नबंधन सं या पी0ट0-40

ॢबहर गजट

[सधरण [क

ॢबहर सरकर हर क०शत

1 मघ 14 श

(स पटन 142) पटन ब१धवर 30 जनवर 2019

laΠ08@vkjksi&01&18@2016&9857@lk0iz0

lkekU; iz'kklu foHkkx

———

ladYi

25 tqykbZ 2018

Jh 'k=qat; dqekj feJ] fcŒizŒlsŒ] dksfV Øekad&899@08] 673@11] rRdkyhu vapykf/kdkjh] Msgjh ds

fo:) ftyk inkf/kdkjh] jksgrkl ds i=kad&1799 fnukad 30-05-2003 ,oa i=kad 2940 fnukad 18-09-2003 }kjk

ljdkjh tehu ij fLFkr isM+ dh voS/k dVkbZ gks tkus ds QyLo:Ik fuykeh dk iSlk ysdj isM+ dh fuykeh ugha

djus] xyr irs ds vk/kkj ij vkoklh; izek.k&iz= fuxZr djus] Hkz"Vkpkj] LosPNkpkfjrk ,oa ljdkjh funsZ'kksa ds

vogsyuk djus dk vkjksi izfrosfnr fd;k x;kA izfrosfnr vkjksiksa ds fy, Jh feJ ds fo:) foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh

ladYi Kkikad&6682 fnukad 28-06-2007 }kjk foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh lapkfyr dh x;hA foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh ds

QyLo:Ik izkIr tk¡p izfrosnu dh leh{kk esa ;g ik;k x;k fd lapkyu inkf/kdkjh }kjk Jh feJ ds fo:)

izfrosfnr vkjksiksa dks rduhdh vk/kkj ij izekf.kr ugha ekus tkus dk earO; fn;k x;k] fdUrq ;g lqLi"V gS fd

voS/k :Ik ls dkVs x;s isM+ dh fuykeh Jh feJ }kjk ugha fd;k x;kA mudk nkf;Ro Fkk fd ljdkjh isM+ dh voS/k

dVkbZ dks os jksdrs rFkk ;fn isM+ dkV yh x;h Fkh rks mldh fuykeh djrs fdUrq muds }kjk bl nkf;Ro dk

fuoZkg ugha fd;k x;kA Li"V gS fd Jh feJ }kjk iz'kklfud ykijokgh cjrh x;h rFkk muls pwd gq;hA

mDr izekf.kr vkjksiksa ds fy, foHkkxh; ladYi Kkikad&8104 fnukad 23-05-2013 }kjk Jh feJ dks ¼i½

nks osru o`f);ksa vlap;kRed :Ik ls nks o"kksZ rd jksdus dk naM lalwfpr fd;k x;kA

mDr naMkns'k ds fo:) Jh feJ }kjk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; iVuk esa nk;j lhŒMCY;wŒtsŒlhŒlaŒ&

11801@14 esa fnukad 03-05-16 dks ikfjr vkns'k dk dk;Zdkjh va'k fuEuor~ gS %&

"In view of above, the impugned order of punishment is not sustainable in law and

the same accordingly quashed.

Since the matter is an old one of the year 1999 and involves cutting of one tree on

request of local residents, required for religious purpose. the matter is not relegated, for

proceeding afresh in the matter. As the order of punishment has been quashed, the petitioner

would be entitled to conscquential benefits."

2

ॢबहर गजट [सधरण 30 जनवर 2019

ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mi;qZDr U;k;kns'k ds fo:) ,yŒihŒ,Œ laŒ&1488@16 nk;j fd;k

x;kA ftlesa ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 18-08-2017 dks ikfjr vkns'k dk dk;Zdkjh va'k fuEuor~ gS %&

''It is the State's appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent and the only reason

which weighed with the learned Writ Court for interfering with the order of punishment, i.e.

stoppage of two increments without cumulative effect was that the Enquiry Officer

exonerated the delinquent employee and without a show cause notice to him the disciplinary

authority disagreed with the finding of the Enquiry Officer, recorded his own finding and

thereafter proceeded to impose the punishment. The learned Writ Court has found that this

is not permissible and in doing so the learned Writ Court has followed the principle laid

down by the Supreme Court in the case of Punjab National Bank and others Vs. Kunj

Bihari Misra: (1998) 7 SCC 84.

we find no error in the order to the learned Writ Court warranting reconsideration.

The appeal is dismissed."

,yŒihŒ,Œ laŒ&1488@16 esa ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mi;qZDr vkns'k ds vkyksd esa

lhŒMCY;wŒtsŒlhŒlaŒ&11801@14 esa fnukad 03-05-2016 dks ikfjr vkns'k ds vuqikyu esa foHkkxh; ladYi

Kkikad&8104 fnukd 23-05-2013 }kjk Jh 'k=qat; dqekj feJ] fcŒizŒlsŒ] dksfV Øekad&899@08] 673@11]

rRdkyhu vapykf/kdkjh] Msgjh ds fo:) lalwfpr naM ¼nks osru o`f);ksa vlap;kRed :Ik ls nks o"kksZ rd

jksdus dk naM½ dks okil fy;k tkrk gSA

vkns'k%& vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl ladYi dh izfr fcgkj jkti= ds vxys vad esa izdkf'kr

fd;k tk; rFkk bldh izfr lHkh lacaf/kr dks Hkst nh tk;A

fcgkj&jkT;iky ds vkns'k ls]

jke fc'kqu jk;]

ljdkj ds voj lfpoA

————

[ध¡क स०चवलय म१णलय

ॢबहर पटन हर क०शत eव# म१ॢत?

ॢबहर गजट [सधरण 142'5)1+1+'ड+ट-+प+?

Website: http://egazette.bih.nic.in