2
ॢबहर गजट
[सधरण 12 ॢदस बर 21
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx
———
vfvfvfvf/klwpuk
/klwpuk
/klwpuk
/klwpuk
fuo
fuo
fuo
fuokZpu lnu] v’kksd jksM] ubZ fnYyh&110001
kZpu lnu] v’kksd jksM] ubZ fnYyh&110001
kZpu lnu] v’kksd jksM] ubZ fnYyh&110001
kZpu lnu] v’kksd jksM] ubZ fnYyh&110001@ rkjh[k % 16 uoEcj 2017@25 dkfrZd] 1939 ¼’kd½
la0 82/BR-HP/ES-1/EP/(2/2014)/2017: fuokZpu vthZ la[;k 2@2014 esa iVuk mPp U;k;ky; ds rkjh[k 28
ekpZ] 2017 ds fu.kZ; ds fo:) nkf[ky dh xbZ flfoy vihy la[;k 2017 dk 5744 esa Hkkjr mPpre U;k;ky; ds fnukad 28 tqykbZ]
2017 ds fu.kZ; dks yksd izfrfuf/kRo vf/kfu;e] 1951 ¼1951 dk 43½ dh /kkjk 116x ¼2½¼[k½ ds vuqlj.k esa fuokZpu vk;ksx ,rn~}kjk
izdkf’kr djrk gSA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO (S) 5744 OF 2017
SATYA NAND SHARMA
Appellant (s)
504491
VERSUS
KAUSHLENDRA KUMAR AND ORS.
Respondent (s)
ORDER
We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the recored. we do not see any
cogent reason to entertain the appeal. The judgment impugned does not warrant any interference.
The appeal is dismissed.
(J. CHELAMESWAR)
(s. ABDUL NAZEER)
NEW DELHI
JULY 28, 2017.
vkns'k ls
vkns'k ls
vkns'k ls
vkns'k ls]
lqfer eq[kthZ
lqfer eq[kthZ
lqfer eq[kthZ
lqfer eq[kthZ]
iz/kku lfpo
iz/kku lfpo
iz/kku lfpo
iz/kku lfpo]
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksxA
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksxA
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksxA
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksxA
———
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
———
NOTIFICATION
Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi – 110001/ Dated 16th November 2017/25 Kartika, 1939 (Saka)
No. 82/BR-HP/ES-1/EP/(2/2017)/2017: In Pursuance of clause (b) Sub Section 2 of Section
116C of Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission hereby
publishes the Order dated 28th July 2017 of the Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 2744 of
2017 filed against the Judgement, date 23rd March, 2017 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in
Election Petition No. 2 of 2014.
3
ॢबहर गजट
[सधरण 12 ॢदस बर 21
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO (S) 5744 OF 2017
SATYA NAND SHARMA
Appellant (s)
504491
VERSUS
KAUSHLENDRA KUMAR AND ORS.
Respondent (s)
ORDER
We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the recored. we do not see any
cogent reason to entertain the appeal. The judgment impugned does not warrant any interference.
The appeal is dismissed.
(J. CHELAMESWAR)
(s. ABDUL NAZEER)
NEW DELHI
JULY 28, 2017.
By Order,
SUMIT MUKHERJEE,
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
ELECTION COMMISSON OF INDIA.
———
[ध¡क स०चवलय म१!णलय
ॢबहर पटन हर %क०शत eव) म१ॢ!त
ॢबहर गजट
[सधरण 1177*571+50*डट-प?
Website: http://egazette.bih.nic.in
