नबंधन सं या पी0ट0-40
ॢबहर गजट
[सधरण [क
ॢबहर सरकर हर क०शत
1 मघ 14 श
(स पटन 14) पटन ब१धवर 30 जनवर 2019
laŒ 08@vkjksi&01&28@2017&¼[kaM½ 8718@lk0iz0
lkekU; iz'kklu foHkkx
———
ladYi
3 tqykbZ 2018
Jh jke mn~xkj egrks] fcŒizŒlsŒ] dksfV Øekad&122@11] rRdkyhu vuqeaMy inkf/kdkjh] Qqyijkl]
e/kqcuh ¼lEizfr lsokfuo`Ùk½ ds fo:) ck<+ jkgr ;kstuk ds xsgw¡ dh {kfr esa fufgr vkjksiksa dh tk¡p gsrq ladYi
Kkikad&8903 fnukad 07-09-2009 }kjk foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh lapkfyr dh x;hA
Jh egrks ds fnukad 31-01-2012 dks lsokfuo`Ùk gksus ds QyLo:Ik mDr foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh dks ladYi
Kkikad&10957 fnukad 06-08-2012 }kjk fcgkj isa'ku fu;ekoyh ds fu;e&43 ¼chŒ½ ds rgr lEifjofrZr fd;k
x;kA lapkyu inkf/kdkjh ls izkIr tk¡p izfrosnu ,oa fcgkj yksd lsok vk;ksx] iVuk ls izkIr earO; dh leh{kk ,oa
vko';d izfØ;k ds mijkar ladYi Kkikad&14213 fnukad 02-09-2013 }kjk isa'ku ls 15 izfr'kr dVkSrh ¼i¡kp o"kksZ
ds fy,½ dk naM lalwfpr fd;k x;kA mDr vkns'k ds fo:) Jh egrks us iVuk mPp U;k;ky; esa ,d jhV ;kfpdk
nk;j dh ftls ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk Loh—fr nh x;hA ,nr~laca/kh lhŒMCY;wŒtsŒlhŒ laŒ&2668@14 esa fnukad
28-09-2016 dks ikfjr vkns'k dk dk;Zdkjh va'k fuEuor~ gS %&
" For the reasons and discussions aforementioned the order of punishment passed by
the State Government bearing Memo No.14213 dated 02-09-2013 cannot be upheld and is
accordingly quashed and set aside. The consequences shall follow and the petitioner shall be
entitled to all consequential benefits to which he is found entitled as on the date on which
the proceedings in question had been initiated and the order impugned passed. The recovery,
if any, made should be refunded to the Petitioner and the entire exercise should be
completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of
this order.
This writ petition is allowed.
2
ॢबहर गजट [सधरण 30 जनवर 2019
mDr U;k;kns'k ds fo:) nk;j vihy ¼,yŒihŒ,ŒlaŒ&1124@17½ fnukad 14-03-2018 dks [kkfjt dj
fn;k x;kA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr U;k;kns'k dk dk;Zdkjh va'k fuEuor~ gS %&
" In our considered view, in doing so, the learned writ Court has not committed any
error to the finding of exoneration granted by the equriry officer is well settled law laid
down in the case of Kunj Bihar Vs. Punjab National Bank (1998) 7 SCC 84 and again
followed in the case of S.P Malhorta Vs. Punjab National Bank (2013) 7 SCC 251 and the
umpugned order passed by the learned writ Court is in accordance with law as indicated her
inabove.
We see no reason to interfere with in the matter. Accordingly, this Appeal is
Dismissed."
vr,o lE;~d fopkjksijkar lhŒMCY;wŒtsŒlhŒlaŒ&2668@14 esa fnukad 28-09-2016 dks ikfjr U;k;kns'k ds
vuqikyu esa Jh jke mn~xkj egrks] fcŒizŒlsŒ] dksfV Øekad&122@11 dks ladYi Kkikad&14213 fnukad 02-09-2013
}kjk lalwfpr 'kkfLRk ¼isa'ku ls 15 izfr'kr dh dVkSrh ik¡p o"kksZ rd½ okil fy;k tkrk gSA
vkns'k%& vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl ladYi dh izfr fcgkj jkti= ds vxys vad esa
izdkf'kr fd;k tk; rFkk bldh izfr lHkh lacaf/kr dks Hkst nh tk;A
fcgkj&jkT;iky ds vkns'k ls]
jke fc'kqu jk;]
ljdkj ds voj lfpoA
————
[ध¡क स०चवलय म१णलय
ॢबहर पटन हर क०शत eव# म१ॢत?
ॢबहर गजट [सधरण 14'(5*1+1'(ड'ट-'प'?
Website: http://egazette.bih.nic.in