िनबंधन सं या पी0ट0-40

बहार

बहार

बहार

बहार गजट

गजट

गजट

गजट

असाधारण अंक

असाधारण अंक

असाधारण अंक

असाधारण अंक

बहार सरकार ारा ूकािशत

बहार सरकार ारा ूकािशत

बहार सरकार ारा ूकािशत

बहार सरकार ारा ूकािशत

7

7

7

7 आषाढ

आषाढ

आषाढ

आषाढ+ 1933

1933

1933

1933 (श0)

(सं

सं

सं

सं0 पटना

टना

टना

टना 301

301

301

301)

)

)

)

पटना

टना

टना

टना, मंगल

मंगल

मंगल

मंगलवार

वार

वार

वार, 28

28

28

28 जून

जून

जून

जून 2011

2011

2011

2011

fuokZpu foHkkx

———

vf/klwpuk

13 twu 2011

laŒ Mh1&0021@2011&35353535— Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx] ubZ fnYyh dh vf/klwpuk la[;k 82@fcgkj@¼1@2006½@2011

fnukad 2 ebZ 2011 dh vaxzsth o fgUnh izfr ,oa fuokZpu vthZ la[;k 01@2006 esa fnukad 5 tuojh 2011 dks ekuuh; mPp

U;k;ky;] iVuk }kjk ikfjr vkns’[email protected]; dks loZlk/kkj.k dh tkudkjh ds fy, izdkf’kr fd;k tkrk gSA

fcgkj&jkT;iky ds vkns’k ls]

vkj0 ds0 izlkn]

fo’ks”k dk;Z inkf/kdkjh

&lg&mi eq[; fuokZpu inkf/kdkjh] fcgkj

&lg&ljdkj ds mi&lfpoA

2

बहार गजट (असाधारण), 28 जून 2011

Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx

———

vf/klwpuk

fuokZpu lnu] v’kksd jksM] ubZ fnYyh&110001] rkjh[k 2 ebZ] 2011@12 oS’kk[k] 1933 ¼’kd½

la0 82@fcgkj@¼1@2006½@2011—yksd izfrfuf/kRo vf/kfu;e] 1951 ¼1951 dk 43½ dh /kkjk 106 ds vuqlj.k esa]

fuokZpu vk;ksx ,rn~}kjk fuokZpu vthZ la0 1@2006 esa fn;s x;s mPp U;k;ky;] iVuk ds rkjh[k 5 tuojh] 2011 ds vkns’k dks

izdkf’kr djrk gSA

vkns’k ls]

ds0 vt; dqekj]

lfpo] Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx A

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

———

NOTIFICATION

Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi-110001, Dated 2nd May 2011/12 Vaisakha, 1933(Saka)

No.82/BR(1/2006)/2011—In pursuance of Section 106 of the Representation of the

People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission hereby published Order dated the 5th

January, 2011 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Election Petition No. 1 of 2006.

By Order,

K. AJAY KUMAR,

Secretary, Election Commission of India.

———

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

E.P. No. 1 of 2006

VIJAY KUMAR SINHA

Versus

FULENA SINGH & ORS.

129/ 05/01/2011

The allegations in this election petition related to double voting only

questioning the winning of the respondent on that factual ground. The election petition did not

raise any allegations of corrupt practice.

Whether double voting took place or not was primarily a question of pure fact.

Now that the fresh election to the Assembly have been held, the issue becomes academic and

the election petition infructuous.

It may only be noticed that both the parties to the election petition contested the

recent Assembly Elections. The fact that the petitioner may have won the recent Assembly

Elections and the respondent may have lost, shall not enthuse fresh life to the present election

petition.

The Courts do not decide academic issues unless they raise far more important

and general questions of law which may keep re-surfacing in cases frequently, more than one. It

has already been noticed that the controversy here was purely factual between the two parties.

The Assembly having been dissolved and fresh constitution having been done, the election

petition is held to be infructuous.

It is accordingly disposed off.

NAVIN SINHA, J.

————

अधी.क, सिचवालय मुिणालय,

बहार, पटना ारा ूकािशत एवं मु3ित।

बहार गजट (असाधारण) 301-571+100-ड0ट0पी0।

Website: http://egazette.bih.nic.in