SERIES II No. 30
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410
Reg. No. RNP/GOA/32/2024-2026
Panaji, 24th October, 2024 (Kartika 2, 1946)
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
Directorate of Art & Culture
––
Order
No. DAC/Accts/Comm.TA/2024-25/2969
In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause 6 (a)
of the Constitution of Tiatr Academy, Panaji-Goa,
Government is pleased to appoint Shri Anthony
Barbosa, r/o. Raia, Salcete, South Goa as President
of Tiatr Academy, Panaji-Goa with immediate effect.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Sagun R. Velip, Director (Art & Culture) &
ex officio Jt. Secretary.
Panaji, 9th October, 2024.
Note:- There are three Extraordinary issues to the
Official Gazette, Series II No. 29 dated 17-10-2024
as follows:-
(1) Extraordinary dated 18-10-2024 from pages
619 to 620 regarding Corrigendum from
Department of Finance and Notification from
Department of General Administration.
(2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 21-10-2024 from
pages 621 to 622 regarding Order from Goa
State Election Commission.
(3) Extraordinary (No. 3) dated 22-10-2024 from
pages 623 to 624 regarding Notifications and
Notice of Election and Public Notice from
Department
of
Panchayati Raj
and
Community Development.
Department of Food and Drugs
Administration
Directorate of Food and Drugs Administration
––
Order
No. 147/DFDA/RTI-INF-ACT/Vol. IV/2024-25/3203
In pursuance of Clause 5 of the Right to
Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “the
said Act”), Smt. Sanjyot U. Kudalkar, Designated
Officer (South Goa) of this Directorate is hereby
appointed as Assistant Public Information Officer;
for the Directorate of Food & Drugs Administration,
South Goa, sub office with immediate effect; and she
will perform the duties as Assistant Public
Information Officer; and forward the application
received under the said Act to the Public
Information Officer; Directorate of Food and Drugs
Administration, Bambolim, Goa within the stipulated
time.
Shweta S. Dessai, Director, Directorate of Food and
Drugs Administration.
Bambolim, 22nd August, 2024.
——————
Department of Forest
––
Order
No. 4/2/2024-FOR/202
Read:
Memorandum No. 4/2/2024-FOR/156 dated
05-08-2024.
On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission as conveyed vide their letter No. COM/
/I/5/22(1)/2023/131 dated 10-07-2024, the Government
of Goa is pleased to appoint Shri Harsh Damodar
Phadte, to the post of Assistant Conservator of Forest
(Group ‘A’ Gazetted) in Level 10 of Pay Matrix [Pay
Suggestions are welcomed on e-mail: [email protected]
625
626
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
Band-3 Rs. 15600-39100+Grade Pay Rs. 5400/- (pre-
-revised)] in the Goa Forest Department, on
temporary basis, with immediate effect.
Shri Harsh Damodar Phadte shall be on probation
for a period of 02 years.
Shri Harsh Damodar Phadte has been declared
medically fit by the Medical Board. The character
and antecedents in respect of Shri Harsh Damodar
Phadte have been verified from the Office of the
District Magistrate, South Goa, Margao and there
are no adverse remarks against him.
Shri Phadte shall report to the Office of the
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Altinho,
Panaji.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dr. Pooja M. Madkaikar, Under Secretary (Forest).
Porvorim, 4th September, 2024.
————
Order
No. 19/1/2024-FOR/223
Read:
Order No. 2-2-159(R&U)-2021-22-Vol.I-FD/5432 dated 21-01-2022.
Government is pleased to constitute Research Advisory Committee to promote research activities on the
issues related to forest and wildlife in the State of Goa comprising of following, with immediate effect:-
1. Chief Wildlife Warden, Goa
—
Chairman.
2. Chief Conservator of Forests
—
Member.
3. Conservator of Forests (Conservation)
—
Member.
4. Conservator of Forests (Wildlife & Eco-tourism)
—
Member.
5. Member Secretary, Goa State Biodiversity Board
—
Member.
6. Representative from Goa State Research Foundation
—
Member.
7. Representative from Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Pune
—
Member.
8. Representative from Botanical Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Pune
—
Member.
9. Representative from National Institute of Oceanography, Goa
—
Member.
10. Representative from Institute of Wood Science & Technology, Bengaluru
—
Member.
11. Dy. Conservator of Forests (Research & Utilization)
—
Member
Secretary.
The terms of reference to diversity and the role of Research Advisory Committee (RAC) shall be as under:-
a. To assess research requirement in forest and protected areas of the State in consultation with field
functionaries.
b. To scrutinize and recommend all research proposals received by the Forest Department including
applications addressed to Chief Wildlife Warden for grant of permit under Section 12, 17, and 28 of
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 to Chief Wildlife Warden.
c. To scrutinize and recommend research proposals in consonance with requirement of statutory
clearances under National Biodiversity Act, 2002 and Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
d. To scrutinize and recommend the ongoing project proposals received for revalidation of permits
issued earlier by Chief Wildlife Warden upon adherence to compliances stipulated in the permit.
e. Research Advisory Committee (RAC) may further co-opt/invite any other experts as per requirement.
f. The Research Advisory Committee shall meet at least once in 6 months (or) as desired by the
Chairman.
The earlier Research Advisory Committee constituted vide Order read in preamble, stands withdrawn.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Dr. Pooja M. Madkaikar, Under Secretary (Forest).
Porvorim, 27th September, 2024.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
627
Order
No. 4/4/2024-FOR/222
Government is pleased to order transfer and posting of following Officers of Goa Forest Department/
/Goa Forest Development Corporation Ltd., with immediate effect, in public interest:-
Sr.
Name of Officer and current posting
Transferred as/additional charge
No.
1
2
3
1.
Shri Amar Heblekar, General Manager, Goa Forest Development
General Manager, Goa Forest
Corporation Ltd. with additional charge of Assistant
Development Corporation Ltd.
Conservator of Forest, Legal Cell
2.
Shri Damodar Salelkar, Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Canacona
Assistant Conservator of Forest,
with additional charge of ACF, Wildlife & Eco-tourism, South
Legal Cell with additional charge
of ACF, Wildlife & Eco-tourism,
South.
3.
Shri Dyaneshwar Kudalkar, Assistant Conservator of Forest,
Assistant Conservator of Forest,
South Goa Division
South Goa Division with additional
charge of Sub Divisional Forest
Officer, Canacona.
Shri Damodar Salelkar, shall move first in line of transfer.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Dr. Pooja M. Madkaikar, Under Secretary (Forest).
Porvorim, 27th September, 2024.
—–––––—
Order
No. 4/4/2024-FOR/228
Read: Order No. 4/4/2024-FOR/222 dated 27-09-2024.
Government is pleased to order transfer and posting of following Officers of Goa Forest Department/
/Goa Forest Development Corporation Ltd., with immediate effect, in public interest:-
Sr. No.
Name of Officer and current posting
Transferred as/additional charge
1
2
3
1. Shri Amar Heblekar, General Manager, Goa Forest
General Manager, Goa Forest
Development Corporation Ltd. with additional charge of
Development Corporation Ltd.
Assistant Conservator of Forest, Legal Cell
2. Shri Damodar Salelkar, ACF, Wildlife & Eco-tourism, South
Assistant Conservator of Forest,
with additional charge of Sub Divisional Forest Officer,
Legal Cell with additional charge
Canacona
of ACF, Wildlife & Eco-tourism,
South.
3. Shri Dyaneshwar Kudalkar, Assistant Conservator of Forest,
Assistant Conservator of Forest,
South Goa Division
South Goa Division with additional
charge of Sub Divisional Forest
Officer, Canacona.
Shri Damodar Salelkar, shall move first in line of transfer.
This supersedes earlier Order of even number dated 27-09-2024, read above.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Dr. Pooja M. Madkaikar, Under Secretary (Forest).
Porvorim, 8th October, 2024.
628
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
Department of General Administration
–––
Notification
No. 37/3/2024-GAD-III/4247
The Government of Goa is pleased to direct that the days specified in the Annexure-I shall be observed
as Public Holidays and the days specified in the Annexure-II as Special Holidays in all Government Offices
in the State of Goa during the year 2025 (Saka 1946-1947). All Government Offices will be functional on
Special Holidays except if the Special Holidays occur on Saturday or Sunday.
2. In addition to the Holidays specified in Annexure-I and Annexure-II, employees are permitted to avail
of any two holidays from the list of Restricted Holidays specified in Annexure-III for the year 2025.
3. The Government is also pleased to declare Commercial and Industrial Holidays for the Commercial
and Industrial Workers in Goa, as specified in Annexure-IV for the year 2025.
4. Further, in exercise of the powers conferred under explanation to Section 25 of the Negotiable
Instrument Act, 1881 (Act 26 of 1881) read with Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi,
vide Notification No. U.11030/2/73-UTL dated 28-6-1973, the Government of Goa is also pleased to declare
the days specified in Annexure-V as Bank Holidays in the State of Goa for the year 2025.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa.
Shreyas Dsilva, Under Secretary (GA-I).
Porvorim, 22nd October, 2024.
—–––––—
ANNEXURE-I
List of Public Holidays for the Year 2025
Sr. No.
Holidays
Date
Saka
Days of the week
1
2
3
4
5
1.
Republic Day
January, 26
Magha, 06
Sunday.
2.
Holi
March, 14
Phalguna, 23
Friday.
3.
Gudi Padava
March, 30
Chaitra, 09
Sunday.
4.
Id-Ul Fitr*
March, 31
Chaitra, 10
Monday.
5.
Ram Navami
April, 06
Chaitra, 16
Sunday.
6.
Birth Anniversary of
April, 14
Chaitra, 24
Monday.
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar
7.
Good Friday
April, 18
Chaitra, 28
Friday.
8.
May Day
May, 01
Vaisakha, 11
Thursday.
9.
Id-Ul-Zuha (Bakri Id)*
June, 07
Jyaishtha, 17
Saturday.
10.
Independence Day
August, 15
Sravana, 24
Friday.
11.
Ganesh Chaturthi (1st Day)
August, 27
Bhadra, 05
Wednesday.
12.
Ganesh Chaturthi (2nd Day)
August, 28
Bhadra, 06
Thursday.
13.
Gandhi Jayanti
October, 02
Asvina, 10
Thursday.
14.
Dussehra (Vijaya Dashmi)
October, 02
Asvina, 10
Thursday.
15.
Diwali (Deepavali)
October, 20
Asvina, 28
Monday.
16
Feast of St. Francis Xavier
December, 03
Agrahayana, 12
Wednesday
17.
Goa Liberation Day
December, 19
Agrahayana, 28
Friday.
18.
Christmas Day
December, 25
Pausha, 04
Thursday.
*The Holiday mentioned at Sr. No. 4 & 9 are subject to appearance of moon.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
629
ANNEXURE-II
List of Special Holidays for the Year 2025
Sr. No.
Holidays
Date
Saka
Days of the week
1
2
3
4
5
1.
Mahashivratri
February, 26
Phalguna, 07
Wednesday.
2.
Milad-Un-Nabi or Id-e-Milad
September, 05
Bhadra, 14
Friday.
(Birthday of Prophet Md.)
N. B.:-
1. Special Holidays at Sr. Nos. 1 & 2 applied shall be necessarily sanctioned. In case where employees do not avail
of the Special Holidays on the designated days, the holidays may be availed of on any working days during the
calendar year 2025 only.
2. Special Holiday mentioned at Sr. No. 2 is subject to appearance of moon.
3. Special Holidays can be prefixed or suffixed to any kind of leave.
—–––––—
ANNEXURE-III
List of Restricted Holidays for the Year 2025
Sr. No.
Holidays
Date
Saka
Days of the week
1
2
3
4
5
1.
New Year Day
January, 01
Pausha, 11
Wednesday.
2.
Makarsankranti
January, 14
Pausha, 24
Tuesday.
3.
Feast of St. Joseph Vaz
January, 16
Pausha, 26
Thursday.
4.
Guru Ravi Das Birthday
February, 12
Magha, 23
Wednesday.
5.
Shivaji Jayanti
February, 19
Magha, 30
Wednesday.
6.
Mahavir Jayanti
April, 10
Chaitra, 20
Thursday.
7.
Vaisakhi/Vishu
April, 13
Chaitra, 23
Sunday.
8.
Maundy Thursday
April, 17
Chaitra, 27
Thursday
9.
Budha Purnima
May, 12
Vaisakha, 22
Monday.
10.
Feast of Sacred Heart of Jesus
June, 27
Ashadha, 06
Friday.
11.
Muharam
July, 06
Ashadha, 15
Sunday.
12.
Raksha Bandhan
August, 09
Sravana, 18
Saturday.
13.
Janmashtami
August, 15
Sravana, 24
Friday.
14.
Hartalika
August, 26
Bhadra, 04
Tuesday.
15.
Onam
September, 05
Bhadra, 14
Friday.
16.
Govardhan Puja
October, 22
Asvina, 30
Wednesday.
17.
Bhaubij
October, 23
Kartika, 01
Thursday.
18.
All Souls day
November, 02
Kartika, 11
Sunday.
19.
Guru Nanak’s Birthday
November, 05
Kartika, 14
Wednesday.
20.
Guru Teg Bahadur Martydom Day
November, 24
Agrahayana, 03
Monday.
21.
Feast of Immaculate Conception
December, 08
Agrahayana, 17
Monday.
of Mary
22.
Christmas Eve
December, 24
Pausha, 03
Wednesday.
23.
New Year’ Eve
December, 31
Pausha, 10
Wednesday.
630
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
ANNEXURE-IV
List of Commercial & Industrial Holidays for the Year 2025
Sr. No.
Holidays
Date
Saka
Days of the week
1
2
3
4
5
1.
Republic Day
January, 26
Magha, 06
Sunday.
2.
Birth Anniversary of Dr. Babasaheb
April, 14
Chaitra, 24
Monday.
Ambedkar
3.
May Day
May, 01
Vaisakha, 11
Thursday.
4.
Independence Day
August, 15
Sravana, 24
Friday.
5.
Ganesh Chaturthi
August, 27
Bhadra, 05
Wednesday.
(1st Day)
6.
Gandhi Jayanti
October, 02
Asvina, 10
Thursday.
7.
Diwali (Deepavali)
October, 20
Asvina, 28
Monday.
8.
Goa Liberation Day
December, 19
Agrahayana, 28
Friday.
9.
Christmas Day
December, 25
Pausha, 04
Thursday.
According to the decision communicated by Government of India, Ministry of Finance in Memorandum
No. F.8 (7) EST (SPI) dated 7th November, 1963 casual employees including daily rated staff will be entitled
to paid holidays if they are in service on the preceding and succeeding working days.
—–––––—
ANNEXURE-V
List of Bank Holidays for the Year 2025
Sr. No.
Holidays
Date
Saka
Days of the week
1
2
3
4
5
1.
Republic Day
January, 26
Magha, 06
Sunday.
2.
Holi
March, 14
Phalguna, 23
Friday.
3.
Gudi Padava
March, 30
Chaitra, 09
Sunday.
4.
Id-UI Fitr*
March, 31
Chaitra, 10
Monday.
5.
Yearly Closing of Account
April, 01
Chaitra, 11
Tuesday.
6.
Birth Anniversary of Dr. Babasaheb
April, 14
Chaitra, 24
Monday.
Ambedkar
7.
Good Friday
April, 18
Chaitra, 28
Friday.
8.
May Day
May, 01
Vaisakha, 11
Thursday.
9.
Id-Ul-Zuha (Bakri Id)*
June, 07
Jyaishtha, 17
Saturday.
10.
Independence Day
August, 15
Sravana, 24
Friday.
11.
Ganesh Chaturthi (1st Day)
August, 27
Bhadra, 05
Wednesday.
12.
Ganesh Chaturthi (2nd Day)
August, 28
Bhadra, 06
Thursday.
13.
Gandhi Jayanti
October, 02
Asvina, 10
Thursday.
14.
Dussehra (Vijaya Dashmi)
October, 02
Asvina, 10
Thursday.
15.
Diwali (Deepavali)
October, 20
Asvina, 28
Monday.
16.
Feast of St. Francis Xavier
December, 03
Agrahayana, 12
Wednesday.
17.
Goa Liberation Day
December, 19
Agrahayana, 28
Friday.
18.
Christmas Day
December, 25
Pausha, 04
Thursday.
*The Holiday mentioned at Sr. Nos. 4 & 9 are subject to appearance of moon.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
631
Department of Information and Publicity
––
Order
No. DI/FP/IITF-NEW DELHI/2024/Part File/2582
The Government of Goa is pleased to constitute
a Committee for the technical and creative
presentation and opening of financial bid of tender
for concept, design and management of Goa Pavilion
at India International Trade Fair (IITF) to be held in
New Delhi from November 14 to 27, 2024.
1. Secretary (Information and
— Chairman.
Publicity)
2. Director, Directorate of Accounts — Member.
3. Principal Chief Engineer, PWD
— Member.
4. Principal, Goa College of Arts
— Member.
5. Director, Art and Culture
— Member.
6. Jt. Director, Information and
—Member.
Publicity
7. Director, Information and
— Member
Publicity
Secretary.
The Selection Committee will meet as and when
required for finalization of the bids.
This issues with the approval of Government
under U.O. No. 3890/F dated 05-09-2024.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dipak M. Bandekar, Director (Information and
Publicity) & ex officio Addl. Secretary.
Panaji, 19th September, 2024.
——————
Inspectorate of Factories and Boilers
––
Order
No. 2/13(Part)/ADM-IFB/2024/2827
On the recommendation of the Departmental
Promotion Committee as conveyed by Goa Public
Service Commission, Panaji, vide letter No. COM/II/
/12/19(1)/2024/240/2943 dated 14-10-2024, the
Government of Goa is pleased to declare Shri
Santosh N. Shinde, Chemist (Group B Gazetted) in
the Inspectorate of Factories and Boilers, Altinho,
Panaji to have satisfactorily completed his probation
period of two years on 25-08-2022 and confirm him
to the post of Chemist (Group B Gazetted) with
effect from the date of his completion of probation
period.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Anant S. Pangam, Chief Inspector of Factories &
Boilers and ex officio Joint Secretary.
Panaji, 18th October, 2024.
——————
Department of Labour
––
Order
No. 28/70/2024-LAB/644
Whereas, the Government of Goa is of the opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the
management of M/s. Bombay Integrated Security
(India) Limited, Betim, Porvorim, Goa and it’s
workman, Ms. Sheetal Rane, in respect of the matter
specified in the Schedule hereto;
And whereas, the Government of Goa considers
it expedient to refer the said dispute for adjudication.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers
conferred by Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of
1947), the Government of Goa hereby refers the said
dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court-II of
Goa at Panaji-Goa, constituted under sub-section (1)
of Section 7 of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
“(1) Whether Ms. Sheetal Rane, Dy. Manager-
-HR, could be construed as “Workman” as
defined under Clause (s) of Section 2 of the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act
No. 14 of 1947)?
(2)
If the answer to the above is in affirmative,
then, whether the action of the management
of M/s. Bombay Integrated Security (India)
Limited, Betim, Porvorim, Goa in terminating
the services of Ms. Sheetal Rane,
Dy. Manager-HR, with effect from
22-04-2024, is legal and justified?
(3)
If answer to issue No. (2) above is in
negative then what relief the workman is
entitled to?.”
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 14th October, 2024.
632
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
Notification
No. 28/02/2024-LAB/Part-III/637
The following Judgement passed by the Labour
Court-II, at Panaji-Goa, on 16-09-2024 in Case No.
Ref. LC-II/LCC/11/18 is hereby published as required
under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 14th October, 2024.
––––
IN THE LABOUR COURT-II
GOVERNMENT OF GOA
AT PANAJI
(Before Shri Suresh N. Narulkar, Hon’ble
Presiding Officer)
Case No. Ref. LC-II/LCC/11/18
Shri Jose Manuel D’Souza,
r/o. H. No. 524, St. Caitano Waddo,
Merces-Goa,
P. O. St. Cruz .... Applicant.
V/s
M/s. Instakart Services Pvt. Ltd.,
7th Main, 80Ft. Road,
Koramangala, Bangalore
… Opponent.
Workman/Party I represented by Adv. Smt. Harsha Naik.
Employer/Party II represented by Adv. Shri A. Salatry.
Panaji, dated: 16-09-2024.
JUDGMENT
1. This Judgment and Order shall determine the
claim application of the Applicant dated
26-06-2018.
2. By the present claim application, the Applicant
claimed an amount of Rs. 6,06,268/- (Rupees six lakh
six thousand two hundred and sixty eight only)
towards his unpaid salary as well as damages and
compensation towards illegal termination of his
services.
3.The Opponent resisted the aforesaid claim
application of the Applicant by filing its reply dated
18-08-2018. The Opponent, as and by way of its
preliminary objections, submitted that the present
petition filed under Section 33 C (2) of the I.D. Act
1947. The Opponent submitted that the Applicant
was appointed in the position of a Hub-in-charge-
-delivery vide appointment letter dated 11-08-2014.
The Opponent submitted that the duties and
responsibilities of the Applicant as Hub-in-charge,
were accountable for overall Hub operations,
accountable for overall Hub Operations as per
operational standards, ensuring customers are
delighted at all times, promptly and effectively
manage customer escalations, ensuring employee
engagement initiatives are implemented, comply
with 100% ZTP (Zero Tolerance Policy), prepare
requisite business dashboard and duly report/
/review with Hub team and Area Manager as
required, budgeting and accounting cash and hub
imprest/petty cash expenses as appropriate, SOP
Adherence at all times and compliance with Service
Level Agreement, maintain the cost per shipment
(CPS) as per budget, ensure Profitable operations,
coordinate with respective departments and adhere
to commercial and statutory compliance, conduct
team meetings, motive team and control attrition,
fill gaps in employee head count within turnaround
time, ensure team leaders and other hub team
members are trained well, managing environmental
bodies, continuously improve in reducing error rate
in operations management, ensure safety of people,
facility and shipment at all times, maintain high
quality facility and people hygiene, grievance
handling and conducting open house/meetings
with hub teams and identify gaps, follow up and
co-ordinate with departments based on open house
discussions/findings and take necessary action as
appropriate, escalate any information related to the
organization to appropriate departments and
seniors for taking necessary actions, ensure
achievement of key performance indicator for the
Hub and set goals for the team accordingly,
co-ordination and execution with local vendors,
collection of cash, accounting and reconciliation
with ERP and deposit as per operation standard,
accountable for all recoveries, accountable for stock
audit, reconciliation and accuracy at any point of
time, monitoring team leader’s performance,
tracking of undelivered shipment on real time basis
and taking proactive action for delivery,
Identification of potential Team Leader candidate
for internal career progression, Achieving capacity
utilization as per target, Has complete knowledge of
PIN codes and routes assigned to the Hub.
The Opponent submitted that the duties and
responsibilities were primarily were managerial
and/or administrative and/or supervisory nature.
The Opponent submitted that the application was
drawing an annual gross compensation of
Rs. 2,77,200/- (Rupees two lakh seventy seven
thousand two hundred only) with annual base
salary of Rs. 1,22,400/- (Rupees one lakh twenty two
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
633
thousand four hundred only). The Opponent
submitted that since the role of duties and
responsibilities of Applicant are of a managerial
and/or administrative and/or supervisory nature.
The Applicant claim application is not maintainable
as the Applicant is not a “Workman” within the
meaning of Section 2 (s) of the I.D. Act, 1947. The
Opponent denied the overall case as pleaded by
the Applicant and prayed for dismissal.
4. Therefore the Applicant filed his re-joinder on
11-2-2019 at Exb. 6. The Applicant, as and by way
of his Re-joinder, confirms and reiterates all the
submissions and averments made by him in his
claim statement to be true and correct and denies
all the statements and averments made by the
Opponent in their Written Statement, which are
contrary to the statements and averments made by
him. He stated that though he was designated as
Hub-Incharge-Delivery, his primary duties were of
Managerial/Administrative/Supervisory nature.
5. Based on the pleadings filed by the parties
hereinabove, this Hon’ble Court was pleased to
frame the following issues on 19-09-2019 at Exb. 13.
1. Whether the Applicant proves that he is a
‘Workman’ within the meaning of Section 2(s)
of the I. D. Act, 1947?
2. Whether the Applicant proves that he is
entitled to receive from the Opponent a sum
of Rs. 6,06,268/- (Rupees six lakhs six thousand
two hundred sixty eight only) towards his
unpaid salaries, damages and compensation
etc.?
3. What order?
6. My answers to the aforesaid issues are as
under:
a) Issue No. 1 : In the affirmative.
b) Issue No. 2 : Partly in the affirmative &
partly in the negative.
c) Issue No. 3 : As per final order.
I have heard the oral argument of Ld. Adv. Mrs.
Harsha Naik appearing for the Applicant as well as
Ld. Adv. Shri A. Salatry representing the Opponent.
I have carefully perused the entire records of the
present case. I have also considered the submissions
advanced before me and is of the opinion as under:
REASONS
7. Issue No. 1:
The Opponent disputed the claim of the
Applicant that he is not a workman as defined
u/s 2 (s) of the I.D. Act, 1947. It is therefore
necessary to refer to the definition of the workman
as defined u/s 2 (s) of the I.D. Act 1947.
8. Section 2(s) of the I.D. Act, 1947 defines the
term ‘workman’ and it means “any person (including
an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any
manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational,
clerical or supervisory work for hire or reward,
whether the terms of employment be expressed or
implied and for the purposes of any proceedings
under this act in relation to an industrial dispute,
includes any such person who has been dismissed,
discharged or retrenched in connection with or a
consequence of that dispute or dismissal, discharge
or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does
not include any such person.
(1) who is subject to the AIR Force Act, 1950 (45
of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or
the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or
(2) who is employed in the police service or as
an Officer or other employee of a prison or
(3) who is employed mainly in a managerial or
administrative capacity
(4) who, being employed in a supervisory
capacity draws wages exceeding Rs. 1,600/-
per month or exercises either by the nature
of the duties attached to the office or by
reason of the powers vested in him, functions
mainly of a managerial nature.”
9. In the case of H. R. Adyanthaya v/s Sandoz
(I) Ltd. reported in 1994 (69) FLR 593 the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India held that a person claiming
to be a “workman” under the I. D. Act, 1947 must
show that he was employed to do the work of any
of the category which of manual, unskilled, skilled,
technical, operational, clerical or supervisory and
that is not enough that he was not covered by either
of the four exceptions to the definition of the
Workman.
10. In the case of Management of M/s. Sonepate
Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. v/s Ajit Singh
reported in 2005 LAB IC 1315, the Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India observed that the question as to
whether the Employee has been performing a
clerical work or not is required to be determined
upon arriving at the findings as regards the
dominant nature of duty with a view to give effect
to the expression to do “any manual unskilled,
skilled, technical, operational, clerical or
supervisory work”, the job of the concerned
employee must fall within one or other category
thereof. It would therefore not be correct to contend
that merely because the employee had not been
performing any managerial or supervisory duties,
ipso facto, he would be a Workman”.
634
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
11. In the case of Bhatiya General Hospital and
anr. (Supra), the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in
para 16 and 18 observed as under:
“16. The definition of “workman”under Section
2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is of wide
amplitude. Four classes of employees are, however,
specifically excluded from the definition of
workman. An employee who is employed mainly
in a managerial or administrative capacity or the
one who is employed in a supervisory capacity,
draws wages exceeding Rs. 10,000/- per month or
exercises, either by nature of the duties attached
to the office or by reason of the powers vested in
him, functions mainly of a managerial nature is,
inter alia, excluded from the definition of workman.
The use of the term, “mainly” underscores the
dominant nature of the duty so as to fall outside
the protective umbrella of the labour legislation.
By its very nature, the question as to whether an
employee is a workman or not is rooted in fact”.
“18. This being the nature of the definition of
workman, the nomenclature of the post held by an
employee is not of decisive significance. It is in the
nature of the duty and not the nomenclature of
the position that matters. Whether the overall
consideration of the duty performed by the
employee satisfies the description of the duties
being either supervisory or mainly managerial
nature, is the question to be posed.”
The principle laid down by the Hori’ble High
Court of Bombay in its aforesaid case is well
established and also applicable to the case in hand.
12. In the case of Gwalior Investment Co. Pvt.
Ltd., (Supra) the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in
para 7 of its judgment held as under:
7.................. Irrespective of the wages paid, the test
to determine whether a person is a workman or not
is laid down by the Supreme Court in A. G. Raj Rao
v/s. Ciba Giegy of India Ltd., Bombay, the Supreme
Court has held”;
“Whether a particular employee is a workman
within the meaning of the expression as defined in
Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or a
person employed in a supervisory capacity the test
that one must employ is what was the primary, basic
or dominant nature of duties for which the person
whose status is under enquiry was employed. A few
extra duties would hardly be relevant to determine
his status. The words like managerial or supervisory
have to be understood in their proper connotation
and their mere use should not detract from the truth.
The definition of the expression workman clearly
shows that the person concerned would not cease to
be a workman if the performs some supervisory duties
but he must be a person who must be engaged in a
supervisory capacity.”
13. Thus, in order to prove that the Party-I was a
“Workman” as defined u/s 2(s) of the I. D. Act, 1947,
the Party-I has to prove that he was performing the
duties of manual, unskilled, skilled, technical,
operational, clerical or supervisory work. It is well
settled law that whether a person is a ‘workman’ or
not as defined u/s 2 (s) of the I. D. Act, 1947 has to
be decided on the basis of the predominant nature
of duties performed by concerned person at the
relevant time, it cannot lay down any straight jacket
formula.
14. In the case of Karnataka Bank Ltd. v/s.
Sunita B. Vatsaraj (SMT), reported in 2007 II CLR
650 the Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court
of Bombay held that “mere designation or
nomenclature of the post not determinative of the
duties performed by the Employer. The Hon’ble High
Court further held that the term supervision means
direction and control. The concerned employee
must have a power to supervise, direct and control
the work of another employee or employees working
under him.”
15. In the case of Vinayak Baburao Shinde v/s
S.R. Shinde and Ors., reported in 1985 I CLR 318,
the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Bombay
observed as under:
The word “supervisor” means to oversee, that is
to look after the work done by other persons. The
word ‘supervision’ occurring in Section 2 (s) of
the Industrial Disputes Act means supervision in
relation to work or in relation to persons. The
essence of supervision consists in overseeing by
one person over the work of others. This also
involves a power in the person overseeing to
direct and control the work done by the persons
over whom he is supervising. In an industrial
establishment normally there are three layers of
work. One is the clerical or the manual work
which is done by the workmen, the second is the
supervisory work done by a supervisor, and at a
higher level is the work of a manager. The last
mentioned officer is normally in a position to give
orders and to see that the work is done. He has
got powers to lay down the norms and to direct
that the work shall be done in accordance with
those norms. He has also, naturally, the power to
take disciplinary action and in case where
applications for leave are made it is within his
power to sanction or reject those applications.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
635
A supervisor is distinguished from a manager in
as much as he has no powers to command others to
do a particular work. His junction is to see that the
work is done in accordance with the norms laid
down by the management. If the work is done, he
has to assist the workmen to do it correctly in
accordance with the norms. If, however, a workman
does not to do the work correctly or properly, the
supervisor has no power to take any disciplinary
action. In the case of leave applications, a supervisor
can only recommend them and not sanction or reject
them, the latter being within the jurisdiction of a
manager.”
16. In the case of John Joseph Khokar v/s R.S.
Bhadange & Ors, reported in 1997 II CLR 921, the
Hon’ble High Court of Bombay held as under:
“The position that emerges from the aforesaid
discussion is that in determining the question
whether a person employed by the employer is
workman under Section 2 (s) of the I.D. Act or not,
the court has principally to see main or
substantial work for which the employee has
been employed and engaged to do. Neither the
designation of the employee is decisive nor any
incidental work that may be done or required to
be done by such employee shall get him outside
the purview of workman, if the principal job and
the nature of employment of such employee is
manual, technical or clerical. In hierarchy of
employees, some sort of supervision by the
employee over the employees of the lower ladder
without any control may not be itself be sufficient
to bring that employee in the category of
supervisor, yet if the principal job of that
employee is to oversee the work of employees
who are on the lower cadre of the hierarchy and
he has some sort of independent discretion and
judgment, obviously such employee would fall
within the category of supervisor. Each case
would depend on the nature of duties
predominantly or primarily performed by such
employee and whether such junction was
supervisory or not would have to be decided on
facts keeping in mind correct principles where
the employee possess power of assigning duties
and distribution of work such authority of the
employee may be indicative of his being
supervisor doing supervision. In a broad sense
supervisor is one who has authority of the
employee may be indicative of his being
supervisor doing supervision. In a broad sense
supervisor is one who has authority over others.
Someone who superintends and direct others. An
employee who in the interest of the employer has
responsibility to direct control the work done by
the other workers and if the work is not done
correct to guide them to do it correctly in
accordance with norms shall certainly be a
supervisor. A supervisory work may be
contradistinguished from managerial and
administrative work and, so also a supervisor from
manger and administrative work. Supervisor’s
pre-dominant function is to see that work is done
by the workers under him in accordance with
the norms laid down by the management, he has
no power to take any disciplinary action”.
17. In the case of Tanojkumar B. Chatterji v/s
Solapur Municipal Corporation, Solapur, reported
in 2004 (2) L.L.N. 566, the Hon’ble High Court of
Bombay in para 5 of its judgment held as under:
“5. Now it is well-settled in this branch of law, as
in many others, that designations are not
dispositive. The court has to have due regard to
the real nature of duties and functions. In so far
as a supervisor is concerned, he or she is one
who can bind the employer by taking some kind
of decision on his behalf.
18. National Engineering Industries Ltd. v/s Sri
Kishan Bhageria (1988 (1) L.L.N. 675). A supervisor
is one who has authority over others to superintend
and direct. A supervisor may possess the authority
to hire, transfer, suspend. lay-off, recall, promote,
discharge, assign, reward or discipline other
employees, or the responsibility to direct them or to
adjust their grievances or effectively to recommend
such action. The work of a supervisor is
distinguished from work which is of a clerical nature
by the exercise of independent judgment. The
decisions of the Supreme Court as well as of this
court have been considered in a judgment of Shri
Justice Rebello, speaking for this court, in Union
Carbide (India) Ltd v/s. D. Samuel and others [1999 (2)
L.L.N.
165].
The
Bombay
Dyeing
and
Manufacturing Company Ltd. v/s. R.A. Bidoo and
Others [1989 (2) L.L.N. 483J Division Bench of this
court held that “a supervisor is an overseer. A
person can be said to be a supervisor if there are
persons working under him over whose work he has
to keep a watch. A supervisor is empowered to take
corrective steps if a subordinate errs in work
assigned to him.
19. In the case of Anaud Regional Co-op. Oil
Seeds Growers Union Ltd. v/s. Shailesh Kumar
Harshadbhai Shah, reported in (2006) 6 SCC 548,
the Hon’ble Apex Court in para 15 explained the
term ‘supervision’ as under:
“15. Supervision contemplates direction and
control. While determining the nature of the work
636
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
performed by an employee, the essence of the
matter should call for consideration. An undue
importance need not be given for the designation
of an employee, or the name assigned to, the
class to which he belongs. What is needed to be
asked is as to what are the primary duties he
performs. For the said purpose, it is necessary to
prove that there were some persons working
under him whose work is required to be
supervised. Being in charge of the section alone
and that too it being a small one and relating to
quality control would not answer the test.”
20. In the case in hand the Applicant was
designated as In-charge-delivery Hub at Merces,
Goa w.e.f. 11-8-2014. The oral evidence of record
indicates that the primarily duties and
responsibilities of the Applicant were to take the
order and delivered it to the customer through his
delivery team, to deliver shipment to the customer,
to deliver the shipment by his own vehicle, doing
sorting as well as driving etc. He used to report
Area Manager of the Employer Mr. Casmiro
Fernandes as well as Mahindra Bhargava. He depose
that he used to report for grievances to the Regional
Manager, Shri Devanand Navale. His gross salary
was Rs. 2,52,000/- p.a. (Rupees two lakh fifty two
thousand only). The aforesaid duties performed by
the Applicant are manual in nature.
21. On the contrary, the Opponent examined Shri
Praveen Kejirwal, alleged Authorized Representative
of the Opponent. However, he could not depose
about the duties and responsibilities of the
Opponent. The said witness of the Opponent also
could not produce his authorization to depose in
the present matter. Thus, the Opponent failed to
plead as well as led cogent evidence that Applicant
was performing the duties and supervisory
administrative and/or managerial in nature and as
such he is not a Workman as defined u/s 2 (s) of the
I. D. Act, 1947. Hence, it is held that the Applicant
proves that he is a workman as defined u/s 2 (s) of
the I.D. Act, 1947. The Issue No.1 is therefore
answered in the Affirmative.
Issue No. 2:
22.
The Applicant claimed an amount of
Rs. 1,12,000/- towards his unpaid salary for the
month of April, 2017 to July, 2017 and some of
Rs. 6,06,268/- towards damages and compensation
for illegal termination of his services and
reinstatement of services.
The Applicant claimed unpaid salary for the
month of April, 2017 to July, 2017 for an amount of
Rs. 1,12,000/- (Rupees one lakh twelve thousand
only). The Opponent did not deny the said amount
in its written statement filed in the present
proceeding. Hence it is held that the Applicant
proves that he is entitled towards his unpaid salary
for the month of April, 2017 to July, 2017 for an
amount of Rs. 1,12,000/-
As regards the damages of compensation for
illegal termination of services and reinstatement in
service is out of jurisdiction of this court u/s 33 c (2)
of the I.D. Act, 1947. More so ever none of the court/
/authority held that the termination of services of
the Applicant is illegal and that is entitled for
damages for the same.
23. The Applicant has filed a present petition
somewhere on 26-06-2018. The evidence on record
indicates that the Applicant made several
representation to the Opponent. Hence, the
Applicant also entitled for an amount of Rs. 25,000/-
(Rupees twenty five thousand only) towards cost of
the present proceedings besides interest on the
assured sum. It is therefore held that the Applicant
partly proved that he is entitled for his unpaid salary
for the period from April, 2017 to July, 2017 for an
amount of Rs. l,12,000/- and failed to prove that he
is entitled for damages and compensation of
Rs. 4,94,268/- towards illegal termination of his
services. The Issue No. 2 is therefore partly proved
and partly negative.
In view of above, I pass the following order:
ORDER
The claim application of the Applicant dated
26-06-2018 is hereby partly allowed. The Opponent
M/s. Instakart Services Pvt. Ltd. is hereby directed
to pay to the Applicant Mr. Jose Manuel D’Souza a
sum of Rs. 1,37,000/- along with simple interest
@ 9% p.a. from the date of passing the present order
till its actual realization.
Pronounced in the Open Court.
Sd/-
(Suresh N. Narulkar),
Presiding Officer,
Labour Court-II.
————
Notification
No. 24/13/2023/LAB/650
Whereas M/s. Goa Carbon Ltd. bearing code No.
GOA/9962 in Goa Region has applied for surrender
of exemption granted by the State of Government
under Clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 17 of
the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) (hereinafter
referred to as the Act).
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
637
2. Whereas a Notification bearing No. 25/21/29-IID
dated 10-05-1982 granting exemption to the said
establishment under Clause (a) of sub-section (1) of
Section 17 of the said Act w.e.f. 10-05-1982 was
published in the Gazette of Goa, Daman & Diu,
subject to the condition specified in this regard
from time to time.
3. And whereas now it has come to the notice to
the State Government that the establishment has
desired to surrender its exemption w.e.f. 01-12-2015
as it is facing practical difficulty to operate PF Trust.
4. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers
conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 17 of the said
Act, the State Government hereby cancels the
exemption granted to the said establishment with
effect from 01-12-2015.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Amalia O. F. Pinto, Under Secretary (Labour).
Porvorim, 21st October, 2024.
——————
Department of Public Health
––
Order
No. 44/81/2018-I/PHD/1471
Read:
Order No. 44/81/2018-I/PHD/1267 dated
05-09-2024.
The Government is pleased to accept the
voluntary retirement tendered by Smt. Vinda S.
Cuncolienkar, Senior Scientific Assistant,
Environment & Pollution Control Wing under
Directorate of Health Services and to relieve her
from the post of Senior Scientific Assistant under
Directorate of Health Services with effect from
31-08-2024 (a.n.) under Rule 48-A of CCS (Pension)
Rules, 1972.
This supersedes the Order dated 05-09-2024 read
in preamble.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dr. Pooja Madkaikar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 18th October, 2024.
Order
No. 44/81/2018-I/PHD/1267
Read:
Order No. 44/81/2018-I/PHD/1255 dated
03-09-2024.
Government is pleased to accept the voluntary
retirement tendered by Smt. Vinda S. Cuncolienkar,
Senior Scientific Assistant, under Directorate of
Health Services and to relieve her from the post of
Senior Scientific Assistant under Directorate of
Health Services with effect from 01-08-2024 (a.n.)
This supersedes the Order dated 03-09-2024 read
in preamble.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dr. Pooja Madkaikar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 5th September, 2024.
—–––––—
Order
No. 2/8/2022-II/PHD/3156
Government is pleased to accept the resignation
dated 02-07-2024 submitted by Dr. Ritvij R. Patankar,
Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Goa
Medical College and he stands relieved from the
said post w.e.f. 02-08-2024 (a.n.).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Gautami S. Parmekar, Under Secretary (Health-I).
Porvorim, 21st October, 2024.
—–––––—
Addendum
No. 27/09/2024-I/PHD/1425
Read:
Order No. 27/09/2024-I/PHD/1005 dated
15-07-2024.
In the Government Order read at preamble,
following member shall be added at Sr. No. 11, as
under:-
Sr. No.
Members
Designation
11.
Secretary, Goa Private
Member.
Dental Practitioners Association
Rest of the contents remain unchanged.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Dr. Pooja M. Madkaikar, Under Secretary (Health-II).
Porvorim, 11th October, 2024.
638
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
Department of Town & Country Planning
Office of the Chief Town Planner (Admn.)
–––
Order
No. 21/22/RTI-GEN/TCP-HQ/2020-21/1930
In supersession of all earlier orders pertaining to appointment of Public Information Officers and Appellate
Authority in the Headquarters, Office of Town and Country Planning Department, Panaji and in pursuance
to Section 5(1) and 19(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, the following officers are hereby appointed
as Public Information Officers as specified in the column No. 2 and Appellate Authority as specified in
column No. 4, with immediate effect until further orders:
Sr.
Name/Designation of
Unit/Section/Subjects
Appellate Authority
No.
Public Information Officer
1
2
3
4
1. Smt. Tecla Fernandes,
Administration
Senior Town Planner (HQs).
Superintendent,
Public Information Officer-1
2. Smt. Anushka Hadkonkar,
Statistics/Revenue/Budget
Town Planner (HQs)/D.D.O.
Statistical Assistant,
Public Information Officer-2
3. Kum. Saloni Naik,
Accounts matters
Town Planner (HQs)/D.D.O.
Accountant,
Public Information Officer-3
4. Shri M.K.C. Srikanth,
Legislation/TCP Act/GLDBCR/
Senior Town Planner (HQs).
Town Planner,
/Regulations/Registration of
Public Information Officer-4
professionals
5. Shri Anand Deshpande,
Conservation/20% FAR for Hotels
Senior Town Planner (HQs).
Town Planner,
and Educational Institutions/
Public Information Officer-5
/Land Acquisition/Compensation
issues etc., Consumer Protection
Court matters
6. Shri Prakash P. Bandodkar,
Section 17 (2) matters/Regional
Town Planner (HQs).
Dy. Town Planner,
Plan matters and matter related
Public Information Officer-6
to Section 39 (A)
7. Shri Manguirish N. Verenkar,
TCP Board/Mopa/Airport related
Senior Town Planner (HQs).
Dy. Town Planner,
matters/PDA related matters/
Public Information Officer-7
/Petroleum Rules/Garbage
Management Site issue/16-A
Committee (Public Projects), Notary
Architect/Engineer
8. Smt. Nadia Terence
Zoning Plans/Complaints/
Senior Town Planner (HQs).
Fernandes,
/Miscellaneous (Technical)/Website/
Dy. Town Planner,
/BPAMS/matters related to IGBC
Public Information Officer-8
9. Shri Rajesh Tirodkar,
Matters related to Section 17-A
Chief Town Planner
Planning Assistant,
(Land Use).
Public Information Officer-9
Matters related to Committee for
Town Planner (HQs).
regulation 6.1.1 and 25000 m2 &
above
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
639
This is issued with the approval of the Chief Secretary/Secretary (TCP).
Vertika Dagur, Chief Town Planner (Administration).
Panaji, 22nd October, 2024.
————
Notification
No. 36/18/17(2)/Notification(11)/TCP-2024/1460
Whereas, the Town and Country Planning Department is in receipt of applications under sub-
-section (2) of Section 17 of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act 21 of 1975) for correction
of inconsistent/incoherent zoning in the Regional Plan for Goa-2021 (RPG-2021) in respect of the plots of
land as specified in detail in columns (2) to (5) of the Table below;
And whereas, the rectifications/corrections as requested in the said applications were scrutinized and
Report of the Town and Country Planning Department alongwith the reports from registered professionals
were submitted to the Government for decision;
And whereas, the Government has considered the Reports and it is of the opinion that alterations/
/modifications as specified in column (6) of the Table below corresponding to respective survey number
as specified in column (2) of said Table are necessary to be carried out to the RPG-2021 for the purpose
of rectifying inadvertent errors that have occurred, and for correction of inconsistent/incoherent zoning
proposals in the RPG-2021 and it has directed the Chief Town Planner (Planning) to carry out alterations/
/modifications as specified in column (6) of the Table below to the RPG-2021;
Now, therefore, as directed by the Government and in pursuance of sub-section (2) of Section 17 of the
Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (Act 21 of 1975), the alterations/modifications as specified in
column (6) of the Table below corresponding to respective survey number as stated in column (2) of said
Table are hereby carried out to the RPG-2021.
TABLE
Sr.
Survey No. &
Name of
Name of
Name of
Alteration/
No.
Sub-Division No.
Village
Taluka
District
/modification carried
out to the RPG-2021
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
10/1-E (Part)
Chopdem
Pernem
North
Settlement Zone.
2.
127/3 (Part)
Colva
Salcete
South
Settlement Zone.
3.
211/2-A
Sao Jose De
Salcete
South
Settlement Zone.
Areal
4.
30/3-J
Sao Jose De
Salcete
South
Settlement Zone.
Areal
5.
391/6-A
Socorro
Bardez
North
Deletion of proposed
road proposed from
Chogm road to National
Highway running North-
-South
paralleled
to
National Highway.
Rajesh J. Naik, Chief Town Planner (Planning).
Panaji, 22nd October, 2024.
640
OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA
SERIES II No. 30
24TH OCTOBER, 2024
Department of Transport
Directorate of Transport
–––
Order
No. D.Tpt./EST/285-V/2024/2522
On the recommendation of the Goa Public Service
Commission, Panaji conveyed vide their letter
No. COM/II/11/49(1)/2022/232 dated 09-10-2024, the
Government is pleased to promote Shri Oswin E.
Carvalho, Motor Vehicles Inspector to the post of
Assistant Director of Transport (Group ‘B’ Gazetted)
in Pay Matrix Level 7 of the 7th Pay Commission on
regular basis with immediate effect and post him as
Assistant Director of Transport, North, Panaji-Goa.
The said Officer shall be on probation for a period
of two years.
Consequently, Shri Francisco Antonio Vaz,
Assistant Director of Transport (HQ), Panaji who vide
Order No. 5/2/93-Tpt/P.F./2024/2027 dated
30-08-2024 was directed to hold additional charge
as Assistant Director of Transport, North, Panaji,
stands relieved of the said additional charge.
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
P. Pravimal Abhishek, IAS, Director of Transport &
ex officio Addl. Secretary (Tpt.).
Panaji, 22nd October, 2024.
Department of Urban Development
(Municipal Administration)
––
Notification
No. 1/RERA/Chairman & Members/2023/Pt.file/
/2140
Read: 1. Notification No. 1/RERA/Chairman &
Members/2018/2200 dated 16th October,
2019.
2. Notification No. 1/RERA/Chairman &
Members/2018/4345 dated 08th December,
2020.
3. Notification No. 1/RERA/Chairman & Members/
/2023/2187 dated 06th October, 2023.
4. Notification No. 1/RERA/Chairman &
Members/2023/Pt.file/1053 dated 11th July,
2024.
In partial modification to the Notification referred
above, Shri Vincent M. D’Silva, Retired District Judge-I &
Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji-Goa is hereby
appointed as Member of the Goa Real Estate
Regulatory Authority, Panaji-Goa in place of Shri
Cholu M. Gauns, Member as per the directions of
the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa in Writ
Petition No. 2013 of 2024 (F).
By order and in the name of the Governor of
Goa.
Brijesh Manerkar, Director (Urban Development)/
/ex officio Additional Secretary.
Panaji, 16th October, 2024.
www.goaprintingpress.gov.in
Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery,
Government Printing Press,
Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001.
PRICE–Rs. 16.00
PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA—236/80—10/2024.