relevant time he was reporting to Deputy General
Manager. From December, 1999, he was controlling
the Food and Beverages and the Stores. He admits
that he was entitled to executive dining, mediclaim,
insurance cover, LTA, conveyance reimbursement,
ex-gratia and order refreshments for himself. As
Dy. Accounts Manager, he was second in command
in the Accounts Department. He left the Union after
he became the Accounts Supervisor. He used to
sign petrol slips, leave applications, Purchase
Journal Vouchers, approve store room requisitions,
sign petrol slips, operate bank accounts along with
others. He was authorized to represent Party II (1) in
a Suit. He was also instructing the Company’s
advocates to take action against persons defaulting
in payment of outstanding amounts. He was also
playing a role in settling outstanding amount with
the Company. He had also signed an application to
renew the registration of establishment.
40. The job description shows that he was to
continually check the accounts payable and see
that no outstanding bills are kept pending, make
efforts for speedy collection of bills, check the
working and reports of night auditors and Income
Accountants, inform Chief Accountant about
possible doubts in accounts, assist the Chief
Accountant in carrying out inventory checks, check
the salary, wage bill and statements, payroll taxes
and employees’ benefits, deposit taxes and
Provident Fund Deductions, to assist in the
preparation of financial statements, income
statements, forecasts, budgets etc. to deputize for
the Chief Accountant in his absence or wherever
required to do so and to attend departmental
meetings and in the absence of the Chief
Accountant to attend the General Manager’s
meetings.
41. Exhibit 60-D is a letter dated 13-12-2007. In
the said letter, it is stated that the job entrusted to
Yatin Chodnekar involves certain “jobs of
supervising various functions of controls carried by
subordinates”. It is stated therein that Yatin
Chodnekar had failed in his supervisory functions
with respect to a bill.
42. All this shows that Yatin Chodnekar was
predominantly discharging supervisory, administrative
and managerial functions. His salary is more than
Rs. 10,000/-. Therefore he is not a ‘workman’.
43. There is no evidence to show that Vincent
Miranda is a ‘workman’.
44. Therefore, Yatin Chodnekar and Vincent
Miranda are not ‘workmen’. The other workmen have
compromised the case. Hence, I hold issue No. 1 in
the negative.
45. Issue No 2: The case of Party I is that the
action of Party II in terminating their services
w. e. f. 07-06-2016 is illegal and unjustified.
46. As seen above, Jose Francisco Moraes,
Mr. Savio Dias, Ms. Candida D’costa and Ms. Diana
Almeida have settled this case with their Employer.
This case has been contested only by Yatin
Chodnekar and Vincent Miranda. It has been proved
that they are not workmen. Therefore, the
termination of their services w. e. f. 07-06-2016
cannot be held illegal and unjustified under the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Hence, I hold issue
No. 2 in the negative.
47.
The Union Representative, Shri P. Gaonkar
has relied upon the following case-laws to show
that Yatin Chodnekar is workman:-
1.
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta v/s Presiding Officer,
Labour Court (II) Faridabad & Anr. 2001 (I)
L.L.N. 447 wherein the Hon’ble Punjab &
Haryana High Court has held that an
accounts executive could be the workman
under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947.
2.
Management of Christian Medical College
and Hospital, Vellore v/s Presiding Officer,
Labour Court, Vellore & Anr. 2003 (2) L. L. N 21
wherein it was held by the Hon’ble Madras
High Court that an account officer could be
a workman under Section 2 (s) of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
3.
Gwalior Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. v/s K. M.
Dessai, & Ors. 1993 (I) LLJ 127 wherein the
Bombay High Court clearly held that the few
extras duties cannot determine the status of
the employee and the focus is on
predominant nature of duties.
4.
Bhatiya General Hospital & Anr. V.
Hanmant Anandrao Raje & Ors. Writ
Petition No. 11048/2022 wherein the Hon’ble
Bombay High Court has held that the overall
consideration should be the duties performed
by the workmen.
1072
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
5. Damodar Mangeshkar V/s Cidade De Goa
2021(6) Mh.L.J.677 wherein accounts
supervisor was held to be a workman by the
Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa as the
management failed to prove that his main
duties were managerial, administrative and
supervisory.
48. A reading of these judgments show that it is
not the designation but the duties done by the
employee which determines whether a person is a
‘workman’ or not.
49. For the reasons stated above, it is seen that
Yatin Chodnekar was working predominantly in a
supervisory, administrative and managerial
capacity. There is no evidence to show that he was
working predominantly as a clerk. He was the
Dy. Manager-Accounts and second in command in
the Accounts Department. Hence, the above
mentioned case-laws do not apply to this case.
50. The Union Representative, Shri P. Gaonkar
has relied upon the laws laid down in Deepali
Gundu Surwase Versus Kranti Junior Adhyapaka
Mahavidyalaya & Ors (2013(10) SCC 324). It deals
with, when and how back wages should be granted.
51. Since Yatin Chodnekar and Vincent Miranda
are not workmen, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction
to grant back wages. The said case-law is irrelevant.
Hence, I pass the following:-
ORDER
(i)
The claims of Yatin Chodnekar and Vincent
Miranda are rejected.
(ii)
No orders as to costs.
(iii)
Inform the Government accordingly.
Sd/-
(Anil Scaria)
Presiding Officer,
Industrial Tribunal and
Labour Court.
——————
Department of Law & Judiciary
Law (Establishment) Division
–––
Order
No. 14-18-2022-LD (Estt.)/156
The order No. HCB/GOA/G-P-88/2023/1484 dated
30-11-2023 which have been issued by the High
Court of Bombay at Goa, is hereby published for
general information of the public.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amir Y. Parab, Under Secretary (Law-Estt.).
Porvorim, 19th January, 2024.
High Court of Bombay at Goa
–––
Order
No. HCB/GOA/G-P-88/2023/1484
Ms. Carmina Fernandes e Mascarenhas, Assistant
Registrar, High Court of Bombay at Goa, shall stand
retired from service on the afternoon of 30th
November, 2023, on superannuation.
Dinesh R. Shetty, Registrar (Admin.).
30th November, 2023.
——————
North Goa Planning and Development Authority
–––
Notification
No. NGPDA/Town Planning Scheme/3098/2024
In supersession of all Notifications in this regards, the Government is pleased to re-constitute the
Taskforce for preparation and implementation of Town Planning Scheme at Downtown Mapusa, Phase-I.
The Taskforce will consist of the following members:
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1073
TASKFORCE
Sr. No.
Name of the person
Occupation
Designation
1.
Shri Ashish Shirodkar
Ex-Chairperson, MMC
Chairman.
2.
Shri Mahableshwar Gadekar
Agriculturist
Member.
3.
Shri Nelson Carvalho
Agriculturist
Member.
4.
Dr. Shivanand Gawas
Attorney, Communidade of Mapusa
Member.
5.
Shri Patrick Gonsalves
Inspector of Survey & Land Records, Mapusa
Member.
6.
Shri Bryan Soares
Architect
Member.
7.
Shri Shaikh Ali Ahmed
Member Secretary, SGPDA
Member
Secretary.
The Taskforce Committee shall work towards the smooth preparation and implementation of Town
Planning Scheme at Downtown Mapusa, Phase-1 with the following objectives.
1. The committee shall co-ordinate with the shareholders/owners/tenants of the land whose land is
earmarked for the preparation of the Town Planning Scheme in the ODP of Mapusa 2021 and shall
build the bridge in-between the Government and the shareholders and shall explain the benefits
of the said scheme to the shareholders.
2. The Taskforce members shall have to make prudent efforts to build the confidence of the stakeholders
with all the letters of willingness for the development of the Town Planning Scheme and the job
has to be accomplished within the period of 6 months as the target set by the Hon’ble Chief
Minister.
3. The Taskforce members shall call for the meetings with consultant, as and when required preferably
twice in a month, besides the regular interactions for the speed up of the design layout within the
time frame of six months with the latest update of the design work of the Town Planning Scheme
and the consultant shall provide the feedback, so that if any shortfalls with respect to required
information can be addressed without any delay.
4. The committee members shall restrain themselves in making any assurances/promises to the
shareholders/owners/tenants of the scheme unless otherwise they are authorised by the
Government.
5. The committee members shall brief the progress of the scheme to the Hon’ble Chief Minister and
Hon’ble Minister of Urban Development from time to time and prepare the minutes of the meeting.
6. The Taskforce members shall be paid the honorarium of Rs. 800/- per meeting as per the Office
Memorandum vide Ref. No. 9/10/2010-Fin(DMU) dated 29-11-2011 and the said honorarium will be
paid from the Town Planning Scheme fund.
7. The Taskforce members shall formally meet twice in the month with the status of the works besides
the corner meetings with partners of the Town Planning Scheme.
The Member Secretary Taskforce Committee shall assist the Taskforce Committee in providing all the
requirements for the members and organize the meetings with the shareholders.
He shall provide the transport as and when required by the member or members of the Taskforce
Committee for accomplishing the works related to the Town Planning Scheme. A vehicle shall be hired on
full time basis to accomplish the various tasks of the Town Planning Scheme. The said vehicle shall be
under the control of Member Secretary Taskforce. The expenses for hiring the vehicle shall be from the
funds of Town Planning Scheme.
The Taskforce is empowered to requisition of the services of other Government authorities/offices
alongwith their implements and machinery for the purpose to carry out the activities of the Taskforce.
All Heads of Government Departments are requested to co-operate with Taskforce and to provide all
technical and other assistance required by the Taskforce.
Vertika Dagur, Member Secretary for and on behalf of Chairman, North Goa P. D.A. with approval of the
Government.
Panaji, 29th January, 2024.
V. No. AP-1220/2024.
1074
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
Department of Personnel
–––
Order
No. 5/12/2017-PER/249
On the recommendation of the Goa Services Board, the Governor of Goa is pleased to order transfer and
posting of the following Junior Scale Officers of Goa Civil Service, in public interest, with immediate effect:-
Sr. No.
Name and present posting of the Officer
Transferred/Posted as
1
2
3
1.
Shri Deepak Vaingankar,
Deputy Collector & SDM, Sattari.
Deputy Collector (Revenue), North
2.
Shri Pranab Bhat,
Under Secretary, Finance (R&C) with
Under Secretary, Finance (Budget) with additional
additional charge of Under Secretary (Budget),
charge of Under Secretary, Finance (Audit)
Under Secretary (DMU) and Under Secretary
and Under Secretary to Chief Secretary
to Chief Secretary.
3.
Shri Shubham Naik,
Deputy Collector (LA), North.
under transfer as Deputy Registrar of
Co-operative Societies (Tech.)
4.
Shri Ravishekhar Nipanikar,
Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies
under transfer as Deputy Collector & SDM,
(Tech.).
Sattari
5.
Kum. Vrushika Kauthankar,
Deputy Collector (Revenue), North.
Deputy Collector (LA), North
6.
Shri Pandurang Gad,
Dy. Director (Admn.), WRD.
under transfer as Dy. Collector & SDM,
Quepem
7.
Shri Manohar Karekar,
Dy. Collector & SDM, Quepem.
Dy. Director (Admn.), WRD
8.
Shri Pandurang Talgaonkar,
Deputy Director (Admn.), O/o the DGP.
Joint Director, Information & Publicity
Smt. Ashwini Bhagat, Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax shall hold the charge of Chief Officer,
Canacona Municipal Council in addition to her own duties.
Shri Ganraj Morajkar, OSD, CSR Authority, Planning, Statistics & Evaluation shall hold the charge of Joint
Director, Information & Publicity in addition to his own duties.
The officers shall complete handing over and taking over process with immediate effect and submit
compliance.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 19th January, 2024.
————
Order
No. 15/9/2022-PER/257
On recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee as conveyed by Goa Public Service
Commission vide letter No. COM/II/11/42(2)/2017/522 dated 12-01-2024, the Governor of Goa is pleased to
promote the following officers to the cadre of Mamlatdar/Joint Mamlatdar/Vigilance Officer, Group ‘B’ Gazetted
in Level-7 of Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2016 on regular basis, with immediate effect:
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1075
1. Shri Ramkrishna Sagun Salgaonkar.
2. Ms. Urvashi Umesh Naik.
3. Miss Gayatri Ganesh Naik Dessai.
4. Shri Surendra N. Gaonkar (ST).
The officers shall be on probation for a period of
two years from the date of their joining. They shall
submit their Annual Assessment Report during the
probation period.
They shall exercise their option for fixation of
pay in promotional grade in terms of F. R. 22(I)(a)(1),
within a period of one month from the date of issue
of order. The option once exercised shall be final.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 23rd January, 2024.
————
Order
No. 6/5/2003-PER(Vol-I)/309
The Governor of Goa is pleased to accept the
notice of voluntary retirement dated 15-12-2023
tendered by Shri Gurudas P. Pilarnekar, Senior
Administrative Grade Officer of Goa Civil Service,
presently posted as Director of Urban Development,
w.e.f. 31-01-2024 (a.n.) in terms of Rule 48-A(1) of CCS
(Pension) Rules, 1972.
The Vigilance Department has certified that there
are no disciplinary proceeding/vigilance cases pend-
ing or being contemplated against Shri Gurudas P.
Pilarnekar.
The Directorate of Accounts has certified that
there are no dues outstanding against Shri Pilarnekar.
Shri Gurudas P. Pilarnekar, stands relieved from
Government service with effect from 31-01-2024 (a.n.).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 24th January, 2024.
————
Order
No. 7/2/2023-PER/326
Shri Anand S. Jadhav, IFS, Dy. Conservator of
Forests Wildlife and Eco Tourism (North) shall hold
charge of the post of Managing Director, Goa Forest
Development Corporation Ltd., in addition to his
own duties, with immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 25th January, 2024.
—–––––—
Order
No. 15/22/2023-PER/328
Government is pleased to accept the resignation
tendered by Shri Noel Gervasio Tavares, Block
Development Officer, vide letter dated 27-12-2023,
who is presently posted in the office of Deputy
Directorate of Panchayats, North. He stands relieved
from the post of Block Development Officer with
immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Eshant V. Sawant, Under Secretary (Personnel-I).
Porvorim, 25th January, 2024.
——————
Department of Public Health
–––
Notification
No. 35/40/2001-I/PHD/Part/149
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
-sections (5) and (6) of Section 17 of the Pre-
-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques
(Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (Central Act
No. 57 of 1994), and in supersession of Government
Notification No. 35/40/2001-I/PHD (PF-IV)/8358
dated 06-04-2015, published in the Official Gazette,
Series II No. 4 dated 23-04-2015, the Government of
Goa hereby re-constitutes an Advisory Committee
consisting of the members mentioned below to aid
and advise the Appropriate Authority of North Goa
District, appointed vide the Government Notification
No. 35/40/2001-I(PF-IV)/8381 dated 06-04-2015,
published in Official Gazette, Series II No. 5 dated
30-04-2015, and also appoints the senior most
Consultant and next senior most Consultant from
amongst members at Sr. Nos. (1) to (3) below to be
the Chairperson and the Vice-Chairperson,
respectively of the said Advisory Committee and
the junior most Consultant from amongst the Sr.
Nos. (1) to (3) below shall be Member Secretary of
the said Advisory Committee.
1076
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
(1) Senior most Gynecologist,
— Member
North District Hospital, Mapusa
(ex officio).
(2) Senior most Radiologist,
— Member
North District Hospital, Mapusa
(ex officio).
(3) Senior most Pediatrician,
— Member
North District Hospital, Mapusa
(ex officio).
(4) Senior most Assistant
— Member
Public Prosecutor at Mapusa
(ex officio).
(5) Information Assistant
— Member.
from Directorate of Information
(ex officio).
& Publicity
(6) Prachi Khandeparkar
— Member.
(7) Vibhuti Kamat
— Member.
(8) Namita D. Naik
— Member.
This Notification shall come into force on the
date of it’s publication in the Official Gazette.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 18th January, 2024.
—–––––—
Notification
No. 35/40/2001-I/PHD/Part/150
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
-sections (1) and (2) of Section 16 A of the Pre-
-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques
(Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (Central Act
No. 57 of 1994), and in supersession of the
Government Notification No. 35/40/2001-I/PHD
(PF-IV)/1591 dated 19-06-2018, published in the
Official Gazette, Series II No. 13 dated 28-06-2018,
the Government of Goa hereby reconstitutes, the
Goa State Supervisory Board, consisting of following
Members namely:-
(1) Minister for Health
— Chairperson
(ex officio).
(2) Secretary (Health)
— Vice-
-Chairperson
(ex officio).
(3) Secretary (Law)
— Member
(ex officio).
(4) Secretary (Women &
— Member
Child Development)
(ex officio).
(5) Secretary (Social Welfare)
— Member
(ex officio).
(6) Director of Health Services
— Member
(ex officio).
(7) Smt. Deviya Rane, MLA
— Member.
(8)
Smt. Jennifer Monserrate, MLA
— Member.
(9) Smt. Delilah Lobo, MLA
— Member.
(10) Adv. Prasanna Timble
— Member.
(11) Shaila D’souza
— Member.
(12) Juliana Lohar-ARZ
— Member.
(13) Prachi Khandeparkar-Sangath
— Member.
(14) Dr. Sandeep Kenkre
— Member.
(15) Dr. Govind Kamat
— Member.
(16) Dr. Shivanand Gauns
— Member.
(17) Dr. Virendra Gaonkar
— Member.
(18) Dr. Jagdish Raguvanshi
— Member.
(19) Dr. Mahesh Sardessai
— Member.
(20) Chief Medical Officer (FW)
— Member.
(21) Dy. Director, Public Health
— Member
Secretary
(ex officio).
This Notification shall come into force on the
date of it’s publication in the Official Gazette.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 18th January, 2024.
—–––––—
Notification
No. 35/40/2001-I/PHD/Part/151
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
-sections (5) and (6) of Section 17 of the Pre-
Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques
(Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (Central Act
No. 57 of 1994), and in supersession of Notification
No. 35/40/2001-I/PHD (PF-IV)/8394 dated 06-04-2015,
published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 5
dated 30-4-2015, the Government of Goa hereby
re-constitutes an Advisory Committee consisting of
the members mentioned below to aid and advise
the Appropriate Authority of South Goa District,
appointed vide the Government Notification No. 35/
/40/2001-I(PF-IV)/8387 dated 06-04-2015, published
in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 5 dated
30-04-2015 and also appoints the senior most
Consultant and next senior most Consultant from
amongst members at Sr. No. (1) to (3) below to be
the Chairperson and the Vice-Chairperson,
respectively of the said Advisory Committee and
the junior most Consultant from amongst the
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1077
Sr. Nos. (1) to (3) below shall be Member Secretary
of the said Advisory Committee.
(1) Senior most Gynecologist,
— Member
South Goa District
(ex officio).
Hospital, Margao
(2) Senior most Radiologist,
— Member
South Goa District
(ex officio).
Hospital, Margao
(3) Senior most Pediatrician,
— Member
South Goa District
(ex officio).
Hospital, Margao
(4) Senior most Assistant
— Member
Public Prosecutor
(ex officio).
at Margao
(5) Information Assistant
— Member.
from Directorate
(ex officio).
of Information & Publicity
(6) Percy Cardozo
— Member.
(7) Juliana Lohar
— Member.
(8) Anwesha Singbal
— Member.
This Notification shall come into force on the
date of it’s publication in the Official Gazette.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 18th January, 2024.
—–––––—
Notification
No. 35/40/2001-I/PHD/Part/152
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
-section (2) read with Clause (a) of sub-section (3) of
Section 17 of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal
Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection)
Act, 1994 (Central Act No. 57 of 1994), and in
supersession of the Government Notification No. 35/
/40/2001-I/PHD (PF-IV)/8398 dated 06-04-2015,
published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 5
dated 30-04-2015, the Government of Goa hereby
re-constitutes an Appropriate Authority for the State
of Goa for the purpose of the said Act, consisting of
the following members, namely:-
(1) Secretary (Health)
— Chairperson
(ex officio).
(2) Secretary (Law)
— Member
(ex officio).
(3) Smt. Pramod Salgaonkar
— Member.
This Notification shall come into force on the
date of it’s publication in the Official Gazette.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 18th January, 2024.
—–––––—
Notification
No. 5/10/2010-II/PHD/259
In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (b)
of sub-section (4) of Section 9 of the Transplantation
of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 (Central
Act No. 42 of 1994) read with Rule 13 of the
Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues
Rules, 2014, and in supersession of the Government
Notification No. 5/10/2010-II/PHD/5122 dated
14-02-2019, published in the Official Gazette, Series
II No. 47 dated 21-02-2019, the Government of Goa
is pleased to reconstitute the State Level
Authorisation Committee consisting of the following
members, namely:-
1.
Dean, Goa Medical College
— Chairman.
& Hospital
2.
Dr. Olavo Rebeiro
— Member.
3.
Medical Superintendent,
— Member.
South Goa District
Hospital, Margao
4.
Adv. Pallavi J. Mulgaonkar
— Member.
5.
Dr. Pramod Salgaonkar
— Member.
6.
Additional Secretary (Health)/
— Member.
/Joint Secretary (Health)
7.
Directorate of Health
— Member.
Services or nominee
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Trupti B. Manerkar, Under Secretary (Health-I).
Porvorim, 23rd January, 2024.
——————
Department of Revenue
–––
Order
No. 35/2/2013-RD/78
In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (b)
of sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Indian Stamp
Act, 1899 (Act No. 2 of 1899), as in force in the State
of Goa, the Government of Goa hereby permits the
1078
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
Life Insurance Corporation of India, Goa Divisional
Office, Panaji (hereinafter referred to as the “LIC
Goa”) to pay consolidated stamp duty of
Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees twenty lakhs only),
chargeable on sums to be insured in the insurance
policies issued by its offices in the State of Goa with
effect from 1st January, 2023 upto 31st December,
2024 in lieu of affixing stamps upon individual
insurance policies, which has been paid vide
cheque No. 000452 dated 18-12-2023, drawn on
HDFC Bank, Panaji, Goa, subject to the following
conditions, namely:-
(a) In case the stamp duty chargeable on the
insurance policies issued during the above
mentioned period falls short of the stamp duty
consolidated herein and paid to the
Government, the excess consolidated stamp
duty shall be adjusted for the calendar year
2024.
(b) In case the stamp duty chargeable on the
insurance policies issued during the above
period exceeds the stamp duty consolidated
herein and paid to the Government, the
balance amount due towards the stamp duty
shall be paid to the Government Treasury by
LIC Goa latest by the first week of January,
2025.
(c) A detailed report of the total stamp duty
charged on the sums insured in the insurance
policies issued by the offices of the LIC Goa
in the State of Goa during the above period
shall be submitted to the Secretary (Revenue),
Revenue Department, Government of Goa on
or before 31-12-2024.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Avelina D’sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).
Porvorim, 23rd January, 2024.
————
Order
No. 35/2/2013-RD/77
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 9A
of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Act No. 2 of 1899), as
in force in the State of Goa, the Government of Goa
hereby permits the Life Insurance Corporation of
India, Goa Divisional Office, Panaji (hereinafter
referred to as the “LIC Goa”) to pay consolidated
stamp duty of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only),
in lieu of payment of duty by affixing revenue stamp
on the receipts issued by its offices in the State of
Goa towards payment of premium on life insurance
policies and various other payments made to
external and internal customers, viz., staff, agents
and contractors, etc., (hereinafter referred to as the
“said receipts”), with effect from 1st January, 2024
to 31st December, 2024, subject to the following
conditions, namely:-
(a) In case the stamp duty chargeable on the
said receipts issued during the above
mentioned period falls short of the stamp
duty consolidated herein and paid to the
Government, the excess consolidated stamp
duty shall not be refunded.
(b) In case the stamp duty chargeable on the
said receipts issued during the above
period exceeds the stamp duty consolidated
herein and paid to the Government, the
balance amount due towards the stamp
duty shall be paid to the Government
Treasury by the LIC Goa latest by the first
week of January, 2025.
(c) A detailed report of the total stamp duty
payable on the said receipts issued by the
offices of the LIC Goa, in the State of Goa,
shall be submitted to the Secretary
(Revenue), Revenue Department, Government
of Goa, on or before 31-12-2024.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Avelina D’sa E Pereira, Under Secretary (Revenue-I).
Porvorim, 23rd January, 2024.
——————
Department of Skill Development &
Entrepreneurship
Directorate of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship
–––
Notification
No. 3/SDCT/TPO/IMC/CAC/3391
Sub.: Reconstitution of Institute Managing
Committee (IMC) of Cacora Government ITI.
In pursuance to the guidelines issued by the
Government of India towards constitution of
Institute Managing Committee (IMC) for the
Industrial Training Institute (ITIs) vide D. O. No.
DGET-21(3)97-CPIU(VOL.IV) dated 25-01-2002
received from the Director General of Employment
& Training and Joint Secretary, Government of India,
Ministry of Labour, New Delhi, the Government is
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1079
pleased to reconstitute the Institute Managing Committee of Cacora Government ITI, Cacora, Curchorem-
-Goa from the date of issue of this notification.
CONSTITUTION:
1. Shri Sudesh Rane, Proprietor,
— Chairman.
M/s. Amey Industries, Cacora Industrial Estate, Cacora-Goa
9822121845
Email: [email protected]
2.
Shri John D’Costa, Proprietor,
— Member.
M/s. Maria Industries, Curchorem-Goa
9822102103
Email: [email protected]
3.
Shri Mahesh T. Naik, Proprietor,
— Member.
M/s. Wheel Point, 65, Bansai, Curchorem-Goa
9011047091
Email: [email protected]
4.
Shri Anuj G. Kamat, Partner,
M/s. Geekay Hydrolinks, 146, Mhadegal, Opp. ITI Cacora,
— Member.
Cacora, Curchorem-Goa
Mob. No.: 9823860189
Email: [email protected]
5.
Adv. Reema Alise Fernandes, Councilor,
— Member.
Curchorem Cacora Municipal Council, Curchorem-Goa
Mob. No.: 9657250527
Email: [email protected]
6.
Shri Arman Bankley
— Member.
AR-Mine’s Industries, Plot No. 21, 22, 23 & D-3/15,
Kakoda Industrial Estate, Sanguem Road,
Kakoda, Curchorem-Goa
911230235
Email: [email protected]
7.
Shri Harishchandra M. Chari, Proprietor,
— Member.
Kamaxi Body Builders, Phase-III, Plot 58/59,
Cacora IDC, Curchorem-Goa
Mob. No.: 9822103232
Email: [email protected]
8.
Shri Shailendra Veluskar, Partner,
— Member.
Kris Manufacturing Company,
Mob. No.: 7350533388
Email: [email protected]
9.
Shri Aniket Rindhe, HR Manager,
— Member.
Mob. No.: 8411886834
Email: [email protected]
10.
Shri Vinayak Vassudev Prabhu Chodankar, Proprietor,
— Member.
M/s. Gomantak Auto Garage, Anandwadi, Sanvordem-Goa
Mob. No.: 9850051543
Email: [email protected]
11.
Shri Pradip Pandurang Kakodkar, Chartered Accountant
— Member.
Mob. No.: 9049480808
Office No. 0832-2652224
1080
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
12.
State Director or his Representative, Directorate of Skill Development
— Member.
& Entrepreneurship, 3rd Floor, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Panaji-Goa
13.
Principal, Cacora Government ITI, Cacora, Curchorem-Goa
— Member Secretary.
Email: [email protected]
14.
Faculty Representative, to be nominated by the Principal,
— Member.
Cacora Government ITI, Cacora, Curchorem-Goa
15.
Student Representative, to be nominated by the Principal,
— Member.
Cacora Government ITI, Cacora, Curchorem-Goa
The term of reference shall be as per attached Annexure also specifying therein indicators for monitoring
the performance of the IMC.
The term of office of the IMC shall be three years from the date of issue of this notification or till the
reconstitution of the IMC thereafter. The members representing the Industries may change by name and
number depending upon the necessity of the IMC from time to time under specific orders of the Government.
Change in the official members, if any, shall be on the basis of the recommendations of the Department
of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship.
The IMC shall meet as frequently as required and in any case at least once in three months. The members
will have to intimate to the Chairman about his/her inability to attend the meeting on genuine ground and
obtain leave of absence. Any member remaining absent for three consecutive meetings without leave of
absence shall cease to be member of the IMC from the date of the third absence.
The non-official members, who attend the meeting shall be paid a fixed honorarium of Rs. 1500/- per
meeting and no other TA/DA shall be payable.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
S. S. Gaonkar, Director (SD&E).
Panaji, 19th January, 2024.
——————
Department of Transport
Directorate of Transport
–––
Notification
No. D.Tpt/EST/3142/2023/235
As per the Charter of Gender Budget Cells developed by the Ministry of Finance on 8th March, 2007,
a Gender Budget Cell of Directorate of Transport is hereby constituted, consisting of the following members:-
1.
Director of Transport
—
Chairperson.
2.
Dy. Director (Admin.)
—
Member Secretary.
3.
Addl. Directorate of
—
Member.
Transport (North)
4.
Addl. Directorate of
—
Member.
Transport (South)
5.
Accounts Officer
—
Member.
6.
Assistant Director
—
Member.
of Transport (HQ)
The above constituted Gender Budget Cell may set for itself, specific quarterly/half yearly/annual
targets to be achieved in terms of the areas of work as suggested in the Charter of Gender Budget Cells.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 44
1ST FEBRUARY, 2024
1081
The functions and working of the Gender Responsive Budgeting (GRB) may be reviewed
atleast once a quarter by Secretary, Transport.
This issues with the approval of the Government vide U.O. No. 2198 dated 04-01-2024.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
P. Pravimal Abhishek, IAS, Director of Transport.
Panaji, 25th January, 2024.
——————
Department of Women & Child Development
Directorate of Women & Child Development
–––
Order
No. 1-125-2006-DWCD-PART/8636
Read: Notification No. 1-125-2006-DWCD-PART/1734 dated 25-06-2021.
In view of the approval of Government, Shri Balaji S. Mayekar, current signatory of the Finance Committee
is hereby replaced with Mrs. Rekha D’Silva, Member of the Goa State Commission for Protection of Child
Rights with immediate effect to exercise the powers relating to financial transaction of the Commission.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Vinesh Arlenkar, Director (Women and Child Development).
Porvorim, 24th January, 2024.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 23.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—379/80—01/2024.