SERIES II No. 2
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2024-2026
Panaji, 12th April, 2024 (Chaitra 23, 1946)
Note:- There is one Extraordinary issue to the Official Gazette, Series II No. 1 dated 4-04-2024 namely, Extraordinary
dated 4-04-2024 from pages 37 to 40 regarding Orders and Notifications from Goa State Election
Commission.
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Department of Co-operation
Office of the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies
—––
Final list of Members/Voters list of
Vassant Vistas Co-operative Housing Society as on 01-12-2023
ANNEXURE “I”
Sr.
Name of the Members/
Main/
Flat No.
Date of
No. of fully
Remarks
Category
No.
/Voters list
/Joint
admission
paid up
SC/ST/
Male/Female
in the
to membership
shares held
/Gen.
Members
Register
(G Form)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1.
Ms. Nanda V. Pednekar
M
B-44
22-02-2017
5
Gen
F
2.
Smt. Nima Subash Patil
M
A-12
22-02-2017
5
Gen
F
Mr. Subash Dattatray Patil
J
Gen
M
3.
Shri Lenzyl Bartolomeu
M
A-13
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Antonio Soares
4.
Mrs. Uma Anil Amonkar
M
A-14
15-07-2022
5
Gen
F
Mr. Anil Shankar Amonkar
J
Gen
M
5.
Mrs. Lourdes Teresa D’souza
M
A-21
20-02-2017
5
Gen
F
Mr. Diago Xavier D’souza
J
Gen
M
6.
Mr. Jeffery Rodrigues
M
A-22
22-06-2018
5
Gen
M
Mrs. Paloma D’sa
J
Gen
F
7.
Mrs. Tanuja Shirodkar
M
A-23
1-20-2022
5
Gen
F
Mr. Dattaprasad Shirodkar
J
Gen
M
8.
Mr. Joseph Nazarius Pereira
M
A-24
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
9.
Shri Kalpit Anant Tendolkar
M
A-31
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Smt. Krupali K. Bhagat
J
Gen
F
10.
Mrs. Pranali L. Prabhudesai
M
A-32
22-02-2017
5
Gen
F
Shri Ladcoba Prabhudesai
J
Gen
M
41
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
42
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
11.
Smt. Krupali K. Bhagat
M
A-33
22-02-2017
5
Gen
F
Shri Kalpit Anant Tendolkar
J
Gen
M
12.
Smt. Jouelle Baracho alias
M
A-34
22-02-2017
5
Gen
F
Joulle Baracho Lewis
13.
Shri Raju Vasant Tar
M
A-41
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Smt. Sara Raju Tar
J
22-02-2017
Gen
F
14.
Shri Raju Vasant Tar
M
A-42
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Smt. Sara Raju Tar
J
Gen
F
15.
Shri Vinayakrao Prabhakar
M
A-43
20-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Nadkarni
16.
Shri Errol Eustace Jerome
M
A-44
20-02-2017
5
Gen
M
D’souza
17.
Shri Raju Vasant Tar
M
A-51
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Smt. Sara Raju Tar
J
Gen
F
18.
Mr. Amay Arjun Phadte
M
A-52
1-22-2021
5
Gen
M
19.
Shri Anil Shrikant Kenkare
M
A-53
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Smt. Anagha Anil Kenkare
J
Gen
F
Mangurish Anil Kenkare
J
M
20.
Shri Savio Brian D’mello
M
A-54
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
21.
Mr. Ashish Rodricks
M
B-11
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
23.
Shri Gurudas Rama
M
B-13
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Harmalkar
Smt. Sugandha Gurudas
J
Gen
F
Harmalkar
25.
Shri Gulam Yakub Shaikh
M
B-21
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
alias Yakub C. Shaikh
26.
Shri Michael Rangel
M
B-22
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
27.
Shri Ronald Braganza
M
B-23
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Smt. Alva Maria Braganza
J
Gen
F
28.
Shri Ronald Braganza
M
B-24
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Smt. Alva Maria Braganza
J
Gen
F
29.
Shri Vishvesh S. Phaldesai
M
B-31
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
30.
Mr. Joseph Souza Pereira
M
B-32
29-07-2020
5
Gen
M
Mrs. Beatrice Souza Pereira
J
Gen
F
31.
Shri Francisco Xavier Mendes
M
B-33
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Smt. Albertina Ana Rosa Mendes
J
Gen
F
32.
Shri Kaizad Mody
M
B-34
6-28-2018
5
Gen
M
33.
Smt. Diana Philomena
M
B-41
6-28-2018
5
Gen
F
D’souza
34.
Smt. Cecilia D’souza
M
B-42
6-28-2018
5
Gen
F
35.
Shri Lino Braz Rodrigues
M
B-43
6-28-2018
5
Gen
M
36.
Mr. Jerry Clement Domnic Vaz
M
A-11
3-9-2020
5
Gen
M
37.
Mr. Rahil Hassan Shaikh
M
B-51
2-3-2021
5
Gen
M
Mrs. Sanofar Rahil Shaikh
J
Gen
F
38.
Smt. Shahin Siraj Birya
M
B-52
6-28-2018
5
Gen
F
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
39.
Smt. Supriya Dashrath Jadhav
M
B-53
6-28-2018
5
Gen
F
Shri Nikhil Suresh Chavan
J
Gen
M
40.
Smt. Jolly Rego
M
B-54
6-28-2018
5
Gen
F
42.
Mr. Datta Tar
M
B-14
22-02-2017
5
Gen
M
Mrs. Sandhya Datta Tar
J
Gen
F
Sd/-, Chairperson/Administrators.
Mapusa, 14th December, 2023.
————
Kamat Prime Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.
B.B. Borkar Road, Porvorim, Bardez-Goa 403521
Reg. No. ARCS/NZ/HSG/477(B)/Goa dated 20-02-2020
——
Provisional list of Voters of Kamat Prime Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.
Sr.
Unit
Type*
Admission
Name of
Gender Age
Address
Phone
No
date
voting member
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1.
Shop# Comm 20-02-2020 Rohan Ramesh Kamat
M
35
501, Kamat
9822980269
rohan.kamat
1 & 2
Metropolis-
@kamat
-II, St. Inez,
realty.com
Panaji 403001
2.
Shop# Comm
09-01-2021
Jerome Marcel Lewis
M
69
H. No. 264/
9326101004
joelewis3108
3 & 4
/75, Near
@gmail.com
Gautam Hotel,
Pilerne, Bardez,
Goa 403114
3.
UG3
Res
20-02-2020
Dr. Rohit Vishwanath
M
59
H. No. 1571, 9822482010
rvhede
Hede
“SITEJ”, B. B.
@gmail.com
Borkar Road,
Penha de
Franca, Alto
Porvorim
403521
4.
F1
Res
20-02-2020
Anjali Arun Sardessai
F
56
633/1, Nandan 9822385399
anjali.
Bungalow,
sardessai@
Law College
gmail.com
Road, Miramar,
Caranzalem,
P. O. 403002
5.
F2
Res
20-02-2020 Sheela Dhume
F
73
Flat No. F2, 9604559962
sheela.dhume
Kamat Prime,
@gmail.com
B. B. Borkar,
Road, Porvorim
44
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
6.
F3
Res
20-02-2020
Madhav Shivaji
M
55
Flat No. F3, 9923063318
Sinai Desai
Kamat Prime,
B. B. Borkar
Road,
Porvorim
7.
S1
Res
20-02-2020
Milan Vilas
F
78
711/64,
9511746872
vilasbhangui
Bhangui
Green Hill
@gmail.com
Society,
Soccorro,
Bardez 403501
8.
S2
Res
20-02-2020
Shailaja Shashikant
F
65
Flat No. S2, 9822385346
shaila
Sardessai
Kamat Prime,
sardessai
B.B. Borkar
@gmail.com
Road, Porvorim
9.
S3
Res
20-02-2020
Suhas Ramkrishna
M
78
Flat No. S3, 7020046909
rs.nagarsekar
Sinai Nagarsekar
Kamat Prime
@gmail.com
B.B. Borkar
Road, Porvorim
10.
T3
Res
20-02-2020
Zeferino Luciano
M
58
Flat No. T3, 9637093958
zeferinoc
Castro
Kamat Prime,
@yahoo.com
B.B. Borkar
Road, Porvorim
*Type: Comm-Commercial, Res-Residential.
Any claims/objections/omission or error in respect of the name or address or other particulars in the list
may be brought to the notice of the Assistant Registrar, Mapusa in writing by any member of the Society
who is a voter, during office hours within 15 days from the date of publication of the provisional list of voters
Sd/-, Chairperson/Secretary
Porvorim, 27th December, 2023.
————
Final list of Voters of Kamat Prime Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.
Sr.
Unit
Type*
Admission
Name of
Gender Age
Address
Phone
No
date
voting member
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1.
Shop# Comm 20-02-2020
Rohan Ramesh Kamat
M
35
501, Kamat
9822980269
rohan.kamat
1 & 2
Metropolis-
@kamat
-II, St. Inez,
reality.com
Panaji 403001
2.
Shop# Comm 09-01-2021
Jerome Marcel Lewis
M
69
H. No. 264/
9326101004
joelewis3108
3 & 4
Joint Member:
/75, Near
@gmail.com
Theresa Lewis
Gautam Hotel,
Pilerne, Bardez-
-Goa 403114
3.
UG3
Res
20-02-2020
Dr. Rohit Vishwanath
M
59
H. No. 1571, 9822482010
rvhede@
Hede
“SITEJ”, B. B.
gmail.com
Joint Member:
Borkar Road,
Shanta Rohit Hede
Penha de
Franca, Alto
Porvorim
403521
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4.
F1
Res
20-02-2020
Anjali Arun Sardessai
F
56
633/1, Nandan 9822385399
anjali.
Bungalow,
sardessai@
Law College
gmail.com
Road, Miramar,
Caranzalem, P. O.
403002
5.
F2
Res
20-02-2020
Sheela Dhume
F
73
Flat No. F2, 9604559962
sheela.dhume
Kamat Prime,
@gmail.com
B. B. Borkar
Rd, Porvorim
6.
F3
Res
20-02-2020
Madhav Shivaji
M
55
Flat No. F3, 9923063318
Sinai Desai
Kamat Prime,
B. B. Borkar
Road,
Porvorim
7.
S1
Res
20-02-2020
Milan Vilas
F
78
711/64,
9511746872
vilasbhangui
Bhangui
Green Hill
@gmail.com
Joint Member:
Society,
Vilas B. Bhangui
Soccorro,
Bardez 403501
8.
S2
Res
20-02-2020
Shailaja Shashikant
F
65
Flat No. S2,
9822385346
shailasardessai
Sardessai
Kamat Prime,
@gmail.com
Joint Member:
B. B. Borkar
Richa S. Sardessai
Road, Porvorim
9.
S3
Res
20-02-2020
Suhas Ramkrishna
M
78
Flat No. S3, 7020046909
rs.nagarsekar
Sinai Nagarsekar
Kamat Prime,
@gmail.com
B. B. Borkar
Road, Porvorim
10.
T3
Res
20-02-2020
Zeferino Luciano
M
58
Flat No. T3, 9637093958
zeferinoc
Castro
Kamat Prime,
@yahoo.com
B.B. Borkar
Road, Porvorim
*Type: Comm-Commercial, Res-Residential.
Sd/- Chairperson/Treasurer.
Porvorim, 11th January, 2024.
————
Kamson Residency Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
Reg. No. HSG(b)-243/NZ/GOA dated 11-07-2005
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa
email: [email protected]
—–––
Provisional List of Members
Sr. No.
Flat No.
Name of Member
Address
1
2
3
4
1.
AF-1
Devdutta Sail
AF-1, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
2.
AF-2
Chetan Achrekar
AF-2, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
46
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
1
2
3
4
3.
AF-3
Purshottam/Dhiraj Borkar
AF-3, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
4.
AG-1
Suraj Jannakunavar
AG-1, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
5.
AG-2
Nilkanth Prabhu
AG-2, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
6.
AG-3
Kirti Sawaikar
AG-3, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
7.
AG-4
Sangeeta Chikhalika
AG-4, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
8.
AS-1
Pankaj Kumar Singh
AS-1, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
9.
AS-2
Domnick Fernandes
AS-2, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
10.
AS-3
Narendra Prabhugaonkar
AS-3, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
11.
BF-1
Vandana Bale
BF-1, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
12.
BF-2
Mandar Bale
BF-2, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
13.
BF-3
Vaishali Dabolkar
BF-3, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
14.
BG-1
Seema Singh
BG-1, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
15.
BG-2
Govardhan Gaonkar
BG-2, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
16.
BG-3
Usha Channabassappa
BG-3, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
17.
BG-4
Mandar Bale
BG-4, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
18.
BS-1
Dheesona Sen
BS-1, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
19.
BS-2
Venkatesh Warkar
BS-2, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
20.
BS-3
Gopal Sawant
BS-3, Kamson Residency Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd.,
Salvador-Do-Mundo, Alto Porvorim, Bardez-Goa.
Sd/-, Secretary.
Mapusa, 11th March, 2024.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
47
The Samrudhi Lifestyle Co-operative Housing Maintenance Society Ltd.,
Porvorim, Goa
—––––
ANNEXURE-E-1
Provisional List of Members of the Samrudhi Lifestyle Co-operative Housing Maintenance Society Ltd., as
on 31st March, 2023
Sr.
Sr. No. in
Name of the member and
Date of
No. of
Remarks
No.
the members
his/her Flat/House No.
admission
fully
register
to
paid up
(G-Form)
membership
shares held
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
1
Mr. Sandesh Raghvendra Prabhu, A-Bldg, S-3
08-09-2022
10
2.
2
Mrs. Tirthana Sunil Lotliker, B-Bldg, UG-1
08-09-2022
10
3.
3
Dr. Ehrlson Savio De Sousa, B-Bldg, F-1
08-09-2022
10
4.
4
Mr. Vinay Vithal Nayak, B-Bldg, S-1
08-09-2022
10
5.
5
Mr. Jagdeesh Goudappa Ambiger, A-Bldg, S-4
08-09-2022
10
6.
6
Mr. Dilip Vasant Sawant, A-Bldg, F-3
08-09-2022
10
7.
7
Mrs. Shraddha Prashant Naik, A-Bldg, UG-3
08-09-2022
10
8.
8
Mr. Rama Anant Shetye, B-Bldg, UG-2
08-09-2022
10
9.
9
Mrs. Kunda Vinayak Sardessai, A-Bldg, S-2
08-09-2022
10
10.
10
Mr. Ramchandra G. Gawade, A-Bldg, S-1
08-09-2022
10
11.
11
Mr. Kiran Sukdo Salunke, B-Bldg, S-2
08-09-2022
10
12.
12
Mrs. Rosy Barboza (alias) Rosy Vaz, A-Bldg, F-4
08-09-2022
10
13.
13
Mr. Ramesh Choudhary, A-Bldg, G-3
08-09-2022
10
14.
14
Mr. Dileep Bhiku Bandekar, A-Bldg, G-1
08-09-2022
10
15.
15
Mr. Purshottam Mulji Patel, Shop No. 6
08-09-2022
10
16.
16
Mr. Jacob Verghese, Shop No. 1
08-09-2022
10
17.
17
Mr. Sunil Laxman Zalmi, A-Bldg, F-2
08-09-2022
10
18.
18
Mr. Vilas Sadanand Naik, A-Bldg, UG-2
08-09-2022
10
19.
19
Mr. Bhupendra Patel, Shop No. 7
08-09-2022
10
20.
20
Mr. Sham Shetye, Shop No. 4
08-09-2022
—
Share amount
not paid.
21.
21
Mr. Vikas Brahmdutt Churiwala, A-Bldg, G-4
08-09-2022
10
22.
22
Mr. Umesh G. Dessai, B-Bldg, T-2
08-09-2022
10
Sd/-, Secretary/Chairman.
Porvorim, 6th February, 2024.
48
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
The Monarch Palms Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.
Bamanwado, Candolim, Bardez-Goa
—––
Provisional List of Voters of Monarch Palms Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.
Sr. No.
Owner Name
Bldg.
Flat No.
Emal Id
Phone No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Kevin Sequeira
A
003
9822163964
2.
Swapnil Gaur/Reetu Gaur
A
004
9623197009
3.
Manish Agarwal
A
101
8828029351
4.
Sydney Barboza
A
103
9819478355
5.
Sri Chaudhary
A
104
9867156564
6.
Francisco M. Pereira
A
203
9822163964
7.
Gordon Pereira/Beaula G. Pereira
A
204
7738827414
8.
Udit Aggarwal
A
302
9540062222
9.
Gunjan Grover
A
303
9873350208
10.
Maurice Gomes
A
304
9820737963
11.
Om Prakash Dwivedi
B
001
7720905567
12.
Gaurav Setia
B
002
8805105352
13.
Sunil Mohan Sukhani
B
003
8999921658
14.
Shankar Chandu Sukhani
B
004
9960806688
15.
Domnic Coutinho
B
101
9822381013
16.
Judy Desouza Lobo/Linus Michael
B
102
9620447540
Lobo
17.
Judy Desouza Lobo/Linus Michael
B
103
9620447540
Lobo
18.
Barbara Zuzarte/Rex Zuzarte
B
201
7066616151
19.
Rex Zuzarte/Barbara Zuzarte
B
204
7066616151
20.
Gurpreet Deshpal Sethi
B
302
9820151025
21.
Nishant Chaudhary
C
001
9910908720
22.
Meer Singh HUF
C
002
9910908720
23.
Meer Singh
C
003
9910908720
24.
Prashant Chaudhary
C
004
9910908720
25.
Rashmi Joshi/Deepak Joshi
C
101
9654328735
26.
Amit Gaur
C
102
8802556677
27.
Farida Konarwala
C
104
9821135165
28.
Prashant Pant
C
201
9676222330
29.
Neil Pinheiro
C
202
9821111206
30.
Marlon Peter Gomes
C
203
9820085129
31.
Alo Pal
C
204
8906059655
32.
Saroj G. Godekar
C
301
9049584268
33.
Lyandra J. Dsouza/Iris E. D’souza
C
302
9820051246
34.
Romel Monteiro
C
303
9820700213
35.
Archana Rani
C
304
9868156954
36.
Amit Bakshi
D
001
[email protected] 9958818899
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
37.
Kalyan Shirodkar
D
002
9822585023
38.
Rajiv Chabra
D
003
9818460259
39.
Pravin Shirodkar
D
004
9822585023
40.
Meghna Vaikul
D
101
9833533235
41.
Mandar Sherlekar
D
102
9833533235
42.
Glanvet Barretto/Joseph Barretto D
103
9833800532
43.
Antoneta Clara Vaz/Natasha
D
104
9423059886
Perpetua Vaz
44.
Jacinta Jose Fernandes/Jose RC
D
201
9820753661
Fernandes
45.
Azra Makarem
D
202
9326138650
46.
Raj Jacob Kollenchery/Vivian M. Raj
D
301
9845273233
47.
Geetha Menon
D
302
9560655811
48.
Rajesh Kumar
D
303
9868156954
49.
Abhay Pawar
D
304
9892118027
50.
Yogandar Singh
E
001
9868357736
51.
Raghini Singh
E
002
9868357736
52.
Arvind Sequeira/Meena S.
E
003
9823160126
53.
Rita Sadwelkar
E
004
abhay [email protected]/
9822167840
54.
Mario Felix Fernandes/Sharon
E
101
9867508018
Fernandes
55.
Thomas Felix Rodrigues/
E
103
9029490964
Yvette Anna Rodrigues
56.
Christilina Almeida
E
104
971507061383
57.
Pradeep Rathod
E
201
9822336494
58.
Gopal S. Shanbhag/Anitha G.
E
203
9900684918
Shanbhag
59.
Stella Ida Dsilva/John Nocolaus
E
204
965-90920960
60.
Asha Gedam
E
301
8879643788
61.
Salil A. Pawar
E
303
9892118027
62.
Davinder Singh Grover
E
304
9212404101
63.
Abhijit R. Belhe/Archana A, Belhe F
001
abhijit [email protected] 9850553008
64.
Tulio Faria
F
002
9890074339
65.
Constantine Fonseca
F
003
9823746061
66.
Remedios Teresa Mascarenhas
F
004
9850929862
67.
Eshwar Chawan
F
101
8888880207
68.
Savio Ribeiro
F
201
8999368389
69.
Niranjan Pereira
F
202
7843016906
70.
Dr. Neel Amonkar
F
203
vikas [email protected]
9823196361
71.
Dr. Roshan A. Nazareth
F
204
9372170545
72.
Alka Agarwal
F
301
9322274464
73.
Farul Agarwal
F
304
8828029351
Sd/-, Mr. Nishant Chaudhary, Chairman and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Secretary.
Mapusa, 5th March, 2024.
50
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
Goa Human Rights Commission
Office of the Goa Human Rights Commission
––
Before the Goa Human Rights Commission
Panaji-Goa
Proceeding No. 76/2023
Shri Edwin Vaz,
Ex-Vocational Instructor (P),
R/o. House No. 84, No Bairo,
Amboi, P. O. Piedade,
Tiswadi-Goa
…… Complainant.
V/s
The Director,
Directorate of Skill Development &
Entrepreneurship,
3rd Floor, Shrama Shakti Bhavan,
Patto, Panaji-Goa …… Respondent.
INQUIRY REPORT
(18th January, 2024)
The complaint was received from the
Complainant on 16-03-2023, stating that he had
retired as a Vocational Instructor from the Directorate
of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship, Panaji, on
30-06-2016. He found that an amount of Rs. 1,30,556/-
was recovered from his Gratuity towards
overpayment made to him from January 2006 to
30-06-2016, by corrigendum dated 05-07-2016, after
his retirement. He stated that he had made
representations to the Respondent but the same
was not considered by the Government.
Accordingly, he filed the present complaint for
refund of his dues of Rs. 1,30,556/-.
2. On perusing the complaint, the Commission by
Order dated 06-12-2023, called for the report from
the Respondent.
3. The Respondent filed their report dated
08-01-2024 conceding that the amount of Rs. 1,30,556/-
was recovered from his retirement graturty.
4. The Commission heard the Complainant and
heard Ms. Siya Parsekar, Office Superintendant, on
behalf of the Respondent.
5. In their reply, the Respondent stated that they
had moved a proposal to give the benefits to the
Complainant to the Finance (R & C) Department but
the same was not considered.
6. Before the Division Bench of the Supreme Court
of India, in Civil Appeal No. 7115 of 2010, Thomas
Daniel Versus State of Kerala & Ors., decided by
Judgment dated 2nd May, 2022, the issue was as to
whether increments granted to the appellant, while
he was in service, can be recovered from him almost
10 years after his retirement on the ground that the
said increments were granted on account of an error.
In para (9), the Supreme Court noted that the Court
in a catena of decisions has consistently held that
if the excess amount was not paid on account of
any misrepresentation or fraud of the employee or
if such excess payment was made by the employer
by applying a wrong principle for calculating the
pay/allowance or on the basis of a particular
interpretation of rule/order which is subsequently
found to be erroneous, such excess payment of
emoluments or allowances are not recoverable. In
para 28, it held that such relief, restraining back
recovery of excess payment, is granted by courts
not because of any right in the employees, but in
equity, in exercise of judicial discretion to relieve
the employees from the hardship that will be caused
if recovery is implemented.
7. In State of Punjab and Others v. Rafiq Masih
(White Washer) and Others, (2015) 4 SCC 334, in
Para 18, it held as under:
“18. It is not possible to postulate all situations
of hardship which would govern employees on the
issue of recovery, where payments have mistakenly
been made by the employer, in excess of their
entitlement. Be that as it may, based on the
decisions referred to hereinabove, we may, as a
ready reference, summarise the following few
situations, wherein recoveries by the employers,
would be impermissible in law:
(i) Recovery from the employees belonging to
Class III and Class IV service (or Group C and Group
D service).
(ii) Recovery from the retired employees, or the
employees who are due to retire within one year, of
the order of recovery.
(iii) Recovery from the employees, when the
excess payment has been made for a period in excess
of five years, before the order of recovery is issued.
(iv) Recovery in cases where an employee has
wrongfully been required to discharge duties of a
higher post, and has been paid accordingly, even
though he should have rightfully been required to
work against an inferior post.
(v) In any other case, where the court arrives at
the conclusion, that recovery if made from the
employee, would be iniquitous or harsh or arbitrary
to such an extent, as would far outweigh the
equitable balance of the employer’s right to
recover.”
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
51
8. The respondent in their reply dated 08-01-2024
have stated that two other Ex-Group Instructors,
Shri Stephen Coutinho and Shri Sudhir S. Kubde
had earlier approached this Commission and based
on the Inquiry Reports dated 08-11-2022, the
amounts deducted of these two have been now
refunded. But as the present complainant was not
before this Commission earlier, his request was not
considered by the Finance Department.
9. As held by the Supreme Court in (2015) 4
SCC 334 (Supra), recoveries from the retired
employees or the employees who are due to retire
within one year of the order of recovery, are
impermissable. So also recoveries from Group ‘C and D
Government employees was barred.
10. The respondent, in their reply, in para 6, had
in fact stated that the Central Government had
issued the office memorandum dated 02-03-2016,
regarding waving of recovery of wrongful/excess
payments made to Group ‘C’ Government servants,
which was adopted by the Government of Goa and
circulated vide office Memorandum dated
07-03-2017.
11. The Commission finds that the complainant
herein, who was a Group C employee, had retired
on superannuation on 30-06-2016. Thereafter by
corrigendums dated 05-07-2016, the excess amounts
paid of Rs. 1,30,556/-, were ordered to be recovered
from his Gratuity amount, which was impermissible.
12. In the facts of the present case, the
Commission accordingly recommends to the
Respondent that in view of the law laid down by
the Supreme Court as outlined above, the
Respondent pursues the matter afresh with the
Finance Department for refund of the said amount
of Rs. 1,30,556/- (Rupees one lakh thirty thousand
five hundred fifty six only), to the Complainant.
13. Under Section 18(e) of the Protection of Human
Rights Act, 1993, the Commission shall send a copy of
the
Inquiry
Report
together
with
its
recommendations to the concerned Government or
authority and they shall, within a period of one
month or such further time as the Commission may
allow, forward its comments on the report, including
the laction taken or proposed to be taken, to the
Commission.
14. Copy of the Inquiry Report be sent to the
Respondent, calling for their comments, including
the action taken or proposed to be taken within a
period of 60 days or on or before 19-03-2024, in terms
of Section 18(e) of the Protection of Human Rights
Act, 1993.
Date: 18-01-2024.
Place: Panaji-Goa.
———
Directorate of Skill Development and
Entrepreneurship
Shram Shakti Bhavan, 3rd Floor, Patto Plaza,
Panaji-Goa
——
Order
No. DSDE/EST/Rec./2017/4151
In pursuance of Inquiry Report/Order dated
18-01-2024 passed by Hon’ble Human Rights
Commission in proceeding No. 76/2023 together
with its recommendation in terms of Section 18(e) of
the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
Whereas, Shri Edwin Vaz, Ex-Vocational
Instructor (P) of Directorate of Skill Development
and Entrepreneurship, Panaji retired on attaining
the age of superannuation on 30-06-2016 (a.n.) and
the pension has been authorized under the Pension
Payment Order No. GOA-A/22186.
2. And whereas, an amount of 1,30,556/- (Rupees
one lakh thirty thousand five hundred and fifty-six
only) was recovered from the retirement gratuity
(DCRG) of Shri Edwin Vaz, Ex-Vocational Instructor
(P) on account of overpayment of pay and allowances
for the period from 01-01-2006 to 30-06-2016.
3. And whereas, the representation dated
25-11-2019 was placed before the Government for a
refund of an amount of Rs. 1,30,556/- (Rupees one
lakh thirty thousand five hundred and fifty-six only)
so deducted from DCRG in terms of O.M. No. F. No.
18/03/2015/Estt (Pay-I) dated 02-03-2016 adopted by
Government of Goa vide O.M. No. 8/7/2008 Fin
(R & C) dated 07-03-2017.
4. And whereas, Finance (R & C) Department
have instructed to fix the responsibility on the
officials responsible for overpayment and to recover
the amount from them.
52
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
5. And whereas, aggrieved with the recoveries of
the aforesaid amount, Shri Edwin Vaz, Ex-Vocational
Instructor (P) approached the Hon’ble Human Rights
Commission on 16-03-2023 against the decision of
the Government.
6. And whereas, Hon’ble Human Rights
Commission vide Inquiry Report/Order dated
18-01-2024 in proceeding No. 76/2023 recommends
to the Respondent to pursue the matter afresh with
the Finance (R&C) Department for refund of the
said amount of Rs. 1,30,556/- (Rupees one lakh thirty
thousand five hundred and fifty-six only), to the
complainant Shri Edwin Vaz.
7. And whereas, upon the instructions of the
Hon’ble Human Rights Commission, the matter was
placed before the Government and the Finance
(R&C) Department for its concurrence on
29-01-2024.
8. And whereas, the Government has inter alia
accepted the recommendation of Hon’ble Human
Rights Commission, which are in line with Hon’ble
Supreme Court vide U.O. No. 11051/F dated
28-12-2024.
9. Now therefore, sanction of the Government is
hereby accorded to refund an amount of Rs. 1,30,556/-
(Rupees one lakh thirty thousand five hundred and
fifty six only) to the complainant Shri Edwin Vaz.
The Assistant Account Officer of Skill
Development and Entrepreneurship, Panaji is hereby
authorized to draw and disburse the amount.
The above expenditure shall be debited to the
Budget Head from where Shri Edwin Vaz was
drawing his pay and allowances.
This isues with the concurrence of Finance (R&C)
Department vide U.O. No. 1400086179 dated
05-03-2024.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
S. S. Gaonkar, Director (Skill Development &
Entrepreneurship) & ex officio Jt. Secretary.
Panaji, 15th March, 2024.
————
Before the Goa Human Rights Commission
Panaji-Goa
Proceeding No. 106/2022
Urmila Umesh Gaonkar,
H. No. 226, Paltadwada.
Maulinguem-Goa
…… Complainant.
V/s
1. The Director General of Police,
Police Headquarters,
Panaji-Goa
2. The Incharge,
Fire Station,
Ona, Maulinguem,
Bicholim-Goa …… Respondents.
INQUIRY REPORT
(22nd February, 2024)
The complaint dated 07-06-2022, was received
from the Complainant praying for compensation on
account of the wound caused to her resulting from
the bullet fired at the Lakherem Firing Range of the
Goa Police at Bicholim-Goa.
2. On perusing the complaint, the Commission by
Order dated 16-06-2022, issued notices to the two
Respondents, i.e. (1) The Director General of Police,
Police Headquarters, Panaji-Goa and (2) The
Incharge, Firing Station, Ona, Maulinguem,
Bicholim-Goa, calling for their replies.
3. The Respondent No. 1 filed their reply on
27-07-2022 and the Respondent No. 2 filed his reply
on 21-07-2022.
4. Thereafter, the Complainant filed her two
Rejoinders to the two replies, on 10-11-2022.
5. The Commission heard Adv. Shri Rahul Kamat
for the Complainant and Police Prosecutor, Mrs.
A.R. Carvalho for the Respondents.
6. The Commission has gone through the
complaint, the replies of the Respondents, the
Rejoinders of the Complainant, the documents on
record and has considered the submissions on
behalf of the Complainant and on behalf of the
Respondents.
7. The complaint had been filed stating that she
resides at Maulinguem and at a distance of around
3 kms. from her house, there is a firing range of the
Department of Police and on 27-01-2021, when she
was working at her residence a bullet from a gun
fired from the Lakherem Firing Range penetrated
and hit her right leg. She took medical treatment for
around eight to ten days but as the swelling of her
leg had not disappeared, she was taken to the Goa
Medical College on 03-02-2021, wherein she was
admitted and she had to undergo a surgery for
removing a bullet from her right leg and was
discharged on 06-02-2021.
8. She stated that after her discharge, her physical
capability to work was badly affected. It is her case
that she was earning her daily livelihood by working
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
53
in various houses and her husband is also a daily
wage labourer. She has stated that due to the
negligence of the Police Department, she has
suffered and as such, she has approached this
Commission for compensation from the Police
Department.
9. The Respondent No. 1, i.e. the Director General
of Police, filed his reply through the Superintendent
of Police stating that they had obtained detailed
reports from the Police Inspector, Bicholim Police
Station and the Incharge, Firing Range, Ona
Maulinguem, Bicholim-Goa.
10. The Respondent No. 1 stated that on
02-02-2021, the Bicholim Police Station had received
written information from the Complainant that on
27-01-2021, a bullet projectile had hit her on the
right leg and fallen in her courtyard and she had
taken treatment at PHC, Bicholim. The Respondent
No. 1 also stated that the spot of the incident was
jointly examined at the residence of the
Complainant and it was revealed that the distance
between the residence of the Complainant and the
firing range is around 3 kms. The Respondent No. 1
also stated that on 03-02-2021, she was referred for
medical examination at Goa Medical College,
Bambolim and it was revealed that a bullet projectile
was inside the heel of her right leg and surgery was
performed and the bullet projectile was removed
from her leg. Consequently, Bicholim Police Station
registered a case as Other Accident No. 01/2021
dated 03-02-2021.
11. So also, the Respondent No. 1 stated that the
Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Ona-Maulinguem-
-Kudchirem had submitted a letter dated 02-02-2021,
to the Bicholim Police Station, requesting to take
precautionary measures by erecting a safety wall
around the firing range or to shift the same to some
other convenient place to avoid any untoward
incident in future. So also, the Sarpanch had filed a
complaint with the DGP office that the Complainant
had been hit by a bullet projectile while she was
washing clothes at her residence and the Panchayat
had also received complaints from three other
persons stating that three bullets projectiles were
found in their locality.
12. The Respondent No. 1 further stated that the
Incharge of the Firing Range, conducted a detailed
inquiry and the inquiry revealed that ‘stray bullets
had been flying over the hillock and landing in the
village which is about two kilometers from the firing
spot’. Thereupon, firing was stopped till further
Orders and at present no firing practice is
conducted at the Firing Range, Maulinguem,
Bicholim-Goa.
13. The Respondent No. 2 had filed a reply on
similar grounds and stated that there was no
negligence on the part of Goa Police Department as
all precautionary measures were taken at the Firing
Range at the time of firing practice to ensure safety
and security of the villagers residing in the
surrounding areas.
14. In her Rejoinders, the Complainant reiterated
that the gunshot fired from the Firing Range travels
over the hills and falls in the village of Maulinguem
on several occasions and denied that the firing had
stopped after the incident with the Complainant.
15. The Commission has considered the
submissions of Adv. Shri Rahul Kamat on behalf of
the Complainant and of Police Prosecutor Mrs. A.R.
Carvalho on behalf of the Respondents.
16. The undisputed fact emerges that the
Complainant had sustained a bullet injury on the
heel of her right leg on 27-01-2021 and she was
eventually hospitalized at the Goa Medical College,
Bambolim, where she underwent a surgery and the
bullet was removed on 03-02-2021. Though the
Police Prosecutor contended that there was no
negligence on the part of the Respondents and the
Complainant may have come close to the firing
range despite the warnings, the fact that the bullet
was fired from the Firing Range is not denied by the
Respondents. The complaint and the subsequent
developments indicate that the Complainant had
sustained an injury near her residence at
Maulinguem, when she was washing clothes in her
courtyard.
17. Again, though the learned Police Prosecutor
submitted that the maximum range of the projectile
fired from the gun is 1350 meters and the residence
of the Complainant is beyond that distance, the
very reply of the Respondent No. 1 admits that the
inquiry conducted by the Police Department reveals
that stray bullets had been flying over the hillock
and landing in the village which is about two
kilometers from the firing spot, as found in para 7 of
the reply of the Respondent No. 1 dated 27-07-2022.
18. The complaint had been filed before the
Bicholim Police Station by the Complainant on
02-02-2021 regarding the bullet injury sustained by
her on 27-01-2021 and the reply of the Respondent
No. 1 again indicates that the Bicholim Police
Station had registered a case as Other Accident
No. 1/2021 dated 03-02-2021.
19. There is also a letter dated 02-02-2021, which
is written by the Sarpanch of Village Panchayat
Ona, Maulignem, Kudchirem to the Police Inspector
of the Bicholim Police Station regarding this
incident and suggesting to construct a safety wall
54
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
around the Firing Range or to shift the same to
some other convenient place to avoid any untoward
incident in future.
20. The discharge card of the Complainant of the
Goa Medical College, Bambolim, indicates that she
was admitted on 03-02-2021 and discharged on
06-02-2021 and was found to have a bullet injury
and she was operated on and the bullet was
removed.
21. Under Section 2(d) of the Protection of Human
Rights Act, 1993, “Human Rights” means the rights
relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the
individual guaranteed by the Constitution or
embodied In the International Covenants and
enforceable by Courts in India.
22. In Union Carbide Corporation and Ors. v.
Union of India and Ors. [1991] 4 S.C.C. 584, the
Supreme Court stated that we have to develop our
own law and if we find that it is necessary to
construct a new principle of liability to deal with
an unusual situation which has arisen and which is
likely to arise in future, there is no reason why we
should hesitate to evolve such principle of liability.
23. In the case of Joginder Kaur v. The Punjab
State and Ors., 1996 ACJ 193, (1995) 109 PLR 117,
it was held as under:-
“In the matter of liability of the State for the tort
committed by its employees, it is now the settled
law that the State is liable for tortious acts
committed by its employees in the course of their
employment”.
24. In N. Nagendra Rao v. State of AP, AIR 1994
SC 2663, the Supreme Court held that the State is
vicariously liable and bound, constitutionally
legally and morally, to compensate and indemnify
the wronged person.
25. The Supreme Court has always leaned in
favour of a welfare state. Hence, wrong committed
by a government servant can be attributable to the
State and can be compensated.
26. In the facts of the present case, and guided
by the case laws cited above, the Commission
agrees with the submissions of the learned
Advocate for the Complainant that the Complainant
has made out violation of her human rights due to
the actions of the Respondents in conducting their
firing practices, resulting in a bullet travelling
beyond the Firing Range and injuring the
Complainant. The acts of the Respondents resulted
in injury to the Complainant and loss of work to her
for over three months as well as pain and suffering.
27. Considering that she was working as a
domestic helper and that the wages in Goa for such
work were around Rs. 12,000 per month, for “Loss of
wages”, for three months, she is entitled for
Rs. 36,000/- and for “Pain and Suffering”due to the
injury, Rs. 14,000/- is a reasonable amount. Thereby,
we find that Rs. 50,000/- can be considered the
quantum of Loss to her, resulting from the acts of
the Respondents.
28. Under Section 18(a) (i) of the Protection of
Human Rights Act, 1993, the Commission may take
any of the following steps during or upon the
completion of an inquiry held under this Act,
namely:-
(a) where the inquiry discloses the commission of
violation of human rights or negligence in the
prevention of violation of human rights or abetment
thereof by a public servant, it may recommend to
the concerned Government or authority—
(i) to make payment of compensation or
damages to the complainant or to the victim or
the members of his family as the Commission
may consider necessary:
29. The Commission considers that the
Complainant is entitled for compensation of
Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) from the
Respondent No.1 as she had sustained the bullet
injury from the bullet which had travelled from the
Firing Range operated by the Respondent No. 1 at
the Firing Station at Ona, Maulinguem.
30. Accordingly, the Commission recommends
that the Respondent No. 1 pays compensation of
Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) to the
Complainant, within 30 days from today, alongwith
simple interest thereon at 6% p.a. from the date of
the complaint i.e. 07-06-2022 till final payment.
31. The Commission notes as stated in the replies
of the Respondents that the Firing Range at
Maulingem has been closed down. This was also
submitted by the Police Prosecutor at the time of
arguments. Accordingly in this respect, no relief is
necessary from the Commission.
32. Under Section 18(e) of the Protection of Human
Rights Act, 1993, the Commission shall send a copy
of the Inquiry Report together with its recommendations
to the concerned Government or authority and they
shall, within a period of one month or such further
time as the Commission may allow, forward its
comments on the report, including the action taken
or proposed to be taken, to the Commission.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
55
33. Copy of the Inquiry Report be sent to the
Respondent No. 1, calling for their comments,
including the action taken or proposed to be taken
within a period of 30 days or on or before
26-03-2024, in terms of Section 18(e) of the Protection
of Human Rights Act, 1993.
Date: 22-02-2024.
Place: Panaji-Goa.
—––––
Superintendent of Police, Legal and Vigilance
Office of the Director General of Police
PHQ, Panaji-Goa 403001
No. PHQ/PET-CELL/GHRC/BICH-19/22/433/2024
dtd. 15-3-2024
To,
The Secretary,
The Goa Human Rights Commission,
O/o The Goa Human Rights Commission,
Old Education Department Bldg.,
18th June Road, Panaji-Goa.
Sub.:
Compliance in respect of Inquiry Report
dated 22-02-2024 passed by the Hon’ble Goa
Human Rights Commission in Proceeding
No. 16/22022.
Sir/Madam,
With reference to the above, I am directed to
submit that in the above proceeding No. 106/2022
into the complaint filed by Smt. Urmila Umesh
Gaonkar, r/o. H. No. 226, Paltadwada, Maulinguem
Goa v/s. Respondent No. (1) The Director General of
Police, PHQ, Panaji-Goa and Respondent No. (2) The
Incharge, Firing Station, Ona, Maulinguem,
Bicholim Goa before the Goa Human Rights
Commission, Panaji-Goa the Hon’ble Goa Human
Rights Commission has passed the following
recommendations at para No. 30:-
That Respondent No.1 pays compensation of
Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) to the
complainant, within 30 days from date of issue
Inquiry Report alongwith simple interest thereon at
6% p.a. from the date of the complaint i.e. 07-06-2022
till final payment.
Further, at para No. 32 & 33 of the Inquiry Report,
the Hon’ble Commission has called for comments
from the concerned authority/Respondent No.1
including the action taken or proposed to be taken
within period of 30 days or on or before 26-3-224, in
terms of Section 18(e) of the Protection of Human
Rights Act, 1993.
In view of the above, it is submitted that the
Respondent No. 1 i.e. Director General of Police Goa,
has applied for approval of the Government to stay
and challenge the Inquiry Report of the Hon’ble
GHRC by filing Writ Petition before the High Court
of Bombay at Goa. As soon as approval of the
Government is granted, further action will be
initiated and the same will be intimated to the
Commission.
Yours faithfully
Sunita Sawant
Superintendent of Police (L&V),
for Director General of Police.
——————
Notification by the High Court of Judicature
Appellate Side, Bombay
––––
No. A-3924/G/2024/874
Subject: Grant of First Assured Career Progression
Scale (A.C.P.-I) to the Judicial Officers in
the Cadre of Civil Judge, Senior Division
as per the recommendations of the
Honourable Shetty Commission, the
directions of the Honourable Supreme
Court in All India Judges’ Association
V/s Union of India and Others [Writ
Petition No. (C) 643/2015] and revised Pay
Scale as per recommendations of the
Honourable Reddy Commission.
The High Court is pleased to confer the First
Assured Career Progression Scale i.e. Rs. 122700/-
up to next level of pay on the following Judicial
Officers in the cadre of Senior Civil Judges w.e.f. the
dates shown against their respective names.
Accordingly, the concerned Head of the
departments shall refix the pay of these Officers as
per the Order No. 8/44/97-Fin (R & C)-FPC/Part IV
dated 8th May, 2003 issued by the Government of
Goa in Finance (Rev. & Cont.) Department and other
relevant orders/circulars/judgments.
56
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 2
12TH APRIL, 2024
Sr.
Judge
Name of the
Date of actual
Date of
Present posting
No.
Code
Judicial Officer
charge taken
conferment
of A.C.P.-I
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
100040 Ms. Apurva Ramnath Nagvekar 30-04-2016
30-04-2021
Ad-hoc DJ-1
Panaji
North Goa.
and Asstt.
Sessions
Judge
2.
100043 Ms. Saee Anil Prabhudessai
20-12-2016
20-12-2021
Ad-hoc DJ-2
Panaji
North Goa.
and Asstt.
Sessions
Judge
3.
100044 Ms. Artikumari Nagba Naik
12-02-2018
12-02-2023
CJSD &
Quepem South Goa.
JMFC
4.
100046 Ms. Shilpa Shashikant Pandit
03-09-2018
03-09-2023
CJSD &
Mapusa North Goa.
JMFC
High Court, Bombay.
R. N. JOSHI,
Dated: 2nd April, 2024.
Registrar General.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 16.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—10/80—4/2024.