नबंधन सं या पी0ट0-40

ॢबहर गजट

[सधरण [क

ॢबहर सरकर हर क०शत

1 मघ 14 श

(स पटन 14) पटन ब१धवर 30 जनवर 2019

laŒ 08@vkjksi&01&28@2017&¼[kaM½ 8718@lk0iz0

lkekU; iz'kklu foHkkx

———

ladYi

3 tqykbZ 2018

Jh jke mn~xkj egrks] fcŒizŒlsŒ] dksfV Øekad&122@11] rRdkyhu vuqeaMy inkf/kdkjh] Qqyijkl]

e/kqcuh ¼lEizfr lsokfuo`Ùk½ ds fo:) ck<+ jkgr ;kstuk ds xsgw¡ dh {kfr esa fufgr vkjksiksa dh tk¡p gsrq ladYi

Kkikad&8903 fnukad 07-09-2009 }kjk foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh lapkfyr dh x;hA

Jh egrks ds fnukad 31-01-2012 dks lsokfuo`Ùk gksus ds QyLo:Ik mDr foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh dks ladYi

Kkikad&10957 fnukad 06-08-2012 }kjk fcgkj isa'ku fu;ekoyh ds fu;e&43 ¼chŒ½ ds rgr lEifjofrZr fd;k

x;kA lapkyu inkf/kdkjh ls izkIr tk¡p izfrosnu ,oa fcgkj yksd lsok vk;ksx] iVuk ls izkIr earO; dh leh{kk ,oa

vko';d izfØ;k ds mijkar ladYi Kkikad&14213 fnukad 02-09-2013 }kjk isa'ku ls 15 izfr'kr dVkSrh ¼i¡kp o"kksZ

ds fy,½ dk naM lalwfpr fd;k x;kA mDr vkns'k ds fo:) Jh egrks us iVuk mPp U;k;ky; esa ,d jhV ;kfpdk

nk;j dh ftls ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk Loh—fr nh x;hA ,nr~laca/kh lhŒMCY;wŒtsŒlhŒ laŒ&2668@14 esa fnukad

28-09-2016 dks ikfjr vkns'k dk dk;Zdkjh va'k fuEuor~ gS %&

" For the reasons and discussions aforementioned the order of punishment passed by

the State Government bearing Memo No.14213 dated 02-09-2013 cannot be upheld and is

accordingly quashed and set aside. The consequences shall follow and the petitioner shall be

entitled to all consequential benefits to which he is found entitled as on the date on which

the proceedings in question had been initiated and the order impugned passed. The recovery,

if any, made should be refunded to the Petitioner and the entire exercise should be

completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of

this order.

This writ petition is allowed.

2

ॢबहर गजट [सधरण 30 जनवर 2019

mDr U;k;kns'k ds fo:) nk;j vihy ¼,yŒihŒ,ŒlaŒ&1124@17½ fnukad 14-03-2018 dks [kkfjt dj

fn;k x;kA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr U;k;kns'k dk dk;Zdkjh va'k fuEuor~ gS %&

" In our considered view, in doing so, the learned writ Court has not committed any

error to the finding of exoneration granted by the equriry officer is well settled law laid

down in the case of Kunj Bihar Vs. Punjab National Bank (1998) 7 SCC 84 and again

followed in the case of S.P Malhorta Vs. Punjab National Bank (2013) 7 SCC 251 and the

umpugned order passed by the learned writ Court is in accordance with law as indicated her

inabove.

We see no reason to interfere with in the matter. Accordingly, this Appeal is

Dismissed."

vr,o lE;~d fopkjksijkar lhŒMCY;wŒtsŒlhŒlaŒ&2668@14 esa fnukad 28-09-2016 dks ikfjr U;k;kns'k ds

vuqikyu esa Jh jke mn~xkj egrks] fcŒizŒlsŒ] dksfV Øekad&122@11 dks ladYi Kkikad&14213 fnukad 02-09-2013

}kjk lalwfpr 'kkfLRk ¼isa'ku ls 15 izfr'kr dh dVkSrh ik¡p o"kksZ rd½ okil fy;k tkrk gSA

vkns'k%& vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl ladYi dh izfr fcgkj jkti= ds vxys vad esa

izdkf'kr fd;k tk; rFkk bldh izfr lHkh lacaf/kr dks Hkst nh tk;A

fcgkj&jkT;iky ds vkns'k ls]

jke fc'kqu jk;]

ljdkj ds voj lfpoA

————

[ध¡क स०चवलय म१णलय

ॢबहर पटन हर क०शत eव# म१ॢत?

ॢबहर गजट [सधरण 14'(5*1+1'(ड'ट-'प'?

Website: http://egazette.bih.nic.in